137a-U6aVotes

  • Upload
    dnm110

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 137a-U6aVotes

    1/10

    UNIT 6: PARTIES ANDVOTESWare CH 11 and Mueller and Strom 112-140

  • 8/10/2019 137a-U6aVotes

    2/10

    Guiding Questions

    When are parties likely to adopt a vote-

    maximizing strategy?

    What factors shape how parties position

    themselves to win votes?

    How can we model party competition?

    What are the strengths/weaknesses of these

    models?

  • 8/10/2019 137a-U6aVotes

    3/10

    When Should Parties Seek Votes?

    Voting certainly matters in democracies. We can conceive of the voting process as delegating

    authority from the citizenry to the political elite.

    But votes, in and of themselves, are rarely useful. We typically see votes as instrumental to achieving other

    goals. When would vote seeking strategies be likely? 1) When parties want to increase their bargaining

    weight. 2) When elections are competitive (i.e. outcome is

    unclear). 3) To reach certain thresholds

    Example: majority/minority government, minimumthreshold for representation, etc.

  • 8/10/2019 137a-U6aVotes

    4/10

    Downss Assumptions about Voters

    Downs 1957

    Models party competition spatially.

    1) Voters hold preferences over the types of policy theywant government to enact.

    These preferences are linked to their interests, and areexogenous to parties.

    2) These preferences can be represented along a singleleft-right dimension.

    3) Voters are rational, but not well informed about

    connections between their preferences and the policiespolitical parties advocate. Takes preferences as exogenous (or given)

    Thus, voters vote for the party positioned closest tothem.

  • 8/10/2019 137a-U6aVotes

    5/10

    Downss Assumption about Parties

    Downs 1957

    1) Parties seek to maximize their vote share.

    2) Parties position themselves along the left/rightspectrum adapting their policy positions based on their

    perceptions of voter interests.Parties are loosely bound by past history.

    Prevents parties from leap-frogging other parties.

    3) Parties use ideology as a tool to mobilize mass

    electorates. That is, policy is viewed instrumentally (i.e. it wins

    votes).

  • 8/10/2019 137a-U6aVotes

    6/10

    Downs and Number of Parties

    4) Number of politicalparties is dependent uponthe shape of distributionof voters.

    Single peaked: twoparty system is likely.

    Multi-peaked:multiparty system islikely.

    Two party systems createincentives for parties toconverge at the positionof the median voter.

    Multiparty systems donot.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/Median_voter_model.png
  • 8/10/2019 137a-U6aVotes

    7/10

    Evaluating Spatial Models of Voting

    Downs 1957 Important contributions

    regarding: 1) Spatial modeling of

    party competition 2) Identification of issue

    dimensions which framepolitics.

    3) Linkages betweencampaign promises andgovernmental performanceexplained as a function ofre-election prospects.

    Dunleavy 1991 Questions assumption

    that voter preferencesare exogenous toparties.

    Government parties canshape preferences via: 1) social engineering 2) social relativities 3) context management.

    Opposition parties canshape preferences via: 1) exploiting social

    tensions 2) strategic agenda setting

    STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES

  • 8/10/2019 137a-U6aVotes

    8/10

    Conclusions: Parties as Unitary Actors

    Modeling parties as unitary actors can be usefultheoretically, but problematic when describing reality.

    Tsebelis (1990)

    Party competition is a nested game party leaders

    play on two levels: electorate and activists. Party activists can constrain the ability of parties to shift

    positions in response to changes in the electorate.

    The ideal political position or platform may not beacceptable to activists.

    But maintaining policy positions preferable to activistsmay come at a cost: possibility of entering office orwinning votes may be affected.

  • 8/10/2019 137a-U6aVotes

    9/10

    Case Study: the Netherlands

    Examine:

    Dutch Labor Party (PvdA)

    Why were policy goals so dominant for so

    long within the party?What did an emphasis on policy goals do for

    the PvdAs vote winning abilities?

    What did it take for office seeking goals to

    be privileged over policy goals?How did the push for votes shape the partys

    behavior?

  • 8/10/2019 137a-U6aVotes

    10/10

    Schedule

    Game: Elections

    Unit Theme: Parties and Ideology

    Readings:

    Ware CH 1Mueller and Strom pgs. 89-111

    Unit Theme: Coalition Formation

    Readings:

    Reserves: Laver and Schofield, Lijphart Dalton and Wattenberg CH 9

    Game: Coalections.