12
1'. I. TERASAKI, D. I,. J-REDI.;VOE. I<, '1. ~'I)RTF:R~. 11, R. AIICKEY~, 'r. 1,. ,\IARC!IIORO.', T. D. FARIS.', T. IIERRMANS~. ASD T. E. STARZL' Deparlments rlj S~crqcry nnrl Prrl,rn/ttqc ilirrlrctnr nnrl I'lchltc Ifrnlth. School nf ,Iferllctne, linaversltu o/ Cnl~fnrr~m. Los Angcie.r, thr Department of Pntholoq1/, St. Jlarl/'s Noapttal, London. Englantl. thr Depnrtmrnl of S~~rucr~/, School 01 .\ferltrtnc. C'nivermty oj Colorntlo, nnri the Vrlernns Admtntslratton Ifospttnl, Denver. Colorado .\n nttcmpt Ivns made to detrrmine whether 36 lone-term kidney homocmit recipirnts and their tionors nwe compntihlr for 7 major Ir~~kocvte croups. It wns fol~nd tlint 21 of thrse rrcipients were surviv- inr 2to 3 yrnrs in spite oi incompnt~hilitv for 1 or 2 mnlor irl~kocyte :rntigcns. Sr~rvivnl of misniatclicd crnits rloes not itwlf indicate that rlir :~nticcns hrine mrnst~red nre not tmnspl;~ntation:Intleens, ior it wns sl~olvn tllnt tllr 15 rccipicnts with no grorlps oi mismatch w r e ciinicnlly ~ l ~ p r r i o r to those with croup incompntihiliries. :\Ioreovcr. hiitopxtlioloeic srorrs .riven to biopsy specimens tnkrn 2 to 3 yrnrs nfrcr trnnsplnntntion were si~nifirnntly corrclntrtl with the number of erollp inismntchrs. Because the Ier~kocyte groups nrrr drtermined by cytotosicity rct~rtions of peripheral 1)lood lymphocytes, the results may have hren influenced consitiernhly hy rhimerism in chronically dinlyzrd tlremic patients or ctlange in lymphocyte antigenicity or sus- ceptihility to lysis upon proloneed immunost~ppress~ve treatment. Althounh the possibility of tlirse comnlicntions couid not he ruled out in all instances, it wns slio~vn that 52 tli:~lyzedurrmic patients and 40 pntirnts ~vllohad l ~ e ~ n treated ~vitli imn~unosuppression for over 1 year did not possess more or less nnrinrns than a random pop~llation of normal individuals. It is conclr~ded that: (1) the major l~i~kocyte nntigrns are histocompatibility nntieens, 2nd ('7) since survival can be attained at times despite mismntchrs for these proups, the nnfieens are of intermedinte strength and kidney homograft rrjection may oc- cllr if rxcessiv~ numhers of nntieens are incompatible or if particular cornhinations of antieens are mismatehrd. In the past year knomlcdge of tissue antigens represented on human Iruko- cyter; tins accu~nulateri rapidly, thus pcrmltting for the first time a study of 'This invrstieation nns supportrti in part hv Rrsparrh Grants AM 02375, AM 07513, A1 04444, AAI 06283, AM 06344, HE 07735, AM 07772, ''41 04152. FR 00051, FR 00069. A1 06091. A1 04606 and FR-3 from the Nationnl Institutes of Henlth. United States Puhlic Health Service, and h7.l grants from the Vniversitg of California Cancer Research Coordi- nating Committee, and from the Medical Research Council of Great Britain. 'St. Mnrv's H06pit~1, I,ondon, England. a School of hledicine. Univemitg of California, Ime Angeles. 'School of M~dicinc, University of Colorado, and the Vrterans Adminirtrntion Hospital, Denver, Colorado. 1 111,. :~rtrl I p:1t 11 111:1tc pr.rrr 1 or if ] clonr 1vn.U p:rtl r :inti: 201 Dau 5p1tr t it is hav~ iunt csar finer It plan %?TO1 arc the > curr( I at I( with clini of in >per I Colo from n-ere clono vlvel JV. I I Lor with: of tll Daur I

11 'r. 1 - [email protected]/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

  • Upload
    phungtu

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

1'. I . TERASAKI, D. I,. J-REDI.;VOE. I<, '1. ~'I )RTF:R~. 11, R. A I I C K E Y ~ , 'r. 1,. ,\IARC!IIORO.', T. D. FARIS.', T. I I E R R M A N S ~ . A S D T. E. STARZL'

Deparlments r l j S~crqcry nnrl Prrl,rn/ttqc ilirrlrctnr nnrl I'lchltc I f rn l th . School nf ,Iferllctne, linaversltu o/ C n l ~ f n r r ~ m . Los Angcie.r, thr Department of Pntholoq1/, S t . Jlarl/'s Noapttal,

London. Englantl. thr Depnrtmrnl o f S ~ ~ r u c r ~ / , School 0 1 .\ferltrtnc. C'nivermty oj Colorntlo, nnri the Vrlernns Admtntslratton Ifospt tnl , Denver. Colorado

.\n nttcmpt Ivns made to detrrmine whether 36 lone-term kidney homocmit recipirnts and their tionors n w e compntihlr for 7 major I r~~kocvte croups. It wns fol~nd tlint 21 of thrse rrcipients were surviv- inr 2 t o 3 yrnrs in spite oi incompnt~hilitv for 1 or 2 mnlor irl~kocyte :rntigcns. Sr~rvivnl of misniatclicd crnits rloes not itwlf indicate that rlir :~nticcns hrine mrnst~red nre not tmnspl;~ntation :Intleens, ior it wns sl~olvn tllnt tllr 15 rccipicnts with no grorlps o i mismatch w r e ciinicnlly ~ l ~ p r r i o r to those with croup incompntihiliries. :\Ioreovcr. hiitopxtlioloeic srorrs .riven to biopsy specimens tnkrn 2 to 3 yrnrs nfrcr trnnsplnntntion were si~nifirnntly corrclntrtl with the number of erollp inismntchrs. Because the Ier~kocyte groups n r r r drtermined by cytotosicity rct~rtions of peripheral 1)lood lymphocytes, the results may have hren influenced consitiernhly hy rhimerism in chronically dinlyzrd tlremic patients or ctlange in lymphocyte antigenicity or sus- ceptihility to lysis upon proloneed immunost~ppress~ve treatment. Althounh the possibility of tlirse comnlicntions couid not he ruled out in all instances, it wns slio~vn that 52 tli:~lyzed urrmic patients and 40 pntirnts ~vllo had l ~ e ~ n treated ~vitli imn~unosuppression for over 1 year did not possess more or less nnrinrns than a random pop~llation of normal individuals. It is conclr~ded that : (1) the major l ~ i ~ k o c y t e nntigrns are histocompatibility nntieens, 2nd ('7) since survival can be attained at times despite mismntchrs for these proups, the nnfieens are of intermedinte strength and kidney homograft rrjection may oc- cllr i f rxcessiv~ numhers of nntieens are incompatible or if particular cornhinations of antieens are mismatehrd.

In t h e past y e a r knomlcdge of tissue ant igens represented on h u m a n Iruko- cyter; tins accu~nula te r i rap id ly , t h u s pcrmlt t ing for t h e first t i m e a study of

'This invrstieation nns supportrti in part hv Rrsparrh Grants AM 02375, AM 07513, A 1 04444, AAI 06283, A M 06344, HE 07735, AM 07772, ''41 04152. FR 00051, FR 00069. A1 06091. A1 04606 and FR-3 from the Nationnl Institutes of Henlth. United States Puhlic Health Service, and h7.l grants from the Vniversitg of California Cancer Research Coordi- nating Committee, and from the Medical Research Council of Great Britain.

'St. Mnrv's H06pit~1, I,ondon, England. a School of hledicine. Univemitg of California, Ime Angeles. 'School of M~dicinc, University of Colorado, and the Vrterans Adminirtrntion Hospital,

Denver, Colorado.

1 111,.

: ~ r t r l

I p:1t 11

111:1tc pr.rrr 1 or i f

] clonr 1vn.U p:rtl r :inti:

201 Dau 5p1tr

t it is hav~ i u n t csar finer

I t plan %?TO1

a r c the > curr(

I a t I ( with clini of in

> p e r I Colo from n-ere clono vlvel JV. I I L o r with:

of tll Daur

I

Page 2: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt s r ~ r v i ~ n l with co~npatil)ility of tlonor : ~ n d ~.c-c.il~icbnt Ic~rtkocytc nntigcns. If lcl~kocytc :intiqens act as histocom- I~:it~l, i l i ty clc~tc~~.~~li~~:irltp. thrn t l i e~e :intlgcns noultl I)r cxpccted to I)e tvell ~natcl~vtl i l l 11u111:in kidney tr:lnsplant patients who have survivrd for long l'priotls. :\rcortiincly, :IS the test systen~. 36 patients who have eurvivcd 2 years or 1onrr.r nitrr rc.~inl trnnsplantation \vers es:unincd alonq with their rc~pcctive

1 ~Ionors. (~'o~no:~til,ility for the i major antlrrcnlc rrrorips ciescrihctl earlier 190) n:ts tc~stcci I ) ? lymphocyte cytoto~icit~y tcsts. From the recent Histocom- ~ ~ : ~ t i l ) i l i t v \TTorkshop 7 and ~ t u d i e s resulting from the exchange of

i nntisera (18) it appears that the 7 groups identified previously by cytotoxicity I ' (10) nre rlosc.ly associated ~v i th the different antigenic groups of Amos ( I ) , I

1 Dausset (4), Pnyne and Bodnler (2) Shulrnan ( 1 4), and van Rood (221. In i s l~ i tc o f the initial scenlingly insuperable complexities oi leukocyte antigens, 1 it is clear now tha t a relatively few serological!y strong leukocyte antigens : have been rrpc:ttedly rletected by independent \&oratories. Undoubtedly, i

furthrr rc.linc~n~r~nts will split off numerous subgroups, but it is of interest to csaminc tllc rompntil~ility of long-term mirvivors 111 terms of the partially de- fined grollps :\lrc:~tiv known.

I t will t)c rliolvn here that contrary to expectations, many kidney trans- plant survivors were inconlpatihle with their donors in 1 or sometimes 2 of the ~crologically s. 15 leukocyte antigens. These serologically detected antigens :ire thsreforc ~)~ 'otmhly not by themselves strong transplantation antigens in the sense thnt n ~ n i s n ~ a t c h would result in inevitable graft rejection in spite of current i~n~nunosuppressive therapy (16, 16) . However, thcy are likely to be nt lcast i r ~ t c r ~ l ~ r d i n t c strength histocompatibility determinants, for patients with no groups of incompatibilities were on the whole superior, both from the clinical stantipoint and from biopsy findings. to those with 1 or more groups f of incompxti1)ilities. t

i F MATERIALS AND AiETHODS 1.

Subjects. Lvinphocvtcs were ieoiated from the blood of 36 long-term kid- ney lionlopl-aft sl~rvivors 11 to 2 ycnrs niter transplantation) and their re- ~1)cctive rlonors. Clinical inforrnntion on thrsc survivors from the University of Colorado :lnd thc Dcnvcr Veterans Administration Hospital can be obtained from previous pul)lications 117. I S ) since the snnie identification numhers n-ere u ~ c t i throl.~~liout. Thirty-one patients had received grafts from related rlonors :inti 5 . t i unrelated donors. An additional patient who has now sur- vived 21/2 years with a graft from a living unrelated ti r ( a patient oi Drs. \T'. E. Good~vin. .J. .J. Rauiman, and D. C. Martin. Clliversity of California, Los Angelcs) is included for analysis. All cytotoxicity tests were performed within 18 hours after venipuncture by methods described previously (18,24).

ilntzssra. The panel of allogeneic antisera employed for testing was ob- tained from multiparous women and volunteers immunized with cells. Many of the sere had been kindly given to us by Drs. D. B. Amos, R. Ceppellini, .J. Dausset, P. Lalezari, R. Payne, J. J. van Rood, and R. L. Walford. D a t a on

Page 3: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

'r~131,i. Slcntntarl/ o/ nnligcnic n~ismnlrh(,n In 96 long-lernr k i r l n o ,,nnaplnnl nt~ruieora

jrnvt Drnver toqcther 1 ~ i I h clinical rank anti hit ,.urr score* - -

I i

, , relnlion Duration oi survival rnl-maich ., ( c ~ a y ~ f ~ ~ i i a A:!:? g;;;;;fn ,,,il;n:zd

analysiq

I 1 - -- --

1 \lot i ~ r r 121% 1 10 0 1 . 4 , S ~ r l r r I 180 1 0 4 - I

1.3 :1 1:rnt. 1 win 1171 I 2 O :!,!I li IIrot l ~ c r 1 104 I 0 0 1 .$

I2 13ror llrr 1 lK:$ I I 8 0 5 . 4 13 A101 11c.r 1027 I 1 !I 1, (i 12.0 14 Ilrol I ~ r r 10'25 I .i 0 7 . 3

i , 15 Iirot llrr 1022 I I .5 0 10.2 17 hlot llcr 1011 I 4 1, 4 !).7 15 Sistcr Died. 937 111 (i (i 13.0 22 Slot her !)Xi I I 5 0 3 . 3 25 Brother !I78 I 1 4 4 ..i 27 L11rrl:ited Remov~tl. 953 I V I 3 12.2 - SO I -~~rc la ted !I48 111 14 A 8.1 33 1101 her 031 I 0 0 2.3

! I I

34 Mother 927 I 3 1 8 . 3 i 36 17~lrelated Died, 712 IV 13 6, 7 5.2 37 Mother 920 11 5 2 11.1 30 Mother 894 I1 4 1 11.1 40 Mot her 80 1 I11 10 4, 6 0.7 41 hlother 884 111 8 2, 4 17.7 4 2 Father 880 I 4 0 6 .9 44 Sister 8iO I I 0 5.6 45 Sister 867 111 10 2, 5 9.8 47 Brother Died, fi66 IV 9 6 10.6 48 Sister 636 111 4 4 0.6 49 Sister 783 I 2 0 3 .O 50 Father 821 I1 5 3 5.8 51 h ~ ~ n t 805 I1 1 0 12.5

- 52 Father 798 I 2 0 5.4

I 53 Uncle 703 I 3 0 ' 21.3 54 Cnrelated 701 IV 14 2, 5 18.7 55 Father 789 111 8 5 11.6 58 Sister Ti3 I 0 0 11.4

I 60 Cor~sirl 769 I1 8 1 8.8 63 Unrelated 759 I1 10 0 6.2

P~lrvival and clinical rank are t o 25 April 1966. h As given in Methods section.

the strength, frequency and specificity oi these antisera are given elsewhere (20, 23).

illatching of donors and recipients. Incompatibilities were expressed in tlic

following ways (5) 6.

i I

'Computing assistance was obtained from the University of California, Los Anpelee, I Health Sciences Computing Facility, sponsored by Nationd Institutes of Health grant FR3. 1

rip~cen in:~tril

I ) . i l

in t t r i (24 1- (lonor f\*:lW 6.

plsrc.. ~i.hirh killinr 1:3 t i

T C 8 C t l

of thr of un colnln match of tlre

3. f

gresa. earlie analv t ~ y fa of a$+ missi~ AIoa consic tions

Der tation n l logr major ing o. of thc brane tcrstit the Ic then : plant graft

Page 4: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

cd in the

b* Anaclc8, ,a i t l~ grant

1 . iinrr, ,uis,trntch 11.tth scpnt.trtc c~trtisrrcl: ( a ) Pcrccrtt scrn ~ttist~trrtrlr. A 1 is- I ~ I : I I I ~ ~ I ( Y n.clrc tonsiilc~r~cvi nllon tllr clonor rc~lls rrnrtrcl \\-it11 :\ scbr.rllll :iri(I tile ~.c~r~!)icx~lt crlls f n i l v d to r.v:lrt. 1l:ltchinc wit11 rcznrtl to :inv scxl.rlln occ\~rrcd ~vlirnr~-cr. tllc clunor rrlls tlicl riot. rcs:~c~t 01. wllrnrvrr the rrcil~icnt rcklls were killcvl l)y t11r scruln. Tlius it can Iw srrli that n match In:tv I)c tallied in some I I ~ S ~ : I I I ~ ~ C F n-hen a eivcln ae.ruln n-:is not t c ~ t c d with both tlic donor's :und re- 1-ipirnt':: crlls. Tllr nii~rnatchcd rrrn clividcd I>y tlic total ~nit:matrlics : ~ n d ~ ~ : \ t c - l i r s (:IS cicfincd :tl)ovc I thrn rreulted in the pcrccnt porn mismatch (T:~l,lc I I . r 1) I Percent totnl ~t~~isntntched units. The details and rationalc involvcd in this rnethod of csprcssing incolnlxltil)ilit,y are given in earlier publications 124). Drirfly i t approximates for any given scrilln the extent to which the cionor't: cclls reacted in C ~ C C S R ot tile recipient's cc. The rxtcnt of cytotoxicitv wns cxl,rcssed as "units!' of dilution "tuhcs" a t ~vhich colnplete killing took placc. Frnctione of :I llnit reprrscntcd tllc cytotoxic indcx in the dilution a t which only n portion of the cells were killed. Thus 1.5 units cquals complete killinc in tlie first dilution anti half of thc viable cells killed in the second 1:3 ciilution. To ohtain the units mis~nntch for a given scrum. the units of rcnctivitv oi the rcripient's cells wcrc subtracted from the units of reactivity ~f the rionor's lymphocytes. As explained earlier (18, 241, the summatcd total of units \\-as corrected for the strength of the particular antiserum tested in common for each pair by expression as a percentage of the maximum mis- ~ n a t c h score. A listing of the values of percent total units mismatched for,each of the transplant pairs was given previously (18).

2 . Group mismatches. Group ~~l ismatches were derived by matching of re- g~.cssion "types." Three types for each cell were determined as dcscril~ed cnrlicr ( 2 0 ) by analyzing the rcactivitirs of cach antiserum 1)y rrgrcssion analysis. Factor "loadings" for thc 7 groups of antisera prcvior~sly rstnl)lisl~ed 1)y iartor :inalysis \\-ere cmploycd as the independent variable. Tliis mctliod o i :~ssignlnent of cells to the 7 recognized grol. !gs permits a correction for mlesing antieera in n given test and elimination ur a few inconsistent rcactions. l l o r t in~portantly, reactions with antisern composed of several fnct.ors are considered to "helong!' to certain groups dcpcnding on the bcst "fit" \\-it11 rcac- tions oi other antisera.

Dctermit~ntion of the biopsy scores. Approximately 2 years nftcr transp1:tn- tation, :i Iargc wedge biopsy was obtained a t open operation from each rcnal :~llograft. Thc material was serially sectioned anci the presence or absencc of 7 major I~istopatl~ological features determined. These were: ( 1 ) fibrous thickcn- in% oi the intima of the interlobular nrtcrics; (2) hyalinizntion of the \valls oi the arterioles; (3) thickening of the glomerular capillary basement mem- hranes: 14) generalized interstitial fibrosis; (5) superficial subcapsular in- trrstitial fibrosjs; (6) cellular infiltration; (7) tubular atrophy. If present, the lesions were arbitrarily graded in severity from 1 to 3. The grades were then added u p giving a final score for each biopsy. In this way a renal trans- plant showing all 7 lesions in maximal degree would be scored as 21, while a graft displaying none of these changes would be scored as 0.

Page 5: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

"The indicated interval is the 95% confidence interval 2 = hi, in which 5 denotes the 1 C 1 mean, 8% denotes the standard error of the mean and t is the percentage point of the Stu-

I s dent t distribution. This notation is used throughout the test. 1

I i r I<rr11* t~t,ist,rtrtr/r S ( . O ~ C R . If ~ n i ~ r ~ ~ a t , ( ~ t i e s in s(\rn or i ~ n i t , ~ :it+(! ( ~ o n ~ i ( I r r ~ ~ ( 1 withollt I '

~,cg:irtI to ~I.OII!IF. it W:IS r(l:\dily ( ~ i c i c n t t,ll:it lrlost (28 out of 3fiI of thc: +Ilr- vivo1.s 11;lrl I I I ~ P I I I ~ ~ C ~ I I ~ S wilicl~ wcrc signific-nntly Frc.:itcr t11:in tho vnri:il,ilitv i t ctsl1rctctl in tllc rcy~roduril)ility of tllc trst (24) . On thc wllole thaw rrcipients I f r ~ i ~ ~ ~ : i t c l c i era or llnits tcntiod to 1)c in thc rlinicallv srlpt:rior

t

c:ltryorics (T:lhlc 1. :mti scr ( 1 8 ) ) . IVrll nlnt,chcci p:tticnts 11i:ty t1c ( ~ x p ~ r t ( ~ 1 to 1l:ivr frw 1nisni;lt~I1cs w i t h :111v 1:lrgc ~,:inrl of scr:i rognrcilcss oi the 1,urity

I i

n of tIlr antieern or rpplicntion of similar spccificitics. As thc nulnhcr of rnis- m:itchcs incrcnscs, the total pcrccntage of Fcra which mismatch is influcnrrfl

t

Ily the composition oi the serum panel. Thus if many sera of one type arc 1 0 C

present in thc ~):incl, one incornpatibilitv mav he counted repeatedly. XI- though this rne:isure of mismatch is obviously a crude one, i t has the ad-

[ ; vantage ovcr groupctl lnismatches in detecting incompatibilities in yct un- recognized groups.

The rnw pcrrcnt mismatch scores can he r ~ a d i l v compared with those which occur in random populations. To determine whether the lcvcl of mismatrhcs founci in these paticnts was sisnificantly Icss than would I)c cx1)cctcri from an

f :

t r 1

1 Y

unselected population, 81 randomly selectcd persons xere matchcd with each other with thc aid of computers to form 6480 random matches. Thc mean mis- match in the r:indom popuiation was 16.0% total mismatched units mith a range of 0.340%. This i~ackground population of unrelated donors and 1.c- cipients can then be compared to the mismatches of 6 surviving recipients

I I

who received kidneys from living unrelated donors. The mean mismatch of the survivors was 11.2 2 4.2% total mismatch unitsu. The difference betwccn the survivors with unrelated donors and the random unrelated population was statistically significant (0.01 < P < 0.05). Thus, although only a relatively few survivors with kidneys from living unrelated donors were available, their mismatches mere significantly less than random matchings, and the highest mismatch was less than the mean for the random group.

1ncomp:itibilities of recipients receiving kidneys from related donors can he compared to those n-hich may occur among random related transplants.

0

t C

t C 1

:: 1

r 1

t l Broken tiown further, the mean mismatch between 14 surviving recipients

I? I with a sibling donor was 8.2 --f 4.5% total units compared to 11.0 -C 6.9 for the 114 randon1 sibling matches tested. If the random matchings among siblings

I I

arc averaged for each family to correct for excessive nun~bera of matchings 1 I

among sibs of large families, a mean of 10.8 * 3.5 was obtained. This mean ' I

value, compared with the mean for the transplanted population was not stn- l- I

tistically different by Student's t-tests. Adjustment for skewness in the tlis- I

tribution by transformation into logarithmic or square root scales also did not show n significant difference. Fourteen transplants from parent to child were mismatched by a mean of 9.8 C 4.0% total units whereas 25 random parent to child combinations were mismatched by 11.3 * 6.0%. The mean for

I c n

I

I C

Page 6: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

I ~pc'rior i > t ( d to ~ w r i t v

11f lnis- ! ~lcnrctl v11c :trc Ily. Al- the ad- :rt un-

ors can *\)lallts. ~~ lp ien t s

I tor the sihlinrs i t c l ~ i n ~ s 1s rnc:\n riot > t t i -

the I I ~ P - ri>o (lid to child ~ ' : rnd~ni wan lor

.\-or'ct>thcr, 19/76 'TEllASAICI ET XL. 69.3

tlrc t r:~nsltl:rntrd grol~p of ~ l n r c ~ l ~ t to rllil(1 wns 1c.w t11:ul tllr rnnclo~n g1.0111) :IS

in t l l c . : ~ l t o ~ r s11)ling ro~np:trison. I)r~t tllc diffrrrl~rr was ng: l i~~ not st:ttisticnlly sianiticnnt. . . 1 1 1 1 ~ Ion-rr lncan luis~natch of 8.2';; :tnlollg ~11)s vcr. 1 ' .3% among p:\rcnt to cllild ~u:rtcl~ing?: is in kcrping with tllco~~c~tical csl)c?c,~ .IS ( 1 1 . 15. 16) :tnd tlrr sr~rvi\-nl data of kidney trnn~pI:untntion 110).

II'~!~t.rs.sio)t ! ~ O I I P t~~istttntchc.~. 'I'\vo oi t l ~ c 01)jrctions to nlcrcly totnlinq up i t 1 1 rliffr~~.rncrs :IF rionr nl)ovc :rrc! tll:~t: I I ) i f Fcra ~vhich tcnd to rract alike : ~ r c 1u'cwnt in tlrc panel, onc differcncc is countcd repeatedly, ant1 (2) ccr- taiu dctrrrninants may 1)r morc important liistoromp:ttil)ility antigens than otl~crs. Grouping of associated antisera by factor analysis (20) pcrlnittcd corrcrtio~l for rl~~plication of nntisera. Sincc rertain sera posscsscd 2 or morc spccifirities, regression analysis was emploverl to determine whether any givcn cell hclongcd to each of the 7 recognized groups. Groups present on lon nor cells and not on rccipicnt cclls were considcrcd to be the incompatihili- tics. Fifteen of the 36 survivors possessed no groups of m i ~ m a t c h , 14 had onc mismatcllrd group and 7 had two mismatched groups (Table 1). No survivor 11-it11 3 or Inore ~nismatchcd groups was found. Group 1 (LA 1, 7i1. 1)ausct 8) n-ns ~nis~natched in 5 rc.cipients. group 2 (Daussct 1, Shulman B1. LA 2, 8a nnti XIIIOS I1 l in 4 rrcipients, group 3 (4a. Dausset 3) in 2, group 4 f6a ?) in 5 , group 5 (61). 4d. Dausset 9, Amos 11) in 3! group 6 (4c, 9a ) in 7 and group 7 (411, Daussct 7) in 1 rccipient. Thus no single nntiqcnic group appears to I)e o i s~lfiicirnt strength that no recipient could survive while being mismatched in that grorlp.

Correlation of clittical ozrtcolne with groups of mismatch. Clinical ranking of kidncy transplant rccipirnts was extremely difficult. The influenre of fac- tors such as lolvercd immunologic compctcncc associated with uremia (9. 26) could not I)c accurately evaluated. Furthermore, the amount, timing and dura- tion oi ill~l~iunos~~~)l)ressivc thempy were variable. Xcverthelcss on the I)asis ni r ~ ~ r r r n t rrnal function, the sta1)ility of this function during the late courpe. and thc intensitv of irnmunosupprrssive therapy requirerl to prevent latc drtc- rioration the patients were separated into 4 ranks for thc analysis. Sonc of tllc patients in rnnk I has had a rcjertion aftcr the first 4 ~nonths: all have oithcr had stcroids completely stopped or arc rcccivine; 7.5 rng a day or Irss. Rccipicnts in rnnk Iv have all had late rejection with more or lcss severe long-term in~pa i r~nen t of function: large doses of l~rcdnisonc arc rcquircd (20 to 45 mg pcr d a y ) to prevent further renal damage. Ranks I1 and 111 h:lvr rl~nractcristics brtwcen those of the other 2 groups. The rllrrcnt ranks 1248 to 759 days aftcr transl~lantation :wc given for etich pnticnt in T:~l)le 1.

The statistical significance oi the indicated association (Tablc 2) can be cvnluatcd hy combining columns to form the table: clinical rank vcrsus nulnbcr of mismatched regression groups (i.e., disregarding which particular groups, if any; are mismatched). The value of x2 for the resulting 4 row, 3 coiumn table is 15.5, 6 degrees of freedom, P = 0.02. The resulting P value can be regarded as understating the statistical significance of the association since the x? statistic does not take account of ordering relations such as: rank

Page 7: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

'TADI,IS 2

i'orrclntion 4 clinicnl r n n k wtlh rc8qrrsaion qrolrp miarnalches

I - -

! ! Mismatched rrrrcsrion g r o u l ~ r ~

I i Ilir

C l ~ n ~ c a l I rank' I I o n c ~ r o u p I

I

\In. of mlrl donor to rrc

I Sone -1 Two group3

I I - - _- _ _ _ I No. of mlrr

reclplcnt to

I 1.:5.(i.14.:1:1.-12.10.1 T I 2 , 25 17 1 - C ' I ~ I I I C R ~ r:u~ks :I* of 25 riprli l!)li6. Ntrmbers In t l ~ c l~ntlv of the tnl)lc nrr p r l t ~ r ~ ~ t rl~~rnl)crn ( w e (17, 1 8 ) ) .

I1 is lcss sntisfnctory than rank I. ctc. To account for thc ~rdcr ing , consitler t 1 1 ~ 2 row-2 coIu111n tal)lc forrned by ron~l~ in ing rank I with rank I1 ant1 rank 111 with r:mk IV anti i)y rcprcacntlng 111ismntc11 as thc tlicllotolny: no group? rnis~~i:~trllcci, orlrl or ~liorc gl.ol~ps misnn~tcllctl. T l ~ c rcsnlting xinclc clcgrcc o i frertiolii xS = 8.98 ailct t l ~ c valuc: of P (Fisher's exact tcst) for a single tail tc5t is 0.0006, ' ro make nllowance ior having sclccted the most significant of the rclevant 2 x 2 tables, i t is nppl.opriate to multiply the obtained value of P t ~ y the number oi 2 x 2 tablcs tlint prcscrvc the orderinp, 6 in the present rase. The result is P' = ( 6 ) (0.0006) = 0.004, which is statistically highly signifi- cnnt.

Correlation of biopsy findings with 2-v!a?l regression group ~nismntches. I1istop:ttholorir findings on I~iopsies takcri on 3.5 oi thcsc rccipicnts about 2 yrars niter traneplantatio~l have heen dcscribcd in detail hy Porter, et a]. ( 13) . A statistically significant correlation was shown to cxist hetween tllc biopsy rankings and regression group mismatches. For the present analysis, a score was derived for the pathologic changes found as described in the meth- ods sect,ion. These srores were then compared to regression group mismatches in two rlirections-clonor to recipient, and recipient to donor. If the phc- nomenon of spngeneic preierence (8 ) occurs in human kidney transplantation, incompatibilities in the reverse direction could he expected to influence the qualitv of the transplant.

The correlation of biopsy findings with extent of mismatching is displayed in Tahle 3. Statistical significance of the association is established by analysis of variance and regression methods. If thc data are combined into 3 groups according to the number of groups mismatched, donor to recipient, the among groups-within groups comparison by analysis of variance yields F = 3.6. 2 and 32 clegrees of freedom, P = 0.01, and comparison of the mean score for two-groups mismatch with zero-groups mismatch yields t = 3.1, 32 degrees of freedom, P = 0.002. Table 3 conveys the impression tha t groups mis- matched, recipient to donor, are also associated with biopsy results. A regres- sion analysis, in which score is regressed on number of groups mismatched,

So. I

a Kit: ~ i v e n i r recipier the opr

SCC

(lonor again to rcc to rec P = is les. shoul(

Po,. for c1 cign I In t l l

patie! propi perce lated The more

1 POPU

Page 8: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

! onr;ider i t l rank croups

>zl.ce oi I

i : i l l test ;

oi the i of P by n t case. 1 signifi- i !

~ ( t t c h c s . *\bout 2 . ct al. vc>n tlie . . vs1s. a

lrth- i~~atclics i1e pllc- ntation. nce the

1~plnycc1 ; i n a I y ~ s i gr.ou\'s

:lmong = 3.6. 2 core for dcprces

Ips Inls- \ rcgres- rlatched,

-

Kidney biopsies taken approx~mntely 2 years after trnnsplantnt~on were scored ns given In the ,\lethods section. The number of mismatched groups between the dorior nrld

T.\131,1S 3 o 1 l o 1 1 0 I 1 I I t i hcd qrorrpq, '

--A - -- - -- - - - -- - I l~opcv score ntlent numberrh

\o oi rn~=rnatcherl urnups- clnnor l o reclp~rnr 1 0 , n i l 1 I 1 2 2

- -- -,- I - - - - _ _ .

Yo of nu-rnatrhd amups- 1 rffIp1ent to donor I 2 O l I 2 0 1 2

-- - - - -, - 0 I ,581 331 i i i 1 , 1

I 2 1 I 1 I 2 5 1 I

r, ripient n-ns determined after clnssification into repression "types." I~~compntibility in tile opposite direction from recipient to donor is also tabr~lated.

See (17, 18).

> - .1 4 5 li - 1

S (1

10

donor to recipient, and on number of groups misnlatched recipient to donor. again sho~ss that biopsy score is statistically significantly related to the donor to recipient mismatch ( t = 2.83. P = 0.0081, hut that the suggested relation to recipient to donor mismatch is not quite statistically significant ( t = 1.55, P = 0.13). This result indicates that although recipient to donor matching is 1e.s crucial than donor to recipient matching, recipient to donor matching should not he entirely neglected for more desirable long-term rcsults.

Po.~sibilit?j o j lymphocyte chimerism in uremics. Although no direct tests for ctiimcrism could be executed, the following evidence suggests that for- cign lylilphocytes from transfusions did not materially affect tlicse results. (11 In tile course of selecting clonors for transplantation 52 prospective uremic patients were typed. As n whole they did not react t,o a significantly greater proportion o i the antiserum panel. This was tested by comparing the total percentage of mismatches which would occur if a random panel of 93 unre- lated persons was used as donors to themselves or to the population of uremics. The mean total mismatch units of 18.3 9.4% for the uremics mas slightly more than the mean mismatch of 16.6 + 8.1% for the random unrelated population. Thus uremics tend to have fewer, though not significantly fewer,

3 , 5 2 1 4 9 1 I 531 ' 1 I 42 1 1 48 i 15 / 14, 22

i

I I

12 I I 00. 55 1 11 I i 1 47 I 1.3

63 / 1 I 40, 45 I 11 I

12 13 14

i v . score So. patients

I I 36 30 I 54

3 3 1 1 . 4 1 5 . 0 1 5 7 1 5 0 1 9 3 1 1 2 0 7 1 5 2 3 1 l i t 5 3 1 3

Page 9: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

!ylnl)iloc~ytc :lutigcns tll:111 11or111:11 inciivirl~~:~ls. If t h i r c(~IIs llntl cnnsi,btr-(l of 2 or 111ore 1lol1111:ttions. :t ,crc.:~tcr nr1n1l)cr oi positive ronctions :mcl Ilc~nc~e fowcr t i ~ i t ; ~ ~ i : ~ t ~ ~ I ~ c e 1vn111(l hnvc Iwrn c~spcctetl. (21 Nine of thc prospcctivc p:itients wrrr tyl)cd 011 2 tliflc1,cnt. occ:lsions ~vitli :L n u ~ n \ ) r r of transfusi0n.r orcrirring Iwtwcrn tllc 2 tcets. ~\nalvsis oi the discrcp:~nt results I)etwecn thc 2 tcsts in- clicntrct that ii slightly I~iglicr proportion of discordant results occr~rrcd with this gl.o~lp t l ~ a n with a cnrnparat)lc group of 8 normal persons, though the tliflerc~ncc was not sign1tir:~nt. One chronically tiialyzed patient (of Drs. AI. E. Rubini and R . Snciwciss. \C'ndsworth Veterans Administration Hospital) rc- ccived 29 units of transiused blood during the 5 month interval between 2 tests. Of the 89 antiscr:~ tcstcd. 4 produced discrepant reactions of greater than 1 dilution n~:lgtiitudc. This was a greater, though not significantly grcatcr, c1iscrcp:tncy than that found with nor~nal lymphocytce.

.4lthough tliese nrgutnents are insufficient to exclude the possibility of the preeencc oi small nunibers oi foreign cells. a t lcast it can be concluded that. within thc limits of ~rnsi t ivi ty of thcsc tcsts, complications in typing pro- (lured I)y cllimcrinn wclrc ncgligiblc.

. Iltcm t ion o j l . t~mphoc.t~tc nn t laenicit!/ 011 i i~~muno~~t ippre s s ion . If vllronir imniu~~osupprcssion alters tlic ;~ntigcnic lnnkc-11p oi lymphocytes in solnc nlanner, retrospectirc typing of long-term survivors would be subject to clues- tion. On the whole, immunosuppression could not have caused loss in anti- genicity, for the series oi long-term survivors tlid not have fcwer antigens than r:lndom individuals. This was tcstcd by comparing the mismatches ~vliicli rvoul(l occur if 49 long-term rccipients and 93 randomly selectcd in- ~livicluals were considered as rccipients for thc same pool of 93 randomly se- lccted clonors. Tlie mean total perccntagc of units mismatch was 17.9 t- 8.0 anti 16.6 I+ 8.1 respectively, which is not a significant difference.

I f lymphocytes from recipients undergoing extensive imlnunosupprcssivc therapy are more susceptible to cytolysis by antibody and cotnplcment be- cause oi tile drugs, an apparent gain in antigenicity may result. As noted al~ovc, the 49 patients who have undergone i~nmunosuppressive treatment for 1 year c~vhen they were tested) did not have. as a group, a significantly greater number of positive reactions than random persons. Also, 1 recipient tested I~eforc transplantation and then again 4 months after grafting while receiv- ing drug therapy did not show significant alterations in his patterns of reactivity. Of the 52 sera tested in comn~on, 2 gave discordant results of 1 dilution tube or more. The result of coinparing the total antigenic profile of these 2 samples with respect to the comparison with 274 random individuals is given in (20) (Fig. 3, person 321). Only 2 random persons out of 274 were matrhetl as well as the duplicate.

DISCUSSION

From thc tintn prcsentcd hcre, i t is obvious that many of the kidney trans- plant patients who survive more than 2 years were incompatible for each of the 6 antigenic groups of leukocytes. These leukocyte groups were serologically the strongest ones, for they had been independently detected by other workere

I r r t h re' no fe.

lor P I S Rt: st:

he fir a c -4: R 1 2,s a i nl. oi in n11

tll thg

Page 10: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

t , *st? ill-

, ~ l wit11 >1rr11 tlic -. AI. E. ~ t n l ) rr- tn-cm 2 rcr than grcatcr,

y of the led t l l~ l t , inq pro-

c~hronir 111 so111e to f (UC'S-

In :inti- :~ntigcns

?;matches

cctetl in- olniv sc- L. 8.0 ant1

~ q > r c ~ s i v c tllent l ~ e - .\s note(\ ~ i i en t fo r y grcatcr llt tcstctl

I ( > I.CCCIV-

ttc'rns of .\11ts of 1 profile o i \elividuals 274 were

ley trans- ,r each of ologically ,r workers

115ing ~:11.io11s mc~tl~ocls. Otllrr ticsign:ltiont: for the ~ i ~ i s ~ ~ l : ~ t r l ~ ( ~ f l C I ~ ~ I I ~ I S : L ( T O I Y ~ -

I I I C to ~.(,crlit. co r~~e~~:~ t ion t : ( ,?, 2.1) : I IT> : i,11 1, I,.\ 2, [id. ((21, !kt, 4:1- 8:1, ( ) I ) , f 2 . 1 1 s t I 1 3, i S ! 4 1, I I . ~ n t l 11. I I ) , Sl111lrrl:tn I1 1 1 l j 1 . It is tllc'rc'forc. :~pl,:il.ont t 11:lt. ~ I I C F C :intigcns , not rx t r r~r i r ly strong t t ~ : ~ ~ ~ s l ~ l : ~ ~ i t : i t i o ~ i : l~ l t igr~is in ( l ip scnsc th:tt :i I ~ I F I ~ ~ : L ~ C I I \vo111~1 lr:~fl inrvit:ll)ly tn to t :~ l inilnunologic rcjcctio~i in spit,r of current im~t~unosi~pprcss ivc therapy.

T ~ v o ol)vious sorlreca of crror roul(1 1i:~ve Icd to t h r :~l)ovc conclusion that tlic ~ e r o i o ~ i c a l l y strong :tt~ticens ~ v c r c nlis~nntchcd in lonq-term h l ~ r v i v o r ~ . 1:ir~t. sinre kidncy tr:lnsplant rc:cipicnts oitrn rcrcive tr:lnsiuvions, i t is pos- sii)lc tha t transfused Iymphocvtts ~nu l t ip ly (6 , 12) nnd survive in tlic IT-

ripicnt,. thus lending to spurious typing rrsults. Tliis is ~ ~ n r t i c i ~ l s r l y likrly, for 11rcmics are often imn~unologicnllv rrippled (9. 26) :1nd arc given i ~ n - munoeupprcssivc treatment nit11 thc trnnsp1:lnt. If srlch cllimCris~n wrrc rs- tn1)lished within the l ~ o s t i t ~vould nffcct tlic results of tlic teat olily if the (lonor's cclls comprised more than 10% of the total pol)ulntion. This Icvrl of contamination would I)e expectcd to Icnci to positivc rractions with rcrn which n c r c n c c a t i ~ e with thr native crlls. Thus such a chin~cric j)olwlation of cells would :lpl,car to possess Inore nntiqens than the recipient's own reils. In gcn- ~brnl. the ~ r o u p o i 52 urrliiic pnticnts dicl not tend to 11:lr.e :I iiighcr antirrcn~c co~nposition ttinn cells from random normal persons. ,\loreover in 9 instances in which puticnts wcre tested before and eer~eral days after transiusion. no marked differences wcre noted.

.-I sccond source of erroneous typing is the possibility t h a t the prolonged immunosuppressive therapy undergone by these recipients had altered either the antigenicity or susceptibility of lymphocytes to cytolysis. Although the reproducibility of the tests was lower among treated recipients than among normal subjects. 49 long-term survivors did not tend to have either more or fewer antigens than normal individuals.

If i t is accepted tha t these leukocyte antigens are indeed mismatched in long-term survivors, i t is of importance to question whether they are rom- pletely irrelevant to transplantation or whcthcr they rcprescnt inter~nctlinte strcngth histocompntibility antigens. The response against such intcrmcdiate .strcncth antigens col~ld he vnria1)ly aupprcssed with drug thernpy anti coultl l)c tolrratcd to varying tlcgrecs by different uremic patients. I t is a common finding tha t indivirlunl cliffcrcnrcs exist in the immunologic rcsponse to iorrign anticens. and tha t many individuals do not respond well t o certain antigens. .As a n cxample, upon deliberate immunization of Rh-ncgativc ~ o l u n t e c r s with Rh-positive red blood cells, if the ABO types were incompatible. us many as 25 o ~ ~ t of 32 immunized persons iniled to produce nntibodics 119). \ITiener. ct nl. ( 2 5 ) also could not produce red cell anti l~odics in a11 18 individuals im- ~ l l u n ~ z e d against 11. I<. P, and S antigcns despite i~nmr~nizat ions over a 1)criod o f 17 months. If this type o i unresponsiveness to known alloccneic nntigcns in normal parsons is added to now well established knowledge of the im- n~unologic unresponsiveness o i the uremic state (9, 26) i t should be expected tha t some recipients m a y have survived in spite of mismatched antigens. Al- though this m a y account for some survivors with many incompatibilities,

Page 11: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

~ I ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I ~ O F I ( ~ I I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ I ~ I S ~ \ , ( ~ I ~ ( ~ S S ~ I I . ~ I I : I I ) I ~ 1111, I 111:1y :I I I I ~ I I Y ~ ( I ~ I I I ~ ~ : I ~ I I , rolc tli:111 l ~ i s t ( ~ c o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ t ~ l ~ i l i t y I I ~ : I I ( * I ~ ~ I I ~ * for ! ~ i i .nI(~nt. ~ I ~ I I ~ I I ~ ~ Y I I ~ ) ~ I ~ ~ Y S I ~ I ~ :I

I:irgr~. I>rol,ortlotl oi ~ . c ~ c - i l ~ i t ~ r ~ t s .:n.lio ~~c,rclivc.c, I ~ Y I ~ O I I I r.oi:~torl 11onor.q sllr- ~.i~.c>cl tli:~n tl~oso 1v11o rt~rt~ivt~tl fr:~ft!: from urlrc:l;~tc~tl .lor5 ( 7 , 1 0 , 1 7 ) .

Sinrc. :I liicli ~)~.ollortion oi tllr lonc- tc*r ,~~~ ~urvi\.ur..: ( 2 2 o11t o i 36, 1v1

fonntl to I1t1 ~ ~ ~ c , o ~ ~ ~ l > : ~ t i l ) l c for lu:\Jor Ioukocytc rroIIp!:, tllc rr lcvanry ot I(-uko- c3ytr :lntirrn..: in t~ . :~~ i s l ) l : i~~ t :~ t io~ l 1~o111c1 1 ) ~ ~111cstio1i(~~I. If nnv of thrrcb : in t i~cns !)at1 I~c.cr~ stl,onc :~nt i rcns in 1l i t1 wnec that nn inrornp:~ti l~il i tv nould hnvr Iccl to ccrtnin I~omorrni t rcjcrtion, no 2 -y t~a r survivors ~ n i s n ~ : ~ t r h c t l for tllca~c clr- tcrrninants !:houltl Ii:tvc 1)ct.n found. Evidence t h a t Ic.ukocvtc nntincns roprc- sent intcrrttedintc st~.cngtli histoco~npatilibity tlctcrminnnts comcs frnm the fact t11:it pntients who su~.vivctl d c ~ p i t c inconipntihilitics rcl~rcscntcti 5ig- nificnntlv pool,cr rcsults 130th from the clinical 1)oint of view :inti fro111 rv:~l - untion of hiopsies taken 2 years post-transplantation (Tat)l(as 2 :~ntl 3 I .. Thus for c~xn~nplc patients rnis~~lntched for :my single antigen sucll as rroup 2 (I lnussct 1. LA 2. Shulrnnn B1, gay Amos 11) have survived, bu t gcncrally with worse function :inti liietoloeical rcsult than patients with no groups of in- compnti1)ilitp. The high degree of correlation wit,h the histopathoiogic finti- ings ( 11J) and T:tble 3) indicate thnt mismatches ior the major lrukocytc types rcxcognized here tlo manifest thcrnc-ives in the 2-pear biopsy. Because this estent of correlation was not a s iily evident in the clinical course within the first year (21 ) , it could hc suggested thnt early intensive im- mtlnosupprcseion rnn often mask incornpatibilitics which latcr become more apparent from histologic studies.

Although it is recognized tha t many more lcukocytc groups exist n.llic11 have not been detected in this study, i t could be argued t h a t the 7 groups which resulted fro111 analysis of about 1.50 antisern constituted the greater pa r t of the major groups. Further these groups, which were serologicallv the st,ronaest 120). could also he the stronqcst ~ v i t h respect to transplantation. as has been true in the only systems (chicken and mouse) for vhich data on this correlation are available. T h e situation with regard to matching which emerges is then different from that envisioned hy Simonsen (15. 16) in n-hich one locus with 3 or 4 alleles are thought to determine the strong an- tieens o i human kidnev transpiantation. The Simonsen hypothesis requires tha t mismatches in the strong antigens inust lead to inevitable death!: within the 1st year. In contrast. the present studv suggests tha t survival or nonsurvi- val rnav not he so precisely linked with mismatching. Thus. variable frnc- tions of those mismatched may survive, for the unbreeciiable strong nn- tigens of Simonsen map not exist.

- 'ier, intermediate strength antigens.

the number of which cannot yet be czilmated, may bc involved to V ~ N I I I ~

degrees. The methods described and evaluated here have since been used to select

donor and recipient combinations before transplantation. T h e results of this project are described e!sewhere ( d l ) .

ACknowledgrnents. We would like to thank Mr. Edward Victoria, Jr., Mr. Terrell Rich,

Page 12: 11 'r. 1 - D-Scholarship@Pittd-scholarship.pitt.edu/3505/1/31735062123595.pdf · the rorrclntion oi kidney trnnslllnnt sr~rvi~nl with co~npatil)ility of tlonor :~nd ~.c-c.il~icbnt

1 n'c'rr louli0- l t i z r n s '1.P Icd

- t s clc-

l'\'\lrr-

I I I I the (1 sig-

, (T-:ll-

. Tl~ue ro \ l l j 2 I!. wrth n i in-

(. finti- ~1;oryte l e r n ~ ~ r e

COIII'SC

1-c iln- f' 1\10rc

\ \ . l l i c s i l

y'Oll(lS c ~ . r n t c r

illy tllc I iOl l . :\s

!:it3 o n , : ~ t r i ~ i u g

, lo ' ) in

jng :IN-

!Y~f!ll i IYY

. n-ithill

rns~isvi-

iv f rn r -

.)ng :in- ntigcns.

varying

o select : af this

rpil Rich,

.inti Alr. Cl~;~rlc-s l<rrr?olr for tllc,ir r~rr.llrnt. trrlin~rnl n.qs~atnnrr. nlso nrkno~vlctlg~ llir 11(>11> oi 1-11itr1t Airl~nrs In r y l e ~ d ~ t i n ~ thr siiip~ncnt of lltc l)lno~l sat~t,>ir:s.

T': ?'ENCES

I . .\IIIo.-. i). 1). 1!165. 1 1 . 151. 111 i{i.v, ,~tthilitll fcslrr~o, l!)l;li. b111nkr;e:lnrd. Coprn- ll;lCe~li.

2. 1~0~1111c~1~. \V. F.: P:tvnr, R . 1965. p. 1 .11 . In Ili.~tocon111ntthiliti1 lrnling. 19liFi. A111nlip- c:~:lrel. ('nl~rnl1nrt.n.

. I 1 . : I I I \ I o n 1. . 196.5. 1). 275. In fli.~(ornmpntihilit~/ .'( lillo. l."i;.i. AI~ink~c.:~:il.d. C~>l>rnltncrn.

4 . 1):111:-vt. . I . ; IV:IIIVI. l',: I r a n y ~ . D. 1!165. 1). 51. Iil f l i . ~ / ~ ~ r o w z ~ ~ / i / ~ i ~ i l ~ ~ lrstit~q, 1.766. ; \ I i ~ n k v : ~ ; ~ r d . Col~c~111i:trrn.

.I. Dison. li-. J. (rd.). 1964. R.lID I)iott~cdicnl contplttcr prnqrart~s. Hrnltli P r i r n r r ~ Colllpr~tlnc Fncilitv. Drpt. of Prrvrntirr: Rlrdicinr nnd Pr~hlic Hrnlth, 1:nirorsity oi C:tl~forn~n. 1.n~ ;\r~celcs.

6. Gootlninn. J. \V.: IIorJc.~on, G. P. 1962. Blood 10: 702. 7 . Jfnnthllrcrr. .I.: Cro~nlrr, J. : Dorinnnt, J. 1065. Lnncet 1 : 985. S Il~triim, Ii. E.: Jlijllrr. G. 1965. Proer. Allergy 0: 158. . ~.kp:~tric.k. C. H.: \Vilson. \V. E. C.: T:~lmnge, D. W. 1064. J. Exp. hied. 110: 527.

10. Al~~r rnr . J. E.: G1c:lson. R . : nnrtholomay, ti. 1065. Transplantation 3: 684. 11. SPW~II. 11. I t . 1961. Trxnspl. I311ll. 27: 452. I? . S o w ~ i l , P. C'. 19Cfi. Canrrr Rrs. 20: 462. 13. I'nrrcr. li. .\. : Itelldnll. J. If .: Stolinski. C . ; Tcrwaki, P. I.: hlnrrhioro, T. L.; Stnrzl,

r. E. 1!)66. .inn. S. I'. .\cad. Fri. (in press). I-I. Sltr~lman, S. R . : Jlnrder. V. J.: Hiller, M. C.; Collier, E. M. 1064. Proqr. Hematol.

;: 322. 15. Sinlonsrn. ,\I. 1965. 1,nncct 1 : 415. 16. Pinionsrn, hl. l%6. Information exchnn~c group KO. 5, memo 87. 17. St:~rxl. T. 15. 1964. fixpcrience in rcl~nl trnnspiantatwn, Saundcrs, Philntlclphin. 18. Stnrzl, T. E.; Marrhioro, T. L.; Terasaki, P. I.; Porter, K. A . ; Faris, T. D.; Herrmnnn,

T. J . ; Vrcdrvoe. D. L.; Hutt, hi. P.: O ~ d e n , D. II.; Wnddcll, W. R . 1965. Ann. Sure. 16'2: 749.

10. st el,^^. I<.: Goodm:tn. II. S.; Brrerr, bf. 1%1. J. Immrlnol. 87: 189. 20. Tcr:~snki. P. I.: ilIickrv, hl. R.: J'rrrlcvoe. D. J,.; Goyctte, D. R. 1066. Vos Snng.

11: 350. 21. Tcr:ls;tki, P. I.: ' rtrr, 1:. X.: JIarrhioro, T. I,.; Mickey, M. R.; Vredevoc, D. L.;

F:lri~. T. D.: ,*I z l . T. E. 1066. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. (in prrm). ?2. vnn Ilood. J. J.; ran Lceuwen. h.; Schippers. M. J . ; Vooys, R. 13.: Frederike. E.;

1l;ilner. H.: Eernlsse, J. G. 1955. p. 37. In IJistocompntibilily testing, 10G6. Alunks- c:tnrd, Copenhagen.

23. Vrcdrvoe. D. L ; Mickey, &I. R.: Govette, D. R.: Magnuson, N. S.; Terasaki. P. I. l!%6. Ann. N. T. Acad. Sci. (in press).

?I . Vrrdrvoe. D. L.; Ternsaki, P. I. ; blickev, M. R. ; Glassock, R.: Merrill. J. P.; hlurrav, J. E. 1%5. p. 25. I n Histocompatzbilily testing, 1966. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.

25. JT~rner, G. S.; Samwick, A. 8.; Morrison, H . ; Cohen, L. 1955. Exp. bled. Surg. IS: 347.

26. IVilson, W. E. C.; Kirkpatrick, C. H.; Talmage, D. W. 1964. J. Clin. Invest. 49: 1881.

Received 29 October 1965.