Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
STARCH SYNTHASE 4 Domain Functions 1
2
Corresponding Author: 3
Samuel C Zeeman 4
Institute of Molecular Plant Biology 5
Department of Biology 6
ETH Zurich 7
CH-8092 Zurich 8
Switzerland. 9
Email: [email protected] 10
Telephone: +41 44 632 8275 11
12
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on November 13, 2017, as DOI:10.1104/pp.17.01008
Copyright 2017 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
Distinct Functions of STARCH SYNTHASE 4 Domains in Starch Granule 13
Formation1 14
Kuan-Jen Lu2, Barbara Pfister, Camilla Jenny, Simona Eicke, and Samuel C. Zeeman* 15
Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland. 16
ORCID IDs: 0000-0001-5401-7500 (K.-J.L.); 0000-0002-4183-9625 (B.P.); 0000-0003- 17
4180-2440 (S.E.); 0000-0002-2791-0915 (S.C.Z) 18
One-sentence summary: In Arabidopsis leaves, the catalytic C-terminal region of 19
STARCH SYNTHASE 4 promotes starch granule initiation while its non-catalytic N-20
terminal region determines starch granules morphology. 21
1This work was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 31003A– 22
153144/1 to S.C.Z.) and by ETH Zurich. 23
2Present address: Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. 24
*Address correspondence to: [email protected] 25
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in 26
this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors 27
(www.plantphysiol.org) is: Samuel C Zeeman ([email protected]). 28
KL and SCZ conceived and designed the experiments. KL, BP, CJ and SE performed the 29
experiments. KL, BP, and SCZ wrote the paper. All authors analysed the results and 30
approved the final version of the manuscript 31
32
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
SUMMARY 33
The formation of normal starch granules in Arabidopsis leaf chloroplasts requires 34
STARCH SYNTHASE 4 (SS4). In plants lacking SS4, chloroplasts typically produce 35
only one round granule rather than multiple lenticular granules. The mechanisms by 36
which SS4 determines granule number and morphology are not understood. The N-37
terminal region of SS4 is unique among SS isoforms and contains several long coiled-coil 38
motifs, typically implicated in protein-protein interactions. The C-terminal region 39
contains the catalytic glucosyltransferase domains, which are widely conserved in plant 40
SS and bacterial glycogen synthase (GS) isoforms. We investigated the specific roles of 41
the N- and C- terminal regions of SS4 by expressing truncated versions of SS4 and a 42
fusion between the N-terminal region of SS4 and GS in the Arabidopsis ss4 mutant. 43
Expression of the N-terminal region of SS4 alone did not alter the ss4 mutant phenotype. 44
Expression of the C-terminal region of SS4 alone increased granule initiation, but did not 45
rescue their aberrant round morphology. Expression of a self-priming GS from 46
Agrobacterium tumefaciens also increased the number of round granules. Remarkably, 47
fusion of the N-terminal region of SS4 to A. tumefaciens GS restored the development of 48
wild-type-like lenticular starch granules. Interestingly, the N-terminal region of SS4 alone 49
or when fused to GS conferred a patchy sub-chloroplastic localization similar to that of 50
the full-length SS4 protein. Considered together, these data suggest that, while the 51
glucosyltransferase activity of SS4 is important for granule initiation, the N-terminal part 52
of SS4 serves to establish the correct granule morphology by properly localizing this 53
activity. 54
55
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
INTRODUCTION 56
Leaf chloroplasts typically contain multiple lenticular starch granules that form between 57
the thylakoid membranes. These semi-crystalline, insoluble granules are composed of two 58
glucose polymers - 70-90% amylopectin and 10-30% amylose. Amylopectin is a large 59
branched polymer, where glucose residues are linked via α-1,4-glucosidic bonds to form 60
linear chains that are connected via α-1,6-bonds (branch points). The chains in 61
amylopectin arrange in a distinct tree-like architecture in which unbranched chain 62
segments cluster. Neighboring unbranched chain segments intertwine to form double 63
helices that further align in layers to produce a semi-crystalline matrix (Pérez and Bertoft, 64
2010; Buléon et al., 1998). The minor component, amylose, consists of lightly-branched 65
α-1,4-linked chains and is localized in the amorphous parts of the granule between the 66
crystalline layers formed by amylopectin. 67
Starch is synthesized by three types of enzyme activity – starch synthases (SSs), starch 68
branching enzymes, and isoamylase-type debranching enzymes (Myers et al., 2000; 69
Zeeman et al., 2010; Pfister and Zeeman, 2016). SS transfers the glucosyl moiety from 70
ADP-glucose to the non-reducing end of an acceptor glucan. Branching enzyme transfers 71
part of a linear glucan chain to another chain, forming an α-1,6-linkage. Subsequently, 72
isoamylase removes a fraction of the α-1,6-linkages and is thereby thought to facilitate the 73
formation of the crystalline amylopectin layers (Ball et al., 1996). Most plants contain 74
multiple SS isoforms. These can be separated into six classes based on amino acid 75
sequence: SS1, SS2, SS3, SS4, SS5 and the granule-bound starch synthase GBSS 76
(Nougué et al., 2014). Insight into the roles of each class during starch synthesis has been 77
obtained by studying mutant plants deficient in each isoform, as well as by characterizing 78
the enzymes in vitro. The exception is SS5, which has not been characterized to date. 79
According to these studies, SS1, SS2 and SS3 are important for establishing proper 80
amylopectin structure: SS1 preferentially elongates newly placed branches to a length of 81
around 10 glucose units, and SS2 further elongates these chains to around 18 glucose units 82
(Delvallé et al., 2005; Fujita et al., 2006; Umemoto et al., 1999; Pfister et al., 2014). SS3 83
is proposed to synthesize long, cluster-spanning amylopectin chains (Fontaine et al., 1993; 84
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
Fujita et al., 2007; Pfister and Zeeman, 2016). GBSS synthesizes amylose within the 85
granular matrix (van de Wal et al., 1998; Tatge et al., 1999; Zeeman et al., 2002). 86
In contrast to the other SSs, SS4 does not have a major influence on the structure of 87
amylopectin or on amylose synthesis (Roldán et al., 2007; Szydlowski et al., 2009), 88
although in a heterologous, yeast system it is capable of creating branched glucans 89
together with the BEs and ISA (Pfister et al., 2016). Rather, it appears to play a critical 90
role in starch granule initiation: the Arabidopsis ss4 mutant usually has zero, one, or rarely 91
two or three granules per chloroplast (Roldán et al., 2007; Malinova et al., 2017), instead 92
of five to seven granules found in most wild-type chloroplasts (Crumpton-Taylor et al., 93
2012). The total starch content at dusk is lower in this mutant, yet this starch is 94
incompletely metabolized at night. In young leaves, the phenotype is particularly severe, 95
where most chloroplasts are starch-free (Crumpton-Taylor et al., 2013). The ss4 mutant 96
also accumulates very high levels of ADP-glucose, indicating that the remaining SS 97
isoforms cannot utilize it when SS4 is absent, presumably due to the lack of glucan 98
substrates (Crumpton-Taylor et al., 2013; Ragel et al., 2013). These findings are 99
consistent with a role for SS4 upstream of the other SSs, i.e., a role in granule initiation. 100
Interestingly, the ss3ss4 double mutant is almost completely starch-free, suggesting that 101
SS3 is important for the less frequent initiations that still occur when SS4 is absent 102
(Szydlowski et al., 2009; Seung et al., 2016). In addition to altering the number of starch 103
granules, SS4 appears also to influence the granule’s size and shape: those from leaves of 104
the Arabidopsis ss4 mutant are enlarged and near-spherical instead of lenticular (Roldán et 105
al., 2007; Crumpton-Taylor et al., 2013). 106
The molecular features that give each SS its specific role are largely unknown. All share a 107
common catalytic domain comprised of a glycosyltransferase 5 (GT5) and a 108
glycosyltransferase 1 (GT1) sub-domain (Pfister and Zeeman, 2016). This structure is 109
conserved in prokaryotic glycogen synthases (GS), such as GlgA from Agrobacterium 110
tumefaciens. In addition, most plant SS isoforms have N-terminal extensions of different 111
lengths that, in some cases, have demonstrated functions. For instance, the carbohydrate 112
binding modules in the N-terminal extensions of SS3 help confer a higher affinity for – 113
and activity on - its glucan substrates (Senoura et al., 2007; Valdez et al., 2008). 114
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
Several SSs have been shown to engage in protein-protein interactions, often with other 115
starch biosynthetic enzymes (Tetlow et al., 2008; Hennen-Bierwagen et al., 2008, 2009, 116
Liu et al., 2009, 2012). For example, an external helix on the catalytic domain of GBSS 117
enables it to engage in a coiled-coil-mediated interaction with PROTEIN TARGETING 118
TO STARCH (PTST), which helps localize GBSS to the starch granule (Seung et al., 119
2015). Similarly, SS4 was recently shown to bind to PTST2 - a protein related to PTST 120
which also contains a carbohydrate-binding module and predicted coiled-coil motifs 121
(Seung et al., 2017). This interaction appeared to involve the catalytic domain of SS4, 122
although the exact interaction site between SS4 and PTST2 has not yet been identified. 123
Like ss4 mutants, the ptst2 mutants have reduced numbers of starch granules, and this 124
phenotype was exacerbated by loss of another homolog (PTST3; Seung et al., 2017). 125
PTST2 was proposed to bind long malto-oligosaccharides with its carbohydrate-binding 126
module and provide them as substrates to SS4 (Seung et al., 2017). This idea is broadly 127
consistent with other observations that mutations affecting malto-oligosaccharide 128
metabolism affect starch granule initiation (Malinova et al., 2017; Satoh et al., 2008; 129
Seung et al., 2016). 130
The unique N-terminal region of SS4 is predicted to contain coiled-coil motifs (Leterrier 131
et al., 2008), although this region is not needed for interaction with PTST2. However, 132
fluorescent tagging showed that the N-terminal region confers a sub-chloroplastic 133
localization to SS4, possibly at areas peripheral to starch granules (Gámez-Arjona et al., 134
2014). The N-terminal region of SS4 was also reported to enable its association with 135
thylakoid membranes and to allow interaction with the thylakoid- and plastoglobule-136
bound fibrillin proteins FBN1a and FBN1b (Gámez-Arjona et al., 2014). It is unclear 137
whether this a coiled-coil-mediated interaction. Further, the significance of this interaction 138
remains to be established since mutants deficient in both FBN1a and FBN1b have a 139
normal starch phenotype. 140
Despite excellent progress in defining the role of SS4, the mechanisms by which it 141
regulates the initiation of starch granules and controls their morphology are not fully 142
understood. SS4 is presumed to determine the number of starch granules in a chloroplast 143
by synthesizing specific amylopectin precursors (Roldán et al., 2007; Szydlowski et al., 144
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
2009) – a role facilitated by its interaction with PTST2 (Seung et al., 2017). This 145
emerging model contrasts with the priming of glycogen synthesis in other organisms. In 146
metazoans and fungi, glycogen synthesis is primed by glycogenin proteins, which self-147
glucosylate to create primers that GS and branching enzymes can elaborate (Wilson et al., 148
2010; Ball et al., 2011). In prokaryotes, the priming process is less well studied. In A. 149
tumefaciens, there is evidence that the GS can self-glucosylate when supplied only with 150
ADP-glucose, thereby synthesizing glucan primers and fulfilling an analogous role to the 151
eukaryotic glycogenins (Ugalde et al., 2003). 152
Previously, we showed that expression of A. tumefaciens GS in Arabidopsis ss3ss4 153
mutants could overcome the defect in starch granule initiation (Crumpton-Taylor et al., 154
2013), though granule morphology was still aberrant. To extend the understanding of how 155
SS4 contributes to starch granule formation in vivo, we investigated the role of its N- and 156
C-terminal regions by expressing truncated forms in the ss4 mutant background. We 157
analyzed the localization of these truncated forms within the chloroplast and their capacity 158
to complement the mutant phenotype. We further fused the N-terminal part of SS4 to A. 159
tumefaciens GS and compared it to expression of GS alone. We show that the N-terminal 160
region of SS4 alters the localization of GS and allows the formation of normal lenticular-161
shaped starch granules. We discuss the distinct functions of the catalytic C-terminal 162
domain and non-catalytic N-terminus in starch granule initiation and growth. 163
164
RESULTS 165
Generation of ss4 Plants Expressing A. tumefaciens GS or SS4 Variants 166
The A. tumefaciens GS was fused N-terminally to the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP), 167
targeted to the plastids by the transit peptide from the Arabidopsis Rubisco small subunit 168
(At5g38430; amino acid residues 1-53), and expressed in the ss4-1 single mutant (Col-0 169
background) (YFP-GS; Figure 1). Since GS is homologous to the C-terminal half of SS4, 170
we also designed a truncated SS4 construct consisting of its C-terminal region (amino 171
acids 476 to 1040; including both GT1 and GT5 domains and a region immediately 172
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
preceding them that is conserved in SS4 orthologs) that was N-terminally fused to YFP 173
(YFP-SS4C; Figure 1). Further, we generated a construct containing the N-terminal half 174
of SS4 (amino acids 1 to 544, also including the conserved region preceding the GT 175
domains; SS4N-YFP) C-terminally fused to YFP. We also made a chimeric construct 176
where this N-terminus of SS4 was fused to full-length A. tumefaciens GS and YFP (YFP-177
SS4N-GS or SS4N-GS-YFP, depending on the position of the YFP; Figure 1). Finally, 178
constructs encoding the full-length SS4 protein fused to YFP (SS4-YFP) and chloroplast-179
targeted YFP alone served as controls (Figure 1). In all cases, constitutive expression was 180
driven by the CaMV 35S promoter. 181
For each construct, we obtained numerous independent transgenic lines in the ss4 mutant 182
background. We then selected three lines of each with different expression levels, judged 183
by immunoblots on total protein extracts using either a monoclonal anti-YFP antibody or 184
polyclonal antibodies against SS4 (Figure 2A). Every plant line gave a band 185
corresponding to the expected molecular weight of its mature introduced protein (i.e. 186
lacking the chloroplast transit peptide). These bands were absent in protein extracts of the 187
ss4 parent line and the wild type. There were additional, often closely migrating bands 188
apparent in the transformed plant lines (Figure 2A). It is possible that these additional 189
bands reflect post-translationally modified forms of the introduced protein (e.g. due to 190
phosphorylation or proteolysis). In case of YFP-GS, we observed additional slowly 191
migrating bands, which possibly resulted from self-glucosylation of the protein. 192
We investigated whether the chain-elongating activities of introduced enzymes were 193
detectable on zymograms (native PAGE gels supplemented with glycogen as a substrate; 194
Figure 2B). After incubating the gels in an ADP-glucose-containing medium, activity 195
bands were visualized as dark bands by iodine staining, indicating elongation of glycogen 196
chains. Bands corresponding to the endogenous starch synthases SS1 and SS3 (Wattebled 197
et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2005; Szydlowski et al., 2009) were detected in all plant 198
extracts. In addition, a dark, smeared band appeared in lines expressing YFP-GS. Among 199
these lines, YFP-GS_3 had the strongest GS activity and YFP-GS_1 had the weakest, 200
consistent with the immunoblotting results (Figure 2A). Faint bands were visible in some 201
SS4N-GS-YFP-expressing and YFP-SS4N-GS-expressing lines. No additional activity 202
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
bands were visible in lines expressing YFP-SS4C, SS4N-YFP, or SS4-YFP. However, 203
these zymograms are evidently not able to detect all glucosyl transferase activities, since 204
the endogenous SS2 and SS4 activities are not visible either (Szydlowski et al., 2009; 205
Pfister et al., 2014). Multiple pale bands were also visible in the zymograms. These result 206
from glucan hydrolytic activities that digest the glycogen substrates and could potentially 207
mask the activities of co-migrating glucan synthases. 208
Plant Growth and Leaf Starch Content Are Partially Restored by GS or the C-209
Terminal Region of SS4 210
We evaluated our transformed plant lines for their growth phenotypes and for their leaf 211
starch accumulation by iodine staining (Figure 3). As previously reported, the ss4 mutant 212
grew slowly and had pale and starch-free young leaves (Roldán et al., 2007; Crumpton-213
Taylor et al., 2013). The older leaves stained for starch at the end of day and, unlike the 214
wild type, did not to fully degrade it during the subsequent night. Control ss4 plants 215
expressing chloroplast-targeted YFP alone were indistinguishable from the ss4 parent. 216
The YFP-GS-expressing plants had greener rosette leaves and line 1 displayed 217
significantly improved growth compared with ss4 mutants. Lines YFP-GS_1 and YFP-218
GS_2 also showed complementation in terms of starch accumulation, as both young and 219
mature leaves stained for starch. Yet part of this starch remained after the night, resulting 220
in patchy staining of the leaves. Similarly, transformants expressing the C-terminal region 221
of SS4 (YFP-SS4C lines) grew better than ss4 mutants and accumulated starch in all 222
rosette leaves. These plants also did not fully metabolize their starch during the night. 223
Interestingly, expression of GS fused to the N-terminal region of SS4 (SS4N-224
GSYFP/YFP-SS4N-GS) resulted in improved growth and iodine-staining patterns that 225
were very similar to those of the wild type and SS4-YFP control plants: all leaves were 226
green, accumulated starch during the day and degraded most of it in the subsequent night. 227
In contrast, when the N-terminal region of SS4 was expressed alone (SS4N-YFP plants), 228
the phenotype was indistinguishable from that of the ss4 mutant. Thus, GS or the C-229
terminal region of SS4 alone partially complement the ss4 mutant phenotype. The extent 230
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
of complementation is improved by the presence of the N-terminal region of SS4, but the 231
N-terminal region alone cannot complement the mutant. 232
The Influence of the N-Terminal Region of SS4 on Starch Metabolism 233
Iodine staining is a qualitative rather than quantitative indication of starch content. To 234
quantify the starch content in our lines, we harvested whole rosettes at the end of a normal 235
day and night, digested the starch enzymatically, and measured the released glucose 236
(Figure 4). As expected, ss4 plants accumulated less starch during the day than the wild 237
type. They also degraded only half of their starch by the end of the night. These results 238
were consistent with our observations from iodine staining (Figure 3) and previous reports 239
(Roldán et al., 2007; Crumpton-Taylor et al., 2013). 240
The YFP-GS lines varied considerably in starch content at the end of day, ranging from 241
near-normal amounts of starch in YFP-GS_1 to starch levels even lower than in ss4 242
mutants in case of YFP-GS_3 (Figure 4). Thus, starch content correlated inversely with 243
the abundance and activity of GS (Figure 2). Consistent with the iodine-staining (Figure 244
3), the YFP-GS lines did not fully mobilize their starch during the night. The lines 245
expressing YFP-SS4C reached starch levels close to those of the wild type, but also 246
degraded only ~70% of the starch reserve during the night. 247
By contrast, SS4N-GS and SS4-YFP plants showed near-wild-type starch accumulation 248
and breakdown, degrading around 80-90% of their starch by dawn (Figure 4). Thus, 249
having the N-terminal region of SS4 positively influenced starch turnover both when 250
combined with GS or the C-terminal region of SS4. Yet, when expressed on its own, the 251
N-terminal region of SS4 again showed no effect on the pattern of starch accumulation, as 252
SS4N-YFP plants phenocopied the ss4 mutant (Figure 4). 253
SS4 Domains Influence Starch Granule Shape and Numbers Independently 254
It was proposed that the reduced starch synthesis and degradation rates in ss4 mutants may 255
be a consequence of its deposition as fewer, enlarged and rounded granules when 256
compared to the wild type (Roldán et al., 2007). Since a number of our complementation 257
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
lines also still displayed impaired starch metabolism, we investigated the number and 258
morphology of starch granules within their chloroplasts. Leaf number 7 (an expanding 259
source leaf; Supplemental Figure S1) was harvested at the end of day, and samples from 260
the middle of the leaf lamina were fixed and embedded in resin. We obtained light 261
micrographs (LMs; Figure 5 and Supplemental Figure S2) and transmission electron 262
micrographs (TEMs; Figure 5 and Supplemental Figure S3) of the leaf mesophyll tissue, 263
where the majority of leaf starch is synthesized. To examine granule morphology in more 264
detail, we also purified starch granules from whole rosettes and visualized them by 265
scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Figure 5 and Supplemental Figure S4). 266
In sections from wild-type chloroplasts, we predominantly observed multiple ellipsoid 267
starch granules (Figure 5), consistent with the flattened, lenticular shape of the granules 268
seen by SEM (Figure 5). In contrast, 80% of the sections of the ss4 mutant chloroplasts 269
were devoid of starch (Supplemental Table S1). The minority of chloroplast sections 270
contained starch, usually as one larger and rounded granule, as previously reported 271
(Crumpton-Taylor et al., 2013; Roldán et al., 2007). It should be noted that chloroplast 272
sections of ~750 nm thickness capture only a part of the chloroplast, meaning that the 273
number of starch-containing chloroplasts will be slightly underestimated. 274
The lines expressing YFP-GS differed from the ss4 parental line in that they typically 275
contained multiple rounded granules per chloroplast section (Figure 5; Supplemental 276
Figure S2, Supplemental Figure S3, Supplemental Figure S4), and only a few (10-20%) of 277
the chloroplast sections were starch-free (Supplemental Table S1). Interestingly, 278
approximately 10% of the chloroplast sections contained supernumerary granules, which 279
were tiny and of irregular shape (Figure 6). The proportion of chloroplast sections 280
containing these aberrant granules was highest in the line YFP-GS_3 (Supplemental Table 281
S1), which expressed GS to the highest level (Figure 2). In the YFP-SS4C lines, ~90% of 282
chloroplast sections contained starch granules, similar to the YFP-GS lines. However, 283
granules produced in the YFP-SS4C lines were larger and fewer in number than those 284
from the YFP-GS lines. Interestingly, the granules still exhibited the rounded shape, 285
characteristic of the ss4 mutant (Figure 5; Supplemental Figure S2, Supplemental Figure 286
S3, Supplemental Figure S4). No supernumerary granules were observed in the case of 287
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
YFP-SS4C expression. Thus, while expression of either GS or SS4C in the ss4 288
background facilitated the formation of more starch granules, neither restored the normal 289
lenticular morphology. 290
Expression of the SS4N-GS fusion constructs almost fully complemented the ss4 mutant 291
phenotype: there were multiple granules per chloroplast section and the granules had the 292
wild-type-like shape, despite being slightly smaller. As in the GS-YFP lines, these lines 293
had also contained some chloroplasts with supernumerary tiny granules within a single 294
stromal pocket (observed in ~10-20% of the chloroplast sections). Often, these 295
supernumerary granules had smooth surfaces while in other sections they were irregular in 296
appearance (Figure 7; Supplemental Figure S5). 297
As expected, the three SS4-YFP lines also produced multiple wild-type-like granules per 298
chloroplast section (Figure 5; Supplemental Figure S2, Supplemental Figure S3, 299
Supplemental Figure S4), even though they contained lower amounts of SS4 than the wild 300
type (Figure 2). In this case, no supernumerary granules were observed. Lines expressing 301
SS4N-YFP had starch granules that were indistinguishable from those of the ss4 parent 302
both in terms of morphology and frequency (Figure 5 and Supplemental Table S1), 303
consistent with our other observations that the N-terminal region of SS4 by itself appears 304
to have no effect on starch biosynthesis. 305
We investigated whether the differences in granule morphology were accompanied by 306
changes in amylopectin structure. Therefore, we enzymatically debranched starch from 307
each line and analyzed its chain-length distribution (CLD) by HPAEC-PAD 308
(Supplemental Figure S6). This confirmed that the CLDs of starch from wild-type and ss4 309
mutant plants are very similar (Roldán et al., 2007). The CLDs of starches from our set of 310
transformed lines were also all very similar to that of the wild type. 311
The N-Terminal Region of SS4 Influences the Sub-Chloroplastic Localization 312
Previous work indicated that SS4 is not homogeneously distributed within the chloroplast 313
stroma, but rather localizes to discrete spots at the edges of starch granules. Furthermore, 314
this localization was suggested to be dependent on its N-terminal region (Gámez-Arjona 315
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
et al., 2014; Szydlowski et al., 2009). To investigate the localization of our expressed 316
proteins, we imaged YFP fluorescence in Arabidopsis leaves during the light period by 317
confocal laser scanning microscopy (Figure 8). As expected, free YFP was uniformly 318
distributed within the chloroplast stroma (non-fluorescent patches typically reflect the 319
presence of starch granules). This localization was similar in case of YFP-SS4C, which 320
also gave a uniform stromal YFP fluorescence. This result differs from that described by 321
Gámez-Arjona et al. (2014), where the C-terminal region of SS4 appeared as a single dot 322
at one end of the chloroplast. This is most likely due to differences between stable 323
expression in transformed Arabidopsis lines used here versus transient overexpression N. 324
benthamiana used previously 325
Interestingly, YFP-GS appeared as ring-like structures surrounding the rounded starch 326
granules, indicating that it preferentially associates with the granule surface. When the N-327
terminal part of SS4 was fused to GS, however, it did not uniformly surround the granules 328
anymore, but rather appeared to localize to discrete areas at the periphery of starch 329
granules. This distribution was similar to that of full-length SS4-YFP and the N-terminal 330
region of SS4 alone (Figure 8). Thus, the N-terminal region of SS4 appears both necessary 331
and sufficient to confer the distinct sub-chloroplastic localization typical of SS4. 332
DISCUSSION 333
This work provides significant new insight into the function of SS4 in starch granule 334
formation. On the one hand, the catalytic C-terminal region of SS4 promotes granule 335
formation, presumably via the catalytic activity of its glucosyltransferase domains – a role 336
that can be substituted by A. tumefaciens GS. On the other hand, the N-terminal region of 337
SS4 confers a specific sub-chloroplastic localization, which is critical in determining 338
granule morphology. It is remarkable that this N-terminal region of SS4 similarly guides 339
the activity A. tumefaciens GS, which is then able to substitute surprisingly well for SS4. 340
Agrobacterium GS Increases Granule Number in the ss4 Mutant 341
The data presented here support our previous work indicating that A. tumefaciens GS 342
promotes the initiation of starch granules in the absence of SS4 (Crumpton-Taylor et al., 343
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
2013). In the ss4 parental line, 80% of the chloroplast sections examined had zero 344
granules, with the remainder having one or at most two granules. Most chloroplasts in the 345
GS-expressing lines contained numerous small, round granules. Very few chloroplasts 346
were granule free, while some contained supernumerary granules (Figures 5, Figure 6, 347
Supplemental Table S1). GS could function to increase the number of granules either by 348
increasing the total amount of glucan-elongation activity, such that it increases the 349
frequency of stochastic granule initiations. Alternatively (or in addition), GS could 350
promote granule initiation via its self-priming ability (Ugalde et al., 2003), providing a 351
substrate for the other starch biosynthetic enzymes. Consistent with this idea, 352
immunoblotting and zymogram analyses revealed multiple and/or smeared bands for the 353
YFP-GS protein and its activity, respectively (Figure 2). Such behavior on SDS- and 354
native-PAGE gels was proposed to be due to self-glucosylation, which changes the 355
protein’s molecular weight and properties, thereby affecting its migration (Ugalde et al., 356
2003). 357
Among the GS-expressing lines, granule numbers per chloroplast and appeared to 358
correlate positively with GS protein/activity. However, starch metabolism was far from 359
normal in these lines; granule morphology was still aberrant, as in the ss4 mutant, and the 360
extent of starch metabolism during the diel cycle was highly variable. Surprisingly, starch 361
content at the end of the day was negatively correlated with GS protein/activity: YFP-362
GS_1 had low GS activities and comparable amounts of starch to the wild type while 363
YFP-GS_3 had the largest amount of GS activity but the lowest amount of starch (Figure 364
2, Figure 4). The reason for this is unclear. One possibility is that, despite increasing the 365
number of granule initiations, excessive amounts of GS somehow interfere with the 366
activities of the plant’s endogenous enzymes, restricting the rate of starch biosynthesis. 367
YFP-GS had a distinct localization, surrounding the starch granules (Figure 8). This is 368
somewhat reminiscent of the subcellular localization of the native GS (EcGS) in E. coli 369
cells, which associates with glycogen particles at the cell poles (Wilson et al., 2010). 370
Association of GS with the starch granule surface might crowd-out the other chain 371
elongating, branching and debranching enzymes necessary for starch synthesis. 372
Interestingly, a somewhat analogous phenotype was observed in transgenic potato tubers 373
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
expressing EcGS; these produced less starch, which was more highly branched, and 374
accumulated more soluble sugars (Shewmaker et al., 1994). However, in our lines 375
expressing YFP-GS, chain-length distributions revealed no such alterations in the 376
structure of the remaining starch (Supplemental Figure S6) and no polyglucans were 377
measured in the water-soluble fraction (data not shown). An alternative explanation for 378
the low starch content in the presence of high GS could be that glucan degradation 379
proceeds simultaneously with synthesis. If glucans made by abundant GS together with 380
the other starch biosynthetic enzymes is unable or slow to crystallize, they may be subject 381
to hydrolysis. Such situations have been reported in Arabidopsis (e.g. in the isa1 382
isoamylase-deficient mutants or the ss2ss3 double mutant; Delatte et al., 2005; Pfister et 383
al., 2014), but again correlated with a measurable change in the structure of the starch 384
(Supplemental Figure S6). Interestingly, when GS was expressed in the ss3ss4 mutant 385
background, starch structure was altered, having more short (d.p. 5-7) and fewer 386
intermediate (d.p. 10-15) chains than wild-type starch (Crumpton-Taylor et al., 2013). We 387
suggest that when GS represents a greater fraction of the total synthase activity, its 388
preference for producing short like chains typical of glycogen, becomes more apparent. 389
Despite variation in the amount of starch synthesized, the proportion of starch degraded at 390
night was increased in all three YFP-GS expressing lines relative to ss4 (Figure 4). Low 391
starch turnover in ss4 plants was proposed to result from having fewer, large starch 392
granules - this changes the surface area available for both synthesis during the day and 393
degradation at night (Roldán et al., 2007). Clearly, the numerous small, round granules 394
made in the presence of YFP-GS have a greater surface area on which starch metabolic 395
enzymes can act, compared with the few large, round granules in ss4 plants (Figure 5, 396
Figure 6). Thus, expression of YFP-GS may help proper starch turnover indirectly by 397
increasing the granule number. However, whether the granule surface area is indeed a 398
limiting factor for synthesis and/or degradation remains to be tested. 399
The C-terminal Region of SS4 Alone Promotes Granule Initiation in ss4 Mutants 400
The C-terminal region of SS4 is homologous to the full-length GS from A. tumefaciens 401
and the phenotypes of plants transformed with the SS4C or the GS construct were similar 402
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
in several respects. First, expression of both constructs partially restored starch 403
accumulation, with over 80% of the chloroplasts producing multiple starch granules 404
(Figure 5; Supplemental Figure S2, Supplemental Figure S3). Second, in both cases a 405
greater fraction of the starch could be degraded at night than in ss4 (Figure 4). Third, 406
neither construct altered amylopectin structure compared to the wild type (and ss4 407
parental line; Supplemental Figure S6). However, also in both instances the starch 408
granules still had the rounded ss4-like morphology (Figure 5, Supplemental Figure S4), 409
demonstrating that neither YFP-SS4C nor YFP-GS could rescue all aspects of the ss4 410
mutant phenotype. 411
Despite the similarities between the YFP-SS4C and the YFP-GS lines, the phenotypes 412
were not identical. The YFP-SS4C lines had fewer starch granules per chloroplast than the 413
YFP-GS lines, and we did not observe supernumerary granules (Supplemental Table S1). 414
This might be due to the relatively low amount of YFP-SS4C protein expressed (Figure 415
2A). YFP-SS4C activity could also not readily be detected using zymograms, even though 416
Raynaud et al. (2016) reported that a similarly truncated form of SS4, when 417
recombinantly expressed in E. coli, was measurable this way. Indeed, the phenotypes of 418
the YFP-SS4C lines were most similar to that of YFP-GS_1, i.e. the line expressing the 419
lowest amounts of YFP-GS. It is possible that higher amounts of YFP-SS4C would have 420
led to more granules and lower starch contents, as seen with high levels of YFP-GS 421
expression. 422
However, there were also qualitative differences between the SS4C and GS proteins that 423
could be relevant to the distinct phenotypes observed. First, immunoblots of the YFP-424
SS4C protein did not yield multiple, slow-migrating bands as they did for YFP-GS 425
(Figure 2A). This is presumably because SS4C does not have self-priming activity 426
(Szydlowski et al., 2009) and rather relies on interaction with the recently-described 427
PTST2 and/or PTST3 proteins to deliver its substrates (Seung et al., 2017). Second, our 428
YFP fluorescence data revealed that SS4C was uniformly distributed in chloroplasts, 429
unlike the granule-surface localization of GS (Figure 8), suggesting a lower inherent 430
affinity to glucans. Third, it is possible that the glucan elongating activity and specificity 431
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
of YFP-SS4C differs from that of YFP-GS. Indeed, if glycogen is a poor substrate for 432
SS4C, this might help explain why we did not detect its activity in glycogen-containing 433
native gels. 434
The N-Terminal Domain of SS4 Determines the Morphology of Starch Granules 435
Our data indicate that the N-terminal region of SS4 has a very specific and important role 436
in starch granule biosynthesis. It contains predicted coiled-coil domains between amino 437
acids 204 and 466 (see Pfister and Zeeman, 2016 and references therein). This sequence 438
conserved in SS4 orthologs, but is absent in the other SS isoforms, although some of them 439
have distinct predicted coiled-coil motifs of their own (Pfister and Zeeman, 2016). The N-440
terminal region of SS4 had a patchy sub-chloroplastic localization similar to that of the 441
full-length SS4 protein (Figure 8), suggesting that this region determines the protein’s 442
localization. However, it did not rescue the growth, starch synthesis and turnover, or 443
granule number and morphology phenotypes of ss4 (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5; 444
Supplemental Figures S2-S4). These data show that the N-terminal region of SS4 alone, 445
while correctly localized, is not functional without the catalytic C-terminal domains. 446
Remarkably, both the function and localization of A. tumefaciens GS could be changed by 447
fusing the N-terminal region of SS4 to it. Expressing the chimeric protein (SS4N-GSYFP 448
or YFP-SS4N-GS) in ss4 plants complemented most aspects of the ss4 phenotype: the 449
plants displayed near-normal growth rates (Figure 3), starch levels and nighttime starch 450
degradation (Figure 4). Strikingly, SS4N-GS expression not only increased granule 451
numbers, but also resulted in wild-type-like lenticular starch granules (Figure 5; 452
Supplemental Figures S2-S4). SS4N-GS furthermore showed a sub-chloroplastic 453
localization that resembled that of SS4 rather than that or GS (Figure 8). Nevertheless, we 454
still observed subtle differences to the wild type. For example, there was a weak negative 455
correlation between SS4N-GS abundance and starch synthesis: The line which contained 456
the highest activity of SS4N-GS also produced the lowest amount of starch among the 457
three lines and vice versa (e.g., SS4N-GS-YFP_3 vs. SS4N-GS-YFP_1; Figure 2, Figure 458
4). This correlation was reminiscent of what was observed in lines expressing just GS 459
(discussed above). Moreover, the SS4N-GS-expressing lines had noticeably more starch 460
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
granules than the SS4-complementation lines (Figure 5; Supplemental Figures S2-S3), 461
and sometimes produced supernumerary smooth-surfaced tiny granules within single 462
stromal pockets of chloroplasts - something not seen in the wild type or in SS4-YFP lines 463
(Figure 7; Supplemental Figure S5). 464
The Functions of SS4 465
Granule initiation probably requires more than just priming of polysaccharide synthesis: It 466
may require that the pre-crystalline glucan is not subject to degradation (e.g. by α-amylase 467
or isoamylase; Seung et al., 2016; Pfister et al., 2016), and also that the polysaccharide 468
can be further elaborated and assembled with other glucan molecules to provide the basis 469
for a semi-crystalline starch granule. Potentially, these processes are mediated by protein 470
scaffolds that localize SS4 at distinct sub-plastidial spots. Such a protein scaffold may also 471
serve to guide the biosynthetic machinery after initiation has occurred, directing the 472
pattern of synthesis. Based on ours and other results, we propose that the domain structure 473
of SS4 serves distinct important roles in these aspects of starch granule initiation and 474
growth. 475
The C-terminal domains confer the catalytic activity for glucan chain elongation by SS4 476
(Szydlowski et al., 2009), which may be particularly important during the early steps of 477
granule initiation. The C-terminal region also appears to confer the capacity to interact 478
with PTST2, which provides it with long malto-oligosaccharide substrates (Seung et al., 479
2017). A conserved domain immediately adjacent to the C-terminal glucosyltransferase 480
domains allows SS4 dimerization, which was suggested to be required for activity 481
(Raynaud et al., 2016). Dimerization may promote the elongation of long malto-482
oligosaccharides in proximity to one another. This could increase the likelihood of glucan 483
interactions that must precede the formation of the higher-order, semi-crystalline 484
structures observed in starch granules. In line with these hypotheses, recombinant barley 485
SS4 exhibits significant glucan-elongating activity only on linear malto-oligosaccharides, 486
but not on branched polysaccharides (Cuesta-Seijo et al., 2016). Although the in-vivo 487
substrate affinity by SS4 may be modulated by PTST2, it is tempting to speculate that this 488
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
combination of catalytic specificity, interaction with PTST2 and self-dimerization renders 489
SS4 capable of granule initiation. 490
Notably, barley isoforms of SS1, SS2, SS3 and GBSS did not display such a preference 491
for malto-oligosaccharides, and were equally or more active on branched polysaccharides 492
as on linear oligosaccharides (Cuesta-Seijo et al., 2016). Phylogenetic analyses of starch 493
synthases suggest that SS1 and SS2 are derived from the duplication of an ancient 494
cyanobacterial GBSS gene, while SS3 and SS4 belong to clade that either derived from the 495
host or a chlamydial pathogen (Ball et al., 2011). This difference in origin could mean that 496
SS1 and SS2 do not share the catalytic capacities required for priming with SS4. Indeed, 497
when expressed in yeast, Arabidopsis SS1 and – to a lesser extent – SS2 were less 498
efficient in glucan synthesis than SS3 and SS4 when the yeast’s endogenous glycogenins 499
were absent (Pfister et al., 2016). It therefore appears unlikely that the catalytic regions of 500
SS1 or SS2 alone or fused to the N-terminal region of SS4 would be capable of granule 501
initiation in the ss4 mutant background. 502
The N-terminal region positions SS4 into specific sub-chloroplastic domains. Thereby, it 503
may help define not only where a granule forms, but also the way in which the granule, 504
once initiated, continues to grow, resulting in their characteristic lenticular shape. The 505
nature of these sub-chloroplastic domains and how the N-terminal region localizes to them 506
remain unclear. It seems likely that the N-terminal region exerts its function by interacting 507
with other proteins (i.e. the protein scaffold hypothesized above). Two candidate 508
interactors of SS4 - the thylakoid-associated fibrillin proteins, FBN1a and FBN1b - have 509
already been identified. Yet, these alone cannot explain the localization and function of 510
the SS4 N-terminus, since lenticular granules are still made when both fibrillins are 511
abolished (Gámez-Arjona et al., 2014). Further studies will be needed to identify 512
additional factors and to build a detailed model of the cell biological context for starch 513
granule biosynthesis. 514
Finally, the experiments described here also further highlight the apparent link between 515
granule numbers/morphology and diel starch turnover. The ability of the C-terminal 516
region of SS4 or full-length GS to increase granule numbers, and of the attached N-517
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
terminal region of SS4 to further restore their normal morphology, correlated with 518
increases in starch amount and its diel turnover. This is important since starch metabolism 519
is central to the plant’s ability to control its overall carbon budget and to maintain 520
efficient growth (Stitt and Zeeman, 2012). However, it is important to note that in other, 521
recently described genotypes, this link seems to be broken: plants deficient in or 522
overexpressing the SS4-interacting protein PTST2 have fewer or more numerous granules 523
than the wild type, respectively, yet still maintain near-normal diel starch turnover (Seung 524
et al., 2017). 525
MATERIAL AND METHODS 526
Plant Material and Growth Conditions 527
Arabidopsis wild type Columbia (Col-0), T-DNA insertion mutant ss4-1 (GABI- 528
Kat_290D11), and T2 generation of ss4-1 plants transformed with each of YFP-GS, YFP-529
SS4C, SS4N-GS-YFP, YFP-SS4N-GS, and SS4-YFP were used. Seeds were sown on soil 530
and placed for 2 days at 4°C in the dark, and were grown in Percival growth chamber 531
(CLF Plant Climatics) under 12-h day/12-h night regime. The temperature was 20°C, 532
relative humidity was 70%, and the light intensity was 150 µmoles quanta m-2
s-1
. 533
Cloning and Isolation of Transgenic Lines 534
The full length coding sequence of GS from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Atu4075) was 535
amplified from genomic DNA using GS-fw and GS-rev primers, given in Supplemental 536
Table S2. The PCR product was cloned into the pDONR221 vector, and was further 537
cloned into the pB7WGY2 vector (modified to contain a chloroplast transit peptide [rCT: 538
amino acids 1-53 of At5g38430] upstream and in frame with YFP) via Gateway™ 539
recombination cloning technology (Invitrogen). The resulting construct was named YFP-540
GS (Figure 1). The same YFP-GS construct as used in Crumpton-Taylor et al. (2013) was 541
introduced into ss4 mutant plants, yielding the two independent lines YFP-GS_1 and 542
YFP-GS_3. The third independent line YFP-GS_2 was generated by crossing the ss4 543
mutant with one of our previously generated YFP-GS lines in the ss3 ss4 background 544
(GS-5-3; Crumpton-Taylor et al. 2013) and selecting for the homozygous YFP-GS, ss4 545
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
and wild-type SS3 alleles. Similarly, the C-terminal domain of Arabidopsis SS4 (SS4C; 546
amino acid residues 467 to 1040) was amplified from the pDONR-AtSS4 plasmid (Roldán 547
et al., 2007) using SS4C-fw and SS4C-rev primers (Supplemental Table S2). The 548
amplified SS4C fragment was cloned into rCT containing pB7WGY2,0 vector and the 549
resulting construct was named YFP-SS4C (Figure 1). The N-terminal domain of SS4 550
(SS4N; amino acid residues 1 to 544) was amplified with attB sites using SS4-fw, SS4N-551
GS-rev primers. The SS4NΔctp-fw and SS4N-GS-rev primers were used to amplify the N-552
terminal domain of SS4 without its predicted chloroplastic transit peptide (amino acid 553
residues 43 to 544). The pDONR-AtSS4 plasmids were used as template. The amplicons 554
of SS4N and GS were cleaved and ligated via Bcl1 restriction sites, cloned into 555
pB7YWG2,0 and into the rCT-containing pB7WGY2,0 vectors. The resulting constructs 556
were named SS4N-GS-YFP and YFP-SS4N-GS (Figure 1). The full-length cDNA of SS4 557
was cloned into pB7WGY2,0 via the Gateway™ LR reaction, and named SS4-YFP 558
(Figure 1). 559
We transformed each expression construct (YFP-GS, YFP-SS4C, SS4N-GS-YFP, YFP-560
SS4N-GS, and SS4-YFP) into ss4-1 mutants. The T1 seeds from each transformation were 561
harvested and sown on soil. Multiple T1 transgenic plants for each transformation were 562
isolated by Basta® resistance screening. Two or three independent lines for each 563
transformation were selected for further analysis, based on different abundances and 564
fluorescence appearance of transformed proteins. T2 plants carrying the ss4-1 allele and 565
transformed constructs were identified by PCR-based genotyping using primers shown in 566
Supplemental Table S2. 567
Immunoblotting and Zymograms 568
Whole rosette from each of 25-day old plants was harvested at the end of day, weighed, 569
frozen in liquid N2, and ground into fine powder. 10 to 20 mg of the frozen powder from 570
each plant was mixed in the extraction solution by the ratio of 100µl extraction solution / 571
10mg frozen powder, containing 100mM MOPS, pH 7.0, 1mM EDTA, 5mM DTT, 572
glycerol, and protease inhibitors (Complete EDTA-free from Roche) with 0.5% Triton-X, 573
10% (v/v). After 5 minutes at 16,000g centrifugation, soluble protein extracts were 574
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
isolated, and which concentrations were quantified by using BCA protein assay kit 575
(Sigma). Equal abundance of soluble protein extract from each sample of each line was 576
pooled, and used for immunoblotting and Zymogram. 20 µg pooled soluble protein 577
extracts from each line were mixed with an equal volume of SDS loading solution (50 578
mM Tris, pH 6,8, 2% SDS, 0,1% bromophenol blue, 10% glycerol, and 5 mM DTT), 579
boiled 5 minutes, and loaded to 10 % SDS PAGEs. After electrophoresis at 10V cm-1 for 580
1-h at room temperature, proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes, which were 581
probed with monoclonal antibodies against YFP (Clontec JL-08) or SS4. Antibodies 582
against beta-actin (from Sigma) were added for quantitative internal controls. Two-color 583
IRDye® secondary antibodies and Odyssey®
Infrared Imaging System (Odyssey® CLx) 584
were then used to visualize signals for transformed proteins (Green) and beta-actin (Red). 585
Abundances of detected proteins were quantified by using Image Studio™ Lite software. 586
The remained homogenate was centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 g at 4°C. Soluble proteins 587
in the supernatant were quantified using Bio-Red Protein Assay. For zymograms, 50 µg 588
protein extracts from each line were loaded onto 7.5% native PAGE gels containing 0.3% 589
oyster glycogen, following the procedures described in Crumpton-Taylor et al., 2013. 590
Starch Measurement 591
Whole rosettes of 25-day old plants from each line were harvested at the end of day and at 592
the end of night, decolorized in hot 70% (v/v) ethanol, stained with Lugol’s solution 593
(Sigma-Aldrich), and stored in cold water overnight to remove excess iodine from 594
rosettes. 595
To quantify starch content, whole rosettes of 25-day old plants of Col, ss4, and each of the 596
transformed lines was harvested at the end of day and at the end of night. Plants were 597
weighed, frozen in liquid N2, ground to a powder, and further homogenized in 2 ml of 598
1.12 M perchloric acid (HClO4). The homogenates were subjected to centrifugation 599
(3,000 g, 10 min, 20°C) to separate the insoluble and soluble fractions. The insoluble 600
fraction contained starch, and was washed once with cold water, four times with 70% 601
(v/v) ethanol, and resuspended in 1 ml water. Starch was quantified in the insoluble 602
fraction as described in Hostettler et al. (2011). 603
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
Confocal Microscopy 604
A 1 cm2 leaf piece from a 30 day-old plant was harvested at the middle of day and 605
observed by Zeiss LSM 780 confocal laser scanning with a 40x water immersion 606
objective. YFP-fused proteins were excited by a 488/514 nm argon laser, and detected at 607
520-570 nm. Chlorophyll auto-fluorescence was excited by a 594 nm helium neon laser, 608
and detected at 620-700 nm. 609
Isolation and Structural Analysis of Starch Granules 610
Whole rosettes of 5 week-old plants from Col, ss4, and each of the transformed lines were 611
harvested after an 11 h photoperiod, frozen in liquid N2, ground to a powder, 612
homogenized in starch extraction medium (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 0.2 mM EDTA and 613
0.5% [v/v] Triton X-100), and filtered through a series of nylon nets (100-µm, 30-µm, and 614
15-µm pore sizes). Starch granules were separated from the filtrate by centrifugation 615
(3,000 g, 20 min, at 20°C) over a 95% (v/v) Percoll (Sigma-Aldrich) cushion. Starch 616
pellets were washed three times with 0.5% (w/v) SDS and four times with water to 617
remove the remaining SDS. The pellets were dried for 16 h in vacuo. Half a milligram of 618
pure starch granules were boiled for 20 min, cooled at room temperature, debranched for 619
3 h by incubation in a solution containing 10 mM sodium acetate pH 4.8, 600 U 620
isoamylase (from Pseudomonas sp.; Sigma), and 1 U pullulanase (M1, from Klebsiella 621
planticola, Megazyme). Linear chains were analyzed by high performance anionexchange 622
chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) as described in 623
Streb et al. (2008). 624
Light Microscopy and Electron Microscopy 625
Leaf pieces (2 mm2) were cut from three young rosette leaves from three 30-day old plants 626
and fixed for 16 h in 2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and 0.05 M sodium cacodylate, pH 627
7.4, at 4°C. The leaf pieces were washed three times with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, pH 628
7.4, and incubated overnight in 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide with 0.1 M sodium 629
cacodylate, pH 7.4 at 4°C. Sequentially, pieces were washed three times with ice-cold 0.1 630
M sodium cacodylate, pH 7.4, and once with water. Samples were dehydrated in a series 631
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
of aqueous ethanol solutions from 50% (v/v) to 100% ethanol and once with 100% 632
acetone. The leaf pieces were incubated sequentially for 2 h in 25% (v/v) and 50% epoxy 633
resin (Spurr’s; Agar Scientific, in acetone), 16 h in 75% epoxy resin, and 7 h in 100% 634
epoxy resin. Embedding was completed by incubation for 48 h with fresh 100% epoxy 635
resin at 70°C. Semithin sections were cut with a Diatome 45° diamond knife. Five 636
hundred nm thick sections were placed on glass slides, stained for 10 min with toluidine 637
blue, washed with water and dried. Light micrographs were taken using Zeiss Axio 638
Imager Z2 light microscope with a 100x oil immersion objective. For transmission 639
electron microscopy, sections of 70-nm thickness were placed on formvar carbon-coated 640
copper grids, stained with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate and Reynold’s lead citrate and imaged 641
with a FEI Morgagni 268 transmission electron microscope (TEM). Pictures are 642
representative for the analysis of sections from two individual plants per genotype. For 643
scanning electron microscopy (SEM), pure starch granules were coated with a 3 nm 644
platinum layer using Balzers MED010 coating device and visualized by Leo 1530 Gemini 645
microscope (Zeiss). 646
647
ACCESSION NUMBERS 648
Arabidopsis Genome Initiative gene codes for Arabidopsis STARCH SYNTHASE 4 (SS4) 649
is At4g18240. A. tumefaciens genome annotation for glycogen synthase (GS) is Atu4075. 650
651
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 652
Figure S1. The rosette leaf chosen for light and transmission electron microscopy. 653
Figure S2. Light micrographs of leaf sections of three independent lines transformed with 654
each construct encoding GS- or SS4-derived proteins. 655
Figure S3. Transmission electron micrographs of mesophyll cell chloroplasts of three 656
independent lines transformed with each construct encoding GS- or SS4-derived proteins. 657
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
Figure S4. Scanning electron micrographs of starch granules from three independent lines 658
transformed with each construct encoding GS- or SS4-derived proteins. 659
Figure S5. Transmission electron micrographs showing supernumerary granules in 660
chloroplasts of YFP-SS4N-GS lines. 661
Figure S6. Chain length distribution of starch from the wild type (Col), from ss4, and from 662
ss4 plants transformed with each construct encoding GS- or SS4-derived proteins. 663
Table S1. Distribution of starch granules in chloroplast sections of the wild type (Col), of 664
ss4, and of ss4 plants lines transformed with each construct encoding GS- or SS4-derived 665
proteins. 666
Table S2. Primers sequences used for ss4 mutant genotyping and for the amplification of 667
coding sequences of A. tumefaciens GS and A. thaliana SS4. 668
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 669
We thank Ángel Mérida for seeds of ss4-1 and for great suggestions during the course of 670
this work. We thank the staff at ScopeM (ETH Zurich) for advice on electron microscopy. 671
We thank Andrea Ruckle for assistance with plant cultivation. We thank Michaela 672
Fischer-Stettler for technical assistance with operation of HPAEC-PAD Dionex. We 673
thank David Seung for reading and providing insightful suggestions during manuscript 674
preparation. 675
676
FIGURE LEGENDS 677
Figure 1. Constructs used for the expression of GS- and SS4-derived proteins in ss4 678
mutants. Constructs encoding the full-length A. tumefaciens glycogen synthase (GS), the 679
C-terminal region of Arabidopsis SS4 (SS4C), and the N-terminal region of Arabidopsis 680
SS4 fused to GS (SS4N-GS) were cloned into vector pB7GWY2,0, modified to encode 681
the Arabidopsis Rubisco small subunit B chloroplast transit peptide (C in grey; amino 682
acids 1-53) upstream of YFP. Constructs encoding the N-terminal region of SS4 alone 683
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
(SS4N), the N-terminal region linked to GS (SS4N-GS), and the full length SS4 all 684
contained the endogenous SS4 chloroplast transit peptide (C in green; amino acids 1-42) 685
and were cloned into vector pB7WGY2,0, such that YFP was fused to their C-terminus. 686
Constructs were driven by the CaMV35s promoter (35S). Pnos:Bastar encoded a Basta 687
resistance gene, driven by the A. tumefaciens nopaline synthase gene promoter. Blue bars 688
and green bars indicate GS and SS4 regions, respectively. Both GS and the SS4C contain 689
glycosyltransferase 5 (GT5) and glycosyltransferase 1 (GT1) domains. The N-terminal 690
region of SS4 contains coiled-coil motifs. Protein domains were predicted by SMART 691
(Letunic et al., 2014). Numbers indicated amino acid residues of the corresponding 692
original full-length SS4 or GS protein sequences. 693
Figure 2. Detection of GS- and SS4-derived proteins in transformed ss4 plants. A, 694
Soluble proteins were extracted from Arabidopsis ss4 mutant plants transformed with the 695
constructs given in Figure 1. Equal amounts of protein from 4 plants of each line were 696
pooled, separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies against 697
YFP (top panels) or SS4 (bottom panels). The expected molecular weights of the mature 698
introduced protein were: 80 kDa for YFP-GS, 94 kDa for YFP-SS4C, 85 kDa for SS4N-699
YFP, 137 kDa for SS4N-GS-YFP and YFP-SS4N-GS, and 141 kDa for SS4-YFP. In 700
some blots exposed for longer times, an endogenous 130-kDa protein in the wild type and 701
in ss4 mutants cross reacted with the anti-YFP antibody. The amounts of SS4-YFP and 702
endogenous SS4 are given as SS4/actin ratio below the anti-SS4 blot. B, For zymograms, 703
equal amounts of soluble protein were separated on native-PAGE gels containing 0.3% 704
(w/v) oyster glycogen. After electrophoresis, gels were incubated for 16 h in a solution 705
containing 1 mM ADP-glucose. Dark bands corresponding to the endogenous starch 706
synthase activities SS1 and SS3 were visible in all lines. Additional dark bands represent 707
the introduced synthase activities. Asterisks mark areas where very faint additional 708
synthase activities could be detected. 709
Figure 3. Growth and starch staining phenotype of ss4 plants expressing GS- or SS4-710
derived proteins. Plants grown in soil for 25 days under a 12-h day/12-h night cycle were 711
photographed at the end of the day (EOD). For iodine staining, rosettes harvested at the 712
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
EOD and end of night (EON) were decolourized with ethanol and stained with Lugol’s 713
solution. Col: wild-type plant. ss4: ss4-1 mutant plant. Plants designated _1, _2, and _3 714
are T2 individuals from independent transgenic lines, as indicated. The mean (± SE) 715
rosette fresh weight (Fw) for each line is given (n = 8-12; ND, not determined) and 716
designated as “a” or “b” when not significantly different from the wild type or ss4 mutant, 717
respectively (determined by ANOVA; p value < 0.05). 718
Figure 4. Starch contents of ss4 plants expressing GS- or SS4-derived proteins. Plants 719
grown for four weeks under 12-h day/12-h night cycles were harvested at the end of day 720
(white bars) and at the end of night (black bars). The mean starch content (± SE) for each 721
line is given (n = 4 individual rosettes for Col, ss4, and SS4N-YFP, n = 6 for all other 722
lines). For Col and for ss4, the data in the upper and lower panels are the same. The 723
percentage of starch broken down during the night is indicated. 724
Figure 5. The N-terminal region of SS4 confers the discoid shape of starch granules. Left 725
panels show light micrographs (LM) of toluidine blue-stained, semi-thin sections cut from 726
fixed, embedded tissue from leaf number 7 of each line. Middle panels show transmission 727
electron micrographs (TEM) of ultrathin sections cut from the same samples. Right panels 728
show scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of starch granules extracted from whole 729
rosettes of the given lines. The lines presented here are those showing the highest 730
expression of the introduced construct, except for YFP-GS, where the line with lowest 731
expression was chosen due to its relatively strong expression. Data from the remaining 732
lines is presented in Supplemental Figures S2, S3 and S4. White bars = 10 µm; black bars 733
= 2 μm. Black arrow, lenticular starch granule; red arrow, spherical starch granule. 734
Figure 6. Variation in granule morphology in chloroplasts of YFP-GS lines. Chloroplast 735
sections of expanding source leaves from each YFP-GS line were analyzed by LM and 736
TEM. A, LMs showing multiple granules in chloroplast sections. B, LMs showing zero, 737
one or two granules in chloroplast sections. C, LMs showing supernumerary granules in 738
chloroplast sections. D, TEM of chloroplasts with supernumerary granules. White bars = 739
10 µm; black bars = 2 µm. White arrows indicate supernumerary, irregular granules. 740
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
Figure 7. Variation in starch granule morphology in chloroplasts of SS4N-GS-YFP-741
expressing plants. LMs (left-hand panels) and TEMs (central and right-hand panels) of 742
chloroplast sections from expanding source leaves of the wild type (Col) and each of the 743
SS4N-GS-YFP-expressing lines. White bars = 10 µm; black bars = 2 µm. Black arrows, 744
lenticular type granules; white arrows: supernumerary granules; green arrows, smooth 745
supernumerary granules; red arrows, irregular supernumerary granules. 746
Figure 8. Sub-chloroplastic localization of YFP-tagged SS4 or GS proteins in mesophyll 747
cell chloroplasts from mature Arabidopsis leaves. Confocal fluorescence micrographs 748
showing free YFP and the YFP-tagged proteins (as indicated) are presented in the left-749
hand panels. The corresponding chlorophyll fluorescence is given in the central panels 750
and the merged images in the right-hand panels. Bars = 5 µm. 751
752
LITERATURE CITED 753
Ball, S., Guan, H.P., James, M., Myers, A., Keeling, P., Mouille, G., Buléon, A., 754 Colonna, P., and Preiss, J. (1996). From glycogen to amylopectin: a model for the 755
biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Cell 86: 349–352. 756
Ball, S., Colleoni, C., Cenci, U., Raj, J.N., and Tirtiaux, C. (2011). The evolution of 757
glycogen and starch metabolism in eukaryotes gives molecular clues to understand 758
the establishment of plastid endosymbiosis. J. Exp. Bot. 62: 1775–1801. 759
Buléon, A., Colonna, P., Planchot, V., and Ball, S. (1998). Starch granules: structure 760 and biosynthesis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 23: 85–112. 761
Cuesta-Seijo, J.A., Nielsen, M.M., Ruzanski, C., Krucewicz, K., Beeren, S.R., 762
Rydhal, M.G., Yoshimura, Y., Striebeck, A., Motawia, M.S., Willats, W.G.T., 763 and Palcic, M.M. (2016). In vitro biochemical characterization of all barley 764
endosperm starch synthases. Front. Plant Sci. 6: 1–17. 765
Crumpton-Taylor, M., Grandison, S., Png, K.M.Y., Bushby, A.J., and Smith, A.M. 766
(2012). Control of starch granule numbers in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant 767
Physiol. 158: 905–916. 768
Crumpton-Taylor, M., Pike, M., Lu, K.-J., Hylton, C.M., Feil, R., Eicke, S., Lunn, 769
J.E., Zeeman, S.C., and Smith, A.M. (2013). Starch synthase 4 is essential for 770
coordination of starch granule formation with chloroplast division during 771
Arabidopsis leaf expansion. New Phytol. 200: 1064–1075. 772
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
Delatte, T., Trevisan, M., Parker, M.L., and Zeeman, S.C. (2005). Arabidopsis 773
mutants Atisa1 and Atisa2 have identical phenotypes and lack the same multimeric 774
isoamylase, which influences the branch point distribution of amylopectin during 775
starch synthesis. Plant J. 41: 815–830. 776
Delvallé, D., Dumez, S., Wattebled, F., Roldán, I., Planchot, V., Berbezy, P., Colonna, 777
P., Vyas, D., Chatterjee, M., Ball, S., Mérida, A., and D’Hulst, C. (2005). Soluble 778
starch synthase I: a major determinant for the synthesis of amylopectin in 779
Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Plant J. 43: 398–412. 780
Fontaine, T., Hulst, C.D., Maddelein, M.-L., Routier, F., Pepin, T.M., Decq, A., 781
Wieruszeski, J., Delrue, B., Koornhuyse, N. Van Den, Bossu, J., Fournet, B., and 782 Ball, S. (1993). Toward an understanding of the biogenesis of the starch granule. J. 783
Biol. Chem. 268: 16223–16230. 784
Fujita, N., Yoshida, M., Kondo, T., Saito, K., Utsumi, Y., Tokunaga, T., Nishi, A., 785
Satoh, H., Park, J.-H., Jane, J.-L., Miyao, A., Hirochika, H., and Nakamura, Y. 786
(2007). Characterization of SSIIIa-deficient mutants of rice: the function of SSIIIa 787
and pleiotropic effects by SSIIIa deficiency in the rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 788
144: 2009–2023. 789
Fujita, N., Yoshida, M., Asakura, N., Ohdan, T., Miyao, A., Hirochika, H., and 790
Nakamura, Y. (2006). Function and characterization of starch synthase I using 791
mutants in rice. Plant Physiol. 140: 1070–1084. 792
Gámez-Arjona, F.M., Raynaud, S., Ragel, P., and Mérida, A. (2014). Starch synthase 793
4 is located in the thylakoid membrane and interacts with plastoglobule-associated 794
proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 80: 305–316. 795
Hennen-Bierwagen, T.A., Lin, Q., Grimaud, F., Planchot, V., Keeling, P.L., James, 796
M.G., and Myers, A.M. (2009). Proteins from multiple metabolic pathways 797
associate with starch biosynthetic enzymes in high molecular weight complexes: a 798
model for regulation of carbon allocation in maize amyloplasts. Plant Physiol. 149: 799
1541–1559. 800
Hennen-Bierwagen, T.A., Liu, F., Marsh, R.S., Kim, S., Gan, Q., Tetlow, I.J., Emes, 801
M.J., James, M.G., and Myers, A.M. (2008). Starch biosynthetic enzymes from 802
developing maize endosperm associate in multisubunit complexes. Plant Physiol. 803
146: 1892–1908. 804
Hostettler, C., Kölling, K., Santelia, D., Streb, S., Kötting, O., and Zeeman, S.C. 805
(2011). Analysis of starch metabolism in chloroplasts. Methods Mol. Biol. 775: 387–806
410. 807
Leterrier, M., Holappa, L.D., Broglie, K.E., and Beckles, D.M. (2008). Cloning, 808
characterisation and comparative analysis of a starch synthase IV gene in wheat: 809
functional and evolutionary implications. BMC Plant Biol. 8: 98–119. 810
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
30
Letunic, I., Doerks, T., and Bork, P. (2014). SMART: recent updates, new 811 developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 43: D257–D260. 812
Liu, F., Makhmoudova, A., Lee, E.A., Wait, R., Emes, M.J., and Tetlow, I.J. (2009). 813
The amylose extender mutant of maize conditions novel protein-protein interactions 814
between starch biosynthetic enzymes in amyloplasts. J. Exp. Bot. 60: 4423–4440. 815
Liu, F., Romanova, N., Lee, E.A., Ahmed, R., Evans, M., Gilbert, E.P., Morell, M.K., 816
Emes, M.J., and Tetlow, I. (2012). Glucan affinity of starch synthase IIa determines 817
binding of starch synthase I and starch branching enzyme IIb to starch granules. 818
Biochem. J. 448: 373–387. 819
Malinova, I., Alseekh, S., Feil, R., Fernie, A.R., Baumann, O., Schöttler, M.A., Lunn, 820
J.E., and Fettke, J. (2017). Starch synthase 4 and plastidal phosphorylase 821
differentially affect starch granule number and morphology. Plant Physiol. 174: 73– 822
85. 823
Myers, A.M., Morell, M.K., James, M.G., and Ball, S.G. (2000). Recent progress 824
towards understanding the biogenesis of the amylopectin crystal. Plant Physiol. 122: 825
989–997. 826
Nougué, O., Corbi, J., Ball, S.S.G., Manicacci, D., and Tenaillon, M.I. (2014). 827
Molecular evolution accompanying functional divergence of duplicated genes along 828
the plant starch biosynthesis pathway. BMC Evol. Biol. 14: 103. 829
Pérez, S. and Bertoft, E. (2010). The molecular structures of starch components and 830 their contribution to the architecture of starch granules: A comprehensive review. 831
Starch/Stärke 62: 389–420. 832
Pfister, B., Lu, K.-J., Eicke, S., Feil, R., Lunn, J.E., Streb, S., and Zeeman, S.C. 833
(2014). Genetic evidence that chain length and branch point distributions are linked 834
determinants of starch granule formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 165: 1457– 835
1474. 836
Pfister, B., Sánchez-Ferrer, A., Diaz, A., Lu, K., Otto, C., Holler, M., Shaik, F.R., 837
Meier, F., Mezzenga, R., and Zeeman, S.C. (2016). Recreating the synthesis of 838
starch granules in yeast. eLife 5: 1–29. 839
Pfister, B. and Zeeman, S.C. (2016). Formation of starch in plant cells. Cell. Mol. Life 840
Sci. 73: 2781–2807. 841
Ragel, P., Streb, S., Feil, R., Sahrawy, M., Annunziata, M.G., Lunn, J.E., Zeeman, S., 842
and Mérida, Á. (2013). Loss of starch granule initiation has a deleterious effect on 843
the growth of Arabidopsis plants due to an accumulation of ADP-glucose. Plant 844
Physiol. 163: 75–85. 845
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
31
Raynaud, S., Ragel, P., Rojas, T., and Mérida, Á. (2016). The N-terminal part of 846
Arabidopsis thaliana starch synthase 4 determines the localization and activity of the 847
enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 291: 10759–10771. 848
Roldán, I., Wattebled, F., Lucas, M.M., Delvallé, D., Planchot, V., Jiménez, S., Pérez, 849
R., Ball, S., D’Hulst, C., and Mérida, A. (2007). The phenotype of soluble starch 850
synthase IV defective mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests a novel function of 851
elongation enzymes in the control of starch granule formation. Plant J. 49: 492–504. 852
Satoh, H., Shibahara, K., Tokunaga, T., Nishi, A., Tasaki, M., Hwang, S.K., Okita, 853
T.W., Kaneko, N., Fujita, N., Yoshida, M., Hosaka, Y., Sato, A., Utsumi, Y., 854
Ohdan, T., and Nakamura, Y. (2008). Mutation of the plastidial alpha-glucan 855
phosphorylase gene in rice affects the synthesis and structure of starch in the 856
endosperm. Plant Cell 20: 1833–1849. 857
Senoura, T., Asao, A., Takashima, Y., Isono, N., Hamada, S., Ito, H., and Matsui, H. 858
(2007). Enzymatic characterization of starch synthase III from kidney bean 859
(Phaseolus vulgaris L.). FEBS J. 274: 4550–4560. 860
Seung, D., Boudet, J., Monroe, J.D., Schreier, T.B., David, L.C., Abt, M., Lu, K.J., 861 Zanella, M., and Zeeman, S.C. (2017). Homologs of PROTEIN TARGETING TO 862 STARCH control starch granule initiation in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell, in 863 press. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.17.00222. 864
Seung, D., Lu, K.-J., Stettler, M., Streb, S., and Zeeman, S.C. (2016). Degradation of 865
glucan primers in the absence of starch synthase 4 disrupts starch granule initiation in 866
Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem.: jbc.M116.730648. 867
Seung, D., Soyk, S., Coiro, M., Maier, B.A., Eicke, S., and Zeeman, S.C. (2015). 868
PROTEIN TARGETING TO STARCH is required for localising GRANULE-869
BOUND STARCH SYNTHASE to starch granules and for normal amylose synthesis 870
in Arabidopsis. PLOS Biol. 13: e1002080. 871
Shewmaker, C.K., Boyer, C.D., Wiesenborn, D.P., Thompson, D.B., Boersig, M.R., 872
Oakes, J. V, and Stalker, D.M. (1994). Expression of Escherichia coli glycogen 873
synthase in the tubers of transgenic potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) results in a highly 874
branched starch. Plant Physiol. 104: 1159–1166. 875
Stitt, M. and Zeeman, S.C. (2012). Starch turnover: pathways, regulation and role in 876 growth. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15: 1–11. 877
Streb, S., Delatte, T., Umhang, M., Eicke, S., Schorderet, M., Reinhardt, D., and 878
Zeeman, S.C. (2008). Starch granule biosynthesis in Arabidopsis is abolished by 879
removal of all debranching enzymes but restored by the subsequent removal of an 880
endoamylase. Plant Cell 20: 3448–3466. 881
Szydlowski, N., Ragel, P., Raynaud, S., Lucas, M.M., Roldán, I., Montero, M., 882
Muñoz, F.J., Ovecka, M., Bahaji, A., Planchot, V., Pozueta-Romero, J., D'Hulst, 883
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
32
C., and Mérida, A. (2009). Starch granule initiation in Arabidopsis requires the 884 presence of either class IV or class III starch synthases. Plant Cell 21: 2443–2457. 885
Tatge, H., Marshall, J., Martin, C., Edwards, E.A., and Smith, A.M. (1999). Evidence 886
that amylose synthesis occurs within the matrix of the starch granule in potato tubers. 887
Plant, Cell Environ. 22: 543–550. 888
Tetlow, I.J., Beisel, K.G., Cameron, S., Makhmoudova, A., Liu, F., Bresolin, N.S., 889
Wait, R., Morell, M.K., and Emes, M.J. (2008). Analysis of protein complexes in 890
wheat amyloplasts reveals functional interactions among starch biosynthetic 891
enzymes. Plant Physiol. 146: 1878–1891. 892
Ugalde, J.E., Parodi, A.J., and Ugalde, R.A. (2003). De novo synthesis of bacterial 893
glycogen: Agrobacterium tumefaciens glycogen synthase is involved in glucan 894
initiation and elongation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 10659–10663. 895
Umemoto, T., Nakamura, Y., Satoh, H., and Terashima, K. (1999). Differences in 896
amylopectin structure between two rice varieties in relation to the effects of 897
temperature. Starch/Stärke 2–3: 58–62. 898
Valdez, H.A., Busi, M. V, Wayllace, N.Z., Parisi, G., Ugalde, R.A., and GomezCasati, 899
D.F. (2008). Role of the N-terminal starch-binding domains in the kinetic properties 900
of starch synthase III from Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemistry 47: 3026– 3032. 901
van de Wal, M., D’Hulst, C., Vincken, J.P., Buléon, A., Visser, R., and Ball, S. (1998). 902
Amylose is synthesized in vitro by extension of and cleavage from amylopectin. J. 903
Biol. Chem. 273: 22232–22240. 904
Wattebled, F., Dong, Y., Dumez, S., Delvallé, D., Planchot, V., Berbezy, P., Vyas, D., 905 Colonna, P., Chatterjee, M., Ball, S., and D’Hulst, C. (2005). Mutants of 906
Arabidopsis lacking a chloroplastic isoamylase accumulate phytoglycogen and an 907
abnormal form of amylopectin. Plant Physiol. 138: 184–195. 908
Wilson, W. A., Roach, P.J., Montero, M., Baroja-Fernández, E., Muñoz, F.J., 909
Eydallin, G., Viale, A.M., and Pozueta-Romero, J. (2010). Regulation of glycogen 910
metabolism in yeast and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34: 952–985. 911
Zeeman, S.C., Kossmann, J., and Smith, A.M. (2010). Starch: its metabolism, 912
evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61: 913
209–234. 914
Zeeman, S.C., Smith, S.M., and Smith, A.M. (2002). The priming of amylose synthesis 915 in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol. 128: 1069–1076. 916
Zhang, X., Myers, A.M., and James, M.G. (2005). Mutations affecting starch synthase 917 III in Arabidopsis alter leaf starch structure and increase the rate of starch synthesis. 918 Plant Physiol. 138: 663–674. 919
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 1. Constructs used for the expression of GS- and SS4-derived proteins in ss4 mutants.Constructs encoding the full-length A. tumefaciens glycogen synthase (GS), the C-terminalregion of Arabidopsis SS4 (SS4C), and the N-terminal region of Arabidopsis SS4 fused to GS(SS4N-GS) were cloned into vector pB7GWY2,0, modified to encode the Arabidopsis Rubiscosmall subunit B chloroplast transit peptide (C in grey; amino acids 1-53) upstream of YFP.Constructs encoding the N-terminal region of SS4 alone (SS4N), the N-terminal region linked toGS (SS4N-GS), and the full length SS4 all contained the endogenous SS4 chloroplast transitpeptide (C in green; amino acids 1-42) and were cloned into vector pB7WGY2,0, such that YFPwas fused to their C-terminus. Constructs were driven by the CaMV35s promoter (35S).Pnos:Bastar encoded a Basta resistance gene, driven by the A. tumefaciens nopaline synthasegene promoter. Blue bars and green bars indicate GS and SS4 regions, respectively. Both GS andthe SS4C contain glycosyltransferase 5 (GT5) and glycosyltransferase 1 (GT1) domains. The N-terminal region of SS4 contains coiled-coil motifs. Protein domains were predicted by SMART(Letunic et al., 2014). Numbers indicated amino acid residues of the corresponding original full-length SS4 or GS protein sequences.
YFP‐GS
YFP‐SS4C
SS4N‐YFP
SS4N‐GS‐YFP
YFP‐SS4N‐GS
SS4‐YFP
YFP
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 2. Detection of GS- and SS4-derived proteins in transformed ss4 plants. A, Solubleproteins were extracted from Arabidopsis ss4 mutant plants transformed with the constructsgiven in Figure 1. Equal amounts of protein from 4 plants of each line were pooled, separated bySDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies against YFP (top panels) or SS4(bottom panels). The expected molecular weights of the mature introduced protein were: 80 kDafor YFP-GS, 94 kDa for YFP-SS4C, 85 kDa for SS4N-YFP, 137 kDa for SS4N-GS-YFP andYFP-SS4N-GS, and 141 kDa for SS4-YFP. In some blots exposed for longer times, anendogenous 130-kDa protein in the wild type and in ss4 mutants cross reacted with the anti-YFPantibody. The amounts of SS4-YFP and endogenous SS4 are given as SS4/actin ratio below theanti-SS4 blot. B, For zymograms, equal amounts of soluble protein were separated on native-PAGE gels containing 0.3% (w/v) oyster glycogen. After electrophoresis, gels were incubatedfor 16 h in a solution containing 1 mM ADP-glucose. Dark bands corresponding to theendogenous starch synthase activities SS1 and SS3 were visible in all lines. Additional darkbands represent the introduced synthase activities. Asterisks mark areas where very faintadditional synthase activities could be detected.
B. SS4N‐GS‐YFP/ss4
SS1
SS3
YFP‐GS
YFP‐SS4N‐GS/ss4SS4N‐YFP/ss4 SS4‐YFP/ss4
*
SS4‐YFP/ss4
Col ss4 _1 _2 _3250
130
100
70
anti‐actin
anti‐SS4
SS4/actin
55
350.14 0.00 0.09 0.04 0.03
A.
Molecular weight
(kDa)
Molecular weight
(kDa)
*
ss4 _1
YFP‐GS/ss4
Col
250
130
100
70
_2 _3
YFP‐SS4C/ss4
Rubisco
_1 _2 _3
anti‐YFP SS4N‐YFP/ss4
ss4Col _1 _2 _3
SS4‐YFP/ss4
_1 _2 _3
SS4N‐GS‐YFP/ss4
_1 _2 _3ss4Col
YFP‐SS4N‐GS/ss4
_1 _2 _3ss4Col
*
Col ss4 _1 _2 _3 _1 _2 _3
YFP‐GS/ss4 YFP‐SS4C/ss4
_1 _2 _3 _1 _2 _3 _1 _2 _3 _1 _2 _3
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 3. Growth and starch staining phenotype of ss4 plants expressing GS- or SS4-derivedproteins. Plants grown in soil for 25 days under a 12-h day/12-h night cycle were photographedat the end of the day (EOD). For iodine staining, rosettes harvested at the EOD and end of night(EON) were decolourized with ethanol and stained with Lugol’s solution. Col: wild-type plant.ss4: ss4-1 mutant plant. Plants designated _1, _2, and _3 are T2 individuals from independenttransgenic lines, as indicated. The mean (± SE) rosette fresh weight (Fw) for each line is given(n = 8-12; ND, not determined) and designated as “a” or “b” when not significantly differentfrom the wild type or ss4 mutant, respectively (determined by ANOVA; p value < 0.05).
0.15 ± 0.01 ga
0.05 ± 0.00 gb
0.06 ± 0.00 gb
0.10 ± 0.01 g 0.06 ± 0.00 gb
0.06 ± 0.00 gb
0.10 ± 0.01 g 0.09 ± 0.01 gND 0.05 ± 0.00 gb
0.05 ± 0.00 gb
0.04 ± 0.00 gb
Fw
EOD
EON
Growth
Fw
EOD
EON
Growth
0.16 ± 0.01 ga
0.12 ± 0.01 g 0.12 ± 0.00 g 0.13 ± 0.01 ga
0.19 ± 0.01 g 0.20 ± 0.01 g0.09 ± 0.00 g 0.09 ± 0.00 g 0.11 ± 0.01 g
Col ss4 YFPYFP‐GS YFP‐SS4C SS4N‐YFP
_1 _2 _3 _1 _2 _3 _1 _2 _3
SS4N‐GS‐YFP SS4‐YFP
_1 _2 _3 _1 _2 _3
YFP‐SS4N‐GS
_1 _2 _3
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 4. Starch contents of ss4 plants expressing GS- or SS4-derived proteins. Plants grown forfour weeks under 12-h day/12-h night cycles were harvested at the end of day (white bars) and atthe end of night (black bars). The mean starch content (± SE) for each line is given (n = 4individual rosettes for Col, ss4, and SS4N-YFP, n = 6 for all other lines). For Col and for ss4, thedata in the upper and lower panels are the same. The percentage of starch broken down duringthe night is indicated.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Col ss4 GS 10 GS 8 GS 11 SS4C 1 SS4C 4 SS4C 5 SS4N 2 SS4N 3 SS4N 4
Starch
content(m
g g‐1FW
)
93% 50% 76% 72% 88% 72% 68% 68%
YFP‐GS YFP‐SS4C
_1 _3_2Col ss4
60% 53% 51%
SS4N‐YFP
_1 _3_2 _1 _3_2
_1 _3_2 _1 _3_2 _1 _3_2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Starch
content(m
g g‐1FW
)
93% 50% 90% 92% 96% 88% 89% 85%
YFP‐SS4N‐GS SS4‐YFPSS4N‐GS‐YFPCol ss4
86% 82% 81%
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Col
ss4
YFP‐GS _1
YFP‐SS4C_3
SS4N‐YFP _1
SS4N‐GS‐YFP_3
YFP‐SS4N‐GS _1
SS4‐YFP_1
LM TEM SEM
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 5. The N-terminal region of SS4 confers the discoid shape of starch granules. Left panelsshow light micrographs (LM) of toluidine blue-stained, semi-thin sections cut from fixed,embedded tissue from leaf number 7 of each line. Middle panels show transmission electronmicrographs (TEM) of ultrathin sections cut from the same samples. Right panels show scanningelectron micrographs (SEM) of starch granules extracted from whole rosettes of the given lines.The lines presented here are those showing the highest expression of the introduced construct,except for YFP-GS, where the line with lowest expression was chosen due to its relatively strongexpression. Data from the remaining lines is presented in Supplemental Figures S2, S3 and S4.White bars = 10 µm; black bars = 2 μm. Black arrow, lenticular starch granule; red arrow,spherical starch granule.
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 6. Variation in granule morphology in chloroplasts of YFP-GS lines. Chloroplast sectionsof expanding source leaves from each YFP-GS line were analyzed by LM and TEM. A, LMsshowing multiple granules in chloroplast sections. B, LMs showing zero, one or two granules inchloroplast sections. C, LMs showing supernumerary granules in chloroplast sections. D, TEMof chloroplasts with supernumerary granules. White bars = 10 µm; black bars = 2 µm. Whitearrows indicate supernumerary, irregular granules.
YFP‐GS_1
YFP‐GS_2
YFP‐GS_3
A B C D
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 7. Variation in starch granule morphology in chloroplasts of SS4N-GS-YFP-expressingplants. LMs and TEMs of chloroplast sections from young leaves of the wild type (Col) and eachof the SS4N-GS-YFP-expressing lines. White bars = 10 µm; black bars = 2µm. Black arrows,lenticular type granules; white arrows: supernumerary granules; green arrows, smoothsupernumerary granules; red arrows, irregular supernumerary granules.
SS4N‐GS‐YFP_1
Col
SS4N‐GS‐YFP_2
SS4N‐GS‐YFP_3
E
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
YFP-SS4C_3
YFP
SS4N-YFP_1
Chlorophyll Merge
SS4N-GS-YFP_3
YFP-SS4N-GS_1
SS4-YFP_1
YFP-GS_1
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 8. Sub-chloroplastic localization of YFP-tagged SS4 or GS proteins in mesophyll cell
chloroplasts from mature Arabidopsis leaves. Confocal fluorescence micrographs showing free
YFP and the YFP-tagged proteins (as indicated) are presented in the left-hand panels. The
corresponding chlorophyll fluorescence is given in the central panels and the merged images in
the right-hand panels. Bars = 5 µm.
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Parsed CitationsBall, S., Guan, H.P., James, M., Myers, A., Keeling, P., Mouille, G., Buléon, A., Colonna, P., and Preiss, J. (1996). From glycogen toamylopectin: a model for the biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Cell 86: 349–352.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ball, S., Colleoni, C., Cenci, U., Raj, J.N., and Tirtiaux, C. (2011). The evolution of glycogen and starch metabolism in eukaryotes givesmolecular clues to understand the establishment of plastid endosymbiosis. J. Exp. Bot. 62: 1775–1801.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Buléon, A., Colonna, P., Planchot, V., and Ball, S. (1998). Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 23: 85–112.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cuesta-Seijo, J.A., Nielsen, M.M., Ruzanski, C., Krucewicz, K., Beeren, S.R., Rydhal, M.G., Yoshimura, Y., Striebeck, A., Motawia, M.S.,Willats, W.G.T., and Palcic, M.M. (2016). In vitro biochemical characterization of all barley endosperm starch synthases. Front. Plant Sci.6: 1–17.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Crumpton-Taylor, M., Grandison, S., Png, K.M.Y., Bushby, A.J., and Smith, A.M.
(2012). Control of starch granule numbers in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 158: 905–916.
Crumpton-Taylor, M., Pike, M., Lu, K.-J., Hylton, C.M., Feil, R., Eicke, S., Lunn, J.E., Zeeman, S.C., and Smith, A.M. (2013). Starchsynthase 4 is essential for coordination of starch granule formation with chloroplast division during Arabidopsis leaf expansion. NewPhytol. 200: 1064–1075.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Delatte, T., Trevisan, M., Parker, M.L., and Zeeman, S.C. (2005). Arabidopsis mutants Atisa1 and Atisa2 have identical phenotypes andlack the same multimeric isoamylase, which influences the branch point distribution of amylopectin during starch synthesis. Plant J. 41:815–830.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Delvallé, D., Dumez, S., Wattebled, F., Roldán, I., Planchot, V., Berbezy, P., Colonna, P., Vyas, D., Chatterjee, M., Ball, S., Mérida, A., andD’Hulst, C. (2005). Soluble starch synthase I: a major determinant for the synthesis of amylopectin in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. PlantJ. 43: 398–412.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fontaine, T., Hulst, C.D., Maddelein, M.-L., Routier, F., Pepin, T.M., Decq, A., Wieruszeski, J., Delrue, B., Koornhuyse, N. Van Den,Bossu, J., Fournet, B., and Ball, S. (1993). Toward an understanding of the biogenesis of the starch granule. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 16223–16230.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fujita, N., Yoshida, M., Kondo, T., Saito, K., Utsumi, Y., Tokunaga, T., Nishi, A., Satoh, H., Park, J.-H., Jane, J.-L., Miyao, A., Hirochika, H.,and Nakamura, Y. (2007). Characterization of SSIIIa-deficient mutants of rice: the function of SSIIIa and pleiotropic effects by SSIIIadeficiency in the rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 144: 2009–2023.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fujita, N., Yoshida, M., Asakura, N., Ohdan, T., Miyao, A., Hirochika, H., and Nakamura, Y. (2006). Function and characterization of starchsynthase I using mutants in rice. Plant Physiol. 140: 1070–1084.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gámez-Arjona, F.M., Raynaud, S., Ragel, P., and Mérida, A. (2014). Starch synthase 4 is located in the thylakoid membrane and interactswith plastoglobule-associated proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 80: 305–316.
Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
CrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hennen-Bierwagen, T.A., Lin, Q., Grimaud, F., Planchot, V., Keeling, P.L., James, M.G., and Myers, A.M. (2009). Proteins from multiplemetabolic pathways associate with starch biosynthetic enzymes in high molecular weight complexes: a model for regulation of carbonallocation in maize amyloplasts. Plant Physiol. 149: 1541–1559.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hennen-Bierwagen, T.A., Liu, F., Marsh, R.S., Kim, S., Gan, Q., Tetlow, I.J., Emes, M.J., James, M.G., and Myers, A.M. (2008). Starchbiosynthetic enzymes from developing maize endosperm associate in multisubunit complexes. Plant Physiol. 146: 1892–1908.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hostettler, C., Kölling, K., Santelia, D., Streb, S., Kötting, O., and Zeeman, S.C. (2011). Analysis of starch metabolism in chloroplasts.Methods Mol. Biol. 775: 387–410.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Leterrier, M., Holappa, L.D., Broglie, K.E., and Beckles, D.M. (2008). Cloning, characterisation and comparative analysis of a starchsynthase IV gene in wheat: functional and evolutionary implications. BMC Plant Biol. 8: 98–119.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Letunic, I., Doerks, T., and Bork, P. (2014). SMART: recent updates, new developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 43: D257–D260.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu, F., Makhmoudova, A., Lee, E.A., Wait, R., Emes, M.J., and Tetlow, I.J. (2009). The amylose extender mutant of maize conditionsnovel protein-protein interactions between starch biosynthetic enzymes in amyloplasts. J. Exp. Bot. 60: 4423–4440.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu, F., Romanova, N., Lee, E.A., Ahmed, R., Evans, M., Gilbert, E.P., Morell, M.K., Emes, M.J., and Tetlow, I. (2012). Glucan affinity ofstarch synthase IIa determines binding of starch synthase I and starch branching enzyme IIb to starch granules. Biochem. J. 448: 373–387.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Malinova, I., Alseekh, S., Feil, R., Fernie, A.R., Baumann, O., Schöttler, M.A., Lunn, J.E., and Fettke, J. (2017). Starch synthase 4 andplastidal phosphorylase differentially affect starch granule number and morphology. Plant Physiol. 174: 73– 85.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Myers, A.M., Morell, M.K., James, M.G., and Ball, S.G. (2000). Recent progress towards understanding the biogenesis of theamylopectin crystal. Plant Physiol. 122: 989–997.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nougué, O., Corbi, J., Ball, S.S.G., Manicacci, D., and Tenaillon, M.I. (2014). Molecular evolution accompanying functional divergence ofduplicated genes along the plant starch biosynthesis pathway. BMC Evol. Biol. 14: 103.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pérez, S. and Bertoft, E. (2010). The molecular structures of starch components and their contribution to the architecture of starchgranules: A comprehensive review.
Starch/Stärke 62: 389–420.
Pfister, B., Lu, K.-J., Eicke, S., Feil, R., Lunn, J.E., Streb, S., and Zeeman, S.C. (2014). Genetic evidence that chain length and branchpoint distributions are linked determinants of starch granule formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 165: 1457– 1474.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Pfister, B., Sánchez-Ferrer, A., Diaz, A., Lu, K., Otto, C., Holler, M., Shaik, F.R., Meier, F., Mezzenga, R., and Zeeman, S.C. (2016).Recreating the synthesis of starch granules in yeast. eLife 5: 1–29.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pfister, B. and Zeeman, S.C. (2016). Formation of starch in plant cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73: 2781–2807.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ragel, P., Streb, S., Feil, R., Sahrawy, M., Annunziata, M.G., Lunn, J.E., Zeeman, S., and Mérida, Á. (2013). Loss of starch granuleinitiation has a deleterious effect on the growth of Arabidopsis plants due to an accumulation of ADP-glucose. Plant Physiol. 163: 75–85.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Raynaud, S., Ragel, P., Rojas, T., and Mérida, Á. (2016). The N-terminal part of Arabidopsis thaliana starch synthase 4 determines thelocalization and activity of the enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 291: 10759–10771.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roldán, I., Wattebled, F., Lucas, M.M., Delvallé, D., Planchot, V., Jiménez, S., Pérez, R., Ball, S., D’Hulst, C., and Mérida, A. (2007). Thephenotype of soluble starch synthase IV defective mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests a novel function of elongation enzymes inthe control of starch granule formation. Plant J. 49: 492–504.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Satoh, H., Shibahara, K., Tokunaga, T., Nishi, A., Tasaki, M., Hwang, S.K., Okita, T.W., Kaneko, N., Fujita, N., Yoshida, M., Hosaka, Y.,Sato, A., Utsumi, Y., Ohdan, T., and Nakamura, Y. (2008). Mutation of the plastidial alpha-glucan phosphorylase gene in rice affects thesynthesis and structure of starch in the endosperm. Plant Cell 20: 1833–1849.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Senoura, T., Asao, A., Takashima, Y., Isono, N., Hamada, S., Ito, H., and Matsui, H. (2007). Enzymatic characterization of starch synthaseIII from kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). FEBS J. 274: 4550–4560.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Seung, D., Boudet, J., Monroe, J.D., Schreier, T.B., David, L.C., Abt, M., Lu, K.J., Zanella, M., and Zeeman, S.C. (2017). Homologs ofPROTEIN TARGETING TO STARCH control starch granule initiation in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell, in press. DOI:10.1105/tpc.17.00222.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Seung, D., Lu, K.-J., Stettler, M., Streb, S., and Zeeman, S.C. (2016). Degradation of glucan primers in the absence of starch synthase 4disrupts starch granule initiation in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem.: jbc.M116.730648.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Seung, D., Soyk, S., Coiro, M., Maier, B.A., Eicke, S., and Zeeman, S.C. (2015). PROTEIN TARGETING TO STARCH is required forlocalising GRANULE-BOUND STARCH SYNTHASE to starch granules and for normal amylose synthesis in Arabidopsis. PLOS Biol. 13:e1002080.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shewmaker, C.K., Boyer, C.D., Wiesenborn, D.P., Thompson, D.B., Boersig, M.R., Oakes, J. V, and Stalker, D.M. (1994). Expression ofEscherichia coli glycogen synthase in the tubers of transgenic potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) results in a highly branched starch.Plant Physiol. 104: 1159–1166.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Stitt, M. and Zeeman, S.C. (2012). Starch turnover: pathways, regulation and role in growth. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15: 1–11.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Streb, S., Delatte, T., Umhang, M., Eicke, S., Schorderet, M., Reinhardt, D., and Zeeman, S.C. (2008). Starch granule biosynthesis inArabidopsis is abolished by removal of all debranching enzymes but restored by the subsequent removal of an endoamylase. PlantCell 20: 3448–3466.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szydlowski, N., Ragel, P., Raynaud, S., Lucas, M.M., Roldán, I., Montero, M., Muñoz, F.J., Ovecka, M., Bahaji, A., Planchot, V., Pozueta-Romero, J., D'Hulst, C., and Mérida, A. (2009). Starch granule initiation in Arabidopsis requires the presence of either class IV or classIII starch synthases. Plant Cell 21: 2443–2457.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tatge, H., Marshall, J., Martin, C., Edwards, E.A., and Smith, A.M. (1999). Evidence that amylose synthesis occurs within the matrix ofthe starch granule in potato tubers. Plant, Cell Environ. 22: 543–550.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tetlow, I.J., Beisel, K.G., Cameron, S., Makhmoudova, A., Liu, F., Bresolin, N.S., Wait, R., Morell, M.K., and Emes, M.J. (2008). Analysis ofprotein complexes in wheat amyloplasts reveals functional interactions among starch biosynthetic enzymes. Plant Physiol. 146: 1878–1891.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ugalde, J.E., Parodi, A.J., and Ugalde, R.A. (2003). De novo synthesis of bacterial glycogen: Agrobacterium tumefaciens glycogensynthase is involved in glucan initiation and elongation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 10659–10663.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Umemoto, T., Nakamura, Y., Satoh, H., and Terashima, K. (1999). Differences in amylopectin structure between two rice varieties inrelation to the effects of temperature. Starch/Stärke 2–3: 58–62.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Valdez, H.A., Busi, M. V, Wayllace, N.Z., Parisi, G., Ugalde, R.A., and GomezCasati, D.F. (2008). Role of the N-terminal starch-bindingdomains in the kinetic properties of starch synthase III from Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemistry 47: 3026– 3032.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
van de Wal, M., D’Hulst, C., Vincken, J.P., Buléon, A., Visser, R., and Ball, S. (1998). Amylose is synthesized in vitro by extension of andcleavage from amylopectin. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 22232–22240.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wattebled, F., Dong, Y., Dumez, S., Delvallé, D., Planchot, V., Berbezy, P., Vyas, D., Colonna, P., Chatterjee, M., Ball, S., and D’Hulst, C.(2005). Mutants of Arabidopsis lacking a chloroplastic isoamylase accumulate phytoglycogen and an abnormal form of amylopectin.Plant Physiol. 138: 184–195.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wilson, W. A., Roach, P.J., Montero, M., Baroja-Fernández, E., Muñoz, F.J., Eydallin, G., Viale, A.M., and Pozueta-Romero, J. (2010).Regulation of glycogen metabolism in yeast and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34: 952–985.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zeeman, S.C., Kossmann, J., and Smith, A.M. (2010). Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61: 209–234.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zeeman, S.C., Smith, S.M., and Smith, A.M. (2002). The priming of amylose synthesis in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol. 128: 1069–1076.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang, X., Myers, A.M., and James, M.G. (2005). Mutations affecting starch synthase III in Arabidopsis alter leaf starch structure andincrease the rate of starch synthesis. Plant Physiol. 138: 663–674.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 23, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.