10 Week7

  • Upload
    car-alv

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    1/40

    Transport as a Tool for Urban DesignProblems, Better Processes, Best Practices

    Urban Transportation PlanningMIT Course 1.252j/11.380j

    Fall 2002

    Mikel Murga, MIT Research Associate

    October 11, 2001

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    2/40

    2

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Transport as a Tool for Urban Design

    ! Transport and Land Uses! Problems

    ! Solutions! Best Practices

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    3/40

    3

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Transport and Land Uses

    ! Let us design a new freeway! Present traffic on existing roads?! Design speed? Desired LOS? Budget?

    ! But! How many new dwellings will be built nearby?! How many office bldgs? Technology parks?

    ! How many parking places are needed?

    ! What size for the new shopping center?! ??

    ! From road builders to urban planners!

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    4/40

    4

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Transport and Land Uses

    ! Thanks to

    J.Kenworthy and F.Laube TheMillennium Cities.Data base forSustainableTransportsponsored by the

    UITP, we knowthat someparameters arevery critical

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    5/40

    5

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Urban Density is critical

    Source ISTP-UITP

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    6/406

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    The higher the density, the higher

    the percentage of sustainable modes

    U.S.A.

    Western Europe

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    7/407

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Job density is also a critical parameter

    As Joel Garreau says(The Edge Cities),when the presidentmoves to thesuburbs, he takes

    the office along

    Source ISTP-UITP

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    8/408

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Percentage of non-motorized trips

    correlated withdensity andmixed uses

    Source ISTP-UITP

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    9/409

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    The automobile will govern if

    Source ISTP-UITP

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    10/4010

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Economic efficiency

    Source ISTP-UITP

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    11/4011

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    The cost of a balanced system

    Economic sustainability

    U.S.A.

    Western Europe

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    12/4012

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    The high price of road fatalities

    U.S.A.

    Western Europe.

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    13/4013

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Problems

    ! Triggers:! Housing density

    ! Suburban job centers

    ! Segregation of land uses

    ! Parking availability and cost

    ! Results:! Unbalanced modal split! Increased economic, environmental and social

    costs

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    14/40

    14

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Better Processes

    ! Transport projects opportunities:! Development (macro):

    ! Strategic and long-term

    ! Examples like Curitiba, Toronto, Stockholm

    ! Self-containment vs dispersal

    ! Urban growth along axes through zoning and land-use incentives

    ! Rehabilitation (micro):! Tactical, short term but also effective

    ! In-fill development vs new demand management

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    15/40

    15

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Better Processes

    ! Development (macro):!

    Curitiba as an example

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    16/40

    16

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Better Processes

    ! Rehabilitation (micro):! It can be implemented rather quickly

    ! Local actions spilling over the metropolitan scale

    ! Zrichs per capita transit trips above Curitibas

    ! Any transport project however minor canbe approached as an improvementopportunity, for instance:! Improving a traffic intersection and

    ! The excuse of a new Light Rail

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    17/40

    17

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    A traffic intersection

    Town of Amorebieta, Basque Country, Spain

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    18/40

    18

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Again, nothing like simulation

    !Although traffic analyses per se will not

    stop traffic growth

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    19/40

    19

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    A traffic intersection

    Espacios existentes

    Espacios peatonales ganados ( 1.600 M2 )

    ESPACIOS PEATONALES

    Espacios existentes

    Espacios peatonales ganados ( 1.600 M2 )

    ESPACIOS PEATONALES

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    20/40

    20

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Transit

    Opportunity forurban

    rehabilitation

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    21/40

    21

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    The power of a LRT project

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    22/40

    22

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Strasbourg

    New public spaces around the LRT

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    23/40

    23

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Zrich

    A true success story, thanks to full priority, strict

    parking policies and pedestrian schemes

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    24/40

    24

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    The power of a LRT project

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    25/40

    25

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    The power of a LRT project

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    26/40

    26

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    The power of a LRT project

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    27/40

    27

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Or simply just closing off a street

    Courtesy of Jan Gehl

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    28/40

    28

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    or removing some parking spots

    Courtesy of Jan Gehl

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    29/40

    29

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    The benefits of a few extra turns for the cars

    City Hall in Copenhagen

    Courtesy of Jan Gehl

    U b T i Pl i F ll 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    30/40

    30

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Transport Solutions

    ! Car Parking:

    ! Critical for modal split! To be seen in a wider context than just on-

    site provision! Complementary measures (pedestrian

    improvements, transit) a must

    ! On-site parking to distinguish betweenshoppers and commuters

    U b T t ti Pl i F ll 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    31/40

    31

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Transport Solutions

    ! Park-Ride facilities:

    !Visible, well signed and secure!Again to be seen in a larger context

    ! It should not preclude high-densitydevelopment near rail stations

    ! Price should be lower than downtown

    ! Shuttle service of prime quality: frequentservice, priority to reach downtown fasterthan by car (similar to an airport car rental shuttle)

    U b T t ti Pl i F ll 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    32/40

    32

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Transport Solutions

    ! Traffic Management:

    ! Traffic Calming a first step:! It fosters more convivial public spaces

    ! It triggers a new relationship betweenpedestrians and cars

    ! It facilitates biking

    !

    Other steps:! To divert through traffic

    ! Priority for bus or LRT service

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    33/40

    33

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Transport Solutions

    ! Pedestrians and

    Cyclists:! O-D pathing

    ! Road crossings

    ! Street furniture! Traffic calming

    !

    Balanced activitiesthroughout the day

    ! Public activities

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    34/40

    34

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Best Practices

    ! The Netherlands ABC location policy:! Locations:

    !A: main transit hub few parking - downtown

    ! B: district center or small town bus junction

    ! C: Not served by transit!Activities:

    !A: People intensive land uses

    ! B: Commercial and service activities with lowturnout (e.g..: car sales, furniture dealers)

    ! C: Goods intensive uses

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    35/40

    35

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Best practices

    ! West Midlands Regional Planning Guidance:

    ! Development within existing urban fabric! Maximize re-use of vacant and derelict sites

    ! Maximize use of existing infrastructure

    ! Strong support for public transport! Measures to control car congestion in town centers

    ! Coordination of strategic parking requirements

    ! Strong support for pedestrian and cyclists facilities

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    36/40

    36

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Best practices

    ! The priorities of the City of York Council:

    ! Pedestrians! People with disabilities

    ! Cyclists

    ! Public Transport passengers! Commercial and business vehicles

    ! Car-borne shoppers

    ! Coach-borne visitors

    ! Car-borne long-stay commuters

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    37/40

    37

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Best practices

    ! The resulting measures in the City of York:

    ! Strict parking policy! 5 park-and-ride sites

    ! Reallocation of road space among buses, cyclists

    and pedestrians! Traffic calming measures: 30 mph on major radials

    and 20 mph, elsewhere

    ! Safe and continuous cycle network! Implementation of a pedestrian route network

    throughout the city

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    38/40

    38

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Best Practices

    ! Global Vision, Local Action

    ! Dont let the global vision rob you fromopportunities for local change

    ! Local change, however limited, is important:! We need early winners to jumpstart a new process

    ! Small changes may become showcases

    !

    Dont forget we need a new model! To start a process more effective

    than relying only on end-state planning

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    39/40

    39

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    Upon starting a process, remember Jane JacobsSystems of Survival

    ! Commercial Syndrome! Shun force

    ! Come to voluntary agreements! Be honest

    ! Collaborate easily with strangers andaliens

    ! Compete! Respect contracts

    ! Use initiative and enterprise

    ! Be open to inventiveness and novelty

    ! Be efficient! Promote comfort and convenience

    ! Dissent for the sake of the task

    ! Invest for productive purposes

    ! Be industrious! Be thrifty

    ! Be optimistic

    ! Guardian Syndrome! Shun trading

    ! Exert prowess! Be obedient and disciplined

    ! Adhere to tradition

    ! Respect hierarchy

    ! Be loyal! Take vengeance

    ! Deceive for the sake of the task

    ! Make rich use of leisure

    ! Be ostentatious! Dispense largesse

    ! Be exclusive

    ! Show fortitude

    ! Be fatalistic! Treasure honor

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

  • 7/30/2019 10 Week7

    40/40

    Urban Transportation Planning Fall 2002

    Day 6

    A Closing Thought

    Do we have to resign ourselves to the

    role of the frog1? Or, can we act now?1 See MITs Peter Senge The Fifth Discipline