-
7/27/2019 13-10-10 Ometz v Lahyani et al (6549/13) in the
Supreme Court of the State of Israel sham Conditional Decree
1/5
Human Rights Alert, NGOJosephZernik,PhD"
"33407- POBox33407,[email protected];
131010Ometz v Lahyani et al(6549/13) in the Supreme Court of
the State of Israel sham Conditional
DecreeSince2002,absentlawfullyappointedChiefClerk,noConditionalDecreesareissuedbytheCourt,pursuanttothelawoftheStateofIsrael,andtheCourtconductsshamreviewofsuchpetitions.
# Caption and No Page
1. 131010Ometz v Lahyani et
al(6549/13)intheSupremeCourtoftheStateofIsraelshamConditionalDecree
[Englishtranslation]
2
2. 131010Ometz v Lahyani et
al(6549/13)intheSupremeCourtoftheStateofIsraelshamConditionalDecree[Hebreworiginal]
3
3.
ConditionalDecreeform,RegulationsCourtProceduresoftheHighCourtofJusticeoftheStateofIsrael,ConditionalDecreeform(Regulation21,Form4)[Englishtranslation]
4
4.
ConditionalDecreeform,RegulationsCourtProceduresoftheHighCourtofJusticeoftheStateofIsrael,ConditionalDecree
form(Regulation21,Form4)[Hebreworiginal]
5
TheshamdecreeistitledDecisionsinsteadofConditionalDecree,failstorefertothepaperasasummons,andissignedbyajudge,insteadofbeingdulysignedbytheChiefClerkoftheSupremeCourt.Since2002theSupremeCourt,absentlawfullyappointedChiefClerk,theSupremeCourtsubvertstheConditionalDecreeprocess,keyprocessforprotectionofrightsinIsrael.AbsentissuanceoftheConditionalDecree,equivalentofasummonsforacaseoforiginaljurisdiction,theCourtactswithnojurisdictionatall.
Innumerousothercases,ConditionalDecreepetitionsaresubvertedthroughtheconductofprolongedPreliminaryProceedingswithnofoundationinthelawoftheStateofIsrael.
LINKS:[1]120510HumanRightAlert,AppendixItoSubmission;15thUPRStateofIsraelIntegrity,orlackthereof,oftheelectronicrecordsystemsofthecourtsoftheStateofIsraelhttps://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU
1/5
mailto:[email protected]://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkUhttps://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkUmailto:[email protected]
-
7/27/2019 13-10-10 Ometz v Lahyani et al (6549/13) in the
Supreme Court of the State of Israel sham Conditional Decree
2/5
In the Supreme Court in Jerusalem
HCJ 6549/13
Before: TheHonorableAShoham
Petitioner:
OmetzCitizensforCompetentAdministration,SocialandJudicialJustice
Respondent: 1.MrShlomoLahyani,MayoroftheCityofBatYam
2.CounciloftheCityofBayYam
3.BatYamBeRoshMuramParty
4.AttorneyGeneraloftheStateofIsrael
Counsel:
PetitionforConditionalDecree
PursuanttoNoticebyRespondent1,Respondent2isscheduledtoconveneonOctober16,2013,todiscusstheremovalofRespondent1fromoffice.
ThePetitionisscheduledforahearinginaforumofthreeonOctober20,2013,at9:00am,andupdatednoticesbytheRespondents13shallbefiledbyOctober17,2013,nolaterthan16:00.
Giventoday,October10,2013
[unsigned]
Judge
_________
Versionsubjecttoeditionandphrasingchanges.1506437.docHG
InformationCenterTel:0771703333,Internetsite:www.courts.gov.il
2/5
http://www.courts.gov.il/http://www.courts.gov.il/
-
7/27/2019 13-10-10 Ometz v Lahyani et al (6549/13) in the
Supreme Court of the State of Israel sham Conditional Decree
3/5
3/5
-
7/27/2019 13-10-10 Ometz v Lahyani et al (6549/13) in the
Supreme Court of the State of Israel sham Conditional Decree
4/5
RegulationsofCourtProceduresoftheHighCourtofJustice(1984)
Form 4
(Regulation21)
Conditional Decree
(TitlesameasinForm1)
PursuanttoPetition,broughtbeforeon______beforethisCourt,inthepresenceofthePetitionerofhisCounsel,thisCourtordersthataConditionalDecree(orSummons)beenteredaddressedto_______requiringhimtoappearandprovideexplanation,why(asstatedinthePetition).
TheRespondentshallfileandservehisResponse,ifhesowishes,within___daysfromtheserviceofinstantDecree,totheCourtandtothePetitioner.
ThePetitionshallbeheardinthisCourton____.
Giventoday,
___________SignatureofMagistrateorChiefClerk
SupremeCourt
4/5
-
7/27/2019 13-10-10 Ometz v Lahyani et al (6549/13) in the
Supreme Court of the State of Israel sham Conditional Decree
5/5
5/5
