1
JULY/SEPTEMBER 2002 PATHWAYS THE NOVARTIS JOURNAL JANUARY/MARCH 2003 • PATHWAYS THE NOVARTIS JOURNAL The most fundamental question in psychology, indeed in all the social sciences, is: What is the nature of human nature? The dominant answer for the past century has been the ‘Blank Slate’, the theory that the human mind comes equipped with little or no inherent structure. Each person’s mind has been inscribed during development, according to this view, by parents, teachers, society, culture, and media messages. The corollary is the doctrine of the Noble Savage, the theory that “humans in their natural state are selfless, peaceable, and untroubled”, and that jealousy, greed, conflict, and aggression are contemporary ills caused by the corrupting influence of civilization. These core doctrines come in many guises – radical behaviorism, social constructionism, postmodernism, environmental determinism, cultural determinism, and even some current theories of neural “plasticity”. In The Blank Slate (TBS), a book monumental in scope and scholarship, Professor Steven Pinker shows that this dominant dogma has long outlived its scientific warrant. Contrary to the blank slate, Pinker argues, humans are not passive receptacles or empty vessels. Anyone who has raised a child knows this, of course, but scientific theories sometimes lag behind what everyone knows. We come equipped, according to TBS, with an astonishing array of evolved mechanisms – innate fears of heights, predators, evolved desires for particular mates; hostility toward out-group members; biases toward investing in children and kin; and dozens of others. TBS keeps the reader riveted by interspersing penetrating arguments with evidence, anecdotes, humor- ous illustrations, historical accounts of academic disputes, and well-placed quotations from literature, film, and popular music. I was simultaneously amused and horr- ified to read of the debating tactics of some blank slate proponants, including prominent professors, who have re- sorted to doctoring the quotations of opponents, calling them nasty names, and even impugning their sex lives. Debates about human nature have long been acrimonious. Pinker brings a calm and incisive voice to these contentious issues. He shows how acknowledging an innate human nature does not have commonly feared consequences, such as resignation to an unalterable fate, despair about improving the human condition or justification of evil deeds. Indeed, he shows how the doctrine of environmental determinism has led to some of the most common modern travesties. Mass killings by Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao were all driven, in part, by blank slate ideology. Recent decades have also witnessed people fobbing off personal responsibility for crimes by using the abuse excuse, the Twinkie defense, the “pornography made me do it” defense, or by blaming media violence, rock lyrics, or different cultural norms. Pinker is at his best when dissecting the underlying logic of scientific arguments, exposing flaws in reasoning, and showing the errors of scientists who let ideologies cloud their thinking. TBS could be criticized for failing to provide pat prescriptions for grappling with the multi-faceted human nature that modern science illuminates. How can we strive for meaning and morality, for example, when confronted with contradictory components of a nature that contains both sexual treachery and life-long love, homicidal impulses and compassionate self-sacrifice? But Pinker’s goal is not primarily prescriptive. He aims to uproot deeply entrenched but now outmoded assumptions about the human mind and confront a nature that is glorious in its complexity, if sometimes disturbing in its contents. On this goal, his aim is true. This may be the most important book so far published in the 21st century. It touches practically everything we care about, from mating to children to violent international conflict. I suspect many feathers will be ruffled by TBS. But I think Pinker’s final analysis is correct – the core doctrines of the blank slate and noble savage will go down in the history of science as examples of “extraordinarily popular delusions” that have had an unseemly stranglehold on the past century of scientific thought. Dr. David M. Buss is Professor of Psychology at the University of Texas at Austin. He has published more than 150 scientific articles and six books. By Steven Pinker Published by Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, London, 2002. ISBN: 0713992565 - Hardback; 560 pages: GBP25.00. VIEWS BOOK REVIEW The Nature of Human Nature The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature DR. DAVID M. BUSS 49

2002_12_pathways

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2002_12_pathways

JULY/SEPTEMBER 2002 • PATHWAYS THE NOVARTIS JOURNALJANUARY/MARCH 2003 • PATHWAYS THE NOVARTIS JOURNAL

The most fundamental question in psychology,indeed in all the social sciences, is: What is thenature of human nature? The dominant answer forthe past century has been the ‘Blank Slate’, thetheory that the human mind comes equipped withlittle or no inherent structure. Each person’s mindhas been inscribed during development, accordingto this view, by parents, teachers, society, culture,and media messages. The corollary is the doctrineof the Noble Savage, the theory that “humans intheir natural state are selfless, peaceable, anduntroubled”, and that jealousy, greed, conflict, andaggression are contemporary ills caused by thecorrupting influence of civilization.

These core doctrines come in many guises – radicalbehaviorism, social constructionism, postmodernism,environmental determinism, cultural determinism, andeven some current theories of neural “plasticity”. In TheBlank Slate (TBS), a book monumental in scope andscholarship, Professor Steven Pinker shows that thisdominant dogma has long outlived its scientific warrant.

Contrary to the blank slate, Pinker argues, humans arenot passive receptacles or empty vessels. Anyone whohas raised a child knows this, of course, but scientifictheories sometimes lag behind what everyone knows. Wecome equipped, according to TBS, with an astonishingarray of evolved mechanisms – innate fears of heights,predators, evolved desires for particular mates; hostilitytoward out-group members; biases toward investing inchildren and kin; and dozens of others.

TBS keeps the reader riveted by interspersingpenetrating arguments with evidence, anecdotes, humor-ous illustrations, historical accounts of academic disputes,and well-placed quotations from literature, film, andpopular music. I was simultaneously amused and horr-ified to read of the debating tactics of some blank slateproponants, including prominent professors, who have re-sorted to doctoring the quotations of opponents, callingthem nasty names, and even impugning their sex lives.

Debates about human nature have long beenacrimonious. Pinker brings a calm and incisive voice tothese contentious issues. He shows how acknowledgingan innate human nature does not have commonly fearedconsequences, such as resignation to an unalterable fate,despair about improving the human condition orjustification of evil deeds. Indeed, he shows how thedoctrine of environmental determinism has led to someof the most common modern travesties. Mass killings

by Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao were all driven, in part, byblank slate ideology. Recent decades have also witnessedpeople fobbing off personal responsibility for crimes byusing the abuse excuse, the Twinkie defense, the“pornography made me do it” defense, or by blamingmedia violence, rock lyrics, or different cultural norms.

Pinker is at his best when dissecting the underlyinglogic of scientific arguments, exposing flaws inreasoning, and showing the errors of scientists who letideologies cloud their thinking. TBS could be criticizedfor failing to provide pat prescriptions for grapplingwith the multi-faceted human nature that modernscience illuminates. How can we strive for meaning andmorality, for example, when confronted withcontradictory components of a nature that containsboth sexual treachery and life-long love, homicidalimpulses and compassionate self-sacrifice? But Pinker’sgoal is not primarily prescriptive. He aims to uprootdeeply entrenched but now outmoded assumptionsabout the human mind and confront a nature that isglorious in its complexity, if sometimes disturbing in itscontents. On this goal, his aim is true.

This may be the most important book so farpublished in the 21st century. It touches practicallyeverything we care about, from mating to children toviolent international conflict. I suspect many featherswill be ruffled by TBS. But I think Pinker’s final analysisis correct – the core doctrines of the blank slate andnoble savage will go down in the history of science asexamples of “extraordinarily popular delusions” thathave had an unseemly stranglehold on the past centuryof scientific thought.

Dr. David M. Buss is Professor of Psychology at the University ofTexas at Austin. He has published more than 150 scientificarticles and six books.

By Steven Pinker

Published by Allen Lane,The Penguin Press,London, 2002.ISBN: 0713992565 -Hardback; 560 pages:GBP25.00.

VIEWSBOOK REVIEW

The Nature of Human NatureThe Blank Slate: The Modern Denialof Human Nature DR. DAVID M. BUSS

49