Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2016 Second Quarter ResultsMaracay Homes – Pardee Homes – Quadrant Homes – Trendmaker Homes – TRI Pointe Homes – Winchester Homes
Forward Looking Statement
Various statements contained in this presentation, including those that express a belief, expectation or intention, as well asthose that are not statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may includeprojections and estimates concerning the timing and success of specific projects and our future production, land and lot sales, operational and financial results, financial condition, prospects, and capital spending. Our forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “potential,” “plan,” “goal,” “will,” or other words that convey future events or outcomes. The forward-looking statements in this presentation speak only as of the date of this presentation, and we disclaim any obligation to update these statements unless required by law, and we caution you not to rely on them unduly. These forward-looking statements are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory and other risks, contingencies and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. The following factors, among others, may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements: the effect of general economic conditions, including employment rates, housing starts, interest rate levels, availability of financing for home mortgages and strength of the U.S. dollar; market demand for our products, which is related to the strength of the various U.S. business segments and U.S. and international economic conditions; levels of competition; the successful execution of our internal performance plans, including restructuring and cost reduction initiatives; global economic conditions; raw material prices; energy prices; the effect of weather; the risk of loss from earthquakes, volcanoes, fires, floods, droughts, windstorms, hurricanes, pest infestations and other natural disasters; transportation costs; federal and state tax policies; the effect of land use, environment and other governmental regulations; legal proceedings; risks relating to any unforeseen changes to or effects on liabilities, future capital expenditures, revenues, expenses, earnings, synergies, indebtedness, financial condition, losses and future prospects; changes in accounting principles; our relationship, and actual and potential conflicts of interest, with Starwood Capital Group or its affiliates; and additional factors discussed under the sections captioned “Risk Factors” included in our annual and quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The foregoing list is not exhaustive. New risk factors may emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors or to assess the impact of such risk factors on our business. This presentation includes certain non-GAAP financial metrics, including adjusted homebuilding gross margin and net debt-to-capital. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered only as supplemental to, and not as superior to, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to the Supplemental Data and Reconciliation section of this presentation for areconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures included in this presentation to the most directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Management Team
3
Michael GrubbsChief Financial Officer
• Over 25 years of real estate and homebuilding experience
• Former SVP / CFO of William Lyon Homes
Douglas BauerChief Executive Officer
• Over 25 years of real estate and homebuilding experience
• Former President and COO of William Lyon Homes
Thomas Mitchell President & COO
• Over 25 years of real estate and homebuilding experience
• Former EVP and Southern California Regional President at William Lyon Homes
Working together for over 20 years, TRI Pointe senior management has significant experience running a large, geographically diverse, growth-oriented public homebuilder. Deep managerial talent at each operating division with key local relationships supports dynamic tailored growth strategies.
A Family of Regional Homebuilders
A Family of Regional Homebuilders
LTM Orders: 4,156 LTM Deliveries: 4,356
LTM Home Sales (“HS”) Revenue: $2,469,741 LTM Average Sales Price (“ASP”): $567
Lots Owned or Controlled: 27,680 2018 Goal: 5,100 – 5,400 Annual Deliveries
Market: Greater Puget Sound AreaLTM Orders: 400 LTM Deliveries: 428LTM HS Revenue: $201,933 LTM ASP: $472Lots Owned or Controlled: 1,4162018 Goal: 400 Annual Deliveries
Markets: Los Angeles/Ventura, Inland Empire, San Diego, Las VegasLTM Orders: 1,176 LTM Deliveries: 1,246LTM HS Revenue: $707,806 LTM ASP: $568Lots Owned or Controlled: 16,3262018 Goal: 1,400 – 1,500 Annual Deliveries
Markets: Orange County, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco Bay Area, DenverLTM Orders: 1,050 LTM Deliveries: 1,165LTM HS Revenue: $821,378 LTM ASP: $705Lots Owned or Controlled: 3,7302018 Goal: 1,400 – 1,550 Annual Deliveries
Markets: Phoenix, TucsonLTM Orders: 625 LTM Deliveries: 539LTM HS Revenue: $212,888 LTM ASP: $395Lots Owned or Controlled: 2,2292018 Goal: 700 Annual Deliveries
Markets: Houston, AustinLTM Orders: 456 LTM Deliveries: 522LTM HS Revenue: $261,813LTM ASP: $502Lots Owned or Controlled: 1,7832018 Goal: 700 – 750 Annual Deliveries
Markets: Washington DCLTM Orders: 449LTM Deliveries: 456LTM HS Revenue: $263,923 LTM ASP: $579Lots Owned or Controlled: 2,1962018 Goal: 500 Annual Deliveries
Data as of June 30, 2016Note: Dollars in thousands
2016 Second Quarter Highlights
2016 Second Quarter Highlights
• Strong absorption rate of over 3.5 new home orders per community per month
• New home deliveries up 25% to 994 with an average sales price of $560K
• Home sales revenue up 30% to $557MM
• Homebuilding gross margin of 22.3%
• Adj. homebuilding gross margin of 24.4% (1)
• Land and lot sales revenue of $67MM generating $53MM in profit
• SG&A expense improved to 11.3% of home sales revenue compared to 12.6% last year
• Net income available to common stockholders of $73.9M, or $0.46 per diluted share vs. $54.9M or $0.34 per diluted share Q2 2015
• Repurchased 1,253,021 shares for $14.7MM at an average price of $11.73 per share
6(1) See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” in the appendix of this presentation
Metric 2Q 2016 2Q 2015 % Change
Orders 1,258 1,238 2%
Deliveries 994 798 25%
ASP ($000s) $560K $535K 5%
Backlog (units) 1,798 1,998 -10%
Home Sales
Revenue ($mm)$557 $427 30%
HB Gross Margin 22.3% 20.0% +230 bps
Land and Lot Sales
Revenue ($mm)$67 $67 0%
Land and Lot Sales
Profit ($mm)$53 $56 -5%
SG&A Expense
(% of sales)11.3% 12.6% -130 bps
EPS (Diluted) $0.46 $0.34 35.3%
Arizona15%
California28%
Maryland6%
Nevada10%
Colorado5%
Texas24%
Virginia6%
Washington6%
Active Selling Communities and Absorption Rate
7
122117
3.53.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
2015 2016
Communities Absorption Rate
Active Selling Communities and Absorption RateAs of and for the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
Communities by StateAs of June 30, 2016
Opened 10 new communities and closed 18 in 2Q16
De
cre
ase
4%
YO
Y
Arizona15%
California43%Maryland
6%
Nevada11%
Colorado3%
Texas11%
Virginia4%
Washington7%
New Home Orders – Q2 2016 Results
8
1,238 1,258
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
2015 2016
Incr
eas
e 2
% Y
OY
Second Quarter - New Home OrdersFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
Orders by StateFor the quarter ended June 30, 2016
Arizona15%
California44%Maryland
6%
Nevada7%
Colorado4%
Texas9%
Virginia5%
Washington10%
Backlog – Units and Dollar Value
9
Backlog – Units and Dollar ValueAs of June 30, 2015 and 2016 (dollars in thousands)
Dollar Value by StateAs of June 30, 2016
1,998
1,798
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Units
$1,199,847
$1,026,219
$-
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$ Value
2015
2016
$601K $571KAverage Sales Price
in Backlog
De
cre
ase
10
% Y
OY
De
cre
ase
14
% Y
OY
Arizona12%
California37%
Maryland7%
Nevada12%
Colorado5%
Texas13%
Virginia4%
Washington10%
New Home Deliveries – Q2 2016 Results
10
Deliveries by StateFor the quarter ended June 30, 2016
New Home DeliveriesAs of and for the quarters ended June30, 2015 and 2016
798
994
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2015 2016
51% 65%Backlog Conversion Ratio
Incr
eas
e 2
5%
YO
Y
Arizona9%
California47%
Maryland6%
Nevada8%
Colorado4%
Texas11%
Virginia5%
Washington10%
Home Sales Revenue – Q2 2016 Results
11
$427,238
$556,925
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
2015 2016
Home Sales RevenueFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016 (dollars in thousands)
Home Sales Revenue by StateFor the quarter ended June 30, 2016
$535K $560KAverage Sales Price of Deliveries
Incr
eas
e 3
0%
YO
Y
SG&A Expenses– Q2 2016 Results
12
$53,895
$62,717
$25,634
$32,448
$28,261$30,269
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
2015 2016
SG&A
S&M
G&A
Selling General and Administrative ExpensesFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
12.6% 11.3%SG&A as a % of Home Sales Revenue
Incr
eas
e 1
6%
YO
Y
$87,002
$116,106
$54,930
$75,339
$0.34
$0.46
$0.00
$0.05
$0.10
$0.15
$0.20
$0.25
$0.30
$0.35
$0.40
$0.45
$0.50
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
2015 2016
Inc Before Taxes Net Income EPS
Income before Taxes, Net Income available to Common Stockholders and EPS (Diluted)For the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
Incr
eas
e 3
7%
YO
Y
Incr
eas
e 3
3%
YO
Y
Orders, Deliveries and Absorption Rate year over year comparisons for the Second Quarter 2016 by Segment
(Includes breakout by state for Pardee Homes and TRI Pointe Homes brands)
184191
91
120
3.4
3.4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
2Q15 2Q16Orders Deliveries Absorption
Orders, Deliveries and Absorption RateFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
2Q15 2Q16$369K $399KAverage Sales Price of Deliveries
14
Orders, Deliveries and Absorption RateFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
2Q15 2Q16$410K $521KAverage Sales Price of Deliveries
Incr
eas
e 3
2%
YO
Y
Incr
eas
e 4
% Y
OY
116
9287
1053.6 3.4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2Q15 2Q16Orders Deliveries Absorption
De
cre
ase
21
% Y
OY
Incr
eas
e 2
1%
YO
Y
124133
123 126
1.6 1.6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2Q15 2Q16Orders Deliveries Absorption
Orders, Deliveries and Absorption RateFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
15
2Q15 2Q16$526K $502KAverage Sales Price of Deliveries
Orders, Deliveries and Absorption RateFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
2Q15 2Q16$649K $553KAverage Sales Price of Deliveries
Incr
eas
e 7
% Y
OY
Incr
eas
e 2
% Y
OY
94
123
81
108
2.2
3.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2Q15 2Q16Orders Deliveries Absorption
Incr
eas
e 3
3%
YO
Y
Incr
eas
e 3
1%
YO
Y
254
201
157
200
6.4
6.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2Q15 2Q16Orders Deliveries Absorption
Orders, Deliveries and Absorption RateFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
16
2Q15 2Q16$489K $681KAverage Sales Price of Deliveries
Orders, Deliveries and Absorption RateFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
2Q15 2Q16$394K $359K
Average Sales Price of Deliveries
California
De
cre
ase
21
% Y
OY
Incr
eas
e 2
7%
YO
Y
101
139
85
118
3.4
4.1
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2Q15 2Q16Orders Deliveries Absorption
Nevada
Incr
eas
e 3
8%
YO
Y
Incr
eas
e 3
9%
YO
Y
305
346
130
167
5.0
4.9
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2Q15 2Q16Orders Deliveries Absorption
Orders, Deliveries and Absorption RateFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
17
2Q15 2Q16$844K $763KAverage Sales Price of Deliveries
Orders, Deliveries and Absorption RateFor the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2016
2Q15 2Q16$472K $509KAverage Sales Price of Deliveries
California
Incr
eas
e 1
3%
YO
Y
Incr
eas
e 2
8%
YO
Y
Colorado
60
33
44
50
3.2
2.3
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2Q15 2Q16
Orders Deliveries Absorption
Incr
eas
e 1
4%
YO
Y
De
cre
ase
45
% Y
OY
2016 Outlook
Third Quarter and Full Year 2016 Outlook
19
Third Quarter
• Anticipate opening 16 new communities and closing out of 12, resulting in 121 active selling communities as of September 30, 2016
• Anticipate delivering approximately 55% of the 1,798 homes in backlog as of June 30, 2016
• Anticipate homebuilding gross margins on deliveries in 3Q16 to be approximately 20.0%
Full Year 2016
• Expect to grow active selling communities by 20% for the full year
• Anticipate delivering between 4,200 and 4,400 homes at an average sales price of $550,000
• Anticipated homebuilding gross margins for the full year to a range of 20.5% to 21.5%
• Anticipate SG&A expenses as a percentage of home sales revenue to a range of 10.3% to 10.5%
See Forward Looking Statement disclosure on page 2 of the presentation
Land Supply
Orders by Month
Debt
Significant Land Supply to Fuel Growth
Combined Lot Position
Market Owned Controlled Total Lots % Owned Inventory Dollars LTM DeliveriesImplied Years of Supply (1)
California 16,888 392 17,280 98% $1,624,349 1,797 9.6
Colorado 505 331 836 60% $73,626 204 4.1
Washington, D.C. (2) 1,916 280 2,196 87% $261,793 456 4.8
Arizona 1,491 738 2,229 67% $225,280 539 4.1
Nevada 1,768 172 1,940 91% $233,878 410 4.7
Texas 1,321 462 1,783 74% $215,310 522 3.4
Washington 1,008 408 1,416 71% $205,977 428 3.3
Total 24,897 2,783 27,680 90% $2,840,213 4,356 6.4
As of June 30, 2016
California62%
Colorado3%
Washington, D.C. (2)8%
Arizona8%
Nevada7%
Texas7%
Washington5%
Total Lots
(1) Based on last twelve months’ deliveries as of June 30, 2016(2) Includes lots in the greater Washington D.C. area. Note: Dollars in thousands
California57%
Colorado3%
Washington, D.C. (1)9%
Arizona8%
Nevada8%
Texas8%
Washington7%
Inventory Dollars
21
New Home Orders – 2015 vs 2016 (through June)
22
324
415
455
410
457
371355
367
274
318
227208
322
409 418
477
425
356
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2015
2016
2016 - 2.98 3.57 3.45 3.89 3.60 3.06
2015 - 2.96 3.67 3.91 3.47 3.82 3.05 2.91 2.97 2.29 2.76 1.98 1.92
Absorption Rate = Orders per Month per Community
Selected Balance Sheet Metrics
23
$450
$300
$450
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
4.375% Senior Notes 4.875% Senior Notes 5.875% Senior Notes
• During the second quarter, the Company increased its total commitments under our unsecured revolving credit facility to $625 million from $550 million. In addition, the Company issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due 2021.
$ in thousands 6/30/2016 12/31/2015
Cash and cash equivalents $ 117,509 $ 214,485
Real estate inventories $ 2,840,213 $ 2,519,273
Total Debt $ 1,282,872 $ 1,170,505
Total Stockholders' equity $ 1,757,301 $ 1,664,683
Debt-to-capitalNet debt-to-capital(1)
42.2%39.9%
41.3%36.5%
Selected Balance Sheet Metrics
Debt Maturities (in millions)
(1) See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” in the Company’s press release
Supplemental Data and Reconciliation
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures(unaudited)
25
In this presentation, we utilize certain financial measures that are non-GAAP financial measures as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We present these measures because we believe they and similar measures are useful to management and investors in evaluating the Company’s operating performance and financing structure. We also believe these measures facilitate the comparison of our operating performance and financing structure with other companies in our industry. Because these measures are not calculated inaccordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), they may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
The following table reconciles homebuilding gross margin percentage, as reported and prepared in accordance with GAAP, to the non-GAAP measure adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage. We believe this information is meaningful as it isolates the impact that leverage has on homebuilding gross margin and permits investors to make better comparisons with our competitors, who adjust gross margins in a similar fashion.
Three Months Ended June 30,
2016 % 2015 %
(dollars in thousands)
Home sales revenue $ 556,925 100.0 % $ 427,238 100.0 %
Cost of home sales 432,738 77.7 % 341,742 80.0 %
Homebuilding gross margin 124,187 22.3 % 85,496 20.0 %
Add: interest in cost of home sales 11,438 2.1 % 7,640 1.8 %
Add: impairments and lot option abandonments 107 0.0 % 882 0.2 %
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin $ 135,732 24.4 % $ 94,018 22.0 %
Homebuilding gross margin percentage 22.3 % 20.0 %
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage 24.4 % 22.0 %
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures (cont’d)(unaudited)
26
The following table reconciles the Company’s ratio of debt-to-capital to the ratio of net debt-to-capital. We believe that the ratio of net debt-to-capital is a relevant financial measure for management and investors to understand the leverage employed in our operations and as an indicator of the Company’s ability to obtain financing.
June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Unsecured revolving credit facility $ 100,000 $ 299,392
Seller financed loans 17,758 2,434
Senior notes 1,165,114 868,679
Total debt 1,282,872 1,170,505
Stockholders’ equity 1,757,301 1,664,683
Total capital $ 3,040,173 $ 2,835,188
Ratio of debt-to-capital(1) 42.2 % 41.3 %
Total debt $ 1,282,872 $ 1,170,505
Less: Cash and cash equivalents (117,509 ) (214,485 )
Net debt 1,165,363 956,020
Stockholders’ equity 1,757,301 1,664,683
Total capital $ 2,922,664 $ 2,620,703
Ratio of net debt-to-capital(2) 39.9 % 36.5 %
__________ (1) The ratio of debt-to-capital is computed as the quotient obtained by dividing debt by the sum of debt plus equity.
(2) The ratio of net debt-to-capital is computed as the quotient obtained by dividing net debt (which is debt less cash and cash equivalents)
by the sum of net debt plus equity. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is the ratio of debt-to-capital.