Upload
warren-griffith
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11
Overview of Legal Process in Overview of Legal Process in IP CasesIP Cases
From notes by Steve BaronFrom notes by Steve Baron© Ed Lamoureux/Steve Baron© Ed Lamoureux/Steve Baron
22
TodayToday’’s Agendas Agenda
Anatomy of an IP caseAnatomy of an IP case The Courts and the LawThe Courts and the Law Links to finding casesLinks to finding cases Parts of the case fileParts of the case file WhoWho’’s on first?s on first?
Anatomy of a CaseAnatomy of a CaseHilton v. Hallmark CardHilton v. Hallmark Card
Owner of IP Infringer of IP
33
44
The Offending CardThe Offending Card
55
Anatomy of a CaseAnatomy of a Case Hilton sues (2008) Hallmark for the use of her image and Hilton sues (2008) Hallmark for the use of her image and
trademarked slogan, trademarked slogan, ““ThatThat’’s Hots Hot”” Hallmark challenges the complaint on free speech grounds under the Hallmark challenges the complaint on free speech grounds under the
First Amendment.First Amendment. The trial court grants part and denies part of HallmarkThe trial court grants part and denies part of Hallmark’’s requests request An appeal takes place to the Ninth CircuitAn appeal takes place to the Ninth Circuit The appellate court agrees with the part of the ruling that enables The appellate court agrees with the part of the ruling that enables
Hilton to sue Hallmark for trademark infringement.Hilton to sue Hallmark for trademark infringement. The appellate opinion becomes part of the common law and is The appellate opinion becomes part of the common law and is
binding not only on the parties but on all other litigants who face binding not only on the parties but on all other litigants who face similar issues.similar issues.
The case goes to trial (on the The case goes to trial (on the factsfacts rather than the rather than the issuesissues) in Dec. 0f ) in Dec. 0f 2010, but the parties settle two days later.2010, but the parties settle two days later.
So the reasoning and outcomes on the issues (issued by the So the reasoning and outcomes on the issues (issued by the appellate court) becomes common/case law/precedent, even though appellate court) becomes common/case law/precedent, even though the case is never decided in a court of law.the case is never decided in a court of law.
66
Facts v. IssuesAs illustrated in the Hilton case, cases involve legal issues and the facts of the case. •For example, the court determined that the 1st Amendment issue (Hallmark’s use as protected/free speech) did not hold in this instance and did not prevent Hilton from taking the case to trial. If that issue was decided in Hallmark’s favor, there would be no trial.•Cases also feature the factual specifics of the incidents. •Often, facts are more/most at risk in preliminaries and at trial court; issues are more at risk on appeal (although a trial court CAN decide to not hear the facts of a case because a given legal issue suggests/demands that the case isn’t worthy) •This feature can be frustrating to “lay” observers like us as we’d almost always like the courts to decide the merits of a case based on the facts. Courts, on the other hand, very often set the facts aside and decide the case based on “technical” legal issues. •Further, the higher one goes, the more lay people want the courts to decide about the facts and the more likely the court is to rule, instead, only on the issues.
• In Eldred, we wanted the Supreme Court to say that the Copyright Extension Act was the right or wrong thing to do for copyright law; instead, they ruled that the Congress has the right to extend the terms of Copyright law.
77
Layers of Federal CourtsLayers of Federal Courts
United States Supreme CourtCitation e.g. Jones v. Smith, 250 U.S. 345 (1982)
United States District CourtsCitation e.g. Jones v. Smith, 415 F. Supp. 1123 (N.D. Ill. 2001)
United States Circuit Courts of Appeal Citation e.g. Jones v. Smith, 327 F.3d 215 (7th Cir. 1999)
Federal Appellate DistrictsFederal Appellate Districts
88
99
Layers of State Courts (Illinois)Layers of State Courts (Illinois)
Illinois Supreme Court
Illinois Circuit Court
Illinois Appellate Court
State Court Appellate Districts, State Court Appellate Districts, IllinoisIllinois
1010
1111
How to Find the Law on the WebHow to Find the Law on the Web Federal Legislation (the stuff from Congress)Federal Legislation (the stuff from Congress)
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ U.S. Supreme Court OpinionsU.S. Supreme Court Opinions
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ State LawState Law
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/states/listing.htmlhttp://www4.law.cornell.edu/states/listing.html Citation guideCitation guide
The Bluebook – A Uniform Manual of Citation, 19th Edhttps://www.legalbluebook.com/
1212
Who’s on first?Who’s on first?these are civil, not criminal actions these are civil, not criminal actions
PlaintiffPlaintiff a party who complains or sues in a civil actiona party who complains or sues in a civil action
DefendantDefendant a party who is being sued by a plaintiffa party who is being sued by a plaintiff
AppellantAppellant a party who appeals from a decision by a trial a party who appeals from a decision by a trial
or or ““lowerlower”” court court AppelleeAppellee
a party who responds to an appeal by a party who responds to an appeal by appellantappellant
1313
Who’s on first?Who’s on first?
Amicus CuriaeAmicus Curiae Friend of the CourtFriend of the Court Non-parties who petition the court for Non-parties who petition the court for
permission to file legal briefs on behalf of their permission to file legal briefs on behalf of their respective constituencies because the issues respective constituencies because the issues involved may have broad impact on theminvolved may have broad impact on them
AmiciAmici Plural of amicus curiaePlural of amicus curiae
1414
Who's on first?Who's on first?
PetitionerPetitioner Party seeking appeal in the U.S. Party seeking appeal in the U.S.
Supreme CourtSupreme Court RespondentRespondent
Party responding to a petition to the Party responding to a petition to the U.S. Supreme CourtU.S. Supreme Court
1515
Parts of the Case FileParts of the Case File ComplaintComplaint
Initial document filed by plaintiff to start a law suitInitial document filed by plaintiff to start a law suit
Cause of ActionCause of Action The theory or theories of legal recovery articulated by The theory or theories of legal recovery articulated by
plaintiff in the complaintplaintiff in the complaint• e.g. Copyright infringement, breach of contracte.g. Copyright infringement, breach of contract
MotionMotion An application to a court or judge for purpose of An application to a court or judge for purpose of
obtaining a rule or order directing some act to be obtaining a rule or order directing some act to be done in favor of applicant.done in favor of applicant.
1616
Parts of the Case FileParts of the Case File
Motion to DismissMotion to Dismiss Filed by a defendant early in a case to challenge the Filed by a defendant early in a case to challenge the
legal theories.legal theories. Assumes all facts alleged are true but says that no Assumes all facts alleged are true but says that no
legal claim existslegal claim exists
Motion for Summary JudgmentMotion for Summary Judgment Filed by either plaintiff or defendant Filed by either plaintiff or defendant No genuine issue of material fact is in disputeNo genuine issue of material fact is in dispute Court can decide the issues without need for a trialCourt can decide the issues without need for a trial
1717
Parts of the Case FileParts of the Case File
HoldingHolding Narrow legal answer to the question posed by Narrow legal answer to the question posed by
the casethe case Holdings of an appellate court are binding on Holdings of an appellate court are binding on
future cases that come before the trial courts future cases that come before the trial courts below the appellate court.below the appellate court.
Dicta: Dicta: Additional explanation within the Additional explanation within the opinionopinion• Not binding on future cases that present the same Not binding on future cases that present the same
issueissue
Writ of CertiorariWrit of Certiorari
An order of an appellate court An order of an appellate court granting or denying a petition to granting or denying a petition to appealappeal
1818
1919
Parts of the Case File: FindingsParts of the Case File: Findings Cases often present multiple issues. Findings can vary across Cases often present multiple issues. Findings can vary across
issues.issues. AffirmedAffirmed
When an appellate court agrees with the lower court decisionWhen an appellate court agrees with the lower court decision ReversedReversed
When an appellate court disagrees with and overturns the When an appellate court disagrees with and overturns the lower court decisionlower court decision
RemandedRemanded When an appellate court sends a case (or an aspect of the When an appellate court sends a case (or an aspect of the
case) back to the lower court for further case) back to the lower court for further proceeding/reconsideration.proceeding/reconsideration.
Mixed Holding: Separate holdings for different partsMixed Holding: Separate holdings for different parts
If we have extra timeIf we have extra time(we’ll finish over the next week)(we’ll finish over the next week)
http://www.goodcopybadcopy.net/http://www.goodcopybadcopy.net/
2020