11
J Med Tech Assoc Thailand, Vol. 40 No. 3, December 2012 Original Article Rapid Haemocultures Report Sujitra Manakul* and Natthiya Inthachang Clinical Microbiology Section, Medical Technology Department, Suratthani Hospital, Suratthani 84000 Thailand Abstract Septicemia or sepsis refers to the presence of pathogenic organisms in the bloodstream with related clinical symptoms causing death. Rapid and accurate identification of a causative agent including antibiogram is, therefore, important. The objective of this study was to compare the results of bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) obtained from the standard (18-24 hours incubation) and the modified (8 - 10 hours incubation) methods. The experiment was performed with 90 bacterial isolates acquired from 89 hemoculture positive samples from Surath-thani Hospital during April 2007 to June 2008. The results showed that 66 isolates (73.3%) were gram negative and 24 isolates (26.7%) were gram positive bacteria. Identification of these bacteria by the standard and modified methods yielded the same results for 64 isolates (97%) in gram negative and 23 isolates (95.8%) in gram positive bacteria. McNemar statistical test revealed no significant difference (p ≥ 0.05) between the two methods in term of identification, although the standard identification of one sample revealed two bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Klebseilla pneumoniae, while the modified method identified as Enterobacter aerogenes. Interestingly, AST of the standard and modified methods gave identical results for 66 isolates (100%) in gram negative and 18 isolates (75%) in gram positive bacteria. Statistical analysis of the AST showed significant difference between the two methods (p ≤ 0.05). Our results suggest that the modified method can be applied in laboratory to reduce the turnaround time for identification of both gram positive and gram negative bacteria. However, this modified method is not suitable for mixed culture specimen. For the AST, the modified method can be used only in gram negative bacteria. Key words: Bacterial identification, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), Haemoculture *Corresponding author E-mail address: [email protected]

128-326-1-SM

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

paper about AST

Citation preview

  • J Med Tech Assoc Thailand, Vol. 40 No. 3, December 2012 Original Article

    Rapid Haemocultures Report

    Sujitra Manakul* and Natthiya Inthachang

    Clinical Microbiology Section, Medical Technology Department,Suratthani Hospital, Suratthani 84000 Thailand

    AbstractSepticemia or sepsis refers to the presence of pathogenic organisms in the bloodstream

    with related clinical symptoms causing death. Rapid and accurate identification of a causative

    agent including antibiogram is, therefore, important. The objective of this study was to compare

    the results of bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) obtained

    from the standard (18-24 hours incubation) and the modified (8 - 10 hours incubation) methods.

    The experiment was performed with 90 bacterial isolates acquired from 89 hemoculture positive

    samples from Surath-thani Hospital during April 2007 to June 2008. The results showed that

    66 isolates (73.3%) were gram negative and 24 isolates (26.7%) were gram positive bacteria.

    Identification of these bacteria by the standard and modified methods yielded the same results

    for 64 isolates (97%) in gram negative and 23 isolates (95.8%) in gram positive bacteria.

    McNemar statistical test revealed no significant difference (p 0.05) between the two

    methods in term of identification, although the standard identification of one sample revealed

    two bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Klebseilla pneumoniae, while the modified method

    identified as Enterobacter aerogenes. Interestingly, AST of the standard and modified methods

    gave identical results for 66 isolates (100%) in gram negative and 18 isolates (75%) in gram

    positive bacteria. Statistical analysis of the AST showed significant difference between the two

    methods (p 0.05). Our results suggest that the modified method can be applied in laboratory

    to reduce the turnaround time for identification of both gram positive and gram negative

    bacteria. However, this modified method is not suitable for mixed culture specimen. For the

    AST, the modified method can be used only in gram negative bacteria.

    Key words: Bacterial identification, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), Haemoculture

    *Corresponding author E-mail address: [email protected]

  • 40 3 2555

    (18-24 .) (8-10 .) 90 89 2550 - 2551 2 8-10 . 18-24 . 66 ( 73.3) 24 ( 26.7) 2 64 ( 97.0) 23 ( 95.8) McNemar Test 2 (p 0.05) E.coli K. pneumoniae E. aerogenes 66 2 66 ( 100) 24 18 ( 75.0) 2 (p 0.05) 8-10 .

    *

    84000

    :

    * E-mail address: [email protected]

  • 4302

    (1,2)

    (3)

    (4)

    (5)

    2

    8-10

    18-24

    90

    BacT/Alert

    89

    2550- 2551

    Gram stain

    Blood agar (BA),

    MacConkey (MAC) Chocolate agar (CA)

    BA CA 5-10%

    CO2 35 C MAC 35 C

    8-10 .

    BA, CA MAC 35 C

    18-24 .

    8 -10 .

    18-24 .

  • 4303

    Vitek 2 Compact Gram positive

    Gram positive identify card (GPI)

    Gram negative Gram

    negative identify card (GNI)

    species (6)

    Disc diffusion CLSI

    (Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute)

    inhibition zone

    CLSI(7)

    susceptible (S), intermediate (I), resistant

    (R)

    control sensitivity discs

    3 Staphylococcus aureus ATCC

    25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922

    Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853

    Amikacin, Ampicillin,

    Augmentin, Cefuroxime, Cefotaxime, Ceftra-

    zidime, Ceftriaxone, Ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin,

    Gentamicin, Cotrimoxazole, Levofloxacin,

    Cefpirome, Netilmicin, Imipenem, Meropenem,

    Ertapenem Sulperazone (

    )

    Staphylococcus spp.

    Augmentin, Cephalothin, Cefuroxime,

    Cotrimoxazole, Erythromycin, Clindamycin,

    Gentamicin, Oxacillin Fosfomicin

    Streptococcus spp.

    Ampicillin, Augmentin, Cefuroxime, Chlor-

    amphenicol, Erythromycin, Cotrimoxazole,

    Clindamycin, Penicillin Vancomycin

    McNemar Test

    8-10 .

    18-24 .

    BacT/Alert 89

    90

    66

    ( 73.3) 24

    ( 26.7)

    E. coli 27.8

    K. pneumoniae 20.0,

    Staphylococcus haemolyticus 7.8

    Acinetobacter baumannii 6.7

    ( 1)

  • 4304

    8-10 .

    18-24 .

    97.0

    95.8 ( 2)

    1

    S. haemolyticus Staphylococcus

    epidermidis urease

    E. coli K. pneumonia

    E. aerogenes (

    3) 8-10 .

    1

    McNemar Test

    8-10

    . 18-24 .

    (p > 0.05) ( 4

    5)

    1 90 BacT/Alert 89 1824

    ( = 66)

    ( = 24)

    Gram Negative 66 (73.3%) Gram Positive 24 (26.7%)

    Escherichia coli

    Klebseilla pneumoniae

    Acinetobacter baumannii

    Salmonella group D

    Enterobacter cloacae

    Proteus mirabilis

    Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Plesiomonas shigelloidis

    Salmonella group B

    Serratia marcescens

    Haemophillus influenzae

    25(27.8%)

    18(20.0%)

    6(6.7%)

    5(5.6%)

    4(4.4%)

    2(2.2%)

    2(2.2%)

    1(1.1%)

    1(1.1%)

    1(1.1%)

    1(1.1%)

    Staphylococcus epidermidis

    Staphylococcus haemolyticus

    Staphylococcus

    coagulase positive

    Streptococcus agalactiae

    Staphylococcus sciuri

    Staphylococcus uberis

    Staphylococcus xylosus

    Staphylococcus simulans

    Streptococcus sanguinis

    7(7.8%)

    7(7.8%)

    3(3.4%)

    2(2.2%)

    1(1.1%)

    1(1.1%)

    1(1.1%)

    1(1.1%)

    1(1.1%)

  • 4305

    2 8-10 18-24

    (= 90)

    Gram Negative* 66 64(97.0%) 2(3.0%)

    Escherichia coli 25 24 1 indole, urease, citrate

    Klebseilla pneumoniaeAcinetobacter baumannii Salmonella group DEnterobacter cloacaeProteus mirabilisPseudomonas aeruginosaPlesiomonas shigelloidis Salmonella group BSerratia marcescensHaemophillus influenzae

    18654221111

    17654221111

    1000000000

    motile

    Gram Positive** 24 23(95.8%) 1(4.2%)

    Staphylococcus epidermidisStaphylococcus haemolyticusStaphylococcus coagulase positive Streptococcus agalactiaeStaphylococcus sciuriStaphylococcus uberisStaphylococcus xylosusStaphylococcus simulansStreptococcus sanguinis

    773

    211111

    763

    211111

    010

    000000

    urease

    * McNemar Test p = .500** McNemar Test p = 1.000

  • 4306

    66 8-10 .

    18-24 .

    susceptible, interme-

    diate, resistance

    100 ( 4)

    24

    8-10 . 18-24

    .

    18

    3 3 8-10 18 24

    18 24 . 8-10 .

    1 Staphylococcus haemolyticus Staphylococcus epidermidis

    2 Escherichia coli Enterobacter aerogenes

    Klebseilla pneumoniae

    75.0

    6 25.0

    ( 4) S. haemolyticus

    3 S. agalactiae, S. uberis S.

    simulans 1

    CXM, CC, OX, E

    AMC inhibition zone

    ( 5)

    McNemar Test

    8-10 . 18 -24

    . (p < 0.05) ( 4)

  • 4307

    4 8-10 1824

    (= 90)

    Gram Negative 66 66(100%) 0(0%)

    E. coliK. pneumoniaeA. baumanniiSalmonella group DE. cloacaeP. mirabilisPs. aeruginosaPle. ShigelloidisSalmonella group BS. marcescensH. influenzae

    2518654221111

    2518654221111

    00000000000

    Gram Positive* 24 18(75.0%) 6(25%)

    S. epidermidisS. haemolyticusStaphylococcus coagulase positive S. agalactiaeS. sciuriS. uberisS. xylosusS. simulansS. sanguinis

    773

    211111

    743

    110101

    030

    101010

    CXM, CC, OX

    C, CC, E

    C, CC, E

    CXM, OX, AMC, E

    CXM = Cefuroxime, CC = Clindamycin, OX = Oxacillin, C = Chloramphenicol,E = Erythromycin, AMC = Augmentin*McNemar Test p = 0.031

  • 4308

    8-10 . 18-24 .

    89 90

    66

    24

    E. coli

    K. pneu-

    moniae

    8-10 .

    64

    5 6 8-10 18-24

    Antimicrobial disc (inhibition zone diameter)

    CXM CC OX AMC E

    1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2

    1 S. haemolyticus S I - - - - - - - -

    2 S. haemolyticus - - S R - - - - -

    3 S. haemolyticus - - S I S R - - - -

    4 S. agalactiae - - S I - - - - S I

    5 S. uberis - - S R - - - - S I

    6 S. simulans S R - - S R S R S R

    CXM = Cfuroxime, CC = Clindamycin, OX = Oxacillin, AMC = Augmentin, E = Erythromycin

    S = susceptible, I = intermediate, R = resistance, 1 = 8-10

    2 = 18-24

    ( 97)

    23

    ( 95.8)

    1 S. haemolyticus

    S. epidermidis

    urease

    8-10 .

    E. coli

    K. pneumonia

    E. aerogenes

  • 4309

    8-10 .

    18-24 .

    McNemar Test

    8-10 .

    18-24 .

    (p > 0.05)

    8-10 .

    66

    66

    ( 100)

    24

    18

    ( 75.0)

    6 ( 25.0) S.

    haemolyticus 3 S. agalactiae,

    S. uberis S. simulans 1

    CXM, CC,

    OX, E AMC inhibition zone

    8-10 .

    inhibition zone

    8-10 .

    18-24 . (p < 0.05)

    8-10 .

    8-10 .

    1

  • 4310

    1. . Laboratory Diagnosis for

    Systematic Bacterial Infection. Text book

    of medical bacteriology.

    , 2549; 201-4.

    2. Young LS, Mandell GL, Bennett JE, et al.

    Principles and Practice of infectious

    Disease. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:

    Churchill Livingstone; 2000: 806-20.

    3. Reynold R, Potz N, Colman M, et al.

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of the patho-

    gens of bacteremia in the UK and Ireland

    2001-2002: the BSAC Bacteremia Resis-

    tance Surveillance Programme. J Antimi-

    crob Chemothere 2004; 53: 1018-32.

    4. Henry DI, Richard FD, Patrick RM, et al.

    Manual of clinical microbiology. 6th ed.

    Washington, D.C.: American Society for

    Microbiology, 1995: 5-18.

    5. . . .

    ,

    , 2553: 15-24.

    6. Vitek 2 compact.

    () 2551.

    7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Insti-

    tute. Performance Standard for Antimicro-

    bial Susceptibility Testing 20th ed. 2010.