1 ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA School Concurrency BCC Transmittal Public Hearing Orange County, Florida School Concurrency BCC Transmittal

1

ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDAORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDAORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA





ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

School ConcurrencySchool Concurrency

BCC Transmittal BCC Transmittal Public HearingPublic Hearing

Orange County, FloridaOrange County, Florida

School ConcurrencySchool Concurrency



January 29, 2008 Board of County Commissioners January 29, 2008 Board of County Commissioners

2

! Background! Requirements! CPP Amendments! Outstanding Issues! Requested Action


Board of County Commissioners

Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline

3





4

Senate Bill 360

• Public schools are subject to concurrency.• Requires that adequate school capacity be

available to support the impact of residential development at the adopted Level of Service (LOS).

• Applied at time of site plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent, for a development or phase of development.

• Adopt by April 1, 2008.

Senate Bill 360

• Public schools are subject to concurrency.• Requires that adequate school capacity be

available to support the impact of residential development at the adopted Level of Service (LOS).

• Applied at time of site plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent, for a development or phase of development.

• Adopt by April 1, 2008.


BackgroundBackground

6





7

Components of School Concurrency

• Data and analysis • Level of Service (LOS)• Concurrency Service Areas (CSA)• Financially feasible 5/10 year CIP for schools• Comprehensive Policy Plan (CPP) Element updates• Executed Interlocal Agreement between OCPS, the

County and the municipalities• Proportionate share mitigation

Components of School Concurrency

• Data and analysis • Level of Service (LOS)• Concurrency Service Areas (CSA)• Financially feasible 5/10 year CIP for schools• Comprehensive Policy Plan (CPP) Element updates• Executed Interlocal Agreement between OCPS, the

County and the municipalities• Proportionate share mitigation


RequirementsRequirements

8

Levels of Service (LOS)

(a) Elementary: 110% of adjusted FISH *

(b) Middle: 100% of adjusted FISH *

(c) High: 100% of adjusted FISH

* Permanent FISH, adjusted to include “in-slot” schools not to exceed Core Capacity.

Levels of Service (LOS)

(a) Elementary: 110% of adjusted FISH *

(b) Middle: 100% of adjusted FISH *

(c) High: 100% of adjusted FISH

* Permanent FISH, adjusted to include “in-slot” schools not to exceed Core Capacity.



9


Concurrency Service Areas (CSA)

• Geographically demarcated areas in which school capacity will be measured using adopted levels of service.

• May be district-wide or less than district-wide (e.g., district, sub-district, school attendance zones).

• If less than district-wide, must apply the adjacency rule.


• Geographically demarcated areas in which school capacity will be measured using adopted levels of service.

• May be district-wide or less than district-wide (e.g., district, sub-district, school attendance zones).

• If less than district-wide, must apply the adjacency rule.


10


• Elementary School CSAs = Modified Middle School Attendance Zones

• Middle School CSAs = Middle School Attendance Zones

• High School CSAs = High School Attendance Zones


• Elementary School CSAs = Modified Middle School Attendance Zones

• Middle School CSAs = Middle School Attendance Zones

• High School CSAs = High School Attendance Zones



11

Interlocal Agreement (ILA)

• Level of service standards• Financially feasible school capital program • School concurrency service areas defined• Coordinated student projections • Development review procedures• School siting criteria• Proportionate share mitigation process

Interlocal Agreement (ILA)

• Level of service standards• Financially feasible school capital program • School concurrency service areas defined• Coordinated student projections • Development review procedures• School siting criteria• Proportionate share mitigation process



12





13

Required CPP Element Updates

• Public School Facilities Element (PSFE)

• Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE)

• Capital Improvements Element (CIE)

Required CPP Element Updates

• Public School Facilities Element (PSFE)

• Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE)

• Capital Improvements Element (CIE)


CPP AmendmentsCPP Amendments

14

Public School Facilities Element (PSFE)

• Correct existing deficiencies• Ensure adequate school capacity for the 5-year and

long-term planning periods• Ensure necessary supporting infrastructure • Include options for proportionate-share mitigation• Coordinate school location with residential development• Incorporate procedures for school site selection

- 163.3177(12), F.S.

Public School Facilities Element (PSFE)

• Correct existing deficiencies• Ensure adequate school capacity for the 5-year and

long-term planning periods• Ensure necessary supporting infrastructure • Include options for proportionate-share mitigation• Coordinate school location with residential development• Incorporate procedures for school site selection

- 163.3177(12), F.S.



15

Capital Improvements Element (CIE)

• Incorporate OCPS’ financially feasible public school capital facilities program

• Include LOS standards

• Update public school capital facilities program and CSA boundaries in conjunction with the annual CIE update

- 163.3180(13)(b)2 and 163.3180(13)(d)1, F.S.

Capital Improvements Element (CIE)

• Incorporate OCPS’ financially feasible public school capital facilities program

• Include LOS standards

• Update public school capital facilities program and CSA boundaries in conjunction with the annual CIE update

- 163.3180(13)(b)2 and 163.3180(13)(d)1, F.S.



16

Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE)

• Policies establishing joint processes for population projections and school siting

• Policies coordinating the comprehensive plan with the plans of the school board

- 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2, 163.3177(6)(h)4a, F.S.

Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE)

• Policies establishing joint processes for population projections and school siting

• Policies coordinating the comprehensive plan with the plans of the school board

- 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2, 163.3177(6)(h)4a, F.S.



17

Timeline

November 2007 LPA Transmittal Hearing

January 29, 2008 BCC Transmittal Hearing

February/March 2008 DCA Review

March 2008 LPA Adoption Hearing

April 2008 BCC Adoption Hearing

Timeline

November 2007 LPA Transmittal Hearing

January 29, 2008 BCC Transmittal Hearing

February/March 2008 DCA Review

March 2008 LPA Adoption Hearing

April 2008 BCC Adoption Hearing



18





19

• Concurrency Service Areas

• Proportionate share – impact fee credits

• Building in long-term concurrency

• Interlocal Agreement (ILA)

• Reconciling process outlined in ILA with concurrency management system and CEA process

• Concurrency Service Areas

• Proportionate share – impact fee credits

• Building in long-term concurrency

• Interlocal Agreement (ILA)

• Reconciling process outlined in ILA with concurrency management system and CEA process


Outstanding IssuesOutstanding Issues

20





21

Action Requested

Transmit the amendments as amended (PSFE Policy 6.1.3, CIE Policy 1.3.9) to the Public Schools Facilities Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element and Capital Improvement Element, and the Draft Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Implementation of Concurrency, to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for further review.

ALL DISTRICTS

Action Requested

Transmit the amendments as amended (PSFE Policy 6.1.3, CIE Policy 1.3.9) to the Public Schools Facilities Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element and Capital Improvement Element, and the Draft Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Implementation of Concurrency, to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for further review.

ALL DISTRICTS


Requested ActionRequested Action

22

PSFE Policy 6.1.3, CIE Policy 1.3.9 The LOS standards to implement school concurrency shall be

calculated as a percentage of the adjusted permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity as follows:(a) Elementary: 110% of adjusted FISH using Modified Middle

School Attendance Zones as CSAs(b) Middle: 100% of adjusted FISH using Middle School Attendance Zones as CSAs(c) High: 100% of adjusted FISH using High School Attendance Zones as CSAs (Note: Adjusted permanent FISH for High Schools does not include in-slots)

PSFE Policy 6.1.3, CIE Policy 1.3.9 The LOS standards to implement school concurrency shall be

calculated as a percentage of the adjusted permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity as follows:(a) Elementary: 110% of adjusted FISH using Modified Middle

School Attendance Zones as CSAs(b) Middle: 100% of adjusted FISH using Middle School Attendance Zones as CSAs(c) High: 100% of adjusted FISH using High School Attendance Zones as CSAs (Note: Adjusted permanent FISH for High Schools does not include in-slots)


Amended PoliciesAmended Policies

23

ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDAORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA






ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

School School ConcurrencyConcurrency



School School ConcurrencyConcurrency



January 29, 2008 Board of County Commissioners January 29, 2008 Board of County Commissioners

Documents

1 ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA School Concurrency BCC Transmittal Public Hearing Orange County, Florida School Concurrency BCC Transmittal