17
1 Presentation for: Green Pacific Conference 21 September 2010, Seattle, WA Marine Vessel Environmental Performance and Rating System (MVeP) (Voluntary Best Management Practices) Presented by: Kevin Reynolds, The Glosten Associates

1 Presentation for: Green Pacific Conference 21 September 2010, Seattle, WA Marine Vessel Environmental Performance and Rating System (MVeP) (Voluntary

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Presentation for: Green Pacific Conference

21 September 2010, Seattle, WA

Marine Vessel Environmental Performance and Rating System (MVeP)(Voluntary Best Management Practices)

Presented by: Kevin Reynolds, The Glosten Associates

“How Green is Green?” - MVeP Holistic Approach to Marine Vessels

Mission Statement: “Provide a common technical basis for assessing environmental performance, so that marine vessel designers, builders, and operators can understand relative environmental impacts of design decisions and operational practices.”

Objective and Approach - MVeP

Objective: Minimize Marine Vessel Environmental Impact

Approach:• Leverage Existing Best Practices• Team Industry, Environmental Groups, and Regulatory Agencies for

Practical Solutions• Provide Technical Basis for

Evaluation, SNAME Technical & Research Publication

• Recognize Industry Leaders and Exemplary Performance

• Encourage VOLUNTARY Implementation Ahead of Regulation

Development & Implementation – MVeP

Phase I Sponsors: Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, and American Bureau of Shipping.

Phase I Project Team: Glosten Associates with review from SNAME T&R, Herbert Engineering Corporation, and Slater & Zeien.

Phase II Sponsors: Under Development.

Phase II Administration Team: SNAME T&R, Alaris, Seaworthy Systems, Wartsila, University of New Orleans, and The Glosten Associates.

Phase II Technical Partners: Quickly Filling – Goal Complete by December.

5

Technical Scope & Metrics1. Energy Efficiency

6

Technical Scope & Metrics2. Air Emissions

7

Technical Scope & Metrics3. Water Emissions

8

GM1 Materials: Reduction / Reuse / Recycle GM2 Hotel Water Use: Reduction / Reuse / Recycle GM3 Ocean Health & Aquatic Life  GM3.1 Underwater Noise

  GM3.2 Wake Wash and Shore Protection

GM3.1 Underwater Light

GM4 Hazardous Materials Control

GM5 Ship Recycling

Technical Scope & Metrics4. General Measures

9

Performance Assessment Guide

1. Scope and Applicability

2. Statement of the Problem

3. Performance Levels

4. Level Justifications

5. Regulatory Environment

6. Directions for Future R&D

7. Design Integration

8. Supporting Documents

Technical Scope & Metrics

Technical Development

Category Energy Efficiency

Air Emissions

Water Emissions

General Measures

Credit

Performance Levels

1 2 … 1 2 … 1 2 … 1 2 …

Prerequisite

Good: Prescriptive Measures

Best Practice: Quantitative Assessment

Zero Impact

1

2

3

4

Technical Development

Category Energy Efficiency

Air Emissions

Water Emissions

General Measures

Credit

Performance Levels

1 2 … 1 2 … 1 2 … 1 2 …

WE 2.1 Ballast WaterPrerequisite – Ballast Convention1

2

3

4

Good – Develop, execute, and document a ballast water plan to meet near land limits set by the California Marine Invasive Species Act – Interim Standard

Best – p = V1T1+ V2T2+V3T3+ V4T4

p = Propagule pressure numerical equivalent

V = Volume of Discharge (V1: w/o treatment or exchange V2: exchanged V3: treated to IMO levels V4: treated to California levels)

T = (100, 84, 48, 12)

Zero Impact – No discharge within 200 nm of any coastline

Bridging Technical Development to Implementation (Phase III)

Level 1 – Standard Practice _ Establish Minimum Measures : Regulatory Requirements Plus .

Level 3 – Best Practice_ Define Metric in T&R Bulletin for Performance Based Measures

Level 4 – Zero Impact_ Establish zero impact definition

Phase 2SNAME T &R Bulletin

Phase 3Third Party

Implementation

_ Establish Baseline Methodology_ Develop Implementation Timelines_ Evaluate New vs . Existing Vessel Considerations_ Subdivide Credits for Focused Recognition (i.e., air pollution )

_ Determine Value of Performance vs . Baseline

Level 2 – Good Practice_ Identify prescriptive measures currently working well

_ Determine relative value of prescriptive measures

Questions and Comments Invited - MVeP

To Participate… Contact: Tim Leach [email protected], Eleanor Nick Kirtley [email protected], Kevin Reynolds [email protected], 206-624-7850.

13

14

Presentation for: Green Pacific Conference

21 September 2010, Seattle, WA

Marine Vessel Environmental Performance and Rating System (MVeP)(Voluntary Best Management Practices)

Presented by: Kevin Reynolds, The Glosten Associates

MVeP Additional Slides

Current Initiatives

MVeP Additional Slides

Phase II Execution ScheduleDevelop Program Management Team – July 2010Category Captains Assigned – August 2010

EE- Mike Gaffney, Matt McKeon, Pete Ryan – AlarisAE – Don Ricciuti, Matt Winkler – SeaworthyWE – Brian Ackerman – WartsilaGM – Chris McKesson – UNO

Credit Group A (At least 3 Performance Assessment Guides per category)Authors Assigned – September 2010Guide Drafts Complete – November 2010 Peer Reviews Complete – January 2011Guide Finals – March 2011

Credit Group B (Remainder of Guides)Authors Assigned – December 2010Guide Drafts Complete – February 2011Peer Reviews Complete – April 2011Guide Finals – June 2011

T&R Bulletin – SNAME Annual Meeting 2011

MVeP Additional Slides

Category Energy Efficiency

Air Emissions

Water Emissions

General Measures

Credit

Metric

1 2 … 1 2 … 1 2 … 1 2 …

Good Better Best

Oily Water

1 pt 2 pts 3 pts

1 pt. Filter bilge water discharge to 5 ppm

2 pts. Reduce volume of discharge by 50%

3 pts. Reduce volume of discharge by 100%

• Quantitative or prescriptive• Verifiable

Certification

Implementation (Class Societies, Other)