Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2138-07
Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Vulnerability of Energy Systems to Climate Change and Extreme Events
Douglas Sparks
19 - 23 April 2010
Hydro-Québec Montreal Canada
Impacts of and Adaptation Options to Extreme Weather events in the Hydropower Sector
Doug SparksHydro-Québec
Major contributors :R. Roy, G. Desrochers, A. Frigon,
C. Demers, M. Minville, G. Pacher, L. Roy
Impacts of and Adaptation Options to Extreme Impacts of and Adaptation Options to Extreme Weather events in the Hydropower Sector Weather events in the Hydropower Sector
Impacts of and Adaptation Options to Extreme Impacts of and Adaptation Options to Extreme Weather events in the Hydropower Sector Weather events in the Hydropower Sector
VulnerabilityVulnerability of of EnergyEnergy Systems to Systems to ClimateClimateChange and Change and ExtremeExtreme EventsEvents; ICTP; ICTP--IAEAIAEAWorkshopWorkshopTrieste , April 2010 Trieste , April 2010
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 201022
Presentation planPresentation plan1.1. HydroHydro--Québec, Climate Change and Extreme Québec, Climate Change and Extreme
WeatherWeather
2.2. Hydropower Vulnerabilities and StrategiesHydropower Vulnerabilities and Strategies1.1. OperationsOperations2.2. PlanningPlanning
3.3. Current evaluations of CC on the Hydropower Current evaluations of CC on the Hydropower sector sector
1.1. Inflows (net gain or loss)Inflows (net gain or loss)2.2. ExtremesExtremes
4.4. Adaptation OptionsAdaptation Options1.1. OperationsOperations2.2. PlanningPlanning
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique33
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique44
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 201055
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 201066
Extreme Climate EventsExtreme Climate Events
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 201077
Extreme Climate Events: Saguenay Flood July 1996Extreme Climate Events: Saguenay Flood July 1996
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 201088
Février 201088
Extreme Climate Events: Saguenay Flood July 1996Extreme Climate Events: Saguenay Flood July 1996
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 201099
Climate variability is at the core of the Hydropower business caseClimate variability is at the core of the Hydropower business case
•• 97% of the electricity generated from hydro97% of the electricity generated from hydro•• 59 Hydropower Plants (Total Capacity : 59 Hydropower Plants (Total Capacity :
36,805 MW)36,805 MW)•• 26 Reservoirs (Total capacity of 175 26 Reservoirs (Total capacity of 175 TWhTWh))
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20101010
ClimateClimate variabilityvariability isis atat the the corecore of the of the HydropowerHydropower business casebusiness case
StSt--Laurent : 7 %Laurent : 7 %
Outaouais : 5 %Outaouais : 5 %StSt--Maurice : 5 %Maurice : 5 %
Manicouagan : 23 %Manicouagan : 23 %
La Grande : 41 %La Grande : 41 %(Churchill Falls : 19 %)(Churchill Falls : 19 %)
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20101111
Février 20101111
Climate variability is at the core of the Hydropower business caseClimate variability is at the core of the Hydropower business case
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20101212
Major Business risks for HydroMajor Business risks for Hydro--QuébecQuébecMajor Business risks for HydroMajor Business risks for Hydro--QuébecQuébec
Source : HydroSource : Hydro--Québec Strategic Plan 2006Québec Strategic Plan 2006--2010 (Expected Net Benefit for 2008 : 2,5 billions $)2010 (Expected Net Benefit for 2008 : 2,5 billions $)
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20101313
-- Operations (short term 1day Operations (short term 1day –– 5 years) :5 years) :-- Annual runoff conditions (droughts)Annual runoff conditions (droughts)-- FloodsFloods-- Extreme weather (ice storm; wind storm)Extreme weather (ice storm; wind storm)-- Ice jams and debrisIce jams and debris
-- Planning (5 Planning (5 –– 30 years…):30 years…):-- Design uncertainty (insufficient knowledge of Design uncertainty (insufficient knowledge of
climatic conditions)climatic conditions)-- Risk associated to commissioningRisk associated to commissioning
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
-- Ongoing adaptation to Ongoing adaptation to seasonal runoff conditionsseasonal runoff conditions
-- Long term adaptation of Long term adaptation of commercial strategy commercial strategy ––exports and imports exports and imports –– can can require modification or be a require modification or be a tooltool
-- Operations (short term 1day Operations (short term 1day –– 5 years) :5 years) :-- Annual runoff conditions (droughts and floods) Annual runoff conditions (droughts and floods) –– 10%10%
Février 20101414
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 2010
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
RMS février 2001
x Réel RMS février 2001 RMS déc. 2000
Gouin
0
824
1649
2473
3297
4122
4946
5770
6594
7419
8243
11-1
2-00
08-0
1-01
05-0
2-01
05-0
3-01
02-0
4-01
30-0
4-01
28-0
5-01
25-0
6-01
23-0
7-01
20-0
8-01
17-0
9-01
15-1
0-01
12-1
1-01
10-1
2-01
07-0
1-02
04-0
2-02
04-0
3-02
01-0
4-02
29-0
4-02
27-0
5-02
24-0
6-02
22-0
7-02
19-0
8-02
16-0
9-02
14-1
0-02
11-1
1-02
hm³
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Bi-monthly strategy review
Février 20101515
Commercial change expected for summer 2001
Annual volume: 3000 hm³
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Routing Inflows at SM33 gates available
401,0
402,0
403,0
404,0
405,0
406,0
407,0
408,0
15-avr 25-avr 05-mai 15-mai 25-mai 04-juin
Res
ervo
ir Le
vel (
m)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Flow
s (m
³/s)
NivN40 Niv N35 Niv N100 T1 Niv30 Niv25 Niv 20 Niv 15QinN40 QoutN40 QinN35 Qout N35 Qin N100 T1 Qout N100 T1 Qin30Qout30 Qin 25 Qout 25 Qin20 Qout 20 Qin15 Qout 15
Based on fixed PMP (design flood)
with varying snowpack prior to
event
Based on fixed PMP (design flood)
with varying snowpack prior to
event
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Minimum Drawdown Constraints adapting for snowpackMinimum Drawdown Constraints adapting for snowpack
1616
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Minimum Drawdown ConstraintsMinimum Drawdown Constraints
Dynamic Level Constraints SM-3Maximum Reservoir Level Prior to Spring Freshet (April 15)
392
394
396
398
400
402
404
406
408
410
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Seasonal Maximum Snow Water Equivalent (cm)
Res
ervo
ir L
evel
(m))
Normal Max Operating LevelNormal Min Operating LevelExtreme Conditions (PMP) - 3 gatesExtreme Conditions (PMP) - 2 gatesNormal Operations - No SpillageNormal Operations - 15% Spillage
Levels calculated considering Outflow of 100 m³/s from April 15th to start of Spring Freshet
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
1717
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Applying Minimum Drawdown Constraint at SM-3 in 2004Applying Minimum Drawdown Constraint at SM-3 in 2004
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Water Management at SM-3
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
04-01-01 04-01-15 04-01-29 04-02-12 04-02-26 04-03-11 04-03-25 04-04-08 04-04-22 04-05-06 04-05-20 04-06-03 04-06-17
Date
Flow
(cm
s)
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
Res
ervo
ir Le
vel (
m)
Total Outflow (T+S)Calculated Inflow3-day Inflow MeanReservoir Level
Normal – 15% chance spillage
Extreme flood –2 gates
Extreme flood –3 gates
1818
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20101919
-- Operations (short term 1day Operations (short term 1day –– 5 years) :5 years) :-- Ice jams Ice jams -- Example: Chute Hemmings 1989Example: Chute Hemmings 1989
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Daily flows at Beauharnois
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360
Julien day of the year
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989
Février 20102020
-- Operations (short term 1day Operations (short term 1day –– 5 years) :5 years) :-- Ice control Ice control –– forming iceforming ice--cover cover –– what we want to dowhat we want to do
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Daily Flows at Beauharnois
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360
Julien day of the year
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010
Février 20102121
-- Operations (short term 1day Operations (short term 1day –– 5 years) :5 years) :-- Ice control Ice control –– forming iceforming ice--cover cover –– doesn't work well for recent warm doesn't work well for recent warm
winterswinters
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20102222
-- Planning (5 Planning (5 –– 30 years…):30 years…):-- Design adjustments (insufficient knowledge Design adjustments (insufficient knowledge
of hydrologic, climatic conditions or of future of hydrologic, climatic conditions or of future role of production assets)role of production assets)
-- Risk associated to commissioningRisk associated to commissioning
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Eastmain 1A: 768 MWWater transfer project
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
ImprovingImproving oldold turbine performanceturbine performance
Runner geometry measurement on site
Simulation of original turbine configuration
Design of a turbine
modification
On-site implementation
Performance gain evaluationStress analysis
2323
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 2010Février 20102424
-- Planning (5 Planning (5 –– 30 years…):30 years…):-- Design adjustments (insufficient knowledge of Design adjustments (insufficient knowledge of
hydrologic, climatic conditions or of future role of hydrologic, climatic conditions or of future role of production assets)production assets)
-- Risk associated to commissioningRisk associated to commissioning
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20102525
-- Planning (5 Planning (5 –– 30 years…):30 years…):-- Design adjustments (insufficient knowledge of Design adjustments (insufficient knowledge of
hydrologic, climatic conditions or of future role of hydrologic, climatic conditions or of future role of production assets)production assets)
-- Risk associated to commissioningRisk associated to commissioning
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Reservoir filling for commissionning
280
285
290
295
300
305
310
315
320
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
365
370
375
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
01-a
vr.-9
8
01-ju
in-9
8
01-a
oût-9
8
01-o
ct.-9
8
01-d
éc.-9
8
01-fé
vr.-9
9
01-a
vr.-9
9
01-ju
in-9
9
01-a
oût-9
9
01-o
ct.-9
9
01-d
éc.-9
9
01-fé
vr.-0
0
01-a
vr.-0
0
01-ju
in-0
0
01-a
oût-0
0
01-o
ct.-0
0
01-d
éc.-0
0
01-fé
vr.-0
1
01-a
vr.-0
1
01-ju
in-0
1
01-a
oût-0
1
01-o
ct.-0
1
01-d
éc.-0
1
NIVE
AU
DATE
SUIVI NIVEAU D'EAU - SM3
NIV. MAX.
NIV MINIM.
Median In flows
Low inflows
Original CD
Advanced CD
Reel Filling Curve
Commissionnign dates
407,0 Maximum Operating Level
393,0 Minimum Operating Level
Reservoir filling requires 4 yearsInterest on project: 14M$ per month in 2001
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 2010Février 2010
2626
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Reservoir filling requires 4 yearsInterest on project: 14M$ per month in 2001
‐30%
‐20%
‐10%
0%
10%
20%
30%19
43
1945
1947
1949
1951
1953
1955
1957
1959
1961
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
Inflow serial differences from long‐term average
Differences
Reservoir filling for SM-3: April 1998
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 2010Février 20102727
-- Planning (5 Planning (5 –– 30 years…):30 years…):-- RiskRisk--based evaluation of projects that figure in based evaluation of projects that figure in
climate information riskclimate information risk-- Example of Peribonka Example of Peribonka –– commissioned in 2008commissioned in 2008
-- 385 MW; 1.2 G$(Can)385 MW; 1.2 G$(Can)
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 2010Février 2010
2828
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
‐40%
‐20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
1943
1945
1947
1949
1951
1953
1955
1957
1959
1961
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
Inflow serial differences from long‐term average
Differences
Cumulative diff.
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20102929
-- Planning (5 Planning (5 –– 30 years…) incorporating risk:30 years…) incorporating risk:-- Use probabilistic inputs for project cost, financial parameters, Use probabilistic inputs for project cost, financial parameters,
production (expected average; serial values)production (expected average; serial values)-- Perform Monte Carlo simulation Perform Monte Carlo simulation
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Distribution of break-even cost
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
< - 1
8%
-17,
2%
-13,
8%
-10,
3%
-6,9
%
-3,4
%
0,0%
3,4%
6,9%
10,3
%
13,8
%
17,2
%
20,7
%
24,1
%
27,6
%
Difference from average break-even cost (%)
Prob
abili
ty (%
)
Feasibility study - option 2009
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20103030
-- Adaptation strategies Adaptation strategies -- Operations (short term 1day Operations (short term 1day –– 5 years) :5 years) :-- Frequent revision of optimal dispatchFrequent revision of optimal dispatch-- Good weather and inflow forecasting toolsGood weather and inflow forecasting tools-- Sufficient climate monitoring data for forecasting and studiesSufficient climate monitoring data for forecasting and studies-- Optimization tools Optimization tools -- nestingnesting-- Expert knowledge for short term adaptation strategiesExpert knowledge for short term adaptation strategies
-- Adaptation strategies Adaptation strategies -- Planning:Planning:-- Annual revision of prioritiesAnnual revision of priorities-- Develop a set of development options (turbine runner change; Develop a set of development options (turbine runner change;
additional powerhouse; new site) additional powerhouse; new site) -- Use risk based asset planning tools integrating drought and Use risk based asset planning tools integrating drought and
information riskinformation risk
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate and current adaptation strategiesand current adaptation strategies
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20103131
-- Inflows (net loss or gain):Inflows (net loss or gain):
-- Extremes:Extremes:-- Climate Factors (P and T)Climate Factors (P and T)-- FloodsFloods-- DroughtsDroughts
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20103232
-- Inflows (net loss or gain):Inflows (net loss or gain):
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
-- Very volatileVery volatile
-- All models All models show show regions that regions that increase and increase and others that others that decreasedecrease
-- Where do Where do they agree?they agree?
(source IPCC, 2007).
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20103333
-- Inflows (net loss or gain):Inflows (net loss or gain):
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
White areas:
<66% agree on the sign of change;
Hatched areas:
>90% agree on the sign
Change in runoff under the A1B scenario by the end of the 21th century, relative to 1980-1999, as projected by 12 IPCC models (source IPCC, 2007).
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20103434
Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sector sector –– methodology for basin scalemethodology for basin scale
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20103535
Current evaluations of CC impacts on the Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sector hydropower sector -- methodologymethodology
Which CM – GCM – RCM?Downscaling – Dynamic or Statistical?Sensitivity of HM to calibration?
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20103636
-- Mean Hydrograph: future (2050) Mean Hydrograph: future (2050) vsvs reference period reference period (%) (average result for 30 years)(%) (average result for 30 years)::
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
(source Ouranos, 2009).
Flo
w (m
3/s)
More fall and winter
runoff
Earlier Spring and drier summer
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20103737
-- Mean annual flow difference: future (2050) Mean annual flow difference: future (2050) vsvsreference period (%) (average result for 36 reference period (%) (average result for 36 scenarios)scenarios)::
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
(source Ouranos, 2009).
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20103838
-- Extremes:Extremes:-- Driving forces Driving forces –– more energy to generate extremes more energy to generate extremes
and more water in the atmosphereand more water in the atmosphere-- Very regional Very regional –– more than average valuesmore than average values-- Climate Factors (P and T)Climate Factors (P and T)-- FloodsFloods-- Droughts Droughts
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20103939
-- Extremes:Extremes:-- Climate Factors (P and T) using RCM for NAClimate Factors (P and T) using RCM for NA-- For For eacheach yearyear (1961(1961--2100) 2100) the annual extreme:the annual extreme:-- TminTmin = coldest night; = coldest night; TmaxTmax = warmest day= warmest day
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
Change in Tmin Change in Tmax
(source B. Casati Ouranos, unpublished).
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20104040
-- Extremes:Extremes:-- Climate Factors (P and T) using RCM for NAClimate Factors (P and T) using RCM for NA-- For For eacheach yearyear (19612100) (19612100) PmaxPmax –– the wettest daythe wettest day
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
Ratio: Future hor 2080/Present 1980PDF for Pmax in NE
(source B. Casati, Ouranos, unpublished).
Non-stationary in both mean and std. dev.
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 2010Février 20104141
-- Extremes:Extremes:-- Floods Floods –– the delta methodthe delta method
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
(Ouranos-HQ, 2009)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
janv févr mars avr mai juin juil août sept oct nov déc
Déb
it (m
³/s)
Actuel moyen1962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998
Summer flood
Winter flood
Fall flood
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 2010Février 20104242
-- Extremes:Extremes:-- Floods Floods –– the delta methodthe delta method
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
(Ouranos-HQ, 2009)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
janv févr mars avr mai juin juil août sept oct nov déc
Déb
it (m
³/s)
Actuel moyenMRCC ACUC2040204120422043204420452046204720482049205020512052205320542055205620572058205920602061206220632064206520662067206820692070207120722073207420752076
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 2010Février 20104343
-- Extremes:Floods Extremes:Floods –– direct inputs from RCMdirect inputs from RCM
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1 14 27 40 53 66 79 92 105 118 131 144 157 170 183 196 209 222 235 248 261 274 287 300 313 326 339 352 365
Dai
ly in
flow
s (m
³/s)
Average hydrographs
1961 - 1990
2041 - 2070
(Ouranos-HQ, 2009)
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 2010Février 20104444
-- Extremes:Floods Extremes:Floods –– direct inputs from RCMdirect inputs from RCM
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109
121
133
145
157
169
181
193
205
217
229
241
253
265
277
289
301
313
325
337
349
361
Daily
Inflo
ws
(m³/s
)
Yearly hydrographs - Reference period 1961 - 1990 196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
(Ouranos-HQ, 2009)
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 2010Février 2010Février 20104545
-- Extremes:Floods Extremes:Floods –– direct inputs from RCMdirect inputs from RCM
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109
121
133
145
157
169
181
193
205
217
229
241
253
265
277
289
301
313
325
337
349
361
Daily
inflo
ws
(m³/s
)
Yearly Hydrographs - Future - 2041-2070 204120422043204420452046204720482049205020512052205320542055205620572058205920602061206220632064206520662067206820692070
(Ouranos-HQ, 2009)
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20104646
-- Extremes: Droughts Extremes: Droughts
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
(source IPCC, 2007).
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20104747
-- Extremes: Glacier Lake Outburst Floods GLOFExtremes: Glacier Lake Outburst Floods GLOF-- Example of Hubbard Glacier Alaska Example of Hubbard Glacier Alaska
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20104848
-- Extremes: Glacier Lake Outburst Floods GLOFExtremes: Glacier Lake Outburst Floods GLOF-- Nepal Nepal –– major risk factor for hydropower planning major risk factor for hydropower planning
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Current evaluations of Current evaluations of CC impacts on the hydropower sectorCC impacts on the hydropower sector
(source ICMOD and UNEP, 2002).
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20104949
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate change change –– Future Adaptation optionsFuture Adaptation options-- Operations (short term 1day Operations (short term 1day –– 5 years) :5 years) :
-- Annual runoff conditionsAnnual runoff conditions- Are existing hydro plants able to adapt?
-- Planning (5 Planning (5 –– 30 years…):30 years…):
-- Changes in demandChanges in demand-- Changes in availabilityChanges in availability-- More severe extremesMore severe extremes
Should we design new hydro with CC data?
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20105050
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate change change –– Future Adaptation optionsFuture Adaptation options-- Operations (short term 1day Operations (short term 1day –– 5 years) :5 years) :
-- Evaluate using existing stochastic dynamic programming WM toolEvaluate using existing stochastic dynamic programming WM tool
Aux Outardes3 plants1000 MW
(Raymond et al.-HQ, Ceati-WMIG 2008)
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20105151
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate change change –– Can Hydro Adapt?Can Hydro Adapt?
(Raymond et al.-HQ, Ceati-WMIG 2008)
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20105252
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate change change –– Adaptation OptionsAdaptation Options-- Operations (short term 1day Operations (short term 1day –– 5 years) :5 years) :
-- Annual runoff conditionsAnnual runoff conditions- Are existing hydro plants able to adapt?-- Where changes are limited to 10 to 20 % Where changes are limited to 10 to 20 % --
yesyes-- Where storage is available Where storage is available -- RunRun--of of ––River remains vulnerableRiver remains vulnerable
-- Planning (5 Planning (5 –– 30 years…):30 years…):
-- Changes in demandChanges in demand-- Changes in availabilityChanges in availability-- More severe extremesMore severe extremes
Should we design new hydro with CC data?
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20105353
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate change change –– Adaptation OptionsAdaptation Options-- Planning (5 Planning (5 –– 30 years…):30 years…):
-- Change in climate:Change in climate:-- Change in demandChange in demand
-- Very gradual Very gradual –– several percent in 50 yearsseveral percent in 50 years-- Change in productivityChange in productivity
-- Also very gradual Also very gradual –– several percent in 50 yearsseveral percent in 50 years
-- Economic and demand factors change Economic and demand factors change much quicker than projected changes in much quicker than projected changes in climateclimate--affected planning variables for affected planning variables for hydropowerhydropower
-- Discount rates for project cost analysis Discount rates for project cost analysis make slightly uncertain or biased future make slightly uncertain or biased future less of a worry than most other planning less of a worry than most other planning factorsfactors
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20105454
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate change change –– Adaptation OptionsAdaptation Options-- Adapting to extremes :Adapting to extremes :
-- Are existing hydro plants able to Are existing hydro plants able to adapt?adapt?
-- Very early to answer this questionVery early to answer this question-- Most CC studies done with delta method Most CC studies done with delta method ––
doesn’t capture variabilitydoesn’t capture variability-- Most tools used to manage extremes can be Most tools used to manage extremes can be
improved and adapted, but it is a big job improved and adapted, but it is a big job –– (non(non--stationnaritystationnarity))
-- Need more studies oriented to extremesNeed more studies oriented to extremes
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20105555
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate change change –– Adaptation OptionsAdaptation OptionsAdaptation options:Adaptation options:
-- NonNon--structural:structural:-- Improving water resource management (data, Improving water resource management (data,
tools, communications between multiple users, tools, communications between multiple users, etc.)etc.)
-- Adapting tools for nonAdapting tools for non--stationary inflows, stationary inflows, extremesextremes
-- Work on flexibility (legal framework for water Work on flexibility (legal framework for water licensing; managing water for multiple basins)licensing; managing water for multiple basins)
-- Prepare for more public discussions on water Prepare for more public discussions on water issuesissues
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20105656
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate change change –– Adaptation OptionsAdaptation OptionsAdaptation options:Adaptation options:
-- Structural:Structural:-- When refurbishing, consider a refit that When refurbishing, consider a refit that
increases flexibilityincreases flexibility-- Consider preConsider pre--investment options for future investment options for future
needs needs –– larger tunnels and options for larger tunnels and options for additional spillway capacityadditional spillway capacity
-- Work on flexibility (design with nonWork on flexibility (design with non--stationaritystationarity))
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
-- Activities with best return on investment:Activities with best return on investment:-- Study tools Study tools –– for planning and operationsfor planning and operations-- Sharing climate change data and analysis Sharing climate change data and analysis
results results –– building consensusbuilding consensus-- Biggest unknownsBiggest unknowns
-- Statistical properties of future extremesStatistical properties of future extremes-- GCM and RCM model uncertaintiesGCM and RCM model uncertainties
-- Lots of workLots of work
Février 20105757
Hydropower Sector Hydropower Sector –– Vulnerabilities to climate Vulnerabilities to climate change change –– Looking aheadLooking ahead
Planification 2010 – HydrauliqueBarrages et Hydraulique
Février 20105858
Hydropower SectorHydropower Sector
DiscussionDiscussion