· 2018-08-05 · SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page i HARA/LIBB NYA RAP January 2016 Nyumba Ya Akiba Project: Resettlement Action Plan Nyumba Ya Akiba SARL SRK Consulting

NyCeUPl

Rep

Ny

Rep

Rep

Jan

yumbemenpdatelan

port Prepa

yumba

port Numb

port Prepa

nuary 2016

ba Yant Proed Re

ared for

Ya Ak

ber: 49248

ared by

6

a Akiboject:esettl

kiba SA

84/RAP

ba : lemen

ARL

nt Ac

ction

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page i

HARA/LIBB NYA RAP January 2016

Nyumba Ya Akiba Project: Resettlement Action Plan

Nyumba Ya Akiba SARL

SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd. 265 Oxford Rd Illovo 2196 Johannesburg

South Africa

e-mail: [email protected] website: www.srk.co.za

Tel: +27 (0) 11 441 1248 Fax:+27 (0) 11 880 8086

SRK Project Number: 492484

January 2016

Compiled by: Reviewed by:

Andrew Hart Senior Social Development Consultant

Briony Liber Partner

Email: [email protected]

Authors:

A Hart; A Bron (report contributor)

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page ii


Table of Contents

Disclaimer ................................................................................................................................................... viii

List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................... ix

Terminology.................................................................................................................................................. x

1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................................................. 1

1.2 The EIA Process ................................................................................................................................. 3

1.3 Overview of the Resettlement Action Plan ......................................................................................... 3

1.3.1 Rationale for the Current Resettlement Activities ................................................................... 3

1.3.2 Phasing and Scope of the RAP ............................................................................................... 6

1.4 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 7

1.5 Assumptions and Limitations .............................................................................................................. 7

2 Legal and Governance Framework ............................................................................. 8

2.1 Relevant DRC Legislation ................................................................................................................... 8

2.1.1 Constitution De La Republique Democratique du Congo ....................................................... 8

2.1.2 Land Regime in Mining Concessions as per the Mining Law ................................................. 9

2.1.3 Land Policy .............................................................................................................................. 9

2.1.4 Traditional Authority and Customary Land Tenure ............................................................... 10

2.2 Good International Industry Practice Guidelines .............................................................................. 11

2.2.1 IFC Performance Standards ................................................................................................. 11

2.2.2 Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan ........................................................... 13

2.2.3 African Development Bank Policy on Involuntary Resettlement ........................................... 14

2.3 Company Policy and Standards ........................................................................................................ 15

2.3.1 Human Rights Policy ............................................................................................................. 15

2.3.2 Sustainable Development Policy ........................................................................................... 15

3 Census and Asset Inventory ..................................................................................... 17

3.1 Approach and Methodology .............................................................................................................. 17

3.1.1 Approach ............................................................................................................................... 17

3.1.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 18

4 Socio-Economic Baseline – Yuku Village ................................................................ 20

4.1 History and Location ......................................................................................................................... 20

4.2 Demography ...................................................................................................................................... 20

4.2.1 Population Structure .............................................................................................................. 20

4.2.2 Age and Gender .................................................................................................................... 21

4.3 Education .......................................................................................................................................... 22

4.4 Health ................................................................................................................................................ 22

4.5 Employment, Income and Livelihoods .............................................................................................. 23

4.5.1 Employment .......................................................................................................................... 23

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page iii


4.5.2 Income and Livelihoods......................................................................................................... 23

4.5.3 Agriculture ............................................................................................................................. 24

4.5.4 Livestock ............................................................................................................................... 24

4.5.5 Charcoal Production and Sales ............................................................................................. 24

4.6 Housing ............................................................................................................................................. 24

4.6.1 Infrastructure and Services ................................................................................................... 25

4.6.2 Transport ............................................................................................................................... 25

4.6.3 Refuse Removal .................................................................................................................... 25

4.6.4 Sanitation .............................................................................................................................. 25

4.6.5 Water ..................................................................................................................................... 26

4.6.6 Energy Sources ..................................................................................................................... 26

4.7 Significant Cultural Heritage Sites .................................................................................................... 27

4.8 Vulnerable Groups ............................................................................................................................ 27

4.9 Implications for Resettlement ............................................................................................................ 28

4.10 Census Verification ........................................................................................................................... 29

5 Resettlement Related Impacts .................................................................................. 29

5.1 Land Acquisition ................................................................................................................................ 29

5.1.1 Summary of Physical Impacts ............................................................................................... 29

5.1.2 Summary of the Economic Impacts ...................................................................................... 30

5.2 Additional Socio-Economic Impacts .................................................................................................. 31

5.3 Demolishment of Yuku Village .......................................................................................................... 33

5.4 Broader Community Impacts ............................................................................................................ 33

5.4.1 Host Area Consultation ......................................................................................................... 33

5.4.2 Integration Measures ............................................................................................................. 33

5.4.3 Design of Project Infrastructure ............................................................................................. 34

5.4.4 Land Access and Management ............................................................................................. 34

6 Stakeholder Engagement .......................................................................................... 35

6.1 Engagement Requirements, Objectives and Principles .................................................................... 35

6.1.1 Requirements ........................................................................................................................ 35

6.1.2 Objectives .............................................................................................................................. 36

6.1.3 Principles of Engagement ..................................................................................................... 36

6.2 Previous Engagement Activities Undertaken .................................................................................... 36

6.2.1 Memorandum of Understanding ............................................................................................ 39

6.3 NYA Communication Strategy and Stakeholder Engagement Plan ................................................. 39

6.3.1 Key SEP Objectives .............................................................................................................. 39

6.3.2 Stakeholder Identification ...................................................................................................... 40

6.3.3 Women and other Vulnerable Groups ................................................................................... 41

6.4 Current RAP Management Structure ................................................................................................ 41

6.4.1 Cadre Concertation Permanent ............................................................................................ 41

7 Grievance Management ............................................................................................. 43

7.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 43

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page iv


7.1.1 Benefits of a Complaints and Grievance Procedure ............................................................. 43

7.1.2 IFC Requirements ................................................................................................................. 43

7.1.3 Objectives .............................................................................................................................. 43

7.2 Current Grievance Process ............................................................................................................... 44

7.2.1 Communication and Dissemination ....................................................................................... 44

7.2.2 Current Grievances and Disputes ......................................................................................... 44

8 Land Tenure and Host Site Selection ....................................................................... 45

8.1 Host Site Selection ............................................................................................................................ 45

8.2 Tenure and Land Allocation .............................................................................................................. 46

8.2.1 Tenure ................................................................................................................................... 46

8.2.2 Land Allocation ...................................................................................................................... 46

8.3 Replacement Agricultural Land ......................................................................................................... 46

9 Resettlement and Compensation Framework .......................................................... 48

9.1 Overview of the Compensation Framework ...................................................................................... 48

9.2 Objectives and Principles .................................................................................................................. 48

9.3 Cut-off Dates ..................................................................................................................................... 48

9.4 Eligibility ............................................................................................................................................ 49

9.4.1 Eligibility Principles ................................................................................................................ 49

9.4.2 Eligibility for Compensation and Assistance ......................................................................... 49

9.5 Entitlements ...................................................................................................................................... 50

9.5.1 General Structure of Entitlements ......................................................................................... 50

9.5.2 Agricultural Land ................................................................................................................... 52

9.5.3 Annual Crops ......................................................................................................................... 52

9.5.4 Perennial Crops ..................................................................................................................... 52

9.5.5 Entitlement Matrix .................................................................................................................. 53

9.6 Methodology to Value Losses ........................................................................................................... 56

10 Livelihoods Restoration Plan .................................................................................... 57

10.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 57

10.2 Job Opportunities .............................................................................................................................. 57

10.3 Mainstreaming Livelihoods ............................................................................................................... 57

10.4 Livelihoods Needs Assessment ........................................................................................................ 57

10.5 Livelihoods Restoration Programme ................................................................................................. 58

10.5.1 Agricultural Enhancement and Support ................................................................................ 58

10.5.2 Community Health and Hygiene ........................................................................................... 58

10.6 Additional Livelihood Support ........................................................................................................... 59

10.6.1 Preservation of a Sense of Community ................................................................................. 59

10.7 Assistance to Vulnerable Households .............................................................................................. 59

10.8 Proposed Livelihood Restoration Plan .............................................................................................. 60

10.8.1 Managing the LRP ................................................................................................................. 60

11 Additional Resettlement Assistance ......................................................................... 62

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page v


11.1 Free Removal Services ..................................................................................................................... 62

11.2 Community Development Activities .................................................................................................. 62

11.3 Employment Opportunities ................................................................................................................ 62

11.4 Environmental Mitigation Measures .................................................................................................. 62

12 RAP Implementation .................................................................................................. 63

12.1 Implementation Arrangements and Responsibilities ......................................................................... 63

12.2 Current NYA EHSS Department ....................................................................................................... 64

12.3 Indicative Implementation Schedule ................................................................................................. 66

12.4 Physical Displacement: Implementation Action Plan ........................................................................ 68

12.4.1 Finalisation of Household Compensation Agreements ......................................................... 68

12.4.2 Implementation of the Compensation Agreements ............................................................... 68

12.5 Economic Displacement: Implementation Action Plan ..................................................................... 71

12.5.1 Identification and Verification ................................................................................................ 71

12.5.2 Engagement .......................................................................................................................... 71

12.5.3 Replacement Land ................................................................................................................ 72

12.5.4 Compensation ....................................................................................................................... 72

12.5.5 Demarcation .......................................................................................................................... 73

13 Monitoring and Evaluation ........................................................................................ 76

13.1 General Objectives of Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................................................. 76

13.2 Internal and External Monitoring ....................................................................................................... 76

13.3 Performance Indicators ..................................................................................................................... 76

13.4 Monitoring Plan ................................................................................................................................. 78

13.5 Completion Audit ............................................................................................................................... 78

Appendices ...................................................................................................................... 83

Appendix A: Census and Asset Inventory Questionnaire and Database ................. 84

Appendix B: NYA Policies ............................................................................................ 85

Appendix C: Meeting Minutes ...................................................................................... 86

Appendix D: Memorandum of Understanding with Local Communities and Stakeholders ............................................................................................................... 87

Appendix E: Affected Field Database .......................................................................... 88

Appendix F: Example of Signed Compensation Agreement ..................................... 89

Appendix G: NYA Grievance Mechanism .................................................................... 90

Appendix H: Grievance Database ................................................................................ 91

Appendix I: Agrisud International – Scope of Work ................................................... 92

Appendix J: HPP Congo – Action Plan ........................................................................ 93

Appendix K: Cut-off Date .............................................................................................. 94

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page vi


List of Tables Table 2-1: Comparative analysis of applicable DRC legislation and the IFC’s PS5 ................................... 13

Table 4-1: Education levels of affected households .................................................................................... 22

Table 4-2: Prevalent ailments and diseases in the past 3 months .............................................................. 22

Table 4-3: Employment levels ..................................................................................................................... 23

Table 4-4: Average household monthly income .......................................................................................... 24

Table 4-5: Sources and uses of energy ...................................................................................................... 26

Table 4-6: Potentially vulnerable households ............................................................................................. 28

Table 5-1: Summary of impacted physical assets ....................................................................................... 30

Table 5-2: Potential socio-economic impacts on the Yuku Village ............................................................. 32

Table 6-1: NYA stakeholder engagement and interactions (2009 – 2013) ................................................. 36

Table 6-2: ECTECH Stakeholder engagement and interactions (2012) ..................................................... 38

Table 6-3: RAP stakeholder engagement and interactions (2015) ............................................................. 39

Table 9-1: Eligibility and entitlement matrix: physical displacement ........................................................... 53

Table 9-2: Eligibility and entitlement matrix: agricultural land ..................................................................... 54

Table 9-3: Identified assets and methodology to value lost assets ............................................................. 56

Table 10-1: Summary of the Livelihood Restoration Plan ............................................................................. 61

Table 12-1: Pros and cons of RAP implementation options ......................................................................... 63

Table 12-2: Indicative RAP implementation schedule ................................................................................... 67

Table 12-3: Household relocation and compensation action plan ................................................................ 69

Table 12-4: Procedure followed for individual field compensation agreements ............................................ 73

Table 12-5: Field relocation and compensation action plan .......................................................................... 74

Table 13-1: Key performance indicators ....................................................................................................... 77

Table 13-2: Proposed RAP monitoring plan .................................................................................................. 80

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page vii


List of Figures Figure 1-1: NYA cement plant location ........................................................................................................... 2

Figure 1-2: Plant layout .................................................................................................................................. 5

Figure 1-3: RAP phasing ................................................................................................................................ 6

Figure 4-1: Age distribution .......................................................................................................................... 21

Figure 5-1: Crop cycle .................................................................................................................................. 31

Figure 12-1: EHSS organogram ..................................................................................................................... 65

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page viii


Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this Resettlement Action Plan have been based on the information

supplied to SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd (SRK) by Nyumba Ya Akiba SARL (NYA). SRK

has exercised due and customary care in developing this plan but has not, save as specifically

stated, independently verified information provided by others. Whilst SRK has compared key

supplied data with expected values, the accuracy of the results and conclusions from the review are

entirely reliant on the accuracy and completeness of the supplied data. SRK does not accept

responsibility for any errors or omissions in the supplied information and does not accept any

consequential liability arising from commercial decisions or actions resulting from them. Opinions

presented in this report apply to the site conditions and features as they existed at the time of SRK’s

limited investigations, and those reasonably foreseeable. These opinions do not necessarily apply to

conditions and features that may arise after the date of this Plan, about which SRK had no prior

knowledge nor had the opportunity to evaluate.

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page ix


List of Abbreviations AfDB African Development Bank

CCR Community and Corporate Relations

CLO Community Liaison Officer

CNC Compensation Negotiations Committee

CSI Corporate Social Investment

DRC Democratic Republic of Congo

EHS&C Environmental, Health, Safety and Community

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

ERM Environmental Resources Management

ESDD Environmental and Social Due Diligence

ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan

FRAP Framework Resettlement Action Plan

GIIP Good International Industry Practice

Ha hectare

HPP Human People to People

IAP Interested and Affected Party

IFC International Finance Corporation

LRP Livelihood Restoration Plan

MoU Memorandum of Understanding

NGO Non-Government Organisation

NYA Nyumba Ya Akiba SARL

PAP Project Affected People

PS Performance Standard

PTOs Permission to Occupy Certificates

RAC Resettlement Advisory Committee

RAP Resettlement Action Plan

SIA Socio-Economic Impact Assessment

SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan

SNEL Société Nationale d'Electricité, Sarl

SOP Standard Operating Procedure

SRK SRK Consulting

TA Traditional Authority

UN United Nations

VIP Ventilation Improved Pit

WBG World Bank Group

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page x


Terminology Compensation: replacement of physical assets or economic resources affected by the project

and other related mining activities.

Cut-off dates: date of completion of the census and assets inventory of persons affected by the

project. Persons moving into the Yuku Village after the cut-off date are not eligible for

compensation and/or resettlement assistance. Similarly, owners of affected fields identified after

the cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation.

Economic Displacement: the loss of income and/or access to livelihood activities resulting from

the acquisition of land associated with a project.

Entitlement: eligibility for compensation and/or other resettlement assistance.

Hosts or Host Communities: existing communities residing in or close to resettlement areas

where displaced households will be resettled. Mbemba Village will be the host community in this

context.

Income restoration: support and/or compensation provided to Project Affected People (PAP) to

restore income generating potential and standard of living.

Involuntary resettlement: occurs without the informed consent of the displaced persons or if

they give their consent, they do not have the power to refuse resettlement.

Livelihood restoration: support provided to PAP to restore their livelihoods through sustainable

development initiatives that leads to improved standards of living for the PAP.

Physical Displacement: the relocation of PAP to a host site resulting from the acquisition of

land associated with a project and the subsequent loss of housing and associated physical

structures.

Project Affected People (PAP): any person who is affected by project related activities,

physical and/or economic displacement.

Zone of Influence: the area in which impacts resulting from project related activities, physical

and/or economic displacement are likely to be experienced.

Resettlement Action Plan: a document in which a project sponsor or other responsible entity

specifies the procedures that it will follow and the actions that it will take to mitigate adverse

effects, compensate losses, and provide development benefits to persons and communities

affected by an investment project. A RAP must meet both in-country laws and requirements as

well as international best practice guidelines and standards.

Resettled Households: entire households, usually comprising of a number of PAP that will be

physically relocated to accommodate the proposed project activities in the project area.

Resettlement Assistance: support provided to a PAP during their relocation. This assistance

may be in the form of transportation, food, shelter and social services. It may also include cash

allowances for inconvenience associated with resettlement such as moving costs and lost

working days.

Vulnerable Groups: people who may be adversely affected by resettlement and limited in their

ability to take advantage of resettlement assistance and related livelihood restoration benefits.

This includes women, children and the elderly.

SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page 1


1 Introduction

1.1 Project Overview

Nyumba Ya Akiba SARL (NYA) is a 50-50 joint venture between Lucky Cement, Pakistan’s largest

cement producer, and the Rawji Group, a banking firm with extensive experience in the Democratic

Republic of Congo (DRC). NYA is currently developing a limestone quarry and cement factory with

associated facilities on a green field site located approximately 250 km south west of Kinshasa in the

Kimpese and Luima Sectors of the Songololo Territory of the Bas Congo Province (Figure 1-1).

Seven settlements are located in close proximity to the NYA Project (“the Project”); namely, Kinsua,

Kokolo, Minkelo, Mbamba, Mbemba, Nkonda and Yuku Village.

The area is characterised by gently undulating topography with three hills and two small lakes.

Grassland forms the predominant vegetation cover, except on the edges of the major rivers, where

patches of dense gallery forest occur. Large water ponds / wetlands are situated both on the east

and west of the proposed plant site. These ponds are used by nearby villages, especially Mbamba,

for water and other activities such as fishing (Figure 1-2).

The Sanzikua River flows in a northwest-south-easterly direction, east of the NYA Project area. The

Yuku River flows between the quarry and cement plant in a north-south direction to meet the

Sanzikua River in the North. A wetland is located immediately east of the NYA plant site and

currently supplies the local Mbamba community with water and fish (Figure 1-2).

NYA holds an exploration permit for 29 km2 (2 900 ha). Within this area, they identified a high grade,

shallow limestone deposit (estimated 70 million tonnes) that will be exploited for the manufacture of

cement. The deposit will be mined using an open-cast method and most of the quarried products will

be transported directly to the cement plant via a haul road. Overburden (waste soil and rock) not

used for construction, will be stockpiled in a non-environmentally sensitive area adjacent and west of

the quarry. Quarry development is expected to take about 24 months prior to the commissioning of

the cement plant.

Construction of the plant commenced mid-2015. Once completed, the cement plant will span

approximately 60 hectares (ha) of land, and the quarry and overburden storage site 45 ha each. The

total footprint area of the project and associated facilities is approximately 192 ha (see Figure 1-2).

At full operational capacity, NYA propose production rates of 3,000 tonnes clinker and 3,580 tonnes

of cement per day (1.18 million tonnes per annum), over double the current total production in the

DRC.

Currently, access to the site is from the national N1 road, via a controlled site access road. The

national N1 road links Kinshasa with Port Matadi. The national railway line passes at a distance of

approximately 100 m from the NYA Project boundary. A 12 m wide gravel access road of 2.6 km

length has been constructed from the N1 road to the plant. The access road crosses the railway line

between two wetlands to the south of the line. The road design provides for culverts (drains that

allow water to flow under the road) that enable flow between these wetland areas.

The haul road between the cement plant and the quarry follows the existing clay track. Culverts will

be provided for the haul road where it crosses the Yuku River to accommodate surface flow during

the rainy season. Within the plant, ore will be transported via conveyor belts from the mill to a raw

meal storage area. NYA will preferably use railways to transport its raw and final product, but as an

alternative, will contract trucking companies to transport the materials via road.

The maximum power demand for the plant is estimated to be approximately 16.5 MW. Power will be

sourced from the DRC national energy grid via the state energy utility, Société Nationale d'Electricité,

SRK Consultin

HARA/LIBB

Sar

exc

Thr

Kins

Min

line

Wa

(IFC

and

med

The

dom

extr

will

App

emp

acc

site

wor

Dur

plan

pers

laun

will

corp

plan

Fig

ng: Project No: 4

rl (SNEL). D

cess water fro

ree power li

shasa to Ing

nkelo; and a

e will run from

stes will be

C) guidelines

d reused. No

dical waste w

e estimated

mestic use.

racted from t

be recycled

proximately 9

ployed on sit

commodated

e) is transpo

rkers come fr

ring operatio

nt site, one

sonnel. A ca

ndries, loung

be situated

porate office

nt will have 3

ure 1-1: NY

492484: NYA RA

Diesel gener

om the quarr

nes will run

ga Dam; an

new propos

m Kwilu subs

disposed o

s and lender

on-recyclable

will be incine

water requi

Raw water

the quarry as

to reduce th

900 construc

te, which is

on site whi

orted to and

rom local vill

n, on-site ac

e for senior

anteen / dini

ges, and ablu

close to the

e will consist

375 personne

YA cement p

AP

ators will be

ry.

through the

existing 220

sed 220 kV p

tation alongs

f in accorda

r requiremen

e industrial w

rated.

rement is 84

supply will

s well as surf

he volumes o

ction laboure

expected to

le a limited

from the w

ages.

ccommodatio

staff and

ng area will

utions. A clin

plant, and a

of 50 perma

el on site.

plant locatio

NYA RAP

e installed fo

e concessio

0 kV line run

power line th

side the exis

ance with DR

nts. Where p

waste will be

40 m3 per d

be sourced

face run-off.

of fresh wate

rs (approx. 5

increase ove

number of lo

worksite on a

on will be pro

another for

be provided

nic and emer

network tow

anent person

on

or emergenc

n area: a p

nning from K

hat will supp

ting 220 kV

RC and the

possible, was

disposed of

day for proc

d from: the

Water requi

r utilised.

50% Pakista

er the next f

ocal labour l

a daily basi

ovided in two

labourers,

d close to th

rgency evacu

wer will be ins

nnel and dur

cy power su

proposed 400

Kwilu sub-sta

ply the NYA

line to Minke

Internationa

ste will be de

in a waste m

cess water a

Sanzikua a

red for produ

ni and 50% C

ew months.

iving in Kim

s. The rema

o accommod

jointly hous

e accommod

uation faciliti

stalled for co

ing the oper

upply and fo

0 kV line, r

ation westwa

Project. The

elo.

al Finance C

econtaminat

managemen

and 120 m3

and Yuku R

ucing cemen

Congolese)

Expatriate la

pese (30 km

aining major

dation camps

sing approx

dation areas

es to service

ommunication

ration phase

Page 2

January 2016

or extracting

running from

ards towards

e new power

Corporation’s

ted, recycled

nt facility and

per day for

Rivers, water

t in the plant

are currently

abourers are

m away from

rity of these

s west of the

ximately 300

s, as well as

e employees

ns. The NYA

, the cement

2

g

m

s

r

s

d

d

r

r

t

y

e

m

e

e

0

s

s

A

t



1.2 The EIA Process An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the project including the limestone quarry and the

cement plant was conducted by an accredited local consultant (OEMS) in December 2010 in

accordance with the DRC’s legislation. This EIA was approved by the local authorities in 2011 and

the quarry operational permit granted.

Subsequently, an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) for lender approval was

undertaken in December 2012 by Pakistani consulting firm ECTECH, covering the cement plant,

limestone quarry and some associated facilities but not covering the entire area of influence of the

Project. These and other gaps relative to the required assessment framework to meet the

requirements of international funders were identified by ERM, who conducted an independent

environmental and social due diligence (ESDD) on behalf of the lenders.

NYA appointed SRK Consulting (SRK) in 2013 to prepare an updated ESIA and Environmental and

Social Management Plan (ESMP) for the Project, in line with the IFC Performance Standards (PS)

and other requirements, including those of the African Development Bank (AfDB). The purpose of

SRK’s updated ESIA and ESMP was to address the outstanding requirements identified in ERM’s

ESDD, as well as comment received from AfDB.

A component of the ESIA included the updating of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) prepared by

ECTECH. Due to time limitations at that time, SRK subsequently compiled a Framework

Resettlement Action Plan (FRAP). This was followed by a Draft RAP in November 2014, with the

inclusion of an action plan for addressing resettlement planning in detail. ERM conducted a second

ESDD in 2015, which included a review of the FRAP but not the Draft RAP. ERM identified that a

RAP needed to be developed to adhere to lender requirements.

NYA appointed SRK to assist them with updating the Draft RAP, since resettlement implementation

activities commenced subsequent to the compilation of the Draft RAP in November 2014. This

updated Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) incorporates the implementation activities that commenced

in 2015 as well as the planned activities for 2016.

1.3 Overview of the Resettlement Action Plan A combination of land take associated with infrastructure footprints and impacts associated with

project activities resulted in the need for physical displacement of households within the project area.

This section discusses the rationale for the current resettlement activities, the phasing of the RAP,

the methodology, and the assumptions and limitations.

1.3.1 Rationale for the Current Resettlement Activities

Physical Displacement

The Yuku Village is located within 1 km of both the quarry and cement plant (refer to Figure 1-2).

The ECTECH ESIA identified the need for the relocation of the Yuku Village households on the basis

of health and safety impacts associated with the haul road option and the 400KV powerline that both

intersected the village at that time. Community leaders and Project Affected People (PAP) had been

made aware of the project information by NYA and ECTECH as part of the original stakeholder

engagement process of the ECTECH ESIA. During consultations undertaken by NYA and ECTECH,

all the households of the Yuku Village indicated that they would be willing to relocate to their original

village of Kinsua or to the nearby Bemba Village on condition that fair and due compensation is

provided.

Due to project design changes the haul road and power line options no longer intersect the village.

However, due to the village’s proximate location to both the quarry and cement plant site, and



associated impacts relating to movement of heavy vehicles and increased levels of dust and blasting

at the quarry, a decision was taken by NYA to continue with the relocation of all the households in

the Yuku Village.

Economic Displacement

Finalisation of the design during the detailed design phase aimed to minimise and avoid economic

displacement where possible. However, several agricultural fields have been identified within the

footprints of the cement plant site, the quarry, the proposed overburden stockpile and the waste

landfill site. These fields within the footprint have been identified as belonging to households within

the Yuku Village as well as to households from other villages. New fields have been identified to

replace the fields affected by land take for the project footprint.

SRK C

HARA/L

Consulting: Project No

LIBB

Figure 1-2: P

o: 492484: NYA RAP

Plant layout

NYA RAP

Page

January 2016

5

SRK Consultin

HARA/LIBB

1.3.2 Ph

The

this

RAP

plan

Fig

The

and

ng: Project No: 4

asing and

e figure belo

s project, na

P, and the

nning proces

ure 1-3: RA

e RAP updat

d covers all im

Section 2:

Section 3:

Section 4:

Section 5:

Section 6:

Section 7:

Section 8:L

Section 9:

Section 10

Section 11

Section 12

Section 13

492484: NYA RA

d Scope of

ow provides a

mely the RA

updated RA

ss, namely th

AP phasing

te includes a

mplementatio

Legal and G

Census and

Socio-Econo

Resettlemen

Stakeholder

Grievance M

Land Tenure

Resettlemen

: Livelihood

: Additional R

: RAP Imple

: Monitoring

AP

f the RAP

a breakdown

AP Scoping

AP. This up

he updated R

an update of

on activities

overnance F

Asset Inven

omic Baselin

nt Related Im

Engagemen

Management;

and Host Si

nt and Comp

Restoration

Resettlemen

mentation;

and Evaluat

NYA RAP

n of the four

Phase, the

pdated docu

RAP.

all the elem

completed to

Framework;

ntory;

e – Yuku Vil

mpacts;

nt;

;

te Selection;

pensation Fra

Plan

nt Assistance

tion.

r distinct pha

Framework

ument repres

ments of rese

o date. The r

lage

;

amework;

e

ases of the r

Resettlemen

sents Phase

ttlement plan

report is struc

resettlement

nt Action Pla

e 4 of the

nning, where

ctured as fol

Page 6

January 2016

t process for

an, the Draft

resettlement

e necessary,

lows:

6

r

t

t

,



1.4 Methodology This update of the Draft RAP that was compiled in November 2014, has been developed on the

basis of the following key activities:

A review of the FRAP compiled by SRK in 2013 and the Draft RAP compiled by SRK in 2014;

A review of the gap analysis and audit completed by ERM in 2015: Environmental and Social

Monitoring, NYA cement plant, report from 2nd site visit, June 2015;

Consideration of the final project description and layout provided by NYA (refer to Figure 1-2);

Update of the census and asset inventory conducted by SRK in June 2013 and July 2014; and,

Discussions with NYA Environmental, Health, Safety and Community (EHS&C) project team 19-

23 October 2015 and 7-11 December 2015.

A detailed outline of the methodology used in collecting baseline data is provided in Section 3.

Baseline data was collected as part of the Draft RAP of November 2014.

1.5 Assumptions and Limitations The following assumptions and limitations apply to this RAP:

At the time of the census and asset inventory (July 2014), measurements were completed for

physical structures and agricultural fields based on structures and fields that were identified and

made known to the team by the household interviewees in June 2013 and in July 2014. While

every effort was made to ensure that measurements were accurate, inaccuracies might have

occurred, which will be verified as art of the census and asset validation process that will be

executed in 2016 prior to the relocation of Yuku Village.

Where household heads were not available, the questionnaire was conducted with a household

representative.

Identification of owners affected by economic and physical displacement was based on the

project layout and design, and associated potential negative environmental and social impacts,

as illustrated in Figure 1-2.



2 Legal and Governance Framework

2.1 Relevant DRC Legislation DRC law draws its substance from at least seven sources, namely the Constitution, international

treaties, legislation, administrative regulations, custom, case law, and doctrinal writings.

At the apex of the legal system, the DRC Constitution is the first source of law. It establishes the

institutions and the apparatus of government, defines the content and limits of government powers,

and protects fundamental human rights and freedoms. While the Constitution does not specifically

refer to ‘resettlement’, there are numerous related references that should be taken into account

throughout the resettlement process.

2.1.1 Constitution De La Republique Democratique du Congo

The preamble of the Constitution reaffirms Congo’s adherence to human rights and the equal

representation of women and men in state institutions. It reaffirms adherence to the Universal

Declaration of Human Rights, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and the United

Nations’ (UN) conventions on the rights of children and women. The DRC has ratified all the main

international human rights and humanitarian legal instruments, including the UN Convention on Civil

and Political Rights and the UN Convention on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights.

The Constitution also protects fundamental freedoms, including opinion, conscience and religion

(Article 22); expression (Article 23); information, press and communication (Article 24); privacy

(Articles 29 and 31); movement (Article 30); assembly, demonstration and petition (Articles 25, 26

and 27, respectively); asylum (Article 33) and protection of foreign nationals and their property

(Article 32).

The Constitution proclaims that private property is sacred (Article 34). It lays down the right to work

(Article 36) and freedom of association (Article 37), the right to form trade unions (Article 38) and the

right to strike (Article 39).

Some of the articles within the constitution that may be more applicable during a resettlement

process include the following:

Article 53

Every person has a right to a healthy environment and which is favourable to his/her full

development;

The environment must be protected; and,

The State must look after the protection of the environment and the health of the people.

Article 123 of the DRC Constitution makes provision for laws to be made concerning, inter alia, “the

protection of the environment and tourism”.

Article 203 allows for co-operative governance by central government and the provincial

administrations “to protect the environment, natural sites and landscapes, and the conservation of

such sites”.

Other provisions in the Constitution that may have some relevance to the resettlement process

include the following:

Article 12 - All Congolese are equal before the law and have the right to equal protection by the law;

Article 13 - In education, access to public services or any other area, no Congolese shall be subject

to discrimination, whether on the basis of law or executive action, on the grounds of religion, family



origin, social status, residence, political opinions or convictions or of belonging to a race, ethnic

group, tribe or cultural or linguistic minority; and,

Article 51 - It also ensures the protection and promotion of vulnerable groups and of all minorities. It

ensures their development.

2.1.2 Land Regime in Mining Concessions as per the Mining Law

The key DRC legislation pertaining to the RAP is the Mining Code (Law No 007/2002 of July 11,

2002). The Code sets out in detail the way in which mining projects of any type may be undertaken

(including quarrying). The Mining Code is supported by the Mining Regulations, which implement the

provisions of the Code. The requirements for compensation are included in Title XI, Chapter II,

Article 281, and are as follows

Article 281: Compensation for the occupants of the land.

Any occupation of land depriving the rightful holders of enjoyment of the surface rights, any

modification rendering the land unfit for cultivation; shall cause the holder or lessee of the mining

and/or quarry rights, at the request of the rightful owners of surface rights, and at their convenience,

to pay fair compensation, corresponding either to the rent or the value of the land at the time of its

occupation, plus 50%.

Land, as referred to in the above paragraph, means the ground on which the individuals have always

carried out or are effectively carrying out any activity.

Amicable settlement of the dispute may be made by any legitimate method other than resorting to

the courts, especially by compromise, settlement, arbitration or before an Officer of the Judiciary

Police or an Officer of the Public Ministry.

In the absence of an amicable settlement between the parties within 3 months from the date on

which the dispute arises, the compensation shall be determined by the competent court pursuant to

the rules on judicial organisation and jurisdiction in force in the DRC.

However, the usual occupant of the land may, in agreement with the holder, continue to exercise his

right to cultivate the land provided the work in the fields does not hinder the mining activities. The

owner of the surface rights shall then no longer continue to construct buildings on it.

Lastly, simply passing through the land does not entitle to pay compensation if no damage results

there-from. The act of passing must take place with a view to best conserving the environment.

2.1.3 Land Policy

An important section of the Mining Code deals with restrictions on the occupation of land (Title XI,

Chapter II: Holder’s relations with the occupants of the land Article 279: Restrictions on the

occupation of land). The provisions of the section were particularly relevant to the finalisation of

infrastructure routes and sites. Information on the location of archaeological sites and cemeteries

were collected during the baseline studies and were considered in the layout design process. The

text of the Article reads as follows:



Article 279: Restrictions on the occupation of the land

Except with the consent of the competent authorities, no person may occupy land:

• Reserved for cemeteries;

• Containing archaeological remains or a national monument;

• Situated on or less than ninety metres from a dam or a building belonging to the State;

• Close to National Defence installations;

• Within an airport;

• Reserved for railway projects;

• Reserved for the planting of young trees or forest plantations;

• Situated less than ninety metres from the boundary of a village, a town, a municipality or a city;

• On a street, a road, a motorway;

• Within a national park.

Unless there is consent from the owner or legal occupant, no person may occupy land situated less than:

• One hundred and eighty metres from occupied, unoccupied or temporarily unoccupied houses or buildings;

• Forty five metres from land hoed and ploughed for farm cultivation;

• Ninety metres from a farm breeding cattle, having a reservoir, a dam or private water reserve.

The Governor of the Province, on the advice of the competent department of the Mines Authority may request the setting up of Perimeters of protection of any dimension within which exploration and exploitation of mineral substances may be subject to certain conditions or may be prohibited, without the holder of the mining or quarry title being able to claim any compensation whatsoever. Said Perimeters are for the protection of buildings and built-up areas, water sources, roads, civil engineering and public utilities works, as in all other cases where it would be necessary in the general public interest.

Compensation representing the total expenses relating to the works or structures demolished or abandoned is however owed by the public entity concerned in the event the holder has to demolish or abandon works or structures duly erected by or commenced by him with a view to exploiting those Perimeters, prior to the setting up of said Perimeters.

2.1.4 Traditional Authority and Customary Land Tenure

Congolese law establishes that all land belongs to the State, and it regards occupants using the land

as “concessionaires.” Under customary and traditional law (as opposed to the law of the State), the

local traditional governance structures, namely the Chefs de Terre, or Land Chiefs, are responsible

within each community for distributing land and performing various ceremonies that help maintain

good relations between the people and their ancestors. However, under Article 53 of Law 73-021 of

20 July 1973, the State proclaimed that all the land in DRC belonged to it and only the State could

govern the sale of land, thus in theory depriving the Land Chiefs of their customary right.

The State does not enforce this provision very frequently, as with the application of the DRC’s formal

law relating to concessions tending to be restricted to urban areas and large holdings of productive

land in rural areas. In most rural areas, such as the NYA concession area, customary law governs.



Accordingly, the traditional chiefs, who are not salaried, collect a fee for services rendered in the

discharge of their responsibilities, such as in dispute resolution or in the organization of community

functions. They sometimes also charge a fee for the allocation of land, although this is in

contravention to the law.

Based upon this system, land can be held in customary ownership through generations of a family.

The local population of a given village has a usage right over the land given by the village or land

chief. This land can be cultivated, or used as a reserve, and reserved land can be left either fallow or

entirely unused. Land is usually not sold, but a ceremonial gift is expected from the new land user to

the chief and/or to the former concessionaire. The allocation system based on lineages applies to

residential areas, bush fields, and prepared land.

However, fields lying fallow for longer than a few years, forests, and water bodies are considered

communal property under the authority of the village’s Chef de Terre.

In practice, the majority of affected farmers in the infrastructure footprints indicated that they do not

pay a yearly rent, but only provided a gift when they received the land. Impacts to land through

acquisition can impact a Land Chief’s ability to allocate land. In addition, Congolese law recognizes

the legal role played by the Chef de Groupement and Territorial Administrator in connection with

disputes with and between Land Chiefs. As there is only one Land Chief in the project area, dispute

such as this are not anticipated, however, NYA should respect the legal system in place in the DRC

and respects the traditional and cultural integrity of the village and land chiefs’ role in society.

As the majority of plots in the in the lease area have been bought and sold informally without any

formal registration through the cadastral office, there is little legitimate documentation of these sales,

making it difficult for NYA to determine whether someone claiming ownership of land, is the

legitimate owner or possessor.

2.2 Good International Industry Practice Guidelines Whilst seeking to comply with DRC legislation, international policies, directives and guidelines will

provide an overarching framework for the NYA RAP.

2.2.1 IFC Performance Standards

The IFC Performance Standards provide internationally recognised standards for a range of

environmental and social risks and impact management including resettlement. The most relevant of

these is IFC PS5 on Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement. PS5 seeks to provide a

framework for responsible and transparent management of physical and economic displacement.

This Standard defines different types of involuntary resettlement, explains the need for negotiated

settlements (as opposed to expropriation), highlights the requirement to improve living conditions at

resettlement sites, and outlines different approaches replacing collective assets and compensation

entitlements.

The main objectives of PS5 are:



To avoid or at least minimize involuntary resettlement wherever possible by exploring alternative

options;

To mitigate adverse social and economic impacts from land acquisition;

Ensuring that resettlement activities are implemented with appropriate disclosure, consultation

and informed participation;

To improve or at least restore the livelihoods and standards of living of displaced persons;

To improve living conditions through provision of adequate housing with security of tenure at

resettlement sites.

Among many themes, PS5 is clear on a number of parameters regarding a RAP exercise. The

following are relevant here:

On project design - Paragraph 7 of PS5 states that, “the client will consider feasible alternative

project designs to avoid or at least minimise physical or economic displacement, while balancing

environmental, social, and financial costs and benefits”.

On Resettlement Planning and Implementation - Paragraph 11 of PS5 states that “where

involuntary resettlement is unavoidable, the client will carry out a census with appropriate socio-

economic baseline data to identify the person who will be displaced by the project, to determine

who will be eligible for compensation and assistance, and to discourage inflow of people who are

ineligible for these benefits”. Paragraph 12 further states that, “the client will also establish

procedures to monitor and evaluate the implementation of resettlement plans and take corrective

action where necessary”. Thus, the implementation of a RAP will be considered complete when

the adverse impacts of the resettlement have been addressed in a manner that is consistent with

the objectives stated in the resettlement plan framework as well as the objectives of PS5.

On displacement - Paragraph 14 of PS5 identifies three different classes of displaced persons

as follows: (i) persons who have formal legal rights to the land they occupy; (ii) persons who do

not have formal legal rights to the land, but have a claim to land that is recognised or

recognisable under the national laws; or (iii) persons who do not have recognisable legal right or

claim to the land they occupy. The census establishes the status of the displaced persons.

On compensation - PS5 Paragraph 16 states that, “if people living in the project area must

move to another location, the client will (i) offer the displaced persons choices among feasible

resettlement options, including adequate replacement housing or cash compensation where

appropriate, and (ii) provide relocation assistance suited to the needs of the poor and the

vulnerable. Alternative housing and/or cash compensation will be made available prior to

relocation”. Paragraph 18 highlights that, “the client is not required to compensate or assist

opportunistic settlers who encroach on the project area after the cut-off date”.

Emphasis is placed on consultation and disclosure, monitoring and evaluation of the RAP and the

establishment of a grievance mechanism to receive and address specific concerns about

compensation and relocation that are raised by displaced persons or members of the host

communities, including a recourse mechanism designed to resolve disputes in an impartial manner.

Table 2-1 below compares IFC Performance Standards to Congolese law. Where Congolese legal

requirements differ from IFC standards and guidelines, NYA has committed to apply whichever of

the two sets of guidelines is most favourable to PAPs (these blocks have been shaded).



Table 2-1: Comparative analysis of applicable DRC legislation and the IFC’s PS5

Issue DRC Legislation IFC Performance Standard 5

Eligibility for compensation for loss of access to, or use of land.

“Right holders” to land are entitled to compensation.

All occupants, regardless of land tenure status (for example, possessors or titled landowners) and including both physically and economically displaced are eligible for compensation.

Establishment of a cut-off date to determine eligibility.

No specific provision is mentioned. If a procedure is not provided by host government legislation, a cut-off date should be established by the Project and widely disseminated.

Cash and in-kind compensation.

Requires a Project to pay compensation in cash.

Strongly favours in-kind compensation particularly when land-based livelihoods are affected, including provision of replacement housing and replacement land.

Calculation of compensation. At “real replacement cost” plus 50%, “except if the property is reinstated”.

Compensation is at replacement cost, which includes market value, transaction and labour cost.

Consultation with PAPs and host communities.

No specific provision. Engagement at all stages of project, and outcomes of consultation to be integrated into design and implementation of the compensation process.

Resettlement Assistance. No specific provision. Mandatory.

2.2.2 Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan

The IFC’s Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan provides guidance on developing

RAPs. The requirements of a comprehensive RAP are listed below:

Identification of project impacts and affected populations;

A legal framework for land acquisition and compensation;

A compensation framework;

A description of resettlement assistance and restoration of livelihood activities;

A detailed budget;

An implementation schedule;

A description of organizational responsibilities;

A framework for public consultation, participation, and development planning;

A description of provisions for redress of grievances; and,

A framework for monitoring, evaluation, and reporting.

The handbook also stipulates that affected people be compensated for temporary and permanent

losses of physical assets, revenue, and income. It clearly outlines compensation procedures and

provides detailed explanations on compensation valuations and replacement costs, described below:

Compensation is a replacement for a physical asset or a resource that is acquired or affected by

a project at the time the asset needs to be replaced;



The rate of compensation for lost assets must be calculated at full replacement cost, that is, the

market value of the asset plus transaction costs;

Replacement costs for agricultural land should be based on the market value of land of equal

productive use or potential located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of preparation

to levels similar or better than those of the affected land, and the cost of any registration and

transfer taxes; and,

In determining replacement costs, depreciation of the asset and the value of salvage materials

are not taken in to account, nor is the value of benefits to be derived from the project deducted

from the valuation of an affected asset.

IFC PS5 is explicit on the avoidance of cash compensation where possible. The RAP entitlement

framework was developed with this principle in mind.

2.2.3 African Development Bank Policy on Involuntary Resettlement

The AfDB policy on involuntary resettlement was developed in 20031. The primary goal of the policy

is to ensure that people displaced by AfDB-funded projects are treated equitably, and that they share

the benefits of such projects. The policy provides a useful African benchmark that largely

complements World Bank Group (WBG) standards. In line with an overarching focus on poverty

reduction, the AfDB resettlement policy moves beyond mitigation to the promotion of sustainable

community and society.

Key principles and requirements of the policy are the following:

A resettlement plan must be developed where physical displacement and loss of economic

assets are unavoidable. The plan should ensure that displacement is minimised, and that

resettlement is undertaken as part of a development programme (in line with the views of the

WBG);

Displaced persons and host communities should be meaningfully consulted early in the planning

process, and involved in the implementation of the resettlement programme;

Attention must be given to disadvantaged groups, including the impoverished, the landless, the

elderly, women and children, and ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities;

Attention must be given to the integration of resettled people into host communities, minimising

the impacts on those communities;

Displaced persons must be compensated for their losses at full replacement cost; and,

The total cost of the project must include the full cost of all resettlement activities.

The IFC and AfDB require one of two levels of resettlement plan: a Full Resettlement Plan where

200 or more people will experience resettlement effects (including economic displacement); and an

Abbreviated Resettlement Plan when less than 200 people will be subject to such effects. The

Project will not affect more than 200 people, including economic displacement; despite this an

equivalent of a full plan was developed in accordance with IFC PS5 and AfDB principles.

1 African Development Bank, 2003: Involuntary Resettlement Policy. Sustainable Development and Poverty Reduction Unit



2.3 Company Policy and Standards NYA does not have a specific resettlement policy; however, there are other policies that will need to

be taken into consideration during the resettlement process. This includes their Human Rights Policy

and the Sustainable Development Policy.

2.3.1 Human Rights Policy

NYA’s key human rights principles to be taken into account during the resettlement process include

the following:

Promote human rights through engagement with host governments, local communities, and our

employees and contractors;

Ensure that all employees treat everyone in and around our operations with dignity and respect;

Consult with our neighbouring communities with regards to operations development;

Fully cooperate with any responsible human rights investigation and support appropriate

punishment for proven violations;

Protect all employees who report suspected human rights violations;

Provide appropriate cultural and human rights education, training and guidance to all relevant

staff, including security personnel;

Ensure fair treatment and work conditions for all employees, including rights to freedom of

association and collective bargaining, and prohibit forced, compulsory or child labour; and,

Implement policies and practices designed to eliminate harassment and unfair discrimination in

all aspects of our activities.

2.3.2 Sustainable Development Policy

The NYA Sustainable Development Policy is focussed on responsible management practices that

avoid and minimize adverse health, safety, social or environmental impacts, and enhance the

benefits associated with NYA activities, products or services.

The NYA Environment, Health and Safety, and Community (EHS&C) Management System outlines

responsibilities to implement this Policy and requires the following:

Engage with stakeholders to ensure that governance and decision-making in the company

considers and is responsive to legitimate suggestions, expectations, views or concerns of

stakeholders;

Identify hazards and avoid and reduce risks where there is potential to cause injury or illness to

people, or to adversely impact the environment or the community;

Provide safe work places and systems of work, empower employees and contractors to address

unsafe or hazardous situations and carry out their work in a manner that does not present a risk

to themselves, others or the environment;

Support the recovery and rehabilitation of employees in the event of work-related injury or

illness;

Set objectives and targets that promote the efficient use of resources, including energy, water

and materials, the minimization of wastes and emissions and the prevention of pollution;

Develop and implement a community development programme that focusses on community

empowerment and well-being;



Comply with relevant EHS&C legal requirements and other commitments including international

standards;

Ensure human resources and labour system incorporates the requirements of fair labour practice

relating to issues such as human rights, non-discrimination, equal opportunity, child and forced

labour, freedom of association, skills development and training, conditions at work, employment

relationships and grievance resolution;

Require contractors and suppliers to meet the requirements of this Policy and the management

system; and,

Regularly monitor, review and report sustainability performance.

Copies of both the Human Rights Policy and the Sustainable Development Policy are included in

Appendix B.



3 Census and Asset Inventory With consideration of the final layout and design, it was confirmed that Yuku Village was the only

settlement to be affected by physical displacement and therefore it was the only village included in

the census and asset inventory. This section of the report describes the census and asset inventory

process that was carried out in the Yuku Village as well with field owners affected by economic

displacement.

3.1 Approach and Methodology Undertaking a household census and asset inventory requires extensive planning. The following

approach and methodologies were implemented:

3.1.1 Approach

SRK Consulting undertook a census and inventory at household level in Yuku Village between 8 and

21 June 2013 in anticipation of physical and economic displacement. Owners of fields to be affected

by economic displacement as a result of these fields being situated within the project footprint were

also identified.

The census and asset inventory was updated between 7 and 11 July 2014 for the purposes of

finalising the RAP with consideration of the final project design. The number of households

increased from eight in 2013 to thirteen in 2014.

Apart from the households in Yuku Village, an asset inventory was also conducted with owners of

agricultural fields within the project footprint. This process was also completed in July 2014.

Following the completion of the original census, further work and verification was completed by NYA

in late 2014 and early 2015. The final number of impacted fields was confirmed as 78.The complete

field database is included in Appendix E. In addition, participant mapping exercises were held with

representatives of Yuku, Kokolo, Mbemba and Mbamba villages to gain an understanding of these

communities’ dependency on ecosystems for livelihoods.

Data for the census and asset inventory included details on affected land and assets, household

structures and basic socioeconomic status for each household (e.g. household size, age, gender,

relationships etc.). The census and inventory was conducted by visiting each of the 13 households in

Yuku Village to administer the surveys. During the survey the team verified affected assets including

structures, houses, subsistence gardens and fields in the presence of affected household members

from Yuku Village.

The census served five important and interrelated functions:

Enumerating and collecting basic information on the seven additional households;

Confirmation of the information collected from six households still present since June 2013;

Confirming the registering of the affected population by locality as established in 2013;

Confirming and updating the list of legitimate beneficiaries;

Laying a framework for subsequent research needed to establish fair compensation rates and to

design, monitor, and evaluate sustainable income restoration or development intervention; and,

Providing a baseline for monitoring and evaluation.

Data collected in the field was used to prepare a database, and to assist with determining

entitlements, eligibility and compensation packages.



3.1.2 Methodology

Community Consultation

Prior to commencing the field work in 2014, NYA informed the community leadership of SRK’s

planned visit to conduct the census and inventory as well as the mapping exercises. The leaders

then informed individual households at Yuku, Kokolo, Mbemba and Mbamba villages about the

intended visit.

Local leadership raised concerns that SRK was conducting a second visit with a similar purpose to

that of 2013. NYA informed leadership that the purpose of the visit was to update the information

collected in 2013 in preparation for the commencement of the project. To address concerns, a local

government official was invited to observe the process in order to confirm the validity and

transparency of the process.

Use of Fieldworkers

Five fieldworkers were deployed to conduct the mapping exercise, census and asset inventory.

Three fieldworkers were from the SRK office and two fieldworkers were from NYA. All the

fieldworkers were involved in the census and asset inventory conducted in 2013. These fieldworkers

are experienced socio-economic consultants, which ensured quality data gathering throughout the

process. Four of the fieldworkers were fluent in French and English.

The NYA fieldworkers and one SRK fieldworker covered the areas affected by NYA’s infrastructure

including the overburden, waste management facility, the plant, the quarry and the access road. The

census and asset inventory for Yuku Village were completed by the two remaining SRK fieldworkers.

Census and Asset Inventory Preparation

Prior to commencing the census and asset inventory, fieldworkers convened to confirm the schedule

and fieldworkers’ respective roles, responsibilities and activities. All the fieldworkers were

experienced in data gathering and were familiar with this particular project and intensive training was

therefore not provided; however, the data gathering methods and instruments were discussed in

detail to ensure a consolidated approach to the data gathering by team members.

Census and Asset Inventory Questionnaire

The questionnaires that were developed for the census and asset inventory in June 2013 were

adapted slightly to capture information that was essential for the development of the final RAP. A

total of 13 questionnaires were completed during the Yuku Village census and asset inventory. The

census and asset inventory questionnaire template and the database are presented in Appendix A.

Data Collection and Capturing

Structures, residential and agricultural land were identified, measured, photographed and GPS

coordinates recorded in the presence of affected households. As per the local regulations, the

measurement of all fields was done in the presence of a local government authority and the owner of

field. Quality control was achieved by the SRK field manager reviewing completed questionnaires.

Census and asset inventory data was captured in Microsoft Excel and SPSS. GPS points were

overlaid onto Google Earth satellite imagery and the layout of the project infrastructure to confirm

impacted fields. Information was compared with the June 2013 database for quality control

purposes, to identify trends and to determine significant changes.



Census Update and Verification

Given the period of time between the completion of the final census in July 2014 and the proposed

completion of the new Yuku village in February 2016, it will be necessary for the NYA resettlement

team to conduct an update and verification of the current census data. This purpose of this update

will be to confirm the demographics of the affected households. It should be noted that eligibility has

already been defined and disseminated and therefore no new households will be eligible for

relocation.

SRK Consultin

HARA/LIBB

4 SoThis

upd

wel

bee

4.1 HisThe

in th

occ

Yuk

loca

Cur

curr

occ

und

Pho

4.2 DeIn th

cen

from

left

Eig

hou

com

4.2.1 Po

The

the

red

pro

ng: Project No: 4

ocio-Ecs section pr

date of the i

lbeing of the

en developed

story ane Yuku Villag

he area. Afte

cupied by loc

ku Village is

ation). The v

rrently the v

rent chief o

cupants rent.

der their curre

oto 1: Yu

emographe period be

nsus conduct

m eight to thi

the village.

ht househo

uses/structur

mpensation.

pulation S

e Yuku Villag

village acco

uction from

bably be att

492484: NYA RA

conomresents an u

nformation c

e affected ho

d for the Proj

d Locatige was origin

er completio

cal people pre

s located be

illage is appr

village is pre

of Mbemba v

. No official

ent mining le

uku Village

phy etween the fir

ted in July 2

irteen. In tota

olds occupie

es in July

Structure

ge increased

ording to the

5.1 people

tributed to th

AP

mic Basupdated soci

contained in

ouseholds po

ect.

on nally establis

n of their res

edominantly

etween the

roximately 0.

edominantly

village claim

title resides

ease.

rst household

014 by SRK

al, six house

ed eight ho

2014. Thirt

d by 22% be

e last censu

per househ

he fact that

NYA RAP

seline –io-economic

the FRAP

ost resettleme

hed by Belg

search the c

from Kinsua

quarry and

.7 km north o

occupied by

ms that Yuk

with the ch

d census co

K, the numbe

eholds moved

ouses in 2

teen househ

etween June

us (2014). T

hold in June

job seekers

– Yukubaseline of

of 2013 and

ent. A comp

ian Scientist

camp was va

a Village tribe

cement pla

of the cemen

y people orig

u Village be

ief and the

nducted in J

er of househo

d into the vill

013, whilst

holds were

2013 and J

This gives an

e 2013. The

s had move

Villagf the affecte

d will be use

rehensive ce

s in the 1960

acated. In the

es.

nt site (refe

nt plant site.

ginating from

elongs to hi

houses are

une 2013 an

olds residing

lage since 20

13 househ

therefore id

July 2014, w

n average h

decrease i

d into the v

e ed Yuku Villa

ed to monito

ensus databa

0’s for resea

e 1970’s the

er to Figure

m Mbemba

im and is c

actually own

nd the secon

g in the villag

013 and two

holds occup

dentified as

with 55 peopl

household si

n household

village, in an

Page 20

January 2016

age. It is an

or the social

ase has also

rch activities

e village was

1-1 for the

Village. The

charging the

ned by NYA

d household

ge increased

o households

pied eleven

eligible for

e occupying

ze of 4.3, a

d size could

nticipation of

0

n

l

o

s

s

e

e

e

A

d

d

s

n

r

g

a

d

f

SRK Consultin

HARA/LIBB

gain

the

The

villa

last

4.2.2 Ag

Atte

imp

and

rese

Rep

201

and

hou

birth

The

gen

leve

you

pote

bre

Fig

Sour

The

fem

ng: Project No: 4

ning employm

community,

e situation in

age on a freq

t year in the v

e and Gen

empting to u

portant part o

d women ar

ettlement.

ported ages

13 to 2014, w

d that formal

useholds hav

hs), and with

e Figure belo

nerally young

el of depend

unger. There

entially incr

akdown of vu

ure 4-1: Ag

rce: SRK house

e community

males and the

492484: NYA RA

ment from th

which is dow

n 2014 confi

quent basis.

village. Of in

nder

understand th

of the RAP p

re more vu

of the same

which allude

schooling w

ve changed

h some mem

ow illustrates

g with 57% o

dency on the

e is only one

ease the v

ulnerable ho

ge distributi

ehold census 20

y comprises 3

e rest (11) by

AP

he Project. Th

wn from 31 y

rms the con

The natural

terest is the

he age diffe

process. Cer

lnerable an

e household

s to the fact

will not neces

somewhat,

bers leaving

s the age dist

of the commu

e income ea

e household

ulnerability

useholds.

on

014

30 males (55

y males.

NYA RAP

his hypothes

years in June

nclusions dra

population g

number of tw

rences and

rtain age gro

d therefore

d members d

t that age is

ssarily comm

with addition

g families.

tribution of th

unity being 1

arners. Furth

d headed by

of this hou

5%) and 25

sis is support

e 2013 to 22

awn in 2013

growth is sm

wins in the v

gender strat

oups and gen

more susc

did not follow

not regarde

ence at a sp

nal members

he inhabitant

18 years of a

hermore, 21%

y a person

usehold. Se

females (45

ted by the dr

years in July

that people

all with only

illage, a total

tification with

nders, partic

ceptible to t

w a logical c

d as a key i

pecific age. T

s joining the

ts of Yuku V

age or under

% of the co

over 60 yea

ction 0 pro

5%), with two

rop in the ave

y 2014.

move in an

one birth rep

l of three set

hin the com

cularly the yo

the potentia

chronologica

ndicator of d

The composi

e family (apa

Village. The c

r, which indi

mmunity are

ars of age,

ovides a mo

o households

Page 21

January 2016

erage age of

nd out of the

ported in the

ts.

munity is an

oung, elderly

al rigours of

al order from

development

tion of some

art form new

community is

cates a high

e 7 years or

which could

ore detailed

s headed by

1

f

e

e

n

y

f

m

t

e

w

s

h

r

d

d

y



4.3 Education The educational levels of inhabitants are depicted in Table 4-1 below.

Table 4-1: Education levels of affected households

Level of Education 2013: Number of people 2014: Number of people

No education (under 7 years) 9 10

No education (over 7 years) 1 2

Attended/Attending Primary School 24 20

Attended/Attending Secondary School 12 23

Attended/Attending Tertiary Institution 0 0

Total 46 55

Source: SRK household census 2013 and 2014

Drawing on the data presented above, the following can be ascertained regarding education in the

affected households:

There are still several children under 7 years of age who do not have any education, mainly due

to a lack of pre-school facilities;

The majority of the population (36%) have attended or are currently attending primary school.

Most students attend primary school in Minkelo Village, approximately 3 km away;

There are two persons who do not have any education at all; this is a much older household

head and his spouse who never attended school. Their widowed daughter and her child do have

an education beyond primary school and are farmers. This situation potentially places this

household in a more vulnerable position;

While there is a relatively high attendance at primary and secondary level, the quality of

education and dropout rate is not reflected in these statistics; and,

There are no students completing secondary and moving onto different forms of tertiary

education. This is possibly due to financial constraints or the lack of tertiary institutions in the

area.

4.4 Health The census survey gathered information on the overall health of the Yuku Village including common

ailments and diseases and sources of treatment. An increase in reported malaria cases is evident

with five mentions in 2014 compared to two mentions in 2013 (Table 4-2).

Table 4-2: Prevalent ailments and diseases in the past 3 months

Ailment/Disease 2013: Number of reported incidents in last 3 months

2014: Number of reported incidents in last 3 months

Fever 2 1

Malaria 2 5

Headaches 1 -

Ear/Nose/Throat 1 -

Tumour 1 -

Eye Problems 1 -

Diarrhoea - 2

Flu - 1



Cyst - 1

Source: SRK household census, 2013 and 2014

Kimpese hospital and Minkelo Clinic are the closest health facilities to the Yuku Village. These are used by residents for all medical needs, including child birth. One family consulted an herbalist for a cough indicating that traditional medicine is not widely practiced nor sought in the community.

4.5 Employment, Income and Livelihoods

4.5.1 Employment

The majority of the adult population in Yuku Village (18 and over) are farmers with some children, under 18, also farming instead of going to school. Only one person was reported to be self-employed and one was formally employed supplementing his income with farming. The figures below reflect the number of people who are formally and not formally employed.

Table 4-3: Employment levels

Type of Employment Number of people**2013 Number of people**2014

Not formally employed 16 25

Formally employed 4 1


*Not formally employed includes people currently earning an income from farming activities and self-employed people

**The remainder of the population attends school or is too young to attend school

4.5.2 Income and Livelihoods

Eight households reported selling of crops as their primary source of income; two households reported livestock and crops as a primary source; two households respectively reported livestock sales, and livestock sales with hunting as their primary sources of income. The one household head earning an income from formal employment refrained from disclosing the monthly household income. Compared to 2013, the number of households earning an income from formal employment dropped from three to one household.

Monthly household income is a useful variable to consider because it brings to light the fact that although households are comprised of individual members of the community, income earning individuals are not spread equally throughout these households. Low or no income makes a household more vulnerable to the impacts that resettlement can pose.

The table below provides a breakdown of the monthly income of the affected households, but should be interpreted with caution since households are reluctant to share exact figures regarding household income. The majority of households (five) in 2014 fell in the $1-$50 income category. With the majority of households in the community earning between $1 and $160 per month, even small additional monthly expenses will have a detrimental effect on them. This needs to be taken into account during the resettlement.



Table 4-4: Average household monthly income

Average monthly income Number of households, 2013 Number of households, 2014

$0 0 0

$1 – $50 (CDF 46 000) 1 5

$51 – $100 (CDF 92 000) 1 1

$101- $160 (CDF 150 000) 2 3

$161 – $250 (CDF 230 000) 2 0

$251 - $300 (CDF 280 000) 1 2

$301 + 2 2

Total no. of households 9 13


4.5.3 Agriculture

All of the households in the Yuku Village are currently involved in agricultural activities. All of the

households derive a considerable proportion of their income from the sale of crops and livestock.

The situation has changed significantly from the previous year, where only four of the nine

households interviewed were dependent on crops and livestock for an income.

The crops grown in the fields include mostly cassava and also peanuts, beans, maize, sweet

potatoes, tomatoes, cabbages, chilli and onions. Numerous fruit trees were also recorded in the

village including banana, orange, avocado, and pineapple trees. The produce from fruit trees is used

predominantly for subsistence use and was not reported as a source of income.

4.5.4 Livestock

While three households in the community derive an income from livestock sales and/or animal

products, only a small portion of the community keep any livestock including a small number of goats

and pigs and several chickens. Livestock includes goats, pigs and chickens.

4.5.5 Charcoal Production and Sales

Several households in the Yuku Village are involved in the production and sale of charcoal as a

source of income. Charcoal (makala) is used extensively for cooking in the project area and as

alternative fossil fuel sources are largely unavailable, charcoal is in high demand. In this context, the

price of charcoal has increased significantly in recent years, making the production and sale more

rewarding, but placing stress on the limited incomes of households.

4.6 Housing All of the houses in the Yuku Village was constructed in the 1960’s. The houses were constructed

using brick and cement and were plastered, with wooden door and window frames. They all have

corrugated iron roofing. The houses are severely run down; many are cracked and missing window

and door frames.

All of the houses in the village are based around the same basic designs and range between 25 m2

and 35 m2. Two structures have been built to accommodate two families each.

SRK Consultin

HARA/LIBB

Pho

4.6.1 Inf

The

imp

leve

an

bud

4.6.2 Tra

Due

com

road

was

emp

Typ

ove

take

4.6.3 Re

Dur

ther

bur

4.6.4 Sa

The

indi

and

latri

han

san

The

imp

for e

ng: Project No: 4

otos 2 and 3

rastructur

e importance

portant in the

el of services

overview of

dgeting.

ansport

e to the rur

mmunity. The

d through th

s often ment

ployment op

pically people

er 3 km away

e into consid

fuse Rem

ring the hous

re is no mu

ied it.

nitation

e availability

icator of a co

d the situatio

ines, which

nd dug pit lat

nitation servic

e provision o

prove the life

each new ho

492484: NYA RA

3: Hou

re and Ser

e of establis

e RAP proce

s to be prov

f what leve

ral and rem

e village lies

he area, and

tioned that t

portunities a

e walk to the

y. It will be i

deration these

oval

sehold censu

nicipal refus

and access

ommunity’s s

on seems to

were often i

trine, whilst t

ces and were

of improved s

styles and q

ousehold at t

AP

using struct

rvices

shing the le

ess for a num

ided to the c

l of services

mote nature

approximate

the main ac

he lack of tr

nd access to

eir place of w

mportant for

e factors.

us, affected h

se removal s

to sanitation

social wellbe

o have dete

n a state of

the rest of th

e therefore u

sanitation fac

uality of life

the host site.

NYA RAP

tures

evel of serv

mber of reas

community w

s will be re

of the Yuku

ely 3 km to t

ccess point f

ransport in t

o various pub

work, or use

r the resettle

households w

service, all h

n services is

eing. There a

eriorated sin

disrepair. In

he household

using the bus

cilities will be

of the comm

.

vices provide

sons. Firstly

when they ar

equired at th

u Village, tr

the north of

for taxis and

the area was

blic amenitie

bicycles, wh

ement, espec

were asked h

households

an importan

are no forma

ce 2013. In

n 2014 one

ds reported t

sh.

e an excellen

munity. NYA

ed to the co

, it allows fo

e resettled.

he host site

ransport is a

the N1, whic

d buses. Dur

s a contribut

s.

hile students

cially the loc

how they dis

indicated tha

t social serv

al sanitation

2013 most

household re

that they did

nt opportunit

are currently

ommunity a

or the same

Secondly, it

e, allowing f

a serious is

ch is the prim

ring the cens

ting factor to

s walk to sch

cation of the

posed of the

at they eithe

vice, and can

services in Y

t households

reported hav

d not have ac

ty for the res

y constructin

Page 25

January 2016

t present is

or improved

provides for

for accurate

ssue for the

mary access

sus survey it

o the lack of

hool which is

host site, to

eir refuse. As

er burned or

n often be an

Yuku Village

s utilised pit

ing use of a

ccess to any

settlement to

g pit latrines

5

s

d

r

e

e

s

t

f

s

o

s

r

n

e

t

a

y

o

s

SRK Consultin

HARA/LIBB

Pho

4.6.5 Wa

Wa

the

of a

Bor

upg

spri

4.6.6 En

Tab

use

Tab

Sour

En

Ele

Ba

Pa

Ca

Wo

Ch

ng: Project No: 4

oto 4: Cu

ater

ter in the Yu

north. The w

access to pot

rehole water

grading the c

ing currently

ergy Sour

ble 4-5 summ

ed by the Yuk

Households

In 2013 ba

lighting, wh

Candles we

and efficien

In 2013 wo

were used b

ble 4-5: So

rce: SRK house

nergy Sourc

ectricity

attery operated

araffin Lamp

andles

ood

harcoal

492484: NYA RA

urrent pit lat

uku Village i

water from th

table water is

r is not an o

current natu

used by Mb

rces

marises the

ku Village ho

s do not have

attery operat

ilst battery o

ere not report

cy;

ood was mos

by all househ

ources and u

ehold census, 20

ce

d torch

AP

trine constru

s sourced so

he river is not

s an importa

option at the

ral spring w

emba village

sources of e

ouseholds. S

e access to e

ed torches

perated torch

ted to be use

st commonly

holds.

uses of ener

013 and 2014

Number of

0

8

7

2

9

6

NYA RAP

uction

olely from th

t potable and

nt considera

e host site d

which will pro

e.

energy and

ome of the k

electricity;

and paraffin

hes were the

ed in 2014, a

y used for c

rgy

Households

Lighti

Cooki

he Yuku Rive

d therefore h

ation for rese

due to acces

ovide the vill

the manner

key points are

n lamps wer

e primary sou

and his migh

cooking, whil

s 2013 N

ng

0

1

6

0

ng

1

1

er which lies

as to be boil

ttlement.

ss limitations

lage with po

in which th

e:

e the prima

urce in 2014

t be as a res

st in 2014 b

Number of H

0

11

6

0

12

12

s approximat

led before us

s therefore

otable water

ese energy

ary source o

;

sult of its cos

both wood a

Households

Page 26

January 2016

tely 300m to

se. Provision

NYA will be

. This is the

sources are

f energy for

st, availability

and charcoal

2014

6

o

n

e

e

e

r

y

l



4.7 Significant Cultural Heritage Sites ECTECH identified a single grave in the Yuku Village area. No other heritage or cultural site was

identified.

Should any resettlement be required, NYA will ensure that relocation of community and individual

sacred sites occurs with culturally appropriate respect and consideration in order to preserve their

cultural significance and importance.

Relocation of graves, if necessary, will occur in a culturally appropriate manner with full participation

of affected elders, community members and families. These may include an offer of financial

compensation and completion of appropriate rituals. Elder men and women would be included

explicitly in the process such that their knowledge of the traditional ways would be incorporated into

planning and implementing the relocation of graves.

4.8 Vulnerable Groups The IFC defines vulnerable persons as those who, “by virtue of gender, ethnicity, age, physical or

mental disability, economic disadvantage, or social status, may be more adversely affected by

resettlement than others and who may be limited in their ability to claim or take advantage of

resettlement assistance and related development benefits”

Additional assistance should be provided to households, which as a result of their “vulnerability” are

unable to fully participate in the resettlement process or the livelihood restoration programme.

Generally households that will be most vulnerable include:

Female-headed households (particularly where the household head is unemployed and they lack

extended family support);

Elderly-headed households;

Physically impaired or disabled-headed households (where the household head is physically or

mentally challenged);

Households with high levels of unemployment (where all household members are unemployed);

and,

Child-headed households (where households are headed by children under the age of 21).

There are various groups in the community that may be particularly vulnerable to the impacts of

resettlement. These vulnerable groups can be categorised as follows:

Children and Youth: There are 12 children seven years and younger and 17 youth between the

ages of seven and eighteen in the Yuku Village. The children and youth most at risk in this

context are those in households headed by single parents or by relatives replacing parents

(grandparents, aunt and uncles). In one household elderly grandparents and a widowed mother

are responsible for five children from eight to 15 years old. The family earns an income by selling

crops. In another, a widowed farmer has six children from six to 18 years old.

Women: Amongst women, groups requiring particular support are single mothers and widows.

In both cases, the women often find themselves caring for a household whilst also seeking to

provide a living for them. Some of the primary needs for women include access to health

facilities and job opportunities. Apart from the household mentioned in the previous paragraph

there are two single mothers, each with a child of eight years old. These females rent their

accommodation and sell crops for an income.



Elderly: As mentioned previously, one household is headed by an elderly person over the age of

75. Together with his wife, these people are the only people over the age of 60. Access to health

facilities and transportation are some of the primary needs for these people. Elderly people

mostly at risk are those without support.

Disabled and Chronically Ill: There is currently not one physically disabled person in the

community.

Three households were identified as being potentially vulnerable during the resettlement process for

the following reasons:

Table 4-6: Potentially vulnerable households

Household Number Potential for vulnerability

HH 3

Widowed father

Low income earning household

Six children of which four children are under 11

HH 4

Widowed mother

Elderly household head and spouse

Low income earning household

Five children of which one child is under eight years old

HH 10 (1)

Widowed mother

One child of eight

Renting accommodation

HH10 (2)

Widowed mother

One child of eight

Renting accommodation

Households that have been identified as being vulnerable will receive specific attention regarding

livelihood restoration and resettlement assistance as detailed in the Livelihood Restoration Plan

(LRP).

4.9 Implications for Resettlement From the socio-economic baseline, it is clear that affected households are predominantly poor relying extensively on agricultural activities for income. Through the LRP (refer to Section 11), NYA will be able to ensure that the livelihoods of these households will not deteriorate as a result of physical and economic displacement.

There are no clear governance structures in the community, with no clear roles and responsibilities. Therefore it will be important that organisational structures (outlined in Section 6) are involved in the implementation process by assisting NYA with gaining access to the community.

With this context in mind, resettlement prompted by NYA activities should:

Minimise impacts on livelihoods and where impacts are unavoidable implement sustainable livelihood restoration programmes in partnership with the affected community;

Consider vulnerable people, and find ways to support and monitor them during the RAP implementation process; and,

Monitor the resettlement process and its implications for the affected population (refer to Section 13).



4.10 Census Verification Following the completion of the census in July 2014, NYA were advised that a verification process would be necessary to update the current database prior to resettlement. Due to the length of time between census and RAP implementation is anticipated that some changes may have occurred within the Yuku community. This process is due to be carried out in January 2016 with the following objective:

Verification of the current census database, including household demographics;

Confirm current household owners and allocate new houses;

Update the current household database where necessary; and,

Ongoing engagement and progress updates.

5 Resettlement Related Impacts The resettlement of the Yuku Village will have numerous potential impacts. These impacts will range

from physical impacts on various assets, economic impacts, social impacts and potential impacts on

the host community.

Further to these impacts will be the impact of economic displacement on numerous households with

fields with in the footprint of the proposed project infrastructure.

5.1 Land Acquisition The cement plant will require approximately 61 hectares of land, and the quarry and overburden

storage site 45 ha each. The total footprint area of the project and associated facilities is

approximately 192 ha, consisting of state owned land (refer to Figure 1-2 for the location of this

infrastructure).

The use of this land results in the physical displacement of a total of 13 households, and associated

immovable assets in the Yuku Village. Land acquisition will also result in economic displacement for

households in the Yuku Village and other households who have fields within the infrastructure

footprints.

This section therefore focusses on the physical and economic displacement of the Yuku Village

households and economic displacement of households other than those in Yuku Village.

5.1.1 Summary of Physical Impacts

During the Yuku Village census and asset inventory, a summary of all the immovable physical assets

was recorded. These assets will be compensated for according to the entitlement matrix. The

entitlement matrix can be found in Section 9. Table 5-1 details the physical assets that were

recorded in the community.



Table 5-1: Summary of impacted physical assets

Affected Category No. Summary of impacts Mitigation Measure

Total number of affected housing structures

11 There are 11 houses in the Yuku Village that will be affected.

All physical structures will be compensated for in line with the entitlement matrix and compensation framework (refer to Section 9).

Total number of affected households

13

Two structures are separated into two sections each, therefore there are 13 families living in 11 structures.

Total number of additional structures affected

3 There are 3 animal enclosures that will be affected.

Number of affected public facilities and amenities

0 There are no public facilities such as schools, clinics, etc. in the Yuku Village.

Not applicable.

Impacted number of graves 1

Number of graves identified during the census and asset inventory which will potentially be affected by relocation.

If possible the grave will remain in situ, otherwise it will be moved in accordance with DRC law and good international industry practice.

Number of businesses affected

0 There are no businesses in the Yuku Village that will be affected.

No mitigation measures required.

5.1.2 Summary of the Economic Impacts

The construction of the cement plant, the quarry, the overburden stockpile and the waste landfill will

result in the economic displacement of agricultural fields and trees. Yuku Village will be settled away

from their fruit trees and the impact on livelihoods will have to be monitored.

During the asset inventory in July 2014 all of the fields and trees belonging to households from Yuku

Village were recorded. In addition, the owners of fields and fruit trees from other villages within the

various infrastructure footprints were identified. Their field and tree locations were recorded, trees

counted and the fields measured.

Following the completion of the 2014 census additional affected fields were identified through the

grievance mechanism. This brought the total number of impacted fields to 78. Detail of these fields

and trees including owner names, GPS coordinates and compensation detail is included in Appendix

E.2

Following the verification of the field database in December 2014, the implementation of the

compensation process commenced. Currently, all 78 affected fields have been compensated for

standing crops in line with the entitlement matrix and replacement land has been identified and

secured. An example of the signed compensation agreements is included in Appendix F.

The crop cycles illustrated in Figure 5-1 have been taken into account when calculating the

compensation and moving dates for fields. Where possible affected people have been allowed to

complete the crop cycle and harvest their crops prior to relocation. This has resulted in some fields

still being cultivated in the footprint of the quarry. These fields will be relocated to their replacement

land following harvesting.

Where affected fruit trees have been actively cultivated and utilised the owners have been

compensated as per the entitlement matrix. As per customary law, where fruit trees have not been

2 The field database was updated by NYA in December 2014 following the initial census in July 2014.

SRK Consultin

HARA/LIBB

acti

part

Fig

5.2 AdRes

affe

yet

sum

of t

voic

ng: Project No: 4

ively cultivate

ticular peopl

ure 5-1: Cr

dditional settlement ca

ected commu

they too n

mmary of som

the Yuku Vil

ced by the co

492484: NYA RA

ed they beco

e.

rop cycle

Socio-Ean often hav

unity. These

eed to be

me of the po

lage. These

ommunity du

AP

ome commun

Economicve profound

impacts are

identified an

otential socio

impacts ha

uring various

NYA RAP

nal property

c Impactimpacts on

e often not ta

nd mitigated

o-economic i

ve been det

consultation

and therefor

ts the socio-e

angible or q

d where pos

impacts expe

termined fro

ns.

re no compen

conomic sta

uantifiable lik

ssible. Table

ected as a re

m past expe

nsation has

atus and wel

ke the physi

e 5-2 below

result of the

eriences and

Page 31

January 2016

been paid to

lbeing of an

ical impacts,

w provides a

resettlement

d sentiments

1

o

n

,

a

t

s



Table 5-2: Potential socio-economic impacts on the Yuku Village

Impact +/- Detail Proposed Mitigation

Social

Loss of a sense of community and family/neighbour support systems

- There are currently family and neighbour support systems in the community. These systems may be detrimentally affected by the resettlement.

The layout of both the community and individual houses has taken the current community layout into account.

Neighbours and families should not be broken apart where possible, unless this is requested.

Household design has been kept in line with current structures and the affected community engaged around the design process.

Improved security of tenure + The community currently do not have title deeds to their properties, when they are resettled their tenure should be improved.

NYA should attempt, through the Lands Commission, to improve the tenure status of the residents of the Yuku Village by securing leases. The status of both owners and tenants should be addressed.

Improved access to basic services

+ The community will receive improved services, particularly water and sanitation.

The new resettlement site will have improved services including a managed and maintained spring and pit latrines.

The Non-Government Organisation (NGO) Human People to People (HPP) are currently providing health and sanitation services and training to the local communities. Improved access to potable water is one of their priorities.

Economic

Possible employment prospects

+ Currently the majority of the community is not formally employed. A large scale project in the area may increase employment opportunities for the local population. At least two households mentioned that they expected to benefit from employment opportunities at the mine, mitigating the negative economic impacts of resettlement.

NYA currently employ local people where possible in accordance with their employment policies and requirements.

Limited access to the market in Minkelo

- At least three households raised the concern that the host site at Mbemba was too isolated and did not allow for easy access to the market in Minkelo and current fields. A river will have to be crossed to get to the main road to Minkelo and current fields.

An access bridge to the main road has been planned for – construction is still pending.

The impact of the move on travel time, cost and access to Minkelo should be monitored. Corrective action should be taken should monitoring results indicate a strain on resettled people’s ability to maintain their living standard.

Two families have indicated that they will prefer to move to Kimpese and Minkelo, which will be adhered to.

Insufficient livelihoods restoration

- One of the key potential negative impacts is livelihoods restoration assistance to help household re-establish themselves.

Agrisud have been appointed to assist with livelihoods restoration. In addition, monitoring and evaluation will focus on the adequacy of assistance rendered, to ensure that assistance is enhanced if required.



5.3 Demolishment of Yuku Village It is currently planned that following the relocation of the affected people, Yuku Village will be

demolished to ensure that people do not settle in the area again. The process will be managed by

NYA. An environmental management plan will have to be developed by NYA to ensure that

demolition is done with a minimum impact on the natural environment. No salvaging of material from

Yuku Village will be allowed. NYA is considering upgrading the structures for office purposes.

5.4 Broader Community Impacts

5.4.1 Host Area Consultation

The host site for the new Yuku Village is approximately 300 metres from Mbemba village, east of the

Sansikua River. Consultations in this regard were held with Cadre Concertation Permanent (CCP)

(permanent consultation framework) and other village representatives as well as the inhabitants of

Yuku Village. The intention was to move the Yuku villager to another hamlet belonging to the same

main village which is not too far away from the current location (refer to Section 8 for additional

information).

Through both the CCP and Comite de Reinstation (CR) (resettlement committee) NYA have

engaged in extensive consultation with the host community to ensure suitable information

dissemination and understanding any potential concerns regarding the proximity of the new village.

Only two affected households in Yuku Village expressed concerns regarding moving to the host site,

therefore, these household will be relocated to Minkelo and Kimpese as per their request. NYA will

continue to engage and monitor the dynamics between the two communities both during and post

implementation. Minutes of the consultation process is included in Appendix C.

5.4.2 Integration Measures

Given the locality of the host site, and the relatively small population of the Yuku Village, it is not

expected that serious integration problems will arise. If and where problems do occur however,

specific actions will have to be undertaken to address and mitigate them. The following will assist the

process of integration into the host community:

Local government structures. NYA will engage with local government. They will be well placed

to ensure local organisational continuity through and after the resettlement.

The activities of the CCP. This forum plays a key role of liaison and communication between

NYA and the broader community. If possible the forum should attempt to identify local

development requirements once the mine is operational. In this role, the forum should benefit

resettled households and hosts alike.

Livelihood Restoration Programme (LRP). This will provide long term restoration of livelihoods

among affected the community. These initiatives will ensure that the resettled households are re-

established as quickly as possible, reducing the potential for disruption of the host community.

The LRP is in line with socio-economic situation in the area and the development goals and

approach of NYA. Refer to Section 10 for further information.

Translocation assistance. Support and assistance to the affected community during relocation,

including transport and removal services, will assist in the short term with integrating the

community into their new surroundings.

Consolidated resettlement. The resettlement process will be undertaken in one consolidated

phase. This will ensure all affected households are moved together, reducing the anxiety that



family, friends and neighbours will be left behind. Currently all of the new houses are being

constructed simultaneously in order to achieve this objective.

Extended resettlement. Two households from Yuku Village have explicitly requested that they

don’t want to move to the new Yuku Village; instead they would prefer to move to Kimpese and

Minkelo. This request has been approved by NYA and currently engagement is ongoing

regarding the possible options. It is important that these affected households benefit from the

same opportunities and are not isolated or marginalised. These houses will be included in both

the ongoing monitoring and evaluation and livelihood restoration. Efforts to Minimize Project

Impacts

During Project development, consideration was given to minimizing the scope of physical and

economic displacement associated with the NYA Project through:

Design of project infrastructure; and,

Approaches to land access and management.

These are discussed ahead.

5.4.3 Design of Project Infrastructure

In terms of the design of project infrastructure, careful attention was given to the following:

1. Minimizing the size of Project components and the distances between those components:

NYA minimized the size of Project components and the distances between them in order to

reduce the mining area. In so doing the social impact of the Project and the take of farmland

were reduced to the minimum, but also from the standpoint of Project efficiency, for example

shorter roads mean lower construction and operating costs.

2. Minimizing buffers around Project components: NYA minimized the buffers around Project

components without compromising the health and safety of nearby residents and rivers/streams.

3. Minimizing loss of access as a result of Project infrastructure: The quarry plan still allows

for access between various villages through or outside the quarry and plant area, and also

ensures continued access to farmlands for local residents, by affecting as few established

access roads and pathways as possible.

5.4.4 Land Access and Management

The reduction of direct and indirect impacts on PAP, particularly with regard to livelihoods was

considered in the development of the final project layout. This involved the detailed design of

environmental and development buffers around key infrastructure and the quarry.

Buffers prevent development around key Project infrastructure to avoid encroachment on the quarry

and plant area and adverse environmental impacts on residents, and also to ensure public safety,

while still keeping the land take to the minimum area needed, reducing resettlement requirements,

and keeping impacts on households and farms to a minimum.

During the land access and resettlement process, farming of food crops will continue in the Yuku

Village area until compensation and resettlement negotiations have been completed and

compensation has been paid. The roll-out of livelihood programs will allow a smooth transition for

villagers out of the quarry and plant area, without compromising food security. Wherever possible,

farmers have been given the opportunity to harvest crops before relocating from the quarry and plant

area.



6 Stakeholder Engagement Extensive consultation and information sharing with the stakeholders involved or affected by the

resettlement were and will be necessary. Engagement will have to meet international requirements

and will have to fulfil specific objectives and principles. NYA has conducted ongoing consultations

with Yuku Village and the host community, which will continue in preparation for resettlement, the

resettlement process itself and during the monitoring activities after resettlement had taken place.

6.1 Engagement Requirements, Objectives and Principles

6.1.1 Requirements

The IFC Guidelines state that “Effective resettlement planning requires regular consultation with a

wide range of Project stakeholders. Early consultation helps to manage public expectations

concerning impacts of a project and expected benefits. Subsequent consultations provide

opportunities for the Project proponent and representatives of affected populations to negotiate

compensation packages and eligibility requirements, resettlement assistance, and the timing of

resettlement activities”

Furthermore, the IFC handbook for preparing a RAP sets out the following requirements for

consultation and communication during a RAP:

Consultation with local government, community leaders and affected people

representatives: “Consultation with officials of local government, community leaders and other

representatives of the affected population is essential to gaining a comprehensive understanding

of the types and degrees of adverse project effects”.

Consultation with host communities: “Consultation involving representatives of both host

communities and the communities to be displaced helps to build familiarity and to resolve

disputes that inevitably arise during resettlement”.

Requirement for a resettlement advisory group and composition: “Depending on the scale

of resettlement associated with a project, it may be appropriate for the sponsor to create a

resettlement advisory group. This advisory group should comprise representatives of the project

sponsor, relevant government line and administrative departments, community organisations,

NGOs involved in support of resettlement as well as representatives of the communities affected

by the project”.

Purpose of consultations: “Early consultation helps to manage public expectations concerning

the impact of a project and its expected benefits. Subsequent consultations provide opportunities

for the sponsor and representatives of the people affected by the project to negotiate

compensation packages and eligibility requirements, resettlement assistance and the timing of

resettlement activities. Project consultation with people affected by resettlement is mandatory”.

NYA endorses that the concept of communication with project stakeholders is an essential

component of any resettlement process. NYA is committed to pro-active and ongoing communication

with all agencies, organizations, and individuals with an interest in the development of the Project.



6.1.2 Objectives

The objectives of formal consultations are to secure the participation of all people regarding their

own resettlement planning and implementation, particularly in the following areas:

Assessment of project impacts;

Resettlement strategy;

Compensation rates and eligibility for entitlements;

Choice of resettlement site and timing of relocation;

Development opportunities and initiatives;

Development of procedures for redressing grievances and resolving disputes; and,

Mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation and for implementing corrective actions.

6.1.3 Principles of Engagement

The following principles for engagement have been identified for the purposes of effective

resettlement planning. These are to be upheld throughout all engagement processes and the means

of engagement modified if required to ensure that these are met:

Transparency to all parties;

Involvement of all affected parties (inclusivity);

Information sharing;

Informed decision-making;

Flexibility in terms of approach; and,

The advisory and objective role of the external support team to be maintained at all times.

6.2 Previous Engagement Activities Undertaken NYA and ECTECH have had various engagements and meetings with authorities and communities

in the project area, as well as other interactions such as site visits with stakeholders between 2009

and 2013. The tables below provide a breakdown of this consultation and engagement.

Table 6-1: NYA stakeholder engagement and interactions (2009 – 2013)

Date of meeting Type of meeting and stakeholder group

Stakeholder Group

9 December 2009 Community meeting at project site Mbemba Community

20 January 2010 Community meeting and project site visit Kinsua Community

13 March 2010 Consultation and familiarisation with Periodical Audit Report (PAR) Report

Local Authorities and Kinsua Community

5 April 2010 Public information meeting regarding digging campaign

Local Authorities, Kinsua Community

20 April 2010 Field visit of Rodio Company and preparation for digging campaign

Administrative authorities, Kinsua Community, Rodio, LUIMA sector head

2 May 2010 Field visit of Holtec Company Kinsua Community and LUIMA sector head

21 May 2010 Site visit with NYA, Rodio and Holtec and preparation of digging campaign

Holtec, Rodio, Kinsua Community and LUIMA sector head



Date of meeting Type of meeting and stakeholder group

Stakeholder Group

10 June 2010 Awarding of gift to local traditional authorities Kinsua Community and head of Makulukulu

17 June 2010 G4S Gas company site visit to project area Kinsua Community

24 June 2010 Launching ceremony for digging campaign Kinsua Community and local authorities

10 July 2010 Community information on progress of digging campaign

Kinsua Community

10 August 2010 Community information on progress of digging campaign

Kinsua Community, head of LUIMA sector and Provincial Division of Mines

20 December 2010 Awarding of end of year basket Kinsua Community, Songololo Territory Administrator

7 October 2010 Preparation of convention between NYA and local population

Kinsua Community, LUIMA sector head

10 November 2010 Discussion of content of convention document Permanent consultation framework

11 December 2010 Reception and modification of convention document by community representatives, local administrative authorities

Members of the permanent consultation framework

23 December 2012 End of the year gift to local communities

29 January 2013 Community meeting to address Kondo Kiomba opposition to giving consent to use their land for the NYA project

Kondo Kiomba Community

3 February 2013 Discussion of the use of Kondo Kiobia land for NYA project,

Kondo Kiombo Community representatives and LUIMA sector head

16 February 2013 Constitution of the Permanent Consultation Framework (PCF)

With the PCF and LUIMA sector head

20 February 2013 Discussion of convention document between NYA and local population

Kinsua Village representatives

18 March 2013, Information visit from ERM Consultants PCF and Sector Head

21 March 2013 Environmental and social situation analysis of ERM experts

Members of the PCF

25 April 2013 Visit of lenders to project area PCF, Territory Administrator, Sector Head and lender bank representatives

8 May 2013 Survey on non-occupied land for site identification of VODACOM antenna and relocation of Yuku Village

Representatives of 5 concerned villages, Songololo Territory Administrator, LUIMA and Kimpese sector heads and 2 principal traditional leaders in the area

17 May 2013 Public notification of VODACOM antenna installation on non-occupied land and relocation of Yuku Village

Members of the PCF and sector head

5 June 2013 Public notification meeting of update of the ESIA and site visits by SRK Consulting

SRK staff, sector head and members of the PCF

27 June 2013 Meeting with African Development Bank representatives

Sector head and 2 tribal leaders in the area and African Development Bank representatives

During the ESIA undertaken by ECTECH Environmental Consultants during 2012, various

consultations took places with key DRC government authorities and local communities. These

meetings are listed in the table below.



Table 6-2: ECTECH Stakeholder engagement and interactions (2012)

Date of meeting Type of meeting Stakeholder Group Approximate Number of Attendees

8 November 2012 Consultation Environment Minister 4

8 November 2012 Consultation GEEC and DPEM 8

10 November 2012 Community meeting Tandi Kumbi and Nkonda Villages 24

11 November 2012 Community meeting Nionga Village 12

12 November 2012 Community meeting Nkondo Kiomba Villages 32

13 November 2012 Community meeting Minkelo and Mawete Village 52

14 November 2012 Community meeting Mbemba and Yuku Villages 17

15 November 2012 Community meeting Kokolo Village 21

16 November 2012 Community meeting Kinsua Village 9

17 November 2012 Consultation Songololo Territory Office 4

18 November 2012 Consultation District des Cataractes Office 3

Between July 2013 and November 2014 the process required to compile an addendum report to

ECTECH’s ESIA was executed. A limited stakeholder engagement process was undertaken as part

of the ESIA Addendum process: a notification letter translated into French and Kikongo was

distributed to stakeholders at the start of the Addendum process, informing stakeholders of the way

forward and avenues available for comment.

Prior to finalisation of the ESIA Addendum report, a non-technical summary was developed and

translated into the relevant local languages. This was distributed to stakeholders for comment early

November 2014, in readiness for finalisation of the Addendum Report in December 2014.

Following the completion of the initial stakeholder engagement conducted by NYA between 2009

and 2013 and ESIA based consultation, further engagement and consultation was conducted by

both SRK and NYA with a particular focus on the resettlement process. This engagement covered

both the preparation of the RAP and the ongoing implementation. The following table provides an

overview of the engagement that has taken place. The detailed meeting minutes are included in

Appendix C.



Table 6-3: RAP stakeholder engagement and interactions (2015)

Date of meeting Key Areas Stakeholder Group

5 March 2015 Establishment of the CR

Overview and confirmation of the host site Comite de Reinstation (CR)

3 April 2015 Overview of the RAP and consultation process

Local recruitment Nkonda Village

24 April 2015 Presentation and visit by IFC and Bank Mondiale Cadre Concertation Permanent (CCP)

11 June 2015 Initial meeting of the CCP

Overview of the engagement process going forward

Cadre Concertation Permanent (CCP)

27 June 2015 Review of the various stages of resettlement regarding physical and economic displacement


17 July 2015 Engagement with the affected people in Yuku Village regarding the construction of new homesteads

Comite de Reinstation (CR)

8 August 2015 RAP progress overview

Compensation for fields


20 October 2015 Resettlement progress overview

Introduction of the HPP Project


6.2.1 Memorandum of Understanding

An outcome of the stakeholder engagement that occurred was the signing of a Memorandum of

Understating (MoU) between NYA and various local community beneficiaries. The MoU details the

NYA project, who the potential beneficiaries of the project will be and what some of the impacts may

be, including the resettlement of Yuku Village.

In the MoU the local communities committed to the possibility of physical and economic

displacement due to project related activities. The full MoU, translated into English, is included in

Appendix D.

6.3 NYA Communication Strategy and Stakeholder Engagement Plan The stakeholder engagement plan (SEP) that was developed by SRK in consultation with NYA (refer

to Appendix 17 of the updated ESIA), outlines and documents NYA’s consultation and disclosure

practices to be implemented for the proposed Project. The SEP includes details of public

involvement activities with NYA affected communities which will occur:

During the feasibility assessment stages of the NYA Project and resettlement;

During development of the Project; and,

Continuing throughout the life of the Project.

The goal of the SEP is to ensure adequate information is provided to project-affected people and

other stakeholders in a clear and timely manner, and that these groups have sufficient opportunity to

voice their concerns and opinions so that they can influence project decisions.

6.3.1 Key SEP Objectives

The SEP aims to improve and facilitate decision-making and create an atmosphere of understanding

that actively involves individuals, groups, and organizations that can affect, or be affected by, the

development of the Project.



Key Objectives of the SEP are:

Keep stakeholders informed of NYA activities;

Consult and educate stakeholders on all aspects of the project;

Include community inputs in project development and design;

Generate and document broad community support for the Project;

Improve communications between interested and affected parties;

Document development of formal public consultation;

Describe formal complaint submittal and resolution mechanisms; and,

Disclosure of project documents.

Key aspects of the consultation and disclosure process include:

Regular release of Project-related information, including NYA policies, Project details, answers

to frequently asked questions, and rights and responsibilities of affected people, presented as

required in a manner consistent with local cultural norms of the area and of DRC.

Articulation and delivery of clear, consistent messages from key staff to the public and

stakeholders, ensuring that community workers and staff are aware of NYA’s position regarding

the project and are capable of responding to questions/comments appropriately.

Communication to be undertaken through the local language.

Regular meetings and forums documented by NYA community workers to present Project-

related information, answer questions, and address concerns.

Development of the NYA Cadre Concertation Permanent (refer to Section 6.4.3), to include

members representative of all stakeholders and acceptable to all parties, to discuss and make

decisions regarding specific Project impacts and community concerns.

An open-door policy for interaction with Community Liaison Officers (CLOs), such that

stakeholders feel comfortable approaching them directly to ask questions, discuss matters, and

raise concerns.

Management of a responsive grievance and complaints procedure for recording and responding

to comments and concerns in a constructive and timely manner.

6.3.2 Stakeholder Identification

The IFC Guidance Notes define stakeholder identification as the process of:

Identifying individuals, groups or local communities that may be affected by the project, positively

or negatively, and directly or indirectly, making special effort to identify those who are directly

affected, including the disadvantaged or vulnerable PAP.

Identifying broader stakeholders who may be able to influence the outcome of the project

because of their knowledge about the affected communities or political influence over them.

Identifying legitimate stakeholder representatives, including elected officials, nonelected

community leaders, leaders of informal or traditional community institutions, and elders within the

affected community.

The NYA Project has a wide variety of stakeholders, people, agencies, and organizations that could

be directly or indirectly affected (positively or negatively) by the Project or that could influence the



Project (positively or negatively). In order to develop an effective stakeholder involvement program, it

is necessary to identify the various stakeholder groups, as different outreach methods may be

required for different groups. In addition, primary concerns will likely differ between various

stakeholder groups.

For the NYA Project, stakeholders have been identified through a variety of methodologies. This

includes:

Formal discussions with Traditional leaders and government agencies;

Community meetings and forums; and,

Focus groups with key groups such as traditional leaders, landowners, women, youth, and

farmers.

Stakeholders in the local communities have also been identified through a comprehensive socio-

economic survey, which also gathered concerns and issues surrounding the project development.

With the commencement of the land access and resettlement process at NYA, further socio-

economic surveys and focus group discussions will identify all stakeholders affected by the Project.

6.3.3 Women and other Vulnerable Groups

Given that women constitute a significant potentially vulnerable group, NYA is developing a Gender

Mainstreaming Plan for the NYA Project which will ensure in particular the interests of women are

considered in all aspects of the NYA Project, particularly during the resettlement process, and

special efforts will be made for consultation with women. Women face a number of disadvantages in

terms of consultation:

Because of the disproportionate amount of work that women undertake in carrying out their

responsibilities of feeding their families, they may have limited time at their disposal to attend

consultative events;

The limited economic means often available to women also imposes obstacles to participation,

for instance by preventing women from accessing transport to public meetings;

The frequent disadvantages suffered by women in terms of educational opportunities and skills

acquisition tend to limit their ability to participate meaningfully;

The limited status of women reduces their confidence (and even willingness) to participate in

consultative forums, and increases the probability that their contribution will be disregarded or

denigrated by male participant; and,

Outsiders may find it uncomfortable to be fully inclusive of women if there is opposition from

male community members who draw on traditional cultural references to exclude women.

6.4 Current RAP Management Structure The rationale behind developing a management structure is to ensure the effective management of

the project and review progress against programme, budget and scope. The management structure

comprise of select members from NYA. Currently all management and implementation of the RAP is

undertaken by the NYA EHSS team with support from dedicated resettlement and livelihood

restoration consultants and NGOs.

6.4.1 Cadre Concertation Permanent

The CCP has been established to ensure that continuous and up to date information on all project

activities are shared with the all six of the villages on the concession. The six villages represented on



the CCP include Nkanda Kiombia, Kinsua, Nyonga, Mawele II, Nkonda and Kumbi II. The CCP

currently meets once every two months (refer to Appendix C for meeting minutes).

Currently the CCP comprises of the following members:

Four representatives from NYA (EHSS Manager, Social Coordinator, RAP Coordinator and a

CLO);

Two representatives from each of the six villages; and,

The Chef de Secteur.

Functions of the CCP

The CCP are currently performing the following functions during the resettlement implementation

process:

Community engagement and information dissemination;

Engagement around affected fields and compensation; and,

Ongoing grievance resolution.

Comite de Reinstation

The CR was established to manage all the information dissemination and engagement around the

physical displacement of Yuku Village. The committee currently meets every two months and

consists of the following members:

Chef de Village of Mbemba Village (host community)

Five representatives from Yuku Village; and,

Three NYA representatives (Social Coordinator, RAP Coordinator and a community liaison

officerCLO).

The role of the CR is solely focussed on the resettlement of Yuku Village which includes areas such

as compensation, house design and construction, host site establishment, host community

engagement and grievance resolution. Minutes of the CR meetings are included in Appendix C.



7 Grievance Management

7.1 Overview A transparent, accessible and accountable mechanism through which affected people can express

grievances is an important mechanism for sustaining good relations between NYA and its

stakeholders. It is accepted good practice to afford affected parties the opportunity to air concerns

and grievances related to sensitive issues such as resettlement and compensation. Against this

background a grievance management provision is a requirement of a comprehensive RAP.

7.1.1 Benefits of a Complaints and Grievance Procedure

Potential benefits of following “due process” in the handling of complaints and grievances include:

Credibility: Creates greater mutual confidence by making it clear that the operation accepts that

it has an obligation to deal fairly and consistently with complaints and grievances from

stakeholders,

Openness: Provides a transparent approach for handling complaints and grievances to develop

trust and build good relations between the operation and its stakeholders.

Accountability: Provides a defined and consistent process for expressing complaints and

grievances, as well as a guarantee that they will be handled in a structured manner.

Improved performance: Ensures that suitable people (with required technical expertise) are

involved in assessing and responding to the complaints and grievances raised.

Understanding: Contributes to providing an environment in which a lasting socio-economic

benefit to host communities can be fostered through improved understanding of the operation’s

impact on stakeholders.

The UN’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights recommend that companies provide

individuals with access to effective grievance redress mechanisms.

7.1.2 IFC Requirements

The complaints and grievance procedure established for the RAP are consistent with the

requirements of the IFC Performance Standards, particularly Standards 1 and 5.

7.1.3 Objectives

The objectives of the complaints and grievance procedure are:

To create a transparent and legitimate process between NYA and the affected community that

enhances the relationship, improves communication and builds trust;

To link the process to the overall stakeholder engagement strategy to allow the two processes to

be mutually reinforcing;

To create a ‘mouthpiece’ for the affected community to voice their concerns;

To address RAP related concerns and grievance effectively and promptly in a manner that is

mutually beneficial to both NYA and the affected communities; and,

To deal with issues quickly and effectively therefore reducing reputational risks that can be

associated with the resettlement process.



7.2 Current Grievance Process In keeping with good international industry practice NYA have developed and implemented a

grievance management mechanism that can effectively address and resolve stakeholder grievances

regarding the project and minimize the social risk. The grievance mechanism has been designed to

be a transparent, accessible and accountable.

The main objectives of the current mechanism are as follows:

Provide to affected people, including communities, a channel to raise in fairly their concern and

issues;

Build a relationship with the communities;

Minimize a potential conflict by addressing effectively the grievance using a mechanism

designed to take into account culturally appropriate ways of handling community concerns;

Provide a channel for communities to engage NYA regarding any unsatisfactory environmental

and social project performance; and,

Provide a clear and understandable mechanism that is accessible to all sectors of affected

communities. This mechanism ensures that affected communities can receive feedback on

investigation and resolution of grievances.

A complete overview of the current Grievance Mechanism is included in Appendix G.

7.2.1 Communication and Dissemination

The availability and redress mechanisms of the current grievance procedure has been

communicated during all consultations with the affected community ensuring that stakeholders,

including all affected households, are aware of the procedure and have easy access to strategic

points through which grievances and complaints can be submitted, recorded, and resolved at no cost

or retributionthe. The CCP in particular play an important role in this process. The mechanism has

been in place since April 2014.

7.2.2 Current Grievances and Disputes

To date NYA have received 88 grievances relating to the resettlement process. To date 76 have

been amicably resolved and closed, while 12 are currently still in progress. Prior to the start of the

RAP implementation the more common grievances and complaints that were encountered included

the following:

The delay in Project construction;

Various issues around recruitment and training; and,

The provision of improved community services including water and education.

Following the commencement of the implementation the nature of the grievances has changed.

Some of the typical grievances now include the following:

Grievances regarding payment of compensation and various assets, particularly fruit trees, not

having been included;

Request for the formation of a public communication structure; and,

Queries and comments regarding livelihood restoration and the use of certain NGOs.

A comprehensive grievance database has been included in Appendix H.

SRK Consultin

HARA/LIBB

8 LaThe

San

rep

villa

villa

incl

NYA

pub

take

Pho

8.1 HoThe

ng: Project No: 4

and Tee location of

nsikua Rive

resentatives

agers (who a

age which is

uded in App

A was conce

blic amenitie

en the option

oto 5: Cu

ost Site Se selection an

Decisions t

communitie

Decisions re

affected ho

practices in

Layouts an

households

The site id

maximize fle

The area is

currently be

Houses are

impacts, pro

492484: NYA RA

nure af the new Y

er. Consulta

as well as

are originally

s not too fa

endix C)

erned not to

s including c

n to identify a

urrent const

Selectionnd securing

to establish

es, the CCP a

egarding the

ouseholds a

to account;

d designs o

s and will be

dentified is u

exibility in th

s sufficient t

eing construc

e located as

ovide continu

AP

nd HosYuku village

tions in th

the inhabita

y from the Ki

ar away from

resettle affe

clinics, scho

alternative sit

truction of n

n of the host s

the site w

and the chef

e exact locati

nd based o

of the reside

consistent w

unoccupied,

e design of t

to accommo

cted on the s

close to the

uity and econ

NYA RAP

st Site has been i

is regard w

ants of Yuku

nsua village

m the curren

ected househ

ools, cemete

tes in Kimpe

new houses

site consists o

were made i

f de terres;

on of infrast

on the curre

ential sites h

with existing s

minimizing

the resettlem

odate the ho

site, of which

e Project Are

nomic opport

Selectdentified clo

were held

u Village. Th

) to another

nt location (

holds too far

ries and sho

ese and Mink

at the host

of the followi

n consultati

ructure on th

ent layout o

have been p

settlement pa

the potentia

ment village;

ouseholds to

one is for th

ea as possib

tunities for re

tion ose to Mbem

with the C

he intention

hamlet belo

minutes of

r from their f

ops. Two aff

kelo.

site

ng activities

on with affe

he site was m

of Yuku Villa

prepared an

atterns;

al impact on

o be resettle

e chief);

ble in order t

esettled hous

mba village,

CCP and o

was to mov

onging to the

the this eng

families, neig

ffected hous

:

ected house

made in cons

age and tak

d approved

n other inha

ed (12 new

to minimise

seholds;

Page 45

January 2016

east of the

other village

ve the Yuku

e same main

gagement is

ghbours and

eholds have

eholds, host

sultation with

king cultural

by affected

abitants and

houses are

resettlement

5

e

e

u

n

s

d

e

t

h

l

d

d

e

t



The host site is suitable for construction and has relatively flat topography;

There is an availability of adjoining land for future village growth and expansion;

Improved infrastructure (water and sanitation) is currently being developed as part of site

preparation prior to affected households resettling on the land; and,

All costs for site preparation, construction and relocation will be borne by NYA.

8.2 Tenure and Land Allocation

8.2.1 Tenure

Currently none of the affected households in Yuku Village have any sort or security of tenure. Land

tenure for the new households will be provided under customary law, however, if possible NYA, in

line with international good practice, will pursue the option of securing title deeds for the affected

households,

In keeping with the dominant customary law in the area, the host site was obtained from the chief of

the Mbemba village who allocated the land to NYA.

8.2.2 Land Allocation

The plan for the new Yuku Village includes adequate physical space for non-residential land uses,

including community and farming uses. The level of service will exceed the level of service available

to current rural homesteads in the Yuku Village.

Following the completion of the house construction (early 2016), residential plots will be allocated to

resettled households in discussion with the household heads. NYA proposes to allocate new houses

based on the current configuration of Yuku Village in order to maintain family, neighbour and social

networks. This engagement and decision will only happen once construction has been completed.

Proposed approaches regarding the handover of the resettlement houses and sites will be confirmed

and agreed as part of ongoing engagement. Resettled households will be provided with a “Handover

Document”, which will include guidance on responsibilities in terms of maintenance of private and

public infrastructure. This document will be prepared to be easily understandable and accessible and

text will be supplemented with graphics and diagrams.

Resettled households will be responsible for maintenance of their individual houses and plots

subsequent to handover. In terms of public infrastructure, roads, drainage and solid waste disposal

will be adopted and managed by the Territory Administration.

A MoU will be prepared to facilitate formal handover of the resettled community to the Territory

Administration.

8.3 Replacement Agricultural Land The replacement agricultural land identification and allocation process is currently underway on the

Project. All 78 affected field owners have identified replacement land which has subsequently been

approved by the chef de terre as per customary land allocation. NYA has ensured, with the

assistance of a full time agronomist that the replacement land is of suitable quality to ensure

continued agricultural activities. These fields are also eligible for the ongoing livelihood restoration

activities (refer to Section 10).

By allowing affected people to identify their preferred replacement land NYA has ensured that land is

generally close to the affected people’s homes and suitable for their needs. Where possible current



agricultural land has been retained and fields left in situ. The replacement agricultural land process

has fulfilled the following criteria and objectives:

Where feasible, agricultural land has been retained by affected households if it remains easily

accessible and affected owners would prefer to maintain their existing fields;

Replacement agriculture land has been identified by the affected people and approved by the

relevant customary authority;

The agricultural suitability of the sites has been approved by an agronomist;

Farmers have been given notice to harvest their existing crops prior to resettlement and this has

been timed to co-incide with the harvesting season. Where necessary farmers have been

afforded additional time to allow for the completion of the crop cycle;

Replacement agricultural land is cleared and prepared for planting;

The necessary inputs (water, fertilizer, top cover, manual labour) are being provided as part of

field and site preparation prior to resettlement; and,

All costs for field preparation are borne by NYA.



9 Resettlement and Compensation Framework

9.1 Overview of the Compensation Framework The IFC stipulates that ‘all affected people and households should be compensated for loss of

physical assets, revenue, and income resulting from economic displacement or physical relocation

whether these losses are temporary or permanent’. The IFC Guidelines emphasize that the preferred

approach is compensation in kind, but that cash compensation is permissible under certain

circumstances.

The RAP compensation framework specifies all forms of asset ownership or use rights among the

population affected by the project and the Project’s strategy for compensating them for the partial or

complete loss of those assets.

9.2 Objectives and Principles The overall objective of the RAP is to set out a framework and process for fair and transparent

redress of displacement losses, including the mobilisation of initiatives to improve the livelihoods and

living standards of those experiencing such losses. Key implementation principles include:

Avoidance of resettlement where possible. This principle has informed the Project from the start;

Fair compensation, at full replacement cost plus 50%, prior to displacement. This principle has

guided the compensation procedures;

Open, amicable and negotiated settlement regarding appropriate compensation and assistance;

The promotion and facilitation of consultation and transparency through all phases of the RAP;

Execution of the RAP as part of a development programme, seeking at least to restore

livelihoods, and wherever possible to improve these and associated quality of life;

The promotion of environmental integrity and sustainable development as a principle

underpinning RAP-linked development initiatives;

The provision of specific assistance, as required, to vulnerable people and groups;

The implementation of structured, sustainable and responsive monitoring and evaluation of the

RAP and those participating in it; and,

The inclusion of the RAP as an up-front project cost.

The implementation principles listed above are in line with international best practice.

9.3 Cut-off Dates Cut-off dates are an important part of the RAP process. They are applied to firstly control and

regulate who is included in the census and asset inventory and secondly to determine when affected

households should stop making improvements to their homes, planting crops, etc. It is important to

implement these cut-off dates to develop an accurate database and compensation strategy and to

prevent opportunistic influx from occurring.

In order to be eligible for compensation (as mentioned in Section 9), households must have been

included in the census and asset inventory database. As part of this resettlement process the

following cut-off dates will be need to be established:



Cut-off date for physical displacement in Yuku Village:

The cut-off date determines which households are affected by physical displacement and are

therefore eligible for compensation. Households who move into the area after this cut-off date are not

entitled to compensation or any other form of resettlement assistance, nor will they be entitled to

permanent or temporary occupancy in the area.

A meeting took place on 21 December 2015, during which the current Yuku villagers’ names were

confirmed against the July 2014 census. After discussion with the community, it was agreed that the

census conducted in 2014 was the cut-off date. Since 2014, three tenants moved in; and these

tenants are not eligible for compensation.

Cut-off date for economic displacement: This cut-off date determines which households are

affected by economic displacement. Apart from the residents of Yuku Village, farmers with

agricultural plots within the project footprint will be impacted.

This cut-off date is determined by the initial census and asset inventory completed in July 2014 and

was communicated 20 August 2014. The copies of communique (Notice) were posted at Minkelo

and Mawete villages starting on 14 July, 2014. Further to the posting, the same information was

verbally shared during the meeting of the “Cadre de Concertation Permanente” on 29 September,

2014. Questions were asked about the meaning of this cut-off date, and the NYA representative

explained to the members.

It should be noted that any further fields eligible for compensation, following the cut-off date, will be

identified and compensated (if applicable) through the grievance mechanism

9.4 Eligibility

9.4.1 Eligibility Principles

Under the IFC PS 5, the following groups of affected households are eligible for compensation:

(a) Those who have formal legal rights to land or other affected assets (including customary or

traditional rights to the use of land and/or assets);

(b) Those who initially do not have formal legal rights to occupy or use the land or other assets but

have a claim to legal rights based upon the laws of the country, upon the possession of

documents of permission to occupy or use the land; and

(c) Those who have no recognisable legal right or claim to the land they are occupying (i.e. tenants

and/or squatters).

Persons and households covered under (a) and (b) should be provided compensation and

resettlement assistance for lost land, and other assets. Persons and households covered under (c)

are provided compensation for the assets they lose, and other assistance, as necessary, to achieve

the objectives set out in this RAP.

9.4.2 Eligibility for Compensation and Assistance

Project-affected households are eligible for compensation and other assistance if they have a

“legitimate interest” in respect of “immoveable assets” in the Project area that are in place at the time

of the entitlement cut-off date.

“Legitimate Interest” in immoveable assets at the household level is usually held by a single

member, the household head. Through traditional and family practice, the household head is

typically the most senior male member of the household. In some instances the legitimate interest

may be held jointly, i.e. by the household head and his/her spouse, or with other members of the



extended family. When the household head dies, NYA will require that other household members

identify the inheritor through a court order before compensation will be paid.

It should be noted that “legitimate interest” is not synonymous with ownership. Even those project

affected persons/households/communities with no recognizable right or claim to the assets they

occupy or hold are considered eligible for resettlement assistance. This is applicable in this context

where some households cannot produce any formal claim to the household structure where others

have been given the right to occupy the house by the chef de terre.

Determination of Eligible Assets

The inventory of immoveable assets, supported by household socio-economic data, forms the basis

for compensation of PAP. In conjunction with compensation rates, the surveys determine the

compensation eligibility and entitlement for each project-affected person/household.

SRK completed a household asset inventory for Yuku Village to determine and record all

immoveable assets located in this affected community. Immoveable assets that were in place at the

time of the asset inventory included:

Complete Immoveable Assets – Assets that are fully established (in the case of crops) or fully

constructed (in the case of buildings); and,

Incomplete Immoveable Assets – Assets that are only partially established: newly planted (in the

case of crops) or partially constructed (in the case of buildings).

9.5 Entitlements Based on the findings of the census and asset inventory, principles to guide the development of an

entitlement matrix that will outline the compensation principles for replacing affected assets were

developed. The objectives of the entitlement matrix are to identify:

All categories of affected people, including property owners and land right holders, tenants,

squatters, sharecroppers, grazers, nomadic pastoralists and other natural resource users,

shopkeepers, vendors and other service providers, communities, and vulnerable groups;

All types of loss associated with each category, including loss of physical, economic and

livelihood assets; loss of access to such assets; loss of wages, rent, or sales earnings; loss of

public infrastructure and elements of cultural significance; and,

All types of compensation and assistance to which each category is entitled, including:

compensation for or replacement of land and natural resources; compensation for structures,

assets, wages, rent, or sales earnings; moving assistance and post-resettlement support.

The entitlement matrix has been structured to differentiate between temporary and permanently

affected assets i.e. the temporary loss of assets such as fields in laydown areas versus the

permanent loss of housing due to physical resettlement.

A copy of the entitlement matrix is presented in Table 9-1 and Table 9-2 and is supported by Section

11, which outlines additional resettlement and compensation mitigation measures (i.e. host site

selection and free removal services).

9.5.1 General Structure of Entitlements

Eligible households will be provided with entitlements as per the final entitlement matrix. The matrix

has been developed following both the determination of the final project layout and the extent of

physical and economic displacement. The entitlement matrix has been developed in line with the

following compensation and associated provision principles:



All compensation packages will be negotiated with affected households;

All compensation packages must restore livelihoods and the standard of living of displaced

persons;

All cash compensation will be paid at full market value plus 50% in accordance with the DRC

Mining Code;

Households must receive compensation packages prior to permanent asset losses;

Where possible, affected assets will be replaced with like-for-like assets;

No cash compensation will be provided for permanent loss of physical structures (i.e. housing).

Households will receive like-for-like replacement assets; and,

All communal assets (i.e. land and physical structures) will be negotiated with the CNC and

community.

Restoration and rehabilitation measures to be provided could potentially include:

Free removal services for all affected households permanently displaced;

Additional assistance to vulnerable households; and,

Resources or other economic and livelihood development programmes (such as agricultural

assistance, and training for non-farming income) to assist with the full restoration of income

earning capacity of affected households as per the LRP.

The management and monitoring measures to be provided could potentially include:

Comprehensive and accessible grievance management procedure;

Organisational arrangements to ensure effective preparation and implementation of the NYA

RAP;

Ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the RAP will be carried out in order

to ensure that compensation and resettlement activities and tasks will be implemented

effectively; and,

Full close-out audit by an independent third party.

Entitlements for households affected by land take include the following three categories:

1) Compensation: compensation is provided by NYA in conformance with Congolese law to offset

loss of ownership or usage over certain assets (such as crops). Compensation will be provided

in cash (for the loss of annual and perennial crops) and in kind (provision of a replacement land

to offset the loss of existing agricultural land). Where it is provided in cash, compensation is

subject to a 50% bonus over the replacement value of the affected asset. Where compensation

is provided in kind in the form of a replacement land, no cash compensation is provided and the

50% bonus is not applicable.

2) Inconvenience allowances: generally in cash, inconvenience allowances are provided by NYA

to offset loss of livelihoods, as well as disturbance and inconvenience experienced by PAPs.

Allowances are an additional benefit provided by NYA in addition to compensation, and are not

subject to the 50% bonus envisioned by Congolese law. Currently it is only proposed that

physically displaced households benefit from this an inconvenience allowance.

3) Livelihood restoration benefits provided to support PAP to restore livelihoods affected by

Project land access activities. Livelihood restoration benefits are generally delivered in kind



and/or in the form of various services, including training and capacity building. An LRP has been

provided detailing options for both physically and economically displaced households.

9.5.2 Agricultural Land

No cash compensation has been paid by the Project in relation to the loss of access to agricultural

land as land in the NYA concession is deemed to be the property of the State per Congolese law

with exclusive usufruct rights granted to NYA per mining regulations. However, land concessionaires

whose livelihoods are affected by the loss of access to agricultural land have been assisted by the

Project to identify replacement farm land and put it into cultivation. These households are also

eligible to benefit from the Livelihood Restoration Plan.

The land replacement allowance will include:

Land preparation by NYA including clearing a new piece of land and putting it into cultivation

(ploughing); and,

Land replacement facilitation fees (“Entente”), including either (i) a fee intended for the current

concessionaire of the replacement piece of land, (ii) a fee intended for the relevant village chief,

and (iii) a fee intended for the land chief.

9.5.3 Annual Crops

Regardless of land ownership (i.e., whether they are concessionaires or tenants), farmers owning an

affected crop receive compensation in cash for:

The market value of crops (including that which is harvested prior to relocation) plus a bonus of

50% of the compensation, in line with DRC legal requirements. Losses of annual crops should

be surveyed and compensation rates calculated shortly before land acquisition takes place (not

at the time of the original household census and asset survey). Crops established after the cut-

off date are not eligible to any compensation.

9.5.4 Perennial Crops

The calculation of the full replacement value for perennial crops (e.g. fruit trees) requires

consideration not only of the production of the crop over one year, but also the cost of re-establishing

the crop (seedlings, soil preparation, fertilizer, etc.), as well as the lost income during the period

needed to re-establish the crop.

Perennial crops are inventoried at the time of the household census and asset inventory.

Market values of the produce for each of the most common fruit trees in the area (banana, mango,

papaya, avocado, etc.) are updated annually by the Department of Agriculture. Except for banana

trees, rates are calculated for the following stages of tree development:

Seedling;

Young, non-productive;

Young, productive; and,

Mature.

For banana trees, only two stages are considered (non-productive and productive) and plants of less

than 0.5 meters in height (most of which are nonviable and have to be eliminated) are not counted.

The following table provides an example of compensation rates for common fruit trees.

Calculations are based on the following values:



A = Average output of a mature tree (kg/tree)

B = Duration for a plant to reach full maturity (years)

C = Market price (CDF per kg of output)

D = Lost revenue until new plant reaches maturity (CDF)

E = Cost of a new seedling (CDF per plant)

F = Cost of land preparation (CDF/plant)

G = Compensation rate for a fully mature tree (productive for more than 5 years), (CDF/plant)

It should be noted that only fruit trees that are actively cultivated and utilised are compensated. Wild

or communal fruit trees are not compensated for.

9.5.5 Entitlement Matrix

Entitlements for each type of impact are presented in Table 9-1 below. Livelihood restoration

benefits are described in further detail in Section 10.

Table 9-1: Eligibility and entitlement matrix: physical displacement

Affected Asset or Right

Eligibility Conditions

Entitlements

Compensation (in kind)Cash compensation

Livelihood Restoration Assistance

Residential structures

Permanent loss of residential structures and other assets including services and facilities

Provide the opportunity to recover assets and to salvage materials from structures.

Provide equivalent alternative housing structures and other assets and services (such as sanitation and water supply, fences etc.).

Complete housing construction prior to resettlement.

Allow households input into layout and design.

Provide free removal services. Provide vulnerable households with additional assistance.

Provide a nominal inconvenience grant (once-off lump sum per household). To be determined by NYA.

The nominal grant will be used by households to pay for farewell ceremonies and other cultural costs associated with relocation.

Household will be eligible to participate in the LRP

Graves Loss of graves by family member of deceased

Follow legislative requirements and customary law provisions.

Family members of those buried in unmarked graves should be identified and graves relocated in accordance with local legislation and customs.

All relocation costs will be paid by NYA.

Cash compensation will be provided for cultural ceremonies and performances.

Not applicable

Fishing grounds

Permanent loss of access to fishing grounds

Alternative access will be provided or assist fisherman with finding equivalent alternative fishing grounds.

Not applicable. Household will be eligible to participate in the LRP



Table 9-2: Eligibility and entitlement matrix: agricultural land


Eligibility Conditions Entitlements

Compensation (in cash) Compensation (in kind) Inconvenience Grant


Recognized concessionaire of an agricultural field.

At the time of the census, be recognized by the local community and/or traditional authorities as the bona fide concessionaire of an affected agricultural field.

Compensation for standing crops at market value (revised annually) plus 50% bonus.

Compensation to cover the labour of clearing replacement land (as determined by an agronomist and local government).

“Entente” fee, including land replacement fee to the individual selling or allocating the land, land replacement fee to relevant village chief, and land replacement fee to relevant “Chef de Terre”.

Assistance by NYA in securing suitable alternative land (identification, agronomic survey (if necessary), assistance in negotiation with relevant stakeholders – owner, chiefs).

Currently no inconvenience grant is envisaged for economically displaced households.

Affected household will be eligible for livelihood restoration assistance as per the LRP including: Access to livelihood restoration inputs, an allocation of seeds and fertilizer and activities that focus on agricultural training and support.

LRP support will be provided by the NGO Agrisud.

Annual Crops At the time of the census, be recognized by local community, landowner or TA as the bona fide owner of an affected annual crop, regardless of land ownership status (i.e., the landowner or land concessionaire may be the same individual as the owner of the crop or not).

Compensation for standing annual crops at market value (revised annually) plus 50% bonus. In consultation with the local government inspector.

N/A Currently no inconvenience grant is envisaged for economically displaced households.

N/A




Eligibility Conditions Entitlements

Compensation (in cash) Compensation (in kind) Inconvenience Grant


Perennial Crops At the time of the census, be recognized by local community, landowner, and/or traditional authority as the bona fide owner of an affected perennial crop, regardless of land ownership status (i.e., the landowner or land concessionaire may be the same individual as the owner of the crop or not).

Compensation for standing perennial crops at replacement value, (revised annually), plus 50% bonus. Trees are categorized as:

- Saplings

- Young non productive

- Young productive

- Mature productive.

For banana trees, only plants higher than 50 cm are taken into consideration, and there are only two categories: “non-productive” and “mature productive”.

Provide an opportunity to harvest fruits.

Provision of fruit tree saplings if tree was less than one years old.

Currently no inconvenience grant is envisaged for economically displaced households.

N/A



9.6 Methodology to Value Losses A number of affected assets were identified during the asset inventory survey. These assets are

classified according to “asset type”. Individual asset valuations have not been prepared yet, these

will be determined prior to resettlement and compensation. The table below provides a summary of

these assets and describes the principles that should be applied to “value” lost assets.

Table 9-3: Identified assets and methodology to value lost assets

Asset type Description Principles

Crops Includes all crops. All permanent losses for crops and vegetables should be based on market values;

Market values plus 50% will be paid to affected households;

Market value to be determined by the Department of Agriculture guidelines;

Payment of an ‘entente’ fee to the land chief for replacement land may be required. This is approximately 7 000 CDF per field but will have to be negotiated and agreed; and,

NYA to carry costs for land clearance.

Vegetables Including cabbages, lettuce, peanuts, tomatoes, sweet potatoes, beetroot, carrots, peanuts, cassava, potatoes, pumpkins, etc.

All permanent losses of vegetables should be based on replacement market values;

Market values plus 50% will be paid to affected household;




Fruit trees Including avocado, banana, orange, safu and butter fruit.

Replacement values for fruit trees should be based on market values;

Values should be estimated at a yield depending on the type of fruit tree and based on market research;

Compensation will be paid plus 50%;




Loss of income Includes businesses relocation, loss of income as a business owner and an employee.

The full replacement values of commercial business structures should be based on market values; and,

Cash compensation for loss of income should be negotiated with business owners and employees and based on annual earnings

A comprehensive database of all impacted fields, including the compensation calculations, has been

included in Appendix E.



10 Livelihoods Restoration Plan

10.1 Purpose The IFC’s notes that “simple restoration of livelihood may be insufficient to protect affected

populations from adverse project impacts, especially induced effects such as competition for

resources and employment, inflation, and the breakdown of social support networks. For this reason,

IFC seeks to promote the improvement of the living standards of people affected by the project”

The social-economic baseline shows that a majority of the households in the Project area are poor

and sustain their livelihoods through multiple livelihood activities. Agriculture is prominent among

these activities, providing food for household consumption, and in some cases, surplus produce is

sold to generate income. Other sources of livelihood include formal and informal employment,

charcoal production and animal husbandry.

The LRP describes NYA’s strategy to ensure that livelihoods disrupted by resettlement are speedily

restored, sustained and where possible improved. Inputs proposed via the LRP are currently being

implemented as part of a broader development programme. Participation of affected households (i.e.

the Yuku Village), NGOs and local authorities is central to the success of this broader development

programme.

10.2 Job Opportunities Of the Yuku village adult population, approximately 90% are employed by NYA during the

construction period. This serves as an effective measure for managing any possible economic

disadvantages that might have been brought about by the Project in the short term.

10.3 Mainstreaming Livelihoods In addition to the development of specific programmes to address livelihood restoration,

development and replacement, as described in Section 10.4, the approach to livelihoods restoration

for the NYA Project shall be developed to consider all project decisions in the context of a

mainstreaming of livelihood considerations. In this sense, all aspects of the land access,

resettlement and project development are considered in terms of livelihood implications, to ensure all

key project decisions promote livelihood restoration and development.

10.4 Livelihoods Needs Assessment In addition to mainstreaming livelihood considerations in key project decisions, the development of

the LRP itself has been based on a comprehensive approach to livelihood assistance requirements

of each project-affected household, based around the principal of a unified approach to addressing

needs, and avoiding several initiatives operating in isolation, such as farming assistance, business

training, employment initiatives etc. The assessment of needs on a household basis has been based

initially on baseline data gathered from the census and asset inventory as well as the overall project

Social Impact Assessment.

This has allowed an initial assessment of each household’s requirement in terms of livelihood

restoration programs. This includes programs to restore farming practices, including facilitating land

access, as well as temporary hardship assistance in certain cases. These programs would be

complemented by NYA Community Development programs which will include vocational training and

community infrastructure projects. The individual program components are discussed further below.



10.5 Livelihoods Restoration Programme Households affected by economic and physical displacement will be eligible to participate in the

livelihood restoration programme. NYA have appointed two NGOs who will be assisting in the

implementation of the ongoing livelihood restoration and enhancement programme. The main focus

of the programme will be around agricultural enhancement and support and the improvement of

community health and hygiene.

10.5.1 Agricultural Enhancement and Support

NYA have appointed Agrisud International to assist with the agricultural component of the LRP.

Agrisud are an international NGO focusing on the alleviation of poverty through agricultural

enhancement and support. The Project will focus on 180 families in the NYA concession and six

development committees all of whom will receive support in the following areas:

Food polyculture training;

Market gardening;

Livestock development and management;

Monitoring and advisory support;

Individual and consolidated farms;

Marketing of products (improving the flow and movement of crops);

Market garden site development;

Support inputs including equipment; and,

Local development committees and their local union.

The comprehensive scope, objectives and action plan of the Agrisud component of the LRP is

included in Appendix I.

10.5.2 Community Health and Hygiene

NYA has partnered with HPP to implement a community health and hygiene component to the LRP.

HPP are a Congolese based NGO with experience in organizing rural communities to take action to

improve their own living conditions and to promote development. This component of the LRP will

include 250 families in the villages of Mawete, Nkonda, Kumbi, Nkondo, Kwamba, Nyonga and

Kinsua and will be carried out from September 2015 to February 2017. (Refer to Appendix J for

HPP’s action plan).

The primary goals and activities of this component of the LRP will be the following:

Strengthening the Family Economy: Ensuring family food security and surplus supply for

market through the establishment of Family Farmers Clubs who will be provided with training

and support.

Health and Hygiene: The reduction of preventable diseases and access to potable water for the

250 families in the Project area. Through training, nutrition and basic health and hygiene the

prevalence and transmission of common diseases such as malaria, cholera and HIV/AIDS will

be reduced. NYA will drill boreholes and HPP will train water management committees to ensure

improved drinking water is provided to communities in the Project area.

Education.

Protecting the Environment.



Youth promotion and upliftment.

The comprehensive scope, objectives and action plan of the HPP component of the LRP is included

in Appendix J.

10.6 Additional Livelihood Support

10.6.1 Preservation of a Sense of Community

Resettlement must avoid breaking up families, separating neighbours and dissolving communal

networks that cause social disarticulation. This is because many households rely on their social

capital to maintain and secure their livelihoods. By destroying social networks, resettlement can

affect a household’s ability to restore their livelihoods. NYA are undertaking the following actions as

part of the LRP to ensure that a sense of community is preserved:

Households are being resettled as a community and current structures are therefore being

maintained;

Extensive consultation and engagement has ensued any concerns and/or suggestions are

incorporated into the overall implementation;

Households affected by resettlement could be provided with the opportunity to attend one-on-

one counselling sessions with trained psychologists and social workers if necessary; and,

The monitoring and evaluation plan should assess the impact of resettlement on affected

households. This assessment would determine and monitor the effect of resettlement on social

capital and community preservation and suggest activities to maintain the sense of community.

10.7 Assistance to Vulnerable Households Additional assistance where necessary will be provided to households, which as a result of their

“vulnerability” are unable to fully participate in the resettlement process or the livelihood restoration

programme. For the purposes of this project, vulnerability may be viewed in the context of two

stages:

Pre-existing vulnerability; and,

Transitional hardship vulnerability, caused by project related physical and economic

displacement.

Pre-existing vulnerability is vulnerability that occurs, with or without the Project development, whilst

transitional hardship vulnerability occurs as a result of those directly affected by the Project being

unable to adjust to new conditions due to shock or stress related to project activities.

Women can be taken up in the Livelihood Restoration Plan by way of a Gender Mainstreaming

Plan.

The Gender Mainstreaming Plan consists of four components:

Building gender strategy into the decision-making of NYA;

Developing Women’s Associations and Groups in the Project-Affected communities, providing a

platform for women in the lease area to express themselves freely, to participate in community

decision making regarding the Project, and to address specifically those issues particular to

women and their roles in society, as well as an opportunity to meet and collaborate on other

issues of common interest;



Partnering with NGOs and governmental agencies, to increase women’s representation and

advancement by providing civic education and sensitization programs on gender for all adults,

women and men, in the mine affected communities; and,

Providing education designed to increase women’s ability to engage in policy and program

dialogue.

The Gender Mainstreaming Plan specifies that the following steps will be taken to promote the

equitable and meaningful participation of women:

NYA’s environment and social responsibility initiatives are committed to filling a balanced

number of positions with women;

Consultative events such as meetings will be timed so as to take into account the various

demands on women’s time (including other work, preparing meals, etc.);

Baseline social profiles will include an analysis of gender dynamics and disparity between men

and women in terms of participation in the local and regional economy. This information will be

used as a basis for further planning to involve and meet the needs of female community

members;

All consultative committees established in view of ongoing stakeholder and neighbour relations

(the CCP, etc.) will be developed with the aim of having a reasonable proportion of female

members. Women’s participation in the leadership and management of these committees will

also be promoted;

In its deliberations, the CCP will demonstrate that gender considerations were taken into

account in all discussions and agreements; and.

Training and awareness-raising workshops will be offered to consultative forums to sensitize

participants to the relations between men and women, and to transform traditional relationships

that have not allowed women to realize their potential.

When monitoring the effects of ongoing community consultation, data will be collected and recorded

in a gender-disaggregated manner so as to provide insight into the differential impacts of the Project

on women and men.

10.8 Proposed Livelihood Restoration Plan Table 10-1 describes the potential LRP inputs that have been proposed, showing also who is

responsible, the timing and duration of the inputs, and key performance indicators (KPIs) to be

followed under the Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (refer to Section 13).

10.8.1 Managing the LRP

As a cooperative and multi-facetted programme the LRP will require coordination and management.

This role will be undertaken by the NYA EHSS team.

Ensuring Sustainability

All LRP programmes have been designed to ensure sustainability. Through an analytical and

consultative process adequate projects will need to be identified that seek to address potential social

opportunities to enhance and improve the livelihoods of those affected by displacement. In addition,

these programmes will need to be implemented with a broader development strategy that aims to

mitigation social impacts and risks.



Table 10-1: Summary of the Livelihood Restoration Plan

Livelihood Programme

Recipients Responsibility Timing and Duration Indicators (examples, to be refined)

Agriculture enhancement

180 households in the Project area (including all households affected by economic displacement, including households affected by the loss of access to agricultural fields and subsistence gardens).

NYA

Agrisud International

September 2015 – February 2017

Increased yields

Increased sales

Application of improved farming methods

Fertilizer appropriately utilized

Use of small scale irrigation

Health and Hygiene 250 families in the Project areas (including households affected by physical displacement).

NYA

HPP

September 2015 – February 2017

Improved food security

Lower disease prevalence;

Improved access to potable water

Preservation of a sense of community

Households affected by physical displacement.

NYA

Community workers, e.g. Social workers and community psychologists

One round of visits by a team of community workers to take place one month before, and one month after physical displacement.

Thereafter visits will take place as required, and recommended by the community therapists.

Maintained sense of community

Maintained levels of income

Improved community relations

Assistance to vulnerable households

Vulnerable households affected by physical displacement and economic displacement.

NYA One round of visits by NYA to determine additional assistance required by vulnerable household four months prior to physical or economic displacement. This is apart from visits for monitoring purposes after resettlement had occurred.

Maintained incomes

Restoration of fields and subsistence gardens



11 Additional Resettlement Assistance Due to the disruptive nature of resettlement affected households will benefit from both livelihood

restoration programmes and resettlement assistance, particularly for vulnerable people (Refer to

Section 10).

The following resettlement assistance measures will be offered to affected households over and

above compensation and LRP initiatives. These measures will both improve relationships between

NYA and the affected community and help to mitigate the disruption and inconvenience caused by

resettlement.

11.1 Free Removal Services All costs associated with resettlement will be covered by NYA. This will include the cost of

transporting household goods and items to the new host site. All affected households should be

provided with free removal services.

11.2 Community Development Activities Households affected by physical and economic displacement will be provided with livelihood

restoration assistance (refer to Section 10). NYA is committed to ensuring that households are not

adversely affected by resettlement. Through a series of community development initiatives, as

detailed in the MoU with local communities, NYA aims to ensure that the quality of life and standard

of living of those affected by displacement is at a minimum restored and preferably improved.

The Sustainable Development Plan (SDP), which outlines the community development activities

NYA will engage in during the life of the Project, categorise households affected by displacement as

a key beneficiary of these community development initiatives. The SDP is included as an Appendix

to the updated EIA report.

11.3 Employment Opportunities NYA will develop a proactive local recruitment policy, which will be supported by a skills training

programme. The policy and the programme still have to be developed, in particular specifying the

nature of the jobs and skills training process. This policy is integral to the operation of NYA’s Human

Resources Department.

11.4 Environmental Mitigation Measures For the proposed mining operation and its associated infrastructure, proposed environmental

management measures will need to be adhered to should authorisation for the project be granted.

In addition, all activities that are listed in terms of DRC legislation will require authorisation and

management in terms of the environmental management plan and conditions set by the record of

decision.



12 RAP Implementation In line with the management measures detailed in this RAP, NYA have commenced with the

implementation of the various resettlement activities. This section of the report details what activities

have been completed to date and what is still outstanding. It also assigns roles and responsibilities

for the outstanding actions.

Where gaps have been identified in the implementation process corrective measures have been

recommended in order to align the process with good international industry practice.

12.1 Implementation Arrangements and Responsibilities The IFC notes that “resettlement and development planning require specialized expertise. It is

essential that the project sponsor engage the services of qualified and experienced personnel to

design and implement resettlement action plans. However, it is equally important that sponsors

engage themselves in the RAP design process. Sponsor participation in the process is instrumental

to coordinating resettlement activities with the project implementation schedule. IFC experience

indicates that the success of a RAP is related directly to the level of sponsor involvement in its

implementation”.

Initial RAP planning was conducted by ECTECH Environmental Consultants and was subsequently

updated by SRK. Following the completion of the RAP, the following implementation options were

available for NYA to consider:

Resettlement managed and executed internally (i.e. by NYA); and,

Resettlement managed and executed jointly by NYA and a facilitation / implementation agent.

The table below presents the pros and cons of the two options:

Table 12-1: Pros and cons of RAP implementation options

Option Pros Cons

Internal option Simplified coordination

Overt demonstration of commitment and accountability

Potential for company-community relationship building

Detailed understanding of the resettlement process

Pressure on limited capacity, with potential for delay

Cost of capacity development

Many tasks not the core business of NYA

Potential for disputes requiring external arbitration

Joint option Roles can be distributed according to the capacity and strength of the company and the implementing agent

Compromise between company ownership and agent neutrality

Opportunity to build capacity in NYA

Complexity of defining roles and responsibilities

Potential for confusion among stakeholders and affected people (need to communicate role definition very clearly)

NYA originally opted for the internal option, looking to their current EHSS department to complete

the RAP implementation. This has been largely successfully; however, following an external audit of

the process a few gaps were identified. For this reason, SRK has been requested to assist with

some aspects of the implementation in order to ensure the process is successfully completed in line

with the applicable standards.



12.2 Current NYA EHSS Department Currently NYA have a full time EHSS team on site. The social team consists of the EHSS manager,

a programme coordinator, a RAP coordinator, two community liaison officers and two community

development consultants. The EHSS department are responsible for the overall RAP

implementation. The organogram below provides an overview of the current structure of the

department. Currently the NYA EHSS, who will be responsible for the management, implementation

and monitoring of the RAP, consists of the following key personnel:

EHSS Manager; and,

Social Programmes Coordinator; RAP Coordinator, CLOs.



Figure 12-1: EHSS organogram

EHSS Manager Christian Ngoy Ndombe

NYA H&S Coord.

Mwepu

HS Supervisor 1

Guy Borrel Massongard

HS Officer

Eric Yobo

HS Officer

Sumbu Longo

HS Officer

JB Ndongala

HS Supervisor 2

HS Officer

Nancy Diansonama

HS Officer

Lisa Kundja

HS Officer

Tito Bwenta

Contractors’ H&S Coord.

Shakil Rehman

HS Supervisor 3

HS Officer

Patience Hioke

HS Officer

Valentin Mutonji

HS Officer

Prospère Moni

Env Coord

Richard Mbafumodja

Env Officer

Pathou Makumi

Env Officer

Eric Mayandu

Temporary Workers (waste landfill + agronomist)

Social Prgms Coord George Mantantu

CLO 1

Adolphe Lubikulu

CLO 2

TBA

RAP Coord

Henri Nyumbaiza

CommunityDevelopmentConsultants

AGRISUD

HPP

EHS Advisor

Jack Tshibangu

Environmental SocialHealth and safety

daewoo

Barrer



Community development consultants and NYA senior management are responsible for providing

strategic direction to the EHSS Manager and team, and for reviewing draft policies, procedures and

rates proposed for the RAP. Senior Management is particularly concerned with ensuring that the

RAP helps meet the NYA’s project objectives, including the overall Project schedule and budget.

The NYA EHSS Team is also responsible for all stakeholder communication, consultation and

information disclosure concerning project development and implementation. The CLOs play an

important role of maintaining relationships with the community leaders and members, and assisting

other Project team members to behave in a culturally appropriate way. The CLOs in addition

maintain an ongoing liaison in the communities, and ensure that NYA is aware of and can act upon

community concerns. They also assist in arranging meetings locally, in presenting project details to

their communities, working closely with community representatives in feeding back to their

communities.

In line with good international industry practice, NYA must retain overall responsibility and

accountability for the resettlement process. All implementation activities should be done in

consultation with the CCP, and with the cooperation of government agencies at the province, district,

territory and national levels.

The following key functions will be necessary for NYA to undertake:

Executive oversight. RAP implementation and monitoring functions should report to the Chief

Executive or an appropriate senior manager.

Execution coordination. This should be a dedicated function undertaken by the EHSS

manager who has an overall understanding of the elements of RAP implementation. Under the

internal management and execution option NYA have opted for, the EHSS manager is supported

by a team addressing various implementation tasks.

Community engagement. NYA have retained and consolidated its engagement capacity and

commitment. Two CLOs currently work closely within the EHSS team to ensure awareness of

community issues and accountability for responses to these issues.

Community development. Resettlement provides an opportunity for development, and pursuit

of development is encouraged in international best practice. The Social Programmes

Coordinator is charged with overall community development and is therefore best placed to

promote and oversee livelihood restoration, and to coordinate RAP monitoring.

12.3 Indicative Implementation Schedule The implementation of the resettlement process is linked closely to the construction of the Project

infrastructure. The schedule below provides a high level overview of some of the key milestones that

have either been competed or are pending. Table 12-3 there-after shows the detail specific to the

physical resettlement process.



Table 12-2: Indicative RAP implementation schedule

ACTIVITY Year Year 1 (2014) Year 2 (2015) Year 3 (2016)

Responsibility Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Formation of CCP NYA

Initial community consultation NYA/CCP/host community/Yuku village

Verification of affected fields

RAP update NYA/SRK

Land identification process and finalisation for the houses

NYA

Land identification for economic displacement.

NYA

Payment of compensation (fields) NYA

Grievance redress (Formal system) NYA

Building of new houses

Move to new houses

Compensation related to physical displacement

Commencement of LRP

Monitoring and evaluation NYA



12.4 Physical Displacement: Implementation Action Plan

12.4.1 Finalisation of Household Compensation Agreements

Once final compensation values, housing design, land identification and allocation, allowances (if

applicable) and livelihood restoration have been concluded, an individual household compensation

package will be drafted and presented to the affected party. The agreement will be a legally binding

document that will clearly spell out commitments of both parties including the following:

NYA: A commitment to deliver replacement assets and/or pay compensation, allowances and

livelihood restoration packages at certain contractual times and according to certain contractual

modalities.

Affected household: A commitment to vacate agreed land at a date agreed upon by both

parties.

Each household agreement will be tailored to the affected household and will draw on information

gathered during the census, asset inventory, and internal processes such as asset valuation. Each

compensation package will include the following information:

Detail of proposed replacement housing;

Detail of proposed replacement plot on the host site;

Overview of any compensation entitlements;

Overview of additional resettlement assistance including assistance with the moving of

household assets such as furniture to the new location.

It will be important that input is gained on each aspect and signoff only obtained once all parties are

satisfied. The agreement will be signed by the household head and NYA. The agreement will be

witnessed by others, such as government official, always with an NYA representative.

In addition to the compensation agreements, receipts and certificates of delivery will be signed by

both parties upon delivery of any of the components of the overall entitlement. Copies of agreements

will be scanned and entered into the resettlement database.

12.4.2 Implementation of the Compensation Agreements

Following the signing of the individual compensation agreements for affected homesteads, the

implementation will be able to progress. This will focus primarily on the implementation of the

compensation packages. This will involve inter alia:

The construction of the replacement housing and associated structures on the identified, agreed

and allocated replacement land for affected homesteads and the process of physically relocating

the affected persons and their occupation of their new homesteads.

The allocation of the identified and agreed land for the replacement of affected agricultural land

and associated uses. This will also include the commencement of the use of this replacement

land with whatever assistance package that has been negotiated and agreed to by the affected

person and NYA in the signed compensation agreement.

The LRP and the monitoring and evaluation plan will continue to be developed throughout this phase

of implementation.



Table 12-3: Household relocation and compensation action plan

Action Detail Status and Timing Responsibility Key Performance Indicator

1. Undertake a household census and asset inventory with all affected households

An individual household census will be completed with all 13 affected homesteads to gather socio economic information on the household.

The asset inventory will be completed simultaneously to the census – it will record detailed information on the homesteads immovable assets which will be used for compensation purposes.

Completed

To be verified in January 2016

SRK and NYA A completed census and asset inventory of all affected households

Database of PAP

Implementation and dissemination of cut-off date

3. Engagement with local land chief

The local land chief (Chef de Terre) will need to be engaged with on a one on one basis. The purpose of this engagement will be the following:

Provide an explanation of the project description

Explain Yuku Village will need to be moved to a different location

Explain how affected people will be compensated and provided with replacement housing

Ascertain the availability of replacement land (in close proximity to host site)

Agree on a way forward to allocate land to affected households (this may require NYA purchasing land from the chief).

Completed NYA Community Liaison

CCP

Minutes of meetings with Chef de Terre

Agreements on any required replacement land

Agreements in principle to move relocate the village

2. Design of replacement housing

Replacement housing should be designed to match the current housing or better. Given the current uniform design 1 or 2 design options will be sufficient.

Completed NYA Engineer Plans of replacement housing

3. Present designs to the individually affected homesteads as a component of the overall compensation agreement

The relevant household design options will be presented the homestead head for comment and negotiation

It will be necessary for there to be allowances for small changes and alterations. It is recommended that graphics are provided when presenting the household designs.

Completed NYA Engineering and Community Liaison

Household designs agreed to and signed off my household heads



Action Detail Status and Timing Responsibility Key Performance Indicator

4. Completion of final compensation agreements

The final compensation agreements will contain detail on all aspects of the compensation (refer to Section 12.4.1).


Final signed off compensation agreements by household head, NYA and local traditional authority

5. Construction of new houses and services

New households will be constructed as per the agreed designs and on the agreed site

Structures must be 100% complete prior to moving people.

A formal handover should be undertaken by NYA.

To be completed February 2016

External Contractor

Replacement housing completed

6. Moving of household valuables

All household valuables such as furniture will be moved to the new household with the assistance of NYA.

To be completed March 2016

NYA CLOs All valuables moved to new location by agreed date

7. Demolition of households

All affected households will be demolished once they have been vacated to prevent future settlement and encroachment.

To be completed May 2016

NYA Engineering/External contractor

All existing structures demolished and cleared

8. Monitoring and evaluation (refer to Section 13)

NYA will be required to monitor the affected households for a certain period after the relocation. This monitoring will draw on the baseline and ascertain whether the physical displacement has detrimentally impacted the households.

Five years post resettlement

SRK and NYA Preparation of a monitoring and evaluation plan

Implementation of the plan



12.5 Economic Displacement: Implementation Action Plan This section of the report provides an overview of the completed and outstanding implementation

activities relating to impacted fields and economic displacement. Table 12-5 provides a summary of

the process to date and includes roles and responsibilities and KPI’s)

12.5.1 Identification and Verification

NYA has identified and recorded all of the affected fields, together with the owners, within the

footprint of the plant, quarry and overburden facility.

This has allowed NYA to quantify the potential land take and extent of economic displacement and

plan accordingly. The extent of land take has dictated the amount of replacement land required and

has guided the process for the identification and allocation.

Following the completion of the final identification and verification in June 2015 NYA implemented a

cut-off date for eligibility. The cut-off date has been widely disseminated to all affected parties and

has been used to determine which field owners will be eligible for compensation. Any further claims

will be managed through the existing grievance mechanism.

A database of impacted fields, including the location, approximate size, crop types and cultivation

status is included in Appendix E.

12.5.2 Engagement

Affected Field Owners

Prior to the payment of any compensation NYA engaged with the affected field owners. This

engagement was predominantly done through the CCP. The purpose of this initial engagement was

the following:

To inform affected households about the project and the reason for their fields having to be

relocated;

To determine if they have any comments, grievances and/or suggestions about the resettlement

process (the grievance mechanism was clearly explained); and,

To understand if they have any preferred sites for replacement land.

Local Traditional Authority

Following engagement with the affected field owners NYA also engaged with the local Chef de Terre

as he is the custodian of land in the area. The purpose of this engagement was the following:

To inform about the project and the resulting economic displacement;

To explain the extent of the displacement;

To ascertain the location and quantity of replacement land that is available and how it can be

obtained by NYA (a customary payment was made to the Chef to secure replacement land);

To secure an agreement for replacement land and buy-in from the Chef to assist in the

relocation process.



12.5.3 Replacement Land

Allocation

The process that has been followed for the identification and securing of replacement agricultural

land has been the following:

1) The affected farmer identifies options for available replacement land;

2) NYA consults with the relevant Chef de Terre to ascertain if the land is available and suitable.

The entente is discussed and agreed by both parties;

3) NYA verifies the quality of identified replacement land with support from agronomists (if

necessary);

4) NYA assists the PAP with preparing the land for use (clearing, ploughing); and,

5) NYA seeks to ensure that land allocation complies with a “square meter for square meter”

requirement, and that it is of similar or better quality than the original land.

Preparation

Once replacement fields have been identified and secured (including the signing of compensation

agreements as detailed below) NYA will assist households with preparing their fields for cultivation.

This preparation will include clearing of bush and making the soil ready for cultivation through

ploughing.

12.5.4 Compensation

Individual Compensation Agreements

After agreement is reached with the affected field owner on compensation, allowances and livelihood

restoration, an agreement has been completed and signed by the field owner and NYA or by both

the husband and wife and NYA, if the asset is jointly owned by the household. In a single headed

household, the individual head of household signs the agreement. However, crops are typically not

considered a joint household asset and in the case of a married couple, the related compensation

agreement is signed by the household member who takes care of the crop.

The agreements have been witnessed by others, such as a government official, but always together

with a NYA representative. The agreement clearly spells out commitments of both parties including

the following:

For NYA: A commitment to deliver and/or pay compensation, allowances and livelihood

restoration packages at certain contractual times and according to certain contractual modalities.

For the affected household: A commitment to vacate agreed land at a date agreed upon by

both parties.

In addition to the compensation agreements, receipts and certificates of delivery will be signed by

both parties upon delivery of any of the components of the overall entitlement. An example of a

signed agreement is included in Appendix F. The following table summarizes these procedures.



Table 12-4: Procedure followed for individual field compensation agreements

Tasks

1. Prepare draft agreement documents.

2. Present draft agreements to affected parties. Ensure affected parties are happy with terms of the draft agreement. Update agreement with any further nuances following negotiations.

3. Verify that affected parties understand the terms of the Final Agreement. Review the terms and conditions of the compensation package.

4. Have affected parties (field owner) sign the final agreement with witnesses (e.g. relevant government official) as well as a NYA representative.

5. Provide affected parties with a signed copy of the final agreement.

6. Scan agreements and enter into the database.

Payment

PAP receiving compensation or allowances in cash have a choice between two options:

With support of NYA, PAPs may open a current account in the local branch of a reputable

Congolese bank, and be paid by bank transfer, and receive the entirety of their compensation in

one payment; or

PAPs may be paid in cash in one payment.

PAP were paid the first 50% of the amount cash, the money was paid when the agreement was

signed and handed over. The remaining 50% will have been paid by December 2015.

12.5.5 Demarcation

NYA will clearly demarcate the footprints within which communities will not be allowed to cultivate

land and to expand villages.

The purpose and location of the demarcated areas will need to be clearly disseminated to all

communities in the area to prevent settlement and try and curb the potential for theft of the wooden

poles. It will be important for NYA to monitor these areas on a weekly basis.

Exclusion areas will be determined in discussion with the legal department involving the government

and the legal representatives and local representatives.



Table 12-5: Field relocation and compensation action plan

Action Detail

Status and

Timing Responsibility

Key Performance Indicator

1. Identification and verification of affected fields and owners

It will be necessary to identify both the location of the affected fields and the owners of these fields within the plant, quarry and overburden sites. The following will need to be recorded in an asset inventory:

- Name of field owner and where they live

- GPS coordinates of field

- Type of crops grown

- Size of affected field.

Completed (June 2015) SRK and NYA A completed asset inventory of all affected fields and owners

Creation of database

Implementation and dissemination of cut-off date

2. Engagement with affected field owner

The affected field owners will need to be engaged (either one on one or in a forum). The engagement will need to serve the following purpose:

- Provide an explanation of the project description;

- Explain why their fields need to be moved to a different location

- Explain how they will be compensated and provided with replacement land

- Ascertain of there are any concerns suggestions or complaints.

Completed

(ongoing through the CCP)

NYA CLOs Minutes of meetings (including issues and responses)

3. Engagement with local land chief

The local land chief (Chef de Terre) will need to be engaged with on a one on one basis. The purpose of this engagement will be the following:

- Provide an explanation of the project description;

- Explain why certain fields need to be moved to a different location

- Explain how affected people will be compensated and provided with replacement land;

- Ascertain the availability of replacement land (in close proximity to affected fields)

- Agree on a way forward to allocate land to affected households (this may require NYA purchasing land from the chief).


Meetings of minutes

In principle agreement to allocate land secured

Entente fee paid



Action Detail

Status and

Timing Responsibility

Key Performance Indicator

6. Allocation of replacement land

In consultation with the Chef de Terre and affected households, replacement land should be allocated (this must be of equal size and agricultural potential). The process must include the following:

- Both NYA, the Chef de Terre and affected household must be present

- Allocated land must be agreed on by all parties

- A signed agreement must be completed between all parties.

Completed NYA CLOs Land allocated and recorded in compensation agreements

7. Preparation of replacement land

Once the replacement land has been allocated to affected households it will be the responsibility of NYA to prepare the land for agricultural purposes. This will include:

- Clearing any bush and grass

- Providing access to the allocated land

Making the land ready for cultivation (i.e. ploughing etc.).

Ongoing (land is prepared as field owners are relocated)

NYA Land prepared and ready for cultivation

8. Payment of compensation

Should the impacted fields currently have crops owners, they should be afforded the opportunity to harvest what they can (within an agreed time period). Following this any lost crops due to economic displacement will be compensated for in cash. This should be in line with set compensation values plus 50% (as per DRC legislation).

Completed NYA

Signed final household agreements

Compensation paid to affected household

All payments recorded in database

10. Demarcation of sites

Once fields have been moved the plant, quarry and over burden sites should be clearly demarcated. This will serve the following purpose:

- Allow NYA to monitor the influx/opportunistic movements of people

- Inform local communities of the restricted areas;

- Allow NYA to implement a cut-off date (i.e. anyone cultivating land in the demarcated area following the cut-off date will not be entitled to any form of compensation).

Ongoing NYA Sites clearly demarcated

Communities made aware of sites

11. Monitoring and evaluation (refer to Section 13)

NYA will be required to monitor the affected households for a certain period after the relocation of the fields. This monitoring will draw on the baseline and ascertain whether the economic displacement has detrimentally impacted the households.

5 years post resettlement

SRK and NYA Preparation of a monitoring and evaluation plan

Implementation of the plan



13 Monitoring and Evaluation

13.1 General Objectives of Monitoring and Evaluation International standards require monitoring and evaluation on the effectiveness of RAP

implementation, including resettlement and rehabilitation activities, the disbursement of

compensation, the effectiveness of public consultation and participation activities and the

sustainability of income restoration and development efforts among affected communities.

The primary objective of the RAP monitoring and evaluation programme is to ensure that the Plan is

fully implemented, and that affected households derive maximum benefit from the agreed

compensation and associated development support. Further objectives include the following:

To guide further interactions with affected persons and communities;

To learn lessons that might be fed back into RAP implementation;

To build a base of goodwill and trust between NYA and affected persons/communities;

To secure early warning of problems and potential conflicts; and,

To establish a base for feedback with affected households, local government, and other

stakeholders.

13.2 Internal and External Monitoring The monitoring and evaluation programme aims to ensure the RAP meet its objectives and complies

with international standards. Internal and external monitoring is an integral component of the RAP

process and has the following general objectives:

a) To assess progress with RAP activities;

b) To monitor RAP implementation including compensation and resettlement processes;

c) To determine the impact of resettlement and compensation on affected households;

d) To prevent potential impacts adversely affecting resettled households; and,

e) To determine the nature and causes of RAP implementation problems and identify solutions.

13.3 Performance Indicators Key performance indicators assist with monitoring and managing RAP implementation and

resettlement impacts. These indicators are classified under three broad categories listed below:

i) Process indicators; Indicating project inputs, expenditures, staff deployment etc. These

indicators will largely address NYA’s internal arrangements;

ii) Output indicators; Indicating RAP implementation results in terms of numbers of affected

people compensated and resettled, livelihood restoration training, etc. These indicators will

largely assess the RAP’s internal implementation processes and results; and,

iii) Impact indicators; Measuring the longer-term effects of resettlement on people affected by

physical and economic displacement. Impacts can be determined using the established

social baseline and the grievance mechanism. These indicators will largely determine the

external impacts of the RAP implementation process.

The table below outlines a set of key indicators for each of the categories.



Table 13-1: Key performance indicators

Indicator Description Measure

Process indicators

Staff deployment If required, recruit additional staff members or external consultants to assist with RAP implementation, management and monitoring

Effectiveness of staff

Terms of reference for external consultants and resettlement specialists

Staff training

Internal staff meetings

Weekly meetings held with staff responsible for resettlement and livelihood restoration

Monthly management meetings with key project personnel

Minutes of meetings

Response time to address issues and actions identified in meetings

Process followed to address issues

Meetings with key stakeholders

Monthly meetings with community authorities(i.e. TAs)

Minutes of meetings

Response time to address issues and actions identified in meetings

Process followed to address issues

Reporting Monthly progress reports

Annual reporting

Reports

Expenditure Expenditure on compensation, resettlement and livelihood restoration programmes

RAP budget

Output indicators

Project affected people

Details of people affected by resettlement including economic and physical displacement

Numbers of people affected by physical displacement

Number of people affected by economic displacement

Compensation Descriptions of compensation payments

Compensation payment amounts

Signed compensation forms

Livelihood restoration training

Review livelihood Number of programme participants every year for the first five years

Percentage of participants who have started small businesses and maintained them into the fifth year of monitoring

Grievances with resettlement

Review the effectiveness of the grievance mechanism

Grievances type by number of grievances received and resolved

Number of hearings

Grievances type by time required to resolve grievances

Percentage of grievances still outstanding

Impact indicators

Collect socio-economic data on affected households

Undertake a household survey with project affected people

Updated socio-economic baseline

Determine differences between pre- and post-resettlement income

Percentage of households with improved income

Livelihood restoration Review the effectiveness of the livelihoods restoration plan

Percentage of households who have continued farming

Percentage of households pleased with the livelihood restoration process



Indicator Description Measure

Perceptions of project affected people

Document changes in households perceptions and evaluate households satisfaction with the resettlement and compensation process

Percentage of households satisfied with the compensation process

Ease of transition of households ito income generation, psychological comfort and social inetgration

Percentage of households pleased with the physical displacement process

Percentage of households with positive sentiments towards NYA

Percentage of households with improved quality of life

Vulnerable households

Undertake a household survey with vulnerable households

Monitor and do bi-annual visits to vulnerable households

Updated socio-economic baseline on vulnerable households ito income, livelihoods and community participation

Determine differences between pre- and post-resettlement income

Percentage of households with improved income

13.4 Monitoring Plan The proposed RAP monitoring plan is presented in Table 13-2. The Plan identifies the various RAP

management domains, some of the key performance areas, broad performance indicators,

monitoring responsibilities, timing and frequency of monitoring, reporting, and the overall duration of

specific monitoring initiatives. Apart from ongoing monitoring, key monitoring intervals will be the

following:

a) On completion of the RAP implementation NYA will commission a Completion Audit to determine

whether resettlement and compensation complied with the procedures and policies outlined in

this RAP, and more generally with the IFC’s Performance Standards.

b) Six months after resettlement. This will be largely internally managed, and will provide an

opportunity to correct deviations from the principles and objectives of the RAP. An evaluation

session involving the main stakeholders will be considered. The session will identify key lessons.

c) One year after resettlement. Internal and external evaluations will take place on this occasion.

The internal evaluation will focus on livelihoods restoration activities, and the external on

sustainability.

d) Two years after resettlement. A second external review will take place on this occasion, again

focussed on issues of sustainability.

13.5 Completion Audit The objectives of the Completion Audit include the following:

Overall assessment of the RAP implementation against the objectives and procedures set out in

this RAP;

Assessment of compliance of implementation with local laws, regulations and international

practice including the IFC PS5;

Assessment of fairness, adequacy and promptness of the implemented compensation and

resettlement procedures;



Evaluation of the impact of the compensation and resettlement programme on livelihood

restoration, measured through incomes and standards of living, with an emphasis placed on the

“no worse-off if not better-off” requirement; and,

Identification of potential corrective actions necessary to mitigate the negative impacts of the

programme, if any, and to enhance its positive impacts.

The Completion Audit will be based on documents and reports generated during the monitoring

process.



Table 13-2: Proposed RAP monitoring plan

RAP Management Domain

Key Performance Areas

Performance Indicators

Monitoring Responsibilities

Timing and Frequency

Reporting Duration of Monitoring

Operational Issues

RAP implementation Implementation against schedule

Check status against schedule

RAP Project Manager

Continuous Progress reported to:

NYA Management

RAP implementation period

Compensation arrangements

Satisfactory conclusion of compensation

All agreements concluded

All compensation delivered

Grievances addressed

RAP Project Manager

End of agreement negotiation period

Six months after resettlement

Reporting to:

NYA Management

CNC

Compensation negotiation period and six months after resettlement

Resettlement arrangements

Satisfactory conclusion of resettlement

All site arrangements concluded

All resettlement completed


RAP Project Manager

Land identification period

End of resettlement process


Reporting t to:

NYA Management

CNC

Land identification and resettlement period and six months after resettlement

Livelihood restoration arrangements

Satisfactory conclusion of LRP initiatives

Refer to indicators listed in Section 10

RAP Project Manager

Introduction of LRP


One year after resettlement

Reporting t to:

NYA Management

CNC

Initiation of LRP to one year after resettlement

Grievances and comments

Satisfactory resolution of grievances

Grievance mechanism known

Recording and response system running


RAP Project Manager

Continuous Reporting t to:

NYA Management

CNC

Intensive for six months, as required thereafter



RAP Management Domain

Key Performance Areas

Performance Indicators

Monitoring Responsibilities

Timing and Frequency

Reporting Duration of Monitoring

Sustainability Issues

Effects of livelihoods restoration

Sustainable benefits to recipients

Effective use of LRP inputs

Extension of LRP by other interests


RAP Project Manager

Survey undertaken six months after resettlement

Reporting to:

NYA Management

CNC


Use of compensation by resettled households

Productive and sustainable use of compensation

Use of compensation in a manner that sustains livelihoods


RAP Project Manager

Survey undertaken six months after resettlement

Reporting to:

NYA Management

CNC


Development status of resettled households

Development status against baseline

Household cash and in-kind incomes

Health status

New livelihoods ventures

RAP Project Manager

Survey undertaken six n after resettlement

External review one and two years after resettlement

Reporting to:

NYA Management

CNC


One year after resettlement

Two years after resettlement

SRK Consultin

HARA/LIBB

Pre

And

Sen

Re

Brio

Par

pp

ng: Project No: 4

epared by

drew Hart

nior Social D

eviewed by

ony Liber

rtner

492484: NYA RA

y

evelopment

y

AP

Consultant

NYA RAP

Page 82

January 2016

2



Appendices



Appendix A: Census and Asset Inventory Questionnaire and Database

Name of Person Interviewed:

Date of census:

Location of Household:

GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:

Length of Time in HH:

Full Name Relation to HH Sex AgeMarital Status

Residence Status

Education Occupation Special Needs

Lufulaki Sami HH M 58 Married Owner Secondary Self Employed ‐

Mfudi Mao Spouse F 42 Married Family Primary Farmer ‐

Public Amenities Utilised Location Clinic Minkelo (4km)

Hospital Kimpese (36km)

Shops Kimpese (36km)

Source of Income Monthly Income Livestock Sales 250 000 CDF

Crop sales

TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME 250 000 CDF

Energy Requirment SourceLighting Torch, parrafin lamp

Cooking Wood, charcoal

Water SourceYuku River

Sanitation Bush toilets

Sickness in past three months? No

Common Ailments:

Health facilities utilised: Minkelo Clinic

Kimpese Hospital

Births in last 3 months? No

Where di they give birth? N/A

Have you heard you will be resettled? Yes

If you are moved, are you happy with the

seelcted host site?

What would you stand to lose from the

resettlement?

Would it be a positive situation? Yes

If there was an issue with the

resettlment, who would you talk to? Local chief

Any further comments? None

Yes. We will be happy to move to the new site if the new houses are well construcuted and the area will be

developed economically.

Nothing

NYUMBA YA AKIBA RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN HOUSEHOLD CENSUS JULY 2014

Household Details Lufulakio Salo (Sami)

07‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'31.41" E 014°12'02.19"

Amenities

Household Members

Income and Expenditure

Energy, Water and Sanitation

Health

Resettlment and Compensation

Sami Lufulakio

10047092715

None

Less than 1 year

Type of Structure:Size: Tenure Status:

Fitted kitchen:Fitted bathroom:Walls:Roofing:Windows:Doors:Ceilings:Flooring:Fencing:

GPS Location Approx Size: 200m2

Type of Crops: Beans

Irrigation Next to river

Fencing: None

Type: Orange

Number: 3

Housing/Structures

Multifunctional residential

6.0m x 3.1m (18.6m2)

Owner

No

Fields

Fruit Trees

Concrete

None

ASSETS INVENTORY

No

Clay fired bricks (plastered)

Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Patrice Adieyi Luyila HH M 40 Widow Owner Secondary Farmer ‐

Muyetu Adieyi Daughter F 18 Unmarried Family Secondary Student ‐

Nkenge Adieyi Son M 14 Unmarried Family Secondary Student ‐

Mombo Adieyi Son M 10 Unmarried Family Primary Student ‐

Nzuzi Adieyi Son M 10 Unmarried Family Primary Student ‐

Diakese Adieye Son M 8 Unmarried Family Primary Student Small child

Nginamao Adieye Daughter F 6 Unmarried Family Primary None Small child

Public Amenity Location LocationPrimary School Minkelo (4km)

Secondary School Kimpese (36km)

Clinic Kimpese (36km)

Source of Income Monthly Income Crop sales 50 000 CDF 2013 Crop sales 20000FC

Informal Employment (NYA) 50 000 CDF Informal Employm240$

TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME 100 000 CDF TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME

Energy Requirment SourceLighting Parrafin lamp

Cooking Wood



Sickness in past three months? Yes

Common Ailments:


Kimpese Hospital





selcted host site?


resettlement?



resettlment, who would you talk to? Family/friends

Any further comments?


Household Details Patrice Adieyi Luyila

08‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'37.73" E 014°12'01.63"

Patrice Adieyi Luyila

10049820688

243 821 414 046

1‐5 years

Household Members

Public AmenityAmenities


Health


Yes. We chose the host site together with the company.

We expect that NYA will build us improved houses to a high standard.

Nothing

Hospital

Cemetery

Shops

Kimpese (36km)

Kinsua

Kimpese/Minkelo

Malaria (fever), diarrhoea




GPS Location Approx Size:Type of Crops: Cassava Sweet Potato Beans

Irrigation None None None

Fencing: None None None

Type: Banana Orange

Number: 100+ 12

2013 1

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


9.0m x 3.8m (34.2m2)

Owner

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

Concrete

None

Fields

Fruit Trees


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Nowa Michel HH M 77 Married Owner None Farmer Elderley

Lelo Selipa Spouse F 64 Married Family None Farmer ‐

Mbambu Kulu Daughter F 45 Widow Family Secondary Farmer ‐

Lelo Selipa Grandchild F 15 Unmarried Family Secondary Student ‐

Nkongolo Zisanwa Grandchild F 12 Unmarried Family Primary Student ‐

Nga Mankutima Grandchild M 12 Unmarried Family Primary Student ‐

Nkusu Lumeka Grandchild M 11 Unmarried Family Primary None ‐

Lwaku Victorine Grandchild F 8 Unmarried Family Primary Student ‐

Public Amenity Location LocationPrimary School Minkelo (4km)



Public Transport Mawete (5km) Church

Source of Income Monthly Income Crop sales 10 000 CDF 2013 Crop sales 50000

Livestock 105000

TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME 10 000 CDF TOTAL MONTHLY10 000 CDF

Energy Requirment SourceLighting Torch





Common Ailments:


Kimpese Hospital





selcted host site?


resettlement?



resettlment, who would you talk to? NYA



We were originally a bit aprehensive, however NYA has explained the process to us and we are now happy to

move to the host site.

Nothing

We expect that it will be difficult at first but we will get used to our new homes.

Minkelo (4km)



Health

Malaria


Cemetery Yuku Village

Shops Kimpese/Minkelo


29 years

Household Members

Nowa Michel

07‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'34.16" E 014°12'0.87"

Nowa Michel

18049873738

None


Household Details



GPS Location Approx Size:Type of Crops: Cassava Cassava Ground Nuts Cassava

Irrigation None None None None

Fencing: None None None None

Type: Banana Orange Avocado Pineapple

Number: 35 30 1 28

2013

BANANA 30

Fruit Trees

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

Concrete

None

Fields


9.0m x 3.8m (34.2m2)

Owner

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Ngenda Paulin HH M 54 Married Owner Secondary Farmer ‐

Mukanda Jeanne Spouse F 47 Married Family Primary Farmer ‐

Ngenda Paulin Son M 15 Unmarried Family Secondary Student ‐

Nsuka Charlotte Daughter F 9 Unmarried Family Primary Student ‐

Public Amenity Location LocationEcole Primary School Minkelo (4km)




TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME 100 000 CDF TOTAL MONTHLY 200000






Common Ailments:






selcted host site?


resettlement?

Would it be a positive situation? No





We are concerned that moving to the host site will isolate us from the social infrastructure we use.

Loss of access to services

We would prefer to move to Minkelo ‐ Mbemba is too isolated



Health

Malaria



2 years

Household Members

Ngenda Paulin

07‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'27.95" E 014°11'58.34"

Ngenda Paulin

None

None


Household Details



GPS Location Approx Size: 2000m2 1000m2 2000m2

Type of Crops: Cassava Cassava Cassava Cassava



Type: Banana Avocado

Number: 30 3

2013

trees 10

banana

Fruit Trees

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

Concrete

None

Fields


7.0m x 3.6m (25.2m2)

Owner

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Nsimba Vangu HH M 38 Married Owner Secondary Farmer, Formal ‐

Lombo Nkango Spouse F 26 Married Family Primary Farmer ‐

Mvibudulu Mpuete Daughter F 8 Unmarried Family Primary Student ‐

Nsimba Nsimba Daughter F 5 Unmarried Family None None Small child

Nzuzi Nsimba Son M 5 Unmarried Family None None Small child

Nsimba Kukambo Daughter F 1 Unmarried Family None None Small child

Nzuzi Vangu Nsimba Daughter F 1 Unmarried Family None None Small child



Source of Income Monthly Income Crop sales Uncertain 2013 Crop sales 200000

Formal Employment (G4S) Unwilling to disclose Formal Employm 100000

TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME Uncertain TOTAL MONTHLYUncertain





Sickness in past three months? Yes (2 people)

Common Ailments:

Health facilities utilised: Kimpese Clinic (G4S benefit)

Births in last 3 months? Yes

Where di they give birth? Kimpese Hospital



selcted host site?


resettlement?




Any further comments? We hope that the whole process goes smoothly


Health


We are not sure what benefit there will be to us. Our fields are here and thererfore we do not really want to

leave

Fever

Loss and scenery and natural environment


Amenities


3 years

Household Members

Public Amenity

Nsimba Vangu

07‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'23.21" E 014°11'57.26"

Nsimba Vangu

None

812 675 594


Household Details



GPS Location Approx Size: 5000m2

Type of Crops: Cassava

Irrigation Yes ‐ pump from river

Fencing: None

Type:Number:

2013

Trees Banana 5

Fruit Trees

Concrete

None

Fields


9.0m x 3.8m (34.2m2)

Owner

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Boniface Kiele HH M 47 Married Family Secondary Farmer ‐

Dibanzile Nkemke Spouse F 42 Married Family Secondary Farmer ‐

Kiampava Mwanda Son M 16 Unmarried Family Secondary Student ‐

Mayifuila Ndosiba Son M 13 Unmarried Family Primary Student ‐

Lusantu Kiele Daughter F 5 Unmarried Family None None Small child



Secondary School Minkelo (4km)

Source of Income Monthly Income Crop sales 40000 CDF

TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME 40000 CDF






Common Ailments:

Health facilities utilised: ‐





selcted host site?


resettlement?




Any further comments? We did not initially suppot it because the host site was too far, but now we are happy since we can decide whe


Health


We will be happy if we are built new homes

‐

None


Amenities

Cemetary Kinsua (6km)


less than 1 year

Household Members

Public Amenity

Kiele Boniface

08‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'20.45" E 014°11'55.47"

Boniface Kiele

100499622016

None


Household Details



GPS Location Approx Size:Type of Crops: Cassava Chilli Onions



Type: Banana Avocado

Number: 23 10

Fruit Trees

Concrete

None

Fields


9.0m x 3.8m (34.2m2)

Owner

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Malambu Toko Samuel HH M 48 Married Family Secondary Farmer ‐

Mansanga Vacanda Spouse F 45 Married Family Primary Farmer ‐

Mutuvuendi Simon Son M 21 Unmarried Family Secondary Farmer ‐

Lwako Elene Daughter F 18 Unmarried Family Secondary Farmer ‐

Malambu Toko Son M 15 Unmarried Family Secondary Farmer ‐


Clinic Minkelo (4km)

Secondary School Minkelo (4km)


Hunting 50 000 CDF Employment 120


Energy Requirment SourceLighting Torch, paraffin lamp



Sanitation Hand dug pit latrine


Common Ailments:






selcted host site?


resettlement?



resettlment, who would you talk to? Chef de groupement

Any further comments? None


Health


We will be happy to move to the host site if everything goes smoothly and they provide us with job

opportunities

Malaria, flu

None


Amenities

Cemetary Kinsua (6km)


5 years

Household Members

Public Amenity

Malambu Toko Samuel

08‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'15.61" E 014°11'53.23"

Malambu Samuel Toko

10049077950

810 208 755


Household Details



GPS Location Approx Size:Type of Crops: Cassava Cassava

Irrigation None None

Fencing: None None

Type:Number:

2013

trees banana orange avo safu

200 28 20+ 20

Fruit Trees

Concrete

None

Fields


9.0m x 3.8m (34.2m2)

Owner

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Nsunda Figas HH M 33 Married Owner Secondary Farmer ‐

Helen Luaku Spouse F 18 Married Family Primary Farmer ‐

Ndombele Nsunda Son M 2 Unmarried Family None None Small Child

Malambu Toko Daughter F 0.2 Unmarried Family None None Small Child

Public Amenity Location LocationClinic Minkelo (4km)


Source of Income Monthly Income Crop sales 100 000 CDF



Cooking Charcoal


Sanitation Bush toilet


Common Ailments:


Births in last 3 months? Yes

Where did they give birth? Minkelo Clinic



selcted host site?


resettlement?



resettlment, who would you talk to? Chief in Mbemba



Household Details Helen Luaku

08‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'10.72" E 014°11'51.25"

Nsunda Figas

None

None


Less than 1 year

Household Members


Cemetary Yuku

None


We do not have a choice to move

If we have to move NYA must give us new houses and fields so we can carry on with our lives


Health


No, the site is too far from Minkelo and the main road.

‐



GPS Location Approx Size:Type of Crops: Cabbage/Tomato

Irrigation None

Fencing: None

Type: None

Number:

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


9.0m x 3.8m (34.2m2)

Owner

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

Concrete

None

Fields

Fruit Trees


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Mavakala Kennedy HH M 29 Married Owner Secondary Farmer ‐

Marie Diasonama Spouse F 26 Married Family Secondary Farmer ‐

Makenka Moyo Son M 7 Unmarried Family Primary Student Small Child

Kufuene Christian Daughter F 5 Unmarried Family None None Small Child

Mavakala Kennedy Son M 3 Unmarried Family None None Small Child

Nsimba Vango Son M 2 Unmarried Family None None Small Child



Minkelo Primary Minkelo (4km)

Source of Income Monthly Income

Crop sales 50 000 CDF 2013 formal employme 30000

crops/livestok 80000



Cooking Charcoal, wood




Common Ailments:



Where did they give birth? ‐



selcted host site?


resettlement?






Household Details Marie Diasonama

08‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'17.63" E 014°12'2.44"

Marie Diasonama

10595607952

None


12 years

Household Members


Cemetary Kinsua

Loss of access to services


We are not looking forward to moving because it will have a negative impact on our lives


Health


No, the site is far from the market in Minkelo and they will have to cross the river which will be a problem in

the rainy season

Malaria, diarrhoea



GPS Location Approx Size:Type of Crops: Cassava Ground nut Sweet Potato Beans Cassava

Irrigation None None None None None

Fencing: None None None None None

Type: Banana Orange Avocado

Number: 30 50 10

2013 banana orange avo

50 15 10

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


12.4m x 3.8m (47.1m2)

Owner

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

Concrete

None

Fields

Fruit Trees


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Marie‐Claire Kavuvi HH F 24 Unmarried Tenant Primary Farmer ‐

Bandue Lo Lukombo Son M 8 Unmarried Family Primary Student Small Child


Shops Minkelo (4km)

Ecole Primary School Minkelo (4km)








Common Ailments:


Herbalist (cough)





selcted host site?


resettlement?






Household Details Marie‐Claire Kavuvi

07‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'20.12" E 014°12'3.42"

Marie‐Claire Kavuvi

10595605208

811 228 862


2 years

Household Members


Cemetary Yuku

Loss of access to services ‐ transport and water sources


There is a high expectation for job opportunities because there will be development in the area


Health


We are happyto move because the arrival of NYA will have a positive impact on us.

‐



GPS Location 5 9 10

Approx Size: 200m2 2000m2 1000m2

Type of Crops: Cassava Cassava Cassava Onions



Type: None

Number:

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


6.2m x 3.8m (23.7m2)

Owner

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

Concrete

None

Fields

Fruit Trees


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Anice Tuka HH F 28 Unmarried Tenant Primary Farmer ‐

Luzayadio Kumtima Son M 8 Unmarried Family Primary Student Small child


Shops Minkelo (4km)

Ecole Primary School Minkelo (4km)








Common Ailments:






selcted host site?


resettlement?



resettlment, who would you talk to? NYA, Chief in Mbemba



Household Details Aniece Tuka

08‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'20.87" E 014°12'4.14"

Aniece Tuka

10048681196

082 310 8677


1 year

Household Members


None


None


Health


We are happy to move and believe it will go well

‐



GPS Location Approx Size:Type of Crops: Cassava Cassava Cassava Onions



Type: None

Number:

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


6.2m x 3.8m (23.7m2)

Owner

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

Concrete

None

Fields

Fruit Trees


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Makola Mbiavanga HH M 32 Divorced Owner Secondary Farmer ‐


Shops Minkelo (4km)


Animal Products 150 000 CDF







Common Ailments:

Health facilities utilised: Kimpese Hospital





selcted host site?


resettlement?






Household Details Makola Mbiavanga

08‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'25.05" E 014°12'6.58"

Makola Mbiavanga

None

None


15 years

Household Members


None


None


Health


Yes, I think the process will go smoothly and I am not sceptical at all

Cyst



GPS Location Approx Size:Type of Crops: Cassava Cassava Beans



Type: Oranges Avocado

Number: 100 + 3

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


6.2m x 3.8m (23.7m2)

Owner

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

Concrete

None

Fields

Fruit Trees


Date of census:


GPS Coordinates

Name of HH Owner:

ID Number:

Contact Number:



Residence Status


Papy Adieyi HH M 32 Married Owner Secondary Farmer ‐

Kama Landua Cousin M 24 Unmarried Family membPrimary Farmer ‐


Shops Minkelo (4km)



Energy Requirment SourceLighting Paraffin lamp





Common Ailments:






selcted host site?


resettlement?






Household Details Papy Adieyi

08‐Jul‐14

Yuku Village

S 05°37'25.60" E 014°12'7.30"

Papy Adieyi

10049815030

None


5 years

Household Members


None


I am looking forward to moving as I will get a new house.


Health


Yes, I think the process will go smoothly.

‐



GPS Location Approx Size:Type of Crops: Cassava Cassava

Irrigation None None

Fencing: None None

Type: Oranges Avocado

Number: 100 + 3

ASSETS INVENTORY

Housing/Structures


6.2m x 3.8m (23.7m2)

Owner

No

No


Corrugated Iron

Wooden Frames

Wooden

None

Concrete

None

Fields

Fruit Trees

NYA Project Socio-economic baseline 1

Unique Household ID

Name of village

Name of person being interviewed

Interviewer’s name

Date of Interview / /2014

GPS Location Homestead

1. Name of the household head and contact details First Last Contact number

2. ETHNICITY. What ethnicities are present in your household. Mark X in the relevant box(es). Yombe

Kakongo

Sundi

Solongo

Manianga

Ndibu

Mboma

Mbata

Zombo

Mpangu

Ntandu

Mbeko

Ndikindiki

Teke

Afinu

Mbisa

Other (specify)………

3. RELIGION. 3.1 What religions are present in your household. Mark X in the relevant box(es) and describe some of your religious practices. Catholicism

Kibanguism

Islam

Traditional (Animism)

Protestant (Christian)

Atheism

Other (specify)……

NYUMBA YA AKIBA CEMENT PROJECT

HOUSEHOLD SURVEY, June 2014


4. LANGUAGES. What languages are spoken in your household. Mark X in the relevant box(es). French

Lingala

Kikongo

Munukutuba

Kiyombe

Kimanianga

Other (specify)………….


5. Please tell us about the members who make up your household. Include people who rent accommodation. Start with yourself (refer to code list 10 below)

No.

Name Relation to HH

Sex Age Residence Status

Marital status Education Main Occupation /livelihood.

Skills Disability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15


6. HOUSING

6.1 When was the household established on this plot? Mark X in the relevant box. Less than 1 year

Between 1 and 5 years



More than 20 years

6.2 Why was the household established here? Mark X in the relevant box Inherited land

Close to fields and arable land

Close to trading sites

Only available land

Potential job opportunities at NYA

Other (specify)..............


6.3 Describe your household dwelling. Indicate the number of rooms and the materials they are made off. (Complete the table using the codes provided below the table) Type of dwelling Rooms Number

Materials used for walls (for codes see below)

Materials used for roof (for codes see below)

Traditional

Bedroom, living area

Modern Kitchen

Bathroom

Toilet (inside dwelling)

Toilet (outside dwelling)

Granary

Animal enclosure

Materials for walls: (1) Mud and wattle, (2) Mud plastered with cement, (3) Sandcrete bricks, (4) cement bricks, (5) corrugated iron, (6) Other (specify) Materials used for roofs: (1) Corrugated sheet, (2) grass thatching, (3) roof tiles, (4) Other (specify)

7. LAND 7.1 Does your homestead currently have access to land? Mark X in the relevant box

YES NO

7.2 What is the size of your plot/stand (including agriculture fields)? Mark X in the relevant box

Less than 1 hectares

Between 1 and 3 hectares


Between 6and 10 hectares


More than 20 hectares


7.3 What is the ownership status of your land? Mark X in the relevant box

Privately owned

Communally owned

Renting (includes sharecropping)

No formal land rights (squatting)

Other (specify)

7.4 How did you access your land? Mark X in the relevant box

Inherited

Purchased land from Mayor/Sub Prefect

Purchased land from traditional leaders

Private purchase

Other (specify)

8. AGRICULTURE

8.1 Please tell us about each of your fields

No

Siz

e o

f fi

eld

s (

acre

s)

Harvested in 2012?

Yes/No

Ownership 1 = Owned – Private Purchase 2 = Rented 3 = No formal land rights 4 = Sharecropped 5 = Other (specify)

Cultivation Method 0 = None 1 = Draught animal, 2 = Hoe, 3 = Other (Specify)

Irrigation 1 = Rain-fed 2 = Well/ Borehole 3 = Flood Irrigation 4 = Pumped from River 5 = Other (Specify)

Fertilization 1 = Commercial Fertilizer 2 = Slash and burn 3 = None 4 = Other (Specify)

Main Crop

Type

Second Crop Type

Crop Use 1 = Consume 2 = Sell 3 = Both

1


2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1 = Maize, 2 = Cassava, 3 = Rice, 4 = Sweet Potatoes, 5 = Beans, 6 = Groundnuts, 7 = Sugar Cane, 8 = Sorghum, 9 = Sesame, 10 = Tomatoes,

11 = Aubergines, 12 = Courgettes, 13 = Spinach, 14 = Cabbage, 15 = Onions, 16 = Soya, 17 = Millet, 18 = Potatoes, 19 = Yams, 20 = Cowpeas,

21 = Fallow (No Crops), 22 = Other (Specify)

NYA Project Socio-economic baseline

8

8. 2 Do you have any fruit or fuel trees? (Mark X in relevant box)

YES NO

8.3 Indicate which productive trees you have and if you sell their produce. Type Number Sell produce

(indicate with yes or no )

How much do you harvest? And then: How often? If sell: in what quantities? What do you get in return?

Bananas

Lemon

Orange

Avocado

Cashew

Mango

Guava

Paw paw

Pineapple

Passion fruit

Coconut

Coffee

Rubber

Palm oil

Coco

Eucalyptus

Other Trees (specify)

9. LIVESTOCK 9.1 Do you have livestock? (Mark X in relevant box)

YES 15.1 NO 15.2

9.2 How many of the following livestock does your homestead possess and how many (if any) were sold during 2012? And how many were consumed by you?

Animal Type Number owned

Number sold

Number consumed

Cattle

Goats

Sheep

Pigs

Rabbits

Chickens Nr of eggs

also asked


9

about?

Ducks

Other (specify)...

10. LAND USE to be asked to villagers living in villages other than Yuka and move this

section to ecosystem servicies

11. STANDARD OF LIVING

11.1 Was there a shortage of food in the household at any time last year? (Mark X in the relevant box)

YES NO

11.2 If yes, why were you not able to meet your household’s food needs? Could not produce enough food from farming

No money to buy food Food too expensive Don’t have access to land Natural calamities (bushfire, drought, disease and pest)

Other (specify).........................

11.3 During which of the following months did your household go hungry? (Mark X in the relevant boxes) Month Household did not have

enough food

January February March April May June July August September October November December


10

12. INCOME AND EXPENDITURE 12.1 How much money (CFA), if any, was earned by your household from each of the following sources in the last month? (Fill in relevant boxes)

Income generating activities

Formal employment If yes, where: Non-land informal employment (kiosk)

Agriculture

Livestock sales

Crop, vegetable, fruit, nut sales

Animal product sales

Other

Artisanal mining

Migrant remittances

Pension/social/welfare grants

Other (specify)................

TOTAL CASH INCOME FOR LAST MONTH

12.2 What have been your expenses (in CFA) for the past month for the following categories/items? (Fill in table below)

Food (including salt, oil, and soap)

Household items (furniture, and household goods)

Transport

School fees and stationary

Clothing

Savings

Lighting and cooking

Communication (mobile)

Water

Healthcare and medicine

Farming equipment

Agricultural inputs (seeds, pesticides, fertiliser)

Livestock (vaccinces, grazing etc)

House construction or repairs

12.3 How many women associations do you have in your

community?______________________________ 12.4 How do you save your money in the

community?__________________________________________


11

12.5 Please answer the following questions:

Proportion of women who have access to formal microfinance services

Proportion of men who have access to formal microfinance services


10. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 10. I am going read through a list of activities, and would like to know whether your household partakes in these activities. Please just answer yes or no to each of the activities I mention. 10.2. For each of the activities you answered “yes” to, I would like to ask some more questions.

10.1. Yes/no

10.2 For each of the activities you partake in, please specify the natural resources you use?

10.2 What do you use each of these for? (ask for each answered YES to in Q10.2)

10.2 Per opportunity you make use of, how much/many do you collect/use? (show quantities, take photo)

10.2 How often do you need these resources? (ask for each answered YES to in Q10.2)

10.2 How do you get it? (trap, cut, etc.) (ask for each answered YES to in Q10.2)

10.2 If it is not available, what would you use instead? (ask for each answered YES to in Q10.2)

10.2 Would you say there is enough for everybody? (yes/no) (ask for each answered YES to in Q10.2)

Charcoal making Specify type of trees Charcoal

for…

Grazing of livestock Specify type of grazing Livestock

for…

Collecting of wood Specify type of trees Wood for…

Collecting wild fruits Specify fruits

Collecting plants Specify plants

Collecting grass Specify grass

Hunting small animals Specify animals

Hunting of birds Specify birds

Hunting of fish Specify fish

Collecting of nuts Specify nuts

Collecting ingredients for traditional drinks

Specify ingredients

Collecting ingredients for traditional medicine


Recreational use of rivers and wetlands

Specify activities

Collecting fresh water Specify where

Agricultural activities Specify activities

Places of spiritual significance including areas of aesthetic value

Specify type of spiritual place

Places important for social relations and connections (meeting points, graveyards, playfields)

Other?

10.3 (Participatory mapping exercise). Please draw all these resources you make use of on a map, showing me where these are in relation to your house and the route you take to get there. Please feel free to call other household members to assist you (Note to fieldworker: please ensure that all the resources the participant mentioned the household used and the routes they take to these, are mapped, and show distances ( day’s walk/1km/etc). 10.4 In your view, how important are these resources to your household to keep you well and healthy? Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is not important at all we can go without it, 3 is it is not that important but it is good to have, and 5 is very important we cannot go without it.

RESOURCE 1 2 3 4 5

Charcoal making

Grazing of livestock

Collecting of wood

Collecting wild fruits

Collecting plants

Collecting grass

Hunting small animals

Hunting of birds

Hunting of fish

Collecting of nuts


Collecting ingredients for traditional drinks

Collecting ingredients for traditional medicine

Recreational use of rivers and wetlands

Collecting fresh water

Agricultural activities

Places of spiritual significance including areas of aesthetic value

Places important for social relations and connections (meeting points, graveyards, playfields)

What else do you use the following for?

Other?

10.5 Which wild animals, for example mammals, fish, birds and reptiles, are encountered in the area? 10.6 For each of these mentioned, please answer the following questions:

Gro

up

10.5 Species’ name

10.6 Brief description Photo if possible

10.6 Location where encountered (show on map: market, forest, etc.)

10.6 Do you use it for household consumption?

10.6 (for each one used for personal consumption) How often do you consume these?

10.6 And how many does your household consume at a time?

10.6 (for each one used for personal consumption) Would you say these are 1: very scarce, 2: somewhat scarce and 3 available in abundance

Fis

h

Bir

ds

Re

pti

l

es


Mam

mals


16

13.1 13. HOUSEHOLD ASSETS 18.1 Do you have any of the following items in your household (in a working condition)? (Mark X in relevant boxes) Motor Car Bicycle Motor Cycle Tractor Plough Mosquito net Sewing machine Table Chair Television Radio Fridge Iron Cooking Pots and Pans Iron Kettle Gas/Paraffin Cooker Mobile/Cell Phone Bed with Mattress Cupboard Generator Satellite

14. ENERGY, WATER AND SANITATION

14.1 What energy sources do you use for cooking and lighting? (Tick X in relevant boxes) Energy source Cooking Lighting

Electricity

Generator

Kerosene lamp/stove

Gas

Torch

Petrol lamp

Wood

Candle

Charcoal

Other (specify)…………..

14.2 Where is the water you use for domestic purposes obtained? – (Tick X in relevant box(es)

Communal pump

Borehole

Hand dug well

Spring water

Stream or River

Piped water

Other (specify)………………….


17

14.3 How do you describe the quality of your water source? (Tick X in relevant box) Description Selection

Always clean

Sometimes polluted

Always polluted

14.4 Please answer the following questions

Yes No

Do you have a water management committee in your community?

Do you organize community work to preserve your water source

Is there any community contribution for the maintenance of water sources

14.5 Please indicate the ways in which your household disposes refuse (Tick X in

relevant box)

Refuse disposal manners

Waste depot/landfill

Private waste pit near household

Dig a hole and bury

Burn waste Compost waste Other (specify)

15. HEALTH 15.1 In the last 6 months have any household members suffered from the following diseases? Indicate YES by showing the number of people affected by the ailment in your household.

Disease Number

Malaria

Cholera

Hepatitis

Meningitis

Tuberculosis

Diarrhoea

Guinea worm

Coughing

STDs (HIV/AIDs)


18

Malnutrition

Dental

Skin Condition

Don’t Know/Can’t Say

Other (specify)…....

15.2 Where do you go first for medical advice? (Only 1 answer)

Healthcare facility (clinic, hospital)

Pharmacy

Community health worker

Boutique / kiosk

Prepared a herbal remedy at home

Traditional healer

Friend/relative

I did nothing

Don’t know

Other (specify)................

15.3 If you didn’t go to the healthcare facility, please provide a reason? (Only one answer)

I cannot access the health facility

I do not like the health facility

I do not have the money for the health facility

Prefer to go to traditional healer

Prefer to get treatment by myself

No need for me to go to the health facility

Don’t know

Other (specify).....................

15.4 What is the name of the healthcare facility that your household usually uses? And where is it? Map…

Name of facility

15.5 Has any member of your HH given birth in the last 12 months? (Mark X in relevant box)

YES NO

15.6 If yes, where did they give birth?

Healthcare facility (clinic/hospital)

Home with community health worker


19

Traditional birth attendant

Home with friend/relative

Alone outdoors

Other (specify)…………………………….

15.7 Have there been any deaths in the family? Please indicate the number and the reason for their deaths.

ldeaths yes or no…. Number of deaths

15.8 Would you consider alcohol abuse as a problem in your village?

YES 19.40 NO 19.41

15.9 Would you consider drug abuse as a problem in your village?

YES 19.42 NO 19.43

15.10 Would you consider prostitution as a problem in your village?

YES 19.44 NO 19.45

15.11 Would you consider in-migration as a problem in your village?

YES 19.44 NO 19.45

16. Are members of your household involved in any community organisations/churches?

No. Name of organisation/mosque/church

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

17. Please tell us what you think about the proposed mining project and how it may impact your household.


20

18. Are there any concerns regarding the presence of security forces/companies in the area? If so, please describe your concerns.

Thank You



Appendix B: NYA Policies

Health and Safety Policy Vision Statement The safety and health of all Nyumba Ya Akiba (“NYA”) employees, along with our commitment to the environment, are of the highest priority. Our objective is zero workplace injuries and occupational illness. We believe that all injuries and occupational illnesses are preventable. We further believe that safety and health considerations are integral to, and compatible with, all other management functions in the organization and that proper safety and health management will enhance rather than adversely affect production or costs. Policy principles As part of this commitment, NYA and any affiliates will ensure: • Compliance with applicable internal and external safety and health standards; • Active management support for best safety and health practices and procedures; • Employees are properly trained and held accountable for following all prescribed

safety procedures and practices; • Awareness regarding safety practices and procedures among employees, host

communities and visitors; and • A work environment that eliminates occupational health and safety hazards

whenever possible. Accountability and Assurance NYA will: • Assign responsibility and determine accountability measures for safety and health

performance at all levels of management; • Ensure that the Board of Directors receive regular reports on outcomes and

results; • Measure progress to attaining our objectives against regularly established

benchmarks; • Provide the training and resources necessary to achieve our safety and health

benchmarks, and management will be held accountable for the results; • As a matter of philosophy and practice, hold all contractors operating at our

facilities accountable for the same level of safety that we expect of ourselves. All contracts will include specific safety provisions designed to achieve this result.

• Conduct comprehensive safety audits and industrial health audits on a regular basis at our project operations to evaluate the status of compliance with our safety and health programs and will communicate that information to senior management.

Adopted by NYA Board 15th July 2013

Human Resources Policy

Vision Statement

The vision of Nyumba Ya Akiba (“NYA”) is to hire the right people, with the right skills, in the right jobs at the right time. NYA is committed to providing its employees with a safe and rewarding work environment and ensuring that its policies, programs and practices are designed to help its employees grow both personally and professionally.

Policy Principles for hiring and recruitment

As part of this commitment, NYA will:

• Consult with the neighbouring communities to optimise opportunities for local employment

• Recruit in a transparent and equitable manner • Select all employees for all positions (by function, not solely by work title) based on

qualifications to best meet company business requirements, and in compliance with the labour legislation of the DRC

• For unskilled and semi-skilled personnel, NYA will implement a hiring policy that will prioritize applicants in the following order:

o Persons affected by project land-takings (i.e. having received compensation for physical or economic displacement)

o Persons registered as residents of one of the villages/ hamlets in and/or close to the project area

o In the event where the two above categories would not provide sufficient numbers of applicants for unskilled and semi-skilled positions, persons registered as residents in the province as per appropriate identification

o Other persons, only in the event where the three above categories would not provide sufficient numbers of applicants for unskilled and semiskilled positions

• Recruit skilled and professional positions from amongst all Congolese nationals with prioritization according to local place of residence given in case of a tie on skills and ability. Final recruitment will however remain subject to NYA’s operational requirements and people having the requisite ability to perform the work.

Accountability and Assurance

This policy will be made binding on NYA and to all contractors and subcontractors working for NYA during the construction and operation phases, as long as they employ 10 or more workers at any given time for project work and their project-related activity is predominantly on project sites. These contractors will be contractually required to develop hiring, recruitment and training plans and procedures to satisfy the requirements of this policy, prior to contract finalization. NYA will monitor contractors’ performance and compliance with the hiring policy.

Approved by the Board

15th July 2013

Human Rights Policy Vision Statement Nyumba Ya Akiba (“NYA”), consistent with our Principles of Business Conduct, is dedicated to the recognition, protection and promotion of human rights in its business dealings. We are committed to conducting business in a manner consistent with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the laws and regulations of the Democratic Republic of Congo as well as applicable conditions and standards of funders. We will not tolerate human rights abuses atour operational sites. We recognize and respect human rights as they pertain to our employees and their families, and the local communities around our areas of operation. Policy principles As part of this commitment, NYA and any affiliates will:

Promote human rights through engagement with host governments, local communities,and our employees and contractors;

Ensure that all employees treat everyone in and around our operations with dignity and respect;

Consult with our neighbouring communities with regards to operations development

Fully cooperate with any responsible human rights investigation and support appropriate punishment for proven violations;

Protect all employees who report suspected human rights violations;

Provide appropriate cultural and human rights education, training and guidance to all relevant staff, including security personnel;

Ensure fair treatment and work conditions for all employees, including rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining, and prohibit forced, compulsory or child labor;and

Implement policies and practices designed to eliminate harassment and unfair discrimination in all aspects of our activities.

Accountability and Assurance NYA will:

Establish guidelines and procedures consistent with this corporate policy, the UDHR and Congolese legislation;

Implement an effective program and management structure for compliance, promotion, education, training, reporting and responding to human rights issues and ongoing assessment of these programs;

Ensure compliance with this policy by all relevant personnel; and

Ensure contractor and supplier companies abide by this policy or adopt similar guidelines and procedures designed to ensure compliance.

Adopted by the Board

15th July 2013

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT POLICY

At NYA, we value the well-being of our employees, contractors, customers, the communities in

which we operate and the environment. We are committed to responsible management practices

that avoid and minimize adverse health, safety, social or environmental impacts, and we aim to

enhance the benefits associated with our activities, products or services.

We have in place an Environment, Health and Safety, and Community Management System for our

activities that drives continual improvement. The Management System outlines responsibilities to

implement this Policy and requires that we:

• Engage with stakeholders to ensure that governance and decision-making in the company

considers and is responsive to legitimate suggestions, expectations, views or concerns of

stakeholders

• Identify hazards and avoid and reduce risks where there is potential to cause injury or illness

to people, or to adversely impact the environment or the community

• Provide safe work places and systems of work, empower employees and contractors to

address unsafe or hazardous situations and carry out their work in a manner that does not

present a risk to themselves, others or the environment

• Support the recovery and rehabilitation of employees in the event of work-related injury or

illness.

• Set objectives and targets that promote the efficient use of resources, including energy,

water and materials, the minimization of wastes and emissions and the prevention of

pollution

• Develop and implement a community development programme that focusses on community

empowerment and well-being

• Comply with relevant EHS&C legal requirements and other commitments including

international standards

• Ensure our human resources and labour system incorporates the requirements of fair labour

practice relating to issues such as human rights, non-discrimination, equal opportunity, child

and forced labour, freedom of association, skills development and training, conditions at

work, employment relationships and grievance resolution

• Require Contractors and Suppliers to meet the requirements of this Policy and the

Management System

• Regularly monitor, review and report sustainability performance.

In implementing this Policy we will engage with our employees, contractors, suppliers, business

partners, customers and Government and communicate expectations to all persons working with or

on behalf of NYA.

Accountabilities

The Board is responsible for establishing and overviewing the Company’s commitment to manage

sustainability in accordance with this Policy and for monitoring the performance of the Company

with respect to its implementation.

The Managing Director is responsible for the implementation of the EHS&C Management System to

ensure the commitments made in this Policy are being met.

___________

Managing Director

Dated:



Appendix C: Meeting Minutes

1

COMPTE RENDU DE LA DEUXIEME SEANCE DE TRAVAIL AVEC DES PERSONNES AFFECTEES PAR

LE PROJET

Tenue à MINKELO le 08 AOUT 2015

Introduction

Dans le cadre d’échanges d’informations sur le processus de réinstallation, il s’est tenu Samedi 08 août

2015 dans la cour de l’Ecole primaire E.C.C la deuxième réunion avec les Personnes affectées par le

projet (PAP) qui attendent le paiement de la deuxième tranche.

Présidée par le Coordonateur Social, il a saisi cette occasion pour souhaiter la bienvenue aux participants

et présenter Monsieur Henri NYUMBAIZA comme Coordonateur RAP en appui à l’Equipe du Social.

A cet effet, le Coordonateur social accorda la parole à Monsieur Adolphe Lubikulu pour énoncer l’ordre

du jour comportant 3 points :

- Lecture du P.V de la réunion du 27 juin 2015

- Objet de la réunion

- Débat

Nombre des participants : 60 personnes.

CIMKO COMMUNAUTE Nom et post nom Fonction Nom et post nom Lieu de provenance 01. Georges MANTANTU Coordonateur Social 01 KUVUMUSU Philippe Minkelo 02. Henri NYUMBAIZA Coordonateur RAP 02 MASAMBA Dominique Mbamba 03 .Adolphe LUBIKULU Officier de Liaison Com 03. NLANDU Zacharie Minkelo 04. LUBENZO NZOLANI Consultant 04 MALUEKI LUZAYADIO Minkelo 05 MAVAKALA Kennedy Minkelo 06 MAKANZU W. Minkelo 07 MATUAZOLA MENAYAME Minkelo 08. KIMPOVI MASAMUNA 09 NSILULU MANTANDU Minkelo 10 NSILULU NSEMI Minkelo 11 NSIMBA DIATEZUA Minkelo 12 NZEZA MATONDO Minkelo 13. NDONGALA MANTUIDI Minkelo 14. N’YANGI LUTALADIO Minkelo 15. KASOMPUA MATONDO M’bamba 16. MANGIETIMONA F Minkelo 17. MAKAYI KIMBEMBE Minkelo 18. KUNSEDIOKO André Minkelo 19. TANDU Christine Minkelo 20. LESA MBANZANGA Minkelo 21. MAKULENDA NSUMBU Minkelo 22. LUYINDULA KILEBE Jérôme Minkelo 23. DIAKIESE Céline Minkelo 24. NKAKUDI MAYIMONA Minkelo 25. NZINGA BETI Minkelo 26. LUNGIABUDILA Minkelo 27. BETI NZINGA Minkelo

2

28. MANGIKULUA MATADILUA Minkelo 29. NSAMBU HODILO Minkelo 30. NSUKULA MAKOMA Minkelo 31. MPANGUAWO Julienne Minkelo 32. LUKEMBA DISENGOMOKO Minkelo 33. NTUMBA KASANDA Minkelo 34. MAMPOVA Céline Minkelo 35. BINASALA Sidonie Minkelo 36. VASAMU MENAYEMA Minkelo 37. MATUVOVANGA NSILU Minkelo 38. BANINGININA Marthe M’bamba 39. MAYINGI MASAMBA M’bamba 40. NOWA Michel Yuku 41. KIELE LUKEBUKA Yuku 42. NKENGE Yuku 43. NSIMBA KIAKU Minkelo 44. MAYITILA MAMPUYA Minkelo 45. LUAKU Helene I Yuku 46. KAVOVI Marie Claire Yuku 47. MELE BONGO Yuku 48. MANSANGA VAKANDA Yuku 49. LELO Selipa Yuku 50. MBAMBUKULU Marie Minkelo 51. LUAKU Helene II Minkelo-Mission 52. DIBAZONGA KEBANUAKU Yuku 53. MATONDO KUANZAMBI Minkelo 54. MABATEZULUA NZUZI Minkelo 55. LUSAVUVU WUMBA Minkelo 56. MPENDANI MAURICE Minkelo

Lecture du P.V de la réunion passée

L’officier de la liaison communautaire a procédé à la lecture du P.V de la réunion du 27 juillet 2015.

Après sa lecture, celui-ci a demandé aux participants à la réunion de réagir. A l’unanimité, le P.V a été

adopté.

Objet de la réunion :

La réunion du jour poursuivait trois objectifs, à savoir :

- Présentation du Coordonateur RAP

- De l’échéance du paiement des PAP

- Communication des l’Ir Agronome aux PAP

1. Présentation du Coordonateur de RAP

Il a été introduit par le Coordonateur Social et communautaire qui lui a présenté comme étant une

personne indispensable en appui à l’équipe du sociale pour le traitement du dossier R.A.P. Après cette

brève présentation, Monsieur Henri a pris langue avec les PAP. Il se réjouit d’être compté parmi les

membres de l’équipe du social de la CIMKO/NYA où son attention, sera focalisée sur la réinstallation. En

ce moment, il est entrain d’analyser ce qui a déjà été fait et voir s’il ya des dossiers qui sont entachés

d’irrégularité sinon se référer aux règles universelles de R.A.P a expliqué le Coordonateur de R.A.P.

3

2. De l’échéance du paiement des R.A.P

Au cours de la réunion du 27/06/2015, il avait été communiqué aux P.A.P qu’on leur payera

probablement au mois de juillet qui venait de s’achever. Bien sur, la société n’a pas honoré à ses

engagements. Mais, elle nous a demandé de vous rassurer qu’elle tient à l’aboutissement heureux de ce

dossier. Et très prochainement, une date de paiement vous sera fixée a expliqué Monsieur Georges

MANTANTU Coordonateur social. En plus, il a articulé sur un autre point ayant trait au paiement de la

deuxième tranche qui s’effectueras à la Banque (Rawbank). Ainsi, cette institution financière a demandé

à toute personne de disposer :

- Une carte d’identité ;

- 2 photos passeports en couleurs

Quant aux personnes qui n’ont pas leurs pièces d’identités, d’aller chercher les attestations de résidences

au Territoire de Songololo.

3. Communication de l’Ingénieur Agronome

Il a axé ses propos sur la préparation des champs pendant la saison agricole A. Ainsi, il a tenu à

prodiguer des conseils aux PAP sur la bonne tenue de leurs champs par rapport à ses observations faites

lors de ses visites d’inspection dans différents sites notamment : méthode de préparation de champs

inapproprié, retard de semis, le sarclage qui intervient souvent en retard ce qui permet aux prédateurs

de ravager les cultures . Il a noté aussi la récolte prématurée des feuilles de manioc qui ne facilite pas la

photosynthèse de la plante. Tout ces facteurs ont de l’incidence sur le rendement a-t-il dit.

Enfin, il a demandé à ses interlocuteurs d’évaluer ensemble la récolte de la récente saison agricole B.

A la suite de cet exposé et après une synthèse faite par Monsieur Georges MANTANTU, Coordonateur

Social, les échanges ont eu lieu.

Q1 Ndongala Mantuidi et Philipe Kuvumusu

En tant que cultivateurs nous vivons des produits de nos champs, mais là où vous avez jeté sur les pistes

aménager tout au tour de l’usine pour nous épargner des accidents ne nous plait pas. Pourquoi ne pas

nous aménager des pistes qui soient favorable aussi bien aux piétons qu’aux véhicules ?

R1 Nous avons posé ce problème au département du Civil. Ce dernier nous avait promis qu’il va réparer.

Donc nous attendons la concrétisation de la promesse.

Q2. Mavakala Kenedy

Ou sommes – nous avec la pose des panneaux qui doivent limiter les zones d’impact du projet pour savoir

là où nous encore cultiver ?

R2. Monsieur Georges

Dès lors qu’on se rendu compte que toute la vallée de Yuku est dans la zone d’impact, la pose des

panneaux n’est plus important. En ce qui vous concerne, comme on vous renvoie à New Yuku d’ici la fin

du mois de septembre, nous vous conseillons de cultiver dans l’autre rive de Sanzikwa.

Q3 Mme MAMPOVA

J’ai été enregistré sur la 1ère liste des P.A.P à l’an 2013. Qu’est ce que qui fait que mon nom ne se figure

pas sur la liste actualisée ?

R3 Monsieur Adolphe

Comme NYA a mis trop de temps pour démarrer ses travaux, les personnes qui étaient enregistré en 2013

ont enfin achevés le cycle de leurs cultures et ont fait la récolte ensuite ils ont fini par abandonner le

terrain .Mais parmi eux ceux qui n’avaient pas cesser de cultiver à leurs endroits habituels, avaient de

4

nouveau été enregistrés en 2014. Comme qui durait, ils n’étaient plus considérés comme des personnes

affectées par le projet.

Q4 Mme NKAKUDI

Est-ce si quelqu’un est absent lors du paiement, il peut se faire mandater par quelqu’un muni d’une

procuration ?

R4 Monsieur Georges

A ce sujet, nous devons nous renseigner auprès de la Banque si elle peut accepter une procuration. Mais il

sera souhaitable que le PAP se présente physiquement car c’est un problème qui concerne l’argent.

Q5 Monsieur MAYITILA

Lors des études d’impacts environnementaux et sociaux de SRK, les experts nous disaient qu’on devrait

continuer à cultiver dans la concession NYA. Mais maintenant on nous interdit parce que il n’ya plus les

voies d’accès dans nos champs. Nous craignons que nous aussi que nous aussi nous soyons relocalisés.

Qu’est ce vous me répondez à cette question.

R5. Monsieur Henry

Si on ne vous pas demandé de quitter, continuez à travailler

Q6. Monsieur Philipe KUVUMUSU

N’est ce pas que NYA avait payé les droits de redevance pour les PAP de la 1ère vague aux ayants droits

foncier ?

R6 Monsieur Adolphe

Affirmatif

Q7 Monsieur Philipe K

Comment se fait-il que Mme NZINGA BETI pour qui on avait payé les droits de redevance aux ayants

droits de Mbamba est menacée de ne plus cultiver sur leur terre ?

R7. Monsieur Georges

Votre préoccupation constitue une plainte que nous enregistrons et nous irons vers eux pour sécuriser

Mme Nzinga Bety

Q8. Monsieur Nsilulu Didier

Ce qui nous intéresse plus, c’est l’argent. A quant le paiement ? Cette saison nous avons réalisé une

mauvaise récolte due au changement climatique. Or, la rentrée scolaire approche. Comment allons –

nous retourner les enfants à l’école ?

R9 Monsieur Adolphe

Au cours de cette réunion, si nous avançons une date du paiement, ce que nous dirons la démagogie.

Mais très prochainement, nous vous communiquerons la date du paiement suivant l’évolution du dossier.

Avant de clore la réunion, l’Equipe du social a promis à tout les P.A.P qu’elle mettra à leur disposition une

fiche où sera insérer les coordonnées de contact de touts les membres de l’équipe du social.

5

Commencé à 10h25’, la réunion a pris fin à 12h40’

Fait à Minkelo, le 08/08/2015

Vu et approuvé par Le rapporteur

Georges MANTANTU DIBANZILUA Adolphe LUBIKULU

Coordonnateur Social Officier de liaison communautaire

6

ANNEXE

7

LISTE DES PRESENCES

8

9

10

11

IMAGES DES PARTICIPANTS

ORD

Uns

INTR

Danvillavend

NOM

Nom01.G02.A

D’encomréunSurdébuDanréinl’ann.IlaYUKplusAprèinforéin

DREDUJOU

seulpointét

‐ Informa

TRODUCTION

ns le but deageYukuendredi17juil

MBREDESP

CIMKetpostnomGeorgesMANTAAdolpheLUBIKU

ntrée en mmmencéparnion.ce, ilasaisiutjusqu’àcens ce propostallationphnéeencours

denouveauKU,deneplusindemnisée

ès ce rappermélespartstallation. L

COMPTER

UR:

taitinscrità

ationsurlar

N

fournir d’avuede solllet2015.

PARTICIPAN

KOFo

ANTU CoULU Of

matière, l’Offsouhaiter la

i l’opportunejour.os, il a aushysiquedons

rappeléàtouspréparerles.

el, le CoordticipantsàlaLa preuve e

RENDUDE

LAREINST

l’ordredujo

relocalisatio

avantage d’iliciter leur im

NTS:15per

onctionoordinateurSofficierdeLiaiso

fficier de Labienvenue

itéderappe

ssi fait metl’indemnis

ousceuxqulasaisonAp

dinateur Soaréunionquest que les

ELAREUNI

TALLATION

Tenue

our,àsavoir

nphysiqued

nformationsmplicationa

rsonnesavaie

Nocial 0onCom 0

0000001111

Liaison Comauxmembr

elertoutes l

ntion de laationseraef

uipratiquenprochainesu

ocial et CouelaCIMKO/travaux de

IONDESPE

NPHYSIQU

le17juille

r:

desfamillesd

s aux personactiveàcep

entprispart

Nometpostno01 NOWAMich03 MELEBONG04 LELOSELIP05MANSANGA06 NKENGED07 MAVAKALA08 LUNTENZIL09. ADIEYI LU10 NSIMBAVA11 KAVOVIM12 MASAYIDI13 TOKOSamu

mmunautaresde la co

lesétapesdu

a relocalisaeffectiveaup

ntl’agricultuurcessites.

mmunauta/NYAtientàe constructi

ERSONNES

UEDUVILL

et2015

duCampYu

nnes concerprocessus,u

tàcetteréun

COMMmhelGOPAAElisabeth.DIBANZILUAAKennedyLABAKALAUYILAPatriceANGUMarie‐ claireNZINGAJérémuel

aire Monsiemmunauté

u processus

ation économplustardver

ure,cultivedCar,s’ilslef

aire Monsieuàrespectersion des nou

S CONCERN

LAGEYUKU

kuauvillage

rnées par laune séanced

nion.(Table

MUNAUTEFonMMMMMMM

MM

mie MPré

ur Adolpheayant répon

sderéinstal

mique quirslafindum

danslapéripfont,leurscu

ur Georgesonplanninguvelles mais

NNEESPAR

U

eMbemba

a réinstallatde travaila

eauetlistede

nctionMembredelacMembredelacMembredelacMembredelacMembredelacMembredelacMembredelacChefduvillag

MembredelacMembredelacMembredelacésidentducomréinstallation

e LUBIKULnduprésent

llation depu

accompagnmoisdejuille

phérieduvilulturesnese

sMANTANTgduprocessusons à Mbe

tion physiquétéorganis

esprésences

comcomcomcomcomcomcomgecomcomcomitéden

LU aà la

uis le

ne laetde

llageeront

TU, ausdeemba

1

ue dusée le

s).

2 s’exécutentetavancentnormalement.Etlarapiditéaveclaquelles’exécutentlestravaux,nousrassurequ’auplustardfindumoisdeSeptembre,cesmaisonsserontmisàladispositiondesbénéficiaires.C’estpourcetteraisonquelaCIMKO/NYAnousdemandedepréparerenavancecetransfertduCampYukuauvillageMbembaparrapportàl’évolutiondetravauxquis’acheminentverslafin.DèslafindumoisdeSeptembredel’annéeencoursles12maisonsserontmisentàladispositiondesbénéficiaires.Débats.A la suitede cet exposédeMonsieurAdolpheLUBIKULU etaprès la synthèse faitepar MonsieurGeorges MANTANTU, les participants ont posés des questions auxquelles l’Equipe du Sociale arépondu.Cesquestionsonttournésurlestatutd’occupantdesnouvelles,lagrandeurdesmaisons,etc.Aprèscesquestions,lesréponsesetexplicationssupplémentairesontétéfournies:Q1.MonsieurNSIMBAVANGU.Jesuisdésolédefairecettedéclarationaujourd’hui.Lamaisonquej’occupeétaitenregistréeenmonnom.Alorsqu’iln’yapas longtemps, j’aientendudemesoreillesunayantdroit que jemeréservedeciterlenomentraindesortirdesproposdontvoici:’’Mêmesiphysiquementnousnesaurionspasexercerune pression conjuguée sur ces gens, spirituellement ilsnous croiseront sur leurschemin’’. N’étantpasnatifdecevillage, n’estilpaspossibledemeconstruire unemaisonailleursquedemêleràcesgens?R1.AdolpheLUBIKULUEnréponseàcettequestion, l’Officierde liaisoncommunautaire a fait savoirquecettequestionnetientpasdébout.Car,cequenousfaisonsmaintenant,c’estlarésultantedetouteslesétudesd’impactenvironnementaletsocialmenéedepuisdesannées.C’estpourcetteraison,qu’onvousdemandaitdedirelavéritélorsqu’onvousposaitdesquestionslorsdel’enquête.Q2MonsieurNOWAMichelJ’observe la construction de 12maisons àMbemba et j’ignoremon sort. Car, il ya longtemps quej’émettemesvœuxdenepasallerhabiteràMbembapourdesraisonsdeconvenancepersonnelle.R2GeorgesMANTANTUAusujetdesréticencesprobablesdedeux(2)personnesquiontémisunrefusc’est‐àdireNowaMichelet Ngenda Paulin d’aller habiter à Mbemba, nous vous rassurons que le Management de laCIMKO/NYAs’enoccuperaaumomentopportun.Q3.MAVAKALAKennedyLe bâtiment que j’occupe ici à YUKU à 2 compartiments. C’est ‐à‐dire, il a deux portes pour deuxfamilles.Or, parmi les12maisonsqu’on construitàNewYuku (Mbemba)? iln’yaaucunbâtimentcompartimenterpourabriterdeuxfamilles.R3.AdolpheLUBIKULUVotrepréoccupationestfondéeetseraacheminéeàlahiérarchieQ4.PatriceADIEYICommenousnepouvonspluscultiveràYuku,même les jardinspotagers,nousn’avonsplus ledroitd’enavoirnonloindecheznous?Q4GeorgesMANATANTUOui,cardansdeuxmoisvousne serezplus là.Vousavez intérêtd’allercultiverdans l’autre rivedeSANZIKUA.Car,cettevalléeestprochedevotrenouveauvillage.DIVERSUnesortedesensibilisationàétéfaiteauprèsdeshabitantsdeYukuElles’estfocalisésurdeuxpoints:‐Interdictionformelledefaireusagedefeudebrousse;‐Annoncerqu’ilyaaménagementdesnouveauxpistesparlaCIMKO/NYA,leurspermettantde

3 contournerlesdifférentesinstallationsdel’usine.Surce,l’accèssurlesiteouseréaliselestravauxserainterdit.LaCIMKOestentraindefourniruneffortpouraménagerlespistesquivontcontournéssesdifférentesinstallationssurlesquellespasserontlesgens. Commencéà9h45’,laréunionaprisfinà10h50’FaitàYUKU,le17juillet2015VuetapprouvéparLerapporteurGeorgesMANTANTUDIBANZILUAAdolpheLUBIKULUVENGACoordonnateurSocialetCommunautaireOfficierdeliaisoncommunautaire

4

ANNEXE

5

LISTE DE PRESENCES

IMAGES

6

1

RAP-EHSS

COMPTE RENDU DE LA Ière SEANCE DE TRAVAIL AVEC DES PERSONNES AFFECTEES PAR LE

PROJET

Tenue à MINKELO le 27 JUIN 2015

Le samedi 27 juin 2015, il s’est tenu une séance de travail pour passer en revue les différentes étapes

de la réinstallation.

NOMBRE DES PARTICIPANTS : 61 personnes avaient pris part à cette réunion

CIMKO COMMUNAUTE Nom et post nom Fonction Nom et post nom Lieu de provenance 01.Adolphe LUBIKULU

Officier de Liaison Com 01 KUVUMUSU Philippe Minkelo

02. Ir LUBENZO NZOLANI

Consultant 02 MASAMBA Dominique Mbamba

03 MENAYAME DIASOLOKA Minkelo 04 MAVAKALA Kennedy Yuku 05 LUYINDULA KILEBE Minkelo 06 LUKOMBO NKIAWETE Yuku 07 YANGI LUTALADIO 08. BAKANAMU MUYETO 09 NSILULU MANTANDU Minkelo 10 BANINGININA MALATA Minkelo 11 NSIMBA KIAKU Minkelo 12 NZINGA BETI Minkelo 13. LUNGIAMBUDILA DIAKIESE Minkelo 14. TADI MARIE Minkelo 15. BETI NZINGA Minkelo 16. BASUNDA José 17. NKENGE DIBANZILUA Yuku 18. MATONDO KUANZAMBI 19. LUAKU Helene 20. NZEZA MATONDO Minkelo 21. DIASUEKAMA DODIKA Minkelo 22. NLANDU NDUAKULU Minkelo 23. MAKULENDA NSUMBU Minkelo 24. MAMPOVA LELE Minkelo 25. BINASALA MAKIESE Minkelo 26. LUVUISA PITA Minkelo 27. MAKAYI KIMBEMBE Minkelo 28. SENDA MELEKI Minkelo 29. MATUVOVANGA NSILU Minkelo 30. MATUAZOLA MENAYAME Minkelo 31. KUNSEDIOKO André Minkelo 32. KASOMPUA MATONDO Minkelo 33. KIABELO VAKANDA Minkelo-Mission 34. KIELE LUKEBUKA Yuku 35. LUMFUANKENDA Minkelo-Mission 36. LUSADUSU LENA Minkelo-Mission 37. NDOZI A MANKELANI Minkelo 38. NSUNGI LUZOLO

2

39. EBUTA GLODI Minkelo 40. LUFIMPA KENE Minkelo 41. NTUMBA KASANDA Minkelo 42. LUSAVUVU Minkelo 43. LESA MBANZANGA Minkelo 44. MAKANZU WAYIKUA Minkelo 45. MANGIETIMONA Minkelo 46. ZOLA WUKUVUIDI Minkelo 47. TANDU Christine Minkelo 48. BATEZULUA Francine Minkelo 49. MBAMBUKULU Marie Minkelo 50. MALUEKI LUZAYADIO David Minkelo 51. TUTONDA KIAMANGA Minkelo-Mission 52. NOWA KANDA Yuku 53. MELE BONGO Yuku 54. ODILO Minkelo 55. LUKEMBA Minkelo 56. DIAKISE Céline Minkelo 57. MANGIKULUA MATADILUA Minkelo 59. PAPY Minkelo

D’entrée en matière, l’Officier de liaison communautaire, modérateur de cette réunion a

commencé par remercier toutes les personnes qui ont répondu à l’invitation. Il a ensuite

présenté des excuses pour l’absence du Coordonnateur Social et communautaire pris à une

autre activité.

En gros, l’exposé a abordé un point, à savoir : L’évaluation du processus de la relocalisation.

Sur ce, il a saisi l’opportunité de rappeler toutes les étapes du processus de la relocalisation depuis le début jusqu’à ce jour.

La relocalisation concerne 3 Sites à savoir : - L’usine - La carrière - Le camp Yuku L’identification et l’enregistrement des personnes, des champs et vergers est intervenu en 2012, 2013,2014 et 2015. Ainsi, comme il s’est passé trop de temps pour que le projet prenne corps, les personnes qui étaient enregistré en 2012 et 2013 ont enfin achevés le cycle de leur cultures et ont fini par récoltées les produits de leurs champs. Ces personnes ne sont plus considérer comme affectées par le projet. Par contre, parmi eux, il ya une franche de ces cultivateurs qui n’ont jamais cessé de cultiver à leurs endroits habituels avaient de nouveau été enregistré en 2014. Tandis que, ceux qui avaient cessé d’exercer les activités à ces endroits avaient formulé des plaintes qui furent ensuite été adressées à NYA disant qu’ils ont été préjudiciés. Car, on les avait interdits formellement de cultiver sur ces terrains.

Dans ce groupe, il ya ceux qui possèdent quelques arbres fruitiers sur ces terrains et qui réclament

être compensés.

I. La relocalisation physique Le modérateur a rappelé à l’assemblée que la relocalisation physique concerne le Camp YUKU dont les

maisons doivent être démoli et ses habitants seront transférés au village MBEMBA , site choisi pour la

3

construction de 12 maisons en remplacement de celles du camp Yuku. Pour l’évolution de travaux de

construction, elle évolue normalement et ils prendront fin vers la fin du mois de septembre. Ces

maisons seront habitée seront habitées au cours du même mois de l’année en cours.

II La relocalisation économique

Il a été rappelé aux participants à la réunion que la relocalisation économique concerne les personnes

qu’on a payé la 1ère tranche de l’indemnisation au mois de décembre et qui attendent la 2ème tranche

de l’indemnisation au plus tard fin du mois de juillet 2015. Toute fois, Monsieur A. LUBIKULU a fait

savoir qu’elle concerne aussi ceux qui avaient introduit des plaintes qui enfin étaient jugées fondées.

Ensuite, il a informé les personnes concernées par ce processus que l’indemnisation est accompagnée

d’un programme de suivi des cultivateurs là où ils exercent maintenant leurs activités.

Une opération déjà amorcée et qui justifie la présence d’un Ingénieur Agronome au sein de l’équipe

CIMKO. Accordant la parole à l’ingénieur LUBENZO, ce dernier a insisté sur le suivi régulier des

cultivateurs.

L’objectif de ce suivi à dit l’Ir Lubenzo, c’est d’aider les personnes affectées par le projet à maximiser

leur rendement en termes de production. Car, à l’heure qu’il est, il faut que l’agriculteur quitte l’étape

de l’agriculture de substance pour une agriculture de business. Il a ensuite révélé aux participants à la

réunion l’opportunité qui s’ouvre à eux.

La CIMKO/NYA constitue un marché potentiel auquel la communauté locale fournira sa production

pour nourrir un effectif de ±1000 personnes chaque jour. Il a demandé aux agriculteurs de s’organiser

en coopérative.

Afin de maximiser le rendement des cultures, l’Ir a cité quelques facteurs qui influencent le rendement

notamment : le choix du terrain, interventions de différentes étapes (préparation, semis, sarclages et

récoltés) à temps opportun.

Après la synthèse faite par Messieurs Adolphe Lubikulu et l’Ir Lubenzo, les participants ont posés des

questions auxquelles les membres de l’équipe du sociale ont répondus.

Q1 Monsieur NDOZI : Est-ce que le suivi des champs concerne tout le monde où ne concernent que

ceux qui attendent la 2ème tranche de leur paiement ?

R1. Adolphe : D’abord ceux qui attendent la deuxième tranche de leur payement. Car pour eux c’est

un processus qui est en cours. Et puis pour les autres, c’est une activité qui commence et va durée le

plus longtemps possible jusqu’assurer que les P.A.P vivent mieux qu’avant et que leur avenir est

promoteur.

Q2 Monsieur TUTONDA : Je suis compté parmi les personnes qui attendent la 2ème tranche

Est-ce que NYA ne peut-elle pas me permettre à protéger encore mes arbres pendant que j’attends la

paie ?

4

R2 Adolphe : Vos jeunes plantes qui sont dans vos champs ont été prises en compte de l’évaluation. Et

vous êtes déjà en possession de moitié du montant total qu’on vous doit. Je pense que vous n’avez plus

besoin de protéger les dits arbres

Quand aux vieux palmiers et autres vieux arbres longeant la rivière Yuku, le Management de la société

est entrain de voir dans quelle mesure les gens peuvent jouir des produits de leurs arbres afin qu’ils

profitent aussi à des générations futures.

Q3. LUYINDULA KILEBE : Depuis que j’ai déposé ma plainte sur le vol de mes bananes par les

Pakistanais du site, je ne bénéficié plus des fruits de ma bananerai. Que dites à ce sujet ?

R3. Adolphe : C’est pour cette raison que vous avez été identifié et enregistrer comme P.A.P afin que

vous vous débarrassiez de ce champ. Donc je vous demande d’en oublier. Car bientôt vous serez

indemnisé.

Q4. Diasuekama Dodika : Est-ce NYA se rappellera-t-elle des endroits où se trouvaient nos champs.

Car actuellement plusieurs sites sont recouverts des herbes. Parfois nous avons arrachés nos produits

de récolte parfois non encore mur puisqu’on ne pouvait plus continuer à cultiver à ces endroits.

Q5. Nous avons vu les indiens et la SNEL indemniser certains de nos compatriotes qui avaient des

cultures le long de la ligne électrique haute tension. Mais à la seule différence que ceux-ci n’étaient pas

voués à beaucoup d’acrobaties comme nous le vivons chez NYA. Alors que les deux projets sont

financés par la même institution financière qui est la banque mondiale. Pourquoi cette différence ?

R 5,6 Adolphe

Rép 5. Ne vous en faites pas, nous sommes conscients de cette situation. Nous gardons les cordonnées

GPS et en tant que Officier de liaison Communautaire, j’ai la maitrise de ce dossier.

R6. Je confirme que les deux projets sont réellement financés par la Banque mondiale. Mais en ce qui

nous concerne, je pense que le processus avance normalement. NYA A un cahier de charge qu’elle est

censé respecter pour vous protéger. Raison pour laquelle il s’effectue un audit au moins deux fois par

an au sein de NYA.

Q7. Nlandu Nduakulu

Je suis parmi les premières personnes à être enregistrer sur la liste des P.A.P en 2013. Et je détiens

encore une copie de P.V établit par Guy Bongwele à l’époque. A présent, qu’est ce qui fait que certains

parmi nous ne soient plus jamais repris sur la liste actualisée?

R7. Comme il s’est passé trop de temps pour que le projet prenne corps, les personnes qui étaient enregistré en 2012 et 2013 ont enfin achevés le cycle de leur cultures et ont fini par récoltées les produits de leurs champs. Ces personnes ne sont plus considérer comme affectées par le projet. Par contre, parmi eux, il ya une franche de ces cultivateurs qui n’ont jamais cessé de cultiver à leurs endroits habituels avaient de nouveau été enregistré en 2014.

Q8. Philipe Kuvumusu : NYA avait payé pour nous qui sommes de la 1ère première vague, le droit de

5

redevance aux chefs de terres traditionnels. Est-ce ne peut elle pas faire autant pour ceux qui viennent

d’être identifier à peine ?

R.8 La société le fera au moment opportun.

Après qu’on ait répondu à toutes les questions des participants à la réunion, Ir LUBENZO a proposé

aux P.A.P un programme de suivi dans 8 sites qui enfin été approuvé à l’unanimité. Il s’agit donc des

listes ci-après :

Minkelo/Lunionzo ;Minkelo/Mission ;Minkelo/Mawete ;Kambua ;Yangadiamuana ;Mbamba/Sanziku

a,Yuku/Mbemba et Kokolo.

Il se déroulera du Mercredi 1 juillet au 16 juillet 2016

Avant de clore la réunion, Monsieur Philippe KUVUMUSU a demandé la parole et a passé son message,

demandant aux siens de penser à lui à hauteur de 10 % frais d’indentification lorsque le payement

s’effectuera pour compenser aux sacrifices consentis en plaidant leur cause auprès de la société. Mais

aussitôt dit, Mr Adolphe lui a demandé de retirer sa parole, car sa déclaration n’est pas commode.

Mais toute fois si quelqu’un se sent toucher par la mobilité de Mr Philippe, il peut l’offrir quelque chose

comme bon lui semble, mais pas une obligation à dit l’Officier de liaison communautaire.

Commencée à 10h15’, la réunion a pris fin à 12h40.

Fait à Minkelo, le 27/06/2015

Vu et approuvé par Le rapporteur

Georges MANTANTU DIBANZILUA Adolphe LUBIKULU

Coordonnateur social Officier de liaison communautaire

6

ANNEXE

7

ANNEXE 1 : LISTE DE PRESENCE

8

9

10

11

ANNEXE II : IMAGES DES PARTICIPANTS

COMPTE RENDU DE LA REUNION DU CARDE DE CONCERTATION

PERMANENTE DU 20 - 08 – 2015

ORDRE DU JOUR :

- Introduction

- Mot de bien venue

- Présentation de l’équipe RAP

- La santé du projet

- Vulgarisation des consignes de sécurité

- Divers

1. Introduction

La réunion a été conduite par Monsieur Georges Mantantu Dibanzilua , Coordonnateur Social. Ce

dernier a tenue à remercier tous les invités qui ont répondu présent à cette réunion, malgré leurs

multiples occupations et les souhaitant la bien venue.

En suite, il a expliqué aux membres du C.C.P la raison qui a occasionnée le report de la réunion de

la fois passée suite à la visite du 1er Ministre MATATA à Yuku.

Sur ce, 23 participants avaient pris part à cette réunion (cfr tableau et liste des présences):

CIMKO COMMUNAUTE Nom et post nom Fonction Nom et post nom Fonction 01. Christian NGOY EHSS Manager 01NDONGALA BONIFACE Membre du C.C.P 02. Georges MANTANTU Coordonnateur

Social 02 NSOLOLO KINSANU Membre du C.C.P

03. Henri NYUMBAIZA Coordonnateur RAP 03 NSIMBA MABIZE Membre du C.C.P 04. Adolphe LUBIKULU Officier de Liaison

Communautaire 04 NDONGALA KANAVANG Membre du C.C.P

05. Ir LUBENZO Nzolani Consultant/ EHSS 05 MAMPUYA MATANA Membre du C.C.P 06 NSILULU METUSOLA Membre du C.C.P 07 NZAYILU LUKOMBO Membre du C.C.P 08 SIMBI TOYAKU Membre du C.C.P 09 MPAKA François Membre du C.C.P 10 NGOMA KALUTEZI Membre du C.C.P 11 MBIYA KANDA Samuel Membre du C.C.P 12 TOKO Samuel Membre du C.C.P 13 KEMBELA Joseph Membre du C.C.P 14 LUBIKULU MAVAKALA Membre du C.C.P 15. UTIDI Alice Membre du C.C.P 16. MAMPUYA MATANA Membre du C.C.P 17. MAKIADI NSINDANI Membre du C.C.P 18. LUVUSU Jean Membre du C.C.P

2. Présentation de Monsieur Henri NYUMBAIZA

Coordonnateur du RAPS a rejoint l’équipe du sociale dans le but de la prêter mains fortes et surtout

de s’occuper du volet des personnes affectées par le projet.

3. De l’état de santé du projet :

Monsieur Georges MANTANTU a expliqué aux membres du C.C.P que les travaux de construction de

l’usine vont bon train. D’ailleurs qu’à chaque moment qu’on se réunisse, vous sentez le progrès qui

va du jour au lendemain a-t-il enchainé.

Articulant sur le même sujet, Monsieur Christian NGOY, a ajouté que les travaux de fondation sont

réalisés à 80%. Quant aux travaux au niveau du site de la carrière, ils sont aux arrêts jusqu’à

l’arrivée de nouvelles machines. Car le peu d’engins qui sont présent sur le site sont sur utilisé au

niveau de l’usine. Les travaux de génie mécanique vont se réaliser sur une durée de 8 à 10 mois

tandis que la construction du four va s’échelonner sur une durée de 14 mois. C’est cette structure

qui va plus durée que les autres.

Ensuite, Monsieur Christian a expliqué a l’assemblée que la fin de construction de l’usine pouvait

intervenir vers fin octobre 2016.

4. Vulgarisation des consignes de sécurité

Pour prévenir les dangers qui peuvent subvenir, la société a pris quelques dispositions sécuritaires :

- La dotation de l’équipement de sécurité à tous les travailleurs quelque soit son rang et

même les personnes étrangères doivent être sécurisé.

- L’interdiction de circuler dans l’enceinte des installations pour les paysans.

- Ceux- là qui doivent accéder au Site sont censés porter des équipements de protection

individuelle surtout les casques et les gilets réflecteurs

- Les habitants de Minkelo , Mbamba, Mbemba, Yuku, Kinsua, Kokolo doivent contourner le

site par des pistes aménagées tout autour du site afin d’éviter tout risque d’accident.

Les dispositions sécuritaires n’ont pas été prises pour tracasser les gens, bien au contraire

pour épargner tout le monde à l’abri.

Exempté les membres de cadre de concertation permanente dont chacun sera doté

d’une carte de visite qui sera valable même à celui qui le remplacera en cas d’empêchement.

Le social étant un domaine sensible qui touche directement la population, Monsieur Christian

Ngoy, Manager de ce département sollicite auprès des autorités de la CIMKO d’installer le bureau

du social en dehors de l’usine pour pouvoir accueillir tout le monde venant de l’extérieur.

Après avoir épuisé tous les points inscrits à l’ordre du jour et une synthèse faite par Monsieur

Georges MANTANTU, les participants ont posés des questions auxquelles les membres de l’équipe du

social ont répondus.

Préoccupation de Monsieur Samuel TOKO et MAKIADI NSINDANI : Depuis que vous nous avez

interdite d’utiliser nos routes traditionnelles, les ressortissants des villages Mbemba et Kinsua

éprouvent beaucoup des difficultés pour l’évacuation de leurs produits agricoles. Ils demandent à

la société de leur trouver une solution durable c’est-à-dire aménager une route ou passera motos,

véhicules.

Rép de Mr Christian NGOY : Votre préoccupation est fondée et connue. Il y avait un tracteur qui

avait entrepris le travail sur cette route. Malheureusement, l’engin est tombé en panne, on devrait

chercher un bulldozer pour la pour de ce travail. Qu’à cela ne tienne, laisser nous d’abord terminer

la route de M’bamba. C’est alors que nous occuperons de cette route.

Proposition de Monsieur Makiadi : prochainement quand vous allez ouvrir une autre route pour

nous faciliter l’évacuation de nos produits agricoles, nous souhaiterons que cette route croise celle

qui mène vers NGOMBE MAKULULU.

Rép de Monsieur Adolphe : Je voudrais vous confirmé que toutes vos routes qui étaient supprimés

pour l’intérêt de la société seront remplacées. Des nouvelles études seront menées à ce sujet.

Monsieur Christian : Lorsque nous allons terminer à construire les murs de l’enclos, on va parler

de ce problème avec les autorités de la CIMKO comme elles sont sur place. Le mieux serait de

constituer une commission de deux ou trois personnes pour leur soumettre cette doléance.

Question de Mr Mpaka : Nous voyons le progrès de l’usine, pouvez vous nous dire quand est- ce

qu’elle va prendre fin ?

Rép de Monsieur Christian : La construction de l’usine à trois phases :

1. La construction de l’usine au point de vue de sa structure qui pendra 7 à 8 mois.

2. La construction de l’usine toute entière va prendre 14 mois.

3. La construction d’autres installations peuvent aller jusqu’à une année.

Donc, ce qui revient à dire qu’elle peut se terminer en 2017.

Préoccupation de Mme Alice UTIDI : Elle reçoit plusieurs plaintes de la part de certaines jeunes

mamans qui avaient postule au poste de ménagère et aide cuisinière mais dont leur demande reste

lettre morte. Mais à notre grande surprise, les structures de recrutement engagent d’autres

mamans qui ne sont même pas de la communauté.

Rép Monsieur Georges : De telles choses se passaient parce qu’on n’avait pas encore organisé ce

secteur. Maintenant qu’on veuille sur ça, elles ne seront plus jamais déçues

Préoccupation de Ndongala Kanavangawo :

Celui-ci a travaillé pour le compte d’une entreprise Chinoise CWC. Cette entreprise avait distribué

de cartes d’accès pour des ayants droits. Mais pourquoi la CIMKO ne peut pas faire de même au

lieu de nous exigé les lettres d’invitations nous envoyées par le chef de secteur. Cette façon d’agir

nous parait comme un manque de considération à notre égard.

Rép de Monsieur Georges : Pour les cartes d’accès (visite), nous vous rassurons que la solution

sera trouve et nous allons nous impliquer pour régler ce problème au plus vite que possible. A ce

sujet, le coordonnateur Social a procédé à la capture des images pour tout membre du C.C.P

présent à la réunion afin de leur doter chacun une carte dans un bref délai.

Question Monsieur Mpaka : Nous avons longtemps réclamé dans nos réunions précédentes que la

CIMKO devrait nous donné des sujets des sujets à traiter dont l’ordre du jour devrait être connu

avant la réunion. Même la tenue de nos réunions après chaque 2 mois n’a pas été prise en compte.

Ceci nous mène à croire que nous venons d’écouter seulement ce qu’il aura à nous dire.

Rép de Monsieur Georges : Non, malheureusement, il ya un contre temps causé par la visite du 1er

ministre à la même date que nous avons fixée.

Question de Monsieur Nzayilu Lukombo : Par rapport aux obligations de la sécurité au Site, est

ce que la CIMKO ne peut –elle pas nous doter des équipements de protection individuel ? Car il ya

des gens qui étaient retenus aux différents poste de contrôle par manque des équipements de

protection.

Rép du Coordonnateur : Nous pensons que se munir de sa carte est une solution durable pour les

mandataires des villages.

5. Divers :

Au sujet des divers, Monsieur Christian a joué un tour d’horizon sur tous les sujets inscrits à l’ordre

du jour. Cependant, il a réagi aux dires de Monsieur Mpaka qui a dit que : il se pose un problème

d’injustice pour le recrutement des cadres universitaires. Les nôtres sont marginalisés au profit de

ceux qui viennent d’ailleurs. Or nous avons aussi des enfants qui remplissent les critères.

Réponse de Monsieur Christian: Vous devez savoir faire la part de chose. C’est ne pas nous qui

sommes chargé de recrutement, c’est plutôt le département des ressources humaines qui s’en

occupe. Tandis que nous, nous sommes dans le département s’occupant du social. C’est la raison

pour la quelle j’associe parfois les gens des ressources humaines de prendre part dans nos réunions.

A dire vrai, la CIMKO n’engagera pas tout le monde. Ceux que vous voyez aujourd’hui, vous ne le

verrez plus à la fin des travaux de construction.

Pour essayer de développer la contrée, la CIMKO par l’entremise de son service social va travailler

en partenariat avec L’ONG international AGRISUD et l’ONG People to People (H.P.P) dans un vaste

programme de développement axé sur : l’Agriculture, l’élevage, l’éducation etc

En ce qui concerne les biens qui sont mentionnés dans la convention durable signée entre la CIMKO

et la communauté locale, biens qui devraient être mis à votre disposition, nous attendons que la

Banque nous finance à la fin du mois en cours. C’est alors que la CIMKO va commencer à vous

satisfaire.

Doléance de Monsieur Makiadi Nsindani : je voudrais m’adresser à Monsieur Georges, nous

apprenons que par le truchement de nos gens qui travaillent ici, il parait qu’ils ne sont payés tous

de la même manière bien qu’appartenant dans une même catégorie

Rép de Monsieur Christian : Vous aurez toujours ce genre des problèmes ou querelles, surtout

pour le problème de la géopolitique. Mais au moins, au moins, il faut qu’il y ait la transparence dans

la publication des offres tout en indiquant les critères de sélection.

Préoccupation de Monsieur Ndongala : J’ai deux préoccupations :

1. Notre clan Ne Masaki du village Kumbi II n’a pas encore reçu son droit de jouissance ‘’ Nkoto a

mfinda’’.

2. Nous réclamons le P.V de l’enquête des vacances.

Rép Georges : Nous prenons en compte vos préoccupations. La sagesse Kongo nous dit :’’ Nlembo

vo ka wa luele ko, u ki kangila wo tende’’.Ce qui signifie comme le doigt ne s’est pas encore blessé, il

faut savoir prendre des dispositions, précautions nécessaires.’’

Annonce de Monsieur Adolphe LUBIKULU : Nous tenons à vous informer que dans le cadre de la

sensibilisation de la population, la CIMKO va projeter le film sur le VIH/SIDA dans les différentes

localités concernées par le projet.

C’est donc sur cette note qu’a pris fin la réunion et le prochain rendez vous a donc été fixé au mois

de septembre 2015.

Commencé à 14h00, la réunion a pris fin à 16 h 50’.

Fait à Yuku/Minkelo, le 24/08/2015

Vu et approuvé par Le Rapporteur

Georges MANTANTU DIBANZILUA Adolphe LUBIKULU – VENGA

Coordonateur Social Officier de liaison Communautaire

ANNEXE

ANNEXE I. LISTE DE PRESENCE

ANNEXE II. IMAGES DES PARTICIPANTS

1

REUNION C.C.P

EHSS CIMKO

COMPTE RENDU DE LA REUNION EXTRA ORDINAIRE DU CADRE DE CONCERTATION PERMANENTE

TENUE A YUKU EN DATE DU 11/06/2015

ORDRE DU JOUR :

- Introduction

- Mot de bien venue

- Entretien avec les auditeurs d’ERM

- Divers

Introduction

La réunion a été conduite par Monsieur Christian Ngoy, Manager EHSS. Il a d’abord tenue à remercier

tous les invités qui ont répondu présent à cette réunion.

Sur ce, 27 participants avaient pris part à cette réunion (cfr tableau et liste des présences) :

CIMKO COMMUNAUTE Nom et post nom Fonction Nom et post nom Fonction 01. Christian NGOY EHSS Manager 01NDONGALA BONIFACE Membre du C.C.P 02. Jean de Dieu LUBASU Directeur des R.H 03 KUNIMA LUVENGO Membre du C.C.P 03. Guy BONGWELE Manager 04 Georges MANTANTU Coordonnateur

Social 04 NSIMBA MABIZE Membre du C.C.P

05. Christopher Masiala Assistant ressources humaine

05 KANAMVANGAWO NDO. Membre du C.C.P

06 Adolphe LUBIKULU Officier de L .Com 06 MAMPUYA MATANA Membre du C.C.P 07 NSILULU METUSOLA Membre du C.C.P EXPERTS E.R.M 08 NZAYILU LUKOMBO Membre du C.C.P

7. Mm Gwenaël NIUALT Expert 09. MAWONSO ADIEYI Membre du C.C.P

8. Benoit Expert 10 SIMBI TOYAKU Membre du C.C.P

11 MPAKA François Membre du C.C.P

12 NGOMA KALUTEZI Membre du C.C.P

13 MBIYA KANDA Samuel Membre du C.C.P

14 TOKO Samuel Membre du C.C.P

15 KEMBELA Joseph Membre du C.C.P

16 LUBIKULU MAVAKALA Membre du C.C.P

17. UTIDI Alice Membre du C.C.P

18. MAMPUYA MATANA Membre du C.C.P

19. MAKIADI NSINGI Membre du C.C.P

2

Mot de bien venue

Le mot de bien venue a été prononcé par Monsieur Christian Ngoy qui a remercié les membres du Cadre

de Concertation Permanente de la volonté qu’ils ont manifestée de prendre part à ces assises, malgré

leurs multiples occupations.

Entretien avec les auditeurs de la Banque Mondiale

Dans ce contexte, Monsieur Christian NGOY a signifié aux membres du Cadre de concertation

permanente, lors de la réunion de la fois passée que les auditeurs de la Banque Mondiale sont toujours

présents aux réunions avec nous, cadre de concertation permanente chaque 6 mois.

En effet, ces derniers ont voulus savoir plus sur l’état d’avancement des travaux en faisant remarquer aux

membres que leur présence n’est pas là pour chercher à établir un climat apaisé , à la recherche des

solutions raisonnables

Q. Mme Gwenaëlle NIAULT : En ce qui concerne l’élargissement du Cadre de Concertation Permanente

au cas où il s’ouvre comme on vous l’avait recommandé ; cela pouvait apporter des solutions à vos

problèmes ?

Rép Monsieur Mpaka François : Le problème de l’élargissement du Cadre de Concertation Permanente

a été abordé lors de la réunion de la fois passée. Tous les membres s’étaient mis d’accord que cela soit

élargi comme NYA le veut.

Q. Mme Gwenaëlle NIAULT : Est-ce que e nouveau cadre fonctionne-t-il ?

Rép Ce cadre n’est pas encore opérationnel. Car nous ne nous sommes pas encore réunis.

Préoccupation de Mr MAKIADI NSINGI : Nous avons remarqué que les gens qui sont chargés de

recrutement de la main d’œuvre ne se donnent pas la peine de recruter les ayants - droits comme prévue

dans la convention. Ceux qui ont la chance d’être recruter se retrouvent dans les catégories inférieures.

Tandis que les non ayants droits sont en majorité recrutés dans des catégories supérieures.

D’ailleurs, nous avons été en réunion de 6 villages qui ont cédé la terre. Ce point étant en exergue parmi

ceux qui étaient abordés. A cet effet, un rapport était dressé avec des recommandations que nous avons

mises à la disposition de NYA.

Rép Monsieur Adolphe LUBIKULU : Nous avons toujours débattu ce problème de recrutement dans nos

différentes réunions. Dans le cadre de collaboration entre NYA et les Services Chargés de recrutement

s’étaient convenu que la main d’œuvre proviendra prochainement des 6 villages en priorité. Mais qu’à

cela ne tienne, les non ayants droits seront également recrutés parce que nous vivons ensemble dans la

communauté. Nous avons demandé aux Chefs des clans d’élaborer les listes reprenant les noms des gens

des villages qui sont les leurs.

Commentaire de Monsieur Christopher MASIALA : Nous disons encore, ce n’est parce qu’on est ayant

- droit, automatiquement l’emploi est là. Mais, c’est après avoir satisfait au test que le travail pouvait

vous être disponible.

3

En ce qui concerne ce problème des catégories qui est sujet d’actualité, après vérification, la différence

entre catégorie se situe au niveau des heures supplémentaires. C’est- à –dire pour ceux qui ont fait des

heures supplémentaires en dehors des heures normales gagnent beaucoup d’argent par rapport à ceux

qui n’en ont pas fait. En plus de listes que vous avez introduit, vous êtes obligés d’établir des lites

supplémentaires pour ceux qui étaient absents lors de l’établissement des premières listes.

Monsieur Georges MANTANTU : La foi passé, il ya quelqu’un parmi vous. Les ayants droits a introduit

une liste des gens de son village.

Après deux semaines, il s’amène encore avec une deuxième liste de 93 personnes, accompagnées de 63

Curriculum vitae. Bref, le Monsieur se substituer en un agence de recrutement. Les ressortissants de

toutes les provinces de la RDC faisaient parti de cette liste. Il exigé même qu’on retire la première liste et

qu’on retienne la seconde.

Quand nous l’avons convoqué afin qu’il nous donne des explications à ce propos, il nous dira que d’autres

personnes sont ses beaux frères. C’est pourquoi, nous vous demandons de cesser avec cette pratique et

surtout d’être sérieux.

Monsieur Robert NGOMA : Nous voulons que cette fois-ci des solutions adaptées soient trouvés à tous

les problèmes que nous vous posons, au risque de mettre notre crédibilité en cause par ceux qui nous

mandatent. Nos mandateurs commencent à cultiver des doutes pour ne plus nous croire parce que depuis

lors leurs revendications n’ont jamais trouvé satisfaction.

Mme Gwenaëlle NIAULT : Concernant la réinstallation physique et les personnes affectées par le projet,

c'est-à-dire les personnes qui doivent être indemnisés avez-vous des doléances à présenter ?

Rép Monsieur Mpaka François : Nous parlons de ce problème toutes les fois que nous sommes en

réunion avec NYA. A ce niveau, nous n’avons pas encore enregistré des doléances. Ceux qui doivent être

installés, leurs maisons sont déjà en construction.

Mme Gwenaëlle NIAULT : Vous avez placé des boîtes à suggestions dans les villages. Est-ce fonctionnent

–telles normalement ?

Rép Monsieur Mpaka François : Ces boîtes fonctionnent très bien, hormis celles qui sont installées dans

de coins reculés ou l’accessibilité est difficile (Kinsuwa , Nionga). Mais comme nous sommes toujours en

possession de leurs doléances, elles sont traitées chaque fois nous sommes en réunion.

Maman Alice UTIDI : Nous avons un sérieux problème de pont qui n’est pas en bonne état pouvant nous

servir avec les gens de Minkelo et ceux de Kinsuwa qui empruntent la même direction.

Monsieur Christian NGOY : Même pour les enfants qui empruntent cette route , NYA est entrain de

prendre des dispositions pour trouver des solutions durables pour tous les villages qui ont des problèmes.

Réclamation Monsieur Mpaka François : Seul le village Nionga qui n’a pas encore bénéficié le droit de

jouissance que nous appelons ‘’NKOTO A MFINDA’’.

R. Monsieur Guy Bongwele : Au moment de la distribution de ce soit disant ‘’NKOTO A MFINDA’’ les

autres et moi étions présents. Mais les gens du village Nionga avaient carrément refusé.

Monsieur Mpaka François : Certes si nous avons refusé parce qu’on ne savait pas de quoi s’agissait-il ?

4

Monsieur Christian NGOY : Pour le problème de Nionga, nous allons continuer à rappeler NYA.

Mme Gwenaëlle NIAULT : Est-ce avez-vous connaissance de l’étude d’impact environnemental au sein

de la communauté. Ces études étaient réalisées, il ya de cela deux ans passés. Le rapport était déposé au

mois de décembre.

R. Monsieur Adolphe LUBIKULU : Nous avons été en réunion au mois de décembre, bien que nous ne

fussions pas encore en possession de ce rapport. Jusqu’à présent, nous attendons la traduction de ce

rapport de l’Anglais en Kikongo.

Mme Gwenaëlle NIAULT : En ce qui concerne la poussière, les eaux et la biodiversité. Avez-vous déjà

remarqué la poussière ?

Rép : Considérant notre position géographique, nous sommes situé à l’Est de l’usine, nous n’avons pas

encore enregistrés des plaintes.

Monsieur Benoit : Depuis le début des activités de la société, avez-vous déjà remarqué des

complications, des malaises, etc.

Rép Monsieur Mbiyavanga : Comme nous sommes encore au début nous n’avons pas encore fait un

constat à ce propos.

Monsieur Mpaka François : Ce dernier temps nous enregistrons beaucoup des cas de vol. Nous osons

croire, Ils viennent de Kimpese. Ceux qui font semblant de venir chercher du travail.

Monsieur Christian Ngoy : Pour ce qui est de l’emploi, Messieurs Jean de Dieu LUBASU et Christopher

MASIALA s’en occupent. D’ailleurs, le recrutement ne se passera plus à l’entrée principale de l’Usine.

Monsieur Christopher Masiala : Hormis les listes qui sont en notre disposition, nous voudrions que vous

nous envoyiez celles reprenant les noms de ceux qui sont des cadres universitaires.

Divers :

Dans le divers nous continuons toujours au sujet de l’emploi.

Monsieur Mbiyavanga : Concernant le recrutement des chauffeurs, d’autres villages n’avaient pas

envoyé leurs candidats parce qu’ils sous informés.

Monsieur Christopher Masiala : Ils ont encore du temps, nous continuons à tester les chauffeurs, le

processus continu

Monsieur Jean de Dieu Lubasu : Nous allons commencer à diffuser l’information en ce qui concerne le

problème des catégories des gens. Cela doit se faire dans la transparence. Nous ferons en sorte que

l’information soit partagée. Seulement, nous n’allons pas prendre ceux qui ne répondent pas aux critères

requis.

C’est donc sur cette note qu’a pris fin la réunion et le prochain rendez vous a donc été fixé au mois

d’Août.

5

Commencé à 14h00, la réunion a pris fin à 16h55’.

Fait à Yuku/Minkelo, le 18/06/2015

Vu et approuvé par Secrétaire Rapporteur C.C.P

Georges MANTANTU Simon LUBIKULU – VENGA

Coordonnateur Social

6

ANNEXE

7

ANNEXE 1 : LISTE DES PRESENCES

8

9

10

ANNEXE 2 : PHOTOS DES PARTICIPANTS

REUNION RAP NKONDA, le 03/04/2015

EHSS CIMKO

RAPPORT DE LA REUNION DE CONSULTATION TENUE AVEC LES HABITANTS DU

VILLAGE NKONDA SUR L’ELARGISSEMENT DU CADRE DE CONCERTATION

PERMANENTE

INTRODUCTION

Dans le but de fournir d’avantage d’information aux habitants du village Nkonda en vue

de solliciter une implication active au sujet de l’élargissement du cadre de concertation

permanente, une séance de travail a été organisée le vendredi 03 mars 2015.

25 participants avaient pris part à cette réunion (cfr tableau et liste des présences):

CIMKO COMMUNAUTE Nom et post nom Fonction Nom et post nom Fonction 01 Georges MANTANTU Coordonnateur

Social 01 LUVOVADIO KINZOLA Chef du village

02 Adolphe LUBIKULU Officier de liaison Communautaire

02 LUKILA SIVI Membre de la communauté

03 KEMBO LUKOMBO Marie Membre de la communauté

04 BAMO NSIDIATUKA Membre de la communauté

05 NSILULU METUSOLA Membre de la communauté

06 KANAVANGAWO NDO Membre de la communauté

07 SIDIAKALA NDONGALA Membre de la communauté

08 MUANDA FUKI Membre de la communauté

09MAMPUYA GUELOR Membre de la communauté

10 MAMPUYA ANTOINE Membre de la communauté

11 MPAKA ALPHONSE Membre de la communauté

12 ZOLANA HONORE Membre de la communauté

13 LUSEKI II ELISABETH Membre de la communauté

14 MAKIESE HENRIETTE Membre de la communauté

15 NSAMBU MARITINE Membre de la communauté

16 KUALA PIERETTE Membre de la communauté

17 LESA KEBOKAMESO Membre de la communauté

18 NSIMBA JULIENNE Membre de la communauté

19 KITUMUA MANSIANTIMA Membre de la communauté

20 LUSIKILA NDONGO Membre de la communauté

21 NKIAMBI NKIAKUMA Membre de la communauté

22 MATUAZOLA JEAN Membre de la communauté

23 MAYETO NDONA MADO Membre de la communauté

D’entrée en matière, l’Officier de liaison communautaire a commencé par souhaiter la

bienvenue aux membres de la communauté ayant répondu à la réunion en indiquant que

celle-ci a été convoquée suite à la nouvelle vision adoptée par l’équipe du sociale de la

CIMKO d’élargir le cadre de concertation permanente.

Ainsi, l’Officier de liaison communautaire a énoncé l’ordre du jour qui comporte deux

points : l’élargissement du cadre de concertation permanente et l’ouverture du débat.

1. Elargissement du cadre de concertation permanente

Mr Adolphe Lubikulu, a, au nom de toute l’équipe du sociale, présenté la situation

actuelle du cadre de concertation permanente réduit aux seuls ayants droits

propriétaires de terre. Mais, dont l’équipe du Sociale voulait l’élargir à certaines

forces vives pour éclore certaines idées novatrices de toute la contrée et ses

environs. C’est pour cette raison, l’Equipe du sociale a saisi l’avenir a bras le

corps pour annoncé à la communauté locale sa nouvelle vision.

Cette nouvelle stratégie donne aux partenaires le temps de bien se munir

d’argument et murir leur réflexion lors de la nouvelle rencontre.

2. Débats

A la suite de cet exposé et après une synthèse faite par Monsieur Georges

MANTANTU, Coordonateur Social, les échanges ont eu lieu. Ils ont tourné autour

du recrutement de la main d’œuvre locale. A ce sujet, la communauté locale se

plaint des conditions de recrutement qui ne sont pas bien clarifiés. La

structure(SCS) attitrée de recruter foule au pied la convention signée en date du

12/12/2013 entre NYUMBA YA AKIBA/ CIMKO et la communauté locale affectée

par le projet de la cimenterie au sujet du recrutement de la main d’œuvre.

Il pratique le trafic d’influence en accordant plus de faveur aux compatriotes qui

viennent d’ailleurs. Dans ce lot, Kimpese remporte la palme.

Après avoir répondu à certaines préoccupations de la communauté, l’équipe du

social levé la séance.

Commencée à 10h20’, la séance a pris fin à 12h50’

Rapporteur

Georges MANTANTU

Coordonnateur social

ANNEXE 1 : PHOTOS DES PARTICIPANTS

ANNEXE 2 : LISTE DE PRESENCE

RAPPORT DE LA REUNION DE CONCERTATION AVEC LES HABITANTS

DU VILLAGE YUKU

Préambule

Dans le cadre de la relocalisation du village YUKU, une visite d’inspection du

nouveau site où sera transféré le village a précédé la rencontre qui a eu ce Jeudi 05

mars 2015 dans l’avant midi entre notre équipe et les habitants affectés par ce

processus de la réinstallation involontaire.

Cette rencontre s’inscrit dans la logique des bailleurs (la banque mondiale) qui ont

établit la norme de performance 5 sur l’acquisition de terre et réinstallation

involontaire, en exigeant aux clients de prendre des mesures appropriées pour

minimiser les impacts négatifs sur les personnes déplacées et les communautés hôtes.

C’est dans cette perspective du processus de la réinstallation que s’est tenu la

réunion.

1. Déroulement des activités

La réunion de concertation entre l’équipe de l’environnement , du social de la

CIMKO et les habitants du village Yuku , s’est tenue le 05 mars 2015 à Yuku.

Treize personnes ont participé à cette réunion (Cfr liste de présence).

2. Ordre du jour

La réunion a connu quatre moments forts :

Le mot d’introduction de Monsieur Adolphe Lubikulu Officier de liaison

communautaire.

Présentation de la situation actuelle concernant la relocalisation du village

Yuku vers le village Mbemba.

Proposition de la mise sur pied d’un comité par les habitants du village Yuku

qui devrait servir de courroie de transmission entre la CIMKO et la

communauté locale.

Débats :

3. Résumé des échanges

Par son mot d’introduction, l’Officier de liaison communautaire a commencé par

souhaiter la bienvenue aux membres de l’équipe de concertation ayant répondu

à l’invitation et a fini par saisir l’opportunité de présenter Monsieur Georges

Mantantu Dibanzilua comme Coordonateur social et communautaire, membre

de l’équipe de l’environnement et du social.

Ayant pris la parole, le Coordonnateur social a circonscrit le cadre de la

rencontre en rapport avec la relocalisation du village Yuku vers le village

Mbemba. Au nom de l’équipe du HESS, le Coordonateur social a présenté la

situation actuelle du projet ainsi que ses perspectives à court et à moyen terme.

Son exposé s’est articulé sur les points suivants :

Présentation des plans des nouvelles maisons à construire ;

Le nombre et type des maisons à construire (12 maisons à construire avec une

dimension de 5 m de largeur sur 7,5 m de longueur).

Sur ce point, les avis techniques des Architectes sont d’une importance

capitale, vu la petite l’inclinaison du terrain.

La date probable du démarrage des travaux de construction de nouvelles

maisons. Le démarrage des travaux pouvait intervenir vers le mois d’Avril et

la délocalisation de Yuku vers le nouveau village situé près du village

Mbemba pouvait intervenir vers le mois de Septembre.

Tandis que, l’EHSS Manager Christian Ngoy a joué un tour d’horizon sur

l’historique du processus de relocalisation. Il a invité les bénéficiaires de ne

point se fatiguer. Le retard de ce processus se justifie par la recherche de

financement. A présent, la Banque Mondiale a souscrit à financer le projet.

Chaque bénéficiaire, occupant devrait être impliqué dans la construction de sa

propre maison. Sur ce, plusieurs réunions de ce genre seront organisées.

Enfin, il a invité les habitants d’être sérieux, concis et pondérés pendant les

interviews avec des visiteurs (experts, auditeurs) de la CIMKO.

4. Ouverture du débat

A la suite de cet exposé, les échanges ont eu lieu. Les membres de la

communauté ont posé des questions auxquelles les membres de l’Equipe

sociale de la Cimenterie Kongo ont répondu. Ces questions ont tourné

principalement au tour de :

Problème de libre circulation dans l’enceinte de la concession de la Cimenterie

Kongo par les habitants de Yuku et de Minkelo. Car, leur mobilité au-delà de

18 heures pose problème. Les éléments de gardiennage commis à ce poste les

empêchent de sortir ou d’entrer.

La ligne haute tension de la SNEL passe au dessus du village Yuku. Cette

société désire démolir certaines maisons. Or, la réinstallation du village Yuku

vers le village Mbemba n’a pas encore eu lieu. Quel sera le sort des habitants ?

Les nouvelles maisons qui seront construites n’auront pas les mêmes

dimensions. Comment se présentera le plan architectural de ces différentes

maisons

Deux personnes ont émis les vœux que la CIMKO construit pour eux des

maisons sur le milieu de leur consentement, dont l’une à Minkelo et l’autre à

Kimpsese.

A ce sujet, les réponses et explications suivantes ont été fournies aux membres

de la communauté :

En rapport avec la libre circulation, l’équipe du social de la CMKO compte

remettre les badges qui vont servir d’office de laissez passer pour chaque

membre de la communauté et les exemptés au control des agents commis à la

sécurité de chaque entrée et sortie. Dans le but de maintenir et de préserver le

climat de paix et de sérénité qui règne entre la communauté locale et la

CIMKO.

En ce qui concerne l’opération de démolition des maisons par la société Snel, il

a plu au EHSS Manager d’éclairer les lanternes sur ce dossier. La gestion de ce

dossier relève de la compétence de deux directions générales des sociétés à

savoir, la CIMKO et la SNEL. Aucune démolition ne peut intervenir sans

pourparlers ni négociation entre les deux sociétés.

Pour le point ayant trait à la présentation des plans des maisons, il avait été

présenté un modèle de maison en deux vues et une autre en perspective

cavalière. A ce sujet, une équipe des professionnels composée des Ingénieurs

en construction et des architectes passera sur le nouveau site ce 06 mars 2015

pour analyser et évaluer le relief. La présence de ces professionnels, nous

fournira les plus amples renseignements sur le terrain à construire.

Quant aux deux personnes qui ont émis le vœu de voir leurs maisons soient

construites au lieu de leur choix, l’EHSS Manager leur a rassurer que l’équipe

S’y penchera sur ce dossier.

C’est donc, sur cette note qu’appris fin la réunion.

Débuté à 17h10’, la réunion a pris fin à 18h15’.

Pour l’équipe du Social

Georges Mantantu Dibanzilua

Coordonateur Social et communautaire

ANNEXE 2 : PHOTOS DES PARTICIPANTS A LA REUNION

Membres de l’Equipe du social de la Cimenterie Kongo

M



Appendix D: Memorandum of Understanding with Local Communities and Stakeholders

Nyumba Ya Akiba SPRL – SEIA Report for 3,000 TPD Cement Project

Appendix – 3.1, Mining Ministry’s Letters Page – A-3.1.1

Appendix – 3.1

Mining Ministry’s Letters

A . * . &

. e n agpIitation be Ia Bitirrion no 045/DIV.PR0.1M11/2011 bu 21/04/2011 yortant ortmt be I'IIrrrOlUSAROII D ' E X P L O ~ ~ O H DE MMUEBES PRWMEFRE no 11238, su rom be NYlMEJJB YE AgIBll agtrtlt son $ihgt IIarkl $i$ gbenue Igongo Lntete no 01, Einshasa/6omBc, ' jf. r' - . ,t'', " , J

I 41 ,d ,.Fd 4, ?L.., i r JAt' , & A 2.1 +

&st itabli le yrisent AT P & O I T ~ DE d s PEE&&@% qui Iui anfire le broif extlue'tf b'effemer, bu 2Z/04/2011 au 26/04/2016, Ies tratlttttx be recberc$e$, be bkbabppemant gt bie%pIoltatfon be la Ilubstanre be tarriireri riuibante : Waire P Ciment h I'fntkrieur btt gdrlmhtre fat$&nt I'obfet be I' IIUTOPISAROH D'EXPMITIIROI DE CllllPEERES P~~ coqo$i be 5 tarrt!$ $itui$ ban$ le. Gerrttoire be Songololo, Bi$Wftt be

, 1 % . Cataractcr, $drobfrre ba Pu-Coqo, . , f . l t ~ . -

. . , ,

.~ . . . Pels toorbonnie$ gkogragbtque$ be$ sommets bubit ghrimitre . . rtont .. rqrisee' , . ban$ I'gnnexe . .. l.qui fait pa_rtte ,I,: .:&:. '

intigrante bu prhlsent CERTWICRT. . t . . .~ i ;< ,

., , ..<: \I 1 . i r$ . - I,. .,

I DIREClXUR GENERAL ADTOINT a.i I

H' I?.

3 I?

, . \ '1 e n appUtation be Ia Bitie'ion no W/DIV.PRO.lgI11/2011 bu 21/04/2911 portant ortrot be I'EVTORISATION PWMFTIIRON DE CUWEBES PEtWMWE no 11M, au nom be YE llgIBll apant %on $fkpe $orfa1 $I$ gbenue lfgongo Lutete no 01, W u a / 6 o m b e , ;' , , < a

aEet ktabli Ie prksent CWlWICAT B'EIORHTIOH DE ClWUERB P- qui Iui tonfire Ie broit excIue'if b'effettuer, bu 21/04/2011 au 26/84/2016, led tritbaux be nrberebae, be bkbebgfrement et b'explottatfon be la mbstante be tarriired suibante : klcaire il Ciment I'fndrfeur btt phimitre tafrraat I'obfet be I' IIUIO1ISBROH PQPLORIIROI DE WtMEWS P E l W W f l Z r o q o $ i be 5 ca r rb e'ituis bane' le merritoire be Songololo, BtIdtrftt bk ktaracta, $hbfnU? bu Bu-Congo,

Pee' toorbonnies giograp@iqnee' beti e'ommets bubit phimitre e'ont reprises bane' I'gnnexe 1 qni fait partie fadgrante bu prhent CEMWICAT.

: 9 . - ' ' , I .

t .. . Qen application be la Bicie'ion no 05)/bIV.PRO.IQ/2011 bu 22/04/2811 portant OL..,, lTOBISBTION D'WLOITllROI DE UMUER&! PlMUENTE no 11841, att nom be IlYlRIll YE inu agant $on $ihp~ I,.,. 4U B e n u e Ilgoq. L.btr no or, uncll.Y/combe,

, ' 1, r * i . , . Qest h b I i Ie prbent CEEIWICAT D'EXPMITETIOI BE qui Iui canfire Ie broit

excIurtif b'effertuer, ba n/61/2011 att aO/M/B(lC, leg trabaux be ret@trc@e#, be bhbeloppement et b'exphitation be la %atb#tance be tarriires e'uibante: C a h h C h t 4 I'inthrieur bu phrfmitre fatarant I'objet be 1' ILIITOIIXII'IIOI D'EXPUNTEROI RE comgoe'i be 5 carris situis bans Ie aerritoire be h - o , Bi0tt'fct be cu8mctm, $!ilrobfnte btl kr-Cosyo,

'Eee' toorbonniee' giogrrapfiiques be$ goinmete' bubit pirimhre e'ont reqrirree' bane' Z'gnnexe 1 qui fait partie I

intigrante bu prhent CEBTEICAT. \

I DIRECTEUR GENERAL ADJOINT a.i I

C. a (D.

5 Pa

E

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO MINES MINISTERY

GENERAL SECRETARY PROTECTION DEPARTMENT OF MINING

ENVIRONNEMENT

True translation of the original copy

CONCERN: EIE-PGEP OF THE SOCIETY NYUMBA YA AKIBA AECP N°11945, 11738, 11737, 11942, 11946 AND 11947 AT SONGOLOLO

The Department of Protection of Mining Environment of the Mining Ministry received from the Mining Cadastre the letters n° Ref/CAMI/DG/0135/2001 and n° Ref/COMI/0135/2011, transferring the Environmental Impact Study (EIE in French) and the Management Plan of Environmental Project (PGEP, in French) of the NYUMBA YA AKIBA basing to the transformation of the Research Permit of Quarry Product n°11945, 11738, 11739, 11737, 11942, 11942, 11946 and 11947 by providing a Permanent Exploitation Permit of the Quarry.

The examinations of the file by the Permanent Evaluation Comity Members, in French quote “CPE” at the time of ordinary meeting of 31st January 2011 show that the goal study respect the condition in the form and substance as on the annex IX of the Mining regulation.

However, it is important to remind the people in charge of the NYUMBA YA AKIBA that the work of the quarry exploitation has sometimes, fatal to the environment, especially:

A. On the quality of air

The works of cutting down and extraction of the rock, the activities of carriage and reloading of materials, the traffic of the machine on the access road, the operation of crushing, the activity of furnaces are the main base of the emissions of TSP, PM 10, COx and NOx that pollute the atmosphere of the zone affected by the production activity of cement.

B. On the quality of water

The spreading of fuels and other similar product can change the characteristic of waters on the surface, more at the YUKU and SANSIKWA when streaming.



ENVIRONNEMENT


C. On the geological structure

The exploitation work of the quarry makes an artificial break that affects directly the landscape and the topography of the area.

D. On the biological area

The big quantity of dust that fall to the vegetations can disturb the normal growth of plants.

So, the Permanent Comity of Evaluation and the Department of Protection of Mining Environment advice the Authority of NYUMBA YA AKIBA to care about the environmental problem that can come up at the time of exploitation.

That is why, the Permanent Comity of Evaluation and the Department of Mining Environmental Protection recommend to the NYUMBA YA AKIBA at the time of exploitation:

1. To plant trees around the area of the Society;

2. Regularly watering the access traffic road at the concern area;

3. To set up a health and protection program in sight of

- Identify, evaluate, supervise and secure at the specific manner the control over the risk for the health and security of employees;

- Adopt some safety procedure of the employees and;

- Assure safety training.

4. To protect aquifer sheets;

5. To resort to the technology that allow to assure the limit of emission at the atmosphere are maintain at acceptable limit:



ENVIRONNEMENT


- To equip the chimneys of the factory by modern electrostatic dust remover and set up dust collector to check regularly the concentration of TSP and PM10 in the air;

- Install the overturning device at the exit of the grinding enabling to confine the emissions of dusts and the ring the dust flux from blow of the grinding room.

6. Proceed with blasting at the manner to reduce vibrations and use of minimal charges;

7. Analyze regularly the physics characteristics and chemicals of effluent canalize by the nature;

8. To settle the water collecting from quarry before any works;

9. To compete to the blossoming of the local community by the setting up social infrastructures at area of the project;

10. Establish notice panel in the quarry to notice risky place and limit speed of engines in the traffic on the quarry at plus or minus 20 Km/h;

11. To forbid to the population to built anarchic construction at the concessions of the quarry by explaining them clearly the incurred risk for their heath to be near the exploitation activity of cement plant;

12. To envisage concretes measures to be setting up in sight of reduce the volume and the quantity of water that can be used for this project;

13. Define and estimate the agriculture activity of the local population at the area of the project and submit to the local authority the compensation plan and delocalization.

At the look of the engagement and hard desire of the responsible of the NYUMBA YA AKIBA to respect the environmental norm during the time of



ENVIRONNEMENT


Exploitation, the Permanent Comity of Evaluation of the Protection Department of Mining Environment give his favorable advice to allow the NYUMBA YA KIBA to pursue the exploitation work at the quarry.

Jacques RAMAZANI LUTUBA

Manager, Chief of Service

RE3w-7 oEmimaunQUE w c w m CAOASTI IE MINIER

L-.*u ad 'AT DfEXPL0ITA!ON ----- t- - - -- - 3 P E I w m m m

&n application be la Pirieion no 003/DIV.PRO/l2 bu 19/03/2012 +tant octroi be I'AUTORISIITIOI D9EXPMIT110N DE C-S PERMMENTE no 12524, au nom be IIPDMBE 1111 RKIBA apant don $iige So cia1 $i$ gbenue Ngongo Latete nOO1, Kinshasa/Gombe,

&et itabli le pririent CERTIFICAT D'EXPLOITATION DE CARMERES PERMAWENTE qui lui tonfire le broit exclue'ii b'eiiectuer, bu 19/03/2012 au 18/03/2011, lee trabaux be recbercbee, be bbeloppement et b'exploitation be la eublitance be carriire duibante : Calcaire ii Ciment a l'intirieur bu pirimitre faieant l'objet be I'~UTOIIWITI0N DyEXPLOITATION DE CllAMERES PERMANENTE towoei be 5 carrie eituie ban$ le Qerritoire be Songololo, Bietrict be Cataractes, @robinre bu Bas-Congo.

Pee coorbonniee giograpbiquee bed eommete bubit pirimitre eont reprieee bane l'gnnexe 1 qui fait partie intigrante bu prigent CERTIFICAT.

0 1 JUN 2012 Bilibri Btnebaea, le .................. . ' * ,

. ..

- *

fa- f,,.:l.., ' \.J

d. _I < - -- Mentions S~Bcifiaues J - II esl rappel6 au Tltulalre de ce t~tre de Carribres qu'en appl~catron de I'article 592 du Rbglement Minler, 11 esl tenu de respecter les dispos~tions du Chapitre VI du Tibe Wl i l dudlt Rbglement vlsant la mlse en conformite envlronnementaie des op6rabons exBcutb en vertu de

son AUTORISATION D'EXPLOITATION DE CARRIERES PERMANENTE. (+ f ib 7 1

I est bgalement rappel6 le d$Bt de I'Attestation de Commencement des travaux de dbveloppernent e l de construction dans les 6 mois de la ddwrance du t~tre

du prbent CERTIFICAT D'EXPLOITATION DE CARRIERES PERMANENTE sera, selon le cas, port& au dos de ce titre ou reprise dans une des annexes compkmenldres q u ~ en feront partres ~ntbgrantes --

CADASTRE. MINIER

E n appltratton be la Birieton no 004/DIV.PR0/12 bu 19/03/2012 .Ubbw..b ,,;rot be I'IIUMRISATIOI D3EXPLOITATION DE CARRIERES PERMANENTE no 12525, au nom be NYUMBA YA I I f l NYUMBA YA =A apant eon eiige eottal Gig abenue Ngongo Lutete nOO1, Kinshasa/Gombe,

, ' $st itabli le prbent CERTIFICBT D~EXPLOITRTION DE CARRERES PERMANENTE qui lui confire le brott extlueif b'effertuer, bu 19/03/2012 au 18/03/2011, lee' trabaux be rer!jerr!je$, be bheloppement et b'exploitption be la eubetante be carrtire ilutbante : Cdcaire ii Ciment 6 l'intirieur bu pirimitre fateant l'objet be l 'WPORISMIOH D~EXPLOITBTION DE CARRIERES PERMANENTE compo~i be 5 tarrig eituie bane le aerrttotre be Songololo, B)t$trict be Cataractes, @robinre bu BasSongo.

pee roorbonniee giograp!jtque$ bee $ommet$ bubtt pirimitre Bont reprieee: bane I'%mexe 1 qui fait partte tntigrante bu priBent CERTIFICAT.

' ' I .,.

b. ', f.'

. -

- qu'en a p p l i i dr I'artkle 592 du R6glement Minim, 1 est tenu de respecter L. dlspositlons du Chapllre

de devebppement et de construction dans les 6 mois de la dblivrance du titre.

--1 te modification ulMeure du p r h n l CERTIFICAT VEXPLOITATION DE CARRIERES PERMANENTE sera, sebn le cas, podbe au dos de ce titre ou reptise dans une des annexes c o m ~ n t a l r e s qui en feroni parties intbgrantes.

& - -- . ,


GENERAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTION OF MINING

ENVIRONNEMENT


RULING No……. / DPEM of … … … bases on the approbation of EIE-PGEP of the NYUMBA YA AKIBA Society, AECP n° 11945, 11738, 11739, 11737, 11 942 & 11947, Songololo.

The Manager, Chief of Mining environment Protection of the Mining Ministry;

In view of the Law n° 007/2002 of 11 July 2002 basing Mining Code in its article 82 and 154;

In view of the decree n° 038/2003 of 26 March 2003 basing on the Mining Regulation in its article 454 and 455;

Preamble the letter of the mining cadastre n° Ref. /CAMI/DG/0042/2011, / CAM/DG/0135/2011 of 18 January and on 03rd February 2011 transferring the documents of EIE-PGEP of the NYUMBA YA AKIBA Society for a environmental instruction;

Preamble the environmental notice favorable of 14th February 2011 in the advantage of the Society mentioned earlier an issued for an instruction and examination of the document by the specialized services of the Department of Protection of Mining environment basing to the articles 64, 70 and 75 of the Mining Code, to the articles 153, 407 of Mining regulation (its annex IX);

In view of the importance and necessity;

DECIDE:

Article 1st: is approved the EIE-PGEP of the NYUMBA YA AKIBA, for the AECP n° 11 945, 11738, 11737, 11 946 and 11947;

Article 2nd: Is recommended to the NYUMBA YA AKIBA to take into account all the remarks or pertinent observations mentioned at the environmental notice allowed for the EIE-PGEP as return earlier during all the period of works and to communicate to the Department of Protection of Mining Environment in the 30th days from the date of approval of it EIE-PGEP proof of payment of the financial safety in conformity to the articles 7 and 8 of the Annex II of the Mining Regulation;

Article 3rd: This decision come into force t the date of signature.

Done at Kinshasa, on … …

Jacques RAMAZANI LUTUBA

Manager, Chief of Service

\ . .. . I '

I . 1 ' I ?

l=lwmAnQUEw- , ' I. , ... :

' \ ' , : < . \

' G A O A 8 T R E MINIER - a *. '., \ a CEBmw D'EmLo=ON L

L & \ 1 . . * 3

. .. , ,

DlNMEEmW- . ,- an ap~liration be La Bkcision no MQ/BIP.PRO.I#I11/2011 bu 22/04/2811 1 tn

D'EXPLOITETIOI DE CIUERB P E l l M l m m no 11231, au aom be HYlMBlI YJI MfIBll a2 Ue 91 te lgoago Luteta no 01, $iarhasa/6ombe,

@st habIi Ie prkeent CEHWICET D'EXPLOITITIOH DE UWUEUEi PEWHMEN'PE gui lui tonfire Ie i t exclueif b'effectuer, bu 22/M/2011 au 26/04/2016, It$ trabaux Be retbertbed, Be bt!beIowmtnt et b'axtpluftstton ne la eub$tante be urrriiree euibante : Cllcolra A Ciment it Sfnttrtmr bu ybrfnr&lre fairmaat I'obfet be I' BUTO~TI011 D'EXPLOITIlTIOI BE CaUREIW PEEWWTE ! - - urmpoei be 5 tar& r(i&t!$ kne Ie tEerritoirc, ~gPP,Songololo, Z4fgtk'fgt Cataractes, @robtnte bu Bas-Congo. - , - -. .- C . <--. ._. - _ . . .

I - - .. ; . f - - e . . . . , , ' 8 , . . . ' 35% toorbonnth3 giograpbiquert.be$ eomtnetg bubit phimitre sont reprises bane L'mnexe 1 qui fait partie . . . ;

. I ., intkgrante bu prieent C E B ' P I F I C ~ . , ,? I

, I . , I 'I ' a . . , , j

,I " < . "

' . . , . ! . ' . 4 .

I DIRFCTEUR GENERAL ADJOINT aj.

, I

.-~ ~- - -

A . * . &

. e n agpIitation be Ia Bitirrion no 045/DIV.PR0.1M11/2011 bu 21/04/2011 yortant ortmt be I'IIrrrOlUSAROII D ' E X P L O ~ ~ O H DE MMUEBES PRWMEFRE no 11238, su rom be NYlMEJJB YE AgIBll agtrtlt son $ihgt IIarkl $i$ gbenue Igongo Lntete no 01, Einshasa/6omBc, ' jf. r' - . ,t'', " , J

I 41 ,d ,.Fd 4, ?L.., i r JAt' , & A 2.1 +

&st itabli le yrisent AT P & O I T ~ DE d s PEE&&@% qui Iui anfire le broif extlue'tf b'effemer, bu 2Z/04/2011 au 26/04/2016, Ies tratlttttx be recberc$e$, be bkbabppemant gt bie%pIoltatfon be la Ilubstanre be tarriireri riuibante : Waire P Ciment h I'fntkrieur btt gdrlmhtre fat$&nt I'obfet be I' IIUTOPISAROH D'EXPMITIIROI DE CllllPEERES P~~ coqo$i be 5 tarrt!$ $itui$ ban$ le. Gerrttoire be Songololo, Bi$Wftt be

, 1 % . Cataractcr, $drobfrre ba Pu-Coqo, . , f . l t ~ . -

. . , ,

.~ . . . Pels toorbonnie$ gkogragbtque$ be$ sommets bubit ghrimitre . . rtont .. rqrisee' , . ban$ I'gnnexe . .. l.qui fait pa_rtte ,I,: .:&:. '

intigrante bu prhlsent CERTWICRT. . t . . .~ i ;< ,

., , ..<: \I 1 . i r$ . - I,. .,

I DIREClXUR GENERAL ADTOINT a.i I

H' I?.

3 I?

, . \ '1 e n appUtation be Ia Bitie'ion no W/DIV.PRO.lgI11/2011 bu 21/04/2911 portant ortrot be I'EVTORISATION PWMFTIIRON DE CUWEBES PEtWMWE no 11M, au nom be YE llgIBll apant %on $fkpe $orfa1 $I$ gbenue lfgongo Lutete no 01, W u a / 6 o m b e , ;' , , < a

aEet ktabli Ie prksent CWlWICAT B'EIORHTIOH DE ClWUERB P- qui Iui tonfire Ie broit excIue'if b'effettuer, bu 21/04/2011 au 26/84/2016, led tritbaux be nrberebae, be bkbebgfrement et b'explottatfon be la mbstante be tarriired suibante : klcaire il Ciment I'fndrfeur btt phimitre tafrraat I'obfet be I' IIUIO1ISBROH PQPLORIIROI DE WtMEWS P E l W W f l Z r o q o $ i be 5 ca r rb e'ituis bane' le merritoire be Songololo, BtIdtrftt bk ktaracta, $hbfnU? bu Bu-Congo,

Pee' toorbonnies giograp@iqnee' beti e'ommets bubit phimitre e'ont reprises bane' I'gnnexe 1 qni fait partie fadgrante bu prhent CEMWICAT.

: 9 . - ' ' , I .

t .. . Qen application be la Bicie'ion no 05)/bIV.PRO.IQ/2011 bu 22/04/2811 portant OL..,, lTOBISBTION D'WLOITllROI DE UMUER&! PlMUENTE no 11841, att nom be IlYlRIll YE inu agant $on $ihp~ I,.,. 4U B e n u e Ilgoq. L.btr no or, uncll.Y/combe,

, ' 1, r * i . , . Qest h b I i Ie prbent CEEIWICAT D'EXPMITETIOI BE qui Iui canfire Ie broit

excIurtif b'effertuer, ba n/61/2011 att aO/M/B(lC, leg trabaux be ret@trc@e#, be bhbeloppement et b'exphitation be la %atb#tance be tarriires e'uibante: C a h h C h t 4 I'inthrieur bu phrfmitre fatarant I'objet be 1' ILIITOIIXII'IIOI D'EXPUNTEROI RE comgoe'i be 5 carris situis bans Ie aerritoire be h - o , Bi0tt'fct be cu8mctm, $!ilrobfnte btl kr-Cosyo,

'Eee' toorbonniee' giogrrapfiiques be$ goinmete' bubit pirimhre e'ont reqrirree' bane' Z'gnnexe 1 qui fait partie I

intigrante bu prhent CEBTEICAT. \

I DIRECTEUR GENERAL ADJOINT a.i I

C. a (D.

5 Pa

E

- I : REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE I I Ministere des Affaires Foncie I I I . I * . .) .. I I : ; A ' ? \::. c;

ORIGINAL ~9 22038

champs -ow---<

vet l a eoas 11 -.---.<

I I SECTrOB t RURALICo----

Livre d'enregistrement 6iiwM-h SO~,GOLOLO. -0-

I

LOCALITE 1 UKUo ----ow-- : vol CX/6 ------- Foli033~8~==. I

I ---LA SWIETE PRIvEE A RESPONSIPILIVE LZYITEE DLN &YUWA YA ULtmA --- S.P.R.L. " i a u t r i a a l i e au noaream Regist .re d e Cor de EInSHISA 60- ---

: l o uuaero 55.941, repr4sent8e aux linr dee pr6eent.s par Monsieur Patrick -- - I

; V A N DEWALLE, Direc tear GkuCral ; arant Sou Si&e Soeial mar leAvenme IYGOnGO- I LUTETE; n u C r o 01 dane l a Commune d e l a WWE i UNSBA5Ao-------------------- i -Est e n r e g i s t r b e comme Gtant, m v e r t u et aux m n d i t i o n r da aontrat d* -- : Smphyt6ose csnelu e n d a t e du r i n g t - t r a i s m1 decu rille onze am w

: 2&lla,lique 1)imocratique du Congo, reCa ce j c regiatre journal I ee- - I : numiros d'ordre &n&ral A.lZ.*Zi7 et s p 6 c i a l ,----I---------.-.* ---

du vingt-trl ----.-------,

I I I I I

iobilier

- 1 I REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU I Ministere des Affaires Foncier 436 I I I I

I I I I I t

\ I I I

I I I

I CERTIFICAT D'ENREGISTREMENTDvm D R ~ I T ~ m ~ m ~ y ~ g I I I 8 I , ORRGlMAL N E 22036 I SECTION 1 : RURALEO----- i Livre d'enreg~strement a&'Yvd~&' I I TERRITOIRE DE : SONGOLOLO,-- : Vol c1/6. ----- - - Folio ~ 3 6 . - - - - - LOCALZTrl I

: ----LA SOCIETE PRNEE A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE DJSNOMNEE " NYUMBA YA AKIBA - : SPRL ", ImmatriculCe au Nouveau RCgist re de Commerce de KINSHASA sons la --

. - : numiro 55.941, r e p r i s e n t 6 e aux f i n s des p r i s e n t e s par Monsieur PATRICK VAN- - ! DEVALLE, Di rec teur GQnkral; ayant Son SiGge S o c i a l sur Avenue NGONGO LUTETE

- - : nurnCro 01 dans l a Commune de l a QOmE B KfNS#ASAo-------------------------- ----Est e n r e g i s t r i e comme i t a n t , en v e r t u a t aux cond i t i ons du c o n t r a t ----

: dmEmphytiose conclu en d a t e du v ine t r o i s novembre deux m i l l e ones avec l a : RCpublique Dimocratique du Congo, requ c e jour au r e g i s t r e journa l sous l e s

- - j nunir os d' or dre gCnCral A. 12.1 75 e t s p i c i a l E/005,------------------------

C

0 ZONGA WILLY 1

- j REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU I I Ministere des Affaires Foncier I

L. I I I 1

I , I I

'\ * I

I I I I

I I I CERTIFICAT D'ENREGISTREMENT p ~ m DRoIP DmEmmTE(

ORIGINAL N O 22037 I

j L~vre d'enregistrement t 1

: Vol -C-r/6.------ Folio -!7*----- I

SECTION : RU=,------ ddMdddg TERRITOIBE DE : GGNGGLGL0,--- LO- -t . WTNKEL - c!*......--

1 ----LA SOCIETE PRIVEE A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE DEKOMMEE NYUMBA YA AKIBA - i SPRL ", Imniatricul6e au Noweau RCgistre de Commerce de i ( I r i s w A sous l e --

. : numhro 55.941. r e p r i s e n t 6 e au fins des prbsentes par Eonsieur PATRICK VAN - - : DEWALLE, Directeur GCniral; ayant Son ..ii&ge S o c i a l sur Avenue NGONGO LUTETE -- -. -- i numiro 01 dans l a Coumune de l a GOMBE i KINSHGA,--------------------------

: 0---Est enreg i s t rhe comme d tan t , en v e r t u e t aux conditons du c o a r a t ----- j dNEmphyt60se conclu en da te du v ing t t r o i s novembre deux mi l l e onze avec l a : R i p u ~ l i q u e Ii6mocrstique du Congo, requ ce jour au r e g i s t r e journal sous l e s

- I

; numCros d'ordre ginCral A. 12,176 e t spicial E/uG6.------------------------

I

;LIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE Ministere des Affaires

- - - - -

SECTION : RURALES.--0- Livre d'enregistrement

Vol w6.--.-.--- Folio la&.----- @6Mbfi& TERRITOIRE DE 8 SONGOLOLO. -- LOCALIm --D6; t MNlauL---

I ----LA SOCIETE PRIVEE A RESPONSABILITE LIHITEE DENOWEE " NYUMBA YA AKIBA - i SPRL It, Immatricul6e au Noweau R i g i s t r e de Commerce de KINSHASA sous l e -- - : numiro 55.941, r e p i s e n t i e aux f i n s dea p r i s e n t e s par Monsieur PATRICK VAN- ! DEWALLE, Di rec teur G i n i r a l ; ayant Son Si6ge S o c i a l sur Avenue NGONGO LUTETE

~ ~~ : numkro 01 dans l a Commune de l a GOMBE Ei KINSHASAm------------------------- : ----Est e n r e g i s t r 6 e comme b tan t , en v e r t u e t aux cond i t ions du c o n t r a t ---- \ d'EmphytCose conclu en da te du v i n g t t r o i s novembre deux m i l l e onze avec l a : Ripublique Dbmocratique du Congo, r equ ce jour au r e g i s t r e journal sous l e s j numCros d'ordre ginCral A m 12.173 e t s p i c i a l E/OO3.------------------------ : ----Emphytioti pour un terme de VINOT G I N 4 ANS, i p a r t i r du v ing t t r o i s -- : novembre deux m i l l e onze du fonds i n d i q n i c i - a p r k : ......................

S O ZONCIA W I L L Y 9

- i REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE D I I Ministere des Affaires Foncie I I I I I

1 I

I I I I I

I

I I t I

I a , I

I , CERTlFlCAT D 'ENREGISTREMENTD*~~ DROIT D*EWPB~TE(

ORIGINAL Nn 22033 I SECTION t RURALEm------

Livre d'enregistrement dMddf! 4 ERRITOIRE DE SONGOLOLO,---

I,.:.

+ . ; .

. ,

I

: ----LA SOCIETE PRIVEE A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE UENOMMEE NYUMBA PA AKIBA - - : SPRL " Immatriculie au Nouveau R6gis t re de Commerce de KINSHASA sous leu-- _ : num6ro 55.941, reprCsentCs aux f i n s des p r i s e n t e s par Monsieur PATRICK ----

: VAN DEWAUE, Directeur Gin6ral ; ayant son Si6ge S o c i a l sur Avenue IJGONGO -- - - i LUTETE num6ro 07 dans l a Commune de l a OOMBE a WNSHASA.-------------------

: ----Est e n r e g i s t r i e cornme i t a n t , en v e r t u e t aux condi t ions du cont ra t ---- --. : dtEmphytiose conclu en da te du v ing t t r o t s ncwembre deux mi l l e onze avec l a

: RBpublique DBrnocratique du Congo, r e s u ce jour au r e g i s t r e journal sous l e s .. . I

1 numiros d'or dre g6n i ra l A. 7 2.1 71 e t s p i c i a l E/OO1 .----------------------0-

: ----Emphytiote pour un terme de VINGT CINQ ANS, i p a r t i r dn v ing t t r o i s ---

-

I I I

REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU , . . I -

Ministere des Affaires Foncieres * - . * ' ? , - \

CERTIFICAT D'ENREGISTREMENTDen~ PROIT U ~ E ~ ~ T E (

L~vre d'enreg~strement

Vol C.li6_._.------ Folio 235,-----

SECTION 8 RE3ALE.----0- M M d TERHJTOIRE DE : SGtiGOLOLOo--0 Lac;- DE L k'rsnl, -.------

----LA SOCIETE P R I V E L A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE DENOMMEE t~ NYUMBA YA AKIBA - SPRL ", Immatr icul ie au Noweau R i g i s t r e de Commerce de KINSHASA sous l e - numiro 55.941, r e p r i s e n t k e n w f i a w des p r i s e n t e s par Monsieur PATRICK VAN- DEWALLE, Di rec teur G i n i r a l ; ayant son Si6ge S o c i a l sur Avenue NGONGO LUTETE numbr o 01 dans l a Commune de l a GOMBE i KINSHASA. .......................... ----Est e n r e g i s t r h e comme i t a n t , en v e r t u e t aux cond i t i ons du c o n t r a t ---- d'Emphgt6ose conclu en da t e du v i n g t t r o i s novembre deux m i l l e onze, avec - l a Republique Dimocratique du Congo, r e s u c e jour au r e g i s t r e journa l sous- l e s numiros d 'ordre g i n i r a l A. 12.174 e t s p i c i a l E/004.-------------------- ----Emphytiote pour u . terme de v i n g t c i n q ane, i p a t * du v i n g t t r o i s -- novembre d e n ~ rni l le onze du fonds i n d i q u i c i -apr6s : .....................

I

Ministere des Affaires

a

C - aC/

CERTIFICAT D'ENREGISTRE

ORIIGIINAL ~9 22032 SECTION : RURALE, ----..

L~vre d'enreg~strement Commune TERRITOIRE DE : SONOOLOLOo-0

Vol Ct/6L%--- - Fol~o 132, ----- L Q W E D E r K f m I L ----. - -- ----LA GOCIETE PRIVEE A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE DENOWE " NYUMBA YA AKIBA- SPRL ", Immatr icul ie au Nouveau RCgist re de Commerce de KINSHASA sous l e - numdro 55.941, r ep re sen t6e aux f i n s des p r i s e n t e s par Monsieur PATRICK VAN DEWALLE, Di rec teur GCniraL; ayant Son SiGge S o c i a l sur Avenue NGONGO LUTETE numCro 01 dans l a Commune de l a GOMBE & KINSWAo------------------------- 0---Est en reg i s t rCe comme i t a n t , en v e r t u e t aux cond i t i ons du c o n t r a t ---- d8Emphyt60se conclu en d a t e du v i n g t t r o i e novembre d e w m i l l e onze avec l a Rhpublique DBmocratique du Congo, requ ce jour au r e g i s t r e journa l sous l e s numiros d 'ordre gknkral A. 12.172 e t s p d c i e l E/002.---------0--------------- ----ErnphytSote pour un terme de V I N G T C I N g ANS; A p a r t i r du v i n g t t r o i s --- novembr e d e w m i l l e onze du fonds indiquhe ci -apr i s : ------------------ ----Une p a r c e l l e de t e r r e A usage AGRICOLE p o r t a n t le numiro 1249 SIR du

P

DRAFT AGREEMENT BETWEEN NYUMBA YA AKIBA S.A.R.L. AND THE

LOCAL COMMUNITY BENFICIARIES WITH CUSTOMARY RIGHT BETWEEN The company NYUMBA YA AKIBA S.A.R.L., limited liability company of by Congolese law, registered with the New Registry under number 55949 / Kinshasa, identified nationally under n° 01-09-N41523H, having its registered office on Avenue Ngongo – Lutete, town of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, District of Gombe, represented by Mr PATRICK VANDEWALLE, its General Director. Hereafter referred to as “NYUMBA YA AKIBA S.A.R.L.” on the one hand, AND For Kinsua For Nkondo Nkombia

MAKIADI NSINDANI ZYK ADOLPHE LUBIXILI

(Signature) 22/12/2012 (Signature) 22/12/2012

The Community of beneficiaries from the villages surrounding the NYUMBA YA AKIBA site in SONGOLOLO here-after; KINSUA; MAWETE; NKONDO-KIOMBA; NKONDA; TANDU and NIONGA; all residing in the SONGOLOLO territory, Lower-Congo Province, Democratic Republic of Congo, represented by the representatives whose names are mentioned in the list in annexure. Hereafter referred to as “THE BENEFICIARIES”, on the other hand, Shall be hereafter collectively named “the parties” and individually “the party”. PREAMBLE For Niongo

MPAKA NENDIMBA FRANCOIS

(Signature) 22/12/2012

CONSIDERING THAT

- The company NYUMBA YA AKIBA S.A.R.L. wishes to build a modern cement factory with a production capacity of 1,200,000 tons of cement per year, on the customary lands of the aforementioned villages, in the Songololo Territory, Lower-Congo Province;

For Nkonda Chief of Sector

NDONGALA BONIFACE (Signature)

(Signature) 22/12/2012

- NYUMBA YA AKIBA S.A.R.L. is driven, on the one hand, by the will to participate to the local communities’ development and the improvement of the living conditions of the populations from the different villages where the cement factory shall be established;

- Following the minutes of the meeting held in MAWETE on July 31st, 2012

and in presence of the Chef of sector of LUIMA, the representatives of the villages in which the concession of the NYUMBA YA AKIBA company is located suggested to the latter a series of community interest projects to be carried out;

- Considering the need for the parties to define a legal framework in order

to govern their relations pertaining to the present project ;

FROM WHAT IS MENTIONNED HEREABOVE, IT HAS BEEN AGREED AND DECIDED AS FOLLOWS Article 1: Object By the present accord, the parties mean to define their expectations and commitments on the one hand, with the operating of a modern cement factory by the company NYUMBA YA AKIBA on the customary lands of the aforementioned villages, and on the other hand, the development of the local community. Article 2: Duration of the Memorandum of understanding and application The present agreement shall be concluded for an undetermined duration which shall start running as from the date of its signature. Article 3: Commitments of the parties

In order to favour the development of the local community by the construction of social infrastructures within the project area, the two parties shall agree to the following commitments:

A. Commitments by NYUMBA YA AKIBA SARL NYUMBA YA AKIBA SARL commits to:

Build a modern school in one of the aforementioned villages housing its concession, and to rehabilitate the school located in the NKONDA village.

Build a modern clinic in the concession and a market in one of the villages that shall be defined in the near future. In the aforementioned clinic, only the consultations shall be free of charge. All the other fees shall be borne by the patients.

Build a bridge made of lasting materials over the Sansikwa river and the roads according to the company’s development plan and the company’s needs. The aforementioned roads may be used by the local communities provided that some measures are taken for security reasons.

Recruit some of its employees within the local community depending on the employment availability and their qualifications.

Develop water supply sources in order to permit local villagers to have regularly access to water.

Supply to local communities 200 plastic chairs and 200 metal sheets per village.

Every end of year, supply to local communities a number of goods in kind, of which the content shall be decided at the discretion of the NYUMBA YA AKIBA company’s hierarchy. However, this allocation shall only be granted during the first two year of the factory’s construction.

Sell to local communities the cement at factory price following a quota that shall be determined by the hierarchy of the company NYUMBA YA AKIBA.

B. Commitments by the benefiting local community The Community commits to:

Accept the relocation, for the company’s exploitation needs, of some villages, namely YUKU, in return for compensation by new constructions in the surrounding villages.

Accept the relocation of the farming activities in return for compensation, after assessment by an agricultural expert named by local authorities.

Support the project, and not carry out any act likely to bloc or sabotage the fulfilment of the project.

C. Joint commitments Both parties commit to:

Closely collaborate for the good and complete fulfilment of the present agreement, and jointly try to find the necessary possibilities and means to warranty the good functioning of the project. To that effect, the parties shall agree to put in place a permanent consulting framework for the application of the present agreement.

Article 4: Timing to carry out the projects All the above-mentioned community interest projects shall be carried out as from the first year of production of cement and shall be spread out in time. However, some projects for which the costs to carry them out are not too high may be carried out during the construction period. It shall be up to the hierarchy of the company NYUMBA YA AKIBA SARL to choose the projects that shall be carried out during that period.

Article 5: Termination The present agreement shall be terminated should one of the parties not carry out its contractual commitments. A one month prior notice shall be sent to the failing party.

Article 6: Domiciliation Any notification or communication pertaining to the present memorandum of understanding shall be considered as duly transmitted if it is validly made in writing and handed out personally to one or the other party, or transmitted by special letter to the addresses mentioned here-after or any other address that each party shall take care to notify to the other. For NYUMBA YA AKIBA SARL Avenue Ngongo Lutete n°1 Commune de la Gombe / Kinshasa Tel.: 00243 81 769 84 91 E-mail: [email protected] For the benefiting local communities Offices of the Chief of sector of LUIMA in SONGOLOLO Article 8: Litigation settlement The conflicts which may arise from the application of the present agreement shall be settled out of court by the parties or the local administrative authorities should the litigation continue. Done at SONGOLOLO, on …/…/2012 in two original copies, each party acknowledges having received its copy.

mailto:[email protected]

For Tandu – (illegible) For Mawete

KIVUILA JEAN (Signature) MABIZ NSIMBA TUH

NDONGALA KANAVANGAU (Signature) (Signature)

22/12/2012

FOR NYUMBA YA AKIBA SARL FOR THE LOCAL COMMUNITY



Appendix E: Affected Field Database

N° Nom Post‐nom Prénom Num tél Village Sexe Date de naissance GPS Numéro carte d'électeur Culture/arbres Spécification Supérficie (are)Manioc ares 35

Sous total 35

Canne à sucre pieds 11.2

Sous total 11.2

manioc et patate douce (culture mixte) 22

Manioc Plus de 5ans 43

manioc et patate douce (culture mixte) Moins de 5 ans 33

Sous total 98

Minkelo Mixte (Manioc, patate d, chou, aubergine) 62

Sous total 62

Mixte (Manioc, patate d, arachide) 21

Sous total 21

Manioc, Haricot Culture mixte 62

Sous total 62

Manioc, Wandu Culture mixte 12

Sous total 12

Manioc 5.5

Tomate 6.3

Sous total 11.8

Manioc, wandu Culture mixte 7.6

Sous total 7.6

Manioc 15.21

Manioc, Tomate Culture mixte 22.8

Manioc wandu Culture mixte 3.91

Sous total 41.92

362.52

1049814610

Total général

10595400444

4 Lukebakio Kimfuma Pierre 243‐811‐637‐901 M 05/11/1954 1004988870

243‐820‐081‐839

2 Beno Yisosanga Marie

Minkelo M 26/06/1971

Minkelo F 08/01/1958 10049819191

M 18/12/1982 10049814394

0411712/9379057 10595601385

Kimpese

9 Mabatezulua Nzuzi Francine

8 Nsilulu Matandu Masiya 243‐847‐275‐056 Minkelo

Minkelo F 10591601666

F

0411083/9378334

7 Mangikulua Matadulua Nadège 243‐821‐514‐159

Minkelo6 Makulenda Nsumbu

3 Binasala Makiese Sidonie Minkelo F

5 Nzinga Betty Albertine Minkelo

Bavueza Tuabakama Samuel

08/03/1968

M 05/11/1954

1

0411083/9378334 1004988870

Kouleman M 16/10/1975 10595601156

M 26/06/1957Nlandu10 Nduakulu Zacharie Minkelo

N° Nom Post‐nom Prénom Num tél Village Sexe Date de naissance GPS Numéro carte d'électeur Culture/arbres Spécification Supérficie (are)Poivrons Plus de 5 ans 1.9

Mixte(oignons, piment,amarenthe) Plus de 5ans 5.88

Oignons Moins de 5 ans 1.8

Oignons Plus de 5ans 0.77

10.35

Oignons 1.885

1.885

Manioc, tomates, tabac et oignon champs mixte 5.46

5.46

Oignon 1.725

1.725

Manioc & Patate champs mixte 5

Manioc & Patate champs mixte 51

Manioc 15

71

0411628/9379 Tomate 10

0411598/9379 Piment 4

Poivrons 9

23

Manioc 5

5

Oignons 0.78

Oignons 3.6

Piment & poivron champs mixte 4.8

9.18

243‐815‐193‐576 Terrain en location (mixte) Hectares 10

243‐995‐682‐050 10

Manioc 14

Manioc, Patate Culture mixte 26.7

Manioc 10

50.7

Manioc 10

Manioc, Patate Culture mixte 12

Manioc, aubergine Culture mixte 2.5

Manioc, Patate Culture mixte 1.5

26

Manioc, Patate Culture mixte 20

20

Tomate 15.64

Poivrons 3.12

18.76

Manioc, Patate d, arachide, piment Culture mixte 15

Manioc 10

25

278.06

Mbamba F 25/08/1988 10595602403

M 10049820696

Minkelo 10049811972

18/06/1986F

Mbamba

14 Matondo Kuazambi Emilie

13 Mayingi Massamba Dominique

29/05/1953 13323674553

10595403540

Sous total

Sous total

Sous total

Sous total

04/08/1954

M 12/10/1976 10048394065

9 Luyindula 2 Samba 2 Thérèse Kimpese F

8 Lusambu Lumpina Helas 243‐970‐496‐291 Mbamba

5 Kuvumusu Dimueni Philippe M

10049159060

4 Zola Ukuvuidi Minkelo M

1

10595401599

3 Kasompua Matondo Simon Mbamba M

2 Ebuta Mukongi Glodi Minkelo

Mbamba M

6 Tangala Minkelo

M 10/07/1991

Diankwenu Kiambi

7 Lungiambundila Diakese Joceline 243‐816‐068‐101 Minkelo 21/07/1994

M 13/03/1962Masamuna Thomas 10041408559

10595603647

Baninginina10

Sous total

Sous total

Sous total

411600/937718

Sous total

Sous total

Sous total

F

M

CarineMalata Minkelo

11 Matuvovanga Magellan

12 Pendani Malaki Maurice Minkelo M 20/04/1968 10595600672

Total général

Sous total

Sous total

Sous total

Sous total

N° Nom Post‐nom Prénom Num tél Village Sexe Date de naissance GPS Numéro carte d'électeur Culture/arbres Spécification Supérficie (are)Manioc 2

2

Manioc & arachide 9

Sous total 9

Manioc & arachide Culture mixte 10

Haricot 4

Sous total 14

Mais, Gombo Mixte 9

Manioc,arachide Mixte 12

Maïs ares 33

Avocatier Moins de 5ans 5

Sous total 59

0411628/9379 Manioc 20

0411598/9379 Bananier Adulte 12

Avocatier Plus de 5ans 1

Sous total 33

Manioc 18

Avocatier 2

Bananier 20

Manguier 3

Sous total 43

0411602/9379 Manioc 3

0412101/9379 Manioc & Arachide 16


Oranger Plus de 5ans 1

Bananier 3

24

Bananier 86

Avocatier Moins de 5ans 18

Safoutier Moins de 5ans 4

Mandarinier Moins de 5ans 2

Manguier Moins de 5ans 1

111

Manioc, arachide Culture mixte 25

Manioc, pétit poid 2

27

Maïs Culture mixte 19

Piment & Ananas 1

Bananier 7

Papayer 2

29

Manioc 3

Bananier 50

53

Manioc 4

4

Yuku F 03/02/1999 411497/937907

Sous total

Sous total

Yuku M 13/01/1977 411497/937907 10595602985

52 Nkenge Adieyi Béatrice 243‐819‐569‐045

F 03/02/1973 10049356159

Sous total

50 Nsilulu Nsemi Dieu donné 243‐815‐226‐254

F 19/09/1969 411719/937908 10048447649

49 Nkenge Dibanzilua Solange Yuku

05/05/1982 10595400134

Sous total

46 MbambukuluNdoki A Kanda Marie 243‐813‐222‐067 Yuku

M 1937 10049813738

43 Malambu Toko Samuel 243‐810‐208‐755 Yuku M

M 26/12/1972

37 Nowa Ndongi A Kanda Michel 243‐824‐308‐285 Yuku

36 Luvuisa Pita EO 243‐991‐528‐755 Minkelo

30 Lelo Selipa Yuku

Yuku M 27/12/1967 411083/937833 10049962296

Sous total

Sous total

F 1947 10595601601

Yuku F 13/02/1990 412174/937929 10595605208

21 Kiele Lukebuka 243‐829‐243‐331

M 06/08/1991 412085/937927 10595402110

Sous total

20 Kavovi Marie Claire 243‐824‐697‐166

F08/10/1988

14 Fuakutubua Matula Dodi Kimpese

11 Diasonama Marie Marie 243‐822‐985‐827 Yuku

N° Nom Post‐nom Prénom Num tél Village Sexe Date de naissance GPS Numéro carte d'électeur Culture/arbres Spécification Supérficie (are)anioc, Arachide 59

Safoutier Moins de 5 ans 1

60

Manioc ares 18

Bananier 43

Papayer Plus de 5ans 3


Oranger Moins de 5ans 4

75

Manioc, patate d, arachide, piment ares 120

Haricot 9

Haricot Plus de 5ans 3

Bananier Moins de 5ans 110



Sous total 256

Manioc, arachide Culture mixte 8

Sous total 8

0411402/9379 Manioc 23

0411351/9379 Manguier Plus de 5ans 1

Bananier 39

Sous total 63

Manioc, Tomate, poivrons Culture mixte 5

Sous total 5

875

F 10/11/1972 411391/937892 10049818373

M 13/10/1989 10595400134Yuku

64 Ndungisila Mabanza 243‐814‐732‐732 Minkelo

F 12/12/1977 411656/937908 1049815269

Total général

62 Mavakala Lema Kennedy 243‐822‐985‐827

F 15/07/1972 411299/938024 10595600605

58 Mele Bongo Fifi 243‐824‐308‐285 Yuku

57 Nkakudi Mayamona Hélène Mbamba

M 27/07/1962 411299/938024 12821615214

Sous total

Sous total

M 04/08/1977 411552/937908 10049830381

56 Ngenda Kampuku Paulin 243‐811‐618‐986 Yuku

54 Nsimba Vangu Elvis 243‐812‐675‐594

N° Nom Post‐nom Prénom Num tél Village Sexe Date de naissance GPS Numéro carte d'électeur Culture/arbres Spécification Supérficie (are)manioc, wandu(mixte) Moins de 5 ans 23.55

Manioc Plus de 5ans 28.3

Bananier Moins de 5 ans 1

52.85

Manioc, patate douce, choux, aubergines (mixte) 52.85

52.85

Haricot 2.38

2.38

Manioc 17.65

17.65

Manioc 5

5

Manioc 10.26

10.26

Haricot 12.62

12.62

Mixte(manioc,wandu) ares 10.8

Manioc ares 16.8

Ananas Pieds 27

54.6

243‐815‐193‐576 Manioc 76.83

243‐995‐682‐050 76.83

Tomate & chou 5

Manioc 9

Bananier 4

18

Manioc, patate douce, arachide, piment Mixte ares 110.49

110.49

Manioc ares 153.37

153.37

Manioc 23.98

23.98

Manioc,wandu & Patate champs mixte 3

Canne à sucre 11.2

Manioc 4.93

Haricot 34.68

Manioc, wandu 8

Bananier 6

67.81

Canne à sucre 11.2

11.2

669.89

Sous total

M 25/10/1962 10595602195Sous total

Kokolo M 01/01/1974 10049375420

Kokolo

13 Nsukula Makoma Ley

11 Malueki Luzayadio David 243‐811‐637‐901 M

Sous total

Minkelo

Minkelo M 05/05/1982 10595400134

07/12/1955 10049808300

Joseph 243‐810‐061‐965

F 29/05/1953 13323674553

Sous total

Sous total

10 Makayi Kimbembe Guylain 243‐811‐637‐901

MLusadusu Nakawenga 15/01/1933 10595600087

9 Luyindula Samba Thérèse Kimpese

8 Minkelo

Sous total

Sous totalMinkelo F 05/04/1974 105956002657 Lumfuakwenda Siwetibo Blandine 243‐898‐437‐690

6 Tandu Nsimba Christine

Sous total

Minkelo

Minkelo F26/09/1990 411087/937837 10595400053

F 06/04/1950

F 15/02/1930 10595600222Sous total

Minkelo

5 Lesa Mbanzanganga 243‐811‐637‐901

4 Kiamanga Lukuamusu Albertine

3 Diasuekama Dodika 243‐813‐300‐871

2 Dibazonga Kebanuaku Mamuke

F 04/08/1954 10049811972

Minkelo F

M

17/02/1963 10044521801

Minkelo

Sous total

Sous total

Sous total

1 Bungiena Mbumba Albert 243‐991‐526‐984 M

12

14 Tutonda

KiamangaTutonda 15

Minkelo

Mangietimona

Total général

04/08/1954FMinkelo243‐819‐117‐955EstherSous total

Sous total

Sous total

243‐828‐845‐674FrancoisMpika

Kiamanga Esther 243‐819‐117‐955 Minkelo

N° Nom Post‐nom Prénom Num tél Village Sexe Date de naissance GPS Numéro carte d'électeur Culture/arbres Spécification Supérficie (are)Tomates 0 3

Sous total 3M 25/11/198317 Kiabonzo Mangani 243‐817‐378‐629 Minkelo

N° Nom Post‐nom Prénom Num tél Village Sexe Date de naissance GPS Numéro carte d'électeur Culture/arbres Spécification Supérficie (are)Manioc,wandu 49.7

Manioc ares 4.59

Manioc ares 6.3

60.59

51 Nsilulu Nsemi Dieu donné 243‐815‐226‐254 Yuku

Sous total

M 13/01/1977 10595602985

N° Nom Post‐nom Prénom Num tél Village Sexe Date de naissance GPS

Numéro carte d'électeur

Culture/arbres Nombre

Bananier 50

Sous total 50 Legende:

Bananier 4 P = Pétit

Sous total 4 G = Grand

Avocatier 1

Bananier 4

Papayer 1

Sous total 6

Avocatier mois de 5 ans 10Avocatier plus de 5ans 10

Safoutier 4Bananier 37Manguier 1

Sous total 62Avocatier P 34

Safoutier P 10

Avocatier P 7

Papayer 5

Sous total 56

Bananier 6

Sous total 6

Total général 184

10049375420

6 Tutonda Kiamanga Esther 243‐819‐117‐955 Minkelo F 04/08/1954

10595602195

5 Nsukula Makoma Ley Kokolo M 01/01/1974

10049811972

3 Ntumba Kasanda Anny 243‐854‐366‐677 Minkelo F 10/09/1988 0411299/9380245 12821615214

Kokolo M 25/10/1962

Minkelo M 05/05/1982 10595400134

JeromeKilebe Minkelo

2 Makayi Kimbembe Guylain 243‐811‐637‐901

1 Luyindula 01/04/1962 0411377/9379107 10595401289

4 Mangietimona Mpika Francois 243‐828‐845‐674

M243‐825‐560‐951

N° Nom Post‐nom Prénom Num tél Village Sexe Date de naissance

GPS Numéro carte d'électeur

Culture/arbresSupérficie

(are)/Nombre

Safoutier plus de 5 ans 10 Legende:

Avocatier Plus de 5ans 2 P = Pétit

Palmier Moins de 5 ans 4 G = Grand

Palmier Plus de 5ans 1Sous total 17Total général 17

1 Diakiese Céline 243‐811‐637‐901 Minkelo F 00/00/1947

N° Nom Post‐nom Prénom Num tél Village Sexe Date de naissance GPS

Numéro carte d'électeur

Culture/arbres Spécification Nombre

Safoutier Plus de 5ans 20 Legende:

Manguier Moins de 5ans 4 P = Pétit

Oranger Moins de 5 ans 3 G = Grand

27

M

Sous total

1 Kimpidinga Kimpidinga Kokolo





Safoutier Plus de 5ans 1

Oranger Moins de 5 ans 2

Oranger Plus de 5ans 1

Avocatier Moins de 5 ans 3

Papayer Adulte 2

10

Safoutier P 3

Avocatier P 2

Papayer P 3

Manguier P 9

Manguier G 1

18

Manguier P 1

Safutier P 1

Avocatier P 1

3

Manguier G 4

Safoutier G 3

Palmier P 35

Papayer G 3

Bananier 4

49

Goyavier 15

Avocatier P 1

16

Manguier 1

1

97

Nsimba

10595403540

Mbamba F

Sous total

6 Beti Nzinga Niclette

72 Kiaku Hortence

10049815439243‐991‐721‐978 Minkelo F 20/06/1987

10049811972

Sous total 17

17 Kuvumusu Dimueni Philippe Minkelo M 04/08/1954

Sous total

45 Baninginina Malata Carine Minkelo F 18/06/1986

65 Pendani Malaki Maurice

60 Matuvovanga Magellan

Sous total

M

Sous total

Sous total

Total

16/07/1968 10049820653

Minkelo M 20/04/1968 10595600672




Bananier 7

Papayer 2 Legende:

9 P = Pétit

Bananier 50 G = Grand

50 P = Pétit

anioc, Arachide 59


60

Bananier 43

Papayer Plus de 5ans 3



57

Bananier Moins de 5ans 110



124

Bananier Adulte 5

5

0411712/9379057 Bananier Adulte 12

Manguier Plus de 5ans 2

Avocatier Moins de 5 ans 1

0411611/9379074 Papayer Adulte 2

17

0411712/9379057 Palmier Adulte 18


Avocatier Adultes 12

0411611/9379074

38

355

27/07/1962 0411299/9380245 12821615214

Sous total

3 Nsimba Vangu Elvis 243‐812‐675‐594 M

F 03/02/1973 10049356159

04/08/1977 0411552/9379083 10049830381

1 Nkenge Dibanzilua Solange Yuku

Sous total

Sous total2 Nsilulu Nsemi Dieu donné 243‐815‐226‐254 Yuku M 13/01/1977 0411497/9379077 10595602985

Sous total

4 Ngenda Kampuku Paulin 243‐811‐618‐986 Yuku M

5 Nkakudi Mayamona MbambaHélène

Adieyi Luyila Papy Tandu

Sous total

F 15/07/1972 0411299/9380245 10595600605

M 23/01/1982 10049815030

7 Adieyi Luyila Patrice 243‐823‐495‐042

6

Tandu M 30/07/1971 10049820688

M 30/07/1971 10049820688

Sous total1

Sous total

Sous total

Total général

8 Adieyi Luyila Patrice 243‐823‐495‐042 Yuku


GPSNuméro carte

d'électeurCulture/arbres Spécification Nombre

Palmier Plus de 5ans 8 Legende:

Safutier P Moins de 5 ans 1 P = Pétit

Manguier Plus de 5ans 1 G = Grand

10

10

53 Nsimba Diatezua Peris 243‐852‐446‐087 Minkelo

Sous total

Total général

M 10/10/1997412038/937660 1.005E+10



Culture/arbres Nombre

Manguier G 2 Legende:

Sous total 2 P = Pétit

Total général 2 G = Grand

M 16/10/1975 1059560115644 Makulenda Nsumbu Kouleman Minkelo



Appendix F: Example of Signed Compensation Agreement



Appendix G: NYA Grievance Mechanism

Mécanisme de gestion des plaintes Cimenterie Nyumba Ya Akiba

PROCEDURE DU MECANISME DE GESTION DES PROCEDURE DU MECANISME DE GESTION DES PROCEDURE DU MECANISME DE GESTION DES PROCEDURE DU MECANISME DE GESTION DES

PLAINTESPLAINTESPLAINTESPLAINTES

Novembre 2014

Société Anonyme avec Conseil d’Administration Au Capital de: 180 000 000CDF Siège Social: 1087, coin des avenues Bas-Congo et du Marché RCCM : CD/KIN/RCCM/14-B-3434(Ancien n°NRC/55949) Id. Nat. 01-334-N41523H


PROCEDURE DU PROCEDURE DU PROCEDURE DU PROCEDURE DU MECANISME DE GESTION DES MECANISME DE GESTION DES MECANISME DE GESTION DES MECANISME DE GESTION DES

PLAINTESPLAINTESPLAINTESPLAINTES

Document préparé par :

EMG

(Environmental Mining & Geology Consulting SARL

RCCM :CD/KNG/RCCM/14-B-2420ld. Nat. 01-83-N82183F)

Document préparé pour :

Novembre 2014

Société Anonyme avec Conseil d’Administration Au Capital de: 180 000 000CDF Siège Social: 1087, coin des avenues Bas-Congo et du Marché RCCM : CD/KIN/RCCM/14-B-3434(Ancien n°NRC/55949) Id. Nat. 01-334-N41523H


Page 1 sur 18

Table des matières 1. Objectif du document ..................................................................................................... 3

2. Portée ............................................................................................................................ 3

3. Définitions ...................................................................................................................... 4

4. Schéma de la procédure de résolution des plaintes ....................................................... 5

5. Responsabilités .............................................................................................................. 6

6. Procédure de gestion des plaintes ................................................................................. 8

6.1. Préambule ............................................................................................................... 8

6.2. Qui peut introduire (déposer ou ouvrir) une plainte ? ............................................... 8

6.3. Quels sont les canaux disponibles pour déposer une plainte ? ............................... 8

1. Bureau de Nyumba Ya Akiba à Yuku ...................................................................... 9

2. Boîtes à suggestions/plaintes placées ..................................................................... 9

3. Tout le personnel de Nyumba Ya Akiba et ses contractants .................................... 9

4. Cadre de concertation (ayant-droits), autorités locales et membres de la société civile ............................................................................................................................... 9

6.4. Etapes de la résolution des plaintes ........................................................................ 9

6.4.1. Réception de la plainte ..................................................................................... 9

6.4.2. Enregistrement de la plainte ............................................................................10

6.4.3. Visite d’inspection ...........................................................................................10

6.5. Approche à la résolution des plaintes .....................................................................10

6.5.1. Si la plainte ne requiert pas d’indemnisation en espèces ou en nature ............12

6.5.2. Si la plainte requiert une compensation en nature ou en espèces ...................12

6.5.3. Si le plaignant n’est pas satisfait par les procédures #1 et #2 ..........................13

6.5.4. Si le plaignant n’est pas satisfait par la solution proposée par le CCC ............13

6.6. Les plaintes les plus récurrentes ............................................................................13

6.7. Suivi et évaluation ..................................................................................................14

6.8. Les indicateurs-clés de performance ......................................................................14

6.9. Quelques principes directeurs dans le mécanisme de gestion des plaintes ............14

6.10. Divulgation de la procédure ................................................................................15

Annexe 1. Fiche d’enregistrement de la plainte ....................................................................16


Page 2 sur 18

Liste des abréviations

ALC Agent de Liaison Communautaire

CCC Cadre de Concertation Communautaire

EMG Environmental Mining & Geology Consulting

NYA Nyumba Ya Akiba

ONG Organisation Non-gouvernementale

PAR Plan d’Action de Réinstallation

RH Ressources Humaines


Page 3 sur 18

1. Objectif du document

L’objectif général poursuivi dans ce document est de mettre en place une procédure de

gestion de plaintes de la Cimenterie Nyumba Ya Akiba visant à minimiser les risques

sociaux. La mise en application de cette procédure de gestion de plaintes devrait conduire à

la réduction des conflits et au renforcement des relations entre Nyumba Ya Akiba et les

communautés riveraines.

A ce jour, les plaintes sont gérées conformément au Plan d’Action de Réinstallation Cadre

qui a été élaboré par SRK Consulting. Il n’existe pas une procédure détaillée pouvant

permettre à l’agent de liaison communautaire de gérer efficacement les plaintes. Une

procédure formelle est nécessaire pour gérer les risques et s’assurer à long-terme des

relations avec les communautés, essentiellement à cette période à laquelle les activités de la

société évoluent de la phase d’études à la phase de construction.

Par ailleurs ce document poursuit les objectifs spécifiques suivants :

- fournir aux individus et aux communautés un canal pour faire entendre d’une manière

efficace et transparente leurs préoccupations ;

- établir une relation claire de respect mutuel avec les communautés ;

- minimiser les conflits en résolvant les problèmes à travers une procédure appropriée ;

- fournir un processus accessible et culturellement adapté pouvant permettre aux

communautés d’introduire leurs problèmes, préoccupations et griefs ;

- améliorer la performance de la société ;

- avoir un processus en place où les plaintes peuvent être effectivement résolues de

manière constructive et transparente et dans un délai raisonnable afin d’éviter des

disputes continuelles.

2. Portée La présente procédure s’applique aux griefs et plaintes perçues ou réelles des communautés

environnantes de la Cimenterie Nyumba Ya Akiba. Les plaintes du personnel temporaire ou

permanent de la société doivent être orientées vers le département des Ressources

Humaines (RH) de Nyumba Ya Akiba ou au contractant approprié. Un grief ou une plainte

est un problème, une préoccupation, une réclamation d’un individu ou d’un groupe

d’individus en relation avec les activités de la Cimenterie Nyumba Ya Akiba.

Dans ce document, le mot « plainte » sera fréquemment utilisé pour désigner toutes les

réalités susmentionnées.


Page 4 sur 18

Cette procédure se rapporte à la période de construction, d’exploitation et de fermeture. Elle

fera régulièrement l’objet des mises à jour en fonction des contributions des communautés et

des évaluations afin d’améliorer la performance concernant la gestion des plaintes

communautaires. Les responsabilités spécifiques des parties prenantes sont présentées

dans le document ainsi que le mécanisme et les canaux disponibles pour la résolution des

plaintes. Bien que le personnel du Département de l’environnement et social en soit

directement responsable, les autres départements doivent y contribuer en fournissant des

solutions et en améliorant la performance de la société.

3. Définitions1

Les termes-clés utilisés dans ce document sont explicités dans le tableau ci-dessous :

Terme Définition

Plainte/Grief ou

réclamation

Une affaire, un problème, une préoccupation, une revendication

(perçue ou réelle) qu’un individu ou un groupe d’individus voudrait

que la société Nyumba Ya Akiba puisse résoudre.

Mécanisme de

gestion des plaintes

ou système de

résolution des

disputes

Une méthode institutionnalisée et organisée consistant à résoudre

systématiquement et à travers des rôles, des règles et des

procédures spécifiques les problèmes, les préoccupations et les

plaintes.

Plaignant Un individu ou groupe d’individus (ONG, Associations

communautaires, etc.) ayant une plainte à adresser et/ou à

résoudre.

1 Définitions tirées de “A Guide to Designing and Implementing Grievance Mechanism for Development Projects”,Juin 2008. Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman, Washington DC (Notre traduction).


Page 5 sur 18

4. Schéma de la procédure de résolution des plaintes

Réception et registration de la plainte ou réclamation par NYA

Inspection de la plainte ou réclamation Plainte

non fondée

Fermeture

Est-ce qu’un paiement en cash ou en nature est

nécessaire ?

Oui Non

Plaignant satisfait avec la réponse ?

Plaignant satisfait avec

l’explication ou la résolution ?

Non

Oui

NYA effectue le paiement

Plainte transférée au Cadre de Concertation Communautaire (CCC)

Analyse de la plainte par le CCC

Réponse par le CCC

Plaignant satisfait avec la réponse ?

Est-ce qu’un paiement en cash ou en nature est

nécessaire ?

Fermeture

Ou Non

Le plaignant initie le processus juridique

Ou Non

Fermeture

Oui

Fermeture


Page 6 sur 18

5. Responsabilités

Les responsabilités spécifiques se rapportant au mécanisme de gestion des plaintes

individuelles et communautaires sont décrites dans cette section. Des détails relatifs aux

différentes étapes qui doivent être observées dans la résolution des plaintes y sont aussi

fournis.

Responsable Activités

Tout le personnel

de NYA

- Recevoir les plaintes, réclamations, préoccupations (écrites ou

orales) d’un individu ou d’un groupe d’individus et les adresser

à l’équipe du social (Liaison communautaire) ;

- Fournir les coordonnées du plaignant incluant la date de la

plainte, le village du plaignant et la description du problème ;

- Fournir le nom de la personne ou de la compagnie qui a reçu la

plainte ;

- Se conformer à la procédure du mécanisme de gestion des

plaintes.

Personnel

contractant

- Fournir un support et des solutions, sur demande de NYA, afin

de résoudre les plaintes.

Gestionnaire du

Département de

l’Environnement

et du Social

- Diriger la procédure du mécanisme de gestion des plaintes ;

- Fournir des solutions en collaboration avec les autres

départements concernés ;

- Se concerter avec les autres membres du département pour

résoudre les problèmes ;

- Evaluer les niveaux de risque en tenant compte de la base

d’évaluation de Nyumba Ya Akiba ;

- Faire le suivi de toutes les plaintes, de l’enregistrement à leur

fermeture ;

- Produire des rapports de suivi des plaintes et les partager avec

les autres membres du département et les autres

départements concernés ;

L’agent de

Liaison

communautaire

- Remplir la fiche de plainte (voir Annexe 1) et la soumettre au

Gestionnaire du Département de L’environnement et du

Social ;


Page 7 sur 18

Responsable Activités

(ALC) - Compléter la fiche même pour les plaintes qui semblent, à

première vue, moins importantes ;

- Respecter l’usage du modèle de Nyumba Ya Akiba ;

- Informer et sensibiliser les communautés sur

l’existence/disponibilité de la procédure de gestion des plaintes

et les garder régulièrement informées à ce sujet, surtout les

personnes vulnérables ;

- Collaborer à la résolution des plaintes et à la documentation ;

- Travailler comme médiateur (entre la société et les

communautés).

Directeurs ou

gestionnaires de

Nyumba ya Akiba

(Ressources

Humaines,

Finances,

Sécurité et

Sûreté, etc.)

- Mettre en place des mesures de contrôle afin de minimiser les

risques qui pourraient générer des plaintes dans les

communautés ;

- S’assurer que leurs départements respectifs se conforment à la

procédure du mécanisme de gestion des plaintes.

Directeur Général

des Opérations

- Mettre en place des mesures de contrôle pour la société et ses

contractants afin de minimiser les risques pouvant déboucher

sur des plaintes dans les communautés ;

- Vulgariser la procédure auprès des consultants ;

- S’assurer que les fournisseurs et contractants appliquent la

procédure ;

- Assigner à tous les départements concernés de fournir des

solutions techniques aux plaintes en conjonction avec le

gestionnaire du Département de l’Environnement et du Social

et en conformité avec les normes de Nyumba Ya Akiba et de la

SFI.

Cadre de

Concertation

- Analyser la plainte du plaignant ;

- Analyser la position de Nyumba Ya Akiba ;

- Trouver une solution culturellement appropriée.


Page 8 sur 18

6. Procédure de gestion des plaintes

6.1. Préambule De manière générale, lorsqu’un individu ou un groupe d’individus arrivent à se plaindre, cela

signifie que le problème soulevé constitue un inconvénient ou un impact significatif qui

nécessite que la société y apporte une solution. Que la plainte soit réelle, imaginaire ou

qu’elle résulte d’une mauvaise interprétation, elle doit être enregistrée selon la procédure de

Nyumba Ya Akiba. C’est l’investigation seule qui déterminera si elle est réelle ou fictive.

Les investigations et discussions qui se déroulent au moment de la résolution des plaintes

constituent une opportunité pour la société Nyumba Ya Akiba de construire une bonne

relation de confiance et de compréhension mutuelles avec les communautés.

La présente procédure de résolution des plaintes se basent sur les principes fondamentaux

suivants :

- la procédure de résolution des plaintes doit être transparente, et en harmonie avec la

culture locale;

- tous les membres de la communauté (ou groupes) doivent avoir accès à la procédure

(ayant-droits ou non, hommes ou femmes, jeunes ou vieux) ;

- toutes les plaintes et réclamations, réelles ou irréelles, doivent être enregistrées

selon la procédure de résolution des plaintes ;

- toutes les plaintes doivent déboucher sur des discussions avec le plaignant et

éventuellement une visite de terrain afin de mieux saisir la nature du problème.

6.2. Qui peut introduire (déposer ou ouvrir) une plainte ? Tout individu ou groupe d’individus directement ou indirectement affecté (s) par la Société

Nyumba Ya Akiba ou ses contractants, ainsi que tout individu ou groupe d’individus ayant un

intérêt dans la société ou pouvant influencer ses résultats positivement ou négativement.

Cela inclut la population directement ou indirectement affectée par Nyumba Ya Akiba, la

société civile, les autorités locales et traditionnelles, les hommes d’affaires ou petits

commerçants de la zone d’influence de la société, les associations, les professionnels de

santé et d’éducation et les autres groupes.

6.3. Quels sont les canaux disponibles pour déposer une plainte ? Il existe plusieurs canaux pour déposer une plainte à Nyumba Ya Akiba. Le plaignant a le

choix entre les suivants :


Page 9 sur 18

1. Bureau de Nyumba Ya Akiba à Yuku

Les membres des communautés riveraines peuvent déposer leurs réclamations ou plaintes

directement à la base ou sur le site au bureau de Nyumba à Yuku auprès de l’ALC.

2. Boîtes à suggestions/plaintes placées

Des boîtes à suggestion ont été placées dans tous les villages environnants incluant

Mawete, Nkonda, Mbamba, Mbemba, Minkelo, Nkondo-Kiombya, Nyonga, Kokolo (Yuku et

Kumbi). Les membres de la communauté ont été sensibilisés à y déposer leurs suggestions

et plaintes. La collecte de toutes les plaintes se fait deux fois par mois.

3. Tout le personnel de Nyumba Ya Akiba et ses contractants

Le personnel de la Société fréquente régulièrement les villages riverains et est en contact

permanent avec les membres des communautés avoisinantes. Il constitue un bon canal

d’accès au mécanisme de gestion des plaintes. Tout le personnel de Nyumba Ya Akiba peut

recevoir une plainte verbale ou écrite d’un individu ou d’un groupe d’individus. La personne

qui reçoit la plainte devra noter le nom du plaignant, la date, le village et éventuellement le

numéro de téléphone. Elle devra aussi noter le résumé du problème. L’implication de tout le

personnel dans le mécanisme de résolution des plaintes contribue à bâtir la confiance avec

les membres de la communauté et à améliorer à long-terme la performance du système de

gestion des plaintes. Le personnel qui reçoit la plainte doit informer le plaignant qu’il recevra

la visite d’inspection dans les trois jours suivants ou au plus tard dans une semaine.

4. Cadre de concertation (ayant-droits), autorités locales et membres de la société civile

Certains villageois se sentent confortables en parlant de leurs problèmes à leurs autorités

locales ou aux membres de la société civile. Nyumba Ya Akiba utilisera aussi ce canal pour

enregistrer et résoudre les plaintes.

6.4. Etapes de la résolution des plaintes Le processus de résolution des plaintes passe à travers plusieurs étapes qui sont décrites

dans la présente section. Chaque réclamation ou plainte, qu’elle soit vraie ou non fondée,

doit passer à travers le processus de résolution.

6.4.1. Réception de la plainte

Une plainte verbale ou écrite peut être reçue par n’importe quel agent de Nyumba Ya Akiba

qui l’orientera vers l’ALC afin d’être enregistrée dans le système de gestion des plaintes.

L’agent qui reçoit la plainte doit s’assurer d’avoir noté le nom du plaignant, son village de


Page 10 sur 18

résidence, la date de la plainte et un résumé de celle-ci. Au cas où la plainte est directement

reçue par l’ALC, celui-ci s’assurera de l’usage du formulaire standard des plaintes (fiche de

plainte).

La fiche de plainte complétée devra être contresignée par le plaignant et l’ALC qui en

recevra une copie à la fin du processus.

6.4.2. Enregistrement de la plainte

L’ALC enregistrera la plainte dans la Base de données Excel de gestion des plaintes. Toute

plainte réelle ou fictive doit être saisie dans le système et déboucher sur une inspection au

maximum dans les 7 jours suivants.

6.4.3. Visite d’inspection

L’ALC entreprendra la visite d’inspection dont le but sera de vérifier la véracité et sévérité de

la plainte. Au cours de la visite d’inspection, les activités suivantes doivent être entreprises :

- Obtenir le plus possible d’information auprès de la personne (agent ou autre) qui a

reçu la plainte ;

- Déterminer si la plainte est légitime ;

- Au cas où il s’agit d’un dommage (causé à une culture, une maison ou tout autre bien

de la communauté), prélever les coordonnées GPS du lieu et prendre une photo du

bien endommagé et du plaignant ;

- Clôturer la plainte immédiatement (si elle n’est pas fondée par exemple) ou proposer

une solution qui conduira à une autre visite du site (pour mesurage éventuel). Au cas

où le plaignant n’est pas d’accord et que la solution peut nécessiter des consultations

internes à Nyumba Ya Akiba, l’informer de la date butoir de 15 jours pour la

résolution de sa plainte et lui donner un ferme rendez-vous ;

- Signer la fiche de plainte (si cela n’a pas été fait auparavant) et réserver une copie au

plaignant ;

- Enregistrer la plainte dans le système de gestion Excel ;

- Classifier la plainte en fonction de son ampleur : mineure, moyenne, sérieuse,

majeure ou catastrophique.

6.5. Approche à la résolution des plaintes

Le tableau suivant propose quelques mesures d’atténuation à utiliser dans la résolution des

plaintes. Les mesures proposées ici doivent servir de guide à la résolution des plaintes. A

l’exception des plaintes et réclamations liées à la compensation des cultures et arbres dont


Page 11 sur 18

le tarif d’indemnisation est déjà disponible, la plupart de plaintes seront traitées au cas par

cas.

Type de plaintes Mesures d’atténuation de Nyumba Ya Akiba

Dommage aux cultures à cause de la circulation d’engins

Compensation en numéraire conformément au taux en usage à NYA.

Dommage causé aux cultures par des produits toxiques (chimiques) ou par des déversements accidentels d’huile.

- Compensation en numéraire conformément au taux en usage à NYA ;

- Restauration du site en cas de dommages temporaires ou remplacement de terres s’il s’agit d’un dommage permanent.

Dommage dû à la poussière Compensation en numéraire conformément au taux en usage à Nyumba.

Dommage à un bien individuel (comme la maison)

- Remplacer le bien affecté ; - Rétablir le bien affecté ; ou - Offrir des matériaux et de l’argent

pour la main-d’œuvre. Si le plaignant ne veut pas le remplacement ou le rétablissement, le payer en cash conformément au taux en usage à Nyumba Ya Akiba.

Dommage à un bien commu nautaire (route, infrastructure, etc.)

- Remplacer le bien affecté ; - Rétablir le bien affecté ; ou - Offrir des matériaux et de l’argent

pour la main-d’œuvre. Pas de compensation en cash pour un bien communautaire, à part l’argent pour la main-d’œuvre.

Dommage à un site d’héritage culturel - Remplacer le site culturel ; - Rétablir le site culturel ; - Prendre en charge financièrement le

coût de la cérémonie traditionnelle (si applicable) ;

Accident de route Compensation en cash à la valeur réelle de

la bête tamponnée augmentée de 50%. Nyumba Ya Akiba ou ses contractants recrutent du personnel sans se conformer à l’approche convenue avec les communautés

Fournir une explication dans un forum (dirigé par les Ressources Humaines) après discussions internes entre les contractants et les RH.

Plainte au sujet de la pollution de l’air (par la poussière ou la fumée)

Arrosage de la route et discussion avec l’équipe technique afin de trouver d’autres solutions.

Plainte au sujet de la pollution de l’eau - Si la plainte est sérieuse, procéder au forage des puits dans les villages concernés ;

- Renforcer le contrôle d’érosions ; - Discuter avec l’équipe


Page 12 sur 18

Type de plaintes Mesures d’atténuation de Nyumba Ya Akiba

environnementale afin de trouver d’autres solutions.

Plainte au sujet du manque d’informations de la Société Nyumba Ya Akiba

Fournir la documentation publique disponible.

Plainte des membres de la communauté au sujet du manque de respect des agents de la société Nyumba Ya Akiba (agent de sécurité ou tout autre agent ou contractant)

- Rédiger une lettre d’excuses ; - Sanctionner l’agent discourtois.

La résolution des plaintes est un processus qui peut passer par quatre voies différentes qui

constituent quatre approches :

- l’ALC et le plaignant ;

- l’ALC aidé par d’autres départements ou contractants, et le plaignant ;

- le Cadre de concertation Communautaire (CCC) ;

- les instances judiciaires officielles (tout doit être mis en œuvre afin d’éviter une action

judiciaire et cela doit être le dernier recours lorsque tout a échoué).

En fonction du type de plaintes, les étapes suivantes doivent être entreprises :

6.5.1. Si la plainte ne requiert pas d’indemnisation en espèces ou en nature

Ce type des plaintes sont souvent considérées, à première vue, comme mineures.

Cependant, lorsqu’elles ne sont pas correctement traitées, elles peuvent s’aggraver et

devenir majeures voire catastrophiques (par exemple, un contractant recrute du personnel

sans se conformer à la procédure convenue avec la communauté). La société peut fournir

une réponse verbale (au cours d’un forum) ou écrite. La plainte peut être alors fermée. Si la

plainte est non-fondée, l’ALC l’enregistrera et notera qu’elle n’est pas pertinente. Si

nécessaire, l’ALC impliquera d’autres départements ou contractants dans la résolution des

plaintes. Ces cas de figures peuvent être enregistrés et fermés après leur résolution.

6.5.2. Si la plainte requiert une compensation en nature ou en espèces

Pour les cultures (champs) et arbres, les mêmes taux utilisés dans le cadre du PAR devront

être appliqués afin d’éviter des antécédents. La compensation en nature ou en cash sera

appuyée par des photos et des coordonnées GPS des biens impactés. Si le plaignant est

satisfait de la compensation en nature ou en espèces, la plainte sera fermée et documentée

dans le système de gestion (Excel). Les autorités locales et le représentant de l’Etat seront

impliqués dans la signature des documents de compensation résultant d’une plainte et


Page 13 sur 18

apposeront leur signature sur les formulaires. Si nécessaire, l’ALC impliquera d’autres

départements et contractants dans la résolution de la plainte.

6.5.3. Si le plaignant n’est pas satisfait par les procédures #1 et #2

Dans ce cas, la plainte sera transférée au Cadre de Concertation Communautaire pour sa

résolution. Si la proposition de réponse du CCC satisfait le plaignant, l’ALC procédera soit à

la compensation en nature ou en cash (#2), soit à l’explication verbale ou écrite (#1). Toutes

visites d’inspection effectuées ou toutes réunions tenues par le CCC seront documentées.

6.5.4. Si le plaignant n’est pas satisfait par la solution proposée par le CCC

Le plaignant insatisfait par la réponse proposée par le CCC pourra alors se référer à d’autres

instances judiciaires. L’ALC transférera le dossier au département Légal de Nyumba Ya

Akiba et demeurera dans l’affaire comme médiateur jusqu’à la fermeture de la plainte. Le

recours à la justice devra être la dernière approche. La société privilégiera la résolution des

plaintes et réclamations à l’amiable afin d’épargner aux plaignants les dépenses liées à la

procédure judiciaire officielle.

6.6. Les plaintes les plus récurrentes A ce jour, les plaintes qui reviennent sont les suivantes :

• Omission de certains champs et/ou vergers dans le mesurage des biens de la communauté qui seront impactés ;

• Retard de paiement des compensations ; • Manque de considération du calendrier agricole ; • Dommage à certains biens (arbres) non recensés dans la procédure de

réinstallation ; • Manque de recrutement du personnel parmi les ayant-droits.

Avec l’évolution des travaux de la société, d’autres exemples de plaintes potentiels peuvent être enregistrés. Il s’agit notamment des plaintes et réclamations relatives à (aux) :

• Comportement irrespectueux des agents de la société ; • Tracasserie des agents de sécurité ; • Succession, divorce et autres conflits familiaux résultant du partage des biens issus

de la réinstallation ; • Dommages liés au système d’irrigation ; • Manque ou insuffisance d’information de la société ;


Page 14 sur 18

• Privation des voies d’accès jadis utilisées par les communautés ; • Interdiction d’accès à certaines installations de la société ; • Les nuisances sonores et la pollution de l’air ; • Les accidents de route ; • Contamination du sol et des eaux.

6.7. Suivi et évaluation Deux ou trois semaines après la résolution de la plainte, l’ALC rendra visite au plaignant afin

de s’assurer qu’il est satisfait de la résolution. Cette visite sera documentée.

6.8. Les indicateurs-clés de performance

Les principaux indicateurs de performance dans le mécanisme de gestion des plaintes sont :

• 90% des plaintes sont fermées dans le délai (dans 15 jours) ;

• 90% des plaintes sont fermées dans le délai et sans recours à la justice ;

• 90% des plaintes fermées sont à la satisfaction des plaignants ;

• Maximum trois plaintes enregistrées par mois pendant la phase d’études ;

• Maximum cinq plaintes enregistrées par mois pendant la phase de construction.

6.9. Quelques principes directeurs dans le mécanisme de gestion

des plaintes

• Toutes les plaintes doivent être orientées vers un seul point focal, l’ALC. Toutefois,

tous les agents de la société peuvent recueillir (recevoir) une plainte verbale ou

écrite. Le personnel de la société qui reçoit la plainte doit la transmettre à l’ALC

endéans 24 heures après sa réception. Si la question est urgente ou représente un

niveau élevé de risque, l’ALC la transmettre directement à sa hiérarchie (le

Gestionnaire de l’environnement et du social).

• Toute plainte enregistrée doit, si nécessaire, être suivie d’une visite d’inspection au

plus tard 7 jours après.

• 90% des plaintes doivent être fermées dans les 30 jours qui suivent leur

enregistrement. Les autres plaintes qui nécessitent plus de temps d’investigation

peuvent prendre jusqu’à 4 mois.

• Toutes les plaintes réelles ou fictives doivent être enregistrées et les investigations y

relatives documentées.

• Toutes les solutions proposées pour la compensation des champs et arbres doivent

se basées sur le Plan d’Action de Réinstallation Cadre de NYA.


Page 15 sur 18

6.10. Divulgation de la procédure Cette procédure de mécanisme de résolution des plaintes doit être communiquée à tous les

agents de la Cimenterie Nyumba Ya Akiba (consultants, fournisseurs, etc.) pour s’assurer

qu’ils sont tous au courant et que toutes les plaintes sont gérées de la même manière.

La procédure une fois validée et définitive sera diffusée dans les communautés concernées.


Page 16 sur 18

Annexe 1. Fiche d’enregistrement de la plainte



Appendix H: Grievance Database

N° Date 0BN Libellédelaplainte/Suggestion Degréplainte

Nomduplaignant Plainte:fermée‐ouverte Commentaires

1 17/04/014 Demanded’aidefinancièrede1.300.000FcfaiteparMamanAlicedeKokolo.MembreduC.C.P UtidiAlice

IlestimpossibleàlaSociétédevenirenaideàuneseulepersonne,pourn’estpaslaconfondreàuneœuvredebienfaisance.

Le25/04/2014 Fermée

C’estuneVeuvequidésirehonorerunefacturedel’hôpitaldesafillequiasubit2interventionschirurgicales.

2 22/04/014 ChristianNgoyD emanded’exemplairesdudocumentrésuméderapportnontechniquesurl’évaluationdesimpactsenvironnementauxetsociauxpublierparSRKenjuillet2013

NsimbaTulukaduvillageMawete

LeManagerd’EHSSlesapromisd’attendrelamiseàjourdurapportd’EIESenFrançaisetKikongo.

Le30/04/2014 FerméeLerapporttechniquesurl’EIES2013estdevenucaduque

3 23/04/014 ChristianNgoy

Pendantquelesenquêtesétaiententraind’êtremenéesparlesexpertsdel’IFCauseindelacommunauté,àMinkeloleChefdeCentreademandéquelaSociétémetteenplaceuneéquipequipourrainformerlapopulationchaquefoisqu’ilyaquestiond’actualité.

NdimbuluSimonduvillageMinkelo

Aussitôtexprimélebesoin,le Managerd’EHSS aréponduàcettepopulationqueleurdoléanceestprisencompteetl’augmentationdeseffectifsauseindel’équipedusocials’imposeparlerecrutementdedeuxagentssupplémentaires.


MrGeorgesMantantuDibanziluaestrecrutéauseindelacommunautélocaleautitredeCoordonnateurduSocial.

4 23/04/014 ChristianNgoy

Crid’alarmedelapopulationdeMinkeloquisouffredesmaladiesd’originehydriquesàcausedemanquedel’eaupotable.EnattendantqueNYAs’attelleàlamisesurpieddesonplandedéveloppementdurable,elledemandeàlasociétédeleurconstruire2ou3puitspourunesolutiondurable.

HabitantsdeMinkelo

Onademandéàcettepopulationd’attendrelamisesurpiedduplandedéveloppementdurabledelaCIMKO/NYA.Encestade,laCIMKO,afaitappelauServieNationald'HydroliqueRural,serviceattitrédeforagedespuitsd'eaupourétablrunétatdelieudanslesvillagesenvironnents,


5 15/07/014 A.Lubikulu Nousavonsattendulongtemps.Aquandledébutdestravaux?Etqu’estcequiresteàfaire?

AnonymevillageNionga

Endatedu06/06/2014, aucoursdelacérémonieofficielledelancementdestravaux surlesitedel’usine,leD.GdeNYAenprésencedesautoritéspolitico‐administrativesadéclarépubliquementlechantierouvert,àlagrandesatisfactiondelacommunauté.

Fermée

6 15/07/014 A.Lubikulu

IlsepassetropdetempsdepuisqueNYAainvestiYuku.Nousavonscommeimpressionquecettesociétéfaitautrechosequed’exploiterunecarrièredecalcaire.Oùsontnosrequêtesd’emploisdéposéesilyadecelauneannée?

Nkondo–Kiomba

LaCIMKOétaitàlaphasedesétudestechniques(géologique,environnementaleetsociale).Quantauxlettresdedemanded’emplois,ellessontenregistréesetstockéesdanslabasedesdonnées.Aumomentopportun,leservicedesressourceshumainesentiendracompte



QuelesdécideursdelasociétéNYAactiventleschosesafinqu’ellesmettentenplace,lesinfrastructuresmédicalesetscolairesdignedesonnom.Caraucoursdecettedécennie,onobserveuntauxdemortalitéélevéduaumanquedessoinsdesantédebonnequalité.Onobserveaussiunebaissesensibleduniveaudel’éducationdesenfants

AnonymeNkondo–Kiomba

Onademandéàcettepopulationd’attendrelamisesurpiedduplandedéveloppementdurable.


8 15/07/014 A.LubikuluCommentpouvons–nousêtreembauchésauseindelasociétéNYA?Jesuggèredepenseraussiàformeretàrecyclerlesgenssurétat.Cardit‐iltoutlemondeestutiledanslasociété.

MbutaLukebaduvillageNkondokiombia

Lerecrutementdesagentsseferaàtempsopportunparrapportauprofilrequit.Néanmoins,unedispositiondemiseàniveauestenvisagée,parNYAparlamisesurpiedd’unTrainingCenter.


KL

GRIEVANCE RECORDS KEEPING AND TRACKING


Nomduplaignant Plainte:fermée‐ouverte CommentairesKL


Noussommesfatiguésd’attendredutravail.Préciser‐nousàquandledémarrageeffectif?Est‐ce,faut‐ilcroireauxrumeursselonlesquellesqueNYAexploitelesmineraisaulieudedévelopperunecarrièredecalcaire?

NsimbaMatomesaetAlmedaNdumeduvillageNkondoKiombia

LaCIMKOestdanslaphasedesétudestechniques.Quandauxrumeursquiserépandent,elless’avèrentnonfondées.NYAvaexploiterunecarrièredeCalcairequiconstituelamatièredebasepourlafabricationduCiment


10 15/07/014 A.Lubikulu

NousencourageonsNYApoursonprojetetnousluiencourageonsd’allertoujoursdel’avantpourledéveloppementdenotrecontréeetaussiluttercontrelapauvretéencréantdesemploispourlesjeunes.

YakalawoyengoduvillageNkondo‐Kiombia

NYAseréjouitduprogrèsréaliséetremarquéparlacommunautélocale. Le22/07/2014 Fermée

11 15/07/014 ALubikulu QueDieubénisseNYApourqu’ilatteignesesobjectifscommeprévuspourqu’ilyestbaissedutauxdechaumage.

AiméNSENGAduvillageMbemba

NYAseréjouitduprogrèsréaliséetremarquéparlacommunautélocale. Le22/07/2014 Fermée

12 15/07/014 A.Lubikulu

Noussommestrèscontentsdel’avènementdecettesociétédanscettecontrée.Certesquenosfilsetpetitfilstrouverontdel’emploi.Malgréquelestravauxdeconstructiondel’usineaientdumaladécollé.

Anonyme du village Minkelo

NYA se réjouit du progrès réalisé et remarqué par la communauté locale. Le train de NYA est déjà en marche et rien ne pourra arrêter son parcours.

Le 22/07/2014 Fermée

13 15/07/014 A.Lubikulu

l ’avènementdelasociéténeconcernepasseulementles6villagesquiontconcédéslaterreàlasociété.etquelquesagglomérations.Ilpeutaussiintéresserd’autresvillagesau‐delàduterritoiredeSongololo.Aceteffet,unmécanismepourraêtremisenplacepourquenousquisommesàlaconduitedusecteursoyonsimpliquédanslamobilisation,sensibilisationdesnospopulations.C’est–à‐direnousjoindreaucotédeNYA.

Chef de secteur de la Luima Mr Joseph…….

Nous sollicitons votre implication personnelle en tant que responsable N°1 du secteur dans ce processus de sensibilisation et mobilisation de population de s’approprier du projet.


14 15/07/014 A.Lubikulu

SonPapaestmembreducadredeconcertationpermanente.Leconstatfaitestquedepuisunbonmomentilsnesetiennentplusdesréunions.Pourquoicettetrêve?Est–cedepuistoutcetempsiln’yapaseuuneévolutiondansletraindeviedeNYA?Lesjeunesduterroirfondenttoutleurespoirsurl’avènementdecetteentreprise.

NsimbaMetusoladuvillageNkonda

Cette trêve est due par manque des questions d’actualités.


15 15/07/014 A.NLubikulu

Ilestàlarecherchedel’emploi,porteurd’uneattestationdefind’étudespost‐primairesenPédagogieetensciencesvétérinaire.IlestaussiinfirmierauxiliaireD4,ayantparticipéàplusieursformationsetexercéplusieursfonctionsdanscecadre.

NsimbaMetusoladuvillageNkonda

Nous demandons au concerné d’attendre le moment venu, pour mettre à profit ses compétences.


16 15/07/014 A.LubikuluNousattendonsbeaucoupdel’emploi.Maisnousnesentonsrienquipuissenousrassuré.C’estcommesinousassistonsàunjeudesfarces.Rassureznouspardesactesconcrets.

Anonyme

Par rapport à ce qui se réalise à Yuku, avez‐vous encore de doute quand à la construction de l’usine ? Sa réponse, il n’a plus doute.

LE 25/07/2014 Fermée

17 14/08/014 A.Lubikulu Riennesertdecouririlfautpartiràpointdit‐on.Rassureznousquandàl’emploiparcequenousnousimpatientons.

AiméNSENGAduvillageMbemba

Le recrutement des agents est équilibré comme convenu dans la convention signée entre NYA et la communauté locale (priorité accordée aux membres de la communauté)


18 14/08/014 A.Lubikulu

Parrapportauxoffresd’emploiqueNYAapubliélasemainedernière,nousdemandonsàlaSociétéNYAquefera‐telledenosdossiersquenousavonsdéposésausiteYUKUilyadecelauneannée?Laconventionditqu’onvarecruterlamaind’œuvresauseindelaCommunautélocale.Est‐ceque,NYAachangésaphilosophieoucomment?

AnonymeduvillageNionga

Au cours de la réunion du C.C.P du même mois, cette question a été répondue comme suite : l’Offre affichée à la direction générale à Kinshasa ne vous concerne pas. Elle a été publiée pour répondre aux exigences de l’inspection du travail .Pour les autochtones, les dossiers doivent être déposés au Site.




19 24/09/014 A.Lubikulu

Ilya3endroitsvoir4quirisquentdecouperlarouteàlatombédespluiessurlanouvelleroutepisteaménagéepournouslespopulationsdeMbambaetMinkeloafindecontournerlesitedel’usine.QueNYAnousaideàarrangercesendroitsavantlareprisedespluiespourquenoussachionsévacuernosproduitsagricolesentoutessaisons.

Bamu du village M’bamba

La société a mobilisée une pelle chargeuse pour réparer les endroits endommagés, mais elle n’a pas placée des buses.


Cettepistetraverse4endroitsquiserventdedrainagedubassinversantdont2sontdesbasfondenterrenoirenécessitantdesrechargementslégersenmatériauxlatéritiquesensuivantlapentetransversaleduterrainnaturel.Et,unautreendroitquiaunefortecavitéquinepermettrapasàunvéhiculechargédefranchircetterigole.Acetendroit,ondoitplacerunebusede0,60mФsoitundalotde0,50×0,50×3m.

20 24/09/014 ALubikulu

PourquoiNYAn’embauchepasdesfemmes?Répondez–moi,carjevoudraipostuler.Jen’aipasunequalificationmaisj’aiunniveaude2anspost‐primaireetjesuisunebonneménagère.Cettedemandeestfaiteenvuedemieuxsatisfairemafillequisortetoujours1 ère delaclassedepuisla1 ère annéedeprimaire.Aprésent,elleesten6 ème annéedeprimaire.

Mme Lubuilu du village Mbemba

Après l’implication personnelle de l’équipe du sociale et l’avis favorable du D.G de NYA, cette dame est embauchée comme une aide cuisinière sous contrat SCS

Le / 07./2015 Fermée


NYAnousafoutuledoigtdansl’œilnonseulementpournousavoirsortidelaconcessionmaisaussipournousfaireraterlasaison.Carlemoisdeseptembre,c’estlapériodepropicedepréparerleschampsdelasaisonA.Parcequelapériodedesemisintervientàpartirdu15octobrelorsqu’onrespectelecalendrieragricole.Quedeviendrons–noussionnesemaitpasencettesaison?Surtoutqu’onnousadéposséderdetoutesnoscultures.Noussommesobligésdechercherd’autresterrainsmaisnoussommesbutéspardesdifficultésfinancières.‐QueNYAnousdisequantestcequ’ellepensenousindemniser?‐QueNYAfasseunedélimitationdesterrains(superficie)quiluisontutilemaintenantpournouspermettredenousrattraper sur des terrains qu’elle n’utilisera pas maintenant

DélégationsdescultivateursduvillageMinkeloquiattendentl’indemnisation.

Aussitôtdéposélaplainte,NYAlesacherchéd’autresterrainsenpayantledroitderedevanceauxayantsdroitscoutumiers.Etelleapayélapremièretranchedel’indemnisationaumoisdedécembre2014.Lasecondetrancheestprévueaudébutdudeuxièmesemestre2015. L'indemnisationdeladeuxièmetrancheestintervenule15etle21novembre2015 .

Le 23/12/2014 Le21/11/2015 Fermée


Crid’alarme:Jecrainsuneépidémiedugenred’Eboladansl’agglomérationdeMinkelo.Iln’yapasdespuitsaménagésdanscevillage.Ilyarésurgencedesmaladiesd’origineshydriquesquituentsurtoutdesenfants.QueNYAnousaideavecdesmatériauxetquelapopulationapportel’apportlocal.Etqu’ilsoitmissurpiedunecommissiondegestionoudecoordinationdesactivitésquiseracomposéedel’AssistantMédical,duChefdeCentre,delaCOOPAMIainsiquedureprésentantdesayantsdroitsfonciers.

Luvundu Mewa du village Minkelo

Nous demandons à cette population d’attendre la mise sur pied du plan de développement durable



EnvoyantlesconstructionsquisefontàYuku,nousavonscommeimpressionqu’ilsnesuiventpaslesnormesenvigueurenlamatièreenRDC.N’ya‐t‐ilpasmoyendefairelapartdeschosesdemanièrequ’ilyestdeschantiersquisoientdirigerpardesCongolaisetd’autrespardesPakistanais?

AnonymevillageMinkelo

AucoursdelaréunionduC.C.PtenueendatedulesconstructeursPakistanaissesontdéfenduendisantquelesmaisonsenconstructionssontprovisoiresetserontdémoliesaprèslemontagedel’usine.



Mêmes’ils’agitdesmaisonsprovisoires,ilfautquandmêmeunminimumdesécuritépourqueçarésistentmieuxauxdifférentessollicitations.Nousdéploronslafaçondeconstruireunefondationoùondéposedeslongrinessansarmaturessurunremblai;unlongbâtimentquineportepasdeceinture.QueNYAveuilleauxnormespourquelesintempériesnenousamènentpasdescatastrophes

NsiluluMetusolaDuvillageNkonda

LedépartementCivil,aucoursdelaréuniondeC.C.Paréponduequ’ilapisl’optiondeconstruirelesmaisonsens tructurespréfabriquées.


25 13/10/014 A.Lubikulu MémepréoccupationsurlaqualitédesconstructionsdusiteYuku.

FrancoisMPAKAduvillageNionga MêmeréponsequeleN°24 Le20/10/2014 Fermée

26 13/10/014 A.LubikuluQueditNYApournoussinistrédeschamps?Noussommesabandonnésànotretristesort.Aquandl’effectivitédel’indemnisation?

AnonymevillageMinkelo

L’indemnisationvainterveniravantlafindel’année2014




27 30/10/014 A.LubikuluNotre villageNkondan’aque2lignées.Commentsefait‐ilquelorsdesréunionsduC.C.Pqu’ilsoitreprésentépar3délégués.Qu’estcequijustifielaprésenced’une3 ème personne?

KanavanguawoduvillageNkonda

LeconseilduvillageNkondaafaitsavoirquecettedéclarationn’engagepaslevillage.C’estunproblèmed’homme.


28 30/10/014 A. Lubikulu

NYAnousdoitquandmêmedurespect.Jesuishéritierd’unvergeràcotédel’endroitoùpasselenouveautracédel’usine.Onabatmesarbressansmechercheraupréalable.Jejugecetactedeméchanceté.C’estcommesiNYAn’apasbesoindepréserverlebonclimatsocial?

NsimbaDiatezuaduvillageMinkelo

Uneéquipemixte NYA et GryphonMinerals–ProjetAurifèredeBanfora(structureenconsultancedeprogrammederéinstallation)étaitdescendusurterrainetl’intéresséàétéreprissurlalistedesP.A.P.Enfindecompte,ilaétépayéendatedu17/11/2015.

Le05/11/2014Le17/11/2015 Fermée

29 29/11/014 A.LubikuluαJ.Kalonji

Ellepossède2champsnonencoremesuré.Elledemandeàcequeceschampssoientmesurésetconsidérésdansleprocessusderéinstallation.

KavoviMClaireduvillageYuku

L’équipedusocialeNYAestdescendusurterrainetl’intéresséàétéreprissurlalistedesP.A.P. Elleafiniparêtrepayéendatedu15/11/2015 .



Ellepossède1champnonmesuré:ElleréclamequesonchampestceluidesonfilsLeloSelinasoientévaluésetindemnisés.

MbambukuluNdokiaKandaMarieduvillageYuku

L’équipedusocialeNYAestdescendusurterrainetl’intéresséàétéreprissurlalistedesP.A.P. Elleafiniparêtrepayéendatedu15/11/2015.

Le 06/01/2015Le15/11/2015 Fermée

31 29/11/014 A.LubikuluαJ.Kalonji Possède1champnonmesurédanslazoned’impact MeleBongoFifidu

VillageYuku

Mêmeréponsequeleprécédent. Elleafiniparêtrepayéendatedu15/11/2015

Le06/01/2015Le15/11/2015 Fermée


Déclareposséderenviron30000bananiers,500safoutiers,2000orangers,4000ananaset450avocatiersprésdelamine.

NkunkuAKandaThomasduvillageYuku

Bienquelenombred’arbresdéclaréssoitfantaisiste,l’endroitn’estpasvraimentconcernéparleprojet.

Le29/11/014 Fermée


Possèdeunvergerd’environ250bananiers,300avocatiers,400orangerset150avocatiers(déclarésautourdelamine·Possèdeaussiunchampdemanioc+wandude2Hadesuperficie

MavakalaKennedyduvillageYuku

Le05/03/2015EnregistrésurlalistedesP.A.Pquiserontindemnisésàla2èmevaguedontlapaieinterviendraavantlafindu2èmesemestre2015.Elleafiniparêtrepayéendatedu15/11/2015

Le05/03/2015Le15/11/2015 Fermée


Déclareavoirposséder1vergeravec200avocatierset2000bananiersdanslazonedecarrièreautourdelarivièreYuku.

MalambuTokoSamuelduvillageYuku,

Aprèsavoirconstatéquelesdonnéessontfausses,onaretenuquecequ’ilyaréellementdanssonVerger(50avocatierset50bananiers).EnregistrésurlalistedesP.A.Pquiserontindemnisésàla2èmevaguedontlapaieinterviendraavantlafindu2èmesemestre2015. Elleafiniparêtrepayéendatedu15/11/2015

Le05/03/2015Le15/11/2015 Fermée

35 29/11/014 A.LubikuluαJ.Kalonji Possède1champnonmesurédanslazoned’impact

MansangaVakandaElisabethduvillageYuku

EnregistréesurlalistedesP.A.Pquiserontindemnisésàla2èmevaguedontlapaieinterviendraavantlafindu2èmesemestre2015. Aprèsune2èmeenquête,onluiasignifiéquesonchampn'étaitpasconcernéparl'indemnisationetqu'ellepouvaitcontinueràexploiterl'espace.

Le 05/03/2015 Le04/05/2015 Fermée .

36 16/12/014 A.Lubikulu

Cettemamanaétépayée(indemnisée)mais,lejourmêmequ’elleaétépayée,elleadéclarée9arbresfruitiersquin’avaientpasétéprisencomptelorsdel’évaluation.Elleexigequ’ilssoientprisencomptepourlaprochaineindemnisation.

LumfuankendaSiwetiboduMinkelo‐Mission

Aprèsvérificationsurterrain,1seulmanguieromisaétéretrouvéetilaétéprisencomptelorsdupaiementdeladeuxièmevague .Elleafiniparêtrepayéendatedu15/11/2015

Le 02/02/2015 Le15/11/2015 Fermée

37 17/12/014 A.LubikuluCeMonsieurréclamedel’argentpourlesarbresfruitiersquisetrouvaientdanslechampdeMrLukebakioquiabénéficiédel’indemnisationalorsquelesarbresneluiappartenaientpas.

MenayameDiasolokavillageMinkelo

MrLukebadioluiarestitué400000Fcetajouteraparlasuite19.6$lorsquela2èmetrancheinterviendra

Le17/12/014 Fermée



38 17/12/014 A.LubikuluElleaffirmequesonchampde50aresavaitétéenregistréparNYAdepuis2012.Maiselleestsurprisquesonnomnefigurepassurlalistedeceuxquiontétépayés.

MakieseMabuilaZozoduvillageMinkelo,

Dossiersousexamen. Aprèsune2èmeenquête,onluiasignifiéquesonchampn'étaitpasconcernéparl'indemnisationetqu'ellepouvaitcontinueràexploiterl'espace

Le17/12/014Le04/11/2015 Fermée

39 17/12/014 A.Lubikulu Elleaétéenregistréeaumêmemomentqueceuxquiontétépayés.Ellenecomprendpaspourquoisonnomaétéomis.

LungiambudilaDiakieseduvillageMinkelo

Aprèsvérificationsurterrain,l’intéresséeaétéreprisesurlalistedesP.A.Pàindemniseràla2èmevague. Elleafiniparêtrepayéendatedu15/11/2015

Le 02/02/2015Le15/11/2015 Fermée

40 18/12/014 A.Lubikulu CeMonsieurréclamelapriseencomptedesonmanguierde‐5anslorsdel’indemnisationdela1èrevague, NzezaMatondo

Aprèsvérificationsurterrain,sonmanguieraétéprisencompteetseraindemnisélorsdupaiementdela2èmevague,

Le 02/02/2014 Le15/11/2015 Fermée

41 22/12/2014 A.Lubikulu

Lorsdel’enregistrementdespersonnesquidevraientêtreindemnisé,ceMonsieurétaitAbsentduSite,maiscesvoisinsl’ontaidéàcomptabilisésesplantes.Curieusement,aumomentdelapaienisesvoisins,niluipersonnen’avaitétéservi.Ilvoulaitvoirclair

MbiyavangaMondoleyduvillageMinkelo

Dossiersousexamen. Aprèsune2èmeenquête,onluiasignifiéquesonchampn'étaitpasconcernéparl'indemnisationetqu'ellepouvaitcontinueràexploiterl'espace

Le 22/12/2015 Le15/11/2015 Fermée

42 22/12/2014 A.Lubikulu

Iln’apasétécontentdelasommequiluiaétépayélorsdel’indemnisationparrapportàlagrandeurdece2champs,situénonloinduCampYukuIldemandeàcequ’onreprennelescalculs.

NsiluluDidierduvillageYuku

Aprèsvérification,ils’estrévéléqueleMonsieuraconfondul’étenduedesonchampàcelledesonvoisinpossédantdesarbresfruitiers.


43 22/12/2014 A.Lubikulu

Ilréclamecequisuit:L’indemnisationpourlesarbresabattusàl’ouverturedelanouvellepiste(voied’accèsdel’usine).Danslavoied’accèsdel’usineauniveaudeladiguerechargée,avantlerail.Cettebandedeterreasuppriméleruisseauquisertdepassagedespoissonsentrelesétangs.D’où,ilfallaitfendreladigueetfairelaposedebusepuisrecouvrir.Al’endroitoùseconstruitl’usine.Celieumarquelalimitede4clansancestralequiàprésentdevientinexistant.

KialandaNdomatezoCamile

Uncompromisaététrouvéentreles2parties,moyennantsignatured’unP.Vpoursepartagerl’argentdel’indemnisation.Car,ilyaeu2plaignantspourlemêmeverger.a)Pourlepassagesousladigue,lasociétél’exécuteraavantlafindelasaisonsècheb)Pourlalimitequin’estplusvisible,lasociétéademandéàtouslesvillagesconcernésd’êtreensembleàcetendroitpourplacéunrepèreGPS

Le26/05/2015 EncoursParcequelabusequivadrainerleseauxn'estpasencoreinstallée.

44 22/12/014 A.LubikuluIlréclamed’êtreinsérersurlalistedespersonnesquidoiventêtreindemnisé.CarsonchampsetrouvedanslamêmevalléequeceuxquiontétépayéàKokolo.

KimpoviMasamunaduvillageMinkelo

Aprèsvérification,lescoordonnéesGPSdesonchampaprouvéqu’ilestendehorsdelazoned’impactduprojet.Mais,commesonchampestà150mdelalignedelaconcession,ilsepeutqu'ilsoitdérangé.Raisonpourlaquelle,ilaétéretenusurlalistedesPAP.


45 06/12/014 A.Lubikulu

LorsduforumdeSRKsurlarestitutiondel’avenantdurapportdel’EIESàMinkelo,leshabitantsdeMinkeloetceuxdeMaweteréunisontproposélamisesurpiedd’unnouveaucadredeconcertationpermanenteetsonélargissementauxforcesvivesdelacontrée(ONG),Associations.

LapopulationdeMinkeloetMaweteréunis

Aumoisd’avril2015ourl’élargissementduC.CP,unesériedeconsultationaétémenéedanslesdifférentsvillagesconcernésparleprojet.Cettepropositionavaitétéjugéepositivemalgrélaréticencedecertainespersonnes.Cequidonnelieuàcréerunautrecadrequidevraitetreplusrepresentatifdeforcesvivesdelacontrée.

Le11/04/2015 Encours

L'effectivitédecetorganeplusreprésentatifqueleC,C,Pauralieuaprèsladeuxièmeseriedeconsultationauplutardfinoctobre2015.


LesgardesduchantierdelarizièredeFERONIAàNkondoKiombadéplorentlecomportementdessujetsPakistanaisquiontfaitirruptiondansleurchampsansavoirobteniruneautorisationaupréalableduresponsable.

Duki(gardienduChantierFERONIA)

Ilsontétémisengardeparleurssuperviseurs. Le12/12/2014 Fermée

47 02/02/015 ALubikuluMerciNYApournousavoirrejointsenfindansnosattentessurcettelutteetréclamationacharnéesayanttraitaurecrutementdesautochtones.Casdeschauffeursrécemmentsélectionnés.

LuvutukaduvillageNionga

(AucoursdelaréunionduC.C.P)NYAs'estréjouitduprogrèsréaliséetremarquéparlacommunautélocale.


48 02/02/015 ALubikulu Jesuisheureuxdevoirnosenfantsduvillageentraindeconduirelesvéhiculesdelasociété.

LusivikaduvillageMinkelo

NYAs'estréjouitduprogrèsréaliséetremarquéparlacommunautélocale Le12/02/2015. Fermée




Pourl’intérêtdelacommunautéetceluidelasociété,pendantqu’onestencoredanslaphasedeconstruction,ilyalieudemettresurpiedunprogrammedereboisementcommunautairedanslapériphériedelaconcessionainsiquetoutautourdesvillageslesplusprochesdel’usineconsidéréscommeaffectés.

IrLubenzo(CEFPRODEC)DuVillageMinkelo

L’intéresséaétéintégrédansl’équipedeNYAcommeconsultantdansledomainedel’Agroforesteriedontl’exécutiondequelquestravauxontdéjàdébuté..



Est‐cequelastructurequis’occupedurecrutementdénomméSCSpeutnousdire,àcombienestfixéletauxdesheuressupplémentairesainsiquelesprestationsdesjoursdedimanchesetjoursfériés?

MambonaduvillageMawete

leSuperviseurdeSCSaéclairélelanternesurletaux.Ilestfixéparrapportauxcatégoriesdesouvriers.


51 02/02/015 ALubikuluS’ilvousplait,estcequel’AdministrationdeNYAnepeut–ellepasnousannoncerenavancelesoffresd’emploisparrapportàsonplanningprévisionneldestravaux?

CamileduvillageMawete

LeServicedesressourceshumainesaconfirméquelesoffresd’emploisserontaffichéesdèsquelesbesoinss’annoncent.

le07/02/2015 Fermée

52 02/02/015 ALubikuluJesuismandatéparleChefdeclanpourrappeleràlaSociétélaréparationdel’étangKawengaendommagéaumoisdeJanvierdernier

SamuelTokoduvillageMbemba

Ledépartementducivilaacceptéderéparerlepréjudicecausé. Le08/05/2015 Fermée

53 24/03/2015 G.Mantantu

CeMonsieuraaccusésafemmeaubureaudel'agglomérationdeMinkeloetauprèsdelasociétéNYA.Safemmeavaitétéindemniséepourseschamps,maiscettedernièren’avaitpasététransparenteenverslui.Jusqu’àprésent,lemariignorelemontantperçuparsafemme.Aprésent,ildemandeàlasociétédel’impliquerlorsdupaiementdela2 ème tranche.Bienquececouples’estdisloqueretchacund’euxauraitdéjàreprissaliberté.

KiabeloVakandadeMinkelo‐Mission

Aprèsconfrontationdedeuxparties,laplainteavaitétéjugéenonfondée,carl'unions'estdejàdisloquéebienavantleprocessusderelocalisation.Iln’yaaucuneraisonquidonnelieuàMonsieurKIABELOexépouxdeMmeNKAKUDIàsepartagerl’argentdel’indemnisation


54 31/03/015 G.Mantantu

IlseplaintdusabotagedesabananeraiesituéeautourdelasourcedelarivièreYukuparlessujetsPakistanais.Cesderniersontfaitirruptiondanssonchampetontcoupé10régimesdebananes.Faceàcettesituationnéfaste,ilexigequ’ilsoitrétablidanscesdroits.Surtoutquecechampavaitétérecensé,maisnonencoreindemniser.

LuyindulaKilebeJéromeduvillageMinkelo.

L’équipedusocialeafaitunconstatdelieuetaprisencomptecettebananeraiepourindemnisation. Elleafiniparêtrepayéendatedu15/11/2015

Le02/04/2015Le15/11/2015 Fermée

55 31/03/015 G.Mantantu

CemonsieurseplaintduravagedesabananeraiepardessujetsPakistanais.Or,elleadéjàétérecenséeetattendeuneindemnisation.Ainsi,pourmaintenirunclimatsocialdanslacontrée,jedemanderéparation.

DidierNsiluluNsemiduvillageMinkelo

L’équipedusocialeafaitunconstatdelieuetaprisencomptecettebananeraiepourl’indemnisation. Elleafiniparêtrepayéendatedu15/11/2015

Le02/04/2015Le15/11/2015 Fermée

56 04/04/015 G.Mantantu

NousavonsungrandregretdeconstaterquelaconventionsignéeentreNYAetlesayantsdroitsestfouléaupiedausujetdurecrutementdelamaind’œuvrelocale.Nosenfantssontmarginalisésauprofitdeceuxquiviennentd’ailleurs.

SamuelMbiyavanga(DucduvillageNkondoKiomba)

Uneséancedetravailaeulieuentrel’équipeduSocialdeNYAetlescontractants(SCSetEMI‐Consultingpourendébattreetuncompromisd’équilibresurlerecrutementaététrouvé(Pourlestravauxnenécessitantpasunespécialité,laprioritéestaccordéeauxayantsdroitssuividesautrespersonnes.

Le06/04/2015. Fermée

57 08/04/015 G.Mantantu

3journaliersontconnuunaccidentdûàl’écroulementdumurlatéralgauched’undépôtàl’usine.AprèslespremierssoinsquileursavaitétéadministréparlasociétéNYA,ilsontétérejeter.Jusqu’àprésent,NYArefusedelesembaucherpourqu’ilsseprennentenchargeeuxmême.Qu’elleestlapositiondeNYAaceteffet?

Matingu Valentin Secrétaire a.i du secteur de la Luima.

Aprèsvérificationdesfaits,leconstatsuivantàétéfait:lesvictimesn’étaientpasabandonnéesàleurstristessorts.Nonpasseulementqu’onleursavaientadministréslespremierssoins,maisNYAlesavaitacheminéàl’HôpitalgénéralderéférenceIME/KIMPESEpourdessoinsappropriés.Après,unepromessefermeleuravaitétéfaitesurbased’unelistedresséeparleservicedeSAFETYpourleurréintégrationautravail.


58 12/04/015 G.Mantantu

IlseplaintdelanonpriseencomptedelaconventionsignéeentrelacommunautélocaleetNYA.Pourquoil’importationd’unsigrandnombredePakistanaispourexercerdestravauxn’exigeantpasunehautequalification?

Ntanda Ndomba du village Nionga

Aucoursd’uneréuniondeC.C.P,lePlantManageraconfirméquec’estunemaind’œuvrequalifiéepourcetypedestravauxqu’ilsexécutentsurSite.




59 18/04/015 G.Mantantu

Pourquoilapréférencedeshabitantsvenantd’ailleurslorsdurecrutement,surtoutceuxquiviennentdeKimpeseaudétrimentdelacommunautélocale.NousconstatonsquelaconventionsignéeentreNYAetlacommunautélocaleestfouléaupied.

NdongalaKanavangawo(Chefduvillage)KumbiII

AprèsavoirinvitéMrBENSuperviseurducontractantSCScelui‐cinousarévéléqu’ils’agitd’unemaind’œuvretechniquequalifiéeintrouvableauseindelacommunautélocale.


60 18/04/2015 G.Mantantu

Cederniertempsonfaitunconstatamer:lesayantsdroitssontmarginalisésauprofitdeceuxquiviennentd’ailleurs.Est‐ce,laconventionsignéeentreNYAetlesayantsdroitsesttoujoursd’actualitéouelleestdéjàenterrer

Nsilulu Metusola du village Nkonda

Uneséancedetravailaeulieuentrel’équipeduSocialdeNYAetlescontractants(SCSetEMI‐Consultingpourendébattreetuncompromisd’équilibresurlerecrutementaététrouvé.(Prioritéauxayantsdroits)

Le29/04/2015. Fermée

61 25/04/2015 ALUBIKULU

Noussommesenclavéparcequenousn’avonsplusunevoied’accèsnidesortie.Laroutequimènedansnotrevillageestendommagéevoirsuppriméeparlesenginsquidéversentunequantitéimportantedemottesdeterrerecueillissurlesite.Cettesituationhandicapelacirculationdesbiensetdespersonnessurcettezone.Surce,veuilleztrouverpournousunesolution.

Bamu du village M’bamba

Unecommissioncomposéedel’équipedusocial,dudépartementciviletlesuperviseurdesenginssontdescenduspourétudiercommentdotercettepopulationuneroutequidoitcontournerlesitedel’usinepourévitertoutrisqued’accident.Finalement,ledépartementCivilvaaménagéunepistequisuivralelongd'enclosdel'usineavantlatombéedespluies(Octobre2015).


62 16/05/2015 A. Lubikulu

Mme Nkakudi c’est mon épouse, elle a refusé de m’associer lors de l’indemnisation des P.A.P. Selon lui, cet argent devrait être partagé en 3 parts. Moi, Mme et les ayants droits de Kokolo qui nous avaient céder la terre.

Kabelo Vakanda

Après que ce couple soit entendu au bureau de l’agglomération de Minkelo, ce dernier nous renvoya la copie du jugement condamnant la femme. Après une analyse fouillée du dossier, l’équipe du social a trouvé que le jugement est sentimental.


63 20/05/2015Lubikulu et G. Mantantu

Ils sont venu se plaindre auprès de l’équipe du sociale pour dénoncer l’agissement de leur Superviseur pour les avoir viré du travail parce qu’ils ont réclamé leurs salaires dont la paie est intervenu finalement 2 semaines après leurs réclamations. Mais dont l’un d’entre eux a été repris. Ils demandent leur réintégration au sein d’EMI Consulting

Plaintes collectives de 3 agents d’EMI‐ CONSULTING

Après avoir entendu le Superviseur d’Emi‐Consulting, celui‐ci avançant que ces derniers voulaient inciter leurs collègues au refus du travail. Mais suite à l’erreur commis par le superviseur en récupérant un parmi eux, l’équipe du sociale lui a demandé de réintégrer tout le monde. La finalité tous ont été repris.


64 29/05/2015 AdolpheLubikulu

Onnousaditquelerecrutementestéquilibrépourlesdifférentsvillages.Maisunconstatsedégage,lesayantsdroitssesententtoujoursêtremarginalisé.Afindenousapaiser,nousproposonsauservicedusocialaveclescontractantsdeNYAdedresserunelistedesayantsdroitsrecrutésetpubliélesstatistiquesquipourrontêtrevérifiable.

NdongalaKanavangawoduvillageKumbiII

L’équipedusocialeapasserl’informationàtoutslescontractantsdeNYA.Ainsi,laplainteaététransmiseauRessoursesHumainespouruneréponseappropriée. Lesressourceshumaines,l'équipeduSocialeetlescontractantsdeNYAontoptépourrendrelesoffrespubliquesmaisavecunregardsurlesayantsdroits.ActionmiseenoeuvreaveclerecrutementdesIngénieursTechniciensendatedu01novembre2015.

Le 05/06/2015 Le01novembre2015 Fermée

65 29/06/2015 A.LIBIKULU

NosreprésentantsduclanNeMavanduavaientdemandéparécrituneaudienceauxautoritésdeNYA.Maisleurcorrespondancedemeuretoujourslettremorte.Qu’estcequijustifiecesilence?

EdmondTUSUNGAMAduvillageNkondoKiomba

Aprèsrappeldeladernièrecorrespondance,uneaudienceleuravaitétéaccordéeendatedu15/09/2015parlePlantManagerMrTanveeretceluid'EHSS,MrChristianNGOYaucoursdelaquellecesderniersontdeposéunmémocontenantquelquesrevendicatonspourlesquelleslasociétéapromisderépondre.




66 29/06/2015 A.Lubikulu

Ilyadecelaquelquessemainesdepuisquenousavonsreçul’ONGAgrisuddansnosvillages.Etc’estdanslecadredudéveloppementdurabledenotrecontrée.C’estuneinitiativelouablemaisdontnousignoronslasuite.Renseignez‐nousS.V.P?

NsiluluMetusola

L’ONGInternationaleAGRISUDafaitunétatdelieudelacontréeetaproposéunprojetdedéveloppementdurableàNYAquicedernieraconsentidefinancerleprojetdèslemoisdeseptembre2015.

01/07/2015. Fermée

67 29/06/2015 A.Lubikulu

Minkelo c’est une agglomération qui se trouve dans la concession. Alors que nos villages traditionnels n’ont pas de limite. Je pense qu’il ya lieu que NYA associe les autorités de cette agglomération pour leur indiquer les zones les plus sensibles dans lesquelles on ne peut pas lotir. Car, nous sommes en saison sèche où les gens construisent. Conseil gratuit afin d’éviter des tensions entre la société et la communauté.

Serge du village Minkelo.

NYAremercieMonsieurSERGEpoursesconseilsetenvisagededescendresurterraince07/08/2015avecunexpertafindedéterminerleslimitesdelazoneduprojet.

01/07/2015 Fermée

68 03/07/2015 AdolpheLubikulu

J’aidessouché4Hadesarbistessurunterrainde10Hapourlamécanisationagricolequ’onm’adonnéenlocationparfeuJeanKivuiladuvillageMbambapour10ans.Lejouroùjem’amenaisavecletracteurpourlabourer,onm’empêcherad’accéderdansmonchantiersousprétextequemonterrainestdanslazoned’impactduprojet.MalgrélesdocumentsauthentiquesobtenusauparquetdeSongololo,quej’aiprésentériennefiltresurmonsort.Onnemedittoujoursrien.Lemontantdecettelocationselèveà750$USDetd’autresdépensesyafférentes.Qu’est‐cequeNYAmerépond?

MmeSAMBAThérèsedeKimpese

NYAavaitlancéunedatelimitépourl’enregistrementdesP.A.Pdepuisle20/08/2014.CommentlaDamenes’est‐ellepasfaitenregistrer?Aucoursdenosentretiensaveccelle‐ci,elleafiniparexhibertouteslespreuvesattestantquependantcettepériode,elleétaitmalade.SoncasestsousexamenauniveauduManagement .Aprèsanalysedudossierilaétédécidédel'indeminierendatedu21/11/2015

Le 10/07/2015 Le21/11/2015 Fermée

69 15/07/2015 Adolphe Lubikulu

Lorsqu’onavaitouvertlanouvellerouted’entréeetdesortiedel’usine,ladigueconstruiteaprèslavoieferréeempêchelacirculationdepoissonsentreleslacs.Cequifaitquecetteannée,lapêcheneserapasrentable.Aceteffet,pourlanièmefoisnousdemandonsàNYAdeplacerundispositifcommepassagesousrouteàcetendroitavantlareprisedespluiessoitauplutardmoisd’octobredel’annéeencours.

Camille du village Mawete

AprèsqueleManagerEHSSaierappelerleManagerducivilausujetdupassagesousroutedesbusesendatedu01/08/2015,cedernierluiadonnédegarentiequecetravailseraéxecutédansledélai.

Le01/09/2015 En cours

70 17/07/2015 AdolpheLUBIKULU

Nousavonstravaillédepuisplusde4,5et6moischacun.SCSnousafaitsigneruncontratdontnousignoronslecontenu.Carellenenousapasdonnéletempsdelelire.Voilà,aujourd’huinoussommesviréssansmotifvalable.Nousdemandonsàl’équipedusocialedeplaidernotrecause.

PlaintecollectivedesagentsSCS. OrienterauxRessourcesHumainesmaisenLe25/07/2015 Fermée.


Aprèsavoirétérelocalisé,elleatrouvéunautreterraindontlaSociétéàpayépourelleledroitderedevanceàl'ayantdroitfoncier.Maisquelquesmoisaprèsonlasommeradepayerencoreunautredroit''NkotoaMfinda''àMonsieurBamu,ChefduvillageM'bambasinonqu'ellen'exploitepluscetteterre.

BETIN'ZINGAAlbertine Aprèsl'invitationdel'ayantdroitfoncierpLe04/09/2015 Fermée


CeMonsieurseplaintdufaitquedansleuréquipe,ilssontaunombrede6.Tous,sontdanslacatégorie1,maiscurieusementl'und'entreeuxestdanslacatégorie6etgagneunsalairede280,000Fc,alorsqueceuxdelacatégorie1ontunsalairequivarieentre83000Fcet86000Fc.Cetteinjusticeleurdémotive.

Anonyme(Equipebétonière ) CetteplainteàétéorientéverslesressourLe07/09/2015 Encours




Ilseplaintausujetdesdifférentspoints:1.Des soinsmédicaux:SCS asignéuncontratavecleCentrehospitalierLambadeKimpese,Maisceuxquis'yrendentsonttoujoursdeçus.2.Delarémunération :a)Lesalaireperçuparlesagentsquitavaillentauniveaudelabétonièreetdudechargementdessacsdecimentn'estpasproportionnelauservivicerendu,malgrèsleurexpositionàlatoxicitéduciment.b)Lepaiementintervienttoujoursenretard,12à15joursaprèslafindumois.3.Désequilibreetattributionfantaisistedescatégories .4,Commentpouvez‐vousexpliquer‐lesresponsablesdeSCSnemagentpaslanourritureprovennantdelacuisineSCS.

JeanJacquesPOBA Cetteplainteàétéorientéverslesressourceshumaines Le07/09/2015 Encours


Retarddepaiementquiintervient40ou50joursaprèsquelesfichesdepointagesoientretournésàl'administrationdeNYA.Longprocessusdevérificationdesfichesdepointageavantd'établirledocumentcomptable.Nousdemandonsàl'équipeduSAFTYdevisiterlesinstallations(cuisine)deSCS.Commentpouvez‐vouscomprendre,lesresponsablesdeSCSnemangentpaslanourritureprovenantdeleurproprecuisine?Cequ'ilyaproblème.

Anonyme Cetteplainteàétéorientéverslesressourceshumaines Le07/09/2015 Encours


Depuis2010,onnouspaiesansbulletindepaiepourqoui?Lesdifférentestâchesremplisn'estpasproportionnelausalaireperçu.Notresalaireoscilleentre128et138$.NoussommeslecontractantdelaCIMKOàl'instarddeSCS,EMIConsultingvoirlesélementsdelaPoliceNationale.Pourqouisommesnousprivédelarationalimentairevoirl'eauminéralepotable?

AnonymeOfficierG4S

Cetteplainteàétéorientéverslesressourceshumaines Le07/09/2015 Encours

76 29/08/2015 G.Mantantu

NousavonsvuleSafetyrecrutéles''SafetyOfficers''ilyapresque2mois.PourquoilaCIMKOn'apaspubliél'appeld'offre?Nousavonsdesressourcescompétentes.S.V.PProchainementprièredenousinformer.

TINAduvillageNkondokiomba


77 29/08/2015 G.MantantuOusommes‐nousavecleTraining‐Center.Nousavonsbesoindelamiseàniveauetdel'apprentissagedesmétierscommenosfrèresdeMalangaetZambaaveclaCimenterieP.P.C/BARNET

MasakaladuvillageNionga


78 29/08/2015 G.Mantantu

LebureaudesaffairessocialesduterritoiredeSongololoavaitenvoyéunelistededemandeursd'emploisauservicedeRessourceshumainesàYukudepuislemoisdemai2015.Maisjusqu'àprésentaucunesuiten'estreservéeàcettedemande?

MalembiDiasonamadeSongololo


79 29/08/2015 G.Mantantu

Qu'estcequijustifielaprédominancedemembresdefamilleduresponsabledeSCSdanspresquetoutleservicedirectementgéréparSCS?Parfoislequotadépassemêmeceluidesayantsdroits.Alorsquenousautresavonsétédepossederde3.800Ha.Toussescandidatssontclassésdanslescatégoriessupérieurescomparativementauxpauvresayantsdroitsquisonttoujoursclouésdanslacatégorie1.

MaweteVanzaduvillageNionga; Le07/09/2015 Encours

80 29/08/2015 G.Mantantu

LaCIMKOnepeutellepasorganiserdespaysanatscommecequefaisaitCRAFODdanslesannées80?Qu'estcequisepasseavecL'ONGAgrisud?Aquandledébutdestravaux?Parcequenousl'avonsvufaireunétatdelieudenosvillages.

PaulduvillageNkondokiomba

L'ONGAgrisudaélaboréunprojetdedéveloppementcommunautairequiaétéapprouvéparlaCIMKOetdontnousattendonslefinancement.Danssonprogrammed'action,cetteONGenvisagederegrouperlesculivateursdansunmêmesiteafindelesencadreretdelesappuyerenintrantsetextrantsagricoles.


81 29/08/2015 G.MantantuAcausedesaléasclimatiquesdusàlacarencedespluies,nousavonsperduplusdenossémencesd'arachides.NouslançonsuncridedetresseàlaCIMKOpourqu'ilnousvienneausecours.

NsengaduvillageKinsua

Danslepartenariat''CIMKO''avecdeuxONG:AGRISUDetHPPilestprévuunvasteprogrammed'appuienintrantsetextrants,dontvouspourezêtrebéneficiaire.




82 29/08/2015 G.Mantantu

Porquoiaviez‐voustransfererlepostederecrutementaubureaudusecteurdelaLuimaàMaweteII.Selonvous,celieuresteunmilieuidéalpouvantmettrelesdemandeursd'emploisàl'aise?

BayokaduvillageMawete

NYAajugébonquelesnonayantsdroitsaillents'informerauprèsduChefdeSecteurquiestsenserconnaitreladisponibilitédesoffres.Carpourlesayantsdroits,ilaétédécidéqueleursrecrutementsseferontàpartirdeleursvillagesrespectifs.


83 11/09/2015 G.Mantantu

Ilsefaitque3champssesontretrouvésàl'endroitouonvajetterlepontsurlarivièreYukudontceluideMrKeleBoni.Cemonsieurseplaintdufaitquelasociétéluidemanded'enleversesculturesetqu'ilattendel'indeminisationquivaintervenirdanspeudetemps.Chosequ'iln"admetpas,

KieleBoni

AprèsavoireuuneséancedetravailaveclacommisiondeRAP,ilaétéjugéquelestroispersonnesaffectéesàcetendroitsoitpayésavantqu'ondesaffecteles3champs.Lapaieaeulieule19/09/2015


84 11/09/2015 ALubikulu

CeMonsieurreclameledroitd'entrée''Nkontoamfinda''pourleurvillageKumbiIIquin'ajamaisétépayé,Alorsqueles4autresvillagesconcernésparleprojet,enontdéjàperçu,

NdongalaKanavangawoduvillageKumbiII

AucoursdelaréunionduCadredeconcertationpermanenteC.C.Ptenuele23‐09‐2015,ceMonsieuraétéréponduparMrGuyBongwelequiétaitchargédecettemissionàcetteépoque.Lesdroitsontétépayésen2013entrelesmainsdeMrJeanKivuiladevanttémoinsetdisposedespreuvesprobantes(SignatureduPV,Photos)


85 15/11/2015 A.LubikuluCetteDameréclame9manguiersquisetrouvaientdanssonchamppourlesquelselledemanded'êtreprisencompte(indemnisaton).

LumfuankendaSiwetiboduMinkelo‐Mission


86 15/11/2015 A.LubikuluCetteDame,n'estpasconvaincudumontantperculorsdel'idemisation.Elleveutqu'onpuisserecalculersesbiensaffectésauSitedel'Usine

LungiambudilaDmakieseduvillageMinkelo


87 15/11/2015 A.Lubikulu

Ilreclameses21bananiersquiétaientenregistréslorsdurecensementdeschamps,maisn'apparissentplussurlafichelejourdupayement.

NsimbaVanguduvillageMinkelo

Lesbananiersenquestionontétéenrcegistréaunomd'uneautrePAPrépondantaunomdeLELOSELIPAcommel'ademontélesenquêtes.


88 23/11/2015 ALubikulu

Cettedemoiselleaétéindemnisée,maisreclamel'omissonde21bananiers,1safoutieretsespetitpoidsquin'avaientpasétéprisencompte.EllereclamequeNYAreconnaissentcescultures,

NkengeAdieyiduvillageYUKU.

Aprèsvérificationdelafiched'enregistrementdesbiensaffectésainsiquelabasedesdonnéesquin'amalheuresementpasreprislesbiensdéclarés.Unedescenteaétéeffectuéacechampde4aresoùiln'yavaitaucunetracedesbiensdéclarés.Parconséquent,laplainteaétéjugéenonfondée,




Appendix I: Agrisud International – Scope of Work

PROGRAMME D’

DURABLE DES EXPLOITATIONS

Siège : 48, rue de la Sablière 33500 LIBOURNE

222, Avenue de la Poste Cité de LukulaSite Web : www.agrisud .org Contact RDC

Association à but non

Agropaysage à Nkondo-Kionda

JUIN 2015

Entreprendre contre la pauvreté

ROGRAMME D’APPUI AU DEVELOPPEMENT

XPLOITATIONS AGRICOLES AUTOUR DE LA CIMENTERIE CIMKO

« PADDEAC »

Maraîchage de bas fond à Ku

AGRISUD International

Siège : 48, rue de la Sablière 33500 LIBOURNE – France. Tél : +(33) 05 57 25 17 06

222, Avenue de la Poste Cité de Lukula. Province du Kongo central – RDC. Tél: www.agrisud .org Contact RDC : [email protected]

Association à but non lucratif, reconnue de Bienfaisance

PROPOSITION

DE

PROJET

Kionda

JUIN 2015

IMENTERIE CIMKO

Maraîchage de bas fond à Kumbi

: +(33) 05 57 25 17 06

Tél : 0993 370 077 [email protected]

PROPOSITION

DE

PROJET

AGRISUD International – Offre de projet PADDEAC – CIMKO

Page 2

SOMMAIRE

I. Résumé du projet page 3

II. Présentation du projet 5

2.1. Description du projet 5

2.1.1. Localisation 5

2.1.2. Particularités écologiques de la zone du projet 6

2.2. Objectifs du projet 7

2.2.1. Objectif général 7

2.2.2. Objectif spécifique 7

2.3. Bénéficiaires du projet 7

2.4. Description des activités et des résultats du projet 8

2.4.1. Résultat n° 1 8

2.4.2. Résultat n° 2 11

2.5. Gestion et coordination du projet 15

2.5.1. Personnel 15

2.5.2. Suivi évaluation – audits externes 15

2.5.3. Principaux moyens matériels et financiers du projet 16

2.5.4. Plan d’action du projet 18

2.6. Durabilité de l’Action 20

2.6.1. Impact de l’Action 20

2.6.2. Analyse des risques 20

2.6.3. Hypothèses 21

Annexes 22

Annexe n°1 : Budget du projet 23

Annexe 2 : Cadre logique du projet 25


Page 3

I. RESUME DU PROJET

Titre du Projet: Programme d’Appui au Développement Durable des Exploitations Agricoles autour de la Cimenterie CIMKO « PADDEAC »

Localisation

Pays : République Démocratique du Congo

Province : Kongo Central

Territoire : Songololo

Secteurs : Kimpese et Luima

Durée totale du projet : 18 mois

Dates de début et de fin du projet

Date de démarrage du projet : 1er septembre 2015

Date de clôture du projet : 28 février 2017

Montant contribution requise des partenaires

Montant total :

97 123 USD

.

Financement CIMKO : 89 623 USD 92 %

Financement AGRISUD : 7 500 USD 8 %

Objectifs du projet Objectif général

Contribuer à la lutte contre la pauvreté dans la zone d’intervention de la Cimenterie Kongo par le développement durable des filières agricoles.

Objectif spécifique

Développer les filières existantes et renforcer la commercialisation des produits agricoles en vue de répondre à la demande de CIMKO en produits agricoles.

Groupe(s) cible(s)1 180 exploitations familiales agricoles, Six comités locaux de développement avec leur Union locale de développement) pour la gestion des activités économiques communautaires (magasin d’intrants, commercialisation, entretien pistes) et le plaidoyer.

Bénéficiaires finaux2 Les agents et cadres de CIMKO, pour l’approvisionnement en produits agricoles et d’élevages, les consommateurs urbains de Matadi, Lufu, Kimpese et Kinshasa.

1 Les“ groupes cibles” sont les groupes/entités qui seront affectés directement de manière positive par l'action pour les besoins de

l'action. 2 Les“ bénéficiaires finaux ” sont ceux qui tireront profit à long terme de l'action au niveau de la société ou du secteur au sens large.


Page 4

Résultats attendus Résultat 1 : 180 ménages accompagnés fournissent au moins 50 % des besoins alimentaires de CIMKO en produits agricoles (polyculture et élevage) ;

Résultat 2 : La commercialisation des produits agricoles auprès des bénéficiaires pour l’approvisionnement de CIMKO est organisée et est opérationnelle.

Activités principales

Formation en polyculture vivrière, maraîchage, élevage, suivi et appui-conseil individuel et groupé des exploitations agricoles, commercialisation des produits agricoles, aménagement de sites maraîchers, appui en intrants, matériels agricoles et d’élevage, amélioration de l’organisation de l’écoulement des produits vivriers et d’élevages, Appui à la mise en place et au fonctionnement des comités locaux de développement et de leur union locale.


Page 5

II. PRESENTATION DU PROJET

Le projet fait suite au diagnostic réalisé, par l’équipe d’AGRISUD International basée à Lukula, au début du mois de juin 2015, dans la zone d’activité de la Cimenterie Kongo (CIMKO).

2.1. DESCRIPTION DE LA ZONE DU PROJET

2.1.1. Localisation du projet

− Province du Kongo Central − Territoires de Songololo / secteurs de Kimpese et Luima. Six villages cibles (Kinsua,

Mawete, Nkonda, Nkondo-Kionda, Nionga et Kumbi).

Source : Carte élaborée par l’équipe d’AGRISUD International lors de la mission diagnostic.

Cartographie de la zone du projet


Page 6

2.1.2. Particularités écologiques de la zone du projet

Les particularités écologiques de la zone du projet sont résumées dans la grille SWOT suivante :

Tableau 1. Analyse SWOT

ATOUTS

Climat favorable permettant plusieurs

saisons culturales.

Terres riches et fertiles,

Présence des cours d’eau facilitant l’irrigation.

Proximité de nombreux axes routiers principaux.

Population jeune représentant une force de travail intéressante

Accès facile aux grands marchés de la zone et à la cimenterie CIMKO.

CONTRAINTES

Faible productivité.

Dégénérescence du matériel végétal.

Accès difficile aux semences de qualité.

Fluctuation des prix des produits.

Vol des productions.

Mauvais état des pistes et des ouvrages d’arts.

OPPORTUNITÉS

Implantation de CIMKO, source de débouchés.

Essor de la région (notamment les villes de Kimpesé et Songololo).

MENACES

Erosion des sols.

Dégradation environnementale due à l’utilisation non rationnelle des produits phytosanitaires en maraîchage.

Changement climatique.

La zone agricole concernée par la Cimenterie Kongo (CIMKO) est située entre le Secteur de Kimpese et le Secteur de la Luima dans le Territoire de Songololo.

La zone présente des potentialités intéressantes d’un point de vue agricole : climat tropical de type AW dans la classification de KOPPEN (quatre saisons offrant la possibilité de réaliser trois saisons culturales), pluviométrie allant jusqu’à plus de 1300 mm de précipitations annuelles, présence de nombreux cours d’eau, de sols riches et fertiles à tendance argilo limoneuse notamment dans les vallées inter collinaires. La zone est traversée par la route nationale n°1 et le chemin de fer reliant Kinshasa et Matadi. A noter la présence d’axes routiers ouvrant la zone versla République d’Angola.

Sur le plan de la population, la zone est très cosmopolite avec la présence de plusieurs ethnies (Ndibu, Yombe, Nianga, Ntandu, Swahili, luba,..). La population est assez jeune. La langue


Page 7

française est la langue officielle mais le lingala et le kikongo sont les deux langues les plus utilisées.

C’est une zone à vocation agricole. Les systèmes de culture sont à majorité vivriers et basés sur les cultures de manioc, arachide, haricot, niébé, patate douce, igname, courge, maïs, soja, canne à sucre, pois cajun etc. ; les cultures maraîchères telles que l’oignon, aubergine, tomate, amarante, diverses variétés de chou, piment, poivron etc. sont pratiquées en saison sèche à une échelle plus restreinte. L’élevage est présent à petite échelle, il concerne : les petits et gros bétails (chèvres, moutons, porcs, cochons d’inde, poules, canards, bœufs …).

Les cultures fruitières pérennes concernent : les agrumes, avocatiers, manguiers, papayers, safoutiers, etc.).

Paradoxalement, la population n’échappe pas à l’insécurité alimentaire qui résulte en partie de la faible productivité des exploitations, cette insécurité étant liée à trois problèmes majeurs :

− Techniques: manque d’accès aux intrants de qualité, absence de formation et/ou d’encadrement, dégénérescence du matériel végétal…

− Economiques : mauvaise programmation saisonnière des cultures impliquant d’ importantes périodes d’abondance (qui occasionnent des baisses de prix) et de pénuries (qui engendrent des hausses de prix), peu d'informations sur les prix des marchés et des filières agricoles…

− Commerciaux: Infrastructures de communication parfois inexistantes ou en délabrement rendant difficile l’approvisionnement des marchés ruraux et urbains.

2.2. OBJECTIFS DU PROJET

2.2.1. Objectif général :

Contribuer à la lutte contre la pauvreté dans la zone d’intervention de la Cimenterie Kongo par le développement durable des filières agricoles. 2.2.2. Objectif spécifique Développer les filières existantes et renforcer la commercialisation des produits agricoles en vue de répondre à la demande de CIMKO en produits agricoles.

2.3. BENEFICIAIRES FINAUX

− Les agents et cadres de CIMKO ; − Les consommateurs ruraux de la zone du projet ; − Les consommateurs urbains de Matadi, Lufu, Kimpese et Kinshasa.


Page 8

2.4. DESCRIPTION DES ACTIVITES ET DES RESULTATS ATTENDUS

Résultat 1 : 180 ménages accompagnés ont amélioré leurs systèmes de cultures vivrières, maraîchères et d’élevage.

Résultats intermédiaires

− Une situation de référence des exploitations agricoles réalisée ; − 180 exploitations agricoles renforcées dans leurs activités de production vivrières ; − 150 exploitations renforcées dans leurs activités d’élevages de cycle court (100 en

aviculture, 50 en petits ruminants : ovins et/.ou caprins ; − 20 exploitants de référence (Maîtres-Exploitants) formés et actifs dans la démonstration

des pratiques et la formation de leur entourage immédiat (1 M.E. pour 9 exploitants en moyenne) ;

− 900 tonnes de produits vivriers et maraîchers annuels produits à fin projet soit une augmentation de 25% ;

− 15 tonnes de productions carnées annuelles produites à fin projet soit une augmentation de 20%.

Activités A.1.1. Identification et sélection de 180 ménages agricoles Cent quatre-vingt(180) ménages seront identifiés et sélectionnés sur la base d’entretiens et de visites de leurs exploitations dans les six villages cibles. Cette activité permettra d’évaluer la situation socio économique et technico économique des exploitants rencontrés. Elle permettra la rédaction d’une situation de référence des exploitations agricoles (SR), étape de diagnostic préalable à l’identification des améliorations à apporter sur les systèmes de production. Cette situation de référence sera élaborée au cours des premiers mois de mise en œuvre du projet. Pour chaque bénéficiaire, une convention de collaboration sera signée avecle projet. Elle permettra, sur la base de la caractérisation de sa situation socio économique et technico économique, d’identifier les besoins en formation/accompagnement et les besoins en matériels (équipements, intrants….) de chaque exploitant. Cette base de données sera par la suite mise en lien avec :

− Le système de Suivi Technico Economique des exploitations (STE) permettant d’évaluer les résultats des exploitants (rendements, marges, revenus…)

− Le Système d’Information Géographique (SIG) permettant de suivre l’évolution des surfaces mises en valeur par les exploitants.

A.1.2. Amélioration des systèmes de polyculture vivrière et pratiques vivrières et d’élevages Le projet prévoit d’améliorer les systèmes de production par l’introduction de pratiques agro écologiques qui permettent à la fois des activités économiquement performantes, la préservation de l’environnement et un développement humain.


Page 9

Ainsi seront installées : − Vingt (20) parcelles de démonstration (à raison d’un champ de démonstration par maître

exploitant). Ces parcelles de démonstration restent la propriété de l’exploitant qui est appuyé pour une mise en place rapide et complète des modèles proposés par le projet (aménagements, pratiques). Les superficies moyennes des exploitations en polyculture seront étendues de 30 à 40 ares.

− Six champs de multiplication semencière à raison d’un champ par village cible. Chaque champ de multiplication d’une superficie d’un hectare sera divisé en autant de parcelles qu’il y’aura de cultures principales (manioc : 0,50 ha ; arachide 0,25 ha ; maïs : 0,25 ha).

A.1.3. Amélioration des techniques maraîchères Le projet prévoit de mieux répondre aux besoins du marché notamment celui de CIMKO par la mise en place des productions maraîchères de contre saison et l’étalement des périodes de production. Les cultures suivantes seront vulgarisées : oignon, tomate, ciboule, aubergine violette, poivron, piment, chou pommé, chou de chine, concombre, carotte. D’autres cultures pourront être introduites à la demande. A cet effet le projet appuiera le réseau des maraîchers dans l’installation d’une boutique d’intrants (semences, outillage). De même il les accompagnera dans la formation aux techniques de production, dans l’aménagement des sites maraîchers et l’installation des jardins individuels améliorés de façon à assurer la production tout au long de l’année. Les pratiques agro écologiques seront aussi privilégiées en mettant un accent particulier sur les traitements naturels à base de nem, tabac, piment. Les engrais de synthèse et autres pesticides ne seront utilisés qu’à titre exceptionnel, en complément d’une fertilisation organique adaptée (compost, fumier recyclé). Les superficies moyennes des exploitations familiales en maraîchage seront portées de 200 m² à 350 m². A.1.4. Amélioration des systèmes d’élevages de cycle court Les améliorations apportées aux élevages des volailles et des petits ruminants seront les suivantes :

− Introduction des coquelets de race améliorée et des géniteurs (boucs, béliers) à fort potentiel, adaptés au milieu pour une amélioration génétique des sujets locaux (réduction de la durée d’élevage par l’amélioration de la croissance).

− Organisation de campagnes de vaccination pour lutter contre la pseudo peste aviaire (volaille) et la peste des petits ruminants (ovins, caprins) ;

− Appui à la complémentation des rations alimentaires des petits ruminants (pierre à lécher) et au déparasitage interne et externe des animaux.

Pour faciliter la diffusion des innovations : − Six (6) poulaillers de démonstration seront créés à raison d’un poulailler par village. Ces

poulaillers seront tenus par 6 maîtres exploitants. − Six (6) chèvreries (une par village) seront mises en place et gérées par les maître exploitant

ayant le plus de têtes dans les villages. Ces unités de démonstration auront pour objet de former les exploitants aux techniques améliorées des élevages.


Page 10

Des vaccinateurs villageois seront formés et équipés en vaccins et en matériels de conservation des vaccins. Leurs prestations seront rémunérées par les éleveurs. Un travail préalable sera réalisé pour établir les conditions organisationnelles et financières nécessaires à la durabilité de ce service en s’inspirant de l’expérience du projet APROFIL d’AGRISUD International. A.1.5. Formation professionnelle Les formations seront organisées en suivant les itinéraires techniques et les saisons culturales pendant les douze premiers mois de mise en œuvre du projet de sorte que les six derniers mois soient consacrés au suivi et au perfectionnement des Maîtres Exploitants3. Cinq thèmes seront abordés en vivriers et 11 en maraîchage. Ils vont de la préparation du terrain à la récolte et la gestion économique de l’exploitation. Les formations techniques individuelles ou collectives des éleveurs seront organisées de manière essentiellement thématique (castration, vaccination, préparation d’une ration alimentaire, préparation des blocs de pierre à lécher, construction des poulaillers, réparation des enclos, abattage….). 6 thèmes seront abordés en aviculture et 8 thèmes en élevage ovin ou caprin. Une attention particulière sera portée à la vulgarisation des pratiques agroécologiques. A.1.6. Appuis directs4 aux exploitants Les exploitants agricoles de la zone du projet ont souvent des capacités d’autofinancement trop faibles pour investir dans le renforcement et le développement de leurs activités agricoles de plus grande ampleur. La collaboration du projet avec l’INERA de Mvuazi est prévue, notamment pour l’introduction des variétés autre que la RAV déjà sensible à la mosaïque dans cette zone. Les semences d’arachide, de maïs, de haricot et de niébé proviendront aussi de l’INERA, à défaut, des agromultiplicateurs certifiés par le Service National des Semences (SENACEM). Le projet apportera aux exploitants une contribution en équipements et intrants leur permettant de lancer ou relancer leurs activités, à charge pour eux de les développer progressivement. Quelques organisations non gouvernementales locales existant dans la zone du projet (VIVIDILA, CEPRODEP etc) seront associées à l’action du projet pour la multiplication des boutures de manioc et des semences. Les semences maraîchères seront en un premier temps achetées par le projet à Kinshasa chez les distributeurs de TECHNISEM pour les semences exotiques et à SEPROSEM pour les semences locales. En aviculture et élevage des ovins ou caprins, les conditions actuelles seront améliorées surtout au niveau sanitaire (vaccinations, déparasitage), alimentaire (compléments alimentaires, amélioration des rations et génétiques (introduction de coqs Isa Brown, de boucs de race locale sélectionnés de l’INERA). A.1.7. Suivi et appui conseil en agriculture et élevage

3 Maitre Exploitant (M.E) : Agriculteur ou éleveur expérimenté identifié par le projet, volontaire et capable de transférer aux autres exploitants son savoir faire spécifique.

4 Quantification des appuis : Confère Cadre logique en annexe.


Page 11

L’objectif du suivi et appui conseil est d’assurer un accompagnement efficace des bénéficiaires dans l’amélioration et le développement de leurs activités agricoles. Ce système est basé sur l’établissement des situations de référence technique, économique et sociale des exploitants bénéficiaires. 20% d’entre eux seront aussi associés au suivi technico économique (STE) rapproché (à raison de 6 bénéficiaires par village cible) de leurs activités et de leurs résultats. Tout au long du projet, le STE renseignera sur les points forts et les points faibles des exploitations, sur les atouts et les contraintes. Il permettra aussi de mesurer les résultats obtenus, leurs évolutions et permettra de réaliser le conseil en gestion des 180 exploitations. Deux animateurs ruraux seront chargés de cet accompagnement avec comme mission particulière de suivre et d’évaluer la mise en œuvre pratique des différentes formations reçues pour pouvoir remédier aux difficultés. Ce travail d’encadrement sera réalisé sur les exploitations par des visites périodiques de suivi, selon un calendrier défini avec les exploitants. Les animateurs seront étroitement associés dans l’action d’appui aux organisations professionnelles, groupements de producteurs, réseaux de maîtres exploitants etc. qui doivent à terme prendre le relais du conseil en gestion des exploitations. Résultat 2 : La commercialisation des produits agricoles auprès des bénéficiaires pour l’approvisionnement de CIMKO est mise en place et est opérationnelle.

Résultats intermédiaires

− Six points de collecte construits et en activité ; − Douze marchés hebdomadaires organisés et dynamiques ; − Un réseau de Comités Locaux de Développement créé et opérationnel ; − Des tronçons de pistes de desserte agricole de la zone régulièrement entretenus ; − Trois ateliers interprofessionnels réalisés ; − 8 tonnes de produits agricoles seront livrées hebdomadairement à fin projet.

Activités A.2.1. Appui conseils aux exploitants agricoles familiaux pour l’amélioration de la qualité des produits.

Un accent particulier devra être mis dans l’amélioration de la qualité des produits. A cet effet le projet favorisera la diffusion des aires de séchage avec bâches5 pour les cossettes de manioc, des sacs pour l’arachide et l’utilisation des caissettes pour les produits frais (haricot, aubergine, poivron, tomate etc.) et des filets pour l’oignon.

A.2.2. Création des points de collecte des produits agricoles

En vue d’assurer un approvisionnement régulier des produits agricoles de qualité, il est nécessaire de procéder à la construction de six points de collecte (un par village). Ces points de collecte

5 Les aires de séchage devront être fabriquées par les exploitants eux-mêmes qui pourront après bénéficier d’une subvention en bâches polyéthylène. Pour ce faire ils supporteront 20 % du prix de la bâche. Les frais d’acquisition des sacs et des caissons seront à leur charge.


Page 12

permettront de regrouper la production et d’assurer les échanges dans chaque village à l’abri des intempéries (pluies) et des animaux domestiques.

Chaque point de collecte comprendra une aire cimentée de stockage des produits et d’un compartiment servant de magasin d’entreposage des équipements et d’intrants communautaires (outillage, intrants etc.). L’aire de stockage sera ceinturée par un mur en briques cuites d’un mètre de hauteur, muni d’une porte d’accès pour empêcher les animaux domestiques d’y entrer. Le bâtiment couvrira 25 m² dont 20 m² d’aire de stockage et 5 m² de magasin d’entreposage. Sa construction sera orientée contre les vents dominants. Les bénéficiaires participeront à la construction des points de collecte par la fabrication des briques.

Chaque point de collecte sera géré par un Comité Local de Développement du village (Cf. Paragraphe A.2.5).

A.2.3. Organisation des marchés

La production des six principaux villages est destinée principalement à l’approvisionnement des travailleurs de CIMKO.

A cet effet la Cimenterie et les six Comités Locaux de Développement des villages concernés, réunis autour de leur Union devront s’entendre pour créer deux circuits de collecte permettant d’organiser les marchés une fois par semaine. Le tableau suivant donne un exemple d’organisation des circuits de collecte à mettre en place.

Tableau n° 2 : Circuits de collecte des produits agricoles.

Circuit de collecte Villages Jour de marché

Nombre Désignation

Circuit n° 1

3

Nkinsua Mardi Kumbi

Nkonda Circuit n° 2

3

Nkondo-Kionda Vendredi Nionga

Mawete

Pour chaque jour de marché, un véhicule de CIMKO organise des achats dans chaque village en commençant par le village le plus éloigné (Nkinsua pour le circuit n°1 et Nkondo Kionda pour le circuit n°2). La longueur totale d’un circuit n’excède guère 30 km6.

Dans chaque village, la production regroupée au point de collecte est échangée sur un principe de fixation et de transparence des prix après négociations entre représentants des Comité locaux de développement et CIMKO. Ces négociations pourront être renouvelées par période et seront fonction de l’évolution des prix sur les marchés avoisinants.

6 Du point le plus éloigné d’un circuit à la cité de CIMKO.


Page 13

A.2.4. Entretien des pistes de desserte agricole des circuits de collecte

S’il est vrai que la zone de projet dispose d’une infrastructure routière intéressante, deux tronçons sont par contre d’accès difficile surtout en saison des pluies. Il s’agit du tronçon Minkelu – Nkonda Kionda (9 km) et RN1 – Nkinsua (10 km environ)7.

Les Comités locaux de développement concernés devront s’organiser pour couvrir les points noirs qui entravent la circulation. Le projet mettra à leur disposition de l’outillage approprié pour réaliser cette activité en cas de nécessité (Cf. paragraphe A.2.5).

La pérennité de l’entretien des pistes tient aussi à la capacité des populations à contrôler l’accès à ces voies de circulation en période pluvieuse. Un travail sera réalisé pour la mise en place des barrières de pluie associées à la mise en place d’un péage routier afin de mobiliser les ressources financières pour payer les travaux d’entretien. Le péage de Kimuana sur l’axe Kimpese - Kilueka est un bel exemple à suivre. Il conviendra le moment venu d’associer les autorités administratives des secteurs concernés à la mise en place et à la gestion de ces dispositifs.

A.2.5. Organisation des Comités Locaux de Développement

La durabilité des actions du projet ne peut être pérenne que si les producteurs sont organisés autour d’associations qui défendent leurs intérêts et les accompagnent à développer leurs capacités techniques.

Ces organisations ne peuvent être efficaces que si elles ont une base technique et économique viable : Commercialisation, approvisionnement en intrants, entretien des pistes rurales etc.

A cet effet les actions à mener par le projet sont :

− Appui des producteurs à la mise en place des Comités Locaux de Développement (un dans chaque village) en charge dans chaque village de : d’identifier les besoins techniques des producteurs, de gérer les approvisionnements en intrants, de les accompagner dans la commercialisation des produits, de gérer le point de collecte du village et d’organiser éventuellement l’entretien des pistes rurales. Chaque Comité Local de développement aura à gérer les droits des marchés perçus lors des transactions (montant à définir entre membres du CLD), des péages (pour deux CLD) et les bénéfices substantiels tirés de la vente des intrants. Ces recettes seront utilisées à la maintenance et à l’entretien du point de collecte et aux autres actions communautaires (entretien des pistes, pharmacies villageoises, entretien point d’eau, fonctionnement CLD, etc.).

− Appui des CLD à la mise en place d’une plateforme ayant pour objectif principal d’assurer leur plaidoyer auprès de CIMKO (fixation des prix des produits). Cette plate forme devra aussi être mise en relation aux moments opportuns avec les services de crédit, des structures de vulgarisation (AGRIPEL, Développement rural), de recherche (INERA) et d’approvisionnement en intrants. L’ Union des CLD doit être une structure

7 Au cours de notre mission d’identification du projet, nous n’avons pu atteindre le sixième village (Nkinsua) à cause de ce mauvais état de la piste.


Page 14

légère qui a pour objet de prêter ses services auprès des ses CLD membres, de telle sorte que chaque CLD doit être suffisamment autonome.

A.2.6. Organisation des ateliers interprofessionnels

Trois ateliers interprofessionnels seront organisés sur la durée du projet (à raison d’un atelier par semestre). Chaque atelier regroupera une trentaine d’acteurs des filières agricoles de la contrée (producteurs, représentants de CIMKO, vendeurs d’intrants, associations, services agricoles et de développement rural).

L’objectif principal est de mettre en évidence les tendances et besoins du marché, de coordonner les activités des acteurs concernés pour mieux adapter l’offre à la demande dans des conditions d’équité et des échanges. Au travers de ces ateliers, il s’agit de préparer les saisons culturales à venir (saison sèche ou saison de pluies) en fonction des observations et des résultats capitalisés au cours de la saison passée.

Les observations collectées seront utilisées pour orienter les systèmes de production et pour accompagner le dispositif de conseil en gestion des exploitations.


Page 15

2.5. GESTION ET COORDINATION DU PROJET

2.5.1. Personnel

Les activités du projet seront animées sur le terrain par deux agents : i) Un Agroéconomiste formateur, responsable de l’accompagnement des organisations professionnelles, ii) Un agronome, animateur de développement chargé du suivi technique des exploitations .

Les termes de référence des deux agents seront élaborés au démarrage du projet.

Des missions d’appui court terme seront organisées par l’Equipe AGRISUD basée à Lukula dont le Responsable assurera la coordination du projet. Ces missions seront réparties comme suit :

− Cinq missions de supervision dont 1 lors de l’atelier de lancement du projet et pour la mise en place des outils comptables et administratifs, 2 de supervision des activités 1 évaluation à mi parcours et 1 évaluation finale.

− Cinq missions d’appuis techniques.

Toutes ces missions seront entièrement financées par AGRISUD International

2.5.2. Suivi évaluation – Audits externes

La méthode proposée pour le suivi évaluation est celle basée sur la gestion du projet axé sur les résultats (GAR). Pour ce faire il sera indispensable de déterminer la situation de référence en début du projet (évaluation initiale) , de fixer un repère d’évaluation en cours des activités du projet (fin premier cycle cultural des cultures autres que le manioc) et de faire une évaluation des activités à la à mi parcours et une, à la fin du projet (évaluation finale) de façon chaque fois à comparer les résultats obtenus aux prévisions d’une part et à la situation de référence d’autre part.

Le tableau suivant présente les principaux indicateurs de suivi et d’évaluation du projet.

Type d’indicateurs Désignation

Indicateurs d’atteinte des objectifs quantitatifs (Indicateurs physiques)

Pourcentage des exploitants bénéficiaires de l’action. Quantités d’intrants diffusés par rapport aux prévisions. Nombre de formations réalisées en rapport avec les prévisions. Pourcentage des superficies mises en valeur par rapport aux prévisions. Quantités de produits commercialisés en rapport avec la situation de référence.

Indicateurs de la participation des bénéficiaires de l’Action (Indicateurs d’effet)

Nombre de bénéficiaires travaillant effectivement dans leurs exploitations pilotes. Nombre de bénéficiaires appliquant les formations reçues. Pourcentage de bénéficiaires maîtrisant les techniques et systèmes de production diffusés.

Indicateurs d’amélioration de la situation de la population cible. (Indicateurs d’impact)

Revenus additionnels des cultures vivrières et légumières obtenus par rapport à la situation de référence. Changements qualitatifs/ quantitatifs perçus au niveau des ménages pilotes.


Page 16

Les premiers indicateurs sont mesurables immédiatement, après la réalisation d’une activité ou sous activité. Ils devront figurer dans les rapports trimestriels.

Les indicateurs de second niveau seront par contre perceptibles à moyen terme, au bout d’un cycle cultural ou à la fin d’une longue activité. Ils devront figurer dans les rapports semestriels.

Enfin les indicateurs d’impact seront atteints à long terme, très souvent à la fin du projet. L’évaluation finale devra les faire ressortir.

Afin de bien réaliser cette évaluation, la configuration des rapports périodiques (que l’on souhaite trimestriels) épousera la présentation chronologique des résultats et des activités tels que décrits ci avant. Pour chaque activité (ou le cas échéant sous activité) il sera indiqué les objectifs initiaux du projet, les quantités physiques obtenus et le pourcentage d’atteinte des résultats avec des commentaires éventuels.

Le bailleur principal est appelé à réaliser à souhait des audits techniques et financiers du projet. Tous les rapports lui seront progressivement transmis dans les délais. De même les documents comptables y afférents seront mis à sa disposition aux moments opportuns.

2.5.3. Principaux moyens proposés pour la mise en œuvre des activités du projet

Moyens d’équipement du projet

Deux motocyclettes tout terrain (type AG 200 ou 125 RX) seront acquises et mises à la disposition de l’Agronome formateur.et de l’Animateur du projet.

Un ordinateur, une photocopieuse, un groupe électrogène et un modem pour Internet.

Un bureau du projet. Il sera installé à Mawété la plus grande localité de la contrée. Ce village est facilement accessible du fait qu’il est situé sur la Route nationale N°1. Ce local sera équipé du mobilier composé au moins de deux bureaux, quatre chaises, une armoire et des accessoires d’informatique (stabilisateurs, multiprises etc.).

Moyens d’appui aux bénéficiaires

Les exploitations vivrières et maraîchères recevront de l’outillage et des intrants agricoles correspondant à leur besoin, en fonction de la superficie cultivée et de leur niveau de précarité : houe, machette, pelle, bèche, râteau, binette, arrosoirs, semences (boutures), engrais minéraux et organiques, produits phytosanitaires, bâche pour séchoir.

Les élevages recevront de petits équipements et intrants : compléments alimentaires, produits zoo pharmaceutiques, semences fourragères etc.

Les Comités Locaux de Développement recevront les matériaux pour construire les points de collecte des produits agricoles (Ils devront eux-mêmes disposer des briques), des kits d’outillage


Page 17

d’entretien routier8, une motopompe et des semences pour la mise en place du périmètre maraîcher dans chaque village.

CIMKO interviendra dans la commercialisation des produits agricoles par la mobilisation d’un de ses véhicules.

Moyens financiers

Le coût total du projet est de 97.123 dollars américains, répartis comme suit :

N° d’ordre Désignation des rubriques Montant (USD) %

1 Ressources humaines 21350 22

2 Equipement et matériel 8200 8

3 Fonctionnement bureau 6900 7

4 Autres coûts et services 2500 3

5 Coûts d’appuis bénéficiaires 45600 47

6 Coûts administratifs 5073 5

7 Coûts de supervision du projet 7500 8

Total 97123 100

Sources de financement

92 % du budget du projet sera financés par CIMKO soit 89.623 dollars américains.

AGRISUD International apportera 7.500 dollars américains (8% de l’enveloppe budgétaire) pour prendre en charge les frais liés à la supervision des activités du projet.

Le détail du budget du projet figure à l’annexe 1.

8 Détail des kits Cf. cadre logique.


Page 18

2.5.4. Plan d’action pour la mise en œuvre des activités du Projet

Activité Semestre 1 Semestre 2 Semestre 3 Organisme Responsable de mise en œuvre

Mois 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Résultat 1 : 180 ménages accompagnés ont amélioré leurs productions vivrières, maraîchères et d’élevages

A.1.1. Identification et sélection de 180 ménages agricoles

Equipe projet

A.1.2. Amélioration des systèmes et pratiques vivrières et d’élevages

Equipe projet

A.1.3. Amélioration des techniques maraîchères

Equipe projet

A.1.4. Formation professionnelle Equipe projet

A.1.5. Appuis directs aux exploitants

Equipe projet

A.1.6. Suivi et appui conseils en agriculture et élevage

Equipe projet

Résultat 2 : La commercialisation des produits agricoles auprès des bénéficiaires pour l’approvisionnement de CIMKO est organisée et est opérationnelle.

A.2.1. Appui conseils pour l’amélioration de la qualité des produits.

Equipe projet

A.2.2. Création des points de collecte des produits agricoles

Comité local de dévelopt.

A.2.3. Organisation des marchés. Union locale A.2.4. Entretien des pistes de desserte agricoles de la zone du projet

Union locale

A.2.5. Organisation des comités locaux de développement

Union locale

A.2.6. Organisation des ateliers Equipe


Page 19

interprofessionnels projet Monitoring du projet

A.3.1 Elaboration des rapports trimestriels

Equipe projet

A.3.2 Elaboration des rapports semestriels

Equipe projet

A.3.3. Audits financiers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIMKO A.3.4. Missions de supervision et d’évaluation du projet

Agrisud International

A.3.5. Capitalisation des acquis du projet

Equipe projet

A.3.6. Elaboration du rapport final du projet

Equipe projet

Légende : Les tirets discontinus expriment la réalisation de l’activité à tout moment.

Remarque : Chaque activité comprend deux ou plusieurs sous activités que l’équipe du projet affinera au démarrage de l’Action, avec l’appui de l’Equipe d’AGRISUD International.


Page 20

2.6. DURABILITE DE L’ACTION

2.6.1. Impact de l’Action

Le processus d’amélioration des systèmes et des pratiques agro écologiques et agro forestières mis en œuvre, permettra une amélioration régulière de la production, stabilisera les zones de cultures.

Ces familles agricoles dégageront des bénéfices qu’elles réinvestiront dans la production et dans le tissu socio économique local favorisant ainsi leur bien être.

L’amélioration des pratiques d’élevages permettra d’augmenter les productions, d’introduire l’intégration agriculture –élevage au sein des exploitations agricoles familiales grâce àla production du fumier pour le maraîchage qu’elle génère.

La valeur ajoutée générée par la commercialisation des produits agricoles dont CIMKO en est le principal client est partiellement transférée aux ménages grâce à leur meilleure maîtrise des circuits (au travers des Comités Locaux de Développement) et à la transparence de l’information (prix).

Les acteurs regroupés autour des CLD (et de leur union)et la vingtaine de maîtres exploitants formés disposent d’outils et de méthodes leur permettant de répliquer l’approche développée par le projet. Ils seront à même de maintenir et renforcer les acquis du projet, de manière à les pérenniser après projet.

2.6.2. Analyse des risques

Désignation des risques Plan de réserve

Au plan économique

Risque d’augmentation de la production supérieure aux besoins de CIMKO Seuls les producteurs les plus aisés sont capables de profiter du marché

Calage des systèmes de culture par la définition avec chaque bénéficiaire et le CLD d’un programme cultural échelonné. Mise en relation avec les marchés extérieurs (Kimpese, Matadi, Lufu, Kinshasa) pour l’écoulement du surplus de production. Le projet accompagne les producteurs les plus aisés dans la prise de risque et accentue le suivi et les appuis directs nécessaires pour sécuriser les moins favorisés dans leur évolution.

Au plan technique

Risque de perte de la fertilité des sols par une intensification des cultures. Risque de non maîtrise des innovations techniques et technologiques par les acteurs (producteurs). Difficulté d’animation des activités de la commercialisation

Pris en compte au travers la diffusion d’itinéraires techniques adaptés. Formations professionnelles dans une optique agro écologique adaptée. Formations –actions des innovations techniques non maîtrisées. Réalisation des apprentissages psychomoteurs par la méthode TWI pour la maîtrise par les producteurs des innovations technologiques. Suivi accompagnement des acteurs par les cadres du projet dans le processus d’organisation des


Page 21

marchés. Au plan environnemental

Risque d’altération climatique (réduction de la pluviométrie) La logique d’augmentation de la production peut induire une extension des pratiques de « déboisement -brûlis »

Intensification des pratiques agro écologiques favorisant l’économie en eau. Risque pris en compte par la diffusion aux bénéficiaires des pratiques agro écologiques permettant une sédentarisation des cultures tout en augmentant la productivité.

Au plan social

Les personnes ne bénéficiant pas de l’action peuvent décourager l’investissement des bénéficiaires dans la démarche Certains producteurs appuyés peuvent se placer en situation d’assistanat et d’attente matérielle. La diffusion par les maîtres exploitants des pratiques et techniques innovantes est rendue difficiles en raison des interférences sociales. Les Comités locaux de développement et/ou leur union ne mettent pas en pratiques les plans et les stratégies élaborés. Risque de non appropriation des CLD (ULD) par les acteurs

L’identification des bénéficiaires est faite sur les critères de motivation. Les choix sont effectués en toute transparence lors des réunions villageoises en présence des autorités locales. Les appuis sont réalisés en fonction des besoins et des motivations de chaque bénéficiaire afin d’initier les activités et appellent toujours une contre partie. Agrisud a déjà prouvé l’efficacité et la durabilité du réseau des maîtres exploitants dans les conditions similaires (Kimpese, Luozi, Lukula Tshela). Les compétences des maîtres exploitants sont reconnues par l’entourage. Suivi accompagnement rapproché des CLD (ULD) en vue de déceler et éradiquer les difficultés. Identification des facteurs démotivants, proposition éventuellement de restructuration des organes

2.6.3. Principales hypothèses pendant et après la phase de mise en œuvre du projet

− Pas de troubles sociopolitiques susceptibles d’entraver les activités du projet dans la zone ;

− Pas d’augmentation significative des prix des intrants et des équipements agricoles pouvant déstabiliser la rentabilité des exploitations et le budget du projet ;

− Pas d’accidents climatiques majeurs mettant en péril les activités agricoles.

− CIMKO et les bénéficiaires du projet acceptent d’établir une convention de partenariat sur la commercialisation des produits agricoles au niveau de chaque village couvert par le projet.


Page 22

ANNEXES


Page 23

Annexe 1 : Budget du Projet

Budget du projet Septembre 2015 à Mars 2017

Coûts Unité # d'unités Coût

unitaire (en $US)

Coût total (en $US)

1. Ressources humaines 1.1 Agronome /Formateur Par mois 18 700 12 600

1.2 Agronome Animateur Par mois 15 500 7 500

1.3 Missions/voyages 0

1.3.1 Zone projet-Kinshasa (Equipe projet) Par mission 5 250 1 250

Sous-total Ressources humaines 21 350

2. Equipement et matériel

2.1. Motocyclettes 120CC Nombre 2 3 000 6 000

2.2. Mobiliers de bureau Nombre 2 300 600

2.3. Ordinateurs Nombre 1 800 800

2.4. Photocopieur, imprimante et accessoires Nombre 1 800 800

Sous total équipements, matériels et fournitures 8 200

3. Fonctionnement Bureau local

3.1. Coût du loyer Mois 18 100 1 800

3.2 Consommables - Fournitures de bureau Forfait 1 500 500

3.3 Carburant Mois 18 100 1 800

3.4 Autres services (tél/fax, électricité/ maintenance) Par mois 18 100 1 800

3.5 Matériel pédagogique Forfait 1 1 000 1 000

Sous-total fonctionnement bureau local 6 900

4. Autres coûts, services 8

4.1 Coûts d'évaluation à mi parcours et finale Evaluation 1 1 500 1 500

4.2 Services financiers (coûts de garantie bancaire, etc) Forfait 1 500 500

4.3 Actions de visibilité (signalétique projet) Forfait 1 500 500

Sous-total Autres coûts, services 2 500

5. Appuis aux activités des bénéficiaires

5.1. Construction points de collecte Nombre 6 2 000 12 000

5.2 Kits entretien pistes Nombre 3 300 900

5.3 Appui en équipements et intrants polyculture vivrières Bénéficiaires 180 70 12 600

5.4. Appui en intrants et équipements maraichage Bénéficiaires 180 70 12 600

5.5. Appui en équipements et intrants élevages Bénéficiaires 150 40 6 000

5.6. Organisation des journées interprofessionnelles Nombre 3 500 1 500


Page 24

Sous-total Autres 45 600

6. Sous-total des coûts de l'Action (1 à 5) 84 550

7. Coûts administratifs AGRISUD International (6%) 5 073

8. Total des coûts du projet (financement CIMKO) (6 + 7) 89 623

9. Supervision projet (Financement AGRISUD International)

h-jour 50 150 7 500

10. Total général du budget du projet (8+9) 97 123


Page 25

Annexe 2 : Cadre logique

Logique d’intervention Indicateurs objectivement vérifiables Sources et moyens de vérification

Hypothèses

Objectif général

Contribuer à la lutte contre la pauvreté dans la zone d’intervention de CIMKO par le développement durable des filières agricoles

Evolution des indicateurs de socio économiques (niveau de vie) des bénéficiaires directs du projet : habitat, équipement, santé.

Situation de référence, Bases des données du projet sur le suivi économique. Rapport à mi parcours et rapport final du projet.

Contexte socio politique stable

Objectifs spécifiques

Développer les filières existantes et renforcer la commercialisation des produits agricoles en vue de répondre à la demande de CIMKO en produits agricoles

Amélioration des quantités de produits agricoles issus des zones de production appuyées par le projet, autoconsommés par les populations locales ; Accroissement des quantités des produits issues de l’appui projet, approvisionnement CIMKO.

Situation de référence, Bases des données du projet sur le suivi économique

Les bénéficiaires et CIMKO acceptent d’établir leur convention de partenariat.

Résultats attendus

R1 : 180 ménages accompagnés ont amélioré leurs systèmes de productions agricoles

Nombre d’exploitants par domaine d’activité ayant bénéficié des appuis du projet : 180 Nombre de maîtres exploitants formés : 20 Nombre de villages couverts par le projet : 6

Rapports d’activité Absence d’accidents climatiques (inondations ou fortes sècheresses) des zones de cultures. et d’épizooties pour les élevages.

A.1.1. Identification et sélection de 180 ménages agricoles.

Nombre de conventions de collaboration signés avec les bénéficiaires : 180 Nombre de situation de référence réalisé : 1

Conventions signés Etude réalisée

A.1.2. Amélioration des pratiques de polyculture vivrière

Nombre d’exploitants appuyés en polyculture vivrière : 180. Nombre de parcelles de démonstration réalisées: 20 Nombre de maîtres exploitants formés en polyculture vivrière : 20. Nombre de fiches « systèmes de culture » élaborées et distribués aux maîtres exploitants : 5

Rapports d’activité


Page 26

A.1.3. Amélioration des techniques maraîchères

Nombre d’exploitants appuyés en maraîchage : 180 ; Nombre de périmètres maraîchers réalisées: 6 ; Nombre de maîtres exploitants formés en maraîchage : 20 ; Nombre de fiches « systèmes de culture » élaborées et distribués aux maîtres exploitants : 6 Nombre moyen de cycles longs maraîchers réalisés par bénéficiaire par an : 3


A.1.4. Amélioration des pratiques d’élevages de cycle court.

Nombre d’exploitants appuyés en petit élevage avicole (100) et en petit ruminants (50) ; Nombre de maîtres exploitants formés en élevage avicole (15) et en petits ruminants (10 ; Nombre de fiches systèmes d’élevage élaborées et distribuées aux exploitants (1 fiche par type d’élevage) Nombre de campagne de vaccination des volailles contre la pseudo peste aviaire réalisées : 5 Nombre de campagnes de vaccination réalisée contre la peste des petits ruminants : 1


A.1.5. Formation professionnelle

Nombre de thèmes de formations dispensées par domaine d’activités : Polyculture : 5 ; maraîchage : 11 Aviculture : 6 et élevage des petits ruminants : 8. Nombre de formations dispensées : polyculture : 900 ; maraîchage : 1980 ; aviculture : 600 ; petits ruminants : 400


A.1.6. Appuis directs aux exploitants

180 Kits d’outillages distribués composés de machettes (180), râteaux (180), arrosoirs (180), bêches (180), motopompes (6) Des intrants composés de : 1080 bottes de manioc améliorés (au moins 3 clones différents) soit 54.000 mètres linéaires ; 2,7 tonnes de semences d’arachide, 900 kg de semences de niébé/haricot ; 1,8 t de semence de maïs ; 9.000 plants d’acacias. 10,8 kg de semences maraîchères ; 12 pulvérisateurs ; 5 kg de produits phytosanitaires (bio pesticides) ; 50 coquelets de racé

Rapports d’activité Base des données du projet Fiches de cession des équipements et intrants aux bénéficiaires.


Page 27

améliorée (Isa Brown) ; 10 boucs (béliers) ; 6 Kits de vaccination9 ; 3 Kits d’outillage HIMO10

A.1.7. Suivi et appui conseil en agriculture et élevage

Nombre d’exploitants classés par catégorie de maîtrise des systèmes de culture/d’élevage11 ; Pourcentage d’exploitants des deux dernières catégories ayant accédé aux catégories supérieures.

Rapports d’activité Base des données du projet

R2 : Des circuits de collecte des produits agricoles pour l’approvisionnement de CIMKO sont mis en place et sont opérationnels

Nombre de points de collecte crées (6) ; Nombre de circuits de collecte crées et fonctionnels (2); Quantité de produits livrés à CIMKO par mois

Rapports d’activité Les bénéficiaires et CIMKO acceptent d’établir leur convention de partenariat

A.2.1. Appui conseils aux exploitants pour l’amélioration de la qualité des produits

Niveau de satisfaction de la qualité des produits par le Client (CIMKO)

Fiches périodiques d’entretien avec le client

A.2.2. Création des points de collecte des produits agricoles.

Nombre de circuits de collecte crées et fonctionnels (2);


A.2.3. Organisation des marchés.

Fréquence mensuelle des marchés. Quantité de produits mis en marché

Rapports d’activité Enquête marchés

A.2.4. Entretien des pistes de desserte agricoles

Nombre de km de pistes entretenus (30) Rapports d’activité

A.2.5. Organisation des comités locaux de développement.

Nombre de CLD structurés et fonctionnels


A.2.6. Organisation des Nombre d’ateliers interprofessionnels organisés (3) Rapports d’activité

9 Ces 6 kits sont composés de 15 gilets de vaccinateurs, 9 glacières dont 3 de grand format ; 16.000 doses de vaccins contre la pseudo peste aviaire et 300 doses de vaccins

contre la peste des petits ruminants.

10

Chaque kit comprend : 10 pelles, 10 machettes ; 3 marteaux, 5 râteaux, 5 dames à mains, 3 brouettes, 2 limes, 5 pioches, 5 haches, 2 doubles décamètres (pentamètres), 2 cordeaux

11 Quatre catégories : meilleurs exploitants, bons exploitants, exploitants moyens et exploitants faibles.


Page 28

ateliers interprofessionnels Activité transversale : gestion et coordination du projet

Composition de l’équipe : 1 agronome superviseur des activités de terrain ; 1 équipe d’appuis ponctuels de techniciens d’AGRISUD International, basée à Lukula. Sous la direction du Chargé de mission d’Agrisud International – Lukula.



Appendix J: HPP Congo – Action Plan

Humana

People to People

Congo

(HPP-CONGO)

Community Development Project

in Songololo

Organization

31, Rue Katako Kombe II,

Q. Joli Parc C. Ngaliema -

Kinshasa

RDC CONGO

Tel. +243 81 161 5225

E-mail :

[email protected]

www.hpp-congo.org

JUNE 2015

A partnership between

CIMKO and HPP-Congo.

1

I. INTRODUCTION TO THE PARTENERSHIP

This paper is an invitation to CIMKO to become a partner in development with

HPP-Congo to implement the project: “The Community developing Songololo”

The partnership is based on CIMKO setting up a modern cement factory in the

rural area of Songololo while HPP-Congo has thorough experiences in

organizing rural communities to take action to improve their own living

conditions and to promote development. The Songololo communities will surely

benefit from a modern industry being built in their area and it is important that

people engage in improving their capacities and conditions to match the new

neighbor and that they do it by taking the local development in their own hands

and not to wait for CIMKO to do that; whereas CIMKO can support their

initiatives with appropriate infrastructures.

HPP-Congo will mobilize the community to organize in Family Action Groups

(GAFs), in farmers clubs, environmental committees, youth clubs and water

committees to work for improvements and development. The program model to

be used is the “Child Aid Program” that works with some or all of 10 lines of

activities. The Child Aid program engages communities, strengthens the

families’ capacities and enables them to analyze their environment, identify

constraints and opportunities, plan and implement activities to improve living

conditions, for the benefit of individual and collective development. The ideal

length of the Child Aid program is 5 years, but good results can be achieved

with less time.

The project “The community developing Songololo” is carried out together with

250 families in the villages of Mawete, Nkonda, Kumbi, Nkondo, Kwamba,

Nyonga and Kinsua. The project lasts 18 months from September 15 2015 to 28

February 2017 and will leave people with a solid foundation to move on.

The project will cost 68.000 USD.

2

BUDGET MAIN FIGURES USD

Salaries and staff costs project staff 22 940

Equipment, furniture and bicycles 4 580

Program activities 15 067

Project center and visibility 10 140

Administration and technical support 5 273

Education and training of 2 teachers 10 000

TOTAL 68 000

II. STRUCTURE AND APPROACH

The 250 families are organized in Family Action Groups (FAG) as the key

structure of the project and where all activities start implementation. Each of the

7 villages will have a FAG that will select 2 literate members to be trained as

FAG coordinators. At least one of the coordinators is a woman. The

beneficiaries and the actors in the program are thus the same people.

When mobilized, trained and organized the FAG take the issue of improving

livelihoods and promote development in their own hands. Member families send

one representative to the weekly meetings or actions on important topics of

health, hygiene, education, nutrition and other local issues or problems of

importance to the local community. Problems and issues are discussed, solutions

are found and decisions are put into actions.

Topics are treated at 2 meetings: the meeting where the topic is introduced and

discussed. Most often the topic is presented by one of the Project Leaders. At the

following meeting the topic will be repeated by the coordinators or other

members of the FAG. The FAGs organize cleaning and other actions to improve

community conditions. Many of the FAG members will also be in the Farmers

Clubs, others in the environmental committees or in the IGA activities.

The local authorities and key people in the communities will be contacted prior

to the implementation of the program and mobilized to participate and give their

full support.

Structure in each of the targeted seven villages

3

1) A Family Action Group (FAG) with 2 trained coordinators

2) A youth club with minimum 25 youths

3) A Farmers clubs with at least 25 members

4) An environment committee with 5 trained and active members

5) A water management committee with 5 members

III. PROGRAM GOALS AND LINES OF ACTIVITY

1. Strengthening family economy:

The goal of this activity line is that the families eat sufficient and healthy food

and that a surplus production is made to be sold.

Activities: Farming families will organize in Farmers clubs of 25 – 35 members

depending on distance. The clubs will meet for theoretical and practical lessons

given by the project leaders on better farming techniques 2-4 times per month

and they will practice the techniques in the common demonstration plots. The

families will also learn about and engage in vegetable production to improve

nutrition and income.

In the FAGs there will be training in the importance of savings and management

of the family economy. Some of the FAG members will be trained in Income

Generating activities (IGA) like managing and expanding a small business,

processing farm produce like making cassava-bread and soy milk or other IGAs

according to existing possibilities and capabilities.

2. Health and Hygiene

The goal of this activity line is to reduce preventable diseases significantly and

secure access to potable water for the 250 families and specifically for the

children in the project area.

Activities: The FAGs will be trained in how to avoid a number of local diseases

like diarrhea, malaria, typhoid, HIV/AIDS and others by providing education

about the causes and transmission of the diseases and what practices to put in

place to avoid them (Simple hand wash systems, dig refuge pits, keep hygienic

latrines, etc..). With education on nutrition, basic health, hygiene and sanitation,

HIV/AIDS, malaria, reproductive and maternal health, families can undertake

4

actions to prevent and significantly reduce the diseases. Community actions

organized by the FAGs to clean the homesteads, the surroundings and public

places and improve access to clean water are a crucial part of securing better

health, which again leads to more productivity and less family expenses. The

local clinics will be involved in some of the activities and will register the

improvements in their statistics.

Clean drinking water

It is the intention of the project that all villagers should have access to clean

drinking water. The project staff with the assistance of the national office of

HPP-Congo will find out together with the communities if natural sources can

be captured and where wells mist be drilled and propose the infrastructure

improvements to be made. HPP-Congo has the technical expertise to organize

and secure the work to capture sources or engage a company to make the

drilling. The project will train water management committees to manage potable

water sources and pumps. CIMKO will provide the wells or the materials for

capturing natural sources.

3. Education

Education is basic and crucial to create development. The goal of the Education

line is to improve education for all.

Activities: The FAG will be encouraged to take active part in the life and

teaching in the schools and to make campaigns to get all the children in school.

3 times during the 18 months program the teacher training college in Mbankana

(operated by HPP-Congo in partnership with "Ministère de l'Enseignement

Primaire, Secondaire et Initiation à la Nouvelle Citoyenneté (MEPSINC)") will

send teachers or teachers trainees to train the local primary school teachers in

teaching methods and to share experiences and discuss education challenges.

The project will train 45 youth and adults to read, write and calculate. The

literacy program will run for 9 months following the national literacy

curriculum. The training will take place 3 times a week, 3 hours a day and will

be done by the project leaders and community volunteers.

Training 2 teachers at “Ecole Normale DNS Mbankana” :

To contribute to a durable improvement of the quality of primary school

education in Songololo the project will select 2 young people to carry through

5

the 2 years education of the DNS Mbankana Teacher Training College to be

trained as rural primary school teachers and development agents.

The 2 year’s program train a new kind of teachers, qualified with a solid training

in pedagogy and general knowledge and in community development, enabling

them to support development actions around the village school in cooperation

with the parents, children and other community members. The DNS Mbankana

Teacher Training College is a boarding school with an intensive theoretical and

practical training with the students in the driver’s seat of his own education. The

trained teachers will receive a specialization diploma from the MEPSINC and

will be incorporated in the government’s salary system to return to teach in

primary schools in Songololo.

4. Protecting the environment:

The goal of this line is that people understand and engage in protecting the

environment.

Activities: Environmental committees are organized with 5 members from each

FAG. The committees will be trained in basic understanding of the environment

for the survival of human beings and in how to protect the environment. The

committee members will train others and organize nurseries and tree planting

and other protective activities according to the local conditions. The agricultural

methods taught to the farmers are also protective to the environment, like soil

conservation and using compost. The communities will plant Moringa, Acacia

and fruit trees. Schools will also participate in tree planting to achieve a total of

5,000 trees planted during the 18 months of the project.

5. Young people active in the economic, political, social and

cultural spheres of the society:

The goal of this activity line is that young people organize to participate actively

in the economic, political, social and cultural spheres of their society.

Activities: The young people are organized in 7 clubs of 25-30 members around

topics of their interest: football, literature, theater, peer educator, music etc. to

develop their talents and learn life skills like the dangers of drugs and alcohol,

reproductive health, human rights, HIV/AIDS prevention, the world in which we

live, protection of the environment etc. The youth clubs each select 2 club

6

leaders who will be trained by the project in organizing the activities in the

youth clubs. The youth clubs will also take part in community actions as tree

planting and cleaning actions.

IV. PEOPLE AT THE PROJECT

For the implementation of the project one Project Leader is the overall

responsible for the management and administration of the main activities

described above assisted by a co-project Leader.

The project leaders will start by mobilizing families to participate in the program

and they will train the FAG coordinators and support them to carry out the

program activities. The Project Leaders will give most of the lessons in the

FAGs, in the Farmers Clubs, the youth clubs and the Environmental committees.

At times they may call upon others like the local nurse or teacher for specific

lessons or trainings. The project leaders live in Songololo and are present in the

community at all times so as to be available for organizing actions, solving

issues, mobilizing members and be in the forefront of the improvements in the

community.

V. MONITORING AND EVALUATION BY HPP-CONGO

During the implementation of the project, HPP-Congo will carry out a

monitoring review at least once every quarter to assess the level of progress in

the program, identify gaps and suggest improvements. A report will be written

by the end of each monitoring mission. The project leader will also prepare

weekly narrative and financial reports that will be sent to the national

headquarters of HPP-Congo. Progress reports will be sent to the partner every 6

months or as agreed.

7

VI. TIMELINE

N° ACTIVITY Expexted results First 12 months 2nd Year

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6

1 Start up

Installation of staff

and baseline study.

1 baseline study is carried out.

2 Program activities

Strengthening the

Economy of the

Family.

Training in selling the products

and management small IGAs.

Environment 7 Environment committees

trained

5000 trees of different kind are

in nursery and planted.

Health 250 people have improved their

health and access to water.

Construction of wells and

capture sources

Education 2 youths trained as primary

school teachers and development

agents

45 people have learnt how to

read and write after 9 months.

Capacity building of primary

school teachers

8

N° ACTIVITY Expexted results First 12 months 2nd Year

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6

Youth Clubs

100 youth have improved their

knowledge and participate in the

development of their community

2 youth events held

2 Conclusive phase

Evaluation 6 evaluation missions with

reports are organized

Financial audit 1 financial audit is realized.

9

The community developping Songololo - Budget details

Désignation Unité

Qté Freq P.U. USD

TOTAL USD

1. Ressources Humaines

1.1.1. Leader de Projet Mois 1 18 530 9 540

1.1.2. Co Proj Leader Mois 2 18 300 10 800

1.1.3. Gardien Mois 1 18 100 1 800

1.1.4. Voyage et installation staff 1 fois 2 1 400 800

Sous total de Ressources Humaines 22 940

2.2 Fourniture, computer équipement

2.2.1. Ordinateur pour rapport, programme etc 1 fois 1 1 800 800

2.2.2. Imprimante, scanner et stabilisateur 1 fois 1 1 300 300

2.2.3. Meubles dans le bureau 1 fois 1 1 900 900

2.2.4. Groupe électrogene et lampes solaires 1 fois 1 1 600 600

2.2.5. Projecteur pour la formation avec toile 1 fois 1 1 430 430

2.2.6. Camera 1 fois 1 1 250 250

2.2.7. Meubles et équipements pour résidence 1 fois 1 1 600 600

2.2.8. Bicycletes 1 fois 2 1 150 300

2.3.1. Maintenance de bicyclettes Par trim 2 8 25 400

Sous total équipement 4 580

2.4 Activités

2.4.1. Mobilisation et réunions de demarrage 1 fois 1 1 100 100

2.4.2. Etude des lignes de base 1 fois 1 1 100 100

2.4.3. Formation des coordinateurs des GAF 1 fois 14 2 5 140

2.4.4. Formation et actions dans les GAFs, points d'eau etc. Par trim 7 6 120 5 040

2.4.5. Matériels de clubs de jeunes par ans 1 7 126 882

2.4.6. Semences et matériel pour clubs de fermiers par an 7 1 100 700

2.4.7. Matériel pour les différentes campagnes par village 7 6 30 1 260

2.4.8. Pépinière d'arbres par village 7 1 100 700

2.4.9. Démonstration culinaire GAF/trimestre 7 2 20 280

2.4.10. Primes pour volontaires Par trim 1 6 100 600

2.4.11.Transport local au projet et au réunions Mois 1 18 80 1 440

2.4.12. Fourniture Bureau par mois Trimestre 1 18 140 2 520

2.4.13. Renforcement de capacités des enseignants Par part. 1 3 150 450

2.4.13. Matériels d'alphabétisation Par part. 45 1 15 675

2.4.14. Evénement et certificat aux alphabétisés Apprenant 45 1 4 180

Total activités 15 067

3. Centre de Projet et visibilité

10

3.1. Location de centre du projet pour réunions et formation mois 1 18 250 4 500

3.2. Maintenance du centre, eau, groupe etc. mois 1 18 75 1 350

3.3. Communication, téléphone et internet mois 1 18 100 1 800

3.4. Carburant groupe electrogene Mois 1 18 80 1 440

3.5. Panneaux de visibilité par club 7 1 150 1 050

Total Centre du projet 10 140

Total des activités 52 727

Autres

4.1. Assist. Technique, S&E, comptabilité 10% par an 5 273

4.2. Formation de 2 enseignants à l'Ecole Normale DNS Par part. 2 2 2500 10 000

Grand Total 68 000



Appendix K: Cut-off Date

SRK Consultin

HARA/LIBB

Re

Co

Na

Mr

Lib

En

Ap

This

tran

the

ng: Project No: 4

eport No.

opy No.

ame/Title

r Christian Ngo

brary

nviro

pproval Signat

s report is p

nsmitted in a

copyright ho

492484: NYA RA

SRK R

oy

ure:

protected by

ny form or b

older, SRK.

AP

Report D

492484/RA

1

Company

NYA

SRK

SRK

copyright v

by any means

NYA RAP

Distrib

AP

y Cop

1

2

3

vested in SR

s whatsoeve

bution R

y Dat

Janu

Janu

Janu

RK (SA) (Pty

er to any pers

Record

e

uary 2016

uary 2016

uary 2016

y) Ltd. It ma

son without t

d

Authoris

Ms A Bron

Ms A Bron

Ms A Bron

ay not be re

the written p

Page 95

January 2016

sed by

n

n

n

produced or

permission of

5

r

f

Documents

· 2018-08-05 · SRK Consulting: Project No: 492484: NYA RAP Page i HARA/LIBB NYA RAP January 2016 Nyumba Ya Akiba Project: Resettlement Action Plan Nyumba Ya Akiba SARL SRK Consulting