Upload
leo-harmon
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2nd Quarter SFY 14
2
OTIA IIIOTIA III State Bridge Delivery Program State Bridge Delivery Program Construction Progress SummaryConstruction Progress Summary
2nd Quarter SFY 14
4
Project Delivery Dashboard: State & Local Projects
Note: New dashboard (2.0) is not yet operational
Dundas Dashboard (PDLT)
Right click to open hyperlink:
2nd Quarter SFY 14
5
Project Delivery Dashboard: State Projects(SFY 2014)
Note: Data not accurate. Dashboard not operational till week of Feb. 3
2nd Quarter SFY 14
6
% of Projects On Time for PS&E Acceptance(State/Local Comparison)
Metric Definition: Project no greater than 90 days over the target PS&E Acceptance date. Target PS&E acceptance date is currently defined as the target bid let date minus 45 days.
2nd Quarter SFY 14
7
To Construction Timeliness(State/Local Comparison)
Metric Definition: % of projects reaching NTP before deadline. Deadline = PS&E Accept date + Advt Length + FHWA Review weeks + 27 days of OPD’s activities + 57 days for contract time between bid and NTP.
2nd Quarter SFY 14
8
% Preliminary Engineering (PE) (State/Local Comparison)
Metric Definition: Percentage of Preliminary Engineering = Design Cost divided by Total Project Cost
2nd Quarter SFY 14
9
% of Design Outsourced
Metric Definition: Percent of Design Outsourced for State Projects
2nd Quarter SFY 14
11
% Construction Engineering (CE) (State/Local Comparison)
Metric Definition: Percentage of Construction Engineering = Engineering Performed divided by Construction Costs
2nd Quarter SFY 14
12
% of Projects Awarded Within Engineering Estimate (State/Local Comparison)
Metric Definition: % of Projects awarded at no greater than or less than 10% of the Engineering Estimate.
ODOT CONFIDENTAL DATA. DO NOT DISTRIBUTE.
2nd Quarter SFY 14
13
Metric Definition: % of Projects awarded at no greater than or less than 10% of the Engineering Estimate.
% of Projects Awarded Within Engineering Estimate(State Only)
ODOT CONFIDENTAL DATA. DO NOT DISTRIBUTE.
2nd Quarter SFY 14
14
Number of Bids per SFY Qtr(Statewide)
Metric Definition: Number of bids per SFY Qtr
# OF BIDS 73 ## ## ## 58 119 ## 112 45 81 87 167 60 50 121 ## 63 ## 145 ## ## ## ## ## 93 ## 173 ## ## ## 70 ## ## ## 107 ## 55 ##
Avg Bids per Project4 4 4 3 3 5 4 3 3 3 5 4 4 6 6 6 6 9 8 5 5 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 6 7 8 5 5 6 7 5 5 5
73
132 129120
58
119
100112
45
8187
167
6050
121
193
63
210
145
426
182
248
401
341
93
146
173
218
100
230
70
305
123
168
107
243
55
188
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SF
20
05 Q
1
SF
20
05 Q
2
SF
20
05 Q
3
SF
20
05 Q
4
SF
20
06 Q
1
SF
20
06 Q
2
SF
20
06 Q
3
SF
20
06 Q
4
SF
20
07 Q
1
SF
20
07 Q
2
SF
20
07 Q
3
SF
20
07 Q
4
SF
20
08 Q
1
SF
20
08 Q
2
SF
20
08 Q
3
SF
20
08 Q
4
SF
20
09 Q
1
SF
20
09 Q
2
SF
20
09 Q
3
SF
20
09 Q
4
SF
20
10 Q
1
SF
20
10 Q
2
SF
20
10 Q
3
SF
20
10 Q
4
SF
20
11 Q
1
SF
20
11 Q
2
SF
20
11 Q
3
SF
20
11 Q
4
SF
20
12 Q
1
SF
20
12 Q
2
SF
20
12 Q
3
SF
20
12 Q
4
SF
20
13 Q
1
SF
20
13 Q
2
SF
20
13 Q
3
SF
20
13 Q
4
SF
20
14 Q
1
SF
20
14 Q
2
CO
UN
T P
ER
QU
AR
TE
R
AV
ER
AG
E P
ER
PR
OJ
EC
T
Project Bidding: Averages and Counts Avg Bids per Project # OF BIDS
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
2nd Quarter SFY 14
15
On Budget: % of Original Const. Auth. Spent (State/Local Comparison)
Metric Definition: % of Original Construction Authorization spent
2nd Quarter SFY 14
16
Financial Plan Snapshot 2012-2015(1st Qtr FFY 14)
Metric Definition: 4-Year Cumulative Ending Balances for the Financial Plan broken down by Regions and Programs
2nd Quarter SFY 14
17
Federal Funds Obligated(FFY)
Metric Definition: Percentage of Federal Funds Obligated
2nd Quarter SFY 14
18
Local Program Funds Obligated(1st Qtr FFY 14)
Metric Definition: Percent of Local Program Funds Obligated
$ Amount
2nd Quarter SFY 14
19
% of Contractor Evaluations Completed (For evaluations due between 7/1/2012 and 6/30/2013)
Metric Definition: Percent of Prime Contractor Evaluations completed before 90 days past the due date
2nd Quarter SFY 14
20
PDLT Recent Accomplishments
• Completed revised PDLT charter for ILT approval, incorporating intermodal aspects
• Completed membership changes• Developed strategies to improve PDLT
communication– All Area Managers & Tech Center Managers have a seat at
meetings– All Area Managers & Tech Center Managers will be copied
on agendas and meeting materials
• Completed sub-team review– Role based teams do not need to be chartered (AMT, PMST,
PDST)– PDST & PMST will continue to be sponsored by AMT and the
AMT sponsors now have a seat at PDLT to raise issues directly
2nd Quarter SFY 14
21
PDLT Current Initiatives
• PBLT/SSLT/PDLT collaboration and integration• Intermodal Oregon Integration
– Rail Safety Crossing project – future process improvement
• Local/State Integration of guidance, processes, tools
• Annual Project Delivery resource planning process• Biannual PDLT work plan development• ILT High Priority #5: Project Initiation
Improvement• ILT High Priority #6: Technical “mode” training for
project delivery staff