199
Designing Wood Frame Structures For High Winds

15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DesigningWoodFrameStructuresForHighWinds

Page 2: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

“TheWoodProductsCouncil”isaRegisteredProviderwithTheAmericanInstituteofArchitectsContinuingEducationSystems(AIA/CES),Provider#G516.

Credit(s)earnedoncompletionofthiscoursewillbereportedtoAIACESforAIAmembers.CertificatesofCompletionforbothAIAmembersandnon-AIAmembersareavailableuponrequest.

ThiscourseisregisteredwithAIACESforcontinuingprofessionaleducation.Assuch,itdoesnotincludecontentthatmaybedeemedorconstruedtobeanapprovalorendorsementbytheAIAofanymaterialofconstructionoranymethodormannerofhandling,using,distributing,ordealinginanymaterialorproduct.________________________________Questionsrelatedtospecificmaterials,methods,andserviceswillbeaddressedattheconclusionofthispresentation.

Page 3: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

CourseDescription

Woodframingisconducivetomeetingthechallengesofwind-resistivedesign.Amongitscharacteristics,woodcancarrysubstantiallygreatermaximumloadsforshortdurationsoftimeasisthecaseinhigh-windevents.Woodbuildingsalsotendtoincludemultipleandoftenredundantloadpathsforresistancetowindforces.Thispresentationwillcoverthedesignofabuilding’swind-resistingsystem,includingwindloadcalculations,diaphragms,shearwallsandcollectors.Loadpathcontinuitywillbediscussed,aswilluniquedesignconsiderationsfordesigningwood-framestructurestoresistuplift,in-plane,andout-of-planewindloads.Designexampleswillbepresentedtoillustraterelevantdesignproceduresanddetailingbestpractices.

Page 4: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

LearningObjectives

1. ReviewtheparametersforbuildingwindloadcalculationsperASCE7andtheInternationalBuildingCode.

2. Examinethethreemaintypesofbuildingwindloads(uplift,in-plane,andout-of-plane)anddesignconsiderationsassociatedwitheach.

3. Discusscommonwood-frameshearwall,diaphragm,andtie-downsystems.

4. Recognizethebenefitsofredundancyinwind-resistingwood-framesystems.

Page 5: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Overview

• Wind• CalculatingWindLoads• Uplift• WallDesign• Diaphragms• Shearwalls

Page 6: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MakingourBuildingsSafe- WindHighwindloadsactingonabuildingarearesultofavarietyoftypesofwindstormswhichhavedifferingnaturesandoccurrences.Buildingdesignshouldincludewindloadresistanceandaccountforthecharacteristicsofthetypeofstormsthatcanimpactthebuilding.

Page 7: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MakingourBuildingsSafe- Hurricanes

ImageSource:WholeBuildingDesignGuide

Page 8: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ImageSource:WholeBuildingDesignGuide

MakingourBuildingsSafe- Tornadoes

Page 9: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

“Experiencehasshownthatcode-compliantwoodbuildingsperformexceedinglywellduringhighwindeventssuchashurricanes.Woodisstrongandmostwood-framebuildingsoffertheadvantageofrepetitivemembersandmultipleconnections,whichtogethercreateredundantloadpathstoeffectivelytransferwindforcesfromthebuildingenvelopetothefoundationandsoilbelow”.

UsingWoodtoResistWind:Benefits

QuoteSource:Wind-ResistiveDesignofWoodBuildings,AWC

Photo:NewGenesisApartments,Killefer Flammang Architects,KCKim,GBConstruction

Page 10: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WhyWood?

UsingWoodHelpsReduceYourEnvironmentalImpact

WoodProductsPlayaSignificantRoleinModernEconomy

WoodCostsLess

WoodisVersatile

WoodMeetsCode

WoodisDurable

WoodisRenewable

Page 11: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindLoadsWindloadsactingonbuildingsaremodeledasuniformsurfaceloads.Windloadscancreatebothpositiveandnegativeloads(inwardsandoutwardsloads)onbuildingsurfacesandcreatethreedifferentloadingconditions:

• Uplift

• Racking/overturning

• Sliding/shear

Page 12: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindForceDistribution

ImageSource:WholeBuildingDesignGuide

Page 13: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindLoadDemand

IBC:BaseCode– ReferencesASCE7fordeterminationofwindforcesonstructures

ASCE7:ReferencedStandard.Providesinformationrequiredtodeterminewindforcesona

structure

Page 14: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

CalculatingWindLoads

• ASCE7-05§ Chpt.6:ContainedAllProvisions

• ASCE7-10§ Chpt.26:GeneralRequirements§ Chpt.27:MWFRS– Directional§ Chpt.28:MWFRS– Enveloped§ Chpt.29:OtherStructures§ Chpt.30:Components&Cladding§ Appendices

Page 15: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DetermineBasicWindSpeed,Vmph

PerASCE7-10Fig.26.5-1A

115

Page 16: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DetermineBasicWindSpeed,V

• ASCE7-05§ ASDLoads§ 90mphperfig.6-1

• ASCE7-10 (figuresincorporateimportancefactor)§ UltimateLoads§ 115mphperfigure26.5-1AforRKII

§ 120mphperfigure26.5-1BforRKIII&IV

§ 105mphperfigure26.5-1CforRKI

Note:RK=RiskCategoryImageSource:SKGhosh Associates

Page 17: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindSpeedByLocationSoftware

windspeed.atcouncil.org

Page 18: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RunningtheNumbers:VelocityPressure

• qz =0.00256KzKztKdV2

§ qz =velocitypressure(psf)§ Kz – Exposurecoefficient,Table30.3-1(7-05Table6-3)

§ Kzt – Topographicfactor,Figure26.8-1(7-05Figure6-4)

§ Kd – Directionalityfactor,Table26.6-1(7-05Table6-4)

Page 19: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindLoadsTypes

2TypesofWindLoads

• MWFRS– MainWindForceResistingSystemAnassemblageofstructuralelementsassignedtoprovidesupportandstabilityfortheoverallstructure.Thesystemgenerallyreceiveswindloadingfrommorethanonesurface.Eg.Shearwalls,diaphragms

• C&C– Components&CladdingElementsofthebuildingenvelopethatdonotqualifyaspartoftheMWFRS.Eg.Wallstuds

Page 20: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MWFRSMethodOptions

TwoMethodsofCalculatingMWFRSloads:• Envelope:Pressurecoefficientsrepresent“pseudo”loadingthatenvelopethedesired

moment,shear...Limitedtolow-rise

• Directional:Pressurecoefficientsreflectwindloadingoneachsurfaceasafunctionofwind

direction

Page 21: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MWFRSMethodOptions

Howtodecidewhichmethodtouse:Envelope:ASCE7-10Chapter28• Part1:Canbeusedforallregular-shapedenclosed&partiallyenclosedbuildingswithmeanroofheight≤60ft

• Part2(Simplified):Canbeusedforallregular-shaped,enclosed,simplediaphragmbuildingswithmeanroofheight≤60ft

Page 22: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MWFRSMethodOptions

Howtodecidewhichmethodtouse:Directional:ASCE7-10Chapter27• Part1:Canbeusedforallregular-shapedbuildings

• Part2(Simplified):Canbeusedforallregular-shaped,enclosed,simplediaphragmbuildingswithmeanroofheight≤160ft

Page 23: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MWFRSMethodOptions

ASCE7-10MWFRSOptions

Part1:Enclosed,PartiallyEnclosed,Open

BuildingsAllHeights

DirectionalMethod,CH27 EnvelopeMethodCH28

Part2:Enclosed,Simple

DiaphragmBuildingswithh≤160ft

Part1:Enclosed&PartiallyEnclosed Buildingswithh≤60ft

Part2:Enclosed,Simple

DiaphragmBuildingswithh≤60ft

Note:WindTunnelProcedure(ASCE7-10Chpt31)canalsobeused

Simplified,Directio

nal

Simplified,Envelope

Page 24: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

SimpleDiaphragmBuildings

Abuildinginwhichbothwindwardandleewardwindloadsaretransmittedbyroofandverticallyspanningwallassemblies,throughcontinuousfloorandroofdiaphragms,totheMWFRS.

SimpleDiaphragmBuilding Non-SimpleDiaphragmBuilding

Page 25: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Example:FlatRoof,30’x60’Building:

Ch.27Directional

• WindwardWall(0.8)• LeewardWalls(-0.3)

• DetermineGustEffect(G)=0.85

• ForMWFRSGCpf =(1.1)(0.85)=0.935

Ch.28Enveloped

§ LimitedtoLow-Rise(h≤60’)§ WindwardWall(0.4)

§ LeewardWall(-0.29)

§ ForMWFRSGCpf =0.69

35%differenceinloadingnotaccountingforendzones.

ComparisonofmethodstocalculateMWFRS(GCpf)

ASCE7-10Figure28.4-1

ASCE7-10Figure27.4-1

Page 26: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MWFRSMethodOptions

Beneficialtousetheenvelopemethodwhenitslimitationsaremet

ASCE7-10Fig.C28.4-1

Page 27: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MinimumWindLoads

ForboththeDirectional&EnvelopeMethods,considerminimumwindloads:ASCE7-10Sections27.1.5&28.4.4:

WindLoadsforMWFRSinanenclosedorpartiallyenclosedbuildingshallnotbelessthan:§ 16psf (ultimateor~10psf ASD)forwalls§ 8psf (ultimateor~5psf ASD)forroofs

Wallandroofloadsshallbeappliedsimultaneously.Thedesignwindforceforopenbuildingsshallbenotlessthan16psf ultimate(openbuildingprovisionsapplyonlytoDirectionalMethod).

Page 28: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

BuildingEnclosure

Accountsfordegreetowhichwindforcescanenterandexitastructure,creatingvaryingamountsofinternalwindpressure

3buildingenclosureclassifications:Open,PartiallyEnclosed,andEnclosed

Page 29: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RunningtheNumbers:DesignWindPressure

• p=qh[(GCp)– (GCpi)]§ p=Designwindpressure(psf)§ qh =velocitypressure(psf)§ GCp:Externalpressurecoefficient

Figures27.4-1,28.4-1,30.4-1Note:Figure27.4-1alsorequiresGusteffectfactor(G)persection26.9

§ GCpi:Internalpressurecoefficient,Table26.11-1(7-05Figure6-5)

Page 30: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

InternalPressureCoefficient– Table26.11-1

+/- 0.18- Enclosed+/- 0.55– PartiallyEnclosed

Page 31: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ActualWindLoads

ComparingASCE7-05toASCE7-10:LoadCombinations:

7.0.6D+W(ASCE7-05)7.0.6D+0.6W(ASCE7-10)

3SecondWindSpeed:90mph (ASCE7-05)115mph*√0.6=89mph(ASCE7-10)

Finalloadonbuildingisverysimilar

Page 32: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

IBC’sAlternateAll-HeightsMethodIBCSection1609.6providesanalternativetotheDirectionalWindLoadProcedureinASCE7

AlternateAll-HeightsMethod

Limitationssuchas:• BuildingHeight≤75ft• BuildingHeight/Width≤4• Buildinghassimplediaphragm• Others(IBC1609.6.1)

Pnet =0.00256V2KzCnetKzt

Page 33: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

IBC’sAlternateAll-HeightsMethod

Pnet =0.00256V2KzCnetKzt

• V=Basicwindspeed(ASCE7)

• Kz =Exposurecoefficient(ASCE7)

• Kzt =Topographicfactor(ASCE7)

• Cnet =Net-pressurecoefficient(IBCTable1609.6.2)

Page 34: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

IBC’sAlternateAll-HeightsMethod

IBCTable1609.6.2

Page 35: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindBorneDebrisRegions

PerASCE7-10,section26.2,WindBorneDebrisregionsareAreaswithinhurricane-proneregionswhereimpactprotectionisrequiredforglazedopenings(buildingsinRiskCategoryIareexempt– ASCE26.10.3&IBC1609.1.2)

Protectionofglazedopeningsisrequired(ASCE726.10.3):

• Within1mileofthecoastalmeanhighwaterlinewherethebasicwindspeedisequaltoorgreaterthan130mph,or

• Inareaswherethebasicwindspeedisequaltoorgreaterthan140mph

• Otherexemptions,testingrequirementsgiveninASCE7-10,section26.10.3

Page 36: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindBorneDebrisRegions

Image:greenheck.com

Page 37: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindBorneDebrisRegions

Failedopeningscanchangeastructurefromenclosedtopartiallyenclosed,significantlyincreasingwindforces

Page 38: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Let’sTalkAboutWood

1.Uplift– LoadPathContinuity2.Wall– StudDesign3.Diaphragms4.Shearwalls

Page 39: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

UpliftWindLoads

Uplift– Outward(suction)forceactingonroof

Loadpath- rooftofoundationrequiredunlessdeadloadisgreaterthanuplift

Page 40: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

UpliftLoads

Source:strongtie.com

Page 41: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MethodstoResistUpliftLoads

• Mechanicalconnectors(straps,hurricaneties,screws,threadedrods)

• Sheathing

• DeadLoads

Source:strongtie.com

Page 42: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

UpliftResistance:MechanicalConnectors

Source:IIBHS

Page 43: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

UpliftResistance:WallSheathing

• Whenjoints,fastenersareconsidered,canusesheathingtoresistuplift

• SDPWSSection4.4

SDPWSFigure4I

Page 44: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

UpliftResistance:DirectLoadPath

Importanttodetailupliftrestraintconnectorstoprovidedirectloadpath

Page 45: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RoofGeometry&Uplift

ImageSource:WholeBuildingDesignGuide

Page 46: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Uplift:MWFRSorC&C?

ConsidermemberpartofMWFRSif:• TributaryArea>700ft2 perASCE7-1030.2.3• LoadcomingfrommorethanonesurfaceperASCE7-1026.2

Page 47: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Uplift:MWFRSorC&C?

AWC’sWFCMcommentaryC1.1.2statesthatMWFRSisusedforallupliftconditions:

TherationaleforusingMWFRSloadsforcomputingtheupliftofroofassembliesrecognizesthatthespatialandtemporalpressurefluctuationsthatcausethehighercoefficientsforcomponentsandcladdingareeffectivelyaveragedbywindeffectsondifferentroofsurfaces.

Page 48: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Uplift:MWFRSorC&C?

ASCE7-1026.2commentaryprovidessomediscussiononuplift&MWFRSvs.C&C.

ComponentsreceivewindloadsdirectlyorfromcladdingandtransfertheloadtotheMWFRS.Examplesofcomponentsincludefasteners,purlins,girts,studs,roofdecking,androoftrusses.ComponentscanbepartoftheMWFRSwhentheyactasshearwallsorroofdiaphragms,buttheymayalsobeloadedasindividualcomponents.

Page 49: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

EffectiveWindArea

Forwinddesign,tributaryareadoesnotnecessarily=effectivewindarea

EffectiveWindArea(EWA)- Twocases:• Areaofbuildingsurfacecontributingtoforcebeing

considered(tributaryarea)• Longandnarrowarea(wallstuds,rooftrusses):width

ofeffectiveareamaybetakenas1/3length;increaseseffectivearea,decreasesload(perASCE7-10section26.2commentary);EWA=L2/3

Page 50: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

EffectiveWindAreaExample

44’-0”

Trusses@2’o.c.

44’-0”

Trusses@2’o.c.

Trib.A=(44)(2)=88ft2 EWA=442/3=645ft2

Page 51: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

UpliftExampleCalculation

• RoofFramingRafter• 20’Span• 2’Spacing• 2’Overhang• 115mphExposureB• RoofH=80ft• 65’x220’

Photocredit:MattTodd&PBArchitects

Page 52: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MWFRS- ExternalPressureCoefficient

Lookatwindactingonbuilding’slongside:L=65ft,h/L=80/65=1.23Cp =1.3,-0.18

ASCE7-10Fig.27.4-1

Page 53: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

• GCp:(0.85)(-1.3)=1.105(26.9.4&Fig.27.4-1)• GCpi:±0.18(Table26.11-1)• qh =0.00256KzKztKdV2

§ Kz :0.93– Table27.3-1§ Kzt :1.00- Figure26.8-1§ Kd :0.85- Table26.6-1§ Vu:115mph

• qh =26.8psf• p=(26.8psf)(-1.105+(-0.18))=34.4psf

MWFRS- Runningthenumbers

Page 54: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MWFRS- RoofOverhangpersection27.4.4• ForOverhangs:ASCE727.4.4– useCp =0.8onundersideofoverhang,usesametoppressurescalculatedfortyp.roof

• poh =(26.8psf)(-0.8)(0.85)=18.2psf• pext =(26.8psf)(-1.105)=29.6psf• poh net=18.2+29.6=47.8psf

Poh

pext

PerASCE7-10section27.4.4

pint

Page 55: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

MWRFS- DeterminingtheUpliftLoad• p=(34.4psf)(2ft)=68.8plf• poh =(47.8psf)(2ft)=95.6plf

68.8plf

Uplift=0.6(95.6plf(2ft.)+68.8plf*20ft/2)=528lbsDeadLoad=0.6((2+20/2)*10psf*2ft)=144lbsNetUpliftatLeftSupport=528lbs -144lbs =384lbsNote: Itiscommonpracticetouse2sets ofdead loads:highestpotential dead loadsforgravity,lowestpotential deadloadsforuplift

95.6plf

Page 56: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

C&C- ExternalPressureCoefficient3zoneswithdifferingwindloads:

1:Field2:Perimeter3:Salientcorners

a=smallerof10%ofleasthorizontaldimensionor0.4h,butnotlessthaneither4%ofleasthorizontaldimensionof3ft

ASCE7-10Fig.30.4-2A

Page 57: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

C&C- ExternalPressureCoefficient– Fig.30.4-2A

EWA=H2/3=222/3=161ft2

GCP =-1.1FORINTERIOR

ASCE7-10Fig.30.4-2A

Page 58: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

• GCp:-1.1(Figure30.4-2A)• GCpi:±0.18(Table26.11-1)• qh =0.00256KzKztKdV2

§ Kz :0.93- Table30.3-1§ Kzt :1.00- Figure26.8-1§ Kd :0.85- Table26.6-1§ Vu:115mph

• qh =26.8psf• p=(26.8psf)(-1.1+(-0.18))=34.3psf

C&C- Runningthenumbers– Zone2

Page 59: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

C&C- RoofOverhangpersection30.10• ForOverhangsFigures30.4-2A&30.10-1areutilized• poh =26.8psf(1.7+0.18)=50.4psf• ps =pw =34.3psf• poh net=50.4+34.3=84.7psf

ps

pW

pOH

EWA=2*2=4sf

GCp =-1.7

PerASCE7-10Fig.30.10-1ASCE7-10Fig.30.4-2A

Page 60: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

C&C- DeterminingtheUpliftLoad• p=(34.3psf)(2ft)=68.6plf• poh =(84.7psf)(2ft)=169.4plf

68.6plf

Uplift=0.6(169.4plf(2ft.)+68.6plf*20ft/2)=615lbsDeadLoad=0.6((2+20/2)*10psf*2ft)=144lbsNetUpliftatLeftSupport=615lbs -144lbs =471lbsNote: Itiscommonpracticetouse2sets ofdead loads:highestpotential dead loadsforgravity,lowestpotential deadloadsforuplift

169.4plf

Page 61: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DeterminingtheUpliftLoad

384lbs MWFRSOR471lbs C&[email protected]

Page 62: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Overview

• Wind• CalculatingWindLoads• Uplift• WallDesign• Diaphragms• Shearwalls

Page 63: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DesigningWoodWalls

Page 64: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindLoadsUniformsurfacewindloadsgenerallyincreasewithbuildingheight

ASCE7-10Fig.27-6.1

Ifwindloadsvarywithbuildingheight,commontousehigherwindloadoverasinglestoryorbuilding

Page 65: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Panels

Hinges

L/dRatio

Unbraced Length

WallVeneer

WindonlyloadingC&C

DesignProperties

WallDesignConsiderations

Page 66: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

LoadsintoWSPWindloadsaretransferredtowallframingstudsthroughwoodstructuralpanels(sheathing)

SDPWSTable3.2.1

ForASDCapacity:DivideNominalCapacityby1.6

ForLRFDCapacity:MultiplyNominalCapacityby0.85

Page 67: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

TOPPLATE

L/D<502x6:22’-11”2x4:14’-7”

Whichwallisgoingtowithstandhighwinds?

Page 68: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

GableEndWallHinge

Page 69: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

GableEndBracingDetails• AWC’sWoodFrameConstructionManual

Page 70: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

GableEndBracingDetails

• Gableendwallandroofframingmayrequirecrossbracing

Page 71: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

FullHeightStudsatGableEndWalls

• Ifnoopeningsingableendwallexist,candesignstudstospanfromfloor/foundationtoroof(varyingstudheights).Mayrequirecloserstudspacings attallerportionsofwall

Page 72: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

GableEndWallswithOpenings

Page 73: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

GableEndWallswithOpenings

Page 74: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

GableEndWallGirts&Jambs

• Oftengableendwallsarelocations oflargewindows

• Horizontallyspanningmember inplaneofwallbreaksstud length,providesallowableopening

Verticallyspanningjambs

Horizontallyspanning

girts

Page 75: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DeterminingUnbraced Length

Whatistheunbracedlength,lu ?Strong&weakaxis

Page 76: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Gypsum&WeakAxisBuckling

NDSCommentary:“Experiencehasshownthatanycodeallowedthicknessofgypsumboard,hardwoodplywood,orotherinteriorfinishadequatelyfasteneddirectlytostudswillprovideadequatelateralsupportofthestudacrossitsthicknessirrespectiveofthetypeorthicknessofexteriorsheathingand/orfinishused.”

Page 77: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

IntermediateWallStudBlocking

Page 78: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

CalculatingDeflection– IBCTable1604.3

ForΔ ofmostbrittlefinishesusel/240

ForC&Cpressuresa30%loadreductionisallowedforΔ only(IBCTable1604.3footnotef)

f.Thewindload ispermitted tobetakenas0.42times the"component andcladding” loadsforthepurposeofdetermining deflection limits herein.

Page 79: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WoodStudswithBrickVeneer- Deflection

IBCTable1604.3:min.walldeflectionwithbrittlefinishes=L/240

BrickIndustryAssociationrecommendsmuchstricterlimits

StructureMagazineMay2008article,HaroldSprague

BIATechNote28

Page 80: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Example:LargeDiamondRetailer22’tallwoodframedwalls.

Assumestuds16”o.c.

130mphExposureB

LeastHorizontalDim.=64ft.

Page 81: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ExternalPressureCoefficients– WallZones4&5

a=Lesserof:

• 10%leasthorizontaldimension(LHD)64’*0.1=6.4’

• 0.4h=0.4*22=8.8’.Butnotlessthan:

• 0.04LHD=2.6’or3’

Usea=6.4’forzone5

Page 82: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ExternalPressureCoefficients- Walls

Assumewallstudsare22’long

EWA=h2/3=161ft2

Zone4:

GCpf =-0.89

GCpi =-0.18(Table26.11-1)

Zone5:

GCpf=-1.0

ASCE7-10Figure30.4-1

Page 83: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Runningthenumbers– Zone4

• GCpf:0.89(Figure30.4-1)• GCpi:0.18(Table26.11-1)• qh =0.00256KzKztKdV2

§ Kh :0.70- Table30.3-1§ Kzt :1.00- Figure26.8-1§ Kd :0.85- Table26.6-1§ V:130mph

• qh =25.74psf• p=25.74psf(0.89+0.18)=27.54psf• 0.6W=0.6(27.54)=16.52psf

Page 84: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

LumberDesignProperties

DesignPropertiesfromNDSSupplement.

Assume2x8DouglasFir-Larch#2Studs,16”o.c.

RepetitiveMemberadjustment=1.25

SizeFactor=1.2

DurationofLoad=1.6

Page 85: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

StudRepetitiveMemberFactorNoteonstudrepetitivememberfactor:

NDSsection4.3.9:CR =1.15

SDPWSTable3.1.1.1largerCR factorsforstudsinbending,16”spacingmaxincreasedto24”in2015SDPWS),interiorcoveredwithmin.½”gypsum,exteriorcoveredwithmin.3/8”WSP,otherfastenerrequirements

DESIGNPROPERTIES

Fb (psi) 900 NDSSupp.Table 4A

CD 1.6 NDSTable2.3.2

CR 1.25 SDPWS Table 3.1.1

CF 1.2 NDSSupp.Table 4A

E(psi) 1600000 NDSSupp.Table 4A

Sx (in3) 13.1 CalculatedNDS3.3-4

I(in4) 47.6 CalculatedNDS3.3-3

Page 86: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Soisourstudgoingtowork?

Twoofthemostcriticaldesignparametersarebendinganddeflection.

Studswork!

IBCTable1604.3footnotef

Page 87: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

• GCp:1.00(Figure30.4-1)• GCpi:0.18(Table26.11-1)• qh =0.00256KzKztKdV2

§ Kh :0.70- Table30.3-1§ Kzt :1.00- Figure26.8-1§ Kd :0.85- Table26.6-1§ V:130mph

• qh =25.74psf• p=25.74psf(1.0+0.18)=30.37psf• 0.6W=0.6(30.37)=18.22psf

Runningthenumbers– Zone5

Page 88: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Whataboutcornerzones?

Deflectionchecknogood– solution:reduceloadsoneachstud

IBCTable1604.3footnotef

Page 89: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

12”StudSpacing

Sincestuddepthcannotbeincreasedconsiderreducingstudspacingto12”inallZone5areas:

Studswork!– Use2x8@16”o.c.typical,use2x8@12”o.c.incorners(Zone5areas)

IBCTable1604.3footnotef

Page 90: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WallDesignConsiderations

Fortallwallswhileitislesslikelyforcombinedbendingandaxialtocontrol

• MainWindForceLoadsmaybe

utilized

• Loadcombinations(ASCE7Chpt 2)

for:

§ wind+deador

§ dead+0.75live+0.75rooflive

(orsnow)

D,L,S

W

Page 91: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WallDesignConsiderations

Forotherdesignissuesseethearticle:

• ConsiderationsinWindDesignofWoodStructures

• FreedownloadfromAWCavailableat:http://www.awc.org/pdf/codes-standards/publications/archives/AWC-

Considerations-0310.pdf

Page 92: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WallStudDesignAidWesternWoodProductsAssociation(WWPA)DesignSuite:

http://www.wwpa.org/TECHGUIDE/DesignSoftware/tabid/859/Default.aspx

Page 93: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Overview

• Wind• CalculatingWindLoads• Uplift• WallDesign• Diaphragms• Shearwalls

Page 94: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DiaphragmDesign

Page 95: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindLoadDistributiontoDiaphragm

WINDINTODIAPHRAGMS

WINDSURFACELOADSONWALLS

Page 96: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindLoadPaths

WINDINTODIAPHRAGMSASUNIFORMLINEARLOADS

Page 97: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindLoadPaths

DIAPHRAGMSSPANBETWEEN

SHEARWALLS

WINDINTOSHEARWALLSASCONCENTRATEDLOADS

Page 98: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

StudtoDiaphragm

WINDLOAD

DIAPHRAGMSHEATHING

Floor/Roofframingperpendiculartowalls

FLOORJOIST

Page 99: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

StudtoDiaphragm

WINDLOAD

DIAPHRAGMSHEATHING

Floor/Roofframingparalleltowalls(addblocking)

FLOORJOIST

BLOCKING

Page 100: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

VisualCue

VisualCue:FloorBeaminPlan=DiaphragminElevation

FloorBeam

FloorBeam

FloorBeam

FloorJoists

FloorFramingPlan

FloorJoists

Page 101: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

VisualCue

VisualCue:FloorBeaminPlan=DiaphragminElevation

Diaphragm

Diaphragm

Foundation

WallStuds

WallFramingElevation

WallStuds

Page 102: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Floor- BendingMember

• SimplySupportedMember:loadingcausescompressioninoneedgeofmember,tensioninotheredge

Compressionedge

Tensionedge

Loadingdirection

ReactionReaction

Page 103: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Diaphragm– BendingMember

Tensionedge

Compressionedge

Page 104: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindLoadPath- Lateral

•Diaphragmactslikeadeepbeam.• Sheathingcarriesshearforces• ChordshaveT&Cforces• Rimboardtransfersshear

DIAPHRAGM

Page 105: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

UnblockedDiaphragm

Page 106: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

BlockedDiaphragm

Page 107: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ChordForces

SPLICEINRIMBOARD

LAPINTOPPLATEPROVIDESCONT.TENSILERESISTANCE

TENSILEFORCE

Page 108: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

AssumeBasicWindSpeed=115mphUltimate

ExposureB

DiaphragmDesign

• Capacity

Shearwall Design

• Conventional

• ForceTransferAroundOpening

• PerforatedShearwall

Example:RetailRestaurant

Page 109: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RetailRestaurant– DiaphragmDesign

84’

34’

10’6’ 8’5’

6’

6’

6’

6’

6’

3’3’

4’

29’24’

CriticalShearwall atfrontofbuilding

CheckDiaphragmforwindloadson84’wall

Page 110: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RetailRestaurant– DiaphragmDesign

CriticalShearwall atfrontofbuilding

CheckDiaphragmforwindloadson84’wall

84’

34’

10’6’ 8’5’

6’

6’

6’

6’

6’

3’3’

4’

29’24’

Page 111: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DiaphragmAspectRatios

SDPWSTABLE4.2.4

TYPE- MAXIMUMLENGTH/WIDTHRATIO

Foran84x34diaphragmtheaspectratiois2.5<3.

DiaphragmaspectratioisOK.

Woodstructural panel,unblocked 3:1

Woodstructural panel,blocked 4:1

Single-layerstraightlumbersheathing 2:1

Single-layerdiagonallumbersheathing 3:1

Double-layerdiagonallumbersheathing 4:1

Page 112: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

CalculatingMWFRSWindLoadsCalculatewindpressureusingDirectionalMethod(ASCE7Chpt 27)

p=qh[(GCpf)-(GCpi)]

qh =0.00256*0.57*1.0*0.85*1152*1=16.4psf

GCpf =0.85*[0.8– (-0.3)]=0.935

GCpi =0.18- 0.18=0

p=(16.4psf)(0.935)=15.34psf

0.6*W=0.6*15.34=9.2 psf onwalls

Usemin9.6psf perASCE27.1.5

ASCE7-10Figure27.4-1

Page 113: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ParapetDesign– Figure27.6-2

Atparapetswindwardandleewardpressuresoccuroneachparapet.

Section27.4.5:Pp =q(GCpn)GCpn =1.5Windwardparapet,-1.0LeewardparapetWindwardParapetGCpf is1.5:16.4*1.5*0.6=14.76psfLeewardParapetGCpf is1.0:16.4*1.0*0.6=9.84psfNetParapet=14.76+9.84=24.6psf

Page 114: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RetailRestaurant– DiaphragmDesign

84’

34’

10’6’ 8’5’

6’

6’

6’

6’

6’4’

29’24’

10’

3’

3’

P=(9.6psf*(5’+3’)+(24.6)*3’)*(84’/2)=6,325lb

νdiaphragm=6,325lb/34’νdiaphragm=186plf

P

Page 115: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DiaphragmTypes

CASE1DIAPHRAGM•HigherShearValues•Panelsperpendiculartofloorframingforimprovedperformance

CASES2-6Maybepreferredforlowsheardemandwherechangingframingdirectionhelps•HVACruns•FireBlocking/DraftStopping

RoofTrusses4x8sheathingN-S

Page 116: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DiaphragmTypes

SDPWSTables4.2A&B

Page 117: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DiaphragmCapacity- SDPWSChpt 4

• CapacitiesareNominal:ModifybyASDreductionfactorof2,ModifybyLRFDmultiplicationfactorof0.8

• CapacityisreducedforspecieswithSpecificGravity<0.5• ForSprucePineFirmultiplyby0.92

Page 118: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DiaphragmCapacity:SDPWSTable4.2C

PANELGRADE

COMMONNAILSIZEORSTAPLEf

LENGTHANDGAGE

MINIMUMFASTENERPENETRATIONINFRAMING

MINIMUMPANELTHIICKNESS

MINIMUMNOMINALWIDTHOFFRAMINGMEMBERSATADJOININGPANELEDGESANDBOUNDARIESg

NAILSPACINGATALLPANELEDGES

Case1(Nounblockededgesorcontinuousjointsparalleltoload)

Allotherconfigurations(Cases2,3,4,5and6)

Sheathing&singlefloor

8d(2½“x0.131”)

13/8”

7/16”

2IN. 6IN. 460(Seismic)645(Wind)

340(Seismic)475(Wind)

3IN. 6IN. 510(Seismic)715(Wind)

380(Seismic)530(Wind)

CapacityisreducedforspecieswithSpecificGravity<0.5.ForSprucePineFirmultiplyby0.92

Capacity =(645plf)(0.92)/2=297plf297plf >186plf,diaphragmisadequatewithsheathing&fasteningasshownabove

Page 119: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

TransferringDiaphragmShearForces

BLOCKTOTRANSFERFORCES

UPPERWALL

Page 120: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

TransferringDiaphragmShearForces

BLOCKTOTRANSFERFORCES

PARAPET

NOTE:PARAPETKICKERSMAYBEREQUIREDFORTALLTRUSSPARAPETS

Page 121: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

TransferringDiaphragmShearForces

SHEARWALLBELOW

SHEARFORCEFROMDIAPHRAGM

RIMJOISTPROVIDESDIAPHRAGMLOAD

TRANSFER

Page 122: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DiaphragmtoShearwall Fastener

RIMBOARD

FLOORJOIST

TOPPLATE

TOENAIL150plf (ASD)LIMITINSDCD,E,F(SDPWS4.1.7)

METALCLIPSFORADD’LSTRENGTH

Page 123: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RoofDiaphragmtoShearwall

BLOCKINGTRANSFERSSHEARFORCESFROMROOFDIAPHRAGMTO

TRUSS

DIAPHRAGM

SHEARWALL

TRUSSTOWALLCONNECTION

COMPLETESLOADPATH

Page 124: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RoofDiaphragmtoShearwall

BLOCKINGTOTRANSFERSHEAR

FORCES

DIAPHRAGM

SHEARWALL

Page 125: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

• Diaphragmscanbeidealizedasflexible,semi-rigid,orrigid

• ASCE7-10Section26.2statesthatdiaphragmsconstructedofwoodstructuralpanelsarepermittedtobeidealizedasflexible

WoodEducationInstitute

DiaphragmFlexibility

Page 126: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DiaphragmFlexibilitySomebuildinglayoutsmayrequirediaphragmdesigntoaccountforcantilevers,oropenfrontstructures.• Trendsinmid-rise,multi-familybuildingstowardfewer

exteriorshearwallsmoveintosemi-rigid&rigidmodeling

Cant.

SWSWSWSW

SWSWSWSWSW

SW

NoexteriorShearwalls

Cor

ridor

onl

y sh

ear w

alls

Offs

et s

hear

wal

ls

Page 127: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DiaphragmsofOpenFrontStructures

ExamplesofOpenFrontStructuresper2015SDPWSFigure4A

Page 128: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

OpenFrontStructures(SDPWS4.2.5)

• Canidealizediaphragmasrigidifmax.in-planediaphragm

deflectionis≤2xavg.storydriftofverticalelements

• Ifnotidealizingasflexibleorrigid,mayusesemi-rigidanalysis,

distributesshearbasedonrelativestiffnessofbothdiaphragm

andverticalresistingelements

• Commontouseenvelopeanalysisinlieuofsemi-rigidanalysis• 2015SDPWS:DiaphragmCantilever≤35feet

AdditionalConsiderations:

• L/WRatio

• Irregularities&TorsionalEffects

• Diaphragmdeflections,especiallyatcorners

Page 129: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall &DiaphragmDeflection

Whencalculatingshearwall anddiaphragmdeflections,valuesofapparentshearstiffness,Ga,arerequired,butarenotprovidedforwinddesigninSDPWS

Page 130: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall &DiaphragmDeflectionAWCFAQ:Cantheeffectiveshearstiffnessvalues,Ga,inSDPWSbeusedforcalculationofdiaphragmandshearwalldeflectionsduetowindloads?

Valuesofapparentshearstiffness,Ga,aretabulatedinseismiccolumnsofthe SDPWS tofacilitatecalculationofseismicstorydriftinaccordancewithASCE7MinimumDesignLoadsforBuildingsandOtherStructures.ValuesofGa areequallyapplicableforcalculation ofthesheardeformationcomponentoftotaldeflectionduetowindloadsuptotheASDwindunitshearvaluecalculatedasvw/2.0.Thislevelofunitshearforwindisidenticalto1.4timestheASDseismicunitshearcapacityforwhichapparentshearstiffnessvalueswereoriginallydeveloped.

http://awc.org/faqs/general/can-the-effective-shear-stiffness-values-ga-in-special-design-provisions-for-wind-and-seismic-%28sdpws%29-be-used-for-calculation-of-diaphragm-and-shear-wall-deflections-due-to-wind-loads

Page 131: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Overview

• Wind• CalculatingWindLoads• Uplift• WallDesign• Diaphragms• Shearwalls

Page 132: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindLoadDistributiontoShearwalls

WINDINTODIAPHRAGMSWINDINTOSHEARWALLS

WINDSURFACELOADSONWALLS

Page 133: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwalls

HOLD-DOWN

WSPSHEATHING

ANCHORBOLTS

WOODSTUDS

Page 134: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WSPShearwall Capacity• CapacitieslistedinAWC’sSpecialDesign

ProvisionsforWindandSeismic(SDPWS)• Sheathedshearwallsmostcommon.Canalso

usehorizontalanddiagonalboardsheathing,gypsumpanels,fiberboard,lathandplaster,andothers

• Blockedshearwallsmostcommon.SDPWShasreductionfactorsforunblockedshearwalls

• Notethatcapacitiesaregivenasnominal:mustbeadjustedbyareductionorresistancefactortodetermineallowableunitshearcapacity(ASD)orfactoredunitshearresistance(LRFD)

Page 135: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall Capacity- SDPWSChpt 4

Page 136: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WindLoadscreateshear(sliding)andrackingforcesonastructure

Slidingresistedbyshearwall baseanchorageRackingresistedbyshearpanel&fasteners

Shearwall Functions

Page 137: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ShearWallComponents:WallFraming

Strut/collector

WallFraming(Studs)

BlockingBetweenStudsatAllPanelEdges

WallTopPlates

WallSolePlate

Note:Canuse“un-blocked”wallbutcapacitiescanbesignificantlylower:SDPWS4.3.3

Page 138: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RackedShearwall

EDGENAILINGPROVIDESRACKINGRESISTANCE

Page 139: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ShearWallComponents:WSP&Fasteners

Strut/collector

FieldorIntermediateNailing– Typ.12”o.c.

BoundaryNailing–Typ.2”– 6”o.c.

BoundaryNailing:Attachesall4edgesofeverypaneltowallframing(studs,blocking,top&soleplates)

FieldorIntermediateNailing:Attachespaneltointermediatewallframing(studs)notalongpaneledges

SheathingPanelsOSBorPlywood

Page 140: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PanelFasteners

Page 141: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwalls

ANCHORBOLTSTOFOUNDATION

PREVENTSLIDING!

Page 142: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Duetocantilevernatureofshearwalls,overturningforcesarealsogenerated

Overturningforcesareresistedbytension/compressioncouple–tensionportionresistedbydeadloadsandholddownanchors

Shearwalls - Overturning

Page 143: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Floor- CantileverMember

Tensionedge

Compressionedge

Page 144: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall - CantileverMember

Tensionedge

Compressionedge

Page 145: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Hold-DownsResistEndUplift

HOLD-DOWNS

Page 146: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ShearWallComponents:BaseAnchorage,EndPosts&HoldDowns

Strut/collector

SolePlateUniformAnchorage:Transfersshearfromwallsoleplatetofloor/wallorfoundationbelow.

SolePlateUniformAnchorage(Nails,Screws,Anchor

Bolts)

WallEndPost&HoldDown:Transfersverticaltension&compressionforcestofloor/wallorfoundationbelow.

WallEndPost&HoldDown

WallEndPosts(SizedforTension&Compression)

Page 147: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall HoldDowns

Source:DartDesignInc.com

Source:strongtie.com

BucketStyle

Page 148: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall HoldDowns

Straps

Source:strongtie.com

Page 149: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall HoldDowns

ContinuousRodTieDownswithShrinkageCompensation

Devices Source:hardyframe.com

Source:cteg.com

Page 150: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall Placement- Symmetrical

INTHISCASEDRAGSTRUTSCARRYLITTLE LOAD

TOPPLATE– NTSDRAGSTRUT

SHEARWALLS

WINDWARD

LEEWARD

Page 151: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall Placement– LargeDragStruts

INTHISCASEDRAGSTRUTSTRANSFERLEEWARDLOAD

TOPPLATE– NTSDRAGSTRUTSHEARWALLS

WINDWARD

LEEWARD

Page 152: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DragStruts&IsolatedWalls

INSOMECASESDOUBLETOPPLATEISINADEQUATE

WHATTOWATCHFOR:

• ISOLATEDSWWITHHEAVYNAILING• NOSHEARWALLSWITHIN10’OFWALLCORNER

Page 153: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

LateralForceResistingSystem

Page 154: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwalls inaLine- Stiffness• Windloadstomultipleshearwalls inthesamelinearedistributed

basedonshearwall stiffness• Ifwallshavethesameframing&sheathing,assumedtohavethe

sameper-footstiffness&loadsaredistributedbasedonwalllength• Eg.5’longwallreceives5/(5+12)=29%oftotalload

12’longwallreceives12/(5+12)=71%oftotalload

SHEARWALLLENGTHSDETERMINESTIFFNESS&LOADSHARING5’12’

Page 155: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall AspectRatio

NDSSDPWSTABLE4.3.4

MAXIMUMSHEARWALLDIMENSIONRATIOS

SeeSDPWSTable4.3.4forfootnotes

Woodstructural panels,blocked Forotherthanseismic:3½:11

Forseismic: 2:11

Woodstructural panels,unblocked 2:1

Diagonalsheathing, single 2:1

StructuralFiberboard 3½:13

Gypsumboard,portland cement plaster 2:12

L

H

AR=H/L

Page 156: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

EngineeredShearWallSystemsw/WSP

SolidorSegmentedWalls

PerforatedWallsForceTransferAround

OpeningsWalls

Page 157: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RetailRestaurant– Shearwall Design

84’

34’

10’6’ 8’5’

6’

6’

6’

6’

6’4’

29’24’

10’

3’

3’

P =7,602lb – fromdiaphragmcalcs usingDirectionalMethod

Let’sseewhathappenswhenweuseEnvelopeMethodtocalculateMWFRSloadstofrontshearwall

P

Page 158: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

CalculatingMWFRSWindLoadsCalculatewindpressureusingEnvelopeMethod(ASCE7Chpt28)

p=qh[(GCpf)-(GCpi)]

qh =0.00256*0.70*1.0*0.85*1152*1=20.14psf

GCpf (Zones1&4) =0.4– (-0.29)=0.69(ASCE7Fig.28.4-1)

GCpf (Zones1E&4E) =0.61– (-0.43)=1.04(ASCE7Fig.28.4-1)

GCpi =0.18- 0.18=0

P1&4=(20.14psf)(0.69)=13.9psf;0.6*W=0.6*13.9=8.3psfwallstyp.

P1E&4E=(20.14psf)(1.04)=20.9psf;0.6*W=0.6*20.9=12.5psf wallscrnr

ASCE7-10Figure28.4-1

Page 159: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

CalculatingMWFRSWindLoads

ASCE7-10Figure28.4-1

a=Lesserof:

• 10%leasthorizontaldimension(LHD)34’*0.1=3.4’

• 0.4h=0.4*13’=5.2’.Butnotlessthan:

• 0.04LHD=1.4’or3’

Usea=3.4’forzones1E&4E

2a=3.4’*2=6.8’

Page 160: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ParapetDesign– Section28.4.2

Atparapetswindwardandleewardpressuresoccuroneachparapet.

Section28.4.2:Pp =q(GCpn)GCpn =1.5Windwardparapet,-1.0LeewardparapetWindwardParapetGCpf is1.5:20.14*1.5*0.6=18.12psfLeewardParapetGCpf is1.0:20.14*1.0*0.6=12.08psfNetParapet=18.12+12.08=30.2psf

Page 161: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

RetailRestaurant– Shearwall Design

84’

34’

10’6’ 8’5’

6’

6’

6’

6’

6’4’

29’24’

10’

3’

3’

P

6.8’12.5psf8.3psf

77.2’

P=(8.3psf*(5’+3’)+(30.2)*3’)*(84’/2)+((12.5psf-8.3psf)*(5’+3’))*6.8’*(77.2’/84’)=6,804lb(forcomparison:Directionalmethodgaveus6,325lb)

Page 162: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Shearwall AspectRatios

10’

3’

3’34’

6’ 6’ 6’ 6’ 6’2’ 2’

10’

• CheckAspectRatios:AssumeblockedWSPShearwall• 10’/2’=5>3.5;Inadequate• 10’/6’=1.67<3.5;OK

FrontWallElevation

Page 163: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

• CheckAspectRatios:AssumeblockedWSPShearwall• 10’/2’=5>3.5;Inadequate• 10’/6’=1.67<3.5;OK

Shearwall AspectRatios

10’

3’

3’34’

6’ 6’ 6’ 6’ 6’2’ 2’

10’

νshearwall =6,804lb/12’=567plf

Page 164: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ConventionalShearwall Capacities

νshearwall =567plf

Assume15/32”,StructuralIsheathingattachedwith8dnails

NominalTabulatedCapacity=1540plfAdjustedASDCapacity =(1370plf)(0.92)/2=630plf630plf >567plf,OK8dnailsat3”o.c.acceptable

PANELGRADE FASTENERTYPE&SIZE

MINIMUMPANELTHIICKNESS

MINIMUMFASTENERPENETRATIONINFRAMING

NAIL SPACINGATALLPANELEDGES

PANEL EDGEFASTENERSPACING

WoodStructuralPanels–Sheathing

8d(2½“x0.131”)

15/32” 13/8” 3IN. 980(Seismic)1370(Wind)

SDPWSTable4.3A

Page 165: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

DesignTableDetails– 16”o.c.Studs

• Spacefasteners12inchesoncenteronintermediatesupports(SDPWS4.3.7.1.3)

• Ifnailspacingis2”o.c.use3inchnominalframing (SDPWS4.3.7.1.4)

• If10dnailsareutilizedalongwith3incho.c.edgenailingusenominal3xframing(SDPWS4.3.7.1.4)

• Ifnominalunitshearoneithersideofwallexceeds700plf inSDCD,E,orF,usenominal3xframing(SDPWS4.3.7.1.4)

Page 166: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ConventionalShearwall Overturning

νshearwall =567plfHolddownsrequiredatshearwallsT=νhT=567plf*10’=5,670lb

Holddowncapacity=7,045lbManyavailableprefabricatedholddownswithcapacitieslistedbymanufacturers

34’

6’ 6’ 6’ 6’ 6’2’ 2’

10’

Page 167: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Hold-DownAnchor

Page 168: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ConventionalShearwall Overturningνshearwall =567plfPostsarealsorequiredatendsofthewalltoresistcompressionforcesC=T=νhC=567plf*10’=5,670lb

6’ 6’ 6’ 6’ 6’2’ 2’

10’

SizepostforbearingonwallsoleplateAssume2x6wall,Requiredpostwidth=5,670lb/(565psi)(5.5in)=1.8in;Use2-2x6postmin.

Page 169: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ConventionalShearwall BaseAnchorage• νshearwall =567plf• ½”AnchorBoltcapacityforwoodbearing=680lb*1.6=1,088lb

perNDSTable11E• Spacing=1088lb/567plf =1’-11”o.c.max.

Page 170: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Hold-Downs:Segmentedv.PerforatedSegmentedShearwall

PerforatedShearwall

Page 171: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PerforatedShearWallMethod

HOLDDOWNSATENDOFWALL

WSPSHEATHING

Fewerholddownsrequired,shearcapacityisreduced

Uniformupliftatbaseofwallrequired– magnitude=shearforce– SDPWS4.3.6.4.2.1

Page 172: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

• CheckAspectRatios:AssumeblockedWSPShearwall• 10’/2’=5>3.5;Inadequate• 10’/6’=1.67<3.5;OKUseonlyfullheightsheathedsectionstoresistshear

PerforatedShearwall Design

10’

3’

3’34’

6’ 6’ 6’ 6’ 6’2’ 2’

10’

νshearwall =6,804lb/12’=567plf

TotalPerforatedShearwall

Page 173: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PerforatedShearwall CapacityWallhas12’/18’=67%fullheightsheathing,max.openingH=6’-8”

Multiplycapacityby0.75foropening2H/3

Reducedcapacityis630plf*0.75=473plf <567plf,Inadequate

SDPWSTable4.3.3.5

Page 174: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PerforatedShearwall Capacity

νshearwall =567plf

Tryreducingnailspacingto2”with8dnails– willrequire3xframing

NominalTabulatedCapacity=1790plfAdjustedASDCapacity=(1790plf)(0.92)(0.75)/2=618plf618plf >567plf,OK8dnailsat2”o.c.acceptableforperforatedwall

PANELGRADE FASTENERTYPE&SIZE

MINIMUMPANELTHIICKNESS

MINIMUMFASTENERPENETRATIONINFRAMING

NAIL SPACINGATALLPANELEDGES

PANEL EDGEFASTENERSPACING

WoodStructuralPanels–Sheathing

8d(2½“x0.131”)

15/32” 13/8” 2IN. 1280(Seismic)1790(Wind)

SDPWSTable4.3A

Page 175: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PerforatedShearwall Overturning

34’

6’ 6’ 6’ 6’ 6’2’ 2’

10’

νshearwall =567plfHolddownsrequiredatendsofperforatedwallT=νh/CoT=567plf*10’/0.75=7,560lb

Holddowncapacityfromsegmentedwalloption=7,045lb,Inadequate– needtoselecthighercapacityholddown

Page 176: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PerforatedShearwall Uplift

34’

6’ 6’ 6’ 6’ 6’2’ 2’

10’

νshearwall =567plf/0.75=756plf,usesamemagnitudeforuniformupliftatfullheightsegmentsOneoptionistouseanchorboltswithlargewasherstoresistupliftinbearingIfnetwasherarea=8in2,canresist(565psi)(8in2)=4,520lb inuplift• Max.anchorboltspacing=4,520lb/756plf =5’-11”o.c.• Willalsoneedtocheckshearloadsonanchorboltsforcontrolling

case

Page 177: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ForceTransferAroundOpening(FTAO)

HOLDDOWNSATENDSOFWHOLEWALL

WSPSHEATHING

Page 178: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ForceTransferAroundOpening(FTAO)

Page 179: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

FTAOShearwallsMethodologies• Shearwall designmethodologywhichaccountsforsheathed

portionsofwallaboveandbelowopenings(perforatedneglects)• Openingsaccountedforbyreinforcingedgesusingstrappingor

framing• SDPWS4.3.5.2providesspecificrequirements

• H/Lratiodefinedbywallpier• Min.wallpierwidth=2’-0”

• Reducednumberofholddowns(onlyatendsoftotalwall)

• Thereare3mainmethodsofFTAOanalysis;SDPWSdoesnotrequireoneparticularmethodbeused,onlythatdesignis“basedonarationalanalysis”• DragStrut,CantileverBeam,&DiekmannDesignOptions

Page 180: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

FTAOShearwallsDragStrutDesignMethodology• Forcesarecollectedandconcentratedintotheareasaboveand

belowtheopenings• Strapforcesareafunctionofopeningandpierwidths

APAFormM410

Page 181: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

FTAOShearwallsCantileverBeamDesignMethodology• Forcesaretreatedasmomentcouples• Segmentedpanelsarepiersatsidesofopenings• Strapforcesareafunctionofwallheightaboveandbelow

openingsandpierwidths

APAFormM410

Page 182: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

FTAOShearwallsDiekmann DesignMethodology• Assumeswallbehavesasmonlithic trussorframe• Internalforcesresolvedviaprinciplesofstatics• Wallsectionsonallsidesofopeningareassumedtohaveapoint

ofinflectionatmidlength,producingnoforceintheinnerchordsofthesections

APAFormM410

Page 183: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

FTAOShearwall DesignAid

ImagesSource:RISATechnologies

RISATechnologiesdesignsoftwareincludesanoptiontodesignFTAOwoodsheathedshearwalllsusingfiniteelementanalysis(FEM)

Page 184: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Double-SidedShearwalls

High-strengthwoodshearwallscanbedouble-sidedwithWSPsheathingoneachside:SDPWS4.3.3.3SummingShearCapacities:Forshearwallssheathedwiththesameconstructionandmaterialsonoppositesidesofthesamewall,thecombinednominalunitshearcapacity shallbepermittedtobetakenastwicethenominalunitshearcapacityforanequivalentshearwallsheathedononeside(4.3.5.3hasmaxcapacitiesfordouble-sidedperforatedwalls)

Page 185: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Double-SidedShearwalls

Thereisalsoanoptiontohaveasinglesided,doublesheathedshearwall.

TestingandreportbyAPAconcludethatitispermissibletousethecapacityofthewallthesameasiftherewasonelayerofWSPoneachsideofthewallprovidedthatanumberofcriteriaaremetincluding:• Framingmembersatpanel

jointsare3xor2-2x• Minimumnailspacingis4”• Others

Page 186: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

OpenFront&NarrowWalls

Page 187: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

UsingPrefabShearwalls

Considerations:EngineeredNarrowWallSection

Proprietary

LargeHold-downforces

Deflections

Page 188: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

HybridWood/SteelPrefabShearwalls

Source:hardyframe.com

Page 189: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PrefabWallAspectRatios

10’

3’

3’34’

30’2’ 2’

10’

• AspectRatioInadequate• 10’/2’=5>3.5• V=6,804lb• Let’stryaprefabshearwall

Page 190: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PrefabShearwall CapacitiesLOADIS=6,804lb

3,660lb *2panels=7,320lb

Page 191: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PrefabShearwall Anchorage

Page 192: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PrefabShearwall Anchorage

Page 193: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PrescriptivePortalFrameSystems

• SeniorLiving• Apartments/Condos• MixedUse• StudentHousing• AffordableHousing• Hotels

WhereWoodisaviableoption,it’slikelythemostappropriatechoice.

PrescriptiveCodePortalFramesIBC2308.9.3.2

ProprietaryPortalFrames

Source:strongtie.com

Page 194: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

PrescriptivePortalFrameSystems

• SeniorLiving• Apartments/Condos• MixedUse• StudentHousing• AffordableHousing• Hotels

WhereWoodisaviableoption,it’slikelythemostappropriatechoice.

APAReportTT-100F

Allowable DesignShearValues

Min.Width(in.)

Max.Height(ft.)

Shear(lb)

168 850

10 625

248 1,675

10 1,125

Page 195: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

GypsumShearwalls• LowercapacitiesthanWSPShearwalls (about1/3capacity)• SDPWSTable4.3C,Section4.3.7.5providescapacities&

requirements• NotpermittedinSDCEorF

Page 196: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

WSPShearwalls OverGypsum• Fireresistanceratedwallsmayrequiregypsumboardon

eachside• SDPWSTable4.3Bprovidesshearwall capacitiesforwalls

withWSPinstalledover½“or5/8”gypsumboard• Ruleofthumb:samecapacitiesaswithoutgypsumcan

beobtainediffastenerlengthincreased(gouponenailsize;i.e.if8dwithoutgypsum,use10dwithgypsum).

WallFraming

Gypsumboardeachsideofwall

WSPinstalledovergypsum

board

WallSection

Page 197: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Recap

• Wind• CalculatingWindspeeds• Uplift• WallDesign• Diaphragms• Shearwalls

Page 198: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

Questions?

ThisconcludesTheAmericanInstituteofArchitectsContinuingEducationSystemsCourse

Visitwww.woodworks.org formoreeducationalmaterials,casestudies,designexamples,aprojectgallery,andmore

Page 199: 15LS03 Designing Wood-Frame Structures For High Winds V2 · ASCE 7-10 26.2 commentary provides some discussion on uplift & MWFRS vs. C&C. Components receive wind loads directly or

ThispresentationisprotectedbyUSandInternationalCopyrightlaws.

Reproduction,distribution,displayanduseofthepresentationwithoutwrittenpermission

ofthespeakerisprohibited.

©TheWoodProductsCouncil2016

CopyrightMaterials