Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotton Variety Testing Results
Cooperative ExtensionAgricultural Experiment Station
The University of Arizona, TucsonU.S. Department of Agriculture
2016
2 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
3 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotton Variety Testing Results2016
IntroductionVariety selection is one of the most important decisions a grower will make contributing to the success
of a cotton crop. It is critical, that a grower have as much information as possible in order to make an informed decision regarding variety selection.
In an effort to help supply reliable variety performance information, the University of Arizona conducts a statewide Upland cotton variety testing program. This program consists of a few different types of trials. The first is a small plot evaluation of commercially available varieties along with experimental varieties, and is conducted in 3 locations across Arizona including; Yuma, Maricopa, and Safford. This testing program is called the University of Arizona Upland Cotton Advanced Strains Testing Program.
Another type of University sponsored trial is a large plot, replicated strip trial conducted on grower cooperator farms in a wide variety of locations across Arizona. These large plot strip trials consist of replicated plots extending the full length of the irrigation run at each location. This program is titled the University of Arizona Upland Cotton Variety Testing Program (UCVT). Eight locations across the state were conducted in 2016.
The table found below contains location, planting date, early and mid-season data collection dates, final irrigation date, initial defoliation date, harvest date, soil type, and irrigation technique, for each of the trials conducted across Arizona in 2016. The remainder of the tables in this publication contain yield and fiber quality data for each of the locations. Statistical analysis for all parameters is presented at the bottom of each table. Included this year are early season data of stand count and vigor ratings along with mid-season data including plant height and nodes above white flower (NAWF) collected at early to mid bloom. For each location of the UCVT trial a figure plotting lint yield as a function of fiber premium/discount is presented. The vertical line represents the average of the trial for fiber premium and the horizontal line represents the trial average for yield. Any varieties falling in the upper right quadrant performed better than average for both lint yield and fiber quality at that location. If you have any questions regarding these trials or this publication please direct them to Dr. Randy Norton, Regional Extension Specialist and Director of the Safford Ag Center at [email protected].
The work performed over the course of the 2016 cotton season to produce the results contained in this booklet was funded in part by Cotton Incorporated through the Arizona Cotton Growers Association and also by participating seed companies.
Team membersRandy Norton, editorRegional Extension SpecialistAyman MostafaAssistant Area Agent, Agriculture, Maricopa County
4 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Loca
tion
and
agro
nom
ic in
form
atio
n fo
r the
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ariz
ona
Upl
and
Cot
ton
Adva
nced
Stra
in T
estin
g Pr
ogra
m, 2
016.
Loca
tion
Elev
ation
Latit
ude
Long
itude
Plan
ting
Date
Early
Sea
son
Data
Mid
-Sea
son
Data
Fina
l Irr
igati
onDe
folia
tion
Date
Harv
est D
ate
Soil
Type
Irrig
ation
Tech
niqu
eYu
ma
121
32.7
09-1
14.7
055/
17/2
016
6/7/
2016
7/7/
2016
10/5
/201
611
/15/
2016
12/1
9/20
16Ga
dsde
n Cl
ayFu
rrow
Mar
icop
a11
9133
.063
-111
.971
4/26
/201
66/
13/2
016
7/14
/201
69/
8/20
1610
/28/
2016
11/2
8/20
16Ca
sa G
rand
e Sa
ndy
Clay
Loa
mFu
rrow
Saffo
rd29
6032
.813
-109
.679
5/5/
2016
6/6/
2016
7/6/
2016
9/6/
2016
10/2
3/20
1611
/17/
2016
Grab
e Cl
ay L
oam
Furr
ow
Loca
tion
and
agro
nom
ic in
form
atio
n fo
r the
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ariz
ona
Upl
and
Cot
ton
Varie
ty T
estin
g (U
CVT
) Pro
gram
, 201
6.
Loca
tion
Elev
ation
Latit
ude
Long
itude
Plan
ting
Date
Early
Sea
son
Data
Mid
-Sea
son
Data
Fina
l Irr
igati
onDe
folia
tion
Date
Harv
est D
ate
Soil
Type
Irrig
ation
Tech
niqu
eYu
ma
111
32.6
42-1
14.6
763/
16/2
016
4/19
/201
6---
8/2/
2016
9/2/
2016
9/21
/201
6Cl
ayFu
rrow
Good
year
923
33.4
02-1
12.3
805/
26/2
016
---8/
10/2
016
9/15
/201
610
/27/
2016
12/1
/201
6Lo
amFl
ood
Eloy
1498
32.8
41-1
11.5
025/
11/2
016
6/2/
2016
7/19
/201
69/
20/2
016
11/1
5/20
1612
/13/
2016
Sand
y Lo
amFu
rrow
Que
en C
reek
1548
33.1
69-1
11.4
974/
15/2
016
6/2/
2016
6/29
/201
69/
12/2
016
10/2
1/20
1611
/15/
2016
Loam
Furr
owRe
d Ro
ck18
5132
.545
-111
.357
5/5/
2016
6/2/
2016
7/19
/201
69/
12/2
016
10/2
4/20
1611
/14/
2016
Sand
y Lo
amFu
rrow
Mar
ana
2011
32.4
38-1
11.1
954/
19/2
016
6/2/
2016
7/14
/201
69/
15/2
016
10/3
/201
610
/17/
2016
Sand
y Lo
amFu
rrow
That
cher
2872
32.8
60-1
09.7
724/
29/2
016
6/14
/201
67/
20/2
016
9/16
/201
610
/3/2
016
10/2
1/20
16Cl
ay L
oam
Subs
urfa
ce D
ripW
illco
x40
7932
.012
-109
.080
4/14
/201
66/
15/2
016
7/28
/201
69/
4/20
1610
/15/
2016
11/7
/201
6Si
lty C
lay
Loam
Cent
er P
ivot
5 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Yiel
d an
d fib
er q
ualit
y da
ta fo
r the
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ariz
ona
Upl
and
Cot
ton
Adva
nced
Stra
in T
estin
g Pr
ogra
m, Y
uma,
AZ
2016
.
See
d C
ompa
nyVa
riety
Lint
Yie
ld (l
bs/
acre
)Yi
eld
Mea
ns
Sep
arat
ion*
Per
cent
Li
ntC
olor
G
rade
Sta
ple
(32n
ds)
Mic
ro-
naire
Stre
ngth
(g
/tex)
Leng
th
(in.)
Leaf
G
rade
Uni
form
ity
Inde
x (%
)P
rem
ium
(c
ents
/lb)
Valu
e**
($/a
cre)
Am
eric
ot/N
exG
enA
MX
1601
B2X
F1,
943.
3a
43.2
3139
5.2
36.9
1.21
383
.72.
2$1
,054
.81
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1725
B2X
F1,
671.
2b
44.6
3139
4.8
34.1
1.22
381
.24.
3$9
40.6
4M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
neD
P15
49B
2XF
1,59
4.0
bc41
.031
394.
735
.31.
203
81.1
4.3
$896
.70
Pre
miu
m C
otto
n G
enet
ics
0708
-806
-W90
31,
496.
2bc
d37
.031
385.
135
.11.
203
81.9
2.2
$810
.59
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1044
B2R
F1,
488.
9bc
d38
.731
385.
134
.31.
193
81.0
1.6
$796
.96
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
15R
556B
2XF
1,48
0.2
bcd
47.7
3139
5.0
36.5
1.21
382
.53.
1$8
13.5
7A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
NG
5007
B2X
F1,
466.
3bc
d41
.931
394.
632
.31.
213
80.3
3.5
$814
.30
Am
eric
ot/N
exG
enN
G34
06B
2XF
1,36
7.3
cde
42.3
3137
4.9
32.1
1.15
382
.42.
9$7
50.4
9B
ayer
FM19
53G
LTP
1,36
5.3
cde
41.1
3139
5.0
34.0
1.20
382
.12.
8$7
47.3
4M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
ne16
R23
2B2X
F1,
353.
9cd
e41
.231
415.
138
.21.
263
81.3
2.2
$732
.53
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
228N
RB
2XF
1,32
3.3
def
46.3
3140
4.8
35.0
1.24
381
.53.
4$7
31.6
2M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
ne16
R25
2NR
B2X
F1,
308.
2de
fg42
.931
395.
135
.01.
213
82.2
2.6
$713
.02
Bay
er/F
iber
Max
FM18
30G
LT1,
302.
5de
fg41
.731
385.
034
.71.
203
83.3
3.2
$718
.96
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
225N
RB
2XF
1,29
4.1
defg
46.8
3139
4.8
34.7
1.23
381
.73.
4$7
14.2
3M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
ne16
R24
2NR
B2X
F1,
262.
1de
fgh
41.6
3139
5.2
37.8
1.23
381
.61.
7$6
77.8
8B
ayer
BX
1737
GLT
1,17
1.3
efgh
i40
.031
395.
133
.21.
213
81.6
1.7
$628
.51
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
229B
2XF
1,14
8.2
efgh
ij41
.131
364.
932
.91.
133
81.6
2.9
$629
.37
Am
eric
ot/N
exG
enN
G45
45B
2XF
1,13
1.0
efgh
ijk39
.831
384.
635
.01.
203
81.8
4.7
$641
.27
Bay
erB
X17
75G
LTP
1,11
0.0
fghi
jk39
.031
394.
733
.71.
233
81.7
4.3
$624
.37
Bay
er/S
tone
ville
ST4
949G
LT1,
105.
0fg
hijk
42.4
3138
4.9
34.1
1.20
382
.13.
6$6
13.1
2B
ayer
ST5
020G
LT1,
104.
5fg
hijk
42.0
3139
4.8
35.3
1.21
381
.23.
3$6
10.9
4B
ayer
/Sto
nevi
lleS
T494
6GLB
21,
093.
7fg
hijk
42.5
3138
4.8
35.4
1.18
381
.73.
6$6
09.7
3P
rem
ium
Cot
ton
Gen
etic
s07
13-8
06-W
903
1,08
0.0
ghijk
35.6
3139
5.1
35.6
1.22
381
.13.
0$5
93.3
7M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
neD
P17
47N
RB
2XF
1,04
1.2
hijk
45.3
3138
5.2
35.1
1.19
382
.02.
6$5
68.5
7A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
NG
3517
B2X
F1,
019.
1ijk
38.7
3138
4.4
34.5
1.20
381
.33.
8$5
67.7
5A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
NG
3500
XF
991.
1ijk
l42
.331
384.
835
.61.
203
82.2
3.6
$550
.10
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
251N
RB
2XF
978.
7ijk
l46
.431
404.
735
.91.
253
81.3
4.3
$550
.89
Pre
miu
m C
otto
n G
enet
ics
0708
-808
-W90
596
5.0
ijkl
33.3
3138
4.8
34.3
1.20
381
.53.
3$5
34.3
4P
rem
ium
Cot
ton
Gen
etic
s07
10-8
06-W
904
946.
1ijk
l33
.831
365.
234
.31.
143
82.2
2.0
$510
.36
Bay
erB
X17
33G
LT94
5.8
ijkl
41.2
3137
4.9
33.6
1.17
381
.82.
7$5
18.2
6P
rem
ium
Cot
ton
Gen
etic
s07
02-8
05-W
901
907.
0jk
l32
.231
404.
838
.51.
253
81.3
3.9
$507
.22
Bay
erB
X17
74G
LTP
904.
6kl
38.4
3138
4.7
32.6
1.19
382
.44.
7$5
12.5
2B
ayer
BX
1739
GLT
755.
4l
42.1
3139
5.1
35.0
1.22
381
.32.
6$4
11.2
9Av
erag
e1,
213.
541
.1--
-38
4.9
34.8
1.20
---
81.7
3.1
$668
.49
LSD
§24
2.9
2.4
---
10.
42.
20.
03--
-N
SN
S$1
31.9
2O
SL†
<0.0
001
<0.0
001
---
<0.0
001
0.00
5<0
.000
1<0
.000
1--
-0.
558
0.08
6<0
.000
1C
V‡
14.2
4.2
---
2.1
6.1
4.5
1.8
---
1.7
45.5
14.0
*Mea
ns fo
llow
ed b
y th
e sa
me
lette
r are
not
sig
nific
antly
diff
eren
t by
Fish
er’s
Pro
tect
ed L
SD
at α
= 0
.05.
**
Valu
e ca
lcul
ated
from
CC
C lo
an s
ched
ule
base
pric
e of
$0.
52/lb
+ p
rem
ium
/dis
coun
t§
Leas
t Sig
nific
ant D
iffer
ence
† O
bser
ved
Sig
nific
ance
Lev
el‡
Coe
ffici
ent o
f Var
iatio
n
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16
6 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Varie
tyPl
ant P
opul
ation
(p
lant
s/fo
ot)
Plan
t Vig
or R
ating
(0
-9 L
-H)
Plan
t Hei
ght
(inch
es)
Nod
es A
bove
Whi
te
Flow
er (N
AWF)
0702
-805
-W90
13.
67.
355
.45.
307
08-8
06-W
903
3.1
8.0
49.3
4.9
0708
-808
-W90
53.
67.
356
.05.
407
10-8
06-W
904
3.5
7.7
52.1
4.5
0713
-806
-W90
33.
67.
054
.86.
215
R556
B2XF
2.4
4.7
52.3
4.8
16R2
25N
RB2X
F2.
66.
052
.46.
316
R228
NRB
2XF
2.7
5.3
51.2
5.6
16R2
29B2
XF2.
55.
350
.35.
616
R232
B2XF
3.3
7.3
59.0
5.9
16R2
42N
RB2X
F3.
26.
351
.35.
216
R251
NRB
2XF
3.1
6.0
51.2
5.4
16R2
52N
RB2X
F3.
26.
754
.25.
8AM
X160
1B2X
F2.
45.
349
.64.
7BX
1733
GLT
3.2
6.7
49.8
5.4
BX17
37GL
T3.
47.
352
.24.
9BX
1739
GLT
2.7
6.0
56.6
5.7
BX17
74GL
TP3.
56.
749
.34.
7BX
1775
GLTP
3.8
7.7
53.4
5.3
DP10
44B2
RF3.
46.
750
.05.
4DP
1549
B2XF
3.2
6.7
54.5
5.9
DP17
25B2
XF3.
06.
052
.55.
1DP
1747
NRB
2XF
2.6
6.0
52.5
5.6
FM18
30GL
T2.
95.
350
.95.
1FM
1953
GLTP
3.7
7.3
50.2
5.7
NG3
406B
2XF
3.3
7.3
53.1
5.0
NG3
500X
F3.
57.
050
.85.
2N
G351
7B2X
F3.
37.
053
.54.
8N
G454
5B2X
F2.
96.
354
.75.
3N
G500
7B2X
F2.
66.
052
.05.
7ST
4946
GLB2
3.1
6.3
49.7
4.6
ST49
49GL
T1.
84.
754
.15.
0ST
5020
GLT
3.4
7.0
51.4
5.0
Mea
n3.
16.
552
.55.
3
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Ad
vanc
ed S
train
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Yum
a, A
Z 20
16.
7 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Yi
eld
and
fiber
qua
lity
data
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Ad
vanc
ed S
train
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Mar
icop
a, A
Z 20
16.
See
d C
ompa
nyVa
riety
Lint
Yie
ld
(lbs/
acre
)Yi
eld
Mea
ns
Sep
arat
ion*
Per
cent
Li
ntC
olor
G
rade
Sta
ple
(32n
ds)
Mic
rona
ireS
treng
th
(g/te
x)Le
ngth
(in
.)Le
af
Gra
deU
nifo
rmity
In
dex
(%)
Pre
miu
m
(cen
ts/lb
)Va
lue*
* ($
/ac
re)
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
252N
RB
2XF
2,68
9.0
a43
.031
385.
133
.61.
163
81.5
2.3
$1,4
60.4
1M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
ne16
R22
8NR
B2X
F2,
667.
6a
44.0
3140
4.9
35.5
1.24
381
.43.
6$1
,484
.57
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1549
B2X
F2,
648.
1a
39.9
3138
4.5
34.8
1.20
380
.33.
4$1
,467
.74
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1747
NR
B2X
F2,
565.
0ab
44.0
3138
4.8
34.4
1.19
380
.43.
9$1
,433
.71
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
225N
RB
2XF
2,52
0.4
abc
43.8
3139
4.7
35.7
1.23
380
.83.
8$1
,404
.86
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
229B
2XF
2,46
9.5
abcd
41.7
3137
5.2
32.8
1.14
380
.91.
4$1
,318
.87
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1725
B2X
F2,
396.
3bc
de42
.531
385.
032
.21.
193
79.7
2.6
$1,3
07.2
5M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
neD
P10
44B
2RF
2,37
7.2
bcde
f38
.331
385.
034
.21.
193
81.0
3.2
$1,3
10.4
6M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
ne16
R23
2B2X
F2,
375.
7bc
def
37.1
3140
5.0
36.2
1.24
380
.93.
8$1
,324
.13
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
15R
556B
2XF
2,36
2.7
bcde
f44
.931
384.
633
.91.
203
80.8
4.5
$1,3
34.9
7B
ayer
BX
1733
GLT
2,34
9.1
bcde
fg39
.231
394.
734
.91.
223
79.6
3.8
$1,3
10.7
9B
ayer
ST4
949G
LT2,
344.
0bc
defg
h42
.831
375.
033
.41.
173
81.3
3.5
$1,2
98.8
4B
ayer
/Fib
erM
axFM
1830
GLT
2,32
6.0
cdef
gh41
.031
395.
034
.71.
233
80.6
3.2
$1,2
82.3
1A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
NG
5007
B2X
F2,
311.
2cd
efgh
i41
.731
394.
831
.91.
203
79.9
3.8
$1,2
90.1
5P
rem
ium
Cot
ton
Gen
etic
sP
CG
612
2,28
0.7
defg
hij
37.9
3138
5.4
35.2
1.19
380
.50.
7$1
,200
.40
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
242N
RB
2XF
2,26
8.0
defg
hij
40.5
3140
5.0
38.9
1.24
380
.82.
6$1
,238
.46
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
251N
RB
2XF
2,24
8.0
efgh
ij42
.631
404.
733
.41.
243
79.6
3.3
$1,2
41.4
3A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
AM
X16
01B
2XF
2,21
0.5
efgh
ijk41
.931
395.
035
.11.
203
81.0
3.3
$1,2
23.4
6B
ayer
ST5
020G
LT2,
198.
3ef
ghijk
40.2
3139
5.0
34.9
1.22
380
.33.
0$1
,207
.99
Pre
miu
m C
otto
n G
enet
ics
0713
-806
-W90
32,
189.
2ef
ghijk
36.8
3139
5.1
35.5
1.21
380
.81.
5$1
,169
.49
Am
eric
ot/N
exG
enN
G34
06B
2XF
2,17
1.7
fghi
jk39
.931
374.
932
.61.
163
82.2
3.7
$1,2
08.9
0P
rem
ium
Cot
ton
Gen
etic
sP
CG
604
2,13
6.5
ghijk
38.4
3139
4.7
35.3
1.23
380
.44.
0$1
,195
.34
Bay
erB
X17
37G
LT2,
123.
3hi
jkl
38.8
3139
4.6
32.9
1.23
380
.14.
0$1
,189
.65
Pre
miu
m C
otto
n G
enet
ics
PC
G60
52,
097.
3ijk
lm35
.831
395.
335
.51.
223
80.7
1.2
$1,1
16.1
3P
rem
ium
Cot
ton
Gen
etic
s07
13-8
09-W
904
2,09
2.5
ijklm
38.1
3138
5.4
34.3
1.19
380
.10.
6$1
,100
.46
Bay
erB
X17
75G
LTP
2,07
5.8
jklm
n39
.931
394.
732
.81.
223
80.3
3.3
$1,1
46.0
8A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
NG
4545
B2X
F1,
994.
5kl
mno
39.7
3138
4.7
34.4
1.19
380
.54.
1$1
,118
.58
Bay
erB
X17
76G
LTP
1,91
0.3
lmno
p38
.531
384.
932
.31.
193
80.4
3.5
$1,0
59.6
7B
ayer
BX
1774
GLT
P1,
895.
1nm
opq
38.5
3139
4.6
33.9
1.21
380
.34.
1$1
,062
.82
Pre
miu
m C
otto
n G
enet
ics
PC
G61
51,
862.
5no
pq36
.531
405.
234
.91.
243
81.1
1.7
$999
.42
Bay
erFM
1953
GLT
P1,
815.
2op
q38
.631
394.
534
.01.
223
80.1
4.0
$1,0
16.1
0A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
NG
3517
B2X
F1,
748.
4pq
37.6
3139
4.5
36.0
1.23
380
.84.
1$9
81.3
3A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
NG
3500
XF
1,69
7.6
pq39
.431
394.
836
.41.
213
81.1
3.8
$945
.52
Bay
erB
X17
39G
LT1,
683.
6q
42.4
3140
4.8
34.0
1.24
378
.92.
6$9
18.8
9Av
erag
e2,
208.
840
.2--
-39
4.9
34.4
1.21
---
80.6
3.1
$1,2
16.7
4LS
D§
221.
41.
7--
-1
0.3
1.7
0.04
---
1.0
1.50
$120
.36
OS
L†<0
.000
1<0
.000
1--
-<0
.000
1<0
.000
1<0
.000
1<0
.000
1--
-<0
.000
1<0
.000
1<0
.000
1C
V‡
7.1
3.0
---
2.4
4.8
3.5
2.2
---
0.9
34.3
7.1
*Mea
ns fo
llow
ed b
y th
e sa
me
lette
r are
not
sig
nific
antly
diff
eren
t by
Fish
er’s
Pro
tect
ed L
SD
at α
= 0
.05.
**
Valu
e ca
lcul
ated
from
CC
C lo
an s
ched
ule
base
pric
e of
$0.
52/lb
+ p
rem
ium
/dis
coun
t§
Leas
t Sig
nific
ant D
iffer
ence
† O
bser
ved
Sig
nific
ance
Lev
el‡
Coe
ffici
ent o
f Var
iatio
n
8 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Ad
vanc
ed S
train
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Mar
icop
a, A
Z 20
16.
Varie
tyPl
ant P
opul
ation
(p
lant
s/fo
ot)
Plan
t Vig
or R
ating
(0
-9 L
-H)
Plan
t Hei
ght
(inch
es)
Nod
es A
bove
Whi
te
Flow
er (N
AWF)
0713
-806
-W90
35.
05.
328
.86.
007
13-8
09-W
904
4.8
5.3
31.1
5.9
15R5
56B2
XF4.
44.
528
.75.
816
R225
NRB
2XF
4.2
4.8
27.0
5.9
16R2
28N
RB2X
F4.
24.
029
.66.
216
R229
B2XF
4.1
3.8
29.7
6.6
16R2
32B2
XF4.
74.
530
.65.
916
R242
NRB
2XF
4.5
5.0
29.9
5.8
16R2
51N
RB2X
F3.
63.
328
.96.
716
R252
NRB
2XF
3.7
4.3
30.8
5.8
AMX1
601B
2XF
4.6
4.0
28.2
5.8
BX17
33GL
T4.
95.
330
.75.
8BX
1737
GLT
4.9
5.3
28.1
6.1
BX17
39GL
T4.
65.
329
.36.
5BX
1774
GLTP
4.5
5.0
28.2
5.9
BX17
75GL
TP5.
25.
527
.76.
0BX
1776
GLTP
5.1
6.3
27.1
6.7
DP10
44B2
RF4.
14.
029
.06.
0DP
1549
B2XF
4.6
5.3
29.6
6.3
DP17
25B2
XF4.
34.
327
.65.
8DP
1747
NRB
2XF
4.0
4.0
29.7
6.1
FM18
30GL
T4.
64.
028
.16.
0FM
1953
GLTP
3.6
4.0
27.9
5.6
NG3
406B
2XF
4.8
5.8
29.8
5.4
NG3
500X
F4.
45.
031
.06.
4N
G351
7B2X
F4.
64.
330
.05.
9N
G454
5B2X
F4.
55.
032
.56.
2N
G500
7B2X
F4.
13.
830
.45.
6PC
G604
5.1
6.3
31.1
6.3
PCG6
054.
54.
830
.66.
2PC
G612
4.9
6.3
29.6
6.0
PCG6
155.
16.
328
.36.
0ST
4949
GLT
3.7
4.3
28.5
6.5
ST50
20GL
T4.
65.
529
.15.
4M
ean
4.5
4.8
29.3
6.0
9 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Ad
vanc
ed S
train
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Saf
ford
, AZ
2016
.
See
d C
ompa
nyVa
riety
Lint
Yie
ld
(lbs/
acre
)P
erce
nt
Loss
Adj
uste
d Li
nt
Yiel
d (lb
s/ac
re)
Yiel
d M
eans
S
epar
atio
n*P
erce
nt L
int
Col
or
Gra
deS
tapl
e (3
2nds
)M
icro
naire
Stre
ngth
(g
/tex)
Leng
th
(in.)
Leaf
G
rade
Uni
form
ity
Inde
x (%
)P
rem
ium
(c
ents
/lb)
Valu
e**
($/
acre
)M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
neD
P10
44B
2RF
740.
666
.02,
177.
5a
40.2
3138
4.4
32.2
1.17
381
.24.
4$1
,228
.95
Bay
erB
X17
34G
LT88
4.8
58.5
2,12
6.0
ab42
.231
384.
934
.41.
183
82.4
3.5
$1,1
80.3
5B
ayer
FM18
88G
L10
61.2
49.8
2,10
8.2
abc
43.4
3139
4.9
34.3
1.21
383
.33.
6$1
,173
.04
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1549
B2X
F91
2.6
56.6
2,09
7.9
abcd
43.4
3137
4.3
31.9
1.17
381
.24.
4$1
,183
.11
Bay
erB
X17
74G
LTP
797.
561
.72,
083.
5ab
cde
39.5
3138
4.2
31.3
1.19
381
.14.
4$1
,175
.84
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
251N
RB
2XF
883.
557
.22,
063.
6ab
cdef
44.6
3139
4.5
31.8
1.21
381
.44.
3$1
,161
.53
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
242N
RB
2XF
850.
758
.72,
056.
8ab
cdef
41.7
3139
4.9
36.1
1.22
382
.63.
4$1
,140
.40
Pre
miu
m C
otto
n G
enet
ics
0713
-809
-W90
470
8.4
65.0
2,02
2.6
bcde
fg40
.431
375.
031
.61.
143
81.2
2.3
$1,0
97.7
6M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
neD
P17
47N
RB
2XF
708.
464
.51,
994.
1cd
efgh
45.0
3137
4.4
30.9
1.16
381
.04.
1$1
,118
.60
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1725
B2X
F44
2.8
77.7
1,98
5.1
cdef
gh45
.231
374.
829
.61.
153
80.8
3.3
$1,0
97.2
7B
ayer
BX
1735
GLT
1086
.345
.01,
971.
0de
fgh
39.6
3140
4.0
34.4
1.26
382
.24.
7$1
,116
.89
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
15R
556B
2XF
862.
256
.21,
968.
6de
fghi
47.0
3139
4.0
32.5
1.21
380
.54.
1$1
,104
.53
Pre
miu
m C
otto
n G
enet
ics
PC
G61
564
6.8
67.1
1,96
3.1
efgh
ij38
.631
394.
733
.41.
213
81.8
4.5
$1,1
08.6
5B
ayer
/Sto
nevi
lleS
T494
6GLB
254
5.9
72.2
1,96
2.4
efgh
ij41
.331
384.
533
.01.
183
81.6
4.3
$1,1
04.8
9P
rem
ium
Cot
ton
Gen
etic
s07
08-8
06-W
903
543.
572
.51,
958.
1ef
ghij
40.8
3139
4.6
35.0
1.21
382
.64.
5$1
,106
.95
Bay
er/F
iber
Max
FM18
30G
LT79
6.8
59.3
1,94
6.3
fghi
j43
.331
394.
632
.91.
233
81.6
4.4
$1,0
97.5
8B
ayer
BX
1733
GLT
642.
866
.51,
915.
1gh
ij42
.231
384.
533
.11.
183
81.4
4.4
$1,0
80.1
2B
ayer
/Sto
nevi
lleS
T494
9GLT
627.
767
.11,
906.
8gh
ij43
.931
374.
630
.21.
163
80.3
3.7
$1,0
61.6
9M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
ne16
R25
2NR
B2X
F74
9.1
60.3
1,88
1.9
hijk
44.4
3137
4.6
31.0
1.16
380
.23.
8$1
,050
.13
Bay
er/F
iber
Max
FM19
11G
LT10
27.2
44.4
1,83
9.6
ijkl
41.1
3138
4.8
33.3
1.20
381
.84.
3$1
,035
.94
Bay
erFM
1953
GLT
P73
2.7
60.3
1,83
7.0
jklm
40.4
3139
4.3
32.7
1.22
382
.14.
6$1
,039
.38
Pre
miu
m C
otto
n G
enet
ics
PC
G61
152
9.5
70.2
1,76
4.5
klm
39.7
3138
4.7
32.7
1.18
381
.64.
2$9
92.1
6A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
NG
3517
B2X
F59
2.5
66.1
1,74
5.6
lmn
39.1
3139
4.5
32.8
1.20
382
.64.
7$9
89.7
6A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
NG
3500
XF
607.
665
.41,
737.
3lm
n41
.131
374.
933
.11.
153
82.5
3.3
$961
.74
Am
eric
ot/N
exG
enN
G45
45B
2XF
610.
364
.81,
730.
1lm
n40
.731
374.
832
.31.
163
80.5
3.9
$966
.76
Am
eric
ot/N
exG
enN
G34
06B
2XF
381.
377
.71,
708.
0m
n42
.331
374.
431
.21.
163
82.0
4.3
$961
.17
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
232B
2XF
535.
168
.61,
693.
5n
38.0
3139
4.4
35.4
1.21
382
.74.
7$9
59.6
5A
mer
icot
/Nex
Gen
AM
X16
01B
2XF
434.
974
.41,
687.
3n
44.3
3139
4.9
34.1
1.20
381
.43.
9$9
43.7
4M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
ne16
R22
8NR
B2X
F46
8.7
72.3
1,68
6.5
n43
.331
383.
832
.31.
193
80.6
3.8
$941
.41
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
16R
225N
RB
2XF
467.
070
.01,
553.
0o
43.9
3139
3.8
32.8
1.22
381
.34.
4$8
76.1
4B
ayer
BX
1736
GLT
1006
.035
.21,
551.
8o
42.7
3139
4.1
33.6
1.23
382
.04.
6$8
78.0
9P
rem
ium
Cot
ton
Gen
etic
sP
CG
612
606.
560
.51,
531.
2o
39.6
3137
5.0
32.0
1.15
381
.02.
8$8
40.3
1M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
ne16
R22
9B2X
F51
9.6
65.9
1,52
5.3
o41
.731
364.
630
.21.
113
81.2
3.7
$850
.51
Am
eric
ot/N
exG
enN
G50
07B
2XF
399.
973
.71,
508.
2o
43.2
3137
4.5
28.6
1.15
380
.73.
6$8
38.8
5P
rem
ium
Cot
ton
Gen
etic
sP
CG
616
543.
563
.61,
491.
6o
38.1
3138
4.6
31.2
1.17
379
.23.
3$8
24.6
1Av
erag
e68
7.5
63.2
1853
.541
.9--
-38
4.5
32.5
1.19
---
81.5
4.0
$1,0
38.5
0LS
D§
114.
73.
913
0.0
1.7
---
10.
31.
50.
03--
-N
S1.
0$7
9.91
OS
L†<0
.000
1<0
.000
1<0
.000
1<0
.000
1--
-<0
.000
1<0
.000
1<0
.000
1<0
.000
1--
-0.
053
0.00
0<0
.000
1C
V‡
12.0
4.5
5.0
3.0
---
2.1
4.7
3.3
1.8
---
1.5
18.2
5.5
*Mea
ns fo
llow
ed b
y th
e sa
me
lette
r are
not
sig
nific
antly
diff
eren
t by
Fish
er’s
Pro
tect
ed L
SD
at α
= 0
.05.
**
Valu
e ca
lcul
ated
from
CC
C lo
an s
ched
ule
base
pric
e of
$0.
52/lb
+ p
rem
ium
/dis
coun
t§
Leas
t Sig
nific
ant D
iffer
ence
† O
bser
ved
Sig
nific
ance
Lev
el‡
Coe
ffici
ent o
f Var
iatio
n
10 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Ad
vanc
ed S
train
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Saf
ford
, AZ
2016
.
Varie
tyP
lant
Pop
ula-
tion
(pla
nts/
foot
)
Pla
nt V
igor
R
atin
g (0
-9
L-H
)
Pla
nt
Hei
ght
(inch
es)
Nod
es A
bove
Whi
te
Flow
er (N
AWF)
0708
-806
-W90
34.
46.
332
.05.
407
13-8
09-W
904
3.6
6.0
31.3
5.8
15R
556B
2XF
2.0
3.3
31.8
7.3
16R
225N
RB
2XF
1.9
3.3
30.7
6.4
16R
228N
RB
2XF
1.9
3.7
31.0
5.4
16R
229B
2XF
2.6
4.5
33.8
6.2
16R
232B
2XF
3.7
5.7
34.1
5.7
16R
242N
RB
2XF
4.3
6.3
30.7
5.4
16R
251N
RB
2XF
2.3
4.0
31.8
6.9
16R
252N
RB
2XF
3.7
6.0
30.5
6.8
AM
X16
01B
2XF
2.3
4.3
30.7
5.4
BX
1733
GLT
3.9
5.7
31.8
6.4
BX
1734
GLT
4.0
5.7
33.1
5.5
BX
1735
GLT
3.9
6.3
30.5
5.7
BX
1736
GLT
3.3
5.7
30.6
5.4
BX
1774
GLT
P3.
85.
329
.25.
3D
P10
44B
2RF
3.4
5.0
31.0
6.3
DP
1549
B2X
F3.
65.
330
.66.
0D
P17
25B
2XF
2.7
4.3
28.0
5.4
DP
1747
NR
B2X
F3.
35.
330
.66.
1FM
1830
GLT
3.6
5.3
30.7
6.2
FM18
88G
L3.
16.
030
.55.
5FM
1911
GLT
3.8
5.8
30.0
6.2
FM19
53G
LTP
4.2
6.0
30.1
6.0
NG
3406
B2X
F3.
87.
033
.06.
1N
G35
00X
F3.
96.
032
.66.
0N
G35
17B
2XF
3.8
6.0
31.7
5.9
NG
4545
B2X
F4.
56.
730
.45.
9N
G50
07B
2XF
2.3
4.5
29.5
5.3
PC
G61
14.
16.
729
.55.
8P
CG
612
4.3
6.3
32.4
6.3
PC
G61
53.
46.
331
.25.
3P
CG
616
3.8
6.7
31.8
6.1
ST4
946G
LB2
3.2
5.3
31.7
5.7
ST4
949G
LT3.
05.
030
.65.
9M
ean
3.5
5.5
31.1
5.9
11 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Yi
eld
and
fiber
qua
lity
data
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Yum
a, A
Z 20
16.
See
d C
ompa
nyVa
riety
Lint
Yie
ld
(lbs/
acre
)Yi
eld
Mea
ns
Sep
arat
ion*
Per
cent
Li
ntC
olor
G
rade
Sta
ple
(32n
ds)
Mic
ro-
naire
Stre
ngth
(g
/tex)
Leng
th
(in.)
Leaf
G
rade
Uni
form
ity
Inde
x (%
)P
rem
ium
(c
ents
/lb)
Valu
e *
($/a
cre)
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1522
B2X
F2,
039.
1a
36.5
3137
5.2
33.6
1.15
482
.50.
9$1
,077
.70
Bay
er/S
tone
ville
ST4
946G
LB2
1,89
0.5
b36
.721
375.
133
.21.
143
81.3
1.8
$1,0
17.3
5M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
neD
P16
12B
2XF
1,80
9.8
bc34
.431
374.
933
.31.
194
80.7
1.8
$973
.49
Dow
/Phy
toge
nP
HY
333W
RF
1,79
1.7
bcd
35.4
3138
4.5
33.9
1.21
480
.02.
1$9
68.9
2D
ow/P
hyto
gen
PH
Y31
2WR
F1,
731.
3cd
e34
.631
374.
732
.91.
183
81.6
4.0
$969
.10
CP
S/D
ynag
Gro
DG
3385
B2X
F1,
687.
8de
34.1
2137
5.0
31.0
1.14
282
.53.
9$9
41.8
3B
ayer
/Sto
nevi
lleS
T494
9GLT
1,64
6.4
ef36
.131
375.
133
.31.
174
81.6
1.5
$880
.18
CP
S/D
ynag
Gro
DG
3757
B2X
F1,
541.
8f
37.8
2137
5.2
31.1
1.16
281
.81.
7$8
27.9
4Av
erag
e1,
767.
335
.7--
-37
5.0
32.8
1.17
381
.52.
2$9
57.0
6LS
D§
115.
21.
5--
-N
S0.
3N
S0.
041
NS
NS
$62.
09O
SL†
<0.0
001
0.00
1--
-0.
678
0.00
10.
123
0.04
00.
007
0.17
30.
063
<0.0
001
CV
‡3.
72.
4--
-2.
63.
24.
22.
119
.51.
455
.43.
7*
Valu
e ca
lcul
ated
from
CC
C lo
an s
ched
ule
base
pric
e of
$0.
52/lb
+ p
rem
ium
/dis
coun
t§
Leas
t Sig
nific
ant D
iffer
ence
† O
bser
ved
Sig
nific
ance
Lev
el‡
Coe
ffici
ent o
f Var
iatio
n
12 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Yum
a, A
Z 20
16.
Varie
tyPl
ant P
opul
ation
(p
lant
s/fo
ot)
Plan
t Vig
or R
ating
(0
-9 L
-H)
Plan
t Hei
ght
(inch
es)
Nod
ea A
bove
Whi
te F
low
er
(NAW
F)DG
3385
B2XF
2.4
6.7
7.0
DG37
57B2
XF2.
16.
37.
7DP
1522
B2XF
2.3
7.0
8.1
DP16
12B2
XF2.
47.
76.
9PH
Y312
WRF
2.2
6.3
7.4
PHY3
33W
RF2.
06.
07.
2ST
4946
GLB2
2.2
5.7
6.9
ST49
49GL
T1.
64.
77.
1M
ean
2.2
6.3
7.3
Figu
re p
rese
ntin
g lin
t yie
ld (y
-axi
s) v
ersu
s fib
er q
ualit
y pr
emiu
m/
disc
ount
(x-a
xis)
for t
he U
CVT
loca
tion
in Y
uma,
AZ,
201
6.
13 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Yi
eld
and
fiber
qua
lity
data
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Goo
dyea
r, AZ
201
6.
See
d C
ompa
nyVa
riety
Lint
Yie
ld
(lbs/
acre
)Yi
eld
Mea
ns
Sep
ara-
tion*
Per
cent
Li
ntC
olor
G
rade
Sta
ple
(32n
ds)
Mic
ro-
naire
Stre
ngth
(g
/tex)
Leng
th
(in.)
Leaf
G
rade
Uni
form
i-ty
Inde
x (%
)
Pre
miu
m
(cen
ts/lb
)Va
lue
* ($
/ac
re)
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1555
B2R
F2,
147.
7a
40.1
3140
4.0
35.1
1.25
383
.25.
1$1
,226
.34
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1549
B2X
F2,
111.
4ab
38.8
3139
3.8
33.6
1.20
382
.05.
4$1
,212
.02
Dow
/Phy
toge
nP
HY
444W
RF
2,11
0.7
ab37
.631
423.
934
.71.
303
83.9
5.0
$1,2
02.0
4D
ow/P
hyto
gen
PH
Y33
3WR
F2,
090.
2ab
37.5
4139
4.3
33.0
1.22
683
.4$1
,067
.36
Bay
er/S
tone
ville
ST4
946G
LB2
2,08
8.0
ab36
.031
384.
734
.61.
184
83.6
2.5
$1,1
37.4
9C
PS
/Dyn
agG
roD
G33
85B
2XF
1,97
2.1
ab35
.831
394.
832
.71.
203
84.3
4.8
$1,1
20.1
2B
ayer
/Sto
nevi
lleS
T494
9GLT
1,94
8.5
b37
.741
384.
232
.81.
205
83.4
0.4
$1,0
20.0
3C
PS
/Dyn
agG
roD
G37
57B
2XF
1,69
1.3
c37
.531
384.
232
.11.
203
83.5
5.3
$968
.70
Dow
/Phy
toge
nP
HY
725R
F1,
485.
1d
32.3
4140
3.6
38.5
1.26
584
.60.
5$7
79.3
7Av
erag
e1,
960.
637
.0--
-39
4.2
34.1
1.22
483
.53.
1$1
,081
.50
LSD
§18
2.1
1.5
---
10.
31.
40.
031
1.3
2.8
$129
.24
OS
L†0.
000
<0.0
001
---
0.00
00.
000
0.00
00.
000
0.00
50.
048
0.00
30.
001
CV
‡4.
11.
8--
-1.
13.
51.
81.
216
.50.
739
.25.
2*
Valu
e ca
lcul
ated
from
CC
C lo
an s
ched
ule
base
pric
e of
$0.
52/lb
+ p
rem
ium
/dis
coun
t§
Leas
t Sig
nific
ant D
iffer
ence
† O
bser
ved
Sig
nific
ance
Lev
el‡
Coe
ffici
ent o
f Var
iatio
n
14 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Goo
dyea
r, AZ
201
6.
Varie
tyP
lant
Pop
ulat
ion
(pla
nts/
foot
)P
lant
Vig
or R
atin
g (0
-9 L
-H)
Pla
nt H
eigh
t (in
ches
)N
odes
Abo
ve W
hite
Fl
ower
(NAW
F)D
G33
85B
2XF
35.2
6.0
DG
3757
B2X
F34
.27.
5D
P15
49B
2XF
39.2
7.4
DP
1555
B2R
F35
.67.
5P
HY
333W
RF
39.1
5.5
PH
Y44
4WR
F36
.16.
0P
HY
725R
F35
.85.
7S
T494
6GLB
234
.65.
7S
T494
9GLT
35.8
6.9
Mea
n36
.26.
5
Figu
re p
rese
ntin
g lin
t yie
ld (y
-axi
s) v
ersu
s fib
er q
ualit
y pr
emiu
m/
disc
ount
(x-a
xis)
for t
he U
CVT
loca
tion
in G
oody
ear,
AZ, 2
016.
15 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Yi
eld
and
fiber
qua
lity
data
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Que
en C
reek
, AZ
2016
.
See
d C
ompa
nyVa
riety
Lint
Yie
ld
(lbs/
acre
)Yi
eld
Mea
ns
Sep
arat
ion*
Per
cent
Li
ntC
olor
G
rade
Sta
ple
(32n
ds)
Mic
rona
ireS
treng
th
(g/te
x)Le
ngth
(in
.)Le
af
Gra
deU
nifo
rmity
In
dex
(%)
Pre
miu
m
(cen
ts/lb
)Va
lue
* ($
/ac
re)
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1044
B2R
F1,
894.
0a
36.1
4137
4.8
31.5
1.15
382
.52.
9$1
,040
.03
Bay
er/F
iber
Max
FM18
30G
LT1,
857.
8ab
37.2
3139
4.8
34.2
1.22
282
.65.
4$1
,065
.68
Dow
/Phy
toge
nP
HY
444W
RF
1,79
9.9
abc
37.9
3139
4.0
33.8
1.23
282
.55.
3$1
,031
.63
CP
S/D
ynag
Gro
DG
3757
B2X
F1,
761.
4bc
37.8
3137
4.8
31.2
1.17
283
.05.
2$1
,008
.17
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1549
B2X
F1,
702.
1cd
36.6
3137
4.5
32.1
1.15
281
.14.
7$9
65.1
1B
ayer
/Sto
nevi
lleS
T494
9GLT
1,69
3.8
cd36
.831
374.
732
.11.
163
82.5
4.0
$948
.96
Dow
/Phy
toge
nP
HY
333W
RF
1,58
0.3
d35
.341
384.
232
.31.
193
82.2
3.6
$878
.07
CP
S/D
ynag
Gro
DG
3445
B2X
F1,
393.
9e
33.6
3139
4.6
35.8
1.23
283
.85.
1$7
96.3
6Av
erag
e1,
710.
436
.4--
-38
4.6
32.9
1.19
282
.54.
5$9
66.7
5LS
D§
128.
02.
6--
-1
0.3
1.5
0.04
10.
90.
8$6
8.08
OS
L†<0
.000
10.
044
---
0.00
80.
000
0.00
00.
001
0.00
30.
002
<0.0
001
<0.0
001
CV
‡4.
34.
0--
-2.
13.
72.
71.
917
.50.
610
.44.
0*
Valu
e ca
lcul
ated
from
CC
C lo
an s
ched
ule
base
pric
e of
$0.
52/lb
+ p
rem
ium
/dis
coun
t§
Leas
t Sig
nific
ant D
iffer
ence
† O
bser
ved
Sig
nific
ance
Lev
el‡
Coe
ffici
ent o
f Var
iatio
n
16 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Que
en C
reek
, AZ
2016
.
Figu
re p
rese
ntin
g lin
t yie
ld (y
-axi
s) v
ersu
s fib
er q
ualit
y pr
emiu
m/
disc
ount
(x-a
xis)
for t
he U
CVT
loca
tion
in Q
ueen
Cre
ek, A
Z, 2
016.
Varie
tyP
lant
Pop
ula-
tion
(pla
nts/
foot
)
Pla
nt V
igor
Rat
-in
g (0
-9 L
-H)
Pla
nt H
eigh
t (in
ches
)N
odes
Abo
ve W
hite
Fl
ower
(NAW
F)
DG
3445
B2X
F1.
46.
025
.15.
7D
G37
57B
2XF
2.2
7.3
28.8
7.0
DP
1044
B2R
F3.
17.
526
.07.
0D
P15
49B
2XF
2.6
7.8
24.6
6.2
FM18
30G
LT2.
27.
023
.46.
2P
HY
333W
RF
2.0
7.3
28.0
6.2
PH
Y44
4WR
F1.
76.
525
.56.
2S
T494
9GLT
1.7
6.0
26.1
6.6
Mea
n2.
16.
925
.96.
4
17 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Yi
eld
and
fiber
qua
lity
data
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Elo
y, A
Z 20
16.
See
d C
ompa
nyVa
riety
Lint
Yie
ld
(lbs/
acre
)Yi
eld
Mea
ns
Sep
arat
ion*
Per
cent
Li
ntC
olor
G
rade
Sta
ple
(32n
ds)
Mic
ro-
naire
Stre
ngth
(g
/tex)
Leng
th
(in.)
Leaf
G
rade
Uni
form
ity
Inde
x (%
)P
rem
ium
(c
ents
/lb)
Valu
e *
($/a
cre)
Dow
/Phy
toge
nP
HY
333W
RF
1,72
2.0
a40
.531
384.
330
.61.
183
79.9
3.7
$958
.85
Bay
er/S
tone
ville
ST4
949G
LT1,
599.
7b
41.5
3138
3.9
30.8
1.18
380
.13.
9$8
94.2
9B
ayer
/Sto
nevi
lleS
T494
6GLB
21,
586.
1bc
39.9
3138
4.2
32.2
1.19
380
.74.
0$8
87.4
7D
ow/P
hyto
gen
PH
Y44
4WR
F1,
560.
8bc
40.4
3141
3.5
33.2
1.27
379
.62.
7$8
53.3
7M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
neD
P10
44B
2RF
1,49
2.4
bc38
.231
364.
230
.51.
123
80.3
3.1
$822
.29
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1549
B2X
F1,
483.
5c
40.6
3137
3.5
31.7
1.16
379
.41.
9$7
99.8
5C
PS
/Dyn
aGro
DG
3445
B2X
F1,
360.
4d
37.4
3139
3.8
33.9
1.22
380
.54.
2$7
64.4
2C
PS
/Dyn
aGro
DG
3757
B2X
F1,
302.
4d
41.1
3136
4.1
30.3
1.14
380
.33.
4$7
21.6
8Av
erag
e1,
513.
439
.9--
-38
3.9
31.6
1.18
380
.13.
3$8
37.7
8LS
D§
113.
91.
7--
-2
NS
1.5
0.04
---
1.0
1.30
$72.
73O
SL†
<0.0
001
0.00
2--
-0.
000
0.07
80.
001
<0.0
001
---
0.22
40.
040
0.00
0C
V‡
4.3
2.4
---
2.3
8.6
2.8
2.0
---
0.7
23.0
5.0
* Va
lue
calc
ulat
ed fr
om C
CC
loan
sch
edul
e ba
se p
rice
of $
0.52
/lb +
pre
miu
m/d
isco
unt
§ Le
ast S
igni
fican
t Diff
eren
ce†
Obs
erve
d S
igni
fican
ce L
evel
‡ C
oeffi
cien
t of V
aria
tion
18 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Elo
y, A
Z 20
16.
Varie
tyP
lant
Pop
ulat
ion
(pla
nts/
foot
)P
lant
Vig
or R
atin
g (0
-9 L
-H)
Pla
nt H
eigh
t (in
ches
)N
odes
Abo
ve W
hite
Fl
ower
(NAW
F)D
G34
45B
2XF
3.2
7.0
32.2
5.7
DG
3757
B2X
F3.
26.
332
.55.
0D
P10
44B
2RF
3.8
6.7
29.1
5.3
DP
1549
B2X
F3.
57.
033
.05.
5P
HY
333W
RF
3.6
7.7
33.5
5.3
PH
Y44
4WR
F3.
77.
031
.85.
3S
T494
6GLB
22.
97.
032
.95.
0S
T494
9GLT
3.1
6.7
31.6
5.8
Mea
n3.
46.
932
.15.
4
Figu
re p
rese
ntin
g lin
t yie
ld (y
-axi
s) v
ersu
s fib
er q
ualit
y pr
emiu
m/
disc
ount
(x-a
xis)
for t
he U
CVT
loca
tion
in E
loy,
AZ,
201
6.
19 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Yi
eld
and
fiber
qua
lity
data
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Red
Roc
k, A
Z 20
16.
See
d C
ompa
nyVa
riety
Lint
Yie
ld
(lbs/
acre
)Yi
eld
Mea
ns
Sep
arat
ion*
Per
cent
Li
ntC
olor
G
rade
Sta
ple
(32n
ds)
Mic
rona
ireS
treng
th
(g/te
x)Le
ngth
(in
.)Le
af
Gra
deU
nifo
rmity
In
dex
(%)
Pre
miu
m
(cen
ts/lb
)Va
lue
* ($
/ac
re)
Bay
er/S
tone
ville
ST4
949G
LT2,
171.
6a
38.5
2138
4.6
31.4
1.19
382
.05.
1$1
,241
.15
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1044
B2R
F2,
019.
8a
36.4
2138
4.8
32.7
1.20
383
.65.
2$1
,155
.96
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1549
B2X
F2,
011.
2a
37.4
2138
4.4
33.3
1.19
282
.35.
6$1
,158
.73
Dow
/Phy
toge
nP
HY
312W
RF
1,98
1.1
a35
.731
404.
633
.11.
243
84.0
4.9
$1,1
28.1
3C
PS
/Dyn
agG
roD
G37
57B
2XF
1,90
8.2
a40
.921
384.
730
.41.
192
82.4
5.6
$1,0
99.4
5D
ow/P
hyto
gen
PH
Y44
4WR
F1,
885.
9a
38.6
2139
4.3
32.8
1.23
282
.15.
8$1
,090
.34
CP
S/D
ynag
Gro
DG
3385
B2X
F1,
869.
8a
38.1
2138
4.9
31.4
1.19
283
.55.
8$1
,081
.35
Bay
er/S
tone
ville
ST4
946G
LB2
1,85
4.4
a36
.131
384.
833
.11.
202
83.3
5.2
$1,0
61.8
0Av
erag
e1,
962.
737
.7--
-38
4.7
32.3
1.20
282
.95.
4$1
,127
.11
LSD
§N
S1.
6--
-N
S0.
21.
6N
S1
1.2
0.60
NS
OS
L†0.
628
0.00
0--
-0.
096
0.00
20.
011
0.06
20.
013
0.01
30.
028
0.71
3C
V‡
10.7
2.3
---
2.0
2.8
2.8
1.8
19.1
0.8
6.0
11.0
* Va
lue
calc
ulat
ed fr
om C
CC
loan
sch
edul
e ba
se p
rice
of $
0.52
/lb +
pre
miu
m/d
isco
unt
§ Le
ast S
igni
fican
t Diff
eren
ce†
Obs
erve
d S
igni
fican
ce L
evel
‡ C
oeffi
cien
t of V
aria
tion
20 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Red
Roc
k, A
Z 20
16.
Varie
tyPl
ant P
opul
ation
(p
lant
s/fo
ot)
Plan
t Vig
or R
ating
(0
-9 L
-H)
Plan
t Hei
ght
(inch
es)
Nod
es A
bove
Whi
te
Flow
er (N
AWF)
DG33
85B2
XF2.
27.
035
.26.
3DG
3757
B2XF
3.0
5.7
39.8
6.1
DP10
44B2
RF2.
96.
036
.96.
7DP
1549
B2XF
2.8
6.3
36.9
7.2
PHY3
12W
RF2.
26.
039
.26.
9PH
Y444
WRF
2.1
5.7
39.6
6.5
ST49
46GL
B22.
76.
336
.96.
8ST
4949
GLT
1.8
5.0
36.5
6.9
Mea
n2.
56.
037
.66.
7
Figu
re p
rese
ntin
g lin
t yie
ld (y
-axi
s) v
ersu
s fib
er q
ualit
y pr
emiu
m/
disc
ount
(x-a
xis)
for t
he U
CVT
loca
tion
in R
ed R
ock,
AZ,
201
6.
21 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Yi
eld
and
fiber
qua
lity
data
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Mar
ana,
AZ
2016
.
Seed
Com
pany
Varie
tyLi
nt Y
ield
(lb
s/ac
re)
Yiel
d M
eans
Se
para
tion*
Perc
ent L
int
Colo
r Gra
deSt
aple
(3
2nds
)M
icro
naire
Stre
ngth
(g/
tex)
Leng
th (i
n.)
Leaf
Gra
deU
nifo
rmity
In
dex
(%)
Prem
ium
(c
ents
/lb)
Valu
e *
($/
acre
)Do
w/P
hyto
gen
PHY4
44W
RF97
9.2
a38
.321
394.
232
.01.
232
80.5
5.3
$560
.57
Baye
r/St
onev
ille
ST49
46G
LB2
968.
9a
35.7
2136
4.8
30.5
1.11
281
.93.
1$5
33.5
8CP
S/Dy
nagG
roDG
3385
B2XF
930.
7ab
37.4
3136
4.9
30.0
1.13
282
.04.
0$5
21.7
2M
onsa
nto/
Delta
pine
DP15
49B2
XF92
9.3
ab36
.921
354.
630
.11.
092
80.6
2.8
$509
.21
Baye
r/St
onev
ille
ST49
49G
LT90
3.7
ab37
.231
364.
830
.61.
143
81.5
3.0
$497
.05
CPS/
Dyna
gGro
DG34
06B2
XF85
5.5
ab37
.421
364.
730
.21.
113
80.7
3.6
$475
.78
Dow
/Phy
toge
nPH
Y312
WRF
838.
1b
34.4
3137
4.7
30.4
1.15
381
.03.
9$4
68.0
2M
onsa
nto/
Delta
pine
DP16
39B2
XF81
4.3
b37
.031
365.
131
.51.
113
81.5
1.3
$433
.82
CPS/
Dyna
gGro
DG37
57B2
XF80
8.2
b38
.921
354.
929
.61.
102
81.5
2.9
$443
.97
Aver
age
892.
037
.0---
364.
730
.51.
132
81.2
3.3
$493
.75
LSD§
NS
2.8
---3
2.8
NS
2.84
NS
NS
NS
NS
OSL
†0.
062
0.00
2---
0.00
3<0
.000
10.
100
0.00
60.
507
0.73
20.
408
0.05
0CV
‡7.
92.
7---
2.6
2.7
2.9
2.8
27.6
1.4
51.7
9.1
* Va
lue
calc
ulat
ed fr
om C
CC lo
an sc
hedu
le b
ase
pric
e of
$0.
52/lb
+ p
rem
ium
/disc
ount
§ Le
ast S
igni
fican
t Diff
eren
ce†
Obs
erve
d Si
gnifi
canc
e Le
vel
‡ Co
effici
ent o
f Var
iatio
n
22 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Mar
ana,
AZ
2016
.
Varie
tyPl
ant P
opul
ation
(p
lant
s/fo
ot)
Plan
t Vig
or R
ating
(0
-9 L
-H)
Plan
t Hei
ght
(inch
es)
Nod
es A
bove
Whi
te
Flow
er (N
AWF)
DG33
85B2
XF2.
67.
230
.65.
1DG
3406
B2XF
2.7
7.2
30.2
5.8
DG37
57B2
XF2.
26.
432
.75.
3DP
1549
B2XF
2.8
7.8
31.0
5.7
DP16
39B2
XF2.
56.
829
.25.
4PH
Y312
WRF
2.5
7.4
32.6
5.2
PHY4
44W
RF2.
47.
029
.85.
0ST
4946
GLB2
2.7
7.0
30.7
5.5
ST49
49GL
T2.
26.
230
.45.
6M
ean
2.5
7.0
30.8
5.4
Figu
re p
rese
ntin
g lin
t yie
ld (y
-axi
s) v
ersu
s fib
er q
ualit
y pr
emiu
m/
disc
ount
(x-a
xis)
for t
he U
CVT
loca
tion
in M
aran
a, A
Z, 2
016.
23 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Yi
eld
and
fiber
qua
lity
data
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Tha
tche
r, AZ
201
6.
See
d C
ompa
nyVa
riety
Lint
Yie
ld
(lbs/
acre
)Yi
eld
Mea
ns
Sep
arat
ion*
Per
cent
Li
ntC
olor
G
rade
Sta
ple
(32n
ds)
Mic
ro-
naire
Stre
ngth
(g
/tex)
Leng
th
(in.)
Leaf
G
rade
Uni
form
ity
Inde
x (%
)P
rem
ium
(c
ents
/lb)
Valu
e *
($/a
cre)
Bay
er/F
iber
Max
FM19
11G
LT2,
155.
9a
38.2
2138
4.7
31.7
1.18
380
.94.
5$1
,216
.74
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1549
B2X
F2,
101.
6a
36.8
2137
3.8
30.6
1.15
279
.54.
9$1
,195
.33
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1044
B2R
F2,
011.
0a
36.2
2137
3.9
30.0
1.15
380
.13.
6$1
,118
.49
Bay
er/F
iber
Max
FM18
30G
LT1,
981.
1a
39.2
2140
4.4
33.6
1.25
282
.15.
6$1
,141
.35
Dow
/Phy
toge
nP
HY
333W
RF
1,95
2.5
a37
.231
374.
231
.01.
163
80.8
3.6
$1,0
84.8
2C
PS
/Dyn
aGro
DG
3757
B2X
F1,
924.
4a
40.6
2137
4.4
30.0
1.16
379
.84.
0$1
,077
.89
Dow
/Phy
toge
nP
HY
444W
RF
1,88
6.5
a38
.821
403.
332
.41.
243
79.8
2.1
$1,0
21.3
2C
PS
/Dyn
aGro
DG
3385
B2X
F1,
857.
4a
36.6
2137
4.5
29.7
1.16
381
.24.
7$1
,054
.42
Aver
age
1,98
3.8
38.0
---
384.
131
.11.
183
80.5
4.1
$1,1
13.7
9LS
D§
NS
2.2
---
10.
21.
61.
25N
SN
SN
SN
SO
SL†
0.23
50.
009
---
<0.0
001
<0.0
001
0.00
1<0
.000
10.
171
0.45
90.
078
0.17
7C
V‡
7.3
3.3
---
1.6
3.0
2.9
1.7
27.1
1.9
29.3
7.9
* Va
lue
calc
ulat
ed fr
om C
CC
loan
sch
edul
e ba
se p
rice
of $
0.52
/lb +
pre
miu
m/d
isco
unt
§ Le
ast S
igni
fican
t Diff
eren
ce†
Obs
erve
d S
igni
fican
ce L
evel
‡ C
oeffi
cien
t of V
aria
tion
24 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Tha
tche
r, AZ
201
6.
Varie
tyP
lant
Pop
u-la
tion
(pla
nts/
foot
)
Pla
nt V
igor
R
atin
g (0
-9
L-H
)
Pla
nt
Hei
ght
(inch
es)
Nod
es A
bove
Whi
te
Flow
er (N
AWF)
DG
3385
B2X
F6.
77.
731
.04.
7D
G37
57B
2XF
5.6
7.0
27.6
4.1
DP
1044
B2R
F6.
17.
731
.34.
8D
P15
49B
2XF
6.1
7.3
31.1
5.0
FM18
30G
LT5.
77.
031
.04.
3FM
1911
GLT
5.2
7.0
28.5
4.5
PH
Y33
3WR
F5.
67.
031
.35.
0P
HY
444W
RF
5.7
7.3
28.7
4.1
Mea
n5.
87.
330
.04.
6
Figu
re p
rese
ntin
g lin
t yie
ld (y
-axi
s) v
ersu
s fib
er q
ualit
y pr
emiu
m/
disc
ount
(x-a
xis)
for t
he U
CVT
loca
tion
in T
hatc
her,
AZ, 2
016.
25 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Yi
eld
and
fiber
qua
lity
data
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Willc
ox, A
Z 20
16.
See
d C
ompa
nyVa
riety
Lint
Yie
ld
(lbs/
acre
)Yi
eld
Mea
ns
Sep
arat
ion*
Per
cent
Li
ntC
olor
G
rade
Sta
ple
(32n
ds)
Mic
ro-
naire
Stre
ngth
(g
/tex)
Leng
th
(in.)
Leaf
G
rade
Uni
form
ity
Inde
x (%
)P
rem
ium
(c
ents
/lb)
Valu
e *
($/a
cre)
CP
S/D
ynaG
roD
G33
85B
2XF
2,35
1.6
a38
.821
404.
131
.21.
241
83.9
5.9
$1,3
62.3
9M
onsa
nto/
Del
tapi
neD
P16
12B
2XF
2,30
7.3
a38
.021
404.
032
.61.
252
83.0
5.7
$1,3
29.8
5D
ow/P
hyto
gen
PH
Y31
2WR
F2,
299.
1a
36.2
2140
4.0
31.4
1.25
383
.05.
5$1
,321
.01
Mon
sant
o/D
elta
pine
DP
1522
B2X
F2,
259.
6a
36.8
2139
4.3
31.6
1.22
282
.65.
6$1
,302
.58
Bay
er/F
iber
Max
FM19
11G
LT2,
188.
9ab
38.1
2140
3.9
32.9
1.25
282
.85.
7$1
,263
.72
Dow
/Phy
toge
nP
HY
333W
RF
2,18
2.4
ab36
.821
394.
131
.81.
223
82.3
5.4
$1,2
53.3
3B
ayer
/Fib
erM
axFM
1320
GL
2,15
0.5
ab39
.221
384.
231
.51.
182
81.2
5.5
$1,2
37.1
6C
PS
/Dyn
aGro
DG
3757
B2X
F2,
034.
4ab
38.2
1138
4.0
29.3
1.19
181
.85.
6$1
,170
.77
Aver
age
2,22
1.7
37.8
---
394.
131
.51.
222
82.6
5.6
$1,2
80.1
0LS
D§
NS
1.4
---
1N
S1.
00.
031
1.4
NS
NS
OS
L†0.
080.
005
---
0.01
30.
172
<0.0
001
0.00
40.
029
0.04
60.
798
0.06
9C
V‡
5.2
2.1
---
1.9
4.6
1.7
1.6
24.1
1.0
6.9
5.2
* Va
lue
calc
ulat
ed fr
om C
CC
loan
sch
edul
e ba
se p
rice
of $
0.52
/lb +
pre
miu
m/d
isco
unt
§ Le
ast S
igni
fican
t Diff
eren
ce†
Obs
erve
d S
igni
fican
ce L
evel
‡ C
oeffi
cien
t of V
aria
tion
26 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cotto
n Va
riety
Testi
ng R
esult
s20
16Ea
rly a
nd m
id-s
easo
n da
ta c
olle
cted
for t
he U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a U
plan
d C
otto
n Va
riety
Tes
ting
Prog
ram
, Willc
ox, A
Z 20
16.
Varie
tyP
lant
Pop
ulat
ion
(pla
nts/
foot
)P
lant
Vig
or R
atin
g (0
-9 L
-H)
Pla
nt H
eigh
t (in
ches
)N
odes
Abo
ve W
hite
Fl
ower
(NAW
F)D
G33
85B
2XF
2.4
7D
G37
57B
2XF
2.1
6.3
DP
1522
B2X
F2.
67.
3D
P16
12B
2XF
3.1
7.7
FM13
20G
LT2.
65.
7FM
1911
GLT
2.2
7.3
PH
Y31
2WR
F2.
57.
3P
HY
333W
RF
2.6
7.0
Mea
n2.
57.
0
Figu
re p
rese
ntin
g lin
t yie
ld (y
-axi
s) v
ersu
s fib
er q
ualit
y pr
emiu
m/
disc
ount
(x-a
xis)
for t
he U
CVT
loca
tion
in W
illcox
, AZ,
201
6.
27 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
28 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
AZ 1736P-171
February 2017
extension.arizona.edu/pubs/az1736-2017.pdf
Any products, services, or organizations that are mentioned, shown, or indirectly implied in this publication do not imply endorsement by The University of Arizona
The University of Arizona is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer