Upload
bryan-moody
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Laboratory Activity Six
ProteinsExtraction, Precipitation &
Quantification
Purpose of Lab 06
Introduction to the theory, concerns & applications in the handling of proteins for biochemical studies.
Specifically:
Tissue disruption & protein extraction.
Salting in vs. salting out & ammonium sulfate fractionation.
Treatments that promote protein denaturation
Treatments that promote protein “protection”.
Methods for protein quantification.
2
Underlying Premises of Protein Handling
Proteins are most stable & functional in their native environment (i.e. the cells & tissues in which they are found). pH = 7.4 Osmolality = 0.3 – 0.4 Compartmentalized. Reducing environment.
Many biochemical studies involve removal/purification of proteins from their cellular environments.
Overall concern is to keep isolated proteins in their most functional condition during handling and studies.
3
Important Concerns When Studying & Handling Proteins: Choice of tissue disruption method to release protein(s) of
interest.
Protection of protein extracts & components from endogenous & exogenous factors (i.e. maintenance of protein integrity).
Concentration & purification of individual protein components.
Estimation of protein concentrations / amounts.
Diversity of protein structures & functions.
Introduction to Protein Handling
4
Common Tissue Disruption Methods
Main Concerns: Sheer forces vs. tissue/cell disruption vs. organelle &
protein damage/destruction. Sample dilution into homogenization buffer; thermal
denaturation. Release of toxic cellular contents; exposure to oxidizing
conditions. 5
Toxic Cellular Components ?
Hydrolytic enzymes of lysosomes & plant vacuoles.
Phenolics, pigments, acids, ions of vacuoles.
6
Polyvynylpolypyrrolidone(PVPP)
Tannic Acid
Common Additives to Tissue Homogenization Media
Buffers Thiol Reagents Protease Inhibitors Osmoticants Detergents PVPP Low (non-freezing)
Temperatures Others (lab manual)
7
Collectively referred to as the homogenization buffer or the homogenization “cocktail”.
Most Homogenizations Greatly Dilute Out Cellular Contents
Cell-Free Extracts Often Require “Reconcentration”: Lyophilization (freeze-drying). Reverse Osmosis.
Salting Out. Centrifugation (lab 10).
8
Semi-PermeableMembrane
AddedPressure
PureSolvent
Solute ofInterest
Small-scale Lyophilizer
Salting In & Out of Proteins
9
So
lub
ilit
y
Salt Concentration
Salting in
Salting out
ProteinMolecules
Cations: N(CH3)3
+ > NH4+ > K+ > Li+ > Mg2+ > Ca2+ > Al3+ > guanidinium
Anions: SO4
2- > HPO42- > CH3COO- > citrate > tartrate > F- > Cl- > Br- > I- > NO3
- > ClO4-
> SCN-
Salting In & Out of Proteins
Some Important Notes:
NH4SO4 is normally the salt of choice. Relatively high solubility ( 4.0M; 528 g/L; 52.8% w/v). Concentrated solutions have low densities; do not interfere with
protein sedimentation. Concentrated solutions are anti-microbial. Concentrated solutions protect most proteins against
denaturation.
Different proteins have different solubility curves. Differential salting out can be used for purification.
Salt concentrations are expressed as a % of saturation. % Saturation ≠ % (w/w) or % (w/v). 100% saturation = 4.1M @ 20C; 3.9M@ 0C.
10
Activity 1: Preparation of a Cell-Free Leaf Extract (TA’s)
Preparation of a Cell-free Extract from Spinach Leaves:
11
1 2 3 4 5 6
Activity 2: Students test the effects of different treatments on protein denaturation.
Protein Denaturation
Defined as . . .The disruption (or unfolding) of tertiary & secondary protein structure that leads to loss of protein function.
Often manifested as the formation of cloudy precipitates or flocculation of protein.
12
Activity 3: NH4SO4 Fractionation of a Cell-Free Leaf Extract (TA’s)
NH4SO4 Fractionation of Spinach Cell-free Extract:
13
• Add (NH4)2SO4 to 50% saturation.(31.3g per 100 mL of extract)
• Equilibrate for 30 min.• Centrifuge @10,000 x g for 10 min.
50%Supt.
• Redissolve in fresh extraction buffer.
Bradford / Coomassie Blue Protein Assay
50%Pellet
Cell-Free Leaf Extract
TA’s
UV-280Protein Assay
+Students(Activities 4 & 5)
Save fractions for electrophoresis (in two weeks).• Recovery or
purification of Rubisco subunits.
383 mL
450 mL
27 mL
Activity 4: UV-280 Protein Determination
Based on absorbance of aromatic amino acids @ 280 nm.
[Protein], mg/mL = ABS280 x 1.55
[280 0.645 mL/(mgcm)].
Advantages: Simple, non-destructive. Fairly sensitive (20µg/mL - 3
mg/mL).
Disadvantages: Contaminants (especially nucleic
acids) also absorb @ 280 nm. Variable amounts of aromatic
amino acids in various proteins.
14
H2N CH C
CH2
OH
O
H2N CH C
CH2
OH
O
OH
H2N CH C
CH2
OH
O
HN
H2N CH C
CH2
OH
O
N
NH
Phe Tyr
Trp His
Activity 5: Bradford Protein Assay
Based on the quantitative colorimetric shift that occurs when “Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250” binds with proteins.
Binding promoted by hydrophobic & electrostatic interactions.
15
+
H
H
+
-
-
H+
Basic Amino Acids(in protein structure)
Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 Colorimetric Reactions
Anionic form bound to protein(max = 610 nm)
Cationic form(max = 470 nm)
Bradford Protein Assay
Advantages: Simple, quick, sensitive assay (1 – 200
µg/mL). Few interfering substances.
Disadvantages: Unstable color reaction. Relatively high blanks ( 0.400A). Not perfectly linear (i.e. limited linearity). Different proteins bind different amounts
of dye.
16
Sample Bradford Data
17
Bradford Estimates of 10 mg/mL
SolutionsProtein Conc.*Pepsin 4.1-Globulin (rabbit)8.0Lysozyme 9.9Histones 15.8BSA 21.1Cytochrome c 25.3(*Data from Appendix XII;
standard was Bovine -Globulin)
The Biuret Reaction*
A quantitative test for protein (1 – 10 mg/mL). Based on a colorimetric shift from blue to purple (max = 540 nm). Involves the formation of a “tetra-dentate” Cu2+-protein complex.
18
Protein + Biuret Reagent
NaOH, CuSO4 &Na/K-Tartrate
(Tetra-dentate Complex)
(*Performed as part of Activity 2)
Summary of Activities
TA’s prepare cell-free extract & NH4SO4 cuts. Students:
Test effects of various treatments on protein denaturation.
Quantify protein in various fractions via UV-280. Quantify protein in various fractions via Bradford.
19
Questions or Comments
20
21