Upload
letitia-wheeler
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2014-2015MCC MCA Data Discoveries
What does Minnesota think is important?What do we want kids to do?
Pass important tests “Be Proficient” Grow in their knowledge “Growth” Have equal opportunity to learn Close the
“Achievement Gap” Graduate from high school “Graduation”
Minnesota believes each of the above things
are equally important so…
Because each of these things are equally important, they should be treated that way…
Pieces of the MMR Pie for High Schools
ProficiencyGrowthAchievement GapGraduation
Elementary and Middle Schools don’t graduatestudents so for them the pie looks like this…
Pieces of the MMR Pie for Elementary and Junior High Schools
ProficiencyGrowthAchievement Gap
Focus Rating
Consists of: Focused Proficiency Achievement Gap Reduction
Title I schools can fall into 5 groups based on MMR and FR
• Reward Schools: These schools are the top 15 percent of Title I schools based on the MMR. They represent the highest-performing schools on the four domains in the MMR.
• Celebration Eligible: These are the 25 percent of schools directly below the Reward school cutoff. These schools may apply to be Celebration schools, and MDE selects approximately 10 percent of Title I schools to receive the Celebration school recognition.
•Continuous Improvement: These are the bottom 25 percent of Title I schools that have not already been identified as Priority or Focus. Continuous Improvement schools must work with their districts to create and implement improvement plans as well as set aside 20 percent of Title I funds to support school improvement efforts.
• Focus: All Minnesota schools receive a Focus Rating (FR) that measures their contribution to the state’s achievement gap. The 10 percent of Title I schools with the lowest FR are identified as Focus Schools. Focus schools are required to set aside 20 percent of Title I funds to support school improvement efforts. These schools are identified every three years.
Some Focus schools are identified for persistent low graduation rates. These are schools with a six-year graduation rate, averaged over three years, below 60 percent. This separate group of low graduation rate
• Priority: These are the 5 percent most persistently low-performing Title I schools based on the MMR. Priority schools are required to set aside 20 percent of Title I funds to support turnaround efforts, and these schools are also identified every three years.
MCC MMR HS DATA
Analyzing our data
District Demographics
subgroup State MCC
American Indian 2.4% 0.8%Asian 7.2% 0.8%Hispanic 8.4% 3.3%Black 11.5% 0.8%White 70.5% 94.3%English Learners 8.3% 0.9%Special Education 14.9% 12.3%
Free/Reduced Price Lunch
38.3% 33%
Reading
Reading
Attention:
First year assessed on the reading mca-iii• 2013 for 3rd-8th grades &
10th grade
2015 District Reading Proficiency
District Reading Proficiency Trends
Elementary Reading Proficiency Trends
High School Reading Proficiency Trends
Subgroup Reading Proficiency Data
• Looking at our demographics, is there a sub-group that makes up a significant part of our student population?
SpEd vs. Non-SpEd Trend Data
FRP vs. non-FRP Trend Data
Cohort Proficiency Trend Data Helps Identify:
• Possible gaps in student learning• Possible instructional gaps
• WE ARE COMPARING THE SAME STUDENTS FROM YEAR TO YEAR. MCA III TESTS ONLY
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• Class of 2017 are 11th graders in 15-16
8t h Gr a de 10t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2017 Cohort Reading Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2019 are 9th graders in 15-16
6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 10t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
75.00%
67.20%72.40%
60.30%57.00% 57.10%
Class of 2019 Cohort Reading Trend DataDistrict State
% p
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2020 are 8th graders in 15-16
5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 10t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2020 Cohort Reading Trend DataDistrict State
% p
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2021 are 7th graders in 15-16
4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 10t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2021 Cohort Reading Trend DataDistrict State
% p
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2022 are 6th graders in 15-16
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 10t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2022 Cohort Reading Trend DataDistrict State
%pr
ofici
ent
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2023 are 5th graders in 15-16
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 10t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2023 Cohort Reading Trend DataDistrict State
% p
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2024 are 4th graders in 15-16
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 10t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2024 Cohort Reading Trend DataDistrict State
% p
rofic
ient
Grade Level Proficiency Trend Data Helps Identify:
• Possible gaps in instructional practices• Possible gaps in curriculum and resources
3rd Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
4th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
5th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
6th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
7th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
8th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
10th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
2015 MCA Reading Strand Data
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 10t h Gr a de
4.73
6.07
5.72 6
4.77
5.66
4.985.1
5.1 5.2
5.2
5.1
5.1
4.85
6.2
5.58
6.3
4.38
5.71
5.09
5.12 5.21
5.07 5.
28
5.02 5.11
4.83
MCC Lit State Lit MCC Inf Text State Inf Text
District Wide Action Plan
• Complete:– Current Curriculum and Instruction Data for
Reading– Reading Action Plan
Math
Math
Attention:
First year assessed on the math mca-iii• 2011 for 3rd-8th grades• 2014 for 11th Grade
District Math Proficiency
District Math Proficiency Trends
Elementary Math Proficiency Trends
High School Math Proficiency Trends
Subgroup Math Proficiency Data
• Looking at our demographics, is there a sub-group that makes up a significant part of our student population?
SpEd vs. Non-SpEd Trend Data
FRP vs. non-FRP Trend Data
Cohort Proficiency Trend Data Helps Identify:
• Possible gaps in student learning• Possible instructional gaps
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2016 are seniors in 15-16
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 11t h Gr a de0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Class of 2016 Cohort Math Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2019 are freshman in 15-16
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 11t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2019 Cohort Math Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2020 are 8th graders in 15-16
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 11t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2020 Cohort Math Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2021 are 7th graders in 15-16
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 11t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2021 Cohort Math Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2022 are 6th graders in 15-16
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 11t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2022 Cohort Math Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2023 are 5th graders in 15-16
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 11t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2023 Cohort Math Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
Cohort Trend Data• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.• The class of 2024 are 4th graders in 15-16
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 11t h Gr a de0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Class of 2024 Cohort Math Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
Grade Level Proficiency Trend Data Helps Identify:
• Possible gaps in instructional practices• Possible gaps in curriculum and resources
3rd Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
4th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
5th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
6th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
7th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
8th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
11th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
2014 MCA Math Strand Data
3r d Gr a de 4t h Gr a de 5t h Gr a de 6t h Gr a de 7t h Gr a de 8t h Gr a de 11t h Gr a de
4.72
5.51
5.91
5.73
4.53
5.1
0
4.98
5.54 5.
84
6.38
4.74 4.
95
5.73
4.51
5.43
6.02
5.52
4.72
5.4
5.23
4.7
5.6
5.3
5.7
4.7
5.4
5.4
Number & Operation Algebra Geometry & Measurement Data Analysis
District Wide Action Plan
• Complete:– Current Curriculum and Instruction Data for Math– Math Action Plan
Science
Science
Attention:
First year assessed on the SCIENCE mca-iii• 2012 for Grades 5, 8, &
10
District Science Proficiency
District Science Proficiency Trend Data
2012 2013 2014 20150.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
District Science Profi ciency Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
10th Grade Science Proficiency Trend Data
2012 2013 2014 20150.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
10th Grade Science Profi ciency Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
8th Grade Science Proficiency Trend Data
2012 2013 2014 20150.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
8th Grade Science Profi ciency Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
5th Grade Science Proficiency Trend Data
2012 2013 2014 20150.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
5th Grade Science Profi ciency Trend DataDistrict State
% P
rofic
ient
Graduation Rate Report
• The 2014 Graduation Rate is used for calculation on the 2015 MMR.
• This is because 2015 Graduation Rates will not be released until February/March 2016 & the 2015 MMR is calculated in September 2015.
Graduation Trend DataYear % Students Graduated
2011 85.3%
2012 92.2%
2013 87.1%
2014 97.7%
2015 * 98.2% *(Unofficial %)
State goal is that all districts have 90% graduation rate by 2017, with no sub-group less than 85%.
Testing in 2015-16
• Districts need to hold ACT contract directly with ACT – deadline was AUGUST 14
• Testing limits– Grades 1 – 6 max 10 hrs per year– Grades 7 – 12 max 11 hrs per year– State required tests are not to be included in this
• Writing Assessment – TBD• HS Graduation requirements – no GRAD• ACCESS available online
Next steps
Goals for 2015-2016 District:
Elementary:
High School: