11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evaluating Change

Citation preview

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    1/12

    ABHIJIT SINGH

    02

    Evaluating

    change

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    2/12

    O Economic Crisis

    O Changes In Laws

    O Social DevelopmentO Global Competition

    O Demographic Trends

    O Explosive Technological Changes

    CONDITIONS PROMOTING

    CHANGE

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    3/12

    O The final and most important stage of the

    change planning process is to determinewhich measures you will use to monitor

    and evaluate the project outcomes (i.e.

    were the objectives met?).

    HOW TO EVALUATE

    CHANGE

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    4/12

    Evaluating Change

    Clarity of Purpose

    Strategies :-

    O SurveyO Case study

    O Experimental

    O Longitudinal

    O Cross-sectional

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    5/12

    Change EvaluationO Longitudinal Measurement

    O Change is measured over time

    O Ideally, the data collection should start

    before the change program is implemented

    and continue for a period considered

    reasonable for producing expected results.

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    6/12

    Change EvaluationO Comparison Units

    O Appropriate use of control groups

    O It is always desirable to compare results inthe intervention situation with those in

    another situation where no such change

    has taken place.

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    7/12

    Change Evaluation

    O Statistical Analysis

    O Alternative sources of variation have been

    controlledO Whenever possible, statistical methods

    should be used to rule out the possibility

    that the results are caused by random error

    or chance.

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    8/12

    PRIMARY DATA :-

    OBSERVATIONS

    INTERVIEWS

    QUESTIONNAIRES

    SECONDARY DATA :-

    RAWSUMMARIES

    GATHERING DATA FOR

    ANALYSIS

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    9/12

    ANALYSIS AND

    FEEDBACKO Analysis aimed at determining impact of

    intervention or data

    O Goals, outcomes, performance

    O Measures of the interventions effect

    O Top down approach or Bottom up

    approach

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    10/12

    O TELSESALES INCORPORATED IS A LARGE

    COMPANY OPERATING IN UK NSURANCE

    SECTOR.

    O TELESALES WAS CONSIDERING THEINTRODUCTION OF COMPUTER BASED

    TRAINING (CBT) FOR INTRODUCTORY

    TELESALES.

    O HOWEVER PRIOR TO DECIDING TO MAKE ACHANGE THEY NEEDED TO ESTABLISH

    WHETHER CBT WAS AS LEAST AS EFFECTIVE A

    MEDUM AS THEIR EXISTING TRADITIONAL

    TRAINING APPROACH.

    CASE STUDY

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    11/12

    O TO ESTABLISH THIS EFFECTIVENESS THEY

    PROGRAMMED A SIX MONTH TRAINING

    PROGRAM.

    O IN THIS THEY FORMED 4 GROUPS

    a) SELF STUDY CBT

    b) GROUP STUDY CBT

    c) EXISTING TRAINING GROUP

    d) CONTROL GROUP

    A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF 120

    EMPLOYEES WHO REQUIRED TELE SALESTRAINING WERE SELECTED AND 30

    ALLOCATED TO EACH GROUP WERE

    OBSERVED OVER THE PERIOD OF SIX

    MONTHS.

  • 5/24/2018 11 - Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions

    12/12

    O DATA WAS COLLECTED WITH THE HELP OF

    QUESTIONNAIRES,OBSERVATIONS AND

    INTERVIEWS.

    O THE WHOLE DATA WAS EVALUATED AND

    WITH THE HELP OF THIS EVALUATION

    DECISION WAS TAKEN.