2.0 SLC Engineering

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    1/38

    Announcements/ Reminders

    FB group (IE 155 A.Y. 2012-2013)

    Form 5 and class card

    Index card/ picture

    1/4 sheet (at least one per mtg)

    Case study #1 on Monday, December 10

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    2/38

    Previously

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    3/38

    System Life-Cycle [Engineering]

    M.A.Ramirez | December 04, 2012

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    4/38

    Objectives

    Define system life cycle

    Identify the phases of a system life cycle andactivities associated

    Identify principles and approaches in designing forthe system life cycle

    Identify problems in a system life cycle Enumerate some system process models

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    5/38

    Introduction

    Last meeting .

    Industrial engineers design industrial

    systems

    Few I.E.s really engage in overall systemdesign

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    6/38

    Introduction

    Industrial engineers are systems engineers

    Classical engineers has focused mainly on productperformance as the main objective rather on

    development of the overall system of which the

    product is a part

    Accordingly, engineers must turn its focus on life-cycle engineering

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    7/38

    The System Life Cycle

    Fundamental to application of systems design/engineering is understanding the system life-cycle

    process illustrated for the product in the figure below

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    8/38

    The System Life Cycle

    The significance of focusing on the system life cycle is thatdecisions made early in the Acquisition Phase are informed of

    the proposed and intended activities in the Utilization Phase(e.g. Maintenance and Operation, etc.)

    A life cycle focus can save money in the long term

    Sixty percent of the errors in system development originate in thesystems requirements analysis

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    9/38

    The System Life Cycle

    Classification is generic

    Both the acquisition and utilization process may involve boththe customer and the producer

    Detailed presentation of the elaborate technological activities

    and interactions that must be integrated over the system life-cycle process is shown in your handout :)

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    10/38

    The System Life Cycle

    Progression is iterative from left to right, and not serial

    Life cycle functions described and illustrated are generic

    It is essential that this process be implemented completely,not only in the acquisition of new systems but also in re-

    engineering of existing systems

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    11/38

    The System Life Cycle

    A. IDENTIFYING THE NEED/ CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

    producing a clearly-defined set of user requirements at the

    system level

    clearly defining the functional requirements of the system

    establishes a Functional Baseline (the whats and whys ofthe system)

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    12/38

    The System Life Cycle

    B. PRELIMINARY DESIGN Aim: convert the Functional Baseline into a preliminary definition of the

    system configuration or architecture (the hows of the system)

    The stage where functional design is translated into physical design

    Result: Allocated Baseline -- indicates that the functional requirements

    have been grouped together logically and allocated to subsystem level

    requirements which combine to form the overall system design

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    13/38

    The System Life Cycle

    C. DETAIL DESIGN and DEVELOPMENT

    Development of the individual subsystems and

    components in the system

    Prototyping, testing and evaluation

    Product Baseline

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    14/38

    The System Life Cycle

    D. PRODUCTION and/or CONSTRUCTION

    system components will be produced in accordance

    with the detailed design specifications

    Configuration audits

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    15/38

    The System Life Cycle

    E. PRODUCT USE, PHASEOUT, & DISPOSAL

    Operational use and system support

    Disassembly and disposal of elements or

    components of the system without causingenvironmental degradation

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    16/38

    The System Life Cycle

    Systems engineering activities may continue to support

    any modification activity that maybe required

    rectify performance shortfalls

    meet changing operational requirements or

    external environment

    enhance current performance or reliabilitymaintain ongoing support to the system

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    17/38

    Designing for the Life Cycle

    Get sheet!

    What is the meaning of designing within the

    system life-cycle context compared to the old school

    definition of design?

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    18/38

    Designing for the Life Cycle

    Life-cycle focused design is simultaneously responsive tocustomer needs and to life-cycle outcomes

    Design should not only transform a need into a definitiveproduct and system configuration

    It should ensure the designs compatibility with relatedphysical and functional requirements

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    19/38

    Designing for the Life Cycle

    System life cycle goes beyond the product life cycle

    It embraces the life cycle of the manufacturingprocess as well as the life cycle of the product

    support and service capability

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    20/38

    Designing for the Life Cycle

    3 concurrent life cycles progressing in parallel

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    21/38

    Designing for the Life Cycle

    Need for the product comes into focus first

    During conceptual design of the product,consideration should simultaneously be given to its

    production

    This gives rise to a parallel life cycle for bringing amanufacturing capability into being

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    22/38

    Designing for the Life Cycle

    3 concurrent life cycles progressing in parallel

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    23/38

    Designing for the Life Cycle

    Third life cycle is of great importance too, but often

    neglected until product and production design iscompleted

    Needed to service the product during use and to

    support the mfg capability during its cycle

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    24/38

    Designing for the Life Cycle

    Communication and coordination is needed to develop theproduct, the manufacturing process, and the support

    capability

    Not easy to achieve

    Progress in this area is facilitated by new technologies thatmake more timely acquisition and use of design information

    possible

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    25/38

    Designing for the Life Cycle

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    26/38

    Systems Engineering

    Process Models

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    27/38

    Waterfall Process Model

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    28/38

    Waterfall Process Model

    Introduced by Royce in 1970

    Initially used for software development

    Each phase is carried out to completion in sequence

    until the product is delivered

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    29/38

    Vee Process Model

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    30/38

    Vee Process Model

    Developed by Forsberg and Mooz

    the Vee describes and models the technical aspectof the project cycle

    Starts with user needs (upper left)

    Ends with user-validated systems (upper right)

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    31/38

    Spiral Process Model

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    32/38

    Spiral Process Model

    Developed by Boehm in 1986

    Introduces a risk-driven approach for thedevelopment of products and systems

    Iterative and proceeds through the several phases

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    33/38

    What the requirement stated. What the designer specified

    What the programmers implemented What the user wanted

    System Life Cycle Problems

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    34/38

    System Life Cycle Problems

    It leads to misunderstandings between users anddevelopers about what is to be delivered

    The information used in one subsystem is frequently

    needed by other subsystems

    Systems grow and change

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    35/38

    System Life Cycle Problems

    The SDLC needs an integration stage that identifies all

    inter-relationships

    Every system is part of a larger system and can be

    broken into smaller subsystem

    The numerous components of a system mustcommunicate with each other

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    36/38

    System Life Cycle Problems

    The most specialized systems are the least adaptable

    Slow, inflexible, people-intensive system that iscomplex and unresponsive to organizational needs

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    37/38

    Next Meeting

    Quality function deployment; and/or Functional Analysis

  • 7/29/2019 2.0 SLC Engineering

    38/38

    - END

    Thank you!