1 Gravitational Model of the Three Elements Theory : Mathematical Details

1

Gravitational Model of the Three

Elements Theory :

Mathematical Details

2

Acknowledgments

3

Table of content Introduction The gravitational model (reminder) Used mathematical model Lorentz transformation (postulate 1) Postulate 3 Geodesics Black holes Conclusion

4

Introduction (1)

This work The three elements theory (1983 first idea, 1999 first version) The gravitational model of the three elements theory (since 2007)

Last NPA visio-conferences The gravitational model of the three elements theory (July 17th, 2010) The three elements theory (Dec 18th, 2010). A specific measurement of G (March 10th, 2012)

5

Introduction (2)

The aim of this visio-conference

Describing (more in depth) the mathematical basis of this gravitational model.

« Reminding » that the Riemannian (locally euclidean) metric gives another interesting view of relativity.

6

The idea Gravitational mysteries might comes from the fact that relativity could not be coherent enough : Lorentz transform acts like an algebraic postulate in front of GR beautiful principles. The idea is therefore to explain Lorentz transform with the help of GR “space-time deformation by energy” principle. This idea yields a local space-time deformation postulate (postulate 1), and then a global space-time deformation postulate (postulate 3). In between, postulate 2 must be added for coherence (mattter is made of indivisible particles, allways travelling at c speed). Calculations with this global space-time deformation yields a modification of Newton’s law. This modification of Newton’s law is completely compatible with relativity, by construction.

The gravitational model (reminder) (1)

7

A modification of Newton’s law


03

2s

s xmM G xFx² M

sx

02M GM

c²

1s f 1: space time deformation relative contribution co min g from universe matter density

f : space time deformation relative contribution co min g from local matter density

8

Main theoretical result :

G is no longer a constant, but a variable which value is a function of matter distribution.

The role of this distribtution must be taken in account locally, but also globally in the universe.

Linearity of gravitational forces is no longer valid in any cases and must be whatched carefully.


9

Experimental results : Explanation of the mysterious galaxy speed profiles. Explanation of the anomaly in the speed of the galaxies and in the deviation of light beams. Explanation of the Pioneer anomaly to be compared with reference [2],

Explanations for miscellaneous physics mysteries: sideral gravity, Impossibility of an accurate measurement of G

“spurious forces” with asymmetric objects (linearity violation) , non-Newtonian role of surrounding matter (linearity violation and variable G).

“Missing asteroids” in the main belt, Sagnac effect (see reference [1] at the end of this presentation).


105.8 10 / s ²m 10 210 /m s

10

Used Mathematical model (1)

The idea

Using a Riemannian model for understanding relativity:

In place of the pseudo-Riemannian one:

² ² ² ²ds c dt dr

² ² ² ²ds c dt dr

11


Why using this unusual representation ?

Euclidean representation is the used representation, from the beginning of the construction of the three elements theory model :

Postulate 1: Lorentz transform, local space-time

deformation.

Postulate 3: global space-time deformation.

Description and understanding luminous points trajectories.

12


Differentiated version :

This Riemannian metric

with all positives,

must be linked to the usual pseudo-Riemannian one:

with negatives for

1 2 300 11 22 33² ² ² ² ² ²ds h c dt h dx h dx h dx

1 2 300 11 22 33² ² ² ² ² ²ds g c dt g dx g dx g dx

h

g 1

13


Link between classical Minkowskian pseudo-Riemannian metric and used Riemannian metric:

which leads to this equation:1 2 3

00 11 22 33' ² 1/ ² ² 1/ ² 1/ ² 1/ ²ds g c dt g dx g dx g dx

1ii

ii

hg

0i

0000

1h

g,

Extracted from F. Lassiaille, "Gravitational Model of the Three Elements Theory: Mathematical Explanations," Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 4 No. 7, 2013, pp. 1027-1035. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2013.47138.

14

Lorentz transform (1) Postulate 1 figure

Extracted from F. Lassiaille, "Gravitational Model of the Three Elements Theory," Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 3 No. 5, 2012, pp. 388-397. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2012.35054.

Does it implies ....

1'

1 ² / ²

1'

²1 ² / ²

x x vtv c

vxt t

cv c

15

Lorentz transform (2) YES. The rule is applying postulate 1 figurein the normal map of the Riemannian metric:


²

r

r

x x vt

vxt t

c

1'

1 ² / ²

1'

²1 ² / ²

x x vtv c

vxt t

cv c

and then apply the base transformationin the laboratory frame:

16

Postulate 3 (slide 1) Postulate 3 figure

dx

relativisticcoefficientds


17

Postulate 3 (slide 2)

This equation comes from the parallel transport of time vectors in this Riemannian representation of space-time:


time lenghts ratio space lenghts ratiorelativisticcoefficient

dxds

YES

18

Geodesics (1)

2x x x

²

Is the following geodesics principle still valid in the context of this Riemannian metric ?


?

19

Geodesics (2)

2x x x

²

YES the « following geodesics » principle is still valid in the Schwarzschild metric for this Riemannian version:

as a first order approximation for the law deformations

in the reference frame attached to the attracting object.


20

Geodesics (3)

**: F. Lassiaille, "Gravitational Model of the Three Elements Theory: Mathematical Explanations," Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 4 No. 7, 2013, pp. 1027-1035. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2013.47138.

2x x x

²

2 02 00

00 0

2 1 2 1001 1

²

² 2

² ²'

² 2 ² 2 ²

gx cg

x

gx xc McNewton s law

x x

2 02 00

00 0

42 1 2 14 00

00 1 1 1 1

²

² 2

² ² ²1

² 2 ² 2 ² 2 ²

'

gx cg

x

gx xc Mc M Mcg

x x x x

Approximation of Newton s law

In Minkowskian pseudo-Riemannian metric yields:

And in this Riemannian metric it yields:

21

Geodesics (4) BUT this « following geodesics » principle is fundamentally only

valid in the Minkowskian metric. This proeminent role of the Minkowskian metric is explained by

a rule which comes from the three elements theory model: The maximisation of mass energy, therefore the minimisation of motion energy, is the rule when determining free falling particle trajectories:

is maximised because

is maximised and is minimized.


00 11² ² ²ds g c dt g dx

00cd g cdt

11g dx

22

There are no black holes (as predicted by the model).

2

2

11 2² ² ² ²

1 21

MMrrds c dt drMMrr

Schwarzschild Minkowskian metric in the Gravitational model of the three elements theory:

Black holes (1)

02

²

M GM

c

23

Black holes (2) This time coefficient cannot be equal to 0 but only tend to 0 when

speed tend to c:


00 2

1 2

1

Mrg

Mr

00 2 0 for 0r

g rM

And therefore the Swarzschild ray is equal to 0

020

²

M GSchwarzschild ray M

c

24

Black holes (3) Remark


00 2

1 21

1

MMrg for r MrM

r

25

Conclusion

26

CONCLUSION (1)

This Riemannian metric allows to explain the gravitational model of the three elements theory in a coherent manner.

Applying postulate 1 in the Riemannian metric normal map allows to retrieve Lorentz transform.

This describe the local space-time deformations. Applying postulate 3 in this Riemannian metric using the parallel

transport of time vectors allows to calculate the relativistic coefficient. This describe the global space-time deformations. It will yield the modification of Newton’s law.

Geodesics The « following geodesics » principle is still valid in the Riemannian

metric in the case of the law deformations and in the referential frame which is attached to the attracting object.

The Physical explanation of this principle is explained in a straightforward manner.

This Riemannian metric allows to understand relativity in a more human sensitive manner.

27

CONCLUSION (2)

Next to come

This “In depth” understanding of the Riemannian metric validates once more the gravitational model of the three elements theory.

Help!

?

28

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

NPA and WorldSci organisations

Journal of Modern Physics from which some material where used in this presentation (*, **).


*: F. Lassiaille, "Gravitational Model of the Three Elements Theory," Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 3 No. 5, 2012, pp. 388-397. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2012.35054.

29

QUESTIONS

30

APPENDIX 1

4 dtan(α)F = mc²cos (α)tan(α)

dx

3/ 2

d tan( ) tan( ) ²

dx (1 tan²( ))F mc

-4 dtan(α)F = mc²cos (α)tan(α)

dx

03

2

2

ss xmM G xF

x² Rs

x

Version Equation Equation with the slope angle

Minkowski (correct one)

Old one”mystmass.doc”

Riemannian time-line geodesic

Not interesting

03/2

2 2

22

=² 8 8 2

+

R dss s x

x dxmM GF

x R R Rs s s s

x x x

0

2

M G MR

c²


31

APPENDIX 2

0 2 121 3

M G² x R R

² x² x x

0 2 191 3

M G² x R R

² x² x x

0 2 201 3

M G² x R R

² x² x x

Version Limited development

Minkowski (correct one)

Old version”mystmass.doc”

Riemannian time-line geodesic

0

2

M G MR

c²


32

APPENDIX 3


1 2

1 21 2

2( , )

L Loper L L

L L

33

APPENDIX 4


34

APPENDIX 5


4

28 p

pp

cG

e

x

35

APPENDIX 6

1

2 2 21 ² 1b b

M Mds c dt dx

x x

1'2 2 21 ² 1b b

M Mds c dt dx

x x


36

APPENDIX 7


37

REFERENCES

[ 1 ] R. Wang, Y.Zheng, A.Yao, D.Langley, “Modified Sagnac experiment for measuring travel-time difference between counter-propagating light beams in a uniformly moving fiber”, Physics Letters A 312 (2003) 7-10. DOI:10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00575-9

[ 2 ] R. Francisco, F.; Bertolami, O.; Gil, P. J. S.; Páramos, J., “Modelling the reflective thermal contribution to the acceleration of the Pioneer spacecraft”, Physics Letters B, Volume 711, Issue 5, p. 337-346.

Documents

1 Gravitational Model of the Three Elements Theory : Mathematical Details