2014-08-13 UN Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States (2014) - Human Rights Alert (NGO) draft submission

8/11/2019 2014-08-13 UN Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States (2014) - Human Rights Alert (NGO…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2014-08-13-un-universal-periodic-review-of-human-rights-in-the-united-states 1/57

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Joseph Zernik, PhDPO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, Israel

[email protected]

2014-08-13 Human Right Alert: United States DRAFT UPR Sumissi!n "2014#$arge-s%ale &raud in 'T s(stems !& the US %!urts - unann!un%ed regime

%hange)*+e%uti,e Summar(Wide segen!s o" !he people o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es !oda% hold !ha! !he #$ governen! has &ndergone a!rans"ora!ion over !he pas! 'o&ple o" de'ades, and !he #$ (ons!i!&!ion is no longer in "or'e and e""e'!)Ins!an! s&*ission do'&en!s !ha! !he #$ (ons!i!&!ion +as indeed voided, and !ha! !he ipleen!a!iono" invalid, "ra&d&len! IT s%s!es in !he #$ 'o&r!s +as a ke% even! in !his regard, +hi'h ena*les+idespread &di'ial 'orr&p!ion and disregard o" !he la+ o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es and !he #$ (ons!i!&!ion)Allegati!ns:-) The IT s%s!es o" !he #$ 'o&r!s ena*le !he ro&!ine 'ond&'! o" si&la!ed .sha/"ake li!iga!ion and!he p&*li'a!ion o" si&la!ed &di'ial re'ords1 2) #nder s&'h 'ir'&s!an'es, !he r&le o" la+ and !he #$(ons!i!&!ion are e""e'!ivel% s&spended, a''ess !o !he 'o&r!s is e""e'!ivel% denied1 3, $&'h 'ondi!ions

sho&ld *e 'onsidered &nanno&n'ed regie 'hange1 4) $&'h 'ondi!ions ao&n! !o viola!ion o" an% ar!i'leo" !he Universal Declaration of Human Rights, +here in!egri!% o" !he 'o&r!s and !he &s!i'e s%s!e is aprere&isi!e)*,iden%e:IT s%s!e anal%sis do'&en!s a $ervers o" &nveri"ied iden!i!%1 * Invalid ipleen!a!ion o" ele'!roni'signa!&res .in'l&ding invisi*le ele'!roni' signa!&res 5 6The peror8s 9e+ (lo!hs:1 ' Invalidipleen!a!ion o" a&!hen!i'a!ion, 'er!i"i'a!ion, and servi'e pro'ed&res1 d s!a*lishing o" 6do&*le *ooks:s%s!es, +here !he p&*li' and pro5se par!ies .!hose, +ho are represen!ed *% a!!orne%s 'anno! see !r&eand 'ople!e 'o&r! re'ords1 e Invalid ipleen!a!ion o" a&!hori!ies and perissions, so !ha!&na&!hori;ed persons 'an a''ess !he 'o&r!s8 da!a *ase and ake en!ries in do'ke!s1 " Dis'riina!ion ina''ess !o !he 'o&r!s, +here a!!orne%s are peri!!ed a''ess !o (</(=, *&! no! pro5se par!ies, anda!!orne%s are peri!!ed !o en!er papers in !he #$ dis!ri'! 'o&r! do'ke!s +i!h no prior revie+ *% !he 'lerko" !he 'o&r!1 g #niversal "ail&re !o do'ke! s&onses1 h Ad&l!era!ion and dele!ion o" 'o&r! re'ords)(ase s!&dies do'&en! !he o&!'oe o" 'ond&'! o" si&la!ed li!iga!ion in a!!ers involving depriva!ion o" li*er!% and proper!%, as +ell as "&ndaen!al 'ons!i!&!ional a!!ers)!n%lusi!ns:-) Thro&gh !he ipleen!a!ion and opera!ion o" invalid, "ra&d&len! IT s%s!es, !he #$ 'o&r!s !oda% ro&5!inel% 'ond&'! si&la!ed ."ake/sha li!iga!ion, &nla+"&ll% deprive !he li*er!% and proper!% o" individ&als,and pla'e !he *anks a*ove !he la+) 2) $&'h 'ond&'! ao&n!s !o serio&s viola!ion o" "&ndaen!al >&5an ?igh!s o" !he people o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es) 3) $&'h 'ond&'! is also 'en!ral !o !he '&rren! so'io5e'o5noi' 'risis, "ailing *anking reg&la!ion, and !he 6=ore'los&re (risis:, +hi'h res&l!ed in vas! in'rease inpover!% and hoelessness) 4) The validi!% o" an% legal and &di'ial re'ords, origina!ing in !he #ni!ed$!a!es, and !he validi!% o" an% li!iga!ion in !he #$ 'o&r!s sho&ld *e 'onsidered d&*io&s) @) The in!erna5!ional 'o&ni!% sho&ld reassess !he na!&re o" !he '&rren! regie in !he #ni!ed $!a!es, and an% 'lais!ha! i!s "oreign poli'% is driven *% >&an ?igh!s in!eres!s) ) ""or!s !o address 'ondi!ions, +hi'h have*een es!a*lished in !he #ni!ed $!a!es, and !o res!ore !he "or'e and e""e'! o" !he #$ (ons!i!&!ion and #$la+, are likel% *e pro!ra'!ed and ee! s!ark resis!an'e *% po+er"&l #$ se'&ri!%, legal, and "inan'ialgro&ps and !heir in!eres!s)Re%!mmendati!ns:

erging "ro !he '&rren! 'ondi!ions +o&ld re&ire a "&ndaen!al 'orre'!ive pro'ess in !he #ni!ed$!a!es, +here as a res&l! o" '&rren! 'ondi!ions, !he poli!i'al pro'ess is &nderined-) The large5s'ale "ra&d in !he #$ 'o&r!s, +hi'h in "a'! ipli'a!es ea'h and ever% #$ si!!ing &dge,+o&ld likel% re&ire an approa'h s&'h as a Tr&!h and ?e'on'ilia!ion (oission) 2) D&e !o !he 'en!ralrole o" !he Adinis!ra!ive O""i'e o" !he #$ (o&r!s in ipleen!ing !he "ra&d&len! IT s%s!es o" !he #$'o&r!s, !he O""i'e sho&ld *e res!r&'!&red or 'losed) 3) <eas&res, siilar !o !hose !aken a 'en!&r% ago&nder siilar 'ir'&s!an'es !hro&gh !he Salary Act .--, +hi'h pla'ed !he 'lerks o" !he #$ 'o&r!s&nder !he dire'! a&!hori!% o" !he A!!orne% Ceneral, sho&ld *e 'onsidered) 4) #$ legal and 'op&!ingexper!s sho&ld *e eplo%ed in an ini!ia!ive !o res!ore !he in!egri!% o" !he IT s%s!es o" !he #$ 'o&r!s,&nder a''o&n!a*ili!% !o !he #$ (ongress, +i!h !he goal o" aking s&'h s%s!e as !ransparen! !o !hep&*li' a! large as possi*le) @) In na!ions, +here !he separa!ion o" *ran'hes is es!a*lished *% la+, !he'o&r!s &s! no! *e peri!!ed !o develop and ipleen! !he 'o&r!s8 IT s%s!es) ) >&an ?igh!s andin!erne! a'!ivis!s &s! keep a +a!'h"&l e%e on !he validi!% and in!egri!% o" IT s%s!es o" !he 'o&r!s andprisons)

.nline A//endi+:To *e 'ople!ed

>&an ?igh! Aler! .9CO D?A=T #P? $&*ission 5 #ni!ed $!a!es .20-4Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - unannounced regime change?

1/57

Digitally signed

by Joseph

Zernik, PhD

Date:

2014.08.13

16:07:01

+03'00'

mailto:[email protected]






2/57

Contents

Page Section

1 Executive Summar

! ". #uman $ights "%ert &'()*

! +. "%%egationsSpecific allegations

5 ,. Evience1. sstem ana%sis

a ) Systems developed, implemented with no lawful authority

b) Servers of unverified identity

c) Invalid implementation of electronic signatures

d) Invalid implementation of authentication and service procedures

e) Establishing of “double books” systems

f) Invalid implementation of authorities and permissions

g) Discrimination in access to the courts

h) niversal failure to docket summonses!

g) "dulterated and missing of court records

2. ,ase stuies a) #abeas $orpus in the nited States % the case of &ichard Isaac 'ine

b) Securities and E(change $ommission v ank of "merica $orporation

d) *og $abin &epublicans v S" et al

e) $iti+ens nited v 'ederal Election $ommission

f) $iti+ens nited v 'ederal Election $ommission S-$.S)

!0 . $esponses 'ationa% "uthorities/Experts

1. )33ice o3 "ttorne (enera% an the 4S epartment o3 ustice

2. 4S ,ongress

!. he juiciar 6. he %ega% pro3ession

5. $esponses 'ationa% "uthorities/Experts

0. 'ationa% meia

!7 E. ,omp%iance ith re%evant 4S %a 1. #aeas ,orpus /! 8irst "menment - the right to 3i%e papers in court !. 8irst "menment - the right to access court recors

6.$u%es Ena%ing "ct 5. 8eera% $u%es o3 ,ivi% Proceure -uties o3 the c%erk

0. "uthentication an certi3ication o3 juicia% recors9 :ega% Process 7. E%ectronic Signatures6; 8. ,omp%iance ith re%evant treaties an conventions 1. +ase% "ccors - internationa% anking regu%ation

6; (. $eta%iation against anti-juicia% corruption activists

6; #. #istorica% perspective - $oer +aron $eviva% Era.

51 . ,onc%usions

51 . $ecommenations

52 <. )n%ine "ppenix

52 :. $e3erences



A. Human Rights Alert (NGO)

he 2=1= #uman $ights "%ert >#$"? sumission 3or the 4P$ o3 the 4nite States3ocuse on conitions in :os "nge%es ,ount9 ,a%i3ornia. he sumission provieocumentation o3 %arge-sca%e 3a%se imprisonment an rea% estate an 3inancia%institution 3rau ,a%i3ornia State juges in co%%usion ith attornes9 an 3inancia%institutions9 uner patronage o3 %oca%9 state9 an 3eera% %a en3orcement authorities.he sumission as in part ase on ocumentation o3 %arge-sca%e 3rau in sstemso3 the Superior ,ourt o3 ,a%i3ornia9 ,ount o3 :os "nge%es &Sustain*9 an in the sstem o3 the :os "nge%es ,ount Sheri33s epartment &nmate n3ormation ,enter*.>i9ii? he sumission as incorporate re3erence into the o33icia% #uman $ights,ounci% >#$,? Pro3essiona% Sta33 $eport ith a note re3erring to Acorruption o3 thecourts an the %ega% pro3ession an iscrimination %a en3orcement in ,a%i3orniaB.

>iii

?he 2=1! #$" sumission 3or the 4P$ o3 the State o3 srae% 3ocuse on ana%sis o3the sstems o3 the Supreme ,ourt9 the istrict courts9 an the etainees courts insrae%. he sumission provie ocumentation o3 %arge-sca%e 3rau in such sstem9hich starte in 2==2. he sumission as incorporate re3erence into the o33icia%#$, Pro3essiona% Sta33 $eport ith a note re3erring to A%ack o3 integrit in thee%ectronic recor sstems o3 the Supreme ,ourt9 the istrict courts an the etaineescourts in srae%.B >iv?oseph Cernik9 Ph9 the author o3 instant sumission9 has specia%ize over the pastecae in ana%zing the e%ectronic recor sstems o3 courts9 prisons9 an anks. #isreports on these sujects ere peer-reviee9 pu%ishe an presente in internationa%

computer science &ata mining* an crimino%og con3erences. >v?t is %ike% that the #$" sumission 3or the 2=1= 4P$ o3 the 4nite States9 an evenmore so the #$" sumission 3or the 2=1! 4P$ o3 the State o3 srae%9 are the 3irst-ever #uman $ights reports that are ase on sstem ana%sis an ata mining o3 suchsstems.Dhereas the 2=1= #$" sumission 3ocuse on the ,a%i3ornia courts an their sstems9 instant sumission 3ocuses on the 4S 3eera% courts an their respective sstems.

B. Allegations


!/57



=ig&re - (over o" Tie aga;ine "or #$ Independen'e Da%, J&l% 4, 20--

Die segments o3 the peop%e o3 the 4nite States9 3rom mainstream meia9 throughright- an %e3t-ing po%itica% activists9 to #arvar %a pro3essors >vi9vii? toa ho% thatthe 4S government has unergone a trans3ormation over the past coup%e o3 ecaes9an the 4S ,onstitution is no %onger in 3orce an e33ect.Such notion is 3urther supporte the statements o3 no other than 3ormer 4SPresient imm ,arter9 that the 4S Ahas no 3unctioning emocracB9 > viii? an a ca%%

no other than the ,hair o3 the Senate uiciar ,ommittee 3or a ruth an$econci%iation ,ommission on the 4S epartment o3 ustice. >ix? Such commissionsare tpica%% institute in nations that emerge 3rom uner trannica% regimes... n theextreme9 such notion gives rise to various issient groups9 inc%uing9 ut %imite toSovereign Peop%e9>x? 8reemen9>xi? an the arme De%% $egu%ate Fi%itias9>xii?hose recent stano33 ith arme 3eera% 3orces aroun the 'evaa +un ranch asan unpreceente incient in 4S histor. >xiii?3 true9 the voiing o3 the 4S ,onstitution the 4S government shou% e viee asan unannounce regime change in the 4nite States.nstant sumission provies amp%e evience that the 4S ,onstitution as ineevoie.

+oth experts an the pu%ic at %arge a%so rea%ize that iesprea corruption o3 the 4S juiciar in particu%ar an the 4S justice sstem in genera% is centra% to suchconitions. >xiv9xv9xvi? Foreover9 oth experts an the pu%ic at %arge rea%ize thatcorruption o3 the 4S courts an the 4S justice sstem is irect% tie to the currentsocio-economic crisis in the 4nite States9 its 3ai%ing anking regu%ation9 an ongoing3orec%osure 3rau epiemic. >xvii9xviii9xix?nstant sumission ocuments that iesprea corruption o3 the 4S juiciar9 4Separtment o3 ustice9 an the 4S %ega% pro3ession is centra% to such conitions9 anthat the imp%ementation o3 inva%i 3rauu%ent sstems in the 4S courts9 hichstarte some to ecaes ago as a ke event in esta%ishing current conitions -voiing the 4S ,onstitution - an in ena%ing iesprea juicia% corruption.

=ig&re 2 PA(? is !he p&*li' a''ess s%s!e o" !he #$ dis!ri'! 'o&r!s and #$ 'o&r!s o"appeals, and (</(= is !he respe'!ive 'ase anageen! and ele'!roni' "iling s%s!e)

he 3rau inherent in the sstems o3 the 4S courts is not the tpica% sporaiccorruption9 hich can e 3oun in an justice sstem to some egree or another. t is

corruption that as centra%% imp%emente9 an hich each an ever sitting 4S jugemust e aare o39 as e%% as an inte%%igent an capa%e attorne9 ho appears e3orethe 4S courts.

Specific allegations

-) he sstems o3 the 4S courts ena%e the routine conuct o3 simu%ate&sham/3ake* %itigation an the pu%ication o3 simu%ate juicia% recors.

2) 4ner such circumstances9 the ru%e o3 %a an the 4S ,onstitution are e33ective%suspene. )therise state9 access to civi% courts &as oppose to mi%itartriuna%s*9 operating uner the %a o3 the 4nite States9 is e33ective% enie.

3) Such trans3ormation o3 the 4S justice sstem shou% e consiere unannounceregime change. ,urrent conitions are tpica% o3 a nation uner martia% %a.


6/57



4) Such conitions shou% e eeme vio%ation o3 an artic%e o3 the niversal

Declaration of #uman &ights9 here integrit o3 the courts an the justice sstemis a prereGuisite.

C. Evidence

1. I s!stem anal!sis

he 4S government has comp%ete a ecae-%ong project o3 transition to igita%aministration o3 the 4S courts at a cost that is estimate at severa% i%%ion 4S o%%ars.

,ourts o3 nations aroun the or% are going through simi%ar processes9 an 4nite 'ations reports on juicia% integrit promote such transitions. )vious%9 e%ectronicsstems can enhance the re%iai%it an transparenc o3 the courts.$ecor keeping an in3ormation processing uner paper aministration o3 the courtshave evo%ve over centuries9 an 3orme the core o3 ue process an 3air hearings.he transition to e%ectronic aministration o3 the courts a33ecte a sea change in suchcourt proceures.o sstems ere imp%emente in the 4S istrict courts an courts o3 appea%sH P",E$ I 3or Pu%ic "ccess to ,ourt E%ectronic $ecors9 an ,F/E,8 I 3or ,ase Fanagement an E%ectronic ,ourt 8i%ing."na%sis o3 the esign an operation o3 sstems o3 the 4S istrict courts an 4Scourts o3 appea% &P",E$ an ,F/E,8* an the sstem o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt9as e%% as ata mining o3 recors 3rom numerous courts an cases9 >xx9xxi? ocuments3unamenta% 3%as in sstem va%iit9 integrit9 an operationH

a) The systems were developed and implemented with no lawful authorityhe ne sstems represent a sea change in court proceures9 ut oth the courtsan the 4S ,ongress 3ai%e to esta%ish the ne e%ectronic court proceures %a.&see ". #) Rules Ena#ling Act9 e%o*

b) Servers of unverified identity

=ig&re 3 $&pree (o&r! o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es 5 &n'er!i"ied server iden!i!%) The (hroe*ro+ser essages indi'a!e a Iden!i!% o" !his si!e is &nveri"ied) * (onne'!ion !o !his si!e is&nen'r%p!ed)

c) Invalid implementation of electronic signatures (including invisible electronic

signatures - “The Emperor's ew !loths")

"%though a%% recors o3 the 4S courts are toa e%ectronic recors9 there is no va%iimp%ementation o3 visi%e e%ectronic signatures on an such recors. 'either o suchrecors ear scanne han signatures.

d) Invalid implementation of authentication and service procedures


5/57



$NIE% &AE& %I&RIC CO$R

'OR HE %I&RIC O' name o district*

,ase 'umerH JnumerKJname1K9 0laintiff 9v.Jname2K9 Defendant .CERI'ICAE O' &ER+ICE

9 the unersigne9 here certi3 that am an emp%oee in the )33ice o3 the ,%erk9 4.S.istrict ,ourt9 'orthern istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia. hat on JateK9 SE$LE a true an correct cop&ies* o3 the attache9 p%acing saicop&ies* in a postage pai enve%ope aresse to the person&s* hereina3ter %iste9 epositingsai enve%ope in the 4.S. Fai%9 or p%acing sai cop&ies* into an inter-o33ice e%iverreceptac%e %ocate in the ,%erks o33ice.Jservice %istKateH JateKJname o3 iniviua%K9 ,%erk >et graphic signature?

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM +H Jname o3 iniviua%K9 eput ,%erk

=ig&re 4 Paper5*ased (er!i"i'a!e o" $ervi'e, as &sed *% !he (lerks o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!sprior !o ipleen!a!ion o" PA(? and (</(=, !he ele'!roni' in"ora!ion s%s!es o" !he #$'o&r!s) The re'ord in'l&ded a 'er!i"i'a!ion s!a!een!, 6I 'er!i"%:, !he nae and a&!hori!% o"!he individ&al exe'&!ing !he 'er!i"i'a!ion, and his/her hand signa!&re) The 'er!i"i'a!ion re'ords+ere 'onsidered an essen!ial par! o" !he p&*li' re'ords in !he paper 'o&r! "iles)

=ig&re @ le'!roni' (er!i"i'a!e o" A&!hen!i'a!ion .9= E 9o!i'e o" le'!roni' =iling "ro

li!iga!ion o" $( v BA( .-05'v50F2 in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, $o&!hern Dis!ri'! o" 9e+

Gork) The "or "ails !o in'l&de a 'er!i"i'a!ion s!a!een!, 6I 'er!i"%:, "ails !o in'l&de !he nae

and a&!hori!% o" an individ&al, +ho iss&ed !he 'er!i"i'a!e, and "ails !o in'l&de a valid

individ&alHs digi!al signa!&re) Ins!ead, onl% an 6le'!roni' Do'&en! $!ap: .a 'he'ks&

s!ring appears in !he 9=) In n&ero&s 'ases, 9=s +ere dis'overed, +hi'h are issing

!he 6le'!roni' Do'&en! $!ap:, and !here"ore !he respe'!ive &di'ial re'ords are deeed

invalid and ine""e'!&al *% !he 'o&r!s !heselves, a "a'! !ha! 'anno! *e de!erined *% !hep&*li' a! large) =&r!herore, !he 9=s are ex'l&ded "ro p&*li' a''ess) .The spe'i"i' re'ord


0/57



is arked 6?eda'!ed *% $(:, and +as o*!ained "ro !he o""i'e o" !he =air =&nd

Adinis!ra!or)

=ig&re le'!roni' (er!i"i'a!e o" A&!hen!i'a!ion .9= E 9o!i'e o" le'!roni' =iling "ro li!iga!ion o" Finev Sheriff .205'v50--4 in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia) The 9= is invalid,p&rs&an! !o !he o'al ?&les o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, sin'e i! is issing !he le'!roni' Do'&en!$!ap) There"ore, !he respe'!ive re'ord, <anda!e *% !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals, !h (ir'&i!, "iled on=e*r&ar% 23, 20-0, +as an &na&!hen!i'a!ed re'ord) The 9= o" !he J&dgen! re'ord in !he saeli!iga!ion also "ailed !o in'l&de !he le'!roni' Do'&en! $!ap, as did all &di'ial re'ord in Zernik v

(onnor e! al in !he sae 'o&r!) $iilar re'ords +ere "o&nd in o!her #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!s as +ell) $&'hpra'!i'e invalida!es !he respe'!ive &di'ial re'ords, ena*ling !he 'ond&'! o" si&la!ed li!iga!ion, al*ei!,!he p&*li' has no a''ess !o !he 9=s, and 'anno! dis!ing&ish *e!+een re'ords *earing valid or invalid9=)

)3 particu%ar concern is the esign an operation o3 the 'E8s9 the certi3icates o3authentication in ,F/E,8. he 'E8 purporte% provies the authentication o3the service o3 an e%ectronica%%-3i%e p%eaing or other 3i%ing parties9 or o3 serviceo3 the e%ectronica%%-3i%e orers an jugments o3 the courts9 upon attornes in thecase ho have een permitte the court to participate in e%ectronic 3i%ing in,F/E,8. here3ore9 3or such parties9 the 'E8 rep%ace the traitiona% certi3icate o3service or proo3 o3 service. :ikeise9 the graphic han-signatures in traitiona%

certi3icates o3 service ere rep%ace in 'E8s igita%% encrpte9a%phanumericchecksum strings. E33ective%9 the 'E8 toa is the evience o3 entr o3 courtminutes9 orers9 an jugments9 an there3ore9 it is o3 critica% signi3icance.

+eon the inva%i esign o3 the 3orm itse%39 as escrie aove the universa%exc%usion o3 the 'E8s 3rom pu%ic access has no p%ausi%e exp%anation that isconsistent ith honest aministration o3 the courts.he opening statement on the 'E8 sasH

Ahis is an automatic e-mai% message generate the ,F/E,8 sstem.Bhere3ore9 the overa%% esign o3 the 'E8s as a certi3icates o3 authentication iscompara%e to sstems9 hich ere recent% escrie as A$oo-signersB9 an erec%aime as inherent to 3rau in anking recors uner the current 3inancia% crisis.he 'E8 is a recor that purports to provie certi3ication o3 critica% court recors9 utin 3act inc%ue no certi3ication statements that imp% accountai%it an iniviua%.


7/57



"s escrie aove9 the E%ectronic ocument Stamp in the 'E8 rep%ace the han-signature o3 the ,%erk in the ,erti3icate o3 Service. #oever9 the Stamp is achecksum string9 an as such9 cannot e eeme a igita% signature. Foreover9 thePeop%e are enie access to the 'E8s an are a%so enie access to an uti%it thatou% permit them to veri3 the integrit o3 an court recor re%ative to the respectiveStamp.

he ,F/E,8 4ser (uie o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 'orthern istrict o3 %%inois is

uniGue among such user guies9 hich have een survee. t provies etai%eescription o3 a Aocument Leri3ication 4ti%itB9 hich permits the ,F/E,8 user toveri3 a given P",E$ recor against the Stamp in the respective 'E8. >2N?#oever9 there is no evience that such access is permitte even to ,F/E,8 users inother 4S courts9 an no court permits such access to the Peop%e.#a the Peop%e een permitte access to the 'E8s an the ocument Leri3ication4ti%it in the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Dashington9 ,9 the to9 comine9 ou% have

provie e3initive evience 3or the au%teration o3 the )rer in the (uantanamo +ahaeas corpus case9 recent% reporte the 'ationa% :a ourna%. >2;?:ikeise9 access to the 'E8s an 4ti%it in the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3

'O9 ou% permit to esta%ish the integrit9 or %ack thereo39 o3 recors in the %itigation

at han. #oever9 su33icient evience is prouce to conc%ue9 3or examp%e9 that no 'E8s at a%% exist 3or an o3 the AminutesB in this case.

he centra% source 3or in3ormation regaring 'E8s remains in ,F/E,8 manua%s.>xxii9xxiii9xxiv9xxv?8or examp%e9 the most exp%icit e3inition o3 the poer an e33ect o3 'E8 in the,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia9 one o3 the most popu%ous in the 4.S.9 inc%uing :os"nge%es ,ount9 remaine in the 4no33icia% Fanua% o3 ,F/E,8 as 3o%%os &$ev=79 2==N9 page 1!*H >xxvi?

,. he Notice o Electronic 'iling

he sstem i%% present ou ith a 'otice o3 E%ectronic 8i%ing &A'E8B* screenan i%% a%so e-mai% ou a cop o3 the 'E8. he 'otice o3 E%ectronic 8i%ing&A'E8B* is our proo3 that the ocument has een E-8i%e. Oou shou% print thescreen to a piece o3 paper or a P8 &or oth* e3ore proceeing9 ecause oui%% nee to attach the 'E8 as the %ast page o3 the courtes cop that ou sumitto the ,ourt. he 'E8 inc%ues a Aocument numerB an a %ink. +e sure to notethat ocument numer9 as ou i%% nee it i3 ou nee to e-mai% a propose orer to the ,ourt. he 'E8 a%so inc%ues an AE%ectronic ocument StampB hich is astring o3 %etters an numers hich ,ourt sta33 can use to veri3 the authenticito3 the 'E8. he 'E8 a%so contains the path an 3i%e name o3 the ocument ouup%oae an an attachments.

" more speci3ic e3inition is 3oun in the 4nite States istrict ,ourt 3or the Destern

istrict o3 exas "ministrative Po%icies an Proceures 3or E%ectronic 8i%ing. >xxvii

?&ection - %einitions and Related Re/uirements &page 5*h. 'otice o3 E%ectronic 8i%ing &A'E8B* is an e%ectronic notice automatica%%generate the E%ectronic 8i%ing Sstem at the time a ocument is ockete.he 'E8 inc%ues the time o3 3i%ing an ocketing9 the name o3 the part an8i%ing 4ser 3i%ing the ocument9 the tpe o3 ocument9 the text o3 the ocketentr9 the name o3 the part an 8i%ing 4ser receiving the notice. 3 a ocumentis attache to the ocket entr9 the 'E8 i%% contain a #per%ink to the 3i%eocument a%%oing recipients to retrieve the ocument.&ection 0 Conse/uences o Electronic 'iling &page 11*a. E%ectronic transmission o3 a ocument through the E%ectronic 8i%ing Sstem

constitutes the 3i%ing o3 the ocument pursuant to $u%e 5&e*9 8EE$": $4:ES


N/57



)8 ,L: P$),E4$E9 an $u%e 6;9 8EE$": $4:ES )8 ,$F'":P$),E4$E.

. he transmission o3 a 'E8 constitutes entr on the ocket pursuant to $u%es5N an 7;9 8EE$": $4:ES )8 ,L: P$),E4$E9 an $u%es 6; an 5598EE$": $4:ES )8 ,$F'": P$),E4$E.&ection 1 Notice o Court Orders and 2udgments

a. mmeiate% upon entr o3 an orer or jugment9 the ,%erk i%% transmit a 'E8 to 8i%ing 4sers. ransmission o3 the 'E8 constitutes the notice reGuire $u%e 77&*9 8EE$": $4:ES )8 ,L: P$),E4$E9 an $u%e 6;&c*98EE$": $4:ES )8 ,$F'": P$),E4$E. he ,%erk i%% sen papercopies o3 orers an jugments to non-8i%ing 4sers.

he (enera% )rer =N-=2 o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia provie aitiona% in3ormation9 pertaining to the signi3icance o3 the e%ectronicocument stamp in the process o3 entrH >xxviii?

I+. Electronic 'iling. &page 17*...O. Certiication o Electronic %ocuments. Pursuant to 8eera% $u%es o3 ,ivi%Proceure 66&a*&1* an 66&c*9 the metho o3 e%ectronic certi3ication escrie

herein is eeme proo3 o3 an o33icia% court recor maintaine the ,%erk o3,ourt. he 'E8 contains the ate o3 e%ectronic istriution an ienti3ication o3the 4nite States istrict ,ourt 3or the ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia as thesener. "n encrpte veri3ication coe appears in the e%ectronic ocument stampsection o3 the 'E8. he e%ectronic ocument stamp sha%% e use 3or the purposeo3 con3irming the authenticit o3 the transmission an associate ocument&s*ith the ,%erk o3 ,ourt9 as necessar. Dhen a ocument has een e%ectronica%%3i%e into ,FE,89 the o33icia% recor is the e%ectronic recoring o3 theocument kept in the custo o3 the ,%erk o3 ,ourt. he 'E8 proviescerti3ication that the associate ocument&s* is a true an correct cop o3 theorigina% 3i%e ith the court.

"%though such in3ormation is erive 3rom isparate 4S courts9 it can e assume to e universa%% app%ica%e9 since the asic p%at3orms o3 P",E$ an ,F/E,8 ereuniversa%% imp%emente in a%% 4S courts. #oever9 signi3icant variations are 3oun inthe manner in hich the 'E8s are emp%oe.

"s ocumente9 aove9 in the texts 3rom the 4S istrict ,ourts in ,a%i3ornia anexas9 the 'E8 toa is the e3initive recor inicating the entr o3 minutes9 orers9an jugments o3 the 4S courts. he %isting o3 such minutes9 orers9 an jugments inthe P",E$ ockets9 in itse%39 is not necessari% inicative o3 entr o3 such juicia%recors as va%i an e33ectua% recors o3 the court.

Examp%es have een recore in various 4S courts o3 minutes9 orers9 an jugments9

hich ere pu%ishe in the P",E$ ockets9 ut ere not authenticate as enterethrough the issuance o3 a va%i 'E8. )vious%9 such minutes9 orers9 an jugments

are not eeme va%i an e33ectua% the 4S courts. > xxix?


;/57



=ig&re 7 Do'&en! Keri"i'a!ion #!ili!% as des'ri*ed in !he (</(= #ser C&ide o" !he #$ Dis5!ri'! (o&r!, 9or!hern Dis!ri'! o" Illinois) The #!ili!% ena*les a&!hori;ed person !o de!erine, i" a'o&r! re'ord +as ad&l!era!ed) The People are denied a''ess !o !he #!ili!%, and also denieda''ess !o !he le'!roni' Do'&en! $!ap, +hi'h is &sed in !he #!ili!%) L30M

e) Establishing of “double boo#s" systems"s as the case in a%% other 4S istrict courts9 hich ere inspecte9 pu%ic access tothe authentication recors &'E8s* o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'eOork is enie. >10? he ,%erk o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 %ike c%erks o3 most c%erks o3other istrict an appea%s courts9 here attempt to access the recors9 to inspect an tocop9 enie such access in vio%ation o3 4S %a.

8urthermore9 at the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'e Oork9 pu%ic access tothe ,a%enars o3 the ,ourts is unreasona% %imite. "ccess is permitte on% to thecurrent seven as ino9 an access to the ocket "ctivit $eport is enie."s a resu%t o3 such conitions9 the pu%ic9 an at times a%so pro%se parties are enieaccess to recors9 hich are essentia% 3or etermination o3 the va%iit an e33ect o3court recors9 hich are pu%ishe on%ine.

f) Invalid implementation of authorities and permissions


1=/57



=ig&re F T+o en!ries "ro !he online PA(? Do'ke! o" $( v BA( .-05'v50F2 in !he #$Dis!ri'! (o&r!, $o&!hern Dis!ri'! o" 9e+ Gork) The Jan&ar% -2, 20-0 en!r% in'l&des a Do'ke!9&*er and a link !o an a'!&al re'ord) The Jan&ar% -, 20-0 en!r% has no Do'ke! 9&*erdesigna!ed, and no link !o an% re'ord) There"ore, no 'o&r! re'ord exis!s "or !he la!!er en!r%)<oreover, given !he design o" !he 9=s .9o!i'es o" le'!roni' =iling, even had !he respe'!ivere'ord exis!ed soe+here, i! 'o&ldnH! possi*l% have *een a&!hen!i'a!ed, and !here"ore, +o&ldhave *een an invalid 'o&r! re'ord) There"ore, !he &l!iple en!ries in !he do'ke! o" !his 'ase,+here no Do'ke! 9&*er and links are provided, sho&ld *e deeed "alse and deli*era!el%

isleading do'ke! no!a!ions) #9 repor!s 'onsider issing 'o&r! re'ords a 'ardinal sign o" &di5'ial 'orr&p!ion)

Entries are mae in 4S istrict court ockets unienti3ie persons o3 unienti3ieauthorit. #oever9 in response to inGuir the o33ice o3 the c%erk o3 the 4S istrict,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'e Oork c%ari3ie that such entries are not mae au-thorize eput ,%erks. :ikeise9 in the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 ,a%i-3ornia9 numerous inva%i entries ere mae in the ockets o3 8ine v Sheri33 an inCernik v ,onnor Fs onna homas9 an unauthorize person.

g) $iscrimination in access to the courts

Practica%% in a%% 4S courts9 hich ere examine9 on% attornes are permitte access

to ,F/E,8. "s a resu%t9 the represente part is permitte to e%ectronica%% 3i%erecors in court9 ith no oversight an accountai%it the o33ice o3 the c%erk. ncontrast9 the unrepresente part is reGuire to 3i%e an serve on% on paper9 incurringsustantia% aitiona% time an mone expeniture.Simi%ar%9 the courts e%ectronica%% serve juicia% recors an an other notices on at-tornes9 hi%e unrepresente parties are serve an notice on% on paper.8urthermore9 such sstem permits attornes9 ho are not authorize as ,ounse% o3$ecor 3or an part9 to appear an 3i%e papers in the 4S courts. "s ocumente inthe Femoranum )pinion uge +ohm9 such conitions are ause attornes9ho appear ith no authorit9 an ith no communications ith c%ients c%ause. > xxx?Such iscrimination in access to the courts shou% e eeme in vio%ation o3 the 3un-

amenta%s o3 8air ria%.

h) %niversal failure to doc#et summonses&


11/57



=ig&re $&ons in $( v Bank o" Aeri'a (orpora!ion in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, $o&!hernDis!ri'! o" 9e+ Gork) The s&ons is &nsigned, and "ails !o *ear !he seal o" !he 'o&r!, and!here"ore invalid) As is !he 'ase in o!her 'o&r!s !ha! origina!e in !he nglish 'oon la+, !hes&ons es!a*lishes !he &risdi'!ion o" !he 'o&r! in a given a!!er) There"ore, !he invalids&ons renders !he en!ire li!iga!ion invalid and +i!ho&! an% &risdi'!ion) $iilar, invalid s&5onses +ere dis'overed in o!her 'ases and o!her 'o&r!s) <oreover, !he #$ 'o&r!s ro&!inel%"ail !o do'ke! !he s&onses, in disregard o" !he #$ (ivil (o&r! Pro'ed&res) There"ore, !hep&*li' a! large 'anno! dis!ing&ish valid and e""e'!&al li!iga!ion "ro si&la!ed li!iga!ion) =&r5!herore, !he 'lerk o" !he #$ (o&r!, $o&!hern Dis!ri'! o" 9e+ Gork denied a''ess !o !he s&5


12/57



ons, in disregard o" !he =irs! Aenden! righ! !o a''ess 'o&r! re'ords) The re'ord +as o*5!ained !hro&gh =reedo o" In"ora!ion A'! re&es! on !he $() L xxxiM

he 4S istrict courts toa universa%% 3ai% to ocket summonses9 in isregar o3 the4S ,ivi% ,ourt Proceures. "s is the case in other courts9 hich originate in the Eng-%ish common %a9 the summonses esta%ish the jurisiction o3 the court in a givenmatter. here3ore9 %itigation9 here no va%i summonses ere issue an execute9 isan inva%i %itigation. #oever9 as a resu%t o3 enia% o3 pu%ic access to the sum-

monses9 the pu%ic cannot istinguish eteen %a3u% %itigation an simu%ate %itiga-tion9 hich is conucte ith no va%i summonses.

g) dulterated and missing of court records

n various cases9 ke recors are e%ete 3rom the P",E$ ockets o3 the 4S istrictcourts or the 4S courts o3 appea%s ith no %ega% 3ounation9 in isregar o3 the 4S,ivi% ,ourt Proceures. >xxxii9xxxiii? 4nite 'ations reports note missing court recorsas a carina% sign o3 juicia% corruptin. >?

n other cases9 the evience inicates that recors ere au%terate9 e.g.9 the Petition3or a Drit o3 #aeas ,orpus o3 $ichar 8ine in the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istricto3 ,a%i3ornia9 an ecision in the #aeas ,orpus petition o3 (uantanamo +a e-

tainee 4thman "u% $ahim Fohamme 4thman in the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Dashing-ton , 9 as reporte meia. >xxxiv?

-. Case studies

$evie o3 the recors o3 iniviua% cases9 emonstrates that the courts on a routine asis conuct simu%ate &mock/sham* court proceeings9 an generate an propagatesimu%ate e%ectronic %ega% pu%ic recors.

a) Ha#eas Cor3us in the $nited &tates 4 the case o Richard Isaac 'ine 5 666v7

=ig&re -0 =ro le"! =orer #$ prose'&!or, an!i5&di'ial 'orr&p!ion a'!ivis! ?i'hard =ine in anin!ervie+ "ro os Angeles prison in 200) #$ <agis!ra!e (arla Woehrle and #$ J&dge JohnWal!er, in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia) The eviden'e indi'a!es !ha! !heha*eas 'orp&s pe!i!ion +as s&*e'!ed !o perversion o" &s!i'e !hro&gh !he 'ond&'! o" pro5!ra'!ed si&la!ed li!iga!ion,

he case o3 $ichar saac 8ine is o3 uniGue signi3icance9 since it provie etai%eocumentation o3 the eprivation o3 the %iert o3 an anti-juicia% corruption activistthrough the operation in concert o3 3rauu%ent e%ectronic recor sstems o3H

• he ,a%i3ornia Superior ,ourt9 ,ount o3 :os "nge%es

• Sheri33s epartment o3 the ,ount o3 :os "nge%es

• 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia

• 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s9 ;th ,ircuit9 an

• 4S Supreme ,ourt.

8ormer 4S prosecutor $ichar . 8ine expose an reuke the taking :os "nge%es juges o3 Anot permitteB paments9 hich ere %ae%e meia AriesB. n thea3termath9 a i%% as passe an signe into %a ,a%i3ornia (overnor "rno%Scharzenegger on 8eruar 2=9 2==;9 proviing Aretroactive immunitB to a%% jugesinvo%ve.


1!/57



o eeks %ater9 on Farch 69 2==;9 $ichar 8ine as arreste the Darrant etai%o3 :os "nge%es ,ount Sheri33s epartment9 at the en o3 a ramatic proceeing9represente as Sentencing - in the presence o3 meia - uge avi Oa33e.

$ichar 8ine as attempting to isGua%i3 uge Oa33e. he asis 3or a33iavits o3isGua%i3ication 3or a cause as uge avi Oa33es accepting o3 such paments 3roma part to the %itigation then at ar I Farina e% $e #ome )ners "ssociation v,ount o3 :os "nge%es &+S1=;62=*.

he entire proceeing %ater 3ai%e to appear in the pu%ic% avai%a%e %itigationchrono%og9 pu%ishe on%ine the court. :ikeise9 the court recor that as theFarch 69 2==; ugment an )rer o3 ,ontempt9 inc%uing hat as represente asSentencing9 hich as ie% reporte meia9 as %ater iscovere to e inva%ion its 3ace. he recor as a%so %acking va%i authentication.

hroughout the #aeas ,orpus petitions o3 $ichar 8ine9 an to this ate9 the :os"nge%es Superior ,ourt enies access to the $egister o3 "ctions &,a%i3ornia civi%ocket I the o33icia% recor o3 the %itigation* in the case o3 Farina e% $e #ome)ners "ssociation v ,ount o3 :os "nge%es.

here3ore9 there is no a to te%% hether the Farch 69 2==; proceeing as at a%%

%iste as a court proceeing the court itse%3. he Farch 69 2==; Finutes &protoco%*9remaine unsigne9 an never mentione an sentencing hearing at a%%.

$ichar 8ine as %ater he% in the Fens ,entra% ai% 3aci%it in :os "nge%es - part o3the in oers ai% comp%ex9 uner unusua%9 possi% unpreceente conitions. #eas he% uner continuous so%itar con3inement9 in a hospita% room in the jai%9 a%eit -no isease or isai%it ere ever c%aime jai% authorities.

$ichar 8ine as he% a%% a%ong ith no arrant at a%%. he in3ormation provie the Sheri33s epartment o3 :os "nge%es ,ount in this matter on its e%ectronic recorsstem - the nmate n3ormation ,enter - as 3a%se an mis%eaing. he arrest an

ooking ere %iste as i3 the ha taken p%ace on %ocation an authorit o3 the

Funicipa% ,ourt o3 San Pero. #oever9 no municipa% courts ha existe in :os"nge%es 3or a%most a ecae at that time.

n the 3irst 3e months o3 his jai%ing9 8ine as enie access to pen an paper9 ansuch conitions unermine his ai%it to 3i%e his #aeas ,orpus an re%ate petitions.ai% authorities a%so exp%icit% attempte in the initia% perio to eprive him o3 the rightto represent himse%39 an to coerce him to accept representation counse%9 hich8ine ec%ine.

)n une 79 2==;9 the :os "nge%es imes pu%ishe report &consiere un3avora%e* 3ema%e ourna%ist Lictoria <im9 ho purporte% manage to enter the Fens ai%9intervie 8ine9 an emerge out o3 the jai% unnotice9 at a time that the Sheri33separtment an the court anne intervies ith 8ine.

'ine1s petition for a writ of #abeas $orpus, 'ine v Sheriff of the $ounty of *os "ngeles

&2H=;-cv-=1;16* as ictate phone to a 3rien9 an as 3i%e on eha%3 o3 $ichar8ine at the 4S ,ourt9,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia &:os "nge%es*9 ut ithout hishan signature9 an ithout revie him o3 the 3i%e ocument. <e ocumentsere %ater c%aime missing 3rom the ocket.

he case as unusua% in that the Sheri339 name as $esponent9 re3use to respon.

Eventua%%9 response as 3i%e the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt an uge aviOa33e. #oever9 such response as 3i%e attorne <evin Fc,ormick9 ho 3ai%e to3i%e the reGuire certi3ications inicating that he as inee engage as a ,ounse% o3

$ecor in the case his c%ients9 an there3ore authorize to 3i%e an appear in thecase on their eha%3. >xxxvi? 8urther investigation provie evience that "ttorne


16/57



Fc,ormick as in 3act never autheorize as ,ounse% o3 $ecor uge avi Oa33ean the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt. >xxxvii?

n "ttorne Fc,ormicks response there as no evience that he ha evercommunicate ith his c%ients. he recors hich he 3i%e9 ere a%% erive 3rom theSheri33s epartment9 not 3rom the ,ourt9 inc%uing a cop o3 the inva%i Farch692==; ugment an )rer 3or ,ontempt9 ith no authentication.

"ttorne Fc,ormicks 3i%ings a%so inc%ue a short ec%aration counse% - not a

competent 3act itness in this case - not uge avi Oa33e or an o33icer o3 the:os "nge%es Superior courts. " scheme9 invo%ving representation counse% - a%eitnot ,ounse% o3 $ecor - ith no communications ith c%ient c%ause - ha een

previous% iscovere an reuke in an unre%ate case in exas9 in Farch 2==N9 ana 72-page Femoranum )pinion provie the etai%s o3 such schemes.

he une 129 2==; $eport Q $ecommenations issue Fagistrate ,ar%a Doehr%econc%ue recommening enia% ith prejuice. he 25 page revie9 care3u%%re3erence9 as istinguishe as #aeas ,orpus revie the 3act that it 3ai%e toever exp%icit% state the caption o3 the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt case that as uner revie9 or ever mention the or arrant.

" une 2;9 2==; ugment issue uge ohn Da%ter9 ho presie in the case a3ter a numer o3 recusa%s9 accepte the recommenation.

#oever9 oth o3 these court papers9 %ike a%% papers issue the 4S. istrict ,ourtin this case %acke authentication9 reGuire to make court papers va%i an e33ectua%9an ere there3ore inva%i court recors.

:ikeise9 a petition 3i%e on 8ines eha%3 at the 4S. ,ourt o3 "ppea%s 3or the ;th,ircuit - 'ine v Sheriff &=;-710;2*9 as enie9 ut the une !=9 2==; )rer eningthe petition9 earing the names o3 ,hie3 uge "%ex <ozinski an ,ircuit uges$ichar Paez an $ichar a%%man as unsigne9 unentere9 an %ackeauthentication as e%%.

Eventua%%9 8ine 3i%e petitions an app%ications to the 4S Supreme ,ourt. #oever9the pattern o3 pretense revie an inva%i court recors an proceures persiste evenin the highest court o3 the %an.

" Fotion to ntervene as 3i%e in the 4S Supreme ,ourt9 inc%uing etai%e revieo3 the 3a%se e%ectronic recors o3 the jai% an the %oer courts.

#oever9 the papers ere never reviee the 4S Supreme ,ourt. nstea9the ere AreturneB mai%9 in apparent vio%ation o3 oth 4S an internationa% %a9ith no revie at a%%.

Foreover9 hi%e the on%ine ockets o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt inicate that the caseso3 $ichar 8ine ere reviee an enie9 attempts to access the recors o3 the 4SSupreme ,ourt9 to inspect an to cop the recors9 3oun no va%i juicia% recors to

support the notations in the on%ine ockets.

)n Septemer 179 2=1=9 $ichar 8ine as re%ease the Sheri33. "gain9 the re%easetook p%ace ith no va%i orer ever entere the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt.nstea9 Septemer 179 2=1= Finutes ere issue uner caption o3 2arina v *"

$ounty &+S1=;62=*9 here issuance o3 an orer as escrie9 ut no evience o3 asigne orer as ever 3oun. he Finutes a%so 3ai%e to spe%% out that an orer asever signe uge Oa33e to a33ect the re%ease o3 $ichar 8ine on that ate. heSeptemer 179 2=1= Finutes opening sentence statesH

8or reasons knon on% to himse%39 8ine is attempting to otain his re%easeR

8urther9 the Septemer 179 2=1= Finutes justi3 the arupt re%ease as 3o%%osH

t is ecoming increasing% c%ear that 8ines conuct is irrationa%R #isconuct is izarre9 an that 3act a%one must e consiere this court...


15/57



he Septemer 179 2=1= Finutes a%so 3ai%e to appear among the %ist o3 court recorsin the case9 hich ere pu%ishe on%ine the ,ourt. :ikeise9 the ,ase Summar3ai%e to state that an )rer as signe uge Oa33e on Septemer 179 2=1=9 orentere the ,ourt on that ate. )3 note9 a a ear%ier9 uge avi Oa33e posteminutes9 hich enie $ichar 8ines reGuest 3or re%ease. Dhat cause the change o3min overnight an the arupt re%ease o3 8ine on Septemer 1792=1=9 remaineunknon.

,omine9 the arrest9 imprisonment9 an re%ease o3 $ichar 8ine present an examp%eo3 aritrar an capricious eprivation o3 %iert through co%%usion o3 the :os "nge%esSuperior ,ourt an the :os "nge%es Sheri33s epartment.

he ,a%i3ornia ,oe o3 $egu%ations9 it%e 15H ,rime Prevention an ,orrections9T!27!. "cceptance an Surrener o3 ,usto9 statesH

Darens an superintenents must not accept or surrener custo o3 an prisoner uner an circumstances9 except va%i court orer or other ue process o3 %a.

he case re3%ects iesprea corruption o3 the Superior ,ourt o3 ,a%i3ornia9 ,ounto3 :os "nge%es9 the %argest count court in the 4nite States9 an cover-up o3 the

same the 4S courts.$eport regaring corruption o3 the Superior ,ourt9 inc%uing9 ut not %imite to9 theimprisonment o3 $ichar 8ine9 as incorporate re3erence into the 2=1= 4P$&4niversa% Perioic $evie* Sta33 $eport o3 the #uman $ights ,ounci% o3 the 4nite

'ations9 ith a note regaring Acorruption o3 the courts an the %ega% pro3ession aniscrimination %a en3orcement in ,a%i3orniaB.

,overage o3 the case as most% %e3t to o33 mainstream meia. :arge corporate meiaout%et reports ere incomp%ete an at times partia% or p%ain% 3a%se.

)ne o3 the centra% recommenations o3 the 2=1= 4P$ report on the 4nite States pertaine to restoration o3 the right 3or #aeas ,orpus9 ith re3erence to etentions in(uantanamo +a.

"s ocumente in the case o3 $ichar 8ine9 the right o3 #aeas ,orpus ase33ective% enie a%so on a 4S citizen9 3ormer 4S prosecutor9 in the territoria% 4niteStates9 through e33ective enia% o3 access to honest courts.

Perhaps the most important insight gaine 3rom the case o3 $ichar 8ine pertains tothe ke ro%e o3 3a%se an e%ierate% mis%eaing e%ectronic recor sstems in thecourts an prisons in the 4nite States in the ause o3 #uman $ights.

ue to the unusua% set o3 characters9 the numer o3 court cases 3i%e $ichar 8ine9an the meticu%ous ocumentation9 the case as a ho%e provies unpara%%e%e stu o3the justice sstem9#uman $ights9 an civi% societ conitions in the 4nite States atthe onset o3 the 21st centur.

#) Securities and Echange !ommission v an# of merica !orporation 5666viii8666i67

=ig&re -- =ro le"! !o righ! lo%d Blank"ein, 'hie" exe'&!ive o" Coldan $a'hs1 Jaie Di5on, 'hie" exe'&!ive o" JP <organ (hase1 John <a'k, 'hairan o" <organ $!anle%1 and


10/57



Brian <o%nihan, 'hie" exe'&!ive o" Bank o" Aeri'a, s+orn in *e"ore !he =inan'ial (risis In5&ir% (oission, Jan&ar% -3, 20-0, and #$ J&dge Jed ?ako"", $o&!hern Dis!ri'! o" 9e+Gork) The eviden'e indi'a!es !ha! J&dge ?ako"", $( and Bank o" Aeri'a 'oll&ded in !he'ond&'! o" si&la!ed li!iga!ion in a landark 'ase &nder !he '&rren! "inan'ial 'risis) Al!ho&gh =BI Dire'!or ?o*er! <&eller III repea!edl% !es!i"ied *e"ore !he $ena!e !ha! i! +as in5ves!iga!ing 'riinali!% &nderl%ing !he s&*5prie 'risis, Lxl,xliM no prose'&!ion o" !op "ig&re everres&l!ed "ro s&'h inves!iga!ions) In 'on!ras!, inves!iga!ion o" 9e+ Gork $!a!e A!!orne% Cen5eral Andre+ (&oo &n'overed *la!an! 'riinali!% o" !op "ig&res in Bank o" Aeri'a in 'oll&5sion +i!h !op #$ o""i'ers 5 (hairan o" !he =ederal ?eserve Ben Bernanke, Treas&r% $e're5

!ar% >enr% Pa&lson) LxliiM The $ena!e $&*'oi!!ee on Inves!iga!ions repor! on !he "inan'ial'risis, like+ise, do'&en!ed vas! 'riinali!% in "inan'ial ins!i!&!ions) Lxliii,xlivM ?egardless, no !op"ig&re in lending ins!i!&!ions has *een 'riinall% prose'&!ed) LxlvM ven!&all%, in 20-3 A!!orne%Ceneral ri' >older 'onsen!ed *e"ore !he $ena!e J&di'iar% (oi!!ee !ha! !here +as 'rii5nali!% &nderl%ing !he 'risis, *&! in !es!ion% !ha! +as la!er re"erred !o as !oo *ig !o "ail, !o *ig!o ail, 'laied !ha! prose'&!ing *anking exe'&!ives +as no! possi*le) Lxlvi,xlviiM As do'&en!edhere in !he li!iga!ion o" Securities and !change "ommission v #an$ of America "or%oration .and in o!her 'ases o&!lined in linked re"eren'es in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, $o&!hern Dis!ri'! o"9e+ Gork, li!iga!ion o" *anking5rela!ed a!!ers +as &nderined !hro&gh 'oll&sion in "ra&d on!he 'o&r! *% &dge, 'lerk, and 'o&nsel "or *o!h par!ies, +hile edia "ailed !o ade&a!el% repor!on +ha! !ranspired in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r! in 9e+ Gork)

=ig&re -2 $&ons as iss&ed *% !he (lerk o" !he (o&r! and as exe'&!ed in $( v Bank o" Aeri'a (orpora!ion .-05'v50F2 in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, $o&!hern Dis!ri'! o" 9e+ Gork) The s&ons is &nsigned, and "ails !o sho+ !he seal o" !he 'o&r!) The s&ons +as alsonever do'ke!ed, in disregard o" #$ la+, and !he #$ 'o&r! denied a''ess !o i!) I! +as even!&5all% o*!ained !hro&gh a =reedo o" In"ora!ion re&es! "ro $() The 'ond&'! o" li!iga!ion+i!h no valid s&ons, no valid in&!es, and +here !he 'o&r! denies a''ess !o !he a&!hen!i5'a!ion re'ords .9=s 55 9o!i'es o" le'!roni' =iling, as +ell as !he o&!'oe o" !he li!iga!ion,

poin! o&! !o !he 'ond&'! o" sha/si&la!ed li!iga!ion "ro !he s!ar!, !hro&gh 'oll&sion o" !he &dge, !he 'lerk, and a!!orne%s "or *o!h $( and Bank o" Aeri'a (orpora!ion) In "a'!, "ro!he s!ar! 55 a sho+ !rial)


17/57



SE$ v "$ &1H=;-cv-=0N2;*9 an the re%ate case o3 SE$ v "$ &1H1=-cv I==215*ere summe as 3o%%os in the 8air 8un "ministrator esiteH

he 4nite States Securities an Exchange ,ommission &ASE,B* 3i%een3orcement actions against +ank o3 "merica ,orporation &A+",B* a%%egingthat +", vio%ate the 3eera% prox regu%ations in the merger eteen +", anFerri%% :nch Q ,o.9 nc. &AFerri%%B* that c%ose on anuar 19 2==;. "s part o3a sett%ement o3 those actions approve the #onora%e e S. $ako33 o3 the

4nite States istrict ,ourt 3or the Southern istrict o3 'e Oork on 8eruar229 2=1=9 +", pai approximate% U15= mi%%ion into a 8air 8un that i%% eistriute to investors injure the a%%ege misconuct.8o%%oing +",s merger ith Ferri%%9 the SE, 3i%e to actions9 SE, v . +anko3 "merica ,orp.9 =;-cv -0N2; &S$* &A+onuses "ctionB* an SE, v . +ank o3"merica ,orp.9 1=-cv -=21 5 &S$* &AV6 :osses "ctionB* &co%%ective% 9 theA"ctionsB*. n the +onuses "ction9 initia%% 3i%e on "ugust !9 2==;9 the SE,charge +", ith vio%ating Section 16&a* o3 the Securities Exchange "ct o31;!6 &AExchange "ctB* an $u%es 16a-! an 16a-; thereuner ase on +",s3ai%ure to isc%ose9 in prox materia%s so%iciting shareho%er votes 3or approva%o3 the merger9 its authorization 3or Ferri%% to pa ear-en onuses o3 up to U5.N

i%%ion to its emp%oees prior to the c%osing o3 the merger.n the V6 :osses "ction9 3i%e on anuar 129 2=1=9 the SE, charge +", ithvio%ating Section 1 6&a* o3 the Exchange "ct an $u%e 1 6a-; thereuner aseon +",s 3ai%ure to isc%ose9 prior to the ecemer 59 2==N shareho%er meetingto approve the merger9 extraorinar %osses that Ferri%% sustaine in )ctoer an

'ov emer 2==N.)n 8eruar 229 2=1=9 the 4nite States istrict ,ourt 3or the Southern istricto3 'e Oork &the A,ourtB* entere a 8ina% ,onsent ugment9 pursuant to hich+", as reGuire to pa a civi% pena%t o3 U1 5=9===9=== an isgorgement o3U1.

Information regarding 0"$E& and $23E$' in the S District $ourt, Southern

District of 4ew 5ork he p%at3orms o3 P",E$ an ,F/E,8 in the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3

'e Oork9 are the same as previous% escrie in other 4S istrict courts. >? hee%ectronic authentication recors &'E8s I 'otices o3 E%ectronic 8i%ings* are exc%ue3rom pu%ic access in P",E$. he 'E8s are toa accessi%e on% through ,F/E,89on% the courts an attornes9 ho are authorize the courts in particu%arcases.he *ocal &ules o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'e Oork9 ason%oae 3rom the ,ourts esite9 ere reviee9 particu%ar% re%ative to the3o%%oing mattersH >1!? )perations o3 P",E$ an ,F/E,8 an court proceures inherent in them ,erti3ication o3 court recors uner e%ectronic 3i%ing ssuance9 ocketing9 execution o3 service o3 summons an comp%aint ,erti3ication o3 attornes as "ttornes o3 $ecor upon appearance9 an e3inition o3 va%i igita% signatures uner e%ectronic 3i%ing."s as the case in other 4S courts9 hich ere reviee9 the *ocal &ules o3 the 4Sistrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'e Oork 3ai%e to provie c%ear anunamiguous etai%s o3 e%ectronic 3i%ing an e%ectronic court recors proceures ingenera%9 an in particu%ar re%ative to the matters %iste aove.8urther in3ormation regaring the esign an operations o3 P",E$ an ,F/E,8 as3oun in the Electronic $ase 'iling &ules 6 Instructions an the $2 3 E$' "ttorney

$ivil Dictionary o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'e Oork. >16?


1N/57



#oever9 such sources are not va%i o33icia% sources 3or esta%ishing the va%iit o3court recors.4sers manua%s9 a%eit not va%i court recors9 provie aitiona% in3ormationregaring the esign an operation o3 P",E$ an ,F/E,8 in other 4S istrictcourts9 hich ere inspecte. >15? #oever9 no access as 3oun on%ine to the4sers Fanua% o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'e Oork." tota% o3 1; proceeings ere %iste in the P",E$ ocket &see the 3u%% P",E$ocket an %inke recors uner the )n%ine "ppenix*. 8or to o3 the proceeings9 noocket entr as create &see e%o*. hese to proceeings shou% e eeme Wo33the recor. 8or the remaining 17 proceeings inva%i ocket entries ere create -no minutes recors at a%% ere %inke to the ocket %istings9 no ocket 'umers ereesignate9 an no in3ormation regaring content o3 the proceeings as provie inthe ocketing text. Foreover9 ase on the esign o3 the 'E8s &see e%o*9 it isimpossi%e that such ocket entries ere authenticate9 an there3ore9 ere e33ective%inva%i ocket entries9 ith no corresponing va%i court recors.

=ig&re -3 T+o en!ries "ro !he online PA(? Do'ke! o" $( v BA( .-05'v50F2 in !he#$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, $o&!hern Dis!ri'! o" 9e+ Gork) The Jan&ar% -2, 20-0 en!r% in'l&des aDo'ke! 9&*er and a link !o an a'!&al re'ord) The Jan&ar% -, 20-0 en!r% has no Do'ke!9&*er designa!ed, and no link !o an% re'ord) There"ore, no 'o&r! re'ord exis!s "or !he la!!er

en!r%) <oreover, given !he design o" !he 9=s .9o!i'es o" le'!roni' =iling, even had !he re5spe'!ive re'ord exis!ed soe+here, i! 'o&ldnH! possi*l% have *een a&!hen!i'a!ed, and !here5"ore, +o&ld have *een an invalid 'o&r! re'ord) There"ore, !he &l!iple en!ries in !he do'ke! o"!his 'ase, +here no Do'ke! 9&*er and links are provided, sho&ld *e deeed "alse and de5li*era!el% isleading do'ke! no!a!ions)

)3 such 17 minutes ith no recors9 10 ere Wentere an iniviua% ienti3ie asWmro. he 3u%% name an authorit o3 the person remain unknon. n contrast9 out o3 a tota% o3 26 ocket %istings o3 orers an the jugment9 here ocket numer asesignate9 here a recor as %inke9 an here in3ormative ocketing text as

provie9 not a sing%e item as entere Wmro. he ocketing epartment o3 the,ourt con3irme that ocketing in the case as not per3orme eput ,%erks9 ut

re3use to isc%ose the names o3 the iniviua%s invo%ve. >1N?Entr o3 transactions in the P",E$ ockets unauthorize court personne%9 hoere not oun )ath o3 )33ice9 as ocumente in other 4S istrict courts ase%%. +eon unermining the integrit o3 the ockets9 such practices emonstrate the%ack o3 securit an va%iit o3 P",E$ an ,F/E,8 as a ho%e.)vera%%9 nohere in the P",E$ ocket is the authorit o3 the ,%erk o3 the ,ourtinvoke9 neither is the name9 nor the authorit o3 an iniviua% as eput ,%erk to e3oun.

$ourt records in SE$ v ank of "merica $orporation >x%viii?

"ugust 7, /889 : Summons issued

he P",E$ ocket states that on "ugust !9 2==;9 summons as issue as to +",.#oever9 asent a ocket 'umer9 the text cannot possi% e eeme a va%i ocket


1;/57



entr. "itiona%%9 no %ink as provie in the P",E$ ocket to the summonsrecor itse%3. here3ore9 no e%ectronic authentication cou% have een issue throughan 'E8 uner such circumstances on the summons.he summonses o3 the courts are pu%ic recors %a. here3ore9 access to thesummons as issue as repeate% reGueste 3rom the o33ice o3 the ,%erk o3 the ,ourt."ccess as enie.Eventua%%9 a cop o3 the summons9 as issue the ,%erk o3 the ,ourt9 as otainethrough 8reeom o3 n3ormation "ct &8)"* response 3rom SE,. he summons asissue the ,%erk as iscovere to e unsigne. here3ore9 the summons as in3act inva%i. >1;?he inva%iit o3 the summons unermines the va%iit o3 the %itigation as a ho%e.#oever9 the inva%iit o3 the summons in this case cou% not e iscerne inP",E$9 the pu%ic access sstem.Service of 0rocess

'ohere in the ocket o3 the case is there an inication that service o3 the summonsas in 3act execute9 a%ternative%9 that service as aive. n 8)" response9 theunsigne summons recor as provie as the recor o3 oth the summons as issuean the summons as execute. &'igure 9* 'ee%ess to sa9 execution o3 service o3

unsigne9 inva%i summons is inva%i execution. Foreover9 no recor o3 the executiono3 service as provie.

"ugust 7, /889 % 2otion for entry of Settlement "greement

"%though meia reporte 3rom the onset o3 the %itigation that a propose Sett%ement"greement 3or U!! mi%%ions as 3i%e on "ugust !9 2==;9 a%though severa% ocketrecors %ater re3erre to the pening Sett%ement "greement9 an a%though onSeptemer 269 2==;9 )rer as entere in the ocket9 purporte% rejecting the then

pening e3ore the ,ourt propose Sett%ement "greement9 no Fotion 3or entr o3 the propose Sett%ement "greement an no propose Sett%ement "greement ere 3ounin the ocket.he 3ai%ure to 3i%e a Fotion 3or Entr o3 the Sett%ement "greement9 an conseGuent

conuct o3 motion ith no 3ounation recors support the opinion that the %itigation asa ho%e as conucte as an inva%i %itigation.

"ugust ;8, /889 : <off the record= proceeding

here is no ocket %isting at a%% 3or the "ugust 1=9 2==; proceeing. #oever9evience o3 its conuct is provie in the P",E$ ocket entries X159109 an 17.he conuct o3 Wo33 the recor court proceeing a%so supports the opinion that the%itigation as a ho%e as conucte as an inva%i %itigation.

"ugust />, /889 % -rder pertaining to review of proposed Settlement "greement

he "ugust 259 2==; )rer &kt X1!* statesHhis ,ourt has the o%igation9 ithin care3u%% prescrie %imits9 to etermine

hether the propose ,onsent ugment sett%ing this case is 3air9 reasona%e9aeGuate9 an in the pu%ic interest.he ru%ing on a matter that as never pening e3ore the ,ourt supports the opiniono3 conuct o3 an inva%i %itigation.

'ebruary //, /8;8, 'inal $onsent ?udgment

)n 8eruar 229 2=1=9 the 8ina% ,onsent ugment &kt X;7* as 3i%e uge e$ako33.he ocketing text o3 the 8ina% ,onsent ugment statesH

8'": ,)'SE' 4(FE' "S ) E8E'"' +"'< )8 "FE$,",)$P)$")' X 1=9=2;7 in 3avor o3 Securities an Exchange ,ommissionagainst +ank o3 "merica ,orporation in the amount o3 U 15=9===9==1.==.

&Signe uge e S. $ako33 on 2/26/2=1=* &"ttachmentsH X 1 'otice o3$ight to "ppea%* &t* &EntereH =2/26/2=1=* >sic Ijz?


2=/57



"ccess as repeate% reGueste to the 'E8 o3 the 8ina% ,onsent ugment9 asenthich9 the recor cannot e eeme a va%i court recor. "ccess continues to eenie.-ther 0"$E& &ecords

etai%e revie o3 the other P",E$ recors is provie in the )n%ine "ppenix. #ereon% high%ights are provieH

"ugust 7, /889 % $ivil $over Sheet

"%though recors o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'e Oork9 state that a,ivi% ,over Sheet is reGuire hen 3i%ing a comp%aint9 no ,ivi% ,over Sheet as3oun in the ocket o3 the case at han. n contrast9 ,ivi% ,over Sheets are routine%3oun ockete in P",E$ ith the comp%aints in other cases. "s 3urther note in the

&ules of $ourt 9 the ,ivi% ,over Sheet must e part o3 Service o3 Process9 togetherith the summons an comp%aint. he 3ai%ure to 3i%e an ocket a ,ivi% ,over Sheet is o3 particu%ar signi3icance9 since itis one o3 the on% recors9 here a han signature o3 a eput ,%erk o3 the ,ourt9ienti3ie name an authorit9 is reGuire.

'reedom of Information "ct '-I") and 'air 'und "dministrator &esponses

Dhi%e the ,%erk o3 the ,ourt re3use to provie access to the missing court recors inthis case9 hich are pu%ic recors %a9 %imite9 ut signi3icant access as gaineto recors 3rom other sources.he 8)" response ie%e a cop o3 a recor that as escrie as Asummons9 asissue c%erkB an Asummons9 as executeB. #oever9 the recor prouce in the8)" response is an unsigne summons ith no sea% o3 the ,ourt. here3ore9 it cou%not possi% e eeme a va%i summons.he 8air 8un "ministrator provie a cop o3 one 'E8 on%. he same o33icere3use to provie the 'E8s o3 other recors9 most nota% the 'E8 o3 the 8ina%,onsent ugment &kt X;7*. 'o exp%anation at a%% as provie the 8air 8un"ministrator 3or the re3usa% to provie copies o3 the aitiona% 'E8s.

$ircumstances Surrounding the *itigation of SE$ v "$ he 'e Oork imes reporte the nes regaring the 8ina% ,onsent ugment in thiscase as 3o%%osH >2=?

n a ru%ing that 3ree +ank o3 "merica 3rom some %ega% pro%ems9 a 3eera% juge rote on Fona that he ha re%uctant% approve a U15= mi%%ionsett%ement ith the Securities an Exchange ,ommissionR Ahis court9 hi%eshaking its hea9 grants the S.E.,.s motion an approves the propose consent

jugment9B the juge rote.nepenent investigation o3 events surrouning the +",-Ferri%% :nch merger State o3 'e Oork "ttorne (enera% "nre ,uomo as summe up in his "pri% 2!92==; %etter to the 4S ,ongress. >21? "na%sts reporte 3o%%oing re%ease o3 the %etter

an its attachments uner hea%ines such as W:et the ,rimina% nictments +eginHPau%son9 +ernanke9 :eis9 W+igger han DatergateY9 an W,uomo 4nvei%s Pau%son9+ernanke9 :eis ,onspirac. #oever9 in contrast ith such ana%sts opinions9none o3 the perpetrators su33ere an materia% conseGuences so 3ar.uge e $ako339 ho presie in the case9 is consiere one o3 the most experiencean nota%e among 4S juges in matters pertaining to securities9 hite-co%%ar crime9an racketeering.$egaring uge e $ako33s conuct in the case at han9 the @all Street ?ournal

*aw log saiH >22?$ako33s current% proving himse%3 to e9 i3 nothing e%se9 una3rai to sing%e-hane% take on some heaveight institutions an their %aers.


21/57



'umerous attornes appeare in the case9 oth 3or P%ainti33 SE,9 a government entit9an 3or e3enant +",. )ver 2= 'otices o3 "ppearance appear in the P",E$ ocketo3 the case.n a Septemer 229 2==; report9 the Dashington Post Guotes o33icia% statement SE,H

>D?e i%% vigorous% pursue our charges against +ank o3 "merica an takesteps to prove our case in court9 the SE, sai in a statement. De i%% use theaitiona% iscover avai%a%e in the %itigation to 3urther pursue the 3acts anetermine hether to seek the courts permission to ring aitiona% charges inthis case.

t is a%%ege that it is practica%% impossi%e that the prominent attornes9 hoappeare in the case 3or oth SE, an +", attornes ere unaare o3 the inva%inature o3 the %itigation.he %itigation o3 the case as extensive% covere major 4S meia out%ets9 ana%so internationa% meia. " tota% o3 ten &1=* reports o3 the %itigation ere 3oun inthe 'e Oork imes9 eight &N* reports in the Dashington Post9 an ozens o3 reportsin the Da%% Street ourna%. :ikeise9 3ourteen &16* reports ere 3oun on the matter inthe imes o3 :onon. #oever9 there is no reason to assume that an meia9 hich

reporte on the %itigation ever gaine access to recors in the case eon thoseaccessi%e in the P",E$ ocket9 as escrie aove. here is a%so no evience o3e33orts meia to gain access to the missing critica% court recors9 here pu%icaccess as enie. t is i33icu%t to e%ieve that experience %ega% reporters o3 majormeia out%ets never notice the 3ata% e3ects in the recors an conuct o3 the%itigation.

-verall $onduct of the *itigation

he conuct o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt in this matter shou% e reviee in the contexto3 the conuct o3 civi% %itigation as stipu%ate in the 'ederal &ules of $ivil 0rocedure9an as out%ine in the $ivil *itigation 2anagement 2anual, Second Edition &2=1=* the uicia% ,on3erence o3 the 4nite States. >2!? 4pon such revie9 a reasona%e

person ou% most %ike% conc%ue that the %itigation as a ho%e as ever eeme the 4S ,ourt itse%3 as va%i %itigation9 conucte pursuant to the %a o3 the 4niteStates.he outcome o3 the %itigation shou% a%so e viee 3rom the 3unamenta% 3airness

perspectiveH niviua%s9 ho ere anking executives9 un%a3u%% took onuses inthe sum o3 U5.N i%%ions 3rom shareho%ers. he outcome o3 the %itigation as thatcompensation in the sum o3 U15= mi%%ions as pai the shareho%ers to themse%ves9no 3uns ere returne an executives ho receive the un%a3u% onuses9 an noiniviua% as he% accounta%e 3or the un%a3u% conuct.he "ugust 259 2==; )rer &kt X1!* statesH

his ,ourt has the o%igation9 ithin care3u%% prescrie %imits9 to eterminehether the propose ,onsent ugment sett%ing this case is 3air9 reasona%e9aeGuate9an in the pu%ic interest.

he ru%ing on a matter that as never pening e3ore the ,ourt supports the opiniono3 conuct o3 an inva%i %itigation.)n 8eruar 229 2=1=9 the 8ina% ,onsent ugment &ktX;7* as 3i%e uge e$ako33. he ocketing text o3 the 8ina% ,onsent ugment statesH

8'": ,)'SE' 4(FE' "S ) E8E'"' +"'< )8"FE$," ,)$P)$")' X 1=9=2;7 in 3avor o3 Securities an Exchange,ommission against +ank o3 "merica ,orporation in the amount o3U15=9===9==1.==. &Signe uge e S. $ako33 on 2/26/2=1=* &"ttachmentsH

X 1 'otice o3 $ight to "ppea%*&t* &EntereH =2/26/2=1=* >sic Ijz?


22/57



"ccess as repeate% reGueste to the 'E8 o3 the 8ina% ,onsent ugment9 asenthich9 the recor cannot e eeme a va%i court recor. "ccess continues to eenie.

Dhi%e the ,%erk o3 the ,ourt re3use to provie access to the missing court recors inthis case9 hich are pu%ic recors %a9 %imite9 ut signi3icant access as gaineto recors 3rom other sources. he 8)" response ie%e a cop o3 a recor that asescrie as Asummons9 as issue c%erkB an Asummons9 as executeB. #oever9

the recor prouce in the 8)" response is an unsigne summons ith no sea% o3 the,ourt. here3ore9 it cou% not possi% e eeme a va%i summons.he 'e Oork imes reporte the nes regaring the 8ina% ,onsent ugment in thiscase as 3o%%osH

n a ru%ing that 3ree +ank o3 "merica 3rom some %ega% pro%ems9 a 3eera% juge rote on Fona that he ha re%uctant% approve a U15= mi%%ionsett%ement ith the Securities an Exchange ,ommissionR Ahis court9 hi%eshaking its hea9 grants the S.E.,.s motion an approves the proposeconsent jugment9B the juge rote.

nepenent investigation o3 events surrouning the +",-Ferri%% :nch merger State o3 'e Oork "ttorne (enera% "nre ,uomo as summe up in his "pri% 2!9

2==; %etter to the 4S ,ongress."na%sts reporte 3o%%oing re%ease o3 the %etter an its attachments uner hea%inessuch as W:et the ,rimina% nictments +eginH Pau%son9 +ernanke9 :eis9 W+iggerhan DatergateY9 an W,uomo 4nvei%s Pau%son9 +ernanke9 :eis ,onspirac.#oever9 in contrast ith such ana%sts opinions9 none o3 the perpetrators su33erean materia% conseGuences so 3ar.uge e $ako339 ho presie in the case9 is consiere one o3 the most experiencean nota%e among 4S juges in matters pertaining to securities9 hite-co%%ar crime9an racketeering. $egaring uge e $ako33s conuct in the case at han9 the Da%%Street ourna% :a +%og saiH

$ako33s current% proving himse%3 to e9 i3 nothing e%se9 una3rai to sing%e-

hane% take on some heav eight institutions an their %aers. 'umerous attornes appeare in the case9 oth 3or P%ainti33 SE,9 a government entit9an 3or e3enant +",. )ver 2= 'otices o3 "ppearance appear in the P",E$ ocketo3 the case.n a Septemer 229 2==; report9 the Dashington Post Guotes o33icia% statement SE,H

>D?e i%% vigorous% pursue our charges against +ank o3 "merica an takesteps to prove our case in court9the SE, sai in a statement. De i%% use theaitiona% iscover avai%a%e in the %itigation to 3urther pursue the 3acts anetermine hether to seek the courts permission to ring aitiona% charges inthis case.

$ourt &ecords in *itigation of SE$ v "$

he primar source o3 recors as through pu%ic access to P",E$ recors."itiona%%9 e33orts ere mae to otain missing recors9 here access in P",E$as not avai%a%e9 through reGuests9 hich ere 3orare to the o33ice o3 the ,%erko3 the ,ourt9 attornes 3or SE, an +", in the case9 o33ice o3 the ,hair o3 SE,9o33ice o3 +", Presient9 8reeom o3 n3ormation "ct &8)"* o33ice o3 SE,9 an theo33ice o3 8air 8un "ministrator.

0ublic "ccess to Electronic $ourt &ecords

"s as the case in a%% other 4S istrict courts9 hich ere inspecte9 pu%ic access tothe authentication recors &'E8s* o3 the ,ourt in P",E$ is enie. >10? 8urthermore9at the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'e Oork9 pu%ic access to the


2!/57



,a%enars o3 the ,ourts is unreasona% %imite. "ccess is permitte on% to thecurrent seven as ino9 an access to the ocket "ctivit $eport is enie &see

e%o*."%though never state in the &ules of $ourt o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southernistrict o3 'e Oork9 the evience shos that9 as is the case in other 4S courts9 the

'E8s ere in 3act eeme the authentication the ,%erk o3 the ,ourt. 'o other3orms o3 authentication recors9 pertaining to juicia% recors &minutes9 orers9

jugment* ere 3oun in the P",E$ ocket. he 'E8 o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9Southern istrict o3 'e Oork9 as to 3orm9 as ientica% to the 'E89 as iscovere inother 4S courts. he 'E8 3orm9 in an o3 itse%39 shou% e consiere inva%i as acerti3icate. t inc%ues no certi3ication statement9 A certi3RB9 it never invokes theauthorit o3 the ,%erk o3 the ,ourt9 it never names the person9 ho issue it9 an itinc%ues neither a graphic han-signature9 nor a va%i igita% signature o3 anauthorize iniviua%9 a33ixe as a smo% o3 intent to take responsii%it. nstea9 iton% inc%ues a machine generate9 encrpte checksum string."%though the 'ederal &ules of $ivil 0rocedure prescrie the ocketing o3 thesummons as issue the ,%erk o3 the ,ourt9 an the minutes o3 the proceeings9these recors ere missing 3rom P",E$ ocket o3 the case at han.

0ublic "ccess to &ecords from -ther Sources$eGuests 3or copies o3 the missing %itigation recors9 hich ere 3orare to theo33ice o3 the ,%erk o3 the ,ourt9 to attornes 3or parties in the case9 to the o33ice o3SE, ,hair9 an to the o33ice o3 Presient o3 +",9 ere a%% enie.Eventua%%9 on% one 'E8 as otaine 3rom the o33ice o3 the 8air 8un"ministrator. "ccess to the other 'E8s as enie the same o33ice ith noexp%anation at a%%.he summons9 as issue the ,%erk o3 the ,ourt9 as eventua%% otaine inresponse to a 8reeom o3 n3ormation "ct &8)"* reGuest. #oever9 the same o33ice3ai%e to prouce the missing recors o3 the 'E8s in this case.

0"$E& and $23E$', Information Systems of the S $ourtshe case o3 SE, v +ank o3 "merica ocuments the critica% e33ect o3 P",E$ an,F/E,89 the in3ormation sstems o3 the 4S courts re%ative to integrit o3 4S courtrecors an integrit o3 the 4S courts9 or %ack thereo3.,onitions that toa prevai% in the 4S courts stan in stark contrast ith the %asenacte 4S ,ongress9 Presientia% irectives9 $egu%ations9 an app%ications9hich have een presuma% imp%emente 3or authentication an va%iation o3 e-government in the 4nite States. >269 25?e3iciencies in the esign an operation o3 P",E$ an ,F/E,8 ere previous%note in reports9 hich ere pu%ishe in a computer science an in a %ega% journa%s.>209 27? he report in the 4ational *aw ?ournal ocumente the apparent

3a%si3ication o3 recors in another %anmark case I the haeas corpus petition o3 a(uantanamo etainee in the 4S istrict ,ourt in Dashington ,. Such conuctshou% have een prevente9 or shou% have triggere a%erts in an va%i courtin3ormation sstem.

2issing $ourt &ecords : $ardinal Sign of ?udicial $orruption!

4nite 'ations reports on AStrengthening uicia% ntegritB avocate theimp%ementation o3 computerize in3ormation sstems in the courts9 as a too% 3orenhancement o3 transparenc an integrit o3 the courts. >!19 !2?#oever9 the same 4nite 'ations reports %ist missing court recors as a carina% signo3 juicia% corruption. n the case o3 P",E$ an ,F/E,89 the imp%ementation o3inva%i in3ormation sstems in the courts9 ena%es the conuct o3 %itigation9 herecritica% recors are permanent% missing9 as emonstrate in the current report.


26/57



anking &egulation

,onuct o3 the SE,9 +",9 an the 4S istrict ,ourt in SE$ v "$ 9 as ocumentein the current report9 stans contrar to ongoing e33orts the 4S ,ongress9 anrepeate statements the 4S (overnment regaring e33orts to restore the integrit o3 +anking $egu%ation in the 4nite States9 an enhance the accountai%it o3 irectors9executives9 accountants9 an attornes9 acting on eha%3 o3 corporations. n the akeo3 the Enron scana%9 the 4S ,ongress passe the Sarbanes%-(ley "ct &2==2*. n thecurrent 3inancia% crisis9 the 4S ,ongress passe the 'raud Enforcement and &ecovery

"ct &2==;*. SE, an other +anking $egu%ators routine% appear e3ore the 4S,ongress an provie testimonies9 hich c%aim that integrit o3 +anking $egu%ationin the 4nite State has een restore.he 4S (overnment as a%so pressure the internationa% communit9 hich asserious% harme the ongoing 3inancia% crisis9 to take corrective measures9consistent ith the 4S (overnments uties an o%igations in internationa% treatiesan accors.n that context9 the %itigation o3 SE$ v "$ in the 4S ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'eOork9 reviee in the current report9 as reporte as the ha%%mark o3 en3orcement o3+anking $egu%ation in the ongoing 3inancia% crisis.

n contrast9 revie o3 the case at han ocuments %itigation o3 SE$ v "$ as mere% a pretense. t a%so ocuments the tight %ink eteen integrit in the 4S courts9 or %ackthereo39 an the 3ai%ure o3 4S +anking $egu%ation. he case as a ho%e can eviee as a Asho tria%B9 intene to 3a%se% represent the perception o3 e33ective+anking $egu%ation an en3orcement o3 the %a.

d) *og !abin +epublicans v %S et al

=ig&re -4 In og (a*in ?ep&*li'ans v #$A e! al, J&dge Kirginia Phillips, #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!,(en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia, 'ond&'!ed "or an% on!hs "ra&d on !he 'o&r! in a a!!er !ha!o''&pied !he #$ Presiden!, !he #$ (ongress, !he #$ Ared =or'es, and !he #$ p&*li', and+hi'h +as !he 'en!er o" edia a!!en!ion)

he P",E$ ocket an recors 5:7 o3 the case mae it evient a%% a%ong that the casein the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia uner uge Lirginia Phi%%ipsan ,%erk err 'a3isi9 amounte to 8rau on the ,ourtH

• 4S uges (eorge Schiave%%i an Lirginia Phi%%ips appeare as Presiing uges inthe case9 oth ith no "ssignment )rers. "sent "ssignment )rer in a speci3iccase9 a 4S juge has no authorit to ajuicate in the matter.

• n 2==6 uge Schiave%%i issue a jugment in the case9 in 3avor o3 the 4niteStates. he jugment as %iste in the P",E$ ocket as AentereB9 an as %istein the ugment nex o3 the ,ourt.

• ,onseGuent%9 the case as eeme Ac%oseB court sta33. #oever9 access to thecerti3ication o3 the2==6 jugment is enie.

• he 2==6 uge Schiave%%i AugmentB as never overturne through an appea%9 or an other juicia% proceeing.

•n 2=1= uge Phi%%ips appeare in the case an issue the opposing jugment9 in3avor o3 the :og ,ain $epu%icans. he 2=1= jugment as again %iste in the


25/57



ocket as AentereB9 ut as not %iste in the ugment nex o3 the ,ourt. "ccessto the certi3ication o3 the 2==6 jugment is enie as e%%.

,%erk o3 the istrict ,ourt E$$O '"8S ha previous% enie access to theserecors9 in patent isregar o3 8irst "menment an ,ommon :a rights to accesscourt recors.

8reeom o3 n3ormation response the 4S epartment o3 ustice as sustanar9et it provie the e3initive evience o3 the conuct o3 simu%ate %itigation in the 4S

istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 ,a%i3orniaH517 5-7 • " simu%ate summons recor9 missing the sea% o3 the court9 reGuire 4S

%a. 5;7

• " simu%ate9 inva%i authentication recor &'E8* 3or the )ctoer 2=1= ugment uge L$('" P#::PS9 missing the E%ectronic ocument Stamp9reGuire the (enera% )rer =N-=2 o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3,a%i3ornia. 597

he 8)" response as a%so nota%e in the recor that it 3ai%e to provieH

• "ssignment )rer 3or uge (eorge ,hiave%%i

• "ssignment )rer 3or uge Lirginia Phi%%ips

•"uthentication recors &'E8s* 3or various Finutes an )rers either uges.

Such 8rau on the 4S ,ourts 3rom coast to coast has een tpica%% reserve 3orcases9 here the civi% rights o3 iniviua%s are ause to ene3it anks9 %argecorporations9 an corrupt government o33icia%s. "pparent%9 :og ,ain $epu%icansgot ea%th an in3%uentia% enough to purchase 8rau on the ,ourt through theservices o3 a %arge anking %a 3irm - ,ase Q Dhite9 ::P. he case o3 :og ,ain$epu%icans is the 3irst to ocument 8rau on the ,ourt 3or the protection o3 civi%rights...

uge L$('" P#::PS is one o3 a series o3 ,a%i3ornia an 4S juges9 hore3use to anser on reGuests to isc%ose 3inancia% ene3its to them9 i3 an9 +"'<

)8 "FE$,"9 hi%e continuing to engage in 8rau on the ,ourt in cases invo%ving+"'< )8 "FE$,". 507

8rau on the ,ourts is tpica%% reserve 3or cases9 here the civi% rights o3iniviua%s are ause to ene3it anks9 %arge corporations9 an corrupt governmento33icia%s. he case o3 :og ,ain $epu%icans is the 3irst to ocument the same 3or the

protection o3 civi% rights.

I9N$L-M --5025-2 ? 5 ?epl% in ?e 5 =OIA ?esponse on og (a*in ?ep&*li'ans v #$A e! al .2045'v50F42@in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia sh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/F4F0424/L2M $i&la!ed li!iga!ion, si&la!ed de'isions, si&la!ed servi'e here re"er !o 'ond&'! de"ined in !he

Texas (riinal (ode as "ollo+sTexas Penal (ode 32)4F) $I<#ATI9C CA P?O($$).a A person 'oi!s an o""ense i" !he person re'klessl% 'a&ses !o *e delivered !oano!her an% do'&en! !ha! si&la!es a s&ons, 'oplain!, &dgen!, or o!her 'o&r!pro'ess +i!h !he in!en! !o .- ind&'e pa%en! o" a 'lai "ro ano!her person1 or

.2 'a&se ano!her !o.A s&*i! !o !he p&!a!ive a&!hori!% o" !he do'&en!1 or.B !ake an% a'!ion or re"rain "ro !aking an% a'!ion in response !o !he do'&en!,

in 'oplian'e +i!h !he do'&en!, or on !he *asis o" !he do'&en!).* Proo" !ha! !he do'&en! +as ailed !o an% person +i!h !he in!en! !ha! i! *e "or+arded!o !he in!ended re'ipien! is a s&""i'ien! sho+ing !ha! !he do'&en! +as delivered)

The pra'!i'e is +idespread in *o!h !he s!a!e and #$ 'o&r!s a! all levels)L3M #$ la+, 2F #$( -- re&ires

All +ri!s and pro'ess iss&ing "ro a 'o&r! o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es shall *e &nder !he seal o" !he 'o&r! andsigned *% !he'lerk !hereo")


20/57

http://www.scribd.com/doc/84804264/




L4M 0F502500 #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r! (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia Ceneral Order 0F502, A&!hori;ing (</(=,Digi!al A&!hen!i'a!ion and A!!es!a!ion in 9=sh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/273247-/9o!e The #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia i!sel"'on'eded !ha! &di'ial re'ords, iss&ed +i!h invalid a&!hen!i'a!ion re'ords .9=s 5 9o!i'e o" le'roni'=iling are invalid 'o&r! re'ords, +hi'h sho&ld *e reoved "ro !he do'ke!s-250350F The #$ (o&r!s ngage in arge5$'ale =ra&d on !he Peopleh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/F4@3@04/L@M --50250 Press ?elease DonH! Ask, DonH! TellH !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals, !h (ir'&i! Insis!s on(ond&'!ing a $i&la!ed Appeal "ro a $i&la!ed J&dgen! o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/40703-@/

LM --5052 P&*lished Opinion in og (a*in ?ep&*li'ans v #$A e! al in !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals, !h(ir'&i! !he o&!'oe o" si&la!ed li!iga!ionh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/F47732 /L7M --5045-2 P?$$ ?A$ Bri*ing o" $!a!e and #$ J&dges *% Bank o" Aeri'a <&s! *e a $erio&s(on'ernQh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@2F4@02/LFM --50F50- Zernik, J =ra&d and 'orr&p!ion in !he #$ 'o&r!s is !igh!l% linked !o "ailing *anking reg&la!ionand !he "inan'ial 'risis, -!h World (riinolog% (ongress presen!a!ionh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/-3@-@2/LM -050F5-F Zernik, J Da!a <ining o" Online J&di'ial ?e'ords o" !he 9e!+orked #$ =ederal (o&r!s,In!erna!ional Jo&rnal on $o'ial <edia <oni!oring, <eas&reen!, <ining, -5F3 .20-0h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3F32F@F@/L-0M --504523 >a*eas (orp&s in !he #ni!ed $!a!es 5 !he 'ase o" ?i'hard Isaa' =ineh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/24720F4/--50522 P?$$ ?A$ J&dge C&il"ord ?e"&ses !o Opines on=ra&d in !he le'!roni' ?e'ord $%s!es o" !he #$ (o&r!s sh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@F4F47/-0502524 >&inski v To+n o" Benning!on Keron! .035703 5 Alleged =ra&d *% J&s!i'e $o!oa%or sh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/273F33-/-050@5-@ >&inski v ?&!land Polli'e Depar!en! e! al .-5'v5-0 Alleged >ones! $ervi'es =ra&d a! !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r! 5 Keron!h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3-407-37/-05025-2 >&inski v ?&!land Poli'e Depar!en! e! al .-5'v5-0a! !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, Keron! =alse <eo and Order5 served +i!h no 9= a! all5sh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3-30@3-2/--50530 ? <'Carr% v Ceria!ri' =a'ili!ies o" (ape (od In' e! al.--05'v5--343 5 ?a'ke!eering !hro&gh $i&la!ed i!iga!ion in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, <assa'h&se!!sh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@-24-/L--M --50452@ in;er D, In Ci!o Opinion, T+o Kersions o" ?eali!% 5 Pro P&*li'a, April 2@, 20--h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@2-3F@/-05-05-- in;er, D) 6In CIT<O Opinion, T+o Kersions o" ?eali!%,:The 9a!ional a+ Jo&rnal, O'!o*er --, 20-0h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@3@422/L-2M -250-507 O''&p% !he (o&r!s E Jan&ar% 20, 20-2

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/774@72/L-3M 02500500 <essinger, I $'o!! Order in The (o&r! 5 >is!or% o" (lerks o" #ni!ed $!a!es (o&r!s, =ederalJ&di'ial (en!er .2002h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/34F-774/L-4M --507504 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographi'al $ke!'hh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/442---3/

e) *og !abin +epublicans in the %S !ourt of ppeals, th !ircuit

=ig&re -@ og (a*in ?ep&*li'ans v #$A e! al, a landark 'ase o" na!ional signi"i'an'e, +ass&*e'!ed !o si&la!ed appeal pro'ed&res in !he !h (ir'&i! (o&r! o" Appeals &nder J&dgesWillia (an*%, Jr, d+ard eav%, Ar!h&r Alar'on, Diar&id = O8s'annlain, Barr% C$ilveran,

he 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s ho%s jurisiction to conuct appea%s on% 3rom va%i an

e33ectua%9 certi3ie jugments9 not 3rom voi ones9 an the recors in the appea% cou%


27/57








































not possi% e eeme va%i %ega% recors o3 the 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s9 ;th ,ircuit9eitherH

• " ocket as opene 3or the appea% the 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s ,%erk F)::O ,DOE$ 3rom an uncerti3ie jugment. he ,%erk o3 the 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%sshou% have re3use to open a ocket 3rom an uncerti3ie jugment o3 the 4Sistrict ,ourt.

• he purporte orers the ,ircuit uges in the "ppea% are a%% unsigne recors.

•

he ,ourt o3 "ppea%s9 ;th ,ircuit enie a reGuest 3or certi3ication o3 the ocket o3 the "ppea%.

Dhi%e the appea% as purporte% e3ore the ;th ,ircuit ,ourt9 r Cernik 3i%e amotion to intervene9 proviing etai%e evience o3 the 8rau on the ,ourt in the%itigation o3 the case. $egar%ess9 the 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s continue the %itigation o3the simu%ate appea% 3rom the simu%ate istrict ,ourt jugment9 hich asconc%ue in a pu%ishe simu%ate opinion. 57

e) !iti.ens %nited v /ederal Election !ommission in the %S $istrict !ourt, $!

=ig&re - #$ (hie" J&dge ?o%'e () a*er!h, #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, Washing!on D() In !heli!iga!ion o" a landark 'ase *% a (hie" J&dge !here is an invalid *eginning, an invalid end,and an o"" !he re'ordH pro'eeding in *e!+een)

$iti+ens nited v 'ederal Election $ommission &8E,* &=N-2=5* is no out one o3 the

%anmark ecisions o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt. A>?ecision ho%ing that corporationsan unions can spen un%imite amounts o3 mone in e%ection campaignsR astunning examp%e o3 juicia% activismRB >>i?? #oever9 a va%i an e33ectua% cop o3 the 8eruar 229 2=1= ugment o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt in the case I a historicocument I is et to e iscovereR >>ii?9>iii??$evie o3 the %itigation recors o3 ,itizens 4nite v 8E, &1H=7-cv-226=* in the 4Sistrict ,ourt9 Dashington ,9 here the case originate9 emonstrates simu%ate -an inva%i eginning9 an inva%i en9 an an Wo33 the recor proceeing in eteen.>>iv??


2N/57

http://inproperinla.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/lamberth-photo-175.jpg



=ig&re -7 Invalid PA(? $&ons o" (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =( in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, D() The

re'ord "ails !o sho+ !he $eal o" !he (o&r!)

Summons as execute I he recor o3 the Summons as execute on 8eera% E%ection,ommission &kt X15* is an inva%i recor9 since it 3ai%s to sho the Sea% o3 ,ourt9 asreGuire 4S %a. " repeat 8)" reGuest as 3i%e9 in orer to exc%ue the

possii%it that the Sea% o3 the ,ourt as missing as a resu%t o3 photocoping or

scanning. >>v?? RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 0-/-0/200F <in&!e n!r% Pro'eedings held *e"ore a Three J&dge Panel o" (ir'&i! J&dge A?a%ond ?andolph and #ni!ed $!a!es Dis!ri'! J&dges ?o%'e () a*er!h and ?i'hard W)?o*er!s Preliinar% In&n'!ion held on -/-0/200F) .(o&r! ?epor!er Wend% ?i'ard) .re.n!ered 0-/-0/200F RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR =ig&re 2 Invalid PA(? do'ke! no!a!ion o" <in&!es o" !he Jan&ar% -0, 200F pro'eedingin (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =() 9o do'ke! n&*er +as designa!ed, and no re'ord o" !he <in&!es+as linked !o !he do'ke! no!a!ion)

Finutes I 'o va%i recor at a%% exists 3or the anuar 1=9 2==N proceeing9 the on% proceeing %iste in the recor o3 the case. nva%i notation as create in the ocket9

ith no recor %inke to it at a%%. E33ective%9 it as an Wo33 the recor proceeing o3the court.


2;/57

http://inproperinla.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/07-12-17dkt015summonsasexecuted_page_1.jpg



=ig&re -F Invalid, si&la!ed re'ord o" !he =e*r&ar% 22, 20-0 J&dgen! in (i!i;ens #ni!ed v=ederal le'!ion (oission in !he #$ $&pree (o&r!, as i! appears in !he PA(? do'ke! o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!)

4S Supreme ,ourt ugment I he ugment recor9 as it appears in the ocket o3the 4S istrict ,ourt9 is unsigne9 an 3ai%s to inc%ue authentication the ,%erk o3the 4S Supreme ,ourt. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR J&dgen! Index ?epor!

#)$) Dis!ri'! (o&r! E E Dis!ri'! o" (ol&*ia?epor! Period 0-/0-/200@ E 0@/23/20--$orr% E no da!a "or !he 'hosen sele'!ion 'ri!eriaJ&dgen! Index ?epor! $ele'!ion (ri!eria(ase n&*er -075'v52240 RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR =ig&re @ The (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =( en!r% in !he J&dgen! Index o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, D()J&dgen! Index E 9o J&dgen! a! all is lis!ed in !he (o&r!Hs J&dgen! Index "or !he 'ase, and!he 'oplain! is lis!ed as never !erina!ed in !he ?ela!ed Transa'!ions ?epor!)

he practice o3 Simu%ate :itigation is proa% as o% as the courts themse%ves. )ver centuries9 recor keeping o3 the courts9 the core o3 ue Process9 evo%ve to prevent it.

mp%ementation o3 computerize case management sstems in the state an 4S courts9here the nature o3 signatures an authentication as %e3t vague an amiguous9 isc%aime to e centra% to the iesprea practice o3 Simu%ate :itigation. >>ix??$eGuest 3or revie o3 the evience o3 3rau in the computerize recors o3 the 4Sistrict ,ourts an ,ourts o3 "ppea%s &P",E$ an ,F/E,8* as previous%3orare to #arvar :a Pro3essor Oochai +enk%er9 an expert on computers an the%a. >>x??

RRRRRRRR I9N$LiM 050-52- (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =ederal le'!ion (oission -30 $)(!) F7 .20-0 a! !he $&pree (o&r! o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es E opinion o" Pro" (heerinsk% and Wikipedia overvie+htt/:s%rid%!md!%4134083

LiiM --50@5-7 P?$$ ?A$ (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =ederal le'!ion (oission in !he #$ $&pree(o&r! E so "ar onl% a si&la!ed J&dgen! re'ord has *een dis'overed


!=/57





htt/:s%rid%!md!%13401LiiiM --50@523 ? (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =ederal le'!ions (oission, =( =OIA 9o) 20--542ndZernik s ?epl% on =( s 2nd =OIA ?esponse� �htt/:s%rid%!md!%048803LivM --50@523 (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =ederal le'!ion (oission .-5075'v52240 in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, D(

invalid 'o&r! re'ords in a $i&la!ed i!iga!ion�htt/:s%rid%!md!%08010LvM --50@523 ? (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =ederal le'!ions (oission, =( =OIA 9o) 20--542nd Zernik s�?epl% on =( s 2nd =OIA ?esponse s�htt/:s%rid%!md!%048803

LviM $i&la!ed i!iga!ion here re"ers !o 'ases, +here !he eviden'e sho+s 'ond&'! de"ined in !he Texas(riinal (ode as "ollo+sTexas Penal (ode E $e'!ion 32)4F) $i&la!ing egal Pro'ess

32)4F) $I<#ATI9C CA P?O($$)�.a A person 'oi!san o""ense i" !he person re'klessl% 'a&ses !o *e delivered !oano!her an% do'&en! !ha! si&la!es a s&ons, 'oplain!, &dgen!,or o!her 'o&r! pro'ess +i!h !he in!en! !o.- ind&'e pa%en! o" a 'lai "ro ano!her person1 or .2 'a&se ano!her !o.A s&*i! !o !he p&!a!ive a&!hori!% o" !hedo'&en!1 or .B !ake an% a'!ion or re"rain "ro !aking an%a'!ion in response !o !he do'&en!, in 'oplian'e +i!h !hedo'&en!, or on !he *asis o" !he do'&en!).* Proo" !ha! !he do'&en! +as ailed !o an% person +i!h!he in!en! !ha! i! *e "or+arded !o !he in!ended re'ipien! is as&""i'ien! sho+ing !ha! !he do'&en! +as delivered)The pra'!i'e is +idespread in *o!h !he s!a!e and #$ 'o&r!s a! all levels)LviiM --50250 Press ?elease DonH! Ask, DonH! TellH !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals, !h (ir'&i!, Insis!s on(ond&'!ing a Pre!ense Appeal "ro a Pre!ense J&dgen! o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!htt/:s%rid%!md!%4506031LviiiM Zernik, Joseph $e'&ri!ies and x'hange (oission v Bank o" Aeri'a (orpora!ion E$i&la!ed i!iga!ion and $i&la!ed Banking ?eg&la!ion in !he #ni!ed $!a!eshtt/:s%rid%!md!%443232LixM Zernik, J Da!a <ining o" Online J&di'ial ?e'ords o" !he 9e!+orked #$ =ederal (o&r!s, In!erna!ionalJo&rnal on $o'ial <edia <oni!oring, <eas&reen!, <ining, -5F3 .20-0htt/:s%rid%!md!%383288LxM --5045-4 P?$$ ?A$ >arvard a+ Pro"essor Go'hai Benkler has *een asked !o revie+

!he eviden'e o" large5s'ale 'op&!er "ra&d in !he #$ 'o&r!shtt/:s%rid%!md!%255358LxiM --50@50F Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographi'al $ke!'hhtt/:s%rid%!md!%4421113LxiiM -05045- >&an ?igh!s Aler! .9C0 s&*ission !o !he #ni!ed 9a!ions >&an ?igh!s (o&n'il "or!he 20-0 ?evie+ .#P? o" >&an ?igh!s in !he #ni!ed $!a!es as in'orpora!ed in!o !he #P? s!a"" repor!,+i!h re"eren'e !o 6'orr&p!ion o" !he 'o&r!s and !he legal pro"ession:)htt/:s%rid%!md!%38836

f) !iti.ens %nited v /ederal Election !ommission in the %S Supreme !ourt

=ig&re - (i!i;ens #ni!ed is arg&a*l% !he os! signi"i'an! de'ision o" !he $&pree (o&r! in

re'en! de'ades) The $&pree (o&r!8s =e*r&ar% 22, 20-0 J&dgen! re'ords in !his 'ase is

issing) #9 repor! 'onsider issing 'o&r! re'ords a 'ardinal sign o" &di'ial 'orr&p!ion)

$iti+ens nited v 'ederal Election $ommission 'E$) &=N-2=5* is no out one o3 the%anmark ecisions o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt. t as reporte to have accorecorporations 8irst "menment rights9 Aecision ho%ing that corporations an unions


!1/57











http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VOHmxlM2pvM/TbHRe76Di_I/AAAAAAAACIU/2POfBg1Y3tw/s1600/scotus+class+pic-resized.jpg













can spen un%imite amounts o3 mone in e%ection campaignsR a stunning examp%eo3 juicia% activismRB >i?

the 4S Supreme ,ourt ocket notes that on 8eruar 229 2=1= jugment as issue&ut not entere*.

=ig&re 20 x'erp!s "ro !he online do'ke! o" !he #$ $&pree (o&r! in "iti&ens United vFederal lection "ommission

#oever9 a va%i an e33ectua% cop o3 the 8eruar 229 2=1= ugment in the case - ahistoric ocument - is et to e iscovere... 'o such recor as iscovere among

the e%ectronic recors o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt.here3ore9 8reeom o3 n3ormation reGuests ere 3i%e on the 8eera% E%ection,ommission9 on the ,ivi% ivision o3 the 4S epartment o3 ustice an on the 4SSo%icitor (enera%9 reGuesting 3rom each a cop o3 the 8eruar 229 2=1= ugmentan its authentication recors9 as serve on them the 4S Supreme ,ourt.

)n Fa ;9 2=11 8reeom o3 n3ormation "ct &8)"* response as receive 3rom8E, on reGuest 3or the 8eruar 229 2=1= ugment an the corresponingauthentication the ,%erk o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt. >ii?


!2/57

http://c/Users/Dr%20Z/Documents/A%200%200%20TEMP/11-05-10%20Citizens%20United%20v%20Federal%20Election%20Commission%20-%20Simulated%20Litigation%20in%20the%20US%20Supreme%20Court%E2%80%A6.doc#_edn1


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-sJQD-Bx-y0E/TbHRszmn8NI/AAAAAAAACIc/-_aW-MPCMeQ/s1600/1+11-03-16+docket_Page_2.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BmV1hN1-9wM/TbHRsQ4LxSI/AAAAAAAACIY/9iBJuLfT88s/s1600/1+11-03-16+docket_Page_1.jpg





=ig&re 2- The re'ord !ha! +as provided *% =( as !he =e*r&ar% 22, 20-0 J&dgen!

in "iti&ens United v Federal lection "ommission 'o*ined +i!h i!s a&!hen!i'a!ion *% !he(lerk o" !he #$ $&pree (o&r!)

he jugment recor9 hich as provie in the 8)"-response 8E, cannot possi% e eeme a va%i court recorH

• t is a recor ate anuar 219 2=1=9 hereas the on%ine ocket note the issuanceo3 a ugment on 8eruar 229 2=1=.

• t is a ugment recor9 hich is not signe an justice o3 the Supreme ,ourt9an hich ears a stamp certi3ing that it is a A" true copB9 ut not rue ,op o3 the )rigina%9 the va%i certi3ication statement.

• he stamp itse%3 is signe9 ut not ate. Foreover9 the name an authorit o3 the

person ho signe the stamp &,nthia $app* ere not printe e%o the signature%ine. here3ore9 the signature on the stamp9 certi3ing A" true copB is o3 uiousva%iit as e%%.

• ,ontrar to hat as state in the 8)" response %etter >i?9 the recor9 hich as provie9 i not inc%ue true an va%i attestation/authentication the ,%erk o3the Supreme ,ourt o3 the 4nite States.

" %ega% ictionar sasH"4#E',")' - "n attestation mae a proper o33icer9 hich hecerti3ies that a recor is in ue 3orm o3 %a9 an that the person ho certi3ies it isthe o33icer appointe %a to o soR + authentication is a%so unerstoohatever act is one either the part or some other person ith a vie o3

causing an instrument to e knon an ienti3ie.


!!/57

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-H-ZenPlaVfg/Tcis2Fb8rmI/AAAAAAAACJ0/nq0w3kgELaA/s1600/Judgment.jpg



t shou% e o3 particu%ar concern that 8E,9 %ike other parties to the %itigation9 so 3arhas not prouce a cop o3 the 8eruar 229 2=1= ugment as serve on 8E, the,%erk o3 the Supreme ,ourt. nstea9 the recor9 hich as prouce9 as erive3rom the P",E$ ocket o3 the 4S ,ourt9 istrict o3 ,o%umia. as ocumente in therecor heaer. #oever9 to the egree that the recor9 hich as provie9 as arecor 3i%e an entere in the 4S ,ourt9 istrict o3 ,o%umia9 it as missing the

'E8 &'otice o3 E%ectronic 8i%ing*9 hich is eeme the va%i authentication recor the 4S istrict courts uner e%ectronic 3i%ing. >iii?

he on%ine recors o3 the Supreme ,ourt an previous attempts to iscover a va%irecor o3 the 8eruar 229 2=1= ugment support the notion that no va%i recor o3the 8eruar 229 2=1= ugment existsH• he on%ine ocket o3 $iti+ens nited v 'ederal Election $ommission statesH 5iv7

• 8e 229 2=1= 4(FE' SS4E.• ssuing o3 orers an jugments9 hich are neither certi3ie9 nor entere9 is a

common 3rau in the %oer courts. [v] he 8eruar 229 2=1= ugment as not

3oun among the on%ine recors o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt.

• he on%ine recors o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt [vi a%so sho that the ourna% 3or

anuar 219 2=1=9 the ate o3 the presume ecision9 is missing the tpica%

introuctor remark9 3oun in man &ut not a%%* ates o3 seating o3 the court9regaring certi3ication an entr o3 the orers an ecisions.8or examp%e9 on anuar 259 2=1=9 the immeiate next seating o3 the ,ourt9 theourna% sasH

he ,hie3 ustice saiHDe have issue orers toa9 the have een u% entere an certi3ie9 an3i%e ith the ,%erk. >uner%ine ae -jz?

• he Farch 2;9 2=11 response 3rom )33ice o3 So%icitor (enera% on the 8)"reGuest9 statesH

'either o3 these recors ere 3oun in revie o3 recors maintaine the)33ice o3 the So%icitor (enera% &)S(*.

• he Farch 269 2=11 response 3rom the ,ivi% ivision o3 the 4S epartment o3ustice to 8)" reGuest statesH

he ,ivi% ivision oes not maintain recors re%ating to that case.

• $eGuest as a%so 3orare to parties in the case9 3or a cop o3 the jugment9hich as suppose to have een notice an serve. )ne part respone thatthe 8eruar 229 2=1= ugment as neither serve nor notice9 in apparentvio%ation o3 ue Process rights. 'o part respone that a 8eruar 229 2=1=ugment as either notice or serve.

• Previous attempts to iscover va%i an e33ectua% juicia% recors in paper court3i%es o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt uni3orm% 3ai%e. "ccess to the e%ectronic recors o3

the 4S Supreme ,ourt as an is enie9 in apparent vio%ation o3 8irst "menmentan ue Process rights.

t shou% e note that reports o3 the 4nite 'ations ,rime Prevention ,enter onStrengthening uicia% ntegrit %ist missing court recors as a carina% sign o3

juicia% corruption. 5vii7

Simu%ate %itigation is e3ine in the .e(as 0enal $ode &T!2.6N* as 3o%%osH" person commits an o33ense i3 the person reck%ess% causes to e e%ivere toanother an ocument that simu%ates a summons9 comp%aint9 jugment9 or othercourt processR

he practice o3 Simu%ate :itigation is the most common 3orm o3 corruption o3 juges

an c%erks in oth the state an 4S courts toa. t is common in a%% %eve%s o3 the 4Scourts9 in oth oscure an high pro3i%e cases.


!6/57














o examp%es o3 recent cases o3 Simu%ate :itigation9 hich ere ie% reporte meia as va%i court actions areH

• *og $abin &epublicans v nited States of "merica et al &2H=6-cv-=N625* in the4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia &4S uge Lirginia Phi%%ips*9 anits counterpart9 the appea% &1=-500!6* sti%% unera in the 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s9

;th,ircuit. he uner%ing matter is the ispute ont "sk ont e%% po%ic o3the arme 3orces. 5viii7

•

Securities and E(change $ommission v ank of "merica $orporation &1H=;-cv-=0N2;* in the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 'e Oork &4S uge e$ako33*. he uner%ing matter is the un%a3u% taking o3 U5.N i%%ions in onuses

anking executives uring the Ferri%% :nch- +ank o3 "merica merger. 5i67

he practice o3 Simu%ate :itigation is proa% as o% as the courts themse%ves. )ver centuries9 recor keeping o3 the courts9 the core o3 ue Process9 evo%ve to preventit. mp%ementation o3 computerize case management sstems in the state an 4Scourts9 here the nature o3 signatures an authentication as %e3t vague anamiguous9 is c%aime to e centra% to the iesprea practice o3 Simu%ate:itigation.

'ee%ess to sa9 computer techno%og cou% have ha the opposite e33ect9 i3 correct%imp%emente.

t shou% e note that the 1NN0 Supreme ,ourt ecision9 hich is the origin o3 thenotion o3 ,orporate Personhoo as a%so a vague an amiguous recor. he on%re3erence in in Santa $lara $ounty v! Southern 0acific &ailroad, 11N 4.S. !;6 &1NN0*to ,orporate Personhoo is in a heanote ae the court reporter9 ut not in the

o o3 the ecision itse%3.

$iti+ens nited v 'ederal Election $ommission

presuma% accore corporations8irst "menment rights. #oever9 the 8irst "menment right o3 the peop%e9 3oraccess to va%i an e33ectua% recors o3 the Supreme ,ourt o3 the 4nite States9 isenie. "s a resu%t9 so 3ar9 there is no a to ascertain9 hether in 3act a va%i an

e33ectua% 8eruar 229 2=1= ugment in $iti+ens nited v 'ederal Election$ommission as ever certi3ie an entere.

he 4S Supreme ,ourts case management sstem9 a ke to esta%ishing the va%iit9or %ack thereo39 o3 various Supreme ,ourt recors9 remains uner a vei% o3 secrec9 inapparent vio%ation o3 8irst "menment an ue Process rights. ,%aims o3 on%ine

pu%ication o3 3a%se an e%ierate% mis%eaing recors the o33ice o3 the ,%erk o3the 4S Supreme ,ourt ere part o3 the previous reGuest 3or impeachment o3 ,%erkDi%%iam Suter. 56i7

,IN<&

LiM 050-52- (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =ederal le'!ion (oission -30 $)(!) F7 .20-0 a! !he $&pree

(o&r! o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es 5 opinion o" Pro" (heerinsk% and Wikipedia overvie+ h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/4-340F3/

LiiM --50@5-0 ?epl% on =( ?esponse on =( =reedo o" In"ora!ion A'! .=OIA ?e&es!, 9o)

20--54, in re =e*r&ar% 22, 20-0 J&dgen! in (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =ederal le'!ion (oission .0F5

F0@ 5s

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@@0@32-F/

LiiiM ?egarding !he 9=s as a&!hen!i'a!ion re'ords o" !he #$ 'o&r!s &nder ele'!roni' "iling, see

--50-507 og (a*in ?ep&*li'ans v #$A e! al .-05@34 a! !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals, !h (ir'&i! 5

<o!ion !o In!ervene and (on'oi!an!l% =iled Papers as p&*lished in !he online PA(? do'ke!s

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/4@-034/

LivM --5035- "iti&ens United v Federal lection "ommission .0F520@ in !he $&pree (o&r! o" !he

#ni!ed $!a!es 5 ?evie+ and (opiled Online ?e'ords h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@000FF/


!5/57






http://c/Users/Dr%20Z/Documents/A%200%200%20TEMP/11-05-10%20Citizens%20United%20v%20Federal%20Election%20Commission%20-%20Simulated%20Litigation%20in%20the%20US%20Supreme%20Court%E2%80%A6.doc#_ednref1






















LvM =or revie+ o" "alse iss&an'e o" invalid re'ords in !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r! and !he #$ (o&r! o"

Appeals .PA(? and (</(=, see

--50250 Press ?elease 8Don8! Ask, Don8! Tell8 !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals, !h (ir'&i!, Insis!s on

(ond&'!ing a Pre!ense Appeal "ro a Pre!ense J&dgen! o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/40703-@/

--50-507 Log "a'in Re%u'licans v USA et al .-05@34 a! !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals, !h (ir'&i! 5

<o!ion !o In!ervene and (on'oi!an!l% =iled Papers as p&*lished in !he online PA(? do'ke!s

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/4@-034/

=or revie+ o" "alse iss&an'e o" invalid re'ords in !he $&perior (o&r! o" (ali"ornia

.e"ourt and Sustain, see

--5045-7 P?$$ ?A$ Lomas v #an$ of America .N(0@37 E =ra&d !&rns in!o x!or!ion in

!he os Angeles $&perior (o&r!

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@32-27-0/

0504520 Pro" li%ah& $hair8s Opinion e!!er re $&s!ain 5 !he (ase <anageen! $%s!e o" !he

$&perior (o&r! o" (ali"ornia, (o&n!% o" os Angeles

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/40337/

LviM --5035- "iti&ens United v Federal lection "ommission .0F520@ in !he $&pree (o&r! o" !he

#ni!ed $!a!es 5 ?evie+ and (opiled Online ?e'ords

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@000FF/

LviiM 00504500 ?epor! o" !he =irs! Kienna (onven!ion 5 $!reng!hening J&di'ial In!egri!%, (I(P5, #ni!ed

9a!ions Dr&g (on!rol and (rie Preven!ion (en!er .2000 .$ee p@5

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@034404/

0-50350- $!reng!hening J&di'ial In!egri!% Agains! (orr&p!ion (I(P5-0, #ni!ed 9a!ions Dr&g (on!rol

and (rie Preven!ion (en!er .200- .see p@5

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/4F-037/

LviiiM --50250 Press ?elease 8Don8! Ask, Don8! Tell8 !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals, !h (ir'&i!, Insis!s on

(ond&'!ing a Pre!ense Appeal "ro a Pre!ense J&dgen! o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/40703-@/

LixM Zernik, Joseph $e'&ri!ies and x'hange (oission v Bank o" Aeri'a (orpora!ion 5 $i&la!ed

i!iga!ion and $i&la!ed Banking ?eg&la!ion in !he #ni!ed $!a!es

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/443232/

LxM --5045-4 P?$$ ?A$ >arvard a+ Pro"essor Go'hai Benkler has *een asked !o revie+

!he eviden'e o" large5s'ale 'op&!er "ra&d in !he #$ 'o&r!s

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@23F/

LxiM --50-52@ ?e&es! "or Ipea'hen! o" #$ $&pree (o&r! (lerk WIIA< $#T? s

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/47@33F2/

%. Res3onses #! National Authorities=E63erts

1. Oice o Attorne! General and the $& %e3artment o 2ustice

n no case9 here %a en3orcement agencies ere in3orme o3 the corruption an

crimina%it state or 4S juges9 attornes9 an/or anks9 ere an corrective mea-sures unertaken. >x%ix9 %?

,omp%aints9 3i%e ith the 4S "ttornes )33ice against attornes9 an court sta33 erenever aresse. >%i?

$eGuest9 3i%e ith the 4S "ttorne (enera%9 to aress the %arge-sca%e 3rau inP",E$ an ,F/E,89 as never aresse. >%ii?

o e comp%ete

-. $& Congress

o e comp%ete >%iii?


!0/57














































$eGuests 3or mpeachments9 ocumenting corruption o3 4S juges9 inc%uing ugee $ako339 ho as centra% to 3rau in %itigation o3 3inancia% institutions9 resu%ting3rom the 3inancia% crisis9 >%iv? ere never aresse.

;. he >udiciar!

n no case9 here a court as notice o3 the simu%ate nature o3 the proceeings anthe recors9 up to the Supreme ,ourt o3 the 4nite States9 i a court cease such con-uct9 or correct its 3a%se e%ectronic pu%ic recors.

Foreover9 the evience shos that the 4S courts have e33ective% esta%ishe a po%ico3 ening the right to 3i%e recors in court9 hich ocument state or 3eera% juicia%corruption. &see ".c) /irst mendment - the right to file papers in court *

9. he legal 3roession

4ner conitions9 hich ere create through the imp%ementation o3 P",E$ an,F/E,89 attornes routine% appear as counse%9 hi%e not authorize as ,ounse% o3$ecor. Foreover9 as ocumente in cases invo%ving 3inancia% institutions9 the attimes appear ith no communication ith c%ient c%ause. >%v?

Such appearance attornes in the 4S courts shou% e eeme 3rau on the court.

n cases invo%ving anks9 particu%ar% uner the current 3inancia% crisis9 attornes

routine% 3i%e 3rauu%ent anking recors. >%vi?

t is impossi%e that capa%e an competent attornes9 ho appear e3ore the 4Scourts9 3ai% to recognize the 3unamenta% 3rau in such sstems. "n et9 no recorsere 3oun o3 protest the 4S +ar "ssociation.

$eGuest 3or revie o3 the evience o3 3rau in the computerize recors o3 the 4Sistrict ,ourts an ,ourts o3 "ppea%s & 0"$E& an $23E$' * as previous%3orare to #arvar :a Pro3essor Oochai +enk%er9 an expert on computers an the%a. >x?

'o computer science or %ega% expert in the 4ntie States as i%%ing to opine on the3inings o3 stuies9 or revie acaemic papers9 hich ocumente the 3inings o3

instant sumission. 'o %a ean in the 4nite States9 hich has een aske9 agree to opine on theevience o3 3rau in the 4S courts. >%vii?

+enk%er

Six &0* top acaemic %a journa%s9 hich specia%ize in #uman $ights or computersan %a9 re3use to accept 3or revie acaemic papers9 ea%ing ith the issues9etai%e in instant sumission. :ikeise9 in internationa% con3erences9 here 4Sscho%ars ere in aministrative ke positions9 such papers ere exc%ue9 even a3ter

passing peer-revie. >%viii?

:. National media

o e comp%ete9 an see uner !. ,ase stuies - SE, v +ank o3 "merica ,orporation

E. Com3liance ?ith relevant $& la?

1. Ha#eas Cor3us


!7/57





=ig&re 22 e"! Wri! o" >a*eas (orp&s, #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, as!ern Dis!ri'! o" Penns%lvania U(S(

e!( rel( )ohn *heeler v( +assmore *illiamson .J&l% -, -F@@ ?igh! Wri! o" >a*eas (orp&s Ad

Tes!i"i'and&, #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, $o&!hern Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia, #$ v ?ivera and $an'he; .<a% -, -2-) x!ensive sear'h in !he PA(? re'ords o" vario&s #$ dis!ri'! 'o&r!s "ailed !o

dis'over a single Wri! o" >a*eas (orp&s, iss&ed a"!er !he ipleen!a!ion o" PA(? and(</(=) $in'e !he Wri! o" >a*eas (orp&s is in "a'! !he s&ons in s&'h li!iga!ion, all 'aseso" >a*eas (orp&s in !he #ni!ed $!a!es !oda% sho&ld *e deeed invalid, si&la!ed li!iga!ion)There"ore, !he privilege o" >a*eas (orp&s sho&ld *e deeed s&spended, no onl% in !heC&an!anao Ba% de!en!ion 'en!er and o!her *la'k hole prisons, opera!ed *% !he #$governen! in vario&s lo'a!ions aro&nd !he +orld, *&! also in !he !erri!orial #ni!ed $!a!es)

he 4S ,onstitution9 Section ;H *imits on $ongress9 sasH

he Privi%ege o3 the Drit o3 #aeas ,orpus sha%% not e suspene9 un%esshen in ,ases o3 $ee%%ion or nvasion the pu%ic Sa3et ma reGuire it.

he proceure9 app%ica%e 3or #aeas ,orpus is initiate a Petition 3or Drit o3

#aeas ,orpus. he rit in this case is a summons ith the 3orce o3 a court orer itis aresse to the custoian &a prison o33icia% 3or examp%e* an emans that a

prisoner e taken e3ore the court9 an that the custoian present proo3 o3 authorit9a%%oing the court to etermine hether the custoian has %a3u% authorit to etainthe prisoner.

:ouis +raneis &4S Supreme ,ourt ustice 1;10 to 1;!;* re3erre to it as thegreatest achievement o3 the Eng%ish-speaking courts - esta%ishing :iert %a.

Di%%iam +rennan r &4S Supreme ,ourt ustice 1;50 to 1;;=* routine% re3erre to itas he (reat Drit9 an the ,ornerstone o3 the 4nite States ,onstitution.

"n in 'ay v 4oia &1;0!* ustice +rennan roteH

he asic princip%e o3 the (reat Drit o3 haeas corpus is that9 in a civi%izesociet9 government must a%as e accounta%e to the juiciar 3or a mansimprisonmentH i3 the imprisonment cannot e shon to con3orm ith the3unamenta% reGuirements o3 %a9 the iniviua% is entit%e to his immeiatere%ease.

he 4P$ $eport on the 4nite States &2=1=* recommene that the 4S restore theright 3or #aeas ,orpus. #oever9 that report as primari% ase on conitions inthe (uantanamo +a etention center an other %ack ho%e prisons9 operate thegovernment o3 the 4nite States in various %ocations aroun the or%.

#oever9 as ocumente in instant sumission9 an in particu%ar in the case o3$ichar 8ine9 &;.a) Ha#eas Cor3us in the $nited &tates 4 the case o Richard Isaac

'ine* #aeas ,orpus as an is in 3act suspene a%so in the territoria% 4nite States.+eon the notes aove9 pertaining to the inva%iit o3 the P",E$ an ,F/E,8recors in &ichard 'ine v Sheriff of *os "ngeles $ounty &2H=;-cv-=1;16* in the 4Sistrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia9 one shou% noteHi. 'o Drit o3 #aeas ,orpus as ever issue the ,ourt9 3o%%oing the 3i%ing o3 the

Petition. here3ore9 there as no summons in this case - inva%i %itigation ith no jurisiction the ,ourt.

ii. Sheri33 as right% name 8ine as $esponent9 since he as ho%ing $ichar8ine.

iii. Sheri33 re3use to respon9 an never respone on the #aeas ,orpus petition o38ine.


!N/57



iv. 4S Fagistrate ,ar%a Doehr%e ecie to permit uge avi Oa33e o3 the :os"nge%es Superior ,ourt to appear as $esponent instea. Such ecision9 to changethe name $esponer in %itigation9 as mae ith no authorit at a%%.

v. 4S Fagistrate ,ar%a Doehr%e as never u% assigne to the case. here3ore9 sheha no authorit to ajuicate in the 3irst p%ace. >%ix?

v. <evin Fc,ormick appeare on eha%3 o3 uge Oa33e an the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt ith no authorit at a%% - he as never appointe ,ounse% o3 $ecor 3or such

parties.vi. 'o ec%aration uge Oa33e or an other responing part can e 3oun in the

#aeas ,orpus papers. <evin Fc,ormick 3i%e response papers ith ec%aration counse% a%one - inva%i p%eaing.

vii. 'o signature hatsoever uge Oa33e or an other responing part can e3oun in the #aeas ,orpus papers 3i%e "ttorne Fc,ormick.

viii. 'o ocket9 no arrant9 an no va%i jugment 3rom the uner%ing case &Farinav :" ,ount* in the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt ere ever 3i%e9 to sho that theimprisonment con3orm>e? ith the 3unamenta% reGuirements o3 %a.

$egar%ess o3 the 3act that a%% juicia% recor in this case shou% e eeme voi9 notvoia%e9 one shou% particu%ar% note that in her une 129 2==; $eport an

$ecommenation &%ater aopte 4S uge ohn Da%ter in his ugment9 eningthe Petition*9 4S Fagistrate ,ar%a Doehr%e sasH > %x?

II. &AN%AR% O' RE+IE@

$evie o3 the Petition in this case is governe provisions o3 the"ntiterrorism an E33ective eath Pena%t "ct o3 1;;0 &A"EP"B* . 4ner"EP"9 a 3eera% court ma not grant haeas re%ie3 on a c%aim ajuicate on itsmerits in state court un%ess the ajuicationAresu%te in a ecision that ascontrar to9 or invo%ve an unreasona%e app%ication o39 c%ear% esta%ishe8eera% %a9 as etermine the Supreme ,ourt o3 the 4nite States9B orAresu%te in a ecision that as ase on an unreasona%e etermination o3 the

3acts in %ight o3 the evience presente in the State court proceeing.B 2N 4.S.,.T 2256&*.

'ee%ess to sa9 the imprisonment o3 $ichar 8ine ith no %a3u% recors9con3orming ith the 3unamenta% reGuirements o3 the %a9 as unreasona%eapp%ication o3 c%ear% esta%ishe 8eera% %a. +ut the recors o3 8ine v Sheri33 in the4S istrict ,ourt9 as a ho%e9 an the reasoning in the $eport an $ecommenationin particu%ar9 emonstrate that the privi%ege o3 #aeas ,orpus as in 3act suspene9uner the ruric o3 "ntiterrorism...

-. 'irst Amendment to the $& Constitution4 the right to ile 3a3ers in court

=ig&re 22 #$ J&dge ?i'hard eon, #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, Dis!ri'! o" (ol&*ia, ro&!inel% denies!he righ! !o "ile papers !ha! provide eviden'e o" &di'ial 'orr&p!ion)


!;/57



=ig&re 23 =ive .@ papers +i!h eave !o =ile Denied, ?J in *indsor v vans et al ) In'ases seeking pro!e'!ion agains! &di'ial 'orr&p!ion, !he 'lerk o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, D(,"ailed !o do'ke! papers, +hi'h provided eviden'e o" &di'ial 'orr&p!ion, in disregard o" =irs! Aenden! righ!s and !he d&!ies and o*liga!ions o" !he 'lerk) Ins!ead, s&'h papers +eredire'!l% "or+arded !o J&dge ?i'hard eon, +ho hand s'ri**led on !he eave !o =ileDenied, and had !he re!&rned !o !he "iler) Willia Windsor, a no!a*le an!i5&di'ial 'orr&p!ion

+his!le5*lo+er, reains !he !arge! o" re!alia!ion *% !he 'o&r!s !o !his da!e) >%xi?

=ig&re 24 9ine . papers +i!h eave !o =ile Denied, ?J in ,erni$ v elson et al )

he 4nite States courts have e33ective% esta%ishe a po%ic exc%uing 3rom the 8irst"menment right Ato petition the (overnment 3or a reress o3 grievancesB papers9hich ocumente juicia% corruption. Foreover9 to accomp%ish such po%ic9 therecors shoe 4S juges an court personne% co%%uing in 8rau on the ,ourt9 antight %inkage as emonstrate eteen such conuct9 ause o3 #uman $ights9 an3ai%ing anking regu%ation in the 4nite States.he series o3 cases originate at the Superior ,ourt o3 ,a%i3ornia9 ,ount o3 :os"nge%es9 an as opine as rea% estate 3rau > ? a 8rau Expert I 8+ veteran9 ho

ha een ecorate 4S ,ongress9 4S "ttorne (enera%9 an 8+ irector.he ene3iciaries o3 the a%%ege racketeering at the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt9 %e


6=/57



,a%i3ornia uge ",V4E:'E ,)'')$9 inc%ue ,ountrie 8inancia%,orporation9 an %ater +ank o3 "merica ,orporation. "'(E:) F)C:) &then ,E)o3 ,ountrie*9 S"')$ S"F4E:S &then ,hie3 :ega% ,ounse% o3 ,ountrie9toa- "ssociate (enera% ,ounse% o3 +ank o3 "merica*9 an +$"' F)O'#"'&then (enera% ,ounse%9 toa - Presient o3 +ank o3 "merica*9 ere a%% irect%invo%ve in the matter9 as as "L P"SE$'"< &3ormer Presient o3 the :os"nge%es ,ount +ar "ssociation an 3ormer Femer o3 the ,a%i3ornia uicia%,ounci%*. > ? $egar%ess o3 the vo%uminous crei%e evience o3 a%%ege racketeering

,ountrie9 +ank o3 "merica9 an juges o3 the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt98+ an 4S epartment o3 ustice re3use to en3orce the %a in :os "nge%es ,ount9,a%i3ornia9 even a3ter inGuiries the 4S ,ongress.n contrast9 o33icia% 8+ po%ic9 as state in 2==N9 as 8+ i%% pursue a%% a%%egationso3 juicia% corruption vigorous%9 as pu%ic corruption vio%ations are among the mostserious o3 a%% crimina% conuct an can tear at the 3aric o3 a emocratic societRhere3ore9 in Fa 2==; petition as 3i%e at the 4S istrict ,ourt9 Dashington , -Cernik v Fe%son et a% &1H2==;cv==N=5*9 uner cause o3 action o ,ompe% 4S )33icer to Per3orm #is uties. "mong e3enants ere <E''E# <"SE$ &"ssistantirector o3 8+ 3or ,rimina% nvestigations*9 <E''E# FE:S)' &then irector o3

4S "ttornes )33ice*9 an S"F4E: +ECE< &Senior ,ounse% at SE,*. ,onuct o3uge $,#"$ :E)' at the 4S istrict ,ourt9 istrict o3 ,o%umia9 as then

preicta%e I the 4S ,ourt e%iminate 3rom the ocket - ith no ue Process/8air#earing - papers9 hich ere u% 3i%e9 an hich provie evience o3 juicia%corruption at the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt. > ?"t the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia9 uge L$('" P#::PSan Fagistrate ,"$:" D)E#$:E ha previous% engage in 2==N-; in simi%arconuct in Cernik v ,onnor et a% &2H=N-cv-=155=*9 here ten juges o3 the :os"nge%es Superior ,ourt9 "'(E:) F)C:) an S"')$ S"F4E:S ere nameamong e3enants in comp%aint uner cause o3 action o3 eprivation o3 $ights unerthe ,o%or o3 :a. he evience provie in the case e33ective% ocumente

racketeering at the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt. "t the commencement o3 the%itigation at 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia9 the APro Se ,%erkBre3use to issue va%i summons presente to him. :ater9 papers9 hich provieevience o3 juicia% corruption9 ere ishonest% ockete I concea%e unerunre%ate paper an ocketing text in the on%ine P",E$ ocket. > ? Dhen that

practice as proteste9 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia initiatethe practice o3 se%ective% re3using to 3i%e9 an se%ective% issuing perverte pretenseAiscrepanc 'oticesB on certain papers ith no ue Process/8air #earing. he sta33o3 the )33ice o3 the ,%erk a%so exp%icit% in3orme P%ainti33 that Fagistrate ,"$:"D)E#$: instructe them to issue such A'oticesB on an papers pertaining toa%%egation o3 juicia% corruption. > ? 8urthermore9 Fagistrate ,"$:" D)E#$:E an

uge L$('" P#::PS o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia%ater issue a pretense A)rerB - prohiiting P%ainti33 3rom access to the 4S ,ourts inthe matter. > ? he recors o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia9 a%soocumente a%%ege uicia% Fisconuct an 8rau on the ,ourt I re%ative to theissuance an ocketing o3 inva%i pretense ,ourt recors Fagistrate ,"$:"D)E#$:E an uge L$('" P#::PS in co%%usion ith unauthorize court

personne%. >6?>5?>0?,onuct o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia as there3ore sujecto3 a Petition9 hich as u% 3i%e in une 2==N at the 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s9 ;th,ircuit - Cernik v 4S,-,", &=N-72716* I purporte% reviee ,ircuit ugesSEP#E' $ $E'#"$9 F"$S#" S +E$C)' an F:"' SF#9 $. hePetition at the 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s9 ;th ,ircuit9 sought to ,ompe% ue Process$ights I issuing o3 va%i summons an engaging in honest ocketing at the 4S


61/57



istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia. #oever9 papers9 hich provieevience o3 the enia% o3 the right to 3i%e papers at the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra%istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia9 an a%%ege iesprea corruption at the :os "nge%es Superior,ourt9 ere e%iminate 3rom the ocket o3 the 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s9 ;th ,ircuit. )n%unsigne orers ere issue the ,ircuit uges9 hich ere serve an noticeith no authentication/certi3ication the ,%erk o3 the 4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s9 ;th,ircuit. > ?:ater9 in "pri% 2=1=9 simi%ar conuct as ocumente at the Supreme ,ourt o3 the4nite States9 uner caption o3 8ine v Sheri33 &=;-"N27*. he "pp%ication9

purporte% reviee the ,on3erence o3 the Supreme ,ourt9 pertaine to theimprisonment in so%itar con3inement o3 3ormer 4S prosecutor $ichar 8ine9 ith noarrant an no entr o3 ugment/,onviction or Sentencing9 a3ter he ha expose9

pu%icize9 an reuke the taking o3 Anot permitteB paments &AriesB* jugeso3 the :os "nge%es Superior ,ourt9 hich reGuire the enactment o3 AretroactiveimmunitiesB &AparonsB* 3or such juges.Papers9 hich ere u% 3i%e as Fotion to ntervene > ? at the Supreme ,ourt o3 the4nite States uner the caption9 re3erence aove9 an hich ocumente the

para%%e%s in a%%ege corruption o3 the Superior ,ourt o3 ,a%i3ornia9 o3 the ,a%i3ornia

uicia% ,ounci%9 o3 the 4S istrict ,ourt9 ,entra% istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia9 an o3 the4S ,ourt o3 "ppea%s9 ;th ,ircuit9 in the #aeas ,orpus Petition o3 $ichar 8ine anthe cases pertaining to r Cernik9 re3erence aove9 ere e%iminate 3rom the ocketo3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt ,ourt ,ounse% "''O +,<E:: ith no authorit ata%%. > ? 8urthermore9 upon revie o3 recors o3 the 3i%e o3 the "pp%ication at theSupreme ,ourt o3 the 4nite States9 no recor as 3oun o3 an juicia% revie at a%%.> ? $egar%ess9 3a%se an e%ierate% mis%eaing notices o3 purporte enia% o3 the"pp%ication the ,on3erence o3 the Supreme ,ourt o3 the 4nite States as issue

unauthorize personne%. enia% o3 the "pp%ication as %ikeise 3a%se% note in theon%ine ockets an journa% o3 the Supreme ,ourt. > ? here3ore9 the case a%soemonstrate isregar o3 the #aeas ,orpus right I the Athe cornerstone o3 the 4S

,onstitutionB accoring to the %ate 4S Supreme ,ourt ustice Di%%iam +rennan r.he cases in a%% courts invo%ve a%so ocumente the ke ro%e o3 on%ine pu%ic accesssstems &e.g. P",E$* an computerize case management sstems &e.g. ,F/E,8* inena%ing such conuct9 through exc%usion 3rom the on%ine pu%ic access sstem o3 thec%erks authentication/certi3ication recors9 an enia% o3 access to such recors thecourts9 comine ith perverte notice an service practices. " reasona%e personou% conc%ue that toa the c%erks o3 a%% courts invo%ve eeme themse%vesunaccounta%e 3or the va%iit an honest o3 an o3 the recors in the respectiveon%ine pu%ic access sstems.n recent ears #uman $ights "%ert repeate% ca%%e upon the 4nite States ,ongressto enact 3eera% ru%es o3 on%ine pu%ic access an case management sstems9 since

oth state an 3eera% courts uni3orm% 3ai%e to pu%ish such ru%es9 in apparentvio%ation o3 ue Process/8air #earings rights. > ?he cases at han ere part o3 evience9 hich as sumitte to the #uman $ights,ounci% &#$,* o3 the 4nite 'ations as part o3 the 3irst ever9 2=1= 4niversa% Perioic$evie o3 #uman $ights in the 4nite States. > ? Sta33 report o3 the #$, %ater noteAcorruption o3 the courts an the %ega% pro3essionB in ,a%i3ornia. > ?:ikeise9 in u% 2=1= Pro3 :aurence rie9 in kenote aress to the "nnua%,on3erence o3 ,hie3 ustices o3 the state courts9 in his capacit as Senior ,ounse%9 4Separtment o3 ustice9 "ccess to ustice nitiative9 arne that the state courts in the4nite States might ecome inistinguisha%e 3rom courts in Athir or%B nations. > ?#oever9 the evience no re%ease #uman $ights "%ert9 shoe that the eventhe highest 4nite States courts - 'ationa% riuna%s 3or Protection o3 $ights pursuantto rati3ie nternationa% :a - in 3act patronize such conuct9 through hat must e


62/57



eeme vio%ation o3 the 8irst "menment right to 3i%e petitions9 enia% o3 "ccess tothe ,ourts9 enia% o3 the ue Process/8air #earing rights9 an 8rau on the ,ourts.Foreover9 comine9 the cases at han ocumente the tight %inkage eteencorruption o3 the justice sstem9 ause o3 #uman $ights9 an 3ai%ing ankingregu%ation in the 4nite States.#uman $ights "%ert &'()* is eicate to iscovering9 archiving9 an isseminatingevience o3 #uman $ights vio%ations the justice sstems o3 the State o3 ,a%i3orniaan the 4nite States in :os "nge%es9 ,a%i3ornia9 an eon. Specia% emphasis isgiven to the uniGue ro%e o3 computerize case management sstems in the precipitouseterioration o3 integrit o3 the justice sstem.$'7SL M 075-25-7 $aaan v Zernik .$(0F7400 a! !he $&perior (o&r! o" (ali"ornia, (o&n!% o" os Angeles,David Pas!ernakHs Cran! Deeds in re 320 $o&!h Pe'k Drive, Beverl% >ills, (A 02-2, opined "ra&dexper! and =BI ve!eran as "ra&d *% Jaes Wedi'kh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/24-23F/$ee also !he A&g&s! 2-, 200F in"oral le!!er *% "ra&d exper! and =BI ve!eran Jaes Wedi'k, in"oringDe"endan! Dr Zernik !ha! =BI $pe'ial Agen!, +ho +as assigned !o !he 'ase agreed +i!h hi !ha! !he'ase involved real es!a!e "ra&d, and expressing 'on'ern !ha! =BI +o&ld no! provide &al Pro!e'!ion in!he 'ase, sin'e i! +o&ld involve addressing +idespread 'orr&p!ion o" !he 'o&r!s in os Angeles (o&n!%,(ali"ornia)0F50F52- $aaan v Zernik .$(0F7400 ail le!!er *% highl% de'ora!ed =BI ve!eran, Jaes Wedi'k,

regarding re"&sal !o Inves!iga!e =BI !o provide Dr Zernik pro!e'!ion agains! real es!a!e "ra&dh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/27-3733/L M 0F50@527 Zernik v (onnor .20F5'v50-@@0 a! !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia, Dk! S02 =irs! Aended (oplain!h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3073@4/L M a 05052 Zernik v <elson e! al .-05'v500F0@ a! !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, Dis!ri'! o" (ol&*ia Epapers re'eived *% ail "ro #$ J&dge ?i'hard eon, alleged as Denial o" =irs! Aenden! righ!s andJ&di'ial =ra&d on !he (o&r!) 5 Papers ?e'eived *% <ail =ro J&dge ?i'hard eon 5 Alleged J&di'ial=ra&d on !he (o&r!h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/377F/Please no!e The re'ords in a, a*ove, are "a'e pages o" papers, +hi'h had *een d&l% "iled *% Plain!i"" inZernik v <elson e! al .-05'v500F0@, and +ere la!er re!&rned *% ail !o Plain!i"" +i!h Dis'repan'%9o!i'e and no "or o" a&!hen!i'a!ion/'er!i"i'a!ion *% an a&!hori;ed Dep&!% (lerk)a'h o" !he papers +as hand ins'ri*ed on i!s "a'e page eave !o "ile denied +i!h !he da!e6/2/0:and ini!ials o" J&dge ?i'hard eon)There"ore, !he re'ords are alleged as eviden'e o" Denial o" =irs! Aenden! righ! and J&di'ial =ra&d on!he (o&r! *% J&dge ?i'hard eon in 'oll&sion +i!h Dep&!% (lerk David $'o!!)The re'ords, +hi'h Plain!i"" +as !h&s denied !he righ! !o "ile a! !he 'o&r!, in'l&ded, *&! +ere no! lii!ed !opapers, +hi'h do'&en!ed "ra&d *% &dges o" !he $&perior (o&r! o" (ali"ornia in 'oll&sion +i!h(o&n!r%+ide =inan'ial (orpora!ion)9o en!ion o" !hese papers, or !he p&rpor!ed denial o" !heir "iling *% J&dge ?i'hard eon +as everno!ed in !he PA(? do'ke! o" !he 'ap!ion re"eren'ed a*ove)* 05052 Zernik v <elson e! al .-05'v500F0@ a! !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, Dis!ri'! o" (ol&*ia Ep&rpor!ed Order *% J&dge ?i'hard eon as re'eived *% ailh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/37F07F4/Please no!e The re'ord in .*, a*ove, is provided as re'eived *% Plain!i"" *% ail "ro !he (o&r!) I!in'l&ded no "or o" a&!hen!i'a!ion/'er!i"i'a!ion *% (lerk o" !he (o&r!)?egardless, !he p&rpor!ed 6Order: +as do'ke!ed .Dk! SF in !he online PA(? do'ke! as 6en!ered:)The (o&r! denied repea!ed re&es!s "or !he 9=s .9o!i'es o" le'!roni' =ilings, +hi'h are !oda%

deeed *% !he #$ 'o&r!s as a&!hen!i'a!ion/'er!i"i'a!ion *% !he (lerk)There"ore, !he re'ords are alleged as eviden'e o" J&di'ial =ra&d on !he (o&r! *% J&dge ?i'hard eon in'oll&sion +i!h Dep&!% (lerk David $'o!!)L M a (ond&'! o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia, &nder Zernik v (onnor e! al .20F5'v50-@@0, +as de!ailed in !he Pe!i!ion !o !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals, !h (ir'&i!, see =oo!no!e L@M, Belo+)* Pre!ense <ar'h 2-, 200F 6<in&!es:, iss&ed *% J&dge KI?CI9IA P>IIP$, &es!ioning !he'ons!i!&!ional righ! "or &n*iased &dge0F50352- Zernik v (onnor e! al .20F5'v50-@@0 a! !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia,Dk! S0-4 5 J&dge Kirginia Phillips8 <in&!es Den%ing Teporar% ?es!raining Orderh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/2474F0/' 0F5050 Zernik v (onnor e! al .20F5'v50-@@0 a! !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"orniaDk! S03 5 p&rpor!ed <agis!ra!e (arla Woehrle <in&!es 5 'on!riving novel dishones! do'ke!ing r&les,alleged as =ra&d on !he (o&r!h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/377@/

Please no!e The a*ove !+o re'ords o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia are deeedas J&di'ial =ra&d on !he (o&r!, sin'e !he% +ere iss&ed +i!h no 6Do'&en! $!ap: in !he respe'!ive9=s, +hi'h is re&ired p&rs&an! !o !he (o&r!Hs Ceneral Order 0F502 as a&!hen!i'a!ion/'er!i"i'a!ion *%


6!/57



!he (lerk, a "a'! !ha! 'o&ld no! *e dis'erned in !he PA(? do'ke! o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!) <oreover, !hepre!ense <ar'h 2-, 200F 6<in&!es: .*, a*ove, +as iss&ed +i!h no a&!hori!% a! all *% <A?KA DIA?D,(o&r!roo Dep&!%, and no! *% a Dep&!% (lerk, as re&ired *% la+) ike+ise, !he pre!ense J&ne , 200F6<in&!es: .', a*ove, +as iss&ed +i!h no a&!hori!% a! all *% Donna Thoas, +ho +as E &pon in"ora!ionand *elie" E (o&r!roo Dep&!%, "ra&d&len!l% iden!i"ied in !he 6<in&!es: as a 6Dep&!% (lerk:) (lerk o" !he(o&r! T??G 9A=I$I, and Presiding J&dge A#D?G (OI9$ re"&sed !o respond on repea!edre&es!s !o 'on"ir or den% !he "a'!, al!erna!ivel% E !o ini!ia!e 'orre'!ive a'!ions)L M $ee re'ords o" papers, +hi'h provided eviden'e o" alleged 'orr&p!ion o" !he &dges o" !he (ali"ornia$&perior (o&r!, and +hi'h +ere denied !he "iling !ho&gh perver!ed 6Dis'repan'% 9o!i'es: a! !he #$Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia &nder

050450 Zernik v (onnor e! al .20F5'v50-@@0 a! !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia,Dk! S-0@ (opiled ?e'ords o" Perver!ed Dis'repan'% 9o!i'esh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3773F7/L M 0504524 Zernik v (onnor e! al .20F5'v50-@@0 a! !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia,Dk! S-0 p&rpor!ed J&dge KI?CI9IA P>IIP$ Order A''ep!ing ?epor! and ?e'oenda!ion o" #$<agis!ra!e (A?A WO>?, den%ing Plain!i"" a''ess !o #$ (o&r!s in !he a!!erh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/377@020/Please no!e The a*ove re'ord o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia, is deeed asJ&di'ial =ra&d on !he (o&r!, sin'e i! +as iss&ed +i!h no 6Do'&en! $!ap: in !he respe'!ive 9=, +hi'his re&ired p&rs&an! !o !he (o&r!Hs Ceneral Order 0F502 as a&!hen!i'a!ion/'er!i"i'a!ion *% !he (lerk, a"a'! !ha! 'o&ld no! *e dis'erned in !he PA(? do'ke! o" !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!)L M 0F50524 Zernik v #$D( .0F5727-4 a! !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals !h (ir'&i! 5 Alleged =ra&d on !he(o&r! and #nderining o" Banking ?eg&la!ionh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3@24@4-/L M a -0504520 =ine v Ba'a .0 AF27 <o!ion !o In!ervene and rela!ed papersh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30304@7/h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30--@73/h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30--3/h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30-2-0/h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30-2-44/h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30--2/h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30-F@@7@/* (oplain! agains! #$ $&pree (o&r! (o&nsel Dann% Bi'kell Alleged P&*li' (orr&p!ion andDepriva!ion o" ?igh!sh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/337723-3/' -050752@ =ine v Ba'a .0 AF27 Alleged "ra&d in #$ $&pree (o&r!h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/34F34@30/d -050752F =ine v Ba'a .05AF27 Addi!ional viden'e "or =ra&d a! !he #$ $&pree (o&r! per!aining!o p&rpor!ed denial o" !he Appli'a!ion in (on"eren'e o" !he (o&r!

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3@0-4@/L M a 04522 =ine v $heri"" .05AF27 a! !he #$ $&pree (o&r! 5 Dr Zernik8s De'lara!ion ? (o&r!(o&nsel Dann% Bi'kell and =iling a! #$ $&pree (o&r!h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3-43044/* -050F50- =ine v Ba'a .05AF27 a! !he #$ $&pree (o&r! 5 =&r!her viden'e o" =ra&d, <isprision o"=elonies 5 April 2, 20-0 e!!er *% (o&r! (o&nsel Bi'kell Indi'a!ing ?e!&rn o" <o!ion !o In!ervene and?ela!ed Papersh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3@-37/L M-050752F =ine v Ba'a .05AF27 a! !he $&pree (o&r! o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es 5 De'lara!ion o" Ceorge<'Dero!! ?e #nsigned e!!er da!ed April 2, 20-0, *% $&pree &nnaed Dep&!% (lerk re Denial o"!he Appli'a!ionh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3@0-4@/L M-050F5-3 ? =ine v Ba'a .05AF27, =ine v Ba'a .05-2@0, and =ine v Ba'a .-05A24 a! !he$&pree (o&r! o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es 5 O'!o*er 200 Ter Jo&rnal 5 validi!%, or la'k !hereo"

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3472/L M 0-50753- >&an ?igh!s Aler!Hs ?e&es! "or !he J&di'iar% (oi!!ees !o s!a*lish (ase <anageen!and Online P&*li' A''ess $%s!e o" !he #$ (o&r!s *% a+h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3@-427-/L M-05045- >&an ?igh!s Aler! s&*ission "or !he 20-0 #P? .#niversal Periodi' ?evie+ o" >&an?igh!s in !he #ni!ed $!a!es *% !he #ni!ed 9a!ionsa Press ?eleaseh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30200004/* $&*issionh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30-47@F3/' Appendixh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30-3-3/L M-05-050- #ni!ed 9a!ions >&an ?igh!s (o&n'il ?e'ords "or 20-0 ?evie+ .#P? o" >&an ?igh!s in!he #ni!ed $!a!es 5 'orr&p!ion o" !he 'o&r!s and !he legal pro"ession in (ali"orniah!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3F@F37/L M -050752 Pro" a&ren'e Tri*e8s Ne%no!e ?earks a! !he Ann&al (on"eren'e o" (hie" J&s!i'es sh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3@-2-/


66/57



;. 'irst Amendment to the $& Constitution4 the right to access court records to

ins3ect and to co3!

n 4i(on v! @arner $ommunications, Inc! 6!5 4.S. 5N; &1;7N*9 the 4S Supreme,ourt rea33irme the common %a right to access juicia% recors to inspect an tocopH

t is c%ear that the courts o3 this countr recognize a genera% right to inspect an

cop pu%ic recors an ocument9 inc%uing juicia% recors an ocuments..."merican ecisions genera%% o not conition en3orcement o3 this right on a proprietar interest in the ocument or upon a nee 3or it as evience in a%asuit. he interest necessar to support the issuance o3 a rit compe%%ingaccess has een 3oun9 3or examp%e9 in the citizens esire to keep a atch3u% eeon the orkings o3 pu%ic agencies... an in a nespaper pu%ishers intention to

pu%ish in3ormation concerning the operation o3 government...

he Supreme ,ourt 3oun this right inherent to the 8irst "menment9 to the 8ourthan the Sixth "menments.

$egar%ess9 through the imp%ementation o3 the sstems o3 the 4S courts9 the pu%ic

is toa enie access to court recors9 at times9 even a part to recors in on%itigation.

9. Rules Ena#ling Act

8rom Dikipeia $u%es Ena%ing "ctHhe $u%es Ena%ing "ct &ch. 0519 Pu.:. 7!I6159 6N Stat. 1=069 enacte une1;9 1;!69 2N 4.S.,. T 2=72* is an "ct o3 ,ongress that gave the juicia% ranchthe poer to promu%gate the 8eera% $u%es o3 ,ivi% Proceure. "menments tothe "ct a%%oe 3or the creation o3 the 8eera% $u%es o3 ,rimina% Proceure another proceura% court ru%es. he creation an revision o3 ru%es pursuant to the$u%es Ena%ing "ct is usua%% carrie out the uicia% ,on3erence o3 the4nite States9 the po%icmaking o o3 the 4nite States 3eera% courts.he enactment o3 the $u%es Ena%ing "ct on une 1;9 1;!6 as a revo%utionarmoment in the histor o3 civi% proceure in the 4nite States. he %a repea%ethe archaic con3ormit princip%e hich ha governe actions at %a &an on%actions at %a* in 4.S. 3eera% courts 3or over 16= ears name%9 the ru%e that3eera% courts shou% con3orm their proceure in such actions to that o3 thecourts in the state in hich the ere %ocate. he con3ormit princip%e hacause major pro%ems 3or 3eera% courts that i not actua%% sit in the 4niteStates9 such as the 4nite States ,ourt 3or ,hina.Dhi%e the courts exercise ru%emaking poers grante to them uner the "ctithout ,ongressiona% intervention 3or near% 3ort ears9 ,ongress re3use to

a%%o the 8eera% $u%es o3 Evience to go into e33ect a3ter their approva% theSupreme ,ourt in 1;7!. he $u%es o3 Evience ere eventua%% passe9 ithsustantia% changes9 as %egis%ation ,ongress. +ecause o3 ,ongresssintervention in 1;7! an suseGuent ears9 the ru%emaking poers grante to the

juiciar the "ct have een reuce.

t is c%aime that the evience provie in instant sumission ocuments that theeve%opment9 imp%ementation9 an operation o3 the sstems o3 the 4S courts in3act vio%ates the &ules Enabling "ct! Such sstem represent the seizing the 4S

juiciar o3 un%a3u% authorit. Foreover9 since the ru%es9 emee in such sstemshave never een isc%ose or pu%ishe9 such sstems a%so vio%ate the 3unamenta%

princip%e o3 Pu%icit o3 the :a.

:. 'ederal Rules o Civil rocedure 4duties o the cler


65/57



he 8eera% $u%es o3 ,ivi% Proceure saH

$u%e 6. Summons&a* ,ontents "menments.&1* $ontents! " summons mustH...&8* e signe the c%erk an&(* ear the courts sea%.

"s ocumente in instant sumission9 the 4S courts toa o3ten 3ai% to issuesummonses that are signe the c%erk an ear the courts sea%. Foreover9 as shonin Cernik v 4S istrict ,ourt9 Southern istrict o3 ,a%i3ornia9 hen the 4S ,ourt o3"ppea%s9 ;th ,ircuit as petitione to manate the 4S istrict ,ourt to issue va%isummonses9 the petition as summari% enie. >?

$u%e 5. Serving an 8i%ing P%eaings an )ther Papers...&* 8i%ing.&1* $eGuire 8i%ings ,erti3icate o3 Service. "n paper a3ter the comp%aint that isreGuire to e serveZtogether ith a certi3icate o3 serviceZmust e 3i%eithin a reasona%e time a3ter service.

"s shon in instant sumission9 va%i ,erti3icates o3 Service are no %onger 3i%e iththe c%erk o3 the courts uner P",E$ an ,F/E,8.

$u%e 5N. Entering ugment

...

&* Entering ugment.&1* Dithout the ,ourts irection. Suject to $u%e 56&* an un%ess the courtorers otherise9 the c%erk must9 ithout aaiting the courts irection9

prompt% prepare9 sign9 an enter the jugment henH&"* the jur returns a genera% verict&+* the court aars on% costs or a sum certain or &,* the court enies a%% re%ie3.

"s shon in instant sumission9 the c%erk o3 the court no %onger signs an enters theugments o3 the 4S courts uner P",E$ an ,F/E,8.

$u%e 77. ,onucting +usiness ,%erks "uthorit 'otice o3 an )rer orugment&a* Dhen ,ourt s )pen. Ever istrict court is consiere a%as open 3or3i%ing an paper9 issuing an returning process9 making a motion9 or entering anorer....&2* -rders! Suject to the courts poer to suspen9 a%ter9 or rescin the c%erks

action 3or goo cause9 the c%erk maH...&* Serving 'otice o3 an )rer or ugment.&1* Service! mmeiate% a3ter entering an orer or jugment9 the c%erk mustserve notice o3 the entr9 as provie in $u%e 5&*9 on each part ho is not ine3au%t 3or 3ai%ing to appear. he c%erk must recor the service on the ocket.

"s ocumente in instant sumission9 toa the right to 3i%e papers is o3ten enie9hen papers provie evience o3 juicia% corruption. he c%erk o3 the court no %onger sen notice o3 an orer or jugment9 an the c%erks 3ai% to recor the service in theocket.

$u%e 7;. $ecors <ept the ,%erk&a* ,ivi% ocket.


60/57



&1* n (enera%. he c%erk must keep a recor knon as the Acivi% ocketB in the3orm an manner prescrie the irector o3 the "ministrative )33ice o3 the4nite States ,ourts ith the approva% o3 the uicia% ,on3erence o3 the 4niteStates. he c%erk must enter each civi% action in the ocket. "ctions must eassigne consecutive 3i%e numers9 hich must e note in the ocket here the3irst entr o3 the action is mae.&2* tems to e Entere. he 3o%%oing items must e marke ith the 3i%enumer an entere chrono%ogica%% in the ocketH&"* papers 3i%e ith the c%erk&+* process issue9 an proo3s o3 service or other returns shoing executionan&,* appearances9 orers9 vericts9 an jugments.

"s ocumente in instant sumission9 the uner P",E$ an ,F/E,89 the ockets areno %onger kept the c%erks o3 the courts or persons9 authorize them. Foreover9the c%erks o3ten re3use to accept the 3i%ing an/or recor in the ocket papers9 hich

provie evience o3 juicia% corruption9 as e%% as process issue9 an proo3s o3service or other returns shoing execution &e.g.9 summonses*.

. Authentication and certiication o >udicial records8 legal 3rocess under the

signature o the cler and the &eal o the Courthe 4S ,onstitution9 "rtic%e L9 T19 ec%aresH

8u%% 3aith an creit sha%% e given in each state to the pu%ic acts9 recors an juicia% proceeings o3 ever other state. "n congress ma genera% %as prescrie the manner in hich such acts9 recors an proceeings sha%% e prove9 an the e33ect thereo3.

he "ct o3 Fa 209 17;=9 statesHhat the act o3 the %egis%atures o3 the severa% states sha%% e authenticate havig the sea% o3 their respective states a33ixe theretoH hat the recors an

juicia% proceeings o3 the courts o3 an state sha%% e prove or amitte9 in

an other court ithin the 4nite States9 the attestation o3 the c%erk9 an thesea% o3 the court annexe9 i3 there e a sea%9 together ith a certi3icate o3 the

juge9 chie3 justice or presiing magistrate9 as the case ma e9 that the saiattestation is in ue 3orm. "n the sai recors an juicia% proceeings9authenticate as a3oresai9 sha%% have such 3aith an creit given to them9 inever court ithin the 4nite States9 as the have9 %a or usage9 in the courtso3 the state 3rom hence the sai recors are9 or sha%% e taken.

he "ct o3 Farch 279 1N=69 statesHhat9 3rom an a3ter the passage o3 this act9 a%% recors an exemp%i3ications o3o33ice ooks9 hich are or ma e kept in an pu%ic o33ice o3 an state9 notappertaining to a court9 sha%% e prove or amitte in an other court or o33icein an other state9 the attestation o3 the keeper o3 the sai recors or ooks9an the sea% o3 his o33ice thereto annexe9 i3 there e a sea%9 together ith acerti3icate o3 the presiing justice o3 the court o3 the count or istrict9 as thecase ma e9 in hich such o33ice is or ma e kept or o3 the governor9 thesecretar o3 state9 the chance%%or or the keeper o3 the great sea% o3 the state9 thatthe sai attestation is in ue 3orm9 an the proper o33icer an the saicerti3icate9 i3 given the presiing justice o3 a court9 sha%% e 3urtherauthenticate the c%erk or prothonotar o3 the sai court9 ho sha%% certi39uner his han an the sea% o3 his o33ice9 that the sai presiing justice is u%commissione an Gua%i3ie or i3 the sai certi3icate e given the governor9

the secretar o3 state9 the chance%%or or keeper o3 the great sea%9 it sha%% e uner


67/57



the great sea% o3 the state in hich the sai certi3icate is ma e. "n the sai proceeings o3 the sai court.

he 4S %a9 2N S$ A ;B9; % Seal and teste of process, sasH"%% rits an process issuing 3rom a court o3 the 4nite States sha%% e uner thesea% o3 the court an signe the c%erk thereo3.

'o orer o3 the 4S courts is issue toa uner the sea% o3 the court an uner thesignature &either han-signature or e%ectronic signature* o3 the c%erk o3 the court.

"n as shon aove9 in numerous cases9 a%so the summonses o3 the 4S courts areissue unsigne an ith no sea% o3 the court emosse on them.

'either is an juicia% recor authenticate through a ,erti3icate o3 Service earingthe signature o3 the c%erk o3 the court.

0. Electronic &ignatures in Glo#al and National Commerce Act (-) and E4

Government Act (--)

8rom Dikipeia9 CElectronic Signatures in lobal and 4ational $ommerce "ctC Hhe E%ectronic Signatures in (%oa% an 'ationa% ,ommerce "ct &ES('9Pu.:. 1=0I22;9 116 Stat. 6069 enacte une !=9 2===9 15 4.S.,. ch. ;0* is a4nite States 3eera% %a passe the 4.S. ,ongress to 3aci%itate the use o3

e%ectronic recors an e%ectronic signatures in interstate an 3oreign commerce ensuring the va%iit an %ega% e33ect o3 contracts entere into e%ectronica%%..."%though ever state has at %east one %a pertaining to e%ectronic signatures9 it isthe 3eera% %a that %as out the guie%ines 3or interstate commerce. he genera%intent o3 the ES(' "ct is spe%%e out in the ver 3irst section &1=1.a*9 that acontract or signature Ama not e enie %ega% e33ect9 va%iit9 or en3orceai%itso%e% ecause it is in e%ectronic 3ormB. his simp%e statement provies thate%ectronic signatures an recors are just as goo as their paper eGuiva%ents9 anthere3ore suject to the same %ega% scrutin o3 authenticit that app%ies to paperocuments.

he stipu%ations o3 the E-Sign "ct in themse%ves are inaeGuate9 an to the egree thatit app%ies to government recors9 such as recors o3 the 4S courts9 the "ct as never

promu%gate in a meaning3u% a.

8rom Dikipeia9 E%overnment "ct /88/)H

he E-(overnment "ct o3 2==2 &Pu.:. 1=7I!679 110 Stat. 2N;;9 66 4.S.,. T1=19 #.$. 265N/S. N=!*9 is a 4nite States statute enacte on ecemer 1792==29 ith an e33ective ate 3or most provisions o3 "pri% 179 2==!. ts state

purpose is to improve the management an promotion o3 e%ectronic governmentservices an processes esta%ishing a 8eera% ,hie3 n3ormation )33icerithin the )33ice o3 Fanagement an +uget9 an esta%ishing a 3rameorko3 measures that reGuire using nternet-ase in3ormation techno%og to improve

citizen access to government in3ormation an services9 an 3or other purposes.he statute inc%ues ithin itH

• 8SF" &the 8eera% n3ormation Securit Fanagement "ct o3 2==2 as it%e9 an

• ,PSE" &the ,on3ientia% n3ormation Protection an Statistica% E33icienc"ct* as it%e L.

t is ovious that a%% the 4S courts juicia% recors toa are e%ectronic recors.$egar%ess9 the ear no va%i han or e%ectronic signatures. :ikeise9 hen suchrecors are serve on parties as paper recors9 the ear no va%i han or e%ectronicsignatures. "t times9 the recors ear scanne graphic signatures o3 4S juges.

#oever9 such signatures are neither va%i han signatures9 nor va%i e%ectronicsignatures.


6N/57



he e%ectronic recors o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt ear no signatures at a%%. "n henSupreme ,ourt recors ere inspecte9 in the case o3 &ichard 'ine v Sheriff *ee

aca9 no han signatures ere iscovere in the paper 3i%e either. here3ore9 itremains unc%ear i3 an Supreme ,ourt juicia% recors are ever signe at a%%.

,onitions that toa prevai% in the 4S courts stan in stark contrast ith the %asenacte 4S ,ongress9 Presientia% irectives9 $egu%ations9 an app%ications9hich have een presuma% imp%emente 3or authentication an va%iation o3 e-

government in the 4nite States.'. Com3liance ?ith relevant treaties and conventions

asel ccords - international ban#ing regulation

8rom Dikipeia +ase% "ccorsHhe +ase% "ccors &see a%ternative spe%%ings e%o* re3er to the ankingsupervision "ccors &recommenations on anking regu%ations*Z+ase% 9 +ase% an +ase% Zissue the +ase% ,ommittee on +anking Supervision&+,+S*. he are ca%%e the +ase% "ccors as the +,+S maintains itssecretariat at the +ank 3or nternationa% Sett%ements in +ase%9 Sitzer%an anthe committee norma%% meets there. he +ase% "ccors is a set o3recommenations 3or regu%ations in the anking inustr.

he +ase% "ccors ere %arge% in3%uence the 4S government. #oever9conitions9 hich ere esta%ishe in the 4nite States9 re%ative to ankingregu%ation9 stan in stark contrast ith such "ccors.)n such ackgroun9 the purporte authorit that the 4S courts c%aim re%ative to anking institutions in other nations appear %uicrous.

G. Retaliation against anti4>udicial corru3tion activists

=igre 2@ An!i5&di'ial 'orr&p!ion a'!ivis!, *logger ?oger $h&ler, a"!er *eing *ea!en and "alsel%iprisoned in Ala*aa)

"s part o3 the protoco% o3 the 4' #uman $ights ,ounci% &#$,*9 the author9 thencitizen an resient o3 the 4nite States9 as reGuire to 3orar ra3ts o3 the 2=1=sumission9 regaring corruption o3 the ,a%i3ornia courts9 to the 4S authorities.,onseGuent%9 in "pri% 2=1=9 just the as prior to the ea%ine 3or sumitting thereport to the #$,9 the author as sought the 4S Farsha%s9 istrict hreat 4nit.

Dithin as a3ter 3i%ing the #uman $ights "%ert sumission ith the #$, an the3%ing ith the 4S Supreme ,ourt o3 papers ocumenting 3rau in the 4S courts9 theauthor ha to 3%ee the 4nite States9 a3ter his neighors arne him that arme 3eera%agents appeare at his resience an %ooke eager to shoot.

H. Historical 3ers3ective 4 Ro##er Baron Revival Era.


6;/57



=ig&re 2 (orpora!e Personhood is one o" !he 'on'ep! !ha! en'aps&la!es !he!rans"ora!ion o" !he #$ regie and !he role o" 'o&r! 'orr&p!ion in s&'h !rans"ora!ion) I!also poin!s o&! !he vas! siilari!% *e!+een !he '&rren! era and !he ?o**er Baron ra !ha!"ollo+ed !he (ivil War)

,onitions9 hich have een esta%ishe in the 4nite States over the past coup%e o3

ecaes resem%e conitions9 hich prevai%e in the 4nite States over a centur ago9uring the $oer +aron Era9 >%xii? 3rom the en o3 the ,ivi% Dar an into the

eginning o3 the 2=th centur an the (reat epression.

he perio as characterize the ui%up o3 extreme ea%th a 3e9 an theimpoverishment o3 the man. he ne $oer +arons o3ten the oners o3 rai%roaan anking corporations. :aor o3 men9 omen9 an chi%ren as exp%oite inextreme 3ashion9 an %aor isputes ere suppresse through murerous vio%ence.nepenent 3armers ere impoverishe9 strang%e high interest et to the anks9%eaing to conso%iation o3 3arm%an the rich.

+anks an rai%roa corporations acte as unregu%ate trusts or monopo%ies9 an

engage in 3rau in 3inancia% institutions an the stock markets. "s a resu%t9 the 4Seconom as p%ague a series o3 3inancia% panics9 economic chaos9 ith mi%%ionso3 "mericans %osing jos9 3armers eing 3orce o33 their %an9 an rai%roas9 anks9an other usinesses going uner.

,orruption o3 %oca%9 state9 an 3eera% government as rampant. he presienc9regar%ess o3 part a33i%iation9 ecame suservient to the usiness magnets.

'ota%9 the perio as a%so characterize iesprea corruption o3 the courts9 ancorruption o3 the o33ices o3 the c%erks o3 the 4S courts as notorious. >%xiii? he$oer +arons ere e33ective% p%ace aove the %a. ,onuct o3 the 4S courts asescrie in the 4S ,ongerss as a ur%esGue an a sham 9

he Supreme ,ourt as conucive to increasing the poer o3 the monopo%ies9unermining their regu%ation either the 3eera% or state governments. + 1NN0 the4S Supreme ,ourt issue the uious ecision recor in Santa $lara $ounty v!

Southern 0acific &ailroad I 11N 4.S. !;6 &1NN0*9 hich %e to ,orporatePersonhoo. his ecision shou% e consiere an ear% examp%e o3 a simu%ateSupreme ,ourt recor. he part pertaining to ,orporate Personhoo as not part o3 the ecision the justices itse%39 ut a heanote a court reporter. ,orporatePersonhoo an practices o3 the 4S Supreme ,ourt mae corporations 3ar the

primar ene3iciar o3 the ue Process 16th "menment9 hich as origina%%enacte to protect the rights o3 the 3ree s%aves.

"ccoring to a historica% stu 8eera% uicia% ,enter9 the Salary "ct &1;1;* as

centra% to re3orm o3 the 4S courts. he "ct p%ace the chie3 c%erks o3 the 4S courtsuner the irect authorit o3 the 4S "ttorne (enera%. )ther kes to the re3orm asthe appointment o3 Supreme ,ourt justices that 3avore the restriction o3 corporate

poer9 such as +enjamin ,arozo9 knon 3or piercing the vei% o3 corporatestructures9 an :ouis +raneis9 ho as a proponent o3 anking regu%ation9 knon3or his ook )ther Peop%es Fone. "n et9 passage o3 major re3orms as part o3$ooseve%ts 'e ea% as %ocke the 4S Supreme ,ourt9 unti% the Supreme,ourt as irect% 3ace ith the ,ourt Packing threat.

:ater in 2=th centur9 the provisions o3 the Salary "ct ere reverse9 an the chie3c%erks o3 the 4S courts ere again p%ace uner authorit o3 the 4S juiciar. "n asocumente in instant sumission9 corruption o3 the o33ices o3 the chie3 c%erks9 anthe resu%ting corruption o3 court recors9 is again a ha%%mark o3 the 4S courts toa.


5=/57



n 1;;; the lass%Steagall "ct &1;!!*9 corner stone in 3inancia% institutions regu%ationuring the (reat epression9 as repea%e uner heav %oing 3inancia%institutions. >%xiv? he repea% o3 lass Steagall is perceive among the major irectcauses o3 the current 3inancia% crisis. >%xv?

oa9 ,orporate Personhoo is again centra% to conitions in the 4nite States ase%%. he 2=1= ,itizens 4nite ecision o3 the Supreme ,ourt9 ase on ,orporatePersonhoo an corporate 8irst "menment 8ree Speech rights9 unermine

campaign 3inance regu%ation9 an create unpreceente poer 3or corporations over po%iticians an po%itics in the 4nite States. > %xvi? "s shon in instant sumission9 the,itizens 4nite 2=1= case is marke simu%ate court recors9 %ike the Santa ,%aracase o3 1NN0. "n in the recent #o :o ecision9 a 3urther extension o3,itizens 4nite9 corporations ere grante 8irst "menment 8reeom o3 $e%igionrights.

,orporate Personhoo is a%so the 3ocus o3 current re3orm e33orts in the 4niteStates. 8or examp%e9 the 2=12 )ccupFarines Press $e%ease summarize their goa%sinH a* $epea%ing o3 the '""9 * )verturning o3 ,itizens 4nite9 an c* Exposingan inicting the 1[. >%xvii? "n overturning ,itizens 4nite is the sing%e cause o3 theFove to "men grass-root movement. >%xviii?

he histor o3 re3orm o3 4S corporate corruption an court corruption in the 3irst ha%3o3 the 2=th centur emonstrates the re%ationship eteen the to9 an the magnitueo3 the reGuire e33orts. t a%so points out that re3orm o3 the o33ices o3 chie3 c%erks o3the 4S courts is a necessar 3irst step.

I. Conclusions

he 3inings o3 instant sumission ho% serious imp%ications re%ative to the currentsocio-economic crisis in the 4nite States9 to anking regu%ation9 an #uman $ightso3 a%% resients o3 the 4nite States. Foreover9 ue to the ominant g%oa% economic

position o3 the 4S9 an its ongoing attempts to ominate the g%oa% anking an3inancia% sstems9 particu%ar% through the 4S court sstem9 >%xix9%xx? the 3inings a%so

have serious imp%ication 3or socio-economic eve%opment or%-ie. :ikeise9 the3inings have serious imp%ications9 re%ative to the position o3 the 4S in variousinternationa% isputes an con3%icts.-) hrough the imp%ementation an operation o3 inva%i9 3rauu%ent sstems9 the

4S courts toa routine% conuct o3 simu%ate &3ake/sham* %itigation an un%a-3u%% eprive the %iert an propert o3 iniviua%s an p%ace the anks aove the%a.

2) Such conuct amounts to serious vio%ation o3 3unamenta% #uman $ights o3 the peop%e o3 the 4nite States.

3) Such conuct is a%so centra% to the current socio-economic crisis9 3ai%ing ankingregu%ation9 an the A8orec%osure ,risisB9 hich resu%te in vast increase in povert

an home%essness in the 4nite States an unermine the 4S mi%e-c%ass.4) he va%iit o3 an %ega% an juicia% recors9 originating in the 4nite States9 an

the va%iit o3 an %itigation in the 4S courts shou% e consiere uious.@) he internationa% communit shou% reassess the nature o3 the current regime in

the 4nite States9 an an c%aim that its 3oreign po%ic is riven #uman $ightsinterests.

) E33orts to aress conitions9 hich are no esta%ishe in the 4nite States9 anto restore the 3orce an e33ect o3 the 4S ,onstitution an 4S %a9 are %ike% e

protracte an meet stark resistance interests an strongho%s o3 4S securit9%ega%9 an 3inancia% groups.

2. Recommendations


51/57



Emerging 3rom the current conitions ou% reGuire a 3unamenta% corrective processin the 4nite States9 here as a resu%t o3 current conitions9 the po%itica% process isunermineH-) he %arge-sca%e 3rau in the 4S courts9 hich in 3act imp%icates each an ever

4S sitting juge9 ou% %ike% reGuire an approach simi%ar to a ruth an$econci%iation ,ommission.

2) ue to the centra% ro%e o3 the "ministrative )33ice o3 the 4S ,ourts inimp%ementing the 3rauu%ent sstems o3 the 4S courts9 the )33ice shou% erestructure or c%ose.

3) Feasures9 simi%ar to those taken uner simi%ar circumstances a centur agothrough the Salary "ct &1;1;*9 hich p%ace the c%erks o3 the 4S courts uner theirect authorit o3 the "ttorne (enera%9 shou% e consiere.

4) 4S %ega% an computing experts shou% e engage in an initiative to restore theintegrit o3 the sstems o3 the 4S courts9 uner accountai%it to the 4S,ongress9 ith the goa% o3 making such sstem as transparent to the pu%ic at%arge as possi%e.

@) n nations9 here the separation o3 ranches is esta%ishe %a9 the courtsmust not e permitte to eve%op9 an imp%ement the courts sstems.

) #uman $ights an internet activists must keep a atch3u% ee on the va%iit anintegrit o3 sstems o3 the courts an prisons.

<. Online A33endi6

o e comp%ete

"ugust 129 2=16

oseph Cernik9 PhHuman Rights Alert (NGO)

,. Reerences


52/57



i Zernik, J Be%ond vo!ing a'hines 5 'ase anageen! s%s!es o" !he 'o&r!s 5 $&s!ain and !he os Angeles $&perior

(o&r! Par! Ih!!p//es)s'ri*d)'o/do'/--0477747/ Zernik, J Be%ond ele'!roni' vo!ing a'hines 5 "ra&d in 'ase anageen! s%s!es o" !he 'o&r!s 5 $&s!ain and !he os Angeles $&perior (o&r! 5 Par! IIh!!p//es)s'ri*d)'o/do'/--047@07/Zernik, J Be%ond vo!ing a'hines 5 'ase anageen! s%s!es o" !he 'o&r!s 5 $&s!ain 5 (<$ o" !he os Angeles$&perior (o&r! 5 A*s!ra'! and =ig&res s

h!!p//es)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30-2FF0/Zernik, J (op&!ers !he (o&r!s 5 $&s!ain 5 (<$ o" !he os Angeles $&perior (o&r! 5 ?egis!ers o" A'!ionh!!p//es)s'ri*d)'o/do'/30-24-/

ii Zernik, J Da!a <ining as a (ivi' D&!% E Online P&*li' PrisonersH ?egis!ra!ion $%s!es,International )ournal on Social edia. onitoring/ easurement/ ining - F45 .20-0h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3F32F@-/

iii >&an ?igh!s Aler! .9CO s&*ission !o !he #ni!ed 9a!ions >&an ?igh!s (o&n'il "or !he #P? o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es

.20-0, as i! appears in !he #ni!ed 9a!ions >&an ?igh!s (o&n'il si!e>TTP//li*)oh'hr)org/>?Bodies/#P?/Do'&en!s/session/#$/>?Aler!R#P?R#$AR$0R20-0R>&anU20righ!sU20aler!-)ppd" >&an ?igh!s Aler! .9CO A ppendix I !o s&*ission "or !he #P? o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es *% !he #ni!ed 9a!ions>&an ?igh!s (o&n'il

h!!p//li*)oh'hr)org/>?Bodies/#P?/Do'&en!s/session/#$/>?Aler!R#P?R#$AR$0R20-0R>&anU20righ!sU20aler!-)pd" h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/2@4374/#ni!ed 9a!ions >&an ?igh!s (o&n'il Pro"essional $!a"" ?epor!, re"erring !o >&an ?igh!s Aler! s&*ission +i!h !heno!e 'orr&p!ion o" !he 'o&r!s and !he legal pro"ession and dis'riina!ion *% la+ en"or'een! in (ali"ornia .page ,paragraph 4@h!!p//da''ess5dds5n%)&n)org/do'/#9DO(/C9/C-0/-/@/PD=/C-0-@)pd"VOpenleen!

iv >&an ?igh!s Aler! .9CO s&*ission !o !he #ni!ed 9a!ions >&an ?igh!s (o&n'il "or !he #P? o" !he $!a!e o" Israel

.20-3, as i! appears in !he #ni!ed 9a!ions >&an ?igh!s (o&n'il si!eThe >&an ?igh!s Aler! .9CO s&*ission .20-3 "or !he #niversal Periodi' ?evie+ o" israel *% !he #9 >&an ?igh!s(o&n'il, as i! appears on !he #9 +e* si!eh!!p//li*)oh'hr)org/>?Bodies/#P?/Do'&en!s/$ession-@/I/>?AR#P?RI$?R$-@R20-2R>&an?igh!sAler!R)pd" 20-350-50- The >&an ?igh!s Aler! .9CO s&*ission, as in'orpora!ed in!o !he #9 >&an ?I!gh!s (o&n'il #P? repror!

+i!h !he no!e a'k o" in!egri!% in !he ele'!roni' re'ords o" !he $&pree (o&r!, !he dis!ri'! 'o&r!s and !he de!ainees 'o&r!sin Israel .page 4, paragraph 2@h!!p//da''ess5dds5n%)&n)org/do'/#9DO(/C9/C-2/-F0/-2/PD=/C-2-F0-2)pd"VOpenleen!20-250@5-0 >&an ?igh! Aler!, Appendix I !o $&*ission1 -@!h #P? 5 $!a!e o" Israel 5 In!egri!%, or la'k !hereo", o" !heele'!roni' re'ord s%s!es o" !he 'o&r!s o" !he $!a!e o" Israelh!!ps//drive)google)'o/"ile/d/0BFAa2xC*k@'9xd2s;X0@o<k#/edi!V&spYsharing

v Biographi'al $ke!'h E Joseph Zernik, PhD

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/442---3/

vi 20--5-050@ Tea Par!% and i*erals 'onvene a! >$ !o dis'&ss (ons!i!&!ional (onven!ion .video

h!!p//!oda%)la+)harvard)ed&/!ea5par!%5and5li*erals5'onvene5a!5hls5!o5dis'&ss5'ons!i!&!ional5'onven!ion5video/

vii a+ren'e essig8s 'all "or s!a!e5*ased a'!ivis on *ehal" o" a (ons!i!&!ional (onven!ion 'o&ld provide !he &proo!ed

oveen! +i!h a poli!i'al proe'! "or +in!er 20--5--5-7 Alesh >o&dek, >as a >arvard Pro"essor <apped O&! !he 9ex! $!ep "or O''&p% Wall $!ree!V) The Atlantic h!!p//+++)!hea!lan!i')'o/poli!i's/ar'hive/20--/--/has5a5harvard5pro"essor5apped5o&!5!he5nex!5s!ep5"or5o''&p%5+all5s!ree!/247@-/

viii 20-35075- Al*er!o ?iva, Ji% (ar!er #$ 6has no "&n'!ioning deo'ra'%:, Salon

h!!p//+++)salon)'o/20-3/07/-F/i%R'ar!erR&sRhasRnoR"&n'!ioningRdeo'ra'%Rpar!ner/

ix In a spee'h in Ceorge!o+n #niversi!%, $ena!or eah%, (hair o" !he $ena!e J&di'iar% (oi!!ee 'alled "or a Tr&!h

and ?e'on'ilia!ion (oission on !he #$ Depar!en! o" J&s!i'e)2005 Trans'rip! o" $ena!or eah% spee'hh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3F4722@-/

x 20--50500 $overeign (i!i;ens 5 A Cro+ing Does!i' Threa! !o a+ n"or'een!, F#I

http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/september-2011/sovereign-

citizens

http://es.scribd.com/doc/110477747/







http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session9/US/HRAlert_UPR_USA_S09_2010_Human%20rights%20alert1.pdf



http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G10/169/65/PDF/G1016965.pdf?OpenElement

http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/Session15/IL/HRA_UPR_ISR_S15_2012_HumanRightsAlert_E.pdf


https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU/edit?usp=sharing



http://today.law.harvard.edu/tea-party-and-liberals-convene-at-hls-to-discuss-constitutional-convention-video/

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/11/has-a-harvard-professor-mapped-out-the-next-step-for-occupy-wall-street/247561/



http://www.salon.com/writer/alberto_riva/

http://www.salon.com/2013/07/18/jimmy_carter_us_has_no_functioning_democracy_partner/



http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/september-2011/sovereign-citizens











http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/Session15/IL/HRA_UPR_ISR_S15_2012_HumanRightsAlert_E.pdf




http://today.law.harvard.edu/tea-party-and-liberals-convene-at-hls-to-discuss-constitutional-convention-video/




http://www.salon.com/writer/alberto_riva/

http://www.salon.com/2013/07/18/jimmy_carter_us_has_no_functioning_democracy_partner/






xi 20-05 John Nerse%, The =reean on !he and <oveen! Crass ?oo!s i*er!arianis in A'!ion, Li'ertarian Alliance

h!!p//+++)li*er!arian)'o)&k/VYnode/-

xii Well ?eg&la!ed Aeri'an <ili!iash!!p//+rasi!e)'o/VxgRso&r'eYsgResRne!+ork

xiii 20-45075-0 B&nd% ran'h s!ando"" invigora!edH an!i5governen! gro&ps, repor! sa%s, *ashington +ost h!!p//+++)+ashing!onpos!)'o/ne+s/pos!5na!ion/+p/20-4/07/-0/*&nd%5ran'h5s!ando""5invigora!ed5an!i5governen!5

gro&ps5repor!5sa%s/

xiv I !hink i!8s di""i'&l! !o "ind a "ra&d o" !his si;e on !he #)$) 'o&r! s%s!e in #)$) his!or%, said ?a%ond Bres'ia, a visi!ingpro"essor a! Gale a+ $'hool +ho has +ri!!en ar!i'les anal%;ing !he role o" 'o&r!s in !he "inan'ial 'risis) I 'an8! !hink o"one +here %o& have li!erall% !ens o" !ho&sands o" "ra&d&len! do'&en!s "iled in !ens o" !ho&sands o" 'ases)20--5-2522 $'o! Pal!ro+, $pe'ial ?epor! The +a!'hdogs !ha! didn8! *ark, Reutersh!!p//+++)re&!ers)'o/ar!i'le/20--/-2/22/&s5"ore'los&res5id#$T?7B0<(20---222

xv )))a s%s!e in +hi'h onl% !he li!!le people have !o o*e% !he la+, +hile !he ri'h, and *ankers espe'iall%, 'an 'hea! andde"ra&d +i!ho&! 'onse&en'es)20--5035-3 Pa&l Nr&gan, Ano!her Inside Jo*, 01T h!!p//+++)n%!ies)'o/20--/03/-4/opinion/-4kr&gan)h!lVRrY0

xvi <ore !han -00 la+ pro"essors have signed on !o a le!!er released !oda% !ha! proposes 'ongressional hearings and

legisla!ion aied a! "ashioning anda!or% and en"or'ea*le e!hi's r&les "or $&pree (o&r! &s!i'es "or !he "irs! !ie) Thee""or!, 'oordina!ed *% !he li*eral Allian'e "or J&s!i'e, +as !riggered *% re'en! edia repor!s, !he le!!er said, apparen!l%re"erring !o s!ories o" ee!ings and o!her po!en!ial 'on"li'!s o" in!eres! involving J&s!i'es An!onin $'alia and (laren'eThoas aong o!hers)20--502524 Blog o" !he egal Tiesh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/4@F43/

xvii 20--504507 =ore'los&re "ra&d The hoeo+ner nigh!ares 'on!in&e, Fortuneh!!p//"or!&ne)'o/20--/04/07/"ore'los&re5"ra&d5!he5hoeo+ner5nigh!ares5'on!in&e/

xviii 20-250-507 Cre!'hen <orgenson, 6=ro as! and Wes!, =ore'los&re >orror $!ories:, 9e+ Gork Ties

h!!p//+++)n%!ies)'o/20-2/0-/0F/*&siness/or!gage5servi'ing5horror5s!ories5"air5gae)h!lVpage+an!edYallRrY0

xix Zernik, J =ra&d and (orr&p!ion in #$ (o&r!s are Tigh!l% inked !o Banking =ra&d and !he Clo*al 'onoi' (risis 5

-!h World (riinolog% (ongress presen!a!ion.20--h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/-3@-@2/

xx Zernik, J Da!a <ining o" Online J&di'ial ?e'ords o" !he 9e!+orked #$ =ederal (o&r!s, In!erna!ional Jo&rnal on $o'ial

<edia <oni!oring, <eas&reen!, <ining, -5F3 .20-0h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/3F32F@F@/

xxi Zernik, J Invalid le'!roni' ?e'ord $%s!es o" !he $!a!e and =ederal #$ (o&r!s E na*lers o" >&an ?igh!s A*&seand !he =inan'ial (risis E (GB?AW 20-3 paper E peer5revie+ed and a''ep!ed, !hen ree'!ed adinis!ra!ivel%)h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/--704040-/

xxii 20-0503524 #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia (</(= #no""i'ial Anderson <an&al) 9o O""i'ial <an&alexis!ed)

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/2FF@33/

xxiii O""i'ial <an&al o" !he as!ern Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia

h!!p//+++)'aed)&s'o&r!s)gov/'aed/DO(#<9T$/(<(=/#ser<an&al)pd"

xxiv O""i'ial <an&al o" !he $o&!hern Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia

h!!p//+++)'asd)&s'o&r!s)gov/'e'"/pd"/$D(AR#sersRan&al)pd"

xxv (opila!ions o" o'al ?&les o" #)$) Dis!ri'! (o&r!s

h!!p//do's)google)'o/vie+erVaYvY'a'he<xhAi!9-ZekJ+es!)!hoson)'o/s!ore/"ilingandshelvingdo+nload)aspxU3="ileU3D-242R200F32R-3@333)pd"nor!herndis!ri'!o"illinois'/e'"an&alhlYenglY&spidY*lsr'idYADC$i*X"5Nk*kv7DBJ93(Gs2l>ODT9o

xxvi 20-0503524 #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia (</(= #no""i'ial Anderson <an&al) 9o O""i'ial <an&al

exis!ed)

http://www.libertarian.co.uk/?q=node/1

http://wramsite.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/07/10/bundy-ranch-standoff-invigorated-anti-government-groups-report-says/


http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/22/us-foreclosures-idUSTRE7BL0MC20111222

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/opinion/14krugman.html?_r=0

http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/%20


http://fortune.com/2011/04/07/foreclosure-fraud-the-homeowner-nightmares-continue/

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/08/business/mortgage-servicing-horror-stories-fair-game.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0





http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caed/DOCUMENTS/CMECF/UserManual.pdf

http://www.casd.uscourts.gov/cmecf/pdf/SDCA_Users_manual.pdf

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:MxhAitN1ZekJ:west.thomson.com/store/filingandshelvingdownload.aspx?file=12942_2008329_135333.pdf+northern+district+of+illinois+cm/ecf+manual&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESibX6mf-QKkbkmvQ7DB6JN3qCYs2lLHODLLTNo4BxdpajoFAJ4sFax8rb0NHzGP05V3fNLFfyGvmFHuvcitHdh-1QjKVTY5NcpAMURpIQqWywiJDJaF5vujqLnPPiKCRP_28W-k&sig=AHIEtbTeIuioblVZauGwfFnvZHdjeAxVZQ




http://www.libertarian.co.uk/?q=node/1

http://wramsite.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network



http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/22/us-foreclosures-idUSTRE7BL0MC20111222

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/opinion/14krugman.html?_r=0


http://fortune.com/2011/04/07/foreclosure-fraud-the-homeowner-nightmares-continue/

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/08/business/mortgage-servicing-horror-stories-fair-game.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0





http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caed/DOCUMENTS/CMECF/UserManual.pdf

http://www.casd.uscourts.gov/cmecf/pdf/SDCA_Users_manual.pdf






h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/2FF@33/

xxvii 20-050450- #ni!ed $!a!es Dis!ri'! (o&r! "or !he Wes!ern Dis!ri'! o" Texas,Adinis!ra!ive Poli'ies and Pro'ed&res "or

le'!roni' =ilingh!!p//+++)!x+d)&s'o&r!s)gov/e'"/do's/e"ilepro'd)pd"

xxviii 200F502507 #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r! (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia Ceneral Order 0F502

http://www.scrib.com/oc/2!"#2$!1/

xxix 20--50-507 Zernik,J <o!ion !o In!ervene in Log "a'in Re%u'licans v USA et al .-05@34in !he #$ (o&r! o" Appeals,!h (ir'&i!

http://www.scrib.com/oc/$"%1"0#$/

xxx 200F50350@ (ase o" Borro+er Willia Parsle% .0@50374, Dk! S24F J&dge Je"" Boh8s <eorand& Opinion,

re*&king (o&n!r%+ide8s li!iga!ion pra'!i'es, (o&n!r%+ide8s "alse o&!side 'o&nsel s'hee 5 appearan'es *% 'o&nsel +hoare no! (o&nsel o" ?e'ord, +i!h no 'o&ni'a!ions +i!h 'lien!s 'la&se

http://www.scrib.com/oc/2%001&""/

xxxi 20-05050 $e'&ri!ies and x'hange (oission, =OIA ?esponse 9o -050345=OIA, ? S" v #an$ of America"or%oration .-05'v50F2h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/40F@@/

xxxii 20-35-0524 #$ PA(? "ra&d, diappearing re'ords 5 T$A li!iga!ionR In"or+arsh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/-7047@/

xxxiii 20-450450 Tai!; v (olvin .--35'v50-F7F in !he #)$) Dis!ri'! (o&r! Dis!ri'! o" <ar%land E re'ords disappeared "roPA(? do'ke!Q

http://www.scrib.com/oc/211"$2&&'/

xxxiv 20--50452@ Da"na in;er, In Ci!o Opinion, T+o Kersions o" ?eali!%, +ro+u'lica

http://www.propublica.org/article/in-gitmo-opinion-two-versions-of-realit(

xxxv Zernik, J >a*eas (orp&s in !he #ni!ed $!a!es 5 !he 'ase o" ?i'hard Isaa' =ine 5 ?evie+h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/24720F4/

xxxvi

-500500 #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia, Cenral Order 507 5 (er!i"i'a!ion as !o Par!iesh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/44303-/

xxxvii 20-05035- P) (arri;osa, 6? ngageen! o" A!!orne% <'(ori'k in Fine v Sheriff .205'v50--4 in !he #$

Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia:, e!!er on *ehal" o" !he (ali"ornia J&di'ial (o&n'ilh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/2F4@@22/

xxxviii Zernik, J) Design and Opera!ion o" In"ora!ion $%s!es o" !he #$ (o&r!s are inked !o =ailing Banking?eg&la!ion, Da!a Anal%!i's 20-2, Bar'elona, $painh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/-0023333/

xxxix Zernik, J) $e'&ri!ies and x'hange (oission v Bank o" Aeri'a (orpora!ion 5 $i&la!ed i!iga!ion and

$i&la!ed Banking ?eg&la!ion in !he #ni!ed $!a!esh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/443232/

xl 200F50524 =BI Inves!iga!es =o&r =irs a! >ear! o" !he =inan'ial <ess, Truthout

h!!p//!r&!h5o&!)org/ar'hive/'oponen!/k2/i!e/F02@0"*i5inves!iga!es5"o&r5"irs5a!5hear!5o"5!he5"inan'ial5ess

xli 20-25035-@ $!a!een! o" ?o*er! $) <&eller, III, =BI Dire'!or, *e"ore !he #ni!ed $!a!es $ena!e, (oi!!ee on Appropria!ions, $&*'oi!!ee on (oer'e, J&s!i'e, $'ien'e and ?ela!ed Agen'ies h!!p//+++)appropria!ions)sena!e)gov/si!es/de"a&l!/"iles/hearings/<&ellerU20Tes!ion%U20=I9A)pd"

xlii 200504523 ? S" v #A" .-05'v50F2 $!a!e o" 9e+ Gork A!!orne% Ceneral Andre+ (&oo e!!er !o #$

(ongress and anal%s!s8 responses

http://www.scrib.com/oc/$10!&&&0/

xliii 20--5045-3 Cre!'hen <orgenson, 9aing (&lpri!s in !he =inan'ial (risis, 01T

http://www.n(times.com/2011/0$/1$/business/1$crisis.html)pagewante*all


http://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/ecf/docs/efileprocd.pdf









http://www.propublica.org/article/in-gitmo-opinion-two-versions-of-reality








http://truth-out.org/archive/component/k2/item/80250:fbi-investigates-four-firms-at-heart-of-the-financial-mess

http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/Mueller%20Testimony%20FINAL.pdf


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/business/14crisis.html?pagewanted=all


http://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/ecf/docs/efileprocd.pdf







http://www.propublica.org/article/in-gitmo-opinion-two-versions-of-reality






http://truth-out.org/archive/component/k2/item/80250:fbi-investigates-four-firms-at-heart-of-the-financial-mess

http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/Mueller%20Testimony%20FINAL.pdf


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/business/14crisis.html?pagewanted=all



xliv 20--5045-3 #$ $ena!e $&*'oi!!ee on Inves!iga!ions, Wall $!ree! and !he =inan'ial (risis Ana!o% o" a =inan'ial

(ollapse

http://www.n(times.com/interactive/2011/0$/1$/business/1$crisis-ocviewer.html

xlv 20--5045-4 Cre!'hen <orgenson, In =inan'ial (risis, 9o Prose'&!ions o" Top =ig&res, 01T

http://www.n(times.com/2011/0$/1$/business/1$prosecute.html)pagewante*all+,r*0

xlvi 20-350350 <ark Conglo"", ri' >older Adi!s $oe Banks Are J&s! Too Big To Prose'&!e, Huffington +ost

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/201#/0#/0"/eric-holer-bans-too-big,n,2'21!$1.html

xlvii 20-350350 Trans'rip! o" A!!orne% Ceneral ri' >older8s rearks *e"ore !he $ena!e J&di'iar% (oi!!ee, in +hi'h he

dis'&sses !he idea !ha! soe *anks are 8Too Big !o Jail8, American #an$er h!!p//+++)aeri'an*anker)'o/iss&es/-7FR4@/!rans'rip!5a!!orne%5general5eri'5holder5on5!oo5*ig5!o5ail5-0@72@5-)h!l

xlviii The 'ople!e PA(? do'ke! +i!h de!ailed anal%sis, addi!ional re'ords in li!iga!ion o" S" v #A" .-05'v50F2,and links !o os! o" !he re'ords in !he re"eren'e lis! *elo+, are provide in !he Online Appendix a!

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/443232/

xlix 20-25035-@ Zernik, J os Angeles $&perior (o&r! 5 +idespread 'orr&p!ion and re"&sal o" #$ governen! !o !akea'!ion, -!h World (riinolog% (ongress presen!a!ionh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/-3@-4/

l 20-050750 (oplain! =iled +i!h #$ A!!orne% O""i'e os Angeles Agains! <o%nihan Bank o" Aeri'a L9G$BA(M

Br%an (ave P Alleging ?a'ke!eering

http://www.scrib.com/oc/##&!10&&/

li 20-05075-2 (oplain! "iled +i!h !he #$ A!!orne%8s O""i'e, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia, agains! #$ <agis!ra!e (arlaWoehrle and O!hers a! !he #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, (en!ral Dis!ri'! o" (ali"ornia, on P&*li' (orr&p!ionh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/34-4403/

lii

20--50750 6?e&es! "iled *% Windsor and Zernik +i!h #$ A!!orne% Ceneral ri' >older "or ?evie+ o" In!egri!% o" P&*li' A''ess and (ase <anageen! $%s!es o" !he #$ (o&r!s:, Human Rights Alert 20345h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/@4F07-F/

liii Zernik, J viden'e o" +idespread 'orr&p!ion o" !he #$ 'o&r!s and proposed 'orre'!ive eas&res s&*i!!ed !o !he #$

>o&se o" ?epresen!a!ivesh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/F@4F-@@@/

liv 20--50-5-0 ?e&es! "or inves!iga!ion/ipea'hen! pro'eedings, in re #$ J&dge JD ?ANO== and (lerk ?#BG

N?AJI(N, #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r!, $o&!hern Dis!ri'! o" 9e+ Gork, (ond&'! o" $e'&ri!ies and x'hange (oi!!ee v Bank o"

Aeri'a (orpora!ion .-05'v50F2

http://www.scrib.com/oc/$""1"%#0/

lv 200F50350@ (ase o" Borro+er Willia Parsle% .0@50374, Dk! S24F J&dge Je"" Boh8s <eorand& Opinion,re*&king (o&n!r%+ide8s li!iga!ion pra'!i'es, (o&n!r%+ide8s "alse o&!side 'o&nsel s'hee 5 appearan'es *% 'o&nsel +hoare no! (o&nsel o" ?e'ord, +i!h no 'o&ni'a!ions +i!h 'lien!s 'la&se

http://www.scrib.com/oc/2%001&""/

lvi 200F50-50F (ase o" Borro+er >ills .0-522@74 5 in !he #$ Bankr&p!'% (o&r!, as!ern Dis!ri'! o" Penns%lvania,

Pi!!s*&rgh) (o&n!r%+ide8s Three ?e'rea!ed e!!ers and a Trans'rip!

http://www.scrib.com/oc/2%00#$&$/

lvii 20-050452@ ?e&es! and ?e"&sal o" Opinion e!!er *% >arvard a+ $'hool Dean <ar!ha <ino+ in re Alleged =ra&d inPA(? and (</(=h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/304F@2F/

lviii Zernik, J Invalid le'!roni' ?e'ord $%s!es o" !he $!a!e and =ederal #$ (o&r!s E na*lers o" >&an ?igh!s A*&se

and !he =inan'ial (risis E (GB?AW 20-3 paper E peer5revie+ed and a''ep!ed, !hen ree'!ed adinis!ra!ivel%)

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/04/14/business/14crisis-docviewer.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/business/14prosecute.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/06/eric-holder-banks-too-big_n_2821741.html

http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/178_45/transcript-attorney-general-eric-holder-on-too-big-to-jail-1057295-1.html













http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/04/14/business/14crisis-docviewer.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/business/14prosecute.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/06/eric-holder-banks-too-big_n_2821741.html

http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/178_45/transcript-attorney-general-eric-holder-on-too-big-to-jail-1057295-1.html













h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/--704040-/

lix 200504520 =ine v $heri"" .205'v50--4 Dk! S2 9o!i'e o" ?e"eren'e !o <agis!ra!e (arla Woehrleh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/44203247/

lx 200505-2 =ine v $heri"" .205'v50--4 Dk! S2 5 ?epor! and ?e'oenda!ion *% #$ <agis!ra!e (arla Woehrleh!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/432-F7/

lxi

20-450-50 Joseph Zernik, D&pli'i!o&s #$ &dges Jed ?ako"", ?i'hard eon, 4%d0e6s(comhtt%.77666(o%edne6s(com7articles787Du%licitous-US-9udges-)ed-'y-)ose%h-,erni$-#an$ing-"rime:#an$ing-"risis:#an$ing-Fraud:"orru%tion-;<=;=>-@8(html

lxii >o+ard Zinn, (hap!er -- ?o**er Barons and ?e*els, in People8s >is!or% o" !he #ni!ed $!a!es)

https://libcom.org/librar(/peoples-histor(-of-unite-states-howar-zinn

lxiii <essinger, I $'o!! Order in The (o&r! 5 >is!or% o" (lerks o" #ni!ed $!a!es (o&r!s, =ederal J&di'ial (en!er .2002

http://www.scrib.com/oc/#$'1&!!$/

lxiv 20-45045- Dan ?o*er!s, Wall $!ree! dereg&la!ion p&shed *% (lin!on advisers, do'&en!s reveal, The 3uardian,

#N

http://www.theguarian.com/worl/201$/apr/1&/wall-street-eregulation-clinton-avisers-obama

lxv 20-250F527 Jaes ?i'kards, ?epeal o" Class5$!eagall (a&sed !he =inan'ial (risis,US 0e6s

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2012/0'/2!/repeal-of-glass-steagall-cause-

the-financial-crisis

lxvi 20-050-52- (i!i;ens #ni!ed v =ederal le'!ion (oission -30 $)(!) F7 .20-0 a! !he $&pree (o&r! o" !he #ni!ed

$!a!es 5 opinion o" Pro" (heerinsk% and Wikipedia overvie+

h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/4-340F3/

lxvii 20-25075-- O''&p%<A?I9$ Press ?elease .J&l% F, 20-2 5 de"ining do'&en! o" !he ?o**er Baron ?evival ra h!!p//+++)s'ri*d)'o/do'/F4F-F/

lxviii <ove !o Aend +e*5pageh!!ps//ove!oaend)org/

lxix 20-450530 Joseph Zernik, A?C9TI9A Again on !he verge o" e'onoi' 'ollapse 5 again !he vi'!i o" #$!rea'her%Q, 4%d0e6s(comh!!p//+++)opedne+s)'o/ar!i'les/A?C9TI9A5Again5on5!he5ve5*%5Joseph5Zernik5Argen!inaRClo*al5Banking5(ar!elRIn!erna!ional5<one!ar%5=&nd55I<=RIsrael5-4030523)h!l

lxx 20-450452 <a%er Bro+n, #$ Dis!ri'! (o&r! >olds Tha! a 9on5Par!% =oreign Bank <&s! Prepare a Wi!ness Wi!hDo'&en!s Overseash!!p//+++)a%er*ro+n)'o/#$5Dis!ri'!5(o&r!5>olds5Tha!5a59on5Par!%5=oreign5Bank5<&s!5Prepare5a5Wi!ness5Wi!h5Do'&en!s5Overseas50452520-4/




http://www.opednews.com/articles/3/Duplicitous-US-judges-Jed-by-Joseph-Zernik-Banking-Crime_Banking-Crisis_Banking-Fraud_Corruption-140106-593.html


https://libcom.org/library/peoples-history-of-united-states-howard-zinn%20


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/19/wall-street-deregulation-clinton-advisers-obama

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2012/08/27/repeal-of-glass-steagall-caused-the-financial-crisis





https://movetoamend.org/

http://www.opednews.com/articles/ARGENTINA-Again-on-the-ve-by-Joseph-Zernik-Argentina_Global-Banking-Cartel_International-Monetary-Fund--IMF_Israel-140630-923.html


http://www.mayerbrown.com/US-District-Court-Holds-That-a-Non-Party-Foreign-Bank-Must-Prepare-a-Witness-With-Documents-Overseas-04-29-2014/







https://libcom.org/library/peoples-history-of-united-states-howard-zinn%20


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/19/wall-street-deregulation-clinton-advisers-obama





https://movetoamend.org/



