65
Lot-by-lot Acceptance Sampling Techniques by Attributes

11 Sampling Tech 3new

  • Upload
    soonvy

  • View
    131

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Lot-by-lot Acceptance Sampling

Techniques by

Attributes

Page 2: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Topic Outcome:At the end of this topic, student will be able to:

Describe the consumer-producer relationship

from a OC curve.

Determine and explain producer’s risk,

consumer’s risk, AQL, and LQ.

Determine and explain AOQ, ASN, and ATI.

Design and apply a sampling plan.

Page 3: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Topic Outline:Introduction

Consumer-Producer Relationship

Producer’s Risk () & AQL (Tahap Mutu

Kebolehterimaan)

Consumer’s Risk () & LQ (Mutu Terhad)

AOQ (Mutu Purata Pengeluaran)

ASN

ATI

Design of Sampling Plan.

Page 4: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

(1) Introduction

Page 5: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Introduction An OC curve can be plotted for any combination of sample

size (n) and acceptance number (c).

Each combination results in a different curve.

Some of the most important things to remember about OC curves can be seen by comparing the curves.

DIFFERENT n: A larger sample size tends to result in a steeper curve such a plan is said to have greater “discriminating power” than plan with smaller sample size and shallower curve.

DIFFERENT c: a larger c tends to change the shape of the curve, creating a flat “shoulder” at the top while retaining a thin “tail” at the bottom.

Page 6: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

OC curve has 3 parts

1.0

0.5

05.0 10.0

Pro

bab

ility

of A

cce

pta

nce

, Pa

[or

Pe

rcen

t of L

ots

Acc

ep

ted

,10

0Pa]

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

Shoulder (or peak) at the topIt shows the quality of the product that

will be accepted by sampling plan without question.

Thin part of the tail at the bottom

It shows the quality of the product that is almost certain to be rejected by

the plan.

Middle portion between shoulder and tail

At exact centre of the curve, where the Pa is 50%, product of corresponding quality has 50-50 chance of being either rejected

or accepted.

Page 7: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

In general, engineer should make sure that the “shoulder” of the curve corresponds to the product he/she is willing to be accepted and that the “tail” of the curve corresponds to the product he/she is willing to be rejected.

Maximum economy is likely to be obtained when the process is running at or near its capability level and when this level matches the shoulder of the OC curve to be used.

Page 8: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

(2) Consumer–Producer Relationship

Page 9: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Producer’s RiskAQL

Page 10: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Producer’s Risk (Producer’s Risk ()) It is defined as the probability or risk of rejecting a lot

when the quality of the lot is acceptable.

What does this mean to an engineer?

The risk for a good product to be rejected a lost to an

organization.

Example:

A process capability is 99%. Customer is willing to accept 1%

nonconforming units. However, during inspection a certain

percentage of lots still rejected ever though the percent of

nonconforming is less than 1%.

Page 11: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

How to estimate Producer’s Risk ()How to estimate Producer’s Risk ()

1) Plot OC curve for the sampling plan.

2) Find the percentage nonconforming (100p0) in the

process.

• Rough estimation can be done if no exact data is available.

• However for a more accurate check, a process process capability studycapability study is preferable.

3) Use the process capability percentage to determine the probability of acceptance (Pa) on the OC curve.

4) Producer’s Risk () = 1 - Pa

Page 12: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Q & A:

Process Capability = 99%

1.Sampling Plan, N=3000, n=80, c=0

2.Sampling Plan, N=3000, n=80, c=1

3.Sampling Plan, N=3000, n=80, c=2

4.Sampling Plan, N=3000, n=80, c=3

5.Sampling Plan, N=3000, n=80, c=4

Find the Producer’s Risk for the above sampling plans according to the stated process capability.

Page 13: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

OC Curve

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Lo

ts A

cc

ep

ted

(1

00

Pa)

c=4

c=3

c=2

c=1

c=0

Process Capability = 99% 100p0 = 1%

c 100Pa 100

0 44.9% 55.1%

1 80.9% 19.1%

2 95.2% 4.8%

3 99.1% 0.9%

4 99.8% 0.2%

Percentage of Lots NOT Accepted (Pr)

Page 14: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

It is associated with producer’s risk.

It is a numerical definition of an acceptable lot.

It is the maximum percent nonconforming that can be considered satisfactory for the purposes of acceptance sampling.

It is a reference point on the OC curve and is not meant to convey to the producer that any percent nonconforming is acceptable.

It is a statistical term and is not meant to be used by general public.

Producer only can guarantee an acceptable lot when 0% nonconforming or the number nonconforming in the lot less than or equal to acceptance number, c.

Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)

Page 15: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Producer’s quality goal is to meet or exceed the specifications so that no nonconforming units are present in the lot.

A sampling plan should have a low Producer’s risk for quality that is equal to or better than the AQL.

Example:

Sampling plan: N=4000, n=300, and c=4, AQL=0.7%. What is the non-acceptance probability?

Page 16: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

OC Curve

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Lo

ts A

cc

ep

ted

(1

00

Pa)

(AQL, 1-100Pa)

93%

Comment:

• Producer’s risk = 7%

• Product that is 0.7% nonconforming will have a non-acceptance probability of 0.07 or 7%.

• 7 out of 100 lots that are 0.7% nonconforming will not be accepted by the sampling plan.

Page 17: 11 Sampling Tech 3new
Page 18: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Consumer’s RiskLQ

Page 19: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Consumer’s Risk ()

It is defined as the probability or risk of accepting a “bad” lot based on a sampling plan.

It is expressed in terms of probability of acceptance.

To estimate consumer’s risk:

Plot OC curve for a sampling plan.

Find out the percent nonconforming that the consumer wants to reject.

Find this value on the OC curve and determine the probability of acceptance. This gives the risk of accepting unsatisfactory quality provided the product of such poor quality is actually submitted.

Page 20: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Q & A:

Consumer wants to reject product that is 4% nonconforming.

1. Sampling Plan, N=3000, n=80, c=0

2. Sampling Plan, N=3000, n=80, c=1

3. Sampling Plan, N=3000, n=80, c=2

4. Sampling Plan, N=3000, n=80, c=3

5. Sampling Plan, N=3000, n=80, c=4

Find the Consumer’s Risk () for the above sampling plans.

Page 21: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

OC Curve

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Lo

ts A

cc

ep

ted

(1

00

Pa)

c=4

c=3

c=2

c=1

c=0

c 100Pa=100

0 4.1%

1 17.1%

2 38.0%

3 60.2%

4 78.1%

Page 22: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

It is associated with consumer’s risk.

It is a numerical definition of a nonconforming lot.

It is the percent nonconforming in a lot for which (for acceptance purposes) the consumer wishes the probability of acceptance to be low.

For previous example, LQ = 4% for 100 = 5% (for c=0) lots that are 4% nonconforming will have a 5% chance of being accepted. 1 out of 20 lots that are 4% nonconforming will be accepted by this sampling plan.

Limiting Quality (LQ)

Page 23: 11 Sampling Tech 3new
Page 24: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

(3) Average Outgoing Quality (AOQ)

Page 25: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

It is the average quality of outgoing product.

All accepted lots + All rejected lots after the rejected lots have been effectively 100% inspected (screened) and all nonconforming units replaced by conforming one.

Rectifying Inspection.

AOQ = (100p0)(Pa)

It is the quality that leaves the inspection operation.

When rectification/sorting does not occur, the AOQ is same as the incoming quality (or process quality).

Average Outgoing Quality (AOQ)

Page 26: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Rectifying Inspection Program

Fraction non-conforming

Page 27: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

AOQ Curve

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0 1 2 3 4 5 6Percent Nonconforming

Ave

rag

e O

utg

oin

g Q

ual

ity-

%

AOQL

Average Outgoing Quality Limit (AOQL)

N=3000, n=89, c=2

Incoming quality = 2% nonconforming AOQ

is ~1.45%

Page 28: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

AOQ Curve

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0 1 2 3 4 5 6Percent Nonconforming

Ave

rag

e O

utg

oin

g Q

ual

ity-

%

AOQL

Curve without rectification

Why AOQ is better than Incoming quality?

Page 29: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Q & A

Suppose that over a period of time, 15 lots of 3000 each are shipped by producer to the consumer. The lots are 2% nonconforming and a sampling plan of n=89 and c=2 is used to determine acceptance.

Page 30: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

OC Curve

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Lo

ts A

cc

ep

ted

(1

00

Pa)

73.6%

• 100Pa for 2% nonconforming

lot (100p0) is 73.6%.

• How many lots are accepted

by the consumer?

• 0.736 x 15 = 11 lots

• 4 lots are NOT accepted by the

sampling plan and returned to

the producer for rectification.

• These 4 lots receive 100%

inspection and are returned to

the consumer with 0%

nonconforming.

Page 31: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

ConsumerProducerN = 3000

n = 89c = 2

15 lots2% Nonconforming

11 lots2% Nonconforming

4 lots2% Nonconforming

4 lots0% Nonconforming

Total Number Number Nonconforming11 lots (2% NC) 11(3000) =33,000 33,000(0.02) = 6604 lots (0% NC) 4(3000)(0.98)=11,760 0

------------ ------- 44,760 660

Percent Nonconforming (AOQ) = (660/44760)100 = 1.47%[consumer actually receives 1.47% nonconforming, whereas the producer’s quality is 2%]

Page 32: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

OC Curve

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Lo

ts A

cc

ep

ted

(1

00

Pa)

73.6%

• If the producer’s risk () is equal to 0.05, the AQL=1%

• Producer at 2% nonconforming is not achieving the desired quality level.

Page 33: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

(4) Average Sample Number(ASN)

Page 34: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Average Sample Number(ASN) It is a comparison of the average amount inspected per lot

by the consumer for a certain sampling plan. The ASN depends on the type of sampling plan: Single Sampling Plan

ASN is constant Double Sampling Plan

ASN = n1 + n2(1+P1)Where n1 is the first sample size number

n2 is the second sample size number

P1 is the probability of a decision on first sample

Page 35: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Multiple Sampling PlanASN = n1P1 + (n1+n2)P2 + ….+ (n1+n2+…+nk)Pk

Where nk is the sample size of the last level, Pk is the probability of a decision at the last level.

ASN curves

Page 36: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

ASN curves are a valuable tool for justifying double or multiple sampling.

When inspection costs are great due to inspection time, equipment cost, or equipment availability.

Page 37: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Q & AGiven the single sampling plan n=80 and c=2 and the equal effective double sampling plan n1=50, c1=0, r1=3, n2=50, c2=3, and r2=4, compare the ASN of the two by constructing their curves.

For single sampling, the ASN is a straight line at n=80.For double sampling, the solution is

PI =P0 + P3 or more

Assume that p0=0.01; then np0=50(0.01)=0.5. From Appendix C:P0=0.607P3 or more = 1-P2 or less = 1-0.986 = 0.014ASN = n1+n2[1-(P0+P3 or more)]ASN = 50 + 50[1-(0.607+0.014)]=69Repeating for different values of p0, the double sampling plan is plotted as shown in Fig. above.

Page 38: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

The formula assumes that inspection continues even after the rejection number is reached.

It is frequently the practice to discontinue inspection after the rejection number is reached on either the first or second sample.

This practice is called curtailed inspection, and the formula is much more complicated. Thus, the ASN curve for double sampling is somewhat lower than what actually occurs.

Page 39: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Analysis of the ASN curve for double sampling. At p0 of 0.03 single and double sampling plans have

about the same amount of inspection. For p0<0.03 double sampling plan has less inspection

because a decision to accept on the first sample is more likely.

For p0>0.03 double sampling plan has less inspection because a decision not to accept on the first sample is more likely and a second sample is not required.

Note: in most ASN curves, the double sample curve does not get close to the single sample one.

Page 40: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Typical ASN curves

Page 41: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

(5) Average Total Inspection (ATI)

Page 42: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Average Total Inspection (ATI) It is the amount inspected by both the consumer and the

producer. Provide information on the amount inspected and NOT the

effectiveness of the plan. Single Sampling Plan

ATI = n + (1 – Pa)(N – n)

Assumption:Rectified lots receive 100% inspection.

Lots with 0% nonconforming ATI = n Lots with 100% nonconforming ATI = N

Page 43: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Example Determine the ATI curve for the single sampling plan N =

3000, n = 89, and c = 2.

Assume that p0 = 0.02. From the OC curve, Pa = 0.731. ATI = n + (1 – Pa)(N – n) = 89 + (1 – 0.731)(3000 – 89)

ATI = 872 Repeat for other p0 values until a smooth curve is obtained.

Page 44: 11 Sampling Tech 3new
Page 45: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

(6) Design of Sampling Plan

Page 46: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Design of Sampling Plan

“Rule of Thumb”

A sampling plan should not be adopted without seeing

the OC curve!!!!!

Page 47: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Sampling Plans for Stipulated Producer’s Risk

When and its corresponding AQL are specified, a family of sampling plans can be determined.

1.0

0.5

05.0 10.0

Pro

bab

ility

of A

cce

pta

nce

, Pa

[or

Pe

rcen

t of L

ots

Acc

ep

ted

,10

0Pa]

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

AQL

Producer’s Risk

Page 48: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

How to construct a family of sampling plan? [=0.05, AQL (or 100p0)=1.2%]

1) Arbitrarily select c values.

2) Find np0 values correspond to the c values (from

Table below) -- interpolation

3) Calculate n, from n=np0/p0

4) Construct OC curves with n and c values.

Page 49: 11 Sampling Tech 3new
Page 50: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Construct a family of sampling plan [=0.05, AQL (or 100p0)=1.2%]

•Arbitrarily select c values.

• c=1, 2, and 6

• =0.05 Pa=0.95 np0 values correspond to the c values (Table 9-4). If np0 value is not available in

the Table, interpolation is needed to find the values using the pre-calculated values from Table above.

• From Table 9-4 obtain np0 values

Q & A

Page 51: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

• Calculate n, from n=np0/p0

• Pa = 0.95; p0.95 = 0.012

c np0 (from Table 9-4) n = np0/p0

1 0.355 29.6 (~30)

2 0.818 68.2 (~68)

6 3.286 273.9 (~274)

• Construct OC curves with n and c values.

Page 52: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

OC Curve

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Lo

ts A

cc

ep

ted

(1

00

Pa) c=1

n=30

c=2n=68

c=6n=274

100=5

AQL=1.2%

100=10

• All the plans provide the same protection for the producer, but the consumer’s risk () = 0.10 is quite different.

• For plan c=6, n=274 product that is 3.8% nonconforming will be accepted 10% (= 0.10) of the time.

For consumer’s viewpoint, the plan with c=6, n=274 provides better protection,but the size is large.

Page 53: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Sampling Plans for Stipulated Consumer’s Risk

When and its corresponding Limiting Quality (LQ) are specified, a family of sampling plans can be determined.

1.0

0.5

05.0 10.0

Pro

bab

ility

of A

cce

pta

nce

, Pa

[or

Pe

rcen

t of L

ots

Acc

ep

ted

,10

0Pa]

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

LQ

Consumer’s Risk

Page 54: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Construct a family of sampling plans [=0.10, LQ (or 100p0)=6.0%]

• Arbitrarily select c values.

• c=1, 3, and 7

• Find np0 values correspond to the c values (from above Table).

=0.10 100Pa=10 np0 values correspond to the c values

in the Table.

Q & A

Page 55: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

• Calculate n, from n=np0/p0

• Pa = 0.10; p0.95 = 0.060

c np0 (from above Table) n

1 3.890 64.8 (~65)

3 6.681 111.4 (~111)

7 11.771 196.2 (~196)

• Construct OC curves with n and c values.

Page 56: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

OC Curve

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Lo

ts A

cc

ep

ted

(1

00

Pa) c=1

n=65

c=3n=111

c=7n=196

100=5

LQ=6.0%

100=10

• All the plans provide the

same protection for the

consumer, but the

producer’s risk () = 0.05 is

quite different.

• For plan c=1, n=65

product that is 0.5%

nonconforming will not be

accepted 5% (100= 5%) of

the time.

For producer’s viewpoint, the plan with c=1, n=65 provides better protection,but the size is large.

Page 57: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Sampling Plans for Stipulated Producer’s & Consumer’s Risk

It is difficult to obtain an OC curve that will satisfy both

conditions.

There will be 4 sampling plans that are close to meeting

both stipulations.

How to determine the plans?

Page 58: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Given: (decisions based on historical data, experimentation, or engineering judgment, purchasing contract)=0.05, AQL=0.9=0.10, LQ=7.8

667.8009.0

078.0

95.0

10.0 p

p

• From above Table, the ratio falls between the row for c=1 and c=2.

• Thus, plans that exactly meet the consumer’s stipulation of LQ = 7.8% for =0.10 are:

cnp0.10 (from Table 9-4)

n=(np0.10)/p0.10

1 3.890 49.9 (50)

2 5.322 68.2 (68)

Page 59: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Plans that exactly meet the producer’s stipulation of AQL =0.9% for =0.05 are:

cnp0.95 (from Table 9-4)

n=(np0.95)/p0.95

1 0.355 39.4 (39)

2 0.818 90.8 (91)

Construct OC curves.

Page 60: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

OC Curve

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Percent Nonconforming (100p0)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Lo

ts A

cc

ep

ted

(1

00

Pa)

100 = 5

AQL=0.9

100 = 10

LQ=7.8

c=1n=39

c=2n=91

c=1n=50

c=2n=68

Page 61: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

Which of the 4 plans to select?Based on 4 criteria.

1st Criterion:The lowest sample size and the lowest acceptance numberbe selected.e.g. c=1, n=39

2nd Criterion:The greatest sample size and the largest acceptance numberbe selected.e.g. c=2, n=91

Page 62: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

3rd Criterion:The plan exactly meets the consumer’s stipulation and comes as close as possible to the producer’s stipulation. e.g. c=1, n=50 and c=2, n=68.

Calculations to determine which plan is closest to the producer’s stipulation of AQL=0.9%, =0.05 are:

c n p0.95=np0.95/n

1 50 0.355/50=0.007

2 68 0.818/68=0.012

0.009This plan is selected

Page 63: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

4th Criterion:The plan exactly meets the producer’s stipulation and comes as close as possible to the consumer’s stipulation. e.g. c=1, n=39 and c=2, n=91.

Calculations to determine which plan is closest to the producer’s stipulation of LQ=7.8%, =0.10 are:

c n p0.10=np0.10/n

1 39 0.3890/39=0.100

2 91 5.322/91=0.058 0.078This plan is selected

Page 64: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

The task of designing a sampling plan system is a

tedious one.

Sampling plan systems are available.

E.g.: ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 – 1993 (equivalent to MS 567 –

1978)

universally used for acceptance

product.

This is an AQL or producer’s risk

system.

E.g.: Dodge-Romig

LQ or consumer’s risk system.

Page 65: 11 Sampling Tech 3new

END