1-s2.0-S0090825804003610-main.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 1-s2.0-S0090825804003610-main.pdf

    1/3

    Case Report

    Pregnancy after trachelectomy: a high-risk condition of preterm delivery.

    Report of a case and review of the literature

    Patrick Petignat,a,* Catalin Stan,a Eric Megevand,a and Daniel Dargentb

    aGynecologic Oncology Service, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandbDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery, Hospital Edouard Herriot, Lyons, France

    Received 4 August 2003

    Available online 2 July 2004

    Abstract

    Background. Trachelectomy is a conservative but locally radical procedure associated with a high risk of preterm delivery.

    Case. A 28-year-old patient with cervical cancer FIGO stage IB1 was treated with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by

    trachelectomy. Three years later, she conceived spontaneously. In consideration of the high risk of preterm delivery, the cervical status was

    evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography. At 16 weeks gestation, we observed the cerclage suture correctly placed at the level of the

    internal cervical os and a neo-cervical segment length of 1.5 cm. Thereafter, serial ultrasound measurements showed preservation of the

    cervical competence. The patient achieved an uneventful pregnancy and delivered by elective cesarean section at 37 weeks.

    Conclusion. Transvaginal scans to evaluate the competence of the neo-cervix may contribute to the management and counseling of

    patients after trachelectomy.

    D 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Cervical cancer; Fertility; Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy; Pregnancy; Trachelectomy

    Introduction

    Women with early stage cervical cancers are usually

    managed by radical hysterectomy and have to forego

    their desire for future fertility. The issue of having

    children after cervical cancer is important as the disease

    affects primarily young women and many of them before

    childbearing is completed. Vaginal trachelectomy is a

    locally radical procedure which allows preservation of

    the body of the uterus, but is associated with a high risk

    of preterm delivery in pregnancy (Table 1) [110].

    In a woman with a stage IB1 cervical cancer who

    desired to preserve her childbearing potential, we per-

    formed laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection fol-

    lowed by a radical trachelectomy. Three years later, the

    patient had a successful pregnancy and term delivery.

    Case report

    A 28-year-old woman, gravida 3, para 1, with no medical

    or surgical history apart from one normal pregnancy and

    delivery, presented to our colposcopic clinic for evaluation

    of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion identified on

    her Papanicolaou smear. A cervical biopsy showed a cervi-

    cal intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III, and the patient was

    treated with large loop electrosurgical excision of the trans-

    formation zone. Histologic examination showed invasive,

    well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma measuring 9

    mm laterally and infiltrated to a depth of 7 mm, without the

    presence of lymph vascular space involvement.

    The patient was assessed by magnetic resonance imag-

    ing of the pelvis and abdomen and examination under

    anesthesia to determine the extension of the disease and

    was staged FIGO IB1. She was informed of the standard

    management in this situation, including radical hysterecto-

    my. However, because the patient strongly desired to

    preserve her fertility, she was counseled as to the possi-

    bility of radical trachelectomy and informed of the known

    risks and complications of the procedure, including the

    possibility of compromised fertility.

    0090-8258/$ - see front matterD 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.039

    * Corresponding author. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,

    University Hospitals of Geneva, Boulevard de la Cluse 30, 1211 Geneva,

    14 Switzerland. Fax: +41-22-382-42-24.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (P. Petignat).

    www.elsevier.com/locate/ygyno

    Gynecologic Oncology 94 (2004) 575 577

  • 8/10/2019 1-s2.0-S0090825804003610-main.pdf

    2/3

    Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed

    which revealed no lymph node metastases. We then pro-

    ceeded with radical vaginal trachelectomy, as previously

    described [4]. In addition, a single monofilament non-ab-sorbable (1 nylon) suture was inserted into the lower segment

    of the uterus to form a cerclage; the knot was hidden in the

    isthmo-vaginal suture after a Sturmdorf closure. The vaginal

    mucosa was approximated to the isthmic mucosa (squamo-

    columnar junction) to leave a permeable cervical canal. At the

    end of the procedure, the cervical canal was measured and

    showed a neo-cervix of 1.2 cm length below the isthmus.

    The patient then resumed normal menses; follow-up by

    colposcopy and Papanicolaou smear repeatedly tested neg-

    ative. Three years later, she conceived spontaneously. Trans-

    vaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length was

    performed at 16, 20, 24, 28, and 34 weeks of gestation to

    assess the stability and competence of the cervix (Fig. 1).The cerclage placement was located at the internal os with a

    cervical length of 1.5 cm throughout the pregnancy.

    At 37 weeks gestation, a low transverse cesarean section

    was performed under rachis anesthesia, and a live healthy

    female child weighing 2700 g was delivered. The mother

    and child were discharged 6 days post delivery.

    Discussion

    The most important issue for the patient and her physi-

    cian following a treatment for cancer is the cure rate. The

    available data in terms of survival after trachelectomy are

    scant because the number of patients treated by this proce-

    dure remains small. However, it seems that the control of the

    disease and survival are comparable to traditional surgicalprocedures for early-stage cervical cancer[3,4,6,10].

    The second important issue is the fertility and pregnancy

    outcome. Even if the body of the uterus is preserved, this

    therapeutic approach may alter the reproductive function

    and expose those women to a high risk of preterm labor. To

    the best of our knowledge, 10 reports regrouping 40 women

    and 55 pregnancies have been published in the literature to

    date (Medline search: 1966 to April 2003). Among those

    women with a pregnancy of more than 20 weeks gestation,

    42% delivered z36 weeks gestation(Table 1).

    Preterm delivery may occur as a result of lack of

    mechanical support of the residual cervix or ascending

    infection followed by chorioamnionitis. Given the largeamount of cervix surgically removed, most authors rec-

    ommend the insertion of a prophylactic cerclage to

    provide sufficient mechanical support. A second poten-

    tially effective prevention strategy (not performed in our

    case) is a total cervico-vaginal occlusion using the Saling

    technique, which should be performed between 12 and 14

    weeks of pregnancy in an effort to reduce the risk of

    chorioamnionitis [4,11].

    To date, no data exist in the literature on the cervical

    status and competence during pregnancy following trache-

    lectomy. However, it can be assumed that early detection of

    preterm labor in these women might be difficult given the

    Table 1

    Pregnancy outcome and gestational age at delivery after radical trachelectomy

    Authors (years) Number

    of patients

    Number of

    pregnancies

    Gestational age

    at delivery (weeks)

    N(%) deliveries at

    z36 weeks gestation

    Roy et al. [1] 4 5 25; 34; 38; 39 2 (50%)

    Martin et al.[2] 1 1 27 0

    Covens et al.[3] 4 5 2 miscarriages; 28; 2 at z36 2 (66%)*

    Dargent et al.[4] 13 20 10 miscarriages or fetal deaths; 10 at z36 10 (NA)*Burnham et al. [5] 1 1 37 1

    Shepherd et al.[6] 8 14 4 miscarriages; 25; 26; 28; 31; 35; 35; 4 at z36 4 (40%)*

    Alexopoulos et al. [7] 1 1 25 0

    Rodriguez et al. [8] 1 1 39 1

    Schlaerth et al.[9] 4 4 24; 26; 32; 38 1 (25%)

    Burnett et al. [10] 3 3 20; 24; >36 1 (33%)

    Total 40 55 38* 22 (58%)*

    Miscarriage (

  • 8/10/2019 1-s2.0-S0090825804003610-main.pdf

    3/3

    risk of painless and progressive dilation of their residual

    uterine cervix. Usual approaches used to detect preterm

    delivery are regular digital cervical examinations, sterile

    speculum examinations or ultrasonographic examination.

    After trachelectomy, digital cervical and speculum exami-

    nations have a limited reliability due to the markedly

    modified anatomy caused by the suture of the vaginalmucosa to the neo-cervix, except in cases presenting with

    advanced cervical dilatation or prolapsed of the membranes.

    Transvaginal ultrasonographic follow-up may present a

    significant advantage over digital or speculum examination

    to evaluate the neo-cervix and the endocervical canal, and

    to identify women truly at risk of preterm delivery. The

    clinician performing the scan should be aware of the

    anatomical modifications induced by the surgery, as the

    narrowing of the upper part of the vagina due to its

    approximation to the isthmic mucosa and should avoid an

    excessive pressure on the vaginal probe which could poten-

    tially disturb the neo-cervix. In our case, we inserted the

    probe slightly into the vagina until it met resistance, visu-

    alized the cerclage in the sagittal plane and manipulated the

    probe until the entire cervical canal has been visualized.

    Neither suture displacement nor significant cervical short-

    ening was observed during the complete pregnancy.

    What is the appropriate management if an ultrasono-

    graphic diagnosis of cervical incompetence is established?

    First and foremost, antenatal interventions should be per-

    formed such as a transfer to a facility with a neonatal

    intensive unit and the administration of corticosteroids to

    the mother to hasten lung maturation. Other approaches

    such as the Saling procedure or a second vaginal cerclage

    performed in an emergency status would seem to us to beconsidered as perilous.

    We conclude that serial vaginal ultrasound assessment

    of the neo-cervix in patients after trachelectomy allows

    the determination of its competence and subsequently

    contributes to the management and counseling of the

    patient. The effective benefit of this procedure has not

    yet been established by evidence-based scientific proof

    because of the rarity of these cases, but this attitude may

    be considered as a likely contributing factor to the efficient

    clinical care of these patients.

    Acknowledgment

    We thank Mrs. Rosemary Sudan for editorial assistance.

    References

    [1] Roy M, Plante M. Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for

    early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1494 6.

    [2] Martin XJ, Golfier F, Romestaing P, Raudrant D. First case of preg-

    nancy after radical trachelectomy and pelvic irradiation. Gynecol

    Oncol 1999;74:2867.

    [3] Covens A, Shaw P, Murphy J, DePetrillo D, Lickrish G, Lafranboise

    S, et al. Is radical trachelectomy a safe alternative to radical hyster-

    ectomy for patients with stage IA B carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer

    1999;86:22739.

    [4] Dargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A, Mathevet P. Laparoscopic vagi-

    nal radical trachelectomy. A treatment to preserve the fertility of

    cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer 2000;88:1877 82.

    [5] Burnham A, Venkitaraman U, Street P. Successful pregnancy follow-

    ing trachelectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for cer-

    vical cancer. Gynaecol Endosc 2000;9:734.

    [6] Shepherd JH, Mould T, Oram DH. Radical trachelectomy in early

    stage carcinoma of the cervix: outcome as judged by recurrence and

    fertility rates. BJOG 2001;108:8825.

    [7] Alexopoulos E, Efkarpidis S, Fay TN, Williamson KM. Pregnancy

    following radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for

    Stage I cervical adenocarcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;

    81:7912.

    [8] Rodriguez M, Guimares O, Rose PG. Radical abdominal trachelec-

    tomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine conservation and

    subsequent pregnancy in t he treatment of early invasive cervicalcancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:3704.

    [9] Schlaerth JB, Spirtos NM, Schlaerth AC. Radical trachelectomy and

    pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine preservation in the treatment of

    cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:2934.

    [10] Burnett AF, Roman LD, OMeara AT, Morrow CP. Radical vaginal

    trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for preservation of fertil-

    ity in early cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2003;88:41923.

    [11] Saling E. Der fruhe totale Muttermundsverschluss zur Vermeidung

    habitueller Aborte und Fruhgeburten. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 1981;

    1852:25961.

    P. Petignat et al. / Gynecologic Oncology 94 (2004) 575577 577