24
11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

11

Capital Budgeting and Risk

©2006 Thomson/South-Western

Page 2: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

2

Introduction

This chapter looks at adjusting a project’s risk level when it has more or less than the firm’s average risk level.

Page 3: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

3

Risk Project risk

The risk that a project will perform below expectations

Some of the risk can be diversified away. Beta risk

Depends on the risk of the project relative to the market-portfolio

Beta risk cannot be diversified away. Capital asset pricing model (CAPM)

Used to estimate risk-adjusted discount rates for capital budgeting

Page 4: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

4

Information on Risk

The Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) http://www.sra.org/index.htm

Official journal of the SRA is Risk Analysis http://www.sra.org/journal.htm

Page 5: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

5

Adjusting for Total Project Risk NPV-Payback approach

Simulation approach

Sensitivity analysis

Scenario analysis

Risk-adjusted discount rate approach

Certainty equivalent approach

Page 6: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

6

NPV-Payback Approach

A project must have a positive NPV and a payback of less than a critical number of years to be acceptable.

Page 7: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

7

Simulation Approach

Estimate the probability distribution of each element which influences the CFs of a project.

ElementsNumber of units sold Market price

Unit production costs NINVUnit selling cost Project life

Cost of capital

Calculate the NPV using randomly chosen numerical values for the elements.

Repeat the process until a probability distribution of the NPV can be estimated.

Page 8: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

8

Page 9: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

9

Sensitivity Analysis

Systematically change relevant variables to measure influence on NPV/IRR

Sensitivity curves show the impact of changes in a variable on the project’s NPV

Electronic spreadsheets and financial modeling make sensitivity analysis easy to perform.

Examine the sensitivity of CF at this Web site:http://www.toolkit.cch.com/tools/tools.asp

Page 10: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

10

Scenario Analysis

Considers the impact of simultaneous changes in key variables on the desirability of an investment project

Estimate the expected NPV

Optimistic Pessimistic Most likely Estimate the Probability of each Compute the expected NPV Compute the standard deviation (SD) of

the NPV

Page 11: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

11

Page 12: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

12

Page 13: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

13

Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Approach An individual project is discounted at a

discount rate adjusted to the riskiness of the project instead of discounting all projects at one rate.

ka* = rf + risk premium

Calculate the NPV substituting ka* for k in

the formula.

Page 14: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

14

Page 15: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

15

Page 16: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

16

Certainty Equivalent Approach

Involves converting expected risky CFs to their certainty equivalents and then computing the NPV

The risk-free rate (rf) is used as the discount rate not the cost of capital (k).

Page 17: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

17

Certainty Equivalent Approach• The certainty equivalent factor is the ratio

of the certainty equivalent CF to the risky CF:

t

certain return

risky return=

Page 18: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

18

The Certainty-Equivalent NPV

• The certainty-equivalent NPV:

n

trf

t

11

αNCF0 t

tαNINVNPV

Page 19: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

19

All-Equity Case

The project’s risk-adjusted discount rate is found with the SML equation:

β)(*fme rrrk

f

Page 20: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

20

The Equity and Debt Case

Betas can be observed for firms in the same investment class as the proposed investment.

These betas can be used to estimate risk-adjusted discount rates.

A two-step process is used 1. Calculate an unleveraged beta

2. Calculate a new leveraged beta to reflect appropriate debt capacity

Page 21: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

21

Step 1: Calculate an Unleveraged Beta

Convert the observed, leveraged beta, l, into an unleveraged, or pure project beta, u.

)/)((11

ββ

EBTl

u

Page 22: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

22

Step 2: Calculate a New Leveraged Beta Calculate the new leveraged beta, l, for

the proposed capital structure of the new line of business

Glossary of terms http://www.contingencyanalysis.com/

EBT 11ββ ul

Page 23: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

23

Step 2: Continued

Calculating the required rate of return, ke, based on the new leveraged beta, l:

Calculate the risk-adjusted required return, ka

*, on the new line of business:

)equity( % )debt( % eιa kkk

*

β)(*fme rrrk

f

Page 24: 11 Capital Budgeting and Risk ©2006 Thomson/South-Western

24

Special Elements of Risk When Investing Abroad

Captive funds

Foreign government takes over assets

Exchange rate risk Risk of inflation

Uncertain tax rates