15
1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown, Ph.D. Director, Center for Clinical Informatics

1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

1

On Track Advanced Topics

Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data

Eric Hamilton, M.S.Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions

Jeb Brown, Ph.D.Director, Center for Clinical Informatics

Page 2: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

2

Overview

1. What can outcomes data add to my practice?

2. A closer look at the Client Feedback Form

3. What is MyToolkit and what do all those numbers mean?

4. Putting data into practice

5. Discussion

Page 3: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

3

What can outcomes data add to my practice? • Do you always know which patients

struggling in therapy?• Do some of your clients stop therapy before

you can establish a good relationship?• Can you show clients evidence of their

progress compared to benchmarks?• Can you show prospective clients,

colleagues, or managed care companies evidence of your clinical outcomes?

Page 4: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

4

How good are clinicians at identifying clients at risk for treatment failure?

• Lambert and colleagues compared clinician predictions to predictive algorithms using early client self-assessment data

• Only 3 out of 550 cases predicted to have poor outcome• Of the 40 that had a poor outcome, only 1 had been predicted

by a clinician• Algorithms based on early assessments identified 85% of

poor outcome cases – but also identified some that did well

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Positive No Change Deteriorated

TherapistPredictedOutcome

ActualtreatmentOutcome

Source: Hannan, et al (2005), JCLP

Number of cases

Page 5: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

5

What do the predictive algorithms mean?

• Statistical model that compares early client progress to a “typical profile,” adjusting for case characteristics such as intake severity

• Poor early progress does not “predict” a likelihood of failure – rather it is an indicator of heightened drop-out risk

• “Off-track” clients who remain engaged generally get good outcomes – it just might take them longer

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Intake 3 6 9 12 15 18+

Weeks

WA

-Adu

lt S

core

Actual score

85% percentile

Predicted Score

15th percentile

Clinical cuttoff

Global DistressScore

Page 6: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

6

Client Feedback Form (CFF) - Adult

Item Groups • Global Distress: 1-10

– Core scale– Sensitive to change over time– Depression, anxiety, social functioning

• Risk of self-harm: 5– Risk indicator

• Substance use: 11-13– Risk indicator

• Work productivity: 14-15 – Indicator of functioning

• Therapeutic alliance: 16-18– Support tool for therapist

• Background items: 19-20– For case-mix analysis and identification of co-

morbidities

Page 7: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

7

Tips for Using the CFF

• Print multiple copies before you need them• Have available for the member to complete

before the session begins• Show you value the data – when giving the

CFF and when it is returned• Review scored results online before the

next session • Measure early and measure often!

Page 8: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

8

CFF Results: What do all those numbers mean?

Access On Track results

Page 9: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

9

Outcomes based on the most recent CFF

High scores in red

Page 10: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

10

You decide which variables

to display

Page 11: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

11

Results: Key things to remember• “Effect Size” is a way of looking at the combined

results of cases with 2+ data points, compared to normative data

• Links at the top of each column take you to more information

• All scores are presented as means– Range is from zero to four

• Higher severity results appear in Red• GDS = Global distress score (Questions 1-10)• Change Score = Difference in the mean GDS score

from first assessment to the most recent• Benchmark Score = How much better or worse the

change score is compared to norms

Page 12: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

12

Interpreting Adult Global Distress Scores• Scores of 0 to 1.5

– Typical of community (non-treatment) samples

• Scores of 1.6 to 2.5– Moderate distress– Only 20% of community samples would be expected to score

in this range; about half of individuals seeking treatment score in this range

• Scores of 2.6 to 4.0– Severe distress– 25% of individuals seeking MH services score in this range

Page 13: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

13

The Trajectory of Change Graph

Case is “off-track” compared to the benchmark projection

Page 14: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

14

Putting Data Into Practice

• Most cases don’t require a lot of review of the data, look for the high risk results

• Talk with your clients about their results, especially when they share something new or surprising

• An “off-track” cases does not mean a big change is needed – some encouragement to stay engaged may be all that is needed

• Be sensitive to small changes in the alliance questions

• If your effect size is low at first, keep measuring and reviewing the data

• Alliance items are a great place to look for clues for improving effectiveness

Page 15: 1 On Track Advanced Topics Getting the Most Out of Your Outcomes Data Eric Hamilton, M.S. Vice President of Clinical Informatics, ValueOptions Jeb Brown,

15

Questions and Discussion Resources for Questions

– Frequently Asked Questions

On the web site, near bottom of the ValueOptions page– Technical/Data/Web:

Email to [email protected]

– General comments or questions: Email to [email protected] or Call On Track Customer Service 866-476-9796