10
1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University www.gmuace.org

1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

1

Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context

Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy

George Mason Universitywww.gmuace.org

Page 2: 1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

Rehabilitation

1. Educate in basic or vocational skills; 2. Involve in therapeutic activities to facilitate

changes in attitudes, behaviors, or values; or, 3. Alter through punishment.

The rehabilitation ideal provides a punitive experience with

opportunities to learn to become a contributing member of society.

2

Page 3: 1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

Challenges: Providing rehabilitative services within correctional settings. Correctional settings do not allow for autonomy, they

focus on control. (Toch, 1987; Goffman, 1961; Dahlen & Johnson, 2010)

Correctional settings replace client-centered efforts with programming suitable for a punitive setting. (Dahlen & Johnson, 2010)

Correctional settings affect staff actions and behaviors by emphasizing control. (Rudes, Lerch, & Taxman, 2011)

Can “what works” (evidence-based practices) thrive within a correctional culture?

3

Page 4: 1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

Study—Mixed Methods Used RNR Program Tool

for Adults to assess use of evidence-based practices and quality programming in one community (N=38)

Content analysis of 4 common curriculums: Seeking Safety (SS), A Cognitive Behavioral Approach: Treating Cocaine Addiction (CBT), Thinking for a Change (T4C), & Strategies for Self-Improvement and Change (SSC)

4

Page 5: 1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

5

RNR Program Tool for Adults Ranks Programs Based on EBPs and “What Works”

Page 6: 1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

Average quality score (lowest scores in implementation and needs)

55/100

Average # of therapeutic approaches used 3.5

% programs that use more controls than therapeutic approaches

53%

% programs that use more sanctions than rewards

53%

Page 7: 1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

Curriculum Review: Positive & Forward vs. Negative & Backward

Criminal Justice Curricula Non-Criminal Justice Curricula

T4C SSCSS CBT

Present/Fwd Looking 38% 11% 26% 25%Positive/Supportive 31% 28% 18% 23%Backward Looking 48% 29% 16%6%Negative Lang/Dir --- 17%45% 38%

Present/Positive 54%46%

Backwd/Negative 47%52%

7

Page 8: 1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

Curriculum Review: Therapeutic Direction

8

• “Show them how to do this” (T4C).• “If the patient becomes upset, emphasize the

emotional pain and then redirect the conversation to a neutral, present topic” (SS).

• Minimal use in CJ curricula (just 13 times total, <1%)• More common in non-CJ curricula (59 occurrences;

about 3% of codes).

Page 9: 1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

Implications of the Culture of Control

Affects treatment programs in untold ways Structurally, programs reinforce the notion of control Difficult to build programs that focus on motivation

and client-centered care Emphasis on risk management is directed at staff;

privileging controls over incentives Curriculums reinforce the notion that individuals must

change regardless of content

9

Page 10: 1 Rehabilitation: The Ideal vs. The Context Faye S. Taxman, Danielle S. Rudes, Catherine Salzinger, Michael Caudy, & Amy Murphy George Mason University

Thank you!

Questions & Comments

Catherine [email protected]

10