Upload
thitikarnokowat
View
13
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
paper about AST
Citation preview
J Med Tech Assoc Thailand, Vol. 40 No. 3, December 2012 Original Article
Rapid Haemocultures Report
Sujitra Manakul* and Natthiya Inthachang
Clinical Microbiology Section, Medical Technology Department,Suratthani Hospital, Suratthani 84000 Thailand
AbstractSepticemia or sepsis refers to the presence of pathogenic organisms in the bloodstream
with related clinical symptoms causing death. Rapid and accurate identification of a causative
agent including antibiogram is, therefore, important. The objective of this study was to compare
the results of bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) obtained
from the standard (18-24 hours incubation) and the modified (8 - 10 hours incubation) methods.
The experiment was performed with 90 bacterial isolates acquired from 89 hemoculture positive
samples from Surath-thani Hospital during April 2007 to June 2008. The results showed that
66 isolates (73.3%) were gram negative and 24 isolates (26.7%) were gram positive bacteria.
Identification of these bacteria by the standard and modified methods yielded the same results
for 64 isolates (97%) in gram negative and 23 isolates (95.8%) in gram positive bacteria.
McNemar statistical test revealed no significant difference (p 0.05) between the two
methods in term of identification, although the standard identification of one sample revealed
two bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Klebseilla pneumoniae, while the modified method
identified as Enterobacter aerogenes. Interestingly, AST of the standard and modified methods
gave identical results for 66 isolates (100%) in gram negative and 18 isolates (75%) in gram
positive bacteria. Statistical analysis of the AST showed significant difference between the two
methods (p 0.05). Our results suggest that the modified method can be applied in laboratory
to reduce the turnaround time for identification of both gram positive and gram negative
bacteria. However, this modified method is not suitable for mixed culture specimen. For the
AST, the modified method can be used only in gram negative bacteria.
Key words: Bacterial identification, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), Haemoculture
*Corresponding author E-mail address: [email protected]
40 3 2555
(18-24 .) (8-10 .) 90 89 2550 - 2551 2 8-10 . 18-24 . 66 ( 73.3) 24 ( 26.7) 2 64 ( 97.0) 23 ( 95.8) McNemar Test 2 (p 0.05) E.coli K. pneumoniae E. aerogenes 66 2 66 ( 100) 24 18 ( 75.0) 2 (p 0.05) 8-10 .
*
84000
:
* E-mail address: [email protected]
4302
(1,2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
2
8-10
18-24
90
BacT/Alert
89
2550- 2551
Gram stain
Blood agar (BA),
MacConkey (MAC) Chocolate agar (CA)
BA CA 5-10%
CO2 35 C MAC 35 C
8-10 .
BA, CA MAC 35 C
18-24 .
8 -10 .
18-24 .
4303
Vitek 2 Compact Gram positive
Gram positive identify card (GPI)
Gram negative Gram
negative identify card (GNI)
species (6)
Disc diffusion CLSI
(Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute)
inhibition zone
CLSI(7)
susceptible (S), intermediate (I), resistant
(R)
control sensitivity discs
3 Staphylococcus aureus ATCC
25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853
Amikacin, Ampicillin,
Augmentin, Cefuroxime, Cefotaxime, Ceftra-
zidime, Ceftriaxone, Ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin,
Gentamicin, Cotrimoxazole, Levofloxacin,
Cefpirome, Netilmicin, Imipenem, Meropenem,
Ertapenem Sulperazone (
)
Staphylococcus spp.
Augmentin, Cephalothin, Cefuroxime,
Cotrimoxazole, Erythromycin, Clindamycin,
Gentamicin, Oxacillin Fosfomicin
Streptococcus spp.
Ampicillin, Augmentin, Cefuroxime, Chlor-
amphenicol, Erythromycin, Cotrimoxazole,
Clindamycin, Penicillin Vancomycin
McNemar Test
8-10 .
18-24 .
BacT/Alert 89
90
66
( 73.3) 24
( 26.7)
E. coli 27.8
K. pneumoniae 20.0,
Staphylococcus haemolyticus 7.8
Acinetobacter baumannii 6.7
( 1)
4304
8-10 .
18-24 .
97.0
95.8 ( 2)
1
S. haemolyticus Staphylococcus
epidermidis urease
E. coli K. pneumonia
E. aerogenes (
3) 8-10 .
1
McNemar Test
8-10
. 18-24 .
(p > 0.05) ( 4
5)
1 90 BacT/Alert 89 1824
( = 66)
( = 24)
Gram Negative 66 (73.3%) Gram Positive 24 (26.7%)
Escherichia coli
Klebseilla pneumoniae
Acinetobacter baumannii
Salmonella group D
Enterobacter cloacae
Proteus mirabilis
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Plesiomonas shigelloidis
Salmonella group B
Serratia marcescens
Haemophillus influenzae
25(27.8%)
18(20.0%)
6(6.7%)
5(5.6%)
4(4.4%)
2(2.2%)
2(2.2%)
1(1.1%)
1(1.1%)
1(1.1%)
1(1.1%)
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus haemolyticus
Staphylococcus
coagulase positive
Streptococcus agalactiae
Staphylococcus sciuri
Staphylococcus uberis
Staphylococcus xylosus
Staphylococcus simulans
Streptococcus sanguinis
7(7.8%)
7(7.8%)
3(3.4%)
2(2.2%)
1(1.1%)
1(1.1%)
1(1.1%)
1(1.1%)
1(1.1%)
4305
2 8-10 18-24
(= 90)
Gram Negative* 66 64(97.0%) 2(3.0%)
Escherichia coli 25 24 1 indole, urease, citrate
Klebseilla pneumoniaeAcinetobacter baumannii Salmonella group DEnterobacter cloacaeProteus mirabilisPseudomonas aeruginosaPlesiomonas shigelloidis Salmonella group BSerratia marcescensHaemophillus influenzae
18654221111
17654221111
1000000000
motile
Gram Positive** 24 23(95.8%) 1(4.2%)
Staphylococcus epidermidisStaphylococcus haemolyticusStaphylococcus coagulase positive Streptococcus agalactiaeStaphylococcus sciuriStaphylococcus uberisStaphylococcus xylosusStaphylococcus simulansStreptococcus sanguinis
773
211111
763
211111
010
000000
urease
* McNemar Test p = .500** McNemar Test p = 1.000
4306
66 8-10 .
18-24 .
susceptible, interme-
diate, resistance
100 ( 4)
24
8-10 . 18-24
.
18
3 3 8-10 18 24
18 24 . 8-10 .
1 Staphylococcus haemolyticus Staphylococcus epidermidis
2 Escherichia coli Enterobacter aerogenes
Klebseilla pneumoniae
75.0
6 25.0
( 4) S. haemolyticus
3 S. agalactiae, S. uberis S.
simulans 1
CXM, CC, OX, E
AMC inhibition zone
( 5)
McNemar Test
8-10 . 18 -24
. (p < 0.05) ( 4)
4307
4 8-10 1824
(= 90)
Gram Negative 66 66(100%) 0(0%)
E. coliK. pneumoniaeA. baumanniiSalmonella group DE. cloacaeP. mirabilisPs. aeruginosaPle. ShigelloidisSalmonella group BS. marcescensH. influenzae
2518654221111
2518654221111
00000000000
Gram Positive* 24 18(75.0%) 6(25%)
S. epidermidisS. haemolyticusStaphylococcus coagulase positive S. agalactiaeS. sciuriS. uberisS. xylosusS. simulansS. sanguinis
773
211111
743
110101
030
101010
CXM, CC, OX
C, CC, E
C, CC, E
CXM, OX, AMC, E
CXM = Cefuroxime, CC = Clindamycin, OX = Oxacillin, C = Chloramphenicol,E = Erythromycin, AMC = Augmentin*McNemar Test p = 0.031
4308
8-10 . 18-24 .
89 90
66
24
E. coli
K. pneu-
moniae
8-10 .
64
5 6 8-10 18-24
Antimicrobial disc (inhibition zone diameter)
CXM CC OX AMC E
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
1 S. haemolyticus S I - - - - - - - -
2 S. haemolyticus - - S R - - - - -
3 S. haemolyticus - - S I S R - - - -
4 S. agalactiae - - S I - - - - S I
5 S. uberis - - S R - - - - S I
6 S. simulans S R - - S R S R S R
CXM = Cfuroxime, CC = Clindamycin, OX = Oxacillin, AMC = Augmentin, E = Erythromycin
S = susceptible, I = intermediate, R = resistance, 1 = 8-10
2 = 18-24
( 97)
23
( 95.8)
1 S. haemolyticus
S. epidermidis
urease
8-10 .
E. coli
K. pneumonia
E. aerogenes
4309
8-10 .
18-24 .
McNemar Test
8-10 .
18-24 .
(p > 0.05)
8-10 .
66
66
( 100)
24
18
( 75.0)
6 ( 25.0) S.
haemolyticus 3 S. agalactiae,
S. uberis S. simulans 1
CXM, CC,
OX, E AMC inhibition zone
8-10 .
inhibition zone
8-10 .
18-24 . (p < 0.05)
8-10 .
8-10 .
1
4310
1. . Laboratory Diagnosis for
Systematic Bacterial Infection. Text book
of medical bacteriology.
, 2549; 201-4.
2. Young LS, Mandell GL, Bennett JE, et al.
Principles and Practice of infectious
Disease. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:
Churchill Livingstone; 2000: 806-20.
3. Reynold R, Potz N, Colman M, et al.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of the patho-
gens of bacteremia in the UK and Ireland
2001-2002: the BSAC Bacteremia Resis-
tance Surveillance Programme. J Antimi-
crob Chemothere 2004; 53: 1018-32.
4. Henry DI, Richard FD, Patrick RM, et al.
Manual of clinical microbiology. 6th ed.
Washington, D.C.: American Society for
Microbiology, 1995: 5-18.
5. . . .
,
, 2553: 15-24.
6. Vitek 2 compact.
() 2551.
7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Insti-
tute. Performance Standard for Antimicro-
bial Susceptibility Testing 20th ed. 2010.