Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Module ApprovalExplained
04/18/02
Jeffrey [email protected]
2®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Agenda
• Background
• Existing Module Approval Status
• Details of the Requirements
• Proposed Changes
• Single Device Approval
• Industry Consortium
3®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Background• Before the Module Approval process
– ALL intentional radiator implementations need to be individually “type” approved.
– This is a large burden to OEM’s (each instantiation must be individually approved), and also to the regulators that need to process the applications
– Translates directly to a TTM and cost issue
4®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Present Regulations
• The FCC released (6/26/00) Public Notice DA 00-1407, governing Part 15 unlicensed Modular Transmitter approval
• The process has been incorporated in the R&TTE requirements (EU)
• The Japanese MPT are currently reviewing the process
• The FCC regulations have been sent to China, and further discussions are required
5®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Modular Approval
• Full Modular Approval is for compliance with ALL 8 of the requirements
• Limited Modular Approval is available as a sub-set compliance with the “Grantee” retaining control over the final installation of the device (this includes liability)
• The FCC is concerned with Transmitters, not receivers (exception is scanning receivers)
6®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Factors to Consider
• Unit needs to be a complete transmitter– Reference Oscillator “on-board”– Antenna– The only connectors
• power supply• Modulation/data inputs
• Comply with RF Exposure requirements• The Grant holder is responsible for
compliance of the module in its final configuration
7®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
The Requirements
1. Must have its own RF shielding
2. Must have buffered modulation/data inputs (concern is over-modulation and excessive data rates)
3. Must have its own regulator to control output power and sideband splatter
4. Must comply with antenna requirements Section 15.203, 15.204. Either be permanently attached or have a unique connector. Antennas need to approved with the module. Additional antennas can be added with a Class II permissive change.
8®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
The Requirements
5. Must be tested in a “stand-alone” configuration. Non battery operated devices need to meet AC line conducted requirements (Section 15.207)
6. Must be labeled with its own FCC ID, if inside then System need copy of label (Contains FCC ID: xyzmodel1)
7. The device must comply with any specific rules of operating requirements, (transmit timing requirements, etc.). Instructions for compliance need to be submitted.
8. Must comply with applicable RF exposure requirements.
9®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Proposed Radio Architecture
PAPA D/AD/A
*/* M*/* MLOLO
DET.DET.
BasebandBaseband
HardwareHardware
ProtocolProtocol
Software ##Software ##
PlatformPlatform
ComponentsComponents
FFref or ref or FFrefref
Ant ##Ant ## AFE / Up-converter ## Platform
## Grant components## Grant components
10®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Module Approval for Programmable Network Radio
DA 00-1407 Proposed Implementation
1) Fully Shielded Unit No Change
2) Buffered Modulation Inputs Separated from Module
3) On-Board Regulator No Change
4) Comply with Antenna Requirements 15.203,4
No Change
5) Independently Tested No Change
6) Labeling Follow SDR recommendation
7) On-Board Reference Osc. Change * (Future)
8) Comply with Applicable RF Exposure Requirements
No Change
The following list compares the proposed architecture to the current FCC - Modular Approval Process:
11®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Single Device Approval
• Several technologies advancements have occurred allowing radio integration to be adopted for high volume cost wireless applications.
• Vendors are providing modular solutions for the PC platform with differing levels of radio integration.
12®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Single Device ApprovalLTCC Technology(Low Temperature, Co-fired Ceramic) Allows high integration of radio
components by embedding passive devices within substrate.
Generates dramatic cost savings.
Extends low loss behavior to an operating range beyond 40Ghz.
Crystal component is too large for LTCC integration.
XTAL_IN XTAL_OUT
ANTVDD
(multiple)
Vss
UART
USB
Proposal– Change MA to allow Module/device without an integrated crystal to be approved.
– Grant would be for; Module/device, Antenna, and Crystal plus load capacitors.
13®
Inte
l L
abs
Inte
l L
abs
®
Slide No.
*Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners
Industry Consortium• Intel was asked by the FCC to head an Industry
Consortium to disseminate information on building compliant solutions
• The FCC supplied initial contact names with a first group meeting beginning of March.
• The Consortium will have 3 focus areas:– Modification of the Module Approval process for SW Radios– Harmonization of the Module Approval process world wide– Providing industry guidance on building compliant systems
