Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2012 IT Decision Makers’ Views of Mobile
Enterprise Device & Applications Trends
A Survey on Preferences & Policies Regarding Mobile Devices, Applications, and Management Platforms
NC11-65December 2012
NC11-65 2
Research Team
Brent IadarolaGlobal Research Director, ICT
1-210-481-0752
Contributing Analyst
Tonya FowlerGlobal Director, Customer Research
1-210-247-2413
Research Director
Lead Analyst
Luis R BalandranSenior Analyst, Customer Research
1-210-477-8411
NC11-65 3
Contents
Section Slide Numbers
Research Background, Objectives, and Methods 5
Executive Summary 9
Usage Prevalence and Policies of Mobile Devices in the Workplace 11
Overall Workforce Trends 12
Organization Issued Versus Employee Owned Smartphones 14
Organization Issued Versus Employee Owned Tablets 16
Organizations Policy of Employee Owned Smartphones and Tablets 17
Implementation of Mobile Applications 21
Top Mobile Applications Currently Deployed and Future Deployment 22
Mobile Application Design that Best Serves Organizational Needs: Pre-packaged Versus Custom
24
Mobile Implementation Methods: On-premise Versus Hosted/Cloud 25
NC11-65 4
Contents (Continued)
Section Slide Numbers
Benefits and Restraints of Mobile Application Solutions 27
Preferred Strategic Partner for Selecting, Purchasing, and Implementing Mobile Applications
28
Top Ranked Benefits of Deploying Mobile Solutions 29
Top Ranked Restraints When Deciding to Deploy Mobile Application Solutions
31
Profile 33
The Frost & Sullivan Story 40
<report code, only for GPS> 5
RESEARCH BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVES, AND METHODS
NC11-65 6
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Research Background and Objectives
Research Background
The Mobile & Wireless Communications market is characterized by rapidly
changing technology, evolving customer demands, and the frequent
introduction of new products and services. With the deployment of Next Generation network technologies, today's businesses are in search of
applications that can take advantage of increased data speeds and bandwidth
to provide compelling services to users. In the following survey, Frost & Sullivan measures preferences and policies regarding mobile devices, applications, and
management platforms across various industry verticals throughout the United
States.
Objectives
Frost & Sullivan aims to measure mobile device use within the enterprise
realm, specifically focusing on smartphones and tablets, and determine the policies toward mobile devices on the workplace. Furthermore, we measure the
adoption rates and attitudes toward mobile application solutions.
NC11-65 7
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Methods
Methodology
Web-based survey. The data was collected in May–July 2012.
Sample
To achieve our targeted number of responses, we partnered with a trusted
web-panel based supplier. Generally, web-panel members are compensated by
the web-panel supplier to participate in surveys for which they qualify. For this research, we surveyed 880 IT decision makers within U.S. organizations of
various sizes and across specified industries: education, government, financial
services, healthcare, and retail.
Reporting notes: Due to rounding errors, percentages in charts and tables,
may not sum to 100.
Total
sampleEducation Government
Financial
servicesHealthcare Retail
N=880 n=175 n=177 n=175 n=176 n=177
NC11-65 8
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Definitions
Remote workers/telecommuters include: Employees who work from home at least one day a week.
Mobile workers include: Employees who work 25 percent or more of the time
away from their primary workplace AND field workers who are on the road all the time.
Communication-enabled business process (CEBP) leverages unified
communications capabilities (i.e. UC services) to reduce human latency by embedding them into the business process flow. For example, if someone
doesn’t approve something in a designated period of time, then the business
process would invoke a UC service such as “notify and respond” from an IP PBX, voice portal/IVR, conferencing application, etc. If the person does not
“respond” to the notification then it can be escalated to a manager in the same
manner. The result is a more efficient, more automated closed-loop process; translating into significant return on investment (ROI).
<report code, only for GPS> 9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NC11-65 10
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Executive Summary
Smartphones and Tablet Issuances
Currently more organizations issue smartphones than tablets, yet approximately only one third distribute smartphones. Among those issuing smartphones, more remote and mobile workers are recipients compared to traditional, in-office workers. Despite the low organizational issuance of smartphones and tablets, employees are purchasing their own and using them at work. Most organizations are allowing these personally owned smartphones and tablets, but with varying levels of support. The largest proportion of these ‘allowing’ organizations do not actively support the devices on their networks.
Implementation of Mobile Application Solutions
Despite the variety of mobile applications available (and the limited ones questioned about), enterprises have not currently implemented all that are available. Wireless email and PIM are most prevalently used, but still only at an uptake rate of 45 percent. However, within the next couple of years, adoption of other mobile application solutions (e.g. company asset tracking) is expected to double the current rates.
Overall, out of the box solutions are preferred to custom solutions, particularly within the retail sector. Furthermore, on-premise implementation is currently most prevalent, yet, hosted/cloud implementation is gaining popularity and is expected to increase significantly within the next two years.
Benefits and Restraints of Mobile Application Solutions
The top ranked benefits of mobile application solutions are related to producing efficiency. Cost, particularly cost of ownership, is the top restraint to mobile application solution adoption.
<report code, only for GPS> 11
USAGE PREVALENCE AND POLICIES OF MOBILE DEVICES IN
THE WORKPLACE
NC11-65 12
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Overall Workforce Trends
14%
61%
18%12%
56%
14%
74% 79%68%
Current workforce population Currently using corporate networks Future workforce population
View of Workforce and Use of Corporate Networks (Mean Percents): United States, 2012
Remote Mobile Traditional, in-office
Number of employees currently
using corporate networksNumber of employees likely to use corporate networks in five years*
Remote 75 96
Mobile 59 69
Traditional, in-office 514 472
Total workforce 648 637
Percent of workforce 74% 72%
*Calculated assuming future workforce population multiplied by currently using corporate network percentages.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q1. Currently, approximately, what percent of your organization’s workforce consists of remote/telecommuters, mobile
workers, and/or traditional, in-office workers?
Q2/3. Approximately, what percent of each type of already identified workforce regularly requires access to the corporate
network/resources using the Internet, secure IP VPN client, extranet, etc.?
Q4. Thinking about the next five years, approximately what percent of your organization’s workforce is expected to be
remote/telecommuters, mobile workers, and/or traditional, in-office workers?
NC11-65 13
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Overall Workforce Trends Summary Slide
The traditional, in-office workforce still dominates the US organizational landscape (74 percent), leaving roughly one-quarter as either remote or mobile
workers (14 percent versus 12 percent). Most traditional, in-office workers
require access to corporate networks, yet much fewer remote or mobile workers do. Given the expectation that within five years there will be fewer
traditional, in-office workers, required access to corporate networks is expected
to slightly decline.
NC11-65 14
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Organization Issued Versus Employee Owned Smartphones
35%31%
26%29%
36%32%
27% 28%
33% 33% 32%35%
Current workforce Expected workforce in twoyears
Current workforce Expected workforce in twoyears
Remote workers Mobile workers Traditional, in-office workers
Among the current general workforce, more own smartphones that are organization issued than employee owned. Yet, within the next two years, organization issued smartphones are expected to decline, while employee owned smartphones are expected to increase.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q18. Approximately, what percent of each type of workforce as shown below is currently issued an organizational owned smartphone and/or tablet?
Q19. Approximately, what percent of each type of workforce as shown below is expected to be issued an organizational owned smartphone and/or
tablet in two years?
Q20. Approximately, what percent of each type of workforce as shown below uses an employee-owned smartphone and/or tablet at work?
Q21. Approximately, what percent of each type of workforce as shown below is expected to use an
employee-owned smartphone and/or tablet at work in two years?
Organization Issued Versus Employee Owned Smartphones (Mean Percents): United States, 2012
Organization Issued Employee Owned
NC11-65 15
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Organization Issued Versus Employee Owned Smartphones (Continued)
Investigation of the workforce classifications, reveal that slightly more remote and mobile workforce members are issued smartphones by their organizations.
This is to be expected, since these workers need tools (e.g. smartphones) to
keep them connected to the office. Conversely, more traditional, in-office workers own their own smartphones, using them at work. Organization issued
smartphones to traditional, in-office workers is likely perceived as more of an
option or privilege since these workers are already connected to the office.
NC11-65 16
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Organization Issued Versus Employee Owned Tablets
13%
17%
11%14%
12%15%
10%14%13%
17%
13%17%
Current workforce Expected workforce in twoyears
Current workforce Expected workforce in twoyears
Remote workers Mobile workers Traditional, in-office workers
Organizations have been cautious in handing out tables to employees, but within the next two years are expected to issue slightly more, specifically to remote and traditional, in-office workers more so than to mobile workers. Employee owned tablets (that are used at work) are expected to have a slight increase over the next two years.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q18. Approximately, what percent of each type of workforce as shown below is currently issued an organizational owned smartphone and/or tablet?
Q19. Approximately, what percent of each type of workforce as shown below is expected to be issued an organizational owned smartphone and/or
tablet in two years?
Q20. Approximately, what percent of each type of workforce as shown below uses an employee-owned smartphone and/or tablet at work?
Q21. Approximately, what percent of each type of workforce as shown below is expected to use an
employee-owned smartphone and/or tablet at work in two years?
Organization Issued Versus Employee Owned Tablets (Mean Percents): United States, 2012
Organization Issued Employee Owned
NC11-65 17
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Organizations Policy of Employee Owned Smartphonesand TabletsOverall, most organizations allow employee-owned mobile devices, yet, few offer total support.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q22. What is your organization’s current policy regarding the use of employee-owned smartphones and
tablets?
26%
32%
16%
10%
16%
Only company provideddevices are allowed
Employee owneddevices must beapproved by our
organization and we donot actively support
them
Employee owneddevices must beapproved by our
organization and weprovide a mixed level of
support
Employee owneddevices must beapproved by our
organization and weprovide a total level of
support
Other
Organizations Policy of Employee Owned Smartphones and Tablets: United States, 2012
58 percent allow employee owned devices, but with varying
levels of support
Allowance and
support
No allowance
NC11-65 18
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Organizations Policy of Employee Owned Smartphones and Tablets by IndustriesGovernment and financial services organizations are most restrictive. Conversely, education and retail organizations are least restrictive.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q22. What is your organization’s current policy regarding the use of employee-owned smartphones and
tablets?
Education Government Financial services Healthcare Retail
Only company-provided devices are allowed 17% 36% 37% 18% 23%
Employee-owned mobile devices must be approved by our organization and we do not actively support them
33% 33% 26% 39% 29%
Employee-owned mobile devices must be approved by our organization and we provide a mixed level of support
25% 11% 20% 15% 10%
Employee-owned mobile devices must be approved by our organization and we provide a total level of support
11% 8% 9% 9% 14%
Other 14% 11% 9% 20% 24%
Organizations Policy of Employee Owned Smartphones and Tablets by Industries: United States, 2012
No allowance
Allowance and support
NC11-65 19
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Frequency Use of Videoconferencing on Laptops
Overall, the largest proportion use videoconferencing on laptops extensively (28 percent), but moderate and sporadic use prevails as well, leaving one quarter that do not use laptops for videoconferencing. Those within the retail sector use videoconferencing via laptops less frequently, compared to other industries, with 41 percent having no use.
Note: Extensive use is 76 percent or more of the time, moderate use is 26-75 percent of the time, sporadic use is 1-25 percent of the time.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q8. Please rate the level of use that videoconferencing is being used in your organization on the
following type(s) of devices. Laptops
73%
33%25% 31% 28%
21%28%
21%27% 19% 18%
19%21%
26% 25% 26%24%
19%
24%
17% 20% 22%25%
41%25%
3% 3% 2% 5% 1% 3%
Education Government Financialservices
Healthcare Retail Total sample
Frequency of Videoconferencing on Laptops: United States, 2012
Don't know
NO use
Sporatic use
Moderate use
Extensive use
NC11-65 20
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Frequency Use of Videoconferencing on Tablets
Note: Extensive use is 76 percent or more of the time, moderate use is 26-75 percent of the time, sporadic use is 1-25 percent of the time.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q8. Please rate the level of use that videoconferencing is being used in your organization on the
following type(s) of devices. Tablets
46%
11% 6% 5% 6% 6% 7%
18%18% 14% 16%
9%15%
29%31%
23% 23%
16%
24%
37% 42%55% 52%
68%51%
5% 4% 2% 3% 1% 3%
Education Government Financialservices
Healthcare Retail Total sample
Videoconferencing Usage on Tablets: United States, 2012
Don't know
NO use
Sporatic use
Moderate use
Extensive use
Compared to laptops, videoconferencing via tablets is significantly (statistically) lower (73 percent versus 46 percent, respectively). Despite the lower frequency of use within the total sample, those within the education and government sectors use tablets for videoconferencing more frequently than their industry counterparts. Meanwhile, videoconferencing via tablets within retail continues to lag. Upon market entry in 2010, tablets have been highly popular, first for personal use, then gaining popularity in the business realm.
<report code, only for GPS> 21
IMPLEMENTATION OF MOBILE APPLICATIONS
NC11-65 22
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
45% 38%21% 20% 20% 19% 18%
22%24%
20% 22% 18% 22% 25%
33% 38%
59% 57% 62% 59% 58%
Wir
ele
ss e
ma
ila
nd
PIM
Access t
oin
tern
al da
tab
ase
(s)
Co
mp
an
y a
sse
ttr
ackin
g
Sta
nda
lone
co
rpora
tein
sta
nt
me
ssa
gin
g
Em
plo
ye
e-t
o-
em
plo
ye
e s
ocia
ln
etw
ork
ing
Access t
oco
rpora
tete
lep
hon
y
Access t
oe
nte
rprise
co
llabo
ration
app
s
Top Mobile Applications Currently Deployed and Future Deployment: United States, 2012
Not deployed, norplanning to deploy withinthe next two years
Planning to deploy withinthe next two years
Currently deployed
Top Mobile Applications Currently Deployed and Future DeploymentWireless email and PIM are currently most prevalently used among all mobile applications surveyed, with another 22 percent expected to deploy it within the next two years. Access to internal databases are also prevalent, yet lagging behind wireless email and PIM. Despite low deployment prevalence now, within the next two years, other mobile applications are expected to be deployed, and in most cases doubling current deployment levels.
Base: All respondents (n=765).
Q23. Of the following mobile applications, which has your organization already deployed or is planning to deploy in the future–specifically, in the
next two years?
NC11-65 23
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
17% 16% 14% 12% 11% 11%
24% 24%21% 20% 18% 18%
59% 59% 64% 68% 71% 72%
Access t
oe
nte
rprise
co
nfe
rencin
ga
pp
s
Sta
nda
lone
wir
ele
ss f
orm
s
Fie
ld w
ork
forc
em
an
ag
em
en
t
Sta
nda
lone
vid
eo
ca
ptu
re
Sale
s f
orc
ea
uto
ma
tion
Fle
et tr
ackin
ga
nd
ma
nag
em
en
t
Less Prevalent Mobile Applications Currently Deployed and Future Deployment: United States, 2012
Not deployed, nor planningto deploy within the nexttwo years
Planning to deploy withinthe next two years
Currently deployed
Less Prevalent Mobile Applications Currently Deployed and Future DeploymentSales force automation and fleet tracking and management are least popularly deployed.
Base: All respondents (n=765).
Q23. Of the following mobile applications, which has your organization already deployed or is planning to deploy in the future–specifically, in the
next two years?
NC11-65 24
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Mobile Application Design that Best Serves Organizational Needs
Overall, pre-packaged solutions are the most desired, while fully customized solutions are least desired. Within the pre-package category, turn key (out-of-box) implementations are more conducive to organizational needs among survey respondents, especially within retail organizations.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q25. Overall, which of the following mobile software application design best serves your organization's current
needs?
45%36%
46% 49%
68%
49%
37%
38%30% 27%
17%
30%
18%27% 24% 23%
15%21%
Education Government Financialservices
Healthcare Retail Total sample
Mobile Applications Design that Best Serve the Organizations Current Needs: United States, 2012
A fully customized solution
A pre-packaged solution whichrequires some level of additionalback-end integration and/orcustomization
A pre-packaged solution, ready forout-of-the-box implementation, withno back-end integration required
NC11-65 25
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Mobile Implementation Methods
In total, approximately half of organizations are currently using on-premise server solutions. However, deployment to hosted or cloud solutions are expected to double within the next two years.
49%
19%15%
33%36%
49%
On-premise server solution Hosted or cloud solution
Current and Future use of Mobile Application Implementation: United States, 2012
Currently use Planning to use within the next two years No plans of using
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q26. Which method of mobile application implementation does your organization currently use or is planning to use in
the future–specifically, in the next two years?
2012
2013-2014
NC11-65 26
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
2% 1%5%
2% 3% 3%
17% 16%21%
15%20% 18%
30%29%
33%
31%27% 30%
34% 43%
30%39% 40% 37%
17%12% 11% 13% 11% 13%
Education Government Financialservices
Healthcare Retail Total sample
Likelihood to Change to a 4G Mobile Broadband NetworkUnited States, 2012
Don't know
Unlikely/Very unlikely
Moderate likelihood
Likely/Very likely
Currently deployed
Likelihood to Change to a 4G Mobile Broadband NetworkVery few are currently on a 4G mobile broadband network, with the largest proportion (approximately 37 percent) unlikely to deploy even if it became available. This lack of enthusiasm toward 4G mobile broadband network is likely due to current networks not performing to their theoretical pick of 12 Mbps (Source: Frost & Sullivan’s “ 4G Network Access: Shaping Business Wireless Broadband?”).
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q24. If a more powerful and ubiquitous 4G mobile broadband network became available, how much more likely would your organization be to
deploy additional mobile software apps during the next two years?
<report code, only for GPS> 27
BENEFITS AND RESTRAINTS OF MOBILE APPLICATION
SOLUTIONS
NC11-65 28
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
28%
12%10%
5% 5% 4% 3% 3% 1%
29%
38%
14% 14%
7% 5% 5%8%
2%
8%
Wir
ele
ss c
arr
ier
or
op
era
tor
Ma
jor
corp
ora
teso
ftw
are
ven
dor
Syste
ms
inte
gra
tor
or
pro
fessio
na
lse
rvic
es fir
m
VA
R (
valu
ea
dd
ed r
eselle
r)
Mo
bile
devic
e/h
an
dse
tm
an
ufa
ctu
rer
Mo
bile
mid
dle
ware
/pla
tfo
rm v
en
do
r
Mo
bile
app
lica
tio
nd
eve
lope
r
PB
X/U
C v
end
or
Oth
er
Do
n’t U
se
Primarily and Preferred Strategic Partner for Selecting, Purchasing, and Implementing Mobile Applications: United States, 2012
Primarily use Prefer to use
Preferred Strategic Partner for Selecting, Purchasing, and Implementing Mobile Applications
Overall, enterprises primarily use and prefer a wireless carrier or operator as a strategic partner when selecting, purchasing, and implementing mobile applications solutions.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q27. Which of the following does your organization primarily use as a strategic partner for selecting, purchasing, and/or
implementing mobile application solutions? Which would your organization most prefer to use as a strategic partner for
selecting, purchasing, and/or implementing mobile applications?
NC11-65 29
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Top Ranked Benefits of Deploying Mobile Solutions
The top ranked benefits to deploying mobile solutions are related improving efficiency: enhancing employee productivity, improving operational efficiencies, improving responsiveness to customers.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q28. Please rank the top three benefits you view as most important when deciding to deploy mobile application
solutions–where a #1 rank represents most important, a #2 rank represent the second most important, etc.
24% 22%16% 16%
6% 6% 5% 5%
22% 19% 18%10% 9%
6%10%
5%14% 14% 17%
9%12%
6% 9% 7%
60% 56%51%
34%27%
18%24%
17%
Enh
ancin
ge
mp
loye
ep
rodu
ctivity
Imp
rovin
go
pe
ration
al
effic
ien
cie
s
Imp
rovin
gre
sp
on
siv
ene
ss
to c
usto
mers
Incre
asin
gsa
les
Incre
asin
ge
mp
loye
eco
llabo
ration
Expe
ditin
g c
ash
flo
w
Imp
rovin
g y
our
co
mp
etitive
adva
nta
ge
Incre
asin
gco
llabo
ration
with
pa
rtn
ers
#1 rankings #2 rankings #3 rankings Total of top three rankings
Top Ranked Benefits of Deploying Mobile Application Solutions: United States, 2012
Efficiency-related
NC11-65 30
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Top Ranked Benefits of Deploying Mobile Solutions by IndustriesThose within the retail sector perceive mobile solutions as most beneficial for increasing sales, while other enterprises focus on the efficiency benefits.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q28. Please rank the top three benefits you view as most important when deciding to deploy mobile application
solutions–where a #1 rank represents most important, a #2 rank represent the second most important, etc.
Education GovernmentFinancial services
Healthcare Retail
Enhancing employee productivity 26% 37% 22% 22% 11%
Improving operational efficiencies 24% 32% 24% 24% 8%
Improving responsiveness to customers 18% 12% 14% 16% 21%
Increasing sales 7% 3% 15% 11% 42%
Increasing employee collaboration 9% 10% 5% 5% 1%
Increasing collaboration with partners and end-customers
7% 2% 5% 6% 4%
Expediting cash flow 3% 2% 7% 9% 7%
Improving your competitive advantage 5% 2% 7% 7% 5%
Top Ranked Benefits of Deploying Mobile Application Solutions by Industries (Total of Top Three Rankings): United States, 2012
NC11-65 31
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Top Ranked Restraints When Deciding to Deploy Mobile Application Solutions
Total cost of ownership is a top challenge to overcome when deciding to deploy mobile application solutions.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q29. Please rank the top three restraints you view as most challenging when deciding to deploy mobile application
solutions–where a #1 rank represents most challenging, a #2 rank represent the second most challenging, etc.
17% 15% 13%7% 7% 7% 6%
15%8% 7% 10% 9%
6%8%10% 7% 10% 7% 9% 6% 7%
42%
29% 29%24% 24%
18% 22%
Overa
ll hig
hto
tal cost
of
ow
ne
rsh
ip
No
pe
rce
ive
dn
ee
d
Vuln
era
bili
ty o
fco
rpora
tein
form
atio
n
Re
qu
ired
hard
wa
ree
xpe
nse
RO
I be
ne
fits
are
un
cle
ar
No
t u
se
rfr
ien
dly
Pro
fessio
nal
se
rvic
es
expe
nse
#1 rankings #2 rankings #3 rankings Total of top three rankings
Top Ranked Restraints When Deciding to Deploy Mobile Application SolutionsUnited States, 2012
NC11-65 32
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
12% 16% 18%8% 8% 12%
34% 31%33%
27%20%
29%
54% 54% 49%
65%72%
59%
Education Government Financialservices
Healthcare Retail Total sample
Current Status of Management Platform: United States, 2012
NO plans
Plan to implement inthe next two years
Currentlyimplemented
Current Status of Management Platform
Few (12 percent, overall) already have management platforms implemented, with prevalence highest within government and financial services industries, and lowest within healthcare and retail industries.
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q30. A mobility management platform allows a business or organization to create and securely manage multiple mobile devices and mobile
applications that are connected to your backend systems. Please indicate which of the following statements most accurately describes your
organization's current status.
<report code, only for GPS> 33
PROFILE
NC11-65 34
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Enterprise Size
Base: All respondents (n=880).
S3. Using the ranges below, please select the range that best describes the number of employees within your company -
including all plants, divisions, branches, and subsidiaries.
47%
31%
61%56%
88%
57%
17%
24%
13%18%
4%
15%7%
10%
2% 6%
1%
5%
29%36%
24% 20%
7%
23%
Education Government Financialservices
Healthcare Retail Total sample
Enterprise Size: United States, 2012
1,000 or more employees
500-999 employees
100-499 employees
1-99 employees
NC11-65 35
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Number of Divisions
Base: All respondents (n=880).
S4. How many locations does your company have in the U.S.?
58%
34% 37%
53%
77%
52%
19%
16%
26%
19%
12%
18%
11%
14%
13%
7%
4%
10%
6%
11%
5%7%
1%
6%
6%
25%19%
14%6%
14%
Education Government Financialservices
Healthcare Retail Total sample
Number of Divisions: United States, 2012
20 or more locations
10-19 locations
5-9 locations
2-4 locations
One single location
NC11-65 36
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Enterprise Industry
Base: All respondents (n=880).
S5. Which of the following best describes the industry/market of your company?
20% 20% 20%
12% 11%
9% 8%
Retail/Consumer Healthcare FinancialServices
Local, County,or State
Government
Education -Higher
Education
Education - K-12 FederalGovernment
Enterprise Industry: United States, 2012
NC11-65 37
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Role in Organization
Base: All respondents (n=880).
Q52. Which of the following general workplace roles best describes your role/responsibility within your
organization?
26% 21% 18% 18%24% 21%
23%21%
17% 14%7% 16%
51%57%
66% 69% 69%62%
Education Government Financialservices
Healthcare Retail Total sample
Role in Organization: United States, 2012
Other
IT Department Director
IT Manager
NC11-65 38
Certification
We hereby certify that the views expressed in this research service accurately reflect our
views based on primary and secondary research with industry participants, industry
experts, end users, regulatory organizations, financial and investment community, and
other related sources.
In addition to the above, our robust in-house forecast and benchmarking models, along
with the Frost & Sullivan Decision Support Databases, have been instrumental in the
completion and publishing of this report.
We also certify that no part of our analyst compensation was, is or will be, directly or
indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this service.
NC11-65 39
Legal Disclaimer
Frost & Sullivan takes no responsibility for any incorrect information supplied to us by
manufacturers or users. Quantitative market information is based primarily on interviews
and therefore is subject to fluctuation. Frost & Sullivan research services are limited
publications containing valuable market information provided to a select group of
customers. Our customers acknowledge, when ordering or downloading, that Frost &
Sullivan research services are for customers’ internal use and not for general publication
or disclosure to third parties. No part of this research service may be given, lent, resold
or disclosed to noncustomers without written permission. Furthermore, no part may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the permission of
the publisher.
For information regarding permission, write to:
Frost & Sullivan
331 E. Evelyn Ave. Suite 100
Mountain View, CA 94041
© 2011 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved. This document contains highly confidential information and is the sole property of Frost & Sullivan.
No part of it may be circulated, quoted, copied or otherwise reproduced without the written approval of Frost & Sullivan.
<report code, only for GPS> 40
THE FROST & SULLIVAN STORY
NC11-65 41
The Frost & Sullivan Story
Pioneered Emerging Market & Technology Research
• Global Footprint Begins
• Country Economic Research
• Market & Technical Research
• Best Practice Career Training
• MindXChange Events
Partnership Relationship with Clients
• Growth Partnership Services
• GIL Global Events
• GIL University
• Growth Team Membership™
• Growth Consulting
Visionary Innovation
• Mega Trends Research
• CEO 360 Visionary Perspective
• GIL Think Tanks
• GIL Global Community
• Communities of Practice
NC11-65 42
What Makes Us Unique
All services aligned on growth to help clients develop and implement innovative growth strategies
Continuous monitoring of industries and their convergence, giving clients first mover advantage in emerging opportunities
More than 40 global offices ensure that clients gain global perspective to mitigate risk and sustain long term growth
Proprietary Team Methodology integrates 7 critical research perspectives to optimize growth investments
Career research and case studies for the CEOs’ Growth Team to ensure growth strategy implementation at best practice levels
Close collaboration with clients in developing their research based visionary perspective to drive GIL
Focused on Growth
IndustryCoverage
Global Footprint
Career Best Practices
360 Degree Perspective
Visionary Innovation Partner
NC11-65 43
Frost & Sullivan’s proprietary TEAM Methodology ensures that clients have a complete 360 Degree
PerspectiveTM from which to drive decision making. Technical, Econometric, Application, and Market
information ensures that clients have a comprehensive view of industries, markets, and technology.
Technical
Real-time intelligence on technology, including emerging technologies, new
R&D breakthroughs, technology forecasting, impact analysis, groundbreaking
research, and licensing opportunities.
Econometric
In-depth qualitative and quantitative research focused on timely and critical
global, regional, and country-specific trends, including the political,
demographic, and socioeconomic landscapes.
Application
Insightful strategies, networking opportunities, and best practices that can be
applied for enhanced market growth; interactions between the client, peers,
and Frost & Sullivan representatives that result in added value and
effectiveness.
Market
Global and regional market analysis, including drivers and restraints, market
trends, regulatory changes, competitive insights, growth forecasts, industry
challenges, strategic recommendations, and end-user perspectives.
TEAM Methodology
NC11-65 44
Our Global Footprint 40+ OfficesScanning the Globe for Opportunities and Innovation