11 Ecology and Nature Conservation - Waverley Council 11 … · January 2008 11-1 RPS Planning & Development 11 Ecology and Nature Conservation Introduction 11.1 This chapter assesses

Crest Nicholson Regeneration Limited and Proposed Redevelopment: East Street, Farnham Sainsbury’s Supermarket Limited Environmental Statement

January 2008 RPS Planning & Development 11-1

11 Ecology and Nature Conservation

Introduction

11.1 This chapter assesses the potential for ecology and nature conservation effects occurring as a consequence of the redevelopment proposals at East Street, Farnham. The assessment provides a description of the habitat types at the site and in its vicinity and identifies the potential for any protected species or areas of particular nature conservation interest to be affected by the construction and/or operation of the project. This information has been used to identify potential ecological constraints and to identify measures to address such constraints. In addition, the assessment identifies opportunities to enhance existing habitats or create new habitats as part of the project.

11.2 The baseline conditions are described using information gathered during habitat and species surveys carried out in 2003, 2006 and 2007. Copies of the 2006 and 2007 survey reports are attached in the appendix and are referred to within the text of this chapter.

Methodology

Baseline Conditions

11.3 Baseline information gathering was undertaken with reference to the Institute of Environmental Assessment’s ‘Guidelines for Baseline Ecological Assessment’ (1995) and comprised two phases: a desk study and ecological field surveys. The methodologies applied are described below.

Desk Study

11.4 The purpose of the desk study was to collect baseline data held by statutory and non-statutory consultees. Information was requested for the site and a 2km study area around the site, from the following organisations:

• Natural England;

• Environment Agency;

• Surrey Wildlife Trust;

• Surrey Biological Records Centre;

• Surrey Bat Group;

• Surrey Bird Club;

• West Surrey Badger Group; and



• Surrey Dragonfly Recorder.

11.5 Table 11.1 summarises the information provided by each of the consultees. The desk study report is attached in Appendix 11.1

Table 11.1: Summary of information provided by consultees

Consultee Information supplied

Natural England Referred to Surrey Biological Record Centre, MAGIC website and Nature on the Map websites

Environment Agency Details of historic records of water voles (1999), otters (2003) and white-clawed crayfish in area. None of these recorded in 2006 surveys- the presence of signal crayfish means the white-clawed crayfish have almost certainly disappeared from area

Surrey Wildlife Trust Referred to Surrey Biological Records Centre

Surrey County Council Ecologist No response received

Surrey Biological Record Centre Protected and notable species records and information on statutory and non-statutory designated sites provided

Surrey Bat Group Records of bat species within the study area

Surrey Bird Club No response received

West Surrey Badger Group Records of badgers setts and RTAs within the study area

County Dragonfly Recorder Referred to Surrey Biological Records Centre

Ecological Field Surveys

11.6 Site visits were carried out on the 5th and 7th of August and 12th September 2003. The dominant plant species were recorded and habitats classified according to their vegetation types. Results were presented in the standard Phase 1 habitat survey format (Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 1993). A further visit to the site was made on June 13th 2006 to update the existing Phase 1 habitat survey information and to survey new areas included in the proposed development following amendments to the site boundary.

11.7 Particular attention was paid to record the potential presence of protected species such as bats, water voles and otters.



Bats

11.8 Sixteen species of bat are known to breed in the UK. All 16 species and their roost sites are protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and The Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994. As a signatory to the Bonn Convention (Agreement on the Conservation of Bats in Europe) the UK is also required to protect their habitats. This legislation makes it illegal to kill, injure, capture or disturb bats or to obstruct access to, damage or destroy bat roosts and affords protection from damage or disturbance to important feeding areas. Under the law, a roost is any structure or place used for shelter or protection.

11.9 Daytime site visits were carried out on the 7 August and 12 September 2003 and then updated on 30th October 2007. The exterior of each building was examined using binoculars to identify any roost access points. The loft space of each building was accessed, where access by bats was possible, and searched for the presence of roosting bats. The surrounding habitat was also surveyed to identify any important features. Evidence of bats is usually detected by any one or more of the following signs:

• presence of bat droppings, which tend to accumulate under established roost sites or at roost entrances;

• accumulation of large numbers of moth wings, which have been discarded by feeding bats;

• areas of staining by urine or from fur rubbing; and

• presence of bats or their corpses.

11.10 Evening activity surveys were carried out on 7 August and 12 September 2003 using direct observation, and both heterodyne (Bat Box III) and time-expansion (Tranquillity II) detectors to record bat activity. Data from the time-expansion detector was analysed using Bat Sound software. Using this combined approach it is possible to identify the majority of bat species present. However, myotid contacts are still difficult to identify with complete certainty and such surveys tend to under-record those species with weak echolocation calls such as long-eared bats.

11.11 Bat activity is strongly influenced by weather conditions and time of night. Peak activity occurs at dusk and dawn, but activity continues throughout the night as bats can commute long distances from the roosts to particular foraging sites (depending upon the species). For this reason the evening activity surveys started at sunset and continued for approximately 2 hours after sundown.

11.12 At the time of survey, insect activity across the site was moderate. Conditions appeared generally favourable for bats and no problems were encountered that might affect the survey results.

Water voles

11.13 The water vole is partially protected under Section 9(4) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). It is thus an offence to:



• intentionally or recklessly damage, destroy, or obstruct access to any structure or place which water voles use for shelter or protection; or

• disturb water voles while they are using such a place.

11.14 A water vole survey was carried out in 2003 and again in June 2006. Evidence of water voles is usually detected by one or more of the following signs:

• Faeces or latrines; • Feeding stations; • Burrows; • Grazed lawns; • Nests; • Footprints; and • Runways in vegetation.

11.15 Both banks of the River Wey were examined from the river channel and field signs of water voles were recorded on a standard survey form.

Otters

11.16 European otters are protected under the EC Directive (92/43) The Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Flora and Fauna (the Habitats Directive). They are listed in Annexe IV which relates to species of community interest in need of strict protection. In the UK the Directive is applied through the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994; otters are listed in Schedule 2 of the Regulations. This legislation makes it illegal to damage or destroy breeding sites or resting places and capture, kill or disturb otters. Otters are also afforded full protection under the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), being listed on Schedule 5 of the Act. The Act makes it an offence to intentionally kill, injure or take otters or to intentionally damage, destroy or obstruct access to any structure or place which otters use for shelter or protection. It is also an offence to intentionally disturb an otter occupying such a place.

11.17 An otter survey was carried out in 2003 and again in June 2006. Evidence of otters is usually detected by one or more of the following signs:

• Spraint; • Prints; • Holts; • Couches; and • Slides and runs.

11.18 The south-eastern bank of the river between the bridges at South Street and Farnham Sports Centre was walked with particular attention paid to areas around the two bridges.

Assessment methodology

11.19 This assessment takes account of the following relevant guidance:

• Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (2006) Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the United Kingdom;



• Institute of Environmental Assessment (1995) Guidelines for Baseline Ecological Assessment.

11.20 In accordance with this guidance, the assessment has been undertaken in four main stages:

• baseline studies (review of existing conditions);

• identification of Valued Ecological Receptors;

• identification and characterisation of potential effects; and

• assessment of significance of effects.

Identification of Valued Ecological Receptors

11.21 Having identified the sites of known importance for nature conservation, species populations, species assemblages and habitats present within the zone of influence of the proposed development, Valued Ecological Receptors (VERs) were identified. VERs are habitats and species that are valued in some way and which could be affected by the project.

11.22 Identified sites, populations of species, species assemblages and habitats have been evaluated with reference to their importance in terms of ‘biodiversity conservation’ (which relates to the need to conserve representative areas of different habitats and the genetic diversity of species populations).

11.23 Where appropriate, reference is made to social benefits that species and habitats deliver (e.g. relating to enjoyment of flora and fauna by the public) and economic benefits that they provide, but only where these are significant considerations.

11.24 For the purposes of this assessment, sites, species populations, species assemblages and habitats have been valued using the following scale:

• International; • UK; • National (i.e. England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland); • Regional; • County; • District; • Parish; • Neighbourhood.

11.25 The valuation of sites makes use of established value systems e.g. SSSIs are all of national importance, County Wildlife Sites are of county importance. Judgement is required for the valuation of sites of less than county value.

11.26 The valuation of species populations, assemblages of species and habitats uses accepted criteria, examples include:

11.27 Species populations. The importance of populations is evaluated on the basis of their size, recognised status (e.g. published lists of species of conservation concern, BAP status) and legal protection status. For example, bird populations exceeding 1% of published



biogeographic populations are considered to be of international importance, those exceeding 1% of published national populations are considered to be of national importance, etc.

11.28 Species assemblages. In some instances it is the species assemblage that is of importance. Criteria used to evaluate the importance of assemblages include SSSI selection criteria. Fuller (1980), for example, provides a dated but useful framework for evaluating the relative importance of bird assemblages.

11.29 Habitats. Criteria for the evaluation of habitats and plant communities include Annex III of the EC Habitats Directive, guidelines for the selection of biological SSSIs and, where available, Local Authority and Wildlife Trust criteria for the selection of Local Sites (e.g. County Wildlife Sites). Legal protection status is also a consideration for certain habitats.

11.30 In this assessment sites, species populations, species assemblages and habitats are considered to be VERs if they meet the district level of importance.

Identification and Characterisation of Potential Effects

11.31 The likely effects of the project during its construction and operation are identified and characterised taking into consideration the following parameters:

• positive or negative – whether the effect will result in net loss or degradation of a VER or whether it will enhance or improve it;

• magnitude – the size or intensity of the effect measured in relevant terms e.g. number of individuals lost or gained, area of habitat lost of created, or the degree of change to existing conditions (e.g. noise or lighting levels);

• extent – the spatial scope of the effect, for example the physical area affected or the geographical pattern of the effect;

• duration – the length of time over which the effect occurs;

• reversibility – the extent to which effects are reversible either spontaneously or through active mitigation; and

• timing and frequency – consideration of the timing of events in relation to ecological change, some effects may be of greater significance if they take place at certain times of year (e.g. breeding season). The extent to which an effect is repeated may also be of importance.

11.32 The assessment of effects takes into account any measures to avoid or reduce the effect, which are integral to the design of the development and to which there is commitment. Any further mitigation or compensation recommended but not forming part of the design at this stage is identified but is not taken into account in the assessment of significance of effects.

11.33 An indication of the confidence with which predictions of potential effects are made has been given.

11.34 The magnitude of the predicted effects on VERs is assessed as indicated in Table 11.1.



Table 11.1: Criteria for Determining the Magnitude of Effects

Magnitude Criteria

Major negative The proposal may adversely affect the conservation status of the site or feature.

Intermediate negative

The site or feature’s conservation status will not be adversely affected, but the effect is likely to be significant in terms of ecological objectives or populations. If, in the light of full information, it cannot be clearly demonstrated that the proposal will not have an adverse effect on conservation objectives, then the impact should be assessed as major negative.

Minor negative Neither of the above apply, but some minor negative impact is likely.

Neutral No observable impact.

Positive Impacts which provide a gain for biodiversity.

11.35 Conservation status is defined by the Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (2006) as follows:

• habitats – ‘conservation status is determined by the sum of the influences acting on the habitat and its typical species, that may affect its long-term distribution, structure and functions as well as the long-term survival of its typical species within a given geographical area’.

• species – ‘conservation status is determined by the sum of the influences acting on the species concerned that may affect the long-term distribution and abundance of its populations within a given geographical area’.

11.36 The decision as to whether the favourable conservation status of a VER is likely to be compromised has been made using professional judgement based on an analysis of the predicted effects of the project.

11.37 For designated sites that are affected by the project, the focus is on the effects on the integrity of each site, defined as ‘the coherence of ecological structure and function, across a site’s whole area, that enable it to sustain the habitat, complex of habitats and/or levels of populations of species for which it was classified.’ This assessment has been made with reference to the features for which a site has been classified/notified and involves combining assessments of the effects on the conservation status of each of these features.

11.38 For non-statutory sites, such features may not have been formally defined but the main interest features have been identified from the site description.

Positive effects

11.39 A positive effect is considered to be significant if project activities cause:

• a non-valued ecological receptor to become valued;

• restoration of favourable conservation status for a habitat/species population; and/or



• restoration of a site’s integrity (where this has been undermined).

Assessment of Significance

11.40 Significance has been assessed on the basis of the value of the features and the magnitude of effects as set out in Table 11.2.

Table 11.2: Estimating the Significance of Effects

Magnitude of impact

Nature conservation value of features affected

International UK/National Regional County District Major negative

Substantial adverse

Substantial adverse

Major adverse

Moderate adverse

Slight adverse

Intermediate Negative

Major Adverse

Major adverse

Moderate adverse

Moderate adverse

Slight adverse

Minor negative

Slight adverse

Slight adverse

Slight adverse

Slight adverse

Slight adverse

Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Positive Major

beneficial Major beneficial

Moderate beneficial

Moderate beneficial

Slight beneficial

11.41 The significance of any effects is thus determined in terms of the importance/value and sensitivity of the sites, habitats and species that would be affected in a national, regional, and local context.

11.42 An assessment has been made of potential nature conservation effects arising as a consequence of implementing the proposals as described in Chapter 2 both during construction and operation. The potential for positive and negative effects has been considered. The significance of any effects has been determined in terms of the importance/value and sensitivity of the habitats and species that would be affected.

11.43 It is generally the case that no significant effect can occur to features of less than district importance, other than in exceptional circumstances such as where a feature has high social or economic value, or the magnitude of effect is particularly high.

11.44 The assessment also takes account of any likely changes including, for example, trends in the population size or distribution of species, likely changes to the extent of habitats and the effects of other proposed developments or land-use changes.

11.45 Effects may be either permanent or temporary. The following terms are used to describe the time-scale of temporary effects in the context of ecology and nature conservation:

Short-term: <12 months Medium-term: 1-5 years Long-term: >5 years

11.46 Where potential negative impacts have been identified, means to mitigate those impacts should be incorporated into the design of the proposals where practicable. The effectiveness of this mitigation is taken into account in the assessment of the significance of impacts.



Measures Adopted as Part of the Project

11.47 The majority of the existing trees present on the East Street site are to be removed as part of the development proposals. In order to avoid conflict with nesting birds, vegetation clearance would be undertaken outside of the bird-nesting season (March to August inclusive) where practicable.

11.48 Some habitats would be permanently lost to the proposals, most of which are of limited ecological value. The site of most ecological interest is the River Wey; particular care will be taken when developing areas adjacent to the river. Mitigation has been incorporated into the scheme’s design to minimise effects on the ecological and nature conservation of this site.

11.49 Landscape planting and habitat creation is proposed as part of the project. Areas courtyard gardens, creation of a ‘wildlife friendly’ balancing pond and native tree and shrub planting are proposed. These areas would be managed to maintain their habitat value, particularly for birds and bats. Further details are provided in the landscape strategy and design and access statement.

11.50 The River Wey and surrounding vegetation provide foraging and commuting habitat for bats on site. These linear features are to be retained within the new development and will remain unlit.

11.51 Habitat creation for bat and birds would be incorporated into the new development in the form of bird and bat boxes. The boxes would be erected into retained mature trees in suitable areas i.e. in unlit for bats. The incorporation of sparrow and bat bricks into new buildings is also proposed, again at suitable locations and at suitable heights.

11.52 The trees that will be felled as part of the development proposals will be utilised to create log piles or ‘loggeries’ for stag beetles. The ‘loggeries’ will be created within the retained woodland on site to create additional habitat for this species.

11.53 Sedum roofs and roof gardens are proposed as part of the development. Where the roofs and gardens are to be incorporated into the development, they are likely to contribute beneficially to the site’s ecology subject to correct plant species selection.

Legal and Policy Context

11.54 A number of legislative, guidance and policy documents were taken into account as part of the assessment and are outlined below.

11.55 The UK legislation protecting certain habitats and species includes:

• Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended);

• The Conservation (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1994;

• Countryside and Rights of Way (CRoW) Act 2000; and

• Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006.



11.56 The following EC legislation is also relevant:

• European Directive on the Conservation of Wild Birds 79/409/EEC (the Birds Directive); and

• European Directive on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora 92/43/EEC (the Habitats Directive).

11.57 Certain habitats, features and species are also afforded protection under specific legislation such as the Hedgerow Regulations 1997 and the Protection of Badgers Act 1992.

11.58 The UK also has commitments as a signatory to the Biodiversity Convention (Rio de Janeiro 1992), which are set out in "Biodiversity: the UK Action Plan" (CM2428, HMSO 1994). The plan sets out the strategy for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity. Action plans identify management measures and objectives regarding the sustainability and enhancement of priority species and habitats of concern.

11.59 The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 places a duty on Government Ministers and departments to have regard to the conservation of biodiversity in accordance with the Convention.

11.60 The Government’s biodiversity strategy ‘Working with the Grain of Nature: a biodiversity strategy for England’ was published in 2002. The purpose of the strategy is stated to be to ensure that biodiversity considerations become embedded in all the main sectors of economic activity, public and private.

11.61 Targets and actions to conserve species of importance at the local level are described in Local Biodiversity Action Plans. The Local Biodiversity Action Plan relevant to this development is the Surrey Biodiversity Action Plan (2002).

11.62 There are also national and local planning guidance and policies which are relevant to nature conservation.

National

11.63 The Government’s Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 9 Biodiversity and Geological Conservation was issued in August 2005. Accompanying PPS9 is an ODPM/Defra Circular (ODPM 06/2005, Defra 01/2005): Biodiversity and Geological Conservation – Statutory obligations and their impact within the planning system

11.64 The Key Principals of PPS 9 (set out at paragraph 1) include:

‘(ii) Plan policies and planning decisions should aim to maintain, and enhance, restore or add to biodiversity and geological conservation interests. In taking decisions, local planning authorities should ensure that appropriate weight is attached to designated sites of international, national and local importance; protected species; and to biodiversity and geological interests within the wider environment.’



and;

‘(vi) The aim of planning decisions should be to prevent harm to biodiversity and geological conservation interests. Where granting planning permission would result in significant harm to those interests, local planning authorities will need to be satisfied that the development cannot reasonably be located on any alternative sites that would result in less or no harm. In the absence of any such alternatives, local planning authorities should ensure that, before planning permission is granted, adequate mitigation measures are put in place. Where a planning decision would result in significant harm to biodiversity and geological interests which cannot be prevented or adequately mitigated against, appropriate compensation measures should be sought. If that significant harm cannot be prevented, adequately mitigated against, or compensated for, then planning permission should be refused.’

Natural Environment & Rural Communities Act 2006

11.65 The Natural Environment & Rural Communities Act 2006 enforces Natural England to ensure that the natural environment is conserved, enhanced and managed for the benefit of present and future generations, thereby contributing to sustainable development. Under the Act, Natural England's general purpose includes:

• promoting nature conservation and protecting biodiversity, • conserving and enhancing the landscape, • securing the provision and improvement of facilities for the study, understanding

and enjoyment of the natural environment, • promoting access to the countryside and open spaces and encouraging open-air

recreation, and • contributing in other ways to social and economic well-being through management

of the natural environment.

Regional

11.66 At a regional level, the relevant planning guidance for Farnham, which lies in the South East region, is RPG 9 ‘Regional Planning Guidance for the South East’ (March 2001). This statutory regional guidance supports the continued protection of nationally and internationally important nature conservation and wildlife sites.

County

11.67 At a county level, the relevant planning policy is set out in the Surrey Structure Plan (2004), which provides the strategic framework for land use planning in the county. Policy SE1 Natural Resources and Pollution Control states, ‘designated areas and features of acknowledged importance within the natural environment should be conserved and enhanced.’ Policy SE7 Nature Conservation affords protection to designated sites, resisting inappropriate development, whilst Policy SE6 Biodiversity seeks to conserve and enhance



biodiversity through retaining features within the landscape of importance for flora and fauna, ensuring that developers retain these features and mitigate for impacts on their conservation.

Local

11.68 The proposed development site is in the local council area of Waverley Borough Council. The Waverley Borough Local Plan (2002) sets out the Council's policies for guiding and controlling the way that buildings and land are used and developed up to the end of 2006. The relevant policies of the plan are listed below.

Policy D1 – Environmental implications of development

The Council will have regard to the environmental implications of development and will promote and encourage enhancement of the environment. Development will not be permitted where it would result in material detriment to the environment. The Council will seek, as part of a development proposal, to resolve or limit environmental impacts.

Policy C9 – International and national conservation sites

Development will not be permitted within or affecting statutory designated sites. In considering proposals within or affecting these areas which are regarded as acceptable, the Council will take account of any associated measures to enhance, manage or protect the nature conservation importance of these areas.

Policy C11 – Undesignated wildlife sites

In considering proposals for development on other sites with a wildlife interest, the Council will seek to preserve and enhance the ecological features of these sites.

Policy C12 – Canals and river corridors

Development will not be permitted which will have a detrimental effect on the visual qualities, setting, amenities, ecological value, heritage interest or water quality of a number of river corridors and canals, including the River Wey (north and south). In considering development proposals, the Council will seek enhancement of sites to the benefit of the canal or river corridor, such as landscaping, water quality and volume improvement, or habitat creation.

Policy C10 – Local nature reserves, sites of nature conservation importance and regionally important geological and geomorphological sites

Development will not be permitted within or affecting these non-statutory designated sites unless it can be demonstrated that it would not conflict with nature conservation interests. When considering proposals within or affecting these sites the Council will



take account of any associated measures to enhance, manage or protect the nature conservation importance of these areas.

Policy C7 – Trees, woodlands and hedgerows

The Council will seek to ensure that the extent of tree cover in the Borough is maintained and in particular will resist the loss or seek the replacement of trees, woodlands and hedgerows in areas which contain features that make a significant contribution to the appearance of the landscape or streetscape, are of wildlife interest or historic significance or are of significance for recreation.

Policy D5 – Nature conservation

Development in both urban and rural areas should take account of nature conservation issues. The Council will seek to retain within a site any significant features of nature conservation value, will not permit development that would materially harm a protected animal or plant species or its habitat and will encourage the enhancement of existing areas or features of nature conservation value and the creation and management of new wildlife habitats.

Policy D7 – Trees, hedgerows and development

Development proposals on sites which contain or are close to, important trees, groups of trees or hedgerows should provide for their long-term retention. The Council will not permit development which would result in the loss of important trees or groups of hedgerows and require that trees or hedgerows which are to be retained are adequately protected during construction. The Council requires the planting of new trees and other vegetation where appropriate.

11.69 As explained in chapter 5, Waverley Borough Council is currently developing a revised Core Strategy. As part of the development of the revised Core Strategy it will be necessary for the Council to revisit the previous Appropriate Assessment. This is required in order to assess the potential effect of the Core Strategy on the Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) that are within or close to Waverley. The Appropriate Assessment assesses the potential effect on these sites and the associated Mini Plan sets out the Council's proposals for off-setting any significant effects.

11.70 Natural England recognises the challenges associated with the conservation of Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area in such a highly developed landscape and has established the Thames Basin Heaths Delivery Plan. The Delivery Plan aims to safeguard the SPA through developing and establishing a strategic, sub-regional approach to avoidance and mitigation of the impact of housing developments across the 15 local planning authority areas around the SPA consistent with the law and planning policies. The SPA is a European designation for wild birds, and on Thames Basin Heaths especially protects Woodlark, Dartford warbler and Nightjar, which are particularly subject to disturbance from ramblers, dog walkers and cat predation. Any residential development close to the SPA has the potential to have a significant adverse effect on the birds and their habitats since additional residential



accommodation will be likely to increase the number of people living close to the SPA. Local planning authorities are therefore required to provide sufficient new or improved, accessible open space of appropriate character to provide adequate alternative (to the SPA) recreational opportunities for residents of new developments. Natural England recently issued a draft document detailing mitigation standards for residential development around the SPA (English Nature, 2006).

11.71 In response to this document, Waverley Borough Council has produced a Draft Mini Mitigation Plan for Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (Jan 2007) with the aim of dealing with the problem of mitigation affecting the council’s ability to deliver the housing development required by the South East Plan and the Structure Plan. The plan gives guidance to developers on the requirements of Natural England for mitigation to compensate for the pressure of a new population around the SPA and provides information on suitable mitigation sites within the borough. The requirements of Natural England are that a suitable area of alternative green space is either:

• provided by the developer;

• the developer buys into provision of green space assembled by the local authority; or

• the developer buys into the upgrading if an existing site owned by the local authority.

11.72 In this case Waverley Borough Council have identified in the draft the existing Farnham Park as a potential area of informed land. However Farnham Park can only provide this level of mitigation if there is:

• a full-time manger based on site;

• improved interpretation facilities; and

• enhanced access points (pedestrian and parking).

11.73 Consequently as East Street lies in Zone C (that is a site more than 2km but less than 5km from the SPA), mitigation can be provided by the enhancement of Farnham Park (at least up until 2018) by a contribution from the developers of £400/head. Crest Nicholson support the Draft Masterplan and have indicated their willingness to provide this contribution through the appropriate section 106 agreement.

Baseline Conditions

11.74 The existing situation is described on the basis of information provided by consultees, desk-based research and field survey information.

11.75 A number of statutory and non-statutory designated sites fall within the study area. One non-statutory designated site, the River Wey SNCI, lies partially within the development site boundary. The locations of all designated sites are shown in Figure 11.2.



Statutory Designated Sites

Thames Basin Heaths Special Protected Area (SPA)

11.76 The Thames Basin Heaths Special Protected Area (SPA) comprises internationally important lowland heathland and lies approximately 2.5km from the proposed development site boundary. The SPA Review (JNCC, 2005) states that the site qualifies under Article 4.1 of the Directive (79/409/EEC) by supporting populations of European importance of the following species listed on Annex I of the Directive:

• European nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus: 264 males representing 7.8% of the GB breeding population

• Woodlark Lullula arborea: 149 pairs representing 9.9% of the GB breeding population

• Dartford Warbler Sylvia undata: 445 pairs representing 9.9% of the GB breeding population

11.77 The citation for designation of the SPA site is attached at Appendix 11.1. The SPA comprises 13 Sites of Special Scientific Interest.

Bourley and Long Valley Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)

11.78 The Bourley and Long Valley SSSI forms part of the Thames Basin Heaths SPA and consists of a mosaic of heathland, woodland, mire, scrub and grassland habitats. These diverse habitats support a rich flora and fauna including nationally scarce plants, nationally rare invertebrates and 3 bird species listed in Annex 1 of the EC Directive on the Conservation of Wild Birds. The full citation for designation of the site is attached at Appendix 11.1.

Non Statutory Designated Sites

11.79 Six non-statutory County Wildlife Sites, known in Surrey as Sites of Nature Conservation Importance (SNCIs), are located within the study area:

1) River Wey North SNCI (partially within site boundary)

Of significant interest for its rich diversity of aquatic and marginal flora. It also includes the only site in the county for the white-legged damselfly Platycnemis pennipes.

2) Snayleslynch – River Wey SNCI (0.4km from site boundary)

Wetland containing rare and notable species in conjunction with the adjacent river

3) Farnham Park SNCI (0.25km from site boundary)

An exceptional population of notable amphibian species occur in the ponds on site. Also a high quality invertebrate site with notable species present in ponds and other notable insects with affinities to ancient pasture woodlands.



4) Copse West of Claypit Wood SNCI (1.75km from site boundary)

Species-rich, spring line woodland supporting a range of vegetation community types.

5) Monk’s Walk SNCI (2.5km from site boundary)

Site containing county rare flora.

6) Bricksbury Hill and Hungry Hill SNCI (1.75km from site boundary)

Unimproved acid grassland and relict patches of heath.

11.80 Six areas listed on the Ancient Woodland Inventory for England occurred within the study area:

1) Pond Wood (2.5km from site boundary) - 8ha of semi-natural and replanted ancient woodland

2) Quarry Wood (2.25km from site boundary) - 4ha of semi-natural and replanted ancient woodland

3) Claypit Wood (1.5km from site boundary) - 6ha of semi-natural and replanted ancient woodland

4) Monks Wood (2km from site boundary) - 8ha of semi-natural ancient woodland

5) Black Lane Wood (2.75km from site boundary) - Predominantly re-planted ancient wood

6) Moor Park Wood (2.25km from site boundary) - 5ha of semi-natural ancient woodland

Habitats

11.81 Information gathered during the Phase I Habitat Survey forms the basis of the baseline description of the habitats on the site. A full survey report can be found at Appendix 11.2.The following paragraphs briefly describe each habitat present, with standard JNCC habitat type code. The habitats present on site are shown in Figure 11.1.

J3.6 Hardstanding/Buildings

11.82 The site was dominated by buildings, mainly shops, and associated car parking. There were also three tennis courts. This type of habitat is of minimum ecological value, but some of the buildings could provide bird nesting habitat and potential bat roosts.

J1.2 Amenity grassland

11.83 There were a number of areas throughout the site used for amenity and recreational activities. These areas were intensively managed and regularly mown. The main areas of amenity



grassland on site include Brightwell Gardens and open spaces along the River Wey and around the Sports Centre. These areas were dominated by perennial rye-grass Lolium perenne, with occasional cock’s-foot Dactylis glomerata, Yorkshire-fog Holcus lanatus,common bent Agrostis capillaris, false oat-grass Arrhenatherum elatius and annual meadow-grass Poa annua. A variety of herbs were recorded, which included dandelion Taraxacum spp., daisy Bellis perennis, creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens, yarrow Achillea millefolium, common ragwort Senecio jacobaea, ribwort plantain Plantago lanceolata, white clover Trifolium repens, cut-leaved crane’s-bill Geranium dissectum, dove’s-foot crane’s-bill Geranium molle, common vetch Vicia sativa, common cat’s ear Hypochoeris radicata and common mouse-ear Cerastium fontanum.

11.84 Most residential properties on the site have now been vacated and consequently the lawn areas are becoming overgrown. Species present included those listed above but with timothy Phleum pratense, black horehound Ballota nigra, great willowherb Epilobium hirsutum and fat-hen Chenopodium album also recorded.

11.85 The ecological value of the amenity grassland areas is limited as the majority are intensively managed and regularly mown. However, they do provide foraging habitat for a range of common species of bird and the more overgrown areas provide a food source for nectar and pollen dependent insects.

A1.1.1 Semi-natural broad-leaved woodland

11.86 A small remnant area of woodland was present along the western bank of the River Wey. The habitat was dominated by mature crack willow Salix fragilis with occasional sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus, which has formed a dense canopy. The shading had restricted the development of the ground flora, which was dominated by common nettle, docks Rumex sp., bramble, ivy Hedera helix, Indian balsam Impatiens glandulifera, great willowherb and hemlock water-dropwort Oenanthe crocata. The areas of broad leaved woodland in the southwest of the site and beyond the site boundary are small but will provide habitat and shelter for a range of wildlife.

G2 Running water

11.87 The proposed development site incorporates a small section of the River Wey, a tributary of the River Thames, in the southeast. The river has potential for protected species including water voles and otters.

J1.4 Introduced shrub

11.88 There were a number of areas of introduced scrub, dominated by non-native ornamental species, associated with the original landscape treatment of the site. A small yew Taxus baccata hedge and a number of formal, well maintained, beds were identified in and around Brightwell Gardens. A few areas, particularly around the car park off East Street, had become overgrown and were dominated by butterfly-bush Buddleja davidii. Two areas of Japanese knotweed Fallopia japonica were recorded.



11.89 Introduced shrubs and species-poor hedgerows may provide shelter and lying up areas for wildlife and offer bird nesting habitat. Although dominated by non-native species, they could also provide a food resource for pollen and nectar dependent insects.

A3.1 Broad-leaved scattered trees

11.90 A number of mature trees were present within the site, previously planted as part of the overall landscape treatment of the area. Species present included lime Tilia x europaea, sycamore, false-acacia Robinia pseudoacacia, hornbeam Carpinus betulus, ash Fraxinus excelsior,rowan Sorbus aucuparia, crack willow, walnut Juglans regia, horse-chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum, copper beech Fagus sylvatica, spruce Picea sp. and cedar Cedrus atlantica.Scattered mature trees provide potential bird nesting habitat and offer potential habitat for invertebrates. Few holes, which can provide roost sites for certain species of bats, were recorded in the trees.

J2.1.1 Intact hedge- species-poor

11.91 Ornate and intact species-poor hedges occurred occasionally as part of the formal landscaping on site. These hedgerows may provide shelter and lying up areas for wildlife and offer bird nesting habitat and although dominated by non-native species, they could also provide a food resource for pollen and nectar dependent insects.

A2.1 Dense/continuous scrub

11.92 A small area of dense scrub occurred on amenity grassland northwest of the River Wey. Elder Sambucus nigra and cherry Prunus sp. trees were flanked by thick bramble Rubus fruticosus agg. Dense scrub may provide shelter and cover for wildlife, suitable bird nesting habitat and a food resource for pollen and nectar-dependent insects.

A2.2 Scattered scrub

11.93 Areas of scattered scrub were limited and mostly occurred along the fencing of vacant residential properties towards the centre of the site. Bramble dominated, with occasional common nettle, cleavers Galium aparine, hogweed Heracleum sphondylium, hedge bindweed Calystegia sepium and creeping thistle Cirsium arvense.

11.94 Although limited in size and isolated, this habitat does provide some shelter and lying up areas for wildlife and a food resource for pollen and nectar-dependent insects.

F2.1 Marginal vegetation

11.95 A narrow strip of marginal vegetation was present along the western bank of the River Wey, dominated by common nettle and greater willowherb Epilobium hirsutum with occasional Indian balsam Impatiens glandulifera and reed canary grass Phalaris arundinacea. Common nettle, greater willowherb, branched bur-reed Sparganium erectum and fool’s watercress Apium nodiflorum occurred along the eastern bank. The lack of species diversity and



restricted size limits the ecological value of this marginal vegetation, although it does provide habitat and shelter for a range of riparian species including dragonflies and damselflies.

J3.8 Earth bank

11.96 There is a grassy flood bank on amenity grassland several metres from the eastern bank of the River Wey. In some circumstances banks can provide suitable habitat for badger setts but due to the intensive management of the surrounding grassland and the high degree of human traffic across this habitat type, it has little potential for badgers and no field signs were seen.

J1.3 Ephemeral/Short perennial

11.97 Some plant species were found growing in cracks in the hardstanding and loose gravel of the car parks. Species present included annual meadow grass, mugwort Artemisia vulgaris,common mallow Malva sylvestris and prickly lettuce Lactuca serriola. The ecological value of the ephemeral/short perennial individual plants is very limited, but they again could provide a food resource for some insect groups.

Habitats Beyond the Site Boundary

J3.6 Buildings / Hard standing

11.98 The site was flanked by urban development to the north, east and west.

G2 Running water

11.99 The River Wey bordered the south-eastern boundary of the proposed development site.

F2.1 Marginal vegetation

11.100 Common nettle and greater willowherb occurred along the eastern bank of the river beyond the site boundary. The narrow strip of marginal vegetation on the western bank became overgrown with scrub to the south.

A2.1 Dense/continuous scrub

11.101 Areas of dense scrub dominated by hawthorn Crataegus monogyna occurred southwest of the site along the western bank of the River Wey. A row of dense scrub containing elder and common nettle with occasional tall crack willow stands occurred east of the river bordering a strip of broad-leaved woodland.

J1.2 Amenity grassland

11.102 Amenity grassland bordered the eastern bank of the River Wey. The grassland was mostly mown short but left longer across the flood bank.



A3.1 Broadleaved scattered trees

11.103 Sycamore occurred on the western bank of the River Wey. Coppiced mature crack willows and young planted ash, sycamore and hornbeam occurred on amenity grassland east of the river.

A1.1.1 Semi-natural broad-leaved woodland

11.104 A strip of semi-natural broad-leaved woodland occurred to the southeast of the site beyond the river. The woodland was dominated by hazel Corylus avellana with occasional pin oak Quercus palustris, ash and sycamore. A dry ditch ran parallel to the northern boundary of the woodland.

Protected and Otherwise Notable Species

11.105 Information gathered from the desk study and ecological surveys form the basis of the baseline description of protected and notable species on site and in the surrounding area. The following paragraphs briefly describe the species present. All protected species records collated during the desk study are shown in Figure 11.3.

Flora

11.106 The desk study identified tower mustard Arabis glabra as occurring 1km from the site boundary. Tower mustard is a UK BAP Priority Species. Yellow vetchling Lathyrus aphaca and green-flowered helleborine Epipactis phyllanthes, both Nationally Scarce species, occur in the same area.

Amphibians

11.107 The desk study identified records of great crested newt Triturus cristatus approximately 0.5km from the site. No areas of water suitable for the species were seen in the Phase I Habitat Survey of the site. Common frog Rana temporaria, common toad Bufo bufo and smooth newt Triturus vulgaris were also identified as present in the study area.

Reptiles

11.108 Grass snake and slow-worm were identified in the desk study as occurring approximately 0.75km and 1km from the site respectively. No suitable habitats for the species were noted during the Phase I Habitat Survey.

Bats

11.109 The desk study identified records of the following bat species in the vicinity of the site: brown long-eared Plecotus auritus, soprano pipistrelle Pipistrellus pygmaeus, common pipistrelle Pipistrellus pipistrellus, Daubenton’s Myotis daubentonii and Natterer’s Myotis nattereri.



11.110 The majority of the buildings on site were not considered to provide suitable roost sites, with few access points identified. The buildings considered most suitable were surveyed with the loft space accessed and checked for evidence of bats. No bats or signs of bat activity were found in the surveys undertaken in 2003 and 2007. The evening activity surveys carried out in 2003 recorded only individual 45kHz pipistrelles (Pipistrellus pipistrellus), with the majority of activity recorded along the River Wey. The only real foraging opportunities on site exist along the river and small areas of broad-leaved woodland in the southeast of the site (see Appendix 11.5 for full survey report).

Badgers

11.111 The results of the desk study show badgers Meles meles to be active within the surrounding area. Evidence of badgers or their setts were recorded immediately off site, no badger setts were recorded within the development site boundary. The badger sett is currently severed from the existing site due to the A31 acting as a physical barrier. Due to restricted access, not all residential gardens within the site could be checked for evidence of badgers but no obvious access points or signs of badger activity were identified around the gardens. No signs of badgers were noted in the woodland to the west of the river. The woodland to the east of the river beyond the site boundary has potential for badgers. Foxes Vulpes vulpes are active within the site with a number of lying up areas and runs identified.

Water voles

11.112 The results of the desk study show that water voles are present along the River Wey. The Environment Agency hold historic records for water voles in the Farnham area but recent surveys indicated they were no longer present. No evidence of water voles was recorded during the surveys carried out in 2003 and 2006. A survey of the river between the bridges at South Street and Farnham Sport’s Centre at Dogflud Way in 2006 identified evidence of water voles although no recent activity was evident (see Appendix 11.3 for full survey report). The survey identified one likely burrow, two defunct collapsed burrows and old feeding remains. At time of surveying the intact burrow was flooded, lying just below the water level. Poaching and erosion of the banks have made many areas unsuitable for burrowing and the voles are likely to favour upstream sites where more suitable habitat exists. However the river provides food resources, shelter and some burrowing opportunities for water voles and is likely to be important as a corridor for their dispersal.

Hazel dormouse

11.113 One record of the hazel dormouse was identified in the desk study, approximately 1.5km from the proposed development site. The lack of woodland/hedgerow features and connectivity on site makes it unsuitable for hazel dormice. The woodland beyond the site boundary east of the River Wey has some potential for dormice. It consists predominantly of hazel, a favoured food source.



Birds

11.114 The desk study identified the following protected and notable bird species in the vicinity of the site:

Kingfisher Alcedo atthis Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula Redwing Turdus iliacus Song thrush Turdus philomelos Sand martin Riparia riparia Willow warbler Phylloscopus trochilus Goldcrest Regulus regulus Green woodpecker Picus viridis Stonechat Saxicola torquata

11.115 Only a limited number of common bird species were seen or heard on or adjacent to the site during surveying. These included the following species noted in 2003:

Collared dove Streptopelia decaocto Wren Troglodytes troglodytes Blackbird Turdus merula Magpie Pica pica Starling Sturnus vulgaris Feral pigeon Columba livia domest. Robin Erithacus rubecula House sparrow Passer domesticus

11.116 Additional species recorded in 2006 include chaffinch Fringilla coelebs and mallard Anas platyrhynchus.

11.117 The presence of black redstarts Phoenicurus ochruros was a consideration since during redevelopment the site may potentially provide suitable breeding habitat, for example in the form of rubble piles. However no records of black redstarts were identified in the desk study and during the Phase 1 Habitat Survey, no suitable habitat was noted on site.

Otters

11.118 No evidence of otters was recorded on or adjacent to the site during surveys carried out in 2003 and 2006. A full survey report can be found at Appendix 11.4. Otters are known to the use the River Wey and the desk study identified two records in the vicinity of the site. Environment Agency data showed otter activity recorded in the Farnham area in 2003 but further surveys carried out in 2006 found no signs of activity. Although it would appear that the stretch of river passing through the proposed development site is not heavily used by otters, it may still be an important corridor for their dispersal.

Invertebrates

11.119 The desk study identified records of the stag beetle Lucanus cervus and silver-studded blue butterfly Plebejus argus, both of which are protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and are UK BAP Priority Species. As the silver-studded blue is found mainly on heathland, feeding predominantly on heather and gorse, it is unlikely to be present on the site. Although the site has limited potential for terrestrial invertebrate fauna, the small areas of broad-leaved woodland could provide deadwood habitat for stag beetles.

11.120 The nationally scarce white-legged damselfly Platycnemis pennipes has been recorded in the vicinity of the site. The northern branch of the River Wey contains the only county site for this damselfly. During field surveys in 2006 beautiful demoiselle Calopteryx virgo and banded demoiselle Calopteryx splendens were noted in the marginal vegetation along the eastern bank of the River Wey.



Valued Ecological Receptors (VER)

11.121 The Valued Ecological Receptors (VER) comprising valued sites, habitats and species which could be affected by the project are identified in Table 11.3 below:

Table 11.3: Valued Ecological Receptors (VER)

Valued Ecological Receptor (VER) Status

Statutory Sites

Thames Basins Heaths (VER1) SPA

Bourne and Long Valley (VER2) SSSI

Non-Statutory Sites

River Wey- North SNCI (VER3) SNCI

Snayleslynch- River Wey SNCI (VER4) SNCI

Farnham Park SNCI (VER5) SNCI

Bricksbury Hill and Hungry Hill SNCI (VER6) SNCI

Monk’s Walk SNCI (VER7) SNCI

Copse West of Claypit Wood SNCI (VER8) SNCI

Pond Wood (VER9) Ancient Woodland Inventory

Quarry Wood (VER10) Ancient Woodland Inventory

Claypit Wood (VER11) Ancient Woodland Inventory

Monks Wood (VER12) Ancient Woodland Inventory

Black Lane Wood (VER13) Ancient Woodland Inventory

Moor Park Wood (VER14) Ancient Woodland Inventory

Habitats

Buildings/Hardstanding (VER15) None

Amenity grassland (VER16) Urban- LBAP Broad Habitat

Semi-natural broad-leaved woodland (VER17)

Broadleaved, Mixed and Yew Woodland- Surrey BAP Broad Habitat

Running water (VER18) Chalk Rivers- UK BAP Priority Habitat

Rivers and Streams- LBAP Broad Habitat

Marginal vegetation (VER19) None

Broadleaved scattered trees (VER20) None




Dense/continuous scrub (VER21) None

Scattered scrub (VER22) None

Earth bank (VER23) None

Species poor intact hedgerows (VER24) None

Ephemeral/Short perennial (VER25) None

Introduced scrub (VER26) None

Species

Bats (VER27):

Natterer’s Habitat Regulations (Brown long-eared, common pipistrelle, Natterer’s)

Brown long-eared WCA Schedule 5

Common pipistrelle UK BAP Priority Species (Soprano pipistrelle and Brown long-eared)

Soprano pipistrelle

Daubenton’s

Badger (VER28) Protection of Badgers Act 1992

Water Vole (VER29) WCA Schedule 5 (partial protection)

UK BAP Priority Species

European Otter (VER30)

Habitat Regulations Schedule 2

WCA Schedule 5


Hazel Dormouse (VER31)

Habitat Regulations Schedule 2

WCA Schedule 5


Kingfisher (VER32)

EC Birds Directive Annex 1

WCA Schedule 1

BCC Amber listed

Red List Birds (VER33):

House sparrow

Starling

BCC Red listed

WCA

Stag beetle (VER34) WCA Schedule 5





White-legged damselfly (VER35) Nationally notable

Key:

European Protected:Annex 1 – Listed in Annex 1 of the EC Birds Directive Bonn – Listed in appendix of the Bonn Convention Bern – Listed in appendix of the Bern Convention UK Protected:WCA – Listed in the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) Other designations:UK BAP – Listed as a Priority Species in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan LBAP – Listed in the Surrey Biodiversity Action Plan BCC Red - Listed as “red” on the Birds of Conservation Concern list BCC Amber – Listed as “amber” on the Birds of Conservation Concern list

Identification and Assessment of Effects

Mitigation Measures

11.122 The proposals for the development of the site are described in Chapter 2 of this Environmental Statement. This section refers to the measures to be taken to mitigate potential adverse effects on protected or otherwise notable species, and to ensure that the effects on designated sites and important habitats are reduced as far as practicable. These measures are summarised below.

11.123 As animal species are mobile it is possible that additional protected species to those identified above may occur on the site in the future as a result of in-migration in the period between undertaking the surveys and construction. If such species are found to occur, then additional mitigation may be required to satisfy the legal requirements of the species protection provisions of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), and/or the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c) Regulations 1994.

11.124 If no mitigation were used to protect the habitats and species on site, a number of impacts might occur. It should be noted however that different impacts would occur during the construction/demolition phase and during operational stages. The detailed design of the scheme will also affect the type and severity of impacts that occur.

Construction Effects

11.125 Potential impacts on nature conservation interests at the site would occur during the construction phase, which would include site preparation and demolition work. The development would require ground preparation, including the removal of vegetation. To avoid any impact on birds, vegetation clearance, including tree and scrub removal, will be carried out during the period September to February inclusive to avoid the bird-nesting season.



11.126 A proportion of the habitat on site will be lost during site preparation work. This will include the demolition of several existing buildings on site, some of which might provide habitat for bird or bat species. The buildings considered most suitable for bats were surveyed in 2003 and 2007 but no bats or signs of their activity were identified. Since bats and birds are very mobile and will occupy new roosts, buildings will be searched by an ecologist for both bats and nesting birds prior to demolition.

11.127 Contamination of areas of the site and adjacent habitat may occur through dust and other materials being transferred by the wind, through the soil or via water. Pollution risks are generally related to the construction period of the development but may also be ongoing, although to a lesser magnitude, throughout the operational phase. Specific risks would include spillages, poor storage or handling of contaminants and the possibility of contaminated run-off entering the River Wey. Such pollution could cause long-term damage to the productivity and diversity of the river. Certain compounds, such as heavy metals, may affect riparian fauna directly through lethal levels of toxicity and sub-lethal effects on reproduction and fitness, as well as indirectly through degradation and contamination of the food chain. Pollutants such as oil or petrol will reduce the waterproofing properties of animal’s fur, which will affect its ability to control its body temperature whilst swimming. Strict measures will therefore be taken to ensure no significant pollution of the river occurs as a result of the construction works and appropriate monitoring will be carried out to ensure effectiveness.

Operational Effects

11.128 Disturbance during the operational phase is usually related to issues such as increased public access and direct human disturbance. Since the proposed development is in an already busy urban setting, these impacts will not be significant. The wildlife onsite is likely already habituated to disturbance relating to human traffic.

11.129 The effects of lighting on plants and animals are difficult to assess, but it is thought that lighting can adversely affect invertebrates and disorientate birds and bats. As the site is already lit and is situated within a well-lit area, any effects are likely to insignificant. An appropriate lighting strategy should be implemented in line with the Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE) best practice guidance to minimise light spillage and pollution from the development.

Assessment of Likely Effects

11.130 The effects on the key nature conservation features identified in Table 11.3 are considered in turn below. Effects of the construction stage, including site clearance and demolition work, and the operational phase are considered separately.

11.131 Where potential negative impacts have been identified, means to mitigate those impacts are described below. The effectiveness of this mitigation is taken into account in the assessment of the significance of impacts.

11.132 The assessment of effects follows the methodology and significance criteria identified at paragraphs 11.19 to 11.45 above. The construction effects are essentially short-term whilst



operational effects are long-term. The likely duration of potential effects has been taken into account in the assessments presented below.

Designated Sites

Thames Basin Heaths SPA (VER1)

11.133 At its closest point, the proposed development would be approximately 2.5km from the SPA. There would thus be no direct effects on the designated site during construction or operation. No habitat on the proposed development site is suitable for use by the populations of the heathland bird species for which the SPA is designated.

11.134 An indirect operational effect of the development might be increased pressure on the designated site due to additional housing. This issue is addressed in detail in Waverley Borough Council’s Draft Mini Mitigation Plan for Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (2006) and Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area: Mitigation standards for residential development, English Nature (2006). The proposed development site falls within indicative Zone C (2-5 km from the SPA) and thus the mitigation standard of 8ha of (per 1000 population) Suitable Accessible Natural Green Spaces (SANGS) is required. Since the proposed development incorporates 239 apartments, based on a national average occupancy rate of 2.4 persons per unit, an increase in population of 574 may occur. In reality, the net population increase within zone C may be lower because: the development offers predominantly one and two bedroom apartments and the residents would be a mix of newcomers, translocation of existing private owners / local authority occupiers, and first time buyers currently living with parents in the area. However, for the purposes of this assessment an increase in ‘population’ of 573 people has been assumed. The relative mitigation standard would therefore be 4.6ha. Mitigation can take the form of new land or the enhancement of existing land. For Zone C this land should be a minimum of 12ha in size and located up to 2 km from the development or at least 20ha in size and located a maximum of 5 km from the development.

11.135 Waverley Borough Council proposes Farnham Park, a medieval deer park covering an area of 130ha, as suitable open space. It is well placed to provide mitigation for development in north Farnham. The nearest access point to the park is located only 250m from the development site and the council suggest the park can potentially absorb 7117 more visitors per year, which is equivalent to 57 hectares of mitigation. The park therefore offers more than adequate mitigation for the housing proposed.

Summary of effects on Thames Basin Heaths SPA

Value of feature: International Effects Magnitude: Significance Construction Neutral Neutral Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral



Information for Appropriate Assessment

11.136 Natural England has agreed an Interim Avoidance Strategy (IAS) with Waverley Borough Council for the SPA. This sets out improvements to a suite of accessible open spaces to make them more attractive to the public. These are termed Suitable Accessible Natural Green Spaces (SANGS). The changes to these open spaces will ensure that all additional housing applications which contribute towards these SANGS, in line with the Interim Strategy requirements, will avoid effects upon the SPA. This will continue to be the case until such time as the recreational capacity of these sites to perform their functions as SANGS is reached.

Bourley and Long Valley SSSI (VER2)

11.137 Bourley and Long Valley SSSI is a component of the Thames Basins Heaths SPA. As for the SPA, there would be no direct effects on the SSSI as a result of the proposed development and any increased pressure on the site from additional housing would be mitigated as described above.

Summary of effects on Bourley and Long Valley SSSI

Value of feature: National Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Neutral Neutral Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral

River Wey- North SNCI (VER3)

11.138 The proposed development incorporates an additional footbridge across the River Wey and creation of a terraced water meadow landscape north of the river to form floodwater storage and an outdoor amphitheatre. Prior to construction drainage requirements would be identified as water tables and drainage patterns may need to be controlled to limit damage to soils and/or vegetation during the construction phase.

11.139 Impacts to ecology on this site during construction would be mainly along and within the river corridor and therefore, depend on the detailed design and construction methodology of nearby construction like for example, the pedestrian footbridge. The riverbanks and marginal vegetation are an integral part of the river habitat and disturbance to or loss of these features should be kept to a minimum. Where necessary and appropriate, protective fencing and would be erected around riverbanks and marginal vegetation to be retained during construction. Such fencing would be maintained for as long as required to protect these features. The importance and sensitivity of this habitat and its associated species would be explained to site personnel before the start of works and at appropriate times during the progress of the works. Sensitive work methods would be employed in the vicinity of the river.

11.140 The proposed development would provide greatly improved public access to the riverfront and the provision of public amenity space adjacent to the river. This would result in increased human traffic and a likely increase in dogs utilising the area. Indirect operational effects of the



proposed development could therefore be further poaching of the banks and loss of marginal vegetation as well as disturbance to the river channel itself. Since the existing riverside walk is already heavily used, any additional effects are likely to be minor.

Summary of effects on River Wey- North SNCI

Value of feature: District Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse Operation Minor negative Slight adverse Overall Significance of Effects: Slight adverse

Snayleslynch- River Wey SNCI (VER4)

11.141 This site lies approximately 0.4km east of the development site and will not be directly affected by the proposed development. Measures taken to ensure no significant pollution of the River Wey- North SNCI will ensure no adverse impact on the Snayleslynch- River Wey SNCI.

Summary of effects on River Wey- North SNCI

Value of feature: District Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Neutral Neutral Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral

Farnham Park SNCI (VER5)

11.142 At its closest point, Farnham Park SNCI lies 0.25km north of the proposed development site. It will not be directly affected by the proposed development. Indirect effects may occur during operation as a result of the site being used as mitigation for increased recreational pressure on Thames Basin Heaths SPA as described in paragraph 11.130. Waverley Borough Council have identified the need for a full-time ranger based on site, improved visitor interpretation and enhanced access in order for the park to be used as mitigation and to ensure the increase in visitors does not adversely affect the site (Waverley Borough Council, 2006).

Summary of effects on Farnham Park SNCI

Value of feature: District Effects Level: Significance: Construction Neutral Neutral Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral

Bricksbury Hill and Hungry Hill SNCI (VER6), Monk’s Walk SNCI (VER7), Copse West of Claypit Wood SNCI (VER8), Pond Wood Ancient Woodland (VER9), Quarry Wood Ancient Woodland (VER10), Claypit Wood Ancient Woodland (VER11), Monks Wood Ancient Woodland (VER12), Black Lane Wood Ancient Woodland (VER13) and Moor Park Wood Ancient Woodland (VER14)



11.143 These sites are all located a minimum of 1.5km from the development site and would not be affected by the proposed development.

Summary of effects on Bricksbury Hill and Hungry Hill SNCI, Monk’s Walk SNCI, Copse West of Claypit Wood SNCI, Pond Wood, Quarry Wood, Claypit Wood, Monk’s Wood, Black Lane Wood and Moor Park Wood.

Value of feature: District Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Neutral Neutral Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral

Habitats

Buildings/hardstanding (VER15)

11.144 The site is dominated by buildings, mainly shops and associated car parking, which are of low ecological value but do provide bat roosting and bird nesting opportunities. These species are assessed later in this section. The development will involve demolition of several buildings on site, such as the Redgrave Theatre and vacant residential properties.

Summary of effects on buildings/hardstanding

Value of feature: Neighbourhood Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral

Amenity grassland (VER16)

11.145 There are a number of areas throughout the site used for amenity and recreational activities. Proposals for the site include re-development of some areas of amenity grassland and permanent loss of some of this habitat type. However the bulk of the grassland has been incorporated into the design of the new development and would be retained.

Summary of effects on amenity grassland

Value of feature: Neighbourhood Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Neutral Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral

Semi-natural broad-leaved woodland (VER17)

11.146 A small remnant area of woodland is present along the western bank of the River Wey. This would be retained in the proposed development. Care should be taken during construction of



the floodwater storage unit/amphitheatre on the adjacent amenity grassland to ensure disturbance of this habitat type is minimal.

Summary of effects on semi-natural broad-leaved woodland

Value of feature: Neighbourhood Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Neutral Neutral Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral

Running water (VER18)

11.147 Measures would be taken to ensure no significant pollution of the river occurs as a result of the construction works as explained in paragraph 11.127 above.

11.148 Impact on this habitat type during construction will depend on the detailed design of the bridge. Measures would be taken to minimise disturbance to the river corridor as described in paragraph 11.125 above.

11.149 The proposed development would provide greatly improved public access to the riverfront and the provision of public amenity space adjacent to the river. This would result in increased human traffic and a likely increase in dogs utilising the area. An indirect operational effect of the proposed development could therefore be disturbance to the river channel. Since the current riverside walk is already heavily used, any additional effect is likely to be minor.

Summary of effects on running water


Marginal vegetation (VER19)

11.150 Narrow strips of marginal vegetation were present along the banks of the River Wey. Although limited in size and species diversity, this vegetation is an integral feature of the river habitat and provides habitat and shelter for riparian fauna. Prior to construction, drainage requirements would be identified. Water tables and drainage patterns would then be controlled as necessary to limit damage to vegetation during the construction phase.

11.151 Impact on this habitat type during construction will depend on the detailed design of the proposed footbridge. Measures would be taken to minimise habitat loss and disturbance during construction. In so far as there could be deposition of dust on vegetation, this would only be likely to occur to any significant degree in the immediate vicinity of the construction works. Whilst deposit of dust on leaf surfaces can reduce rates of photosynthesis and can affect rates of gaseous exchange by blocking of stomata, any such effects would be localised and short-term.



11.152 Greatly improved public access to the riverfront may lead to further poaching of the riverbanks and loss of marginal vegetation during operation. However since the existing riverside walk is already heavily used, any additional effects are likely to be minor.

Summary of effects on marginal vegetation


Broadleaved scattered trees (VER20)

11.153 A number of trees have been planted within the site as part of the overall landscape proposals for the area. Although most of these have been incorporated into the new development and would be retained, some would be removed during the construction phase. Mature trees provide potential bird nesting habitat and bat roosting sites. As such, they should be examined by an ecologist for nesting birds and evidence of bat activity prior to removal.

11.154 As part of the development proposal, green areas (courtyard gardens) would be established with additional planting. Where appropriate, locally native tree species would be used. Once established these areas would replace those removed and should be managed to enhance the area for wildlife.

11.155 No impacts will occur on the retained trees during operation.

Summary of effects on broadleaved scattered trees

Value of feature: Neighbourhood Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse Operation Netural Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Slight adverse

Dense/continuous scrub (VER21)

11.156 A small area of dense scrub on amenity grassland northwest of the River Wey would be removed to make way for the floodwater storage unit and amphitheatre in the proposed development.

11.157 The limited size of this habitat type restricts its ecological value but it does offer potential habitat for nesting and foraging birds.

Summary of effects on dense/continuous scrub

Value of feature: Neighbourhood Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse



Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Slight adverse

Scattered scrub (VER22)

11.158 Areas of scattered scrub were limited and mostly occurred along the fencing of vacant residential properties towards the centre of the site. These will be removed in the proposed development to make way for new residential properties and amenities. Again, the limited size of this habitat type restricts its ecological value but it does offer potential habitat for nesting and foraging birds.

Summary of effects on scattered scrub

Value of feature: Neighbourhood Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Slight adverse

Earth bank (VER23)

11.159 A two-tier grassy bank on amenity grassland several metres east of the River Wey will be retained in the proposed development with the new footbridge across the river passing over the bank. The bank will not be affected during the construction or operational phase of development.

Summary of effects on Earth bank

Value of feature: Neighbourhood Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Neutral Neutral Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral

Intact hedge- Species-poor (VER24); Ephemeral/Short perennial (VER25); Introduced Shrub(VER26)

11.160 Intact species-poor hedgerows, ephemeral/short perennial and introduced shrub occurred scattered throughout the site. Much of these habitat types will be permanently removed or disturbed during the construction phase. They are all of minimal ecological value although species-poor hedgerows offer potential bird nesting and foraging habitat and as such should be removed outside the bird-nesting season.

11.161 An agreed method statement will be prepared to deal with the stands of Japanese knotweed so that the construction works will not contravene the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and to prevent any cross contamination of the site.



Summary of effects on intact species-poor hedgerows, ephemeral/short perennial and introduced shrub

Value of feature: Neighbourhood Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Slight adverse

Habitats beyond the site boundary

11.162 Due to the urban nature of the development site, access for construction work will not impact on any habitats beyond the site boundary. To the north, east and west the site is flanked by roads, namely East Street, Dogflud Way and South Street.

11.163 The only habitats beyond the site boundary with potential to be affected by the proposed development are the River Wey and the area of dense continuous scrub, scattered trees and semi-natural broad-leaved woodland to the southeast of the site. Measures will be taken to ensure the scrub and woodland are not disturbed during construction and access to the south-eastern aspect of the site. Measures taken to prevent pollution of the River Wey- North SNCI will ensure no adverse impact on the adjacent river corridor.

Species

Bats (VER27)

11.164 Bats such as brown long-eared, common pipistrelle, soprano pipistrelle, Natterer’s and Daubenton’s have been recorded foraging and commuting in the vicinity of the site. To date, no bats have been recorded roosting in the buildings or trees on site, but should bats be found during building demolition and tree felling, all works should halt immediately and a Natural England disturbance licence application sought.

11.165 Proposals for the site include areas of open space, ‘wildlife friendly’ balancing pond with additional garden planting, sedum roofs and roof gardens. Where appropriate locally native species will be used. If appropriately designed and managed, this could create flight paths, foraging habitat and enhance the area for bats.

11.166 Provisions of bat boxes on retained mature trees within the development are likely to provide additional roosting habitat for bats on site. The boxes will be positioned areas where bats have been recorded on site i.e. in unlit areas, positioned in mature trees along the River Wey corridor and woodland edge.

11.167 Artificial lighting can affect bat activity patterns and can deter them from their usual foraging areas. As the site is already lit and situated within a well-lit area, this impact will be insignificant. Lighting will only become an issue should significant additional artificial lighting be situated along the banks of the River Wey and the adjacent woodland. Surveys identified that most bat activity on site occurred along the river and lighting can be particularly harmful if situated along river corridors and near woodland edges. Measures will be taken to ensure stretches along the river are left unlit, lighting is directed to avoid light spillage, the height of lighting columns is limited and brightness is not excessive to requirement. These measures



will be applied to the construction phase should lighting be required for works, as well as to the operational phase.

Summary of effects on bats

Value of feature: International Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Slight adverse

Badger (VER28)

11.168 Badgers are known to be active in the area and a sett has been recorded immediately off site. However, no signs of badgers were found on site and no setts identified during the walkover surveys. Should the small areas of woodland in the southeast of the site and beyond the site boundary need to be fenced off during the construction period, this could lead to some disruption to badger’s access to foraging areas. Where only stock fencing is required, provision will be made for badgers to pass through the fence to access the woodland.

Summary of effects on badgers

Value of feature: National Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Neutral Neutral Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral

Water vole (VER29)

11.169 Water voles have been identified using the stretch of the River Wey between the bridges at South Street and Farnham Sports Centre, although no recent activity was noted. The proposed development will bridge an additional section of the watercourse to allow public access across the river. Although only defunct, collapsed burrows were identified in the area, the crossing point will need to be examined for water vole burrows prior to construction of the bridge to ensure no new burrows had been excavated since surveying. Should burrows be identified which will be affected by the proposed work, measures to exclude water voles from the relevant section of the watercourse will need to be taken. The methods for exclusion of water voles will be agreed with Natural England.

11.170 Impact on the riverbanks, and thus potential burrowing sites, during construction will depend on the detailed design of the bridge. Disturbance to the banks will be kept to a minimum; as best practice a buffer zone of at least 3 metres should be marked out from the bank face inland, which contractors are not allowed entering during the construction phase. Should any work be necessary closer to the banks, sensitive work methods should be employed. Loss of riverbank habitat available to water voles during construction will be kept to a minimum.



11.171 Since the proposed development will result in increased human traffic and a likely increase in dogs utilising the area, measures will need to be taken to ensure further poaching of the banks and loss of marginal vegetation, as well as disturbance to the river channel itself, does not occur during operation as this will adversely affect the habitat for water voles. Since the existing riverside walk is already heavily used, these effects are only likely to be minor. Within the proposed development there is potential to enhance water vole habitat through the restoration of degraded riverbanks.

Summary of effects on water vole

Value of feature: National Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse Operation Minor negative Slight adverse Overall Significance of Effects: Slight adverse

European otter (VER30)

11.172 Desk studies identified otters using the River Wey in the vicinity of the proposed development. Although no signs of otters were identified in a survey of the river between the bridges at South Street and Farnham Sports Centre, this does not necessarily preclude them from this stretch of river.

11.173 Disturbance caused by increases in people and traffic at the site during construction and operation will affect the behaviour of any otters using this stretch of river. Since the site is in a busy urban setting, any otters present are likely habituated to human traffic along the riverbanks and so the most significant impact will occur during the construction phase. Being inquisitive animals, otters may investigate the work site or conversely, they may be alarmed and divert from their normal paths to a more hazardous route to avoid the works. As a result there are many possible hazards that could be fatal to otters such as being hit by works vehicles or being caught in machinery. For this reason, personnel and equipment on the river banks and adjacent habitat should be limited and provisions made to ensure otters can pass along the river safely at all times.

Summary of effects on European otter

Value of feature: International Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Slight adverse of short-term duration

Hazel dormouse (VER31)

11.174 One dormouse record was identified in the desk study approximately 2 km from the development site. During field surveys only the area of broad-leaved woodland southeast of the site was identified as having potential for dormice. A continuous layer of scrub separates the woodland from the development and so long as these habitats are not disturbed during



construction, particularly when vehicular access is required to the southeastern aspect of the site, any dormice present should not be affected by the development.

Summary of effects on Hazel dormouse

Value of feature: International Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Neutral Neutral Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Neutral

Kingfisher (VER32)

11.175 Kingfishers have been recorded in the stretch of the River Wey just north of the development site. No kingfishers were seen during field surveys but there is some potential for them on site. The riverbanks offer nesting opportunities and abundant fish were noted in-channel, although there were few riverside perching opportunities. The existing trees on the riverbanks are to be retained.

11.176 Effects on the riverbank habitat will depend on the detailed design of the proposed footbridge but disturbance or loss of this habitat and marginal vegetation should be kept to a minimum. During construction some disturbance may occur to birds nesting close to the working area from noise and dust, although small birds of this nature are generally unperturbed by such activities.

Summary of effects on kingfisher

Value of feature: National Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Slight adverse for short-term duration

Red list birds (VER33)

11.177 Starlings and house sparrows were both recorded on site during field surveys in 2003, 2006 and 2007. Although most of the mature trees and hedgerows on site have been incorporated into the new development and will be retained, a few will be removed during the construction phase. Some disturbance may occur to species nesting in remaining vegetation close to the working areas from noise and dust, although small birds of this nature are generally unperturbed by such activities.

11.178 House sparrows, starlings and blue tits may also nest in some of the buildings on site. Should nesting birds be found in buildings prior to demolition, appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented. House sparrows readily nest in artificial nest boxes, which could be incorporated into the design of new builds or added to existing buildings to be retained. Provision of sparrow terraces on new buildings and bird boxes on retained mature trees within the development will provide replacement habitat for the species of birds currently utilising the site. The sedum roofs and roof gardens will also provide additional foraging and nesting habitat for birds.



Summary of effects on Red list birds

Value of feature: National Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Minor negative Slight adverse Operation Neutral Neutral Overall Significance of Effects: Slight adverse for short-term

duration

Invertebrates (VER34)

11.179 Stag beetles have been recorded in the vicinity of the proposed development. The small areas of broad-leaved woodland on site and to the southeast of the site could provide deadwood habitat for the species. So long as these woodlands are retained with only minimal disturbance and with effective strategies for deadwood management, stag beetles should not be affected by the proposed development.

11.180 The trees that will be felled as part of the development proposals will be utilised to create loggeries for stag beetles. The loggeries will be created within the retained woodland on site to create additional habitat for this species.

11.181 White-legged damselfly has been identified approximately 2km from the site. Although not known to occur on site, with two other species of damselfly recorded during field surveys, there is potential for the white-legged damselfly. The white-legged damselfly is a riverine species which favours unshaded areas with emergent and floating vegetation. To ensure the habitat remains viable for the damselfly, the aquatic vegetation must be retained with minimal disturbance.

Summary of effects on invertebrates

Value of feature: National Effects Magnitude: Significance: Construction Neutral Neutral Operation Positive Slight beneficial Overall Significance of Effects: Slight beneficial

Summary of Effects

11.182 Table 11.4 summarises the likely effects of the project during construction and operation.

Further Mitigation

11.183 Further mitigation will include a construction Ecological Management Plan, to promote the nature conservation interests of the land within the development site. This will be formulated with discussions and input from Natural England and the Surrey Wildlife Trust.

Cumulative Effects

11.184 A number of other developments are planned within the 2km study area. However, the effects of the project on ecology are not considered likely to significantly add to those of other



developments. In particular, effects arising from severance or fragmentation are unlikely given that the area surrounding the East Street project site is already highly urbanised.



References

Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (July 2006) Guidelines For Ecological

Impact Assessment – Final

Institute of Environmental Assessment (1995) Guidelines for Baseline Ecological Assessment.

Waverley Borough Council (2006) Draft Mini Mitigation Plan for Thames Basin Heaths Special

Protection Area.

English Nature (2006) Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area: Mitigation Standards for

Residential Development.

Waverley Borough Council (2002) Waverley Borough Council Local Plan

JNCC (1993). Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey. A Technique for Environmental Audit.

Stace C (1997) New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press.

UK BAP (2005). UK Biodiversity Action Plan. List of priority species: http://www.ukbap.org.uk

Surrey Biodiversity Action Plan (1999) http://www.ukbap.org.uk

The Highways Agency (2001) Design Manuel for Roads and Bridges

Crest Nicholson Regeneration Limited and Proposed Redevelopment: East Street, FarnhamSainsbury’s Supermarket Limited Environmental Statement

January 2008 RPS Planning & Development11-41

Table 11.4: Summary Impact Tables

Feature/VER Value Magnitude of effect(Construction)

Significance of effect(Construction)

Magnitude of effect(Operation)

Significance of effect(Operation)

DESIGNATED SITESThames Basin HeathsSPA (VER1)

International Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral

Bourley and LongValley SSSI (VER2)

National Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral

River Wey-North SNCI(VER3)

District Minor negative Slight adverse Minor negative Slight adverse

Snayleslynch-RiverWey SNCI (VER4)

District Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral

Farnham Park SNCI(VER5)


Other SNCIs andancient woodland1.5km fromdevelopment site -VER6, VER7, VER8,VER9, VER10, VER11,VER12, VER13,VER14


HABITATSBuildings andhardstanding (VER15)

Neighbourhood Minor negative Slight adverse Neutral Neutral

Amenity grassland(VER16)


Semi-naturalbroadleaved woodland(VER17)

Neighbourhood Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral

Running water - RiverWey (VER18)


Marginal vegetation(VER19)


Crest Nicholson Regeneration Limited and Proposed Redevelopment: East Street, FarnhamSainsbury’s Supermarket Limited Environmental Statement

January 2008 RPS Planning & Development11-42

Feature/VER Value Magnitude of effect(Construction)

Significance of effect(Construction)

Magnitude of effect(Operation)

Significance of effect(Operation)

Broadleaved scatteredtrees (VER20)


Dense/continuousscrub (VER21)


Scattered scrub(VER22)


Earth bank (VER23) Neighbourhood Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral

Intact hedge (VER24),Ephemeral/Shortperennial (VER25),Introduced shrub(VER26)


SPECIESBats (VER27) –assuming no lightingimpacts

International Minor negative Slight adverse Neutral Neutral

Badgers (VER28) National Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral

Water vole (VER29) National Minor negative Slight adverse Minor negative Slight adverse

European otter(VER30)

International Minor negative Slight adverse Neutral Neutral

Hazel dormouse(VER31)

National Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral

Kingfisher (VER32) National Minor negative Slight adverse Neutral Neutral

Red list birds (VER33) National Minor negative Slight adverse Neutral Neutral

Invertebrates National Neutral Neutral Positive Slight beneficial

Documents

11 Ecology and Nature Conservation - Waverley Council 11 … · January 2008 11-1 RPS Planning & Development 11 Ecology and Nature Conservation Introduction 11.1 This chapter assesses