20
1950: 2.5 billion people

1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

  • View
    229

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

1950: 2.5 billion people

Page 2: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

2000: 6 billion people

Page 3: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

2050: 9.2 billion people

Page 4: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

The top 8 commodities, such as corn, wheat, soy and rice, provide

more than 80% of human calories.

Page 5: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

All commodities have followed the same basic pattern.

yields

prices

Page 6: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

These patterns put more marginal land into production -- and increase the use of chemicals, fossil fuels, and water.

1950 2000

Global Fertilizer Use

Page 7: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

Since 1945, severe or extreme soil degradation has affected an area larger than India and China.

Page 8: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

Stark warning that the ability of the planet’s ecosystems to sustain future generations can no longer be taken for granted:

Recommends radical changes in the way nature is treated at every level of decision-making.

Source: Living Beyond Our Means: Natural Assets and Human Well-Being. Statement from the Board of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. March 2005

THE UN MILENNIUM ASSESSMENT, 2005

“Resilience and abundance can no longer be confused with indestructibility and infinite supply.”

Page 9: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

1

Limits To Growth Study, 1972 & 2004

Natural Resources

Industrial Output

Food

Population

Pollution

Source: Dennis Meadows, 2004

Page 10: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

MODERN DAY MYTHS

The earth is a subsidiary of

our economies

The earth has infinite

resilience and productivity to

meet whatever

humans need

“Externalities” are real, but

because they are not on our

P&Ls or Balance Sheets, they don’t exist and no one is accountable.

Page 11: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

USA WASTES MORE ENERGY THAT JAPAN USES …… WORLD’S 3RD LARGEST GDP

Page 12: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

‘HUBBERT’S PEAK IS NEAR OR HERE’

Page 13: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

COST OF OIL 1978 - 2008

Average Cost of Crude Oil

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

Pri

ce p

er B

arre

l (U

SD)

Page 14: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

STATE OF THE WORLD 2008: WAVES OF INNOVATION

Page 15: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

RENEWABLE ENERGY COST TRENDSLevelized cost of energy in constant 2005$

Source: NREL Energy Analysis Office (www.nrel.gov/analysis/docs/cost_curves_2005.ppt)1These graphs are reflections of historical cost trends NOT precise annual historical data. DRAFT November 2005

Cost of OilIn cents/kwh

Page 16: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

MilkPackagingFinished

Product

Transport

Facility Energy

Use

Transport

to/from

Processors &

Copackers

Employee

Commute

Business

Travel

SugarFruit & Flavors,

Other

Waste Disposal

STONYFIELD FARM GHG EMISSIONSM

etric To

ns C

O2

Page 17: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

RE-MOOABLE ENERGY

Wanner Dairy FarmNavron, Pennsylvania, USA

Anaerobic digester for manure from 600 cows feeds an electric generator

Environmental benefits:Avoids methane emissions from manureReplaces local coal-generated electricity Eliminates propane and oil use on the farmProvides watershed protection from reduced runoff

Economic benefits to the farm:Two new commodities for sale: electricity & carbon offsets Financial credits for reduced runoffReduced and predictable on-farm heat and power costsDigested and dried manure reduces animal bedding costs Positive PR value for the farm

Page 18: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

Sustainable agricultural practices– Cane is green harvested, not burned

– Waste streams from production recycled for soil building or power generation

– Biological pest control program uses beneficial insects and natural predators

– Fields reconfigured to prevent soil erosion

Payoffs– Green harvesting saves 40K tonnes CO2/yr & 3.5 million liters water/hr at mill

– 90% reduction in pest damage

– Increased biodiversity (189 species of birds, reptiles, and mammals)

– Increasing groundwater quality and volume

BRAZIL SUGAR: A BIG ECOLOGICAL AND FINANCIAL SUCCESS STORY

10% increase in yields & 50%

reduction in cost premium in 5 years

Page 19: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people

$10.00

$12.00

$14.00

$16.00

$18.00

$20.00

$22.00

$24.00$22.87

$22.50$22.00

$14.00

$12.32

$11.88

$14.30 $14.43

$15.14

$15.56

$16.98

$17.35 $17.53$18.20

$20.00

$12.37

$11.06

$11.80 $11.83 $12.05

$12.71

$13.74

$12.07

$13.00

$14.20

$10.57 $10.97

$14.00

Comparing Organic vs Conventional Pay Price

Organic Milk Conventional Milk Org. Milk Budget. 07 Conv. Milk Budget 07

Page 20: 1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people