Upload
imranullah-khan
View
139
Download
9
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Koji Ueda (Nomura)Nazri Omar (KFH Malaysia)Qudeer Latif (Clifford Chance Dubai)Reiko Sakimura (Clifford Chance Tokyo)
Nomura Sukuk-al-IjaraCase Study
Tokyo (8 December 2010)
1
Introduction Nomura’s Perspective KFH’s Perspective and Shari’a Process Islamic Structural and Legal Issues Capital Markets Issues
Nomura Sukuk Ltd – Transaction Overview
3
Transaction DetailsIssuer Nomura Sukuk Ltd (Labuan SPV)
Ratings BBB+ (S&P)
Structure Sukuk Al-Ijarah
Format Reg S
Issue Size US$100,000,000
Tenor 2 year, bullet payment
Distribution Semi Annually
Price LIBOR 6months + 160bps
Issuing Price 100%
Guarantor Nomura Holdings Inc.
Underlying Assets 2 Aircraft (Boeing 737-800, Airbus 320-232)
Listing Bursa Malaysia
Governing Law English Law
Nomura Sukuk Ltd successfully priced its inaugural international US$ Sukuk – Al Ijarah Offering
4
A Highly Flexible Shari’a-compliant Structure
* NBB : Lease Arrangement company which specializes in the international leasing of large equipment in Nomura Group
Funding
The underlying physical assets for the sukuk were 2 aircraft, and the transaction involved transfer of legal ownership to the Sukuk issuer
This more strictly follows Shari’a guidelines, compared with many other Sukuk Al Ijarah issuances, which usually apply a transfer of Beneficial Ownership
The structure satisfies the more stringent Shari’a requirements of Middle Eastern investor and opens the way for Nomura to tap Middle East as well as Asian Islamic investors
SPV 2(Orphan Trust)
Airline
NHINBB*
Islamic Market
SPV 1
Guarantee (SPV1’s Obligation)
100% Owner
100% Owner
Sale andLease-back
LeasePayment Sukuk
IssuanceInvestment in Sukuk
Agent Agreement
OriginalOwner SPV
Nomura Group Funding
Company
100% Funding(LOAN)
OriginalLease
Contract
Aircraft Sales
Operational Lease
Novation
Sukuk Related
Aircraft Related Flow & Contracts
Capital Relation
Funding Source (Repaid with Sukuk Funding)
5
Client Accessibility to Sukuk Al-IjarahThe order book was closed within 24 hours. With strong demands after close book, we realized secondary allocation by end of August
Final Secondary Allocation August 20101st Close Allocation July 2010
6
Transaction TimelineNomura drove all aspects of the transaction, from start to finish, and allowed Nomura Holdings Inc to complete issuance of its first Islamic issuance within a 12 week execution period.
Sukuk Timeline Underlying Asset Timeline
1st week Fixing Financing Scheme Underlying Asset DD
3rd week Documentation Start (till 11th week)
4th week Establishment of issuer SPV Establishment of Lessor SPV
8th week Lease License for Lessor SPV
10th week DD Meeting, Prospectus Circulation
11th week Price Fixing, Subscription Agreement Finalize title transference execution
12th week Closing / Settlement Legal Title Transfer
Transaction Timeline
Strong demand from Islamic investors for non-Islamic issuers, and for foreign currency (USD) Sukuk issuance. The structure allowed the issuance to be rated the same as a conventional Nomura Holdings issuance and so generated further
investor interest and pricing tension. The Nomura team, working closely with an Islamic bank (Kuwait Finance House) was a successful combination in realizing an
innovative structure which generated very strong demand from Islamic and non-Islamic investors. The Nomura now has proven structuring and execution capabilities to advise non-Islamic corporate clients on Shari’a-compliance
issuance.
Key Takeaways
8
Investor/Issuer/Shari’a Key Requirements
Shari’a•Permissible asset
•Permissible business income
•Key Lease Terms
Issuer•Pricing competitiveness
•No impact from Tax/Accounting/business operations
Investor•Similar features to fixed income and tradeable
•Rating – certainty and timeliness of payments
Objective:to balance the requirements of all 3
stakeholders
9
Shari’a Key Requirements (1)Key Parameters Description• Permissible asset (for
tradeability of Nomura Sukuk Ijarah)
• Completed and clearly identified asset by both parties
• Tangible or intangible assets (that can be independently valued)
• Non-perishable (durable) or consumable
• Issuer has a clearly defined right of use over the asset
• Permissible business income
• Asset is used to generate Shari’a compliant business income, to avoid
• Restricted Food and beverage (ie Alchohol)
• Speculative/gambling related
• Media/Entertainment• Interest bearing activities
Nomura Case• Asset is a completed aircraft
• Legal ownership by Issuer/SPV
• Business income generated from aircraft leasing
10
Shari’a Key Requirements (2)Key Parameters Description• Lease Rental (for
Nomura Sukuk Ijarah)
• Determined at the time of contract
• Rental charged when Asset is handed over to the lessee
• Different rent can be fixed for different phases, provided amount/formula is agreed upon at the time of affecting a lease
• Lessor cannot increase the rent unilaterally
• No rental if no usufruct/right of use
• Lease Period • Period of lease must be determined in clear terms at the time of contract
• Responsibility of lessor
• bears and assumes the full risk of the leased asset
• liable to pay all expenses incurred with respect to asset
Nomura Case• Rental formula determined upfront
to cater for floating rate mechanism
• 2 year tenor for lease
• Insurance to cover total loss
• Appointment of lessee as Servicing Agent - expenses offset by lease formula
11
Investor/Issuer Key RequirementsKey Parameters Description• For Investor - Fixed
Income features• Defined tenor, with periodic
coupons, bullet maturity, and tradeable
• Rating – certainty and timeliness of payments
Nomura Case• Sukuk achieved requirements with the
following:
• Periodic coupons incorporated into lease payment
• Purchase/Sale undertaking to cater for Principal on maturity
• Rating of BBB+ with NHI guarantee on Obligor’s obligations under transaction
12
Issuer Key RequirementsKey Parameters Description• For Issuer - • Pricing competitiveness –
comparable to conventional benchmark
• No impact from Tax/Accounting/business operations – ie no different than conventional bonds
Nomura Case• Achieved - Commercial Terms and
Conditions and Credit Risk comparable to NHI’s Bonds
• Sale Transfer from SPV1 to SPV2 and leaseback (done in Labuan, an International Business & Financial Centre (IBFC)) – viewed as a financing transaction, achieved tax neutrality
• SPV1 lease payments to SPV2 viewed as substitute to interest payments by tax/accounting
• SPV1 operates as an Operating Lease company
15
Nomura Sukuk I
US$100 million Sukuk Certificates Ijara
Shari’a compliant lease Lease rental payments “mirror” the profit payments under
the Sukuk Certificates Obligation to undertake major maintenance of leased asset
remains with lessor (SPV) Obligation to insure the leased asset remains with the
lessor (SPV) Obligation to pay any ownership taxes remains with the
lessor (SPV)
16
Nomura Sukuk II
Service Agency Agreement Lessor appoints an agent (usually the lessee ) to carry out
servicing duties pursuant to a servicing agreement Recovery of Services Agency Costs?
Acceleration of debt? Sale & Purchase Undertakings
Asset based v Asset backed What risk are investors taking?
17
Islamic Documentation
Sale and Purchase Agreement Lease Agreement Service Agency Agreement Purchase Undertaking Sale Undertaking Substitution Undertaking Replacement Undertaking Guarantee Deed
18
Ijara Sukuk - Important Considerations
Size of Sukuk issuance is restricted by the value of the assets transferred to the Lessee
Once the assets have been transferred for the purposes of a Sukuk issue, they cannot be used for any other purpose until the Sukuk issue has matured
20
Differences from Conventional Bonds (1)
Parties and Terms
Conventional Bonds SukukIssuer TrusteeTrustee (if any) DelegateGuarantor guarantees payment to investors
Guarantor guarantees payment to Trustee
Bonds Trust CertificatesInterest Periodic DistributionsRedemption Payment Dissolution DistributionEvents of Default Dissolution Events
21
Differences from Conventional Bonds (2)
Nomura Subsidiary
(Issuer)
Bond-holders
Promise to pay (if it had been a trust deed structure, covenant to pay would be held on trust by the trustee for the benefit of the Bondholders)
Nomura Holdings
Guarantee
Certificate-holders
Lease and undertakings held on trust for Certificateholders
NBB Ijarah Ltd
Nomura Holdings
Lease
Purchase etc. undertakings
Guarantee
Trust Assets
Delegate
Powers vested in Delegate
Nomura Sukuk Ltd (Trustee)
Nomura MTN Nomura Sukuk
22
Delegate
Enforcement Delegate can sue obligor (whether it be NBB Ijarah or
Nomura Holdings) in the name of the Trustee for unpaid amounts
– Note: no recourse to aircraft assets
Locus standi of Delegate: attorney of Trustee
Powers vested in the Delegate Convening meetings Determination of Dissolution Event Amendments, waivers etc. Delegate = attorney BUT does not hold trust assets “on
trust”
23
Similarities with Conventional Bonds (1)
Disclosure Ultimate credit = Nomura Holdings Offering Circular
disclosure Due diligence: corporate and asset Auditors’ comfort letters
Terms and Conditions Nomura Holdings’ negative pledge Dissolution Events related to Nomura Holdings
– Cross Default threshold– Grace periods– Bankruptcy/insolvency etc. events
24
Similarities with Conventional Bonds (2)
Subscription and sale Subscription Agreement
Periodic / “principal” payments to investors Agency Agreement
Clearing Euroclear and Clearstream, Luxembourg
Speakers’ contact details:Koji Ueda (Nomura, Singapore)+65 6433 [email protected]
Nazri Omar (Director, KFH Malaysia)+603 2055 [email protected]
Qudeer Latif (Partner/Head of Islamic Finance)+971 4 362 0675 [email protected]
Reiko Sakimura (Partner)+81 3 5561 [email protected]