Upload
bernadette-candace-lamb
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Results from the BRAHMS experiment at RHIC
Dieter Röhrich Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen
for the
BRAHMS collaboration
• Experimental setup• Stopping• Particle production
– Charged particle pseudo-rapidity distribution– Rapidity dependence of ratios of identified particles
2
BRAHMS collaboration
I.G. Bearden7, D. Beavis1, C. Besliu10, Y. Blyakhman6, J. Bondorf7, J.Brzychczyk4, B. Budick6, H. Bøggild7, C. Chasman1, C. H. Christensen7, P. Christiansen7, J.Cibor4, R.Debbe1,
J. J. Gaardhøje7, K. Grotowski4, K. Hagel8, O. Hansen7, H. Heiselberg7, A. Holm7, A.K. Holme12, H. Ito11, E. Jacobsen7, A. Jipa10, J. I. Jordre10, F. Jundt2, C. E. Jørgensen7, T.
Keutgen9, E. J. Kim5, T. Kozik3, T.M.Larsen12, J. H. Lee1, Y. K.Lee5, G. Løvhøjden2, Z. Majka3, A. Makeev8, B. McBreen1, M. Murray8, J. Natowitz8, B.S.Nielsen7, K. Olchanski1, D. Ouerdane7, R.Planeta4, F. Rami2, D. Roehrich9, B. H. Samset12, S. J. Sanders11, I. S.
Sgura10, R.A.Sheetz1, Z.Sosin3, P. Staszel7, T.S. Tveter12, F.Videbæk1, R. Wada8 and A.Wieloch3.
1Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA 2IReS and Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France
3Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland 4Institute of Nuclear Physics, Cracow, Poland
5Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
6New York University, USA 7Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
8Texas A&M University, College Station, USA 9University of Bergen, Norway 10University of Bucharest, Romania
11University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA 12University of Oslo, Norway
3
RHIC physicsAugust 2000 & August 2001
2:00 o’clock
4:00 o’clock6:00 o’clock
8:00 o’clock
10:00 o’clock
STARPHENIX
RHIC
AGS
LINACBOOSTER
TANDEMS
9 GeV/uQ = +79
1 MeV/uQ = +32
HEP/NP
g-2
U-lineBAF (NASA)
BRAHMS: Lpeak = 3.3 1025 cm-2 s-1
Lave = 1.7 1025 cm-2 s-1
Rcoll= 350 HzPHOBOS
6 b-1
2 wks
August 2000 and 2001
4
BRAHMS detector
– Centrality detectors• Tiles• Silicon strips• Beam-Beam counters • Zero-degree
calorimeters
– Two movable spectrometers• Midrapidity spectrometer
• Forward Spectrometer
• Broad RAnge Hadron Magnetic Spectrometer
5
Global detectors: SiMA, TMA, BB, ZDC
• SiMA (-2.0< <2.0) • TMA (-2.2< <2.2)• Beam-Beam (3 < | | < 4)
97% (geom)
6
Centrality determination
• Multiplicity measurement– Si strips + tiles
• Corrected for vertex position dependence
1m
7
Forward & midrapidity spectrometers
FS: 2 TPC, 2 TOF, C1-threshold, 3 Drift Ch. Mod., RICH, 4 Dipoles
2.5 - 30 deg. = 1.5 - 4
MRS: 2 TPC, 1 Dipole, 1TOF
30 - 90 deg. = 0 - 1.5
8
First BRAHMS collision at 100 AGeV+100AGeV
T1
MTPC1
T2
MTPC2
MRS: 90 deg
6.5 msr
FS: 6 deg
0.8 msr
Dipole Magnets
9
Spectrometer acceptanceAugust 2000 & 2001
FFS
BFS
10
TPC tracking and vertex reconstruction
MTPC1
z
y
11
Hadron identification MRS (90, 40 deg)
m2=p2( t2 / L2 -1)
p-bar
K p
=0
=3
p
K
0
p, pbar
K±
12
Hadron identificationFS (4 deg & 200AGeV) (1)
TOF (H1) and Cherenkov (C1) veto in FFS
C1,H1,T2
13
Hadron identificationFS (4 deg & 200AGeV) (2)
K- p-
K+ p
• C1 Cerenkov pion threshold ~2.7GeV/c
• C1 segmented in 32 6.35cm x 6.35 cm pixels.
• Mean # of tracks/event ~1.4• TOF resolution roughly 25%
better than in 2000
• TOF K/p in FFS up to 5GeV/c
• TOF pi/K in FFS to 3GeV/c
14
Hadron identificationFS (200AGeV) (3)
• Full PID in FS• Ring Imaging Cerenkov
Detector (RICH)
• Secondary ToF counter (H2)
PID up to 25 GeV/c
15
Proton rapidity distribution
• AGS energies – Central collisions
– Energy dependence
B. Back et al., E917 Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 1970
16
Stopping
• Rapidity loss– energy
dependence
F. Videbæk, nucl-ex/0106017
17
Net proton rapidity distribution
• SPS • central (6%) Pb+Pb, 158 GeV/nucl. • NA49
• RHIC• central (6%) Au+Au, sNN= 130 GeV
• BRAHMS, STAR
G. Cooper et al. (NA49 Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A661 (1999) 362c-365c
C. Adler et al. (STAR), subm. Phys. Rev. Lett.; F. Videbæk (BRAHMS), QM01
18
Net proton rapidity distribution – model predictions
• FRITIOF 7.02 • HIJING
• BRAHMS (central) preliminary
19
Antiproton/proton ratio – rapidity dependence
• SPS • central (14%) Pb+Pb, 158 GeV/nucl. • NA49
• RHIC• central (40%) Au+Au, sNN= 130 GeV
• BRAHMS
G. Cooper et al. (NA49), Nucl. Phys. A661 (1999) 362c;G. Veres et al. (NA49), Nucl. Phys. A661 (1999) 383c
I.G. Bearden et al., (BRAHMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001)
20
Antiproton/proton ratio – centrality dependence
• SPS • Pb+Pb, 158 GeV/nucl. • NA49
• RHIC• Au+Au, sNN= 130 GeV
• BRAHMS
G. Cooper et al. (NA49), Nucl. Phys. A661 (1999) 362c;G. Veres et al. (NA49), Nucl. Phys. A661 (1999) 383c I.G. Bearden et al., (BRAHMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001)
21
Antiproton/proton ratio – energy dependence
• Energy systematics • RHIC, Au+Au sNN= 130 GeV
sNN= 200 GeV
RHIC, central Au+Au, BRAHMS
J.J. Gaardhøje, (BRAHMS), CIPPQG (2001)
22
Particle production dNch/d @ snn= 130 GeV
• Charged particle pseudorapidity distribution
– SiMA, TMA, BB, TPC– Consistency between 4
independent detector systems
• Central 0-5% N(ch)d =
4050 ± 300
– dN(ch)/d (=0) = 553
1 36– FWHM of distribution
= 7.6 0.7
0-5%
10-20%
20-30%
30-40%
40-50%
5-10%
600
BRAHMS subm. Phys. Lett. B (2001)
65 AGeV + 65 AGeV
23
Number of Participants
From HIJING
• dN/d ~ 3.2 per participant nucl. pair at =0 for central (0-5%); <Npart>=346
• Enhancement of particle production for central collisions at mid-rapidity
• At high rapidities ( >3) particle production scales with Npart
24
dNch/dvs. participant nucleon pairs
@ snn=130 GeV
SPS
25
dNch/d and model predictions
snn=130 GeV
C. E. Jørgensen, Thesis NBI 2001
FRITIOF
HIJING
26
Particle production dNch/d @ snn= 200 GeV
• Charged particle pseudorapidity distribution– SiMA, BB
• Central 0-6% N(ch)d =
5100 ± 300
– dN(ch)/d (=0) = 610
50– FWHM of distribution
= 7.9 1.0
100 AGeV + 100 AGeV
27
dNch/dvs. participant nucleon pairs @ snn=200 GeV
• Soft-Hard:
dN/d=(1-X) npp <Npart>/2
+ X npp <Ncoll>
with <Ncoll>=1049, <Npart>=339, npp=2.43 =>dN/d=668 (with X=0.9)
• High Density QCD-saturation:
dN/dy = f( Npart, Qs2, ,QCD,s,y)
with =0.3 from HERA data
=> dN/d=620 (using dN/d=549 at s=130 GeV)
Kharzeev and Levin (nucl-th/0108006)
28
dNch/dvs. participant nucleon pairs - energy dependence
• 130 AGeV• 4000 charged part. observed• Nch 23.5 pr. part. pair• cf. Nch 17 in p+p at
s=130GeV• 35-40% increase over p+p
Syst
?BRAHMS
200 AGeV
• 200 AGeV• 5100 charged part. observed• Nch 30 pr. part. pair• cf. Nch 20 in p+p at
s=200GeV• 50% increase over p+p
29
Rapidity dependence of ratios of identified particles - how consistent are the models @ snn= 130GeV?
30
Rapidity dependence of K/K+ ratio @ snn= 130GeV
BRAHMS
preliminary
BRAHMS
preliminary
31
Transverse momentum dependence of ratios of identified particles (1)
snn= 130GeV
• Ratios at y 0
• 0-40% central
• No observed dependence on centrality
• No strong pt-dependence
• N()/N(+) = 0.990.02
• N(K)/N(K+) = 0.900.06
32
Transverse momentum dependence of ratios of identified particles (2)
snn= 130GeV
• Ratios at y 0
• 0-40% central
• N(K)/N() increases
with pt (0.16 – 0.6)
• N(p)/N() increases
with pt ;
pbar(p) > for pt > 2 GeV/c
33
Ratios of identified particles and jet quenching
• Kaon/pion ratio as probes of jet quenching and initial density in AA collisions P. Levai, SQM2001
• Anomalous antiproton to negative pion ratio as revealed by jet quenching
I. Vitev, M. Gyulassy, hep-ph/0108045
34
Thermal models at RHIC
F. Becattini, J. Cleymans, A. Keranen, E. Suhonen, K. Redlich,
Phys.Rev. C64 (2001) 024901
BRAHMS Preliminary
y2 y0
35
Summary: Au+Au snn=130 & 200 GeV
RESULTS: 65 + 65• Nch (0-5%) 4050• dN/d (y=0) 553; FWHM 7.6• dN/d (y=0) 3.14 pr. part. pair
• Pbar/p = 0.64 ± 0.05 ± 0.06 (y 0)
= 0.66 ± 0.05 ± 0.06 (y 0.7)
= 0.41 ± 0.05 ± 0.06 (y 2)
/+ = 0.990.02 (y 0)
• K/K+ = 0.900.06 (y 0)
= 0.830.1 (y 2.5)
• No (weak) pt and centrality dependence
RESULTS: 100 + 100 • Nch (0-5%) 5100
• dN/d (y=0) 610. FWHM 7.9
• dN/d (y=0) 3.6 pr. part. pair
• Central mult increases by 14%
• Pbar/p 0.48 ± 0.08 (y 2)
/+ = 0.990.01 (y 3)
• Large y and pt coverage to come