2
 Paul Mortimer-Lee 8 August 2011 Desknote www.GlobalMarkets.bnpparibas.com 10 Reasons the US Downgrade Matters There are lots of reasons to expect a limited impact on Treasuries of the S&P downgrade of the US from AAA to AA+ with a negative outlook, including the fact that it was widely anticipated (see ). But it clearly does matter (otherwise Treasury and the White House would not have spent so much effort commenting and criticising S&P). 1) We don’t need more bad news and uncertainty in current markets. The downgrade raises a whole slew of questions where market participants feel unsure of the answers. Uncertainty has risen. When summer markets are thin and psychology is fragile, another uncertainty is not welcome. 2) There will be a range of follow-on downgrades, S&P said in its note on Friday: “On Monday, we will issue separate releases concerning affected ratings in the funds, government-related entities, financial institutions, insurance, public finance, and structured finance sectors.” For example, fifteen US states are currently AAA and it is fair to ask whether they can rank above the US. 3) US Treasuries play an important role in financial markets. While we do not expect a knee-jerk reaction in Treasury yields, longer-term we reckon the downgrade could add 25bp to 10-year Treasury yields which is bound to push up other rates. When the risk-free asset is no longer risk-free, it not only questions what economic participants had taken for granted but also raises many questions about other assets. 4) Ratings are in part relative. US Treasuries bei ng downgraded will put the spotlight on ot her AAAs. In this regard, markets and economic agents may ignore the fact that a lack of political will to implement fiscal consolidation in the US was cited as the main reason for the downgrade, and may ignore this when pricing other debt. 5) Responses by China in particular illustrate that concern over the US debt trajectory is serious. China’s Dagong Global Credit Rating. Co. last week cut the US from A+ to A with a negative outlook. China’s Xinhua news agency said China has "every right now to demand the United States address its structural debt problems and ensure the safety of China's dollar assets. International supervision over the issue of US dollars should be introduced and a new, stable and secured global reserve currency may also be an option to avert a catastrophe caused by any single country." Anything that increases Chinese concerns over holding Treasuries should be a concern to every other holder of Treasuries. 6) The USD is the world’s premier reserve currency. The downgrade is symbolic of the reducing importance generally of the West in the global economy and is a symptom of a wider malaise and relative decline. Worries about US fiscal sustainability and political willingness to take hard choices cannot be good for global currency and financial market stability. 7) We’ve crossed the Rubicon. The next sovereign downgrade will be easier. S&P’s long-run outlook on the US is negative. The upside scenario for S&P is “likely to slow the deterioration of the government's debt dynamics, the long-term rating could stabilize at 'AA+'.” That does not look like much of an upside. 8) The downgrade gives more brickbats for US politicians to throw at each other, without necessarily improving the chances of an agreed path towards sustainable public finances. We hope this focuses the minds of the politicians on the bipartisan Committee seeking to agree on the composition of USD 1.5trn of budget savings over 10 years. But markets fear it may polarise views, not bring them together. 9) The downgrade cannot be good for US growth. It will increase borrowing costs, for example for state and local governments and for a whole range of private sector institutions. It increases uncertainty and therefore will act as a deterrent to investment and hiring. It will tend to slow an economy that is already slow. It will lower the private sector’s belief in the ability of the state to stabilise the economy and markets. 10) The downgrade reflects legitimate concerns. First, about the process of agreeing to budgetary savings in the US and second about the massive adjustment the US faces in putting its primary deficit onto a sustainable footing (see http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fm/2011/01/pdf/fm1101.pdf .) While markets have concentrated on eurozone fiscal dynamics, for the eurozone as a whole the deficit position is far more favourable than in the US (though there is a big problem about dispersion). The recently agreed package to secure an extension of the debt ceiling is too small to achieve a sustainable fiscal balance and US politicians likely will not take the further needed steps(on top of the too-small savings agreed in principle so far) to make the budget sustainable until 2013 at the earliest.

10 Reasons the US Downgrade Matters

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/6/2019 10 Reasons the US Downgrade Matters

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/10-reasons-the-us-downgrade-matters 1/2

 

Paul Mortimer-Lee 8 August 2011

Desknote www.GlobalMarkets.bnpparibas.com 

10 Reasons the US Downgrade Matters

There are lots of reasons to expect a limited impact on Treasuries of the S&P downgrade of the US from AAA to

AA+ with a negative outlook, including the fact that it was widely anticipated (see ). But it clearly does matter (otherwise Treasury and the White House would not have spent so much effort commenting and criticising S&P).

1) We don’t need more bad news and uncertainty in current markets. The downgrade raises a whole slew of questions where market participants feel unsure of the answers. Uncertainty has risen. When summer marketsare thin and psychology is fragile, another uncertainty is not welcome.

2) There will be a range of follow-on downgrades, S&P said in its note on Friday: “On Monday, we will issueseparate releases concerning affected ratings in the funds, government-related entities, financial institutions,insurance, public finance, and structured finance sectors.” For example, fifteen US states are currently AAAand it is fair to ask whether they can rank above the US.

3) US Treasuries play an important role in financial markets. While we do not expect a knee-jerk reaction inTreasury yields, longer-term we reckon the downgrade could add 25bp to 10-year Treasury yields which isbound to push up other rates. When the risk-free asset is no longer risk-free, it not only questions whateconomic participants had taken for granted but also raises many questions about other assets.

4) Ratings are in part relative. US Treasuries being downgraded will put the spotlight on other AAAs. In thisregard, markets and economic agents may ignore the fact that a lack of political will to implement fiscalconsolidation in the US was cited as the main reason for the downgrade, and may ignore this when pricingother debt.

5) Responses by China in particular illustrate that concern over the US debt trajectory is serious. China’s DagongGlobal Credit Rating. Co. last week cut the US from A+ to A with a negative outlook. China’s Xinhua newsagency said China has "every right now to demand the United States address its structural debt problems andensure the safety of China's dollar assets. International supervision over the issue of US dollars should beintroduced and a new, stable and secured global reserve currency may also be an option to avert a

catastrophe caused by any single country." Anything that increases Chinese concerns over holding Treasuriesshould be a concern to every other holder of Treasuries.

6) The USD is the world’s premier reserve currency. The downgrade is symbolic of the reducing importancegenerally of the West in the global economy and is a symptom of a wider malaise and relative decline. Worriesabout US fiscal sustainability and political willingness to take hard choices cannot be good for global currencyand financial market stability.

7) We’ve crossed the Rubicon. The next sovereign downgrade will be easier. S&P’s long-run outlook on the US isnegative. The upside scenario for S&P is “likely to slow the deterioration of the government's debt dynamics,the long-term rating could stabilize at 'AA+'.” That does not look like much of an upside.

8) The downgrade gives more brickbats for US politicians to throw at each other, without necessarily improvingthe chances of an agreed path towards sustainable public finances. We hope this focuses the minds of thepoliticians on the bipartisan Committee seeking to agree on the composition of USD 1.5trn of budget savings

over 10 years. But markets fear it may polarise views, not bring them together.9) The downgrade cannot be good for US growth. It will increase borrowing costs, for example for state and local

governments and for a whole range of private sector institutions. It increases uncertainty and therefore will actas a deterrent to investment and hiring. It will tend to slow an economy that is already slow. It will lower theprivate sector’s belief in the ability of the state to stabilise the economy and markets.

10) The downgrade reflects legitimate concerns. First, about the process of agreeing to budgetary savings in theUS and second about the massive adjustment the US faces in putting its primary deficit onto a sustainablefooting (see http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fm/2011/01/pdf/fm1101.pdf .) While markets have concentratedon eurozone fiscal dynamics, for the eurozone as a whole the deficit position is far more favourable than in theUS (though there is a big problem about dispersion). The recently agreed package to secure an extension of the debt ceiling is too small to achieve a sustainable fiscal balance and US politicians likely will not take thefurther needed steps(on top of the too-small savings agreed in principle so far) to make the budget sustainableuntil 2013 at the earliest.

8/6/2019 10 Reasons the US Downgrade Matters

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/10-reasons-the-us-downgrade-matters 2/2

 

RESEARCH DISCLAIMERS: 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES: Please see important disclosures in the text of this report.

The information and opinions contained in this report have been obtained from, or are based on, public sources believed to bereliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information is accurate, complete or up to dateand it should not be relied upon as such. This report does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or other investment. Information and opinions contained in the report are published for the assistance of recipients, but are not tobe relied upon as authoritative or taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by any recipient, are subject to changewithout notice and not intended to provide the sole basis of any evaluation of the instruments discussed herein. Any reference topast performance should not be taken as an indication of future performance. To the fullest extent permitted by law, no BNPParibas group company accepts any liability whatsoever (including in negligence) for any direct or consequential loss arisingfrom any use of or reliance on material contained in this report. All estimates and opinions included in this report are made as of the date of this report. Unless otherwise indicated in this report there is no intention to update this report. BNP Paribas SA andits affiliates (collectively “BNP Paribas”) may make a market in, or may, as principal or agent, buy or sell securities of any issuer or person mentioned in this report or derivatives thereon. BNP Paribas may have a financial interest in any issuer or personmentioned in this report, including a long or short position in their securities and/or options, futures or other derivativeinstruments based thereon, or vice versa. BNP Paribas, including its officers and employees may serve or have served as anofficer, director or in an advisory capacity for any person mentioned in this report. BNP Paribas may, from time to time, solicit,perform or have performed investment banking, underwriting or other services (including acting as adviser, manager,underwriter or lender) within the last 12 months for any person referred to in this report. BNP Paribas may be a party to anagreement with any person relating to the production of this report. BNP Paribas, may to the extent permitted by law, haveacted upon or used the information contained herein, or the research or analysis on which it was based, before its publication.BNP Paribas may receive or intend to seek compensation for investment banking services in the next three months from or inrelation to any person mentioned in this report. Any person mentioned in this report may have been provided with sections of this report prior to its publication in order to verify its factual accuracy.

BNP Paribas is incorporated in France with limited liability. Registered Office 16 Boulevard des Italiens, 75009 Paris. This reportwas produced by a BNP Paribas group company. This report is for the use of intended recipients and may not be reproduced (inwhole or in part) or delivered or transmitted to any other person without the prior written consent of BNP Paribas. By acceptingthis document you agree to be bound by the foregoing limitations.

Certain countries within the European Economic Area:

This report is solely prepared for professional clients. It is not intended for retail clients and should not be passed on to any such

persons.

This report has been approved for publication in the United Kingdom by BNP Paribas London Branch. BNP Paribas LondonBranch is authorised and supervised by the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel and authorised and subject to limited regulation bythe Financial Services Authority. Details of the extent of our authorisation and regulation by the Financial Services Authority areavailable from us on request.

This report has been approved for publication in France by BNP Paribas, a credit institution licensed as an investment servicesprovider by the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel whose head office is 16, Boulevard des Italiens 75009 Paris, France.

This report is being distributed in Germany either by BNP Paribas London Branch or by BNP Paribas Niederlassung Frankfurtam Main, regulated by the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin).

United States: This report is being distributed to US persons by BNP Paribas Securities Corp., or by a subsidiary or affiliate of BNP Paribas that is not registered as a US broker-dealer to US major institutional investors only. BNP Paribas Securities Corp.,a subsidiary of BNP Paribas, is a broker-dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and a member of the

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and other principal exchanges. BNP Paribas Securities Corp. accepts responsibility for the content of a report prepared by another non-US affiliate only when distributed to US persons by BNP Paribas SecuritiesCorp.

Japan: This report is being distributed to Japanese based firms by BNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limited or by a subsidiary or affiliate of BNP Paribas not registered as a financial instruments firm in Japan, to certain financial institutions defined by article17-3, item 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law Enforcement Order. BNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limited is afinancial instruments firm registered according to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan and a member of theJapan Securities Dealers Association and the  Financial Futures Association of Japan. BNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limitedaccepts responsibility for the content of a report prepared by another non-Japan affiliate only when distributed to Japanesebased firms by BNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limited. Some of the foreign securities stated on this report are not disclosedaccording to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan. 

Hong Kong: This report is being distributed in Hong Kong by BNP Paribas Hong Kong Branch, a branch of BNP Paribas whosehead office is in Paris, France. BNP Paribas Hong Kong Branch is regulated as a Registered Institution by Hong Kong Monetar yAuthority for the conduct of Advising on Securities [Regulated Activity Type 4] under the Securities and Futures Ordinance.

 © BNP Paribas (2011). All rights reserved.