Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
2008-2009 School Grade. Add your own data/celebrate. Celebrating Our Success. Success. Why. Next Steps. Vision And Mission Reflections. Looks Like. Sounds Like. Feels Like. 2008-2009 State Report Card/School Grade Data Source. School. “ ” = Not Applicable Cell - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
2008-2009 School Grade
Add your own data/celebrate
2
Celebrating Our Success
Success Why Next Steps
3
Vision And Mission Reflections
Looks Like Sounds Like Feels Like
4
Total Points = /
2008-2009 State Report Card/School Grade
Data Source
ODMS Report SIP0010
“ ” = Not Applicable Cell
A=525 B=495 C=435 D=395 F=394
School
Exercise #1
5
Grade Level Data: High Standards
Data Source
School Name
ODMS Report SIP0020
Exercise #2
6
Grade Level Data: Percent Making Annual Gains
GradeLevel
Year
Reading Math
% Learning
Gains+/-
% Learning
Gains+/-
Grade___
2008
2009
Grade___
2008
2009
Grade___
2008
2009
Exercise #3
7
GradeLevel
Year
Reading Math
% Learning
Gains+/-
% Learning
Gains+/-
Grade___
2008
2009
Grade___
2008
2009
Grade___
2008
2009
Exercise #4
Grade Level Data: Lowest Quartile Making Annual
Gains
8
Grade Level Data: High Standards
Grade
Level
Year
Reading Math Science Writing
% Level 3+
+/-
% Level 3+
+/-
% Level 3+
+/-% 3.5+ +/-
Grade
___
2008 X X X X2009 X X X X
Grade
___
2008 X X2009 X X
Grade
___
2008 X X2009 X X
Exercise #2
9
Subgroup Data: Percent Making Annual Gains
Data Source
ODMS Report SIP0050
School Name
Exercise #5
10
Reading Achievement Level Comparisons By Grade Level
Reading Level 1
+/-Level 2
+/-Level 3
+/-Level 4
+/-Level 5
+/-
Grade
_____
2008
2009
Grade
_____
2008
2009
Grade
_____
2008
2009
Exercise #6
11
Math Achievement Level Comparisons - Overall
Math Level 1
+/-Level 2
+/-Level 3
+/-Level 4
+/-Level 5
+/-
Grade
_____
2008
2009
Grade
_____
2008
2009
Grade
_____
2008
2009
Exercise #7
12
Achievement Level Comparisons - Overall
Science Level 1
+/-Level 2
+/-Level 3
+/-Level 4
+/-Level 5
+/-
School
2008
2009
District
2008
2009
State
2008
2009
Exercise #8
13
FCAT WritingCombined 200
82009
+/-
Mean Score - All Curriculum
% Scoring 3.5 and above – Standard Curriculum
% Scoring 3.5 and above – All Curriculum
% Scoring 4.0 and above – All Curriculum
ExpositoryMean Score - All Curriculum
% Scoring 3.5 and above – All Curriculum
% Scoring 4.0 and above – All Curriculum
Narrative/PersuasiveMean Score - All Curriculum
% Scoring 3.5 and above – All Curriculum
% Scoring 4.0 and above – All Curriculum
Exercise #9
14
Made AYP – Status Model
15
Made AYP – Safe Harbor
16
Made AYP – Growth Model
17
Adequate Yearly Progress
Writing Reading Math% Met
AYP?% Met
AYP?% Met
AYP?
Total YesNo
YesNo
YesNo
White YesNo
YesNo
YesNo
Black YesNo
YesNo
YesNo
Hispanic YesNo
YesNo
YesNo
Asian YesNo
YesNo
YesNo
Am. Indian YesNo
YesNo
YesNo
EconomicallyDisadvantage
d
YesNo
YesNo
YesNo
ELL YesNo
YesNo
YesNo
SWD YesNo
YesNo
YesNo
Did We Meet AYP for 2008-2009?
18
Eliminating the Achievement GapReading Math
% atLevel 3
Achievement Gap?
% atLevel 3
Achievement Gap?
Total YesNo
YesNo
White YesNo
YesNo
Black YesNo
YesNo
Hispanic YesNo
YesNo
Asian YesNo
YesNo
Am. Indian YesNo
YesNo
EconomicallyDisadvantaged
YesNo
YesNo
ELL YesNo
YesNo
SWD YesNo
YesNo
19
Eliminating the Achievement Gap
Data Source
School Name
ODMS Report DEM0050
