EnterDrise Resl?OnSe tO ltem 2 laI

During the inspection Ente「prise presented the fo=owjng doouments related to the

∞記Iection of dafa on geotechnicaI hazard threats:

. 1M Process 2-00 Risk Analysis P「ocess

・ IM Procedure 2-01 Pipel ne RiskAnaIysis Procedure

・ Risk Aleor軸m Document

・ lM Process 6-00 Determining P「eventive and Mitigative Measures

・ lM P「ocedure 6-01冊ormation AnaIysis - Line Pipe

.　剛P「ocedure 6-02 P「eventive and Mitigative Measu「es

・ information Analysis conducted on L!D 699 AID 143 MP 193 to MP 312

. Operations Ques軸omaire for軸e Informatton Analysis ∞nducted on L看D 699 AiD

143MP 193to MP312.

As expressed in the docume可S iden珊ed above, the lnteg「ity Management Program (lMP)

in∞rPOrateS inspection, teSt, SurveⅢance) Patrol, etC. information from Ente「prise

PrC喝ramS that are not managed by or executed wi師n the剛P. Whiie the listed IMP

documents esta輔sh the purpose fo「 the collected data言t can be generally stated that the

IMP aggregates the data and incorporates旧nto its risk analysis and decision making

P門)CeSS.

The Iisted lMP documents do not specifjca=y require the coliection and integratien of

known pipe exposures. Howeve「, the data ∞ilected and integrated aliows Ente申Se tO

understand if皿e亜eg「fty of the pipe is being effectiveiy managed. As was demonetra[ed

in the audit th「ough the records review o=isted documents, the integrity of the pipe is

being effectively managed through the exis航g Enterprise prog「ams.

Du而g the inspection, the questienneire ∞mPleted by locai operations fo「 the purposes

Of Infomatien Analysis and Risk Analysis was reviewed. This questionnaire indicated that

there were no geotechnicaI hazards of the type defined by the IMP・

Enterprise is not aware of any reguIatory de軸ition for geotechnicaI hazards no「 any

requirement for [he management of exposed pipe through Integ航y Management

Procedures. ln addition, the safety re∞rd of the pipeline in question does no=nclude

SyStemic fa冊「es from geotechnica冊reats or pipeline exposures・ Ac∞rdingiy’Enterprise

disputes.that we have vio!ated the requirements of 49 CFR 195・452 and respecffu=y

requests that胴s probable vioIatien be面thdrawn.

NOPV Item 2 (b)

frofocots　3.O4　&　5,03 “ §195.452　脚e　加fegI華y ma朋gemeut　血　研gh

consequence areas.佃月面pehol碗治砂e憎/ua伽g fhe加legr殉y of each pjPe伽e

Segme旬an qu渦略tOr must ana小ze a〃 a融ble肋fo仰a章ion abo証的e fhfeg所fy of

書he en肘e p小e伽e and the co"SequenCeS Ofa fajJu鳩. 7T書is崩虎ma書ion血ofurdes:

(卸Daねga納ered加co所unc(ion面的O納er加SpeCfjons, fesfs, S附γe親らnce and

pafrots堪q血ed by伽庵P負互加cfud伽g, CO〃OSjon ∞n‡ro/ mo面r繭ng and cafhodie

pro‡ection sun伯yS.

3

77]e PSB /s ∞nCemed about poten脆/ SO〃 subs/dence in HCAs. Abng励h ∞nduc緬g

patro肋g and鳩vfewing emeIgeney P/ans and prooed(〃℃S for naturaI dsasteIS, Wha吊s

Ente仰座seもpねn of action fo profect胸e ;ntegr的y of抑e pゆe励e from excessive徹oodh〕g

and so〃 movemen掴n醐as?刷ease submit a plan of ac細n fo the PSB no /afer f偏n

M急場h 9, 201a

Enterかrise Res鴫onse to ltem 2(b)

Enterprise, aS OPe「atOr Of the Mid-Americ霞Pipe冊e, regularly monitors its pipe!ines for

exposures and e「osiona=mpacts via a〔油al patroIs and ground pat「oIs as requj「ed by

Enterprise’s Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Procedu「es. Aerial patroIs are conducted

in accordance w軸O&M Sec縄on 3000, Damage f}’evention, Whjch requires aerial pafroIs

be conducted at least 26 times pe「 yea「, nOt tO eXceed 3 weeks, Additienatly, Per O&M

Section LO901 , Eme岬enay Con調的ns, Enterprise performs inspections afte「 fIooding

events to identify any exposures or threats on the pipe冊es as a res朝of heavy 「ains. In

the Placitas area, Enterprise also conducts quarteriy ground patroIs aIong the pipeIine

right ofway.

Enterprise has completed numerous erosion protection p「qiects in the Placitas area to

Proactively protect the pipe=ne from impacts related to erosion and soii

movement. Enterprise has subm皿ed pemits to the Corp of Engineers and upon approvai

W冊have additfonal prQjects addressing erosion controI w冊in our right of way, Enterprise

COn軸ua叩y assesses the need fo「 fu血her erosion controI prqiects. Amua=y, Enterprise

PIans additionai prqjects and budget appropriation as needed to pro[ect the pipelines,

Should you have any questions, require fl血he「 information in comectien with the above or wish

to discuss軸s matte「 in greater detail, Please do not hesitate to contact ou「 o用ce. Enterprise

Weicomes the oppo血nfty to discuss t輔s response w剛NMPRC if further cIa「崩cation is required,

Sincerely,

_一一一之÷〇〇〇て_ノー

Graham W. Bacon

Executive Vice President, Operations & Enginee血g

FW Respouse from Enterprise to PRC

Subject: FW二Response from Enterp「ise to PRC

From: James Hoiden-Rhodes <「econman@swcp.com>

Date: 5/3/2018 6:23 PM

To: Dwight <dwight@xitechinc.com>

D

FYI

Senper Fi

H-R

---〇〇〇 Forwarded Message

From: EIaine Cimino <eC面inolO@gma乱eom>

Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 16:39:04-0600

1t): 」ames HoIden-Rhodes <reCOn弧宣且盟主WCP.襲担>, <通謀垣娃@蓮如inc,CO坦>

Cc: <盤旦垣韮坦壁隻旦@ao上c○坦>

Subject: Response from Enterprise to PRC

FYi on the Enterprise response to State on their regulatory concems.

Elaine Cimino

Confidentiaiity Notice: This ema時nciuding aIi attachments, is for the soie use ofthe intended 「ecipient(s〉.

Ifyou are nota spec甫ca=y named recipient, anyViewing, uSe, discIosure, distribし面on, Or rete南on ofany

Part Ofthis ema旧s prohibited. ifyou are nota specifica=y named recipient, Piease contact me and delete

aIi copies ofthis message.

一一一一一一End of Forwarded Message

-- -Attachments: 〉…~ ~ ^ノ肌…" -~--ノー…Y----~-~

Response to 17-1217-98-PL.PDF

l ofl

279 KB

5/8/2018 10:39 AM