19
1. learning vs plasticity 2. reinforcement learning vs supervised learning 3. circuits: VOR & OKR 4. open vs. closed loop controllers 6. plasticity: cerebellar LTD 5. learning: adjusting the FF controller

1. learning vs plasticity

  • Upload
    qamra

  • View
    40

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

1. learning vs plasticity. 2. reinforcement learning vs supervised learning. 3. circuits: VOR & OKR. 4. open vs. closed loop controllers. 5. learning: adjusting the FF controller. 6. plasticity: cerebellar LTD. VOR Circuit. E. E. H. frequency. frequency. ipsi. contra. MR. LR. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

1. learning vs plasticity

2. reinforcement learning vs supervised learning

3. circuits: VOR & OKR

4. open vs. closed loop controllers

6. plasticity: cerebellar LTD

5. learning: adjusting the FF controller

Page 2: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

frequencyfrequency

E E

H

LRMR

abducens nucl.

vestibular nucl.

oculomotor nucl.

semicircularcanals.

MLF

VORCircuit contraipsi

PPRF

Page 3: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

Motor NeuronsRm =

eye position (deg)

From Fuchs & Leschei 1970 From Robinson & Keller 1972

0-75-150 75 1500

100

200

300

eye velocity (deg/s)

r / k = = 0.25 sviscoelastic time constant

Ro = 100 sp/s

Ro

r 1 (sp/s) / (deg/s)

+ rĖ

k 4 (sp/s) / deg

+ kE

-45 -30 -15 0 +15 +30 +45

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

firi

ng f

requ

ency

(sp

ikes

/s)

Page 4: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

E

Pursuit System(Gaze Velocity Purkinje Cell)

EpMotor

NeuronE + Ė

NeuralIntegrator

(NPH for H INC for V)

Eout

Extra-OcularMuscle

-H

Vestibulo-OcularReflex (VOR)

Saccade System(Burst Neurons in PPRF)

Er

Final Motor Pathway

Ein

?

Page 5: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

Integrator Lesion: Effects

Cannon & Robinson 1987

Page 6: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

Planes of the Semi-Circular Canals

horizontal anterior posterior

Excitatory Motions for the SCC’s on the left.

from Carpenter, fig. 2.7

from KS&J, fig. 33-9

cochlear n.

vestibular n.

vestibulo-chochlear n.

foramen magnum

Angle at which the plane ofthe anterior semicircular ductcrosses the midsagittal line

cochlea

semicircular ducts:

anteriorhorizontalposterior

internal acousticmeatus

left right

Page 7: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

DTN/NOT LTNMTN

D+antU+postH ipsiversive

EIRabbit OK (Afferents)

stimulus speed (deg/sec)

direction selectivity

1010.10.01 inferior

posterioranterior

superior

canal: horizontal anterior posterior

Accessory Optic System

data from Simpson 1984

Page 8: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

VN

NPHINC

Ė

E

MN

E

I+

AOS/NOT

InferiorOlive

Cerebellum

climbing fibers

mossyfibers

SCC

errorsignal

Rabbit OK(adjusting VOR gain)

Final Motor Pathway

Page 9: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

The normal VOR

Page 10: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

Spectacles to change VOR gain

Steve Lisberger

Page 11: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

VOR before and after learning

Miles & Fuller, Brain Res. 80:512-6, 1974

Page 12: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

Learning in the feedforward controller for saccades

Tim

e du

ring

ada

ptat

ion

expe

rim

ent

Straube et al. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 874-895, 1997.

Page 13: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

Double steps of target speed for studying learning in the feedforward controller for pursuit

Kahlon & Lisberger, J. Neurosci. 16: 7270-7283, 1996.

Page 14: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

Sequence of a pursuit learning experiment

Kahlon & Lisberger, J. Neurosci. 16: 7270-7283, 1996.

Page 15: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

LEARNING

FeedbackController

~100 msretinalinputs

GoalFeedforward

Controller Eyeball+ eyemovement

I.

G.

SensedVariable

VORSaccadesPursuit

HII

-EII

VNSC, PPRF

MT, DLPNFMP

General Scheme for Motor Learning

e.g. AOS

Page 16: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

to eye musclemotor neurons

VRN

FTN

inferiorolive

GCGC

inhibitoryinterneurons

HGVP

parallel fibers

climbingfiber

inhibitionexcitation

mossy fibers

after Lisberger 1998

sites oflearning

I.

H.

Cerebellar Circuit

(ipsi)

(contra)

Page 17: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

The learning rule:“Marr-Albus-Ito” or “Floccular” Hypothesis

Version 1: operational

retinal slip

vestibularinformation + contra I

.. ipsi H gain

CF + PF LTD

Version 2: synaptic plasticity

Page 18: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

after Linden & Connor 1995

heterosynaptic LTD

associative LTD

homosynaptic LTD

PC

CF

PF

cerebellar LTD

Long Term Depression

Page 19: 1. learning  vs  plasticity

PLC

PIP2

DAG

IP3

NO

cGMP

LTDInduction

PKC*

after Linden & Connor 1995

Parallel Fiber: H(glutamate)

.

Ca++

Ca++

Climbing Fiber: I(PC depolarization)

.

AMPA Na+

mGluR1

Na+

Ca++ Ca++

HGVP

Cerebellar LTD