8

2facetruth.com · 2013. 7. 16. · Atterbury's business model is also dif- ferent in that staff are not issued shares on performance; they are offered as they join. Van der Watt explains:

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2facetruth.com · 2013. 7. 16. · Atterbury's business model is also dif- ferent in that staff are not issued shares on performance; they are offered as they join. Van der Watt explains:
Page 2: 2facetruth.com · 2013. 7. 16. · Atterbury's business model is also dif- ferent in that staff are not issued shares on performance; they are offered as they join. Van der Watt explains:
Page 3: 2facetruth.com · 2013. 7. 16. · Atterbury's business model is also dif- ferent in that staff are not issued shares on performance; they are offered as they join. Van der Watt explains:
Page 4: 2facetruth.com · 2013. 7. 16. · Atterbury's business model is also dif- ferent in that staff are not issued shares on performance; they are offered as they join. Van der Watt explains:
Page 5: 2facetruth.com · 2013. 7. 16. · Atterbury's business model is also dif- ferent in that staff are not issued shares on performance; they are offered as they join. Van der Watt explains:
Page 6: 2facetruth.com · 2013. 7. 16. · Atterbury's business model is also dif- ferent in that staff are not issued shares on performance; they are offered as they join. Van der Watt explains:
Page 7: 2facetruth.com · 2013. 7. 16. · Atterbury's business model is also dif- ferent in that staff are not issued shares on performance; they are offered as they join. Van der Watt explains:
Page 8: 2facetruth.com · 2013. 7. 16. · Atterbury's business model is also dif- ferent in that staff are not issued shares on performance; they are offered as they join. Van der Watt explains: