2
#35 A t t o rn ey; G r o ss I m m or a l C o n d uct. R e sp o n d e n t P e d r e ñ a , a P u b li c A t t o r n ey, w a s char g edfor sexual ha r assm en t . The S up reme C ourt held tha t ther eco r ds sh ow t h a t t h e r e sp o n d e n t ru b b e d t h e co m p l ai n a n t s ri g h t l e g w i t h h i s h a n d ; tri e d to i n se rt h i s n g er in t o h e r r m l y c lose d h a n d ; g r a b b e d h e r h and a n d forci b l y p lace d it o n his cr o t chare a ; a n d p r e ss e d h i s n g er a g ai n st h er p rivat e p ar t . G i ve n t h e cir cu m sta n ces in w h i ch h e co m m it t e d t h em, h i s a ct s w ere n ot m er e l y o e nsive a n d u n d e sirable b u t r e p ulsi ve , d i sg r a ce f u l a n d g rossl y i m m o r a l. T h e y co n sti t u t e d mi sc o n d u ct o n the p a rt o f a n y l a w ye r. In t h is r e g ard, im m or a l co n d u ct i s g r o ss w h en it is so co rr u pt a s to co n stit u t e a crimin a l act, o r soun p rinci p l e d a s t o b e r e pr e h e n si b l e t o a h i g h d e g re e , or w h e n c o m m i tt e d u n d er su ch sca n d a l o us or r ev oltin g cir cu m sta n ce s as t o sh o ck t h e co m m u n it y’ s s e n se o f d e ce n cy. A t t y. P e d r e ña’ s m iscon d uct w a s a g g r ava t e d by t h e f a ct tha t he w a s th e n a P u blic A t t o rn e y m a n d a t e d t o p r o vi d e f r e e l e g a l ser vi ce t o in d i g e n t l iti g a n t s, a n d b y t h e f a ct th a t co m p l a i n a n t w a s th e n su ch a cli e n t. He also d isr e g ar d ed h is o a t h a s a p u b lic o ce r t o se rve o t h e rs an d t o be a cco u n t a b le a t a ll t i m es, b e ca u se h e t h e r e b y t o o k a d va n t a g e o f h er vu l n er a b i l i t y as a cl i e n t t h en in d e sp e r a t e n e e d o f h is l e g a l as s i s t a n ce . Th u s, r esp o n d en t w as m et ed o u t t h e p enal t y o f su sp en si o nfr o m t h e p r ac tice o f l aw f o r t w o ( 2) ye ars.   Joc e l y n De L e o n v.  A tt y . T y rone Pe d r e n a ,  A .C . N o . 9 4 01 , Octo b er 22 , 201 3 .

18. 9401

  • Upload
    mar-joe

  • View
    217

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 18. 9401

8/18/2019 18. 9401

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/18-9401 1/1

#35

Attorney; Gross Immoral Conduct.Respondent Pedreña, a Public Attorney, was

charged for sexual harassment. The Supreme Court held that the records show

that the respondent rubbed the complainant’s right leg with his hand; tried to

insert his finger into her firmly closed hand; grabbed her hand and forcibly placed

it on his crotch area; and pressed his finger against her private part. Given the

circumstances in which he committed them, his acts were not merely offensive

and undesirable but repulsive, disgraceful and grossly immoral. They constituted

misconduct on the part of any lawyer. In this regard, immoral conduct is gross

when it is so corrupt as to constitute a criminal act, or so unprincipled as to be

reprehensible to a high degree, or when committed under such scandalous or

revolting circumstances as to shock the community’s sense of decency. Atty.

Pedreña’s misconduct was aggravated by the fact that he was then a Public

Attorney mandated to provide free legal service to indigent litigants, and by the

fact that complainant was then such a client. He also disregarded his oath as a

public officer to serve others and to be accountable at all times, because he

thereby took advantage of her vulnerability as a client then in desperate need of

his legal assistance.Thus, respondent was meted out the penalty of

suspension from the practice of law for two (2) years.  Jocelyn De Leon v.

 Atty. Tyrone Pedrena, A.C. No. 9401, October 22, 2013.