1. INTRODUCTION •H•••.,••••u••••••••n••~• .. ••• .. • .. •••••••• .. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• .. ••••••••••••••••H••H•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• .. ••••••••••••••• .. ••••••••••••••• .. ••••.,•••••••••n••••••

Enviva manufactures wood pellets for use as a renewable fuel for energy generation and industrial customers. Enviva's customers use wood pellets in place of coal, significantly reducing emissions of pollutants such as carbon dioxide, mercury, arsenic and lead. The company is dedicated to improving the environmental profile of energy generation while promoting sustainable forestry in the southeastern United States. Enviva holds certifications from the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) and the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certifications (PEFC). Enviva requires that all suppliers adhere to state-developed "Best Management Practices" (BMPs) in their activities to protect water quality and sensitive ecosystems. In addition, Enviva is implementing an industry leading "track and trace" system to further ensure that all fiber resources come from responsible harvests. We pay particular attention to: land use change, use and effectiveness of BMPs, wetlands, biodiversity and certification status. Al) of this combined ensures that Enviva's forestry activities contribute to healthy forests both today and in the future.

This application has been developed for two reasons, to request a construction permit for an eighth dry hammermill and to submit the initial Title Vapplication. Thus, included in this application are three copies of the application for the construction permit component and three copies for the Title V application component. Enviva requests a construction permit be issued for the eight hammermill as soon as possible. In accordance with the "two-step" Title V application option under 15A NCAC 2Q .0504, Enviva Pellets Nmthampton, LLC (Enviva) is submitting a Title V application within one year of commencement of operation of the facility. Operation of the facility commenced on April 22, 20 l :t

1.1. REGULATORY APPLICABILITY This application contains regulatory applicability information for SIP, NSPS, NESHAP, and state only regulations. The forms have been developed with the general facility forms followed by source specific forms.

Both the current operating permit and the tabular summary provided after Form E3 identify all Title V applicable requirements. Please note that the 40 CFR Part 64 Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Regulations apply to the particulate matter and associated pollution control system for the rotary wood dryer; however, because post-control emissions are less than the major source threshold of 100 tpy, the CAM Plan is not required until Title V permit renewal.

Air quality modeling analyses for certain toxic air pollutants (TAPs) are required in accordance with relevant North Carolina Division of Air Quality's (NC DAQ's) regulations. The facility was previously modeled for TAPs from the dryer, emergency generator and fire pump. However, some of the same TAPs are emitted from the hammermills and the pellet coolers. Therefore, the modeling for air toxics (or TAPs) has been updated as a part of this application submittal and is included in Section 4.0

1.2. UPDATED EMISSION CALCULATIONS AND REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT EIGHTH HAMMERMILL

Based on testing from other facilities, there have shown to be VOCs, HAPs, and TAPs in downstream processes such as the hammermills and pellet coolers. Therefore, Enviva has updated the potential emissions in Appendix B to account for these downstream emissions. The information in this

1·1

, application also reflects an increase of the annual production from 475,000 to 537,625 oven dried tons per year.

In addition to updating the calculations, Enviva is also requesting the addition of an eighth hammermill. Enviva request the addition of the eight hammermill be completed as a construction application and issued before the Title V permit.

1.3. APPLICATION ORGANIZATION

Six copies of the application are being submitted to DAQ, three for the construction permit and three for the initial Title V application. Since a pennit fee was submitted with the initial application, a fee is not required for the initial Title V application. However, since Enviva is also including in this application a request to construct an eight hammermill, Enviva has included the appropriate $904 fee for construction application.

This application contains the following information:

• Section 1 provides an introduction, • Section 2 provides a project description and discusses air emissions, • Section 3 discusses regulatory applicability, • Section 4 summarizes the air dispersion modeling analysis, • Appendix A contains air permit application forms, • Appendix B presents air emissions calculations, • Appendix C contains TAP modeling support, • Appendix D contains the electronic modeling files, and • Appendix E contains the zoning consistency determination.

1-2

2. PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND AIR EMISSIONS

The Northampton wood pellets plant is designed to produce up to 537,625 oven-dried tons (ODT) per year of wood pellets typically consisting of pressed hardwoods, but could cont.a.in up to 10% softwoods on a 12-month rolling total basis. This section discusses the Northampton Plant's pelletizing process and associated air emissions for the existing plant, which consists of the following:

• Green wood handling and sizing operations; • Green wood fuel storage bin; • Log debarker; • Log bark hog; • Log chipper; • Two (2) rechippers also referred to as green wood hammermills; • Eight (8) dry wood hammermills controlled by eight cyclones and three fabric filtration systems; • Hammermill area emissions controlled by a hammermill fabric filter; • A pellet mill feed silo controlled by bin vent filter; • Twelve (12) wood pellet presses and six (6) pellet coolers controlled via cyclones; • One 175.3 MMBtu/hr green wood direct-fired dryer system with pollution control equipment

consisting of a three simple cyclones and wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) for particulate matter abatement,

• Finished product storage and loading controlled by a fabric filter; • Pellet fines bin controlled via a bin vent filter; • Dried wood handling operations; • Two (2) diesel storage tanks; • Emergency electric generator; and • Fire water pump.

Detailed air emissions calculations are presented for each source discussed in this section in Appendix B. A process flow diagram is presented in Figure 2-1.

2-1

(Trucks) Whole Log_s __ _.., Chipper

(Trucks) Pre-Chipped Wood

Pellet Mill Loadout

into Trucks

t (Trucks)

Finished Product

Re-Chippers

Green Wood Handling

Finished Product

Bagtiouse

Pellet Loadout

Bins

Figure 2-1. Process Flow Diagram

DRYER

Bumer(s)

Fuel Bin ,__ _ ___.

I I I

Hammermills I I r I I

WESP Dryer Stack

Bag houses

i i l •••• , ____________ ..i i : j

EP-2 thru 4

Hamme,mills Stacks

---'----------- ! 1 - -- Nuisance Oust

System

EP-13

Finished Product

Handling

Pellet Mill Feed Silo

Pellet Mill! Presses

Pellet Coolers

1

I

I I t f I I

___ I

Figure I. Process Flow Dia.,ram e

2-2

,...B_i_n_V_e_n_l _B_ag- f-ilt_e..l.,r I I ~

! EP-12 ; !

Pellet ,.J • Fines Bin ·-··1 Bin Vent Sagfilter I

EP-6 lhl'\J 11

Pellet Coolers S13ck

J J )

' 2. 1. GREEN WOOD HANDLING AND SIZING, FUEL STORAGE BIN, AND STORAGE PILES

"Green" (i.e., wet) wood will be delivered to the facility via trucks as either pre-chipped wood or unchipped low grade wood fiber, tops, limbs, and logs from commercial thinning for on-site chipping. Pre-chipped wood will be screened and oversized chips will undergo additional chipping. Unchipped wood will be debarked and chipped to specification for drying in the on-site electric-powered debarker (lES-DEBARK-1), chipper (ES-CHIP-1), and two green wood hammermills/ rechippers (ES-RCHP-1, ES­RCHP-2) as required. Chipped wood for drying is conveyed to a chipped wood storage pile while bark is conveyed to a bark fuel storage pile (IES-GWFB).

Green wood and bark contains a high moisture content approaching 50 percent by weight. Therefore, green wood handling and sizing, fuel storage bin, and storage piles have negligible emissions and are included on the insignificant activities list. Representative drop point emission calculations using AP-42 Section 13.2.3 for Aggregate Handling are attached in Appendix B for green wood handling and sizing to demonstrate that these emissions are negligible.

Fugitive particulate emissions from chipped wood storage piles are quantified in Appendix B. Emission factors are developed based on surface area of the piles in accordance with U.S. EPA guidance for active storage pile fugitive emissions.1 These factors provide estimates of PM emissions due to wind erosion at the surface of each storage pile based on the annual frequency of high wind speeds(> 12 mph).

In addition to particulate matter emissions, volatile organic compounds are also emitted from the storage pile. Emission factors are obtained from a National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) document provided by SC DHEC for the calculation of fugitive VOC emissions from woody biomass storage piles. Emission factors ranged from 1.6 to 3.6 lb VOC as carbon/acre-day. Enviva chose to employ the maximum emission factor to be conservative. Emission factors are provided in pounds of carbon per surface area of the pile. Detailed calculations are included in Appendix B.

2.2. DEBARKING, CHIPPING, GREEN WOOD HAMMERMILLING, AND BARK HOG

Bark is removed from unchipped wood prior to chipping in rotary drum debarkers. There are no current AP-42 emission factors or other emission factors available for de barkers, and visual observation of these units in operation at other Enviva plants indicate that emissions are negligible due to the high moisture content of bark and the wind break provided by the drums.

Emission estimates for the chipper and bark hog are based on limited emission factors available for wood chipping. As shown in the attached emissions calculations (Appendix BJ, VOC emissions from these sources are calculated using emission factors from AP-42 Section 10.6.3 emission factors for hardwood chipping emissions. Methanol emissions are also calculated using factors from AP-42 Sections 10.6.3 and 10.6.4. Particulate matter (PM) emissions will be negligible from the green wood chipper (ES-CHIP-1) because the exhaust is directed downward towards the ground.

1 U.S. EPA Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, EPA-450/3-88-008. September 1988.

2-3

VOC emission estimates for the rechippers (ES-RCHP-1 and 2) are based on AP-42 Section 10.6.2 emission factors. Particulate emissions are assumed to be small due to the inherently high moisture content of the wood. Any PM emissions would be fugitive and are routed downward to the ground.

2.3. WOOD DRYER (ES-DRYER)

Green wood is conveyed to a single rotary dryer system. Direct contact heat is provided to the system via a 175.3 MMBtu/hr total heat input burner system using bark and wood chips as fuel. Air emissions are controlled by three identical simple cyclones to capture bulk particulate matter. Emissions from each of the cyclones are combined into a common duct and are routed to the wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) for additional particulate, metallic HAP, and hydrogen chloride removal.

Criteria pollutant emissions are calculated using a combination of AP-42 emission factors, Enviva Northampton October 2013 stack testing results, and specifications from the dryer system vendor. The reader should refer to detailed footnotes in Appendix B for details of the origin of each emission factor.

HAP and TAP emissions are calculated from combustion of wood in the dryer using AP-42 Section 1.6 and control of metallic HAP emissions via the WESP. In addition to HAP and TAP emissions from combustion of wood in the dryer, HAPs and TAPs are also released during the drying of wood. Emission factors for green, direct wood-fired softwood are obtained from AP-42 Section 10.6.2. To account for hardwood HAP and TAP emissions, factors are conservatively calculated by taking the AP-42 HAP factors for 100% hardwood, and multiplying by the ratio of the total listed VOC emission factors for hardwood and softwood (0.24 / 4.7).

2.4. DRIED AND SIZED WOOD HANDLING (IES-DWH)

Dried materials are transferred from the dryer via conveyors to screening operations that remove smaller size wood particles prior to transfer into hammermills for further size reduction prior to pelletization. Smaller particles passing through the screens are diverted to the hammermill discharge conveyor, while oversized wood is diverted to the hammermills. Dust generated from transfer operations around the screening operation is diverted to the hammermill area filtration system, which is described in the following subsection. There are several other transfer points comprising an Insignificant emission source designated as "IES-DWH", dried and sized wood handling. IES-DWH is located between the dryer and hammermills, and are completely enclosed with no emissions.

2.5. HAMMERMILLS (ES-HM-1 THROUGH 8)

Prior to pellitization, dried materials are reduced to the appropriate size needed for pelletization using eight hammermills operating in parallel. A conveyor system receives the ground wood from the hammermills and sends it to the pellet mill feed silo.

Particulate emissions from each of the eight hammermills are controlled using cyclones, which are subsequently controlled by fabric filters. The first three cyclones are directed to hammermill filter HM­BFl. The second three cyclones are directed to hammermill filter HM-BF2. The last two cyclones are directed to hammermill filter HM-BF-3. Appendix B summarizes the emissions from each hammermill bagfilter system. Particulate matter emissions from each bagfilter are calculated using a manufacturer guaranteed grain loading factor for the wood particulates and the maximum nominal stack flow rate.

2-4

,........__ VOC, HAP, and TAP emissions are calculated using En viva Northampton September 2013 stack testing results as shown in Appendix B.

2.6. HAMMERMILL AREA EMISSIONS/ NUISANCE DUST SYSTEM (ES-NOS)

An induced draft fan is used to transfer dust generated from a number of enclosed transfer /handling sources around the hammermill to one of the three hammermill bagfilters (CD-HM-BF3). The sources controlled by this bagfilter include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Emissions from the seventh and eight hammermill; • Hammermills infeed and distribution transfer; • Pellet cooler transfer (particulate emissions from pellet cooler cyclones large enough to drop

out of entrainment) & pellet screening; • Hammermill pre-screen feeder emissions; and • Pellet screen fines cyclone.

Emissions from this bagfilter are calculated assuming a manufacturer guaranteed grain loading factor for the wood particulates and the maximum nominal stack flow rate.

2.7. PELLET MILL FEED SILO (ES-PMFS) AND PELLET MILL FINES BIN (ES-PFB)

Sized wood from the hammermills is transported on a set of conveyors to the pellet mill feed silo prior to pelletization. Particulate emissions from the pellet mill feed silo bin vent filter are calculated assuming a manufacturer guaranteed grain loading factor and the maximum nominal stack flow rate.

Fine pellet material from the hammermill pollution control system and screening operation is collected in the pellet fines bin which is controlled by a bin vent baghouse. Particulate emissions from the baghouse are calculated assuming a manufacturer guaranteed grain loading factor and the maximum nominal stack flow rate.

2.8. PELLET PRESS SYSTEM PELLET COOLERS (ES-CLR-1 THROUGH 6)

Dried ground wood is mechanically compacted in the presence of water in twelve presses in the Pellet Press System. Exhaust from the Pellet Press and Pellet Coolers are vented through the cooler aspiration cyclones and then to the atmosphere, as shown in Appendix B. No chemical binding agents are required for peHetization.

Formed pellets are discharged into one of six pellet coolers. Cooling air is passed through the pellets. At this point, the pellets contain a small amount of wood fines, which are swept out with the cooling air and are controlled utilizing six cyclones operating in parallel prior to discharge to the atmosphere.

Particulate matter emissions from each cyclone are calculated assuming a maximum grain loading factor for the wood particulates and the maximum nominal stack flow rate. VOC, HAP, and TAP emissions are calculated like the hammermills using Enviva Northampton September 2013 stack test data. Please see Appendix B for a detailed discussion.

2-5

2. 9. FINISHED PRODUCT HANDLING AND LOADOUT

Final product is conveyed to pellet truck load out bins that feed two pellet truck loadout operations (ES­PL-1. -2) . Emissions from the Pellet Load out Bins are controlled by a bagfilter. Pellet Loadout is accomplished by gravity feed of the pellets through a covered chute to reduce emissions. Emissions to the atmosphere from conveyance from the Pellet Loadout Bins are minimal because dried wood fines have been removed in the pellet screener, and a slight negative pressure is maintained in the loadout building as a fire prevention measure to prevent any buildup of dust on surfaces within the building. Slight negative pressure is produced via an induced draft fan that exhausts to the same bagfilter (CD­FPH) that controls minor dust emissions from loading of the Pellet Loadout Bins.

Particulate emissions from finished product handling and loadout are cakulated assuming a manufacturer guaranteed grain loading factor and the maximum nominal stack flow rate for the bagfilter.

2.10. EMERGENCY GENERATOR, FIRE WATER PUMP, AND FUEL OIL STORAGE TANKS

The plant will utilize a 250 brake horsepower emergency generator for emergency operations and a 250 brake horsepower fire water pump engine. All engines will combust diesel fuel. Aside from maintenance and readiness testing, the generator and fire water pump engines will only be utilized for emergency operations. Diesel for the emergency generator will be stored in a storage tank of up to 2,500 gallons capacity and diesel for the fire water pump will be stored in a storage tank ofup to 1,000 gallons capacity. Emissions from all fuel oil storage tanks are insignificant and these units are categorically exempt from construction permitting requirements.

2-6

3. REGULATORY APPLICABILITY ANALYSIS

This section summarizes the applicability and requirements of key federal and state regulations.

3.1. FEDERAL REGULATIONS

3. 1.1. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), 40 CFR Part 51. 166

North Carolina implements the federal PSD requirements of 40 CFR 51.166 under North Carolina Regulation 15A NCAC 2D .0530. Under the PSD regulations, a major stationary source for PSD is defined as any source in one of the 28 named source categories with the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of any regulated pollutant, or any source not in one of the 28 named source categories with the potential to emit 250 tpy or more of any regulated pollutant other that GHGs.2 Neither wood pellet production nor operation of associated combustion sources qualifies the facility for classification in one of the 28 listed source categories.

Federal PSD requirements for GHGs have been implemented in North Carolina under 15A NCAC 2D .0544, which essentially adopts the U.S. EPA's "GHG Tailoring Rule." The GHG Tailoring Rule establishes emission rates triggering PSD review for GHGs with the major source threshold being 100,000 tpy of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) and a significant emission rate of 75,000 tpy CO2e. As shown in Appendix B, Table B-1 the proposed project does not trigger PSD review for CO2e, since the biomass deferral rule is still in effect in North Carolina.

As shown in Appendix B, Table 8-1 the Northampton facility is minor for all pollutants.

3.1.2. Title V Operating Permit Program, 40 CFR Part 70

40 CFR Part 70 establishes the federal Title V operating permit program. North Carolina has incorporated the provisions of this federal program in its Title V operating permit program under 15A NCAC 2Q .0500. The major source thresholds with respect to the North Carolina Title V operating permit program regulations are 10 tons per year of a single HAP, 25 tpy of any combination of HAP, 100 tpy of certain other regulated pollutants, and 100,000 tons ofGHGs per year (expressed as CO2c)-

The site is a major Title V source for criteria pollutants as shown in Appendix B, Table B-1. The biomass deferral rule is still in effect as of the submittal of this application. The site is an area source for HAPs (minor) . The purpose of this application is to request a Title V permit, which is being submitted within one year after commencement of operation date of, April 22nd, 2013.

3.1.3. New Source Performance Standards, 40 CFR Part 60 (15A NCAC 2D .0524 New Source Performance Standards)

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), located in 40 CFR Part 60 and implemented in North Carolina Regulation lSA NCAC 2D .0524, require certain categories of new, modified, or reconstructed sources to control emissions to specified levels. Three potentially applicable NSPS are addressed below.

1 40 CFR §SZ.21(b)(1) (i)

3-1

.....

-,

~ Moreover, any source subject to an NSPS is also subject to the general provisions of NSPS Subpart A, unless specifically excluded.

3.1.3.1. NSPS Subpart /Ill

NSPS Subpart 1111 applies to owners or operators of compression ignition (CI) internal combustion engines (ICE) manufactured after April 1, 2006 that are not fire pump engines, and fire pump engines manufactured after July 1, 2006. As noted in Section 2, the plant will have a 250 hp emergency generator and a 250 hp emergency fire pump. The emergency generator and fire pump are subject to the provisions of NSPS Subpart 1111.

Under NSPS Subpart JIil, owners and operators of emergency generators manufactured in CY 2007 or later with a maximum engine power greater than or equal to 50 hp are required to comply with the emission limits referenced in 40 CFR §60.4205(b ). These limits are as follows: 0.20 g/kW for PM, 3.5 g/kW for CO, and 4 g/kW for NOx + nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHC).

Enviva complies with the emission limits by operating the emergency generator and fire water pump as instructed in the manufacturer's operating manual in accordance with 40 CFR §60.4211 (a), and purchasing an engine certified to meet the referenced emission limits in accordance with 40 CFR §60.4211(c). The engine is also equipped with a non-resettable hour meter in accordance with 40 CFR §60.4209(a). Emergency and readiness testing of the unit will be limited to 100 hours per year.

In accordance with NSPS Subpart IIII, owners and operators of fire pump engines manufactured after July 1, 2006 must comply with the emission limits in Table 4 of NSPS Subpart 1111, which are organized based on the size of the unit. These limits are as follows: 0.20 g/kW for PM, 3.5 g/kW for CO, and 4 g/kW for NOx + nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHC).

Enviva complies with these emission limits by operating the fire pump as instructed in the manufacturer's operating manual in accordance with 40 CFR §60.4211(a), and purchasing an engine ce1-tified to meet the referenced emission limits in accordance with 40 CFR §60.4211(b). The engine is equipped with a non-resettable hour meter in accordance with 40 CFR §60.4209(a). Emergency and readiness testing of the unit will be limited to 100 hours per year.

Both the emergency generator and fire pump comply with the fuel requirements in 40 CFR §60.4175.3, which limit sulfur to a maximum of 15 ppmw and a cetane index of at least 40.

3.1.3.2. NSPS Subpart Kb

NSPS Subpart Kb, Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels, regulates storage vessels with a capacity greater than 75 cubic meters (m3) (19,813 gallons) that are used to store volatile organic liquids for which construction, reconstruction, or modification is commenced after July 23, 1984.3

Diesel fuel oil storage tank capacities are well below the NSPS Subpart Kb storage capacity

threshold of 19,813 gallons. Thus, Subpart Kb is not application to any emission source for process heat at the Enviva Northampton facility.

3 40 CFR 60.11 Ob(a)

3·2

3.1.3.3. NSPS Subpart Db

The plant will utilizes direct fired drying of chipped wood and, therefore, does not trigger the NSPS Subpart Db (Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units) regulations.

3.1.4. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Regulated Source Categories, 40 CFR Part 63 (1 SA NCAC 2D .1111 Maximum Achievable Control Technology)

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) are listed in 40 CFR Part 63 and implemented via North Carolina regulation 15A NCAC 2D .1111. One potentially applicable NESHAP is addressed below.

3.1.4.1. 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart ZZZZ

40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ applies to reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE) located at a major or area source of HAP emissions. Emergency stationary RICE are defined in 40 CFR 63.6675 as any stationary RICE that operates in an emergency situation. These situations include engines used for power generation when power from the local utility is interrupted, or when engines are used to pump water in the case of fire or flood.

The emergency generator and the emergency fire pump at the site are classified as emergency stationary RICE under the NESHAP and will comply with the requirements listed under this subpart by complying with NSPS IIII, 63.6590( c).

3.2. NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS

For the sources that are included for review in this application package, the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) rules and regulations have been evaluated for applicability. Applicable rules are identified below.

3.2.1. 15A NCAC 02D .0515 Particulates from Miscellaneous Industrial Processes

Particulate emissions from all emissions sources subject to permitting, including the wood pellet dryer are regulated under 15A NCAC 2D .0515. This regulation limits the particulate emissions based on process throughput using the equation E = 4.10 x P0-67, for process rates (P) less than 30 tons per hour (ton/hr) and E=SS x po.u.40 for process rates greater than 30 tons per hour.

All emissions from particulate matter sources at the proposed facility are either negligible or well­controlled. The most significant emission unit at the site, the process dryer operating a 71. 71 ODT /hr, has an emission limit of 48 lb/hr. Maximum emissions from the dryer are approximately 5.7 lb/hr, well below the standard.

3.2.2. 1 SA NCAC 02D .0516 Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Combustion Sources

Under this regulation, emissions of sulfur dioxide from combustion sources cannot exceed 2.3 pounds of sulfur dioxide per million Btu input. Wood is fired in the dryer and low sulfur diesel is combusted in the two emergency engines, resulting in operation well below regulatory limits.

3-3

3.2.3. 15A NCAC 020 .0521 Control of Visible Emissions

Under this regulation, for sources manufactured after July 1, 1971, visible emissions cannot be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged over a six-minute period. However, six-minute averaging periods may exceed 20 percent opacity under the following conditions:

• No six-minute period exceeds 87 percent opacity, • No more than one six-minute period exceeds 20 percent opacity in any hour, and • No more than four six-minute periods exceed 20 percent opacity in any 24-hour period.

This rule applies to all processes that may have a visible emission, including the dryer, other particulate matter emissions sources controlled by cyclone and/or baghouse, and the diesel-fired engines. Compliance will be achieved for all sources.

3.2.4. 15A NCAC 02Q .0700 Toxic Air Pollutant Procedures

This regulation requires that certain new and modified sources of toxic air pollutants with emissions exceeding specified de minimis values apply for an air toxics permit. Facility-wide emissions of several compounds emitted from the site exceed the permitting de mini mis level. A comparison of emissions to de minimis values are summarized in Appendix B, Table B-3. Air dispersion modeling results for compounds triggering permitting is discussed in Section 4 of this application.

3. 2. 5. 15A NCAC 2D . 1100 - Control of Taxi c Air Pollutant Emissions

A toxic air pollutant (TAP) permit application shall include an evaluation of the TAP emissions from facility sources, excluding exempt sources listed under 15A NCAC 2Q .0702(a)(18). This regulation outlines the procedures that must be followed if modeling is required under 15A NCAC 2Q .0700. Air dispersion modeling results for compounds triggering permitting is discussed in Section 4 of this application.

3-4

.....

4. STATE AIR TOXICS MODELING REQUIREMENTS •• ''' ••• ' ........... u,oo •••••• ' •• ''''''' •• ' ........... '''''''' ••• ''''''''''''''' ••••••• ''' ••••••••• '''' •• ''''''' ········'''''''''''''''' ·········''''''''''''''''''' ·········''''''''''''''''' .................. ''''''''' ............................ .

This section presents the methodology and results of the TAP air dispersion modeling conducted for the Enviva Pellets Northampton, LLC (Enviva) plant which is located near Garysburg, NC (Northampton Plant). The modeling methodology used to demonstrate compliance with the NC toxic air pollutant (TAP) acceptable ambient levels (AAL) conforms to the Guidelines for Evaluating the Air Quality Impacts of Toxic Pollutants in North Carolina (February 2014). In lieu of a modeling protocol a protocol checklist is provided in Appendix C.

4.1. FACILITY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

Enviva operates a wood pellets manufacturing plant in Northampton County, near Garysburg, NC. The Northampton plant consists of a wood drying system along with various material handling and emergency equipment.

Figure 4-1 provides a map of the area surrounding the Northampton property. The approximate central Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates of the facility are 265.7 kilometers (km) east and 4,042.9 km north in Zone 18 (NAD 83). A signed survey of the property is included in Appendix C.

4-1

FIGURE 4-1. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE ENVIVA NORTHAMPTON AREA

4.045,000

4,044,500

4,044,000

4 .04 3,500

-E

t: 4.043,000 0 ;z :;; t;

4,042.500

4,042,000

4,041.500

4.041.000

4,040.500

263.500 264.1)00 264,500 26.5,000 265.500 266,000 266,500 267.000 267,500 268.000

UTM Eost (m)

For modeling purposes, the appropriate urban/rural land use classification for the area was determined using the Auer technique, which is recommended in the Guideline on Air Quality Models. In accordance with this technique, the area within a 3-km radius of the facility was identified on US Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps (and was delineated by land use type. More than 50 percent of the surrounding land use can be classified as undeveloped rural (i.e., Auer's A4 classification), therefore the area is classified as rural.

Potential emissions of several compounds regulated under 15A NCAC 2Q .0700 (NC Air Toxics) exceed their toxics permitting emission rates (TPER) and this air dispersion modeling evaluation has been conducted to demonstrate compliance with all applicable AAL.

4-2

4. 2. MODEL SELECTION

The latest version (13350) of the AERMOD modeling system was used to estimate maximum ground­level concentrations in all Class II Area analyses conducted for this application. AERMOD is a refined, steady-state, multiple source, Gaussian dispersion model and was promulgated in December 2005 as the preferred model for use by industrial sources in this type of air quality analysis.4 The AERMOD model has the Plume Rise Modeling Enhancements (PRIME) incorporated in the regulatory version, so the direction-specific building downwash dimensions used as inputs are determined by the Building Profile Input Program, PRIME version (BPIP PRIME), version 04274.s BPIP PRIME is designed to incorporate the concepts and procedures expressed in the GEP Technical Support document, the Building Downwash Guidance document, and other related documents, while incorporating the PRIME enhancements to improve prediction of ambient impacts in building cavities and wake regions.6

The AERMOD modeling system is composed of three modular components: AERMAP, the terrain preprocessor; AERMET, the meteorological preprocessor; and AERMOD, the control module and modeling processor. AERMAP is the terrain pre-processor that is used to import terrain elevations for selected model objects and to generate the receptor hill height scale data that are used by AERMOD to drive advanced terrain processing algorithms. National Elevation Dataset (NED) data available from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) were utilized to interpolate surveyed elevations onto user specified receptor grids and buildings and sources in the absence of more accurate site-specific (i.e., site surveys, GPS analyses, etc.) elevation data.

AERMET generates a separate surface file and vertical profile file to pass meteorological observations and turbulence parameters to AERMOD. AERMET meteorological data are refined for a particular analysis based on the choice of micrometeorological parameters that are linked to the land use and land cover (LULC) around the meteorological site shown to be representative of the application site.

Enviva used the most recent versions of AERMOD and AERMAP (version 11103) to estimate ambient impacts from the modeled sources in the Class II area. Per NCDAQ guidelines, AERMOD will be run using all regulatory default options.

4.3. SOURCE DESCRIPTION

Table 4·1 presents a table of the modeled sources and their locations at the Northampton plant. All locations are expressed in UTM Zone 18 (NAD83) coordinates.

4 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W-Guldeline on Air Quality Models, Appendix A.1-AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD). s Earth Tech, Inc., Addendum to the ISC3 User's Guide, The PRIME Plume Rise and Building Down wash Model, Concord, MA 6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Guidelines for Determination of Good Engineering Practice Stack Height (Technical Support Document for the Stack Height Regulations) (Revised), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, EPA 450/4-80-023R, June 1985.

4-3

--' TABLE 4-1. MODELED SOURCE LOCATIONS

Model UTM-E UTM-N Elevation

ID Description (m) (m) (m)

EP1 Wet ESP Stack 266,018.7 4,042,780.2 48.91

EP2 Hammermill Filter #1 266,040.7 4,042,879.0 49.02

EP3 Hammermill Filter #2 266,040.9 4,042,883.2 49.05

EP4 HammermilJ Filter # 3 266,041.3 4,042,893.2 49.13

EP7 Pellet Cooler #1 Aspiration Stack 266,109.2 4,042,965.1 50.36

EP8 Pel let Cool er #2 Aspiration Stack 266,104.2 4,042,965.3 50.32

EP9 Pellet Cooler #3 Aspiration Stack 266,099.3 4,042,965.5 50.29

EP10 Pellet Cooler #4 Aspiration Stack 266,093.0 4,042,965.8 50.24

EP11 Pellet Cooler #5 Aspiration Stack 266,087.3 4,042,966.0 50.20

EP12 Pellet Cooler #6 Aspiration Stack 266,082.3 4,042,966.2 50.15

EP14 Emergency Generator 266,061.4 4,042,777.6 48.75

EPlS Diesel Fire Pump 266,054.2 4,043,084.1 46.90

Tables 4-2 and 4-3 present the stack parameters and emission rates input to the model for each of the sources. The hammermill baghouse (EP2-4) and firewater pump (EPlS) discharges are oriented horizontally and thus, per NCDAQ guidance, were modeled with an exit velocity of 0.01 m/s. All other emission points at the site are unobstructed, vertical releases.

TABLE 4-2. MODELED SOURCE PARAMETERS

Stack Stack Exit Stack

Model Height Temperature Velocity Diameter

ID (m) (KJ (m/s) (m)

EPl 28.66 352.59 7.58 3.05

EPZ 14.78 310.93 0.01 1.62

EP3 14.78 310.93 0.01 1.62

EP4 14.78 310.93 0.01 1.62

EP7 12.19 333.15 17.70 0.76

EP8 12.19 333.15 17.70 0.76

EP9 12.19 333.15 17.70 0.76

EPl0 12.19 333.15 17.70 0.76

EPll 12.19 333.15 17.70 0.76

EP12 12.19 333.15 17.70 0.76

EP14 1.77 766.48 78.30 0.10

EPlS 3.05 803.15 0.01 0.13

4-4

Model

ID

EPl EP2

EP3

EP4

EP7

EP8

EP9

EP10

EP11

EP12

EP14

EPlS

TABLE 4-3, MODELED EMISSION RATES

Modeled Emission Rates (g/s)

ARS6NIC BAP CADMIUM a. FORM HXCLPDXN HO. MERCURY NICKEL VNYLCHLR

3.52E-OS 5.74E-OS 6.57E-06 l.7SE-02 l.SSE-01 3.53E-OS 4.20E-02 7.73E-OS 7.29E-04 3.98E-04 . . . . 3.09E-02 . . . -. - . - 3.09E-02 - - - -. . - . 2.06E-02 . . . .

- . . . 1.99E-03 . . . .

- . - . l.99E-03 - . - -- - . - 1.99E-03 . - . . . - - - 1.99E·03 . -

- - - . l.99E-03 - - . .

. - . . 1.99E-03 . . . .

- 5.SOE-08 . . 3.64E-04 . - . .

- 4.97E-08 . . 3.12E-04 . . . .

4.4. METEOROLOGICAL DATA

The AERMOD modeling results were based on sequential hourly surface observations from Rocky Mount/Wilson, NC and upper air data from Newport, NC. These stations are recommended by NCDAQ for modeling facilities located in Northampton County. The base elevation for the surface station is 46 m.1

The five (5) most recent years of meteorological data (2008-2012) were downloaded from NCDAQ's website and input to AERMOD.8 As shown in Section 4.7, TAP model impacts, with the exception of formaldehyde were less than 50% of the AAL, so only the most recent year (2012) was evaluated. The formaldehyde analysis utilized all 5 years in a single, concatenated file.

4.5. MODELED RECEPTORS

The receptors included in the modeling analysis consisted of property line receptors, spaced 25 meters (m) apart, and Cartesian receptor points spaced every 100 m, extending out 2.5 kilometers (km) from the center of the facility. There are no public right-of-ways (e.g. roads, railways) traversing the property line, so the same receptor grid was modeled for the one-hour (1-hr) and annual TAP analyses. The impacts were reviewed to ensure that the maximum impacts were captured within the 100 m spaced grid. Figure 4-2 shows the receptors included in the modeling analysis.

7 http:/ /www.ncair.org/perm its/mets/ ProfileBaseEleva tions. pdf 0 http://www.ncair.org/permits/mets/metdata.shtml

4-5

.

-.

-.

.

-

-

.

-.

4,045,SOOr

4,045,000

~ 4,044,500

4,044,000 ~

E ,.., i:5 4,043,500 <t: :z 00

~ 4,043,000 -

1 l <::

~ 4,042,500 0 ;z ~

!::: 4,042,000l

4,041,500

4,041 ,000

4,040,500

FIGURE 4-2. MODELED RECEPTOR GRID

+ -t 1++ t 1- t+~+T L t

H·+++++ I-+++++-++++ ++++++++++-,-++·t 1-+,+++++­

,+t++++++++++++++·H 1++++++ l-++ + ++++++++..1..+++++-+++++-++++

++++++++-I I 1+++-+++++T+++++-+++1~+ +++..1..++++++++++1~++++..1..+++++..1..++++++++

+-i-;-++++++t-+++++++I I!--+++++-+++++++++ l +++t+++++ , ++++-1-+++++·r-l I t-++-r++++++++++

++++_,. ! 1-+++.1.+++++-+++++++++-I I I++++++++++ +++++-++++I· 1++++-:-++++++++++..1..+++I+-'-++++-+

+++++-:--rl-++++-:-++++..1..+++++-+++++-++++++++++-,-++ +++++-+++++++++++-+++ I I ·-+++++-t-+++++++++++++ ++ ·I + t .,.+++++- +++++-+++++i--++ I l-+++++++++++..1..++..j-+

r·t-++++-d I ~++-++++++++++.:.++++++I ~ ++t~++++-++f +++++++++++++-i I~++-+++++-+++++~++++ ++++.++ -+ -+++++++++++++++++ · t++++-i-+++++++++++-:-+-i I f +++ +

t++++-+++++-:-+++++-++I :+++++++++++++++++-++1 li·+ + ~ t-t-·H·+-++l++-+-1 +++-'-+++++++·! :++++++++-++++-+++++++ +++++++,-1 I ++..,..++++-~+++++ +~I~+++-++++++++++++ ..1..+++++++++ +-1. I ~ +++-++o+..++:¢1~,*~+-+++-I I ..-++++++++++++ - + t-+++..1..+++++++t++ I I ++ J +-.+++++++ I I s-++++++++ -tt+++-++t++-+-i-+++-1-++ ~ 1tt+++-++++-++I ~~+++ -, I+++...,.++ ++-+++++++ -"T t+++-++++-++++++I .. !

++,--i-++-1 , !-++++++++++++ f- + · I+++++++++++++++++-+ +++++++++++++++++..1..++- +.++++++++++++++++++-+++++--'-+++++++++++; I +-• +++++++·'·+++ I ' I ++++++++ +++++-+++++-++++++++ +..:...+++++-++++-+++I I++++ -I I I++-:-+++++-+++++++++, , · 1 +-++++--'-.++++-+++-+ 1- ++-t • +++++-i I 1--+++,+++++++++-r- --1+..1.., 1 t++-. ++++++++++ -+++i--++++--'-+++++ I I +++++++++-i- ..s..+-+++++ · !-+++++++++-++++

t- !-+-++++++++++ I '++++-i--i-++++-++++++++·I I++++++,-+++ t ++-,-++++ +++++++ +++ I-·~+++++.-+++++++++++++++--+++­

++++++++-:-+++++·++++-++ I I +++++++++++++++++-++r · ++-I I·+++++++++++++++-++++++ I I I +-+++++-r++++..,.+++ + ++++++ I + ++++.:..++++++++++-+++++ .. !-+++++++++++++

..s..+++++ t+++-1 I ··t+++~+++++-+++-t+-t++-• I ttt++..1..tt- t -++++-+ ·+++++.,.. + I l·-+++++++++++++++++ I It·- l +

+++++-++++++++++,+1++++++++++++++-++++7-f I ++++-++++..s..++++++++++-+++++~+++++-++++++ ++++' ++++-+t++-1-+++++-++++++-I I++++++++++

++ ++++ ·I · + r++-+++++t++++++++++ I++++-+ + +++++-+·H I ·++++++++++++++++-'-++ ··

-++++++++++.++ I ~-++++++++++++-jj++ ++++++++++++++++! 1++...!...-1-++++­

++..:...++ t-+-+++++-1-++++-1 t++++++ -++ tt-+++++++++++ . +++! ..:...

+-t -+++++++++++++++ -t++ I H+++++..s..+

+

j

i

263,500 264,000 264,500 265.000 265,500 266,000 266 .. 500 267.000 267,500 268,000 268,500

UTM Ea~ting (Zone 18, NAD83 m)

The AERMOD model is capable of handling both simple and complex terrain. Through the use of the AERMOD terrain preprocessor (AERMAP), AERMOD incorporates not only the receptor heights, but also an effective height (hill height scale) that represents the significant terrain features surrounding a given receptor that could lead to plume recirculation and other terrain interaction.9

Receptor terrain elevations input to the model were interpolated from National Elevation Database (NED) data obtained from the USGS. NED dat.a consist of arrays of regularly spaced elevations. The array elevations are at a resolution of 1 arcsecond (approximately 30 m intervals) and were interpolated using the latest version of AERMAP (version 11103) to determine elevations at the defined receptor intervals .. The data obtained from the NED files were checked for completeness and spot-checked for accuracy against elevations on corresponding USGS 1:24,000 scale topographical quadrangle maps. AERMAP was also used to establish the base elevation of all Enviva structures and emission sources.

9 us EPA. Users Guide for the AERMOD Terrain Preprocessor {AERMAP}, EPA-454/B--03-003, Research Ttiangle Park, NC.

4-6

4.6. BUILDING OOWNWASH

AERMOD incorporates the Plume Rise Model Enhancements (PRIME) downwash algorithms. Direction specific building parameters required by AERMOD are calculated using the BPIP-PRIME preprocessor (version 04274),

EPA has promulgated stack height regulations that restrict the use of stack heights in excess of"Good Engineering Practice" (GEP) in air dispersion modeling analyses. Under these regulations, that portion of a stack in excess of the GEP height is generally not creditable when modeling to determine source impacts. This essentially prevents the use of excessively tall stacks to reduce ground-level pollutant concentrations. The minimum stack height not subject to the effects of downwash, called the GEP stack height, is defined by the following formula:

HGEP = H + 1.SL, where:

HGEP = minimum GEP stack height,

H = structure height, and L = lesser dimension of the structure (height or projected width).

This equation is limited to stacks located within SL of a structure. Stacks located at a distance greater than SL are not subject to the wake effects of the structure. The wind direction-specific downwash dimensions and the dominant downwash structures used in this analysis are determined using BPIP. In general, the lowest GEP stack height for any source is 65 meters by default.10 None of the proposed emission units at the Northampton will exceed GEP height.

Figure 4-3 presents a site layout for the facility that shows the source and building arrangement as modeled.

1040 CFR §51.l00(ii)

4.7

,.,

4,043,400

4,043,300

4,043,200-

-5 ~ 4,043,100 c < z .,,; -;; 4,043,000 C

~ al) C

l 4,042,900~ z -~ 1-.:::i

4,042,800

4,042,700

4,042,600

4,042,SOOE

FIGURE 4-3. ENVIVA NORTHAMPTON MODELED SITE LAYOUT

- -EPl5 LDOUTBH

\ PELLSILO/EP5 PELLSCRN \ , /

, \ / EP7-EP12 LOADOUT \ \ / ,//

PCOOL MA INT·- --------,

CHIPPER EP2-EP4< n HMILL

D PRESCRN

.FUELBIN DRYER

WESP­/ - /

EPl / I

EP14

~

\

\

\

.Enviva Northampton Property Line

265,500 265,600 265,700 265,800 265,900 266,000 266, l0O 266,200 266,300

UTM Easting (Zone 18, NAD83 m)

4-8

-,

4. 7. TAP MODELING RESULTS

Table 4-4 presents the results for the state toxics modeling that was performed for the proposed Enviva Sampson facility. As shown, the project will not cause an exceedance of any pollutant AAL. With the exception of formaldehyde, all modeled TAP had impacts less than 5 0% of the AAL, and as such, only the most recent meteorological year (2012) was modeled. The formaldehyde results are based on the full five years of meteorological data. Electronic copies of an modeling input and output files are included on the CD-ROM in Appendix D.

TABLE 4-4. TAP MODELING RESULTS

Maximum %of Averaging UTM-E UTM-N Date/Time Concentration AAL AAL

Pollutant Period (m) (m) (YYMMDDHH) (µg/m1 (µg/m3.) (%)

Arsenic Annual 266,220.00 4,043,046.20 2012 1.00E-05 2.30E-04 4.35%

Benz.o(a)pyrene Annual 266,220.00 4,043,046.20 2012 2.00E-05 3.30E-02 0.06%

Cadmium* Annual 266,220.00 4,043,046.20 2012 2.20E-06 S.SOE-03 0.04%

Chlorine 1-Hour 265,872.30 4,042,507.50 12111814 1.79E-01 900 0.02% 24-Hour 265,939.30 4,042,496.30 12102724 7.S4E·02 37.5 0.20%

Formaldehyde 1-hour 266,171.10 4,042,931.10 10083106 114.32 1S0 76.21%

Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 1,2,3,6,7,8 Annual 266,220.00 4,043,046.20 2012 1.00E-05 7.60E-05 13.16%

Hydrogen chloride (hydrochloric acid) 1-Hour 265,872.30 4,042,507.50 12111814 0.43 700 0.06%

Mercury 24-Hour 265,939.30 4,042,496.30 12102724 3.30E-04 0.6 0.06%

Nickel 24-Hour 265,939.30 4,042,496.30 12102724 3.lSE-03 6 0.05%

Vinyl chloride Annual 266,220.00 4,043,046.20 2012 1.30E-04 0.38 0.03%

• Mocleled impacts in the AERMOD output file are shown in nanograms per cubic meter in order to capture enough ~ignificant figures.

4-9

APPENDIX A - NCDAQ APPUCATION FORMS

-FORM E5

TITLE V COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION (Required) Revised 01101/07 NCOENR/Olvlsion of Air Quality• Application for Air Permit to Construct/Ope.-ate

In accordance with the provisions of Title 15A NCAC 2Q .0520 and .0515{b)(4) the responsible company offlcfal of:

SITE NAME:

SITE ADDRESS:

CITY,NC:

COUNTY:

PERMIT NUMBER:

Enviva Pellets Northampton, LLC

874 Lebanon Church Road

Garysburg, NC

Northampton

NIA

CERTIFIES THAT(Check the appropriate statement(s):

~The facility is in oompliance with all applicable requirements

c:=lln accordance with the provisions of Title 15A NCAC 2Q .0515(b}(4) the responsible company official certififies that the proposed minor modification meets the criteria for using the procedures set out in 20 .0515 and requests that these procedures be used to process the permit application.

~ The facility is not currently in compliance with all applicable requirements If this box is checked, you must also complew form E4 ·Emission SovrC'9 Complia11ce Schedulo"

The undersigned certifies under the penalty of law, that all information and statements provided in the application, based on lnfonnation and bellef formed after reasonable inauirv. are true, accurate, and complete.

Date: y 0 1c1a (REQUIRED, USE BLUE INK) I I

Michael Doniger, Director of Operations Name, Title of responslble company official {Type or print)

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

5

/l,pp•nGlk j\ P,..,., lo,2

E,,v ...... No,~ ...... ::: .. ,, I-~,_.., T,e10 VA1>otlc..>t10.-. F6-.,, ..... 3 E5

--

REVISED 11/01/02

FORM A1 FACILITY (General Information)

NCOENR/OM&lon of AJr Quality· Appllcatlon for Air Penn it to Construct/Operate

NOTE- APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT THE FOLLOWING: I

l.!!'..J)cal Zoning Consistency Detemiination (if ,equired) ~ Facility Reduction & Recycling Survey Fo0 onn A4~ Application Fee 0 Responsible Official/Authorized Contact Slgnall.lf<l Gdi:,propriats Number of Copies of Ap~icalion J P.E. Seal (if required)

GENERAL INFORMATION Leqa/ Coraorate/Owner Name: Envlva Pellets Northamoton, LLC SltaNem&: Envlva Pellets Ncrthamm,,n LLC Site Aod<ess 1911 Address! Line 1: 874 Lebanon Chutch Road Site Address Line 2:

City: Garysbura Stale: North Carolina Zio Code: 27886 County: Northampton

CONTACT INFORMATION Pem,11/Techn/Cdl Contact: Facl/ltvllnsll<lt:tion Contact: Namerrnre: Joe Han-ell Name/Title: HeathLucv Mailino Alldress Line 1: 142 N.C. Route 561 East Mallino Aadress Line 1: Same as Slti, Address Mailino Address Line 2: Mailina AOdress Line 2: Citv: Ahoskie Slate: NC Zio Code: 27910 Citv: Slate: Zip Code: Phone No. (area <>Ode) (252)2~032 !Fax No. (area code) Phone No. { area code) (910) 318,2743IFax No. ( area code) Email Addres Joe.Harrell@lenvlvabiomasa.com Email Addres$: ... ,.,,,., 1 .. .- :.V, .... ,. ... ,.,. RaSfJonslble Officisl/Aulhoriied Contact: Invoice Contact· NamefliUe: Michael Donlqer Director Plant Ooeratlons NamefTi!le: Same as oelT!llt/technlcal contact Mailing Address line 1: 7200 Wisoonsln Avenue Mailinq Address Line 1: Mailinq Add=s Line 2: Suite 1000 Mailina Address Line 2: Citv: Bethesda State: MD Zip Cod&: 20814 Citv: State: Zio Code: Phone No. (area codeJ 804 9298418 I Fa" No. (area oode) Phone No. (area coae) I Fax No. (area code I Email Adores Pete.Naierata:..nvlvablomas&.oom Email Address:

A, ... A,IIVl'I l:S EING MAnE FOR fe" Non-permitted Facility!Greenfield l:!.J Modification of Facility (perm~ted) u Renewal -..;th ModificaIion

D Renewal (TV Only)

FACILITY CLASSIFICATION a.,-.1ctc APPLICATION (Check Onlv Onel U General I !Small u Prohibitory Small U Syn1hetic Mnor l..{JliUe V

FACILITY (Plant Site) INFORMATION Describe nature of (plan! sitel ooer;ition(s): FacililV ID No. : 6600167 Wood pellet manufacturing faclllty

P~ma,y S!C/NAICS Code: 2499 IWood Products, Not Else'M!ere Clas9ifiedl Cutrent/Previous Air Pennit No. 10203R02 Expiration Date Facilily Coordinates: Latitude: 256,700 UTM E Lon~ilude: 4.o42900UTMN Does t~is application contain confidanUal data? l J YES ~ NO

PERSON OR FIRM THAT PREPAREO APPLICATION Person Name: Date Overcash Firm Name: Trfnl lV Consultanls, Inc. Mailing Address Line 1: One Coptev Pal1<wav MallinQ Adaress Line 2: Suite 310 Cltv. Morrlsvllle IS1ate: North Carolina Zio Code: 27560 ICountv: Wake Phone No. J 919) 462-96!!3 IFaxNo. (919) 462-9694 Email Addtess: . rr,..-.h(({1rr1,-••,. , .. ,. • ._ c.n.,.

SIGNATURE OF Ri-,..PONSIBLE OFFICIAUAUTHOK1ZicD CONTACT Name lt voedJ Michael Dcnioer Title: Oire<:191 Pla~t Ootrations X Signatu,e(Blue Ink): _-.,.. ~~ Cl Dale:

'Y ;00o/f '777 ~ ~ Attach Additional Sheets As Necessa ry

APR 2 :! 2fl14

PJr Per.mif~ Secffon

I-\ I

2/28/2017

AllP•"a,,. A f' ••• 1 .,, 2

E,,vh•G, \Jo.,i..,.,..,-,on lnu::11T1~1"VAp:11:•l•onFor"'~ .. 3 r,:

FORMsA2,A3 EMISSION SOURCE LISTING FOR THIS APPLICATION -A2

112r APPLICABILITY INFORMATION -A3 REVISE004/10/0'f NCOEN~Orvi,ion of Air Quality. Apptic:ation for Air Permit to Con1t,octJOpende I AL

I , ,N <>uun. .... c u;:,, ,rou: New, Mo a111ea, n evrousIy unpermm=, Keplacea, ue,etea

EMISSION SOURC~ EMISSION SOURCE I CONTROL OEVICE I CONTROL DEVICE IDNO. OESCRIPTION ID NO. DESCRIPTION

r;n,u- nt To B e AOOEO Bv This ""'""''ication INew Pir...-...1v Un....-. d or Reolacementl ES-CHIP-1 Loa Chiooina NIA NIA ES-RCHP-1 and 2 RHhiooers NIA NIA ES-DRYER Green Wood Direct-Fired Dryer Svstem CD-DC Three 131 Simple Cyclones

CD-WESP Wet Electrostatic Precioitator ES-HM-1 through 8 Eiaht 181 Hammermills CD-HM-CYC·1 CO-HM·BF1 Simole Cvclone Baqfilter

CD-HM-CYC-2 CD-HM-BF1 Simole Cvclone Baofilter CD-HM-CYC-3 CD-HM·BF1 Simole Cvclane Baglilter CD-HM-CYC-4 CD-HM-BF2 Simole Cvclone. Baofilter CO-HM-CYC-5 CO-HM-BF2 Simcle Cvclone, Bagfilter CO-HM-CYC-6 CD-HM-BF2 Sim Pie Cvclone Baofllter CD-HM-CYC-7 CO-HM-BF3 Sim Die Cvclone. Bagfilter CD-HM·CYC-8 CO-HM·BF3 Simole Cvclone Baofilter

ES-NOS Nuisance Oust Svstem CD-HMA·BF3 Baalllter ES-PMFS Pellet Mill Feoo Silo CD-PMFS-BV Bin Vent Baghouse ES-CLR-1 throuah 6 Six 161 Pellet Coolers CD-CLR-1 through& Six 161 Pellet Cooler Cyclones ES-PFB Pellet Fines Bin CD-PFB-BF Bin Vent Baghouse ES-FPH Finished Product Handling ES-PB Pellet Loadout Bins CD-FPH-BF Finished Pro<1uct Handling Bagfilter ES-PL Pellet Mill Loadout 1 and 2 ES-GN Emem encv Generator (350 bhol NIA NIA ES-FWP Fire Water Pumo 1300 bhp} NIA NIA

Existing Penittl1.d Eaulnme ,t To Be MOOIFl111u B\t Thfs A nntloetion

Eouinment To Be DELETED Bv Thill t.n .. tication 1 &..., ~.._ n1r• .£ Ponab1e l..nh.,u,c;f N,il N,il

112{1') APPUCABILITY INFORMATION I /J. , l[J;. your ,~ainy stJq•cl to 40 .CFR Par1 tiH ~nevenlion or Accldenta, n e:t:11ies"' · Section 11:i(r} o t the Feoer.11c,ean A11 A<::I? Ve$/ X No If No. please &pe4;ify in dd~il how your facility ,woided applicability:

If your facility is Subj~c.t to 112(r}, pCease- complett tile- fo1lowin9.

A Have you 91(-e3dy Sllbmiltcct .a Risk Mt1nagemem Pl.an (RMP) Co EPA Pursuanl 10 40 CFR Part 68.10 or Part 61\.15-0'> Yes ~ No t Sp•cify required RMP •obmitlal date: U s11bmit<ed, RMP s.ubmittiil date:

B. Ate you 11~i119 aOministralh,e COl'ltr(lls to subjecl your f~cility lo a tesser ·t12(r) pn::,9n:1m iUlnd~ud? Yes fl No t tf yes. ~ease spe,e1ty.

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

A,,,,, . .,, .A P .•. ,,. 'i , .. 1.r,

~ ........ '. .. ;,..,,.,!,, .. VA.-_. ... ""o" r ,., ..... v:i l>.2 ,.,., A~

FORMA4 .. r,r .,., nv . t

DATE: Does rtcllfrv have an tnwlronmenttl m:,ngement $)'Stem in plact ? l) YES t X) NO If ao, i• b~ility ISO UOOO Certifoed? ( IYES IXINO

Facility Nome: Envlv.a PelJef'S Northampto,i, LLC ~rmltNum~r: 10203R02

F1cJli<ylD: NIA 11ooe County: Nort"-ampto(l EnvlronMenGI Contact Joellam,11

Maitfno Addr'~IS5 Line 1 : 87, l 1baraon Church Ro1d Phone No, ( ) 1252) 209-6032 Fax No.( )

MaU!ng Addre&s. line 2: ZlpCoae: 27866 County: NOtthampNn

City: Garysburg SI.ate: Jilor1h C•rolina EmailAddre-,s.: Joe.Harr,ell@envlvablornas$.<:om

. . . . . Air r-' - ·- : ·-· ~ --- n ..... .. _., dh• __ _..,, 1vr• 11 tlU"I

EntwC..;uJe for Dale R·eduction auaotily Emitted Quantity Emitted Has redVdlo.n acUvly Addi't1on detail a.bout s.our<e been

Source AJr Pollutant En1inlo n Reduc.tfon Option from prior :tnnual from c urr.nt annual diKontlnued? If so, OUcription and lmplemerned whon

ID OQ}!g/1 f:Sae Code,} (mo!yi, report 10 DAQ (ll)lyt) report to DAQ !lblyr1 wu ~ dii;con1inutd?

NIA

Commtnts:

... ft--'· ·-··' ... ··-··-- ·--l .. t. J ..... •·- _.., f ~ w.,.., t V l Ml'

Po11u1an1 emcr Cod& tOt Oat• ReduetJon Quantlty EmtttQd QuantH.y Emhfed Has recsuc1ion ac1lvJty Addition detail about so urea bcon

SotJ~t' ., Emiulon R&au.etion Option from prior .annu.al from current a.n.n.ual discontinu,e<I? tf so,

Offcriptiion or lmplememed """'" Activity Rgcycle:(I o-r oauon {Sae codul tmcl'fr) repon r<>port w.,:;; rt dis.r;.ornlnue<I?

Reduced (mc/'jr) Materiid$

NIA

•11,i

The rnques.teCI mfgnn11tlo11 above shall b• used for fulfithng lhe requir~ml:!nts. o r North Carol,r,a G1!ncr.:il StattJta 14.3-215 1 OS(g). Thi? pum,c holder sh3:II !\ubmit lo th=

~ Oopanrnent .i \'\o1'\nori do;cuptwn of cur r9n1 and pto,tected plans to r,cruce the emissions of a,r pollul31"1ts by so1.1rce reduc.Oon Of recycling nu1 vNltte-n dt&cnptton sh.i(I ~\ 3Ccompany any apphc:11lon for a r,e"' permu, rnodifitahon of Jn c,il~g permit and tor C-ilCh anl'lu.lf ;ur quafrty perl'htl fee paym~t sourct- rcductlon cS ttel•nld .ss

~ r•Guclng lhe amount of any hazari:ioug f,I.IO!itl!lnc;e, po11ut~nt, or conbmmanl onttrtnw any w.isle &tre.arn or otherwise- release cl mta tho oriv1ronment (inc[u111ng ruglttve , cmtssJons) pnor to recyc:ltng, treatment. or dlspos.31. tf 110 aclfVlty h;:is tati:~n pt11ce 5tncc th! pt>lv1ou~ report, s1trts)ly md1c.ate so by chPcking the no box In that Hctlon. ]f onc<t completll!d. ttu& form {)houtd b2 submitted arong with your fee p:iymr.int Examp(es are Usted on the fic;.1 hne of c:,,ch Hct,on of the forcYI for your benefit. ·; -""""",. . "'" RFVISl'D 1,07

-~... .. ,. " ' .... , ,,,,,.. ~· -' "'· .... ..... .. .... :·

-,

-,

FORM D1 FACILITY-WIDE EMISSIONS SUMMARY

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/DMsion ot Air Quality . Appllcatlon for Alr Permit to Construct/Operate

C.F,!111111:11A AIR t<l>LLUTANT E;M1NSIONS INl' t»<uATuN • FACILI I Y•WIDE EXPECTED 1'CTUAL EMISSIONS POTENTIAL EllllSSIONS

(AFTER COi-ITROLS I (BEFORE COITTROLS/ LIMITATIONS) LIMlTATIONSl

AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED IOnslvr tons/'ir

PARTICULATE MATTER !PM) See Emission Calculatlons in Aooendlx B PARTICUI..ATE MATTER< 1D MICRONS (PM..)

PARTICULATE MATTER < 2.5 MICRONS (PMz..)

SULFUR DIOXIDE rS021

NITROGEN OXIDES CNOxl

CARBON MONOXIDE !CO) [\/04.ATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS tVOCI

LEAD OTHER ,.

- -- l"'VLLlJTANT E ... ,.,..,oNS INr• • FACILITY-WIDE

EXPECTED ACTUAL EMISSIONS POTENTIAL EMIS,.,uNS (AFTER CONTROLS/ (BEFORE CONTROLS I

UMITAT IONS) LIMITATIONS!

HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED CASNO. tonsi-.r loo,;/yr Su Emission c.iculations"' AnNOndix B

TOXIC A:18 POI.LUTANT EVISSIORg l'ff"ORM.A.rn- • FACUTY-WlDE

I Ul

POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (AFTER CONTROLS /

LIMITATIONS I

lons/vr

POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (AFTER CONTROLS /

LIMITATIONS I

tonsl>r

INUK,/\Tl: REQUE;:,1cOACTUAL EMISSIONS AFTER CONTROLS I LIMITMIONS. EMISSIONS ABOVE THE TOXIC PERMl1 EMISSION RATE (TPER) lN 15A Nt"'..AC 2Q .0711 MAY REQUIRE AIR DISPERSION MODELING. USE NETTING FORM D2 IF NECESSARY.

Modelinn R••nnired ?

TOXIC AIR POLLU TANT EMITTED CASNO. 11:l/tlr I lblda• lb'year Ye,, No See Emis.~n Calculations In Aooendix 8

COMMENTS:

Attach Add1t1onaI !>heets As Necessa ry

A u,, .. ,. •• ,.,/\

r"I.,,," 11 o, 1:~1

(.,., . .,=- IJ~,1•,,, "''"''" r ... ,,., T ,u,, './A:"" , " \'"" r: o• , .. ., ~ 3 01

.....

FORMD TECHNICAL ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT PERMIT APPLICATION

REVISED: 12/0111)1 NCDENR/DlvlslonOf Air Quality. Application for Air Permit to Construct/0 erate

PROVIDE DETAILED TECHNICAL CALCULATIONS TO SUPPORT ALL EMISSION, CONTROL, AND REGULATORY DEMONSTRATIONS MADE IN THIS APPLICATION INCLUDE A COMPREHENSIVE PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM AS

NECESSARY TO SUPPORT ANO CLARIFY CALCULATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS. ADDRESS THE 1-ULLUWINc:.; Sf't:l:11-1\; ISSUl;S UN Stl-'At<A I I; f'A(.;tS:

05

A SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE (EMISSION lr~FORMATION) (FORM B) • SHOW CALCULATIONS USED, INCLUDING EMISSION FACTORS, MATERIAL BALANCES, ANO/OR OTHER METHODS FROM WHICH THE POLLUTANT EMISSION RA'rtiS IN THIS APPLICATION WERE OERIVCO. INCLUDE CALCUlATION OF POTENTIAL BEFORE AND, WHERE APPLICABI.E. AFTER CONTnOLS. CLEARLY S TATE ANY ASSUMPTIONS MACE ANO PROVIDE ANY REFERENCES AS

B SPECIFIC EMISSION SOURCE (REGULATORY ltffORMATIONJ{FORM E2 • TITLE V ONL YJ • PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF /\NY REGULAT IONS APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUAL SOURCES AND THE FACILITY AS A WHOLE. INCLUDE A DISCUSSION OUTING METHODS (e.g. FOR TESTING AND/OR MONITORING REQUIREMENTS) FOR COMPLYING WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, PAnTICULARLY THOSE REGULATIONS LIMITING EMISSIONS BASEOON PROCESS RATES OR OTHER OPERATIONAL PARIIMETERS. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR AVOIDANCE OF /\NY FEDERAL REGULATIONS (PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT OETERIORA TION (PSO), NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANOAR05 (NSPS). NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLlUT ANTS (NESHAPS). TITLE V), INCLUDING EXEMPTIONS FROM lHE FEDERAL REGULA TI0NS WHICH W:X,LO OTHERillnSE BE APPUCABlE TO THIS FACILITY. SUBMIT AtN REQUIRF.0 TO DCX:I.IMENT COMPLIANC!: Willi ANY REGULATIONS. INCLUDE EMISSION RATES CALCULATED IN ITEM "A' ABOVE,

C CONTROL DEVICE ANALYSIS (FORM C). PROVIDE /I TECI-INICAL EVALUATION WITH SUJ.>PORTING REFERENCES FOR ANY CONTROL EFFICIENCIES LISTED ON SECTION C FORMS, OR USED TO REDUCE EMISSION RATES IN CALCULATIONS UNDER rfEM "A" ABOV~. INCLUDE PERTINENT OPERATING PARAMETERS (e.g. OPERATING CONOITIONS. MANUFACTURING RECOMM ENDATIONS, AND PARAMETERS AS APPLIED FO~ IN THIS APPLICATION) CRITICAL TO ENSURING PROPER PERFORMANCE OF TH E CONTROi. DEVICESi INCLUDE AND LIMITATIONS OR MALFUNCTION POTENTIAL FOR THE PAl<TICUL.AR CONTROL DEVICES AS EMPLOYED -,y THIS FAOUTY DETAIL PROCEOURES FOR ASSURING PROPER OPERA TKJN OF THE CONTROL

0 PROCESS ANO OPERATIONAL COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS· (FORM E3 • TITLE V ONLY) · SHOWING HOW COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED WHEN USING PROCESS, OPERATIONAL, DR OTHER DATA TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. REFER TO COMPLIANCE REQUIRl:MENTS IN THE REGULATORY ANALYSIS IN ITEM "B" WHERE APPROPRIATE. LIST ANY CONDfTIONS OR PARAMETERS THAT CAN BE MONITOnED ANO REPORTED TO DEMONSTRATE

E PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SEAL - PURSUANT TO 15A NCAC 20 .0112 "APPUCA TION REQUIRING A PRO.ESSIONAL f:NGINEERING SEAL." A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTER~D IN NORTH CAROLINA SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SEAL T~Ct1NICAL PORTIONS OF THIS APPLICATION FOR NEW SOURCES AND MODIFICATIONS OF EXISTING SOURCES. (SEE INS I RUCTIONS FOR FURTI-IER APl'LICA81LITYJ.

M Dale Ove,rash • iJ/test /hat this application for _ ___ Enviva Pellets Northamoton LLC 1-------- --------- has oeen reviewed by me and is accunite, complete and consistent OM/h the intormalion suwlied in the engjneering plans, cak:u/at/ons, and all o/l>er suppo,ting doellmfmlation to the oest of my knowledge. I further attest t/lat to the best of my knowledge the proposed design has been ptTJpared in 8CCOl!fance v.;111 tile applicable regulations. Altllough certain portions of this submittal package may have been developed by other professionals. inclusion of these mat&rlals under my see/ signifies that I t,ave reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with /Ile proposed design. Note: In accordance with NC General Sta lutes 143-215. BA and 143-215. 6B. any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any applic111ion sha/1 be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanorwnich may include a fine not to exceed $10,00Q as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.

(PLEASE USE BLUE INK TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING)

NAME: M. Dale Overcash DATE: COMPANY:

TELEPHONE:

SIGNATURE:

Trinity Consultan One Copley Parkway, Suite 31 O Morrtsvllle, NC 27560

919 462-9693

PAGES CERTIFIED: -=E"-'nt-"'lr"'e-'-A"'p.._P ... llt ... • .. tl .. on ____________ _

t ... .•.. 111 ....... ,.,, .. ,. l,\••• \f l\1,1•"• 11""'" r '"'•'• .,3 l)t,

FORM E1 TITLE V GENERAL INFORMATION

REVISED: 12/01/01 OIVlslon of Air Quality • Application for Air Permit to Construct/Openite I Cl

If' YOUR FACILITY II Cl.ASSWIEO AS '"MAJOR"' POR TITLE V YOU MUST COMPLETE THIS FORM /ll.:J ALL OTHER Rl!!QUIRED "E" FORMS (£2 THROUGH ES AS APPLICABLE )

lndicale here if vour facilitv is subiect to TiUe V bv: X Emissions 1, Other

If subject to T itle V by other, check or specify: d NSPS d NESHAPS (MACT) \4 IDLEN

Other, specify:

If vo~ are or v.nll be subiect to anv maximum achievable control technoloov standards CMACn issued oursuant to section 112( ) of the Clean A ir Act, specify below:

EMISSION SOURCE EMISSION SOURCE ID DESCRIPTION MACT ES-EG ES-FWP Emercenc}'. Generator and Fire~m[ Subean z:zzz ES-DRYER Green Wood Direct-Fired D~r S~1 40 CFR 63 Subeart B, j1 12l!!l]

1 List any aoa111ona1 regu1a uon wrncn are reques,eo 10 ce cnc•uoeo 1n me sn1e10 ano prov,oe a oe1a1= exp1ana11on as to wny the shield should be granted: REGULATION EMISSION SOURCE (Include ID) EXPLANATION

Comments:

Attach Additional sneets As Necess.- ry

/\,. .......... t'. f ......... N ... r •• ,,. .... ~ ... - 1 .... ... 1.,.,. V /\,,. ,-1., ·"·· .. r ..,, ... ~ ~3 P,.., .. ; .,,,t :,:; r.1

FORM E2 EMJSSION SOURCE APPLICABLE REGULATION LISTING

R£\11SEO 12/01/01 OM&loo of Air Quality • Appllcat.ion for Air Permit to Constn,ctlOperetc I C-' EMISSION EMISSION OPERATING SCENARIO SOURCE SOURCE INDICATE PRIIYIARY {P) APPLICABLE IDNO. DESCRIPTION O R AL TERNATJVE !Al POLLUTANT REGULATION See attached table followina Form E3 for a svmmaN of recwiatot , =uirements and associated comDflance ' ""''iremenls

.. Attach Add1t1onal Sheets As Necessary

A,,r,f\•hl •r A

F',.<i,. U ., , 4S L ....... . , N.,.\ ·•·• , .. , ..... . 1 ... , .. ,, T,u .. './ ,, •. .,, .. ,,.,. , ... r ., ... , "v3

C2

..., FORM EJ

EMISSION SOURCE COMPLIANCE METHOD REVISED 12/011ll1 NCOENR/Oi11ision 0 1 Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operale rrr-..., Emission Souu IO NO. SH attached table following Form

Regulated Pollutant E3 for a summary of regulatory requirements and

associated compliance requirements

Applicable Regulation

AllemaUve Ooe<ating Scenano IAOSJ NO:

ATTACH A SEPARATE PAGE TO EXPAND ON ANY OF THE BELOW COMMENTS

MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

Is Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) 40 CFR Part 64 Applic.ible? fl Yes d No If yes, la CAM Piao Al1'lc!M,d (ii appGcable, CAM plan must tJe atached)? o Yes I, No Describe MOR!oring Device Type: Detcribe Monitoring Locauoo: Other MMiloring Methods (Desc~be In Del8il):

Desaibe ttle freciuency and dUration of monitonng a,1C1 how lhe dala will be recoreled (i.e., fll'ery 15 minutes. 1 minute iMtanlaneous readings taken to prOduoe en howiy 9Verage):

RECOROKEEPING R~1.1t11t<EMENTS

Data ( Parameter) b&ing recording:

Frequency of recordkeeping (How often is data recorcled?):

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

Generally describe wl1al is being reported:

Frequency: d MONTHLY ~ OUARTERL ~ EVERY 6 MONTHS

OTHER IOESCRIBEl' TSSTING

Specify proposecl relerenoe test method· Specify relerence te$t method rue aM citaIlon; Specify lesling frequency:

NOTE - Propos.&d tes1 melhod s ubject to approval and possible change during Ille test protocol process

.. Attach Add1tronal Sheets As Necessary

/\,,, . ........ 1\ [ ... ,.,. N.,.,,_, .... .,, .. l .. , .. 'V .1\,.,. .. , .. , ... , r ,.,, .. ., .,3 P .. .... ~') ,.r 1::, El

..., FORM E4

EMISSION SOURCE COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE Revised 12!01/01 NCOENAIOMsion of Air Quality • Application ror Air Permit to Construct/Operate

COMPLIANCE STATUS WITH RESPECT TO ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS

Will each emission source at your facility be rn compliance with all applicable requirements at the time ot pem,it issuance and continue to comply with lhese requirements?

X Yes No If NO, complete A th rough F below for each requirement foe which comoliance is not achieved.

Will your facility be in compliance with au applicable requirements laking effect during the term of the pennit and meet such reQuirements on a Umelv basis?

X Yes No If NO, complete A through F below for each requirement for v.tiich comPliance is not aehieved.

If this application is for a modification of existing emissions source(s), is each emission source currently in compliance with all applicable requirements?

X Yes No If NO, complete A through F below for each requirement ror which compliance is not achieved.

A. Emission Source Description (Include JD NO.)

B. Identify applicable requirement for which compliance is not achieved :

C. Nsrrative descrip tion of how compliance will be achieved ll>ll h this applicable requirements:

D. Detailed Schedule or Compliance: Step(sl Date Expected

E. Frequency for submitlal of progress reports (6 month minimum):

F. Starting date of submittal of progress report1i:

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

A,., . ..,.,., ,,./\ .:: ....... ., .. +\J.,,,,.;, ... ,,,, .. , l .. 1 . , T,,.,, V /,1,,,.,,. ,..,.,r r ... '"" .. ..-3 f" ,.,.,,. l t ., • II~ [',

~

' TA8LE 8-3

DETE RM INA TION OF POLLUTANTS SU BJ ECT TO A I H 'l'OX ICS PERM ITl'ING E/IIVIVA PELU:TS NORTHAMPTON, LLC

TAP F.miisions

Oe.5cription V f\U Hn,nmtnnills ftfltr Coot~rs Cn1er<-en,v Ceo~rator t-'in: Water Pump Tf)tal rollu1ant CAS Numbu (lb/hr) Clblda!I (lblyrl (lb/h,) (lb/day) (lb/yr) (lblhrl (lb'd•yl 1lblyrl (11,/hrl \lb/d»J (lb/vrl /11>/hrl (lb/day) (lbly,) (lb/hrl (lhld,v) (lb/yr)

l 3-But3dicnc 106-99·0 O.Ol'Jtll 0.0023 0.0479 0.0001 1100'-0 IUl<ll i.;i~-04 4.27E•O.l •.~<lE-112 Ac.:,ald.:"'·dt 75-07-11 1,x.;i;-01 IU40 ~.ss~.>.• U(MJICI O.CH~I U.93% 0.0016 (l(l~l U.kCtS-1 1 .• sr,.111 1.8'/E+OI :, 89F.:+O~ Acrot~in 107-02-8 0.0002 O.OGS4 0.113.l 11.00112 0.fl047 0.0971 ~.lll::-<14 1.0IE-112 2.IOE-01 A~cnic l.80UJ4 0001 2.45 2.80E-04 6.71£-U) 1.,1s£.,,oo Bcn7A;OC: 71-43-2 0.002) (JOf.-19 I lol'(,I <Ul020 (1.041,l 0.9797 4.151:'.-0;i l.ll2E-01 1.12E+(l0 Rcnro(alp\1cuc 50·32-~ "::;<,f: .. ()4 0.011 3.CJV 00000 0.1111()(1 <l 0002 OJlU(i<, U,U(JOO O.<Hl02 -U1E-414 I.IOE-02 3~9f.t-:•O Rc:":lfi11m m..nl {un-ccacei:dJ CAls:o 111cludc iu BEC) 1 .rOF:-<:i; 0.000 ll,12 I .UJE'.-415 3.;66-04 1 '-lF...01 Cadmium Mccat l~f<:mcntaf uu--:~;,i.:cct!•~Add w/(DC) 5.21E.0j o.oo, O.lt(, 5-11€-05 l.15E-03 4}{,~ .. 01 C~rbon T c1rR>.h1ondc ).S9!;-0J 0.139 1,9.IO 7:<\IE·03 I.S%..OI 6.91El(ol Chloria; l.3$iJ2-01 3.:-2-l l.l 13.1 S l.33E-01 ~-~lF.t-00 l.lllHOJ CMoroll-..lJ.1~nc ~.na:-u; 0.139 S0.6> 5.7Sf:-ll:\ I.J9E~I 5,07E+Ol <:Moroforn1 ~)-66-J CJ1J,m1ll! ,1cid (C:hn1mturn VI) 7)38•Y4-:> -1.451;-<)) 0.001 <U9 .f-l:iF.-0~ l.O)E-!)J ).1,10£-411 Dijl1:1h,·lhcx~l)·,h1holacc (DEHP) 8.2JE-06 0.000 0.Q) • ,.Jt;.(16 l.9t[-O-I 1.lll::J)l Etmlcnc dicliloridc ( 1.2..(tiehlor<.-cdunc) 5.08~-0l o.12z 44 .. B ~.llXf,,OJ l.11E'-OI HSE•OI fqnn~tdcl\\ak ~0-00-0 l.47E+OO 3~.J63 Ul.9!5.U al.ii) 15.69 "-.9C•Ll'i om 2.27 )09.0J ct.0019 0.0694 1.4,1.H 0.0025 u.0;9; 1.,390 2.11[1-00 :1.:;:;t::+o1 l.66E+-04 Hc.~ai:hbrodibcnzo•r.-dioxin 1,2,3.6.7 :< HOE~J 0.007 2A6 2.301,.0., 6.7.))::;~.I;; 2 .. u;e+-00 HwJro,-.::,, chl~tid:: (hvdmct.!nric :Jcid) ;,)3£-01 7.994 1.917.69 J.JJL-(lt 7.9-~«J<l 2.92E+-03 l\13ait~sc A:. oom1.ounds Z.03E--02 0.4&& 17R.tj 1.UJE.-U2 J.tKE--01 l.7KE<-02 f\•lcrtuf\·, ,,;1.por (lnc:lud~ in f\.krcu1v&:Com1,cls} 6. l~E-04 0.015 s.n 6.1-lt-<J4 1.47E--Ol :t37€tOO Mc1h,·lcl1loRJforrri {l.J.t tcichloroc1han.:) 5.JJE--03 0.1~0 ~7.60 ~.4:;C~3 l.3UEJJI 4.76E+IJI Mcth,·I ~,11,·I kcron-: 9.47E-04 (J.02~ U9 9.'1~~)4 2.271!-02 ~.29E+OO m-,1,-X,1cnc 1.lJ0-20-7 o.ouo; 0.0168 0.)4')) 00,11)6 Q.vl.W U.19'¥.'; L.JtJt:~)]. 3.IIE-<12 6.•8E·OI Mctl'l\'I isobutvl ketone IOs-10·1 Mctfw~n.:: chlo~ 75-09-l Nickel mcl:11 (Com,"loncnt orNick.d &. Co1nuuunds.) ~.7HE•03 U.D9 ~0.6t :i.7K£-UJ J.39E,OI 5 07F.•01 rcnc:.chl"'ro!,h.:nol ~.04E-06 U.000 ll.03 M.94E-06 l.l~E-04 7.SJF.Jl2 P.::rchlor(Jll;tln·'=nc (ti..'1rachloto.:lln·lc.nc) 6.66E-03 0,160 :H:i.3) 6.66£-fi:i 1.6()[.0I ·' s,F.-'{11 Phenol IOR-9,-'-Poh..:::hlocul.ltl.::d bit:lumds l.43(;.()6 0.000 0.01 l.43E-06 3.438-0~ 1.256..(11 StWCI\~ I00-4?-; ·rccrad)fo.ro,JWcrw:i• ,.Jin'<in. 2.3.7,X- ,.~,e~,9 Q.000 0.00 i . .ilE,tJiJ 3.61F.-(llt r.HE.Jl.~ ·ro1u.::ue lllS-83-J 0.0010 0.01.~~J o.~010 U.0011!1 0.0206 0 .. ,29_; l.&6E-03 ,i.-llf'.-411. 9.JOE,01 Trii:hJocOl.!tb,·IOOI; 5.261i-()J Q.116 ,lf,.tn 5.l6E-OJ I ).6f.~II 4.611l+OI Trichtorofluoromcthanc (CFC 11 I) 1.C9E-03 0.172 62.% 7.191l<l.l 1.'i2E-Ol 6}0~+01 Vin,·I chloride 3.166-03 0.076 Z7.64 3.166-ll.l 7 '7€-4ll 2.761l+OI

TPF.R f:'l'tffl pirison Tal>le

Tot•I TPER (2Q .0711 I Modeling rotlutant CASNumhtr fib/hr) (Cb/day) (lbly1·t (C~n,r) (lb/Jay) (lb/yr) Req1,1iNld?

l.l-Butad1,,·~u: !06-9\1-u 8.YUE-02 1 lftf.-t(H IJo A'-Claldch,'dc 75-07-0 7.88E--Ol 6.SOE+OO t'o ACJ1)1i;io 107-4.Jl-X J.l!E--04 2.00!l-02 No Ars.."fliC H5Et•OO L.6(16,02 Ye~ Benzene 71-13·2 l.121:.+00 S.IOEtOO No B~nzo(a)r,n-cnc ;0.32.g J.991\+00 1.2or,oo Y~s BcnUium l.22E-01 1.3013-01 No Cadmtum 4.56F...OI J,701!-0I \'~~ Catbnn Tctrachlornlo 691F.+01 4,601:<-01 No Chlorine I.JSE-01 3.32F.+OO l.JOE--01 7.911fc--OI \'~s ChlorobcnLCne 1.NF.--01 4.601:;.+0l N• C'hlorofl>nn 67-66-3 0.00E+OO 2.90E·•02 Nu C'hromfo a..-:id (Chromium Vt) 7738-94-5 I OlE-'H l.301i--02 Nu Di/2-elh,·lhcx-·l)r l<holalc llli-liPJ l.9~E-04 6.JOE-01 Nu 13'.th,·knc dirhlon<lc Cl.2-dichk11ucll1am:\ 4.451.-1<11 l.601l+02 No r-onnafdch,'1c 50-00-0 2.11E•OO 4.00E-02 v .. Hcxachlorodibc1u::o• ;.Jiuxin l ),l.6.,,k 2.461ii<JO S.10EA>3 '\'n lfrdroqcn chJocide {hvJruchloric :.cid) 3.33&01 I.BOE--01 ro Mait..:JJK:!e 1k. wm ·,oonds •.i~i::-01 6.~0E-01 No Mc:tcun·. nf,;!t (Include in McKUl\•&Comnds) 1.471,-02 l.3UE-02 Ye< Mcth,·I d,locofoml CJ.I.I 1ticMoroe1ham:l !, ... 3t:-03 I.JOE-01 ~ .. ,01:-t111 250Ettl2 No Mt:Uwl cah,·I kcu:mc 9.47J::--04 2.27E-02 l.21E+lll 7.80Ettll No X\'reru:: IJJ0-10-7 I.JOii-OJ J.ILE-02 l.64E+OI >.70E+OI No MelhvJ isctlut\1 ketone 10&-JIJ-I U.00.E+OO O.OOll+-00 7.60E+OO 5.20E+OI No Mcch\·1cne chloride 1~-09-l O.OOE+-00 O.OOEttlO J.90£-01 I 60F.+O~ No Nkkel metal_{Com,'l'Mcnr of'Niclcd &, Conrnounds:1 L.3~f--01 t.)OF.--01 \'ts Pcol3chloro1;henoi S.94£-06 2.1!\F.~11 6.40F.-OJ ~ JOF.<l? No PctthloroeOwlcnc (tct~hlonxth,·knc) 3.&~E+OI I.JOE104 No Pheno[ 108·'15·2 0.00EttlO '-.4/lf.-OI No Pnkchlorin.ttr::d bi.ltcn\iS 1.2.<F.--Ol. ~.608.f.00 No Snn;n,c 100-02-5 O.OOE+OO 1.701l•OO No Tcmdtlorodibco.1.o•Jt-dio:..in., 2,3-.7,8- I.UE-4); 2,00E<l4 1\-o T.,lucnc )0~-88-l 1.86£-03 ~.47F.--O'- 1.441l+OI 9.30€<ill r-.o Tricbloroe1!\,·lenc 4.61E+OJ 4.ooi::+o; Ko Trichlorofluor¢mtthanc (CfC C l J) 7 19F.-fl) 1.401,+02 l\u \'infit:hloridc 1.16E+OJ 2.60E<OI y..,

-,

Emission Source Description and ID No. Pollutant

Wood-fired Dryer System ( ES-DR YER}

Nuisance Dust System (ES-NDSl PM/ Coarse I lammerrnills (ES-HM-I through 8 ) PMIO/PM2.5

Pellet Mill Feed Silo (ID No. ES-PMFSl Pellet Fines Bin (ES-PFB)

Finished Product Handling (ES-FPHl

Pellet Presses & Coolers (ES-CLR-1 through 6)

Wood-fired Dryer System ( ES-DR YER) S02

Emergency Generator (fD No. ES-EG) and Fire Water Pump (ID S02 No, ES-FWP)

Wood-fired Drvcr Svstem ( ES-DRYER) Nuisance Dust System (ES-NDS)

Coarse Ha.mmermills <ES-HM-1 through 7) Pellet Mill Feed Silo (ID No. ES-PMFS) Opacity

Pellet Fines Bin CES-PFB) Finished Product Handling (ES-f'PH)

Pellet Presses & Coolers (ES-CLR-1 through 6)

Emergency Generator (ID No, ES-EG} Opacity Fire Water Pump (lD No. ES-FWP)

Emergency Generator (ID No. ES-EG) PM,CO,NOx, Fire Water Pump (ID No. ES-FWP} NMIIC, S02

Emergency Generator (ID No, ES-EG) IIAPs Fire Water Pump (ID No. ES-FWP)

Summary of Title V Applicable Regulations and Compliance Demonstration Procedures Enviva Pellets Northampton, LLC

Regulation Final Control Vevice

Cyclones+ WESP

15/\ NCAC 2D ,0515

fabric Filter

Cyclones

15A NCAC2D,0516 WESP

15A NCAC 2D ,0516 N/A

Cvclones + WESP

15A NC/\C 2D. 0521 Fabric Filter

Cvcloncs

15A NCAC 2D, 0521 NIA

40 CFR Part 60 Subpart NIA

!III

40 CFR Part 63 Subpart NIA lZZZ

Monitol'ing Method/Frequency/Duration Recordkeeping Reporting PM cm1~s1ons sna 11 oe contro11eo ny a an 1·,::,1·. Io assure compliance, daily verification of power and

Written or electronic log of date and time of each Any maintenance performed on the scrubber within rapper operations are functioning, Monthly visual inspection, results of inspection and maintenance, 30 days of a written request by DAQ, Semi-annual inspection of the ductwork and material collection

units, r.very 24 months internal inspection of the and variance from manufacturer's recommendation progress report and annual compliance certification

~ , ......... t ..... ,.., inTe:P ritv

Inspections and maintenance, including monthly Written or electronic log of date and time of each Semi-annual progress report and annual compliance inspection of ductwork and annual internal inspection, results of inspection and maintenance,

inspection of bagfilter integrity and variance from manufacturer's recommendation certification

Inspections and maintenance, including monthly Written or electronic log of date and time of each Semi-annual progress report and annual compliance inspection of ductwork and annual internal inspection, resultli of inspection and main·,enance,

inspection of cyclone and variance from manufacturer's recommendation certification

None required because inherently low sulfur content of wood fuel achieves compliance

None required because inherently low sulfur content of fuel a<:hieves compliance

Monthly visible observation for "normal." If above normal, correct action or Method 9 observation

required

NIA

All requirements as outlined in the regulation, including the following: use certified emergency

engines, operate according to manufacturers procedures, use fuel oil with fuel content of no

more than IS ppmw sulfur and cetane index ofat least 40. install non-rcsctt~blc hours meter.

Comply with the NSPS requirements above and no other requirements apply

Ai,po11no1v A P • .,.10.,.45

Written or electronic log of date/time/result of each observation, results of each non-compliant

observation and actions taken to correct, and results of the corrective action

NIA

Maintain records of engine certification, fuel certifications and hours/year of operation of each

engine

Comply with the NSPS requirements above and no other requirements apply

Semi-annual progress report and annual compliance certification

NIA

Annual Compliance Certification

Annual Compliance Certification

Env,v• Non"• n, pto n lnthl Tit,o11 V Apptit":Ar..-..-. F..,. '"", ..,3 R•111.uteto,y Sum"' afv

-FORM D4

EXEMPT ANO INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES SUMMARY REVISED: 12/01/01 t.'CDENR/Dl~islon of Air Quality. Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate I U4

ACTIVITIES EXEMPTED PER 2Q .0102 OR

lNSIGNtFICANT ACTMTIES PER 20 .0503 FOR TITl,.E V Af)UR($S 51LC VI'<

PRODUCTION BASIS FOR EXEMPTION OR INSIGNIFICANT DESCRIPTION OF EMISSION SOURCE RATE ACTIVITY

1. Green Wood Handlillg and Sizing Operations NIA 15A NCAC 020 .0102 (c){2l(E) ~ow

IES-GWHS emissions, see Appendix B

2. Dried Wood Handling and Sizing Operations NIA 15A NCAC 02Q .0102 (c)(2)(E) -negligible IES-OWHS emissions. enclosed

3. Emergency Generator Diesel Fuel Storage Tank Upto 2,500 15A NCAC 02Q .0102 (c)(1){D)

TK-1 gallons

4. Firewater Pump Diesel Fuel Storage Tank Up to 500 15A NCAC 02Q .0102 (c)(1)(D)

TK-2 gallons

5. Green Wood Storage Piles N/A 15A NCAC 02Q .0102 (c){2)(E) -low

IES-GWSP1 and IES-GWSP2 emissions, see Appendix B

6. Debarker N/A 15A NCAC 020 .0102 (cl{2)(E) -negligible IES-DEBARK-1 emissions

7. Green Wood Fuel Bin 13.93 ODT/hr 1SA NCAC 02Q .0102 (c)(2)(E) -no IES-GWFB quantifiable emissions

8.

9.

1G.

. . Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

, ... , ........ ,. • .I\ [ "' . .,,. N0 ,,.., 11 ,.,,.,.,,. l .. 1,111 l ,, ,. VA,,,.,.~,.,,.,., i ,,. m ,, v3

LM

Source Specific Forms - Chipper

-

.....

FORMB SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES)

RElllSED 12/01/01 NCOENIVDMslon of Air Quality - Appllca1ion for Air Permit to Construc1/0perat~ D

EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES-EPWC CNpper

CONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S}: NIA

OPERA TING SCENARIO , ·oF 1 EMISSION POINT !STACK] 10 NO!SI: NIA DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Green wood chips are s«:reened and oversind chips wlll under,io addnlonal chipping as required.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECX ANO COMPLETE AP PROPRIATE FORM 8 1-B9 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): D Coat.wood.oil, oas. Oltlerbwne<(FOfln Bl) D WoodwO<t.ing (Form 84) U Manuf~ct ol chem~ls.Jcoatings~nks (Form 67} O lntcornbustion engin8/generato, (Form B2) O Coating/finishing/printing (Form BS} D Incineration (Fonm B8) D Liquid storage tanks (Form B3) n Storage siros/bins (Fe<m 86) • Other (Form 89) START CONSTRUCTION DATE: !OPERATION DATE: 4122/201 3 IDATE MANUFACTURED: MANUFACTURER / MODEL NO.: CE'-1 112" 15KN SUS Pellet Prot:elEXPECTEO OP. SCHEDULE: 24 HRIOAY 7 DAYJWK M WKNR JS TttS SOURCE SUBJECT TO? NSPS (SUBPART?;: NESHAP tSUBPART?I: MACT !SUBPART?,: PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGI-IPUT t~r. OEC-A:8 25% MAR-MAY 25% JUN-AUG 25% SEP-NOV 25% EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION 8,7&0 VISIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: <20 %OPACITY

~n..l I c;;r,_,_ SUH l'(.Jl ,L J ·sf,v I I/VIV I'"\ JI< I 111:::, l'liVlJ.Nl...~

SOIJRCE OF EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS EMISSION CM'TiR COttTROL.8 t LIMITS) (BEFORE CONTROl.S I Ll,WITS) (AF1Eft CO~ROLS I L:M1 I SJ

AI R POLLUTANT EMITTED rACTOR lb/llr I tons/vr lbl11r tons/vr ~ tons/._r PARTICULATE MATTER IPM1 See Emission CatcLJl.ltlons lo ADI ndix8 PA.'HICULATE MA TTER<10 MICRONS"'"'··' PARTICULATE MATTER<2.5MICRO'IS (PM,,J SULl'UR DIOXIDE 1S02) NITROGEN OXIDES tNO•l CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 1VOC) LEAD OTrtER

HA '1<.'A fRt'UL I ,-·· 'SIN NF "IR I ..,.. .u ... , , .. SOURCE OF EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS

EMISSION tAFTER CONTROLS I LJMITS) (BEfOA:a COffTROUI / Ufl.1 rs, (AFTER CONTROLS , .. , ... ,rs• HA?ARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT AN D CAS tiO. FACTOR lb/hr tonom lb/hr tons/yr lb/hr lonsr<r NJA

,-.( I., -/""l'N I ;4NI 11YruHM 10N ,-uR THIS ""' " o.n E INUICAlt- _A r-C" I t:U A'-'TU.o.L ~M·~~ N::, Ar IC" , m ~~L:, / I Im, I A IIUN:

TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT ANO CAS NO. EFSOURCE tb/hr lb/day ltl/\'r NIA

Att»chmen1,: (1} e mbolan, ca!culatinni- and ,uppcrting do.;umentotic>n. (2) iudicstt alt ,e,qucsted state and federa l tntorceable permit 1in•11 (e.g . houq Gf oporot»on, e mi~-.ion rAtes) ;ino <tesccibe h.nw lhese a~ mortito1ed enid whh wh~t frequ•ney: .:100 (3} d w cribe ,my monitoring ch-..ices. g-eU(IH. <-r tftl pot11 ror lhis scwoa .

I..VMt'Lt: It: , Ml:> /"VKM AND _.... . . . _!;:It: AIVV A I I AI..M A - ... It: B1 I - t,::, r-uttM r-utt EACH SOURCE Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

A,. ••••• A P.u,.1 3 ..,,4!;

[. .. ., , .. ,. N,.,.,., ... , .. , ,..,., 1.-. • .,. , l ,, ••. \' 1\,.,,,., """'" r .. , ... , .,:J P.(i;S-CIIP-1)

-REVISED: 12101/0t

FORM 89 EMISSION SOURCE (OTHER)

NCDENR/Division of AirQuallly . Application tor Air Penni! to Construct/Operate I 89 EMISSlON SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Chipper EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES-EPWC

CONTROL DEVICE ID NO($): NIA

OPERATING SCt.NARIO: 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT tSTACKI ID NOISt N/A DESCRIBE IN DETAIL rHE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM):

Green wood chips •I'll screened and oven;ized chips will un<lergo additional chipping as required.

MAT-~• S"E~flll\JG PN••--CQlilT•N<nor,~ l'fWCESS MAX. DESIGN REQUESTED CAPACITY TYPE UNIT$ CAPACITY (UNIT/HR I LIMITATION(UNIT/HR)

Greenwood DOT 71.71

MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS · BATCH OPERATION MAX.Dl:SIGN REQUESTED CAPACITY TYPE UNITS CAPACITY tUNIT/BATCHJ LIMITATION (UNIT/BATCH!

MAXIMUIJ DESIGN t8ATCHES / HOURI REQUESTED LIMITATION (BATCHES/ HOURJ BATCH!iSIYRI

FUF.:LUSED: NIA TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE 1MILLION BTU/HRl: N/A MAX. CAPACITY HOURLY FUEL USE: N/A REQUESTED CAPACITY ANNUAL FUEL USE: NIA !COMMENTS:

Attach Additional Sheets as Necessa ry

A,,,,.,,.,,,,/\ 1,;,,,v,v11 N .. ,., .. ,. ........ 1 ..... ,,1 ...... VA,, ..... ..... , .. F .. , ..... .,3 F,, .... l • .,, 15 89 IC~·CIIP-1)

-Source Specific Forms - Green Wood Hammermills

....

-FORMB

SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES) REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Di\lislon ot Ait Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate I ts EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES-RCIIP-1, 2 Rechippen;/ Green Wood Hammermllls

COl'HR0L DEVICE ID NO($): NIA

OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT ($TACK) ID NO!S) NIA DESCRIBE IN DETAILTHE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Green wood Cl'lip& are 3CreEtled and oversized chips will undergo atl<lltlonal Cftipping as tequired.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK AND OOMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM B1-B9 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): D Coal,wood,oil, gas. olher bumer{Foon 131) OV¼>oclwo~ing (Form B4) O Menufacl of chemicalskoatingsr.nks {Form 97) O lnlcombuslion enginetgenerator (Form 82) OCOEJting/linishinglprinting (Form BS) O tncinera~e>n (Form 98) Qllquid storagolanks (Form B3) 0 Storage silOSlbins {Form B6J • Other (f onn B9J $TART CONSTRUCTION OATE: !OPERATION DATE: 412212013 IDATE MANUFACTURED: MANUFACTURER/ MODEL NO.: Willlams#49o !EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE: 24 MR/DAY 7 DAY/WK 52 WKNR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO'? NSPS (SUBPART?)'. NESHAP (SUBPART?): MACT (SUBPART?): PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT (%): DEC-FEB 2S% MAR-MAY 25% JUN-AUG 2S% SEP-NOV 25% EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION 8 7601VJSIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL_ OPERATION: <20 %OPACITY

_,.. , ,-HJD. ,-un ·u ... l,LJ/.AN/ ·- ,• -· . lf.;J,V ,-.-µt< I .,.,._,,, .. ~1...1_1:~1"'11'- ~~

SOURCE0I EXPECTED ACTUAL POTEliTIAL EMSSIONS !::MISSION (Af (tX comrmts, LIPAITS} \BS.FORE CONTRQ:.S I LIMITS) (AFTER CONINOLS t I IMIJS)

AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED FACTOR ll>lhr I tons/vr lb/hr tons/1,r lb/hr tons/vr PARTICULATE MATTER 1PM) See Emission Calculations In An=ndix B PARTICULATE MATTER<10MICRONS (PM,~ PARTICULATE MATTER<2.5 MICRONS (PM,.)

SULFUR DIOXIDE •S02) NITROGEN OXIDES {NOx\ CARBON MONOXIDE 1CO) VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (V0CJ LEAD OTHER

HA A11~POLLL rANT EM/,-•·-~ INFORMA m FOR THIS :,,:uuwCE SOURCE OF EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL_ EMSSIONS

F.MISSION (AFTER CCNJROLS I u,.orS) (BEFORE CONI KOL-.<;/ llll\lT$) tAFYC:R COHTROLS I LIMITS} HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT ANO CAS NO. FACTOR lb/hr tonsM lb/hr tons/yr lbihr tons/yr NIA

TOr,,. · AIR p, LLUTAi rl' EMISSIONS IN,..,., MA1'JONt . ..., THI& SOtl_Rl,,.. INlJIL:ATE. "'"' - lt:L A\.. IUAlE• ,~,.,~ :S A t- 1 R COi IIKUL:S I LIMIIA ll ,ma,

TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. Ef SOURCE lb/hr lbldav 11>/yf N/A

Attachments.: {1) tmi$Sions ca!culatiu11s ~nd wpportin:g documont:ation; (2) indic~ue ~,, requ°'ted itate and fed~al ~forc:esble pem,i« limits (GQ. hrm~ of operauon. emis$ion rele,) end desctibe llw, these- are monitnrM sM w~h what hequ1;ncy; and (3) dJM;1ibe any m«1i1oring dcvlc~. gauges., or test ports r01 thi'$ wuree.

<.,umr'LETE I Hl.:i rur<m ANU <.,umr'Lt:: I I::: ANU Al I A<.;H ~- - ,., It:: B1 I , ,. _ _ ''::. ""' rur<m ,COR EACH ::iOURCE Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

/\.,.., .......... /\ f. ....... N,,,..,,, ,.,,,,, .... l,u,.,, T ... , V ,'\,, ..... c ftUO.'> r ., ....... , .. 3 p,..,,. l~ ... , '1!1 B f[S-GI-IM/

....

-,

...,

....,

REVISED: 12/01/01

FORM B9 EMISSION SOURCE (OTHER)

NCDENR/Oivision of Air Quality· Applicatlcm for Air Permit to Construct/Operate I B9 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Green Wood Hamrnermills EMISSION SOURCE 10 NO: ES-RCHP-1 2

CONTROL DEVICE 10 NO($): NIA

OPERA TING SCENARIO: 1 OF 1 DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM):

EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO(SJ: EP-6

Greeo wood chips a"' scre<>ned and oversized chips wlll undergo addiUonal chipping as r,:qulred •

"!AT.ERl41 Al:-•--• 'PROC~SS • U'JN11NUOOS PR()CI ;s MAX.OF.SIGN REQUESTED CAPACITY TYPE UNITS CAPACITY (UNIT/HR) LIMITATION(UNIT/HR)

Greenwood OOT 71.71

Mu.lBIALS ENTERING-• - • BATCH QP.EIIAnotl MAX. DESIGN REQUESTED CAPACITY TYPE UNITS CAPACITY !UNIT/BATCH) UMIIATION (UNIT/BATCH)

MAXIMUM DESIGN !BATCHES /HOURl:

REQUESTED LIMITATION (BATCHES /HOUR): (BATCHES/YRJ:

FUEL USED: N/A TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE (MILLION BTU/HR): NIA MAX. CAPACITY HOURLY FUEL USE: NIA REOUESTEDCAPACITY ANNUAL FUEL USE: NIA COMMENTS:

.. Attach Add1t1onal Sheets as Necessary

Ar-r~,,,,.,. /\ F ..... ,. N • .,,., ... 1 ...... , J l O., '.J 1\r,,., .......... ~ r: ..... ,., .. J P.-. 11 ., 1() ,,, 4:;. E:9 (£5-GI-IM)

..,

-,

Source Specific Forms - Dryer Source ,..,

,..,

-,

FORMS SPECIF JC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES) - REVISED 12/01/01 NCOEPIR/Dlvlslon of Air Quality · Application for Air Permll to Construct/O))erate I t,

EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: !EMISSION SOURCE 10 NO: ES-DRYER G,.,.,., Wood Direct.fired n.ver Sw tem !CONTROL DEVICE ID """S): CO.DC, CO-WESP OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF • I EMISS10N POINT !STACK) JO N01Sr. EP-1 DESCRIBE IN DETAJLTHE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Green wood Is conveyed to a rotary dryer system. Direct contact heat Is provldoo to the system vi• a 175.3 mmBlu/hr burner system. Air emissions are controlled by <:yclones for bulk particulate removal and addttional ))articulate is removed utlllll•ing • wet electrostatic preclpit41or (WESP) operating ~fter th~ cyclones.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK ANO COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM B1-B9 ON THE FOLLOWIPIG PAGES) : a Co!ll,wood,oil, gas, on,e, burner (Form B1) 0 WoodwOO<ing (Form 84) O Manufet.t. of chemicals/coatings/Inks (Form 87) O Int.combustion enginef¥0era101' (Fonn 82) 0 Coalingflllisl'onglpmllna (Form 85) Q fnci<terallon(FormB8) Q Liqukl sl0fage tanks (R>rm 83) O Storage silosl!)ins (Ferm 86) 0 Other {Form 89) START CONSTRUCTION DATE: !OPERATION DATE: 4122/2013 !DATE MANUFACTURED: MANUFACTURER/ MODEL NO.: Buettner SX26R I EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE: 24 HR/DAY 7 DAY/WK 62 WK/YR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO'? NSPS <SUBPART?!: NESHAP 1SUBPART7I: MACT <SUBPART?,: PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT ('!I.I: OEC-FEB 25% tAAR-MAY 25% JUN-AUG 25% SEP-NOV 25% EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION 8,760 VISIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: <20 %OPACITY

~I</ , ._,..,- 141~ l'UJ...LU HlVI .• _. 11'.rV"-nnM r,u rvrc , "'"'' ~UL/.1'((;1.: SOURCE O! EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS

EMISSION (AFTER C0NTIIOUIUW11SI l nJ:-FOf<E COOfflOOl.Sl l.WIUl Yw-'"TE.N CONTROl-5, IJMrf.s)

AIR POU.UTANT EMITTED FACTOR lbJIT I tons!,, l>!h- to<1S11r lbltT lons/11 PARTICULATE MATTER tPMI See Emission Calculations In Aooendlx B PARTICULATE MATTER<10 MICRO/IS (PM,.J

PARTICULATE MATTER•2.S MICRONS IPM, .l SULFUR DIOXIDE fS021 NITROGEN OXIDES tNOxl CARBON MONOXIDE tCO) VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCJ LEAD OTHER

7& 11IQ __.., f ,,.NT .. ,~, R-n ·-FOR "'-"0·-·-· ~ SOURC\~ 1 EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS

EMISSION (AFTER <.:ONTROLS/ LIMIT$) (9EfCRE CONTROLS/ LIIAITS) '°'F'l'Eft C~ROLS/LIWITt;

HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT ANO CAS NO. FACTOR I lb/ht tons/vr lb/I\' IOOS/vr lblt.- IOn$/vr See Eminlon Calculations In Appendix B

r/( --PoLLU -.Te-"' Ns J- w-ATI ,- i=,~-,--- .. Un, .~ INOtCATt: EXPE\,1t:uACTLJ,-.L ~U< "' l t:R : ONTNul..S / UMITA IUN:::.

TOXIC I\IR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. EFSOUR""1 blhr lblda. lbM See Emission Calculatiomi in a nnenalx B

Att.:,ehment.1: C1) emls,slons calcul1Ytion> •rid tuppOl'ting rtncumeruauon: (2) indi-cate lill reque-:.ted ~* • ffll federal enJoreie-abte pe,mil lrrih: (t.g. h®n ol t1peratiffl. emf'J,ion rares) -,nu

desa1b,, """' "1ese ON> """1iln«d ond wfth wh!ot freqw ncy; and (3l-er,y ,,,.......,,,a - --. 01 le,I pcm b.,.. ...,, .. -ET E In,:, t"VKM AND 1.,VIYJr-L c: I c: ANO A I 114<,n ,:. ·-· IC 81 1. B9 rv~"" rvtt EA CH ;SUURCt:

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

l\,.,,, ...... ,. 1\ ( ..... ,.,,. N,..,.,,.,. ,.,,,, .... I,., u• l .,,,.. V /,,. ,.,,.111:,n,. r ,. . ,., ., ., '.l P~"·· 17o,4~ B /ES DRYrn)

-' FORM 61

EMISSION SOURCE (WOOD, COAL, OIL, GAS, OTHER FUEL-FIRED BURNER) REVISED 12/01101 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality. Applicallon ro, Air Pe.-mn to Construct/Operete I 0 1 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: !EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES.DRYER Green Wood Direct-Fired Dryer System !CONTROL DEVICE 10 NO(S}: CD-DC, CD-WESP

..... OPERA TING SCENARIO: 1 OF 1 !EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO{SI: EP-1 DESCRIBE USEC ,i/ PROCESS HEAT => ~ SPACE HEAT i!J ELECTRICAL GENERATION

~ CONTINUOUS USE d STANO BY/EMERGENCY ~ OTHER (DESCRIBE\ HEATING MECHANISM: ,/) INDIRECT < ,/) DIRECT ::, MAX. FIRING RATE (MMBTU/1-tOURl: 17£.3 I

WOOD-FIRED BURNER WOOD TYPE: 0 BARK C. Ji WOOD/BARK ~ TWOOD i! DRYWOOD & OTHER /DESCRIBE):

PERCENT MOISTURE OF FUEL: 20 to 50%

,/) UNCONTROLLED d CONTROLLED WITH FLY ASH REINJECTION C ii CONTROLLED W/0 REINJECTIOti:> FUEL FEED METHOD: HEAT TRANSFER MEDIA: ~ STF.Alot ,/) AIR ')!. OTHER METHOD OF TUBE CLEANING: NIA

COAL..f'IRED BURNER TYPE OF BOILER IF OTHER DESCRIBE:

PULVERlll:D l OVERFEED STOKER UNDERFEED STOKER SPREADER STOKER FLUIDIZED BED OWET BED t UNCONTROLLED ~ UNCONTROLLED d UNCONTROLLED ~ CIRCULATING 0 DRY BED (o! CONTROLLED ~ CONTROLLED !J FLYASH REINJECTION i RECIRCULATING

~ NO FLY ASH REJNJECTION METHOD OF LOADING: ~ CYCLONE ~ HANDFIRED ~ TRAVELING GRATE ~ OTHER tDESCR18EJ METHOD OF TUBE CLEANING: CU:ANING SCHEDULE:

OfUGAS-FIREO BIJttNER TYPE OF BOILER: LJ VIILll 1 u ···--- ,,.,~

LJ -- ·- LJ . ·--·--· .•. ·-

TYPE OF FIRING: LJNUNMAL LJ TANl3tNI IAL LJ LOW NUX liUl{NER:S LJ NU LUW NUX RURNEI{

METHOD OF TUBE CLEANING: CLEANING SCMEDULE: OTHER fl'U!l.flRED l:WRNER

TYPE OF FUEL: PERCENT MOISTURE: TYPE OF BOILER: LJ UIILIIY LJ INOU:STRIAL LJ <;UMMERGIAL u Rt:.;;rutNIIAL

TYPE OF FIRING: TYPE OF CONTROL (IF ANY): FUEL FEED METHOD: ___ METHOD OF TUBE CLEANING: CLEANING SCHEDUlE:

MJei. USAGi 11 1\jr.1 11n1: sTARtUP1&.AcKuP FueLs ,. MAXIMUM u1:.;:,1<,;N REQUESTED CAPACITY

FUEL TYPE UNITS CAPACITY (UNIT/HR) LIMITATION (UNIT/HR) Balk/Wet Wood ton 20.8

FUEL CHARACT~ISTICS ICOMPLETI! ALL THAT ARE APPUCAFi .1!'1 SPECIFIC SULFUR CONTENT ASH CONTENT

FUEL TYPE BTU CONTENT (% BY WEIGHT) (% BY WEIGHT) Barl<JWet Wood Nominal 4 200 BTU/lb 0.011

SAMPLING PORTS, COMPLIANT WITH EPA METHOD 1 WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE ST.4.CKS: 'e_ YES .) ~ NO COMMENTS:

.. Attach Add1t1onal Sheets As Necessary

J\,.,, ... .,,,,. /\ !.. .......... M ............. ,.. ..... 1 ....... r .... , v A,.,, ........ ,.~ r ,.,,. ... y3 P .. .,., l~ .. , 4~ ,\1 :rs.ORY[~)

FORMC4 CONTROL DEVICE (CYCLONE, MULTICYCLONE, OR OTHER MECHANICAL)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/0Mslon of Air Quality -Application for Air Pennit to Con&truct/0perate ~ CONTROL DEVICE 10 NO: CO-DC CONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHIOI EMISSION SOURCE ID NO(S): ES-DRYER

EMISSION POINT I ST ACKl ID tJO./SI· EP-1 POSITION IN SERIES Of CONTROLS NO. 1 OF 2 UNITS

MANUFACTURE Lundberg E-Tube 115719 MODEL NO:

DATE MANUFACTURED: PROP0SEDOP~RATION DATE: OPERATING SCSIARIO; PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION DATE:

1 OF 1 P.E. SEAL REQUIRED IPER 2Q .0112)'? ~ YES ~ NO

rJESCRl8E CONTROL SYSTEM : Three Identical simple cyctones a re equipped to the di sch• rg e of the rotary dryer system to upture bulk PM emission&. Emissions from each the cyclone.a are comb,ned into• common duet and are routed to Iha WESP. The paramete~ Presented he.-e are per each cyclone:

POllUTANT(S) COLLECTED: PM 2M.tL PM2.s

BEFORE CONTROi. EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): --- --- ---CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: ~% ____!!!.% ~ % or.

C0NTROl DEVICE EFFICIENCY: ---% ---% --- % %

CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY: % --- % --- % % - --EFFICIENCY DETERMINATION CO0 F.: --- --- ---TOTAL EMISSION !<ATE (LB/HR):

PRESSURE DROP (IN. H,OJ: MIN MAX 6.0" WARNING ALARM? t YES ~ NO

INLET TEMPERATURE /'F): MIN MAX Nomlnal400 OUTLET TEMPERATURE (°F): MIN MAX Nominal 400

INLET AIR FLOW RATE IACFM): 117,000 BULK PARTICLE DENSITY (LB/FT'): 3.43E-D5

POLLUTANT LOA0ING RATE IGR/FT1 0.2, S!l"n.MOWIIBER <:¥CLONE lo1UL TICVCl..OHE

LENGTH !INCHES,: INLET VELOCITY !FTISECt. 95 -' CIRCULAR°)! RECTANGLE NO. TUBES:

Wt0TH flNCHESt DIMENSIONS (INCHES! See instrvcti0n8 IF IM:T $PRAY UTILIZED 0IAMETER Of TUBES:

HEIGHT (INCHF.S): H: Od: LIQUID USED: HOPPER ASPIRATION SYSTEM?

VELOCITY (Fl /SEC. l: W: Lb: 156" FLOW RATE IGPMt i YES .; NO

NO. TRAYS: De: 79• Le: 312" MAKE UP RATE tGP\11: LOUVERS'? NO. BAFFLES: D: 156" C• i YES I; NO

TYPE OF CYCL(lNE J CONVENTIONAi) ~ HIGH EFFICIENCY ! OTHER

DESCRIBE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES: PAITT!Cl.li SIZE t;ll!iTRIBUTION

Periodic inspection of mechanical integrity during plant outages SIZE WEIGHT% CUMULAIIVI:

as specified by manufacturer {MICRONS) OF TOTAL %

DE.SCRtBE INCOMING AIR STREAM: 0-1 Unknown

The flue gas ffom the dryer will be split and dis1rlbuted through a set of 1-10

three cyclones before entering the WESP. After the cyclones, the gas 10-25

stream will be combined into a single duct and directed to the WESP inlet 25-50

point. ~,oo >1 00

TO'rAL = 100

DESCRIBE ANY MONITORING DEVICES. GAUGES, Tc<> • 1-'VRTS. ETC:

None

ON A SEPARATE PAGE, ATTACH A DIAGRAM OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONTROL 0EVICE TO ITS EMISSION SOURCE(SI:

Attacn Additional :meets As Necessa ry 'Final equipment selection has not yet occurred but will be sim ilar in design to specifications snown.

,\,,, .• , .. .,.,,. A C,,, .. , .. N .. ,, ........... 1 ....... -r .... , v r-, ........ ,, .• r ........ 3 P .. ,., .. l V ,., 'IS C:4 {r.5·0~YW)

--,

FORM C2 - CONTROL DEVICE (Electrostatic Precipitator) REVISED 12/01/01 IICDENR/Dlvlslon of Air Quality. Appllcalion for Afr Pt>mllt to Construct/Operate I C2 CONTROL DEVICE ID NO: CD-WESP CONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EM 1$$10N SOURCE ID N< ES-ORYER EMISSION POINT (STACK ID NO(SJ: EP-1 POSITION IN SERIES OF CONTROLS: NO. 2 OF 2 UNITS MANUFACTURER: Lundbero E-Tube 116719 MODEL NO. Lundbero E-Tube 115719 MANUFACTURE DATE: PROPOSED OPERATION DATE: TBD

Ql'eAATING SC.EttAAIO: PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION DATE: TBD OF P.E. SEAL REOUIRlc.D (PER 10 .01121? (.~ YES .)~ NO

EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS GAS DISTRIBUTION GRIDS: ( el YES) ,! NO TYPE: C i: wen ~ DRY C ~ SINGLE-ST AGE) ! TWO-STAGE TOTAL COlLECTION PLATE AREA (FT'): 2&904 NO. FIELDS 2 NO. COLLECTOR PLATE PER FIELD: 567tubes COLLECTOR PLATES SIZE (FT): LENGTH: WIDTH: SPACING BETWEEN COLLECTOR PlATES !INCHES): 12" hextube TOTAL DISCHARGE ELECTRODE LENGTH/FT): 19"-0" GAS VISCOSITY tPOISE): 2.054E-04 Poise NUMBER OF DISCHARGE EL.£CTRODeS: 5&7 NUMBER OF COLLECTING ELECTRODE RAPPERS: nont MAXIMUM INLET AIR FLOW RATE (ACF'M): 117,00D PARTICLE MIGRATION VELOCITY IFT/SECI: 0.234 MINIMUM GAS TREATMENT TIME (SECJ: 2.3 BULK PARTICLE DENSITY (LBIFT'I: 4511>/cu. rt. FIE.LO STRENGTH (VOLTS) CHARGING: 3HVA COLLECTING: NIA CORONA POWER (WATTS/1000CFMl: 4000 ELECTRICAL USAGE /kw/HOURI: 141.6 CLEANING PROCEDURES: {: RAPPING i PLATE VIBRATING ~ WASHING Y, OTHER

oP~AATili/G PARAMETER$ IPRF.SSURE DROP (IN. H20): MIN Z' MAX 2" WARNING AlARM? I! YES ,; NC( J RESISTIVI IY OF POLLUTANT /OHM.CM): ti/A GAS CONOITLONII<(,: ~ YES Y NO TYPE OF AGENT ur YES): INLET GAS TEMPE:.HATURE l°Fl: 240 "F nominal OVTLET GAS TEMPERATURE ('F): 1ao 'F nominal VOLUME OF GAS HANDLED IACFMt 117000 INLET MOISTURE PERCENT: MIN 40% MAX SO%

PO~ REtl,UIREMEMIS I 1$ AN ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM USED? t YES ~ NO FIELONO. NO.OF SETS CHARGING EACH TRANSFORMER (kVAJ EACH RECTIFIER Kv Ave/Peak Ma De

1 1 118 831126$ 2 1 118 &311265

POLLUTANT($) COLLECTED: PMIPM,9/PMa BEFORE CONTI.CL EMISSION RATE (LBIHRJ: 150.0() CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: % o/o % % CONTROL DEVICE EFFICIENCY: % % % % CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY: % % % ½ EfflCIENCY DETERMINATION CODE: TOTAL EMISSION RATE (LBIHR): See calculations in Appendix B

PAlfflCl,.,E ~ Ql$TRIIW'tltWI DESCRIBE STARTUP PROCEDURES: SIZE WEIGHT% CUMULATIVE ~eattached

(MICRONS) OF TOTAL %

0-1 Unknown DESCRIBE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES: 1-10 See attached

10-25 25-50 DESCRIBE ANY AUXILIARY MATERIALS INTRODUCED INTO THE CONTROL

50-100 SYSTEM: >100 NOAH

TOTAL• 100

DESCRIBE ANY MONITORING oev1c1as. GAUGES, OR TEST PORTS ASATT/\CHMF.:NTS: PLC

/I HACl-1 A DIAGRAM OF THE TOP VIEW OF THE ESP WITH DIMENSIONS (inclu(la al a minimum the plale spacing and w,re spacing an~ indicate lheelecf/Ode tv,.,,, AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONTROL DEVICE TO ITS EMISSION SOURCE($):

Attach Adatttona1 :sheets As Necessa ry

,\, • .,,., ,,,,. /1, [,. .... , .. ,, N(I- ... ~,., (,.,,,., f.,,~ VA,,,..,,.,,,,,.,, r ..... ,,. .. ~ P.,:,·· 20 •• , II~ C? (CS-[;RYEF<)

...,

Source Specific Forms - Hammermills 8: Hammermill Area

-

.... FORM B

SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES),........,...._, REVISED 12101/01 NCOENR/Dlvlslon of Air Quality - Application for Air Pennltto Conetruc1/0perate l:j

EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: EMISSION SOUl<CE 10 NO: ES-HM-1 thru 8

El11ht (8) Hammem,ffls CONTROL DEVICE IO NO(S): CO-HM-CYC-1 tlvouah & CD-ttM-SF1 throUQh 3

OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO/SI: EP-2 DESCRIBE 1111 DETAIL THE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW OIAGRAMJ: Dried materials are reduced to the appropriate size nee<le<I for pelleUzalion using eight hammermills.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE {CHECK ANO COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM 8 1-89 OH THE FOLLOWING PAGES): n Coe~ wood.oi, gas. olher burner (Form 81) O Woodwooing (Fonn 84) O Menuract ol chemicels/coatings/inks (Form 87) O Int combustion enginelgoncralor (Fom, 82) O Cootingllinishin(J'printiog (Form B5) Olnclnera6on (Form 08) O Liquid storage lankS (Fe>tm B3) O Sloreg• siloolbins (Form B6) a Olher (Fofln 89) START CONSTRUCTION DATE: !OPERATION DATE: 4122/2013 IDArE MANUFACTURED: MANUFACTURER I MODEL NO.: Bliss Hammermill ERn..&.tEXPECTEO OP. SCHEDUlE: u HR/DAY 7 DAY/WK 6, WK/'IR IS THS SOURCE SU8JECT TO? NSPS ISUBPART?I: NESHAP /SU8PART?,: MACT 1SU8PART?C PERCENTAGE ANNUAL TI-IROUGHPUT I'!\): DEC-FEB ZS% MAR-MAY 25% JUN-AUG 26% SEP-NOV 25% EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION 8 760 VISIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: <20 % OPACITY

• . r£1 t:n:, _ _ ,re. /'(.JLL

AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED PARTICULATE MATTER 1PM) PARTICULATE MATTER<10MtCRONS <PM-> PARTICUIATE MATTE.R<2.5 MICRONS !l'M.5)

SULFUR DIOXIDE 1502) NITROGEN OXIDES IIIIOxl CARBON MONOXIDE /CO) I/OLA TILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IVOC) LEAD OTHER

H S AIR.,,., I

HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. NIA

rt r-F.J/ IJ1,1..1n l"'l.JH /'"'JI~"''' ~

SOURCE Of EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS EMISSION <.-FrEI' CCl'TAOLS I LIMITSI (SEFORE CO., I l!OLS I IIMlrS\ IA.,ER CONTROLS I LIMITSI FACTOR lllltr I WLVvr lbtllf """"'-r lbitv' IOOSM

see Emission Calcvlatlons in AD""ndlx B

ANT EM .... >NX ,.,, ORMA ,,, FOil •.. :,,,nLJRCE SOURCE OF EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS

EMISSfON fAFIERCONl~OLS/ltMITS. cBEF'M£ CONTi:tOLS / llt.tITS) (A,rE~ CONT AOL$ I LINt?l';l

FACTOR lt>lhf tens/yr lbAv rons,yr 11>/hr 1ons1vr

,.,,.,,r AIR POLLtna, 1:1 /NFOR.lifllfUIN ·,R tf1IS 1N1.m.~1 c. ~.Ar-c w ·t1. A1.,; 1UAL tNl :...~n. J1v3 Ar ~" .• l.JN KULS (ll""11M.

TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT ANO CAS NO. EF SOURCE. lb/hr ID/tlav lbl\'r NIA

Attachmenh.: ( t} ernissloris c:;ifcutaCions s,nrt- s11ppaning aoeumt~don; (2) inclicalt .,11 ,eq\letted $l3tc 0nd federel ttnfo•c.eaibl& permit limlt, (eQ. hou1s ot ~•ration. emi$$ion r~IQS) and dHt.title how 1J'le~@ art1 monitored and wilh wt11t r,equenc,i: :1nd (3) dncri.be an~ monittlll'IO Cl..,i,c:e,.. g-,uges. or '-tit pa.ts for this sourc•

--·· ~t:lt: 1n,;:,rvrcm,.,.v _c,cA/VuAI/At;t1"., ,_ ... lt:l:H I ... ___ jj!lrvrcmrvrct:A!;N:.UVKl.t:

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

t\1,.,,,., 1, .,. A V . •. 1 ,. 21 ..,, •1f'i

£,.,, . .,,. 1\1,.,\ ... , ....... ~ .. 1 ..... ,. T.11 .. V ,\,,.,., .... ,, ... , r "' ....... :1 8 C[S IIM ! ..,,,.,. ,. -R)

....

' ...., FORM B9

EMISSION SOURCE (OTHER) REVISED: 12101,01 NCDENR/DMglon of Air Quality -Appllcatlon tor Air Pem,lt to Construct/Operate I 89 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Eight 18) Hammermllls F.MISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES-HM-1 thru 8

CONTROL DEVICE 10 NO(S}: CD•HM-CYC-1 tllfOUQh 8 CO.HM•BF1 throuQh 3

OPERA TING SCENARIO: 1 OF 1 EMISSION KllNT <STACK) 10 NO($ ): EP-2 throuoh 4 DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE PROCESS (ArTACH FLOW DIAGRAM):

Dried materials are reduce<l to the appropriate size needed for pellellzatlon using eight hammetmilts.

-- --~· s ENTERING -· "-~,. CQNTif!l .. vmS PRQC£SS MAX. DESIGN REQUESTED CAPACITY TYPE UNIT$ CAPACITY /UNITIHRl LIMITATION{UNITA-IR)

Dried Wood DDT 71.71

MATERIALS l:Ntl:1ilNO PROCESS - BATCH OPER'A-T.1Qtl MAX DESIGN REQUESTED l:APACITY TYPE UNITS CAPACITY !UNIT/BATCH\ UMITATION !UNIT/BATCH)

MAXIMUM DESIGN (BATCHES /HOUR ):

REQUESTED LIMITATION !BATCHES I HOUR1: (BATCHES/YR):

FUEL USED: NIA TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE !MILLION BTU/HR): NIA MAX. CAPACITY HOURI Y FUEL USE: N/A REQUESTED CAPACITY ANNUAL FUEL USE: NIA COMMEN'rS:

. -Attach Add1t1onal Sheets as Necessary

j\,,, ..... ,. .. /\. [.,,.,,.,. N,.~'""'"('"··•· 1-, .• , l,uo \I /1..,.,..,,-.~vo,, i·.,,,.,,. .,.J

J9 ((5-IIW.-1 """""" -A)

FORM C4 CONTROL DEVICE (CYCLONE, MUL TICYCLONE, OR OTHER MECHANICAL)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Dlvision ol Air Quality • Application tor Air Pennit to Constructl()porale rcr ~.l)NTROL OEVICE JD NO: CD-HM-CYC-1 thru-8 CONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE ID NO/SI: ES-HM-1 throuah-8 EMISSION POINT !STACK! ID Nots ,: EP-2 POSITION IN SERIES OF CONTROLS NO. 1 OF 2 UNITS

MANUFACTURER: Alrcon AC-96 MOOELNO: AC-96 DATE MANUFACTURED: PROPOSED 0P£RATION DATE: 1Q2014

OPERATING SCENARIO: PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION I TBO

1 OF 1 P.E. SEAL REQUIRED (PER i o .011:m C YES 1 ~ NO

Dt:SCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM : One cyclone is equipped ror each hammonnlll to capture bulk PM eml&Slona. The emissions from the cyclone are then routed to oo>e or three baglitters.

POLLUTANT(S) COLLECTED: PM ~ ~ BEFORE CONTROL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): See calculations In A~ndlx B

CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: 98.0%'1. ~'!I, ~ ')(, !lo

CONTROL DEVICE EFFICIENCY· % % % % --- ---CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY: % % % % --- ---EFFICIENCY OETERMINA TION CODE: --- ---TOT AL EMISSION RATE (I.B/HR): See catcutatlons in A!!e:!!dlx 8

PRESSURE DROP (IN. H,O): MIN MAX 6.0" WARNING AL'\RM? ~ YES i NO

INLET TEMPERATURE (0 F\: MIN MAX Ambient OUTLET TEMPERATURE !°Fl: MIN MAX Ambient INLET AIR FLOW RATE. tACFMi: 15,000 each cyclone BULX PARTICLE DENSITY (LBIFT'): 1.43E-43

POLLUTANT LOADING RATE (GR/Fl'J: , o arid inlet

SE7TIJNG CHAMIJ!#'l CYClOl'lf: MU L llC'l'CI.ON£ LENGTH UNCHES): INLET VELOCITY (FT/SF.C l : 114.65 '. CIRCULAR~ ! RECTANGLE NO. TUBES:

WIDTH UNCHESJ: DIMENSIONS /INCHES/ See ln$ttuc/ior1S IF WET SPRAY UTILIZED DIAMETER OF TUBES:

HEIGIIT /INCHES>: H: 60 Dd: 20 LIOUIDUSEO: HOPPER ASPIRATION SYSTEM?

VELOCITY !FTISEC.r W: 32.25 Lb: 60 FLOW RATE iGPMI: e YES i! NO NO. TRAYS: De: 45 Le: 120 MAKE UP RATE (GPM): LOUVERS?

NO. BAFFLES: 0: 9~ .,. 64.75 ~ YES I. NO

TYPE OF CYCLor.if J CONVENTIONA') ~ HIGH EFFICIENCY ~ OTHER

DESCRIBE MAINTENANCE PROCEO\JRES: J>ART1CLE SIZE ~SUTION Periodic ln1pection or mechanical lntegrily during plant outages ::;J4c Wc 1\>HT % CUMULATIV~ as soecmed bv manufacturer <MICRONS) OF TOTAL %

DESCRIBE INCOMING AIR STREAM: 0-1 Unknown The material will be pulled through the cyelOne under negative pressu,•. The 1-10

cyclone will separate the material from the air stream and !he air will 10-2S dlseharge to an associated bag filter priorto being discharge to atm0-6phere 25-50 via a discharge statk common to au OUeta in this area. 51}-100

>100

TOTAL= lOO DESCRIBE ANY MONITORING OE\/lCES. C3AUGES. TEST PORTS. ETC:

None

ON A SC PARA TE. PAGE, ATTACH A DIAGRAM OF THE. RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONTROL DEVICE TO llS EMISSION SOURCEtS):

Attach Add1t1onal ~meets As Necessa ry

/',.,,,., .. .... I\ E .,.,,.,,, N .. .,..,,. ....... , .. 1 ..... , , T ... ,. './ Ar,t>" ~ .. , .. .,, f ...... , .. ., :i P,.,, .. 2.~ . 11:, C4 (CS ·lllvt ·CYt: -1 .......... 6)

...,

.....,

-

FORM C1 CONTROL DEVICE (FABRIC FILTER)

re, REVISED 12101/01 IICOENR/Oivision of Air Quality - Appllcatlon for /!Jr Permit to Construct/Operate CONTROL DEVICE 10 NO: CD-HM-BF-1 and 2 I CONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE ID NOISl: ES.HM-1 throu~h 8 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO($ ): EP-2 IPOStTION IN SERIES OF CONTROLS NO. 2 OF 2 UNITS MANUFACTURER: Alrcon MODEL NO: Air<:on 16 RAB 412-10 CATE MANUFACTURED: PROPOSED OPERATION DATE: 102014

OPERATING SCENARIO: PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION DATE: TBO , OF 1 P.E. SEAL REQUIRED IPER 20.01121" C • YES .> ~ NO DESCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM:

Three 131 bagfllters will be utilized for emission control on eight hamm<!rmlll cyclones. HMs 1 - 3 vent through bagnlle, 1, HMs 4-6 vent Ill rough bagfiller 2 and the 7 and 8 cyclones v.411 be routed routed to the third bagfilter along v,;1~ hammermm area emission$.

POLLUTANT(S) COLLECTED: PM PM-10 PM-2.5 ---BEFORE OONTROL EMISSION RATE (LBlrlR): See catculatlons in Appendix B ---CAPTURE t:l'FtCtENCY: -99.9 % -99.9 % -99.9% % ---CONTROL DEVICE: EFFICIENCY: '¼ % % % ---CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY. % % % % ---EFFICIENCY OETE:RMINATION CODE: ---TOTAL EMISSION RATE (LBll'IR): See calculations in Aeeen<llx B

PRESSURE DROP (IN. H20): MIN: MAX: 6'0

GAUGE? C d YES J NO WARNING ALARM? ~_s..,., ~NO BULK PARTICLE DENSITY (Ltl/FT3J; 1.43E-0~ INLET TEMPERATURE (°FI: 120 POLLUTANT LOADING RATE: 0.1 or/cl inlet ,! LB/HR C 0

l ,-o,d3 OUTLET TEMPERATURE ("F): 100 INLET AIR FLOW RATE IACFM I 45,000 FILTER MAX OPERATING TEMP. 1•F); NIA NO. OF COMPARTMENTS: 1iND. OF BAGS PER COMPARTMENT: 412 LENGTH OF BAG (IN.I: 144 DIAMETER OF BAG (IN. l : 6.7£ IDRAFT: i INIJUCEDINEG. 0 FORCED/PO];) Fil TER SURFACE AREA (FT'J: 6.250 !AIR TO CLOTH RA TIO: 7.20 !FILTER MATERIAL: Polytsterorcqulvalent ( WOVEN ( fl FELTE~ DESCRIBE CLEANING PROCEDURES: PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

~ ~ SONIC StZE WEIGHT% CUMULATIVE . J. SIMPLE BAG COLLAPSE {MICRONS) OF TOTAL %

,; MECHANICAUSHAKER ~ RING BAG COLLAPSE 0-1 Unknown ~ OTHER 1-10

DESCRIB~ INCOMING AIR STREAM: 10-25 The air str4'am v.;11 contoin wood dust particles. Larger particles 'Nill hav4' beeo 25-50 removed by the upstream cyclone. 50-100

>1[)()

TOTAL; 100 METHOD.FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO CLEAN: I ( AUTOMATJi:l d TIMED -I, MANUAL METHOD FOR DETERMINING·• "'"''' rn oco, , I'$ THE BAGS:

i ALARM C i INTERNAL INSPECTION ~ i VISIBLE EMISSION ~ OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Nooe

i MOISTURE BI_INDING ! CHEMICAL Rl::$1'.;TIVITY ! OTHER EXPLAIN:

DE.SCRIBE MAtNTF:NANCE PROCEDURES: Per manufacturer recommffldation&

ON A SEPARATE PAGf:. ATTACH A DIAGRAM S~!O','\IING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONTROL OCVICE TO ITS !:.MISSION SOURCE(SJ: .. Attach Adtllbonal Sheets As Necessary

'Final equipment selection has not yet occurred but will be similar in design to specifications shown.

/\1,,,,..,..,,. A

P .. ~·· lll .,, II~ ( .. _ ••• 1\1.,, •• , ... •••• t., ,. T. .. , V 1\,., . .,. •• ,.., f """ .3

ct ,:cs.1 tM-or .1 ,, .... ~:

.....

FORM C1

- REVISED 12/01101

CONTROL DEVICE (FABRIC FILTER) NCOENRIDivlslon or Air Quality· Applica11on ro, Air Pannlt to Construct/Operate rcr

CONTROL DEVICE 10 NO: CO-HM-BF-3 !CONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE ID NO(Si ES-HM-7 HM-II, •nd ES-NOS EMISSION POINT ISTACKI ID N vsJ: EP-2 IPOSI 11uN IN SERIES Ur ., NTROLS ND. 2 UF 1 U1'TS

MANUFACTURER: Alrcon MODEL NO: 16 RAB412-10

DATE MANUFACTURED: PROPOSED OPERATION DATE: 102014 Ol"fJRA'llNG SCfi:ffAAIO: PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION DATE: TBD

1 •. OF 1 P.E. SEAi. REQUIRED !PER 2Q .01121? C ~ YES .:, ~ NO DESCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM:

Three (3) bagfiltefS WIii b1I utlllzed for emission control on seven of the l\1mmermlll cyclones. HMs 1 • 3 vent through 1>agfllter 1, HMs ~6 vent throu11h b•gfiller 2 and Ille

7 and 8 cyclones WIii be routed rouled to the third bagflller along with bammennm area emissions.

POLUJTANT(S) COLLECTED: PM PM-10 PM-2.5 ---BEFORE CONTROL E'-'ISSION RATE (LB/HR): See c&lculatlons In A.ppen<llx B ---CAPTURE EFFICIENcY: -99.9 o/o -99.9 % •99.9 % % - --CON TROI. DEVICE EFFICIF.NCY: % % % % - - -CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY: % o/o % ',I, ---.EFFICIENCY OETEFINIINATION CODE ---TOTAL EMISSION RA"TE (LB/HR); See ca leuJatl()nS in Aeeend Ix B

PRESSURE DROP (IN. H20): l,IIN: MAX: 6" GAUGE? C t! YES "J NO WARNING ALARM? 14...:f:ES_.) ~ NO

BULK PARTICLE DENSITY (LB/FT'J 1.43E-<)5 INLET TEMPERATURE t'Fl: 120

POlWTAN·r LOACING RATE: 0.1,.,.,.,inlet I LBIHR ( • r:r,.a• OUTLE"I TEMPl:.RATURE l"Ft: 100

INLET AIR FLOW RATE IACFM 1: 45,0DO FILTER MAX OP~RATING TEMP. ('Fl: NIA NO. OF COMPARTMENTS; 1INO. OF BAGS PER COMPARTMENT: 412 LENGTH OF BAG (IN.): 144

OIAMETER OF BAG !IN.): 5.76 loRAFT: ti INDUCED/NEG. c .. FOHCED/Pn~ FILTER SURFACE ARCA <FT"): 6251)

AIR TO CLOTH RATIO: 7.20 !FILTER MATERIAL: Polymer or eQuiv1lt111t !- WOVEN ( ~ FELTEQ)

DESCRIBE CI.EANING PROCEDURES· PARTICU! SIZE Dl:5TRIIIUTIOti

~ t SONIC SIZE WEIGHI% CVMUI.ATIVE

0 f SIMPLE BAG COLLAPSE (MICRONS) OF TOTAL %

,i MECHANICAL/SHAKER .._4 RING BAG COLLAPSE 0-1 Unknown ;< OTHER 1-10

DESCRIBE INCOMING AIR STRf'AM· 10-25

The air stream w!K contain wood dust particles. Laryu particles wltl have been 25-SO

removed by tile upstream cyclone. The filters wltt discharge to a common alack. This 50-100

stack will afgo accept the discharge air flow from a lhlrd bag filter (CO-HM A-BF) >100

llfocated in this area.I TOTAL: 100

METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO CLEAN:

( AUTOMATIO ~ TIMED • MANUAL M ETHOD FOR DETERMINING •••• ,r •• T- ~r~ • • ~r THE BAGS:

,!. ALARM C ,r INTERNAL INSPECTION ~ <' VISIBL.F. EMISSION t! OTHER

SPECIAi. CONDITIONS: None

~ MOISTURE BLINDING I. CHEMICAL RESISTIVITY ; OTHER

EXPLAIN: DESCRIBE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES. Per manufacturer recommtndatlons

ON A SEPARATE PAGE ATTACH A DIAGRAM SHOWl~JC Tt-tE RELATIONSHIP OF THE l,;ONTROL DEVICE TO ITS EMISSION SOURCE(SI

Attach Addilional Sheets As Necessary 'Final equipment selection has not yet occurred but will be simllar in design to specifications shOwn.

/,,, ... ,, ...... " C,,. , ... N ............ , .. , . .... T .... \/A,,,., ........... f ,. M' ,:,

p.,,.., 2~ .. , 11~ (: 1 fC$.: 1M.13r .r1

....,

...,

FORM B SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Olvision of Air Quality . Appllcatlon for Air Penni! to Construct/Operate ts EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES-NOS NulsanC<! Dust Svstem/ Hammermill Aru CONTROL DEVICE ID N()jS): CO.HM-BF-3 OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 !EMISSION POINT ISTACK t ID N01Sr. EP-2 DESCRIBE JN DETAIL THE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Hammennlll area <lust fl'om the hammcrmOI and screening operallons will be vented to tho hommermlll bagfilter 110. ~ (CO-HM-BF-3) to cootrol particulate matter emission&.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK ANO COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM 81-89 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES):

u Goal.wood. oil. gas, other burner (Fo,m 81) 0Woodwooting (Form B4) CJ M enufact. ol chemic9tslcootingsfinl<s (Form 87) O Int.combustion engine/generator (Form 82) O Coaun~nishin\¥pnnting (Form 85) O Incineration (Form 08) D Liquid storage tank& (Form 83) O Slonige silos/bins (Form Be) a OIiier (Form B9)

START CONSTRUCTION DATE: !OPERATION DATE: 41:W2013 DA TE MANUFACTURED: MANUFACTURER/ MODEL NO.: EXPECTED OP. SCt lEDULE: 24 HR/DAY 7 OAY/WK 52 WK/YR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO? NSPS tSUBPART?I. NESHAP ! SUBPART? ~ MACT rSUBPART?t PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT l 'KI'. DEC.fEB 25"4 MAR-MAY 25% JUN-AUG 25% SEP-NOV 25% EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION 8,76D VISIBLE STACK EMISStONS UNDER NORM/\L OPERATION: c?B % OPACITY

Cl(/ c~,,. ,.,,., r-<" ,, ~, n 'l<JN r"'\Jrt ru_, .,l llJ/"f.\ - r-

SOURCE. Of EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS EMISSION (AFTER CONTROLS I UMITS) cee~OftE CONTROUI ' LIMITS} 1-A,t"f'ER CONTROLS I Ll,\flTSt

AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED FACTOR lblhr I tons/, , lb,ty VJr\$/vr 11m ,~,.,, PARTICULATE MATTER 1PM) See Emls,r,lo.n Calculations In Ar>.,..ndix e PARTICUI.ATE MATTER<10 MICRONS <PM,~

PARTICULATE MATTER<2.~MICF!ONS fPM-.l SULFUR DIOXIDE 1S02J NITROGEN OXJDES 1NOx1 CARBON MONOXIDE ICOI VOLATILE ORGANIC COM POUNDS tvOCl LEAD OTHER

H" , n '''·'-A/R P I HNT ~-, "'·-,INF ·--Qt/ F ,_ rH/ " URcE SOURCE Of EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS

EMISSION (),FTEA CONJ~OLS J uMll'Sl (:'IF.FORE CONTftO:.S I LIMITS} fAFt'!R CONTROl.S / LINJTS•

HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. FACTOR lt)Jhr 10115/Vf lbh' tonslvr lbJhr I009/"' NIA

T ••m .. A/H ,.,,. Lu, Qn t=M/'<"/ N'< INFORMA r/nN r , R THIS" INUOl,I\IC ~~,· ~~[~D \\,OUAL - t\rl els CUN1 r<VI SI UM! 0><1lll l'>:>

TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. EF SOURCE lb/hr lb/<lav Jblvr NIA

Attachments; C 1J emis*ons caJc:ul3tion~ ond suppo:1in9 dn,curnenlation: (2) i11di~ate ell ro<,uttiliN.l ~ate snd fcdcr:i• ent0r1caahlP. permit llmlb (e.g. hQun of ope1e!lon, emission rtm::"S) • ,-J

<lftC/ibe hcrw 1Jie&e we 1T1ori1otec:r aM will'I whet frequency: c1.nd (3) describe :Jny 1'1'10f'lilorino ct•-.iic:es. gaugH. o, tesl pons (o. thi~ &owe• •

--<= 1 c , nr;, r vrcm A/Yu -IC ANUA1 IR<..n A .•• It: tn , •. ,.., ..,!:.;:-' o :, r-vr<1n rvrc t:A<..n

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

/\ ....... ... , .. /\ C ..... , N.,.,. ...... ,.. 1,.,., , T, VA, ...... ..... , f.,, .. , , .J

P .. ..,o 26"" •1t. 13 tCS·NV5)

-,

FORM B9 EMISSION SOURCE (OTHER)

REVISED: 12/01/01 NCDENR/[);vision of Air Quality - Application for Air Pennlt to Con~ruct/Operate

EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: EMISSION SOURCE ID NO:

Nul&ance Dust s..-1111 HamemilU Ana CONTROL DEVICE IONOtS•:

OPERAT ING SCENARIO: 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACKI ID NO{SI:

DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM):

I R!l

ES-NOS CO.JiM-8F3

EP-2

Hammennlll ama dust from the hammermill and sc,eening operations will be vented to the nammermlll bagfilter No. 3 (CO-HM-BF-3) to control particulate matter emlssione.

MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS· CONTINUOUS PROCESS MAX. DESIGN

TYPE UNITS CAPACITY

Dried Wood ODT 71.71

MA--" ENTERING Pfl!OCES$ • BATCH Ol>l:RATION MAX. DESIGN

TYPE

MAXIMUM DESIGN IBATCHES I HOURI:

REQUESTED LIMITATION (BATCHES/ HOUR):

FUELUSEO: NIA MAX. CAPACITY HOURLY FUEL USE: NIA COMMENTS:

UNITS CAPACl'TY (UNIT/BA TCH1

IBATCHES/YRI:

TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE (MILLION BTU/HR):

REQUESTED CAPACITY ANNUAL FUEL USE:

.. Attach Add1t 1onal Sheets as Necessary

A,., .• ,, , .. A p,,<I ... 27 .. , '1!.,

REQUi:STED CAPACITY

I.IMITATION!UNIT/HRI

REOUi:STEO CAPACITY

LIMITATION (UNIT/BATCH I

NIA NIA

r,, ., . .,., N .. ,, • ......... ,. 1. ..... , T,11 .. '.' /\,,,,.,. ,.,,,, .. r ........ .,3 f\il f[5,NOSJ

Source Specific Forms - Pellet Presses & Coolers

,...,

.....

-,

...,

..., FORMS

SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES} REVISED t2/Q1/01 NCDENR/OMBion of AlrQuallty • Appllcallon for Air Perm~ to Construct/Operate D

EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: I EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES-CLR1 throuqh 6 Pellet Coolers ICONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S): CD-CLR-1 through 6 OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 I EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO{$ ): EP-10 ttirou<ih 15 DESCRIBE IN DET All THE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM I: Six (6) Pellet Coolers follow the potrd presses to cool the ne-.My formed pelletl!> down to an acceptable storage temperature.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK ANO COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM 81-89 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): O Coal.wooa.oil. gas. other bwner (Form B1) [l Wooct.vorking (Form 04) O Manufact. of chemi<:alslcoatings!inks {Foon B~J O Int.combustion er19inelgenerator (Form 82) 0Coa1ingllioishinglprinting (Form BS) O Incineration (form B8) Oliqui(I storage tanks (Form B3) OStorage silOS/bins (form 86) a0tt1cr (Form 89)

START CONSTRUCTION DATE: !OPERATION DATE: -4/2212013 DATE MANUFACTURED: MANUFACTURER/ MODEL NO.: Kahl Press 60-1250 EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE: 24 HR/DAY 7 DAY/WK 52 WKf(R IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO? NSPS ISUBPART?); NESHAP (SUBPART?): MACT ISUBPART?): PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT /%!: OEC-FEB 25% MAR-MAY 25% JUN-AUG 2&% SEP-NOV 25% EXPE.CTEO ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATIOI\' 8,760JVISIBLE. STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: <20 % OPACITY

. . Kl • = n:~M __ ,n,. r, . ... 'Ill~ r rvr,: In., ~, ..... II ...

AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED PARTICULATE MATTER IPMI PARTICULATE MATTER<10MICRONS IPM,a)

PARTICULATE MATTER<2Ma!CRONS (PM,,J SULFUR DIOXIDE (S021 NITROGEN OXIDES INOxl CARBON MONOXIDE (COi VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS tvOCJ LEAD OTHER

HAZARDOUS AlR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. NIA

SOURCE OF EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS EMtSSIQN (AFTER CON'fROLS t llMtrS} \3:FORE CONTFtOI.S I UMllSJ (AFTER CONJROLSJ UMffSj

FACTOR lbihr I tonsi';r lbJhr tooS/vr lb/hf t011s/yr See EmiSSion Calculations in Aoocnd!x B

,,,ON F - ,~SOJJRCE SOURCE O l EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS

EMISSION (AFTER CONTROLS I LIMITS}

FACTOR lb/ht lonsivr {BEFORE CONTROLS I LI.Mil :s, (AFTER CONTROLS /t.1MrTSJ

lb/hr lcns/vr lb/hr tons/, ,

t nc•CAIRP'" " , ,,.,N11:.MJ""'"'' i.JN~/NFORM.IJ,uu,vJ Ot< ttil~ ,re

INUl\;A l t: c.1v•c ... Tt:DAf.; 1 , .1A 1. 1:, l~ lu N:,Ar er< \;UN I J-<OLSI UMl1"1,u N~ TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. EF SOURCE lb/hr lb/dav NIA

lblvr

Att.)ehments.: (1) emissions c:a.1eulations and suppof'Ung dowment.sl>Qn; (2) ind!c:ate: a!I ,eque~e<t slat& an<J tederaJ enforceabte pe<mil limits (e.g. hoUI'$ <,( oporation, P.rni~sion rat&S.) .1na dese:ribe hCJw these are moritot'ed ond with whRI frequency; ~nd (3) d~suib,: any monlto,iny devices. g,ugcs, or to.st potts fflf fhi$ source.

-"''"" ICJ1->f"VKMAIVU '"lt=A,,vAIIAr..;N • - ..• lt:t:111 ···- "·-B9,-VHmf"Vt<t:Ac.n -~

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

A,., ......... A L ...... , N.,.,., .... ,. .... 1,., .,· T..,., VA .... , ...... f •· .. ,. .J P ...... 2~ ,., .1;1 !l rr~-C l ~-1 , ••• .,,. -6)

,...,

....

REVISED: 12/01101

EMISSION SOURCE DESCRJPTION;

Pellet Coolers OPERATING SCENARIO: 1

FORM 89 EMISSION SOURCE (OTHER)

NCDENR/Oivision of Air Quality -Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate

EMISSION SOURCE ID NO:

CONTROL DEVICE ID 00\St

OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO(S):

DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM):

I B9 ES-CLR1 throulltl I C~LR-1 throuah 6

EP-10 throuqh 15

Six (6) Pellel Coolers follow the pellet presses to 0001 the newly fanned pellets <!own to an acceprable &1orage, temptt111ture.

"MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS - CONTINUOUS PROCESS MAX. DESIGN REQUESTED CAPACITY

TYPE UNITS CAPACITY IUNfT/HRl UMITATIONIUNIT/HRI

DrtedWood ODT 7$J)7

MATERJALS E/IITERJNG PROCESS - BATCH OPERATION MAX. DESIGN REQUESTED CAPACITY

TYPE UNITS CAPACITY lUNIT/BATCH I LIM ITATION IUNrT/BATCHI

MAXIMUM DESIGN IBATCHES I HOUR>

REQUESTED LIMITATION !BATCHES/ HOUR): I BATCH ES/YR I:

FUEL USED: N/A TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE (MllllON BTU/HR): N/A MAX. CAPACITY HOURLY FUEL USE: NIA REQUESTED CAPACITY ANNUAL FUEL USE: NIA COMMENTS:

.. Attach Add1t1onal Sheets as Necessary

1\,,.- .... 11 •• A C,·~ ... ,. N,,,,., ..... .,,,. ., 1,,.,,.,, T .... ~ V A,..,.,,1, .. 1, .... f .. , ,., ,. .. J r>,.u,o 29 "' 11:, {i9 ~£ S-: Ll~-1 u,n .. ,,:." ·6)

....,

FORMC4 CONTROL DEVICE (CYCLONE, MUL TICYCLONE, OR OTHER MECHANICAL)

REl/tSEO 12J01J01 NCOENRIOl\.'lsl,:,n ()f Air Quality - Ap.pllcatl,:,n for Air Penn it lo C,:,nstructiOparate rt:r CONTROL DEVICE FD NO: CD-CLR-1 throuoh 8 CONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE 10 NOIS>: ES-CLR1 lhrounh 6 EMISSION POINT /STACK) ID NO/Sl· EP-10 throuoh 15 POSITION IN SERIES OF CONTROLS NO. 1 OF 1 UNITS

MANUFACTURER: Aircon HE64 MODEL NO: Aircon HE54

DATE MANUfACTUREO: PROPOSED OPERATION 0A TE: 4/22/2013 OPERATING SCENARIO: PROPOSED START CONSTRUCT>ON DATE:

1 O F 1 P.E. SEAL REQUIRED (PER 2Q .01121? .("YES ) ~ NO DESCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM : Six 161 identJcal hi9h efficloney cyclones are lo be usod to capture bulk PM emissions trom six 161 pellet coolors. Each cooler vents to one d~icated cyclone. Tlle cyclones wtJI operate under negaliYe pressure.

POLLUTANT (S) COLLECTED: ~ ~ ~ BEFORE CONTROL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): ~1lonsC~s In Appendix B

CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: ~ % _..!!!.% ~% %

CONTROL DEVICE EFFICIENCY: % % % o/o --- - -- ---CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY: % % o/o % --- --- - - -EFFICIENCY DETERMINATION CODE: --- - -- ---!TOTAL EMISSIOl'l RATE {l.8111R): See Emissions Calcul~tlons in Append!~ B

PRESSURE DROP (IN. li,O): MIN MAX 6.0" WARNING ALARM? ,i YES ~· NO

INLET TEMPERATURE c•Ft MIN MAX Ambient OUTLET TEMPERATURE t"Fl: MIN MAX Ambient

INLET AIR FLOW RATE !ACFMt 21 OOOeacll BULK PARTICLE DENSITY (LB/Fr): 2.S&E-46

POUIJTANT LOADING RATE /GRIFT' : 0.2 SETT1..IH(J ~ ~LOffE MUL TICYCLONE-

LE.NGTH IINCHESl: INLET VELOCITY tFTISF.Cl : 94.76 i. CIRCULAR 11 RECTANGLE NO. TUBES:

WIDTH i lNCHESl: DIMENSIONS /INCHES) See instructions IF WET SPRAY UTIULED DIAMETER OF TUBES:

HEIGHT IINCHESt. 1-1: 38 Od: 22 LIQUID USED: HOPPER ASPIRATION SYSTEM?

~OCITY IFTJSEC.I W : 25 Lb: 74.25 FLOW RATE IGPMI: ~ YES ,! NO

NO. TRAYS: De: 32 Le: 84.5 MAKE UP RATE iGPM): LOUVERS?

NO. BAFFLES: D: 54 $: 44.38 l YES ~ NO

TYPE OF CYCLONE: ~ CONVENTIONAL 1-. '- HIGH EFFICIENOf i. OTHER

DESCRIBE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES: PARTICLESIZiillfR'RIBOTION Periodic inspection of mechanical int~rtty during plant outages SIZtc WEIGH! o/o <.;UMULATIVE .s ,,_,Hied b~ manuracturcr (MICRONS) OF TOTAL %

DESCRIBE INCOMING AIR STREAM: 0-1 Unknown The cyclones used for particul•te capture the pellet coolers will be ducted to 1-10 a discharge stack. The stack will be eommon to all cooler aspiration systems. 10-25

25-50

50-100

>1 00

TOTAL : 100

DESCRtBE ANV MONliuKING DEVlCES, GAUGES, TESl PORTS. ETC: None

ON A SEPARATE PAGF.. ATTACH A DIAGRAM OF Tl-IE RELATIONSHIP OF THE. CONTROL DEVICE TO ITS EMISSION SOURCEIS)

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary '' Final equipment selection llas not yet occurred but wm be similar in design to specifications shoY.n.

.!\,., ... ... , ... t, E .. v,.,,, N,.,, ............ , .. " " " ' T .. ,(' \/ A')c c,1•,,Ahftn r ,.,,,. .,J P .. t1 .. 30 t,!-1 Ca ([S·CLH-:.:Y<.: -1 ..... ,., .. €i

. .,

' Source Specific Forms - Pellet Mill Feed Silo ....

...,

-,

FORMS -, SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Qoollty • Applicallon for Air Penni! to Construct/Operate C

-,

EMISSION SOURCE OESCRIPTION: !EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES-PMFS Pellet Mill Feed SIio I CONTROL DEVICE ID NOISJ; CD-PMFS-BV OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 I EMISSION POINT {STACK) ID NOISJ: EP-3 DESCRIBE IN DET AlLTHE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM!: A pellet press silo stores dried ground wood prior to Cransport to the pellet presses.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE !CHECK ANO COMPLETE APPROPR!A TE FORM 81-B9 ON T.HE FOLLOWING PAGES): D Coal,wood,oil, gas. olhe.- burner {Form 81 J n Woodw0<1(ing [Form 84) O Mam,racl. of chnmicals/coetings/inks {Form 87) O lnt.eombus~on engine/generator (Form 132) O Coalinglfrrishing/p<intin9 (Form 85) O Incineration {Form B8) O Liq1.lid storage tanks (Fo,m 83) a Storage silos/bins (~orm 66) lJ Ott,..- (Form 89)

,..,

START CONSTRUCTION DATE: !OPERATION DATE: 412212013 IDATE MANUFACTURED: MANUFACTURER/ MODEL NO.: Laldin 633 !EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE; 24 HR/DAY ., DAY/WK 52 WK/YR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO? NSPS (SUBPART'?); NESHAP (SUBPART?J: MACT CSUBPART?I: PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPllT 1%1: DEC-FEB 25% MAR-MAY 2S'4 JUN-AUG 26% SEP-NOV 25% EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION 8,7GOIVI$IBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: <20 %OPACITY

_,,,. r "' "lfY I - • ••A••• l'f~!N r'-(1"1 , ,-,.,_, ~ ·-SOURCE ~1 EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSStONS EMISSION (AF'T~RCONfROLSfl"IIIS) {RE'::'ORE. COH'Ui'OLS/ C~UTS) (AFTER CONTROLS, UYHT$.

AIR POU.UTANT EMITTED FACTOR lb/hr I lonsNr lb/hr tons/vr lb/llt tons/vr PARTICULATE MATTER fPMI See Emission Calculations in Appendix B PARTICULATE MATTER<IOMICRONS {PM1,l

PARTICULATE MATTER<2.5MICRONS (PM,sl SULFUR DIOXIDE (S02) NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx) CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS !VOC) LEAD OTHER

HAZARDQ.tn: l1IR ~ LLU 'ANT ~·"~IONS INF1 ,..,M,. ,10 FOR r~, xn.UR.CE SOURCEOl EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS

EMISSION tAFTER CCN'JROLS 11:MITS) (BEFME C.Otfri;;ot.s I U"-IT8\ {At r£n r.o~TROlS I LIMITS} HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS 110, FACTOR lb/hr tons/Ir lb/hr tons/~, lb/hr tonsNr NIA

,.,,.,,c .IJ.IR ,..._,, I UTAN EMfSS/O "'" INFO. .,,,, R ,.:.,., S . IJHt : ..

l,.rn,~AI c: c:J\l"'CI.- I ED A1,.;TUAl tMl:S:::.IUN:S Ar R .dl\11r.v1 /L1ml lAI I\ "" TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. EFSOURCE lbIhr lb/aav lbhr NIA

Attaehment5. · (1) emissions ea:icula':ions ltfld $Uppor11(lg cJucumentalio11; (2) indi-c.ltc ;;ill requeislM'I state ::1nd fed«al enforotable permit Ii mils (e.g. hou1s of ope:.Y.ion. emission rt,tes} and describe huw these are mCtniOOred ~nd wiJh whl't frequency: ana (3) <l~sc,it,e 3ny mo,nltoRuy tJe'licE-$. g~ugK. or ~t ports for tt-ie S<1uroe.

1.-vw1rLJ; I/;; , n,-, f"UKM A IVLJ • __ ,c AIVLJ At ,,<1,.;N A - ••• //;; l$1 I .,.,~ l$lf f"UKM f"UK /;;A (.;N _ _ _ ~-

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

A .... ,,. • ., .• ,. l\. c ......... N ... , ....... ~ ...... 1. ••...• 1.~ .. vA ................ r ........... ~ P ....... JI,., ,1~ ,I (fS-rMrSj

FORM 86 EMISSION SOURCE (STORAGE SILOJBJNS)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCOENR/Olvtslon or Air Quallty. Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate I B6 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Pellet MIii Feed Silo IEMISSlON SOURCE ID NO: ES-PMFS

ICONTROL DEVICE ID NQ,s i CO-PMFS-BV

OPERATING SCENARIO: OF I EMISSION POINTISTACKI ID NO!Sl: EP-3

DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE PROCESS (ATTACH Fl.OW DIAGRAM):

A pellet press silo stores dri•d oround wood prior to transport to the pellet presses.

MATERIAL STORED: IDENSITY OF MATERIAL !LB/FT3 t 40

CAPACfTY !CUBIC FEET: ITONS: DIMENSIONS (FEET} IHEIGHT: I DIAMETER: I (Of(J !LENGTH: WIDTH: H!:IGHT:

ANNUALPRODUCTTHROUGHPUTfTONSJ IACTUAL: I MAXIMUM DESIGN CAPACITY:

PNEUMATICALLY l'IU.ED MECHANJCALL V FIL.LI!() FI.LEDF1'0N ,I BLOWER t scsu=w CONVEYOR ;, RAILCAR

t COMPRESSOR K:1 BELT CONVEYOR I MOTOR 1-P: e TRUCK

d OTHER: ~ B\JCKET ELEVATOR e STORAGE PILE

l'l OTHER: K:;, OTtiER:J Convevor

NO. FILL TUBES:

MAXIMUM ACFM :

MATERIAL IS FILLED TO:

BY WHAT METHOD rs MATERIAL UNLOADED FROM SILO?

MAXIMUM DESIGN FIWNG RATE OF MAT ERIAL (TONS/HR): 105

MAXIMUM DESIGN UNLOADING RATE OF MATERIAL (TONS/HR): 105

COMMENTS.

.. Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

A.,, •.... , .• ;., C,,.,. • .,. ,, .\J, .. , .... ,., •. , .. , .. , .•. , T,., .• V /\,.,.,.,, ........ f '>'•" ~ .,3 P.,,;, , 3~ ..,, 1~

,.,

FORM C1 CONTROL DEVICE (FABRIC FILTER)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Divi&ion of Air Quality · Application for Air Permit to Construd/Oper«te rcr OONTROL DEVICE ID NO: CD·PMFS-BVICOIIITROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE 10 NO{Si: ES-PMFS EMISSION POINT ($TACK! ID NO{Sl: EP..SIPOSITION IN SERIES Of CONTROLS NO. 1 OF t UNITS

MANUFACTURER: Aircon BVl&& MODEL NO: Ai<con 8\125-6

°"TE MANUFACTURED. PROPOSED oPERATION DA TE: 4/2212013

OPERATING SC&NARI(): PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION DATE: 1 OF 1 P.E. SEAL REQUIRED (PER 2Q .01121" C ~ ya; ~ NO

DESCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM: A bin vent fitter is used to create a slight negative prosgure on lhe Pellet Mill Feed Silo. The bin vent coUf>Cls dust

lrom t~e air volume present In the silo. The bJn vent is sl~ed to onset the air displacement created by lhe matnrlal

•eed to the sllo.

POLLLITANT(S) COLLECTED: PM PM·10 PM·2.5 ----BEFORE CONTROi. EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): - ---CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: % % % % - ---CONTROL DEVICE EFFICIE:NCY: -99.9 % ~.9 't. -99.9 "' 'Y. ----CORRESPONDING OVERAU. 1::FflCIENCV: % % % ----%

EFFICIENCY OF.TERMINATION COOE: - ---TOTAL EMISSION RATE (LBltiR): See calc11lat1ons in Appendix B

PRESSURE DROP (IN H,0): MIN: MAX: 4" GAUGE? C ii YES~ ,t NO WARNING ALARM? t.L ve.U4 NO

BULK PARTICLE DENSITY {LB/FT'): 1.43E-06 INLET TEMPERATURE (°F). Ambient

POLLUTANT LOADING RATE: D.1 i LBIHR C ,I r.RJEJY OU11.ETTEMPERAT1.JRE (°F); Ambient INLET AIR FLOW RATE (ACFMJ: FILT~R MAX OPERATING TEMP. l'Fl: NIA NO. OF COMPARTMENTS: 1 INO. OF BAGS PF.R GOMPARTIIIENT: 1 LENGTH OF BAG IIN. 1: 120 DIAMETER OF DAG UN. ): S.&75 IOR>.FT: C ~ INCU0:0/NEGJ C FO='--""' is ~ FILTER SURFACE AREA (FT2 t ST7

AIR TO CLOTH RATIO. &(FILTER MATERIAL: ~ WOVEN C d FELTEDJ DESCRIBE CLEANING PROCEDURES: PARTICLE SIZE OlSTRJBUTION

~ i SONIC SIZE WEIGHT'II> CUMULATIVE

t. REVERSE FLOW f. SIMPLE BAG COLLAPSE (MICRONS) OFTOTAL %

,! MECHANICAIJSHAKER ~ RING llAG COLLAPSE 0-1 Unknown ,i OTHER 1·10

OESCRIClE INCOMING AIR STREAM: 10-25

TIie air stream will tontain wood dust particulate emissions 2$-50

50-100

>100

TOTAL= 100

ME-, HOO FOR DETERMINING WI IFN TO CLEAN:

d AUTOMATIC C~ TIMED.:) t MANUAL !METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO REPLACE THE BAGS:

i ALARM Ci INTERNAL INSPECTION ~ !. VISIBLE EMISSION t! OTHER

SPECIAL CONDITIONS: None ; MOISTURE BLINDING "'! CHEMICAL RESISTIVITY €- OTHER EXPLAIN:

DESCRIBE MAlt.TEN ... NCE PROCEDURES: Per manufact.urer recommendations

ON A SEPARATE PAGE. ATTACH A DIAGRAM SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONTROL DE\/ICE TO ITS EMISSION SOURCE{$ :

Attach Addlltonat Sheets As Necessa ry 'Final equipment selection has not yet occurred but will be similar in design to specifications shown.

Aror, .. ,,,, .A

P .• !I,. 3~ ., .,5 c. ..... .v., \l,),11+1111 ,r,11> .. T,..,,V/\ , , ..... .. ,,o., r .. ~,.,, vJ

C I (CS-PMr S- ~VJ

,..,

.., Source Specific Forms - Pellet Fines Bin

,..,

...,

,..,

-

FORMS SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES)

REVISl:D 12.01'°1 NCOENR/Oivislo.n of Air Quality. Application for Air Permit to COnstructlOperate I tj

EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: I EMISSION SOURCE 10 NO: ES-PF8 Pellet Fillf!S Bin !CONTROL DEVICI:: ID NO!Sl : CD.f'FB-BV OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 I EMISSION POINT !STACK! ID NO!S): EP.7 DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Fine pellet material from hammermill pollution control sy"5tem and screening operation Is collected in lhe pellet fines bin Wllleh Is controlled by a bin \lent filler.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK AND COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM 81-B9 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): O Coal,wood.oil. gas, other burner (Fom, 81) LJ Wooc:IWorl<ing (Form 64) O Manutact. of ctMlmicals/ooatings/1nks (Form 87)

D lnt.comoustion engine/generator (F0<m 82) O Coaling/linishirl!,'pfinting (Form 85) 0 lncinetaliOn (Fonn 88)

Oliquicl S10r89e llinl<s (F«m B3l • Storage siJ<nJl)jns (Fonn 86) D 0t11er (Fonn 89J START CONSTRUCTION DATE: !OPERATION DATE: 412212013 IDATE MflNUFACTUREO: MANUFACTURER J MODEL NO.: Aircon I EXPECTED OP. SCH"OULE: 24 HR/DAY 7 DAY/WK 52 WK/YR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO? NSPS <SUBPART?): NESHAP (SUBPART?k MACT 1SUElPART'>1; PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT (%): DEC-FEB 26% MAR-MAY 25% JUN-AUG 25% SEP-NOV 25% EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS Of OPERATION 8,760 I/ISl8LE STACK EMJSSK)NS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION. <20 'lbOPACITY

:.Hl·cru#4 ..,.,,..,-.• n .UI ,v I ,_ _ _ , _,

UN:S ,.. '" '/UN svrr 1n1;:, ..,,.

t;OURCEO> EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL ENISSIONS EMISSION (AFTl;.R CONlROL~ t llMll!;) {8~~0R£ CONfROL.S / L1M1lS) tAfftR C('JNTROLS I UMITSl

AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED FACTOR 11;>/hr I tons/vf lb/hr ~S/, r 11,111r tonsl, r PARTICULATE MATTER 1PM ) Sff E mlsslo n Calculations i11 An""ndlJI B PARTICUlATE MATTER<IO ~IIC~ IPM •• 1

PARTICULATE MAlTER<2.S MICRONS fl'M l SULFUR DIOXIDE !S021 NITROGEN OXIDES fNOxl CARBON MONOXIDE iCOl VOI.ATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS !VOCI LEAD OTHER

_,.7 ARDO''" AIR pn, 11 aNf IN ·--nT/ .. - - THIS ~• .. ·-· E

SOURCE O I EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL eMSSIONS EMISSION µITER C<:WTIIOl.$1 LNTS! C9UOAEGOtOHOl.SIUli,tll6~ IM7£RCOHTROlSIUWITti

HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTAtll AND CAS NO. FACTOR 11:vtY lonsl.r lb/tY tonSM JbnY tMsM NIA

1 u/c;A/R -n LIi~·• l<iM/,•m "INFO.,. uu -~- r 1 ·- THIS sov-· E INu11 .. l\1r:.~~~IEUACIUALEM1 .;,IUNS Ar ll t< CUNTROI /l..1M11ATIONS

TOXIC AIR POLL UT ANT ANO CA$ NO. EFSOVRCE lb/h( lblda, bfyr NIA

Attachments: ( 1} timis'Sions colculaticns and "uppQrUng &>«imentatlon: (2) jndic~e all ,1quastar1 st3lt and tede111 enforCfl.-blt pe1mit lnit& (e.g. hr:nr.. of opefation, emissioo f.rt~&) eff'J describe how th$te ar& monitcted and with whef J,equcncy; and {3) "6(rlbe an)! monito,1~ llwices. 93\.'1<!S-, er 1st pnrts for IA$ source ..

{.;Ullfl'Lt:, t: '"'"' rvr<m ANI.J <,vmr-u:, C ANI.J A, I""'" '!. /t: t:17 I DY rvr<m rvr< """'" ;;;,vurr<,c Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

1\.,,i,, ...... ,.._

::,,,,,,, :l4 ...,,: !) (. .. v, ..... N,.r, .. ,, ... J•lo" '"'" " T.,,, V /\,, .. , •. ,,.,., ... F .... '"" ..,3

B (ES ,=>r-3)

,..,

-FORM B6

EMISSION SOURCE (STORAGE SILO/BINS) REVISED 12101/01 NCOENRIOMslol) or Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate I 86 EMISSION SOURCE 01.SCRIPTION: Pellet Fines Bin J EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES.PFB

ICONTROL OEV!CE ID NO!Sl CD-PFB-BV OPERATING SCENARIO: 1 OF 1 I EM1$$10N POINT(STACK) ID NO(SI: EP-7 .., OF.SCRI SE IN DETAIL THE PROCESS !ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM):

Fine pellet material from hammermlll pollution control system and screening operation is collected in th<:' pellet tines bin Wlllch is controlled by a bin vent !Iller . ..,

MATERIAL STORED: Fine DE llet material I DENSITY OF MATERIAL (LBIFT3); 40 CAPACrTY lcue1c FEET: 2200 l roNs:

DIMENSIONS tFEETJ !HEIGHT: I DIAMETER: 127 (OR) ILENGTH: WIDTH: HEIGHT: ANNUAL PROCJUCT THROUGHP/Jr (TONS} IACTUAL: I MAXIMUM DESIGN CAPACITY: 61Dh

PNEUMATICALLY FIUll!O MECHANICALL V Fllll!ID FII.U!OFROM

~ BLOWER ii SCREW CONVEYOR i,, RAILCAR

~ COMPRESSOR C t/; BELT CONVEYOR I MOTOR HP: Ill TRUCK

~ OTHER: 6 OUCKET ELEVATOR "1 STORAGE PILE

!l OIHe.R: 'C f OTHER'.""') Convavor NO. FILL TUBES:

MAXIMUM ACFM:

MATERIAL IS FILLFD TO:

BY WIIAT METHOD IS MATERIAL UNLOADED FROM SILO?

MAXIMUM DESIGN FILLING RATE OF MATERIAL (TONS/HR):

MAXIMUM DESIGN UNLOADING RATE Of MATER:AL iTONS/HRJ:

COMMENTS:

.. Attach Add1t1onal Sheets As Necessary

l\,,,. ..•..•. ~ ,, r ....... ,. N .......... ,,. ...... 1 ...... , T ..... \' ,\,_,.., •. ,. .. ,,~ r ......... ,..3 P .. .., .. 3!J .,. '1~ ClG ([S-PfB)

-FORM C1

CONTROL DEVICE (FABRIC FILTER) REVISED 12.<11/01 NCOENRJOMslon of AJr Ouallty. Application for Air Pem,il to ConstNct/Operate rcr CONTROL DEVICE tD NO: CD-PFB-BVICONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE ID NO!St ES-PFB

EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO<SJ: EP-7IPOSITION IN SERIES OF CONTROLS NO. 1 OF I UNITS

MANUFACTURER: Alrcon MODEL NO: 31>-6

DATE MANUfACTURID PROPOSED OPERATION DATE: 4/22/21113 Ol'tiRA JING SCEl'tARIG: PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION DATE:

j .OF 1 P.E. SEAL REQUIRED {PER 20 .01121? (1_ YES ~ d NC

DESCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM:

A bin vent bllgholJSe collects dust rron, when wood enters or e><its the silo and displaces atr.

POUUTANT{S) COI.LECTEO- PM PM,o PM2.1 ----BEFORE CONTROL EMISSION RArE (LB/HR): See calculations in Appendix B ----CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: ~9& % -99% ~99 % % ----CONTROL DEVICE F.FFICIENCY: % % % %

CORHESPONOtNG OVERALL EFFICIENCY % % '¥, % - ---EFFICIENCY DETERMINATION CODE:

TOTAL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): See calculations In Apeeodlx B

PRESSURE DROP (IN. H))). MIN: TBD MAX: TBO GAtX;E? u YES~ t NO WARNING ALARM" .(.YES ,!)NO

BULK PARTICI.E DENSITY (LB/FT"): 1.4SE-05 INLET TEMPERATURE 1°F): Ambient

POLLU"TANT LOADING RATE: 0.1 I LB/HR C,; GR/ITT' OUTLET TEMPERATURE l"F): Ambient

INLET AIR Ft.OW RATE (ACFM ): J 600 FILTER MAX OPERATING TEMP. (•F). NIA

NO. OF COMPARTMENT: TBO INO. OF BAGS PER COMPARTMENT: TBO LENGTH OF BAG IIN. 1: TSO DIAMETER OF BAG UN.r IDRAFT: C i INOUCEOINEG~ f. FORCEOIPOS FILTER SURFACE AREA (FT'): 325 AIR TO CLOTH RATIO: 11.08 I FILTER MATERIAL: e WOVF.N ~ FELTED

DESCRIAE CLEANING PROCEDURES: PAATICLE SIZE IIGJT'RIBUTION {. AIR PULSE ~ SONIC SIZE WEIGHT % CUMULArlVE

I REVF.RSE FLOW >! SIMPU: DAG COUAPSE {MICRONS) OFTOTAL ~

! MECHANICAL/SHAKER ~ RING BAG COLLAPSE 0-1

C. !, OTHER_:> 1-10

DESCRIBE INCOMING AIR STREAM: H>-25

The air stream will cont-ail"'I wood du.st particles 25-50 ~-100

>100

TOTAL= 100

METHfn M ' " UETERMINING WHEN TO CLEAN:

<2.AUTOMATLJ ~ TIIAEO i M~UAL METHOD FOR DETERMINlNG WHEN TO REPLACE THE BAGS:

i ALARM C.) INTERNAL INSPECTIW ~ VISIBLI: EMISSION ~ OTHER

SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

i MOISTURE BLINDING ~ CtlEMICAL RESISTIVITY ~ OTHER

EXP1.All't" DESCRIBE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES· Per manufacturer recommendations or common industry practices.

ON A SEPARATE PAGE A HACH A DIAGRAM SHO'MNG THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONTROL DEVICE TO ITS cMISSION SOURCEIS): .. Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

/\,,,.,,,,,.,. A

P,.,,,, 36 ,., 1~ [""'"" N,~f·.ri., .. ,,,, .,,. 1. ..... , l ,, .. V 1\,,,,..,. ,. ..... , r., ...... .,J

c:, fE5-Pre.avi

,...,

....,

Specific Forms - Final Product Handling .....

...,

-FORMB

SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES) REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/OMslon of Air Quatity-Appllcatlon for Air Pennlt to Co,istruet/Operatc I B EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: ES-FPH, t:::i-t'B, ES-PL 1 Flnlshe-d Product Hanal>ogl Pellet Loadout Bins I Pellet Loadout EMISSION SOURCE 10 NO: and2

CONiROL DEVICE ID NO(S): CO,FPH-BF OPERA TING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT tSTACK1 ID NO($ ): EP-8

-,

DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATIACH FLOW DIAGRAM):

Pelletized product is conveyed to pellet load out bins that feed two pellet toad out operations {ES-PL-1, -2). Emissions from the Pellet Loaclout Bins are controlled by a bagfilter. Pellet Loadout Is accomplished by grallity feed of the pellets Into trucks through a covered shoot tnat automa1lcally telescopes upward during tne loadout process to maintain constant contact with product as it is loaded to prevent emissions. Although emissions to the atmosphere from conveyance from the storage bins are minimal because of drte<I wood lines have been removed in the pellet coolers, a slight negatiYe> pressure is maintained In the loadout building a fire prevention measure to prevent any buildup of dust on sutfaces within the bulldlng. The slight negative pressure i& produced via an Induced draft fan that e~hatJSts to the same bagfllter tl,at controls minor dust emissions from toad!ng of the oellet press silo. Trucks are covered tmme<liatetv after loading.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK ANO COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM B1-B9 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): D Coat.wood,oil_ g<,s. olhor bumer (Form 81) D WoodNorking (Form 84) O Manufsct. of chemicals/coatings/inks (Form 87) D lnlQOmbuslion engine/generator (Form 82) [I Coatingllinishing/printing {Form BS) CJ Incineration (Form B8) O Liquid slorago tanks (Ferm B3) • Storage siloS/bins (Form 66) • Olher (Form B9) START CONSTRUCTION DATE: IOPERATION DATE: 4122/2013 IOATE MANUFACTURED: MANUFACTURER / M0Df.l NO.: Anfll 1200 Pellet Storaoe I EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE: 24 HR/OAY 7 DAY/WK ~2 WK/YR !S THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO? NSPS tSUBPART?l : NESHAP rsuBPART?J: MACTISUBPART?J: PERCENTAGF. ANNUAL THROUGHPUT' %): DEC-FEB 2~% MAR-MAY 2.$% JUN-AUG 25% SEP-NOV 25% EXPECTF.D ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION 8,760 VISIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: <20 %01'AClfY

1.~, · ~ n.~ ~,., II INI uw, .,~m" ~"~ r 111:; ~·· c<r

SOURCE O F EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENn.AL EMSSIONS EMISSION (AFTER COr-t'TROL.$i LIMITS) (8EFO"!t:. CONTROLS I LlttllTS) (AFTER COMJflQLS / UMITS)

AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED FACTOR lb/hr I to11s/'lr lb/hr tons/vr lbfllr toos/.r PARTICULATE MATTER tPMJ See Emission Catcutatlons in A<>.,.,ndix B PARTICULATE M.ATTER•10 MICRONS (PM,.,/

PARTICUI.ATE MATTER<2.~MICRONS (FM l SULFUR DIOXIDE IS02l NITROGEN OXlDES !NOxl CARBON MONOXIDE ICOI VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC• LEAD OTHER

HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS tN -uRMAT/0 '1~, R TH/ <:~, UR SOURCE Of EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS

EMISSION tAr,:.~r.:::>NTROLSI LIMITS) 16EFORE CONJ~~LS/UA,OTS) tMTER COtlTROLS I UIUl $~ HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. FACTOR lb/hr tonsM lb/hr tonsAr lb/hr tons/yr NIA

TOXtr. AIR POLLUTA T E.M/'-SJONS INFOR MAT/ON FOR TUf<: ' '>URIE INDICATF t:J<~ n-1 ti AC rUA~ EMl"""'N'iA>-1 t=t-< c;uNTRu LS / I IQJIAI , '"'"

TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CA$ NO. Ef SOURCE NIA

lb/hr ll)ldav lb/Yr

AttAr.hrnenls: (1) ern,ssloM cal<:v~lions aoo suppo1tiny \Jucumentetiol'\; (2) iooic.otc .:ill requested MRIP: Rnd teaeral antore&able pe,mrt limib (e.g. hou,s uf operelion, emissi~ rate$) .>nd descfibv hw, these sre monitored and with wh.il frequ~n,cy: ~nd (3) descnr>o any monitOJing devices. 9au9~. or test ports. for tfis siouree.

l-VM~Lt::lt:: 1r11::, t-VHNI AND COMPLETE ANu Al /At.;N A - ' "TE B1 1 ,, ,~, 89 /-VHM /-VH EA<,;11 ~-~- , __

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

/\,,,.,.., .... ,, £,.,.. • ..,., \J ........ ,.. ... , ••. , .. 1 .. , ••• 1 l ,.,u \/A,.,,,.,,.,, .. ,. f ,., ........ 1 P,.:.,·· 3) •.. _.,~

,.,

...,

REVISED: 12/01/01

FORM B9 EMISSION SOURCE (OTHER)

NCOENRIDil/ision of Air Oualily • Application tor Alt Permit to Construct/Operate I B9 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Finished Product Handling EMISSION SOURCE 10 NO: ES-FPH

J CONTROL DE;VICE JD NO(S): CD-FPH0BF OPERATING SCENARIO: 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT <STACK) ID NOtSJ: EP-8 DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM):

Collection of lraosfer points, pellet screening operatiollS, and pellet conveying.

M,.-.....t!:; l!!lil'l'ERI.NG P$.Oefili5 • ~,N •-•OUS PRnm .,. MAX.DESIGN REQUESTED CAPACITY TYPE UNITS CAPACITY (UNIT/H~l LIMITAT!ON(UNITIHRJ

Dried Wood ODT 74.94

MATERIALS EJ.jn-RUOO. PROCESS • BATCH OPERATION MAX. DESIGN REQUF,STED CAPACITY TYPE UNITS CAP.1'.CITY tUNIT/BATCHl LIMITATION (UNIT/BI\TCH)

MAXIMUM DESIGN !BATCHES I HOUR): REQUESTED LIMITATION (BATCHES I HOUR): (BATCHES/YR): FUELUSEO: NIA TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE tMILLION BTU/HR): NIA MAX. CAPACITY HOURLY FliEL USE: II/A REQUESTED CAPAC II Y ANNUAL FUEL USE: NIA COMMENTS:

.. Attach Additional Sheets as Necessary

A.,, ... ,,,.,\ c .... , ..... No'IP•l'I········ 1 .. , ... , r ... ,\Jf\,., ............. F ........... 3 P .• .., .. :m., .. 1~ B9 IE~.f Pl-I)

...,

FORM B6 EMISSION SOURCE (STORAGE SILO/BINS)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Dlvlsloo of Air Quality - Appllcalion for Air Permit to Construct/Operate I B6 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION'. Pellet Loadout Bins I EMISSION SOURCE 10 NO: ES-PB

!CONTROL DEVICE 10 NO<St: CD-FPH-BF

OPERATING SCENARIO: 1 OF 1 !EMISSION POINT!STACKI ID NOCSl EP-S

DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE PROCESS (AllACH FLOW DIAGRAM):

Pellet loadout bins are used t o store pellets for • hipping. Pellets a re then loaded from the bins Into t rueles/train In eithe r of the two pellet loadout areas.

MATERIAL STORECX Pel let Product IDENSffY OF MATERIAL rLBIFT3 ~ 40

CAPACfTY lcueic FEET: !TONS: DIMENSIONS fFE~I IHEIGKT: !DIAMETER: 121 (OR) !LENGTH: WIDTH: HEIGKT:

ANNUAL PRODUCT THROUGHPUT (TONS} !ACTUAL: I MAXIMUM DESIGN CAPACITY: 71.190DT/hr

PNEUMA'flCAU.Y FILLED MeCHANICALLY FILLED FIU.EOFROM

~ BLOWl:R ~ S~<><=W CONVEYOR ii RAILCAR

6 COMPRESSOR ~ BE:LT CONVEYOR I MOTOR HP: ~ TRUCK

6 OTHER: ~ BUCKET ELEVATOR ,,

STORAGE PILF

~ OTHER: ..,,--1 OTHER~ Convevor

NO. FILL TUBES:

MAXIMUM ACFM: 7511each

MATERIAL IS FILLED TO:

BY WHAT Ml:THOO IS MATERIAL UNLOADED FROM SILO?

MAXIMUM DESIGN F1UING RATE OF MATERIAL (TONSltlR):

MAXIMUM DESIGN UNLOADING RAW. OF MATERIAL (TONS/HR):

COMMENTS:

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

I ..... , . .. N .. ,, .. ,..., ''' "" 1 .. , ... , r,., .. V !\"""" "''"'' F .... ,,, ,. ... i P ,.,,.,.. :J::J .,, ,1!,

,..,

...,

..,

REVISED: 12101101

FORM 89 EMISSION SOURCE (OTHER)

NCOENR/Dillislon of Air Quality • Application for Air Penni! to Construct/Operate I B9 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Pellet Loadot.rt 1 and 2 EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES-PL-1 and PL-2

CONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S): CO-FPH-BF OPERATING SCENARIO: 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACKJIO NO(S1: EP-8 DESCRIBE IN DETAIL HIE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM):

Final prodU<:t ls loaded into trucks in enher of the twl> (21 pellet loadout areas.

MJ,\TERIALS ENTERING PROCESS - CONTINUOUS PROCESS MAX. DESIGN REQUt=STED CAPACITY TYPE UNITS CAPACITY IQOTI L.IMITA TIONIUNITIHR)

Dri~Wooll O0T 70.83

MATERIAlS ENTERING PROCESS • BATCH OPERATION MAX. DESIGN REQUC:STED CAPACITY TYPE UNITS CAPACITY {UNIT/BATCH) I.IMITATION <UNIT/BATCH)

MAXIMUM DESIGN 11:!ATCHES / HOUR•: REQUESTED LIMITATION (BATCHES I HOURI· IBATCHESIYR): FUEL USED: NIA TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE IMILLION BTU/HRl: NIA MAX. CAPACITY HOURLY FUEL USE: NIA REQUESTED CAPACITY ANNUAL FUEL USE: NIA COMMENTS;

.. Attach Add1t1onal Sheets as Necessary

/\,,., ....... /\ [ ........ t,· ....... , ...... .., .. f,.,..,, ·1 ..... V 1\,.,,.,, ....... ,, r ~, ... ~ .. 3 I' .• , •. •C .- a; P.11 lfS-P'.·1 .... , 2)

FORM C1 CONTROL DEVICE (FABRIC FILTER)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/0I1/Won of Air Qualliy • Application for Air Pennlt to Construct/Oper.ite ITT

ICONTROlS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE ID N01Sr. ES-FPH, ES-PB-1 through 12,

CONTROL DEVICE ID NO: Co.FBH-BF ES.PL1 and Z EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID N01S1: EP-8 IPOSITtON IN SERIES OF CONTROLS NO. 1 OF 1 UNITS .., MANUFACTURER: Aircon MODEL NO: Aircon 13.6 RAW 268-10

DATE ~IANUFACTVRED: PROPOSED OPERATION DATE: 412212013 AK"RATlNG SCENARIO: PROPOSED START CONS"IRI.ICTION DATE: ..L_OF 1 P.E. SEAL REQUIRED !PER 20 .01121? C , YES ~ •NO

DESCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM:

TIiis bagfi~~rwill be utiliud to control partlculote form the finished p,oduct handllng pellet conveye,s and screens, as w,ill as the pellet load out operation consisting of loadir,g nnlshed product from the bins into the trucks.

POLLUTANT(S) COLLECTED: PM PM-10 PM-2.5 ---BEFORE CONTROL EMISSION RATE (~BIHR): See calculatlont in Appendix B - --CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: -99.9 % -99.9 "4 -99,9 % % ---CONTROL DEVICE EFFICIENCY: % ')I, •.1, % ---CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY: % % % % - - -EFFICIENCY DETERMINATION CODE: ---!TOTAL EMISSION RATE (lS/HR). See calculations In Appendix 8

PRESSURE DROP (IN. H20): MIN: MAX: 6" GAUGE? C ti YES -i NO WARNING ALARM? ~ NO

BULK PARTICLE DENSITY IL8/FT'J: 1.43E-05 INLET TEMPERATURE ('Fl: 120

POLLUTANT LOADlNG RATE: 0.1D 4 LBIHR C .. "".:fl OUTLET TEMPERATUREl"F~ 100

INLET AIR FlOWRATE fACFM) 35500 FILTER MAX OPERATING TEMP. (°F): NIA NO. OF COMPARTMENTS: 1 INO. OF BAGS PER COMPARTMENT: LF.NGTH OF DAO IIN.) U4

DIAMETER OF BAG IIN. l : 5.75 IDRAFT: ! INDUCEOINEG. Q FORCED~ FILTER SURFACE AREA (Fr'l: 4.142

~R TO CLOTH RATIO: 7.SO !FILTER MATERIAi.: Polyester or oauivaleM t!l WOVEN C ~ FELTEo) DESCRIBE CLEANING PROCEDURES: PAR'l'ICLE SfllE OIS'tlUBUll'OH

~ J, SONIC SIZE WEIGHT% CUMULATIVE

0 i SIMPLE BAG COLLAPSE (MICRONS) OF TOTAL %

<! MECHANICAI..ISHAKER ~ RING BAG COLLAPSE 0-1 Unknown i- OTH\:R 1-10

DESCRIBI: INCOMING AIR STREAM: 10-25

The air stream wtl I cont a in wood dust particles. 25-50

50-100

>100

10TAL ~ 100

M.ETHilll_fOR DETERMINING WHEN TO CLEAN:

C AUTOMATJQ ~ TIMED !, MANUAL METHOD FOR DETERMINING .• ,~., Tn ~~~. ,t:F THE BAGS:

~ ALARM C D INTERNAL INSPECTION ) ;', VISIBLE EM ISSION f8 OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS: None

i MOlSTURE BLINDING i CHEMICAL REStSTMTY t. OTHER EXPLAIN:

DESCRIBE MAIN1'ENANCI: PROCEDURES· Per manufacturer recommendations

ON A S'.:PARATE PAGE, ATTACH A DIAGRAM SHOWING THE RELO,TlONSH!P OF THE CONTROL OE\~CE TO ITS EMISSION SOURCia(S):

Atiach Additi-011a1 Sheets As Necessary 'Final equipment selection has not yet occurred but will be similar in design to speclfications shown.

b,.r,,. ,.,.,., 1\ : ......... , N, .. ,.., .. ,,.,..,,, ... 1.., .. ,. 1 .. , .. 'V A,., ..... ,..,,o,, r "''"• '• .. ~ ,.\ ,,.,, '11 ... ·1~ c, ccs -ro11 -of 1

-Source Specific Forms - Emergency Generator & Fire pump

-

-

-

..,

FORMB ,., SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Olvlsion of Air Quality· Application for Air Permit to Construet/Opente C,

,.., EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES.EG Emeroency Generator 1350 bhol CONTROL DEVICE ID NOtS): II/A OPi::RATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 !EMISSION POINT cSTACKl ID NOtS): EP-4 DESCRIBE IN DETAlLTHE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Dlesel-fired internal combustion generator to prol/ide power in the case Man emergency.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK AND COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM Bt-89 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): D Coal,woocl,oil, gas, olher blA"ne, (Form B1) D Woodwo<l<ing (fOflll 64) O Manufacl. of chemic;ils/coatingsfinks (Form 87) a int.combustion engine/generator (Fonn 82) D Coating/finishi11glprintin9 (Form 85) D Incineration (F onn BB) 0 Liquio storase lanks (Form B3) OStorage silos/bins (Form 86) lJ Other (Form B9) START CONSTRUCTION DATE: !OPERATION DATE: 4/2212013 IDATE MANUFACTURED: MANUFACTURER I MODEL NO.: Generac 5D200 !EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE: 24 HR/DAY 7 DAY/WK 52 WK/YR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO'? NSPS (SUBPART'>): 1111 NESHAP (SUBPART?!: MACT (SUBPART?\: ,, PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT (%): DEC-FEB ~% MAR-MAY 2So/, JUN-AUG 2So/o Sl:.P-NOV 26% EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION 500 VISIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: <20 %OPACITY

1,-.•~..f/t:,;T'(I ... -1.nl " - -·· ,· !••,.,o ,Jll!r.4 r-lJn _, n1,..;, :YLJLJ~.f. ~r

SOURCE ~I EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS EMISSION (AFTER COl'ITROLS/ U><l?SJ c:,rrORE COtlTROLS / LOll'rs, (AFTER CONJ~LSl Ut.lllTS)

AJR POLLUTANT EMITTED FACTOR I lb/hr I tons/vr lb/hr tons/vr lbhY tonS/vr PAR'IICULATE MATTER rPMI See Emission Calculallons in Appendi• 8 PARTICULAlE MATTER<10MICRONS (PM 1,,)

PARTICULATE MATTER<2.S MICRONS(l'M,s)

SULFUR DIOXIDE (5021 NITROGEN OXIDES INOx1 CARBON MONOXIDE ICOI VOlA TILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS !VOCI LEAD OTHER

uA 711RDOUS AIR ,-0, 1 UTAN1 EM/.• ,..,Q N., /NFt THNUJ n QN 1-0R T ~.,.."""CE SOURCEOI EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIDNS EMISSION (AFTER CONTROLS I llMITS) {BEFORE C.ON'ff;.-01.S I 1..IMITS) fAflf::K CCUTROlS I I 1e.tll!;)

HA2AROOUS AIR POUUTANT ANO CAS NO. FACTOR lb/hr I tons/Vr I lb/hr tons/Vr lb/hr tonsJy, See Emioslon Calculations in Aooendlx B

"'" AIR PQI 1.u,,.,. T EMIS:.n I ""'"OR 'IA TION F, R THIS SOURCE INUI .~ , ta ,:Xl-'tG I t:.O A<.;. I UAL. ·••• J,.~ AFT >< , ,., "u' ,/ UMIIA11v ,.-,

TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. EFSOURCEI 101hr I lb/dav lb/vt See Emission Calculations In Appendix B

Attachments: (1) P.rnissions ealcu'..ations and iuppor11ng dc,wn1~nlslion; (2) indicate .:»II ,equested :i.hUe and federal enlorc:eable: pe1mit limit:. (e.g. hou~ of operation, $m;ssion ,ates) 11rvt d~cribe hc,ni lh11Se are monitored Qr,d with what frNJu1J:ncy: anC, (3) oesetibe, any monitoring ,h,11ices, gsug:es, •>C test pons t« thi:r. l>()ttl'Ce.

<..VMl'LJ: I/;; , n,.:, f-Vf<M AND <..VMl'L.l: I/;; ,.,.,_,AI I A<..N ~. - -· //;; l:j] I • • B9 f-VKM f-VK CMvn

Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

)\, .......... l\ (, • .., ... ,,, t\, .. u,., .... ,., ..... f ....... r ..... \/ /\,,,., ... ··~·· r. ... , ....... ~ ~· .. .., .. 42 .,, 4;:I s :cs.r.'J:,

-, FORM B2

EMISSION SOURCE (INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES/GENERATORS) REVISEU 12/01/01 NCOENR/Dlvlslon of Air Quality. Appllcatlon for Air Permit to Construct/Operate I 82 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Emergency Generator I EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES-GIi

!CONTROL DEVICE ID NOISI: NIA OPERATING SCENARIO: 1 OF 1 !EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NOtSl: EP-4 CHECK All THAT APPi. Y c._ d EMERGENCY __;:> ~ SPACE HEAT ~ ELEC'fRICAL GENERATION

~ PEAK SHAVER ~ OTHER /DESCRIBE): GENERATOR OUTPUT (KW): ENGINE OUTPUT (HP):

ANTICIPATED ACTUAL HOURS OF OPERATION AS PEAK SHAVER IHRS/YRl

T't'f'E ICE: ~ GASOLINE ENGINE c_ ti D!ESE.. ~E UP TOOOO _t:j!!)i I, DIESEL ISNGINE GREATER THAN QI-fl'> f OOAt AJel SIIIGINE ~ OTHER IDlffiCRJBEJ: .,~~'• below\

ENGINE TYPE e RICH BURN ~ LEAN BURN ~ EMISSION REDUCTION MODIFICATIONS ~ INJECTION TIMING RETARD ~ PREIGNITION CHAMBER ODMBUSTION ~ OTHER OR " STATIONARY GA-$-'Tl- (compleie beliawl ;, NATURAL GAS PJPEUNE OR QR TURe:NE IR~-~ belGW) FUEL: e NATURAL GAS ~ OIL JENGINE TYPE: !! 2-CYCLE LEAN BURN !! 4-CYCLE LEAN !! TURBINE

~ OTHER (DESCRIBE): II 4-CYCLE RICH BURN !\ OTHER (DESCRIBE): CYCLE: ~) COGENERA TION ~ SIMPLE JCONTROLS: tJ COMBUSTION MODIFICATIONS (DESCRIBE):

Ill ~EGENERATIVE ~ COMBINF.D d NONSELECTIVE CAT AL YT IC REDUCTION 6 SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION CONTROLS: I! WATER-STEAM INJE(';TION fl CLEAN BURN AND PRECOM8USTION CHAMBER ~ UNCONTROLLED ~ UNCONTROLL~O ~ LE:AN-PREMIX

t-'Llr:L t) 5 ..... _ STARTUP/BACKUP FUEL! MAXIMUM DESIGN REQUESTED CAPACITY

FUEL TYPE UNITS CAPACITY (UNIT/HR) LIMITATION (UNIT/HR) No. 2 Fuel Oil !131 $,66 6.55

FUE).. CHARACflffllSTICS ICOM~lti Al L THAT A ti:. Af)l>U¢AE\Li!l

FUEL TYPE BTU/UNIT UNITS SULFUR CONTENT (% BY WEIGHT)

No. 2 Fuel Oil 19,300 lb <15 ppmw

MA "- 'URl:!R'S SPEC11'1C EMISS.101\I PA" 1~ (IF AVAlLABLEl POLLUTANT NOX co I PM PM10 I voe OTHER

EMISSION FACTOR LB/UNIT I I UNIT I I

DESCRIBE METHODS TO MINIMIZE VISIBLE EMISSIONS DURING IDLING. OR LOW LOAD OPERATIONS:

Periodic equipment molntenance will minimize opacity by follOWing m•nufaclurets specification or common industry prae!lces.

COMMEN'IS:

.. Attach Add1t1onal Sheets As Necessary

As:P""'"" ,,,

''""" ,n ,,,'-~ ( .. ~,~ .. N ............... ,. ... F .. ,,,., T .... , \J .,.,,. 1,,., ... , ..... r ..... , ... J

62 tC5-GNI

FORMS SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/DMslon of Air Quality. Application tor Air Permit to Construct/Operate I ts EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: !EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: ES-FWP Fire Water Pump 1300 bhDI !CONTROL DEVICE ID NOi$ >; NIA OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 IEM1$$10N POINT (STACK! ID NOIS}: EP-5 DESCRJBE III DETAIL THE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Dleosel-flred intemal combustion pump to provide water in the ca$e of a fire emel'"IJency.

TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK AND COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM B1-E!\I ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): D Coal.wood.oil, ga$, other burner (Form 81) D Woo<t.Yorking (FQllll 84) D Manufact. of chemicals/ooaUn9s/inks (Fotm B7) a1nl.oombuS1ion en9ine/9enerat0< (Form 82) O Coatinglfinishinglpnnting (Fonm B5) O Incineration (F om, 88) O liquia storage tanks (Form BJ) 0 Storage silos/bins (Fonm B6) 0 Other (Form B9) START CONSTRUCTION DATE: !OPERATION DATE: !DATE MANUFACTURED: .2012 MANUFACTURER/ MODEL NO.: Clarke/John Doore PE60GSL220451 !EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE: 24 HR/DAY 7 DAYNJK 52 WK/YR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO'? NSPS (SUBPART?): 1111 NESHAP (SUBPART?l: MACT {SUBPART?\: uu PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT (%): DEC-FEB 25% MAR•MAY 2S% JUN-AUG 2S'/o SEP-NOV 25% EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION 100 VISIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: <20 %0PACrTY

'1/H r-vw.u,,-..,..,, rlf..!.IY r'Vl';'{ I , ~,~

SOURCE Of EXPECTED ACTUAL POTENTIAL EMSSIONS EMISSION (AFTE.R CONTROL6J OMITS, (BC"rOR:E CONTROLS I UMIT:S} (AFT€.~ COtn'ROLS I Llt,IITS}

AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED FACTOR tt>lhr I tons/yr I lb/hr 1ons/vr lb/hr tons/yr PARTICUL.ATE MATTER (PM) See Emission Calculatlons in An= ndix a PARflCULATE MATTER<10MICRON~ (PM.0)

PART/CUL.ATE MATTER<2.$MICRONS (PM,,) SULFUR DIOXIDE (S02J NITROGEN OXIDES /NO..) CARBON MONOXIDE !COJ VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) LEAD OTHER

u,a ·, n RDOUS AIR,.;,;, ··~ EMSSIONS EMISSION (A,"TF.R CONTROLS' llMIT$) (BEFORE CONT'ROl..$1 LIMITSJ (A~l t:tt CONlROLS I UMITS~

HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT At/0 CAS NO. FACTOR I lb/hr I IOns/yr I lb/hr tons/vr lb/hr tons/yr Ste Emi"8ion Caleulatlons in ADoendlx B

Tu/( AfRPUL l ··-~ TF,M~-"O - •~~• RMA (I•·- F ,K THr.s so .. - · -IN~....., ,t cA~~y, ti.l A\.. TUAL AFTER "UN I t<Vl /sl,v,.,M ,_

TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. EFSOURCE lb/hr lb/dav lbNr See Emission Calculations In Ao.,..ndix B

Atbchments: ( 1) emii;sio,ns calcutat:ons ~nt;I "&UO))Orting C\Jt.~.nn&nfelion; (2) indiciltc ;)II cec:i;uestect :\,;ne ~nd ,9Clera1 etiforotab1e pem,it liuibs (e.g. hc,1,1,s of opcu1tion, erN&.Wln rmes) and de$('4ibe how thes1t ~re monitored 3nd with whal rreqwmcy: and (l) o~eribe $1lY monitorlog dwi"~s., g.soges, or tC$t ports fer th,!i ~ol)roe.

\..Vrvrr-1..t: I C r n1.:, I-UHM Atvv t;UMf'Lt: 11: ANI.),., / At;h ~ • • -· ,., I I: t:l1 , __ -~ = -' rvr<tvt rvr< t::A<.,n .:,vur<<.-e Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

A,.,,.,.,,,,. /\ P .... N ,1-1 ,., '1:l

t.: ..... V" t\1,. •• , ...... ,, •••••• , ....... ·r., .. v A,,,. .............. r , ..... ~ y~

B l[S-fWP)

,..,

FORM B2 ...., EMISSION SOURCE (INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES/GENERATORS)

REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Oivision ol Air Quality· Application for Air Penn it to Construct/Operate I 82 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Fire Watet Pump I EMISSION SOURCE 10 NO: ES-FWP

ICONTROL DEVICE ID NOCS): NIA OPERA TING SCENARIO: 1 OF 1 JEM1$$10N POINT CSTACKI ID NO(S): EP-5 ,., CHECK ALL THAT APPLY C ti EMERGENCY _;;, e SPACE HEAT ~ ELECTRICAL GENERATION

~ f>EAKSHAVE:R 14 OTHER !DESCRIBE): GENERATOR OUTPUT <KWl ENGINE OUTPUT {I IPI:

ANTICIPATED ACTUAL HOURS OF OPERATION AS PEAK SHAVER (HRS/YR):

..., TYf'E ICE: ,~ GASOLINE ENGINE f:._e DIESEL ENGINE UP TO eoo HP_=> el 011:S!R SNGINE GRB'.TER THAN 600 HP -~ DUAL FUEi. ENGINE d OTHER /DESCRIBE I. (complete be1aw1

ENGINE TYPE ~ RICH BURN 6 LEAN BURN ~ EMISSION REDUCTION MODIFICATIONS ~ INJECTION TIMING RETARD ~ PREIGNITION CHAMBER COMBUSTION f/ OTHER OR t STATIQffl\F(Y r.:.ua; n~INE c(oomole!& ~ j e NATI- GASPIPl!LIN!:'.~SSOROfP'•-INe l"""'"""" ilelolll FUEL: !! NATURAL GA$ \'I Oil ENGINE TYPE: i!/ 2-CYCLE LEAN BURN ~ 4-CYCLE LEAN </) TURBINE

~ OTHER (DESCRIBE): I/ 4-CYCLE RICH BURN ~ OTHER (DESCRIBE): CYCLE: J COGENERATION ~ SIMPLE CONTROLS: ~ COMBUSTION MODIFICATIONS (DESCRIBE):

d REGENERATIVE fl COMBINED (J NONSELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION ~ SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION CONTROLS: ~ WATER-S"tEAM INJECTION ~ CI.F.AN BURN ANO PRECOMBUSTION CHAMBER ~ UNC:ONTROlLEO

d UNCONTROLLED e LEAN-PREMIX

FUliLU ...,,.E ltNCl.U.OE ~1A.RTUPIBACKUP FUELi

MAXIMUM DESIGN REQUESTED CAPACITY FUEL TYPE UNITS CAPACITY (UNIT/HR) LIMITATION (UNIT/HR)

No. 2FuelOil gal 6.55 6.66

Fl)l!!l. CHARACTERISTI(;$ , 1 E AI..I,. THAT AAe APPL!:r.Mll El SUlFUR CONTENT

FUEL TYPE BTU/UNIT UNITS {% BY WEIGHT) No. 2 Fuel Oil 19,300 lb <15 oomw

MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFIC EMISSION FA'.CTORS IIF AVAILABLE) POLLUTANT NOX co I PM PM10 I voe I OTHER

EMISSION FACTOR LB/UNIT I I I UNIT I I I

DESCRIBE METHODS TO MINIMIZE VISIBLE EMISSIONS DURING IDLING. OR LOW LOAD OPERATIONS:

Periodic equlpmeiit maintenance will minimize opacity by follov,;ng manufacturers specl!lcalion or common Industry practices-.

COMM!a:1'11"S:

.. Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary

f.,r,,,, ... ,, .• A. [.,.,.~.- 1\1,..., .. u ... .,, .... 1 ....... , T ..... \ 1 ,\,.,.., ... ,,, ...... f. ....... , ... 3 ,-,.,,.,., -1~ .1:, Bl (ES-rw:>J

,..,

,..,

APPENDIX B - EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ..................................... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .......... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ....... ,,,,,,,,,,,,, .... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .......................... ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ................. ,,,,,, ........... .

...,

Source Description

Dryer System Emergency Generator Fire Water Pump

Hammern1ills/ \11,isance Dust System

Pellet Mill Feed Silo Pellet Mill Fines Bin Pcllcl Presses and Coolers l,og Debarking/Chipping Rechipping

Finished Product Handling/ Pellet Loadout Rios! Pellet Loadout Areas

Green Wood Handling Green Wood Pile~ Dried Wood Handling Die~el Storage Tanks

Trinity Consultants

TABUH-1 FACILIT\'-WIDE CRITERIA POI .l,UT J\NT SUMMARY

ENVIVA PELLETS NORTHA'1PTON, LLC

Unit co NOx TSP PM-10 PM-2.5 II) (tpy) (tpy) (tpy) (tpy) (cpy)

ES-DRYER 60.95 125.50 22.12 22.12 22.12 ES-EG 0.50 0.58 O.oJ 0.03 O.oJ ES-FWP 043 0.49 002 0.02 0.02

ES-I-IM-1 thru &1 F.S-NOS . . 20.27 20.27 20.27

ES·l'Mf'S . 0.38 0.38 0 . .18 F.S-PFB 0.54 0.54 0.54 ES-CLRI thru -6 38.52 35.05 21.19 ES-CHIP-I . - . ES-RCHP-1, -2 . .

ES-FPH/ ES-l'Ll & '2! ES-PB-I thru 12

. 5.33 4.85 2.93

0016 0.007 0.0011 2.65 1.33 0.20 0.07 0.03 0.00

'IKI & TK2 . . .

Total Emissions 61.88 126.57 89.95 84.63 67.69

Page 1 of 18

J

S02 (tpy)

19.20 0.0003 00003

.

.

.

.

-19.20

J J J )

CO:i.biomnss

Tocal voe detr,rnl CO2•

(lpy) (tpy) (try)

189.78 3,341.43 162,118.83 0.0006 93.35 93.35 0.0005 80.02 80.02

20.45 . .

.

. 17 96 . 0.73 . 1.44 . .

. . .

2.93

3.79£-03 . .

233.30 3,514.80 162,292.20

PSD Permitting Enviva Northampton Calculations 4.17.2014

] J

~

" TABLE 8-2 F.~ CJLITVWIOF. UAP JlMJSSIONS S1,'),IMARV

Ell'VIV,1 PELLE.TS N0RTIIAMYf0 11', LLC

Oc-rtri()fiOfl 'P.S,DltY~K E.S--H.Vll tlirv 7 l:S-CLRJ thro ~ l!S-EG ES•fWP ES·CHfr.1 tS,RC.ffP,1,.? ')'01!!1

(tp~·) OJ>Y) 011J) (Cf'l_t'} IIP)' Ct1·~·> (tpy) (tpy)

J .J-8u111dicnc l.39E'lS 2.Uj£.o, -' 4lF.-O\

"" .. """® 2.!ME--tOO 0.00E+t)U Q.IJOf:+O(I -l.7UE·O., 4.0JF.-OI 2.CHE100 ............. ...,. :!A6E•JG 2.46E.{16 Acmbin (l.{Kll:'.+-OU 9.0HE+OO O.OIJE+DO ,.67~-05 >.86E•l5 l .0$E--04

A:uti111on,• &. - ,._....., utd:. -I 411F.-tt4 4 ,oE4< Ac5CAi,; & Cumn 11.1nds l .:!2£-11) l.22£-0J

Uc= }.11£-0I 4.90£-04 1 OGE• o Bcntli0111 onal (ua-rtamd (AIM> iacbod: ;,, BEC> t..ll[ -0:< 4 12£-<>,

Clidmn'IM Ma,.I tdl.,n:rul lll"l~c::d"l-c Alli .. «:DC, .t~-lLi 2.2ijc,Ol Carbu,1 ~tr:aebloridc: ).46E-02 3.46F.-02

t"hlori,~ 6.C>7E-Ol G.n?E,01 CbloroOOn:ie11e 1.$3E,U2 2.'31'.l-OZ .... Cluc1niullt-Oll1.:r ~anrwl.r: (add w1cl'll-ol'II ;acid &o .... , C::RC\ Y.7-U:'.-<M ~ 7-IE-()al

c•, ..,.""""". ).b.!F.-OI l 6).£-01

Ckbrof'cn n U.OOE..00 Cumcnr U.CIOE'"1C>

Di:ni1- -nol. >._,1.. 1.3KE-(l-i J,)BE,OI-o;n-cth,·Zl,1:~·\'t)~hlh,11:i,c (DEHPl ~ 61F.•O) :t6Jl:-U~

EU"·I tJCll:«11.C 2.JiE-02 2. )l<F.-02

Ed,,lcred-i<l<'.1 1.2.&- .. l 2.D£ -1f2 2.2JE-02 Fnr-cn.,ldch\ dt SA!>E+w 2.·U Et,00 l.:UF.-01 7,?;;E:.l).J (,.lUE-{l-1 ~.,uEH>O

H\'dtu 't:ft chfaridc ()rrdr«hlorit. ocidl >A6I+uo 1.#1£-+(MJ

L1:~d .:uMI LU11d ct>lnOC1111ds 2.67E•o 2.67F.•ll

in·-~ X,·li:IM: I.HE·Ct..l I 5df..(~ l.2,E.¢.1 MoA•~111,c,c ~ conin.~uds ~.91E•OZ 8 91E-02

Mcrnrl. ,a~, tlndudc: ia: .'-4;rca,n·&COl'lfds) l.fi'JE-0:1 2.Q.>t:-OJ Mal,:,nol U l F.+00 IA-IE+-00 7.11JE~I o.,~ tt.::?9 (,.9~F.10f1

MC'!fh\'I bron1idc tl"4'QmM1ef1181ic) U5E-11~ l.l~E-02 Mc1hd cldorick rctll61'omc:1baric1 l.?7E-<J2 J.7?1!-1)2

McLlNI t:hlorolhnn O . I. I trichlr.rocth:rnd ~.)t:.l£-02 1.rn,,12 M,c,.,:lwt ltnbl.1"·1 kttetk •HIOEIOO-

.., ........ - . UOOE<-00 'la ~,h.at-nc 7.<SE-02 HSE-U2

'-"-\'.c-1 rnelal 1Comoc1ucn1 ofNicl.tl & Cam,,.•IM, 1 2.~Jt::-02 2.5"E•U2 Nlll\'ll'lhcnoJ. -1. H..l:iF.•U' H,4~E-.US

o-X,·t..:n~ . O.tM'JE+Oo rtneaehloro~t.atol 3.9 2£-tJj J.92E-05

__ ._iaac ktraub'~lcnc' 2.?!F.-02 UlE-<12 Phenol O.tltJF.lllO h OO[.a-11.1 O.tJOE+oO u.noE+t~O

1hl'*l111'orns Mdol, YdlO,\ cr White V >7E-t12 l ,1t7E-U2 Pnl,·ctlloriri3tcxl b1r1'"11,·li 1\.2(,f-ll(• <,.l&E~l6

l>w\i,e(IMlc1cln·c1c ~. IOl£-OI \UJOE+!m lUJUF.+(M) !. lf>E-01 PlorwlcilC dichloride f 1.2 ~,c1'1o, ., . ...,.. .. •nc: ! i.1~-AJ2 2 ).11,-<n

Scbi••~llnh l.l~E,o 2.l}E--03 ~-r~ u.noE~on

i c1r.:a:hlorcxljbcn;-..,.M insin 2.3.7.x.. fd.nE-o•) f),li0E•t19

T1>J11tnc 2:HF.,OJ 2. 15E•l>I >.6;E·l" Toool PAil (POW ~.60E-02 l.OlE-CM IUCll:-Uj 9.6 2E>l2 T,ithoroctll, ((no 2 . .30E-ll1 l.JCIE--0,

T1-idalo,o[I.~ 2 -1.& 1.6CJE~ 1.,?E-OS

V~·J chJoridc USE-0? 1.:-isE-n2

' fOTAL HAP l~M l.?J 1.0/, tUtO? ll))(ll tUfl it.JI} 21.l.l

....

,-,

Dryer Inputs

Dryer l11rou~hr.M (@ Dryer Exit)

TABLEB-4 ROTARY DRYli:R -CRITERIA POI .J,UT ANT EMISSlONS

ENVIVA PEU,F.T NORTHAMPTON, LLC

S75,000 tons/year (!]i 6.5% moisture Annual Dried Wood Throughput of Dryer 537,625 ODT/year Do we wimt to inrrease produ<'tion

Max. Hourly Dried Wood Throughput of Dryer 71.71 ODT/hr ODT/hr increase as well? Burner Heat Input 175.3 MMBtu/hr Percent Hardwood 90% Per~nl Softwood 10% Potential Operation 8,760 hr/yr

Criteria Pollutant C11lculations:

Biomass Emission Pollutant Emission Factor Units Factor Source Total Potenti,d Emissions

(lb/ODT) (lb/hr)

co 0.23 lb/OOT Cak:ulated from NOR October 16.26

18, 2013 Stack Test 2

NOx 0.47 lbiOOT Calculati:d from NOR October 33.48

18, 2013 Stock Tcst 2

PM/PM1ufl'M25 Condensible 0.017

fraction lb/MMBtu AP-42, Section 1.6) 1.22

TSP (1-'iltcrablc) 0.062 lb/ODT Calculated from Guaranteed

4.48 WESP Specifications 1

Total TSP (Filterable+ Condensible) 5.70

PMw(Filterablc) 4.48 TotalPM111

(filterable-;- Condensible) 5.70

PMu (Filterable) 4 48 Total PM2.~

(Filterable+ Condensible) 5.70

S02 0.025 lb/MMBtu AP-42, Section 1.6 l 4.38

voe as alpha-pinene 0.67 lb/OL>T Calculated from NOR O(..'tober

18, 2013 Stack Test 2 48.33

Derived from NOR October Tomi voe 0.71 lb/ODT 18, 2013 Siad<. Test and OTM 50.63

261

Lead 0.00 N/A NIA 0.00

Note: 1

l'ilterable PM/PM1t, emission factors were provided by the dryer system vendor. The PM 2.~

filterahle emission factor is 11ssumed to be the same as PM and PM 111 •

' CO, NOx, and VOC emission factors are calculated from the Nonhampton O<.-'tober 2013 stack lest.

.1 No emission factor is provided in /\P-42, Section 10.6.2 for SO2 for rotary dryers. Enviva has conservatively C<1lculated SO2 emissions based upon the heat input of the chyer bumel's using an emission factor lor wood combustion from AP-42, Section 1.6.

(tpy)

60.9

125.5

5.3

16.8

22.1

16.8

22.1

16.8

22.1

19.2

181.2

1$9.8

0.0

Calculation lnpun;

537.625 90% to%

ut 71.71 90% 10%

Emission Calculktions:

TABI.F.Jl-5 ROTARY l>RYF.R-HAI' A"il> TAJ> WOOD COMBUSTION EMISSIONS

DIVIVA PELLET NORTHAMPTON, Ll,C

En,iasioo Fa~tor Compariton

J J

Al'· ~L U ilWIRICd ult'ttt AP-4l Gnen, Dlnlctwood· We.igbted Emission Fecw

HAP NCTAP voe 'WOOd·llred, hal'dwood raccor& fire<t ~l"twood fllcton

l'ollulanl CAS Et11l»lo11. Emissioa Shon-term EF AnuualEF Number (Yes/N<>) (\"es/No) (YIOS/No) Fl!Cfor Refenxice Factor Refe~nce

(lb/O01) (l~DT) (U,/09T) tlb/OI>T) £FS.-urce Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 Yes Ye~ Yt:~ :..rn,-03 2 i.505-02 I l.09E-02 1.09E-02 AP-42 \-c1nPcu; .. 107-02-8 Yes Yes Yes O,l!OE±OC r- O.OOE~ Q' ' O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO AP-42 F"onnnldehyde 50-00.0 Yes Yes Yes 7 ISE-0) 2 1.40&01 I 2.04E·02 2.04E-02 AP-42 Me1hanol 67-56-J Yes No Yes 5.62E-03 2 l.101::--0) 1 1.6lE-02 1.61 E--02 AP-42 l'huuol ' l 0~-95-2 Yes Yes Yes :o:QOJ:±00

, O.QOE+OQ ' O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO AP-42

Propionaldohyde l 23-3~-6 Yes No Yes 6.64C-04 2 l.30E-02 I 1.90E.03 l.90E,-03 AP-42

Total IIAPs

No1ts:

' HAI' & TAP emission facto,~ for ""Rotllly O,yer, s.-een, diroct wood-tired. (iulet moisture contcm >SO%, dry basis) softwood wen, obtained fi·om Al'-42, Section J0.6.2, Table 10.6.2-3. ' T,;, account for hardwood emissions since no HAPITAI' ennssion factors are given for direc1 hMdwood-fired. factors were conse,vatively calculated by ,uultiplying AP-42 Section 10.6.2-3 HAP factors for

green. dirccl softwood fired by the ratio of the VOC emission fac1ors for hardwood to softwood d,ying (0.24i4. 7).

J Sho1t-ten11 emissions wore calculated based upon a worst-<:~ scena,io of 2$% soil wood liriug on an hou,-ly basis.

A,u,uol cmi~sions were «ilculated based on cl1c Annual average% Hardwood and Softwood C'omposi1io11 of90% lwdwood to 10"/4 softwood.

• f TI11oui;h 1es1mg ;it olhe,· F.'.nviva facili\j_\!s Acrolcin and Phenol are 1ypically not evider.t in the emissions s1.-eaii1

J )

Poknlial El-alsalom '

(lb/hr) (111yJ 7.85E.01 2.94E100

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO l.47E+OO 5.49E+OO l.lSE+OO 4.32E+OO

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO

l.36&01 S.JOE-01

3.54 J3.2<i

Trinity Consultants Appendix ll Page S of 18

Envlva Northampton Calculations 4.17.2014 Dryer System HAP & TAP Revised

J )

J ]

)

TA~LE 8-6 ltOTARY DRYF.R-1-!A PAND TA P WOOD COMBUSTTO:o; F.M ISSJO:"S

El'i V IVA PELLET NORTHAMPTON, LLC Cnlulatinn l• puu:

HC.ll lr,p111 (.\.1M8tlL'hr) 17.'.)0 Oµerati11s Schedule fh~/~ r) 3,160

I lolt lnp.t tMMlltuh1J 15JH2k WESP ~IGtol HAP ('c,,tr,1 ~ftic1:lllC) 1 9Z.1S'>fo

1-fCI C'or,troi Effic:J;nc:},., 9-3~%

H,-\P & T.\r F:mis,ion Cal(ulJtioru:

Erni.-sinn Fartor1 Emissions 'Pnlh,rant

TyJI< Biom.au 8io1n111.n .\'lui,uum tfncontrolltd Total M fl aim um Controlltd T otat t'OlltJthnt lh/mmRll,l lblmm\ttu Rct lhlbr lblh,· lbfyr tpy 11,11 .. lbi),r rpy

U.....ntrolltd U\ntrnlltd Unc"Otu,el\td ConcroUcd

Ace11)J)h.;no11c HAP 3.ZOE-119 UOP..(19 I 5.61E-O? ~.61E-07 J.61 E-07 4.91E-o; H6E-06 HIE-07 4.9 1E•O} 2.46F.-O~ An:i,n0ny & r.ompC'lunds 1-!AP 7.90~416 ~.ne-01 I, 2 USE--OJ JOOE-04 I.JSE--0} UIE·OI l,:JIE--03 1.00E--04 S.80E-OI 4.40E-04 Al1i.'¢nic TAP/HAP UOE>J.\ :l,OE·06 I,? 386E-03 UOE-04 J 86E--03 J.38E-01 169E-02 2 SOE-0,1 2.4SF.-OO U2!i--OJ Eknzo(t')p, rcnc TAP/HAP 2.60E-06 2 6/iE-06 I 4S6&04 456E-lk 4S6E-04 3 99E-I-OO 200E-OO 4.S61;-61 3.99E---OO 2.00F.-11' ~ilnl11 m.;r:.,I (tt!H'C:Xtcd) I Also mclad..: in BEC) T,ViHAP 1.ltlE-116 ?.9JE-08 I, 2 I ~l£-l>4 J 40£.(1.S I 93E-04 l ~~!;+00 &4.SE.-0< 1.-IOF.-05 1.22E-01 6 12E-OS l:.Wmiurn Mt·ul lcJCmL·nt:il 11n-rcae1cd}-(Add \\/CDC) TAPIH/\P 4 IOE-<1/. 2.971,.(17 I. 2 7.19E-04 ~.lJ'E--0.S 7.19E-04 6.JCE+OO l.15E-O~ }.21.E-O~ 4.S6F,all 2.23£-04 C i'l1boq 1<..1ra<hlorid~ 'rAP/HAP 4.50E.IJ; 4.!0E--OS ) 7.K9E-0) a9f",03 7.S9E-03 6.91£+0) 3.461l-"l 7.$91::.(13 ".91e;+o1 M6E-02 Chlorine TAPIHAP 7.90EJJ4 7.9<Je:-o• 1 IJSE-1,1 I 33£-01 U8E.()1 I 2 IE•03 6 07£-01 IJRF.All 1.21€•0; 6,07~1 C:hlorub;n:z~nc TAPIHJ\P 3.111£-0S 1,iJE-0:< 5.78£-03 J 111:-0; ~ lllE.(IJ HlTF.+(11 lJJE-02 5.71£.Q; S07Et-01 2.531,-02

C.11Klflnt a...i (C111omillln \'I) TAP' BOF.4, 2 . .s•E.-0; I. 2 6.14E-04 4 4SE--05 6.14&04 5 J7E4(Al 2.69E-03 HSE-OS ).90];:-01 l.~$E-OI Chromtum-Olher c::imi:d~ (..:Id widlrom acid an gi:, CR(l HAP 1.75E--0.S 1.271?,.,~ I. 2 J 07E--03 2.22E.-rJ4 3 07E-03 2.69E.+OI l.34E--02 l.22!l-CM l.9lE.+OO 9.741;:-114 Cobolt cnmpOl•nds HAP 6.~0li.lJ6 •l.71E-07 I, 2 J.14C,.O) 8.26E-03 J.14E.IJ.l 9.98c-HJIJ 4.99E--03 8.26E-OJ 7.24t:.IJJ }.62£.(14 Ui11itrophc:nol1 2.4- HAP 1.30£,07 1.80E·Ol J J6F-O~ J.16E-0:S 3. 16E-<Jj 2.i6E-OJ JJ&l:-04 J.16E-Qj l.l<IE-OJ l.J&E--0-I Diil-clhi·lh<'-"'lol•llr.il:w: (DEH r) TAP.'HAP •. 70E-OS •.:>OE-0& l.2~E-OtS 124F.~ a 2•E--Oc, 122£.-02 l.61E-OS u11:;-06 722£-02 3.61£-(IS Eih)ib<m<ne HAP J.11E-O; J.JOE--0\ HJUJ.l S.43E--OJ I.~JE-03 4 16t::+OI 2.lKE-02 S.43E-03 4.?6E+OI 2.3&E-D>. E.\l,~·lc:'L( dklllondc ( 1.2 .. diohlol'OC!h~) TAP/HAP l.9(J!l-U~ 2.90E-OS '.OSF.--OJ ~.OkE.•OJ .l.05E-03 4.45E•·OJ l.lJE-02 ;,O&E-OJ 4.451:.+0J 22.lE-02 Hcx:tchkn.-d1hun20-p-dio'.'l:in l,2.'!.6.1Jt TAP 1.nOE--06 t.6111;:-06 HOE-04 2.l<OE-04 2 SOE--04 2.46E-00 Ul!l--03 2.SOE--04 2.46E.+On Uln-03 Hydroacn chloride (hydrochlu,iu ui:id) T ... P1'HAV 1.901,-02 1.91\E-OJ 1.1 JJ)E+tlll 3.33E-OI ) JJE+OO 2.92E+-04 146E+-OI 3.33£.0l 2.92E~OJ l.46F..«I L~.:id and Le.vi r.on\pound.J 1-!AP HIJE~ ,.•3E-06 I l • ~rn-0; 6 IOE-04 141£-(1; 7.37£->-0t l.69£.-02 6.JQE-0, S.ttciW ..67E.(l]

M"""'"""'&OCf!ll)OOnds TAl'MAP I 60E-O; l.16t-tk r. 2 2 IOE-01 lOJE--02 2.&0E-01 2 46E+-O~ l.23E+QO 2.0.lE-02 l.illE+02 l.91t.-02 Mcrcu,y. "-.p('lf (ln..:lutl.~ in M.:reury&Compd~) rAP/H/\P 3.~0E-06 l.!4E--07 '· 2 6.14£-04 4 ~SE.-0~ 6.14E-1>4 ~.31£+[,0 2.69EA13 6.141,--04 5.37E+OO 2.69E-03 M'-1hyl bmmidc {hromo1n~Ch~11,;) H-.r 150~ ... :.•3 UIIE·O~ ) 2.6JE-l,J 2.63£-03 2.63E--O; 2 JOE+III J.ISi;..(12 2.6JE--OJ 2,0t:+01 l.ljE-Ol ~1~111)·1 chlorid~ (chloron,~111:1110) HAP ).JO&,()~ V•JE,Ol 4.0)f-03 4 0lE-o; .~lE<JJ i .~1F.+n1 l.77&-02 4,036·03 J ~JE•OI J.77E-Ol 'vt..:cb~ I chlor"(o:m ( I • U l:1c:hJoro~1h.1Jll::) TAPIHAP ,.IOE-Cl 3.IOE-0:'- ; ,OE-l)J 5 4lF.-n, ~.43&03 4.l6E~I 2 lRE-'l2 HJE-03 4,76£+01 2.JS&</2 M~l~H·«tO<-" TAP HIJE-tli 5.40E-ll6 9.0E--04 9.471':JJ-l 9 HE-04 R.r,,i;+OO ~.ISE-03 9.47E-0. ~.29E+-OO 4.J5E-03 NupM.:tk.-nc HAP 9.10E>Jj 9.70E,-Oj I I ?OE--02 1.70£:.-02 l.70E-02 l.4~E.•·02 1.4;E--02 J.70£-02 1.491:.+02 HSE-02 NiGkcl 111«,.I (('i>mpor:e111 c:ifNlckcl lJ:. (MlpOOnd&) TAP/HAP J30£-0j 2.)91:.J.)6 I. 2 ~.7k!;-03 4. J9];.f)4 5.781::-0) S.O)E+OI l..\lE,Ol ~.78E-OJ ;.01E+OI 2.5){;.(12 Ni,m1,hcnolt 4· IIAP J.IOt-07 1.IOF.-07 1.YJE-lll 1.YlE-05 19JE,-O; 169E,01 3.4;£.0S 1.9)(;.0) 1.69&-01 R.4lll-Ol Pc11u1,;hlo1opl,..-:onl TAP/HAP S.Wll-0~ ,.10.E--Oa t.~E--06 ¥94E--06 3.94E-06 7S3C.02 J.92E-Ol l.!),tE-OII 7.l.lE-OZ 3.921:-05 Pcmll<lracihi-1:'"' (l«racllklm.-lh)lenol TAP,'liAP 31!()[~ l.l!Ot::--OS I 6'6E-03 66'.ll-03 6.MiE-03 H4F.->OI 2.92E-Ol 6.6€1:-0J l.ME+ol 2.YlE-02 PllOEphorus \.t~ul. Yeller.\·"' V.'h--~ HAP 2.:0E--05 1.966-01\ u 4 73E--03 3.43£-04 4 ?J~-03 4 1si;~o1 2.0lF,-02 4.73!,;--0J 4.ISE+OJ 2.(17£-02 Pol~'Chlorin;i.ttci b1ph~nyls TAP/HAP 8.15£~)9 ~.l5E.-09 1.431:,.()(, 1.,;E-06 1.4JE--06 1.J:'iti-1.J] 6.26E--06 1.43£--06 l.25E,-02 6.26E.()6 !)oh.::~'Clic Orgt\lliC M!'ltter HAP 1.2~&04 1.2~E-CM 2 )9£-112 2.19E-02 2 19£-02 J 92E+-OZ 9.61lt:-02 2.19E-02 l.92E•·02 9.60E--02 rropyknc d1.;:hlo1 ide ( I .2 dichlort1ptt!fJ.111c) HAP 3.JOE.-01 33-0G-0$ I J 78£-11; S lAF,.11.l $.7~~-03 S.OiE•OJ 2 {3£-02 S.78E-03 S.07E+OI 2.53L-02 Sclcllium-- HAP l..llOE-06 2.0Jf.07 I. 2 HIE~ 3.!~E~ 4 91F-04 4,)0t;+oo l..1.;i,;-0; 4.91E.(),I '20E+OO 2.15£.-0) T c:tncl,lorod0..:112:0-p-dio..'-m. 'l .. l. J .J. TAP/HAP i.oOE-12 HQE-12 J 51FAl9 Ulc-09 151Ht9 UlF,.(lj 6,60E•09 l.!>IE--09 l.32E--O; 6.60E·09 Trichloroi;fh\ 11,;.110 TAP/HAP :i.OOE•il3 ~.O<JE-05 $.26E-03 ~ 26f",O~ S.26E>IJ 4.61£+01 2.lOF..Ol 5.Z61::.IJ3 'I GIE+OI 2.JOE-Ol Tlicf\101-oflu~r,,111eth.tnC (CFC' 11,, TAr <.111~-05 4 IOE·O~ 7.19E-03 7.19E-O; 7.19£.()) 630E+-01 3.15E-0Z 7.IQE-l)J 6 301::+0I 3.l;E-02 'f1ichlc-rophc~. Vl,6• HAP 2.20E-08 l.20E-OS 3.$6F.-C<I 3.S6E-116 3 q6E-<l6 J J8F,02 1.G1.,1t:;.(.~ ~ SvE-06 l ~•E-02 1.69&</S VN1yl.:h~nck rAP.IHAP l.8-0E-05 l.!OQE-0.' 3 16£-03 3 16V...l ; l~E-03 2.711E+OI 1 lRF--02 3 16E-O, 2.76E<OI l.38E-02

Total HAPI U8E.-+00 S.9IIUII 3.88£400 J.40£-Hl4 16.98 6.UU,:0 01 S.l71:.+03 M3

~ Uncc-ncu.,Ucd :nd ®f'llr~llod emi~si('ln lhc.to~s (eriwriu ,,ud HAPff AP) fur wood CQml,ustion in a sto~tr boit~r frocn NCDAQ Wood ,,.\Sci: Comb\lstioA Spc::adshect'A P-"12: Compil.Ml<Jn of Air PoUu~ Emjssjou f ~n Vol. I - ~wionary Sources

USEP ... Slh cd Seel""' 1.6, IIA\~

: 11.c oom.ol elTx;ict~·ofthc t\Q':.\!)ci:=fT'O\:tJlic p,l\.'(.i;p,r.itor{WlSP) for fik~~ble p:)tueula.t.;,m;incr (88 9'-i.) is :-.pplic~ 10 ;.i.11 mc:1.,J h:i.ziltdOu\fi and toxic pol~uWll~.

·' Till) WGSJJ .;111plo~c a t:,:rnstic ,011.1:lon in;,, opcnulon in which h~'drochlo,ic ::wid \\tll h:wc hi$h \\:tlur solubtlicy. This c:i.uslic solutic.,n t\'i/1 ncutrJli.zo the ncid and oAuti\'cly ccutrol ft by 90%, pcronnvcmtion on l 0/13/1011

with S~•;cn A .• 1:i.asll1ld. P .E. flf Lu::db.,;rg A~$CIC:il'ltcl a manufacturer ofWESPa:. " ('hromi<;.~id tS:, aubK-:dd1t011lC~ompou00$. ,,·bc;h i$ accoonlcd iorsq,,;.ratet,· :..:i HAP. A, suc.h- .:lm:mic M:kf if ~·Qlcubled .b. 1 TAP.

8·6

103401.0081

FIie: Envivo No:thampton Cilculatlon$ 4.17.2014 9-t: 0ry<!rCombHAP& TAP Cab

J 1

C~lculation 1111,uts:

Total Plant Throu~ht)ut OOT!vr % of Total Throughput ro the

537,625

TABI.F. R-7 HAMMRRMILLS. voe, HAP, AND TAP EMISSIONS

El-VIVA PELLET NORTHA:\1PTON, U,C

! Harnmennills I 53¾ jvia ~OR test for Ory l lammermitl pre-screener byJXlSS

286.554 90% 10%

Short Term Composition and Throu5hput ODT1l1r I ..

Emission C11kulatio11s:

EmLSSlon Fiatfor r A--• -'• ·••

] J )

HAP Weighted Emission Fac:coi-

NCTAP voe Stack Tesis

.Pollutllot CAS Emission Short-term EF Annual EF Number (Yes/No.) (Yes/No) (Yes/No) factor Refermce

(lblOD'f) (lblODl) (lblODT) voe as alpha-pinenc NIA Kl/I. NIA NIA 0.12 2 0.12 0.12

TotalVOC >JIA NIA NIA N!/1. 0.14 2 0.14 0.14 Acetaldehyde 75--07-0 Ye, Yes Yes 000£+00 l 0.0000 0.0000 Aerolein 107-02-& Yes Yes Yes 0.00E·t·00 ., 0.0000 0.0000 formaldehyde 50-00-0 Yes Yes Yes 1.71E-02 )

0.0171 0.0171 Methanol 67-56-t Yes No Yes l .03!:i-02 ' 0.0103 0.0103 Phenol 108-95-2 Yes Yes Yes 0.00E+00 J 0.0000 0.0000 Propionaldehyde 123-38-o Yes No Yes 000E-'-00 ' 0.0000 0.0000

'.'lotes: 1 Annual emissions were calculated ba.~ed on the Annual average% Hardwood and Softwood Composition of90% han.lwood to I 0% softwood. 1 VOC emissions from Enviva Northa,np1on September 2013 Engineering Tests with a mixture of6% softwood. VOC cnlculatcd on an alpha-pinene basi.\ and total

VOC was derived using OTM 26. 3 HAP emissions from Enviva Northampton September 20 l 3 Stack Testing with a throughput of 6% sotlwood.

Trinity Consultants Appendix B

Page 7 of 18

EFSonrtt

~tack test

stack test

stack test

stack te~t

stack test

$lack test

stack test

stack test

Tocat voe Tot:tl HAPs

Potential Emissions

(lblhr)

4.52

5.46

0.00F.+00

0.00E+O0

6.S4E-OI

J 951::-0)

0.OOE+00

0.00E+00

5.46

1.05

(tpy)

16.93

20.45

0.00E+00

000E+00

'.!.45F,+00

l.48E+00

0.00E+00

0.00E+00

20.45

3.93

Enviva Northampton Calculations 4.17.2014

Hammermills Revised

l

Calculation rn11uts:

S37,62S 90% 10¾

Shorr Te,m Com[IO~ition nnd nirou9hput ODT,1,r I

Emission C1 leu1"tions:

TARLF. 8-8 PtLLET rRESSES A~D COOLERS. voe, HAP, AND TAP EMISSIONS

ENV[VA PELLET NORTHA.\1PTON, LLC

F,ml~sion factor Comparison

)

Selected Emission Facto-r

li ,\J' NCTAP voe &hick Tests

f>olluta11t CAS En1i~$ion

Short-term EF Anuual 1':l' Number (Yes/No} {Yes/No) (Ye¥No) Factor Refereru:e

(lbJOOT) U.J!/OOT) (lblQDT)

voe as alpha-pinene ~IA NIA :-,/IA NIA 0.03 l 0.03 0.03

Total VOC NIA NIA NIA NIA 0.07 l 0.o7 0.07

Acelaldehyde 75-07-0 Yes Yes Yes 0.00E+OO -' 0.00E+OO O.OOE+OO

Acrolt:in 107-02-8 Yes Yes Ye~ O.OOE+OO ·' O.OOE-+-00 O.OOE+OO

Fonna!dchyde S0--00-0 Yes Ye$ Yes 1.321!-03 ) l.32E-03 l 32£-03

Methanol 67-56-l Yes No Yes 2.64f.--03 ) 2.641:.-03 2.64F. -03

Phenol lOS-95-2 Yes Yes Yt:S O.OOE+OO ) O.OOt:+00 o.ooE~oo

J>ropioMldehyde 123-38-6 Yes No Ye& O.OOE--00 ' 0.00E-00 0.00E-00

Notes: ' Annual cmi~sions w.:re calct1laccd based on the Annual average% Hardwood and Softwood Composition of90% hardwood to 10% softwood. , VOC emissio.\.~ frc•n t:nviva Northampton September 2013 Engu1ecrini;Tests with a mixture of 6% softwood. VOC t:itlculated on an alpha-pinene basis, and total

voe was dc,ived using OTM 26.

' IIAI' crnissi,,ns from E,wiva Nonhamp1011 September20 13 Slack Testing with a throughput ofo¾ softwood.

Trinity Consul tants Appendix B

Page 8 of 18

EF$o\tN!e

stack lesl

stack lest

stack test

staok test

stack te•t

stack test

stack test

stack test

To talVOC

Totnl HAPs

Potential EJDi»ioos

(lb/hr)

2.30

4.79

0 OOE+OO

O.OOF,-t-00

9.46E-02 1.89E-Ol

O.OOE+oo O.OOE+-00

4.79

0.28

(rpy)

8.63

17.96

O.OOE--00

O.OOE+OO

3.SSE-01 7.09E-OI

0.00E+OO

0.001:;+00

17.96

1.06

Enviva Northampton Calculations 4.17.2014

Pellet Cooler Revised

) ]

,.., TABLEB-9

ELECTRl C POWERED CHIPPER F:MISSIONS EN VIVA PELLET NORTHAMPTON, LLC

tons/year ( dry woodi

tons/h, ( dry wood) 1

Annual Throughput of Chipper

Dryer Throughput Chipper Only processes 50% of dryer throughput

Maximum Annual Operation

314,090

71.71 35.86 8,760

tons/hr Other 50% comt:1; in chip fonn hours

E mission Factors Emissions' Pollutant (lb/dry wood tons) (lb/hr)

Tl JC as Carbon2 0.0041 2.940£-0 I

THC as alpha-l'incnc3 0.0047 3.337£-0J

l'M4 NIA NIA

Methanol2 0.0()10 7.171 E-02

1 1t is assumed that the wood received at the facility has a nominal water content of 50%.

The annual throughput used for the chipper is 50% of the annual 1hroughpul of the dryer; while 1he

short-term throughput is based upon the maximum hourly throughput of the dryer. 2 Emission factor obtained from available emissions fac1or.; for chippers in AP-42 Section 10.6.3, Table 7

(tpy)

0.64

0.73 "I/A

0.16

and Section l0.6.4, Tables 7 and 9. Emission factors for THC and Methanol are the same across all three tables. 1 The Tl-fC'.NOC makeup of wood is primarily composed oftcrpenes (C5H~),, [where n r 2, 3, or 4 typicallyl

hut to convert from carbon to the equivalent weight in THC/VOC, the nssumplion was that alpha­pinene (AP) would be the representative THC/VOC (molecular weight = 136.2 lb/lb-11101). The following equa1ion shows the conversion: lb J/OCIODT • lb CIODT • (136.1 /bimo/ AP 112 lblmol CJ* {I mo/ AP I 10 mo! CJ

4 PM emission factor is not 11pplicable os the chipper emissions nre routed downward to the ground.

...,

,....

,..,

.....

TABLE B-10 HA.MMERMILLS. voe, HAP, AND TAP EMISSIONS

ENVlVA PELLET NORTHAMPTON, 1.1,C

Annual Throughput of Each Rechipper

Shon-term Throughput of Each Rcchipper Maximum J\nuual Op1.m1tion

Pollutant

Tl-IC as Carbon2

Tl IC as alpha-Pinene3

PM4

Mcthanol2

575,000

70.83 8,760

F.mission fartors (lb/dry wood t11ns)

0.0041

0.0047

NIA

0.0010

tons/year ( d1y wood) 1

tons/hr (dry wood)1

hours

Emissions5

(lb/hr)

2.904E-01

3.296E-0l

NIA

7.083E--02

1 Jt is assumed that the wood received at the facility has a nominal water content of SO%.

The annual 1hroughput used for 1he rechippers arc the same as the annual 1hroughput of the dryer; while the short-1erm throughput is based upon the maximum hourly throughput oflhe dryer.

2 Emission factor obtained from available emissions faclors for rcchippers in AP-42 Section 10.6.3, Table 7

(tpy)

1.27

1.44 NIA

0.29

and Section 10.6.4, Tables 7 and 9. Emission factors for THC and Methanol arc the same across all three tables. 3

The THCNOC makeup of wood is primarily composed ofterpcncs (C;II,).[where n ~ 2, 3, or 4 typically) but to convert from carbon to the equivalen1 weight in THCNOC, the assumption was that alpha­pinene (AP) would be the representative THCNOC (111011:cular weight~ 136.2 lb/lb-mo!). The following equation shows the conversion: lb /IOCiOl)T ~ lb C/ODT • (136. l /blmol AP I 12 lblmol C) • ( I mo/ A Pi 10 mo/ C)

~ PM emission foctor is not applicable as rechipper emissions are routed downward to the ground. ~ Short term emissions were based upon the 111ax short term capacity of the rechippers.

Emissions are representative of the total combined emissions for both rechippers.

Emis.sion Emission lfnit Sour(c ID Hammennills Ba~filtcr I ES-HM-1 d1rou~h 3 Hammermills Hai,.filter 2 ES·H~l-4 l'hroueh 6 Hammcnnills Ba~filrer 3 ES-Hvl-7 and 8; ES-NOS Peller Mill reed Silo Bin Ven,

ES-PMFS Filter l'elle1 Mill Fines Bin Bin Vent

ES-PFl3 Filler Pellet Coolers Cvclone I ES-CLR-1 Peller Cooler; Cvclone 2 ES-CLR-2 Pel let Cooh:r. Cvclone 3 ES-CLR-3 Pellet Coolen C'vcloue 4 ES·CLR-1 Pellet Coolers Cvcloue 5 ES-CLR-5 Pel re, Coolers Cvclone 6 ES·CLR-6 Finished Product Handling l:S·FPH. ES-Pll & 2. ES-PB-Bagfilter I thn1 12

Note:

) J

TABLE 8-11 BAGFJLTER AND CYCLONE EMISSIONS ENVIV A PELLl::TS I\ORTHAMPTON, LLC

Filter. Vent ~r· Pollutanl Annual Cyclone f'lowrul( 1 LoHdin( O11tralion ¾PM that is

ID (cfm) (gr/ct) (hours) PM,0 PMu CD-HM-Brl 45,000 0.004 8,760 100% 100% CD-HM-BF2 45,000 0.004 8.760 100% 100% CD-HM-Bfl 45,000 0.004 8.760 100% 100%

CD-PMFS-BV 2.500 0.004 8,760 100% 100%

C:D-l'f'H-HV HOO 0.004 8,760 100% 100%

CD-CLR-1 17.100 0.Ol 8.760 91% ss,~ CD-CLR·2 17,100 0.01 8.760 91% 55% CD-C:1.1<·.l 17,100 0.01 8,760 91% 55% CD-CLR-4 17,100 0.01 8,760 91% 55% CD-CLR·S 17,100 0.01 8.760 91% 55% C:D-CLl<-6 17.100 0.01 8.760 91% 55%

CD-FPH-BF 35,500 0.004 8.760 91% S5%

TOTAL

) ]

Po1ential Emissions PM PM,/

(lb/hr) (tpy) (lb/hr) (tpy)

1.54 6.76 1.54 6.76 1.54 6.76 1.54 6,76 1.54 6.76 1.54 6.76

0.09 0.311 0.09 0.38

0.12 0.54 0.12 0.5~

1,47 6.42 U3 5.84 1.47 6.42 1.33 5.84 1.47 6.42 1.33 5.84 1.47 612 1.33 5.84 1.47 6.42 1.33 5.84 1.47 6.42 1.33 5.84

1.22 s.n l.l I 4.85

14.85 65,04 13.!>5 61.09

1 Filler. Vent. and Cyclone inler tlow rate (cfinJ provided by design ei1b~nee1ins firm (Mid-South Engineering Co.). The exit flowrate was conser,atively assumed lo be the same as the inlet tlowrate.

l Pollmaur t.oading (gr/ct) provided by Aircon.

l

3 PM2.~ (lb/hr)

1.54 l.54 1.54

0.09

0.12

0.81 0.81 0.81 0.8! 0.81 0.81

0.67

10.34

J Pellet cooler cyclone and finished product handling bagfilter ~peciation based on AP-42 factors for wet wood combustion (Section 1.6) controlled by a mechanical separator. Since the particle size ofrar1icl~ size of parriculaie in•trer trom n pellet cooler is anticipated robe larger than flyash. this factor is believed to be a conservative indicator of wec11ttion.

J )

(tpy)

6.76 6.76 6.76

0.38

0.54

3.53 3.SJ

3.53 3.53 3.53 3.53

2.93

45.31

Trinity Consultants Page 11 of 18 8aghouses and Cyclones

Enviva Northampton Calculations 4.17.2014

)

,..,

t:merg•ncy Gtncr:stor Emissions (ES-EG)

Equipment und Fuel Charact•ristics

Engine Ou!put Engine Powe,

Hours ofOpera1ion Heating Vaine of Diesel Powe.- Conversion

Criteria Pullutant Emissions

Pollutant TSP PMrr,

PM1.s NO, S02 co VOC(NMHC)

'l"oxic/H:iz»rdous Air Pollutant Emissions Ac et aldehyde Acrok."111

Ben2:C11c

Benzo( • )pyrene'' 1,3-Bmadicnc fomialdehyde Total PAH (1'0!\1)

Toluene m·.p-Xylene Highest HAP (Fonnaldthyde) Total HAPS

Note:

TABLE B-12 EMERGENCY c;~;ro:HATOR AND FIRE PUMP

f:NVIVA PELLET J\"ORTIIA\'IPTON, U..C

0.26 MW J50 hp (brake)

500 hrlyr1

19,300 B!uilb 2,545 Btu/hrilap

Category 1£.mi$.'lic.>n Factor Units PSD 4.41E-°'1 lbikW-hr (2) PSD 4.4JE-04 lb/kW-hr (2) PSD 4.41E-04 JbJkW-hq2) PSI> 8.82E-03 lb/kW-hr (5) PSD 15 ppmw (3) PSD 7.721,;-0_l lb/kW-hr (2) PSD 2.51E-03 lbiM\iOtu (4)

HAPITAP 5.37£--06 lb/hp-hr ( 4) HAP/TAP 6.48E-07 lb.11p-hr ( 4) HAPlTAP 6.53£-06 1Mtp·hr(1)

HAP/TAP 1.nE-09 lb/hp·hr(4) HAl'/l"AP 2.74E-07 lb,1,p-hr (4) HAP/TAP 8.26E-06 lb/hf)-hr (4)

HAP 1.1 llE-O<, lbihp-hr ( 4) HAl'fl'AP 2.86E-06 lb/hp-hr ( 4) l·IAPffAP 2.00£-06 lb/h11-hr (4)

8.26E-06 ib,11p-hr (4)

Poten1i~I Emissions lb/hr IJ)y

0.12 2.88E-02 0.12 2.88E--02 0.12 2.88E-02

2.30 5.75E-OI UXF.-03 3.46E-04

2.01 5.0Jfi-01 2.24fi-O.l 5.59£-04

LS8E-03 OOE-04 2.271::-04 5.67E-05 2.29E-03 5.71[-04

4.61E--07 l.15E-07 9.58E--OS 2.39E-05 2.89E-OJ 7.23E--04 4.l2E·04 1 flJF.-04 JOOE-03 2.51E-04 6.98E--04 l.75E-04 2.89E-03 7.2.,E-04 9.191::-0J 2.37E--03

1 NSPS allows for only 100 hl'slyr of non-emergency operation ofrhese engines (not rhe 500 !,ours ~hownJ. The PTE for rhe emergency

generator is bas.;d on 500 hr/yr. though. because rhe ,egs allow non-emergency opcrarion and EPA guidance is .SOO hr/yr for emergency gcnCl'1l!ors.

' Einissioos factors fro11, NSPS Subpan llll (or 40 CfR 89.112 where applicable) in compliance with posr-2009 conslmction.

·' Sulfur contenl in accordance wilh Year 2010 stand•r~s of 40 CFR 80.5 IO(a) as required by :--ISPS Subpall Jill.

' Emission fac,or obt.,ined from AP-42 Scction 3.J. Tables 3.3-1 Table J.3-2.

' Emission facror for NO;,c is listed as NOx and NMHC (Non-\iethanc Hydrocarbons or VOC') in Table 4 ofNSPS Subpan JIii. Conservatively assumed enlire limi1 auributable to NOx.

'' BcnzO(a)pyrene is included as a HAP in Total I' AH.

' ...,

Firewater l'ump Ii.missions (li:S-PWI')

Eq. dF ! Cha I · . u1pmenta11 UC r-a<:: t-r1st1c.s

Engine Output 0.22 MW Engine Power 300 hp

Hours of Operation 500 hr/yr1

Hearing Value of Diesel 19.300 Btu/lb Power C.onver~ion 2,545 Btw'hr/hp

Criteria Pollutant Emissions P@tential Emissions

I'olluant Category Emission Factor Units lb/hr tpy

TSP PSD 4 .41&04 lb/kW-hr (2) 0.10 2.47E-02

PM10 PSD 4.4!E-04 lb/KW-hr(2) 0.10 2.47E--02

P>iu PSD 4.41E-04 lt,/kW-hr (2) 0. 10 2.47E-02

NO. PSD 8.82E--03 lh/1:W-br (5) 1.97 4.93E--01

so, PSD 15 ppmw(.1) 1.19[-03 2 97E-04

co PSD 7.72E-03 lb/kW-hr (2) 1.73 4.32E-OI V()C(NMHC) l'SD 2 . .Sl[-03 lbiMMHrn (4) l.92[--03 4.79f-Al4

ITn•it/H:iurdous Air Pollutant Emissions ... ccraldehyde HAP/TAP 5.37E-06 lb/hp-hr (4) t.61E-03 4.03E-04 Acrolei11 1-!Al'/l'AP 6.48[-07 lM1p-h, (4) l.94[-04 4.86E-o.,

Benicnc HAP/fAP 6.531':-:-06 lblhp-hr(4) 1.96E-03 4.90£-04

Be11zo(a)J)yn:ne6 HAPfrAP JJ2E--09 lb/hp-hr (4) 3.95E--07 9.87E-Ol! I ,3-Bmadicnc HAP/TAP 2.74E-07 l{)/hp-hr ( 4) 8.21E-05 2 OSE-05 Fonnaldebydc f!APffAP 8.26F,-06 lb/hp-hr i4) 2.4HE-03 6.20E-04

Total PAH IPOM) HAP l.l8E-06 lb/hp-hr (4) 3.53E-04 8.82E-05 Tolnene HAP.'TAP '.!.86E-06 ll•hp-hr(4) 8.59£-04 2. I SE-04 m-,p-Xyleoe HAP/TAP 2.UOF,-06 lb/hp-hr (4) 5.99E-04 J.SOE-04 Highest HAP (1-'onnaldehyde) 8.26E-06 lb/hp-hr (4) 2.48£-03 6.20E-01 Total HAPs 8.DE-03 2.03£-03

Nute: 1 NSPS allows for only 100 hrs/yr of non-emergency operation of lhese engines (nor the 500 hours shown). The PTE f.>r the emergency

i:eneraror is based on 500 hr/yr, though. beu,us" the regs allow non-emergency operation 011<1 F.:Pi\ guidance is 500 hr/yr for emergency l!,Cneralors.

' Emissions faclor.- from NSPS Subpan tlll (or 40 C'FR 89.112 where applicable) in compliance with post-2009 cunstmction.

J Sulfur content in accordance with Year 2010 standards of 40 cm 80 . .51 O(a) as required by NSPS Subpan IJII.

J Emission f:icror obtained fl-om AP-42 Section 3.3, Table.~ 3.3-1 Tubte 3.3-2.

; Emission factor for NOx is li~t"ll "s NOx and :"IIMHC (Non-Meth&ne Hydroca,ht>ns or VOC) in T~ble 4 of NSPS Subpart 11 11. Cooservari vcly assumed entire lin1i1 anributable to NOx.

(, Benzo(a)pyrene is included as a HAI' in Total PAH.

ID Emission Sou re~ Grnu1>

DPl ES-DWH

IJP2 ES-DWH

DP~ t;S-DWH

DP4 ES-DWH

Note:

J

TA8LI!: B-13 DRIED WOOD HAI\OLJI\C DROP POli\'T EXAMPLE EMISSIONS

ENVIVA PF.LLET NORTHA\1PTON, LLC

Max Annual Throughput {tons/yr)

Max Short-Term Throughput (tons/yr)

Amount of Fines Oiverted from Hammermills

Ocscri prion Control

Dryer Dis~harger to Dryer Collection Enclosed Conveyor Belt

Pre-screen Feeder Fines Overs 10 Enclosed

Hammem1ills lnfeed :111d Oistribution

l-l~mmennills Cyclone Diverter Gates ro Hammermills Sysrem Discharge Enclosed

Collection Conveyor Belr

Hammermills System Discharge Collection Conveyor Belt 10 Pellet Enclosed

Mill Feed Silo Jnfeed Screw

57S,000 70.650

46. 7% via NOR !es, for D1y Hamtnermill pr~screene.- bypass

Throughput Max. Max. Pot~ntial t.:ncontrolled

Control Description Hourli Annual Emissions for PM'

(tphJ (t111·) (lb/hr) (t11,•)

Reducl ion to 2 mph 70.65 575,000 5.3E.03 2.2E-02 mean wind speed

Reducri on to 2 mph 32.99 268,525 2.5&03 I 0E-02 mean wind speed

Reduction 10 2 mph 37.66 306,475 28£-03 12E-02

111tmn wind speed

Reduction lo 2 mph 70.65 575,000 5.JE-03 2.2E-02 mean wind speed

TOTAi, l.6E-02 6.SE-02

J ] ] ]

Potential Uncontrolled Potential Uncontrolled

Emissions for PM,/ Emissions for PM2}

(lh/hr) (11,v) (lb/hr) HPV)

2.SE-03 I .0£--02 3.8E--04 l.6E-03

12E.03 4.8E-03 1.8E-04 7.3E--0/4

l.3E--03 5.56-03 2.0E-04 8.3E-04

2.5£,03 LOE-02 3.8E-04 l .6E-03

7.6£.03 3.IE-02 l.ll!:-03 4.7E-03

1 Fu~~tive emissions are not included in iacilicy,wide PTE because lhc :--lorthamplon Peller Mill does not belong lo one of the listed 28 source categories.

2 Max hourly .-a1es based upon 111a,im111n calculaced throughput rates provided in mass balance provided by Mid-South Engineering Company, June 17, 2011; upda1ed for I 3% moiscu,e conlenl on December 29, 2011

; Based en,ission factors calculated per Af>-42 Seclion 13.2.4, September 2006. where: f.' ~ ~mission factor (lb/ton)

k ~ particle size multiplier (dimensionless) for PM 0.74

k = 11anicle siie multiplier (dimensionless) for PM:,> 0.35 k = p;«1icle size multiplier (dimensionless) for PM~.~ 0.053

l: = mo;u, wind speed (mph) 2.00 M = material inoislure content(%) 10

~5- {ll, i \J L-C-1

'15c-J, t, ,sc-3

17 5 ~-I \J 5 t3 -1--

E for PM (lh/ton)~ 7.6E,05 E for PMu, (lb/ton)~ 3.6E,05

E for PM!.; (lb/to11) = 5.4E-li6

) J )

1',,81.tB-U G~€1;~ WOOi> HM'OU:-<G PllOP l"Oll\"T tXAMPLE £MISSIONS

Et<VIV A PtLLET ~ORTHAMJ"TOJ\'. LLC

10 f.1t,ikct'lt"1Sn1tr«·G1-.Nf) T,i,n,;~rAtfi\1ty

M, .. ,;., I ... T)'prt1f Nunil><'r ~t PM P11nicl<t- S"t PMM F:1r1lde PMu h,ticl~ MNtit Wt,.J Moist-,!"(' Emls:ston rM,.Smi••~1 0i:,fntlirne I o,,, • .,.,,.,, I >M,;01,., I s,, Mu16pllor I s,,., >1owr1;., I s,-, 1U) l c,,.,.,.,1,111)' f11~111r

1 r,m") {Jirr1rr1iin1tlos} (dll'IK•1oi,'"11~) (JinarNlrtAk~J (mrfl) t%J (lh/(,)A} (lb/to111)

C.OPI r.:u:w1-1 c;11_1~ J\S-GWH (.;1)!'2 m:.r:w}i (ii)~ 11i;.(:wu

1·11~11.11,:,•r. 1111,i. :-um,n:, I(• t>-.,h,fo,,:,r ~'<''"-"-"'---'~-'-;_1_1

lln'j· Pllir,l1t t·ia <.::.m, .... ·if'l ,., ,,.,.,) B111l f"ialo: 1n J),,\._

·r,.,,:~'i:r l'ui.: 1,~11~1,1 Wocll Chit • t Wcu 'JI\ Omdc,111 !-:(Jl,r111e

~ To_i_1!_li._,-.:1 C'omt--.'in,• 1:<:111 thii11 ~I.: 1ro n1,\'f

r,,,11lffllJnlrin!I

1~11,;)II~.,

Jnt:1d1I~ D~d1)),ur

11 .. ~~h 011!!!_

I. .h~,,~ ,,., • .,,., .. ..,.,,..,, (n l"S<. l>Jllc, ,,.,....,,.,.:1,,1•(h':II l-c~••111.w1m:1 Ol;iK,t 1'111111"' a,·oJ.:•$• t>,;r,.._ri'IJ ;i1111C'-~";;o,11111:1ot1oc.-io,tl.

~. l;m...;i,i: 1:10;,.,, c:,tcul,1;,,.,•.,""'1,.,.f. .. .,.,i .. rc"" ,u>-,!, i...:,;,,.. ,.c ~~ • J\ii~•11 lbNl.i"",r,,1~~ •'ii~ 1~w11on 1,t;.,, n111,._ v.11:,.:, I'. .................. ,,., .. ,,

~ • :w,oi,l: ., ..... ,t•'4i('t1,>111e,1 ... ,10 .. , •l'lf•·~· I.· :-11lllclle111,·11,Jt,.i.:,111i,..,.M<illt .. llicl1~1,. ~ ,,.,,;,,.,.~ ..... ,;,.;('•11li111tlN,:,i,l,:l'<lf1.-1•>.1;,

Ii ,rn,a..,;n,111-;faO 1'111111\1

)I "1"1'1ri,1I n,:i~n1•1m<tn1t•,.,

IU!

:t•)Sl

"

,::.74 ,,._, .. ,t,.r 11,_74

., 1"'-1•< ""'"t ,:110:i(",J ,If'"·'' .. ,.,,•h4 111111,,~,.,;,1:11 :-ul..,..ol-.tm.:IN .. i111 ~11•.1,ont,h] p,:,,c;~,:, 11,,.:..;Ji,;h "/·'M,11'tl-':·.,! ;, .. <..,.,\t,:i,,,n' ,.,.,·,:,.,.,, .. ,,.A,w~l)!l'·i-~,,,•·, .. I"""~ (111 lht ~ ... ,,..,,,;n \')II('?·( fal{.:11 .U, r•,11111:~,<"""'': l>i<IMI •• ,,, •••• l'IIH!lf'aff Clt.:I"") ;..,,..,wi,;4$Q,,i,.•,1lcnl flw rt.I ,., ... MIi:~ c ...........

J. Tll•.'O: 1f'I"' ,,,.,.,~,, .. mn, \/flt)~ ,lh:Njll'(Uftl)lh'l:•'lfllh ·~Ii\,; .... ;,,i-:I ·1~,il(' :,.·,w~llw,,: ... ,,.l .. .,,J,;~~,,.,f' T'°'""' kt ucl, l\l'( Ill( ........... "~ ,ri~v.if 1,c,1,;,1,1N:

U.lS (I~ ~ tUS fl.fl~) ,,.~ Ul?_ 1>.m.1 fil. <U.S ::•JI~ 6t!_

'iM"(,. le'.2 ~ 5c - Z. , ~ )C vj I PJ-f}

't'ril'litv Consultants ~ppcndix 6 Pi)1,c-15of18

4JI",, 3,1.;i: . .-u~ l.7~F.l)'i

~~:,,_ .t.J4H·fl_l l,IC·I-f.15 <1?• .. ~.;~n: 1.6~~.os ~,· .. •L'6E-fJS ,Z,ME.05

f I ~

f'MM IRIIS$f()H

Fnoot)

(lhttan)

1.(.1£-1\6 .U>U·:.CM

2:.576-CIG

.1.116-06

)

)

t'OtMti11I PM PMu P\tu Pot1!1dlul I ivitmv•I I P;1,cfltt11I

'rtu-oa~i.rn,t I tffliubu~ !111i,c:id-,,,. E!l'll~W\11,

ur,Y> (tfl)'J (tor, u,,,.>

l~.7))

u.n:. 1411:.o\•>t:.

S,\l),oljl

(,.<fSE-0~ J .ttlL'\E-OS I 4.<"4~

].Cl91i•IW I l,a!6E-M I 1.lJF.•(IS

~.l1E-Oo1 I ~.011;.(..i I 4,,HIUIS

l."161:·•>2 I l'i.YJH.fl) J L.(ljJ!.(U

1.,r;s.02 I ".Jsie,.,., I 1.1za413

Efl't'l'lct tfo,thaimpton Cal~·litle>ns 4,17,2014

Giccn \Vood Ha11dllt1S:

) J

bni>,Jon TSI' Ernissfon l'acrw' \J>litW

C.WSP I

GWSP2

Toll:ll

De.se,ipfion (l!)lday/a<J'e)

On!1tn Wood Pile N<> I 3.71

Gr?l:n Woo1 Pile h°'l''. 2 HI

,-. ... k-f,,.(J.i, ,i°"jtl llif'II~ fU,.IICl'lbll!•.Ull,~ ti•

f (linll: 1h:11 wi.,.J ,:~,,.::Js S ~(, nu· 12 :nr,h){• .. ,:

Trinitv Con.sulta nts Date: 4/21/'-014

(lblhr/01)

l .m,-OG ) .55E.N.

~1·,

-; ~-..

TA0LEII-IS GREEN WOOD STOP.ACF. Pl LES PUGITJYi:; J::MISSIO:'l"S

E:'l"YIVA P£LLET NORTHAMPTON, lLC

Ouce.r ~ ,._.,

VOCEmi..iOD Facwr' Width l..e•1tlll Jielgbt S1oraie Pile PM JlmlfllOJIS PM1o £.mi11io11,

(lbldll)lllltrtJ (ll>.llul'n') (rt} (I\} ~ (fr) (lh/M (lpy) (11>/hr}

l.ilO H-IE-06 IOIJ ,II)) "' 60,000 0.211 0.933 O.llr.

).(o(I J.4~E-tl~ 2()() .. tlO 10 110.400 0,392 1.717 0.1%

0.605 2.6.~I O.JO~

IJ.1->«1 nn 1nct«-,\,1,,,;~"' 1.hll,, n,~~J 1'1,11 )(<17-101 • tb, N1ll'llu.n,rt<t.1. Nt :.

1~ 1., ltr. fl!llllll~ '" .iqunl ,r." , ,d"T~P 1111:ltd en lJ.:i. l•:PA ('-,.iJ,,tl,' q,'Op,'" /1,,g;,iw 1-:Wia ~•- R.::~Gl\:l f rta&'\A!k Pat.. ~ Ii C.olc.a.. [PA4'S0:J..~ _,... ,m

((py)

0.,;67

o ~~~

!.Jl5

PM: , •.11 •-urrro-1 kl tc111,1I 1.5 ' " of T'S)• V,S EPA !Jnc:.:1M1111d flooi:11-..1:111 (o, R~1i,icir.s tu t-"!1111 Fl"flttia11 k11i,111 ( h r(I fo, AF'..U r\1e,:Qt-c Ou,1 R111l~\K,fl f.::llln1, Nt1,'='ll~'

:m::<,.

Appendix B

P•g• 16of 18

PM,. Boniaslons tlblbr) (lpy)

~016() 0.070

0.029-1 0, 121

0Jl4S4 0.199

J )

voe.canon voc .... ,.....,.,. ... i,,m,,...., "111111.!lo•'

(lb/ho·) (tpy) (lblllr) (tpy)

021 0.90 •n• 1.Ql

0.38 1.67 0.43 l.90

0.59 2.57 0.'1 l.93

Erwiva NorthaMptQo Ul<:ula1ions 4.17.2014 <ireen Waud S.tvrag& Pll11.s

) )

Tank ID Tank Description

TKO! Emergency Generator Fuel Oil Tank2

TK02 Fire Water Pump Fuel Oil Tank2

Note: 1

Conservative design specifications.

TABLE B-16 TANKS EMISSIONS

J

ENVIV A PELLF.T NORTHAMPTON, LLC

Tank Dimensions Volume1 0iameter Height/Length Orientation

(gal) (ft) (ft)

2,500 6 12 Vertical 500 3 10 Horizontal

Throughput Turnovers (gal/yr)

12,000 4.80

10,300 20.60 TOTAL

2 Throughput based on fuel consumption and 500 hours of operation per year. Fuel consumption data provided by pump engine vendors.

J )

) J J

TANKS4.0 VOC Emissions

(lb/yr) (tpy)

0.37 3.57E-03

0.43 2.15E-04 0.80 3.79E-03

TA~Lt B-17 POTENTIAL GHG £MISSIONS FROM COMBllSTJO~ SOURCES

E:"IVIVA PELLET NORTHAMl''l'ON, LLC

O ui;r;1fing Oat;l ;

Dryer !!eat Input Operating Schedule

Emergency Generator Output Operating Schedule

l\'o, 2 fuel Input

E11er1,,y Input

hre W:,cer Pump Output Operating Schedule

No, 2 !'uel lnpur

Ene,1,'Y ln[:>ut

rortable Chipper Output Operating Schedule

No. 2 Fuel lnpur

Energy Input

Truck TippetOutpm Operati11g Schedule

>Jo. 2 Fuel Input

Energy Input

175.30 MMRtu,hr 8,760 hrs/yr

350 hhp 500 hrs/yr

16. 7 snl,1ll'1

2.282 MMRn1/hr

300 bhp 500 hri,/yr

14.3 ga&hr1

1.9.56 MMBtu/11,i

1,300 l>hp 1,000 hrs,yr 61.9 gal/lir1

8.478 M\1Bn1/h,.-!

170 bhp r .noo hrsiyr

&. l gal/hr'

1.109 MMDtuthl

Emission Factors from Table C-1 (l<g/MM81u)3

Emission Unit ID fuel 'l'y11e CO2 CH4 N20

ES-DRYER Wood and Wood Residuals 9.38Ei-O I 3.20E-02 4.20[-03

ES-G:--1 No. 2 Fuel Oil (Distillate I

7.40E-t<>I 3.00E-03 6.00E-04

ES-FWP No. 2 Fuel Oil tOi$tillatel 7.40F.+01 3.00E-03 6,00E-04

ES-CHH'-2 No. 2 Fuel Oil IDistillateJ 7.40£+01 3.00FAB 6,00E-04

ES-TT No. 2 fuel Oil 7,40Ei-OI .3.00E-03 6.0013-04 (l)istillatel

' fuel co11;11mptio,1 .:..alcul.red U$illg a factor of0.0476 g.11/hr-hp. Advanced Environment8l lnterface, Inc. ( 1998). Gc11eral Pennits for Eme1·se11~y E:nl{inos. INSIGHTS, 9&-2. 3.

' Enc<l,'Y calculated 011 a fuel can,umption basis, using an energy fi<ctor of 0. 137 MMBrulgal.

·' Emission factors Ii-om Table C-1 and C-2 ofGHG Reporting Ruic, Emission factors for methane and ~20 •lre11dy mulriplicd by their respective GWPs of 21 and 310.

• As per NC DAQ Oiomass Deferral Rule !.SA NCAC 020 ,0544, CO2 emissions from bioencrgy and other biogeneic

CO2

158,777

93

80

691

90

Tier I F,missions (metric Ions)

Tuto1C02c CH4 NlO lti,.mm~~

deferral 1

54 7 3,341

3 77E-03 7.S.5£-04 93

3,23E>03 6.47E-04 80

2.soc-02 S,6 IE-03 693

3.67£-03 7.33E·04 91

sources are not applicable towards PSD nnd Title V pcnnitting. 171erefore CO2 emissions fom, the dryer are not included in l'he Total CO2e bioma$S deferral column.

]

) ] J

Tot&I C02e

162,119

93

XO

693

91

,..,

,...,

APPENDIX C - TAP MODELING SUPPORT ······••••••••••································•· ...................................................................................... 0,., ••..................••••.. ' ..... ' ·························••••·•··•·····••·•·········· .....

.....

-

....,

.....

.....

....

.....

A.I North Carolina Modeling Protocol Checklist

The North Carolina Modeling Protocol Checklist may be used in lieu of developing the traditional written modeling plan for North Carolina toxics and criteria pollutant modeling. The protocol checklist is designed to provide the same level of infonnation as requested in a modeling protocol as discussed in Chapter 2 of the Guideline for Evaluating the Air Quality Impacts o/Toxic Pollutants in North Carolina. The modeling protocol checklist is submitted with the modeling analysis.

Although most of the information requested in the modeling protocol checklii-1 is self explanatory, additional comments are provided, where applicable, and are discussed in greater detail in the toxics modeling guidelines referenced above. References to sections, tables, figures, appendices, etc., in the protocol checklist are foW1d in the toxics modeling guidelines.

INSTRUCTIONS: The modeling report supporting the compliance demorn,1ration should include most of the information listed below. As appropriate, answer the following questions or indicate by check mark the information provided or action taken is reflected in your repo11.

FACILITY INFORMATION

Name: Enviva Pellets Northampton, LLC Consultant (if applicable): Trinity Consultants

1 Copley Parkway Facility ID: 6600167 Suite 310

Morrisville, NC 27560

Address: 874 Lebanon Church Rd.

Garysburg, NC 27866

Contact Name: Joe Harrell Contact Name: Jonathan Hill

Phone Number: 252-209-6032 Phone Number: 919-462-9693 Email: joc.harrell@envivabiomass.com Email: jhill@trinityconsultants.com

GENERAL

Description of New Source or Source/ Process Modification: provide a short description of the new or modified source(s) and a brief discussion of how this change affects facility production or process operation. Source / Pollutant Identification: provide a table of the affected pollutants, by source, which identifies the source type (point, area, or volume), maximum pollutant emission rates over the applicable averaging period(s}, and, for point sources, indicate if the stack is canoed or non-vertical (C/N). Pollutant Emission Rate Calculations: indicate how the pollutant emission rates were derived (e.g., AP-42, mass balance, etc.) and where aoolicable, provide the calculations. Site I Facility Diagram: provide a diagram or drawing showing the location of all existing and proposed emission sources, buildings or structures, public right-of-ways, and the facility property (toxics) / fence line (criteria pollutants} boundaries. The diagram should also include a scale, true north indicator, and the UTM or latitude/longitude of at least one point. Certified Plat or Signed Survey: a certified plat (map} from the County Register of Deeds or a signed survey must be submitted to validate orooe11v boundaries modeled. Topographic Map: A topographic map covering approximately 5km around the facility must be submitted. The facility boundaries should be annotated on the map as accurately as oossible. Cavity Impact Analvsis: No cavity analysis is required if using AERMOD. See Section 4.2

Pagt: I February 2014

X

X

X

X

ss

X

NA

,-,

..., Background Concentrations (criteria pollutant analyses only): Background concentrations must be determined for each pollutant for each averaging period evaluated. TI1e averaged background value used (e.g., high, high-second-high, high-third-high, etc.) is based on the pollutant and averaging period evaluated. ll1e background concentrations are added to the modeled concentrations, which are then compared to the applicable air quality standard to determine compliance.

Offsite Source Inventories (criteria pollutant analyses only): Offsite source inventories must be developed and modeled for all pollutants for which onsite sources emissions are modeled in excess of the specific pollutant significant impact levels (SILs) as defined in the PSD New Source Review Workshop Manual. Toe DAQ AQAB must approve the inventories. An initial working inventory can be requested from the AQAB.

SCREEN LEVEL MODELING

Model: The latest version of the AERSCREEN model must be used. TI1e use of other screening models should be aooroved bv NCDAQ prior to submittin~ the modeling report. Source / Source emission parameters: Provide a table listing the sources modeled and the applicable source emission parameters. See NC Fonn 3 - Aooendix A. Merged Sources: Identify merged sources and show all annropriate calculations. See Section 3.3 GEP Analysis: See Section 3.2 and NC Form l - Aooendix A Terrain: Indicate the terrain modeled: simple (Section 4.4), and complex (Section 4.5 and NC Form 4 - Appendix A). If complex terrain is within 5 kilometers of the facility, complex terrain must be evaluated. Simple terrain must include terrain elevations if any ten·ai..11 is greater than the stack base of any source modeled.

Simple: Complex:

Meteorology: Refer to Section 4. l for AERSCREEN inputs. Receptors: AERSCREEN - use shortest distance to property boundary for each source modeled and use sufficient ran~e to find maximum (See Section 4.1 (i) and (i)). Terrain above stack base must be evaluated. Modeling Results: For each affected pollutant, modeling results should be summarized. converted to the applicable averaging period (See Table 3), and presented in tabular fonnat indicating compliance status with the applicable AAL, SIL, or NAAOS. See NC Form S5 -Appendix A. Modeline Files: Either electronic or hard copies of AERSCREEN output must be submitted.

REFINED LEVEL MODELING

Model: The latest version of AERMOD should be used, and may be found at http://www.epa.gov/scramOO I/dispersion _pre free .htm. The use of other refined rnode]s must be approved by NCDAQ prior to submittin~ the modeling reoort. Source / Source emission parameters: Provide a table listing the sources modeled and the applicable source emission parameters. See NC Form 3 - Aooendix A. GEP Analysis: Use BPIP-Prime with AERMOD. Cavity Impact Analysis: No separate cavity analysis is required when using AERMOD as long as receptors are olaced in cavity susceotible areas. See Section 4.2 and 5.2. Terrain: Use digital elevation data from the USGS NED database (http://seamless.usgs.gov/index.pl1p). Use of other sources of terrain elevations or the non-regulatory Flat Terrain option will require prior approval from DAQ AQAB. Coordinate System: Specify the coordinate system used ( e.g., NAD27, NAD83, etc.) to identify the source, building, and receptor locations. Note: Be sure to specify in the AERMAP input file the correct base datum (NADA) to be used for identifying source input data locations. Clearly note in both the protocol checklist and the modeling report which datum was used. Receptors: The receptor grid should be of sufficient size and resolution to identify the maximum pollutant impact. See Section 5.3.

Page2 februaty 20 I 4

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

AER.i\fOD 13350

X

X NA

X

NAD83

X

-,

...., Meteorology: Indicate the AQAB, pre-processed, 5-year data set used in the modeling demonstration: (See Section 5.5 and Appendix B)

AERMOD RWI 2008-2012 If processing your own raw meteorology, then pre-approval from AQAB is requirerl. Additional documentation files (e.g. AERMET stage processing files) will also be necessary. For NC toxics, the modeling demonstration requires only the last year of the standard 5 year data set ( e.g., 2005) provided the maximum impacts are less than 50% of the aoolicableAAUs). Modeling Resul~: For each affected pollutant and averaging period, modeling results should be summarized and presented in tabular format indicating compliance status with the applicable AAL, SIL or NAAQS. See NC Fonn R5 - Appendix A. Modeling Files: Submit input and output files for AER1v10D. Also include BPTP-Prime files, AERMAP files, DEM files, and any AERMET input and output files, including raw meteorological data.

Page3 February 2014

X

X

X

,..,

- NOTES

1. THE SURVEY£0 PRCPE:fHY Ut.UfKATtO HCRtON tS lOCA1tO ON N()ATMAWPT('M cw,rv lAX ASS£SW(NT MAP 01--·09993 A..o IS 20NID U (LICHT INOUSfflto\t. 01Sl'tltc.TJ.

== F'R()NT: 100 l'tET i:(.AR: 1$ Fl:Ef S,1)£, 2$ N:tl

2. TH( SlJRV('rtO PROPERlY CIJR9£Nll Y Sl.VlflS ,., TH( UAM( Of (NYIVA PCU,E'TS, NORn-lAWPtON. U.C AS R(COAl)(O IN ()0l) 800K 961 Al PAG'E 81 ~NO WP BOOK -+2 AJ PAC£ t2!> AMONG THE LANO l?(COROS Of tf()IH'MWPTQl'O COUNlY. NOftTH CAROLINA.

3. NOftTH W:rtll)!AN H"ORU.t.nOt4 AS 'S"'O~ 1-t(R'[(:W fS s .... ~o ON NORTH' t•ACUPIA Sf.Alt t:>Utlt coo,;,){ttU{ SVS:1"[1,J. NOR'Df ZONE NA!) 83 ('' NAAN) /IN() rs 11(0 TO WOATMM'Pl()H ca.,t,,tv. N()RlH CAROL"IIA C£00£TIC CONTROl •£--

4. l"1E ~R\l(Y(I) P~fy AS SHOWM HtREON IS SUBJEC' TO ALL (OVENAHT$ ANO R(Sl'RJCnOHS Of' l!(CORO ANO fHOS( RECOROEO ~n-1. 90'M.tAIII CONSULT!ffG ~. l.rD. WAS PRO\'IOCO A f))'t,Cl~11\f(Nf FOR nru: lttSUftA!~C( Jll:C61&" nocurv N~fiONA\, Tlfl.£ IKSIJRAHC£ C()MPAN1". At.I() SCHEOUU Et - PARl ti •s M)ORESSE'O m n(€ nrLE Ct'.)11,fWln.c(Wt R"Ew=w.

5. 0,(£ s.tJlil:\£lO) ff:OPEll'TY 'SNOWM N(ft(ON tS NOT 1H o\ 100-VfilliR fl.~1.AIN. 1, UCS 1H ZOl'f. '"X" (O(T[R1.11N(Q TO SE: o.2x. AJ/HIJAl o-,.,H,C[' F\O()()PU,IN} .\S SMCIIIW OH f'(MA f\000 IN'SU-ANct RAT( MAP rOR N~THA~PJOH COUNTY. NO'tTH t;AROUN4, COUMUl.if'I-Jl'4tf0.. ~MBER l721<400000 J. CITTCTIVE DATE t'~AAY 4, 2009.

6. THE t..O(:An(W Of .. u. \4Sf$:U:: au .. oi~cs. $1'AUCTVRES AHi) OtHER ·--~WOHS SlnJAl[O .:>N TM£ SUAVEV£0 PftQPCftTV, 14'1«tt HAS SU:!f CAffEf"UlLY CSTABl.fSl-lt';O 8Y TH( Clo\S.SCf"'ICt.1'.C,M ANO SPCC1F'ICATION'S f'Ofl! C'~AST~I.L ~YS .AR( CORRECll V S140Wtl.

7. AU. t:,\'S,tfJ0,1'S ANO ~IGHl!>•Of .. WAY .tr.P'PAR£H1 ~ROu A CAtl-tlUL flHYSICA4. IHSP(CTIQN ~ 1'H[ SURV('t£.O PROPtRT'f. OR AS 10£!111f'l[D If S¢M(0UI.£ 8 - hJtT II C, 1"k( C(,!t,11,111\f(Nl F"'()R: Till£ ARE ~RECfl.Y SHO'fitf UNLCSS OTNE:R'IIIISE ttOlU>.

a. l'MtR'(' ARE 111() \l'ISl8l( [NCttO.\CHM(Nf'S °'' .\0..0NMG PR(WISES. STREUS OR EASEMENTS. av \11$81( 8Vl.0JNCS. S't'RuCn.,;IES OR Ol'MCR IMPR0~4t0HS. NOR \IISIBl.£ ~ACHM(NTS. ON $A.(l HfOP(Rh' 8Y VISIE!U SlRUCltM(.S OR OlMER tllPRO\IE:MtNTS SllUATtO ON At)..,IOeMINC Pfl0,HS£S txCEPT AS SHO'fl'N,

10 •'S Of" M OATt ot TM£ 'SURVEY. lkERE WA:S JIIO 08S(R<vm CYll)(NCE Of CU~RtNf (Allf'H ,10\AHG "°Rt;, 8Ull01NC CONSmucnOH OR St/lt.OINC A001nON$ ON 1M( SUUC1' P11()P(A'TY,

11. AS Of" THC OA JC Of THE SU,.V£Y. MM: WAS NO 08stR\IEO (Vl0£NCE or SITE USE. A.S A S(l(.10 WAS't£ bfJ~P. SU~P OR SA.NIT4R:Y LANOF'IU.,

12. ~TY I.WE I\S SliOW OH Pl.Af •sufh't'\'tO fOA NORTM.A.MPION oou"'rv MIO-•"fl.,.,fllflC 4h'OUS181AI,, PARIC. GASTO,, 1'0Wf&.11P. N()A'1MAW"Pl'o,,1 COONIY. ~fN CAA:OUNA • .AJt.Y ].2, 2004" Wf(PAfl(O 8Y -"'SPt:R £1.,EY LAUO SUfh"EYIN(;. ANO REOOROm IN PO,f SOOK l7 ,., PA(;{ 4? M.IQtl:C '0-1( Vt.NO RECOf.:OS OI ~TI-IAlr.CPTOU COUNl""r. t:()RTM (AROUNA.

TITLE COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B-PART !I REVIEW I "-"l:THClt ctlttcFY l'MA, (I) t HA\'C [XMoltHCO nnL 00CUM(M1S l'o,t tH(. MOP!rt1Y ttE:l\£1N 0£SCR•8EI) F-ROvlOEO BY nca1rv NAf'IOto/Al nn.c flt$JRA1"C£ COUP"AH"' F'Olt Til\£ tn.lM8CA 3&511. CfflCllY! OAIL ArRIL 27, 2012 ., 8.001\M AMO (ti) '1111'M RESPECl TO fl-I(,~._$ IOO,lnrQ IN $Ct<D)l'JI.£ 8-PART 1f \li11H ~ESPCCT 1'0 lltE PROFt:RTY.

1ME fOU.OMHG l'lt:WS (:Ir SCHO)ul.( 8-PMt, II PCRT...,,. TO TH( PA:OPC~TY 8UT ARE' (llH(Q !:i fANOARO nl'\£ CXCEPT1()t1~ OR NOf SuRY('( A(I.ATEO ll[MS: EXC£Pfl°"'1 ITEMS ,. 2 At«> S..

txCEPnoN t: 0Ef(C1S, llDIS.. £.,CUM61tl\HC£$., AD'IO'!SC Cl..o\JMS OR OTNER MATTERS. ,r ANY eR(AflD. M$f NP(A81N(; 1H 1HE PUBUC RCCOROS Oft ATTltCHtl\'G SU6S£0UENT TO THE Cf'f'CCnV( OATE NE«EOf' 8V1 ~00 lo 1Ht: 0,\J[ 1HE PflOPOSEO tHSl.lAEO ACOVll'i'(S. F'Olt YAW( OF' R£CORO TM[ t:$TAlf.: OR l'IJCR'E.Sl ()lit MQR1'GAC£ THO>(ON (Oll(•tt> &v !Ml$ OC..,ON£NI.

€1CCCP1'ION ?: f'\.1£ lt[N OF AU. 1'A)l;(S n:;.R 'fl-f£ VEAA 2012 AHO TMCft~. Wl-tlCH A.RC NOT YU 00( AHO PAY118l(.

, " O:a:P'ftON 3: aull.C)INO, lt£$ffi,Cll()H llNE:S. EASCldOtlS. ANO /4111.Y OJ'HCR MAJfl.AS 'SHOWN ON UAP' Oft Pl.AT t .S ' A(¢0A'O(O Wf IIAP 8001( 14. PAOC ~ wltP SOOK ll. P'4CCS 41 NJO 42; MN' 900k: 4Z, PACE 1.2$ ANO '!J/tJ'

.._ "' 900K 42, PAGC 58. w.e. , •• PG. is •s lltOf lOC•'l'tO k(AA ~ ,f().l,A(:£NT to SUUCT PROP~JY "".8. .)7. PC$, 41 A 42 DOES NiOl COH!Alft ANY Of 1H£ A80Y( WAtftRS M,8, 42. PC.. US SHOw$:

80' T'R_,.SMIS'Sl0N L-« (Astll(Mf - AF'ftCI'$ sue..tCl PROPElnY ANO 1S 5)(0WN HC~CN 100' • ,so- 8Ull.()uiC 'S(f81,C,:SJIIIJ'nRS - .m:crs SU8-.IECt """"8tJY N/11 IS SMO ... NElttO. JO" st~ Ost>l(Nf - ..-.tC~ SllSJECf ""0POIY Al<D IS !>!OWN HD!£0N 20* ORANIIICX U,SO.DT .. N'ttCts surJJJ.:C• PROPCRn AHO I'$ ~ MER£0H SO° f\11\P>t: PUIIUC llOAD - M),:,00,S rua.ccr PA<)POllY AHi) 1$ SHOWN H('!(O,., 20* V'fl,JTY (.AS(WENl .. AO,.IQIMS SU&.£CT ~f'I' Nfl) t$ ~ k(11('0N

11.8. -'2, PG, se IS AH AOJl!.CEJtf ,>~ AHO St-lOW: O~H[A() tl£CfRIC UHt (1"RAHSllll'S$10N POwE't UH() $RON $UIJJ((:'T PROPE:Rn' A<:RO'SS ~JACE)tf PlitOPE'.ftTY - 00($ NOT AF'Ft:Cf SUe.81 ~fl' 8IJIJ11HG 'SI: !SAO< u..:s - OOES •or .m:cr s,,,e~ct PROF(RTY

<:4:t EXC£P"ROlt '-: EASC~Oll(S) AMI) RtCtil(S.)-Of'-WU KM ROAOS OR PU8tlC)'PRlVATE UTIU11CS.

OX::0""CN ~: STAn.JlORY ll(NS or MEtH,l.WICS, L.A80RE.RS ANO MA TERW.MEN THAT HA~ l,)[ftf'O,RU£1) OR: nJRN&tE'O I.A~. ~()F"['S~AL 0£SIGM M SllCh<t'YING SE:ft\llC(S, QR f'V'l'lllf~ VA.ft'RIAlS 00 MNTAL COO!PMl'.Nf OF WHICH NO NO?lQ: APPEARS t:1F R:C'C~O. (t,O'ft: 1M1$ (XCCPT10N 'MU. 8( 0€:lEltO Otl.Y UPON R('C'OPt OF OOQNO,tfo\\'ICN 'SAJJSF•C~Y TO 1'HE t;;.Ol,IPAH'l S4TISf't'IWG THE lri&AT'ER!Al ANO l,i.l)Ollt U£NS ~t(Hf st• oa.,, 1111 $.ONCOlAE 8-l Of fl"'IIS COMWIIM£.Nt)

ora:PTION I: AN't £NCPO,t.Oil,\ENT. (HC0"'8AANC£, VIQl.4.nON. V>.RtA.llON. QR AOVCRS£ ORCU11'SfANCt N'l'tCTitfG 1'H£ 1U'\,C 1HAt \IIOJl.0 8C OfSQ.0$£0 QV AN ACCURA'ft'. AHO OOt,cPt.£1( '-AHO SVRV(Y OF 1'HE LAW.

CXCE:PflCN ~ 01~EPANQ~ VARIANCE'$., St<Oft'fAct:S Oft 0Yf;RAC($ IN TM( ACREAGE '>" n-E'. !,AHO.

rxa:P~ 8: R1CH\'S OR Cl.AIMS (Y flAR'1'€S tN P'OSSESSfON AS 1'U4ANTS U~R O.:ffCCMOEO l£As£$.

txa:PTIOH .. 'ClWBE.R oa::o tN fAl,/()lf( Of C(OitClll P1,,::mc ~PORAUOt,I RE<:OAOEI> ... &oOK ~"- PA(;( .)9~ f40f PROVC>E:'Q 8Y n!\£ WI/PAA.T

,io"', :g; ;."-~~~i.~SltTS:GH~--:1:~ .• 1t};~~:o: :2~1:J~rlN~~:t~«~~·N8¥00K !>70. "" " PAI;£ lS~ 8()()1( :)&2, PAC( 919.

0A 34~ PG. 88 - IJWA&l£ 1'0 OE~ UX::ATIOH W'hf INf(lftWA'tt()H PROV'Ctl) 08, 40t. PC. J.3% • \JlllfA.f).£ l'O O('t(blN€ I.O(':An()N 'tllTH H"CIRWAIIOff PR<MOt'O o.e. 492. •G. '57 - oacs •o• mu.r Sl/ll.£Cf ,-rv 0.8. !2•. PC. 138 • OOE:$. HOT A.Fl'tCf SU8.£C• Pft(IP(Rl'I' 0.8. $?0. P<.. -M>O - 00($ NOf "N:Cf SU$.£Cf PRQl>l:R"n o.e. '62. Pc. ~19 - Jl1 Cl\.'50oll'.Nf lOCAll:ll •.iw.m l'O ~ _,.,t,l>, S,D( OF eo· "'101'()'$(0 00'1>. SNO u.sDaENr rs SHO'Mc n:tOM U:8Nt()N (M)R(M ltOAO IN'fO THC SU8.CCT PROPUU'r au, oats NOT OCAC:1 A ~IISMNAflON PQltcT MO 6 SKCnllt HVi1E'.ON.

CXa:P'ffOH H: [AS[MENT(S) M A1CHt(S.)--Of-w~v IN ht.VOR CJ" CAJtOu~ TEU:PHONC ANO rtu.:QR'APM COl,d>Jt.NY RE'.CORO(O 1N e001< 4Jl. PA« 23. UN"*-.( ro O(fElNiNt t.OCAnON lMlM 1\11"<:)IRM.Uw:IH ~

OCGEPnQN l.2: (AS(M(NT(S) Cit RIQ-l~S)-Of-•AY IN (A\'OR Of $1A.T( MICMW.\Y ~WIS~ A((:ORQE:0 IN 800i< 02. PAC[ 44 . ....a.c ro llE:IEIIW"E 1.0CAnON 1111< "'('l<lu.ltON •100V10ro

(l((:D>J!ON ,3: INTEffflONAU.Y D£U::TU>.

DCEPnON 14: .1H'l'.Nft0NAU.Y 0(1.(TC'O

' " (.x:::£Pn()t,I l5: C0..-0,'-Nl'S. C0ft()(lt0NS, Rl:SlR!ChONS. RES(RVA.Tlo+IS, POSS18UTY ANO/<Yl RJQ<f C, R:t~'l't1t. •ts• AA'O OSCMCHls: CONTAINCD m O(t0 i:::«:CROEO ,M 800-: 96l. PA(:E 61. .., "' 0,8, ~\. PG. a, US1'$:

2/f POl'f:IIJM.. ""8-0(CU,g,£ unurr (d;M(NI Atl'(CIS AOJAW<T PR()P£RTV - 1$ s-o ... Ht•EON Y¥ 11:e(J< (•SOIDlf ,m:crs Sl/8.1!'.Ct PltCl'l:Rl'Y ~ 1$ $HOWM H£0£0N 20· ORU1-.CC (AStME'.Nf #'f'(Ct$ ~c, PROPERn NII> tS ~ ~ON

c~(, :t,;6:~Erz'Ju~w~O::~~·(sf~~P~~ut!_H:Vs ~~01~~:, ~ ;t,=~• roR!W IN 80()t(. '91$1. P,-GC U. 90' HOt-~ &ASE:WEHf OF a1on-OF-w.-..v JO 8[ 'ft'.A,1.rruAto) ANO ()P(Rt vPON COMPUnoN Of' 10(/ ,uauc: ROtf-0,-WAY (AO<;t$$ RO.\O) 1'Q 8E CON"'E\'£0 TO TH£ tfOAl'H CNl'OtlMA 0E:PM1'M€N! ()If 1lhH$PORf~ ll0N. ,\fJU:l~ ~Cll<f -IY MIO I'$ $HOON -

CURRENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM TITLE COMMITMENT F'l:C ~ACT:

All THAT C(RTM.f TRACT Of' LAt•O COHfAIN!NC 120.17 ACRES. MOR( OR LCSS, AHO &(NC A ltOlt1'10N OF fH( W10 00AT\.,\;N'flC ...,C>'JS1RfAL PARK' PROPERTY. H(f) 8[1t</C' LOC,d[O IN GASfQ\I TO~S,OP. Nc::RTHAMPTON COUNTY, NOlftM C:AROl..1NA. •~O 801'G Sovt..'0('0 NOW OR F'~l.lOl(.'f 9Y llfAt\.l~AI. 8~AAtCS: ANO/OR l/JIIO O'MIEO 8Y AN0/0(t IN THE POSS£SSION U P£RS0N$ AS f'OU.OWS,; Of THE SOOTH 8Y !110 RE.PP OOC, U. C .. C.4. THOMA$ ESli\1£ ANO 'ill1lUAU W. ~ANT: ~ 1'1€ w{~l 8Y YrllUAM W. ~RANT, Sl. ll(WS()M( "NO C.R. (\(MCNTS; (lN nof[ ~RTH 8Y J.E. (HCl(ENS, LE:. JOHNSO,l ANO J.f. l'-l#l~CRA'Vt: o,c TM( tASf ev J.•. UA.RGfV.\<E At«J OTHER LANDS~ totlMAUPl"QH: OO)NlY; SAIO J'AACT lVIH¢ APP'ROXJWAT[t,Y 1,600 f'EET '111£~! OF N.C. S1'A1't RO"-') t200 Y.k0'1t'N AS t{8ANOt,) CHUA:CM ftOAD.

SAIO lRACT 8[tN(: ~ PAAn~1,.v SHO'ff!f ON' nc,r.., C{RUJN MAP. n'ft.CO, -N~-A£.$1l:)(~1'tM. SU80t'lll~ON PORTION Of MIO-An..ANTIC INOUSf~JAt.. PNllt"' Pfl'EPAll[O 91' ()fARt.[~ '#I. ll:U9t'l<Jrt, A(Gl$1(.~0 SU~~. OAl'EI) tG t,OVOt9~ 2011, WHICM PLAT RECOROED IN MAP 800K 42 AT PACE t2.S (n< ·pl.Ar .. ._ Pu&uc i:tr(OR()S or tl()RTloWrilP'IO~ COV'ITY. IS 8Y A:Ef"(F:~H(:( tNCCAPORATt:0 H(.£1H A$ PART Of THIS OCSCf::IPTIUI ffH[ "'PRoP(RfY-).

l"OC£TH~ ""'IH • l)(A:P(t\JAJ.. NON•fXCWSl\lt, UTlt.lTV (ASE~T 20 F"[(t 11110TH NQ.\.IOtMC lHL RIQH YO C.ON$TRVCT. ~~TA1tl, tNSP(ct. or(RATE. PROT(CT. i;:£PAIR. RtR.'-CE. CHANGE TH( Sil(~- /1.HD/M ~(MO\'C ununcs. 1t1a.voi,.,c. eur NOt u-.-,TEo ro. WAT£R AHO nco~rc. '111Tl1 ~mG£S. roctn-tEFf 'tl'ITH n-ic f:iG111 O' INGRESS ANO (C'=l'.SS, O\.(R, u,-.OER. n.~ouCH ANO A(ROSS SAJO (AS(M(~T '$11\JATEO 1N CA'SfOI TOWNSHIP, NORn-lAUPTC)k COUM'fY. Nt:ft'TH CAA0.1NA. N,Q 80"'10 MOR'E. f'ART•O.llARl.Y 0£SCR!SEO AS f0..LOWS:

SAIO (AS(MOff 8€1tiC NOR( PA.RTICl.JL,!t,,Rt..Y 0£S0118(0 o\S AS 20-fOOT 'Mi)( unuTY CASEMENT LOCAltO ON TM£ SOUTHERN SOUNOAR'< <:F THC f'UfUA( •pueuc ROAD. SHOWN ANO OE:Ptcnb UPON ni[ PlAT l(.t(c•C f#UJW fH( Vl'£STEIIIN C(1CHl-or-'#AY 80UNDART Of N.C. SU,f£ R<»O 1200. tC8At4()t,I o-iu~ llOAO. to nq; (ASTERN (J()JM)ARy or JkC PRO('[RJ\' HtROM C-ON\€'1'(0 JO P,tr,,Rf'f Of ™t S(t'ONO PAIU,

S:A'II'{' ,'N0 EX(:(1)1. lll~THAMP•ON COUNTY. P~fy Of Tl-c(. l'UtSf ,.a.,:n. fl:[S(R\1:S. •JNTO IJS(Lf, ns SUCU5SORS. AMI) ASS,11'.WS. .A PCl¥'£TUAL, NCtc-[X(l.USJV(, Sl!WER (ASEWENt lO t'tl'..T 1N ~OTH INQ.UOlilC TME ~CHT f() C0NS.1RUCT. MAINbJ1'. 1i.SP(er. oPEAAtt. PRO'l'tCT. R(PAIR. RE:PLA.CE. CHANCE ft-I( S,,?£ ,:,;, AJ(f)/<Sf R(WO\€ Ii Sf.~'(A UH( MC> Al=tl'ull1(NANC£s. TOG(THER lfllfl-l ~OH Ct mG~SS ANO (Glt£S5 OvtR. UNOEk, rtif'toUQi •No ACROSS SAJO EASEMENT. 91'UA1£0 IN ¢4$,f(lN tOWNSf'tlP, «0A1'Ho\MPT()N COUIITY, NORTW C,S:Ol.1NA..,. ANO 9(1H~ UORC PAR~Y KscA18(0 AS FOU.Ows:

$.At) £ASD.1Ctfl SEN; MORE PAA:TlCULAA\.Y D(Stil!8El> AS A JO .. fOOT 5£.cR E~SEMEHl 1.0C:Att0 ON TM( SOtlTk(Rlf 90uNOAftY ON PROP(RTY HERrn C()lll\£Y(O ACCOl:rbfNG to tk( '9v.,. I'S 8Y AO'(tl(NC( INOOA:PORAT(O HEt:ICIN AS PART OF TMtS OCSCRtPnOH.

SAVt AHO O(E.PT ALSO A 20-fOOl 11.tOC QAJJMACE E.A:SENEld -.OC•!CC. MM~ 1'HE BOUNOMICS (:R M JO-F'OOf ~O( SC\IICR CAS£MOU ON THE SOUTHEAW 80UHDMtY ANO "1TMIN n,cc SO-FOOT 'MDC 'M.A.NSUISSION O'.:t RIGHT·Ol"-WIIY ON TH( C•stERN 8¢t.lH0AAY AND MtlCE. (:CWt'tHU!N(; A.I.~ 1'HC 0Vl£~ 900Nt»JiY CX' r11C MIO\~ OE:'SCR'eEO 120,17 ACR:( fflACf 01 THC N()RT.t AMO 'fl(ST 80UIIIO.-A:1£S Of TH( PRoPO::l"Y AU. IN ,tr,,ec.MOANCC 'MTM Tl'fC Pt.Al.

APP'UftT(NA.N, {AS('WEN•:

A ftWPORA~Y ~· fOOf woe NON-OCLl.fSI\€ (AS0,10,1' Cl' ~CH1-0r'-WA.Y lC40IHG Ol:()M 1',-,( 'IIICSftRN R'ICHl-OF-WAV Of Hc-qTM CARQ.tli,\; StATE AO.AO 1200 tl1 J. ~SltR'l.Y OIRCCT10H 10 'fK( US'l'(RH 6ClJkOA.fh 01 TME' .«180Vt'•OCSCR'1eto f(E TRAC,. SAJO [ASE1'1£Nl 8(1f(C MOR£' PAJtTICULARl.Y 'SHO\IIN AftO oa,,cn:o A'S "'J'UTUfl( PU8t.lC IIOAO: A.CCOAOING' TO P\Af (NTIT\.00 '"l(QIC-RESIDE:NUAL SUe()l'-4$1¢N l>()Rn(t,I Of° t,,110-I\TLN1T1C INOUStRIAL ,m:· AOCOftOINC ro -' ¥AP PAtf>ARi'.O BY CHARl.(S ... RUSIHC,.. R(QSlIREO SUAlo<Y~. OATEO 16 H0\.048ER 20n. W-OCH Pt.4f. fl!a)ROEO IN u~ 90()1( 4? Af PA.Cf l2$. Pvt!VC: R(C('flOS <Y NORTHAAIPTCN COUNl't. IS 8Y fl[F'('R(NCE tNOO:Jl'P()QAfE:0 H(~ff AS PARI Qr TMIS OESCRIPDOH.

AS SURVEYED METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION a>MIC:NCIN(i A.1' A "'ATION-'l (:El'O(hC SUflV(V lotlAAKE'R OISK. OESICNA'f'ION .. JOR()AH NO 2 1990" (Pl() A15361), ANO 'OEO 1'0 HA() 8.) (2001) M0Rl2(1Jr(lA.L ~OlNA.l( M1M A k('fl:n.GNC Of 1,004,Je~.19 ANO A EASTI!lG Of 2,409.904,67. SAIO 01$1(. ,s tOCA1EO lJ F'[('f (AS• l"AOM TH£ ctNTERt.lN£ U' I.C'6»10N o«JRCH ROAO. STATE tKIUl£ 1200, 60 FOOT AICHT-Of"-WAY AHO ROOQ-!LY •3 FtEf nt()N fHt EASTERlY LINE Of TH£ t..NtDS Of NO!l1'MA.UPTON COUNTY AS ~EO "'f 0(£0 800K 850 Al PAGE 177 AMONG THE lAA() ~(OACS ~ NQAn-.~ COUNfY. NORTH ~Q..-.A.; T'MENCC DEPARTING SAIO 019< AH() 1.£8'AHOM CHUftCH ~Pb ANO CO!tllNUINC ntROUCH $AIO LNIIJS OF NCRbtAMPTOH COUNTY TH( FOUOWNG COU~S,(:

N ~&'19'41• w J61'2.8l FI'EJ TO Af.l IROH PF£ fOUNCt $A.II) Pl$:t£ 8E1MG mE mur PONl Of' 8£CINNN¢; 7H(NC£ (QNTI"'UN(; WTH SA!O lNtOS OF NORTM.t.MPTI)N COUffh' THE rou.OWINC (•) C~S:

S 20'1f28"' fl !00. ,, rnr to AH IRON PIP( &'OIJNO: Tt€NCE S 19'$i'n• W "50.36 IE£ f TO Nf lf:tQN RQ0 SH: lktt«:t S 20*06'5~- W $68. '17 F'£E• ro Nf l~ON RCO Slf: TH(I'~ S 20'00'00" " 15,).31 (Uf TO A1of t~ PIPE FOUHO

SA10 1)1pt 8t:INC OH tut NCfHHOtLY utif£ (Y THC 1.llN()$ (S 5'10 ~PP ONE, U.C A£ea:aD IH OC(I) 900K tSC AT PAC( S.~I A,i,tONG ft£ 1.-'HO lt(CO'tOS OF trcORTttM,tPTON COUNTY. NORTM C.\ro..lN-.; TMENCE 0EPA1tf~ SAJO l.N,()$ ~ !~1'10,IM>!~ CO,JMlY Aft() CONflNWNG \11\tk '$.AIO LANO$ O' ~10 RD'P ON(, 1.L.¢ JH( f(lUOWNG ~S[:

Ii s~~·o,· W 4'f.4.7'9 F'EU TO AN IROH Pff rOUNO SAIO PIP( B(ING ON TH( NORTHEA$f CORfG CF n< LM(()S. OF <:..A. tHOM~S. ('SfAft ~COROEO IH 0a0 900K f96 Al PAC( S61 AMONG 1'H[ I.ANO RECOROS ts ffOFtfHAMPION (OUH'IY, N~TH e.AROllNA: l'HtNt't l)f.:PAIUW,c; SNO I.ANOS~ $10 REPP OE. u.c lt,HJ ocwnMUIN(i. W;TH SAIO LANO$ Of (.A. THOMAS ES.TATE Jl4E fCt.LOVltN'G C0URSt:

N IJ.$'.):2'2$" W ueo.M rt.Cf 10 AN A)(L,E l'OUNO SAIO Axt[ 9(1NC ON TM( E.\STERL.- UNE Of »-IC liU0S. OF DAVIO M ~AHl' AHO CAROL 8. G:ltAN! A£0Cfitlto IN OEW &oQI( $)4 AT PACE 243-; THENU. OE:PARJNG 'SAi() l.AHO$ (S C.A. fHOt,IA.$ C'$fAr( ANO CQH~G '#Tk SAID lAAOS Of OJll\110 W. alANY AHO CMl'Ot. 8. CAo\NT IH PAA:f, lME LANOS ~ SARAl-t L. t({~M£ R:£0)R0t0 tN 0t£:O 800tC 731. A I PAGE: '12 ~\(()lolC TIE t.ANO fttC:OROS f6 NOR'lNM.CPTON COUtflV. HOIUM C>lh).INA »4) THE LANDS Of \1RQNl4 C. (UM(MNf'S A(C~OEO 1N OEEO 800K 133 Al f>Ar.,( 8$1 AMOI'~ n-E L.t.NO RC~OS Of NM1NAMPT(N OOIJHlY. WORTH CAROUlfA TH( f"Ol,lO\-\'\NG (") «utSES:

N 01v41'J.s .. vr 6~1.1.-s rccr to M" 111~ AP! F"'OI.JtCO.: TH£w~ H IS1)8'46· ( 7J0,S2 F'E[' ro AM I~ fl:00 rouHO; THOK:£ N 14'S4'$.2'" t 160.09 f"C(T TO NI IRON PIP( fOUNO; TM(NCE U ,s-o,-~ .. C 69?.1$ Ft€ f fO »l IRON PIPE rouND

SAIO P1P,: SONG Off M SC,JTH(fk.y LIN( CS f>t(' 4.ANOS Of" T()W,11E A.. 01Ci<£NS A(CO(,ttl) CH DUO 800K 7Gt /t,f PACE 17 o\MOtfG; ltt( l/.NO RECORDS t::F "'~TMAJ.PTOI'( COUUfl'. NORTM C4RQ.IN4; ,1-10<a: OEPARTINC $A10 lAN(>S ()If' \<IAGINtA C. OD,l,£NN1$ AHO (('NTINUlNG: WlM SAJ'D l.NOS Of l'OMWI( Jil. OICJ<CNS THE fQ.A..O'i,\NC (J) COURSES:

$ $4'06'ss· C Jl?.50 ffE r to AH IRON ROD rou,.o; 1'MCUC£ N &3~!."t!Y € f.S4.9C rttT 1"0 AH IRON ROO l'OUNO: l'ME:Nct 'I 5,4"$.]'lJ .. ( 49'7.'1 Fen ,o ~, tRON t=IIP( ~HO

SAio ~PC BEIMC THt SOUTM~~T OlRNE:A (It !'Hf LANOS OF TE.RESA JONHSON l~C AHIO SM(I.IA JQHHS(:iof WOOO RCCORDEO It.I 0(£0 8100K i1g .U PM,£ '466 AM!»tC TM£ i.NIO ll((OA't:)$. Of H(:RTHAUPJON COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA,; 1'M€NC( OCPARTf.lG SAID l...AN0S OI f0,&MI( A. OIO<(NS ANO t;QNTt'-JO'(C -.tH 'SAID LAND'S OF TtRCSA JOKtfSOtl lOHG ANO SH(UA JOHNSQN WOO() 1'14£ F"Ou.01"1\lltC: (:3.) COUf'tSCS:

N .54"35'0-4• £ I 28:.84 IC€f TO AN AXL£ F"OUNO: TI-IOHX N 70"23'"45• £ 99.36 'Uf 1n J. OAK St\,11,!P F"OU"IO: lHC"4C£ N 4l"-f6'!,6• ( 1'1.t..47 HCT TO AH IRON ~QI) fOUNO IN (:(INCA(l(

SAIi) ROO 80NC ON fliE: ...:st(RLY lNE' OF 1'M£ LM'OS Of J.f. HAR(';fl:QVE ANO 'SHIRl.EY fl'. tCAR<lRO'vt: RCCMOE:t> fN 0[£0 900K $79 AT PA.Ge &ll '°'""'°"'C 1'11(. t.AAO RE't1JAOS OF' NOfHWAMPfOfll COUNTY, H()RT'M ~4; nENCE OCPARfl'NC S,.,,O l.",M)'S OI ftJl('SA JOHNSCN LOHC ANO Sli(UA JOl«,t~ W000 4tt0 COfTNlliC WfH SAID '-N«l'S Of J. l. tf~RQR0"¥E A.UO 'SI-IIRL!Y fl'. 11AIKRO\'C fM[ f"O..lOW:tlC (3) COVA:$($:

'S 2n3'01• E 244,94 F'E:Ef TO AN 1RON flOO f'OUNt>, TWICNCE S 18'S7"0J" £ .273.98 l"UT ,o AN IRON R(I() F'OJNO; TH(NC(' S 22'31'~1"' £ Ill.GS ,UT 10 AH tR()N PIP( FOUND

SAID PIPE. 8£.iNC ON ntC ttORTM-.CST CORNE~ or ?Mt Al"ORCSAIO l.ANOS (S' H(,lqTHi\MPt(llc ((XJW'tY~ b(.NC£' 0£PAA:Tit((; SAIO LANDS a J.f. HAR(iR()V( ANO 'SHIIA..£Y P. H.4RG:R(IV( AHO eot,1nNuvitG WITH S,r,J} l.N'fOS ts' NOft~PT~ COUNTY TH£ rOI.LO"MNC (2) COURSES;

S 2U'tl2'B" W 61803 f:l:ET JO ANO ~AON~ l'OUNO: THENCE S 20'0751" W 44&.2'3 f'(€f fO Tt'IE POl:N' Of 8EGIHNlffC. Qef,,ITAINWf(; "1' ARCA O' 120.187 ~ES, MOS!:( 0i:t

l.£SS.

. ..

., <>

e ~· tt>FO IRfO IRSe aJ W<(

tl.tC .. P.0.41. -s

LEGEND -""" -·-QIY WJ!C •osr RM,,RQ,(1$1~

'1.M; PUUrM. ~ttrt1U.Nf

'""' Ul\JTl'-N.-.(U --S1Ql'f,f tlWN ~· _"'(,_ IROllfftilXl(«JND fl:(l,tffa)!lf (:MMI llHIC f(H((

~ -HOO...,_ POIIIU-G ffiAN!IOitl,,rtlt

$lH(ll,IN(

£t« r¥ \11.t.'ftRJOTOI tOCf "PA. tU'nR ff:£(Llf£ -,,.u,;r NCCl-l~IILCOll,R4£?1f /CO<>€T01l SfS!fM C~•AAEAf«lroAlKN

C,,,~ft

l!!P··"'

SURVEYOR'S CER'I'JFJCATION

MACON PRICE ROAD _ ROUTE lZO! (6(1' Pusuc P./w)

-- .. __ r..:..____ ,,_ ' • ...1.L_ /. I------. t - - -----

l..t1t: PASICO. 01~18&) HO«OltF'~W(&Y

T£R(SA JOttt-tSCN 1.1:NC ANO Sl'IWA JQ-IHSC,,0 ~

M: UOJ-~1UI 0.8 8'9, PC. ~ ,.,

VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1-•5000'

IA:< P,Jl;(!l 6l062i£ ,cC«'ORf~)

J 1. N.-.fteft4..-£. A.HD SHIRl.£Y f'. HAR~AYE

NN: <I000-96-6~4 o.e. s,~. r1.. U) 1.9 Ii PC 29

MATCH UNE 'A' - SEE SHEET 2

PlAT SHO~INC Al.lA/ACSM LANO ntU: SURVEY

Of PROPER l'Y OWNED BY

ENVIVA PELLETS NORTHAMPTON, LLC

SCALE, ,. " ,oo·

lOCATEO ON

TAX PARCEL 01-09993 OEEO BOOK 961, PACE 81

NORtHAMPTOtl COVNTY, N()RTl1 CAROI.INA 0Aff: NO\l!:Met(R 2

to t~'llfVA PEU.'U'S N~lH~TON'. u.c. rll)£lllY NA,nONll.l. fl'fl.£ IN'SVRANCE Cf»IPNtY ANO 8AftCU,VS. El,..« Pl.C, If$ SUoa:SSORS N4J/OA AS9CN'S . .t,~ 'n-Ec:R Qrl:~Sts MAY APP('-St: i---+---~f .. SL()0<---11 Bowma

.....

LEGEND

9

m <>

0 t,.

~Pf 0 ,..-o OIS• a; O>tC tU:C .... P.0,f, .....

SIGM WP -­W,Wi( POS! RMJte:IM Slau.t

"'"' ~DC'SfN.. f"RH'tMAMl VII.>( Ul\JTI' 11.WQ.( i,.,s,, lllU s--...i• 4IOHPIP£'Wt'tJ -Al)O­flOtill!ilOStr OfAII UC ro,,a CllNtt(I(

CU:,:lllC HOO•AU PQIN1(SiWMilfG:

'""'"''""' --•-- ~~-re,,

-- --·, j;~~:·;~~i f·- j

W:;4.

1(/IJ'{IP,11;8;.~

1'£tUNC l!llt/Sllll/(

W((>WCC<L £0\l"'(NI ,-,,:.Ol<s,sl!V (~flilt(A~fk)N

(l)OjQl[I(

.. 1[.

'"" 129.f

1•Sf<RJ f'RMI!'. ~~-

29.n•

l

g .. SCALE: 1 • = 100·

E±=R==C ... SION==~I Bowma1

,..,

,...,

Ill

··- _,..., b- -,-, C7 ~

~ 1

--~------------

, .. (~1STUR8£0)

DETAIL 7 SCAl£. 1"=:50*

., ,, I

PLAT SHO;~~ SUR\lf:Y T4/ACSM LANI)

AL o, Sl' 11.C LLETSlYNORTHAMPTON.

ENVIVA PE lOC/\TEO ON 09993 TAX PARCEL OlP-;_GE 81

OEEO BOOK ~~\ORlH CAllOUNANOVEM8£R 27 NORTHAMPTOtl COUN • OA TE.

IRowmar