Upload
romelyn-mae-palomar
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
1/38
Announcements/ Reminders
FB group (IE 155 A.Y. 2012-2013)
Form 5 and class card
Index card/ picture
1/4 sheet (at least one per mtg)
Case study #1 on Monday, December 10
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
2/38
Previously
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
3/38
System Life-Cycle [Engineering]
M.A.Ramirez | December 04, 2012
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
4/38
Objectives
Define system life cycle
Identify the phases of a system life cycle andactivities associated
Identify principles and approaches in designing forthe system life cycle
Identify problems in a system life cycle Enumerate some system process models
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
5/38
Introduction
Last meeting .
Industrial engineers design industrial
systems
Few I.E.s really engage in overall systemdesign
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
6/38
Introduction
Industrial engineers are systems engineers
Classical engineers has focused mainly on productperformance as the main objective rather on
development of the overall system of which the
product is a part
Accordingly, engineers must turn its focus on life-cycle engineering
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
7/38
The System Life Cycle
Fundamental to application of systems design/engineering is understanding the system life-cycle
process illustrated for the product in the figure below
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
8/38
The System Life Cycle
The significance of focusing on the system life cycle is thatdecisions made early in the Acquisition Phase are informed of
the proposed and intended activities in the Utilization Phase(e.g. Maintenance and Operation, etc.)
A life cycle focus can save money in the long term
Sixty percent of the errors in system development originate in thesystems requirements analysis
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
9/38
The System Life Cycle
Classification is generic
Both the acquisition and utilization process may involve boththe customer and the producer
Detailed presentation of the elaborate technological activities
and interactions that must be integrated over the system life-cycle process is shown in your handout :)
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
10/38
The System Life Cycle
Progression is iterative from left to right, and not serial
Life cycle functions described and illustrated are generic
It is essential that this process be implemented completely,not only in the acquisition of new systems but also in re-
engineering of existing systems
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
11/38
The System Life Cycle
A. IDENTIFYING THE NEED/ CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
producing a clearly-defined set of user requirements at the
system level
clearly defining the functional requirements of the system
establishes a Functional Baseline (the whats and whys ofthe system)
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
12/38
The System Life Cycle
B. PRELIMINARY DESIGN Aim: convert the Functional Baseline into a preliminary definition of the
system configuration or architecture (the hows of the system)
The stage where functional design is translated into physical design
Result: Allocated Baseline -- indicates that the functional requirements
have been grouped together logically and allocated to subsystem level
requirements which combine to form the overall system design
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
13/38
The System Life Cycle
C. DETAIL DESIGN and DEVELOPMENT
Development of the individual subsystems and
components in the system
Prototyping, testing and evaluation
Product Baseline
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
14/38
The System Life Cycle
D. PRODUCTION and/or CONSTRUCTION
system components will be produced in accordance
with the detailed design specifications
Configuration audits
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
15/38
The System Life Cycle
E. PRODUCT USE, PHASEOUT, & DISPOSAL
Operational use and system support
Disassembly and disposal of elements or
components of the system without causingenvironmental degradation
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
16/38
The System Life Cycle
Systems engineering activities may continue to support
any modification activity that maybe required
rectify performance shortfalls
meet changing operational requirements or
external environment
enhance current performance or reliabilitymaintain ongoing support to the system
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
17/38
Designing for the Life Cycle
Get sheet!
What is the meaning of designing within the
system life-cycle context compared to the old school
definition of design?
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
18/38
Designing for the Life Cycle
Life-cycle focused design is simultaneously responsive tocustomer needs and to life-cycle outcomes
Design should not only transform a need into a definitiveproduct and system configuration
It should ensure the designs compatibility with relatedphysical and functional requirements
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
19/38
Designing for the Life Cycle
System life cycle goes beyond the product life cycle
It embraces the life cycle of the manufacturingprocess as well as the life cycle of the product
support and service capability
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
20/38
Designing for the Life Cycle
3 concurrent life cycles progressing in parallel
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
21/38
Designing for the Life Cycle
Need for the product comes into focus first
During conceptual design of the product,consideration should simultaneously be given to its
production
This gives rise to a parallel life cycle for bringing amanufacturing capability into being
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
22/38
Designing for the Life Cycle
3 concurrent life cycles progressing in parallel
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
23/38
Designing for the Life Cycle
Third life cycle is of great importance too, but often
neglected until product and production design iscompleted
Needed to service the product during use and to
support the mfg capability during its cycle
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
24/38
Designing for the Life Cycle
Communication and coordination is needed to develop theproduct, the manufacturing process, and the support
capability
Not easy to achieve
Progress in this area is facilitated by new technologies thatmake more timely acquisition and use of design information
possible
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
25/38
Designing for the Life Cycle
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
26/38
Systems Engineering
Process Models
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
27/38
Waterfall Process Model
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
28/38
Waterfall Process Model
Introduced by Royce in 1970
Initially used for software development
Each phase is carried out to completion in sequence
until the product is delivered
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
29/38
Vee Process Model
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
30/38
Vee Process Model
Developed by Forsberg and Mooz
the Vee describes and models the technical aspectof the project cycle
Starts with user needs (upper left)
Ends with user-validated systems (upper right)
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
31/38
Spiral Process Model
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
32/38
Spiral Process Model
Developed by Boehm in 1986
Introduces a risk-driven approach for thedevelopment of products and systems
Iterative and proceeds through the several phases
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
33/38
What the requirement stated. What the designer specified
What the programmers implemented What the user wanted
System Life Cycle Problems
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
34/38
System Life Cycle Problems
It leads to misunderstandings between users anddevelopers about what is to be delivered
The information used in one subsystem is frequently
needed by other subsystems
Systems grow and change
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
35/38
System Life Cycle Problems
The SDLC needs an integration stage that identifies all
inter-relationships
Every system is part of a larger system and can be
broken into smaller subsystem
The numerous components of a system mustcommunicate with each other
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
36/38
System Life Cycle Problems
The most specialized systems are the least adaptable
Slow, inflexible, people-intensive system that iscomplex and unresponsive to organizational needs
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
37/38
Next Meeting
Quality function deployment; and/or Functional Analysis
7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering
38/38
- END
Thank you!