2015 AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY RESEARCH AND … · 2019-02-16 · 2015 AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY RESEARCH AND EVALUATION REPORT MEMORANDUM SERIES #ACS15-RER-01 . DSSD 2015 AMERICAN

2015 AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY RESEARCH AND EVALUATION REPORT MEMORANDUM SERIES #ACS15-RER-01 DSSD 2015 AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY RESEARCH MEMORANDUM SERIES

ACS15-R-01 MEMORANDUM FOR ACS Research and Evaluation Advisory Group

From: Patrick J. Cantwell signed 4/7/15 Chief, Decennial Statistical Studies Division Prepared by: Karen King, Michael Starsinic, and Adriana Hernandez Viver

ACS Variance Estimation and Statistical Support Branch, Decennial Statistical Studies Division and

Michael Beaghen ACS Weighting and Estimation Branch Decennial Statistical Studies Division

Subject: The Reliability of ACS 5-Year Estimates of Race Groups and

American Indian and Alaska Native Populations

Attached is the final American Community Survey (ACS) Research and Evaluation report for the reliability of ACS 5-year estimates of race groups and American Indian and Alaska Native populations. In it we documented and compared the reliability of estimates of characteristics of

race groups and tribal groupings across various levels of geography. We examined the level of reliability for almost 300 key characteristics produced from the 2006-2010 5-year ACS estimates found on the Selected Population Tables (SPT).

If you have any questions about this report, please contact Karen King at 301-763-1974 or Michael Beaghen at 301-763-2981. Attachment

cc: ACS Research and Evaluation Work Group Mark E. Asiala

Anthony Tersine Beth Tyszka

American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Program

March 27, 2015

The Reliability of ACS 5-Year

Estimates of Race Groups and American

Indian and Alaska Native Populations

FINAL REPORT

Karen King, Michael Starsinic,

Adriana Hernandez Viver, and

Michael Beaghen

Decennial Statistical Studies Division

2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION

The American Community Survey (ACS) sample is designed to assure reliable estimates for small geographic areas. Some data users have raised concerns that the 5-year ACS estimates do not provide sound estimates for small population groups. The focus of this report was to assess the reliability of characteristics by major race groups, by detailed Asian and Native Hawaiian

and Other Pacific Islander groups, and by American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) tribal groupings. We examined the level of reliability for almost 300 key characteristics produced from the 2006-2010 5-year ACS estimates found on the Selected Population Tables (SPT).

RESULTS The main observation is that the level of reliability and size of the coefficients of variation (CV) were largely dependent on the size of the population on which the estimates were based. A key point the study established was that the reliability of estimates of small tribal groupings was

comparable to that of geographic areas of similar population size. Furthermore, we found that race groups and tribal groupings of similar population size had similar levels of reliability. For a fixed sample size, two populations of similar size tended to have comparable CVs for their estimates.

1. Race groups and tribal groupings with similar population sizes generally had comparable

CVs of estimates of characteristics.

Tribal groupings and places/communities with similar population size totals generally

had comparable CVs.

Race groups and tribal groupings with similarly sized alone-and-in combination populations generally had comparable CVs.

Tribal groupings with similarly sized On Reservation and Off Reservation populations

generally had comparable CVs.

Tribal groupings with different proportions of population for the On Reservation and the Off Reservation had smaller CVs for estimates in the larger of the two groups. However,

results were usually comparable with the results of other populations of similar size.

For race groups and tribal groupings the CVs of estimates of the alone population and the in combination population were comparable when the population sizes were similar.

2. A factor which could influence the size of the CVs was the prevalence of a characteristic in a population. When comparing populations of similar sizes there could be higher CVs for the population where the proportion of the characteristic was smaller, especially if it was relatively close to zero. This was a limitation of using CVs of proportions as a measure of

reliability. 3. While the CVs for the total population of the American Indian reservation/Alaska Native

Village Statistical areas were generally determined by the total population size, there was

evidence that these areas had lower CVs due to higher sampling rates.

3

CONCLUSIONS By focusing the ACS sample design on sound estimates of small geographies, we obtain sound estimates for small population groups. In this sense we are reassured about the ACS sample

design. Another study which would examine the effects of the 2011 sample increase for 5-year estimates may be worth pursuing. We note that we did not have the data available for an analogous analysis of detailed Hispanic

groups. However, in an imperfect comparison we found the CVs for estimates of Hispanic groups similar to those of race groups with similar sizes.

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 5 2. RESEARCH QUESTIONS ................................................................................................ 5 3. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 6

3.1 Race Concepts........................................................................................................... 6

3.2 American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal Groupings ................................................ 6 3.3 Race Alone, Race In Combination, and Race Alone-or-in-Combination ...................... 6 3.4 ACS Sampling........................................................................................................... 7

4. METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................................10

4.1 Source of Data..........................................................................................................10 4.2 Measure of Reliability ..............................................................................................11 4.3 Why the Coefficient of Variation ..............................................................................12 4.4 Presentation of Results ..............................................................................................13

5. ANALYSES .....................................................................................................................14 6. RESULTS ........................................................................................................................16

6.1. How did the CVs of the Race Alone population estimates compare? ..........................16 6.2 The Reliability of Estimates of Asian and Native Hawaiian Other Pacific Islander Race

Groups .....................................................................................................................23 6.3 How did the reliability of a tribal grouping’s alone population estimates compare with

the reliability of its in-combination population? .........................................................25 6.4 How did the reliability of the American Indian/Alaska Native population or tribal

grouping estimates compare with the reliability of the same estimates for the total population at the same summary level or an area of similar size?................................26

6.5 How did the reliability of the tribal grouping estimates for the population living On Reservation compare with the reliability of the same tribal grouping estimates for the

population living Off Reservation? ............................................................................33 6.6 Reliability of American Indian Reservation/Alaska Native Village Statistical Areas ...36

7. SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................38 8. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................40

5

1. INTRODUCTION

The American Community Survey (ACS) collects data similar to what the Decennial Census

Long Form collected in the past. One goal of the ACS is to produce more timely social, economic, and housing data for all geographic areas. One of the highest priorities is to produce high quality and reliable data for small areas and populations. Due to the smaller sample size, ACS must accumulate sample data across five years to produce estimates for the smallest areas

and populations. Now that several sets of 5-year estimates are available, analysts who have used the long form data in the past now look to use the 5-year ACS data to meet their needs in research and for social policy purposes.

The Census Bureau examined the level of reliability for 297 key characteristics produced from the 2006-2010 5-year ACS estimates. The focus of this report was the reliability of estimates of these characteristics by race group and by American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) tribal grouping at various geographic summary levels. These results also serve as a benchmark for

monitoring any changes in reliability in the future.

2. RESEARCH QUESTIONS

All research questions pertained to the 297 characteristics for the 2006-2010 5-year ACS estimates.

1. What was the reliability of estimates for the major race groups at various levels of

geography? 2. What was the reliability of estimates for the detailed Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other

Pacific Islander (NHOPI), and AIAN tribal groupings at the national level?

3. What was the reliability of estimates for the in-combination population for AIAN tribal

groupings?

4. What was the reliability of estimates of the American Indian (AI) and Alaska Native (AN) populations by characteristic at various levels of geography?

5. How did the reliability of the estimates of characteristics for the tribal grouping at the

national level compare with that of the total population in a place of similar population size?

6. How did the reliability of the estimates for the population living On Reservations compare

with the reliability for the population living Off Reservations by AIAN tribal grouping? 7. How reliable were estimates of American Indian Reservation/Alaska Native Village

Statistical areas (AIR/ANVSA)?

6

3. BACKGROUND

3.1 Race Concepts

This report presents reliability results of ACS estimates for major race groups, for particular Asian and NHOPI race groups, and for AIAN tribal groupings. An overview of these race concepts follows.

The Census Bureau collects data on six major race groups: White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, NHOPI, and some other race (Humes et al, 2011). The Census Bureau also asks for the detailed race groups for Asians and for NHOPI persons, and

the tribes for AIAN persons. Furthermore, persons can report more than one major race group. Thus a person who reports that they are White and Asian is counted both as White alone or in combination and as Asian alone or in combination. In the next section, we describe these concepts in more detail.

3.2 American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal Groupings American Indian tribal groupings are formed by combining individual American Indian tribes.

For example, Fort Sill Apache, Mescalero Apache, and San Carlos Apache are combined into the general Apache tribal grouping. Likewise, for Alaska Natives, tribal groupings are formed by the combining of individual Alaska Native tribes. Thus the King Salmon Tribe, Native Village of Kanatak, and Sun’aq Tribe of Kodiak, are combined into the general Aleut tribal grouping.

Respondents reporting more than one AIAN tribal grouping were counted in each grouping. For example, a respondent reporting Navajo and Cherokee was included in estimates for both tribal groupings. Although the percentage varied by tribal grouping, overall less than five percent of

respondents who reported a tribal grouping reported more than one tribal grouping.

3.3 Race Alone, Race In Combination, and Race Alone -or-in-Combination

In the following discussion we describe the concepts of race alone or alone-or-in-combination (AOIC) in detail for AIAN persons. However, they apply analogously to Asians and NHOPI persons. First, people who responded to the question on race by indicating only one race are referred to as the race alone population, or the group who reported only one race (Norris et al,

2012). For example, respondents who marked only the “American Indian or Alaska Native” category on the census questionnaire would be included in the American Indian and Alaska Native alone population. Respondents who reported more than one tribe, such as Navajo and Pima, would also be included in the American Indian and Alaska Native alone population. The

American Indian and Alaska Native alone population can be viewed as the minimum number of people reporting American Indian and Alaska Native. Second, individuals who chose more than one of the six race categories are referred to as the

race in-combination population, or as the group who reported more than one race. For example, respondents who reported they were American Indian and Alaska Native and White or reported

7

they were American Indian and Alaska Native and White and Black would be included in the American Indian and Alaska Native in-combination population. This population is also referred to as the multiple-race American Indian and Alaska Native population.

Third, the maximum number of people reporting American Indian or Alaska Native is reflected in the American Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-in-combination population. One way to define the American Indian and Alaska Native population is to combine those respondents who

reported American Indian and Alaska Native alone with those who reported American Indian and Alaska Native in-combination with one or more other races. The addition of these two groups creates the American Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-in-combination population. Another way to think of the American Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-in-combination

population is the people who reported American Indian or Alaska Native, whether or not they reported any other race(s). Asian and NHOPI and their specific groups are treated analogously to AIAN and the tribes.

3.4 ACS Sampling This discussion describes the ACS sampling for the data years 2006 through 2010, the data used

in the study. There have been refinements in the years 2011-2013, in addition to an overall increase in the sampling rates. For details on the 2010 ACS sampling methodology see the 2010 ACS Accuracy of the Data (U.S. Census Bureau, 2011). For details on the 2013 ACS sampling methodology see the 2013 ACS Accuracy of the Data (U.S. Census Bureau, 2014).

There are two phases to the ACS sampling of the household population: the address selection, and the subsampling of nonresponding addresses. The first phase sampling rate for a given block is determined by the measure of size (GUMOS) of the governmental unit which contains it, by

the measure of size of the census tract which contains it (TRACTMOS), and by its mail response rate. The measure of size for a geographic entity is its number of occupied housing units. If a block is part of more than one governmental unit, the GUMOS of the smallest governmental unit is used to determine the sample rate. See the list of governmental units below.

8

Governmental Units Used in ACS Sampling

Counties

Places

School Districts (elementary, secondary, and unified)

American Indian Areas

Tribal Subdivisions

Alaska Native Village Statistical Areas

Hawaiian Homelands

Minor Civil Divisions – in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin

Census Designated Places – in Hawaii only

The reliability of estimates is a direct function of the sample design, with higher sampling rates leading to more reliable estimates. Consistent with the goal of the ACS replacing the decennial census sample or long form data, the ACS sample is designed to obtain reliable estimates for

smaller geographic entities and governmental units. In Table 1 notice that the sampling rates are higher for blocks in smaller governmental units. In particular, they are higher for those with a GUMOS less than or equal to 1,200, which have sampling rates from 3.3 percent to 10 percent. Further, for blocks in governmental entities with GUMOS greater than 1,200, those blocks in

tracts with TRACTMOS less than 2,000 are sampled at higher rates. To ensure reliable measurements of AIAN people in AIR/ANVSAs, we multiply the GUMOS for the AIR/ANVSA by the proportion AIAN person (AOIC according to the 2010 Census) to

obtain a revised, proportionately lower GUMOS. This revised, lower GUMOS often leads to higher sampling rates in AIR/ANVSAs. For example, if the original GUMOS of an AIR/ANVSA is 5,000 occupied housing units, and 20 percent of its population is AIAN alone or in combination, then the GUMOS used is 1,000. Instead of an initial sampling rate of 1.3

percent to 2.3 percent (depending on TRACTMOS and the response rate) the sampling rate is 3.3 percent (for 2007 through 2010). Note that the sampling rates for non AIR/ANVSAs do not depend on the proportion of AIAN persons.

9

Table 1. 2006 Through 2010 Sampling Rates for the United States

Sampling Rate Category 2006

Sampling

Rates

2007

Sampling

Rates

2008

Sampling

Rates

2009

Sampling

Rates

2010

Sampling

Rates

Blocks in smallest

governmental units

(GUMOS < 200)

10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%

Blocks in smaller

governmental units

(200 ≤ GUMOS < 800)

6.8% 6.7% 6.6% 6.5% 6.7%

Blocks in small governmental

units

(800 ≤ GUMOS ≤ 1200)

3.4% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3%

Blocks in large tracts

(GUMOS > 1200,

TRACTMOS ≥ 2000) where

mailable addresses ≥ 75% and

predicted levels of completed

mail and CATI1 interviews

prior to CAPI subsampling >

60%

1.6% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5%

Other blocks in large tracts

(GUMOS > 1200,

TRACTMOS ≥ 2000)

1.7% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6%

All other blocks

(GUMOS > 1200,

TRACTMOS < 2000) where

mailable addresses ≥ 75% and

predicted levels of completed

mail and CATI interviews

prior to CAPI subsampling >

60%

2.1% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%

All other blocks

(GUMOS > 1200,

TRACTMOS < 2000)

2.3% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2%

In the second phase of ACS sampling nonresponding addresses are sampled for computer assisted personal interviewing (CAPI). The sampling rates are 33.3 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent, and 66.7 percent, depending on the degree of nonresponse. With greater

nonresponse, the sampling rate is higher; see Table 2 below. This is a second way to improve reliability for small geographies. Note that, like the first phase address sampling rates, the 2013 CAPI rates differ from those of 2006-2010.

1 CATI is the abbreviation of computer-assisted telephone interview.

10

Table 2. 2006 Through 2010 CAPI Subsampling Rates for the United States

Address and Tract Characteristics CAPI Subsampling Rates

Unmailable addresses and addresses in Remote Alaska 66.7%

Mailable addresses in tracts with predicted levels of completed mail

and CATI interviews prior to CAPI subsampling between 0% and

less than 36%

50.0%

Mailable addresses in tracts with predicted levels of completed mail

and CATI interviews prior to CAPI subsampling greater than 35%

and less than 51%

40.0%

Mailable addresses in other tracts 33.3%

4. METHODOLOGY

4.1 Source of Data

To produce estimates of reliability we used a subset of estimates available in the 2006-2010 ACS 5-Year Selected Population Tables (SPT) released in May of 2012. This data product was the first the Census Bureau released with this level of statistical detail for race groups and tribal

groupings since the Census 2000 Summary File #4 (SF4) was released about ten years ago. The SPT are a 5-year data product covering years 2006-2010. We chose this product over the regular 5-year 2006-2010 data products because it contains estimates by race group and tribal groupings in finer detail.

In this research we used estimates from the social, economic, and housing data profiles (DP02, DP03, and DP04, respectively). These included estimates for 297 characteristics across the three data profiles. This number excludes characteristics such as household relationships and ancestry and estimates appearing multiple times. These estimates are sometimes referred to as coming

from the "percent profile". Generally, this analysis looked at the CVs of percent distribution of estimates of characteristics given in the profiles, rather than those of the count. For example, the percent of family households and the percent foreign born was included in the analysis, and not the total number of family households or the total number of the foreign born. However, for

some profile lines only estimates of counts were available, in which case the CVs of these counts were used in the analysis. Furthermore, the analyses included means and averages, though not medians.

A limitation of using the SPT was their minimal population size threshold for publication, a disclosure avoidance measure to protect confidentiality. Confidentiality is the guarantee made by law (Title 13, United States Code) to individuals who provide census information, ensuring nondisclosure of that information to others. To be published in the SPT, a specific population

group had to have a population count of 7,000 or more based on the 2010 Census count and a weighted estimate of at least that size from the 2006-2010 5-year ACS. There were exceptions to this rule. If a specific group did not meet the minimum population threshold based on the criteria given above, but was published for Census 2000 SF4, it was included as being eligible

for production. To be published in the SPT for a specific geographic area below the national level, the population group had to have at least 50 unweighted sample cases in the area.

11

4.2 Measure of Reliability

We evaluated the reliability by computing the measure known as the coefficient of variation.

The CV is equal to the standard error (SE) of an estimate divided by the estimate itself, multiplied by 100 to put it in the form of a percentage. The formula is shown below.

𝐶𝑉 = 𝑆𝐸(𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒)

𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 × 100

The SE can be derived from the margin of error (MOE) provided for each ACS published estimate, i.e., SE = MOE/1.645. The CV is undefined for zero estimates, which we omitted from this analysis.

In most cases, the estimates and the MOEs needed to produce the SEs and CVs came from the percent profiles on the SPT. However, we had to produce special tabulations to calculate the estimates and SEs for populations living On and Off AIR/ANVSAs and for the in-combination populations.

The reliability of an estimate is inversely proportional to the size of the CV. The size of the CV is correlated with the size of the population being measured. For a fixed sampling rate, the CV of a small population tends to be larger than the CV of a larger population, while the reliability

of the small population tends to be lower than the reliability of the larger group. Figure 1 illustrates the relationship between the CV of an estimate and the population size on which the estimate is based. The X-axis plots the total population of 12 places2 of varying size

selected for this graph. The Y-axis plots the median CV of the place for the total population over the 297 characteristics. The CVs are from the 5-year 2006-2010 ACS. As we expect, the CVs are smaller for the larger places.

2 A place is a recognized and incorporated governmental entity. The U.S. Census Bureau defines a place

as a concentration of population; a place may or may not have legally prescribed limits, powers, or

functions. This concentration of population must have a name, be locally recognized, and not be part of

any other place. For more information see the Census Bureau’s Geographic Reference Manual (U.S. Census Bureau, 1994).

12

Source: 2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-year Data For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, please see

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/documentation_main/

4.3 Why the Coefficient of Variation

The Census Bureau has developed a set of statistical quality standards to promote quality in its information products and to provide guidance on many aspects of survey development and implementation. See the U.S. Census Bureau’s Quality Standards for more information on these

standards (U.S. Census Bureau, 2013). The CV is a commonly used measure of survey error used to assess adherence to Census Bureau quality standards for data release. For a survey to meet the Census Bureau’s quality standard for sampling error, the majority of the key estimates must have a CV less than or equal to 30 percent. In this assessment, we make no statements

about whether estimates with CVs above or below a certain percent indicate good or poor reliability, because different users have different desired levels of reliability. Estimates with CVs greater than 61 percent can be said to be unreliable, however, as those estimates are not significantly different from zero at the 90 percent confidence level.

The use of CVs entails noteworthy limitations, however. In particular, when the estimate is close to zero, the coefficient of variation approaches infinity. That said, the way we used CVs in this report was mostly robust to such limitations. When we compared race groups, all were using the

same characteristics measured the same way, so we had comparable CVs. An important exception was when there existed large differences in the prevalence of a characteristic between different groups. This situation is described in Section 6.1.

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000

Media

n C

V

Population Size

Figure 1. Median CV Across Characteristics

versus Population Size

for 12 Selected Places

Places


13

4.4 Presentation of Results With millions of published ACS 5-year estimates the decision of how to summarize measures of

reliability was not obvious. We picked estimates of common interest to data users, the profile characteristics at commonly used geographic summary levels. Furthermore, we decided on the quartiles and the median of CVs as measures of the distribution of reliability, though other choices such as the mean were defendable.

We present results for this report in tables with four basic formats.

The first is the simplest; it presents just the CV of the estimates of interest. This format

was used only for tables of CVs of characteristic by major race group at the national level.

The second, like the first, shows CVs of characteristic by major race group. However, the CVs shown are the median CVs taken over geographic areas, e.g., taken across the 51

state equivalents.

The third shows results by tribal grouping or detailed Asian or NHOPI race group. For these we took quartiles across the 297 characteristics for the nation. There was not enough data for tribal groupings or Asian or NHOPI groups to support characteristic by

group breakdowns.

The fourth shows results by AIR/ANVSA, taking quartiles across the 297 characteristics. There was not enough data for AIR/ANVSAs to support characteristic by AIR/ANVSA

breakdowns. Within the latter three formats, we include the 25

th, the 50

th and the 75

th percentile values for the

CVs labeled as Q1 CV, median CV, and Q3 CV, respectively. The majority of the tables include

results for the alone and/or alone-and-in-combination populations for the race groups and for the roughly 60 selected tribal groupings. Tables presented in the report are excerpts of the larger tables attached at the end of the document.

Notes for Tables by Major Race Group With the major race group tables, the CVs were based on all the non-zero characteristic estimates for all geographic areas with published race group percent profiles within the geographic summary level.

Notes for Tables by Detailed Asian or NHOPI Race Group With the detailed race group format, the CVs were based on all the non-zero characteristic estimates with published percent profiles for the nation.

14

Notes for Tables by Tribal Grouping With the tribal grouping format, the CVs were based on all the non-zero characteristic estimates for all geographic areas with published tribal grouping percent profiles within the geographic

summary level. Tables given in the report show a select subset of seven tribal groupings with

populations of about 25,000 or less nationally. We chose to focus on the same set of tribal groupings throughout the report to demonstrate how results may vary when looked at in different ways. However, the tables in the attachment show results for 60 selected tribal groupings, which

are listed in Table A6 in the attachment. Notes for Tables by Characteristic With the characteristic format, the CVs were based on the characteristic’s non-zero estimates

across all the geographic areas where they were published within a particular geographic summary level. For example, the state-level median CV for the characteristic educational attainment for persons 25 years of age and older was based on the estimates for this characteristic published in the SPT for states. We chose to present the same subset of the 297 characteristics

throughout the report. However, tables with the full set of characteristics are found in the attachment.

5. ANALYSES

In this section we describe the analyses we conducted. Each analysis addressed the research question of the corresponding number.

1. Examination of the reliability of Alone populations of the Major Race groups For this set of results we examined the CVs for the social, economic, and housing

characteristics of the AI alone, the AN alone, the White alone, the Black alone, the Asian

alone, and the Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (NHOPI) alone populations. There was no distinction made for persons identifying themselves as having Hispanic origins. Results by characteristic are provided at the national, state, county, tract, and AIR/ANVSA summary levels. For the national level we present the CV for each

characteristic for each major race group. For the subnational geographic areas we determined medians of the distribution of CVs across the geography for each characteristic by major race group. For example, for each characteristic we determined the median CV across the 51 state equivalents.

Note that often there was not a published profile for every combination of population by

geographic area at a particular summary level. For example, the AI alone population results were based on published profiles for only 521 of the 3,139 counties and county

equivalents published in the SPT.

15

2. Examination of the reliability of estimates of Asian race groups, NHOPI race groups,

and Tribal Groupings

We examined the CVs for the detailed Asian and NHOPI race groups, in addition to the tribal groupings. These tables present national-level results, with quartiles of CVs determined across the 297 characteristics.

3. Examination of the In-Combination Population of Tribal Groupings

We compared the reliability of estimates of the alone population to the in-combination

population for the tribal groupings for which the ACS publishes profile estimates. This

comparison was done at the national level across the 297 characteristics. The required data was not readily available in the SPT and required a special tabulation.

3

4. Examination of the reliability of estimates for the AIAN Population broken down by

the AI and AN populations We compared the reliability of estimates for each of the 297 characteristics of the AIAN

population for the AI and AN, populations, both AOIC and alone. We provide results for

the populations at the national, state, county, and AIR/ANVSA summary levels. The national-level results are CVs. However, for states, counties, and AIR/ANVSAs we determined quartiles for the CVs.

5. Places of similar sizes to Tribal Groupings

This analysis addressed the question of whether the reliability of estimates of tribal

groupings was as good as that of places with populations sizes comparable to those of the

tribal groupings. For both the places and tribal groupings we determined quartiles across the 297 characteristics. For the tribal groupings they were determined at the national level.

6. Examination of the reliability of estimates of the AIAN population living “On

Reservation” and “Off Reservation”

We assessed the On and the Off Reservation populations by tribal grouping. The required

data was not readily available in the SPT and required a special tabulation. We defined the

living on a reservation population as those who resided on any AIR/ANVSA and were published in the SPT. A limitation of this approach to calculating the On Reservation population was that the tribal groupings had to have a population of sufficient size to have at least one published percent profile for an AIR/ANVSA to be included in the evaluation.

Ten of the tribal groupings considered in this analysis did not have a published percent profile for any of the AIR/ANVSAs.

3 Data users can derive these estimates with data available in the SPT, but the CVs they calculate using

approximations will not equal the CVs presented in this report, which were calculated directly.

16

Note there were members of a specific tribal grouping living on other AIR/ANVSAs that were not included in the On Reservation results for their tribe. This was because the number of sample cases of members living on that tribal area was less than 50 to meet

minimal population threshold for publication with the SPT. They were included in the Off Reservation results for the tribal groupings that have at least one percent profile published for an AIR/ANVSA.

7. Examination of reliability of estimates of population in AIR/ANVSA

We obtained estimates for AIR/ANVSAs from the SPT. For the largest AIR/ANVSAs we

present median CVs across the 297 characteristics for the AIAN AOIC and AIAN alone

populations.

6. RESULTS

We start with results for the major race groups by summary level. All results presented in the Results section were based on estimates found in the ACS SPT except those for the On and Off Reservation and for the in-combination populations.

6.1. How did the CVs of the Race Alone population estimates compare?

Tables 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 provide the median CV results for the alone population of the four major race groups and AI and AN by selected characteristics for nation, state, county, AIR/ANVSA,

and tract, respectively. For results for the full set of characteristics see Tables A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5 in the attachment. Examining the Reliability of Estimates by Race Alone Populations at the National Level

In Table 3, the CVs of estimates of characteristics of the White alone, Black alone, and Asian alone population were less than one percent. In Table A1 in the attachment, almost all of the characteristic CVs for these groups were less than two percent. For the AI alone population,

about 95 percent of the CVs in Table A1 were below five percent. About 95 percent of CVs for AN alone and the NHOPI alone populations were less than 25 percent and 15 percent, respectively.

17

Table 3. Coefficients of Variation of Estimates of Select Characteristics for the Nation for Race Alone Populations

American

Indian

Alaska

Native White Black Asian NHOPI

Total Population 2,023,781 114,955 224,895,700 37,978,752 14,185,493 491,673

Characteristics

High School Grad 0.6% 1.7% 0.2% 0.3% 0.7% 1.4%

Foreign Born 2.2% 13.2% 0.2% 0.4% 0.1% 1.7%

Spoke a Language

other than English at Home

0.8% 2.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 1.3%

Employed 0.4% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%

Family Income

$50,000 to $74,999 1.0% 4.3% 0.1% 0.3% 0.5% 2.6%

All Persons in Poverty 0.9% 2.7% 0.5% 0.3% 0.7% 2.5%

Owner-Occupied Housing Unit Value

$150,000 to $199,999

1.5% 6.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.8% 5.1%

Source: 2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-year Data For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, please see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/documentation_main/

The CVs of estimates of characteristics foreign born, family income, and housing unit value were noticeably larger for the AI, AN, and NHOPI groups. Their larger CVs were likely due to their

smaller population sizes. We see the relationship between CV and population size again in Section 6.4, which compares estimates of AIAN populations to the estimates of places of similar size.

The Role of the Prevalence of a Characteristic in a Population in Determining the CV of its Estimate We see some exceptions to the pattern of lower CVs with larger populations. For example, in

Table 3 Asians had lower CVs than Whites or Blacks for several characteristics, namely percentage foreign born and percentage spoke a language other than English at home. This was despite Asians having much smaller populations than Whites or Blacks. This counterintuitive result was due to the low prevalence of these characteristics among Whites and Blacks. We see

this same pattern in Tables 5, 6, and 7, among other places in this report. This phenomenon is understood when one compares the prevalence of foreign born and spoke a language other than English at home among the major race groups White, Black, and Asian, as

shown in Table 4. The proportion foreign born of Whites and Blacks is a fraction of that of


18

Asians.4 Similarly, the proportion of spoke a language other than English at home of Whites and

Blacks is a fraction of that of Asians.5 As pointed out earlier in Section 4.3, the CV of a percentage goes to infinity as the percentage gets smaller. The smaller proportion foreign born

and spoke a language other than English at home drove the CVs for estimates of Whites and Blacks higher. Table 4. Proportion Foreign Born and Spoke a Language other than English at Home

Foreign Born MOE Spoke a Language other than

English at Home

MOE

White Alone 7.8% 0.1% 14.5% 0.1%

Black or African American Alone

8.0% 0.1% 7.9% 0.1%

Asian Alone 67.3% 0.2% 77.1% 0.3%

Sources: 2007 and 2009 American Community Survey 1-year Data For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, please see


Examining the Reliability of Characteristics by Race Alone Populations at the State Level

Recall that results were based on areas for which profiles were published. For some race groups only a small fraction of areas had published profiles. As expected, the CVs were larger for smaller populations. This observation was seen when comparing race groups for all summary levels. We also see this when we compared CVs at a higher summary level, such as the nation,

to those of lower summary levels, such as the state. At the state summary level, Table 5 shows the highest of median CVs were less than two percent, six percent, and eight percent for White, Black, and Asian alone populations

respectively. For the AI alone population, the percent foreign born had the highest median CV at roughly 20 percent. For the AN and NHOPI alone populations, the characteristic owner-occupied housing unit value $150,000 to $174,999 had the highest median CVs, with both over 40 percent.

Table A2 in the attachment has the median CVs across states of estimates for 297 characteristics. We notice that the median CVs for the White, Black, and Asian alone populations were modest, with 90 percent of CVs less than 4.5 percent, 14 percent, and 30 percent, respectively. For the

4 The number of Foreign Born broken down by major race group (alone) was presented in the U.S.

Census Bureau Brief, “Race and Hispanic Origin of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States”,

(Grieco, 2010). We calculated the proportions shown in Table 4 from these estimates using the approximation given in U.S. Census Bureau (2014, page 24) to calculate the MOEs for the proportions

from the MOEs of the estimated totals.

5 The estimates of proportion of spoke a language other than English at home broken down by major race

group (alone) were taken from the U.S. Census Brief, “People Who Spoke a Language Other Than English at Home by Hispanic Origin and Race”, (Johnson et al, 2010).


19

AI population, 90 percent of median CVs were less than 40 percent. In contrast, for the AN and NHOPI populations, roughly 15 percent of median CVs were greater than 61 percent with some large outliers. For the Asian population, the median CVs of estimates of foreign born and spoke

a language other than English at home were noticeably smaller than those of other race groups with larger populations. This was likely due to these characteristics being more prevalent in the Asian population.

Table 5. Median Coefficients of Variation Across States of Select Characteristics for Major Race Group Alone Populations

American

Indian Alaska Native White Black Asian NHOPI

Number of State

Equivalents Used 51 7 51 51 51 40

Average Population of Race Group in States Used

39,682 15,023 4,409,720 744,681 278,147 12,190

Characteristics

High School Grad 6.1% 20.1% 0.5% 1.6% 4.5% 17.0%

Foreign Born 20.9% 40.2% 1.6% 5.9% 1.0% 17.2%

Spoke a Language

other than English at Home

9.9% 33.6% 1.2% 4.6% 1.0% 15.0%

Employed 3.7% 10.6% 0.2% 0.9% 1.2% 7.4%

Family Income

$50,000 to $74,999 12.9% 43.0% 0.8% 3.6% 6.3% 32.4%



$150,000 to $199,999

15.5% 48.9% 0.9% 4.7% 7.4% 41.0%



Examining the Reliability of Characteristics by Race Populations at the County Level

Table 6 shows that most of the county-level median CVs for the AN and NHOPI alone populations were less than or roughly equal to the medians at the state level with the exception of foreign born for AN and housing unit value for NHOPI. When compared to the state table, the median CVs for White, Black, Asian and AI alone populations were typically about three times

or more larger.


20

In attached Table A3, around half of median CVs for the AI, AN, Asian, and NHOPI populations were 30 percent or less. For the White population, 85 percent of median CVs were 30 percent or less and for Black population, it was 60 percent. Around 20 percent of median CVs for the AI,

AN, Asian, and NHOPI populations were 61 percent or greater. For the White, five percent of median CVs are 61 percent or more and for the Black, it was ten percent. As we saw in Table 5, for the Asian population, the median CVs for estimates of foreign born and spoke a language other than English at home were noticeably smaller than other race groups with larger

populations. Again, this was likely due to these characteristics being more prevalent in the Asian population. Table 6. Median Coefficient of Variation Across Counties of Select Characteristics for Major

Race Group Alone Populations

American


Number of Counties Used

521 28 3,136 1,581 742 60

Average Population of

Race Group in Counties Used

3,276 3.389 71,713 23,869 18,704 6,286

Characteristics

High School Grad 18.1% 12.2% 4.1% 10.1% 22.1% 17.8%

Foreign Born 58.0% 70.4% 23.5% 47.3% 5.1% 21.9%

Spoke a Language other than English at

Home

30.3% 17.7% 15.8% 38.0% 5.6% 13.9%

Employed 9.9% 10.2% 2.3% 7.3% 6.7% 8.0%

Family Income $50,000 to $74,999

38.3% 31.1% 8.3% 27.1% 30.1% 35.1%

All Persons in Poverty Threshold

25.8% 21.6% 11.0% 15.9% 31.3% 32.7%


$150,000 to $199,999

48.9% 39.6% 11.2% 36.4% 37.7% 63.8%



Examining Reliability of Characteristics by Race Alone Populations at the AIR/ANVSA Level

In Table 7, we see most of the median CVs of estimates of the White, Black, and Asian populations were greater for AIR/ANVSAs than for those of the counties. This was because the populations of AIR/ANVSAs tend to be smaller than those of counties. In contrast, the median


21

CVs of estimates of characteristics of the AI and AN populations were comparable for counties and AIR/ANVSAs. Higher sampling rates in AIR/ANVSAs may account for this.

In Table A4 in the attachment, we see most of the median CVs for AIR/ANVSAs were larger than for those counties. We see this in the percentages of median CVs below 30 and above 61 percent, where 40 percent or less of median CVs were below 30 percent for the four smaller race groups. For the White and the Black populations, about 60 percent of median CVs were below

30 percent. In Table A4 about 40 percent of median CVs for the AN and NHOPI were 61 percent or more. For Asians and AI populations, approximately 75 percent of median CVs were greater than or

equal to 61 percent. For the White and Black populations in contrast, only 10 percent of median CVs were greater than 61 percent. Table 7. Median Coefficients of Variation Across American Indian Reservation Alaska Native

Village Statistical Areas of Select Characteristics for Major Race Group Alone Populations

American


Number of AIR/ANVSAs Used

196 98 160 37 23 16

Average Population of

Race Group in Areas Used

3,911 560 18,450 11,613 2,124 787

Characteristic

High School Grad 15.1% 15.0% 9.1% 10.6% 22.0% 14.0%

Foreign Born 87.9% 83.4% 38.6% 48.8% 6.5% 92.0%


Home

27.5% 15.3% 27.3% 43.6% 7.9% 32.2%

Employed 9.8% 13.9% 5.4% 10.5% 8.8% 11.5%

Family Income 50,000 to 74,999

35.9% 42.5% 16.7% 25.4% 39.4% 33.4%


Owner-Occupied Housing Unit Value $150,000 to $199,999

53.3% 57.4% 23.8% 53.3% 46.2% 47.1%



22

Examining Reliability of Characteristics by Race Populations at the Tract Level In Table 8, we see most of the median CVs for the AI and AN alone populations at the tract level

were less than or roughly equal to the median CVs at the county level with the exception of foreign-born and housing unit value. When comparing the tract-level CVs to the county-level CVs in Table 6, we note that the White alone population’s median CVs were roughly three times as great, and the Black and Asian alone populations roughly twice as great.

In attached Table A5, almost all the median CVs of tract-level estimates were larger than those of the county-level estimates. About half of median CVs for estimates of the AN and White populations were less than 30 percent. For Black, AI, Asian and the NHOPI, about 40 percent of

median CVs were less than 30 percent. About 20 percent of median CVs for the AN and White were 61 percent or more. For Black and AI populations, roughly 30 percent of median CVs were greater than or equal to 61 percent. About 40 percent of median CVs for the Asian and the NHOPI populations were greater than 61 percent.

Table 8. Median Coefficients of Variation Across Tracts of Select Characteristics for Major Race Group Alone Populations

American

Indian

Alaska

Native White Black Asian NHOPI

Number of Tracts Used 468 38 66,713 13,305 4,187 46

Average Population of Race Group in Tracts Used

1,431 1,596 3,345 2,019 1,517 1,199

Characteristic

High School Grad 19.5% 13.3% 14.5% 19.7% 38.2% 18.4%

Foreign Born 94.6% 87.2% 40.1% 61.1% 8.3% 66.9%

Spoke a Language other than English at Home

34.9% 24.0% 33.8% 61.4% 7.0% 33.6%

Employed 12.8% 10.7% 6.3% 11.9% 9.7% 13.2%

Family Income 50,000 to 74,999 45.0% 35.4% 26.6% 45.6% 50.9% 40.2%


Owner-Occupied Housing Unit Value $150,000 to $199,999

63.3% 42.2% 30.6% 59.6% 78.8% 56.9%

Source: 2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-year Data

For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, please see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/documentation_main/


23

6.2 The Reliability of Estimates of Asian and Native Hawaiian Other Pacific Islander

Race Groups

The patterns of reliability of estimates that we see for the detailed Asian race groups in Table 9 and the NHOPI race groups in Table 10 are consistent with the observations made in previous sections. (Note that in Table 9 there are no estimates for Okinawan alone and in Table 10 there are no estimates for Palauan alone because there was not sufficient sample to meet the

publication threshold). Namely, the CVs were smaller as the population sizes increase, as larger populations had correspondingly larger samples. Not surprisingly, the CVs in Tables 9 and 10 were comparable to CVs for AIAN populations and to places with similar population sizes. For example, the total NHOPI AOIC population size of 973,336 was not very different than that of

the Cherokee AOIC (see Table A11) at 1,043,817, and they had similar median CVs over the 320 characteristics of interest, 2.4 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively. For an example with smaller populations, consider the Assiniboine Sioux AOIC (see Table 15) and the Bhutanese AOIC in Table 9. These groups had similar populations of 5,900 and 6,358 and likewise similar

median CVs of 21.5 percent and 25.8 percent.

24

Table 9. Reliability of National Estimates Across Characteristics of Asian Race Groups by Alone-Or-In-Combination and Alone Populations

Alone or In Combination Alone

Group Total Population

Q1 CV Median CV

Q3 CV Total Population

Q1 CV Median CV

Q3 CV

Asian 16,198,607 0.3% 0.7% 1.2% 14,185,493 0.3% 0.7% 1.2%

Asian Indian 2,949,046 0.7% 1.5% 3.1% 2,713,768 0.6% 1.6% 3.4%

Bangladeshi 101,980 3.5% 7.8% 15.9% 93,389 3.7% 8.4% 17.3%

Bhutanese 6,358 12.2% 25.8% 50.7% 5,206 13.2% 26.9% 54.2%

Burmese 54,639 5.1% 10.3% 19.7% 47,171 5.7% 10.9% 21.2%

Cambodian 269,905 2.3% 4.8% 9.3% 234,980 2.5% 5.1% 9.6%

Chinese 3,873,730 0.5% 1.2% 2.2% 3,294,615 0.6% 1.3% 2.3%

Chinese except Taiwanese

3,755,773 0.6% 1.2% 2.2% 3,179,648 0.6% 1.3% 2.4%

Filipino 3,250,597 0.6% 1.4% 2.8% 2,523,448 0.7% 1.6% 3.2%

Hmong 238,312 2.5% 5.2% 10.6% 229,032 2.6% 5.4% 10.9%

Indonesian 92,414 3.3% 7.9% 14.9% 66,852 4.2% 9.8% 18.1%

Japanese 1,324,229 1.0% 1.8% 3.9% 817,103 1.1% 2.4% 4.7%

Korean 1,644,996 0.8% 1.9% 3.5% 1,399,643 0.9% 2.0% 3.8%

Laotian 238,603 2.5% 5.3% 9.8% 203,625 2.8% 5.5% 10.5%

Malaysian 24,659 6.8% 14.2% 26.0% 16,152 8.6% 17.3% 33.6%

Mongolian 16,856 8.1% 17.8% 31.1% 13,856 9.5% 20.4% 35.5%

Nepalese 40,119 5.5% 12.4% 25.0% 35,946 5.6% 12.7% 25.4%

Okinawan 10,527 9.8% 18.2% 36.9%

Pakistani 319,266 2.0% 4.6% 9.5% 288,661 2.2% 4.8% 10.1%

Sri Lankan 39,428 4.9% 11.6% 22.4% 34,868 5.3% 12.2% 24.0%

Taiwanese 126,649 2.9% 6.2% 12.6% 114,967 3.1% 6.6% 13.2%

Thai 232,785 2.3% 5.1% 9.3% 169,086 2.6% 5.6% 11.1%

Vietnamese 1,704,828 0.9% 1.9% 3.6% 1,547,864 0.9% 2.0% 3.8%




25

Table 10. Reliability of National Estimates Across Characteristics of NHOPI Race Groups by Alone-Or-In-Combination and Alone

Alone or In Combination Alone

Group Total Population

Q1 CV

Median CV

Q3 CV Total Population

Q1 CV

Median CV

Q3 CV

Native Hawaiian

and Other Pacific Islander

973,336 1.3% 2.4% 4.1% 491,673 1.7% 3.2% 5.7%

Fijian 33,999 5.8% 14.5% 28.2% 27,070 6.6% 16.1% 30.8%

Guamanian or Chamorro

117,901 3.8% 7.2% 12.8% 77,038 4.6% 8.3% 14.4%

Marshallese 16,257 9.3% 21.6% 40.7% 14,486 9.7% 20.0% 40.3%

Melanesian 34,423 5.8% 14.4% 28.1% 27,216 6.5% 16.3% 31.3%

Micronesian 176,008 3.0% 6.0% 9.9% 127,015 3.6% 6.8% 11.1%

Native Hawaiian 487,684 1.9% 3.5% 6.6% 158,221 3.2% 5.7% 10.1%

Palauan 7,901 12.5% 25.0% 44.1%

Polynesian 685,813 1.6% 2.9% 5.1% 310,119 2.3% 4.1% 7.3%

Samoan 154,052 3.6% 6.8% 12.3% 96,362 4.2% 8.3% 15.0%

Tongan 51,772 5.9% 12.4% 23.9% 39,532 6.2% 13.6% 24.7%


6.3 How did the reliability of a tribal grouping’s alone population estimates compare

with the reliability of its in-combination population?

For the 60 tribal groupings with a published profile for the AOIC population, Table A6 in the attachment gives results for the AOIC, the alone, and the in-combination populations for the median CV. Only 50 of these 60 tribal groupings have published profiles for the alone population. Recall the in-combination population is the balance of the AOIC population once

the alone population has been removed. When the AOIC and in-combination populations were similar in size, so were their median CVs. Figure 2 illustrates this point well, as the median CVs for both populations groups hew closely to

the same curve relating median CV to population size. The Y-axis plots the median CV of 60 tribal groupings, both alone and in combination, for the total population across the 297 characteristics. The X-axis plots the total population of the 60 tribal groupings, alone and IC. About 80 percent of tribal grouping in-combination populations had median CVs that were less

than or equal to 30 percent and all had median CVs less than 61 percent.


26



6.4 How did the reliability of the American Indian/Alaska Native population or tribal

grouping estimates compare with the reliability of the same estimates for the total

population at the same summary level or an area of similar size?

Examining Reliability of Characteristics by AIAN Populations at the National Level Table 11 displays the national-level CVs for estimates of seven selected characteristics for the total population and five AIAN populations. These characteristics cover social, housing, and

economic estimates. Several are of general interest such as educational attainment, poverty, and employment. The two range estimates, family income $50,000 to $74,999 and owner-occupied housing unit value, contain the United States median value of each. We selected the characteristics foreign born and spoke a language other than English at home because their

estimates are often unreliable for small populations. The 2006-2010 5-year ACS estimate of population for each group is provided above the CVs. Note that the AI AIOC total population and the AN AIOC total population add up to less than the AIAN AIOC total populations. The difference represents persons who responded that they were AIAN but did not specify a tribe.

For all characteristics presented in Table A7 in the attachment, 99 percent of the CVs were less than 30 percent. For the Total population estimates, all CVs but five were less than one percent. For the AIAN AOIC, column one of Table 11 shows all characteristics had CVs less than two

percent. Table A7 shows about 95 percent of characteristics for AIAN AOIC had CVs less than three percent.

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

1,000 11,000 21,000 31,000 41,000 51,000 61,000

Media

n C

V

Population Size

Figure 2. Median CVs Across Characteristics of Estimates of 60 Tribal Groupings for the Alone

Population and the In-Combination Populations by Population Size

Alone Pop

In Combination


27

Table 11. Coefficients of Variation of National Estimates of Selected Characteristics

Total

Population

American

Indian Alaska Native Alone

or In

Combination

American Indian Alaska Native

Alone or In Combi-

nation

Alone Alone or In

Combi-

nation

Alone

2006-2010 5-year ACS Estimate of Population 303,965,272 4,787,447 3,710,767 2,023,781 161,271 114,955

Characteristics

High school grad or

equivalency 0.2% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 1.6% 1.7%

Foreign born 0.2% 1.5% 1.8% 2.2% 11.6% 13.2%


0.1% 0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 2.0% 2.1%

Employed 0.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 1.1% 1.2%

Family Income

$50,000 to $74,999 0.1% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 3.6% 4.3%

All persons in Poverty 0.4% 0.6% 0.7% 0.9% 2.8% 2.7%

Owner-Occupied

Housing Unit Value $150,000 to $199,999

0.1% 1.0% 1.1% 1.5% 5.0% 6.1%



Table 11 shows that the estimates of characteristics of American Indian alone and American Indian AOIC populations had CVs about two percent or less. In Table A7 about 95 percent of all

estimates of characteristics AI alone and AI AOIC characteristics had CVs which were about five percent or less. In Table A7 for AN alone and AN AOIC population, about 95 percent of all estimates of characteristics had CVs less than 20 percent, with only a few with CVs above 30-percent.

Examining Reliability of Characteristics by AIAN Populations at the State Level Table 12 provides median CVs of state-level estimates for the same set of characteristics and

population groups summarized in Table 11. Table 12 also gives the average population size for states by population based on the 2006-2010 5-year ACS estimates. All estimates of characteristics shown in Table 12 of the total population at the state level had median CVs of one percent or less. In the attachment, Table A8 shows 90 percent of estimates of characteristics of

the total population had median state-level CVs which were less than three percent.


28

Table 12. Median Coefficients of Variation of Estimates for Populations Across States for Selected Characteristics

Total

Population

American Indian Alaska

Native Alone or In

Combination


Alone or In

Combination Alone

Alone or In Combi-

nation

Alone

Number of States with Profile

51 51 51 51 14 7

Average Population of States

5,960,103 93,872 72,760 39,682 10,671 15,023

Characteristics

High school grad or

equivalency 0.5% 3.4% 3.9% 6.1% 25.1% 20.1%

Foreign born 0.9% 14.5% 17.6% 20.9% 38.6% 40.2%


0.7% 6.6% 7.7% 9.9% 46.0% 33.6%

Employed 0.2% 1.8% 2.1% 3.7% 12.2% 10.6%

Family Income $50,000 to $74,999

0.7% 7.2% 8.4% 12.9% 42.6% 43.0%


Owner-Occupied


0.9% 8.8% 9.7% 15.5% 43.1% 48.9%



In Table 12, all the characteristics for the AIAN AOIC, the AI AOIC, and the AI alone

populations had state-level median CVs of about 21 percent or less. About 90 percent of median CVs in the attachment Table A8 were less than 20 percent. Some characteristics with state-level median CVs greater than 30 percent include: family and household incomes, housing unit values, and gross rent.

We point out that, except for total population, not every state had a published profile available for each of these populations. There is a publication restriction for geographic areas below the national level of 50 unweighted cases. This was the case for the AN alone and AN AOIC

populations. Profiles for the AN alone and AN AOIC populations are only published for seven and 14 states, respectively. In Table 12, the median state-level CVs for most estimates of the characteristics of the AN population were 30 percent or higher. In Table A8 in the attachment we saw similar CVs for the rest of the published characteristics.


29

Examining Reliability of Characteristics by AIAN Populations at the County Level In Table 13, we see the median county-level CVs of estimates of the same set of characteristics

and populations as in Tables 11 and 12. Table 13 also gives the average population size per published county for each group. At this smaller geographic summary level the publication restrictions made a greater impact. For example, the AIAN AOIC population results were based on only 1,173 of the 3,139 counties, and the results for the other groups were based on

substantially fewer counties. The average population sizes for these groups were between about 3,000 and 4,000. For this reason we would have expected the median CVs to be similar. But this was not the case for

some of the characteristics shown here and others in Table A9 in the attachment. There were other factors affecting the county-level median CVs. The prevalence of the specific characteristic in the population likely played a role to some extent. For example, for family income of $50,000 to $74,999, the median county-level CV for the AI was about 40 percent

while it was about 30 percent for the AN population. This might have been because the AI population tends to have income in the lower range categories than the AN populations. Table 13. Median Coefficients of Variation of Estimates Across Counties for Populations for

Selected Characteristics

Total

Population

American Indian Alaska Native Alone

or In Combination


Alone or In Combination

Alone

Alone or In

Combi-nation

Alone

Number of Counties with Profile 3,139 1,173 972 521 31 28

Average Population

of Counties 96,835 3,749 3,427 3,276 4,140 3,389

Characteristics

High school grad or equivalency

3.9% 18.0% 18.8% 18.1% 12.0% 12.2%

Foreign born 15.5% 60.8% 63.5% 58.0% 74.7% 70.4%


Home

11.1% 34.4% 36.1% 30.3% 18.5% 17.7%

Employed 2.3% 10.3% 10.6% 9.9% 9.1% 10.2%

Family Income

$50,000 to $74,999 8.0% 36.8% 38.1% 38.3% 29.3% 31.1%


Owner-Occupied


10.8% 45.7% 46.9% 48.9% 34.7% 39.6%




30

As expected, the relative sizes of the county-level median CVs of the populations were generally larger than what we saw at the state and national levels. That said, the state-level CVs for AN groups were an exception to this pattern, as many of these CVs were higher for states than for

counties. An explanation for this result was not immediately apparent. In Table 13, the median county-level CVs for Total population characteristics were about 15 percent or less. In the attached Table A9, about 90 percent of the median county-level CVs for total population characteristics were less than or equal to 30 percent.

On average, the median county-level CVs for characteristics of the AIAN AOIC population were much larger than those of the total population. About 30 percent of median county-level CVs for the AIAN AOIC population were less than 30 percent. The same was true for the AI alone and

AI AOIC population. Characteristics in Table 13 with median CVs above 30 percent are housing unit value from $150,000 to $199,999, Foreign Born, and, as seen earlier, family income $50,000 to $74,999. For the AN alone or AN AOIC populations, 50 percent of the county-level medians CVs were less than 30 percent and about 15 percent were greater than 61 percent.

Examining Reliability of Characteristics by AIAN Populations at the AIR/ANVSA Level There were 380 AIR/ANVSAs with a total population of sufficient size to have a percent profile

published in the SPT. Table 14 shows the median CVs taken across the AIR/ANVSAs for each selected characteristic. The same results for 297 characteristics are shown in Table A10. The AIAN AOIC population results came from published percent profiles available for 314 of the 380 AIR/ANVSAs. There were fewer published percent profiles for the four broken down

AIAN groups in AIR/ANVSAs because of their smaller populations.

31

Table 14. Median Coefficients of Variation of Estimates Across American Indian Reservation Alaska Native Village Statistical Areas for Selected Characteristics

Total

Population in AIR/ANVSAs

American

Indian Alaska Native Alone

or In

Combination


Alone or In

Combination Alone

Alone or In

Combi-nation

Alone

Average Population of Areas 12,493 3,415 4,645 3,911 634 560

Characteristics

High school grad or equivalency

12.3% 14.5% 14.7% 15.1% 14.5% 15.0%

Foreign born 49.6% 83.3% 87.3% 87.9% 87.2% 83.4%


Home

19.8% 23.1% 27.3% 27.5% 16.3% 15.3%

Employed 9.0% 11.2% 9.8% 9.8% 13.8% 13.9%

Family Income

$50,000 to $74,999 30.7% 36.8% 33.2% 35.9% 42.7% 42.5%

All persons in Poverty

25.1% 26.3% 23.3% 23.6% 30.8% 31.5%

Owner-Occupied


42.1% 51.9% 52.5% 53.3% 53.0% 57.4%



First note that the average population sizes of AI persons per AIR/ANVSA were larger than for the counties. However, the average AN populations of AIR/ANVSAs were smaller than for counties.

About 40 to 50 percent of characteristics given in Table A10 had a median CV of less than 30 percent. On the other hand, about 10 percent of the total population characteristics had median CVs greater than 61 percent. For the AI and the AN populations, 20 and 30 percent of characteristics were greater than 61 percent, respectively. These included the lowest and highest

categories of the characteristic family and household incomes and housing unit value. It is not surprising that foreign born had median AIR/ANVSA-level CVs well above 61 percent. As we pointed out in Section 6.1, the low prevalence of foreign born among the AIAN population would lead to higher CVs.


32

Examining Reliability of Estimates of Characteristics of Selected Tribal Groupings versus Places of Similar Size

In Figure 3 we plotted the median CVs across the 297 characteristics for 14 selected tribal groupings. Paired with each tribal grouping was the median of those places whose range contained the CV of the tribal grouping. For example, paired with the median CV of Alaskan Athabascan was the median taken across all places in the range of 25,000 to 35,000 population.

With larger populations we see smaller CVs, and tribal groupings had CVs similar to those of places with similar populations.



Table 15 shows the distribution of CVs at the national level for estimates of the AOIC population

of a select set of tribal groupings with populations of about 25,000 or less. They are presented with the CV distribution for places of similar population size. We see tribal groupings tended to have smaller differences between the Q1 CV and the Q3 CV than what we see for places of a similar population size. Median CVs for both populations were below 30 percent. For tribal

groupings, the Q3 CVs stayed below 30 percent until the population dropped below 14,000. For places, most Q3 CVs stayed below 30 percent until the population size dropped below 20,000. However, these tribal groupings have Q3 CVs that were smaller than those of the places. See Table A11 for these results for the 60 selected tribal groupings.

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000

Media

n C

V

Population Size

Figure 3. Median CVs Across Characteristics of the Alone or In Combination Population of 14 Selected

Tribal Groupings versus Places with Similar Population Size

Tribal Med CVs

Place Median CVs


33

Table 15. Coefficients of Variation of National Estimates Across Characteristics of Selected Tribal Groupings Alone-or-in-Combination Populations Compared to Places of Similar Size

Tribal Groupings

Alone-or-in-Combination Population Places of Similar Size

Popula-tion

Q1 CV

Median CV

Q3 CV

Q1 CV

Median CV

Q3 CV

Alaskan Athabascan 25,155 6.6% 11.8% 20.8% 5.6% 12.5% 24.9%

Aleut 19,409 8.0% 14.4% 25.0% 7.2% 15.8% 31.0%

Ute 13,683 9.1% 16.8% 28.7% 8.1% 17.6% 34.1%

Houma 10,925 11.2% 21.6% 35.7% 8.8% 19.1% 36.9%

Cree 9,702 10.2% 18.5% 31.1% 9.6% 20.7% 39.5%

Chippewa Cree 7,751 10.8% 19.2% 32.4% 10.7% 23.1% 43.6%

Assiniboine Sioux 5,900 12.2% 21.5% 38.1% 12.4% 26.1% 48.1%



Table 16 shows the distribution of CVs at the national level for estimates of the alone population of a select set of tribal groupings with populations of about 25,000 or less. They are presented with the CV distribution for places of similar population size. The tribal groupings given in this

table were the same as above except for the Chippewa Cree tribal grouping. There were no published profiles for the alone population for this grouping. In the attachment, Table A12 gives similar results for the 40 tribal groupings with published profiles for their alone population. The results were similar to what was seen in Table 16 for the AOIC population of the selected tribal

groupings. Table 16. Coefficients of Variation of National Estimates Across Characteristics of Selected Tribal Groupings Alone Populations Compared to Places of Similar Size

Tribal Groupings

Alone Population Places of Similar Size

Popula-

tion

Q1

CV

Median

CV Q3 CV

Q1

CV

Median

CV Q3 CV

Alaskan Athabascan 16,089 7.0% 12.7% 23.1% 7.2% 15.8% 31.0%

Aleut 11,697 9.4% 17.5% 29.0% 8.8% 19.1% 36.9%

Houma 8,522 11.8% 22.5% 36.5% 9.6% 20.7% 39.5%

Ute 8,279 10.7% 20.4% 37.6% 9.6% 20.7% 39.5%

Assiniboine Sioux 4,602 13.5% 24.0% 41.0% 12.4% 26.1% 48.1%

Cree 2,600 18.3% 33.0% 52.6% 14.0% 28.8% 52.0%


6.5 How did the reliability of the tribal grouping estimates for the population living On

Reservation compare with the reliability of the same tribal grouping estimates for

the population living Off Reservation?

For the next set of tables, we look at the CVs for the On and Off Reservation population. Tables 17 and 18 give the weighted counts and CV distribution results for the Q1 CV, the median CV and the Q3 CV for the On Reservation and the Off Reservation populations for seven

selected tribal groupings. Table 17 shows results for the AOIC population and Table 18 shows



34

results for the alone population for the same tribal groupings. See Tables A13 and A14 in the attachment for details of the other 53 tribal groupings. The size of the median CVs and distribution of CVs depended on the population size of the tribal grouping. Note that in Table 18

Chippewa Cree has no alone population profile, as it did not meet the minimum population size threshold for publication in the SPT. Interestingly, for several tribal groupings, the On Reservation median CVs were smaller than

those of the Off Reservation despite having smaller populations. We see this for Chippewa Cree AOIC tribal grouping, and for the Assiniboine Sioux for alone population. This could be due to the higher sampling rates of AIR/ANVSAs with low percentages of AIAN persons (a higher sampling rate means proportionally more sample selected; see Section 4.3 for a description of the

ACS sampling). However, for most tribal groupings, the size of the On and Off Reservation populations differed, so we cannot make useful direct comparisons. Table 17. First Quartile, Median, and Third Quartile Coefficients of Variation Across

Characteristics of Estimates of the Alone-or-in-Combination On and Off Reservation Populations By Selected Tribal Groupings

Tribal Grouping

On Reservation Off Reservation

Alone or In Com-

bination Popu-lation

Q1 CV

Median CV

Q3 CV

Alone or In Com-

bination Popu-lation

Q1 CV

Median CV

Q3 CV

Alaskan Athabascan 3,600 11.9% 21.6% 35.7% 21,555 7.5% 13.1% 22.2%

Aleut 1,748 18.7% 33.7% 53.1% 17,661 8.5% 15.0% 26.7%

Assiniboine Sioux 2,463 14.9% 27.0% 46.6% 3,437 17.0% 30.9% 52.6%

Chippewa Cree 2,129 13.2% 22.2% 41.3% 5,622 14.3% 27.1% 43.5%

Cree 421 26.6% 41.6% 68.3% 9,281 10.5% 18.9% 33.1%

Houma 5,933 14.4% 28.7% 50.8% 4,992 15.3% 27.7% 45.7%

Ute 4,172 13.0% 22.6% 37.7% 9,511 12.0% 21.7% 37.2%




35

Table 18. First Quartile, Median, and Third Quartile Coefficients of Variation Across Characteristics of Estimates of the Alone On and Off Reservation Populations by Selected Tribal Groupings

Tribal Grouping

On Reservation Off Reservation

Alone

Popu-lation

Q1

CV

Median

CV

Q3

CV

Alone

Popu-lation

Q1

CV

Median

CV

Q3

CV


Aleut 511 21.3% 37.2% 58.4% 11,186 9.9% 17.8% 29.0%


Cree 417 26.9% 41.3% 67.3% 2,183 19.1% 35.9% 55.3%

Houma 5,009 15.2% 28.2% 50.0% 3,513 15.6% 32.8% 49.0%

Ute 3,755 12.9% 23.4% 38.4% 4,524 15.7% 30.3% 49.6%



Figure 4 shows the median CVs across the 297 characteristics for the On and Off Reservation

populations of the 60 tribal groupings by total population. Again, as we would expect, we see a clear relationship between CV and population size, with larger populations leading to smaller CVs. In particular, On and Off populations with similar population sizes had similar CVs, though there may be a tendency for the On Reservation CVs to be a little lower than similarly

sized Off Reservation CVs. If this was true, it could be attributable to the higher sampling rates in some AIR/ANVSAs.



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 10,000,000

Media

n C

V

Total Population (log10 scale)

Figure 4. Median CVs Across Characteristics for 60 Tribal Groupings

for Alone Or In Combination On/Off Reservation by Population Size

On Res

Off Res



36

6.6 Reliability of American Indian Reservation/Alaska Native Village Statistical Areas Table 19 shows the median CVs of estimates across the 297 characteristics for the largest 20

AIR/ANVSAs. It shows these CVs for the areas’ total, AIOC, and alone populations. The median CVs followed the patterns seen throughout, namely, larger population sizes lead to smaller CVs. We see this pattern in the first column of Table 19, where CVs increased as the sample size decreased. That said, there are anomalies in this pattern that are worth noting. For

example, the median CV of 3.9 percent for the Cher-O-Creek State Designated Tribal Statistical area (SDTSA), AL, was lower than for AIR/ANVSAs of similar size (Citizen Potawatomi Nation-Absentee Shawnee Oklahoma Tribal Statistical area (OTSA), and Knik ANVSA, AK). The AIR/ANVSAs closest in total population on either side had median CVs of 6.1 percent and

7.9 percent. It may have been due to the modest number of AIR/ANVSA persons actually living in this area, 717. As described in the section on sampling, AIR/ANVSAs with smaller proportions of AIR/ANVSA persons had higher sampling rates. It seems that the higher sampling rates in this AIR/ANVSA was effective, as the median CV for AIR/ANVSA AOIC

persons was 30.0 percent despite the small population size of 717. We see a similar anomaly with the Samish Tribal Designated Statistical area (TDSA), WA, which had a median CV of 5.9 percent.

37

Table 19. Median Coefficients of Variation of Estimates Across Characteristics of the Alone-or-in-Combination and the Alone Populations by the 20 Most Populace American Indian Reservation and Alaska Native Village Statistical Areas

American Indian Reservation or Alaska Native Village Statistical Area

Total Population AIAN Alone or In

Combination AIAN Alone

Population Count

Median CV

Population Count

Median CV

Population Count

Median CV

Creek OTSA, OK 742,695 2.2% 94,170 6.7% 50,300 8.7%

Cherokee OTSA, OK 496,119 2.9% 118,389 5.7% 69,603 7.2%

Lumbee (state) SDTSA, NC 476,101 3.2% 69,733 9.0% 59,322 9.4%

Chickasaw OTSA, OK 298,670 3.7% 39,478 10.1% 20,919 13.5%

Choctaw OTSA, OK 229,719 3.8% 45,122 8.2% 23,876 10.3%

United Houma Nation (state) SDTSA, LA 199,221 5.0% 9,491 23.4% 7,526 25.4%

Kiowa-Comanche-Apache-Fort Sill Apache OTSA, OK

193,105 4.2% 16,571 14.3% 10,290 16.0%

Cheyenne-Arapaho OTSA, OK 169,942 4.7% 12,266 18.0% 7,775 21.3%

Navajo Nation Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, AZ--NM--UT 169,052 4.7% 163,212 4.6% 162,298 4.6%

Citizen Potawatomi Nation-Absentee Shawnee OTSA, OK

114,525 6.1% 11,973 18.3% 6,544 22.8%

Cher-O-Creek (state) SDTSA, AL 81,850 3.9% 717 30.0% 384 37.2%

Knik ANVSA, AK 61,930 7.9% 6,060 24.0% 2,521 30.2%

Coharie (state) SDTSA, NC 57,805 6.0% 1,700 27.6% 956 29.8%

Sac and Fox OTSA, OK 57,114 8.2% 7,556 19.8% 4,387 24.1%

Echota Cherokee (state) SDTSA, AL 52,402 9.6% 3,445 30.8% 1,867 36.9%

Osage Reservation, OK 47,192 8.9% 9,801 19.2% 6,172 21.3%

Puyallup Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, WA

46,358 6.3% 1,940 26.7% 1,271 31.4%

Samish TDSA, WA 36,392 5.9% 691 35.3% 352 43.1%

Kenaitze ANVSA, AK 31,983 10.6% 3,295 28.7% 1,839 32.1%

Yakama Nation Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, WA 31,692 11.8% 7,463 24.5% 6,642 24.6%



In Table A15 in the attachment, we see about half of the AIR/ANVSAs had median CVs that were below 30 percent for both the total population and AOIC population while less than one

percent of areas have median CVs greater than 61 percent. As expected, the size of the CVs was dependent on the size of the population in the specific area and somewhat followed the trend we have been seeing.


38

Figure 5 plots the median CVs across the 297 characteristics against the population size for the AIR/ANVSAs with populations of at least 250 and under 30,000. From Figure 5 we see that as the population size decreased the median CVs increased, although this relationship was not

smooth. The differences in median CVs for areas with closely similar population sizes were inconsistent with the patterns we saw in other comparisons. This may have been due to differing sampling rates in AIR/ANVSAs, which depended on the number of AIAN persons in an AIR/ANVSA (see the discussion on sampling in Section 4.3).



7. SUMMARY

The main observation is that the level of reliability and size of the CVs were largely dependent on the size of the population on which the estimates were based. A key point the study

established was that the reliability of estimates of small tribal groupings was comparable to that of geographic areas of similar population size. Furthermore, we found that race groups and tribal groupings of similar population size had similar levels of reliability. For a fixed sample size, two populations of similar size tended to have comparable CVs for their estimates.

A major conclusion is that by focusing on ACS sample design on sound estimates of small geographies, we obtain sound estimates for small population groups. In this sense we are reassured about the ACS sample design. Another study which would examine the effects of the

2011 sample increase on 5-year estimates may be worth pursuing.

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

250 4,250 8,250 12,250 16,250 20,250 24,250 28,250

Media

n C

V

Population Size

Figure 5. Median CVs Across Characteristics by Total Population for 297 AIR/ANVSA with

Populations Under 30,000

Reservations


39

Another factor which could influence the size of the CVs was the prevalence of a characteristic in a population. With populations with similar population sizes, there could be higher CVs for the population where the proportion of the characteristic was smaller, especially if it was

relatively close to zero. This was a limitation of using CVs of proportions as a measure of reliability. Lastly, while the CVs for the total population of the AIR/ANVSA were generally determined by

the total population size, there was evidence that AIR/ANVSAs had lower CVs due to higher sampling rates. Several specific observations follow.

By Race Group and Tribal Grouping

Race groups and tribal groupings with similar population sizes generally had comparable

estimate CVs.

The CVs of estimates of the alone population and the in-combination population were comparable when the population sizes were similar.

Tribal groupings and places/communities with similar population size totals generally had

comparable CVs.

Tribal groupings with similarly sized On Reservation and Off Reservation populations generally had comparable CVs.

Tribal groupings with different proportions of population for the On Reservation and the Off Reservation had smaller CVs for estimates in the larger of the two groups. However, results were usually comparable with the results of other populations of similar size.

Race groups and tribal groupings with similarly sized alone-and-in-combination populations

generally had comparable CVs.

By Profile Characteristic

The sizes of CVs were driven by size of the population at all geographic summary levels, but

at the smaller summary levels (county and AIR/ANVSA) the prevalence of the characteristic also played a role.

The median CVs of estimates of characteristics of the American Indian alone and Alaska

Native alone populations were larger than those of the White alone, Black alone, and Asian alone populations. The size of the NHOPI alone population median CVs compared to those of the American Indian alone and Alaska Native alone varied by summary level. These differences were consistent with population sizes.

We add that coefficients of variation were a useful measure of reliability. They provided measures of reliability free of scale which allowed us to compare the reliabilities of estimates of disparate characteristics and populations.

We also note that we did not have the data available in the same format for a directly analysis of detailed Hispanic groups. However, for similar if not completely comparable analyses with

40

Hispanic groups we found the CVs for estimates of Hispanic groups similar to those of race groups with similar sizes.

8. REFERENCES Humes, K., Jones, N., Ramirez, R. (2011). Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010. 2010

Census Briefs. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf

Grieco, E. (2010). Race and Hispanic Origin of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 2007. American Community Survey Reports. http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acs-11.pdf

Johnson, T., Ríos, M., Drewery, M., Ennis, S., Kim, M.O. (2010). People Who Spoke a

Language Other Than English at Home by Hispanic Origin and Race: 2009. American Community Survey Briefs. http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acsbr09-19.pdf

Norris, T., Vines, P., and Hoeffel, E. (January 2012). The American Indian and Alaska Native Population: 2010. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-10.pdf 2010

Census Briefs. U.S. Census Bureau (1994). Geographic Areas Reference Manual; Chapter 9: Places.

http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/pdfs/GARM/Ch9GARM.pdf U.S. Census Bureau (2011). American Community Survey Multiyear Accuracy of the Data

(3-year 2008-2010 and 5-year 2006-2010). http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2010.pdf

U.S. Census Bureau (2013). U.S. Census Bureau Statistical Quality Standards.

http://www.census.gov/quality/standards/Quality_Standards.pdf U.S. Census Bureau (2014). American Community Survey Accuracy of the Data 2013.

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/ACS_Accuracy_of_Data_2013.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acs-11.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acsbr09-19.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-10.pdf

http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/pdfs/GARM/Ch9GARM.pdf

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2010.pdf

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2010.pdf



ATTACHMENT

41

Table A1. Coefficients of Variation of Estimates of Select Characteristics for the Nation for Race Alone Populations

Characteristic AI Alone AN Alone

White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE

Total households 0.5% 2.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.9%

Family households (families) 0.3% 1.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%

With own children under 18 years 0.7% 2.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 1.1%

Married-couple family 0.7% 2.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 1.3%


Male householder, no wife present, family 1.7% 5.0% 0.5% 0.6% 1.0% 3.8%


Female householder, no husband present, family 1.1% 3.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.7% 2.6%


Nonfamily households 0.8% 2.5% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 2.1%

Householder living alone 0.9% 3.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4% 2.9%

65 years and over 1.7% 7.1% 0.5% 0.4% 1.3% 6.8%

Households with one or more people under 18 0.6% 1.6% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.9%

Households with one or more people 65 years and over

1.0% 2.5% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 2.4%

Average household size 0.4% 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 1.0%

Average family size 0.5% 1.6% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.9%

MARITAL STATUS

Males 15 years and over 0.5% 1.5% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.8%

Never married 0.6% 1.4% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 1.2%

Now married, except separated 0.7% 2.3% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 1.2%

Separated 3.2% 10.2% 0.7% 0.6% 1.8% 6.7%

Widowed 3.0% 8.5% 0.3% 0.7% 1.6% 8.9%

Divorced 1.4% 5.8% 0.5% 0.4% 0.9% 4.3%

Females 15 years and over 0.4% 1.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7%

Never married 0.7% 1.9% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 1.2%


Separated 2.8% 8.5% 0.7% 0.6% 1.6% 5.7%

Widowed 1.3% 4.7% 0.1% 0.3% 0.5% 3.7%

Divorced 1.1% 6.0% 0.4% 0.3% 0.7% 3.6%

FERTILITY

Number 15 to 50 years old who had birth past 12 month

2.1% 6.0% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 4.8%

Unmarried women (widowed, divorced, never

married)

2.1% 4.6% 0.8% 0.4% 2.8% 5.6%

Per 1,000 unmarried women 2.9% 7.8% 0.5% 0.7% 2.9% 7.7%

Per 1,000 women 15 to 50 years old 2.0% 6.0% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 4.7%




GRANDPARENTS

Number living with own grandchildren under 18

years

1.4% 4.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.9% 3.2%

Responsible for grandchildren 1.4% 3.1% 0.4% 0.4% 1.9% 4.6%

ATTACHMENT

42



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

YEARS RESPONSIBLE FOR GRANDCHILDREN

Less than 1 year 3.6% 11.9% 0.7% 1.5% 3.7% 10.1%

1 or 2 years 4.0% 11.1% 0.7% 1.4% 3.6% 12.2%

3 or 4 years 4.1% 13.2% 0.8% 1.7% 4.4% 16.3%

5 or more years 3.1% 7.4% 0.6% 1.0% 3.7% 7.8%

NUMBER OF GRANDPARENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR

OWN GRANDCHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS

Who are female 1.0% 3.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.9% 2.3%

Who are married 1.7% 3.1% 0.2% 0.5% 0.9% 2.6%

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT

Population 3 years and over enrolled in school 0.6% 2.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 1.3%

Nursery school, preschool 1.9% 7.2% 0.3% 0.5% 0.9% 5.5%

Kindergarten 2.4% 5.9% 0.2% 0.6% 0.9% 5.2%

Elementary school (grades 1-8) 0.6% 1.8% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 1.3%

High school (grades 9-12) 0.8% 2.6% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 1.9%

College or graduate school 1.1% 4.8% 0.1% 0.3% 0.2% 2.0%

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Population 25 years and over 0.4% 1.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%

Less than 9th grade 1.6% 3.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 3.5%

9th to 12th grade, no diploma 1.1% 3.8% 0.3% 0.3% 0.7% 2.7%

High school graduate (includes equivalency) 0.6% 1.7% 0.2% 0.3% 0.7% 1.4%

Some college, no degree 0.8% 2.6% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4% 1.7%

Associate's degree 1.4% 6.8% 0.1% 0.4% 0.5% 3.0%

Bachelor's degree 1.1% 6.1% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 2.7%

Graduate or professional degree 1.9% 9.6% 0.3% 0.7% 0.5% 4.6%

Percent high school graduate or higher 0.2% 0.7% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4%

Percent bachelor's degree or higher 0.9% 5.1% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 2.2%

VETERAN STATUS

Civilian population 18 years and over 0.3% 1.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%

Civilian veterans 1.0% 4.3% 0.1% 0.3% 0.9% 2.6%

RESIDENCE 1 YEAR AGO

Population 1 year and over 0.3% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%

Same house 0.3% 0.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7%

Different house in the U.S. 1.2% 3.2% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 2.4%

Same county 1.5% 4.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.7% 3.2%

Different county 1.6% 5.1% 0.3% 0.5% 0.8% 3.8%

Same state 2.0% 5.4% 0.4% 0.6% 1.1% 5.6%

Different state 2.5% 10.8% 0.3% 0.8% 1.0% 4.9%

Abroad 6.3% 25.6% 0.7% 1.6% 1.1% 7.7%

PLACE OF BIRTH

Total population 0.3% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%

Native 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.5%

Born in United States 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.7%

State of residence 0.3% 0.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.9%

ATTACHMENT

43



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

Different state 0.6% 3.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.5% 1.4%

Born in PR, U.S. Islands, or abroad American

parent(s)

4.6% 18.2% 0.3% 0.9% 1.0% 2.1%

Foreign born 2.2% 13.2% 0.2% 0.4% 0.1% 1.7%

U.S. CITIZENSHIP STATUS

Naturalized U.S. citizen 2.9% 19.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 2.4%

Not a U.S. citizen 1.2% 9.4% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 1.4%

YEAR OF ENTRY

Population born outside the United States 2.2% 11.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% 1.3%

NATIVE

Entered 2000 or later 8.4% 31.3% 0.9% 2.1% 1.8% 2.9%

Entered before 2000 2.3% 10.1% 0.2% 0.7% 0.6% 1.7%

FOREIGN BORN

Entered 2000 or later 3.0% 18.9% 0.3% 0.6% 0.3% 2.8%

Entered before 2000 1.8% 14.6% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 1.7%

WORLD REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN BORN

(excluding population born at sea)

Europe 17.2% 50.9% 0.2% 2.3% 2.5% 14.7%

Asia 11.7% 43.1% 0.7% 4.3% 0.1% 9.1%

Africa 37.9% 97.1% 1.0% 0.5% 2.5% 26.0%

Oceania 38.0% 27.6% 1.7% 11.6% 4.7% 1.0%

Latin America 0.6% 27.7% 0.1% 0.3% 1.7% 6.7%

Northern America 6.9% 31.0% 0.6% 3.9% 2.4% 26.9%

LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME


English only 0.3% 0.9% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.9%

Language other than English 0.8% 2.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 1.3%

Speak English less than "very well" 1.8% 3.4% 0.2% 0.7% 0.2% 2.2%

Spanish 1.7% 20.8% 0.1% 0.9% 2.1% 6.1%


Other Indo-European languages 4.2% 18.3% 0.2% 0.8% 0.5% 4.4%


Asian and Pacific Islander languages 11.4% 23.7% 1.0% 3.4% 0.1% 1.7%


Other languages 0.9% 2.1% 0.8% 0.9% 5.0% 11.3%


EMPLOYMENT STATUS


In labor force 0.3% 1.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.5%

Civilian labor force 0.3% 1.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%

Employed 0.4% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%

Unemployed 1.2% 3.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.7% 2.7%

Armed Forces 6.0% 34.5% 0.6% 1.4% 2.5% 5.7%

Not in labor force 0.4% 1.5% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 1.2%

Percent Unemployed (civilian labor force) 1.2% 3.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.7% 2.6%

ATTACHMENT

44



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone


In labor force 0.4% 1.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.8%


Employed 0.4% 1.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 1.0%


All parents in family in labor force 0.9% 3.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4% 2.3%

With own children 6 to 17 years 0.7% 2.9% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 1.8%


COMMUTING TO WORK

Workers 16 years and over 0.5% 1.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.8%

Car, truck, or van -- drove alone 0.3% 2.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%

Car, truck, or van -- carpooled 1.3% 5.1% 0.2% 0.6% 0.5% 2.2%

Public transportation (excluding taxicab) 3.0% 12.1% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 4.8%

Walked 2.2% 3.0% 0.3% 0.8% 1.0% 4.9%

Other means 4.3% 4.5% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 7.2%

Worked at home 2.6% 10.6% 0.2% 1.0% 0.9% 5.8%

Mean travel time to work (minutes) 0.5% 2.9% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.9%

OCCUPATION

Management, business, science, and arts occupations

0.9% 2.9% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 1.9%

Service occupations 1.1% 3.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.6% 2.0%

Sales and office occupations 0.9% 2.7% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4% 1.6%

Natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations

1.4% 5.2% 0.2% 0.5% 0.9% 3.1%

Production, transportation, and material moving

occupations

1.3% 5.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.7% 2.3%

INDUSTRY

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and

mining

4.1% 9.8% 0.3% 1.8% 2.1% 11.1%

Construction 1.6% 7.3% 0.3% 0.8% 1.2% 3.8%

Manufacturing 1.5% 11.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.5% 3.5%

Wholesale trade 3.0% 16.9% 0.2% 0.9% 1.1% 5.6%

Retail trade 1.6% 5.9% 0.2% 0.4% 0.5% 2.7%

Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 2.5% 6.4% 0.2% 0.5% 0.8% 3.2%

Information 4.4% 15.1% 0.3% 0.8% 1.0% 7.1%

Finance and insurance, real estate, rental and

leasing

2.5% 11.3% 0.2% 0.4% 0.7% 3.7%

Professional, scientific, and management 1.7% 7.9% 0.1% 0.4% 0.5% 3.2%

Educational services, health care, social assistance 1.0% 3.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.4% 2.1%

Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation 1.5% 6.3% 0.3% 0.5% 0.8% 2.6%

Other services, except public administration 1.9% 8.0% 0.2% 0.6% 1.0% 4.8%

Public administration 1.6% 4.5% 0.2% 0.5% 1.0% 3.7%

CLASS OF WORKER

Private wage and salary workers 0.4% 1.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.5%

Government workers 1.0% 2.7% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 2.4%

ATTACHMENT

45



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

Self-employed in own not incorporated business workers

1.9% 9.7% 0.2% 0.7% 0.8% 4.7%

Unpaid family workers 12.7% 34.2% 0.9% 4.5% 3.7% 22.9%

INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2010 INFLATION-

ADJUSTED DOLLARS)

Less than $10,000 1.1% 5.7% 0.2% 0.3% 0.8% 5.5%

$10,000 to $14,999 1.8% 6.6% 0.2% 0.4% 1.0% 6.2%

$15,000 to $24,999 1.2% 4.6% 0.1% 0.3% 0.7% 3.9%

$25,000 to $34,999 1.3% 3.9% 0.2% 0.3% 0.8% 3.9%

$35,000 to $49,999 1.2% 4.0% 0.1% 0.4% 0.6% 2.6%

$50,000 to $74,999 1.1% 4.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.5% 2.4%

$75,000 to $99,999 1.4% 5.6% 0.1% 0.4% 0.6% 2.9%

$100,000 to $149,999 1.7% 5.6% 0.2% 0.5% 0.4% 3.0%

$150,000 to $199,999 3.1% 11.9% 0.3% 0.9% 0.7% 5.8%

$200,000 or more 4.8% 14.6% 0.3% 1.2% 0.6% 7.4%

Mean household income (dollars) 0.5% 1.7% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 1.0%

With earnings 0.2% 0.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4%

Mean earnings (dollars) 0.6% 2.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 1.1%

With Social Security 0.9% 2.8% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4% 2.0%

Mean Social Security income (dollars) 0.6% 2.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 1.5%

With retirement income 1.3% 3.6% 0.1% 0.4% 0.7% 2.8%

Mean retirement income (dollars) 1.7% 9.7% 0.1% 0.5% 0.8% 3.2%

With Supplemental Security Income 1.5% 7.0% 0.3% 0.4% 0.9% 5.5%

Mean Supplemental Security Income (dollars) 0.9% 5.4% 0.1% 0.3% 0.6% 2.6%

With cash public assistance income 1.9% 3.7% 0.3% 0.4% 1.1% 4.5%

Mean cash public assistance income (dollars) 2.0% 4.2% 0.4% 0.7% 1.3% 5.4%

With Food Stamp/SNAP benefits in the past 12

months

0.9% 3.0% 0.3% 0.2% 0.9% 3.2%

FAMILIES

Less than $10,000 1.7% 7.7% 0.5% 0.5% 1.2% 6.3%

$10,000 to $14,999 2.4% 7.7% 0.5% 0.7% 1.4% 7.8%

$15,000 to $24,999 1.5% 6.2% 0.4% 0.4% 0.9% 5.0%

$25,000 to $34,999 1.9% 5.2% 0.3% 0.4% 1.0% 5.0%

$35,000 to $49,999 1.5% 5.2% 0.2% 0.4% 0.8% 3.0%

$50,000 to $74,999 1.0% 4.3% 0.1% 0.3% 0.5% 2.6%

$75,000 to $99,999 1.6% 6.0% 0.2% 0.5% 0.6% 3.1%

$100,000 to $149,999 2.0% 5.9% 0.3% 0.6% 0.5% 3.2%

$150,000 to $199,999 3.2% 11.7% 0.3% 1.1% 0.7% 6.1%

$200,000 or more 5.0% 16.8% 0.3% 1.3% 0.7% 8.1%

Mean family income (dollars) 0.7% 2.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 1.2%

Per capita income (dollars) 0.6% 1.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 1.0%

Mean nonfamily income (dollars) 1.1% 3.6% 0.2% 0.2% 0.5% 3.1%

ATTACHMENT

46



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES AND PEOPLE WHOSE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS IS BELOW THE

POVERTY LEVEL

All families 1.1% 4.1% 0.5% 0.3% 0.8% 3.1%

With related children under 18 years 1.2% 4.1% 0.6% 0.4% 1.1% 3.3%

With related children under 5 years only 2.7% 10.9% 0.7% 0.8% 2.4% 9.6%

Married couple families 1.9% 7.6% 0.5% 0.8% 1.1% 5.2%



Families with female householder, no husband 1.2% 6.0% 0.3% 0.3% 1.4% 4.5%



All people 0.9% 2.7% 0.5% 0.3% 0.7% 2.5%

Under 18 years 1.3% 4.0% 0.8% 0.5% 1.2% 3.4%

Related children under 18 years 1.4% 4.3% 0.8% 0.5% 1.3% 3.4%


Related children 5 to 17 years 1.5% 4.5% 0.8% 0.5% 1.2% 3.9%

18 years and over 0.8% 2.8% 0.4% 0.3% 0.6% 2.8%

18 to 64 years 0.8% 3.0% 0.4% 0.3% 0.7% 2.8%

65 years and over 2.1% 11.9% 0.3% 0.5% 1.3% 10.4%

People in families 1.1% 3.8% 0.6% 0.4% 0.9% 3.0%

Unrelated individuals 15 years and over 0.9% 3.7% 0.2% 0.3% 0.6% 3.8%

HOUSING TENURE

Occupied housing units 0.5% 2.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.9%

Owner-occupied 0.5% 1.7% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 1.4%

Renter-occupied 0.7% 2.1% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 1.1%

Average household size of owner-occupied unit 0.5% 1.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 1.3%

Average household size of renter-occupied unit 0.6% 2.0% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 1.1%

YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT

Moved in 2005 or later 0.7% 3.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 1.3%

Moved in 2000 to 2004 0.7% 4.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 2.3%

Moved in 1990 to 1999 0.9% 3.9% 0.1% 0.4% 0.5% 2.6%

Moved in 1980 to 1989 1.2% 3.6% 0.2% 0.5% 0.7% 3.9%

Moved in 1970 to 1979 1.7% 6.2% 0.2% 0.5% 1.0% 4.8%

Moved in 1969 or earlier 2.3% 7.9% 0.2% 0.5% 1.4% 6.6%

VEHICLES AVAILABLE

No vehicles available 1.5% 2.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.6% 5.1%

1 vehicle available 0.8% 2.5% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4% 1.7%

2 vehicles available 0.7% 3.5% 0.1% 0.3% 0.2% 1.7%

3 or more vehicles available 1.1% 6.0% 0.1% 0.4% 0.4% 2.2%

HOUSE HEATING FUEL

Utility gas 0.6% 3.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 1.5%

Bottled, tank, or LP gas 1.2% 14.9% 0.1% 0.7% 1.4% 8.9%

Electricity 0.7% 4.8% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 1.6%

ATTACHMENT

47



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

Fuel oil, kerosene, etc. 2.4% 1.8% 0.1% 0.5% 0.8% 10.9%

Coal or coke 9.8% 56.6% 1.0% 9.0% 13.2% 118.0%

Wood 1.1% 4.6% 0.3% 1.9% 5.2% 12.7%

Solar energy 19.6% 90.4% 2.4% 9.2% 5.2% 15.5%

Other fuel 4.6% 30.0% 0.6% 2.2% 4.3% 31.0%

No fuel used 5.8% 29.6% 0.6% 1.7% 1.0% 2.5%

SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS

Lacking complete plumbing facilities 2.8% 3.2% 1.1% 1.6% 2.7% 13.2%

Lacking complete kitchen facilities 3.0% 3.0% 0.8% 1.3% 1.9% 12.6%

No telephone service available 1.8% 6.5% 0.4% 0.8% 1.0% 5.9%

OCCUPANTS PER ROOM

1.00 or less 0.2% 0.7% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.5%

1.01 to 1.50 2.2% 4.7% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0% 3.7%

1.51 or more 3.5% 3.9% 0.7% 1.2% 1.4% 6.0%

VALUE: OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS

Less than $50,000 1.1% 4.4% 0.2% 0.4% 1.8% 8.6%

$50,000 to $99,999 1.0% 4.8% 0.1% 0.3% 1.1% 6.0%

$100,000 to $149,999 1.5% 4.2% 0.1% 0.4% 0.9% 4.2%

$150,000 to $199,999 1.5% 6.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.8% 5.1%

$200,000 to $299,999 1.7% 4.8% 0.1% 0.4% 0.5% 3.5%

$300,000 to $499,999 2.1% 5.6% 0.1% 0.4% 0.4% 2.9%

$500,000 to $999,999 2.9% 15.5% 0.1% 0.7% 0.3% 3.4%

$1,000,000 or more 6.0% 33.8% 0.3% 1.9% 1.0% 10.5%

MORTGAGE STATUS

Housing units with a mortgage 0.5% 2.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.7%

Housing units without a mortgage 0.7% 2.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.5% 3.5%

SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS (SMOC)

Less than $300 7.4% 21.8% 1.0% 4.2% 10.0% 43.8%

$300 to $499 3.2% 8.7% 0.4% 1.4% 3.9% 15.8%

$500 to $699 2.2% 8.9% 0.3% 0.8% 2.1% 12.0%

$700 to $999 1.7% 8.5% 0.2% 0.4% 1.5% 6.1%

$1,000 to $1,499 1.3% 5.6% 0.1% 0.3% 0.7% 4.0%

$1,500 to $1,999 1.9% 7.2% 0.1% 0.4% 0.6% 3.5%

$2,000 or more 1.8% 6.8% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 2.1%

HOUSING UNITS WITHOUT A MORTGAGE

Less than $100 2.6% 11.8% 0.7% 2.8% 6.0% 24.5%

$100 to $199 1.9% 7.5% 0.3% 1.0% 2.5% 12.3%

$200 to $299 1.6% 6.7% 0.2% 0.6% 1.4% 8.5%

$300 to $399 2.1% 6.2% 0.2% 0.7% 1.4% 8.9%

$400 or more 1.8% 2.8% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 3.2%

SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (SMOCAPI)


Less than 20.0 percent 1.2% 4.7% 0.1% 0.4% 0.6% 3.1%

ATTACHMENT

48



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

20.0 to 24.9 percent 2.1% 8.5% 0.2% 0.5% 0.8% 5.3%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 2.3% 11.3% 0.2% 0.5% 0.8% 5.1%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 3.0% 13.1% 0.2% 0.6% 0.8% 5.4%

35.0 percent or more 1.3% 5.9% 0.2% 0.3% 0.5% 2.2%

Housing unit without a mortgage 0.9% 2.9% 0.2% 0.5% 0.8% 3.9%


10.0 to 14.9 percent 2.1% 5.0% 0.1% 0.7% 1.2% 7.7%

15.0 to 19.9 percent 2.7% 6.6% 0.2% 0.9% 1.4% 13.2%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 3.5% 9.3% 0.3% 1.0% 1.9% 13.7%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 4.6% 12.3% 0.4% 1.3% 2.6% 16.8%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 5.5% 12.4% 0.4% 1.6% 2.8% 23.6%

35.0 percent or more 2.4% 6.2% 0.2% 0.7% 1.8% 11.9%

GROSS RENT

Occupied units paying rent 0.7% 3.7% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 1.4%

Less than $200 3.8% 17.5% 0.7% 0.9% 2.8% 14.1%

$200 to $299 3.1% 15.2% 0.6% 0.7% 2.1% 10.9%

$300 to $499 1.7% 8.3% 0.3% 0.5% 1.4% 7.6%

$500 to $749 1.3% 6.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.7% 4.4%

$750 to $999 1.4% 5.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.7% 3.3%

$1,000 to $1,499 2.2% 5.6% 0.2% 0.3% 0.5% 2.5%

$1,500 or more 3.4% 14.5% 0.3% 0.8% 0.7% 2.8%

No rent paid 2.3% 5.9% 0.3% 0.8% 1.6% 9.0%

GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (GRAPI)



15.0 to 19.9 percent 2.4% 8.3% 0.2% 0.6% 0.9% 4.5%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 2.7% 10.1% 0.3% 0.5% 0.9% 4.7%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 2.7% 12.4% 0.3% 0.5% 1.0% 5.3%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 2.8% 13.1% 0.3% 0.6% 1.2% 5.6%

35.0 percent or more 1.0% 3.8% 0.1% 0.2% 0.5% 2.2%


For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, please see



ATTACHMENT

49

Table A2. Median Coefficients of Variation Across States of Select Characteristics for Major Race Group Alone Populations


White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE












65 years and over 18.6% 47.3% 1.0% 3.7% 15.0% 69.8%


Households with one or more people 65 years and

over

10.1% 32.2% 0.3% 1.4% 5.1% 47.1%



MARITAL STATUS


Never married 6.5% 22.8% 0.6% 1.1% 2.7% 15.0%


Separated 29.5% 58.6% 3.3% 7.6% 23.0% 65.7%

Widowed 25.4% 56.2% 1.9% 8.2% 20.9% 53.6%

Divorced 12.9% 37.9% 1.3% 4.0% 12.4% 44.0%


Never married 7.1% 19.9% 0.6% 1.3% 3.2% 17.4%


Separated 23.6% 49.3% 2.9% 5.7% 20.0% 56.6%

Widowed 15.7% 38.4% 0.8% 3.6% 8.1% 43.7%

Divorced 11.1% 31.7% 1.0% 3.4% 9.4% 37.7%

FERTILITY

Number 15 to 50 years old who had birth past 12

month

20.8% 53.3% 2.0% 6.4% 10.5% 43.2%


married)

20.9% 23.5% 3.8% 5.0% 28.9% 42.5%






GRANDPARENTS


years

18.4% 70.2% 2.1% 4.8% 9.6% 46.2%


ATTACHMENT

50



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone


Less than 1 year 38.4% 11.7% 6.4% 12.0% 37.8% 69.1%

1 or 2 years 39.2% 35.4% 6.1% 13.3% 34.1% 61.3%

3 or 4 years 45.7% 60.2% 7.7% 14.4% 45.8% 81.8%

5 or more years 26.2% 84.7% 4.8% 9.1% 35.7% 68.5%



Who are female 10.2% 44.7% 1.4% 3.0% 11.8% 26.6%

Who are married 15.5% 43.3% 1.7% 6.5% 10.9% 23.5%

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT



Kindergarten 22.0% 44.6% 2.0% 6.2% 10.3% 49.0%















VETERAN STATUS





Same house 2.1% 5.2% 0.2% 0.9% 1.3% 7.0%


Same county 12.8% 24.2% 1.4% 3.4% 7.0% 29.7%


Same state 18.7% 48.2% 1.9% 5.4% 13.4% 44.7%

Different state 19.1% 43.2% 2.2% 7.0% 9.4% 35.9%

Abroad 46.0% 88.6% 5.9% 14.5% 10.7% 58.4%

PLACE OF BIRTH


Native 1.0% 2.3% 0.1% 0.4% 2.1% 5.0%



Different state 4.5% 9.4% 0.4% 1.3% 4.5% 12.5%

ATTACHMENT

51



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone


parent(s)

35.9% 68.2% 2.9% 11.2% 13.1% 23.3%

Foreign born 20.9% 40.2% 1.6% 5.9% 1.0% 17.2%



Not a U.S. citizen 12.2% 34.4% 1.1% 4.0% 2.3% 10.7%

YEAR OF ENTRY


NATIVE

Entered 2000 or later 49.8% 48.0% 8.8% 19.2% 19.9% 25.7%

Entered before 2000 17.7% 36.3% 1.4% 5.9% 6.9% 15.5%

FOREIGN BORN

Entered 2000 or later 20.7% 37.1% 2.4% 5.8% 2.8% 22.2%

Entered before 2000 16.1% 47.5% 1.4% 5.5% 1.7% 17.6%



Europe 82.4% 111.2% 2.6% 25.7% 25.9% 81.5%

Asia 73.2% 93.3% 7.0% 43.6% 0.3% 56.6%

Africa 104.7% . 13.5% 3.3% 27.2% 92.9%

Oceania 75.7% 40.0% 14.3% 67.0% 44.8% 20.8%

Latin America 5.0% 64.9% 1.5% 8.6% 27.9% 32.8%




English only 2.1% 3.7% 0.1% 0.4% 3.7% 8.1%



Spanish 18.2% 57.4% 1.5% 7.3% 22.0% 42.6%






Other languages 15.6% 36.1% 8.3% 9.0% 47.0% 74.6%


Selected Economic Characteristics

EMPLOYMENT STATUS


In labor force 2.9% 7.8% 0.2% 0.7% 1.1% 5.5%


Employed 3.7% 10.6% 0.2% 0.9% 1.2% 7.4%

Unemployed 13.0% 34.4% 1.5% 3.3% 10.3% 32.8%

Armed Forces 46.6% 77.7% 4.6% 13.5% 26.8% 46.0%


ATTACHMENT

52



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone



In labor force 4.1% 11.6% 0.2% 0.9% 1.9% 8.2%


Employed 4.7% 14.2% 0.3% 1.2% 2.1% 9.7%





COMMUTING TO WORK





Walked 26.6% 78.5% 2.6% 7.8% 11.8% 54.9%

Other means 34.2% 52.7% 3.0% 10.7% 18.1% 61.4%

Worked at home 25.0% 52.8% 1.6% 9.4% 13.1% 47.3%


OCCUPATION

Management, business, science, and arts

occupations

8.0% 28.7% 0.5% 2.2% 2.6% 23.0%




13.2% 55.9% 1.0% 6.1% 12.8% 34.2%

Production, transportation, and material moving occupations

11.2% 33.3% 1.0% 3.3% 5.9% 27.8%

INDUSTRY


mining

29.8% 48.4% 2.1% 23.5% 30.1% 73.4%

Construction 16.7% 45.9% 1.3% 7.6% 18.2% 45.4%

Manufacturing 14.1% 48.5% 1.0% 4.3% 5.2% 32.3%

Wholesale trade 32.0% 52.9% 1.8% 10.7% 17.0% 71.4%

Retail trade 13.9% 33.9% 1.0% 4.5% 6.9% 30.9%


Information 34.6% 69.3% 2.2% 8.9% 14.9% 64.1%

Finance and insurance, real estate, rental and leasing

22.3% 55.1% 1.2% 5.1% 9.2% 42.8%






ATTACHMENT

53



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

CLASS OF WORKER



Self-employed in own not incorporated business

workers

21.0% 39.2% 1.2% 7.7% 9.2% 52.4%


INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2010 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS)

Less than $10,000 13.9% 39.1% 1.4% 3.0% 8.8% 47.7%

$10,000 to $14,999 17.3% 49.4% 1.5% 4.6% 13.7% 66.2%

$15,000 to $24,999 12.5% 42.4% 1.0% 3.4% 8.5% 39.5%

$25,000 to $34,999 13.7% 56.4% 1.0% 3.8% 9.4% 40.2%

$35,000 to $49,999 11.8% 49.6% 0.8% 3.6% 7.3% 31.6%

$50,000 to $74,999 11.2% 38.5% 0.8% 3.1% 5.5% 30.0%

$75,000 to $99,999 15.2% 44.0% 0.9% 4.5% 7.0% 38.3%

$100,000 to $149,999 16.5% 44.0% 0.9% 5.1% 6.1% 36.3%

$150,000 to $199,999 31.7% 50.8% 1.7% 8.9% 10.4% 63.2%

$200,000 or more 35.5% 69.5% 1.7% 11.9% 9.8% 71.1%


With earnings 2.3% 5.4% 0.1% 0.6% 0.8% 2.8%











months

11.1% 30.5% 1.4% 2.6% 11.2% 38.9%

FAMILIES

Less than $10,000 20.6% 63.1% 2.6% 4.6% 14.6% 60.5%

$10,000 to $14,999 23.5% 55.1% 2.9% 6.4% 20.1% 67.8%

$15,000 to $24,999 16.1% 43.9% 1.6% 4.6% 11.1% 46.6%

$25,000 to $34,999 18.0% 62.0% 1.4% 4.9% 10.9% 45.1%

$35,000 to $49,999 14.1% 42.9% 1.1% 4.1% 8.1% 32.7%

$50,000 to $74,999 12.9% 43.0% 0.8% 3.6% 6.3% 32.4%

$75,000 to $99,999 16.1% 36.3% 1.0% 5.1% 7.4% 48.7%

$100,000 to $149,999 17.6% 43.3% 1.0% 5.4% 7.0% 36.1%

$150,000 to $199,999 34.4% 62.1% 1.8% 9.8% 11.0% 61.5%

$200,000 or more 39.7% 76.9% 1.9% 13.4% 10.2% 77.4%




ATTACHMENT

54



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES AND PEOPLE WHOSE

INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS IS BELOW THE

POVERTY LEVEL

All families 12.4% 43.5% 1.8% 3.1% 9.7% 35.9%









All people 8.2% 20.8% 1.2% 2.4% 6.7% 25.3%

Under 18 years 13.7% 51.4% 2.2% 3.4% 12.5% 36.9%




18 years and over 8.2% 21.2% 1.0% 2.5% 6.4% 26.5%

18 to 64 years 8.4% 20.0% 1.2% 2.7% 6.6% 26.5%

65 years and over 25.5% 49.7% 2.3% 6.2% 17.1% 82.0%



Selected Housing Characteristics

HOUSING TENURE


Owner-occupied 4.4% 20.0% 0.2% 1.5% 2.1% 16.6%

Renter-occupied 5.8% 18.0% 0.7% 1.0% 2.8% 12.4%




Moved in 2005 or later 5.8% 14.6% 0.5% 1.3% 2.3% 11.7%

Moved in 2000 to 2004 9.2% 30.1% 0.6% 2.4% 4.5% 28.6%

Moved in 1990 to 1999 9.9% 30.6% 0.7% 2.9% 5.7% 34.2%

Moved in 1980 to 1989 14.9% 46.0% 1.0% 4.5% 11.1% 58.2%

Moved in 1970 to 1979 20.6% 66.2% 1.1% 5.6% 16.7% 68.7%


VEHICLES AVAILABLE





HOUSE HEATING FUEL

Utility gas 6.9% 18.9% 0.4% 1.1% 2.3% 14.4%


Electricity 7.4% 17.6% 0.6% 1.8% 3.7% 18.2%

ATTACHMENT

55



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone


Coal or coke 91.4% 58.8% 16.7% 56.3% 74.6% #####

Wood 25.0% 50.4% 2.2% 28.4% 41.1% 74.8%

Solar energy 91.5% 90.4% 23.4% 56.7% 91.7% 70.5%

Other fuel 44.8% 53.3% 5.3% 21.0% 50.8% 92.5%

No fuel used 60.6% 67.0% 6.5% 18.7% 37.7% 83.2%





OCCUPANTS PER ROOM

1.00 or less 1.0% 3.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.5% 3.4%

1.01 to 1.50 25.4% 73.6% 3.8% 7.3% 12.7% 45.2%

1.51 or more 42.8% 71.3% 6.9% 14.6% 24.1% 61.3%


Less than $50,000 12.0% 52.4% 1.2% 7.2% 14.3% 63.2%

$50,000 to $99,999 11.5% 46.4% 1.0% 5.1% 10.9% 48.1%

$100,000 to $149,999 13.8% 51.4% 1.0% 4.6% 7.8% 47.3%

$150,000 to $199,999 15.5% 48.9% 0.9% 4.7% 7.4% 41.0%

$200,000 to $299,999 16.0% 33.5% 0.8% 3.9% 5.6% 38.9%

$300,000 to $499,999 23.2% 26.6% 1.0% 6.3% 7.0% 46.5%

$500,000 to $999,999 36.2% 44.1% 1.6% 12.3% 11.9% 57.8%

$1,000,000 or more 59.7% 47.4% 3.6% 24.6% 27.1% 73.3%

MORTGAGE STATUS




Less than $300 63.5% 21.7% 9.7% 30.0% 62.9% 65.9%

$300 to $499 29.7% 102.7% 3.2% 16.7% 33.8% 94.5%

$500 to $699 20.1% 46.0% 1.7% 10.8% 21.2% 72.8%

$700 to $999 14.6% 68.1% 1.2% 5.6% 11.4% 49.9%

$1,000 to $1,499 12.8% 29.2% 0.7% 3.6% 6.8% 39.4%

$1,500 to $1,999 20.3% 32.2% 1.1% 4.4% 7.2% 49.1%

$2,000 or more 20.0% 21.6% 1.0% 4.2% 5.5% 36.3%


Less than $100 42.6% 59.7% 6.7% 27.1% 62.0% 90.5%

$100 to $199 21.6% 76.6% 2.3% 13.3% 31.8% 94.1%

$200 to $299 18.0% 55.9% 1.3% 9.1% 16.4% 87.2%

$300 to $399 17.9% 59.0% 1.3% 9.7% 13.9% 61.0%

$400 or more 13.5% 37.3% 0.6% 3.5% 4.8% 34.2%




ATTACHMENT

56



White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI Alone

20.0 to 24.9 percent 19.0% 58.5% 1.1% 5.4% 8.2% 46.6%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 21.6% 56.7% 1.4% 6.5% 10.5% 52.3%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 26.9% 48.5% 1.8% 7.1% 13.0% 43.0%

35.0 percent or more 13.0% 32.4% 1.0% 2.9% 6.7% 37.8%



10.0 to 14.9 percent 21.1% 58.6% 1.3% 9.4% 13.4% 51.1%

15.0 to 19.9 percent 28.8% 80.9% 1.8% 12.0% 21.7% 98.5%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 33.9% 56.9% 2.2% 12.0% 25.6% 69.8%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 39.2% 40.3% 3.1% 13.2% 35.0% 85.5%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 43.8% 57.3% 3.8% 16.7% 41.0% 98.3%

35.0 percent or more 26.8% 78.1% 2.0% 8.5% 23.1% 76.9%

GROSS RENT


Less than $200 33.1% 75.2% 4.9% 8.0% 40.6% 91.5%

$200 to $299 36.0% 84.2% 4.0% 6.8% 38.3% 83.6%

$300 to $499 17.8% 65.5% 2.1% 5.3% 15.0% 69.0%

$500 to $749 12.1% 53.2% 1.2% 3.0% 6.8% 32.3%

$750 to $999 15.8% 70.7% 1.5% 3.3% 7.1% 30.6%

$1,000 to $1,499 21.8% 50.1% 1.7% 4.0% 8.8% 39.6%

$1,500 or more 45.5% 59.7% 3.3% 9.0% 17.2% 49.8%

No rent paid 26.6% 83.8% 2.5% 11.4% 19.6% 66.3%

GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD

INCOME (GRAPI)



15.0 to 19.9 percent 24.7% 65.0% 2.0% 5.4% 10.3% 44.8%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 24.9% 45.4% 2.0% 5.3% 12.2% 46.8%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 25.6% 53.9% 2.3% 5.4% 13.3% 53.4%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 31.4% 65.3% 2.6% 6.1% 18.3% 57.4%

35.0 percent or more 9.6% 23.9% 1.1% 2.1% 6.2% 27.9%




ATTACHMENT

57

Table A3. Median Coefficient of Variation Across Counties of Select ACS Characteristics for Major Ra ce Group Alone

Populations

AI Alone AN Alone White

Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone

HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE












65 years and over 50.5% 42.8% 9.3% 24.5% 55.1% 62.4%



over

30.2% 21.8% 3.1% 10.4% 26.8% 38.8%



MARITAL STATUS


Never married 18.2% 13.0% 5.7% 7.7% 13.6% 14.7%


Separated 75.3% 53.0% 33.7% 41.3% 68.8% 74.0%

Widowed 68.1% 61.1% 19.7% 42.1% 66.4% 69.3%

Divorced 38.5% 33.4% 11.8% 27.0% 52.4% 51.8%


Never married 21.1% 15.2% 6.7% 9.3% 16.2% 18.8%


Separated 64.1% 49.1% 30.1% 36.1% 62.4% 55.1%

Widowed 45.8% 39.8% 8.2% 19.4% 38.2% 40.2%

Divorced 32.2% 29.0% 11.1% 24.2% 43.3% 42.6%

FERTILITY


57.1% 46.3% 21.8% 41.3% 44.9% 56.0%


married)

40.8% 21.3% 31.6% 23.2% 66.4% 58.5%






GRANDPARENTS


years

49.0% 38.2% 22.0% 30.5% 43.7% 44.6%

ATTACHMENT

58


Populations


Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone



Less than 1 year 66.6% 52.0% 48.3% 56.5% 71.8% 71.0%

1 or 2 years 71.2% 64.4% 48.5% 55.8% 68.0% 61.0%

3 or 4 years 79.5% 50.4% 56.2% 62.3% 75.7% 75.1%

5 or more years 56.6% 57.4% 40.2% 41.3% 74.1% 57.1%



Who are female 27.1% 20.4% 11.3% 14.9% 28.2% 19.9%

Who are married 36.9% 23.5% 12.7% 25.7% 31.6% 26.7%

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT



Kindergarten 60.2% 45.9% 21.1% 40.9% 44.9% 49.7%















VETERAN STATUS





Same house 6.2% 4.9% 1.5% 4.2% 5.0% 8.5%


Same county 38.6% 27.8% 16.1% 29.8% 37.1% 34.7%


Same state 53.8% 45.9% 19.9% 29.5% 46.1% 56.2%

Different state 60.9% 70.6% 27.8% 46.0% 44.0% 60.0%

Abroad 90.3% 77.3% 55.1% 69.7% 44.4% 65.5%

PLACE OF BIRTH


ATTACHMENT

59


Populations


Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone

Native 1.9% 0.9% 0.3% 0.9% 11.3% 6.3%



Different state 18.7% 30.0% 5.0% 13.9% 22.1% 19.7%

Born in PR, U.S. Islands, or abroad American parent(s)

85.5% 77.3% 36.7% 61.8% 48.6% 25.7%

Foreign born 58.0% 70.4% 23.5% 47.3% 5.1% 21.9%



Not a U.S. citizen 30.3% 60.8% 15.8% 24.9% 12.0% 19.2%

YEAR OF ENTRY


NATIVE

Entered 2000 or later 61.4% 95.7% 57.2% 53.3% 49.8% 30.8%

Entered before 2000 45.1% 38.0% 15.4% 31.5% 26.3% 18.4%

FOREIGN BORN

Entered 2000 or later 44.6% 76.6% 29.9% 32.6% 15.5% 29.5%

Entered before 2000 32.2% 54.0% 13.9% 26.8% 7.7% 17.8%



Europe 97.9% 97.7% 29.3% 70.5% 69.7% 94.6%

Asia 83.7% . 62.0% 77.9% 1.4% 64.0%

Africa 100.8% . 71.5% 32.6% 71.3% 95.6%

Oceania 93.8% 61.9% 76.5% 96.1% 85.5% 6.9%

Latin America 23.1% 69.0% 19.5% 33.0% 66.6% 68.1%




English only 5.0% 3.5% 0.6% 1.1% 15.7% 12.0%



Spanish 52.9% 86.0% 20.4% 47.6% 68.2% 61.3%






Other languages 46.4% 18.4% 65.2% 59.6% 87.9% 79.0%


EMPLOYMENT STATUS


In labor force 8.1% 7.6% 2.0% 6.0% 5.8% 6.1%


Employed 9.9% 10.2% 2.3% 7.3% 6.7% 8.0%

ATTACHMENT

60


Populations


Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone

Unemployed 38.3% 24.0% 15.1% 25.5% 39.3% 29.8%

Armed Forces 91.9% 94.7% 60.4% 67.7% 66.8% 76.2%




In labor force 11.6% 10.2% 3.0% 7.4% 9.1% 9.8%


Employed 13.5% 12.6% 3.3% 9.1% 9.8% 12.0%





COMMUTING TO WORK





Walked 68.8% 29.8% 24.7% 50.5% 47.7% 68.5%

Other means 72.7% 38.4% 33.2% 56.0% 62.1% 65.7%

Worked at home 68.6% 45.9% 17.5% 55.9% 51.6% 58.3%


OCCUPATION


occupations

25.0% 20.3% 6.0% 20.0% 13.1% 25.3%




38.2% 28.5% 9.5% 33.3% 52.7% 40.9%


36.2% 33.6% 8.7% 19.4% 31.5% 29.5%

INDUSTRY

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining

67.0% 39.0% 16.9% 62.2% 77.1% 72.8%

Construction 47.7% 52.3% 13.2% 43.9% 65.5% 51.3%

Manufacturing 49.4% 67.7% 10.1% 23.5% 29.0% 39.5%

Wholesale trade 73.6% 97.5% 22.6% 55.0% 56.6% 67.5%

Retail trade 43.8% 41.7% 10.8% 29.0% 31.3% 35.1%


Information 79.1% 76.7% 29.7% 57.7% 57.8% 68.3%


leasing

62.1% 54.1% 16.8% 47.5% 44.0% 44.2%




ATTACHMENT

61


Populations


Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone



CLASS OF WORKER



Self-employed in own not incorporated business

workers

56.0% 46.2% 11.6% 44.9% 44.4% 57.0%



ADJUSTED DOLLARS)

Less than $10,000 40.4% 36.5% 14.0% 21.4% 43.2% 63.9%

$10,000 to $14,999 47.1% 43.6% 14.3% 28.2% 54.2% 70.6%

$15,000 to $24,999 38.6% 27.6% 10.0% 21.7% 41.3% 45.6%

$25,000 to $34,999 39.6% 36.0% 10.3% 25.7% 41.6% 50.0%

$35,000 to $49,999 36.5% 30.4% 8.9% 24.8% 33.7% 37.4%

$50,000 to $74,999 33.7% 26.9% 7.7% 25.2% 27.8% 30.8%

$75,000 to $99,999 45.8% 31.7% 10.5% 35.7% 33.5% 39.7%

$100,000 to $149,999 49.4% 42.1% 12.5% 40.8% 33.0% 37.6%

$150,000 to $199,999 73.9% 56.2% 25.8% 59.6% 46.3% 53.0%

$200,000 or more 89.9% 64.3% 28.8% 66.5% 45.1% 69.1%


With earnings 6.2% 5.3% 1.8% 4.9% 3.6% 3.2%











months

32.1% 23.5% 12.6% 16.5% 50.5% 47.5%

FAMILIES

Less than $10,000 52.9% 44.7% 23.8% 31.7% 57.6% 69.9%

$10,000 to $14,999 60.6% 46.5% 25.0% 37.5% 62.2% 73.2%

$15,000 to $24,999 44.6% 34.9% 14.1% 26.1% 49.6% 49.4%

$25,000 to $34,999 47.1% 40.4% 12.9% 30.1% 47.1% 53.4%

$35,000 to $49,999 41.9% 33.6% 10.2% 28.0% 36.8% 40.3%

$50,000 to $74,999 38.3% 31.1% 8.3% 27.1% 30.1% 35.1%

$75,000 to $99,999 48.0% 33.1% 11.0% 37.3% 35.5% 41.8%

$100,000 to $149,999 52.1% 40.6% 12.9% 42.1% 34.2% 39.1%

$150,000 to $199,999 77.6% 52.6% 27.1% 60.2% 46.8% 59.2%

$200,000 or more 91.3% 65.4% 30.4% 66.5% 46.7% 71.6%

ATTACHMENT

62


Populations


Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone






POVERTY LEVEL

All families 35.6% 28.9% 15.1% 20.8% 45.1% 45.0%









All people 25.8% 21.6% 11.0% 15.9% 31.3% 32.7%

Under 18 years 36.7% 29.9% 18.1% 19.9% 50.5% 40.3%




18 years and over 25.7% 22.7% 10.4% 16.6% 31.2% 33.2%

18 to 64 years 27.0% 23.1% 11.6% 18.0% 32.0% 33.2%

65 years and over 56.9% 74.4% 19.2% 29.4% 58.2% 89.0%




HOUSING TENURE


Owner-occupied 14.0% 9.6% 2.1% 8.8% 9.9% 18.0%

Renter-occupied 16.3% 14.3% 7.1% 10.2% 17.0% 14.5%




Moved in 2005 or later 19.3% 18.5% 6.2% 12.4% 12.6% 15.3%

Moved in 2000 to 2004 29.4% 22.6% 7.5% 19.6% 22.6% 27.8%

Moved in 1990 to 1999 29.4% 22.9% 6.8% 19.6% 30.1% 38.2%

Moved in 1980 to 1989 43.4% 26.3% 10.0% 28.0% 48.1% 53.0%

Moved in 1970 to 1979 54.5% 31.4% 11.5% 29.4% 61.3% 66.5%


ATTACHMENT

63


Populations


Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone

VEHICLES AVAILABLE





HOUSE HEATING FUEL

Utility gas 19.2% 64.5% 4.8% 13.7% 12.6% 16.7%


Electricity 22.9% 42.0% 5.5% 10.0% 16.7% 18.7%


Coal or coke 92.1% 77.9% 68.1% 95.1% 93.7% .

Wood 55.2% 38.6% 19.6% 69.1% 86.9% 94.0%

Solar energy 95.6% 90.5% 86.9% 96.3% 94.0% 59.2%

Other fuel 85.3% 87.0% 43.5% 81.8% 91.2% 93.7%

No fuel used 88.4% 74.1% 57.3% 74.3% 73.5% 59.3%





OCCUPANTS PER ROOM

1.00 or less 3.8% 3.4% 0.4% 1.7% 2.5% 5.2%

1.01 to 1.50 61.9% 41.4% 34.1% 49.1% 51.5% 44.0%

1.51 or more 75.8% 54.8% 58.2% 67.0% 66.5% 64.0%


Less than $50,000 40.8% 33.7% 9.5% 22.6% 59.8% 81.5%

$50,000 to $99,999 35.2% 27.3% 7.5% 19.7% 50.3% 68.6%

$100,000 to $149,999 43.8% 28.2% 9.2% 31.1% 39.2% 57.0%

$150,000 to $199,999 48.9% 39.6% 11.2% 36.4% 37.7% 63.8%

$200,000 to $299,999 50.2% 30.2% 11.9% 39.6% 29.3% 40.1%

$300,000 to $499,999 60.2% 43.3% 17.7% 49.4% 30.6% 34.3%

$500,000 to $999,999 73.3% 72.5% 30.2% 64.0% 44.7% 42.2%

$1,000,000 or more 88.8% 100.4% 46.3% 79.8% 61.8% 92.8%

MORTGAGE STATUS




Less than $300 86.6% 78.6% 66.4% 91.6% 94.9% 85.9%

$300 to $499 69.4% 54.0% 26.8% 55.7% 87.4% 85.6%

$500 to $699 59.3% 43.3% 15.6% 36.3% 70.5% 97.0%

$700 to $999 48.3% 40.1% 9.8% 27.3% 51.9% 73.4%

$1,000 to $1,499 41.5% 49.0% 8.9% 27.0% 31.4% 45.1%

$1,500 to $1,999 57.4% 48.3% 15.6% 41.2% 32.2% 40.3%

$2,000 or more 53.6% 49.1% 19.7% 41.9% 23.9% 26.4%

ATTACHMENT

64


Populations


Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone


Less than $100 74.6% 55.4% 50.8% 83.7% 88.5% 89.6%

$100 to $199 53.7% 45.8% 18.8% 45.6% 73.9% 63.0%

$200 to $299 44.2% 43.2% 11.4% 33.1% 62.9% 80.4%

$300 to $399 50.8% 37.2% 11.2% 34.1% 54.4% 56.5%

$400 or more 39.5% 16.6% 8.4% 23.8% 21.6% 38.8%




20.0 to 24.9 percent 54.2% 48.4% 13.6% 37.4% 40.3% 58.0%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 61.4% 56.3% 16.8% 41.4% 43.8% 52.5%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 68.7% 63.8% 20.7% 44.9% 47.6% 52.6%

35.0 percent or more 39.7% 34.9% 11.8% 22.1% 25.6% 29.0%



10.0 to 14.9 percent 54.3% 40.4% 12.2% 37.2% 49.8% 51.9%

15.0 to 19.9 percent 67.2% 51.8% 17.1% 43.9% 57.7% 54.4%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 78.4% 66.4% 22.5% 50.6% 68.4% 94.6%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 79.0% 62.8% 28.4% 55.6% 69.9% 74.1%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 86.9% 63.8% 34.0% 62.3% 80.4% 91.9%

35.0 percent or more 65.8% 42.6% 19.7% 36.8% 62.9% 71.5%

GROSS RENT


Less than $200 67.6% 64.5% 41.6% 52.1% 71.8% 74.3%

$200 to $299 70.5% 65.9% 32.4% 46.2% 71.8% 74.8%

$300 to $499 49.9% 44.6% 17.3% 31.5% 57.7% 76.9%

$500 to $749 38.2% 39.6% 12.8% 23.4% 32.8% 50.8%

$750 to $999 49.2% 36.1% 21.0% 32.0% 34.6% 34.0%

$1,000 to $1,499 54.9% 49.0% 31.5% 42.0% 38.6% 32.2%

$1,500 or more 69.2% 69.4% 44.5% 58.1% 51.6% 42.4%

No rent paid 63.7% 44.5% 21.1% 43.2% 65.9% 82.9%


INCOME (GRAPI)



15.0 to 19.9 percent 59.5% 46.1% 24.1% 42.7% 46.2% 53.4%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 60.4% 54.3% 24.9% 41.9% 52.5% 52.7%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 59.0% 55.1% 26.1% 41.5% 53.7% 52.0%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 66.1% 63.5% 30.4% 44.6% 57.8% 57.0%

35.0 percent or more 31.3% 31.8% 13.5% 16.9% 30.6% 31.6%




ATTACHMENT

65

Table A4. Median Coefficient of Variation Across American Indian Reservation Alaska Native Village Statistical Areas of Select

ACS Characteristics for Major Race Group Alone Populations

Characteristic AI Alone AN

Alone

White

Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone

HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE












65 years and over 45.8% 60.1% 18.4% 24.5% 71.5% 91.6%



over

24.4% 34.1% 10.5% 10.4% 45.7% 29.8%



MARITAL STATUS


Never married 14.1% 12.0% 14.6% 7.7% 21.7% 23.7%


Separated 72.4% 74.6% 51.9% 41.3% 92.7% 99.2%

Widowed 64.9% 82.3% 37.1% 42.1% 95.8% 72.1%

Divorced 38.1% 56.7% 23.2% 27.0% 55.2% 57.1%


Never married 16.2% 17.3% 17.5% 9.3% 28.9% 20.1%


Separated 63.5% 82.5% 46.5% 36.1% 54.8% 64.3%

Widowed 36.2% 53.7% 21.1% 19.4% 57.3% 42.3%

Divorced 30.4% 64.6% 22.2% 24.2% 44.8% 56.3%

FERTILITY

Number 15 to 50 years old who had birth past 12

month

56.5% 55.3% 42.3% 41.3% 84.2% 83.2%

Unmarried women (widowed, divorced, never married)

38.9% 49.5% 45.4% 23.2% 83.3% 81.2%






GRANDPARENTS


years

39.4% 40.5% 39.4% 30.5% 57.0% 47.3%


ATTACHMENT

66




Alone

White

Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone


Less than 1 year 64.8% 76.2% 58.7% 56.5% 68.1% 102.3%

1 or 2 years 66.7% 80.2% 63.7% 55.8% 104.1% 94.1%

3 or 4 years 76.0% 71.8% 67.6% 62.3% 94.9% 98.0%

5 or more years 52.8% 51.7% 51.9% 41.3% 77.5% 79.6%



Who are female 21.5% 23.1% 19.2% 14.9% 38.7% 42.6%

Who are married 34.7% 34.3% 25.9% 25.7% 51.7% 83.7%

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT



Kindergarten 51.8% 50.9% 44.6% 40.9% 85.3% 56.3%















VETERAN STATUS





Same house 3.6% 5.2% 2.8% 4.2% 5.7% 2.8%


Same county 44.8% 50.8% 30.2% 29.8% 51.5% 57.5%


Same state 64.0% 69.6% 40.2% 29.5% 66.6% 93.7%

Different state 75.2% 86.5% 41.3% 46.0% 39.5% 96.3%

Abroad 92.4% 93.6% 71.0% 69.7% 67.2% 88.5%

PLACE OF BIRTH


Native 1.2% 4.1% 0.9% 0.9% 14.4% 2.4%



Different state 27.3% 67.7% 8.1% 13.9% 25.9% 70.9%

ATTACHMENT

67




Alone

White

Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone


parent(s)

90.5% 102.1% 51.8% 61.8% 53.2% 83.9%

Foreign born 87.9% 83.4% 38.6% 47.3% 6.5% 92.0%



Not a U.S. citizen 61.7% 82.9% 22.9% 24.9% 14.8% 73.5%

YEAR OF ENTRY


NATIVE

Entered 2000 or later 84.8% 112.4% 56.8% 53.3% 67.5% 56.0%

Entered before 2000 52.6% 60.7% 37.4% 31.5% 27.6% 52.4%

FOREIGN BORN

Entered 2000 or later 60.3% 61.5% 37.3% 32.6% 23.0% 40.9%

Entered before 2000 66.1% 78.5% 22.4% 26.8% 7.1% 76.4%

WORLD REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN BORN (excluding population born at sea)

Europe 102.1% 112.8% 41.8% 70.5% 91.4% .

Asia 63.2% . 70.7% 77.9% 1.6% 108.2%

Africa 60.3% . 88.0% 32.6% 94.9% 81.8%

Oceania 68.4% . 74.6% 96.1% 93.6% 69.8%

Latin America 64.5% 42.8% 30.0% 33.0% 76.9% 61.2%




English only 4.5% 12.7% 1.3% 1.1% 20.4% 7.6%



Spanish 70.5% 89.5% 35.8% 47.6% 82.6% 93.3%



Speak English less than "very well" 94.0% . 60.2% 71.4% 62.0% 95.3%



Other languages 30.1% 15.6% 72.2% 59.6% 93.2% .

Speak English less than "very well" 57.0% 28.5% 86.7% 66.1% 125.1% .

EMPLOYMENT STATUS


In labor force 8.4% 9.9% 4.8% 6.0% 6.8% 9.6%


Employed 9.8% 13.9% 5.4% 7.3% 8.8% 11.5%

Unemployed 33.0% 31.1% 28.7% 25.5% 68.8% 54.0%

Armed Forces 91.8% 86.8% 79.2% 67.7% 78.3% 90.9%




ATTACHMENT

68




Alone

White

Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone

In labor force 11.0% 15.1% 6.5% 7.4% 11.5% 12.3%


Employed 13.4% 19.1% 7.3% 9.1% 12.2% 14.6%





COMMUTING TO WORK





Walked 61.6% 23.1% 36.0% 50.5% 47.9% 84.6%

Other means 80.4% 35.5% 46.8% 56.0% 81.5% 105.5%

Worked at home 67.6% 67.5% 30.6% 55.9% 54.3% 88.4%


OCCUPATION


occupations

23.7% 30.8% 11.2% 20.0% 20.6% 32.4%



Natural resources, construction, and maintenance

occupations

37.1% 42.1% 19.4% 33.3% 55.3% 45.4%

Production, transportation, and material moving

occupations

38.9% 45.6% 21.1% 19.4% 34.9% 38.7%

INDUSTRY


mining

60.3% 73.1% 29.9% 62.2% 87.5% 83.7%

Construction 48.1% 66.4% 27.6% 43.9% 79.7% 54.3%

Manufacturing 54.9% 85.2% 23.0% 23.5% 34.9% 66.9%

Wholesale trade 86.8% 98.5% 40.6% 55.0% 88.4% 72.5%

Retail trade 50.5% 49.9% 21.6% 29.0% 37.4% 55.4%


Information 88.2% 86.4% 43.9% 57.7% 73.9% 92.1%


leasing

64.0% 81.3% 29.7% 47.5% 62.7% 67.6%






CLASS OF WORKER




58.4% 78.1% 22.5% 44.9% 42.6% 72.9%

ATTACHMENT

69




Alone

White

Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone

Unpaid family workers 82.8% 87.6% 63.8% 93.1% 93.2% .


ADJUSTED DOLLARS)

Less than $10,000 35.1% 61.4% 27.9% 21.4% 54.5% 73.2%

$10,000 to $14,999 46.6% 64.4% 26.8% 28.2% 72.0% 81.7%

$15,000 to $24,999 35.0% 43.6% 19.6% 21.7% 42.8% 68.2%

$25,000 to $34,999 34.3% 45.2% 20.8% 25.7% 42.6% 53.4%

$35,000 to $49,999 32.5% 42.6% 17.8% 24.8% 41.9% 50.5%

$50,000 to $74,999 32.5% 40.1% 16.3% 25.2% 36.1% 34.0%

$75,000 to $99,999 46.3% 57.9% 21.5% 35.7% 44.0% 46.8%

$100,000 to $149,999 50.6% 58.4% 22.5% 40.8% 41.4% 48.6%

$150,000 to $199,999 83.5% 80.4% 40.7% 59.6% 61.6% 74.9%

$200,000 or more 90.0% 84.8% 42.4% 66.5% 76.7% 90.6%


With earnings 6.5% 7.4% 4.1% 4.9% 5.5% 6.5%











months

28.0% 23.6% 26.4% 16.5% 58.8% 45.7%

FAMILIES

Less than $10,000 46.9% 67.8% 45.3% 31.7% 60.6% 92.1%

$10,000 to $14,999 56.4% 72.9% 42.8% 37.5% 66.0% 87.5%

$15,000 to $24,999 39.6% 54.2% 27.8% 26.1% 56.0% 68.4%

$25,000 to $34,999 40.0% 46.2% 26.5% 30.1% 57.6% 56.4%

$35,000 to $49,999 35.7% 46.8% 21.7% 28.0% 46.8% 56.8%

$50,000 to $74,999 35.9% 42.5% 16.7% 27.1% 39.4% 33.4%

$75,000 to $99,999 49.6% 62.4% 21.5% 37.3% 44.5% 48.7%

$100,000 to $149,999 53.2% 62.7% 23.3% 42.1% 50.7% 46.6%

$150,000 to $199,999 81.4% 80.5% 42.4% 60.2% 63.5% 80.2%

$200,000 or more 90.1% 83.7% 41.7% 66.5% 59.9% 86.9%



Median nonfamily income (dollars) 33.0% 40.4% 14.5% 16.8% 29.5% 47.4%




POVERTY LEVEL

All families 30.0% 40.9% 32.6% 20.8% 49.1% 62.6%


ATTACHMENT

70




Alone

White

Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone








All people 23.6% 31.5% 24.0% 15.9% 40.0% 53.4%

Under 18 years 29.7% 38.6% 32.4% 19.9% 55.8% 82.9%




18 years and over 23.9% 31.4% 22.6% 16.6% 36.2% 49.8%

18 to 64 years 25.5% 32.1% 25.3% 18.0% 44.3% 55.1%

65 years and over 50.4% 80.4% 32.9% 29.4% 53.0% 90.3%



HOUSING TENURE


Owner-occupied 10.3% 11.8% 4.2% 8.8% 13.7% 8.1%

Renter-occupied 17.2% 26.8% 13.4% 10.2% 21.2% 59.6%




Moved in 2005 or later 26.0% 38.5% 12.9% 12.4% 17.4% 50.8%

Moved in 2000 to 2004 28.4% 45.4% 15.7% 19.6% 29.0% 39.9%

Moved in 1990 to 1999 23.7% 34.1% 13.6% 19.6% 37.3% 32.6%

Moved in 1980 to 1989 33.8% 32.7% 19.4% 28.0% 51.2% 62.5%

Moved in 1970 to 1979 42.0% 44.0% 21.5% 29.4% 56.1% 34.6%


VEHICLES AVAILABLE





HOUSE HEATING FUEL

Utility gas 28.1% 75.8% 12.3% 13.7% 19.9% 66.6%


Electricity 25.2% 79.9% 12.7% 10.0% 15.1% 27.1%


Coal or coke 95.3% . 84.2% 95.1% . .

Wood 43.3% 51.8% 26.6% 69.1% 108.4% .

Solar energy 94.2% 92.0% 84.5% 96.3% . 86.4%

Other fuel 77.0% 89.1% 51.7% 81.8% 104.2% .

No fuel used 90.6% 123.4% 70.5% 74.3% 92.0% 16.3%

ATTACHMENT

71




Alone

White

Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone





OCCUPANTS PER ROOM

1.00 or less 4.2% 13.6% 1.2% 1.7% 4.3% 9.4%

1.01 to 1.50 56.0% 41.5% 52.2% 49.1% 66.0% 54.4%

1.51 or more 69.4% 34.4% 69.3% 67.0% 75.3% 73.8%


Less than $50,000 31.1% 40.3% 17.4% 22.6% 51.4% 71.2%

$50,000 to $99,999 25.9% 42.0% 18.3% 19.7% 45.6% 63.9%

$100,000 to $149,999 40.3% 43.9% 21.6% 31.1% 39.8% 54.8%

$150,000 to $199,999 53.3% 57.4% 23.8% 36.4% 46.2% 47.1%

$200,000 to $299,999 56.4% 49.7% 21.5% 39.6% 38.4% 40.8%

$300,000 to $499,999 71.1% 78.9% 28.7% 49.4% 59.0% 41.8%

$500,000 to $999,999 79.2% 100.2% 44.6% 64.0% 88.0% 47.6%

$1,000,000 or more 93.9% 98.3% 53.9% 79.8% 76.6% 73.6%

MORTGAGE STATUS




Less than $300 83.4% 82.9% 79.6% 91.6% 100.2% 104.7%

$300 to $499 53.1% 74.3% 39.0% 55.7% 91.6% 94.9%

$500 to $699 47.6% 71.2% 31.0% 36.3% 69.7% 56.0%

$700 to $999 42.1% 60.0% 21.7% 27.3% 49.0% 41.1%

$1,000 to $1,499 61.5% 67.7% 18.4% 27.0% 42.9% 30.6%

$1,500 to $1,999 77.6% 72.3% 29.1% 41.2% 51.7% 45.7%

$2,000 or more 77.8% 71.0% 30.4% 41.9% 49.4% 72.5%


Less than $100 64.4% 86.5% 56.1% 83.7% 84.2% 81.1%

$100 to $199 36.1% 69.6% 30.0% 45.6% 58.8% 66.6%

$200 to $299 33.1% 58.5% 19.9% 33.1% 59.9% 55.7%

$300 to $399 43.8% 51.3% 20.6% 34.1% 57.8% 74.3%

$400 or more 42.2% 27.9% 14.2% 23.8% 40.5% 39.0%

SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A

PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (SMOCAPI)



20.0 to 24.9 percent 61.2% 72.7% 25.7% 37.4% 61.4% 51.0%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 67.3% 76.9% 29.3% 41.4% 63.2% 62.0%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 81.1% 85.2% 36.3% 44.9% 62.4% 84.0%

35.0 percent or more 52.5% 65.2% 22.9% 22.1% 37.0% 57.9%



ATTACHMENT

72




Alone

White

Alone

Black

Alone

Asian

Alone

NHOPI

Alone

10.0 to 14.9 percent 50.1% 52.5% 23.6% 37.2% 50.0% 71.1%

15.0 to 19.9 percent 60.3% 59.9% 29.8% 43.9% 87.0% 86.7%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 72.3% 78.7% 36.6% 50.6% 65.0% 101.4%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 76.6% 84.1% 37.7% 55.6% 93.5% 89.2%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 86.0% 83.8% 45.8% 62.3% 78.7% 93.5%

35.0 percent or more 61.5% 59.7% 30.4% 36.8% 70.5% 88.3%

Not computed 92.4% . 69.6% 78.2% 100.8% 103.1%

GROSS RENT


Less than $200 58.9% 84.8% 55.3% 52.1% 95.1% 64.0%

$200 to $299 60.5% 81.7% 44.1% 46.2% 91.8% .

$300 to $499 35.7% 68.8% 31.8% 31.5% 46.1% 78.4%

$500 to $749 41.4% 61.2% 25.5% 23.4% 37.2% 80.0%

$750 to $999 64.6% 67.6% 34.4% 32.0% 51.3% 56.4%

$1,000 to $1,499 81.3% 55.8% 46.7% 42.0% 56.0% 73.2%

$1,500 or more 87.7% 80.2% 60.0% 58.1% 92.2% 119.2%

No rent paid 50.7% 48.0% 36.5% 43.2% 79.4% 63.6%


INCOME (GRAPI)



15.0 to 19.9 percent 50.8% 72.0% 39.9% 42.7% 61.4% 64.2%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 60.1% 81.9% 38.1% 41.9% 44.8% 68.7%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 69.1% 83.2% 44.3% 41.5% 53.9% 74.6%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 69.8% 81.8% 47.2% 44.6% 54.7% 109.1%

35.0 percent or more 38.4% 65.9% 24.9% 16.9% 41.3% 59.2%




ATTACHMENT

73

Table A5. Median Coefficients of Variation Across Tracts by Characteristic for Major Race Group Alone Populations

Characteristic AI Alone AN Alone White Alone

Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI

HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE








Female householder, no husband present,

family

30.3% 24.8% 34.1% 25.2% 60.4% 38.8%




65 years and over 57.1% 46.6% 29.4% 49.7% 76.7% 86.3%

Households with one or more people under

18

17.7% 15.1% 13.7% 19.4% 21.0% 16.3%

Households with one or more people 65

years and over

32.3% 26.6% 13.0% 30.1% 39.4% 40.4%



MARITAL STATUS


Never married 18.4% 12.9% 17.1% 18.1% 26.1% 20.9%


Separated 84.2% 62.9% 80.2% 73.7% 94.8% 95.3%

Widowed 72.4% 60.5% 58.5% 76.6% 92.3% 83.1%

Divorced 48.1% 44.0% 35.1% 53.2% 80.7% 65.6%


Never married 21.0% 18.1% 19.6% 16.9% 29.6% 21.8%


Separated 75.0% 64.8% 71.3% 62.8% 92.0% 84.1%

Widowed 48.7% 41.6% 30.7% 44.8% 59.0% 56.4%

Divorced 40.5% 40.4% 29.1% 40.4% 67.2% 57.7%

FERTILITY

Number 15 to 50 years old who had birth

past 12 month

69.0% 55.1% 59.5% 71.9% 73.7% 81.9%

Unmarried women (widowed, divorced,

never married)

42.8% 39.1% 63.6% 38.9% 68.0% 54.0%






GRANDPARENTS

Number living with own grandchildren

under 18 years

50.0% 44.7% 59.0% 55.9% 63.6% 52.1%


ATTACHMENT

74



Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI


Less than 1 year 70.4% 57.3% 80.6% 83.8% 87.5% 94.7%

1 or 2 years 73.8% 73.3% 81.4% 82.0% 88.5% 81.8%

3 or 4 years 79.5% 49.5% 84.7% 86.8% 84.2% 90.1%

5 or more years 61.0% 58.7% 76.7% 69.4% 85.3% 82.4%

NUMBER OF GRANDPARENTS RESPONSIBLE

FOR OWN GRANDCHILDREN UNDER 18

YEARS

Who are female 24.3% 21.3% 23.9% 27.8% 34.8% 34.7%

Who are married 39.5% 30.1% 37.3% 45.4% 42.6% 38.2%

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT

Population 3 years and over enrolled in

school

24.0% 20.1% 16.2% 23.6% 24.8% 30.9%


Kindergarten 60.9% 45.3% 58.0% 71.4% 77.8% 72.7%















VETERAN STATUS





Same house 4.9% 5.6% 4.2% 7.3% 6.6% 5.4%


Same county 57.7% 39.2% 39.0% 47.3% 60.3% 62.0%


Same state 72.4% 46.1% 56.9% 72.7% 83.1% 89.9%

Different state 85.6% 82.3% 64.1% 81.8% 86.8% 91.0%

Abroad 96.4% 80.8% 92.7% 95.8% 80.8% 78.1%

PLACE OF BIRTH


Native 1.7% 1.6% 1.8% 1.9% 17.2% 3.8%



ATTACHMENT

75



Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI

Different state 32.8% 42.0% 13.8% 24.9% 53.2% 61.2%


93.1% 95.3% 69.4% 91.7% 86.1% 65.4%

Foreign born 94.6% 87.2% 40.1% 61.1% 8.3% 66.9%



Not a U.S. citizen 62.8% 66.7% 31.8% 32.9% 23.6% 22.6%

YEAR OF ENTRY


NATIVE

Entered 2000 or later 58.7% 97.1% 69.4% 57.2% 57.0% 54.0%

Entered before 2000 57.7% 42.0% 37.3% 43.3% 44.1% 40.7%

FOREIGN BORN

Entered 2000 or later 64.0% 72.2% 51.4% 44.2% 34.0% 25.6%

Entered before 2000 61.8% 82.9% 22.0% 28.9% 11.1% 50.0%

WORLD REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN

BORN (excluding population born at sea)

Europe 95.7% 112.8% 46.3% 92.8% 96.0% .

Asia 124.8% . 79.1% 94.0% 2.7% 93.5%

Africa . . 93.8% 45.6% 96.5% .

Oceania 70.1% . 97.6% 93.2% 96.5% 18.3%

Latin America 60.3% 44.3% 37.9% 36.5% 94.8% 95.2%




English only 5.6% 4.9% 2.8% 2.2% 33.9% 10.6%



Spanish 90.1% 88.4% 48.5% 77.7% 95.7% 86.8%



Speak English less than "very well" 92.8% . 75.5% 90.4% 71.6% 94.2%



Other languages 35.5% 26.2% 92.8% 86.9% 96.5% 99.3%


EMPLOYMENT STATUS


In labor force 10.7% 8.2% 5.5% 9.5% 8.9% 10.9%


Employed 12.8% 10.7% 6.3% 11.9% 9.7% 13.2%

Unemployed 44.2% 28.8% 39.1% 41.3% 61.6% 53.8%

Armed Forces 101.3% 83.7% 92.2% 93.6% 94.5% 94.6%




ATTACHMENT

76



Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI

In labor force 14.8% 11.3% 8.6% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%


Employed 17.2% 13.5% 9.4% 14.6% 15.4% 18.5%





COMMUTING TO WORK





Walked 70.9% 29.4% 68.0% 84.5% 78.6% 88.1%

Other means 88.4% 42.8% 73.1% 91.8% 91.9% 90.6%

Worked at home 72.1% 46.9% 49.5% 89.2% 75.8% 88.3%


OCCUPATION


30.9% 23.9% 14.5% 31.6% 18.6% 35.2%



Natural resources, construction, and

maintenance occupations

44.5% 35.2% 32.5% 63.8% 71.8% 39.9%


45.2% 37.9% 31.0% 39.6% 53.1% 46.3%

INDUSTRY


69.6% 55.3% 68.5% 92.8% 93.9% 81.2%

Construction 56.1% 57.7% 38.9% 75.4% 86.7% 50.6%

Manufacturing 62.5% 82.5% 32.2% 54.1% 46.1% 84.4%

Wholesale trade 92.1% 102.1% 55.2% 89.8% 75.5% 79.7%

Retail trade 58.3% 46.6% 29.7% 50.2% 51.2% 50.0%

Transportation and warehousing, and

utilities

69.9% 40.5% 46.3% 59.6% 67.7% 64.5%

Information 93.0% 80.0% 62.1% 87.1% 77.5% 98.8%

Finance and insurance, real estate, rental

and leasing

81.9% 63.7% 38.5% 64.4% 55.3% 74.5%


Educational services, health care, social assistance

30.3% 21.2% 19.7% 27.0% 33.9% 38.0%

Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation

46.0% 52.0% 37.4% 56.3% 58.2% 44.0%



CLASS OF WORKER



ATTACHMENT

77



Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI


67.1% 55.3% 38.8% 74.3% 65.1% 69.0%


INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2010 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS)

Less than $10,000 42.7% 45.2% 46.2% 40.7% 72.8% 69.3%

$10,000 to $14,999 55.1% 50.0% 47.4% 52.4% 85.1% 76.0%

$15,000 to $24,999 43.0% 31.3% 33.1% 40.8% 68.0% 65.1%

$25,000 to $34,999 43.3% 36.4% 33.0% 44.9% 67.5% 64.4%

$35,000 to $49,999 41.4% 33.0% 27.4% 41.9% 58.9% 50.7%

$50,000 to $74,999 42.2% 32.4% 22.7% 40.4% 46.9% 40.4%

$75,000 to $99,999 55.8% 43.4% 28.1% 56.4% 50.1% 57.0%

$100,000 to $149,999 65.6% 41.6% 28.4% 62.0% 41.5% 55.9%

$150,000 to $199,999 90.9% 60.9% 49.2% 89.7% 58.1% 86.5%

$200,000 or more 94.5% 64.6% 54.4% 93.2% 62.1% 93.1%

Median household income (dollars) 20.6% 16.0% 10.1% 18.1% 19.0% 19.7%


With earnings 8.7% 5.8% 4.6% 8.3% 6.4% 7.3%







Mean Supplemental Security Income (dollars)

15.0% 19.4% 17.4% 15.3% 7.0% 8.8%


Mean cash public assistance income (dollars)

23.4% 19.7% 24.2% 23.8% 1.5% 19.5%

With Food Stamp/SNAP benefits in the past 12 months

33.9% 26.2% 43.4% 31.7% 72.7% 37.7%

FAMILIES

Less than $10,000 52.3% 59.8% 68.6% 57.2% 90.1% 68.4%

$10,000 to $14,999 64.8% 56.1% 71.1% 69.0% 90.9% 83.5%

$15,000 to $24,999 47.9% 47.3% 49.0% 50.9% 72.5% 60.9%

$25,000 to $34,999 48.7% 42.4% 44.0% 53.9% 71.7% 81.9%

$35,000 to $49,999 47.0% 38.9% 34.5% 49.4% 65.3% 58.4%

$50,000 to $74,999 45.0% 35.4% 26.6% 45.6% 50.9% 40.2%

$75,000 to $99,999 58.9% 45.1% 31.1% 59.8% 53.9% 59.1%

$100,000 to $149,999 66.6% 46.0% 30.5% 65.0% 43.5% 59.5%

$150,000 to $199,999 90.4% 60.3% 51.6% 90.8% 60.1% 92.8%

$200,000 or more 95.1% 81.1% 55.9% 93.4% 63.3% 92.5%

Median family income (dollars) 23.2% 14.0% 11.0% 21.6% 20.0% 21.8%



Median nonfamily income (dollars) 39.8% 31.6% 20.2% 30.4% 49.2% 46.2%


ATTACHMENT

78



Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI

Median earnings for workers (dollars) 18.3% 18.1% 10.4% 16.3% 16.9% 15.8%

Median earnings for male full-time 20.3% 23.3% 11.6% 20.7% 19.8% 21.2%

Median earnings for female full-time 18.3% 18.7% 12.7% 17.0% 23.0% 18.4%

PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES AND PEOPLE

WHOSE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS IS

BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL

All families 34.6% 34.5% 50.4% 39.5% 70.2% 46.0%






Families with female householder, no

husband

36.3% 42.1% 59.1% 40.0% 73.9% 56.2%



All people 27.7% 26.9% 35.2% 32.0% 59.9% 40.4%

Under 18 years 35.4% 37.0% 56.4% 40.3% 78.5% 51.3%




18 years and over 28.6% 27.6% 33.4% 31.8% 58.9% 39.1%

18 to 64 years 29.6% 27.4% 36.7% 33.9% 62.5% 39.5%

65 years and over 56.6% 66.4% 60.2% 55.5% 73.7% 78.2%



HOUSING TENURE


Owner-occupied 13.2% 11.5% 6.0% 16.4% 13.5% 20.8%

Renter-occupied 23.6% 17.5% 18.3% 15.5% 29.2% 21.9%

Average household size of owner-occupied

unit

13.6% 11.4% 5.9% 12.7% 10.7% 16.6%

Average household size of renter-occupied

unit

18.1% 15.3% 12.6% 13.8% 14.2% 16.8%


Moved in 2005 or later 30.2% 22.2% 16.3% 21.6% 26.6% 38.0%

Moved in 2000 to 2004 35.7% 28.4% 20.1% 33.0% 33.8% 38.5%

Moved in 1990 to 1999 31.4% 26.8% 19.8% 34.9% 39.3% 39.6%

Moved in 1980 to 1989 41.8% 24.8% 29.7% 50.4% 58.5% 58.9%

Moved in 1970 to 1979 50.8% 36.9% 35.5% 52.0% 72.8% 48.0%


VEHICLES AVAILABLE





ATTACHMENT

79



Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI

HOUSE HEATING FUEL

Utility gas 38.2% 86.3% 9.3% 15.8% 12.4% 79.6%


Electricity 33.5% 61.3% 19.1% 22.1% 37.4% 38.4%


Coal or coke 83.4% 87.8% 88.9% 95.4% 98.1% .

Wood 46.7% 24.2% 63.1% 92.9% 97.6% 86.8%

Solar energy 97.1% 92.3% 95.5% 98.5% 91.3% 95.4%

Other fuel 85.2% 87.7% 89.2% 95.2% 96.2% 90.3%

No fuel used 92.5% 149.5% 92.0% 95.8% 78.9% 11.9%





OCCUPANTS PER ROOM

1.00 or less 5.8% 5.0% 1.6% 3.6% 6.1% 11.1%

1.01 to 1.50 59.6% 39.3% 76.5% 80.6% 70.2% 53.2%

1.51 or more 69.8% 44.8% 92.3% 93.9% 88.6% 61.0%


Less than $50,000 33.9% 42.4% 46.6% 51.9% 94.7% 85.4%

$50,000 to $99,999 30.8% 32.8% 30.5% 35.0% 91.4% 79.8%

$100,000 to $149,999 50.4% 33.7% 29.0% 50.7% 89.0% 64.8%

$150,000 to $199,999 63.3% 42.2% 30.6% 59.6% 78.8% 56.9%

$200,000 to $299,999 67.1% 37.4% 28.5% 59.6% 59.8% 51.9%

$300,000 to $499,999 79.4% 52.9% 31.2% 58.0% 37.5% 42.1%

$500,000 to $999,999 86.9% 92.4% 45.3% 72.3% 28.9% 49.7%

$1,000,000 or more 92.5% 99.6% 74.5% 95.5% 69.3% 92.7%

Median (dollars) 19.5% 13.7% 5.8% 10.9% 8.7% 17.8%

MORTGAGE STATUS




Less than $300 87.4% 75.9% 94.8% 96.1% 95.3% 106.3%

$300 to $499 68.3% 54.3% 76.6% 91.4% 96.4% 98.8%

$500 to $699 53.8% 54.7% 57.1% 69.1% 96.0% 65.4%

$700 to $999 53.7% 60.2% 37.0% 49.6% 92.6% 54.1%

$1,000 to $1,499 67.2% 49.4% 25.8% 43.0% 68.5% 49.6%

$1,500 to $1,999 86.8% 71.2% 32.6% 57.0% 58.2% 49.5%

$2,000 or more 85.8% 67.1% 27.9% 51.4% 18.4% 58.9%

Median (dollars) 16.9% 16.6% 6.5% 10.3% 11.2% 15.3%


Less than $100 66.6% 55.9% 90.9% 93.2% 91.9% 88.6%

$100 to $199 45.9% 45.8% 61.6% 74.3% 90.4% 62.7%

$200 to $299 41.8% 44.2% 44.0% 59.7% 78.8% 65.9%

$300 to $399 55.0% 40.9% 39.7% 58.6% 71.5% 56.6%

$400 or more 53.3% 21.5% 18.4% 38.7% 32.7% 45.6%

ATTACHMENT

80



Black Alone

Asian Alone

NHOPI

Median (dollars) 14.0% 10.3% 8.5% 17.1% 19.0% 18.7%

SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME

(SMOCAPI)



20.0 to 24.9 percent 72.2% 61.7% 34.7% 63.5% 62.8% 76.1%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 81.7% 68.9% 40.6% 66.8% 66.2% 70.4%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 87.9% 85.2% 48.4% 71.2% 70.3% 87.2%

35.0 percent or more 62.9% 53.3% 26.5% 34.4% 34.2% 39.5%

Not computed 93.3% . 95.4% 96.7% 96.7% 87.5%



10.0 to 14.9 percent 58.6% 37.1% 39.9% 65.4% 70.7% 69.4%

15.0 to 19.9 percent 71.0% 46.6% 51.6% 72.3% 84.2% 85.1%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 83.1% 49.6% 63.7% 79.2% 89.1% 86.0%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 82.5% 60.0% 70.3% 87.5% 90.4% 90.1%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 89.4% 66.8% 84.0% 89.9% 92.5% 89.9%

35.0 percent or more 65.7% 52.7% 54.5% 63.0% 82.2% 81.9%

Not computed 88.5% . 95.0% 96.3% 96.2% 96.5%

GROSS RENT


Less than $200 68.7% 76.7% 86.0% 75.2% 93.8% 80.3%

$200 to $299 68.7% 65.2% 73.6% 71.6% 81.5% 68.8%

$300 to $499 46.6% 50.9% 57.0% 58.8% 82.4% 86.8%

$500 to $749 50.1% 45.0% 38.3% 40.3% 70.1% 67.5%

$750 to $999 76.0% 59.0% 43.5% 43.6% 59.6% 57.9%

$1,000 to $1,499 86.8% 69.3% 46.4% 48.4% 41.8% 52.1%

$1,500 or more 96.9% 76.8% 57.0% 71.7% 45.9% 68.2%

Median (dollars) 17.6% 18.4% 8.9% 10.4% 10.4% 17.3%

No rent paid 62.4% 51.3% 70.4% 80.6% 93.7% 89.1%

GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (GRAPI)



15.0 to 19.9 percent 68.3% 55.1% 57.1% 68.5% 68.1% 72.1%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 73.3% 49.6% 56.9% 66.5% 69.5% 72.0%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 79.4% 61.0% 59.6% 65.3% 73.3% 77.2%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 86.4% 79.8% 66.6% 69.4% 76.9% 87.5%

35.0 percent or more 48.7% 44.9% 31.1% 25.2% 41.4% 37.1%

Not computed 61.3% 51.3% 68.5% 71.9% 90.4% 79.8%





ATTACHMENT

81

Table A6. Coefficient of Variation (CV) Estimates of the Alone or In Combination, the Alone, and the In Combination

Populations for 60 Selected Tribal Groupings

Tribal Grouping Alone or in Combination Alone In Combination

Population Median CV Population Median CV Population Median CV

American Indian Alaska

Native

4,787,447 1.0% 2,480,465 1.3% 2,306,982 1.4%

American Indian 3,710,767 1.1% 2,023,781 1.5% 1,686,986 1.7%

Alaska Native 161,271 4.6% 114,955 5.0% 46,316 11.1%

Alaskan Athabascan 25,155 11.8% 16,089 12.7% 9,066 24.9%

Aleut 19,409 14.4% 11,697 17.5% 7,712 24.9%

Apache 134,300 5.9% 65,274 7.7% 69,026 8.6%

Arapaho 11,808 18.9% 7,542 22.1% 4,266 30.0%

Assiniboine Sioux 5,900 21.5% 4,602 24.0% 1,298 41.5%

Blackfeet 138,301 5.5% 26,080 11.7% 112,221 6.1%

Canadian and French American Indian

14,728 14.9% 5,496 23.6% 9,232 19.5%

Central American Indian 16,513 17.7% 9,358 23.4% 7,155 23.8%

Cherokee 1,043,817 2.1% 282,760 3.7% 761,057 2.4%

Cheyenne 21,733 13.3% 11,739 17.2% 9,994 19.9%

Chickasaw 49,626 9.1% 20,780 13.0% 28,846 12.4%

Chippewa 181,908 4.5% 115,036 5.2% 66,872 7.9%

Chippewa Cree 7,751 19.2%

Choctaw 207,769 4.7% 87,638 6.8% 120,131 6.2%

Chumash 8,761 23.9%

Colville 10,828 17.5% 8,479 18.8% 2,349 37.2%

Comanche 28,523 12.0% 11,872 16.6% 16,651 16.5%

Cree 9,702 18.5% 2,600 33.0% 7,102 22.0%

Creek 88,380 6.8% 41,147 9.2% 47,233 9.5%

Crow 17,515 14.8% 11,056 18.6% 6,459 25.6%

Delaware 20,184 13.7% 7,064 21.7% 13,120 17.5%

Eastern Tribes 15,968 16.1% 8,496 19.5% 7,472 24.1%

Hopi 21,728 15.0% 15,141 17.1% 6,587 28.2%

Houma 10,925 21.6% 8,522 22.5% 2,403 41.8%

Inupiat 36,490 9.2% 26,495 10.4% 9,995 24.1%

Iroquois 99,366 6.1% 48,247 8.2% 51,119 8.7%

Kiowa 14,256 16.7% 8,939 19.9% 5,317 28.6%

Luiseno 6,205 29.1%

Lumbee 81,053 8.2% 67,724 8.6% 13,329 22.0%

Menominee 11,365 16.9% 8,220 19.4% 3,145 30.2%

Mexican American

Indian

155,981 5.9% 109,718 7.2% 46,263 10.7%

Miami 7,852 21.3%

Micmac 9,770 18.3%

Navajo 346,017 3.7% 298,164 3.9% 47,853 12.5%

Oneida Tribe 2,565 28.7%

Osage 18,666 14.2% 7,479 21.2% 11,187 17.9%

Ottawa 12,385 15.5% 6,909 18.9% 5,476 23.4%

Paiute 15,613 16.4% 10,499 17.6% 5,114 32.5%

Pima 27,413 14.1% 22,819 15.5% 4,594 31.7%

Pomo 10,203 21.6%

Potawatomi 34,171 10.8% 17,545 13.5% 16,626 16.3%

Pueblo 68,656 8.5% 56,169 9.0% 12,487 20.1%

Puget Sound Salish 19,386 14.6% 13,806 16.4% 5,580 27.8%

Sac and Fox 8,192 21.0%

ATTACHMENT

82

Table A6. Coefficient of Variation (CV) Estimates of the Alone or In Combination, the Alone, and the In Combination

Populations for 60 Selected Tribal Groupings

Tribal Grouping Alone or in Combination Alone In Combination

Population Median CV Population Median CV Population Median CV

Salish and Kootenai 7,881 21.4%

Seminole 36,892 10.6% 13,223 16.6% 23,669 13.6%

Shawnee 16,326 14.0% 6,034 20.2% 10,292 18.3%

Shoshone 15,556 15.1% 8,750 18.7% 6,806 22.2%

Sioux 188,981 4.6% 116,932 5.5% 72,049 8.1%

South American Indian 40,391 11.0% 20,147 15.7% 20,244 14.7%

Spanish American

Indian

17,668 15.6% 11,397 19.8% 6,271 24.3%

Three Affiliated Tribes

of North Dakota

8,445 18.3%

Tlingit-Haida 26,590 12.2% 15,450 14.9% 11,140 22.0%

Tohono O’Odham 24,313 15.3% 19,730 16.4% 4,583 33.4%

Tsimshian 4,018 25.8% 1,934 30.8% 2,084 39.9%

Ute 13,683 16.8% 8,279 20.4% 5,404 27.1%

Yakama 11,952 21.0% 9,300 23.2% 2,652 39.3%

Yaqui 32,774 11.1% 19,099 14.1% 13,675 20.0%

Yuman 10,364 18.4% 8,123 19.6% 2,241 40.9%

Yup'ik 35,398 8.5% 29,887 8.2% 5,511 30.7%




ATTACHMENT

83

Table A7. Coefficients of Variation of National Estimates of Characteristics

Characteristics Total AIAN AOIC American Indian Alaska Native

AOIC Alone AOIC Alone

Selected Social Characteristics

HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE









family

0.3% 0.7% 0.8% 1.1% 3.1% 3.4%




65 years and over 0.5% 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% 6.9% 7.1%

Households with one or more people

under 18

0.2% 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 1.5% 1.6%


years and over

0.1% 0.5% 0.6% 1.0% 2.7% 2.5%



MARITAL STATUS


Never married 0.3% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 1.3% 1.4%


Separated 0.6% 2.1% 2.6% 3.2% 9.5% 10.2%

Widowed 0.2% 1.8% 2.3% 3.0% 8.5% 8.5%

Divorced 0.4% 0.9% 1.0% 1.4% 5.7% 5.8%


Never married 0.2% 0.5% 0.5% 0.7% 1.6% 1.9%


Separated 0.5% 1.6% 1.9% 2.8% 8.2% 8.5%

Widowed 0.1% 0.9% 1.0% 1.3% 4.3% 4.7%

Divorced 0.3% 0.7% 0.8% 1.1% 5.1% 6.0%

FERTILITY


0.3% 1.4% 1.6% 2.1% 5.0% 6.0%

Unmarried women (widowed, divorced, never married)

0.5% 1.6% 1.7% 2.1% 4.6% 4.6%






ATTACHMENT

84




GRANDPARENTS


under 18 years

0.3% 1.1% 1.3% 1.4% 3.8% 4.0%


YEARS RESPONSIBLE FOR

GRANDCHILDREN

Less than 1 year 0.6% 3.0% 3.1% 3.6% 11.4% 11.9%

1 or 2 years 0.6% 3.0% 3.2% 4.0% 12.8% 11.1%

3 or 4 years 0.8% 3.5% 3.6% 4.1% 13.1% 13.2%

5 or more years 0.5% 2.1% 2.4% 3.1% 7.4% 7.4%

NUMBER OF GRANDPARENTS

RESPONSIBLE FOR OWN GRANDCHILDREN

UNDER 18 YEARS

Who are female 0.1% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 2.7% 3.1%

Who are married 0.2% 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% 3.6% 3.1%

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT


school

0.1% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 1.5% 2.1%


Kindergarten 0.2% 1.5% 1.7% 2.4% 5.8% 5.9%








High school graduate (includes

equivalency)

0.2% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 1.6% 1.7%







VETERAN STATUS





Same house 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.8% 0.8%


Same county 0.5% 1.1% 1.3% 1.5% 3.8% 4.4%


ATTACHMENT

85




Same state 0.4% 1.2% 1.3% 2.0% 5.1% 5.4%

Different state 0.3% 1.5% 1.8% 2.5% 8.8% 10.8%

Abroad 0.5% 3.7% 4.6% 6.3% 22.7% 25.6%

PLACE OF BIRTH


Native 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%



Different state 0.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 2.5% 3.0%


0.2% 2.5% 3.0% 4.6% 15.7% 18.2%

Foreign born 0.2% 1.5% 1.8% 2.2% 11.6% 13.2%



Not a U.S. citizen 0.2% 1.0% 1.2% 1.2% 8.8% 9.4%

YEAR OF ENTRY


NATIVE

Entered 2000 or later 0.6% 4.8% 5.9% 8.4% 25.8% 31.3%

Entered before 2000 0.1% 1.2% 1.4% 2.3% 8.6% 10.1%

FOREIGN BORN

Entered 2000 or later 0.2% 1.7% 2.3% 3.0% 13.3% 18.9%

Entered before 2000 0.1% 1.0% 1.3% 1.8% 11.4% 14.6%



Europe 0.2% 7.7% 10.9% 17.2% 40.3% 50.9%

Asia 0.1% 4.3% 9.4% 11.7% 26.9% 43.1%

Africa 0.5% 13.4% 26.1% 37.9% 95.3% 97.1%

Oceania 1.2% 19.6% 33.1% 38.0% 30.4% 27.6%

Latin America 0.1% 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 23.0% 27.7%




English only 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.7% 0.9%



Spanish 0.1% 1.0% 1.3% 1.7% 12.6% 20.8%






Other languages 0.5% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 2.2% 2.1%


ATTACHMENT

86





EMPLOYMENT STATUS


In labor force 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.8% 1.0%


Employed 0.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 1.1% 1.2%

Unemployed 0.1% 0.8% 0.9% 1.2% 3.0% 3.3%

Armed Forces 0.6% 3.6% 4.2% 6.0% 29.2% 34.5%




In labor force 0.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 1.1% 1.4%


Employed 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 1.5% 1.8%





COMMUTING TO WORK





Walked 0.3% 1.4% 1.6% 2.2% 2.8% 3.0%

Other means 0.4% 2.4% 3.0% 4.3% 4.6% 4.5%

Worked at home 0.2% 1.6% 1.7% 2.6% 9.1% 10.6%


OCCUPATION


0.2% 0.5% 0.6% 0.9% 2.7% 2.9%





0.2% 1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 4.6% 5.2%

Production, transportation, and material

moving occupations

0.2% 0.9% 1.0% 1.3% 4.6% 5.3%

INDUSTRY

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting,

and mining

0.3% 2.5% 2.8% 4.1% 8.6% 9.8%

Construction 0.3% 1.3% 1.5% 1.6% 5.8% 7.3%

Manufacturing 0.1% 0.9% 1.1% 1.5% 10.3% 11.2%

Wholesale trade 0.2% 1.8% 2.5% 3.0% 14.2% 16.9%

Retail trade 0.2% 0.9% 1.1% 1.6% 5.3% 5.9%

ATTACHMENT

87





utilities

0.2% 1.4% 1.8% 2.5% 6.1% 6.4%

Information 0.2% 2.2% 2.7% 4.4% 13.7% 15.1%

Finance and insurance, real estate, rental and leasing

0.2% 1.5% 1.8% 2.5% 10.0% 11.3%


Educational services, health care, social

assistance

0.2% 0.7% 0.7% 1.0% 3.0% 3.1%

Arts, entertainment, recreation,

accommodation

0.3% 1.0% 1.2% 1.5% 5.0% 6.3%

Other services, except public

administration

0.2% 1.3% 1.5% 1.9% 7.3% 8.0%


CLASS OF WORKER



Self-employed in own not incorporated

business workers

0.2% 1.2% 1.4% 1.9% 8.5% 9.7%


INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2010

INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS)

Less than $10,000 0.2% 0.7% 0.8% 1.1% 5.3% 5.7%

$10,000 to $14,999 0.1% 1.1% 1.2% 1.8% 6.1% 6.6%

$15,000 to $24,999 0.1% 0.9% 0.9% 1.2% 4.0% 4.6%

$25,000 to $34,999 0.2% 0.9% 1.0% 1.3% 4.1% 3.9%

$35,000 to $49,999 0.1% 0.6% 0.8% 1.2% 3.7% 4.0%

$50,000 to $74,999 0.1% 0.7% 0.8% 1.1% 3.2% 4.1%

$75,000 to $99,999 0.1% 0.9% 1.0% 1.4% 4.7% 5.6%

$100,000 to $149,999 0.2% 1.0% 1.2% 1.7% 5.0% 5.6%

$150,000 to $199,999 0.3% 2.0% 2.2% 3.1% 10.2% 11.9%

$200,000 or more 0.2% 2.4% 2.7% 4.8% 11.8% 14.6%


With earnings 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.7% 0.8%







Mean Supplemental Security Income

(dollars)

0.1% 0.6% 0.7% 0.9% 4.7% 5.4%


Mean cash public assistance income

(dollars)

0.3% 1.3% 1.7% 2.0% 4.2% 4.2%

With Food Stamp/SNAP benefits in the

past 12 months

0.2% 0.6% 0.7% 0.9% 2.7% 3.0%

ATTACHMENT

88




FAMILIES

Less than $10,000 0.4% 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% 6.9% 7.7%

$10,000 to $14,999 0.4% 1.6% 1.9% 2.4% 7.6% 7.7%

$15,000 to $24,999 0.3% 1.1% 1.2% 1.5% 6.0% 6.2%

$25,000 to $34,999 0.3% 1.1% 1.3% 1.9% 5.4% 5.2%

$35,000 to $49,999 0.2% 0.8% 1.0% 1.5% 4.7% 5.2%

$50,000 to $74,999 0.1% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 3.6% 4.3%

$75,000 to $99,999 0.2% 1.0% 1.1% 1.6% 5.1% 6.0%

$100,000 to $149,999 0.3% 1.1% 1.3% 2.0% 5.2% 5.9%

$150,000 to $199,999 0.3% 2.0% 2.2% 3.2% 10.4% 11.7%

$200,000 or more 0.3% 2.6% 2.8% 5.0% 14.3% 16.8%




PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES AND PEOPLE WHOSE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS

IS BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL

All families 0.4% 0.8% 0.9% 1.1% 3.7% 4.1%







husband

0.2% 0.9% 1.0% 1.2% 5.1% 6.0%



All people 0.4% 0.6% 0.7% 0.9% 2.8% 2.7%

Under 18 years 0.6% 1.0% 1.0% 1.3% 4.0% 4.0%




18 years and over 0.3% 0.5% 0.7% 0.8% 2.8% 2.8%

18 to 64 years 0.4% 0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 3.0% 3.0%

65 years and over 0.2% 1.4% 1.7% 2.1% 11.4% 11.9%




HOUSING TENURE


Owner-occupied 0.2% 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 1.5% 1.7%

Renter-occupied 0.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.7% 1.7% 2.1%

Average household size of owner-occupied unit

0.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 1.5% 1.6%

ATTACHMENT

89




Average household size of renter-occupied

unit

0.3% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 1.7% 2.0%


Moved in 2005 or later 0.2% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 2.4% 3.1%

Moved in 2000 to 2004 0.1% 0.6% 0.6% 0.7% 3.5% 4.0%

Moved in 1990 to 1999 0.1% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 3.4% 3.9%

Moved in 1980 to 1989 0.2% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% 4.0% 3.6%

Moved in 1970 to 1979 0.2% 1.3% 1.3% 1.7% 6.1% 6.2%


VEHICLES AVAILABLE





HOUSE HEATING FUEL

Utility gas 0.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 2.6% 3.8%


Electricity 0.1% 0.4% 0.5% 0.7% 3.8% 4.8%


Coal or coke 1.0% 6.4% 7.9% 9.8% 56.5% 56.6%

Wood 0.2% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1% 4.2% 4.6%

Solar energy 2.0% 11.7% 12.5% 19.6% 90.4% 90.4%

Other fuel 0.5% 3.0% 3.3% 4.6% 27.6% 30.0%

No fuel used 0.4% 3.8% 4.5% 5.8% 24.5% 29.6%





OCCUPANTS PER ROOM

1.00 or less 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.6% 0.7%

1.01 to 1.50 0.5% 1.5% 1.9% 2.2% 4.6% 4.7%

1.51 or more 0.5% 2.4% 3.2% 3.5% 3.9% 3.9%


Less than $50,000 0.2% 0.8% 0.9% 1.1% 4.3% 4.4%

$50,000 to $99,999 0.1% 0.7% 0.7% 1.0% 4.8% 4.8%

$100,000 to $149,999 0.1% 1.0% 1.1% 1.5% 4.4% 4.2%

$150,000 to $199,999 0.1% 1.0% 1.1% 1.5% 5.0% 6.1%

$200,000 to $299,999 0.1% 1.0% 1.2% 1.7% 4.4% 4.8%

$300,000 to $499,999 0.1% 1.3% 1.4% 2.1% 5.6% 5.6%

$500,000 to $999,999 0.1% 1.7% 2.1% 2.9% 13.1% 15.5%

$1,000,000 or more 0.3% 3.9% 4.0% 6.0% 31.5% 33.8%

MORTGAGE STATUS



ATTACHMENT

90




SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS

(SMOC)

Less than $300 1.0% 6.3% 6.5% 7.4% 22.0% 21.8%

$300 to $499 0.4% 2.4% 2.5% 3.2% 9.2% 8.7%

$500 to $699 0.2% 1.5% 1.8% 2.2% 8.8% 8.9%

$700 to $999 0.2% 1.0% 1.1% 1.7% 7.7% 8.5%

$1,000 to $1,499 0.1% 0.7% 0.8% 1.3% 4.5% 5.6%

$1,500 to $1,999 0.1% 1.1% 1.2% 1.9% 6.0% 7.2%

$2,000 or more 0.1% 0.9% 0.9% 1.8% 5.6% 6.8%


Less than $100 0.6% 2.6% 2.5% 2.6% 11.4% 11.8%

$100 to $199 0.2% 1.7% 1.7% 1.9% 7.7% 7.5%

$200 to $299 0.2% 1.1% 1.2% 1.6% 6.3% 6.7%

$300 to $399 0.2% 1.3% 1.5% 2.1% 6.0% 6.2%

$400 or more 0.1% 0.9% 1.2% 1.8% 2.7% 2.8%





20.0 to 24.9 percent 0.1% 1.5% 1.5% 2.1% 7.9% 8.5%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 0.1% 1.5% 1.6% 2.3% 9.7% 11.3%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 0.2% 1.9% 2.1% 3.0% 9.4% 13.1%

35.0 percent or more 0.2% 0.8% 0.9% 1.3% 5.2% 5.9%



10.0 to 14.9 percent 0.1% 1.5% 1.7% 2.1% 5.1% 5.0%

15.0 to 19.9 percent 0.2% 1.6% 1.9% 2.7% 6.3% 6.6%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 0.3% 2.3% 2.6% 3.5% 8.8% 9.3%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 0.3% 2.9% 3.2% 4.6% 12.0% 12.3%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 0.5% 3.4% 4.0% 5.5% 11.1% 12.4%

35.0 percent or more 0.2% 1.7% 1.9% 2.4% 6.6% 6.2%

GROSS RENT


Less than $200 0.5% 2.5% 3.2% 3.8% 16.2% 17.5%

$200 to $299 0.5% 2.2% 2.4% 3.1% 14.2% 15.2%

$300 to $499 0.2% 1.3% 1.3% 1.7% 7.9% 8.3%

$500 to $749 0.1% 0.9% 1.0% 1.3% 4.8% 6.1%

$750 to $999 0.1% 1.0% 1.1% 1.4% 4.4% 5.3%

$1,000 to $1,499 0.2% 1.3% 1.6% 2.2% 5.1% 5.6%

$1,500 or more 0.3% 2.0% 2.2% 3.4% 11.1% 14.5%

No rent paid 0.2% 1.8% 2.0% 2.3% 5.8% 5.9%

ATTACHMENT

91




GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF

HOUSEHOLD INCOME (GRAPI)



15.0 to 19.9 percent 0.2% 1.5% 1.8% 2.4% 6.8% 8.3%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 0.2% 1.6% 1.8% 2.7% 9.0% 10.1%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 0.3% 1.6% 1.9% 2.7% 9.3% 12.4%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 0.2% 1.7% 2.1% 2.8% 9.8% 13.1%

35.0 percent or more 0.1% 0.5% 0.7% 1.0% 3.7% 3.8%




ATTACHMENT

92

Table A8. Median Coefficients of Variation of Estimates Across States for Selected Characteristics




HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE






Male householder, no wife present, family

1.7% 11.7% 13.0% 19.2% 63.5% 66.7%


Female householder, no husband

present, family

0.8% 6.0% 7.1% 11.3% 42.6% 37.1%




65 years and over 1.0% 9.7% 11.3% 18.6% 43.7% 47.3%


under 18

0.4% 3.5% 4.2% 6.2% 22.1% 23.5%


years and over

0.3% 4.6% 5.9% 10.1% 45.6% 32.2%



MARITAL STATUS


Never married 0.5% 3.4% 4.2% 6.5% 19.2% 22.8%


Separated 2.7% 17.4% 19.9% 29.5% 85.1% 58.6%

Widowed 1.7% 16.4% 17.9% 25.4% 81.0% 56.2%

Divorced 1.1% 7.1% 8.0% 12.9% 42.6% 37.9%


Never married 0.5% 3.7% 4.4% 7.1% 19.0% 19.9%


Separated 2.3% 13.8% 15.4% 23.6% 57.3% 49.3%

Widowed 0.7% 8.0% 9.6% 15.7% 64.1% 38.4%

Divorced 0.9% 6.0% 6.6% 11.1% 42.8% 31.7%

FERTILITY


past 12 month

1.7% 14.0% 15.7% 20.8% 73.0% 53.3%


never married)

2.5% 12.5% 15.6% 20.9% 37.1% 23.5%






ATTACHMENT

93




GRANDPARENTS


under 18 years

1.7% 10.5% 11.6% 18.4% 63.7% 70.2%



Less than 1 year 5.2% 27.8% 29.4% 38.4% 55.1% 11.7%

1 or 2 years 5.1% 26.7% 27.7% 39.2% 55.4% 35.4%

3 or 4 years 6.8% 32.5% 36.9% 45.7% 44.3% 60.2%

5 or more years 4.4% 19.1% 19.3% 26.2% 84.2% 84.7%

NUMBER OF GRANDPARENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR OWN

GRANDCHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS

Who are female 1.2% 6.8% 7.8% 10.2% 39.8% 44.7%

Who are married 1.6% 10.1% 10.8% 15.5% 46.6% 43.3%

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT


school

0.2% 3.2% 3.8% 6.2% 25.7% 24.3%


Kindergarten 1.7% 12.8% 14.8% 22.0% 73.7% 44.6%








High school graduate (includes equivalency)

0.5% 3.4% 3.9% 6.1% 25.1% 20.1%







VETERAN STATUS





Same house 0.2% 1.2% 1.4% 2.1% 8.0% 5.2%


Same county 1.2% 7.8% 9.1% 12.8% 38.0% 24.2%


ATTACHMENT

94




Same state 1.7% 10.1% 12.7% 18.7% 50.0% 48.2%

Different state 2.0% 11.6% 13.0% 19.1% 50.2% 43.2%

Abroad 4.7% 31.9% 37.4% 46.0% 74.4% 88.6%

PLACE OF BIRTH


Native 0.1% 0.5% 0.4% 1.0% 1.9% 2.3%



Different state 0.4% 2.8% 3.1% 4.5% 10.6% 9.4%


2.6% 19.3% 25.4% 35.9% 65.0% 68.2%

Foreign born 0.9% 14.5% 17.6% 20.9% 38.6% 40.2%



Not a U.S. citizen 0.8% 7.9% 10.2% 12.2% 31.0% 34.4%

YEAR OF ENTRY

Population born outside the United

States

0.9% 12.7% 15.7% 18.7% 60.3% 48.8%

NATIVE

Entered 2000 or later 6.2% 36.1% 38.8% 49.8% 40.8% 48.0%

Entered before 2000 1.4% 8.6% 10.7% 17.7% 39.6% 36.3%

FOREIGN BORN

Entered 2000 or later 1.5% 15.1% 18.7% 20.7% 41.2% 37.1%

Entered before 2000 1.1% 10.9% 11.9% 16.1% 39.1% 47.5%

WORLD REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN BORN (excluding population born at sea)

Europe 2.6% 58.7% 67.3% 82.4% 99.4% 111.2%

Asia 1.3% 39.8% 63.5% 73.2% 74.2% 93.3%

Africa 6.0% 88.2% 102.2% 104.7% . .

Oceania 13.0% 87.9% 79.3% 75.7% 41.9% 40.0%

Latin America 1.0% 5.2% 5.6% 5.0% 58.0% 64.9%




English only 0.1% 1.1% 1.1% 2.1% 2.9% 3.7%



Spanish 0.8% 10.5% 13.1% 18.2% 66.3% 57.4%






Other languages 4.7% 14.3% 15.6% 15.6% 54.9% 36.1%

ATTACHMENT

95






EMPLOYMENT STATUS


In labor force 0.2% 1.5% 1.8% 2.9% 9.3% 7.8%


Employed 0.2% 1.8% 2.1% 3.7% 12.2% 10.6%

Unemployed 1.1% 7.2% 8.3% 13.0% 52.6% 34.4%

Armed Forces 4.2% 30.8% 32.8% 46.6% 75.5% 77.7%




In labor force 0.2% 2.3% 2.7% 4.1% 13.2% 11.6%


Employed 0.3% 2.7% 3.1% 4.7% 15.4% 14.2%





COMMUTING TO WORK





Walked 2.2% 14.5% 16.2% 26.6% 61.1% 78.5%

Other means 2.7% 20.0% 23.6% 34.2% 71.9% 52.7%

Worked at home 1.5% 13.7% 15.9% 25.0% 78.9% 52.8%


OCCUPATION


occupations

0.5% 4.4% 5.2% 8.0% 30.7% 28.7%




1.0% 7.9% 8.7% 13.2% 69.3% 55.9%


moving occupations

0.8% 6.8% 7.9% 11.2% 42.9% 33.3%

INDUSTRY


2.1% 19.9% 22.7% 29.8% 74.6% 48.4%

Construction 1.2% 9.8% 11.3% 16.7% 81.4% 45.9%

Manufacturing 0.9% 8.4% 9.3% 14.1% 55.6% 48.5%

Wholesale trade 1.7% 18.1% 21.6% 32.0% 54.5% 52.9%

ATTACHMENT

96




Retail trade 0.9% 8.0% 9.0% 13.9% 33.9% 33.9%


utilities

1.3% 11.6% 13.6% 20.2% 55.3% 35.4%

Information 2.1% 20.8% 23.4% 34.6% 93.3% 69.3%


and leasing

1.2% 12.7% 14.1% 22.3% 59.7% 55.1%



assistance

0.6% 5.4% 6.4% 9.8% 38.1% 46.6%


accommodation

1.1% 7.9% 9.9% 15.0% 58.8% 38.6%

Other services, except public administration

1.5% 12.3% 14.5% 23.0% 69.8% 56.0%


CLASS OF WORKER




business workers

1.1% 11.1% 12.6% 21.0% 57.0% 39.2%




Less than $10,000 1.2% 7.6% 9.1% 13.9% 50.1% 39.1%

$10,000 to $14,999 1.3% 9.1% 10.8% 17.3% 64.4% 49.4%

$15,000 to $24,999 0.9% 7.1% 8.0% 12.5% 38.8% 42.4%

$25,000 to $34,999 1.0% 7.7% 8.4% 13.7% 59.3% 56.4%

$35,000 to $49,999 0.8% 6.7% 8.1% 11.8% 45.9% 49.6%

$50,000 to $74,999 0.7% 6.4% 7.4% 11.2% 45.6% 38.5%

$75,000 to $99,999 0.9% 8.6% 9.2% 15.2% 52.6% 44.0%

$100,000 to $149,999 0.9% 9.9% 11.2% 16.5% 52.2% 44.0%

$150,000 to $199,999 1.7% 19.5% 21.5% 31.7% 68.5% 50.8%

$200,000 or more 1.8% 20.5% 24.8% 35.5% 90.0% 69.5%


With earnings 0.1% 1.3% 1.5% 2.3% 6.4% 5.4%








(dollars)

0.9% 5.5% 6.2% 8.5% 2.1% 4.8%



(dollars)

2.8% 14.6% 14.3% 18.5% 5.3% 9.7%

With Food Stamp/SNAP benefits in the 1.1% 5.8% 6.5% 11.1% 39.3% 30.5%

ATTACHMENT

97




past 12 months

FAMILIES

Less than $10,000 2.0% 11.1% 13.6% 20.6% 62.3% 63.1%

$10,000 to $14,999 2.4% 13.6% 16.3% 23.5% 67.1% 55.1%

$15,000 to $24,999 1.3% 9.1% 10.7% 16.1% 51.2% 43.9%

$25,000 to $34,999 1.3% 9.0% 10.9% 18.0% 63.2% 62.0%

$35,000 to $49,999 1.0% 7.7% 9.0% 14.1% 53.4% 42.9%

$50,000 to $74,999 0.7% 7.2% 8.4% 12.9% 42.6% 43.0%

$75,000 to $99,999 0.9% 9.2% 10.5% 16.1% 36.5% 36.3%

$100,000 to $149,999 0.9% 10.6% 11.7% 17.6% 56.4% 43.3%

$150,000 to $199,999 1.7% 21.9% 24.6% 34.4% 91.7% 62.1%

$200,000 or more 1.8% 22.1% 26.6% 39.7% 87.3% 76.9%




PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES AND PEOPLE

WHOSE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS IS BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL

All families 1.3% 7.8% 8.6% 12.4% 37.6% 43.5%







husband

1.7% 8.3% 9.9% 15.1% 41.2% 41.4%



All people 1.0% 5.5% 6.4% 8.2% 30.4% 20.8%

Under 18 years 1.6% 7.8% 9.2% 13.7% 45.6% 51.4%




18 years and over 0.9% 5.1% 6.2% 8.2% 30.4% 21.2%

18 to 64 years 1.0% 5.6% 6.5% 8.4% 30.3% 20.0%

65 years and over 1.9% 13.7% 17.5% 25.5% 79.5% 49.7%




HOUSING TENURE


Owner-occupied 0.2% 2.4% 2.9% 4.4% 23.9% 20.0%

Renter-occupied 0.5% 3.1% 3.9% 5.8% 23.1% 18.0%


0.2% 2.4% 2.6% 3.8% 17.6% 11.7%

ATTACHMENT

98




Average household size of renter-

occupied unit

0.5% 3.1% 3.6% 5.4% 19.8% 16.1%


Moved in 2005 or later 0.5% 3.4% 4.0% 5.8% 19.3% 14.6%

Moved in 2000 to 2004 0.6% 5.2% 6.0% 9.2% 39.9% 30.1%

Moved in 1990 to 1999 0.6% 5.3% 6.2% 9.9% 44.3% 30.6%

Moved in 1980 to 1989 1.0% 8.9% 10.2% 14.9% 50.2% 46.0%

Moved in 1970 to 1979 1.1% 11.4% 13.4% 20.6% 79.1% 66.2%


VEHICLES AVAILABLE





HOUSE HEATING FUEL

Utility gas 0.3% 3.2% 4.0% 6.9% 20.2% 18.9%


Electricity 0.6% 4.7% 5.2% 7.4% 42.3% 17.6%


Coal or coke 14.4% 68.2% 72.0% 91.4% 58.6% 58.8%

Wood 2.0% 13.5% 15.6% 25.0% 46.7% 50.4%

Solar energy 23.2% 91.9% 88.0% 91.5% 90.6% 90.4%

Other fuel 5.1% 36.8% 39.5% 44.8% 80.5% 53.3%

No fuel used 6.1% 41.3% 50.4% 60.6% 91.7% 67.0%





OCCUPANTS PER ROOM

1.00 or less 0.1% 0.6% 0.6% 1.0% 4.4% 3.1%

1.01 to 1.50 2.7% 16.7% 18.4% 25.4% 90.3% 73.6%

1.51 or more 4.9% 28.6% 33.7% 42.8% 96.0% 71.3%


Less than $50,000 1.0% 7.2% 8.3% 12.0% 52.3% 52.4%

$50,000 to $99,999 0.8% 6.6% 8.2% 11.5% 55.9% 46.4%

$100,000 to $149,999 0.9% 7.9% 9.1% 13.8% 51.7% 51.4%

$150,000 to $199,999 0.9% 8.8% 9.7% 15.5% 43.1% 48.9%

$200,000 to $299,999 0.7% 8.7% 10.1% 16.0% 46.8% 33.5%

$300,000 to $499,999 0.9% 11.6% 14.2% 23.2% 40.2% 26.6%

$500,000 to $999,999 1.6% 21.3% 25.4% 36.2% 36.8% 44.1%

$1,000,000 or more 3.4% 32.7% 37.4% 59.7% 49.5% 47.4%

MORTGAGE STATUS



ATTACHMENT

99





(SMOC)

Less than $300 8.4% 46.2% 51.1% 63.5% 21.7% 21.7%

$300 to $499 2.9% 18.8% 22.0% 29.7% 98.1% 102.7%

$500 to $699 1.6% 12.7% 13.9% 20.1% 59.4% 46.0%

$700 to $999 1.1% 8.8% 10.8% 14.6% 70.7% 68.1%

$1,000 to $1,499 0.7% 7.7% 8.6% 12.8% 44.2% 29.2%

$1,500 to $1,999 1.0% 9.7% 11.3% 20.3% 51.3% 32.2%

$2,000 or more 0.8% 11.6% 13.3% 20.0% 49.2% 21.6%


Less than $100 5.5% 29.6% 36.5% 42.6% 82.8% 59.7%

$100 to $199 2.1% 13.7% 15.8% 21.6% 71.7% 76.6%

$200 to $299 1.3% 11.0% 12.7% 18.0% 79.0% 55.9%

$300 to $399 1.3% 10.7% 13.1% 17.9% 41.2% 59.0%

$400 or more 0.6% 7.6% 9.0% 13.5% 38.6% 37.3%





20.0 to 24.9 percent 1.0% 10.9% 12.2% 19.0% 55.8% 58.5%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 1.3% 12.0% 13.4% 21.6% 42.5% 56.7%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 1.7% 14.2% 16.1% 26.9% 53.2% 48.5%

35.0 percent or more 0.9% 7.1% 7.8% 13.0% 43.3% 32.4%



10.0 to 14.9 percent 1.2% 12.2% 13.6% 21.1% 61.0% 58.6%

15.0 to 19.9 percent 1.7% 15.9% 18.3% 28.8% 64.5% 80.9%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 2.1% 21.2% 24.3% 33.9% 64.5% 56.9%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 2.9% 25.9% 28.8% 39.2% 77.6% 40.3%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 3.5% 30.4% 34.4% 43.8% 86.4% 57.3%

35.0 percent or more 1.8% 15.2% 18.2% 26.8% 66.2% 78.1%

GROSS RENT


Less than $200 3.9% 23.6% 27.9% 33.1% 73.2% 75.2%

$200 to $299 3.4% 19.6% 22.3% 36.0% 61.3% 84.2%

$300 to $499 1.7% 10.7% 12.5% 17.8% 54.8% 65.5%

$500 to $749 1.0% 6.9% 7.8% 12.1% 36.6% 53.2%

$750 to $999 1.2% 9.6% 11.2% 15.8% 62.1% 70.7%

$1,000 to $1,499 1.6% 11.3% 14.2% 21.8% 52.2% 50.1%

$1,500 or more 3.0% 26.4% 31.3% 45.5% 90.7% 59.7%

No rent paid 2.3% 16.5% 19.2% 26.6% 79.7% 83.8%

ATTACHMENT

100








15.0 to 19.9 percent 1.7% 12.7% 14.5% 24.7% 76.7% 65.0%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 1.8% 12.9% 15.4% 24.9% 83.0% 45.4%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 1.8% 13.7% 15.7% 25.6% 78.3% 53.9%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 2.2% 15.6% 19.2% 31.4% 60.0% 65.3%

35.0 percent or more 0.8% 5.8% 6.5% 9.6% 35.6% 23.9%




ATTACHMENT

101

Table A9. Median Coefficients of Variation of Estimates Across Counties for Selected Characteristics




HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE






Male householder, no wife present, family

18.2% 54.4% 55.4% 51.5% 31.8% 32.7%


Female householder, no husband

present, family

10.4% 32.3% 32.9% 29.8% 21.3% 20.9%




65 years and over 9.0% 48.9% 51.8% 50.5% 41.0% 42.8%


under 18

4.3% 18.7% 18.7% 16.4% 13.6% 14.0%


65 years and over

3.1% 27.4% 29.7% 30.2% 22.4% 21.8%



MARITAL STATUS


Never married 5.0% 17.5% 18.2% 18.2% 10.8% 13.0%


Separated 29.3% 70.7% 73.1% 75.3% 51.3% 53.0%

Widowed 18.6% 70.2% 73.1% 68.1% 55.8% 61.1%

Divorced 11.1% 36.8% 37.7% 38.5% 33.1% 33.4%


Never married 5.8% 20.7% 21.3% 21.1% 14.8% 15.2%


Separated 26.3% 63.8% 65.4% 64.1% 57.1% 49.1%

Widowed 7.8% 43.1% 45.7% 45.8% 39.0% 39.8%

Divorced 10.4% 33.0% 33.7% 32.2% 28.1% 29.0%

FERTILITY

Number 15 to 50 years old who had

birth past 12 month

20.2% 60.1% 61.7% 57.1% 44.2% 46.3%

Unmarried women (widowed,

divorced, never married)

26.3% 44.0% 43.3% 40.8% 29.3% 21.3%






ATTACHMENT

102




GRANDPARENTS

Number living with own

grandchildren under 18 years

19.1% 52.3% 52.7% 49.0% 38.4% 38.2%



GRANDCHILDREN

Less than 1 year 44.9% 69.1% 71.7% 66.6% 55.0% 52.0%

1 or 2 years 44.6% 70.3% 72.2% 71.2% 70.5% 64.4%

3 or 4 years 51.7% 79.0% 80.3% 79.5% 47.6% 50.4%

5 or more years 35.9% 61.1% 61.6% 56.6% 56.0% 57.4%

NUMBER OF GRANDPARENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR OWN

GRANDCHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS

Who are female 10.1% 31.7% 32.0% 27.1% 18.5% 20.4%

Who are married 12.1% 40.2% 41.3% 36.9% 20.2% 23.5%

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT

Population 3 years and over enrolled

in school

2.7% 14.6% 16.7% 19.6% 11.4% 13.7%


Kindergarten 19.3% 56.3% 58.3% 60.2% 44.1% 45.9%








High school graduate (includes equivalency)

3.9% 18.0% 18.8% 18.1% 12.0% 12.2%





Percent high school graduate or higher

1.3% 5.5% 5.3% 5.7% 4.1% 4.4%


VETERAN STATUS





Same house 1.5% 6.0% 6.4% 6.2% 4.6% 4.9%


Same county 15.0% 37.7% 38.3% 38.6% 28.1% 27.8%


ATTACHMENT

103




Same state 18.1% 47.8% 49.3% 53.8% 41.9% 45.9%

Different state 26.0% 57.5% 57.8% 60.9% 68.0% 70.6%

Abroad 50.7% 87.4% 88.0% 90.3% 94.5% 77.3%

PLACE OF BIRTH


Native 0.3% 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% 0.7% 0.9%



Different state 4.8% 15.9% 16.1% 18.7% 23.6% 30.0%


34.0% 72.2% 73.8% 85.5% 75.7% 77.3%

Foreign born 15.5% 60.8% 63.5% 58.0% 74.7% 70.4%



Not a U.S. citizen 12.2% 30.1% 33.8% 30.3% 60.8% 60.8%

YEAR OF ENTRY

Population born outside the United

States

13.8% 56.9% 60.0% 59.2% 63.2% 72.8%

NATIVE

Entered 2000 or later 52.4% 62.9% 63.2% 61.4% 97.1% 95.7%

Entered before 2000 14.0% 40.0% 39.2% 45.1% 40.4% 38.0%

FOREIGN BORN

Entered 2000 or later 23.9% 41.4% 44.1% 44.6% 62.9% 76.6%

Entered before 2000 11.9% 34.2% 34.1% 32.2% 42.4% 54.0%

WORLD REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN BORN (excluding population

born at sea)

Europe 32.2% 93.7% 96.3% 97.9% 104.0% 97.7%

Asia 25.0% 71.3% 84.8% 83.7% 92.8% .

Africa 60.8% 96.1% 100.0% 100.8% . .

Oceania 73.1% 93.2% 94.9% 93.8% 68.9% 61.9%

Latin America 14.1% 26.6% 28.0% 23.1% 101.2% 69.0%




English only 0.5% 3.9% 3.8% 5.0% 3.5% 3.5%



Spanish 14.2% 49.0% 50.9% 52.9% 69.0% 86.0%






ATTACHMENT

104




Other languages 52.2% 59.5% 58.9% 46.4% 21.3% 18.4%



EMPLOYMENT STATUS


In labor force 2.0% 8.4% 8.4% 8.1% 6.6% 7.6%


Employed 2.3% 10.3% 10.6% 9.9% 9.1% 10.2%

Unemployed 13.1% 39.1% 39.3% 38.3% 24.0% 24.0%

Armed Forces 58.9% 87.0% 88.2% 91.9% 98.0% 94.7%


Percent Unemployed (civilian labor force)

12.9% 38.3% 38.1% 36.6% 24.1% 22.4%


In labor force 2.9% 11.8% 12.1% 11.6% 9.4% 10.2%


Employed 3.2% 14.1% 14.4% 13.5% 11.4% 12.6%





COMMUTING TO WORK




Public transportation (excluding taxicab)

52.0% 70.8% 69.2% 68.2% 72.9% 68.3%

Walked 23.4% 64.3% 66.2% 68.8% 31.3% 29.8%

Other means 31.1% 73.8% 74.2% 72.7% 37.7% 38.4%

Worked at home 17.3% 62.4% 65.1% 68.6% 45.9% 45.9%


OCCUPATION

Management, business, science, and

arts occupations

5.8% 25.4% 25.0% 25.0% 18.3% 20.3%





9.1% 39.1% 40.6% 38.2% 29.6% 28.5%

Production, transportation, and

material moving occupations

8.0% 35.7% 37.9% 36.2% 30.5% 33.6%

INDUSTRY

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and 16.3% 71.6% 71.0% 67.0% 39.5% 39.0%

ATTACHMENT

105




hunting, and mining

Construction 12.6% 50.0% 50.9% 47.7% 39.5% 52.3%

Manufacturing 9.4% 44.6% 45.7% 49.4% 57.2% 67.7%

Wholesale trade 21.9% 75.3% 74.1% 73.6% 89.2% 97.5%

Retail trade 10.3% 41.1% 43.3% 43.8% 37.6% 41.7%


utilities

14.9% 58.3% 61.3% 61.0% 32.5% 40.1%

Information 29.0% 73.8% 77.5% 79.1% 61.2% 76.7%

Finance and insurance, real estate,

rental and leasing

16.4% 60.0% 60.5% 62.1% 55.7% 54.1%

Professional, scientific, and

management

15.4% 49.9% 51.0% 52.4% 43.5% 43.4%

Educational services, health care,

social assistance

6.6% 29.1% 29.7% 28.2% 18.7% 18.7%

Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation

13.8% 41.5% 42.4% 39.4% 35.1% 41.6%

Other services, except public administration

16.2% 59.6% 60.6% 59.4% 47.1% 47.7%


CLASS OF WORKER




11.3% 53.8% 54.6% 56.0% 44.1% 46.2%




Less than $10,000 12.3% 39.9% 41.8% 40.4% 35.4% 36.5%

$10,000 to $14,999 13.3% 49.2% 51.3% 47.1% 43.8% 43.6%

$15,000 to $24,999 9.4% 36.5% 38.0% 38.6% 28.2% 27.6%

$25,000 to $34,999 9.8% 39.8% 41.6% 39.6% 31.7% 36.0%

$35,000 to $49,999 8.5% 36.5% 37.9% 36.5% 30.2% 30.4%

$50,000 to $74,999 7.4% 33.2% 34.2% 33.7% 25.2% 26.9%

$75,000 to $99,999 10.3% 44.5% 45.8% 45.8% 28.8% 31.7%

$100,000 to $149,999 12.0% 48.8% 49.1% 49.4% 35.3% 42.1%

$150,000 to $199,999 25.3% 71.0% 72.2% 73.9% 54.9% 56.2%

$200,000 or more 28.2% 76.2% 77.5% 89.9% 65.2% 64.3%


With earnings 1.8% 6.7% 6.7% 6.2% 4.4% 5.3%







Mean Supplemental Security Income (dollars)

8.8% 14.7% 15.6% 16.5% 15.8% 16.2%

ATTACHMENT

106






(dollars)

22.4% 25.0% 24.7% 23.7% 18.1% 17.0%

With Food Stamp/SNAP benefits in the past 12 months

10.5% 31.0% 32.0% 32.1% 21.7% 23.5%

FAMILIES

Less than $10,000 20.2% 55.6% 56.9% 52.9% 43.6% 44.7%

$10,000 to $14,999 22.4% 64.1% 66.3% 60.6% 46.5% 46.5%

$15,000 to $24,999 13.0% 45.7% 48.5% 44.6% 34.9% 34.9%

$25,000 to $34,999 12.1% 47.2% 49.3% 47.1% 42.7% 40.4%

$35,000 to $49,999 9.7% 42.8% 44.4% 41.9% 32.0% 33.6%

$50,000 to $74,999 8.0% 36.8% 38.1% 38.3% 29.3% 31.1%

$75,000 to $99,999 10.7% 47.3% 49.1% 48.0% 32.8% 33.1%

$100,000 to $149,999 12.5% 50.5% 50.9% 52.1% 33.2% 40.6%

$150,000 to $199,999 26.4% 72.2% 74.6% 77.6% 53.5% 52.6%

$200,000 or more 29.7% 75.8% 80.0% 91.3% 65.2% 65.4%




PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES AND PEOPLE WHOSE INCOME IN THE PAST

12 MONTHS IS BELOW THE POVERTY

LEVEL

All families 12.8% 38.4% 39.8% 35.6% 32.0% 28.9%


With related children under 5 years

only

29.8% 51.2% 51.8% 47.1% 49.1% 51.3%




only

54.3% 74.3% 73.6% 70.7% 83.6% 81.9%


husband

15.9% 38.0% 39.9% 35.4% 37.6% 34.0%



only

25.3% 43.2% 43.7% 42.5% 55.3% 64.0%

All people 9.5% 26.2% 27.3% 25.8% 22.3% 21.6%

Under 18 years 14.4% 36.9% 38.7% 36.7% 30.9% 29.9%




18 years and over 9.1% 26.7% 27.7% 25.7% 23.4% 22.7%

18 to 64 years 10.1% 27.7% 28.6% 27.0% 24.6% 23.1%

65 years and over 17.4% 59.7% 62.7% 56.9% 73.7% 74.4%


Unrelated individuals 15 years and

over

10.0% 29.3% 30.5% 28.2% 22.2% 22.1%

ATTACHMENT

107





HOUSING TENURE


Owner-occupied 2.1% 12.6% 13.3% 14.0% 9.2% 9.6%

Renter-occupied 6.2% 18.2% 18.6% 16.3% 13.4% 14.3%


2.0% 12.2% 12.4% 12.1% 9.6% 9.7%

Average household size of renter-occupied unit

4.6% 15.5% 15.6% 14.7% 10.9% 11.8%

YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO

UNIT

Moved in 2005 or later 5.8% 19.3% 19.2% 19.3% 16.0% 18.5%

Moved in 2000 to 2004 7.1% 28.1% 29.5% 29.4% 23.5% 22.6%

Moved in 1990 to 1999 6.5% 30.0% 30.6% 29.4% 21.7% 22.9%

Moved in 1980 to 1989 9.6% 44.5% 45.5% 43.4% 25.0% 26.3%

Moved in 1970 to 1979 10.9% 53.7% 56.8% 54.5% 32.3% 31.4%


VEHICLES AVAILABLE





HOUSE HEATING FUEL

Utility gas 4.6% 19.6% 19.4% 19.2% 60.6% 64.5%


Electricity 5.1% 22.8% 22.5% 22.9% 39.4% 42.0%


Coal or coke 68.4% 95.3% 95.2% 92.1% 78.0% 77.9%

Wood 18.8% 58.7% 59.3% 55.2% 40.2% 38.6%

Solar energy 86.9% 94.3% 96.0% 95.6% 91.5% 90.5%

Other fuel 43.0% 88.7% 88.7% 85.3% 86.2% 87.0%

No fuel used 56.0% 88.5% 90.7% 88.4% 74.3% 74.1%





OCCUPANTS PER ROOM

1.00 or less 0.5% 3.2% 3.3% 3.8% 3.4% 3.4%

1.01 to 1.50 29.9% 67.2% 67.8% 61.9% 37.6% 41.4%

1.51 or more 51.8% 81.7% 78.9% 75.8% 50.8% 54.8%


Less than $50,000 8.8% 43.0% 45.3% 40.8% 32.5% 33.7%

$50,000 to $99,999 7.0% 35.3% 37.5% 35.2% 27.1% 27.3%

ATTACHMENT

108




$100,000 to $149,999 8.9% 40.3% 42.6% 43.8% 26.5% 28.2%

$150,000 to $199,999 10.8% 45.7% 46.9% 48.9% 34.7% 39.6%

$200,000 to $299,999 11.6% 45.3% 45.8% 50.2% 27.1% 30.2%

$300,000 to $499,999 17.2% 53.8% 54.5% 60.2% 38.5% 43.3%

$500,000 to $999,999 29.6% 70.8% 69.9% 73.3% 60.2% 72.5%

$1,000,000 or more 45.5% 88.8% 88.5% 88.8% 96.6% 100.4%

MORTGAGE STATUS




(SMOC)

Less than $300 64.6% 88.7% 88.1% 86.6% 77.1% 78.6%

$300 to $499 25.3% 76.2% 77.3% 69.4% 52.7% 54.0%

$500 to $699 14.7% 61.5% 61.5% 59.3% 44.8% 43.3%

$700 to $999 9.3% 44.0% 46.8% 48.3% 40.4% 40.1%

$1,000 to $1,499 8.5% 36.5% 37.9% 41.5% 40.5% 49.0%

$1,500 to $1,999 15.1% 49.7% 50.9% 57.4% 41.5% 48.3%

$2,000 or more 19.2% 52.4% 53.3% 53.6% 43.7% 49.1%

HOUSING UNITS WITHOUT A

MORTGAGE

Less than $100 48.5% 83.6% 82.3% 74.6% 65.3% 55.4%

$100 to $199 17.9% 61.4% 62.0% 53.7% 52.0% 45.8%

$200 to $299 10.9% 51.2% 51.6% 44.2% 41.9% 43.2%

$300 to $399 10.8% 52.2% 53.8% 50.8% 40.6% 37.2%

$400 or more 8.0% 34.7% 36.3% 39.5% 16.0% 16.6%


AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD

INCOME (SMOCAPI)



20.0 to 24.9 percent 13.1% 52.1% 53.0% 54.2% 50.2% 48.4%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 16.0% 58.1% 58.6% 61.4% 56.5% 56.3%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 19.8% 64.9% 65.9% 68.7% 63.0% 63.8%

35.0 percent or more 10.8% 35.8% 38.0% 39.7% 34.7% 34.9%



10.0 to 14.9 percent 11.8% 55.1% 56.4% 54.3% 44.4% 40.4%

15.0 to 19.9 percent 16.3% 68.0% 69.5% 67.2% 43.5% 51.8%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 21.4% 75.3% 73.6% 78.4% 65.1% 66.4%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 26.7% 82.0% 82.0% 79.0% 60.5% 62.8%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 32.3% 85.4% 86.7% 86.9% 59.8% 63.8%

35.0 percent or more 18.2% 63.5% 66.4% 65.8% 44.8% 42.6%

GROSS RENT


Less than $200 37.0% 72.1% 72.0% 67.6% 69.0% 64.5%

ATTACHMENT

109




$200 to $299 29.3% 73.0% 74.2% 70.5% 66.1% 65.9%

$300 to $499 15.6% 51.8% 54.1% 49.9% 47.0% 44.6%

$500 to $749 11.7% 37.7% 38.1% 38.2% 44.7% 39.6%

$750 to $999 19.3% 47.6% 47.7% 49.2% 37.0% 36.1%

$1,000 to $1,499 29.9% 53.9% 55.0% 54.9% 43.8% 49.0%

$1,500 or more 44.1% 68.9% 69.4% 69.2% 53.0% 69.4%

No rent paid 19.6% 66.9% 66.7% 63.7% 49.1% 44.5%





15.0 to 19.9 percent 22.4% 60.0% 60.5% 59.5% 49.7% 46.1%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 23.3% 59.5% 58.6% 60.4% 55.9% 54.3%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 24.2% 59.8% 60.5% 59.0% 56.5% 55.1%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 28.1% 65.4% 66.4% 66.1% 58.2% 63.5%

35.0 percent or more 11.8% 28.7% 29.0% 31.3% 28.8% 31.8%




ATTACHMENT

110

Table A10. Median Coefficients of Variation of Estimates Across American Indian Reservation and Alaska Native Village

Statistical Areas for Selected Characteristics




HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE









family

25.6% 27.5% 22.4% 22.8% 34.7% 35.5%




65 years and over 40.6% 47.6% 44.9% 45.8% 57.7% 60.1%


under 18

12.5% 13.7% 13.2% 13.4% 14.5% 14.8%


years and over

22.5% 27.3% 24.0% 24.4% 32.9% 34.1%



MARITAL STATUS


Never married 11.8% 13.3% 14.2% 14.1% 11.6% 12.0%


Separated 64.4% 72.8% 72.5% 72.4% 75.9% 74.6%

Widowed 56.4% 66.9% 63.4% 64.9% 81.4% 82.3%

Divorced 34.5% 42.5% 37.1% 38.1% 53.6% 56.7%


Never married 14.8% 15.9% 15.4% 16.2% 16.8% 17.3%


Separated 57.6% 63.3% 61.0% 63.5% 83.0% 82.5%

Widowed 35.4% 42.7% 35.9% 36.2% 52.8% 53.7%

Divorced 31.5% 35.4% 30.0% 30.4% 63.6% 64.6%

FERTILITY


past 12 month

49.1% 55.0% 55.3% 56.5% 54.5% 55.3%


never married)

36.2% 40.8% 37.0% 38.9% 49.5% 49.5%






ATTACHMENT

111





GRANDPARENTS


under 18 years

36.6% 39.4% 40.0% 39.4% 39.5% 40.5%



GRANDCHILDREN

Less than 1 year 63.9% 69.6% 65.0% 64.8% 79.5% 76.2%

1 or 2 years 66.9% 70.6% 67.0% 66.7% 80.2% 80.2%

3 or 4 years 68.4% 73.8% 75.4% 76.0% 72.0% 71.8%

5 or more years 47.2% 53.0% 54.2% 52.8% 52.5% 51.7%

NUMBER OF GRANDPARENTS

RESPONSIBLE FOR OWN GRANDCHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS

Who are female 18.2% 22.6% 21.3% 21.5% 23.6% 23.1%

Who are married 30.2% 36.0% 35.5% 34.7% 37.1% 34.3%

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT


school

18.7% 20.0% 17.1% 18.7% 22.1% 22.6%


Kindergarten 44.0% 48.4% 50.9% 51.8% 49.0% 50.9%








High school graduate (includes

equivalency)

12.3% 14.5% 14.7% 15.1% 14.5% 15.0%







VETERAN STATUS





Same house 3.2% 4.2% 3.6% 3.6% 5.5% 5.2%


Same county 39.7% 44.7% 43.4% 44.8% 46.3% 50.8%

ATTACHMENT

112






Same state 53.5% 62.0% 58.4% 64.0% 68.5% 69.6%

Different state 56.5% 76.4% 74.4% 75.2% 85.9% 86.5%

Abroad 79.6% 93.5% 91.1% 92.4% 93.3% 93.6%

PLACE OF BIRTH


Native 1.4% 2.1% 1.2% 1.2% 4.1% 4.1%



Different state 21.9% 28.7% 25.2% 27.3% 59.5% 67.7%

Born in PR, U.S. Islands, or abroad

American parent(s)

63.5% 89.0% 90.1% 90.5% 100.9% 102.1%

Foreign born 49.6% 83.3% 87.3% 87.9% 87.2% 83.4%



Not a U.S. citizen 30.6% 56.4% 58.0% 61.7% 66.7% 82.9%

YEAR OF ENTRY


NATIVE

Entered 2000 or later 62.8% 73.2% 73.4% 84.8% 112.4% 112.4%

Entered before 2000 44.7% 57.0% 53.5% 52.6% 52.3% 60.7%

FOREIGN BORN

Entered 2000 or later 41.6% 63.6% 61.9% 60.3% 72.2% 61.5%

Entered before 2000 31.0% 62.5% 62.4% 66.1% 74.2% 78.5%



Europe 59.0% 101.1% 108.8% 102.1% 112.8% 112.8%

Asia 45.9% 92.5% 88.4% 63.2% 95.7% .

Africa 71.8% 60.3% 60.3% 60.3% . .

Oceania 86.2% 74.1% 72.7% 68.4% . .

Latin America 38.8% 55.2% 62.2% 64.5% 42.8% 42.8%




English only 4.9% 5.6% 4.5% 4.5% 11.7% 12.7%



Spanish 53.5% 67.6% 65.2% 70.5% 89.3% 89.5%



Speak English less than "very well" 63.0% 92.5% 93.2% 94.0% . .



ATTACHMENT

113





Other languages 27.7% 26.2% 30.7% 30.1% 16.3% 15.6%



EMPLOYMENT STATUS


In labor force 7.2% 8.5% 8.1% 8.4% 9.8% 9.9%


Employed 9.0% 11.2% 9.8% 9.8% 13.8% 13.9%

Unemployed 27.1% 31.0% 31.6% 33.0% 29.5% 31.1%

Armed Forces 80.3% 90.3% 92.8% 91.8% 87.0% 86.8%




In labor force 9.9% 12.4% 10.6% 11.0% 14.5% 15.1%


Employed 11.8% 14.6% 13.1% 13.4% 18.1% 19.1%





COMMUTING TO WORK





Walked 34.1% 44.3% 62.8% 61.6% 23.3% 23.1%

Other means 44.5% 58.9% 80.8% 80.4% 35.8% 35.5%

Worked at home 52.9% 67.2% 63.6% 67.6% 68.8% 67.5%


OCCUPATION


19.9% 24.9% 23.2% 23.7% 29.4% 30.8%





31.1% 37.7% 36.5% 37.1% 42.1% 42.1%


moving occupations

31.7% 39.5% 38.3% 38.9% 44.3% 45.6%

INDUSTRY

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting,

and mining

46.6% 61.3% 59.2% 60.3% 73.2% 73.1%

ATTACHMENT

114





Construction 41.4% 52.2% 46.7% 48.1% 64.3% 66.4%

Manufacturing 43.5% 56.1% 51.2% 54.9% 82.9% 85.2%

Wholesale trade 56.7% 86.5% 85.9% 86.8% 99.1% 98.5%

Retail trade 37.2% 47.7% 49.2% 50.5% 48.2% 49.9%


utilities

44.2% 53.9% 60.4% 63.0% 48.4% 51.1%

Information 64.4% 86.8% 86.7% 88.2% 83.7% 86.4%


and leasing

51.7% 66.5% 64.2% 64.0% 82.6% 81.3%



assistance

20.6% 25.2% 25.3% 26.2% 25.2% 25.2%


accommodation

31.0% 38.9% 33.3% 33.6% 62.7% 65.5%

Other services, except public

administration

52.2% 63.3% 60.8% 64.0% 66.4% 67.6%


CLASS OF WORKER




business workers

42.7% 61.9% 55.5% 58.4% 77.9% 78.1%




Less than $10,000 38.9% 43.3% 35.6% 35.1% 60.1% 61.4%

$10,000 to $14,999 43.2% 49.0% 45.1% 46.6% 62.4% 64.4%

$15,000 to $24,999 31.4% 35.2% 32.7% 35.0% 42.2% 43.6%

$25,000 to $34,999 34.1% 38.8% 34.0% 34.3% 43.3% 45.2%

$35,000 to $49,999 30.3% 34.7% 31.5% 32.5% 42.1% 42.6%

$50,000 to $74,999 26.7% 34.0% 30.6% 32.5% 39.3% 40.1%

$75,000 to $99,999 38.5% 45.6% 43.8% 46.3% 56.1% 57.9%

$100,000 to $149,999 37.7% 50.6% 49.3% 50.6% 55.6% 58.4%

$150,000 to $199,999 56.9% 78.9% 78.0% 83.5% 80.9% 80.4%

$200,000 or more 61.2% 87.8% 89.0% 90.0% 87.3% 84.8%


With earnings 5.4% 6.6% 6.2% 6.5% 7.3% 7.4%








(dollars)

13.9% 15.6% 15.1% 14.7% 15.2% 16.6%


ATTACHMENT

115






(dollars)

22.9% 23.7% 24.1% 22.6% 22.9% 22.2%

With Food Stamp/SNAP benefits in the

past 12 months

23.1% 25.5% 27.9% 28.0% 23.5% 23.6%

FAMILIES

Less than $10,000 48.0% 51.5% 45.7% 46.9% 67.7% 67.8%

$10,000 to $14,999 53.6% 60.8% 57.1% 56.4% 71.2% 72.9%

$15,000 to $24,999 38.0% 42.4% 39.5% 39.6% 52.7% 54.2%

$25,000 to $34,999 36.6% 42.1% 39.3% 40.0% 45.4% 46.2%

$35,000 to $49,999 32.9% 37.8% 35.5% 35.7% 46.4% 46.8%

$50,000 to $74,999 30.7% 36.8% 33.2% 35.9% 42.7% 42.5%

$75,000 to $99,999 38.6% 48.6% 45.2% 49.6% 60.1% 62.4%

$100,000 to $149,999 40.1% 54.4% 52.9% 53.2% 59.5% 62.7%

$150,000 to $199,999 57.0% 77.2% 77.0% 81.4% 80.8% 80.5%

$200,000 or more 63.3% 87.4% 87.9% 90.1% 83.7% 83.7%




PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES AND PEOPLE WHOSE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS

IS BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL

All families 30.4% 33.5% 29.1% 30.0% 40.9% 40.9%







husband

35.4% 37.8% 30.8% 31.6% 53.6% 54.4%



All people 25.1% 26.3% 23.3% 23.6% 30.8% 31.5%

Under 18 years 31.1% 32.4% 28.8% 29.7% 38.9% 38.6%




18 years and over 24.9% 26.5% 24.1% 23.9% 31.1% 31.4%

18 to 64 years 26.2% 27.6% 25.2% 25.5% 31.5% 32.1%

65 years and over 46.3% 54.5% 50.6% 50.4% 81.0% 80.4%




HOUSING TENURE


ATTACHMENT

116





Owner-occupied 8.5% 10.5% 9.9% 10.3% 11.7% 11.8%

Renter-occupied 17.6% 21.0% 16.9% 17.2% 26.1% 26.8%


10.0% 12.1% 11.1% 11.3% 13.6% 13.8%

Average household size of renter-occupied unit

14.8% 16.9% 14.1% 14.8% 21.5% 21.9%


Moved in 2005 or later 23.0% 27.9% 24.5% 26.0% 36.7% 38.5%

Moved in 2000 to 2004 26.5% 32.4% 26.4% 28.4% 45.5% 45.4%

Moved in 1990 to 1999 22.5% 26.6% 23.6% 23.7% 32.9% 34.1%

Moved in 1980 to 1989 26.7% 32.1% 32.4% 33.8% 32.5% 32.7%

Moved in 1970 to 1979 34.8% 42.0% 40.2% 42.0% 44.5% 44.0%


VEHICLES AVAILABLE





HOUSE HEATING FUEL

Utility gas 26.4% 27.9% 26.6% 28.1% 86.4% 75.8%


Electricity 21.8% 33.4% 24.4% 25.2% 81.2% 79.9%


Coal or coke 83.7% 95.4% 95.8% 95.3% 84.1% .

Wood 31.2% 43.2% 40.7% 43.3% 50.8% 51.8%

Solar energy 79.6% 92.9% 91.4% 94.2% 94.9% 92.0%

Other fuel 59.5% 76.1% 76.9% 77.0% 89.8% 89.1%

No fuel used 65.0% 88.5% 88.5% 90.6% 115.5% 123.4%





OCCUPANTS PER ROOM

1.00 or less 3.9% 5.1% 4.0% 4.2% 13.4% 13.6%

1.01 to 1.50 41.3% 49.0% 56.4% 56.0% 40.2% 41.5%

1.51 or more 50.7% 56.0% 70.0% 69.4% 34.4% 34.4%


Less than $50,000 29.0% 34.2% 31.0% 31.1% 42.3% 40.3%

$50,000 to $99,999 27.2% 29.4% 25.2% 25.9% 41.4% 42.0%

$100,000 to $149,999 34.1% 39.2% 38.5% 40.3% 43.2% 43.9%

$150,000 to $199,999 42.1% 51.9% 52.5% 53.3% 53.0% 57.4%

$200,000 to $299,999 35.9% 50.2% 54.0% 56.4% 47.5% 49.7%

$300,000 to $499,999 46.7% 69.8% 66.1% 71.1% 78.5% 78.9%

$500,000 to $999,999 54.1% 82.5% 80.0% 79.2% 95.9% 100.2%

$1,000,000 or more 66.8% 90.9% 93.3% 93.9% 98.0% 98.3%

ATTACHMENT

117





MORTGAGE STATUS




Less than $300 80.1% 82.9% 83.4% 83.4% 84.6% 82.9%

$300 to $499 46.8% 53.2% 51.6% 53.1% 76.0% 74.3%

$500 to $699 41.2% 48.7% 44.5% 47.6% 64.3% 71.2%

$700 to $999 39.5% 47.1% 43.7% 42.1% 62.0% 60.0%

$1,000 to $1,499 36.6% 57.5% 57.5% 61.5% 67.7% 67.7%

$1,500 to $1,999 42.8% 69.7% 72.0% 77.6% 67.0% 72.3%

$2,000 or more 51.6% 75.7% 74.6% 77.8% 79.2% 71.0%


Less than $100 56.5% 66.1% 63.3% 64.4% 86.3% 86.5%

$100 to $199 36.4% 43.7% 35.4% 36.1% 73.8% 69.6%

$200 to $299 33.2% 38.3% 32.5% 33.1% 57.4% 58.5%

$300 to $399 37.7% 43.9% 42.5% 43.8% 51.6% 51.3%

$400 or more 24.3% 33.5% 36.5% 42.2% 27.9% 27.9%


PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME

(SMOCAPI)



20.0 to 24.9 percent 47.1% 62.7% 59.3% 61.2% 74.6% 72.7%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 49.2% 67.3% 66.0% 67.3% 78.3% 76.9%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 55.3% 78.1% 74.6% 81.1% 88.4% 85.2%

35.0 percent or more 38.9% 52.7% 50.0% 52.5% 66.6% 65.2%



10.0 to 14.9 percent 39.7% 49.1% 49.2% 50.1% 51.5% 52.5%

15.0 to 19.9 percent 46.6% 59.3% 60.0% 60.3% 59.9% 59.9%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 59.4% 71.8% 70.0% 72.3% 78.3% 78.7%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 59.2% 76.9% 74.8% 76.6% 84.4% 84.1%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 62.9% 86.1% 86.0% 86.0% 83.7% 83.8%

35.0 percent or more 47.0% 59.4% 61.4% 61.5% 59.6% 59.7%

GROSS RENT


Less than $200 55.4% 62.9% 53.0% 58.9% 84.8% 84.8%

$200 to $299 54.0% 64.3% 57.6% 60.5% 81.5% 81.7%

$300 to $499 36.7% 43.1% 34.5% 35.7% 67.7% 68.8%

$500 to $749 39.4% 46.0% 38.8% 41.4% 58.9% 61.2%

$750 to $999 48.0% 62.7% 63.6% 64.6% 65.1% 67.6%

$1,000 to $1,499 61.7% 68.0% 77.5% 81.3% 55.2% 55.8%

$1,500 or more 66.0% 82.0% 86.0% 87.7% 77.6% 80.2%

ATTACHMENT

118





No rent paid 40.3% 49.0% 49.6% 50.7% 46.6% 48.0%





15.0 to 19.9 percent 48.6% 55.3% 52.0% 50.8% 67.3% 72.0%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 54.1% 62.4% 57.0% 60.1% 81.8% 81.9%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 55.8% 69.7% 68.2% 69.1% 83.4% 83.2%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 59.2% 70.3% 69.2% 69.8% 81.7% 81.8%

35.0 percent or more 36.5% 44.4% 37.8% 38.4% 64.3% 65.9%




ATTACHMENT

119

Table A11. Coefficients of Variation of National Estimates Across Characteristics of Selected Tribal Group ings Alone-or-in-

Combination Populations Compared to Places of Similar Size

Tribal Grouping Alone-or-in-Combination Population Places of Similar Size

Population Q1 CV Median

CV

Q3 CV Total Pop

Ranges

Q1 CV Median

CV

Q3 CV

American Indian

Alaska Native

4,787,447 0.6% 1.0% 1.6% 1,000,000

or more

American Indian 3,710,767 0.6% 1.1% 1.8% 0.7% 1.5% 2.9%

Cherokee 1,043,817 1.1% 2.1% 3.8%

Navajo 346,017 2.1% 3.7% 7.0% 250,000 to

499,999

1.7% 3.6% 6.8%

Choctaw 207,769 2.5% 4.7% 8.4% 200,000 to

249,999

2.2% 4.6% 8.8%

Sioux 188,981 2.5% 4.6% 8.3% 150,000 to

199,999

Chippewa 181,908 2.4% 4.5% 8.0% 2.4% 5.2% 10.2%

Alaska Native 161,271 2.7% 4.6% 8.5%

Mexican American

Indian

155,981 3.2% 5.9% 10.4%

Blackfeet 138,301 2.9% 5.5% 10.1% 125,000 to

149,999

2.7% 5.9% 11.6%

Apache 134,300 3.4% 5.9% 10.0%

Iroquois 99,366 3.4% 6.1% 11.0% 65,000 to

99,999

Creek 88,380 3.7% 6.8% 12.5% 3.5% 7.7% 15.4%

Lumbee 81,053 4.7% 8.2% 15.2%

Pueblo 68,656 4.5% 8.5% 15.0%

Chickasaw 49,626 4.8% 9.1% 16.0% 45,000 to

64,999

4.1% 9.3% 18.7%

South American

Indian

40,391 5.3% 11.0% 20.0% 35,000 to

44,999

Seminole 36,892 5.6% 10.6% 18.6% 4.9% 10.8% 21.8%

Inupiat 36,490 5.5% 9.2% 16.8%

Yup'ik 35,398 4.4% 8.5% 16.7%

Potawatomi 34,171 5.7% 10.8% 19.4% 25,000 to

34,999

Yaqui 32,774 6.6% 11.1% 18.9%

Comanche 28,523 6.4% 12.0% 21.7% 5.6% 12.5% 24.9%

Pima 27,413 8.3% 14.1% 26.2%

Tlingit-Haida 26,590 6.6% 12.2% 22.0%

Alaskan Athabascan 25,155 6.6% 11.8% 20.8%

Tohono O’Odham 24,313 8.7% 15.3% 26.2% 20,000 to

24,999

Cheyenne 21,733 7.4% 13.3% 22.4% 6.4% 14.2% 28.3%

Hopi 21,728 8.1% 15.0% 26.1%

Delaware 20,184 7.2% 13.7% 26.8%

Aleut 19,409 8.0% 14.4% 25.0% 15,000 to

19,999

Puget Sound Salish 19,386 7.6% 14.6% 25.9%

Osage 18,666 7.2% 14.2% 25.9%

Spanish American

Indian

17,668 8.3% 15.6% 25.3%

Crow 17,515 8.5% 14.8% 26.2% 7.2% 15.8% 31.0%

Central American 16,513 8.2% 17.7% 28.7%

ATTACHMENT

120

Table A11. Coefficients of Variation of National Estimates Across Characteristics of Selected Tribal Group ings Alone-or-in-

Combination Populations Compared to Places of Similar Size

Tribal Grouping Alone-or-in-Combination Population Places of Similar Size


CV

Q3 CV Total Pop

Ranges

Q1 CV Median

CV

Q3 CV

Indian

Shawnee 16,326 7.6% 14.0% 27.3%

Eastern Tribes 15,968 8.6% 16.1% 26.1%

Paiute 15,613 9.2% 16.4% 25.9%

Shoshone 15,556 8.9% 15.1% 26.2%

Canadian and

French American

Indian

14,728 8.7% 14.9% 26.7% 12,000 to

14,999

Kiowa 14,256 9.2% 16.7% 31.0% 8.1% 17.6% 34.1%

Ute 13,683 9.1% 16.8% 28.7%

Ottawa 12,385 8.9% 15.5% 28.1%

Yakama 11,952 12.2% 21.0% 36.0% 10,000 to

11,999

Arapaho 11,808 10.8% 18.9% 33.9%

Menominee 11,365 9.7% 16.9% 28.2%

Houma 10,925 11.2% 21.6% 35.7% 8.8% 19.1% 36.9%

Colville 10,828 10.3% 17.5% 32.8%

Yuman 10,364 10.6% 18.4% 33.2%

Pomo 10,203 12.5% 21.6% 34.8%

Micmac 9,770 10.2% 18.3% 30.1% 8,000 to

9,999

Cree 9,702 10.2% 18.5% 31.1%

Chumash 8,761 12.8% 23.9% 38.4% 9.6% 20.7% 39.5%

Three Affiliated

Tribes of North

Dakota

8,445 10.1% 18.3% 33.6%

Sac and Fox 8,192 11.7% 21.0% 38.7%

Salish and Kootenai 7,881 11.5% 21.4% 35.7% 6,000 to

7,999

Miami 7,852 10.9% 21.3% 38.9% 10.7% 23.1% 43.6%

Chippewa Cree 7,751 10.8% 19.2% 32.4%

Luiseno 6,205 14.3% 29.1% 43.6%

Assiniboine Sioux 5,900 12.2% 21.5% 38.1% 4,000 to 5,999

12.4% 26.1% 48.1%

Tsimshian 4,018 14.3% 25.8% 42.5%

Oneida Tribe 2,565 15.8% 28.7% 54.2% 2,500 to

2,999

14.0% 28.8% 52.0%





ATTACHMENT

121

Table A12. Coefficients of Variation of National Estimates Across Characteristics of Selected Tribal Groups Alone Population s

Compared to Places of Similar Size

Tribal Grouping Alone Population Places of Similar Size


CV

Q3 CV Total Pop

Ranges

Q1 CV Median

CV

Q3 CV


2,480,465 0.8% 1.3% 2.1% 1,000,000 or more

0.7% 1.5% 2.9%

American Indian 2,023,781 0.8% 1.5% 2.4%

Navajo 298,164 2.2% 3.9% 7.4% 250,000 to

499,999

1.7% 3.6% 6.8%

Cherokee 282,760 2.0% 3.7% 6.7%

Sioux 116,932 2.9% 5.5% 10.7% 100,000 to

124,999

3.0% 6.5% 12.7%

Chippewa 115,036 2.8% 5.2% 9.1%

Alaska Native 114,955 2.9% 5.0% 8.9%

Mexican American

Indian

109,718 3.7% 7.2% 12.0%

Choctaw 87,638 3.4% 6.8% 12.4% 65,000 to

99,999

Lumbee 67,724 4.9% 8.6% 16.6% 3.5% 7.7% 15.4%

Apache 65,274 4.5% 7.7% 14.1%

Pueblo 56,169 5.0% 9.0% 16.7% 45,000 to

64,999

4.1% 9.3% 18.7%

Iroquois 48,247 4.6% 8.2% 15.1%

Creek 41,147 5.1% 9.2% 17.6% 35,000 to 44,999

4.9% 10.8% 21.8%

Yup'ik 29,887 4.1% 8.2% 16.5% 25,000 to 34,999

Inupiat 26,495 5.9% 10.4% 18.2% 5.6% 12.5% 24.9%

Blackfeet 26,080 6.4% 11.7% 20.0%

Pima 22,819 9.0% 15.5% 29.4% 20,000 to

24,999

Chickasaw 20,780 7.1% 13.0% 22.2% 6.4% 14.2% 28.3%

South American

Indian

20,147 7.6% 15.7% 29.5%

Tohono O’Odham 19,730 9.3% 16.4% 28.0% 15,000 to

19,999

Yaqui 19,099 8.4% 14.1% 22.8%

Potawatomi 17,545 7.5% 13.5% 26.0% 7.2% 15.8% 31.0%

Alaskan Athabascan 16,089 7.0% 12.7% 23.1%

Tlingit-Haida 15,450 8.4% 14.9% 26.8%

Hopi 15,141 9.3% 17.1% 30.7%

Puget Sound Salish 13,806 9.2% 16.4% 28.4% 12,000 to

14,999

8.1% 17.6% 34.1%

Seminole 13,223 9.3% 16.6% 27.8%

Comanche 11,872 9.1% 16.6% 28.4% 10,000 to

11,999

Cheyenne 11,739 9.0% 17.2% 29.1%

Aleut 11,697 9.4% 17.5% 29.0% 8.8% 19.1% 36.9%

Spanish American

Indian

11,397 9.8% 19.8% 32.1%

Crow 11,056 10.2% 18.6% 34.4%

Paiute 10,499 10.3% 17.6% 29.9%

Central American

Indian

9,358 11.3% 23.4% 39.2% 8,000 to

9,999

ATTACHMENT

122

Table A12. Coefficients of Variation of National Estimates Across Characteristics of Selected Tribal Groups Alone Population s

Compared to Places of Similar Size

Tribal Grouping Alone Population Places of Similar Size


CV

Q3 CV Total Pop

Ranges

Q1 CV Median

CV

Q3 CV

Yakama 9,300 13.3% 23.2% 41.0%

Kiowa 8,939 10.7% 19.9% 35.0%

Shoshone 8,750 10.5% 18.7% 32.1%

Houma 8,522 11.8% 22.5% 36.5% 9.6% 20.7% 39.5%

Eastern Tribes 8,496 11.3% 19.5% 34.9%

Colville 8,479 11.3% 18.8% 35.8%

Ute 8,279 10.7% 20.4% 37.6%

Menominee 8,220 10.0% 19.4% 32.2%

Yuman 8,123 11.8% 19.6% 34.6%

Arapaho 7,542 12.4% 22.1% 39.0% 6,000 to 7,999

Osage 7,479 10.9% 21.2% 35.5%

Delaware 7,064 11.5% 21.7% 37.6% 10.7% 23.1% 43.6%

Ottawa 6,909 11.7% 18.9% 34.2%

Shawnee 6,034 11.7% 20.2% 35.7%

Canadian and French

American Indian

5,496 12.4% 23.6% 39.6% 4,000 to

5,999

12.4% 26.1% 48.1%

Assiniboine Sioux 4,602 13.5% 24.0% 41.0%

Cree 2,600 18.3% 33.0% 52.6% 2,500 to

2,999

14.0% 28.8% 52.0%

Tsimshian 1,934 17.7% 30.8% 49.5% 1,500 to

1,999

14.8% 29.7% 53.7%





ATTACHMENT

123

Table A13. First Quartile, Median, and Third Quartile Coefficients of Variation Across Characteristics of Estimates of the A lone-

or-in-Combination On and Off Reservation Populations By Selected Tribal Groupings

Tribal Grouping On Reservation Off Reservation

AOIC

Population

Q1 CV Median

CV

Q3 CV AOIC

Population

Q1 CV Median

CV

Q3 CV


1,079,210 1.0% 1.9% 3.4% 3,708,237 0.7% 1.1% 1.8%

American Indian 956,969 1.1% 2.0% 3.6% 2,753,798 0.8% 1.3% 2.2%

Alaska Native 65,270 3.0% 5.5% 10.5% 96,001 3.9% 6.8% 11.9%


Aleut 1,748 18.7% 33.7% 53.1% 17,661 8.5% 15.0% 26.7%

Apache 28,675 6.2% 11.3% 20.9% 105,625 3.7% 6.7% 12.1%

Arapaho 4,424 14.1% 25.6% 43.9% 7,384 13.1% 22.7% 41.3%


Blackfeet 7,978 11.1% 20.5% 34.4% 130,323 2.9% 5.7% 10.6%

Cherokee 196,111 2.3% 4.7% 8.7% 847,706 1.3% 2.3% 4.3%

Cheyenne 4,690 9.9% 19.4% 34.9% 17,043 8.4% 16.1% 26.5%

Chickasaw 16,786 7.8% 14.4% 25.6% 32,840 6.0% 11.4% 20.6%

Chippewa 33,895 4.8% 8.3% 16.0% 148,013 2.8% 5.1% 9.5%

Chippewa Cree 2,129 13.2% 22.2% 41.3% 5,622 14.3% 27.1% 43.5%

Choctaw 68,648 4.0% 7.3% 14.0% 139,121 2.9% 5.7% 10.1%

Colville 3,759 15.6% 28.7% 49.5% 7,069 12.5% 20.6% 38.3%

Comanche 6,672 11.8% 20.2% 38.0% 21,851 7.2% 14.5% 25.5%

Cree 421 26.6% 41.6% 68.3% 9,281 10.5% 18.9% 33.1%

Creek 35,811 5.6% 10.1% 18.0% 52,569 4.6% 8.8% 16.5%

Crow 4,603 12.5% 22.0% 39.2% 12,912 10.4% 18.6% 30.1%

Delaware 1,595 21.3% 41.5% 67.4% 18,589 7.6% 14.1% 28.0%

Eastern Tribes 1,431 14.4% 30.4% 56.0% 14,537 9.5% 17.0% 27.6%

Hopi 7,775 10.6% 21.6% 37.5% 13,953 10.1% 19.7% 32.3%

Houma 5,933 14.4% 28.7% 50.8% 4,992 15.3% 27.7% 45.7%

Inupiat 17,527 5.5% 10.5% 18.1% 18,963 8.4% 15.8% 27.4%

Iroquois 12,358 8.8% 15.5% 30.8% 87,008 3.7% 6.5% 11.8%

Kiowa 3,819 16.4% 27.4% 51.3% 10,437 10.3% 19.2% 36.5%

Luiseno 637 22.1% 39.0% 66.1% 5,568 15.2% 31.6% 47.9%

Lumbee 51,580 5.6% 10.2% 20.3% 29,473 7.1% 12.9% 23.5%

Menominee 2,392 14.8% 28.0% 46.2% 8,973 11.4% 19.5% 33.5%

Navajo 157,416 2.4% 4.4% 9.0% 188,601 3.2% 6.1% 10.9%

Oneida Tribe 611 25.5% 47.4% 75.5% 1,954 18.0% 31.9% 56.7%

Osage 5,358 13.0% 23.4% 39.4% 13,308 8.6% 16.5% 30.3%

Paiute 1,792 15.4% 27.6% 49.3% 13,821 10.3% 18.3% 28.5%

Pima 13,880 10.2% 18.3% 34.7% 13,533 12.1% 21.5% 36.8%

Potawatomi 3,914 13.1% 23.2% 45.3% 30,257 6.1% 11.8% 21.4%

Pueblo 36,405 5.9% 10.6% 19.8% 32,251 6.8% 13.1% 22.3%

Puget Sound Salish 5,269 11.0% 19.7% 34.6% 14,117 9.7% 19.4% 35.2%

Sac and Fox 1,844 17.9% 33.5% 59.1% 6,348 13.5% 23.4% 42.5%

Salish and Kootenai 5,017 13.0% 26.5% 44.6% 2,864 16.6% 29.0% 52.1%

Seminole 8,512 10.7% 19.0% 31.9% 28,380 6.7% 12.3% 21.6%

Shawnee 1,623 20.1% 34.6% 55.7% 14,703 8.1% 14.6% 28.2%

Shoshone 1,820 14.6% 28.6% 44.4% 13,736 9.2% 17.1% 28.3%

Sioux 51,438 4.0% 7.4% 13.9% 137,543 3.1% 5.7% 10.8%

Three Affiliated Tribes

of North Dakota

3,336 11.8% 21.2% 36.8% 5,109 13.6% 25.5% 43.5%

Tlingit-Haida 5,566 11.1% 20.9% 32.8% 21,024 8.1% 14.6% 27.2%

Tohono O’Odham 7,723 12.5% 23.0% 42.8% 16,590 10.7% 20.7% 34.3%

ATTACHMENT

124

Table A13. First Quartile, Median, and Third Quartile Coefficients of Variation Across Characteristics of Estimates of the A lone-

or-in-Combination On and Off Reservation Populations By Selected Tribal Groupings


AOIC

Population

Q1 CV Median

CV

Q3 CV AOIC

Population

Q1 CV Median

CV

Q3 CV

Tsimshian 1,149 14.4% 27.6% 47.3% 2,869 19.0% 34.4% 55.0%

Ute 4,172 13.0% 22.6% 37.7% 9,511 12.0% 21.7% 37.2%

Yakama 5,713 16.3% 28.4% 49.0% 6,239 15.5% 26.9% 44.4%

Yaqui 3,603 10.6% 20.6% 36.7% 29,171 6.8% 12.6% 21.4%

Yuman 3,473 12.3% 22.8% 44.9% 6,891 13.8% 25.4% 42.2%

Yup'ik 22,702 3.6% 7.3% 15.1% 12,696 10.5% 19.8% 30.7%




ATTACHMENT

125

Table A14. First Quartile, Median, and Third Quartile Coefficients of Variation Across Characteristics of Estimates of the A lone

On and Off Reservation Populations by Selected Tribal Groupings


Alone Population

Q1 CV Median CV

Q3 CV Alone Population

Q1 CV Median CV

Q3 CV


858,063 1.1% 2.0% 3.6% 1,622,402 0.9% 1.7% 2.7%

American Indian 766,618 1.2% 2.3% 3.8% 1,257,163 1.1% 1.9% 3.1%

Alaska Native 54,831 3.1% 5.9% 10.8% 60,124 4.3% 7.8% 14.2%


Aleut 511 21.3% 37.2% 58.4% 11,186 9.9% 17.8% 29.0%

Apache 25,720 6.5% 11.9% 21.8% 39,554 5.5% 10.0% 17.9%

Arapaho 4,207 14.2% 26.1% 46.0% 3,335 18.5% 31.6% 52.9%


Blackfeet 7,471 11.5% 20.4% 34.7% 18,609 7.4% 13.4% 23.2%

Cherokee 95,457 3.4% 6.4% 11.8% 187,303 2.4% 4.4% 8.2%

Cheyenne 4,307 10.2% 19.2% 35.3% 7,432 12.8% 23.8% 41.1%

Chickasaw 7,362 10.8% 19.2% 34.7% 13,418 8.8% 16.3% 27.8%

Chippewa 31,577 5.0% 8.5% 17.2% 83,459 3.7% 6.4% 11.7%

Choctaw 37,392 5.3% 10.0% 18.2% 50,246 4.8% 9.3% 16.2%

Colville 3,668 15.5% 28.6% 49.5% 4,811 14.4% 23.5% 43.4%

Comanche 3,912 13.7% 23.7% 43.9% 7,960 10.8% 20.9% 36.6%

Cree 417 26.9% 41.3% 67.3% 2,183 19.1% 35.9% 55.3%

Creek 17,531 7.1% 13.1% 23.6% 23,616 6.9% 12.4% 24.5%

Crow 4,435 13.1% 22.3% 39.8% 6,621 13.6% 26.3% 43.2%

Delaware 606 26.5% 49.1% 78.0% 6,458 12.1% 22.3% 39.6%

Eastern Tribes 1,377 14.8% 31.6% 56.0% 7,119 12.6% 22.4% 37.8%

Hopi 7,590 11.1% 22.0% 38.1% 7,551 13.2% 24.2% 40.7%

Houma 5,009 15.2% 28.2% 50.0% 3,513 15.6% 32.8% 49.0%

Inupiat 14,512 5.8% 10.9% 19.5% 11,983 9.4% 18.0% 29.5%

Iroquois 8,544 9.3% 17.0% 33.6% 39,703 5.2% 9.3% 16.4%

Kiowa 2,928 16.4% 29.0% 52.0% 6,011 12.4% 24.2% 46.0%

Lumbee 49,015 5.8% 10.5% 20.8% 18,709 8.2% 15.3% 27.2%

Menominee 2,391 14.8% 28.0% 46.2% 5,829 12.8% 22.7% 39.6%

Navajo 156,138 2.4% 4.5% 9.0% 142,026 3.5% 7.1% 12.0%

Osage 3,008 16.2% 27.4% 48.0% 4,471 14.0% 25.3% 46.6%

Paiute 1,391 17.7% 31.3% 55.8% 9,108 11.4% 19.3% 34.1%

Pima 13,194 10.4% 18.9% 34.7% 9,625 13.8% 24.5% 45.0%

Potawatomi 1,269 16.5% 32.1% 57.0% 16,276 8.2% 14.4% 27.5%

Pueblo 35,461 6.0% 10.8% 20.0% 20,708 7.8% 15.5% 26.1%

Puget Sound Salish 4,933 11.5% 20.0% 35.5% 8,873 12.4% 24.2% 40.8%

Seminole 3,743 13.6% 25.2% 40.6% 9,480 11.8% 19.7% 34.9%

Shoshone 1,707 14.8% 29.3% 43.4% 7,043 12.6% 22.6% 37.2%

Sioux 49,874 4.0% 7.5% 14.2% 67,058 4.2% 7.8% 14.6%

Tlingit-Haida 2,238 12.9% 22.2% 36.5% 13,212 9.5% 16.9% 31.9%

Tohono O’Odham 7,514 12.3% 22.9% 42.8% 12,216 12.1% 23.7% 39.1%

Tsimshian 850 16.2% 30.0% 50.0% 1,084 25.4% 42.9% 69.3%

Ute 3,755 12.9% 23.4% 38.4% 4,524 15.7% 30.3% 49.6%

ATTACHMENT

126

Table A14. First Quartile, Median, and Third Quartile Coefficients of Variation Across Characteristics of Estimates of the A lone

On and Off Reservation Populations by Selected Tribal Groupings


Alone Population

Q1 CV Median CV

Q3 CV Alone Population

Q1 CV Median CV

Q3 CV

Yakama 5,004 17.0% 29.2% 50.8% 4,296 16.3% 31.4% 53.0%

Yaqui 3,263 10.7% 20.8% 38.6% 15,836 8.7% 15.9% 26.6%

Yuman 3,216 12.8% 23.6% 44.6% 4,907 16.1% 28.3% 45.2%

Yup'ik 21,165 3.6% 7.2% 15.7% 8,722 11.1% 20.6% 33.1%




ATTACHMENT

127

Table A15. Median Coefficients of Variation of Estimates Across Characteristics of the Alone -or-in-Combination and the Alone

Populations for American Indian Reservation and Alaska Native Village Statistical Areas

American Indian Reservation or Alaska Native

Village Statistical Area


Combination

AIAN Alone

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Four Winds Cherokee (state) SDTSA, LA 29,291 6.9% 782 37.3% 318 46.4%

Flathead Reservation, MT 28,119 10.9% 8,554 20.9% 7,133 22.3%

Kaw/Ponca joint-use OTSA, OK 27,272 9.0% 3,230 22.6% 2,259 27.3%

Isabella Reservation, MI 26,352 6.8% 2,415 24.5% 1,874 27.8%

Wind River Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, WY

26,215 12.1% 7,676 19.1% 7,137 20.3%

Agua Caliente Indian Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, CA

25,927 5.8% 435 36.0% 186 44.3%

Oneida (WI) Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, WI

23,520 14.8% 4,525 26.5% 4,119 27.1%

Seminole OTSA, OK 22,797 10.6% 5,204 22.4% 3,443 25.5%

Chickaloon ANVSA, AK 22,099 10.8% 2,133 31.6% 1,121 35.3%

Uintah and Ouray Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, UT

21,871 12.4% 2,836 29.1% 2,596 29.8%

MaChis Lower Creek (state) SDTSA, AL 21,097 9.9% 669 40.0% 246 48.5%

Kickapoo OTSA, OK 20,443 11.7% 3,637 25.0% 2,638 27.4%

Pine Ridge Reservation, SD--NE 18,710 15.2% 16,119 16.8% 15,827 16.9%

Nez Perce Reservation, ID 18,677 10.8% 2,485 23.6% 2,007 24.4%

Pawnee OTSA, OK 16,489 12.9% 2,919 27.8% 1,634 33.8%

Caddo-Wichita-Delaware OTSA, OK 14,535 10.7% 2,881 24.9% 2,038 29.2%

Ninilchik ANVSA, AK 13,299 10.6% 774 32.8% 465 39.6%

Ketchikan ANVSA, AK 12,537 17.7% 2,452 35.0% 1,390 43.1%

Southern Ute Reservation, CO 12,448 12.3% 1,656 32.8% 1,420 33.4%

Fort Apache Reservation, AZ 12,424 17.9% 11,506 18.2% 11,280 18.2%

Cherokee Tribe of Northeast Alabama (state)

SDTSA, AL

12,118 18.3%

Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ 11,380 21.6% 11,050 22.0% 10,954 21.8%

San Carlos Reservation, AZ 11,323 20.1% 11,090 19.4% 10,710 19.4%

Santa Clara Pueblo, NM 11,231 11.1% 1,509 28.0% 1,456 28.2%

Kiowa-Comanche-Apache-Ft Sill Apache/Caddo-Wichita-Delaware joint-use OTSA, OK

11,178 17.0% 4,754 26.1% 3,960 27.1%

Zuni Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, NM--AZ

10,876 25.0% 10,623 26.4% 10,537 26.4%

Rosebud Indian Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, SD

10,670 17.2% 9,395 20.1% 9,053 20.6%

Lake Traverse Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, SD--ND

10,624 12.8% 4,348 18.6% 4,067 19.1%

Blackfeet Indian Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, MT

10,429 18.2% 8,985 19.5% 8,732 19.6%

Leech Lake Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, MN

10,270 12.4% 4,195 19.1% 3,860 19.2%

Tulalip Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, WA

10,055 12.1% 2,281 24.9% 2,039 26.6%

White Earth Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, MN

9,862 10.0% 4,756 15.9% 4,050 16.2%

Tohono O'odham Nation Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, AZ

9,753 20.5% 8,451 22.5% 8,244 22.5%

Colorado River Indian Reservation, AZ--CA 9,582 14.9% 2,707 25.6% 2,406 26.6%

Fort Peck Indian Reservation and Off- 9,528 15.5% 6,380 20.0% 5,235 20.6%

ATTACHMENT

128






Combination

AIAN Alone

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Reservation Trust Land, MT

Haliwa-Saponi (state) SDTSA, NC 8,710 17.2% 2,697 26.5% 2,133 27.3%

Hopi Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, AZ

8,515 21.0% 8,284 20.4% 8,284 20.4%

Mississippi Choctaw Reservation, MS 8,320 24.9% 6,740 25.2% 6,132 25.7%

Eastern Cherokee Reservation, NC 8,285 25.6% 6,510 28.2% 6,421 28.2%

Turtle Mountain Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, MT--ND--SD

8,271 20.6% 7,856 21.1% 7,816 21.1%

Occaneechi-Saponi (state) SDTSA, NC 8,228 21.9%

Standing Rock Reservation, SD--ND 8,194 13.0% 6,278 15.3% 6,057 15.8%

Cheyenne River Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, SD

8,099 14.8% 6,137 17.9% 5,932 17.9%

Colville Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, WA

8,014 19.5% 4,833 26.3% 4,721 26.4%

Meherrin (state) SDTSA, NC 7,898 11.1% 420 39.3% 251 45.1%

Port Madison Reservation, WA 7,031 12.7% 504 44.9% 322 47.0%

Nanticoke Indian Tribe (state) SDTSA, DE 6,992 17.9% 501 42.4%

Coeur d'Alene Reservation, ID 6,916 14.2% 1,365 32.1% 1,099 33.7%

Allegany Reservation, NY 6,691 12.5% 1,640 22.8% 1,475 23.9%

Iowa OTSA, OK 6,668 15.7% 519 39.1%

Crow Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, MT

6,609 20.0% 5,305 21.3% 5,022 21.5%

Yankton Reservation, SD 6,504 13.3% 2,993 21.2% 2,761 21.7%

Salt River Reservation, AZ 6,458 23.0% 4,503 27.5% 4,329 27.5%

Ohkay Owingeh, NM 6,419 15.0% 1,108 32.6% 1,100 32.6%

Apache Choctaw (state) SDTSA, LA 6,374 15.9% 1,631 27.8% 1,165 37.3%

Fort Berthold Reservation, ND 6,162 16.9% 4,190 20.6% 3,884 21.1%

Quapaw OTSA, OK 6,059 12.9% 1,493 25.9% 1,180 30.0%

Ottawa OTSA, OK 5,994 14.8% 1,535 26.0% 1,115 29.4%

Bethel ANVSA, AK 5,971 24.7% 4,275 29.8% 3,653 31.1%

Kaw OTSA, OK 5,894 14.4% 749 35.3% 479 39.0%

Nanticoke Lenni Lenape (state) SDTSA, NJ 5,889 13.8% 482 37.2% 290 44.2%

United Cherokee Ani-Yun-Wiya Nation (state) SDTSA, AL

5,749 25.1%

Star Muskogee Creek (state) SDTSA, AL 5,728 16.6%

Red Lake Reservation, MN 5,684 25.5% 5,232 26.3% 5,174 26.3%

Sandia Pueblo, NM 5,471 13.2% 883 31.9% 771 33.6%

Mille Lacs Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MN

5,444 16.3% 1,616 27.9% 1,431 29.6%

Douglas ANVSA, AK 5,352 17.3% 1,151 34.5% 613 35.8%

Fort Hall Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, ID

5,351 21.0% 3,515 25.5% 3,258 25.5%

Taos Pueblo and Off-Reservation Trust Land,

NM

5,258 18.8% 1,755 33.1% 1,597 33.7%

Peoria OTSA, OK 5,030 15.0% 1,199 27.5% 798 30.7%

Omaha Reservation, NE--IA 4,943 15.5% 2,342 23.8% 2,151 25.0%

Laguna Pueblo and Off-Reservation Trust Land,

NM

4,646 26.4% 4,502 25.8% 4,502 25.8%

ATTACHMENT

129






Combination

AIAN Alone

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, MT--SD

4,635 18.2% 4,318 18.6% 4,249 18.6%

Kickapoo (KS) Reservation, KS 4,626 15.2% 813 33.7% 734 34.1%

Unalaska ANVSA, AK 4,485 29.0% 207 53.7% 148 54.4%

Seneca-Cayuga OTSA, OK 4,457 16.8% 698 34.1% 483 39.0%

Lummi Reservation, WA 4,253 17.4% 2,187 26.6% 1,998 28.2%

Fond du Lac Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, MN--WI

4,173 17.1% 1,796 26.8% 1,526 28.5%

Miami/Peoria joint-use OTSA, OK 4,162 15.0% 966 24.5% 709 29.8%

Barrow ANVSA, AK 4,139 30.1% 3,045 35.5% 2,555 37.2%

Pascua Pueblo Yaqui Reservation, AZ 4,093 19.1% 3,850 19.9% 3,507 20.3%

Torres-Martinez Reservation, CA 4,075 19.3% 239 55.5%

Tonkawa OTSA, OK 4,059 16.2% 706 32.8% 523 39.1%

Spirit Lake Reservation, ND 4,040 17.5% 3,390 19.4% 3,357 19.6%

Mescalero Reservation, NM 4,025 27.6% 3,724 26.8% 3,666 26.9%

Warm Springs Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, OR

3,976 27.1% 3,650 28.2% 3,430 30.3%

Sitka ANVSA, AK 3,912 30.8% 1,248 47.1% 1,036 47.6%

Chickahominy (state) SDTSA, VA 3,893 18.2% 527 27.6% 440 30.3%

Muckleshoot Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, WA

3,685 22.8% 1,076 41.1% 993 42.5%

L'Anse Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, MI

3,664 20.0% 1,152 30.1% 1,032 31.9%

Nome ANVSA, AK 3,516 28.8% 2,197 38.7% 1,791 38.4%

Washoe Ranches Trust Land, NV--CA 3,490 19.6% 179 53.2%

Lac du Flambeau Reservation, WI 3,389 21.5% 1,983 27.4% 1,555 29.5%

Pojoaque Pueblo of and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, NM

3,281 17.9% 502 39.3% 494 38.6%

Isleta Pueblo, NM 3,271 30.7% 3,022 31.4% 2,993 31.4%

San Felipe Pueblo, NM 3,241 23.7% 2,402 26.9% 2,395 26.9%

Swinomish Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, WA

3,206 21.9% 870 42.2% 806 45.6%

Mechoopda TDSA, CA 3,194 18.6% 250 50.9%

Kotzebue ANVSA, AK 3,178 20.8% 2,573 23.4% 2,276 24.4%

Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM 3,169 24.4% 3,131 22.4% 3,108 23.0%

St. Regis Mohawk Reservation, NY 3,134 32.2% 2,275 34.2% 2,226 34.5%

Jicarilla Apache Nation Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, NM

3,113 22.6% 2,780 22.8% 2,645 22.6%

Rocky Boy's Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, MT

3,099 19.9% 2,947 19.7% 2,917 19.7%

Acoma Pueblo and Off-Reservation Trust Land,

NM

2,987 24.8% 2,968 24.9% 2,961 25.0%

Lac Courte Oreilles Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, WI

2,984 20.7% 2,070 22.9% 1,970 24.8%

Pee Dee (state) SDTSA, SC 2,950 37.5%

Fort Belknap Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MT

2,798 18.3% 2,662 18.6% 2,648 18.6%

Menominee Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, WI

2,797 26.1% 2,680 26.6% 2,634 26.6%

ATTACHMENT

130






Combination

AIAN Alone

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Umatilla Reservation, OR 2,748 20.7% 1,175 28.4% 917 28.2%

Hoopa Valley Reservation, CA 2,701 24.8% 2,019 27.2% 1,991 27.8%

Cayuga Nation TDSA, NY 2,626 24.7%

Waccamaw Siouan (state) SDTSA, NC 2,623 25.2% 1,672 28.7% 1,621 29.7%

Adais Caddo (state) SDTSA, LA 2,541 19.8%

Winnebago Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, NE--IA

2,526 20.3% 1,771 22.8% 1,717 22.8%

Sappony (state) SDTSA, NC 2,521 21.9%

Creek/Seminole joint-use OTSA, OK 2,427 24.4% 786 38.8% 546 40.0%

Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, CA--AZ 2,377 28.1% 1,473 35.1% 1,349 37.6%

Petersburg ANVSA, AK 2,276 34.0%

Dillingham ANVSA, AK 2,252 23.8% 1,410 31.2% 1,049 34.0%

Cattaraugus Reservation, NY 2,229 33.5% 1,631 34.8% 1,490 35.3%

Ponca OTSA, OK 2,038 23.9% 822 38.5% 684 40.4%

Crow Creek Reservation, SD 2,034 25.5% 1,853 24.2% 1,846 24.7%

Sault Sainte Marie Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, MI

1,993 28.5% 1,291 32.0% 1,109 32.7%

Picuris Pueblo, NM 1,980 20.4%

Hollywood Reservation, FL 1,971 27.9% 537 53.1% 496 53.2%

Jemez Pueblo, NM 1,918 28.7% 1,864 28.6% 1,864 28.6%

Nambe Pueblo and Off-Reservation Trust Land,

NM

1,829 26.5% 719 38.3% 689 37.5%

Bishop Reservation, CA 1,828 31.2% 1,376 31.8% 1,254 31.8%

Spokane Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, WA

1,819 27.1% 1,524 28.6% 1,358 29.5%

Craig ANVSA, AK 1,724 27.5% 402 39.1% 285 42.9%

San Ildefonso Pueblo and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, NM

1,669 23.3% 527 38.5% 509 38.3%

Wyandotte OTSA, OK 1,622 21.0% 399 36.2% 279 40.8%

Lower Brule Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, SD

1,620 26.1% 1,469 26.0% 1,453 25.4%

Upper South Carolina Pee Dee (state) SDTSA, SC 1,608 34.8%

Akutan ANVSA, AK 1,596 39.4%

Wassamasaw (state) SDTSA, SC 1,561 43.1%

Fort Mojave Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, AZ--CA--NV

1,555 28.7% 591 43.1% 576 42.9%

Beaver Creek (state) SDTSA, SC 1,509 40.7%

Bad River Reservation, WI 1,492 29.7% 1,046 31.0% 1,015 31.1%

Annette Island Reserve, AK 1,447 25.9% 1,294 26.0% 1,114 27.7%

Ute Mountain Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, CO--NM--UT

1,436 31.3% 1,361 31.1% 1,313 31.8%

Makah Indian Reservation, WA 1,435 29.0% 1,116 29.6% 1,039 31.0%

Cochiti Pueblo de, NM 1,424 28.8% 591 38.0% 578 38.7%

Quinault Reservation, WA 1,421 33.1% 1,183 33.4% 1,055 35.3%

Point Hope ANVSA, AK 1,418 27.0% 1,274 27.8% 1,178 28.4%

Prairie Band of Potawatomi Nation Reservation,

KS

1,412 28.2% 831 39.9% 758 40.9%

Pyramid Lake Paiute Reservation, NV 1,360 33.3% 1,043 35.7% 1,017 35.5%

ATTACHMENT

131






Combination

AIAN Alone

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Sand Point ANVSA, AK 1,329 35.4% 237 43.5% 179 46.5%

Ho-Chunk Nation Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, WI--MN

1,307 33.8% 981 33.9% 933 33.9%

Yurok Reservation, CA 1,302 34.9% 628 46.5% 478 45.7%

Duck Valley Reservation, NV--ID 1,263 33.0% 1,055 32.0% 1,034 31.5%

Wrangell ANVSA, AK 1,253 36.5%

Hooper Bay ANVSA, AK 1,218 22.4% 1,199 22.4% 1,190 22.4%

Reno-Sparks Indian Colony, NV 1,210 38.1% 1,148 38.1% 1,040 38.6%

Tule River Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, CA

1,196 44.5% 977 45.8% 904 46.0%

Sac and Fox/Meskwaki Settlement, IA 1,173 33.4% 1,044 33.5% 1,004 33.7%

Skagway ANVSA, AK 1,140 38.4%

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Reservation, AZ 1,080 35.6% 959 36.0% 947 36.0%

Pala Reservation, CA 1,077 34.2% 468 47.8% 402 49.6%

St. Paul ANVSA, AK 1,065 46.7% 223 43.3% 207 44.7%

Bay Mills Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, MI

1,046 31.3% 865 33.3% 776 34.8%

Tuscarora Nation Reservation, NY 1,009 34.8% 733 36.0% 710 36.2%

Salamatof ANVSA, AK 996 38.4%

Cocopah Reservation, AZ 992 33.6% 502 44.7% 500 44.7%

Santee Reservation, NE 960 29.1% 627 32.9% 594 33.5%

Cabazon Reservation, CA 957 32.2%

Chevak ANVSA, AK 944 24.3% 929 24.3% 875 24.9%

Rincon Reservation, CA 937 34.6% 400 47.9% 376 48.8%

Santa Ana Pueblo, NM 935 44.0% 935 44.0% 928 44.7%

Ramapough (state) SDTSA, NJ 925 34.9% 288 52.9% 251 60.0%

Wainwright ANVSA, AK 910 31.1% 877 32.2% 840 31.9%

Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, AZ 906 44.7% 873 44.6% 794 45.6%

Zia Pueblo and Off-Reservation Trust Land, NM 901 35.3% 894 34.9% 894 34.9%

Red Cliff Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, WI

865 33.1% 700 31.7% 671 30.0%

Tesuque Pueblo and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, NM

865 33.0% 396 46.2% 391 46.2%

Port Gamble Reservation, WA 861 36.4% 736 38.1% 617 39.3%

Nooksack Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, WA

844 45.1% 644 49.6% 522 51.8%

Togiak ANVSA, AK 831 29.6% 755 29.2% 718 29.8%

Emmonak ANVSA, AK 830 28.8% 773 27.4% 747 28.5%

Indian Township Reservation, ME 767 26.5% 667 27.1% 567 26.7%

Mountain Village ANVSA, AK 765 25.4% 737 24.5% 718 24.2%

Elko Colony, NV 762 37.7% 672 38.5% 646 38.8%

Otoe-Missouria OTSA, OK 745 33.9% 338 40.3% 298 42.1%

Stockbridge Munsee Community, WI 736 32.8% 585 33.4% 528 34.8%

Yavapai-Apache Nation Reservation, AZ 736 45.8% 682 45.9% 661 45.6%

Toksook Bay ANVSA, AK 728 29.3% 698 30.6% 694 30.6%

Santa Rosa Rancheria, CA 725 47.5% 584 48.7% 560 49.1%

Eastern Shawnee OTSA, OK 725 28.3% 183 44.2% 163 47.1%

Selawik ANVSA, AK 716 29.1% 701 29.4% 652 30.9%

ATTACHMENT

132






Combination

AIAN Alone

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Catawba Reservation, SC 714 35.5% 489 37.2% 427 38.8%

Barona Reservation, CA 712 45.1% 479 48.2% 456 50.7%

Lower Elwha Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, WA

706 41.5% 592 40.7% 548 41.6%

King Cove ANVSA, AK 702 47.9% 223 53.6% 204 55.4%

Skokomish Reservation, WA 698 33.9% 412 37.8% 410 37.8%

Bois Forte Reservation, MN 693 32.9% 507 38.2% 482 38.8%

Shishmaref ANVSA, AK 692 29.0% 678 28.0% 660 28.4%

San Pasqual Reservation, CA 687 39.0% 474 48.2% 411 47.9%

Hoonah ANVSA, AK 678 37.0% 396 41.7% 318 44.7%

Nuiqsut ANVSA, AK 678 31.6% 638 32.4% 635 32.4%

Forest County Potawatomi Community and Off-Reservation Trust Land, WI

666 40.5% 582 37.2% 543 39.5%

Chehalis Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, WA

660 42.9% 422 53.4% 401 54.3%

Savoonga ANVSA, AK 660 26.9% 658 26.2% 645 25.7%

Hualapai Indian Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, AZ

658 37.6% 620 37.4% 575 40.4%

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, TX

651 48.4% 440 49.4% 404 52.9%

Kwinhagak ANVSA, AK 649 28.3% 642 28.3% 625 28.3%

Unalakleet ANVSA, AK 647 29.5% 559 30.4% 466 32.3%

Noorvik ANVSA, AK 646 30.5% 614 30.0% 604 30.0%

Grand Traverse Reservation and Off-


644 38.5% 562 39.6% 482 39.0%

Kwethluk ANVSA, AK 644 32.0% 618 30.7% 595 30.7%

Akiachak ANVSA, AK 633 29.4% 583 26.7% 580 26.7%

Alabama-Coushatta Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, TX

630 41.0% 436 38.8% 431 38.6%

Yakutat ANVSA, AK 630 33.9% 412 45.6% 339 49.5%

Morongo Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, CA

619 48.1% 480 54.1% 442 55.9%

Penobscot Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, ME

616 29.1% 469 29.9% 398 31.0%

Gambell ANVSA, AK 613 31.9% 586 31.5% 566 31.5%

St. Croix Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, WI

604 32.3% 480 32.4% 444 32.5%

Klawock ANVSA, AK 597 35.4% 361 40.5% 300 40.1%

Kipnuk ANVSA, AK 595 32.0% 531 32.6% 531 32.6%

Nisqually Reservation, WA 588 44.1% 368 48.8% 338 49.0%

New Stuyahok ANVSA, AK 585 31.9% 557 33.8% 542 33.9%

Kotlik ANVSA, AK 581 27.0% 573 27.4% 560 26.9%

Naknek ANVSA, AK 574 33.6% 250 44.4%

Campo Indian Reservation, CA 567 50.9% 479 56.2% 472 57.3%

Saxman ANVSA, AK 565 45.4% 416 49.6% 375 51.2%

Kickapoo (TX) Reservation, TX 563 41.2%

Kake ANVSA, AK 562 41.4% 380 41.6% 352 42.6%

Tonawanda Reservation, NY 549 36.4% 435 37.0% 428 37.0%

ATTACHMENT

133






Combination

AIAN Alone

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Fort Yukon ANVSA, AK 548 32.5% 516 33.1% 492 33.1%

Kaktovik ANVSA, AK 547 39.3% 538 38.7% 495 39.3%

Siletz Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, OR

541 45.9% 463 49.5% 361 54.3%

Aniak ANVSA, AK 531 31.5% 371 33.9% 302 36.5%

Stebbins ANVSA, AK 526 29.9% 512 29.5% 503 29.7%

Tuluksak ANVSA, AK 525 28.4% 525 28.4% 525 28.4%

Hannahville Indian Community and Off-


520 39.8% 447 39.3% 397 40.4%

Squaxin Island Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, WA

520 46.0% 428 48.4% 393 50.3%

Kasigluk ANVSA, AK 518 33.3% 507 33.5% 487 35.6%

Seldovia ANVSA, AK 518 38.3%

Poarch Creek Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, AL--FL

517 47.6% 338 51.7% 308 51.9%

Pilot Station ANVSA, AK 513 33.0% 494 30.6% 480 31.0%

Walker River Reservation, NV 508 42.8% 387 40.6% 387 40.6%

Chitimacha Reservation, LA 506 39.5% 340 45.2% 309 45.6%

Angoon ANVSA, AK 505 36.0% 455 37.1% 391 38.4%

Alakanuk ANVSA, AK 504 25.7% 455 27.0% 451 27.0%

Lower Sioux Indian Community, MN 497 42.2% 405 47.4%

Modoc OTSA, OK 496 39.2%

Buckland ANVSA, AK 492 33.6% 491 33.1% 488 33.1%

Noatak ANVSA, AK 486 34.2% 449 33.4% 420 33.9%

Galena ANVSA, AK 485 30.7% 366 34.5% 324 37.3%

Scammon Bay ANVSA, AK 479 29.4% 463 29.9% 460 29.8%

Pleasant Point Reservation, ME 475 34.0% 420 32.1% 331 35.3%

Quileute Reservation, WA 474 47.7% 450 48.3% 426 47.8%

Copper Center ANVSA, AK 473 40.9%

Hydaburg ANVSA, AK 473 41.0% 405 42.4% 398 42.4%

Grand Portage Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MN

470 45.2%

Round Valley Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, CA

449 54.4%

Nenana ANVSA, AK 449 32.7% 220 34.9%

Nunapitchuk ANVSA, AK 433 33.0% 412 34.3% 409 34.3%

Newtok ANVSA, AK 426 34.8% 415 35.3% 409 35.3%

Coquille Reservation, OR 423 56.6% 194 53.8%

Clifton Choctaw (state) SDTSA, LA 419 45.9%

Flandreau Reservation, SD 414 41.1% 389 40.1% 373 39.2%

Anaktuvuk Pass ANVSA, AK 413 39.2% 381 38.7% 323 40.9%

Napakiak ANVSA, AK 405 30.8% 394 29.5% 394 29.5%

Chefornak ANVSA, AK 401 37.4% 392 34.1% 392 34.1%

St. Michael ANVSA, AK 399 34.2% 376 34.3% 364 34.9%

Kongiganak ANVSA, AK 394 33.6% 381 32.1% 365 34.3%

Ely Reservation, NV 390 54.8%

Marshall ANVSA, AK 382 35.0% 366 34.1% 360 34.3%

Kivalina ANVSA, AK 381 33.6% 374 32.3% 368 33.6%

ATTACHMENT

134






Combination

AIAN Alone

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Atqasuk ANVSA, AK 380 37.9% 349 37.4% 317 38.1%

Shinnecock (state) (state) Reservation, NY 380 45.3% 344 46.3% 344 46.3%

McGrath ANVSA, AK 379 36.6% 198 42.8%

Karuk Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, CA

378 44.1% 286 47.9% 242 49.9%

Nightmute ANVSA, AK 372 40.5% 372 40.5% 368 40.5%

Point Lay ANVSA, AK 367 41.0% 359 41.0% 342 40.8%

Algaaciq ANVSA, AK 362 35.1% 317 36.3% 317 36.3%

Kalispel Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, WA

360 46.3% 325 48.8% 318 48.8%

Havasupai Reservation, AZ 359 39.3% 352 36.1% 352 36.1%

Santa Ynez Reservation, CA 358 51.9% 292 51.1%

Susanville Indian Rancheria and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, CA

358 56.8%

Goodnews Bay ANVSA, AK 358 33.5% 334 32.4% 328 32.4%

Redwood Valley Rancheria, CA 350 60.4%

Tanana ANVSA, AK 347 36.9% 276 39.5% 270 39.7%

Moapa River Indian Reservation, NV 346 49.0% 296 45.2% 296 45.2%

Tununak ANVSA, AK 345 34.1% 331 33.6% 320 33.8%

Carson Colony, NV 343 56.0% 264 55.2% 255 55.0%

Manokotak ANVSA, AK 341 37.4% 338 39.1% 311 39.0%

Kiana ANVSA, AK 338 37.8% 313 38.2% 301 37.4%

Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Reservation and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, NV

333 38.9% 244 44.1% 212 46.9%

Soboba Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust

Land, CA

332 51.5%

Elim ANVSA, AK 330 36.7% 318 36.4% 302 36.6%

Prairie Island Indian Community and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, MN

329 51.9%

Upper Skagit Reservation, WA 329 50.9% 230 56.2%

Koyuk ANVSA, AK 328 35.0% 322 32.5% 306 32.4%

Shungnak ANVSA, AK 328 37.2% 324 36.5% 324 36.5%

Russian Mission ANVSA, AK 325 37.2% 311 38.2% 200 41.7%

Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community and

Off-Reservation Trust Land, MN

319 54.2% 263 55.5% 230 56.7%

Ambler ANVSA, AK 319 38.6% 303 36.1% 295 36.2%

Brevig Mission ANVSA, AK 315 36.6% 306 35.8% 293 35.6%

Sokaogon Chippewa Community and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, WI

312 47.6% 270 47.1% 252 47.5%

Tazlina ANVSA, AK 310 45.9%

Atmautluak ANVSA, AK 309 35.6% 297 33.5% 290 33.5%

Napaskiak ANVSA, AK 309 44.6% 301 41.2% 301 41.2%

Akiak ANVSA, AK 306 36.3% 285 35.3% 267 35.2%

Tuntutuliak ANVSA, AK 305 32.6% 305 32.6% 302 32.8%

Campbell Ranch, NV 291 53.1% 251 56.0% 251 56.0%

Ouzinkie ANVSA, AK 291 57.0% 191 54.3% 186 54.8%

Aleknagik ANVSA, AK 285 39.0% 251 36.5% 248 36.5%

Fort McDermitt Indian Reservation, NV--OR 282 52.8% 270 53.1% 270 53.1%

ATTACHMENT

135






Combination

AIAN Alone

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Popula-

tion

Median

CV

Holy Cross ANVSA, AK 281 34.7% 276 35.0% 270 35.2%

Iowa (KS-NE) Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, KS--NE

277 44.7% 152 49.8%

Shaktoolik ANVSA, AK 273 38.5% 266 38.5% 263 39.7%

Teller ANVSA, AK 267 38.3% 239 36.8% 218 38.7%

Port Lions ANVSA, AK 265 51.2%

Big Pine Reservation, CA 262 51.5%

Pechanga Reservation, CA 259 54.8%

Sac and Fox Nation Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, NE--KS

258 48.8%

Huslia ANVSA, AK 257 34.3% 247 35.5% 198 35.3%

Old Harbor ANVSA, AK 257 47.6% 222 48.1% 216 48.5%

Dresslerville Colony, NV 256 44.1% 219 47.4% 192 48.3%

Nulato ANVSA, AK 252 41.3% 248 41.6% 245 41.8%

Miami OTSA, OK 249 46.4%

Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Colony and Off-

Reservation Trust Land, NV

245 54.4%

Kwigillingok ANVSA, AK 245 34.2% 245 34.2% 245 34.2%

Lower Kalskag ANVSA, AK 244 38.9% 222 40.8%

Viejas Reservation, CA 240 59.9%

New Koliganek ANVSA, AK 236 43.2% 206 41.4% 204 43.1%

La Jolla Reservation, CA 235 54.3%

Ruby ANVSA, AK 235 37.9% 215 38.3% 209 39.4%

Nondalton ANVSA, AK 227 47.6%

Chilkoot ANVSA, AK 226 49.2%

Eek ANVSA, AK 208 38.7% 203 38.5% 203 38.5%

Grayling ANVSA, AK 208 47.4% 201 44.2%

Kalskag ANVSA, AK 205 44.5% 194 45.2%

Mekoryuk ANVSA, AK 201 43.6%

Nanwalek ANVSA, AK 188 44.7% 188 44.7% 188 44.7%

White Mountain ANVSA, AK 183 40.2% 171 40.1% 171 40.1%

Quartz Valley Reservation and Off-Reservation

Trust Land, CA

168 62.3%

Stewart Community, NV 142 58.1% 134 55.6%

Cantwell ANVSA, AK 119 56.6%





Documents

2015 AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY RESEARCH AND … · 2019-02-16 · 2015 AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY RESEARCH AND EVALUATION REPORT MEMORANDUM SERIES #ACS15-RER-01 . DSSD 2015 AMERICAN