Upload
vuongdang
View
244
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society
Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 461~468, 2012.
461
http://dx.doi.org/10.4191/kcers.2012.49.5.461
The Photocatalytic Decompositions of 2-Chlorophenol on the Sn-impregnated Titania
Nanoparticles and Nanotube
Hyun Soo Kim, Gayoung Lee, Sun-Min Park*, and Misook Kang
Department of Chemistry, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Korea
*Korean Institutes of Ceramic Engineering & Technology (KICET), Seoul 153-801, Korea
(Received August 17, 2012; Revised September 11, 2012; Accepted September 12, 2012)
Sn - 2-Chlorophenol
*
*
(2012 8 17 ; 2012 9 11 ; 2012 9 12 )
ABSTRACT
This study focuses on the difference of photocatalytic activity depending on crystal structure type of nanoparticles (TiO2) andnanotubes (TNT). The photodecomposition of 2-chlorophenol on the synthesized TiO2, Sn-impregnated TiO2, TNT, and Sn-impregnated TNT were evaluated. The characteristics of the synthesized photocatalyts, TNT, Sn/TNT, TiO2, and Sn/TiO2 wereanalyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and UV-Visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis), and cyclicvoltammeter (CV). The water-suspended 2-chlorophenol photodegradation over TiO2 (anatase structure) catalyst was better than thatover pure TNT. Particularly, the water-suspended 2-chlorophenol of 10 ppm was perfectly decomposed within 4 h over Sn/TiO2photocatalyst.
Key words: Hydrothermal method, TiO2, Titania nanotube, Impregnation, 2-Chlorophenol photodegradation
1.
.
, ,
. 2-chlorophenol
, ,
.
.
,
.
,1,2) , ,
3,4)
.
.
.
2
.
(Advanced Oxidation Processes:
AOP). AOP pH UV
.
2
VOC .
OH
.5,8)
Corresponding author : Misook Kang
E-mail : [email protected]
Tel : +82-53-810-2363 Fax : +82-53-810-4613
462
.
,
OH
.
.
AOP
.
CO2 H2O
VOC .
TiO2 Si-TiO2 Pt-TiO2 ,
(
, )
.9-12)
.
(TiO2)
(Titania Nano Tube; TNT)
.
SnO2 Sn/TiO2 Sn/TNT
OH
.
X-ray (XRD),
(TEM), - (UV-
visible spectroscopy), BET (BET surface area),
(Cyclic voltammetry)
, 2-chlorophenol
, 2-
chlorophenol -
.
Fig. 1. Preparation of TiO2, TNT, Sn/TiO2, and Sn/TNT using a hydrothermal method.
Sn - 2-Chlorophenol 463
49 5(2012)
2.
TiO2 TNT
,13)
SnO2 Sn/TiO2 Sn/TNT
.14,15)
2.1. TiO2 TNT
TiO2 Fig. 1 250 mL
0.5 mol TTIP (titanium tetra iso-propoxide, Aldrich)
. 1 pH 3.0
.
200oC
5oC/min 8 .
pH 7.0 ,
80oC 24
TiO2 .
TNT 1 L 10 mol NaOH
1 .
TiO2
.
160oC 5
oC/min
10 .
pH 7.0
0.1 M HCl
, 80oC 24
TNT .
2.2. Sn/TiO2 Sn/TNT
100 mL TiO2 TNT
1 . 1.0 wt-% SnCl4
24 .
.
400oC 2
Sn/TiO2 Sn/TNT .
2.3.
TiO2, TNT, Sn/TiO2, Sn/TNT
X-ray (X-ray diffraction,
XRD, PANalytical , MPD) . Radiation
source CuK (=1.5056) , X-ray
generator 30 k, monochromator .
2=1080o 10
o/min
. (trans-
mission electron microscopy, TEM, HITACHI, S-
4100) , 200 kV .
pore size distribution BET-Japan
Inc. BELSORP-mini II BET
, pore size distribution
Kelvin meniscus
BJH (Barrett-Joyer-Hanlenda)
. 300oC 3 h
degassing . -
(UV-vis spectroscopy, SNINCO, Neosys-
2000) 2-chloro-
phenol .
2.4. 2-chlorophenol
Fig. 2
. 0.1 g
2-chlorophenol 10 ppm
. 365 nm UV-lamp (6 W/cm2, 3)
, 1 2-
chlorophenol UV-visible spectrometer
. 2-chlorophenol
2-chlorophenol .
2-chlorophenol 2-chlorophenol
(2 104
M) 250 mL . 2-chlorophenol
1, 3, 5, 7 9 mL
5 250 mL 8.0 107
,
2.4 106
, 4.0 106
, 5.6 106
M 2-chlorophenol
. 2-
chlorophenol 250 nm
.
3.
Fig. 3 TiO2, TNT, Sn/TiO2 Sn/TNT
Fig. 2. Apparatus of a photoreactor designed for 2-chlorophenol
degradation.
464
XRD . TNT
H2Ti3O7
11.3, 24.5, 29.78, 48.68 2 (d200), (d110),
(d003), (d020) .16)
Fig. 3(c) (d) TiO2 Sn/TiO2
(anatase)
25.3o, 37.79
o, 48.04
o, 55.1
o,
62.69o, 68.76
o, 75.1
o 2 (d101), (d004), (d200), (d105),
(d211), (d204), (d116) .17)
Fig. 3(b) Sn/TNT TiO2, TNT SnO2 (
; 29.86o, 33.29
o, 44.34
o, 57.38
o, 67.69
o18))
Sn TNT
TNT
.
Fig. 4 TiO2, TNT, Sn/TiO2 Sn/TNT
TEM . TNT 200~250 nm,
15~20 nm , Fig. 4(b)
Sn/TNT SnO2 TNT
. Fig. 4(c) TiO2
10~20 nm
. Sn Sn/TiO2
TiO2 SnO2
20~30 nm TiO2
.
Fig. 5 Table 1 /
BET
. N2 /
N2 BJH
. N2
01.0 BET
(SBET) .
IUPAC IV
TNT Sn Sn/TNT N2
Sn TNT
Fig. 3. XRD patterns of synthesized TiO2, Sn/TiO2, TNT, and
Sn/TNT photocatalysts.
Fig. 4. TEM images of synthesized (a) TNT, (b) Sn/TNT, (c) TiO2, and (d) Sn/TiO2 photocatalysts.
Sn - 2-Chlorophenol 465
49 5(2012)
N2 . TNT,
Sn/TNT, TiO2 Sn/TiO2 73.26,
66.27, 135.40, 38.22 m2/g, TNT
TiO2 .
TNT single wall multi wall
. BJH
TNT, Sn/TNT, TiO2 Sn/TiO2
14.06, 16.85, 10.08 11.33 nm,
0.476, 0.161, 0.1847 0.1877 cm3/g.
Fig. 6 TNT, Sn/TNT, TiO2 Sn/TiO2
UV-Visible
. ,
.
.
Fig. 5. The isotherm curves for N2 adsorption/desorption on synthesized TiO2, Sn/TiO2, TNT, and Sn/TNT photocatalysts.
Table 1. BET Surface Area, Pore Volume, and Pore Diameter for Synthesized TiO2, Sn/TiO2, TNT, and Sn/TNT Photocatalysts
TNT Sn(1.0 wt-%)/TNT TiO2 Sn(1.0 wt-%)/TiO2
BET Mulipoint Surface area (m2g1
) 73.261 66.268 135.4 38.127
Total pore volume (cm3g1
) 0.476 0.161 0.1847 0.1877
Average pore diameter (nm) 14.061 16.854 10.084 11.327
Fig. 6. UV-Visible spectra for synthesized TiO2, Sn/TiO2,
TNT, and Sn/TNT photocatalysts.
466
,
,
. TNT
Sn
. TiO2 TNT
, Sn ( )
. Tauc TNT, Sn/
TNT, TiO2 Sn/TiO2
2.97, 3.01, 3.10 3.13eV.
Fig. 7 Ag/AgCl TNT, Sn/TNT,
TiO2 Sn/TiO2 .
. Sn Sn/TNT Sn/TiO2
.
redox
. Fig. 7 Sn
. TNT,
Sn/TNT, TiO2 Sn/TiO2
, (eV)/(eV) =
7.15/4.18, 6.94/3.93, 7.12/4.02 6.89/3.76
. TiO2 TNT Sn
,
( )
.
Fig. 8 TNT, Sn/TNT, TiO2 Sn/TiO2
(0.1 g) (Fig. 2) 10 ppm 2-
chlorophenol
. Fig. 8(a)-(c) 1
2-chloro-
phenol 1
2
. , TNT 14, Sn/TNT 9
Fig. 7. Cyclic voltammeter for synthesized (a) TNT, (b) Sn/TNT, (c) TiO2, and (d) Sn/TiO2 photocatalysts.
Fig. 8. Photodecomposition of 2-Chlorophenol using (a) TNT,
(b) Sn/TNT, (c) TiO2, and (d) Sn/TiO2.
Sn - 2-Chlorophenol 467
49 5(2012)
, TiO2 5, Sn/TiO2, 4 10 ppm 2-
chlorophenol . TNT
TiO2
, TNT TiO2 Sn 1.0 wt-%
2-chlorophenol . Sn
redox( (
) ,
. Sn/
TiO2 Sn/TNT
5 .
TNT TiO2 2-chlorophenol
TiO2
. TiO2 2-chlorophenol
TNT
2-chlorophenol ,
TNT
.
4.
4 , TNT, Sn/TNT,
TiO2 Sn/TiO2
. XRD Sn/TNT
Sn TNT anatase
TiO2
TEM TNT TiO2
. UV-Visible
TNT < Sn/TNT < TiO2 < Sn/TiO2 Sn
. 2-chloro-
phenol , TNT 14, Sn/TNT 9
, TiO2 5, Sn/TiO2 4
. TNT TiO2 Sn
TNT Sn/TNT
TiO2 Sn/TiO2 2-chloro-
phenol .
Acknowledgment
(2011 )
.
REFERENCES
1. B. Guieysse, C. Hort, V. Platel, R. Munoz, M. Ondarts, and
S. Revah, Biological Treatment of Indoor Air for VOC
Removal: Potential and Challenges, Biotechnol. Adv., 26
398-410 (2008).
2. S. Santos, K. Jones, R. Abdul, J. Boswell, and J. Pacac,
Treatment of Wet Process Hardboard Plant VOC Emis-
sions by a Pilot Scale Biological System, Biochem. Eng. J.,
37 261-70 (2007).
3. S. H. Kwona and D. Cho, A Comparative, Kinetic Study on
Cork and Activated Carbon Biofilters for VOC Degrada-
tion, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 15 129-35 (2009).
4. Y. C. Chiang, P. C. Chiang, and C. P. Huang, Effects of
Pore Structure and Temperature on VOC Adsorption on
Activated Carbon, Carbon, 39 523-34 (2001).
5. Y. H. Huang, Y. J. Huang, H. C. Tsai, and H. T. Chen, Deg-
radation of Phenol using Low Concentration of Ferric Ions
by the Photo-fenton Process, J. Taiwan. Inst. Chem. E., 41
699-704 (2010).
6. G. B. Ortiz de la Plata, O. M. Alfano, and A. E. Cassano,
Decomposition of 2-chlorophenol Employing Goethite as
Fenton Catalyst II: Reaction Kinetics of the Heterogeneous
Fenton and Photo-fenton Mechanisms, Appl. Catal. B-
Environ., 95 14-25 (2010).
7. J. M. Monteagudo, A. Duran, and C. Lopez-Almodovar,
Homogeneus Ferrioxalate-assisted Solar Photo-fenton
Degradation of Orange II Aqueous Solutions, Appl. Catal.
B-Environ., 83 46-55 (2008).
8. M. P. Moya, M. Graells, L. J. del Valle, E. Centelles, and H.
D. Mansilla, Fenton and Photo-fenton Degradation of 2-
Chlorophenol: Multivariate Analysis and Toxicity Moni-
toring, Catal. Today, 124 163-71 (2007).
9. Ch. Boughelouma and A. Messalhib, Photocatalytic Deg-
radation of Benzene Derivatives on TiO2 Catalyst, Physics.
Procedia., 2 1055-58 (2009).
10. Y. H. Chena, L. L. Chen, and N. C. Shang, Photocatalytic
Degradation of Dimethyl Phthalate in an Aqueous Solution
with Pt-doped TiO2-coated Magnetic PMMA Microspheres,
J. Hazard. Mater., 172 20-29 (2009).
11. M. A. Barakat, H. Schaeffera, G. Hayesa, and S. Ismat-Shah,
Photocatalytic Degradation of 2-Chlorophenol by Co-
doped TiO2 Nanoparticles, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 57 23-
30 (2005).
12. D. N. Bui, S. Z. Kang, X. Li, and Jin Mu, Effect of Si Dop-
ing on the Photocatalytic Activity and Photoelectrochemical
Property of TiO2 Nanoparticles, Catal. Commun., 13 14-7
(2011).
13. I. C. Flores, J. N. de Freitas, C. Longo, M. A. de Paoli, H.
Winnischofer, and A. F. Nogueira, Dye-sensitized Solar
Cells Based on TiO2 Nanotubes and a Solid-state Elec-
trolyte, J. Photoch. Photobio. A., 189 153-60 (2007).
14. R. Vinu and G. Madras, Photocatalytic Activity of Ag-sub-
stituted and Impregnated Nano-TiO2, Appl. Catal. A - Gen.,
366 130-40 (2009).
15. R. Enderson, I. P. Diego, H.Z. dos S. Joo, B.C. P. Sibele,
468
and G. P. Fbio, Bentonites Impregnated with TiO2 for Pho-
todegradation of Methylene Blue, Appl. Clay. Sci., 48 602-
06 (2010).
16. K. P. Yu, W. Y. Yu, M. C. Kuo, Y. C. Liou, and S. H. Chien,
Pt/titania-nanotube: A Potential Catalyst for CO2 Adsorp-
tion and Hydrogenation, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 84 112-
18 (2008).
17. B. S. Kwak, H. Choi, J. Woo, J. Lee, J. An, S. G. Ryu, and
Misook Kang, Photo-electrochemical Hydrogen Produc-
tion Over P- and B- Incorporated TiO2 Nanometer Sized
Photo-Catalysts, Clean Tech., 17 [1] 78-82 (2011).
18. S. Ken, O. Yuya, U. Hiroaki, H. Eiji, Z. Haoshen, and I.
Hiroaki, Aqueous Solution Synthesis of SnO Nanostrac-
tures with Tuned Optical Absorption and Photoelectro-
chemical Properties through Morphological Evolution, J.
Roy. Soc. Chem., 2 2424-30 (2010).