1569377193

8/3/2019 1569377193

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1569377193 1/4

Simulation and Analysis of Advanced Nuclear Reactor and Kinetics Model

Syed Bahauddin Alam1,

Md. Nazmus Sakib, A B M Rafi Sazzad, Imranul Kabir ChowdhuryDepartment of EEE, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka

1baha [email protected]

Abstract—At the present time, considering cost factors, en-vironmental viability and unlimited resource of power, nuclearis one of the best options and in this era of energy crisis. Theinitiating postulate of energy has hairsplitting the prerequisiteof alternative reservoirs of energies other than fossil fuels. Inthis paper, Characteristic features of gen-4 nuclear reactorsand simulation and analysis of nuclear reactor and kineticsmodel has been discussed.

Index Terms—Reactivity Control, Reactor Kinetics, PARR-1,Resonance Escape Probability.

I. INTRODUCTION

For controlling reactivity, Gen-4 reactors are robust

enough.Reactivity control and its safety is treated by assimi-

lation of neutrons in the nuclear reactor [1]. In these reactors

different mechanisms are used for controlling the mechanism

of reactor core’s activity. When the water flow through the

core is increased, because of neutron moderation, reactivity

is also increased. In Gen-4 nuclear reactors heavy particle

scattering may be done because of smoothing of the reactor

process. Heavy Particle scattering from an Electron and by

this mechanism reactivity and atom speed can be controlled.

For PARR-1 Nuclear Reactor [2] Computer-Aided Testing

and simulation has evolved. In the design of thermal reactorResonance Escape Probability [3] is one of the important

factors. In a thermal reactor, most of the neutrons are im-

mersed after they have retarded to thermal energies. In most

reactor designs, various restraints ensue in this heat departure

the reactor chamber at a comparatively low temperature,

so that trivial or none of it can be retrieved as wattage.

Thermal reactors are typical to diverse escape probability.

All of the fission neutrons must eventually be absorbed

somewhere in the reactor and there having no efflux of

neutrons from an infinite nucleus. A system’s energy is

lost to its surroundings is defined as Confinement times

. In a plasma device, whether enough fusion will occur

to sustain a reaction is determined by confinement times.Thermal Utilization factor of Fusion [4], [5], [6] reactor and

Prompt neutron lifetime. For an infinite thermal reactor time

required for neutron to slow down to thermal energies is

small compared to the time neutron spends as a thermal

neutron before it is finally absorbed. Reactor kinetics model

for delayed neutrons and no delayed neutrons are twisted

with prompt neutron lifetime. Industrial applications of gen-

4 nuclear reactor are basically wide enough. Accelerator

kinetics and its models are used in the reactors for industrial

applications. Transient analysis of nuclear reactors basically

provides security information and its operating condition at

different valve position, temperature etc. In a fusion power

reactor a plasma must be exerted at a high temperature in

order that nuclear fusion can pass off. In this paper, Char-

acteristic features of gen-4 nuclear reactors and simulation

and analysis of nuclear reactor and kinetics model has been

discussed.

II. CONTROL MECHANISM OF GEN-4 REACTOR

By the commixture of Gadolinium Oxide(GdO2) and

UO2 pellets, reactivity control for counterbalancing fuel

burn up is rendered. By insuring circulation rate of flow

through the jet pumps short term reactivity commutes are

performed. When the water flux through the core is changed

magnitude, because of neutron temperance, reactivity is as

well increased. Control cruciform control vanes are required

for longer term reactivity. In the case of Reactivity Control

immersion of neutrons in the reactor fuel, secure reactivity

command is fundamentally acted. For ascertaining reactivity,

Gen-4 reactors are robust enough. In these reactors different

mechanics are exploited for operating the mechanics of

reactor core’s process. Gadolinium is transmuted into lowneutron absorption cross-sectional and by that way more

neutrons are imbibed in the reactor fuel.

Data processor (PC) accomplishes reactivity reckonings

from the static positive reactor period info for the control

rod and accomplishes online acquisition of distinct signals

exploitation of the well-known in−hour equation as given

below,

ρ = 1/T +6

1

βil + λit

(1)

where, p = scheme reactivity, T = static reactor flow, l= neu-

tron interim time period, and βi, λi the fraction and decayconstant of the ith group of delayed neutrons, respectively.

Thermal reactors are distinctive to diverse escape prob-

ability. There can be ordinal outflow of neutrons from an

infinite core; all of the fission neutrons must eventually

be absorbed somewhere in the reactor. “Resonance Escape

Probability” is one of the crucial factors out the contrivance

of nuclear reactor. If P is the probability that, a fission

neutron is not immersed in any of these resonances, then

P is the “Resonance Escape Probability”. However, some

8/3/2019 1569377193


Fig. 1. Testing for PARR-1 Nuclear Reactor

Fig. 2. Resonance escape probability

neutrons might be absorbed as retarding by nuclei having

absorption resonances at energies over the thermal region.

Most of the neutrons are assimilated in a nuclear reactor

subsequently decompressing to thermal energies.

P = e−N F V F I/ξMΣsMV M (2)

Fusion energy gain factor, Q is the ratio of fusion power

density to to the externally supplied power for heating unit

volume of plasma in steady state.Plasma must be maintained

at a high temperature in a fusion power reactor in orderthat nuclear fusion can occur. Various constraints ensue

in this heat imparting the reactor chamber at a relatively

low temperature in virtually reactor excogitations, so that

minuscule or none of it can be recuperated as wattage. In

these reactors, wattage is brought forth from the fraction of

the fusion power comprised in neutrons. The neutrons are

not moderated by the obtuse plasma in inertial confinement

fusion or the magnetic fields in magnetic confinement fusion

but are absorbed in a encompassing “blanket”. Imputable to

Fig. 3. Quality Factor

Fig. 4. Particle Confinement times

versatile exothermic and endothermic reactions, the blanket

may have a power gain factor a few per centum higher orlower than 100%, but that will be neglected in our scheme.

A fraction of the electrical power is re-circulated to run the

reactor arrangements. Fusion energy gain factor is,

Q =1

(1− f c)ηelectηheatf recirc(3)

f recirc < 1, because fusion power plant is to pro-

duce electricity for external consumption. The one con-

duct of energy expiration that is autonomous of the con-

finement intrigue and practically inconceivable to obviate

is Bremsstrahlung actinotherapy. Alike the fusion power

density, the Bremsstrahlung power density devolves on the

square of the plasma compactness, but it does not alter asapace with temperature.

In which 0.5 of a system’s energy is lost to its surround-

ings is defined as Confinement times. In a plasma device,

whether enough fusion will occur to sustain a reaction is

determined by confinement times. A simple expression for

the optimal confinement for the optimal confinement time

is given. In a plasma ignition, the fusion power density

that goes into heating the plasma P heat, must exceed the

power density lost to the environment, P loss. The energy

8/3/2019 1569377193


Fig. 5. Thermal Utilization factor of Fusion reactor

confinement times,τ E is as follows,

τ E =3nkT

P loss(4)

Where we have used the fact that the average kineticthe average kinetic energy of the electrons and ions with

3KT /2. The heating power P heat with Qfus replaced by

the kinetic energy E c of all charged fusion products for the

D-T reactions. Because not all thermal neutrons are absorbed

by the fuel, we define thermal utilization as the probability

that, when a thermal neutron is absorbed, it is absorbed by

the “fuel” (F) and not by the “nonfuel” (NF). Equivalently,

it is the ratio of the average thermal neutron absorption rate

in the fuel to the total thermal neutron absorption rate in the

fuel and nonfuel. Mathematically,

f =

f a

/

NF a

(5)

where N F /N NF is the ratio of fuel-to-nonfuel atomic

concentrations. The value of f can range from near zero for

a very dilute fuel mixture to unity for a core composed only

of fuel.

Towards heavy charged molecules with kinetic energy

(MeV range), the more minuscule separation energy of an

electron to the nucleus is trifling. Thus, a “free” electrons at

rest is that, with which an incident alpha particle interacts.

Since smoothening of the reactor operation, in Gen-4 reac-

tors, heavy particle dispersion is done. As alpha is heavy

charged particles, pass through matter and they interactthrough the Coulombic force, predominately on the electrons

of the medium as of they occupy most of the matter’s bulk.

To analyze this scattering reaction, identify particles X and

y as the electron. For this scattering process, there is no

change in the rest masses of the reactants, i.e., Q = 0. Now,

E e =

2

M + me

MmeE M cosΘe (6)

The maximum electron recoil energy and the maximum

Fig. 6. Heavy Particle Scattering from an Electron

kinetic energy loss by the incident heavy particle, occurs for

cos2Θ = 1 (7)

Thus, the maximum energy of the recoil electron is

(E e)max = 4meE M /M (8)

Virtually collisions transfer less energy from the alpha

particle, and, consequently, tenners of grands of ionization

and innervation fundamental interaction are requisite for an

alpha with respective MeV of kinetic energy to retard and

become part of the ambient medium. This is an energy

sufficient to free most electrons from their atoms and create

an ion-electron pair.

III. KINETICS MODEL OF GEN-4 REACTOR

Considering a core in which the neutron cycle takes l

seconds to complete. The alteration ∆n in the entire count

of thermic neutrons in one cycle at time t is (keff −1)n(t),

where n(t) is the amount of neutrons at the setting out of

the cycle. Thus,

dn(t)

dt=

keff − 1

ln(t) (9)

The solution of this first-order differential equation is,

n(t) = n(0)exp[keff − 1

ln(t)] (10)

where, at t = 0, the neutron population is n(0). In this

framework, the neutron population and therefore the reactorpower alters exponentially soon enough, if keff = 1 For

an infinite thermal reactor, time expected for neutron to

retard to thermal energies is minuscule equated to the time

neutron drops as a thermal neutron before it is finally

engulfed. The interim between emanation of the prompt

neutrons and immersions in nuclear reactor is called Prompt

neutron lifetime, lfp . Mean diffusion time is td.

For an infinite thermal reactor,

8/3/2019 1569377193


Fig. 7. Reactor kinetics

Fig. 8. Reactor Kinetics for Delayed neutrons

td =

√Π2υT (

aF +

aM )

(11)

Considering an infinite homogenous reactor whose caloric

flow must be independent of the position. For thermal

neutron time dependent diffusion equation is,

st − ΣaφT =dn

dt, (12)

dn

dt= kξ(1− β)

aφT

+6

i=1

λiC i (13)

where,

n=

Aeωτ

C =

Beωτ

The complete solution for n is,

n = n0β

β − ρeλρtβ−ρ − ρ

β − ρeρ−βlp (14)

Finally it is,

T = l p/(kα − 1) (15)

Fig. 9. Reactor Kinetics for no Delayed neutrons

where n is the density of thermal neutrons into the thermal

energy region.

IV. CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate safety measures with complimentses to nu-

clear power can emphatically and unquestionably provide

environment friendly, cost effective, sustainable solutions to

the problem of energy crisis and thereby help the world

to excise its future energy exact. Speculating about diverse

viewpoints, it is clear that, succeeding energy for the world

is nuclear. For having a carbon emission free environment,

nuclear is a just alternative. Considering the cost of energy

generation, electricity production and for replenishment of

energy crisis, energy future lies down towards nuclear. Our

analyze settles that in order to obtain a long term solution

to the ongoing energy crisis, it is important for the world to

formulate frameworks for nuclear energy based electricitygeneration in the near future. By devising and comparing

about cost factors, environmental issues, power generation

efficacy and fossil fuel replacement benefits, nuclear can be

good option as a energy source for developing countries.

REFERENCES

[1] F. Baque, G. Rodriguez, N. Jardin, J. M. Carpreau, J. M. Augem,Sibilo, J.;“Generation IV nuclear reactors - R&D program to improvesodium-cooled systems inspection” in Advancements in Nuclear Instru-

mentation Measurement Methods and their Applications (ANIMMA),pp. 1-10, 7-10 june 2009.

[2] “Computer-aided testing and operational aids for PARR-1 nuclearreactor” in Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on ,Volume: 37 Issue:3,pp. 1468 - 1477, Jun 1990

[3] “The application of digital computers to nuclear-reactor design”in :Proceedings of the IEE - Part B: Radio and Electronic Engineering,Volume: 105 Issue:22 , pp. 331 - 336 , 1958.

[4] S. J. Zinkle, ”Fusion materials science: overview of challenges andrecent progress” in (APS DPP43 Invited tutorial)

[5] G.R. Odette and M.Y. He, J. Nucl. Mater. 307-311, 1624 (2002).[6] T.S. Byun and K. Farrell, J. Nucl. Mater . 326, 86 (2004).[7] W. Sweet, “Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor” in Spectrum,

IEEE ,Volume: 34 Issue:11, pp. 41 - 48, Nov 1997.

Documents

1569377193