44
Wildland Fire Decision Support System and the 2009 Implementation Strategy for the Federal Wildland Fire Policy: Air Quality Tools and Opportunities Pete Lahm – Forest Service Fire and Aviation Management

2009 Implementation Strategy

  • Upload
    taniel

  • View
    46

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Wildland Fire Decision Support System and the 2009 Implementation Strategy for the Federal Wildland Fire Policy: Air Quality Tools and Opportunities Pete Lahm – Forest Service Fire and Aviation Management. 2009 Implementation Strategy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Wildland Fire Decision Support System and the 2009

Implementation Strategy for the Federal Wildland Fire Policy:

Air Quality Tools and Opportunities

Pete Lahm – Forest ServiceFire and Aviation Management

Page 2: 2009 Implementation Strategy

NIXON WEATHER STATION (#020113) ENERGY RELEASE COMPONENT

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

5/1

5/8

5/15

5/22

5/29 6/5

6/12

6/19

6/26 7/3

7/10

7/17

7/24

7/31 8/7

8/14

8/21

8/28 9/4

9/11

9/18

9/25

10/2

10/9

10/1

6

10/2

3

10/3

0

DATE

ERC

Average

Maximum

Minimum

1999

Bridger-Knoll Fire, 6/20/96, ERC 48

Mt. Emma Fire, 6/3/99, ERC 19

2009 Implementation Strategy

•Every wildland fire will be assessed following a decision support process that examines the full range of responses.

•The system currently under development to support this is the Wildland Fire Decision Support System (WFDSS).

•A decision support and documentation system – not a decision making system,

•Meets all current operational plan preparation needs,

•Meet national, interagency wildland fire management needs.

Page 3: 2009 Implementation Strategy

NIXON WEATHER STATION (#020113) ENERGY RELEASE COMPONENT

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

5/1

5/8

5/15

5/22

5/29 6/5

6/12

6/19

6/26 7/3

7/10

7/17

7/24

7/31 8/7

8/14

8/21

8/28 9/4

9/11

9/18

9/25

10/2

10/9

10/1

6

10/2

3

10/3

0

DATE

ERC

Average

Maximum

Minimum

1999

Bridger-Knoll Fire, 6/20/96, ERC 48

Mt. Emma Fire, 6/3/99, ERC 19

•Every unplanned wildland fire will receive a management response,

•Every response is developed from the full range of tactical responses,

•Responses may vary in time as well as in space,

•Management responses must meet FMP and Land and Resource Management Plan objectives.

Management Response Principles

Page 4: 2009 Implementation Strategy

2009 Fire SeasonNational Acres Burned

Year-to-date 5.7M10-yr average 6.4M

About 90% of 10-yr avewith Alaska accounting for 3M acres

Page 5: 2009 Implementation Strategy

NIXON WEATHER STATION (#020113) ENERGY RELEASE COMPONENT

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

5/1

5/8

5/15

5/22

5/29 6/5

6/12

6/19

6/26 7/3

7/10

7/17

7/24

7/31 8/7

8/14

8/21

8/28 9/4

9/11

9/18

9/25

10/2

10/9

10/1

6

10/2

3

10/3

0

DATE

ERC

Average

Maximum

Minimum

1999

Bridger-Knoll Fire, 6/20/96, ERC 48

Mt. Emma Fire, 6/3/99, ERC 19

•Decision support processes provide information used by managers when they are making decisions,

•Decision support does not replace decision making,

•Decision support information comes from a variety of sources, ranging from experience to quantitative analysis procedures, science,

•Decision support information has applications across a range of scales and concentrations.

Principles of Decision Support

Page 6: 2009 Implementation Strategy

What is Needed? • Better risk characterization:

•Risk identification• Quality risk-informed decision making:

•Risk acceptance - achieving objectives?•How is success measured?

• Resource use and tactical decisions:•“speed, agility, and focus” - “overwhelming mass” •potential for success – mobility = decreasing

resources when the probability of containment is low – increasing resources when the probability of containment is high.

• Better accountability, • Measures of performance, • Decision command and control• Reporting

Page 7: 2009 Implementation Strategy

NIXON WEATHER STATION (#020113) ENERGY RELEASE COMPONENT

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

5/1

5/8

5/15

5/22

5/29 6/5

6/12

6/19

6/26 7/3

7/10

7/17

7/24

7/31 8/7

8/14

8/21

8/28 9/4

9/11

9/18

9/25

10/2

10/9

10/1

6

10/2

3

10/3

0

DATE

ERC

Average

Maximum

Minimum

1999

Bridger-Knoll Fire, 6/20/96, ERC 48

Mt. Emma Fire, 6/3/99, ERC 19

What is WFDSS?

•A system that:•Is consistent with accepted models of risk-informed decision making,

•presents a risk characterization in support of wildland fire decision making.

•makes risk characterization intuitive, logical, relevant, understandable, and accessible.

•assembles, consolidates, and presents information to decision makers.

•can easily share information among approved users.

•An analytic – deliberative process that is an iterative, information-goal directed process.

•Web-based with mapping & reporting functions

Page 8: 2009 Implementation Strategy

What is WFDSS Used For?

•To improve strategic decision making for all wildland fires,

•To simplify support to decision making,

•To document decisions and rationale,

•To simplify decision documentation process and sharing of analyses and reports.

•Interrelationships with other databases and information sources,

• LANDFIRE• ROSS• ISUITE• FPA

Page 9: 2009 Implementation Strategy

When is WFDSS Used?

•Eventually on every wildland fire.•For planning purposes prior to ignition and for environmental planning and project planning.

•Implementation schedules will vary among agencies (2010 should have all FLM’s using it).

Page 10: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Response Level

1Respon

se Level 2

Response Level

3

Land and Resource Mgmt Plan

Fire Management Plan

•Begins at time of ignition

•Initial action•No decisions•Basic analysis

•Preplanned actions/decisions

•Most detailed analysis and planning

•Detailed Course of Action – may include long-term considerations

•Decision(s)

•Extended action and/or resource benefit objectives

•More detailed analysis and planning

•Developed Course of Action

•Decision(s)

WFDSS Process and Events

Page 11: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Information

Situation

Objectives

Course of Action

Validation

Decision Summary

Periodic Assessment

WFDSS Subsection Areas

Page 12: 2009 Implementation Strategy

WFDSS

Decis

ion

Docu

men

tatio

nDecision Support

Implementation Actions

Objectives

Situation

Information

Validation Course of Action

Periodic Assessme

nt

Decision Summary

Reports

WFDSS Framework

Page 13: 2009 Implementation Strategy

WFDSS Air Quality Tools Integration

WFDSS

Various Air Quality Tools

AQ Portal

Page 14: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Goals: • To provide “one-stop” portal access

to the most useful and relevant air quality tools

• To use data from WFDSS to drill-down into existing tools for relevant information

• To modify tools as necessary to better serve WFDSS needs

• To avoid the need for duplicate entry of information

• To provide help and how-to-use instructions

8 Tools Identified• Includes climatologies, current

conditions and forecasts• Many give fire-specific, customized

information• More can be added

Page 15: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Split by meteorology and smoke impact tools:

• Increasing complexity as one proceeds down the page.

Page 16: 2009 Implementation Strategy
Page 17: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Fire Information• Fire Location information passed from

WFDSS• User can also set Fire Location on

page (through Google Maps app or Lat/Lon)

• More information from WFDSS to be passed in later versions

Page 18: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Tools• Smoke Guidance Point Forecast• Smoke Guidance Maps• RAWS Wind-roses• Current Air Quality Monitoring Data• Climatological Ventilation / Mixing

Height Statistics• Probablistic Smoke Impacts based on

Climatology• Custom While-you-wait Trajectories• Custom While-you-wait Fuels, Fire

Consumption, and Smoke Impact Modeling

• Each Tool briefly explained on website

• What is this? & How can I use it? information provided for each tool

• Tools labeled and searchable based on characteristics to help quickly identify what you are looking for

• Tools provided by USFS AirFire, DRI/CEFA, FCAMMS, STI

Page 19: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Closer Look

• How does it work?

• What kinds of output is available?

• What can this output be used for?

• WFDSS sends information (currently fire location) to a portal website• The website converts this information into forms understandable by the

various tools and drills into the tool to show relevant information• Users can upload the resulting maps, etc… back into WFDSS

• Text summaries, maps and other graphics• Forecasts, real-time monitoring, and climatological summaries

• Long list of user generated potential uses

Page 20: 2009 Implementation Strategy
Page 21: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Smoke Guidance Point Forecast•7 day point specific forecast in 12 hour steps•mixing height speed and direction, ventilation rate, Haines Index

WFDSS Text Air Quality Forecast (active)

Page 22: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Product Delivery

• Web based

• Animation loops

• Forecast grid of individual forecasts

• Raw data output for GACCs (via FTP)

• Maps available by GACC

• Google Earth overlay (coming soon)

Page 23: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Example mixing height map

Page 24: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Example ventilation rate map

Page 25: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Example transport wind map

Page 26: 2009 Implementation Strategy

RAWS Windroses

• Climatological wind directions

• Based on nearest RAWS station

• Daytime and nighttime treated separately

• Single click results from WFDSS portal

Page 27: 2009 Implementation Strategy

RAWS Windroses

Daytime Nighttime

Page 28: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Ventilation Climate Information System (VCIS)

• Climatological Mixing Height and Ventilation Index

• Based on 40-yr model run

• AM and PM treated separately

• Single-click results from WFDSS portal

Page 29: 2009 Implementation Strategy

VCIS Example Output

Page 30: 2009 Implementation Strategy

SMARTFIRE Trajectories

• On the fly trajectories

• Single click results from WFDSS portal

Page 31: 2009 Implementation Strategy

SMARTFIRE Trajectories

Page 32: 2009 Implementation Strategy
Page 33: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Custom, while-you-wait fuels, consumption, and smoke dispersion modeling.

Uses NWS NAM meteorology and the BlueSky Framework.

Page 34: 2009 Implementation Strategy
Page 35: 2009 Implementation Strategy
Page 36: 2009 Implementation Strategy
Page 37: 2009 Implementation Strategy
Page 38: 2009 Implementation Strategy
Page 39: 2009 Implementation Strategy

NIXON WEATHER STATION (#020113) ENERGY RELEASE COMPONENT

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

5/1

5/8

5/15

5/22

5/29 6/5

6/12

6/19

6/26 7/3

7/10

7/17

7/24

7/31 8/7

8/14

8/21

8/28 9/4

9/11

9/18

9/25

10/2

10/9

10/1

6

10/2

3

10/3

0

DATE

ERC

Average

Maximum

Minimum

1999

Bridger-Knoll Fire, 6/20/96, ERC 48

Mt. Emma Fire, 6/3/99, ERC 19

•Strategy test in 2008•Strategy out for all Federal agencies

March 2009 (after SE fire season and just before western fire season)

•Two types Wildland Fire:•Wildfire (unplanned ignition,

natural / human) •Prescribed Fire (planned ignition)

•Allows multiple objectives on wildfires that are adaptive through time and space tied to FMP and L/RMP

•Adaptive to allow risks and potential for success to be fully addressed

•Adaptive to respond to changing weather, fuels, resource availability, resource effects, etc.

2009 Implementation Strategy – After Action Review

Page 40: 2009 Implementation Strategy

NIXON WEATHER STATION (#020113) ENERGY RELEASE COMPONENT

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

5/1

5/8

5/15

5/22

5/29 6/5

6/12

6/19

6/26 7/3

7/10

7/17

7/24

7/31 8/7

8/14

8/21

8/28 9/4

9/11

9/18

9/25

10/2

10/9

10/1

6

10/2

3

10/3

0

DATE

ERC

Average

Maximum

Minimum

1999

Bridger-Knoll Fire, 6/20/96, ERC 48

Mt. Emma Fire, 6/3/99, ERC 19

•Interagency group addressed:• Communications•Air Quality•Reporting•Planning•WFDSS/Decision-making•Operations

•Interagency comprehensive communications plan released with strategy needed

•Assumed multi-year implementation•2009 was a transition year •Any pre-season work facilitated the transition

•Risk discussions held on 30 fire-prone Forests yielded greater understanding and success

AAR-Results

Page 41: 2009 Implementation Strategy

NIXON WEATHER STATION (#020113) ENERGY RELEASE COMPONENT

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

5/1

5/8

5/15

5/22

5/29 6/5

6/12

6/19

6/26 7/3

7/10

7/17

7/24

7/31 8/7

8/14

8/21

8/28 9/4

9/11

9/18

9/25

10/2

10/9

10/1

6

10/2

3

10/3

0

DATE

ERC

Average

Maximum

Minimum

1999

Bridger-Knoll Fire, 6/20/96, ERC 48

Mt. Emma Fire, 6/3/99, ERC 19

• Communications•Develop a national interagency comm. plan

•Consistent terminology•Training•Interagency Implementation website

•Air Quality•Communication plan for wildfire a successful approach (MT/ID)

•Outreach plan needed for public •Coordination between agencies/units…

•Accountability/evaluation process •WFDSS Air Quality tools•Training

AAR-Results - continued

Page 42: 2009 Implementation Strategy

First Look: 2010 Fire Season

Graphic shows typical El Niño impacts during the winter…but this year’s El Niño is not behaving in the usual way

Page 43: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Increased risk ofCalifornia floods &

burned area concerns

More Nor’easters

Page 44: 2009 Implementation Strategy

Preliminary Wildland Fire Outlook for 2010

Normalto Above

Normalto Below

Normalto Below

?