120830 Derek Mackay and Michel Barnier Living Wage Councils and Procurement

7/31/2019 120830 Derek Mackay and Michel Barnier Living Wage Councils and Procurement

1/6

Minister for Local Government and PlanningMinistear airson Riaghaltaslonadail agusDealbhadhDerek Mackay MSP

Derek MacAoidh BPA

FIT:0845 7741741

E: scottish,ministers@scotland,gsi.gov.uk

Ms Kezia Dugdale MSPThe Scottish ParliamentEDINBURGH

EH991SP

Our ref/Ar faidhle: 2012/002569422 August 2012

Dear Kezia

The ScottishGovernmentRiaghaltas na h-Alba

DELIVERINGA GAMES LEGACY FOR SCOllAND

Thank you for your letter of 24 July regarding the progress of the living wage in Scotland and

asking about the introduction of the living wage by local authorities. As you are aware, local

authorities are independent corporate bodies that set the terms and conditions under which

. their own staff are employed, It is therefore, for individual authorities to set their rates of payin regard to the Scottish living wage. I welcome the fact that there is a growing consensus

among local authorities to introduce the living wage, with the majority of councils now either

paying the living wage or committed to introducing it during 2012/13. We have previously

requested information from councils on whether they have implemented the living wage and

the latest position, as we understand it is: .

- 5 councils have confirmed that they already pay the current level of the living

wage through their existing wage structures:

East Dunbartonshire Council,

Shetland Islands Council,

Orkney Islands Council, Western Isles Council,

Perth and Kinross Council

- 9 councils have now introduced the living wage:

Dumfries and Galloway Council,

East Renfrewshire Council;

Glasgow City Council,

North Ayrshire Council,

Scottish Borders Council,

South Lanarkshire Council, West Dunbartonshire Council,

Victoria Quay, Edinburgh EH6 6QQ

Cidhe Bhict6ria, Dun Eideann, EH6 6QQ

www,scotland,gov,uk l:'I


2/6

Aberdeen City Council,

Renfrewshire Council.

- 7 councils have stated that they will implement a living wage during 2012/13:

Highland Council,

Moray Council,

North Lanarkshire Council,

Falkirk Council, South Ayrshire Council,

. Clackmannanshire Council,

Stirling Council.

The new administrations in the remaining 11 local authorities will be considering the

implementation of the living wage in due course.

With regard to the Procurement Reform Bill, you will be aware that, in his evidence to the

local Government and Regeneration Committee inquiry into the living wage in Scotland, the

Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Sustainable Growth stated that the Scottish Government

had sought clarity from the European Commission on the possibility of requiring contractors,as part of the public procurement process, to pay their staff a living wage.

The European Commission has now responded and has confirmed that any requirement on

contractors to pay their employees a living wage set higher than the UK's National Minimum

Wage is unlikely to be compatible with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

In practice, this means that public bodies cannot address the living wage in the award criteria

for a public contract or the Gontract performance clauses and that it is not possible to use the

Procurement Reform Bill to mandate payment of the living wage through procurement

activity. A copy of the Commission's response has been lodged in SPICE and is attached

for your information.

If public bodies wish to encourage contractors to pay their employees a living wage through

procurement processes, this is still possible. We are aware that a number of public bodies

are taking steps to encourage contractors to pay their employees a living wage and are keen

to understand the implications of using procurement activity as a mechanism for promoting

the living wage across the private and voluntary sectors. We intend to use the forthcoming

consultation on the Bill as an opportunity to seek stakeholders' views on this issue:

http://www .sco.tland.gov .uklConsu Itations/Forthcoming?rowld=1539#conRow1539.

Victoria Quay, Edinburgh EH6 6QQ

Cidhe Bhictoria. Dun Eideann. EH6 6QQ

www.5cotland.gov.uk

DEREK MACKAY

ISVE."TOR IS PF.oPLB
http://www.5cotland.gov.uk/http://www.5cotland.gov.uk/


3/6


4/6

MICHEL BARNIER

.A~@~ W~IJU/~

Brussels, 0 7 . 0 5 . 2 0 1 2GR/aa - Ares (20112) 189990

Dear Mr Neil, ~ ~.

Thank you for your letters of 7 December 2011 and 16 February 2012 regarding several public

procurement issues of particular relevance to Scotland. I~ologize for the late reply:

In your letter of 7 December 2011, you have asked the Commission's legal point of view on the possibility

of requiring contractors, as part of the public procurement process, to pay their staff involved in delivering

the public contract a 'living wage', higher than the minimum wage. By your letter of February 2012, youraise certain concerns regarding the concept of 'value for money' in public procurement, as well as the

current thresholds of application of the public procurement directives and invite the Commission to

reconsider these aspects during the negotiation of the recent legislative proposals1for the modernisation

of the current public procurement directives.

First of all, as regards your question on the 'living wage', I would like to point out that the current EU

public procurement rules allow contracting authorities to take into account social considerations in the

award criteria and contract performance clauses of a public contract, provided certain conditions are

met.2

In genera', social considerations must comply with the Treaty's principles (transparency, equal

treatment etc) and with any other EU law that may be relevant.

If social considerations are taken into account in the award criteria, they must be linked to the subject

matter of the contract, Le. to the supply, services, works which are the object of the contract. If they are

included in the contract performance clauses, they must be linked to the performance of the contract, Le.

to the tasks necessary for the delivery/provision/execution of the supplies/services/works of the contract.

Alex NEIL MSP

Cabinet Secretary for Infrastructure

and Capital Investment

Scottish ParliamentEdinburgh, EH99 1SP

Scotland

Proposal for a Directive on public procurement!. COM/2011/0896 final - 2011/0438 (COD) and Proposal for a

Directive on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors!.

COM/201110895 final- 201110439 (COD);I

2 For additional details on these conditions, please see the sections "award criteria" and "contract performance

clauses" of the Guide: "Buying social: A Guide to taking account of social considerations in public

procurement": http://ec.europa.eu/internalmarket/publicprocurement/otheraspects/indexen.htm#social ;

Commission europeenne - Berl 10/034, B-1049 Bruxelles - Belgique - Tel.: 00.32.2.298.17.51 - FAX 00.32.2.292.13.47


5/6

A requirement regarding the payment of a 'living wage' would in practice most probably be linked to the

tasks necessary for the performance of the contract, and therefore be used as a contract performance

clause. Such clause would have to be non-discriminatory and known in advance by all candidates for

transparency reasons.

In terms of other relevant EU legislation, it would have to comply inter alia with the Posting of Workers

Directive3 The 'living wage' to staff involved in the performance of the contract would have to be set in

accordance with one of the procedures laid down by Article 3 of Directive. It was the non-compliance with

this requirement which led the Court of Justice to its decision in the ROff~rt case4 to which you refer in

your letter. In addition, the Court held in the Laval cases that requirements regarding the level of wage

payable to posted workers may not go beyond the mandatory rules for minimum protection provided for.

by the Directive. A 'living wage' set at a higher level than the UK's minimum wage is unlikely to meet this

requirement.

Secondly, as regards your suggestion for the interpretation of the concept of 'value for money' in the

award criteria, the possibility already exists in the procurement procedures to take into account varioussocial considerations. Guidance can be found in the Commission's 2010 publication "Buying social - a

guide to taking account of social considerations in public procurement". To further support the Europe

2020 strategy objectives, the Commission proposes the introduction of a life-cycle cost concept, which will

encourage public authorities to consider the full life-cycle of products in their purchasing decisions. The

life-cycle cost will include internal costs and monetised external environmental costs. Contracting

authorities may take into account criteria linked to the production process of the goods or services to be

purchased.

In addition, contracting authorities may require that works, supplies or services bear specific labels

certifying environmental, social or other characteristics. This should enable authorities to make the most

appropriate procurement choices for their communities, people and businesses. However, I do not believe

that measures that would amount to affording an outright advantage to local tenderers and would thus

discriminate against others irrespective of the merits and value of their offer would serve the objective of

best value for taxpayers' money.

Thirdly, as regards your suggestion to increase the thresholds for publication of tenders, I believe that the

application of the Directives has so far ensured a level playing field in the public procurement sector and

thereby contributed to the reinforcement of the Single Market, creating multiple cross-border business

opportunities in the public sector for companies from all Member States. Increasing the thresholds would

lead to fewer public procurement procedures falling within the scope of the Directives. The procedures

below the increased thresholds would be subject only to national rules, which are divergent and might not

always ensure the same degree of transparency and non-discrimination provided for by EU law.

Moreover, the current thresholds are linked to the EU's international commitments, in particular under

the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement. Increasing the thresholds would be a breach of our

international obligations.

3

4

5

Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the

posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services;

Case C-346/06;

The Court held in the Laval case that the "level ofprotection which must be guaranteed to workers posted to

the territory of the host Member State is limited in principle. to that provided for in Article 3(1), firstsubparagraph, (a) to (g) of Directive 96/71, unless, pursuant to the law or collective agreements in the

Member State of origin, those workers already enjoy more faVourable terms and conditions of employment

as regards the matters referred to in that provision." (point 80 of the Laval judgment).


6/6

Lastly, the proposed rules introduce several provisions aiming to facilitate access by SMEs to public

contracts. For example, contracting authorities must accept self-declarations at the selection stage; annual

turnover requirements may not exceed three times the estimated contract value, and contracting

authorities are encouraged to split contracts into lots to allow more bidders to participate - if they do not,they must specifically explain why.

I hope this helps answering your concerns. I look forward to meeting with you to discuss these issues

further as well as any other public procurement issues of particular relevance to Scotland.

Yours sincerely~ W v L t 1 J .r

Michel BARNIER

Copy: - Rt Hon Francis Maude MP, Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General

- Sir Jon Cunliffe, Permanent Representative of the UKto the EU

Documents

120830 Derek Mackay and Michel Barnier Living Wage Councils and Procurement