8
1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

1

Red Lake CountyReview Meeting 1

June 25, 2012

Page 2: 1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview

06/25/2012

Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2007-2011Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 5 Year Crashes ATP 2

7,505301

State System3,963 – 53%128 – 43%

CSAH/CR1,705 – 23%139 – 46%

Rural1,353 – 79%131 – 94%

Urban352 – 21%

8 – 6%

All Way Stop3 – 2%0 – 0%

Run off Road461 – 67%51 – 65%

On Curve153 – 33%23 – 45%

ExampleAll – %

Severe – %

Right Angle – 42 (48%), 1 (50%)“Other” – 8 (9%), 1 (50%)Left Turn – 12 (14%), 0 (0%)Rear End – 6 (7%), 0 (0%)

Thru-Stop88 – 60%2 – 100%

Rear End – 12 (25%), 0 (0%) Ran Off Road – 9 (19%), 0 (0%)Right Angle – 8 (17%), 0 (0%)“Other” – 4 (8%), 0 (0%)

Signalized8 – 5%0 – 0%

Inters-Related317 –28%41 – 33%

City, Twnshp, Other1,837 – 24%

34 – 11%

Inters-Related147 – 42%

2 – 25%

Not Inters-Related126 – 36%

5 – 63%

Run Off Road – 32 (25%), 2 (40%)Head On/SS Opp – 10 (8%), 2 (40%)Rear End – 33 (26%), 1 (20%)Right Angle – 10 (8%), 0 (0%)

Animal204 – 15%

7 – 5%

Not Inters-Related692 – 60%79 – 64%

Head On, SS Opp47 – 7%

13 – 16%

On Curve16 – 34%4 – 31%

Unknown/Other79 – 22%1 – 12%

Unknown/Other140 – 12%

4 – 3%

Other/Unknown48 – 33%

0 – 0%

Right Angle – 50 (31%), 17 (55%)“Other” – 39 (24%), 8 (26%)Rear End – 20 (12%), 2 (6%)Run Off Road – 16 (10%), 1 (3%)

Thru-Stop161 – 51%31 – 76%

Run Off Road – 49 (34%), 5 (56%) Right Angle – 14 (10%), 2 (22%)“Other” – 29 (20%), 1 (11%)“Not Coded” – 1 (1%), 1 (11%)

Other/Unknown143 – 45%

9 –22%

Not Animal1,149 – 85%124 – 95%

All Way Stop7 – 2%1 – 2%

Signalized6 – 2%0 – 0%

Page 3: 1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

36/25/2012

Red Lake County Crash Data OverviewSource: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2007-2011-- Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A).

5 Year Crashes Red Lake 101

7

State System60 – 59%3 – 43%

CSAH/CR34 – 34%4 – 57%

Rural28 – 82%4 – 100%

Urban6 – 18%0 – 0%

All Way Stop0 – 0%0 – 0%

On Curve0 – 0%0 – 0%

ExampleAll – %

Severe – %

Right Angle – 1 (100%), 0 (0%)

Thru-Stop1 – 50%0 – 0%

Unknown – 1 (100%), 0 (0%)

Signalized0 – 0%0 – 0%

Inters-Related7 –35%1 – 33%

City, Twnshp, Other7 – 7%0 – 0%

Inters-Related2 – 33%0 – 0%

Not Inters-Related3 – 50%0 – 0%

Run Off Road – 1 (33%), 0 (0%)Rear End – 1 (33%), 0 (0%)Right Angle – 1 (33%), 0 (0%)

Animal8 – 29%1 – 25%

Not Inters-Related11 – 55%2 – 67%

Head On, SS Opp1 – 9%0 – 0%

On Curve0 – 0%0 – 0%

Unknown/Other1 – 17%0 – 0%

Unknown/Other2 – 10%0 – 0%

Other/Unknown1 – 50%0 – 0%

Right Angle – 1 (33%), 0 (0%)“Other” – 1 (33%), 0 (0%)Run Off Road – 1 (33%), 0 (0%)

Thru-Stop3 – 43%0 – 0%

“Other” – 2 (50%), 1 (100%)Run Off Road – 2 (50%), 0 (0%)

Other/Unknown4 – 57%

1 – 100%

Not Animal20 – 71%3 – 75%

All Way Stop0 – 0%0 – 0%

Signalized0 – 0%0 – 0%

Run off Road7 – 64%1 – 50%

Page 4: 1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

4

Red Lake County Crash Data Overview

ATP 2 Crash DataRural Crashes 94% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas.

Non-Intersection Related Crashes 64% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are non-intersection related.

o 65% of these are road departure crashes, 45% of which occurred on a curve.

Intersection Related Crashes 33% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are intersection related.

o 76% of these crashes occurred at a thru-STOP intersection.

Red Lake County Crash DataRural Crashes 100% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas.

o 67% (2 crashes) of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are non-intersection related (1 run off the road crash).

o 33% (1 crash) of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are intersection related (1 unknown).

6/25/2012

Page 5: 1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

5

Red Lake County Emphasis Areas

6/25/2012

Red Lake County Emphasis Areas

Emphasis AreaStatewide

Percentage

ATP 2 Red Lake County

Interstate, US & TH CSAH & CR

City, Twnshp & Other

Interstate, US & TH CSAH & CR

City, Twnshp & Other

  Total Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes 8,300 142 142 47 3 6 1

Drivers

Young drivers (under 21) 24% 23%(32) 27%(38) 36%(17) 0%(0) 0%(0) 0%(0)

Unlicensed drivers 8% 18%(25) 8%(11) 9%(4) 0%(0) 0%(0) 0%(0)

Older drivers (over 64) 14% 20%(28) 12%(17) 6%(3) 0%(0) 0%(0) 0%(0)

Aggressive driving and speeding-related 20% 17%(24) 21%(30) 32%(15) 33%(1) 33%(2) 0%(0)

Drug and alcohol-related 26% 35%(49) 44%(62) 45%(21) 100%(3) 100%(6) 0%(0)

Inattentive, distracted, asleep drivers 20% 22%(31) 15%(21) 13%(6) 33%(1) 17%(1) 0%(0)

Safety awareness - - -- -- -- -- -- --

Unbelted vehicle occupants 25% 36%(51) 51%(72) 32%(15) 100%(3) 50%(3) 100%(1)

Special UsersPedestrians crashes 8% 6%(9) 2%(3) 2%(1) 0%(0) 0%(0) 0%(0)

Bicycle crashes 4% 1%(2) 0%(0) 4%(2) 0%(0) 0%(0) 0%(0)

Vehicles

Motorcycles crashes 16% 8%(11) 11%(16) 26%(12) 0%(0) 33%(2) 0%(0)

Heavy vehicle crashes 10% 17%(24) 12%(17) 2%(1) 0%(0) 0%(0) 0%(0)

Safety enhancements - - -- -- -- -- -- --

Highways

Train-vehicle collisions 0% 0%(0) 1%(2) 6%(3) 0%(0) 0%(0) 0%(0)

Road departure crashes 28% 32%(46) 45%(64) 45%(21) 33%(1) 50%(3) 100%(1)

Consequences of leaving road - - -- -- -- -- -- --

Intersection crashes 42% 45%(64) 30%(43) 34%(16) 0%(0) 17%(1) 0%(0)

Head-On and Sideswipe (opposite) crashes 15% 15%(21) 15%(22) 19%(9) 0%(0) 17%(1) 0%(0)

Work zone crashes 2% 0%(0) 2%(3) 0%(0) 0%(0) 17%(1) 0%(0)

EMS Enhancing Emergency Capabilities - - -- -- -- -- -- --

ManagementInformation and decision support systems - - -- -- -- -- -- --

More effective processes - - -- -- -- -- -- --

DPS Crash Data Records, 2006 to 2010

  Top Emphasis Areas by Jurisdiction

Note: Numbers are not additive, as one crash may involve a young driver at an intersection.

The numbers represent severe crashes (Fatal and A-type Injury crashes)

Page 6: 1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

6

Safety WorkshopObjective: Multidisciplinary discussion of a short list of safety strategies (Note: there is no discussion of specific crash locations.)

Date: July 26 Location: U of M Crookston – Youngquist Auditorium Agenda

8:30 AM – Coffee and Registration 9:00 AM – Introductions

o Presentations – Law Enforcement and Local Safety Advocates

o Background Information/Desired Outcomeso Breakout Sessions – Prioritize Strategies

12:00 – 1:00 PM - Luncho Report Back/Final Presentation

2:45 – 3:00 PM - Wrap-up6/25/2012

Page 7: 1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

76/25/2012

Red Lake County’s Sample Invite

Page 8: 1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

86/25/2012

Safety Workshop – County Assignments

April/May Confirm groups and select group leaders Select dates

• June Secure Location and Caterer – Group Coordinator

50-100 people $12/person (“all in” including delivery, tax and tip)

Send invites (example has been provided)

July All Counties:

RSVP Head Count to Rich Sanders by July 16th Group Coordinator (Rich):

Confirm final headcount by July 17th Group Coordinator (Rich):

E-mail Carla Stueve (SRF) at [email protected] Provide final headcount Audio-visual availability for the workshop