1 GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand 2012-019.pdf · 1 GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand 2 NIWA, ... APE : E: GMONT : C: ENTRAL, C: APE

© Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, 2013

ISSN 1177-2425 ISBN 978-1-972192-01-6

1 GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand 2 NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington 6241, New Zealand 3 University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand 4 University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand 5 Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE

Litchfield, N. J.1; Van Dissen, R.1; Sutherland, R.1; Barnes, P. M.2; Cox, S. C.1; Norris, R.3; Beavan, R.J.1; Langridge, R.1; Villamor, P.1; Berryman, K.1; Stirling, M.1; Nicol, A.1; Nodder, S.2; Lamarche, G.2; Barrell, D. J. A.1; Pettinga, J. R.4; Little, T.5; Pondard, N.1; Mountjoy, J.2; Clark, K1. 2013. A model of active faulting in New Zealand: fault zone parameter descriptions, GNS Science Report 2012/19. 120 p.

GNS Science Report 2012/19 i

CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... IX

KEYWORDS ........................................................................................................................ IX

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1

2.0 ACTIVE FAULT ZONE AND PARAMETER DEFINITIONS ...................................... 25

2.1 DEFINITION OF AN ACTIVE FAULT ZONE .............................................................25 2.1.1 Definition of active ........................................................................................... 25 2.1.2 Definition of an active fault zone ..................................................................... 25

2.2 PARAMETER DEFINITIONS ................................................................................25 2.2.1 Dip ................................................................................................................... 25 2.2.2 Dip direction ..................................................................................................... 26 2.2.3 Sense of movement ........................................................................................ 26 2.2.4 Rake ................................................................................................................ 26 2.2.5 Slip rate ........................................................................................................... 26 2.2.6 Quality code ..................................................................................................... 26

2.3 PARAMETER UNCERTAINTIES ...........................................................................27

3.0 PARAMETER DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................ 29

WAIROA NORTH (1)..................................................................................................... 29 KEREPEHI NORTH, KEREPEHI CENTRAL, KEREPEHI SOUTH (2-4) ................................... 29 ALDERMAN EAST 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ALDERMAN WEST 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ASTROLABE 1,2,

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, MATATARA 1, 2, 3, 4, MAUNGATI EAST 1, MAUNGATI WEST 1, 2, 3, NGATORO SOUTH 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, OHENA 1, 2, 3, 4, OTARA EAST 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, OTARA WEST 1, 2, 3, TE ARAWA 1, 2, 3, TUHUA NORTH 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, TUHUA SOUTH 1, 2, 3, TAURANGA TROUGH WEST 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, TAURANGA TROUGH EAST 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, TUAKANA 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, TUATORU 1, 2, 3, TUMOKEMOKE 1, 2, 3, VOLKNER 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, WAIRAKA 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, WHITE ISLAND NORTH 1, 2, WHAKAARI 1, 2, 3, 4 (5-109) ............ 29

CALYPSO 2, 3, DOMINO 2, OKUREI 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, MAKETU 1, 2, 3, MOTUHORA SOUTH 1, MOUTOKI 1, 2, NUKUHOU 1, OHIWA 1, OHIWA NORTH 1, PIRIPAI 1, POKARE 1, 2, PUKEHOKO NORTH 1, PUKEHOKO SOUTH 1, RANGITAIKI 1, 2, TARAWERA 1, 3, 4, 5 TAURANGA 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, THORNTON 1, 2, TOKATA 1, WHITE ISLAND 1, 2, 3 (110-150) ...................................................................... 30

MATATA (151) ............................................................................................................ 30 BRAEMAR (152) .......................................................................................................... 30 OTAKIRI (153) ............................................................................................................ 30 EDGECUMBE COASTAL (154) ....................................................................................... 31 EDGECUMBE 1987 (155) ............................................................................................. 31 ROTOITIPAKAU (156) .................................................................................................. 31 HOROHORO (157) ....................................................................................................... 31 NGAKURU SOUTHWEST (158) ...................................................................................... 31 NGAKURU NEW (159).................................................................................................. 32 MALEME (160) ............................................................................................................ 32 MANGATETE (161) ...................................................................................................... 32 WHIRINAKI WEST (162) ............................................................................................... 32 WHIRINAKI EAST (163) ................................................................................................ 32 HOSSACK ROAD (164) ................................................................................................ 33 TE WETA (165) ........................................................................................................... 33

ii GNS Science Report 2012/19

PAEROA (166) ............................................................................................................ 33 NGAPOURI (167) ......................................................................................................... 33 TUAHU (168) .............................................................................................................. 33 LAKE OHAKURI (169) .................................................................................................. 34 WEST WHANGAMATA (170) ......................................................................................... 34 PUKETERATA (171) ..................................................................................................... 34 WHANGAMATA (172) ................................................................................................... 34 ORAKEIKORAKO (173) ................................................................................................. 34 ORAKONUI (174)......................................................................................................... 35 NGANGIHO (175) ........................................................................................................ 35 WHAKAIPO (176) ........................................................................................................ 35 KAIAPO (177) ............................................................................................................. 35 ARATIATIA (178) ......................................................................................................... 35 KAINGAROA (179) ....................................................................................................... 36 WAIHI WEST (180) ...................................................................................................... 36 WAIHI SOUTH (181) .................................................................................................... 36 WAIHI EAST (182) ....................................................................................................... 36 POUTU (183) .............................................................................................................. 36 TREETRUNK (184) ...................................................................................................... 37 WAHIANOA (185) ........................................................................................................ 37 RANGIPO NORTH, RANGIPO CENTRAL, RANGIPO SOUTH (186-188) ............................... 37 NATIONAL PARK (189) ................................................................................................ 37 RAURIMU (190) .......................................................................................................... 37 OHAKUNE (191) .......................................................................................................... 38 RAETIHI (192) ............................................................................................................. 38 WAIPUNA (193) .......................................................................................................... 38 ORUAKUKURU (194) ................................................................................................... 38 KARIOI (195) .............................................................................................................. 38 SHAWCROFT ROAD (196) ............................................................................................ 39 SNOWGRASS (197) ..................................................................................................... 39 KAWEKA (198) ............................................................................................................ 39 MATAROA, TAIHAPE, RANGITIKEI (199-201) ................................................................. 39 TURI NORTH, TURI CENTRAL, TURI SOUTH (202-204) ................................................... 39 CAPE EGMONT NORTH, CAPE EGMONT CENTRAL, CAPE EGMONT SOUTH (205-207) ...... 40 OAONUI (208)............................................................................................................. 40 INGLEWOOD (209) ...................................................................................................... 40 NORFOLK (210) .......................................................................................................... 40 ARARATA (211) .......................................................................................................... 40 WAVERLEY - OKAIA 1 (212) ......................................................................................... 41 MOUMAHAKI - OKAIA 4 (213) ....................................................................................... 41 RIDGE ROAD - OKAIA 2 (214) ...................................................................................... 41 WAITOTARA 10 & 11 (215) .......................................................................................... 41 NUKUMURU - WAITOTARA 1-6 (216) ............................................................................. 41 OKAIA 5 (217) ............................................................................................................ 42 OKAIA 3 (218) ............................................................................................................ 42 WAITOTARA 8 & 9 (219) .............................................................................................. 42 HARIKI (220) .............................................................................................................. 42 OHAE 1, 2 (221-222) .................................................................................................. 42 OHAE 3 (223) ............................................................................................................. 43 OPAPE 1 (224) ........................................................................................................... 43 OPOTIKI 2, 3 (225-226) ............................................................................................... 43 TIROHANGA 1 (227) .................................................................................................... 43 UREWERA 3 (228) ...................................................................................................... 43 UREWERA 2 (229) ...................................................................................................... 44 UREWERA 1 (230) ...................................................................................................... 44 RAUKUMARA 9 (231) ................................................................................................... 44

GNS Science Report 2012/19 iii

WAIRATA (232) ........................................................................................................... 44 WAIKAREMOANA (233) ................................................................................................ 44 WAIMANA – WAIKAREMOANA (234) .............................................................................. 45 WAIMANA NORTH (235)............................................................................................... 45 WAIMANA SOUTH (236) ............................................................................................... 45 AWAKERI (237) ........................................................................................................... 45 WAIOHAU NORTH (238)............................................................................................... 45 WAIOHAU SOUTH (239) ............................................................................................... 46 WHAKATANE NORTH (240) .......................................................................................... 46 WHAKATANE SOUTH (241) .......................................................................................... 46 WHEAO NORTH, WHEAO SOUTH (242-243) .................................................................. 46 TE WHAITI (244) ......................................................................................................... 46 PATOKA – RANGIORA (245) ......................................................................................... 46 MOHAKA NORTH, MOHAKA SOUTH (246-247) ............................................................... 47 RUAHINE NORTH (248) ............................................................................................... 47 RUAHINE CENTRAL, RUAHINE SOUTH (249-250) ........................................................... 47 MASCARIN 1, 2 (251-252) ........................................................................................... 47 FISHERMAN 1 (253) .................................................................................................... 47 FISHERMAN 2 (254) .................................................................................................... 48 FISHERMAN 3 (255) .................................................................................................... 48 OKUPE 1 (256) ........................................................................................................... 48 OKUPE 2 (257) ........................................................................................................... 48 ONEPOTO 1 (258) ....................................................................................................... 48 ONEPOTO 2 (259) ....................................................................................................... 49 RANGITIKEI OFFSHORE 1 (260).................................................................................... 49 RANGITIKEI OFFSHORE 2 (261).................................................................................... 49 MANA - OTAHEKE 1 (262) ............................................................................................ 49 MANA - OTAHEKE 2 (263) ............................................................................................ 49 MANA - OTAHEKE 3 (264) ............................................................................................ 50 MARTON ANTICLINE (265) ........................................................................................... 50 GALPIN (266) ............................................................................................................. 50 LEEDSTOWN (267) ...................................................................................................... 50 MT STEWART (268) .................................................................................................... 50 FEILDING ANTICLINE (269) .......................................................................................... 51 POHANGINA ANTICLINE (270) ...................................................................................... 51 RUAHINE REVERSE (271) ............................................................................................ 51 SHANNON ANTICLINE (272) ......................................................................................... 51 LEVIN ANTICLINE (273) ............................................................................................... 51 HIMATANGI ANTICLINE (274) ........................................................................................ 52 POROUTAWHAO (275) ................................................................................................. 52 PUKERUA - SHEPHERDS GULLY 1, 2, 3 (276-278) ......................................................... 52 OHARIU SOUTH 1, 2 (279-280) .................................................................................... 52 OHARIU SOUTH 3, OHARIU CENTRAL (281-282) ........................................................... 52 NORTHERN OHARIU (283) ........................................................................................... 53 MOONSHINE (284) ...................................................................................................... 53 AKATARAWA (285) ...................................................................................................... 53 OTAKI FORKS 1, 2 (286-287) ....................................................................................... 53 WELLINGTON HUTT VALLEY 1, 2 (288-289) .................................................................. 53 WELLINGTON HUTT VALLEY 3, 4 (290-291) .................................................................. 53 WELLINGTON HUTT VALLEY 5 (292) ............................................................................. 54 WELLINGTON TARARUA 1, 2, 3 (293-295) .................................................................... 54 WELLINGTON PAHIATUA (296) ..................................................................................... 54 WOODVILLE (297) ....................................................................................................... 54 PAHIATUA (298) .......................................................................................................... 54 MAUNGA (299) ........................................................................................................... 55 RUATANIWHA (300) ..................................................................................................... 55

iv GNS Science Report 2012/19

ORUAWHARO (301)..................................................................................................... 55 WHITEMANS VALLEY (302) .......................................................................................... 55 WAIRARAPA 1 (303) .................................................................................................... 55 WAIRARAPA 2 (304) .................................................................................................... 56 WAIRARAPA 3 (305) .................................................................................................... 56 ALFREDTON - MAKURI 1 (306) ..................................................................................... 56 ALFREDTON - MAKURI 2 (307) ..................................................................................... 56 ALFREDTON - MAKURI 3 (308) ..................................................................................... 56 WHAREKAUHAU 1, 2, 3 (309-311) ................................................................................ 57 BIDWILL (312) ............................................................................................................ 57 MARTINBOROUGH (313) .............................................................................................. 57 OTARAIA (314) ........................................................................................................... 57 DRY RIVER - HUANGARUA 1 (315) ............................................................................... 57 DRY RIVER - HUANGARUA 2, 3 (316-317)..................................................................... 58 NGAPOTIKI (318) ........................................................................................................ 58 KAUMINGI (319) .......................................................................................................... 58 CARTERTON (320) ...................................................................................................... 58 MASTERTON (321) ...................................................................................................... 58 MOKONUI SOUTHWEST, MOKONUI NORTHEAST (322-323) ............................................ 59 WAITAWHITI (324) ...................................................................................................... 59 PONGAROA – WEBER (325) ......................................................................................... 59 SAUNDERS ROAD – WAIPUKAKA (326) ......................................................................... 59 WAIPUKURAU – POUKAWA (327).................................................................................. 59 NAPIER 1931 (328) ..................................................................................................... 60 TUKITUKI THRUST (329) .............................................................................................. 60 RAUKUMARA 1, 2, 3 (330-332) .................................................................................... 60 REPONGAERE (333) .................................................................................................... 60 OTOKO - TOTOTANGI, RAUKUMARA 6 (334-335) ........................................................... 60 PAKARAE (336) .......................................................................................................... 61 MARAU BEACH (337) .................................................................................................. 61 RAUKUMARA 27, 30 (338-339) .................................................................................... 61 RAUKUMARA 29 (340) ................................................................................................. 61 FERNSIDE (341) ......................................................................................................... 61 RAUKUMARA 31, 32 (342-343) .................................................................................... 61 RAUKUMARA 16, 17, 18 (344-346) .............................................................................. 62 MOTU RIVER (347) ..................................................................................................... 62 RAUKUMARA 20 (348) ................................................................................................. 62 RAUKUMARA 21 (349) ................................................................................................. 62 RAUKUMARA 25 (350) ................................................................................................. 62 KEREU (351) .............................................................................................................. 62 RAUKUMARA 24, 26 (352-353) .................................................................................... 63 EAST CAPE (354) ....................................................................................................... 63 HOUTUNUI (355) ......................................................................................................... 63 RUATORIA SOUTH 1, 2 (356-357) ................................................................................ 63 ARIEL BANK, ARIEL EAST, ARIEL NORTH, GABLE END, POVERTY BAY (358-362) ............ 63 PARITU RIDGE, PARITU WEST, TUAHENI RIDGE (363-365) ............................................ 63 LACHLAN 1 & 2, 3 (366-367) ....................................................................................... 64 MAHIA 2 (368) ............................................................................................................ 64 HAWKE BAY 1, 2, 4, 5 & 11, 6 & 12, 7, 8 (369-375) ...................................................... 64 KAIRAKAU 2, KAIRAKAU NORTH, KAIRAKAU SOUTH, KIDNAPPERS RIDGE,

MOTUOKURA NORTH, MOTUOKURA RIDGE, WAIMARAMA 1 & 2, WAIMARAMA 3 & 4 (376-382, 389) ...................................................................................... 64

GNS Science Report 2012/19 v

MADDEN, MOTUOKURA EAST, OMAKERE RIDGE, OMAKERE SOUTH, PAOANUI RIDGE NORTH, PAOANUI RIDGE SOUTH, PORANGAHAU RIDGE, PORANGAHAU WEST 1, PORANGAHAU WEST 2, RITCHIE RIDGE, RITCHIE WEST 1, RITCHIE WEST 2, URUTI EAST, URUTI RIDGE 2, URUTI BASIN, URUTI NORTH, WHAREAMA BANK (383-388, 390-400) ............................................................................... 64

MATAIKONA (401) ....................................................................................................... 65 RIVERSDALE (402) ...................................................................................................... 65 PALLISER – KAIWHATA (403) ....................................................................................... 65 HONEYCOMBE, OPOUAWE - URUTI, PAHAUA (404-406) ................................................. 65 BOO BOO (407) .......................................................................................................... 65 WAIRARAPA - NEEDLES 2 (408) ................................................................................... 65 WAIRARAPA - NEEDLES 1 (409) ................................................................................... 66 VERNON 1, 2, 3, 4 (410-413) ....................................................................................... 66 CLOUDY 1, 2, 3 (414-416) ........................................................................................... 66 WAIRAU 2, 3 (417-418) ............................................................................................... 66 WAIRAU 1 (419).......................................................................................................... 66 NEEDLES (420) .......................................................................................................... 67 CAMPBELL BANK 1, 2 (421-422) .................................................................................. 67 CHANCET (423) .......................................................................................................... 67 KEKERENGU 1, 2 (424-425) ........................................................................................ 67 TE RAPA 1, 2 (426-427) .............................................................................................. 67 HOPE OFFSHORE 1, 2 (428-429) ................................................................................. 68 KAIKOURA (430) ......................................................................................................... 68 UPPER SLOPE (431) ................................................................................................... 68 KEKERENGU BANK (432) ............................................................................................. 68 MARLBOROUGH SLOPE 1, 2, 4, 9 (433-436) ................................................................. 68 NORTH MERNOO B0, B1, B2, E1, E2, F1, F2, K1, K2, M, 18 & 19, 46 & 47 (437-

448) ............................................................................................................... 68 HUNDALEE (449) ........................................................................................................ 69 NORTH CANTERBURY SHELF 1, 2, 4, 8 TO 10, 10, 11, 13 (450-456) .............................. 69 PEGASUS (457) .......................................................................................................... 69 PAPAROA RANGEFRONT (458) ..................................................................................... 69 BRUNNER ANTICLINE (459) ......................................................................................... 69 MAIMAI (460) .............................................................................................................. 70 INANGAHUA (461) ....................................................................................................... 70 LYELL (462) ............................................................................................................... 70 WHITE CREEK (463) ................................................................................................... 70 WAIMEA NORTH, WAIMEA SOUTH (464-465) ................................................................ 70 WAIRAU A (466) ......................................................................................................... 71 AWATERE NORTHEAST 2 (467) .................................................................................... 71 AWATERE NORTHEAST 1 (468) .................................................................................... 71 AWATERE SOUTHWEST (469) ...................................................................................... 71 FOWLERS (470) .......................................................................................................... 71 BAREFELL (471) ......................................................................................................... 72 CLARENCE NORTHEAST (472) ..................................................................................... 72 CLARENCE CENTRAL (473) ......................................................................................... 72 CLARENCE SOUTHWEST (474) ..................................................................................... 72 FIDGET (475) ............................................................................................................. 72 JORDAN (476) ............................................................................................................ 73 HOPE CONWAY (477).................................................................................................. 73 HANMER (478) ........................................................................................................... 73 HOPE 1888 (479) ....................................................................................................... 73 HOPE CENTRAL WEST (480) ....................................................................................... 73 HOPE TARAMAKAU (481) ............................................................................................. 74 KAKAPO (482) ............................................................................................................ 74 KELLY (483) ............................................................................................................... 74

vi GNS Science Report 2012/19

POULTER (484) .......................................................................................................... 74 ESK (485) .................................................................................................................. 74 WAITOHI DOWNS (486) ............................................................................................... 75 LOWRY (487) ............................................................................................................. 75 KAIWARA SOUTH (488) ............................................................................................... 75 KAIWARA NORTH (489) ............................................................................................... 75 OMIHI (490) ................................................................................................................ 75 PORTERS PASS – GREY (491) ..................................................................................... 75 SPRINGFIELD (492) ..................................................................................................... 76 ASHLEY (493) ............................................................................................................. 76 CUST (494) ................................................................................................................ 76 SPRINGBANK (495) ..................................................................................................... 76 HORORATA (496) ........................................................................................................ 76 TORLESSE (497) ......................................................................................................... 76 CHEESEMAN (498) ...................................................................................................... 76 AVOCA (499) .............................................................................................................. 77 BROWNING PASS (500) ............................................................................................... 77 MUNGO (501) ............................................................................................................. 77 BRUCE (502) .............................................................................................................. 77 MISTAKE – ROLLESTON (503) ...................................................................................... 77 SHINGLY (504) ........................................................................................................... 77 NORTH BRANCH (505) ................................................................................................ 78 JAGGED (506) ............................................................................................................ 78 OBSERVATION (507) ................................................................................................... 78 MATHIAS (508) ........................................................................................................... 78 LORD RANGE (509)..................................................................................................... 78 WAITAHA (510) ........................................................................................................... 78 JOLLIE RANGE (511) ................................................................................................... 78 POTTS RIVER (512) .................................................................................................... 79 POTTS RANGE (513) ................................................................................................... 79 TWO THUMB STREAM (514) ......................................................................................... 79 VEIL STREAM (515) .................................................................................................... 79 MOUNT ADAMS (516) .................................................................................................. 79 GUNN GLACIER (517) ................................................................................................. 79 MOUNT ROON (518) ................................................................................................... 79 STRAIGHT CREEK (519) .............................................................................................. 80 MURCHISON (520) ...................................................................................................... 80 LIEBIG NORTH (521) ................................................................................................... 80 MACAULAY 2 (522) ..................................................................................................... 80 LILYBANK (523) .......................................................................................................... 80 BLACK BLOB – HAAST RIDGE (524) .............................................................................. 80 GREAT GROOVE (525) ................................................................................................ 80 DOUGLAS DUPLEX (526) ............................................................................................. 81 KARANGARUA (527) .................................................................................................... 81 LANDSBOROUGH 2 (528) ............................................................................................. 81 HUXLEY (529) ............................................................................................................ 81 AHURIRI (530) ............................................................................................................ 81 DOBSON (531) ........................................................................................................... 81 DINGLE (532) ............................................................................................................. 82 HUNTER (533) ............................................................................................................ 82 MAKARORA (534) ....................................................................................................... 82 LAKE HERON (535) ..................................................................................................... 82 HUTT PEEL (536) ........................................................................................................ 82 HEWSON (537) ........................................................................................................... 82 FOREST CREEK (538) ................................................................................................. 83 IRISHMAN CREEK (539) ............................................................................................... 83

GNS Science Report 2012/19 vii

FOX PEAK (540) ......................................................................................................... 83 BROTHERS (541) ........................................................................................................ 83 ALBURY (542) ............................................................................................................ 83 HUNTERS HILLS (543) ................................................................................................. 83 OPAWA (544) ............................................................................................................. 84 DALGETY (545) .......................................................................................................... 84 OSTLER (546) ............................................................................................................ 84 KIRKLISTON (547) ....................................................................................................... 84 DRYBURGH NORTHWEST (548) .................................................................................... 84 AWAHOKOMO (549) .................................................................................................... 84 WAITANGI (550) .......................................................................................................... 85 FERN GULLY (551) ..................................................................................................... 85 OTEMATATA (552) ...................................................................................................... 85 AHURIRI RIVER (553) .................................................................................................. 85 LINDIS PASS (554) ...................................................................................................... 85 BLUE LAKE (555) ........................................................................................................ 85 CARDRONA NORTH, CARDRONA SOUTH (556-557) ....................................................... 86 GRANDVIEW (558) ...................................................................................................... 86 PISA (559) ................................................................................................................. 86 DUNSTAN (560) .......................................................................................................... 86 RAGGEDY (561).......................................................................................................... 86 GIMMERBURN (562) .................................................................................................... 87 LONG VALLEY (563) .................................................................................................... 87 RANFURLY (564) ........................................................................................................ 87 WAIPIATA (565) .......................................................................................................... 87 HYDE (566) ................................................................................................................ 87 TAIERI RIDGE (567) .................................................................................................... 88 BILLYS RIDGE (568) .................................................................................................... 88 AKATORE (569) .......................................................................................................... 88 SETTLEMENT (570) ..................................................................................................... 88 BLUE MOUNTAINS (571) .............................................................................................. 88 SPYLAW (572) ............................................................................................................ 88 OLD MAN (573) .......................................................................................................... 89 NEVIS (574) ............................................................................................................... 89 HOKONUI (575) .......................................................................................................... 89 TAKITIMU 1, 2 (576-577) ............................................................................................. 89 MOONLIGHT NORTH, MOONLIGHT SOUTH (578-579) ..................................................... 89 MONOWAI (580) ......................................................................................................... 90 HAUROKO NORTH (581) .............................................................................................. 90 HAUROKO SOUTH (582) .............................................................................................. 90 SOLANDER (583) ........................................................................................................ 90 HUMP RIDGE (584) ..................................................................................................... 91 TAURU (585) .............................................................................................................. 91 LIVINGSTONE KEY SUMMIT (586) ................................................................................. 91 HOLLYFORD (587) ...................................................................................................... 91 SKIPPERS (588) .......................................................................................................... 91 DARRAN (589) ............................................................................................................ 92 TE ANAU (590) ........................................................................................................... 92 SPEY-MICA BURN FAULT (591) .................................................................................... 92 FIVE FINGERS (592) .................................................................................................... 92 BARN (593) ................................................................................................................ 92 MADAGASCAR (594) ................................................................................................... 93 MILFORD BASIN 5 TO GEORGE R2, GEORGE R1, CENTRAL WEDGE 1 & 2 & 3,

CENTRAL WEDGE 4 – SOUTH WEDGE 411, SOUTH WEDGE 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 TO 10, ETRON (595-604) ...................................................................................... 93

CASWELL HIGH 1, 211, 3, 4, 5, 67, 8, 9, 10 (605-613) .................................................. 93

viii GNS Science Report 2012/19

WEST BALLENY (614) ................................................................................................. 93 CENTRAL BALLENY (615) ............................................................................................ 93 SNARES (616) ............................................................................................................ 94 PUYSEGUR RIDGE (617) ............................................................................................. 94 ALPINE SPRINGS JUNCTION TO TOPHOUSE (618) .......................................................... 94 ALPINE KANIERE TO SPRINGS JUNCTION (619) ............................................................. 94 ALPINE JACKSONS TO KANIERE (620) .......................................................................... 94 ALPINE MILFORD TO JACKSONS (621) .......................................................................... 95 ALPINE CASWELL TO MILFORD, ALPINE RESOLUTION (622-623) .................................... 95 PUYSEGUR (624) ........................................................................................................ 95 WAIHEMO (625) .......................................................................................................... 95 GREENDALE (626) ...................................................................................................... 96 HIKURANGI RAUKUMARA, HIKURANGI HAWKE BAY, HIKURANGI WELLINGTON (627-

629) ............................................................................................................... 96 RAHOTU, KINA, IHAIA, KIRI, PIHAMA (630-634) ............................................................. 96 MANAIA (635) ............................................................................................................. 96

4.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... 97

5.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 97

FIGURES

Figure 1.1 Overview map of the 635 active fault zones compiled in this study. Outlined in white are tectonic domains discussed in detail by Litchfield et al. (In press). ............................................... 2

Figure 1.2 Northern North Island fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone. ............................................................................................................ 20

Figure 1.3 Northern Taupo Rift and Havre Trough fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone. ...................................................................................... 21

Figure 1.4 Southern North Island fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone. ............................................................................................................ 22

Figure 1.5 Wellington region fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone. ................................................................................................................... 22

Figure 1.6 Northern South Island fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone. ............................................................................................................ 23

Figure 1.7 Southern Alps fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone. ................................................................................................................... 23

Figure 1.8 Southern South Island fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone. ............................................................................................................ 24

Figure 1.9 Puysegur Subduction Zone fault zones. Triangles denote the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone. ........................................ 24

TABLES

Table 1.1 Fault zone parameters. See section 2.0 for parameter definitions. .............................................. 3

GNS Science Report 2012/19 ix

ABSTRACT

A nation-wide model of active fault zones in New Zealand has been compiled. The model serves three main purposes: 1) to provide an overview of permanent strain based on active fault data; 2) to refine fault source information in the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model; and 3) to underpin a synthetic seismicity model for the Wellington region. The purpose of this report is to document the parameters compiled for each fault zone, and briefly describe the data sources and the basis of interpretations. We include references to all relevant published papers, as well as to relevant unpublished data sources, such as university theses.

A total of 635 fault zones have been compiled, including 4 subduction interface fault zones. The fault zones are represented by simplified fault traces suitable for modelling at national or regional scales. Generalised estimates of geometric (dip and dip direction) and kinematic (sense of movement, rake and net slip rate) parameters have been provided for most fault zones, along with assigned uncertainties. In addition, a ‘quality code’ provides an indication of the quantity and type of data available for each fault zone, particularly weighted toward the quality of the slip rate data.

KEYWORDS

Active fault, New Zealand, sense of movement, dip, dip direction, rake, slip rate.

GNS Science Report 2012/19 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

A nation-wide compilation of New Zealand’s active faults was developed over the period between 2005 and 2012. To emphasise the regional-scale nature of the compilation, the faults are referred to as fault zones and the map and associated data are referred to as a model (New Zealand active fault model; NZAFM). In particular, fault zones are generalised traces of faults which are often a simplification of multiple fault traces in databases such as the New Zealand Active Faults Database (http://data.gns.cri.nz/af/).

The NZAFM was developed for three main purposes: 1) to underpin a model of permanent strain derived from active fault data to inform our understanding of the kinematics of the New Zealand plate boundary (Beavan et al., 2007; Litchfield et al., In press); 2) to update the fault sources for the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM; Stirling et al., 1998, 2002, 2012), and 3) to create a synthetic seismicity model for the Wellington region (WSSM) to investigate fault interactions (Robinson et al., 2011).

This report documents the geometric (dip and dip direction) and kinematic (rake, sense of movement, and net slip rate) parameters compiled for each fault zone, and briefly describes the origins of that information. The NZAFM fault zones and parameters in this report specifically correspond to those in Litchfield et al. (In press). However, there is considerable overlap with those fault sources in the NSHM (Stirling et al., 2012) and in the WSSM (Robinson et al., 2011) and so this report also includes some fault-specific descriptions of the origins of the parameters in those models.

The NZAFM comprises a total of 635 recognised fault zones (Figure 1.1), including 4 subduction interface fault zones. Some fault zones have been split into sections which are our best interpretation of fault rupture segments (e.g., the Alpine Fault). Others have been split for modelling purposes. For example, the Vernon Fault has been split into 4 (Vernon 1, Vernon 2, Vernon 3, Vernon 4) for synthetic seismicity modelling (Robinson et al., 2011).

We provide a full set of measured or estimated parameters for each fault zone, with a few notable exceptions, such as fault zones in the central Southern Alps, which are inferred to be active but for which there are no slip rate data (Cox et al., 2012; Litchfield et al., In press). Mapping, interpretation and parameterisation for most of the on-land faults were undertaken by the GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team (K. Berryman, K. Clark, R. Langridge, N. Litchfield, A. Nicol, M. Stirling, R. Van Dissen, and P. Villamor) at a series of meetings during 2005-2008. For fault zones lacking published geometric or kinematic parameters, the estimated or inferred parameter values are attributed to individuals or to the GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team collectively, in the year that the parameters were estimated.

In section 2.0 we define active fault zones, the parameters, and their uncertainties. Section 3.0 forms the bulk of this report, comprising for each fault zone a brief description of the basis for derivation of the fault parameters in Table 1.1. The fault zones are generally numbered from north to south, and are labelled in Figure 1.2 to Figure 1.9. Tectonic domains (Figure 1.1) derived from subjective groupings of fault zones with similarities in geometry and kinematics, are discussed in detail by Litchfield et al. (In press). In this report the tectonic domains are used mainly for geographic reference (section 3.0).

2 GNS Science Report 2012/19

Figure 1.1 Overview map of the 635 active fault zones compiled in this study. Outlined in white are tectonic domains discussed in detail by Litchfield et al. (In press).


Table 1.1 Fault zone parameters. See section 2.0 for parameter definitions.

No. Name Dip best (º)

Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

1 Wairoa North 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 0.09 0.07 0.11 2 2 Kerepehi North 60 45 70 W Normal Dextral 90 80 100 0.15 0.1 0.2 1 3 Kerepehi Central 60 45 70 W Normal Dextral 90 80 100 0.3 0.25 0.4 1 4 Kerepehi South 60 45 70 W Normal Dextral 90 80 100 0.15 0.1 0.2 1 5 Alderman West 5 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.05 0.03 0.05 3 6 Alderman West 4 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.05 0.03 0.05 3 7 Alderman West 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.05 0.03 0.05 3 8 Alderman West 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.08 0.05 0.08 3 9 Alderman West 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.08 0.05 0.08 3 10 Alderman East 6 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.31 0.19 0.31 3 11 Alderman East 5 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.44 0.26 0.44 3 12 Alderman East 4 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.44 0.26 0.44 3 13 Alderman East 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.44 0.26 0.44 3 14 Alderman East 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.25 0.15 0.25 3 15 Alderman East 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.25 0.15 0.25 3 16 Alderman East 7 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.25 0.1 0.25 3 17 Tuhua North 5 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.31 0.19 0.31 3 18 Tuhua North 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.44 0.26 0.44 3 19 Tuhua North 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.44 0.26 0.44 3 20 Tuhua North 4 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.44 0.26 0.44 3 21 Tuhua North 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.44 0.26 0.44 3 22 Tuhua South 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.3 0.5 3 23 Tuhua South 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.23 0.14 0.23 3 24 Tuhua South 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.16 0.09 0.16 3 25 Ohena 4 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 2.57 1.54 2.57 3 26 Ohena 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 2.57 1.54 2.57 3 27 Ohena 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 3.42 2.05 3.42 3

1 Minimum 2 Maximum 3 Direction 4 Sense of movement 5 Dominant 6 Secondary 7 Slip rate



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

28 Ohena 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.44 0.26 0.44 3 29 Astrolabe 8 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.62 0.37 0.62 3 30 Astrolabe 7 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.87 0.12 0.87 3 31 Astrolabe 6 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.62 0.37 0.62 3 32 Astrolabe 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.65 0.39 0.65 3 33 Astrolabe 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.65 0.39 0.65 3 34 Astrolabe 5 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.87 1.12 1.87 3 35 Astrolabe 4 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.81 0.49 0.81 3 36 Astrolabe 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.3 0.5 3 37 Ngatoro South 6 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.02 1.21 2.02 3 38 Ngatoro South 5 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.43 1.46 2.43 3 39 Ngatoro South 4 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.43 1.46 2.43 3 40 Ngatoro South 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.8 1.68 2.8 3 41 Ngatoro South 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 3.05 1.83 3.05 3 42 Ngatoro South 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.71 1.03 1.71 3 43 Tauranga Trough West 4 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.01 0.61 1.01 3 44 Tauranga Trough West 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.02 1.21 2.02 3 45 Tauranga Trough West 5 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.01 0.61 1.01 3 46 Tauranga Trough West 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.43 1.46 2.43 3 47 Tauranga Trough West 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.71 1.03 1.71 3 48 Tauranga Trough East 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3 49 Tauranga Trough East 5 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.17 0.7 1.17 3 50 Tauranga Trough East 4 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.17 0.7 1.17 3 51 Tauranga Trough East 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.49 1.49 2.49 3 52 Tauranga Trough East 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.87 1.12 1.87 3 53 Tauranga Trough East 6 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.93 0.56 0.93 3 54 Tuakana 13 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.47 0.28 0.47 3 55 Tuakana 10 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3 56 Tuakana 9 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3 57 Tuakana 11 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3 58 Tuakana 12 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.93 0.56 0.93 3 59 Tuakana 8 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 2.02 1.21 2.02 3 60 Tuakana 5 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3 61 Tuakana 7 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3 62 Tuakana 6 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 2.8 1.68 2.8 3 63 Tuakana 4 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.93 0.56 0.93 3 64 Tuakana 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.93 0.56 0.93 3 65 Tuakana 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

66 Tuakana 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.56 0.34 0.56 3 67 Matatara 4 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.75 0.45 0.75 3 68 Matatara 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3 69 Matatara 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.75 0.45 0.75 3 70 Matatara 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.37 0.22 0.37 3 71 Maungati West 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.93 0.56 0.93 3 72 Maungati West 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.87 1.12 1.87 3 73 Maungati East 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3 74 Maungati West 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.19 0.11 0.19 3 75 Otara West 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 2.49 1.49 2.49 3 76 Otara West 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.8 1.68 2.8 3 77 Otara West 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.49 1.49 2.49 3 78 Otara East 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 4.67 2.8 4.67 3 79 Otara East 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 3.73 2.24 3.73 3 80 Otara East 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.94 1.17 1.94 3 81 Otara East 4 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3 82 Otara East 5 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 3 83 Otara East 6 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.93 0.56 0.93 3 84 Wairaka 5 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.94 1.17 1.94 3 85 Wairaka 6 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.31 0.19 0.31 3 86 Wairaka 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.78 0.47 0.78 3 87 Wairaka 4 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.78 0.47 0.78 3 88 Wairaka 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.87 1.12 1.87 3 89 Wairaka 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.47 0.28 0.47 3 90 White Island North 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.16 0.09 0.16 3 91 White Island North 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.16 0.09 0.16 3 92 Te Arawa 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 2.49 1.49 2.49 3 93 Te Arawa 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 3.42 2.05 3.42 3 94 Te Arawa 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 3.42 2.05 3.42 3 95 Tuatoru 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.56 0.93 1.56 3 96 Tuatoru 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 3.42 2.05 3.42 3 97 Tuatoru 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 3.42 2.05 3.42 3 98 Volkner 5 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.71 1.03 1.71 3 99 Volkner 4 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 5.13 3.08 5.13 3 100 Volkner 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.89 1.74 2.89 3 101 Volkner 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.93 1.16 1.93 3 102 Volkner 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.87 1.12 1.87 3 103 Tumokemoke 3 50 40 60 E Normal 90 80 100 0.74 0.49 0.74 3



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

104 Tumokemoke 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.49 0.9 1.49 3 105 Tumokemoke 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.49 0.9 1.49 3 106 Whakaari 4 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 3.27 1.96 3.27 3 107 Whakaari 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.56 0.93 1.56 3 108 Whakaari 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.24 0.75 1.24 3 109 Whakaari 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.24 0.75 1.24 3 110 Okurei 5 50 40 60 SW Normal 90 80 100 0.19 0.11 0.19 1 111 Okurei 6 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.19 0.11 0.19 1 112 Okurei 2 50 40 60 E Normal 90 80 100 0.32 0.21 0.32 1 113 Okurei 4 50 40 60 W Normal 90 80 100 0.31 0.19 0.31 1 114 Okurei 3 50 40 60 E Normal 90 80 100 0.53 0.36 0.53 1 115 Okurei 1 50 40 60 E Normal 90 80 100 0.55 0.37 0.55 1 116 Maketu 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.27 0.18 0.27 1 117 Maketu 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.87 0.4 0.87 1 118 Maketu 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.9 0.6 0.9 1 119 Tauranga 1 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.69 0.46 0.69 1 120 Tauranga 2 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.24 0.09 0.24 1 121 Tauranga 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.38 0.95 1.38 1 122 Tauranga 4 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.28 0.19 0.28 1 123 Tauranga 5 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.84 1.4 1 124 Tauranga 6 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.12 0.67 1.12 1 125 Domino 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.07 0.04 0.07 1 126 Tarawera 4 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.17 0.09 0.17 1 127 Tarawera 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.56 0.37 0.56 1 128 Tarawera 5 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.72 0.48 0.72 1 129 Tarawera 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.97 0.65 0.97 1 130 Pokare 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.5 1.4 1 131 Pokare 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.4 0.5 1.4 1 132 Tokata 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.5 0.4 1.5 1 133 Moutoki 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.6 0.3 0.6 1 134 Moutoki 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.6 0.3 0.6 1 135 Thornton 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.85 0.5 0.85 1 136 Thornton 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.85 0.6 0.85 1 137 Motuhora South 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.41 0.34 0.41 1 138 Rangitaiki 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.8 1.5 2.8 1 139 Rangitaiki 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.5 1 2.5 1 140 Piripai 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.9 0.65 0.9 1 141 Ohiwa 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.21 1.35 2.21 1



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

142 Nukuhou 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.05 0.79 1.05 1 143 Pukehoko South 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.53 0.1 2.53 1 144 Pukehoko North 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 3.68 0.9 3.68 1 145 Calypso 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.89 1.74 2.89 1 146 Calypso 3 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 2.18 1.31 2.18 1 147 Ohiwa North 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.53 0.32 0.53 1 148 White Island 3 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.35 0.81 1.35 1 149 White Island 2 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2 0.5 2 1 150 White Island 1 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.5 1 2.5 1 151 Matata 50 40 60 SE Normal 90 80 100 2.61 1.87 5.98 1 152 Braemar 45 35 55 SE Normal 90 80 100 2 1 3 1 153 Otakiri 50 40 60 SE Normal 0.1 0.1 0.1 2 154 Edgecumbe Coastal 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.2 1.5 3 4 155 Edgecumbe 1987 50 40 60 NW Normal 90 80 100 2.61 1.87 5.98 1 156 Rotoitipakau 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.7 1.01 2.46 1 157 Horohoro 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.20 0.15 0.27 1 158 Ngakuru Southwest 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.4 0.6 2 159 Ngakuru New 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.58 0.32 0.92 1 160 Maleme 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 3.5 2.5 4.5 1 161 Mangatete 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.12 0.05 0.20 1 162 Whirinaki West 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.2 0.1 0.3 1 163 Whirinaki East 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.3 0.2 0.4 1 164 Hossack Road 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.12 0.05 0.20 1 165 Te Weta 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.46 0.22 0.79 1 166 Paeroa 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.85 1.29 2.64 1 167 Ngapouri 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.23 0.11 0.40 1 168 Tuahu 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.3 0.7 2 169 Lake Ohakuri 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.7 1.3 2.1 2 170 West Whangamata 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.9 1.4 2.4 2 171 Puketerata 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.8 1.3 2.3 2 172 Whangamata 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.3 0.9 1.7 1 173 Orakeikorako 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.8 1.3 2.3 2 174 Orakonui 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.6 0.2 1 1 175 Ngangiho 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.8 0.5 1.1 1 176 Whakaipo 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.6 0.3 0.9 1 177 Kaiapo 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.8 1.3 2.3 1 178 Aratiatia 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.8 0.5 1.1 1 179 Kaingaroa NW Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.4 0.6 4



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

180 Waihi West 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 1.3 1 1.5 4 181 Waihi South 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 2 1.5 2.5 4 182 Waihi East 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.7 0.5 1 4 183 Poutu 55 40 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.85 1.5 2.2 1 184 Treetrunk 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 1 0.7 1.4 4 185 Wahianoa 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.3 0.10 0.51 1 186 Rangipo North 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 0.2 0.18 1.53 1 187 Rangipo Central 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 0.2 0.18 1.53 1 188 Rangipo South 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 0.2 0.18 1.53 1 189 National Park 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.2 0.1 0.5 4 190 Raurimu 60 50 70 E Normal 90 80 100 1.5 1.31 1.74 1 191 Ohakune 60 50 70 SW Normal 90 80 100 3.5 3.33 3.79 1 192 Raetihi 60 50 70 SW Normal 90 80 100 0.9 0.7 1.1 1 193 Waipuna 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.4 0.10 0.72 1 194 Oruakukuru 60 50 70 S Normal 90 80 100 0.7 0.30 1.13 1 195 Karioi 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.4 0.30 0.51 1 196 Shawcroft Road 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.7 0.51 0.92 1 197 Snowgrass 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.55 0.40 0.72 2 198 Kaweka NW Dextral 1 0.5 1.5 4 199 Mataroa SE Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0.05 0.15 4 200 Taihape E Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0.05 0.15 5 201 Rangitikei SE Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0.05 0.15 4 202 Turi North 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 0.4 0.1 0.4 1 203 Turi Central 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 0.4 0.1 0.4 1 204 Turi South 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 0.4 0.1 0.4 1 205 Cape Egmont North 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 0.8 0.6 1 1 206 Cape Egmont Central 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 0.8 0.6 1 1 207 Cape Egmont South 60 50 70 W Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0.05 0.15 1 208 Oaonui 65 55 75 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.09 0.05 0.18 1 209 Inglewood 60 50 70 SE Normal Strike slip 90 80 100 0.2 0.1 0.4 1 210 Norfolk NW Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0.005 0.2 4 211 Ararata 70 60 80 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.02 0.02 0.02 1 212 Waverley - Okaia 1 SE Normal Dextral 0.04 0.02 0.1 1 213 Moumahaki - Okaia 4 70 60 80 SE Normal Dextral 0.19 0.05 0.19 1 214 Ridge Road - Okaia 2 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.2 0.1 0.3 1 215 Waitotara 10 & 11 NW Normal Dextral 0.16 0.1 0.3 1 216 Nukumuru – Waitotara 1-6 70 60 80 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.07 0.01 0.13 1 217 Okaia 5 Normal 90 80 100 0.03 0.01 0.05 1



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

218 Okaia 3 Normal 90 80 100 0.05 0.04 0.07 1 219 Waitotara 8 & 9 Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.2 0.8 1 220 Hariki 50 40 60 NE Reverse 270 280 290 0.1 0.05 0.1 1 221 Ohae 1 50 40 60 SW Reverse 270 280 290 0.1 0.05 0.1 1 222 Ohae 2 50 40 60 SW Reverse 270 280 290 0.1 0.05 0.1 1 223 Ohae 3 70 80 90 NE Normal 90 80 100 0.08 0.05 0.08 1 224 Opape 1 50 40 60 E Normal 80 70 90 0.17 0.05 0.17 1 225 Opotiki 3 70 60 80 W Normal Dextral 60 45 75 0.5 0.1 0.5 1 226 Opotiki 2 70 60 80 E Normal Dextral 60 45 75 0.5 0.1 0.5 1 227 Tirohanga 70 60 80 E Normal Dextral 60 45 75 0.5 0.01 0.5 1 228 Urewera 3 80 70 90 NW Dextral Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.4 0.6 4 229 Urewera 2 80 70 90 W Dextral Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.4 0.6 4 230 Urewera 1 80 70 90 W Dextral Normal 1 0.8 1.2 4 231 Raukumara 9 W Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 232 Wairata W Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.001 1 4 233 Waikaremoana 80 70 90 W Dextral Normal 7 360 20 1.1 0.8 1.4 1 234 Waimanawa - Waikaremoana 70 60 80 W Normal Dextral 45 35 55 2.3 1.5 3.1 2 235 Waimana North 75 65 85 W Dextral Normal 6 360 20 1.2 0.7 1.7 1 236 Waimana South 80 70 90 W Dextral Normal 6 360 20 2 1 3 1 237 Awakeri 60 50 70 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.25 0.1 0.5 4 238 Waiohau North 65 60 70 W Normal Dextral 71 45 90 0.7 0.5 0.9 1 239 Waiohau South 70 60 75 W Dextral Normal 20 10 30 0.7 0.5 0.9 2 240 Whakatane North 65 60 70 W Normal 90 80 100 2.2 1.3 3.1 1 241 Whakatane South 85 80 90 W Dextral 5 360 20 2.3 2.1 2.5 1 242 Wheao North 80 70 90 W Normal Dextral 0.25 0.1 0.4 2 243 Wheao South 80 70 90 W Normal Dextral 0.25 0.1 0.4 2 244 Te Whaiti 80 70 90 W Normal Dextral 0.5 0.3 0.8 2 245 Patoka - Rangiora 85 80 90 NW Dextral Reverse 354 349 356 3 2 6 2 246 Mohaka North 85 80 90 NW Dextral Reverse 354 349 356 2 1.5 2.5 2 247 Mohaka South 85 80 90 NW Dextral Reverse 354 349 356 4 3 5 2 248 Ruahine North 80 70 90 NW Dextral Reverse 1.1 0.7 1.5 2 249 Ruahine Central 80 70 90 NW Dextral Reverse 1.1 0.7 1.5 2 250 Ruahine South 80 70 90 NW Dextral Reverse 1.1 0.7 1.5 2 251 Mascarin 1 70 60 80 E Reverse 270 260 280 3 1.5 3.5 2 252 Mascarin 2 70 60 80 E Reverse 270 260 280 3 1.5 3.5 2 253 Fisherman 1 75 65 85 NW Reverse 280 270 290 1 0.6 1.2 2 254 Fisherman 2 75 65 85 NW Reverse 280 270 290 1 0.6 1.2 2 255 Fisherman 3 75 65 85 NW Reverse 280 270 290 0.7 0.4 0.9 2



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

256 Okupe 1 75 65 85 NW Reverse 280 270 290 0.8 0.4 1 2 257 Okupe 2 75 65 85 NW Reverse 280 270 290 0.8 0.4 1 2 258 Onepoto 1 70 60 80 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.6 1.2 2 259 Onepoto 2 70 60 80 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.6 1.2 2 260 Rangitikei Offshore 1 70 60 80 SE Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.6 1.2 2 261 Rangitikei Offshore 2 70 60 80 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.4 0.2 0.5 2 262 Mana - Otaheke 1 75 65 85 NW Reverse 280 270 290 0.2 0.1 0.3 2 263 Mana - Otaheke 2 75 65 85 NW Reverse 280 270 290 0.3 0.2 0.4 2 264 Mana - Otaheke 3 65 55 75 NW Reverse 280 270 290 0.6 0.4 0.7 2 265 Marton Anticline 60 50 70 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 266 Galpin 70 60 80 E Normal 90 80 100 0.04 0.04 0.04 1 267 Leedstown 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.07 0.07 0.07 1 268 Mt Stewart 60 50 70 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.3 0.2 0.4 1 269 Feilding Anticline 60 50 70 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.3 0.2 0.4 4 270 Pohangina Anticline 60 50 50 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.1 0.02 0.43 4 271 Ruahine Reverse NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.1 0.05 0.2 4 272 Shannon Anticline 60 50 70 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 273 Levin Anticline 60 50 70 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 274 Himatangi Anticline 60 50 70 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 275 Poroutawhao 60 50 50 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 276 Pukerua - Shepherds Gully 1 90 80 90 Dextral 360 350 10 0.5 0.3 0.6 2 277 Pukerua - Shepherds Gully 2 90 80 90 Dextral 360 350 10 0.5 0.3 0.6 2 278 Pukerua - Shepherds Gully 3 90 80 90 Dextral 360 350 10 0.5 0.3 0.6 2 279 Ohariu South 1 65 55 75 NW Normal Dextral 50 40 60 1.5 1 2 2 280 Ohariu South 2 70 60 80 NW Dextral Normal 26 16 36 1.5 1 2 2 281 Ohariu South 3 75 65 85 NW Dextral Reverse 340 330 350 1.5 1 2 1 282 Ohariu Central 75 65 85 SE Dextral Reverse 345 335 355 1.5 1 2 1 283 Northern Ohariu 90 80 90 Dextral 360 350 10 1.5 1 3 1 284 Moonshine 90 80 90 Dextral 360 350 10 0.2 0.1 0.3 2 285 Akatarawa 75 65 85 NW Dextral Reverse 330 320 340 0.6 0.3 0.9 2 286 Otaki Forks 1 75 65 85 NW Dextral Reverse 330 320 340 0.8 0.4 1.2 4 287 Otaki Forks 2 90 80 90 Dextral 360 350 10 0.8 0.4 1.2 4 288 Wellington Hutt Valley 1 70 60 80 NW Dextral Normal 45 35 55 7 5 8 2 289 Wellington Hutt Valley 2 80 70 90 NW Dextral Reverse 335 325 345 7 5 8 2 290 Wellington Hutt Valley 3 90 80 90 Dextral 360 350 10 7 5 8 1 291 Wellington Hutt Valley 4 75 65 85 SE Dextral Normal 15 5 25 7 5 8 1 292 Wellington Hutt Valley 5 65 55 75 SE Dextral Normal 30 20 40 6.3 5.1 8.2 2 293 Wellington Tararua 1 65 55 75 NW Dextral Normal 45 35 55 6.1 4.5 7.5 2



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

294 Wellington Tararua 2 70 60 80 NW Dextral 360 350 10 6.1 4.5 7.5 2 295 Wellington Tararua 3 60 50 70 NW Dextral Reverse 325 315 335 6.1 4.5 7.5 2 296 Wellington Pahiatua 80 70 90 NW Dextral Reverse 350 340 360 5.7 5.2 6.3 2 297 Woodville 70 60 80 NW Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 298 Pahiatua 70 60 80 NW Reverse Dextral 0.4 0.2 0.6 4 299 Maunga Normal 0.5 0 1 4 300 Ruataniwha 70 60 80 NW Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 301 Oruawharo 70 60 80 NW Dextral 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 302 Whitemans Valley 60 50 70 NW Reverse Dextral 280 260 290 0.1 0.05 0.15 2 303 Wairarapa 1 70 60 80 NW Dextral 360 350 10 11 8 12 2 304 Wairarapa 2 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 340 330 350 11.3 8.3 12.3 1 305 Wairarapa 3 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 345 335 355 6 4.5 7.5 2 306 Alfredton - Makuri 1 70 60 80 NW Normal Dextral 70 60 80 6 4.5 7.5 2 307 Alfredton - Makuri 2 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 345 335 355 3.5 2.5 4.5 2 308 Alfredton - Makuri 3 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 345 335 355 3.5 2.5 4.5 4 309 Wharekauhau 1 45 35 55 NW Reverse 270 260 280 2.5 1.5 3.5 4 310 Wharekauhau 2 45 35 55 NW Reverse 270 260 280 2.5 1.5 3.5 4 311 Wharekauhau 3 45 35 55 W Reverse 270 260 280 2.5 1.5 3.5 4 312 Bidwill 60 50 70 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.2 0.1 0.3 2 313 Martinborough 65 55 75 NW Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 0.1 0.05 0.2 1 314 Otaraia 60 50 70 SE Dextral 270 260 280 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 315 Dry River - Huangarua 1 65 50 80 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.7 0.3 1.2 1 316 Dry River - Huangarua 2 65 50 80 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.7 0.3 1.2 2 317 Dry River - Huangarua 3 65 50 80 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.7 0.3 1.2 2 318 Ngapotiki 45 30 60 NW Reverse 285 275 295 2 1 2.5 2 319 Kaumingi 70 60 80 NW Dextral Normal 30 20 40 1 0.5 1.5 4 320 Carterton 75 65 85 S Dextral Normal 30 20 40 2.4 1.5 3 2 321 Masterton 65 55 75 S Dextral Normal 22 12 32 1.5 0.5 2 2 322 Mokonui Southwest 90 80 90 Dextral 360 350 10 0.5 0.25 0.75 2 323 Mokonui Northeast 70 60 80 S Dextral Normal 22 12 32 0.5 0.25 0.75 2 324 Waitawhiti 85 77 90 SE Dextral Reverse 1 0.5 1.5 4 325 Pongaroa - Weber 80 70 90 NW Dextral 0.5 0.1 1 4 326 Saunders Road – Waipukaka 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 325 315 335 2.5 1.5 3.5 4 327 Waipukurau - Poukawa 40 30 50 NW Dextral Reverse 284 277 294 1 0.8 1.2 1 328 Napier 1931 40 30 50 NW Reverse 284 277 294 2 1 3 2 329 Tukituki Thrust 60 50 70 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.7 0.5 1 1 330 Raukumara 1 60 50 70 Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 331 Raukumara 2 60 50 70 Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

332 Raukumara 3 60 50 70 Normal 90 80 100 0.6 0.4 0.8 4 333 Repongaere 60 50 70 SE Normal 60 50 70 0.1 0.05 0.2 1 334 Otoko Tototangi 60 50 70 NE Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 335 Raukumara 6 60 50 70 S Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 336 Pakarae 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 2.4 2.2 2.6 2 337 Marau Beach SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.1 0 0.5 4 338 Raukumara 30 60 50 70 Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 339 Raukumara 27 60 50 70 Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 340 Raukumara 29 60 50 70 E Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 341 Fernside 30 20 40 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 342 Raukumara 31 60 50 70 N Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 343 Raukumara 32 60 50 70 Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 344 Raukumara 16 60 50 70 Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.0001 1 4 345 Raukumara 17 60 50 70 N Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.0001 1 4 346 Raukumara 18 S Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.0001 1 4 347 Motu River N Reverse 90 80 100 0.03 0.0001 0.04 4 348 Raukumara 20 Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 349 Raukumara 21 S Normal 90 80 100 0.03 0.0001 0.04 4 350 Raukumara 25 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.03 0.0001 0.04 4 351 Kereu 60 50 70 S Reverse 270 260 280 0.1 0 0.5 4 352 Raukumara 24 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 353 Raukumara 26 Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 354 East Cape Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0 0.5 4 355 Houtunui 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 1 0.5 1.5 4 356 Ruatoria South 2 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1.5 0.5 2.5 4 357 Ruatoria South 1 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1.5 0.5 2.5 4 358 Ariel Bank 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 6.1 4.4 8.8 1 359 Ariel North 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.9 0.4 1.8 1 360 Gable End 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 3.8 2.4 5.6 1 361 Poverty Bay 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 2.3 0.7 5 1 362 Ariel East 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1.6 0.7 3 1 363 Tuaheni Ridge 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 4 364 Paritu Ridge 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 2 1 3 4 365 Paritu West 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 4 366 Lachlan 3 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 4.5 2.5 6.5 1 367 Lachlan 1 & 2 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 2.5 1.5 3.5 1 368 Mahia 2 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 0.4 0.2 0.6 4 369 Hawke Bay 7 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 0.1 0.1 0.2 2



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

370 Hawke Bay 6 & 12 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 0.1 0.1 0.2 2 371 Hawke Bay 5 & 11 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 0.3 0.2 0.4 2 372 Hawke Bay 4 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 0.3 0.1 0.4 2 373 Hawke Bay 1 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 0.5 0.2 0.8 2 374 Hawke Bay 2 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 0.8 0.3 1.3 2 375 Hawke Bay 8 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 0.6 0.2 1 2 376 Kidnappers Ridge 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 1.5 1 2 2 377 Waimarama 1 & 2 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 2 378 Waimarama 3 & 4 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 2 379 Kairakau North 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 1 0.5 1.5 2 380 Kairakau South 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 3 2 4 2 381 Kairakau 2 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 1 0.5 1.5 2 382 Motuokura North 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 1 0.5 1.5 2 383 Ritchie West 2 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1.5 0.5 2.5 4 384 Ritchie West 1 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 4 385 Ritchie Ridge 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1.5 0.5 2.5 4 386 Paoanui Ridge North 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 4 387 Omakere Ridge 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 1 0.5 1.5 4 388 Motuokura East 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 2 1 3 4 389 Motuokura Ridge 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 1.5 1 2 4 390 Madden 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 2.5 1.5 3.5 4 391 Omakere South 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 0.5 0.3 0.7 4 392 Paoanui Ridge South 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 4 393 Porangahau Ridge 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 4 394 Porangahau West 2 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1.5 0.5 2.5 4 395 Porangahau West 1 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 4 396 Uruti East 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 4 397 Uruti Ridge 2 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 2 1 3 4 398 Uruti Basin 90 80 90 NW Dextral 270 260 280 4 2.5 5.5 4 399 Uruti North 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1 0.5 1.5 4 400 Whareama Bank 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1.5 0.5 2.5 4 401 Mataikona 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 4 3 5 2 402 Riversdale 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 4 3 5 4 403 Palliser - Kaiwhata 40 30 50 NW Reverse Dextral 310 300 320 5 3 7 2 404 Honeycomb 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 280 290 1 0.5 1.5 4 405 Opouawe - Uruti 40 30 50 N Reverse 270 260 280 1.5 0.5 2.5 4 406 Pahaua 40 30 50 NW Reverse 270 260 280 1.5 0.5 2.5 4 407 BooBoo 90 80 90 Dextral 360 350 10 10 8 12 1



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

408 Wairarapa - Needles 2 70 60 80 NW Dextral 360 350 10 11 8 12 4 409 Wairarapa - Needles 1 70 60 80 NW Dextral 360 350 10 11 8 12 4 410 Vernon 4 60 50 70 S Normal Dextral 67 57 77 4.5 2.5 5 2 411 Vernon 3 70 60 80 S Normal Dextral 65 55 75 2.5 1.5 3 2 412 Vernon 2 80 70 90 S Dextral 360 350 10 4.5 2.5 5 2 413 Vernon 1 65 55 75 SE Reverse Dextral 290 280 300 4.5 2.5 5 2 414 Cloudy 3 60 50 70 S Normal Dextral 70 60 80 1.5 0.5 2.5 1 415 Cloudy 2 70 60 80 S Normal Dextral 60 50 70 1.5 0.5 2.5 1 416 Cloudy 1 80 70 90 SE Dextral 360 350 10 1.5 0.5 2.5 1 417 Wairau 3 65 60 70 S Normal Dextral 55 45 65 4 3 5 2 418 Wairau 2 75 70 80 S Dextral Normal 34 24 44 4 3 5 2 419 Wairau 1 85 80 90 S Dextral Normal 5 0 10 4 3 5 1 420 Needles 80 70 90 NW Dextral Reverse 337 327 347 16 13 19 4 421 Campbell Bank 2 60 50 70 NW Reverse Dextral 295 285 305 3 2 4 4 422 Campbell Bank 1 70 60 80 NW Reverse Dextral 310 300 320 3 2 4 4 423 Chancet 80 70 90 N Dextral 6 356 16 3 1 4 4 424 Kekerengu 2 80 70 90 NW Dextral Reverse 333 323 343 20 18 22 1 425 Kekerengu 1 60 50 70 NW Dextral Reverse 315 305 325 20 18 22 1 426 Te Rapa 2 70 60 80 NW Reverse Dextral 310 300 320 2 1 3 4 427 Te Rapa 1 80 70 90 N Dextral Reverse 340 330 350 2 1 3 4 428 Hope Offshore 2 65 55 75 NW Reverse Dextral 310 300 321 3.5 2 5 4 429 Hope Offshore 1 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 332 312 342 5 3 7 4 430 Kaikoura 90 80 90 Dextral 360 350 10 0.13 0.01 0.25 4 431 Upper Slope 50 35 70 NW Reverse 305 295 315 1 0.5 1.5 4 432 Kekerengu Bank 55 40 70 NW Reverse Dextral 310 300 320 1 0.5 1.5 4 433 Marlborough Slope 4 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.3 0.1 0.5 4 434 Marlborough Slope 1 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.25 0.0001 0.5 4 435 Marlborough Slope 2 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.85 0.2 1.5 4 436 Marlborough Slope 9 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.28 0.05 0.5 4 437 North Mernoo M 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.125 0.05 0.2 4 438 North Mernoo K1 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.215 0.08 0.35 4 439 North Mernoo K2 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.215 0.08 0.35 4 440 North Mernoo 18 & 19 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.08 0.01 0.15 4 441 North Mernoo F2 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.225 0.1 0.35 4 442 North Mernoo F1 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.225 0.1 0.35 4 443 North Mernoo E2 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.26 0.02 0.5 4 444 North Mernoo E1 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.26 0.02 0.5 4 445 North Mernoo 46 & 47 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.16 0.02 0.3 4



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

446 North Mernoo B2 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0.07 0.1 4 447 North Mernoo B1 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0.07 0.1 4 448 North Mernoo B0 55 45 65 S Normal 90 80 100 0.1 0.07 0.1 4 449 Hundalee 55 40 70 NW Reverse Dextral 270 270 275 1.22 0.43 2.34 2 450 North Canterbury Shelf 13 55 45 65 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.25 0.001 0.5 2 451 North Canterbury Shelf 10 55 45 65 SE Reverse 270 260 280 2 1 3 2 452 North Canterbury Shelf 8 to 10 55 45 65 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.25 0.1 0.4 2 453 North Canterbury Shelf 11 55 45 65 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.3 0.1 0.5 2 454 North Canterbury Shelf 4 55 45 65 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.1 0.05 0.15 2 455 North Canterbury Shelf 2 55 45 65 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.14 0.08 0.2 2 456 North Canterbury Shelf 1 55 45 65 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.125 0.05 0.2 2 457 Pegasus 55 45 65 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.25 0.2 0.3 2 458 Paparoa Rangefront 60 45 70 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0.25 0.75 4 459 Brunner Anticline NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.38 0.28 0.47 2 460 Maimai 45 35 55 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0.25 0.75 4 461 Inangahua 45 35 65 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0.25 0.75 4 462 Lyell 60 50 70 E Reverse 270 260 280 0.2 0.2 0.2 4 463 White Creek 45 35 55 E Reverse 270 260 280 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 464 Waimea North 60 30 70 SE Reverse 270 260 290 0.5 0.2 0.8 2 465 Waimea South 60 30 70 SE Reverse 270 260 290 0.5 0.2 0.8 2 466 Wairau A 85 80 90 SE Dextral Normal 5 0 10 4 3 5 2 467 Awatere Northeast 2 80 70 90 NW Dextral 360 350 10 1.5 0.5 2.5 1 468 Awatere Northeast 1 75 65 85 NW Dextral Reverse 340 330 350 6 4 8 1 469 Awatere Southwest 75 45 90 NW Dextral Reverse 340 330 350 5.5 4 7 1 470 Fowlers Dextral 0.5 0.25 1 4 471 Barefell 60 50 70 NW Dextral Reverse 0.5 0.25 1 4 472 Clarence Northeast 60 50 70 NW Dextral Reverse 340 330 350 4.32 3.51 5.04 2 473 Clarence Central 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 355 350 360 1.1 0.9 1.3 2 474 Clarence Southwest 70 60 80 NW Dextral 355 350 360 3 2 4 2 475 Fidget Dextral 2 1 3 4 476 Jordan 37 28 48 NW Reverse Dextral 280 270 290 20 18 22 2 477 Hope Conway 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 354 350 356 25 20 27 2 478 Hanmer 60 50 70 S Normal Dextral 49 28 69 2.29 1.18 4.78 1 479 Hope 1888 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 357 356 358 14.01 11.01 17.02 1 480 Hope Central West 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 351 347 354 17 14 20 2 481 Hope Taramakau 70 60 80 NW Dextral Reverse 3 2 4 2 482 Kakapo 80 70 90 NW Dextral Reverse 356 355 357 6.41 4.41 8.41 1 483 Kelly 90 80 90 NW Dextral Reverse 15 13 17 2



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

484 Poulter 80 70 90 SE Dextral Reverse 349 0 315 1.01 0.50 1.70 1 485 Esk W Reverse Dextral 0.5 0.25 0.75 4 486 Waitohi Downs 50 40 60 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0.25 0.75 4 487 Lowry 55 40 70 SE Reverse 272 270 275 1 0.5 1.5 4 488 Kaiwara South 55 40 70 SE Reverse Dextral 0.61 0.21 1.24 4 489 Kaiwara North 55 45 65 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.61 0.21 1.24 4 490 Omihi 55 40 70 SE Reverse Dextral 272 270 313 1 0.5 1.5 4 491 Porters Pass - Grey 75 60 90 NW Dextral Reverse 348 330 353 3.5 3.1 4.1 2 492 Springfield 50 40 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0.25 1 4 493 Ashley 35 25 45 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.55 0.45 0.65 2 494 Cust 50 40 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.22 0.1 0.3 2 495 Springbank 50 40 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.22 0.1 0.3 4 496 Hororata 50 40 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0.4 0.6 4 497 Torlesse 65 55 75 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0.25 0.75 4 498 Cheeseman 45 35 55 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.6 0.25 1 2 499 Avoca 90 80 90 Dextral 0.5 0 1 4 500 Browning Pass 60 50 70 NW Dextral 2 1 3 4 501 Mungo 60 45 70 S Dextral Reverse 340 320 360 5 502 Bruce 70 55 80 NW Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 503 Mistake - Rolleston 70 55 80 W Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 504 Shingly 60 45 70 SE Reverse Dextral 315 295 335 5 505 North Branch 70 55 80 W Reverse 270 250 290 5 506 Jagged 70 55 80 W Reverse Sinistral 250 230 270 5 507 Observation 65 50 75 NW Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 508 Mathias 65 45 70 W Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 509 Lord Range 70 55 80 NW Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 510 Waitaha 75 55 80 S Dextral Reverse 340 320 360 5 511 Jollie Range 65 50 75 W Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 512 Potts River 60 45 70 W Reverse 270 250 290 5 513 Potts Range 60 45 70 W Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 514 Two Thumb Stream 55 45 65 NW Reverse 270 250 290 5 515 Veil Stream 60 45 70 W Dextral Reverse 342 322 0 5 516 Mount Adams 85 70 90 N Dextral 5 345 15 5 517 Gunn Glacier 80 70 90 S Reverse Dextral 335 315 355 5 518 Mount Roon 70 55 80 SE Dextral Normal 48 28 68 5 519 Straight Creek 45 30 90 N Reverse Dextral 284 264 304 5 520 Murchison 50 45 60 NW Reverse Dextral 290 270 310 5 521 Liebig North 55 45 75 NW Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

522 Macaulay 2 65 50 75 NW Reverse Dextral 275 255 295 5 523 Lilybank 70 55 80 NW Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 524 Black Blob – Haast Ridge 55 45 65 NW Reverse 270 240 300 5 525 Great Groove 45 35 60 SW Reverse Sinistral 227 207 247 5 526 Douglas Duplex 45 35 55 W Reverse Sinistral 250 230 270 5 527 Karangarua 80 70 90 SE Dextral Normal 45 25 65 5 528 Landsborough 2 80 70 90 NW Reverse Sinistral 260 240 280 5 529 Huxley 60 45 70 NW Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 530 Ahuriri 60 45 70 NW Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 531 Dobson 70 55 80 NW Reverse Dextral 280 260 300 5 532 Dingle 70 55 80 W Reverse Dextral 290 280 300 5 533 Hunter 60 45 70 W Reverse Dextral 290 270 310 5 534 Makarora 70 55 80 SE Reverse Dextral 290 270 310 5 535 Lake Heron 60 45 70 W Reverse Sinistral 250 230 270 0.93 0.43 2.83 2 536 Hutt Peel 55 45 65 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.78 0.21 2 2 537 Hewson 75 65 85 SW Reverse Strike slip 0.15 0.1 0.2 4 538 Forest Creek 80 70 90 SE Reverse Dextral 290 270 310 0.9 0.4 2.8 4 539 Irishman Creek 45 30 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.79 0.12 1.42 1 540 Fox Peak 45 40 55 W Reverse Dextral 297 270 315 2.21 0.44 4.4 2 541 Brothers 60 50 70 E Reverse 270 260 280 0.06 0.01 0.13 4 542 Albury 60 50 70 SW Reverse Dextral 0.1 0.02 0.2 4 543 Hunters Hills 60 50 70 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.12 0.02 0.26 4 544 Opawa 60 50 70 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.05 0.01 0.185 4 545 Dalgety 60 50 70 NW Reverse Dextral 297 270 315 0.25 0.05 0.66 4 546 Ostler 45 30 60 W Reverse 270 260 280 1.27 0.70 2.41 1 547 Kirkliston 60 45 70 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.15 0.05 0.28 1 548 Dryburgh Northwest 60 50 70 NE Reverse Sinistral 0.006 0.001 0.026 1 549 Awahokomo 75 60 90 SW Reverse Dextral 280 270 300 0.58 0.22 0.98 1 550 Waitangi 70 60 80 SW Reverse Dextral 280 270 300 0.17 0.10 0.31 1 551 Fern Gully 75 60 90 SW Sinistral Reverse 240 220 250 0.61 0.4 1.73 1 552 Otematata 70 60 80 NE Reverse Sinistral 270 240 300 0.024 0.005 0.082 4 553 Ahuriri River 45 30 70 W Reverse Dextral 0.5 0.1 1 4 554 Lindis Pass 75 60 90 W Reverse Dextral 0.47 0.1 1.31 4 555 Blue Lake 70 60 80 NE Reverse Dextral 297 270 315 0.47 0.10 1.22 4 556 Cardrona North 60 45 70 NW Reverse Dextral 297 270 315 0.38 0.11 1.39 4 557 Cardrona South 60 45 70 NW Reverse Dextral 297 270 315 0.38 0.11 1.39 4 558 Grandview 60 45 70 E Reverse 270 260 280 0.1 0.02 0.43 4 559 Pisa 45 30 70 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.1 0.02 0.43 4



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

560 Dunstan 45 30 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.9 0.25 1.5 1 561 Raggedy 45 30 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.14 0.09 0.30 4 562 Gimmerburn 45 30 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.35 0.12 0.91 4 563 Long Valley 60 45 70 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0.11 1.15 1 564 Ranfurly 45 30 60 NW Reverse 0.05 0.02 0.1 4 565 Waipiata 45 30 60 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0 1 4 566 Hyde 45 30 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.71 0.23 1.8 2 567 Taieri Ridge 45 30 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.71 0.12 1.26 2 568 Billys Ridge 45 30 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0 1 4 569 Akatore 55 45 60 SE Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 1.28 0.70 2.15 1 570 Settlement 55 45 60 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.4 0.2 0.6 4 571 Blue Mountains 45 40 70 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.28 0.11 0.32 1 572 Spylaw 45 40 70 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.28 0.11 0.47 1 573 Old Man 45 35 55 W Reverse 270 260 280 0.01 0.001 0.012 2 574 Nevis 45 30 60 NW Reverse 270 260 280 0.4 0.2 0.6 4 575 Hokonui 45 35 45 SW Reverse 270 260 280 0.5 0.2 0.8 4 576 Takitimu 2 60 50 70 W Reverse Dextral 0.5 0.2 0.8 4 577 Takitimu 1 60 50 70 W Reverse Dextral 0.5 0.2 0.8 4 578 Moonlight North 90 80 90 E Reverse Dextral 1 0.5 1.5 4 579 Moonlight South 90 80 90 E Reverse Dextral 1 0.5 1.5 4 580 Monowai 70 50 90 W Reverse Dextral 300 270 330 1.2 0.8 1.6 2 581 Hauroko North 70 50 90 W Reverse Dextral 300 270 330 1.2 0.8 1.6 4 582 Hauroko South 70 50 90 W Reverse Dextral 300 270 330 0.3 0.1 0.6 4 583 Solander 60 40 70 SE Reverse 270 240 300 0.1 0.05 0.15 4 584 Hump Ridge 70 50 90 E Reverse Dextral 330 300 360 0.5 0.1 1 4 585 Tauru 50 30 70 NE Reverse 270 240 300 0.2 0.1 0.3 4 586 Livingstone Key Summit 60 30 80 E Reverse Dextral 300 270 330 1 0.2 3 4 587 Hollyford 70 60 80 W Dextral Reverse 330 300 360 1 0.2 3 4 588 Skippers 70 60 80 W Dextral Reverse 330 300 360 0.5 0.1 2 4 589 Darran 75 60 90 W Reverse Sinistral 225 195 255 1 0.5 2 4 590 Te Anau 70 50 90 W Reverse Dextral 300 270 330 0.5 0.3 0.8 4 591 Spey-Mica Burn 75 60 90 W Dextral Reverse 315 270 360 0.1 0.05 2 4 592 Five Fingers 80 70 90 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.3 0.1 0.5 4 593 Barn 30 10 60 SE Reverse Dextral 300 270 330 0.5 0.1 1 4 594 Madagascar 60 50 70 SE Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 0.75 0.5 1.15 4 595 Milford Basin 5 to George R2 60 50 70 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.4 0.2 0.6 2 596 George R1 25 15 35 SE Reverse 270 260 280 1.5 0.5 2.5 2 597 Central Wedge 1 & 2 & 3 25 15 35 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.4 0.2 0.6 2



Dip min1 (º)

Dip max2 (º)

Dip dir3

Sense4 Dom5

Sense Sec6

Rake best (º)

Rake Min3 (º)

Rake max4 (º)

SR7 best (mm/yr)

SR Min3 (mm/yr)

SR Max4 (mm/yr)

Quality code

598 South Wedge 2 25 15 35 SE Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 3 1 5 2 599 South Wedge 1 25 15 35 SE Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 0.5 0.1 0.9 2 600 Central Wedge 4 – South Wedge 411 25 15 35 SE Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 3 1.5 4.5 2 601 South Wedge 3 25 15 35 SE Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 3 1.5 4.5 2 602 South Wedge 5 25 15 35 SE Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 3 1.5 4.5 2 603 South Wedge 6 to 10 25 15 35 SE Reverse Dextral 270 260 280 3 1.5 4.5 2 604 Etron 25 15 35 SE Reverse 270 260 280 2 605 Caswell High 8 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.7 0.3 1.1 2 606 Caswell High 9 60 50 70 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.8 0.3 1.3 2 607 Caswell High 10 60 50 70 SE Reverse 270 260 280 0.8 0.3 1.3 2 608 Caswell High 67 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.8 0.3 1.3 2 609 Caswell High 5 65 55 75 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.5 0.1 0.9 2 610 Caswell High 4 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.7 0.3 1.1 2 611 Caswell High 3 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.7 0.3 1.1 2 612 Caswell High 1 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.7 0.3 1.1 2 613 Caswell 211 60 50 70 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.7 0.3 1.1 2 614 West Balleny 75 60 90 E Dextral Reverse 360 340 380 2 0 10 4 615 Central Balleny 70 50 90 E Dextral Reverse 350 300 370 2 0 10 4 616 Snares 70 30 90 E Dextral Reverse 330 270 360 11 0 22 4 617 Puysegur Ridge 85 70 90 E Dextral 360 350 370 14 0 28 4 618 Alpine Springs Junction to Tophouse 65 55 75 SE Dextral Reverse 340 330 350 5.5 3 8 2 619 Alpine Kaniere to Springs Junction 60 40 60 SE Dextral Reverse 324 288 350 14 12 16 1 620 Alpine Jacksons to Kaniere 50 40 60 SE Dextral Reverse 348 327 357 27 22 32 1 621 Alpine Milford to Jacksons 80 70 90 SE Dextral 5 0 10 23 21 25 1 622 Alpine Caswell to Milford 80 70 90 SE Dextral 5 0 10 27.2 24.2 29 1 623 Alpine Resolution 80 70 90 SE Dextral 5 0 10 31.4 27.9 33.5 1 624 Puysegur 20 10 30 E Reverse Dextral 295 270 320 27 20 38 4 625 Waihemo 55 45 65 NE Reverse Strike slip 0.25 0.15 0.35 2 626 Greendale 85 75 90 S Dextral Reverse 20 10 30 0.2 0.05 0.4 2 627 Hikurangi Raukumara NW Reverse 270 260 280 54 48 60 2 628 Hikurangi Hawke Bay NW Reverse 270 260 280 44 37 31 2 629 Hikurangi Wellington NW Reverse 270 260 280 25 20 30 2 630 Rahotu 65 55 75 SE Normal 90 80 100 0.16 0.1 0.24 1 631 Kina 65 55 75 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.44 0.2 0.61 1 632 Ihaia 65 55 75 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.39 0.26 0.61 1 633 Kiri 65 55 75 NW Normal 90 80 100 1.66 0.66 2.04 1 634 Pihama 65 55 75 NW Normal 90 80 100 0.23 0.13 0.37 1 635 Manaia 60 30 70 SE Reverse 270 260 290 0.2 0.1 0.3 2


Figure 1.2 Northern North Island fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone.


Figure 1.3 Northern Taupo Rift and Havre Trough fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone.


Figure 1.4 Southern North Island fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone.

Figure 1.5 Wellington region fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone.


Figure 1.6 Northern South Island fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone.

Figure 1.7 Southern Alps fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone.


Figure 1.8 Southern South Island fault zones. Ticks denote the downthrown side of a normal fault zone; triangles the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone.

Figure 1.9 Puysegur Subduction Zone fault zones. Triangles denote the upthrown side of a reverse fault zone; arrows the sense of movement of a strike-slip fault zone.


2.0 ACTIVE FAULT ZONE AND PARAMETER DEFINITIONS

2.1 DEFINITION OF AN ACTIVE FAULT ZONE

2.1.1 Definition of active

A fault zone is classified as active if there is evidence, or inferred evidence, for ground surface displacement in the past 125,000 years (i.e., since the peak highstand of the last interglacial period, marine isotope stage 5e). We use a different age criterion for the Taupo Rift (Figure 1.1), which is evolving so rapidly (especially narrowing) that fault zones there are classified as active if there is evidence or inferred evidence for displacement in the past 25,000 years (since the Oruanui eruption, Villamor & Berryman 2001, 2006a).

2.1.2 Definition of an active fault zone

An active fault zone in the NZAFM is a series of one or more active faults which are delineated by a single trace (i.e. surface position or projected surface position; Figure 1.1 - Figure 1.8). This trace is often a simplification of multiple fault traces in databases such as the New Zealand Active Faults Database (http://data.gns.cri.nz/af/) or on published maps such as the QMAP 1:250,000 series.

Generally, each line that represents a fault zone approximates a previously named, and commonly published, active fault. In such circumstances, the published name is used. Other fault zones are identified here for the first time, or are groupings of one or more published active faults, and these have informal names, some also with numbers. Each fault zone has a unique identifier number, which is shown on Figure 1.1 - Figure 1.8 and Table 1.1.

The NZAFM model should not be used for any purposes relating to land-use or engineering development. The detailed underlying datasets should be consulted where specific information is required.

2.2 PARAMETER DEFINITIONS

Parameters defined in the NZAFM are: (i) dip; (ii) dip-direction; (iii) sense of movement; (iv) rake; (v) net slip rate; and (vi) quality code. These are defined below and uncertainties are discussed in section 2.3.

2.2.1 Dip

The downward inclination of the fault plane from the horizontal (0-90º). All fault zones are considered to be planar and we have adopted the best estimate of average dip. For fault zones with an inferred dip, we assign a general uncertainty of ±10º-15º.


2.2.2 Dip direction

The geographic octant towards which the fault zone dips:

N = north S = south W = west E = east NW = northwest NE = northeast SW = southwest SE = southeast

2.2.3 Sense of movement

Dominant, and where applicable, secondary sense (type) of relative movement (slip or displacement) on the fault plane. The sense is generally restricted to normal, reverse, sinistral (left lateral), or dextral (right lateral). For a small number of faults with strike slip movement, the sense is not known and is given simply as strike slip.

2.2.4 Rake

The direction of hanging wall slip relative to a horizontal line on the fault plane. Rake is expressed as an angle from 0º to 360º whereby:

360º = 0º = dextral 90º = normal 180º = sinistral 270º = reverse

For fault zones with an inferred rake, uncertainties were generally assigned as ±10º.

2.2.5 Slip rate

Net (rake-parallel) rate of movement averaged over a time period spanning at least two, but typically many more, ground-rupturing earthquakes. Generally this is calculated from the displacement of a marker of known age, and the slip rate is then assumed to be constant over that time. Where fault zones have associated folds, the net slip rate usually includes displacement accommodated by folding.

2.2.6 Quality code

A ranking system is used to provide an indication of the quantity and type of geological data available for each fault zone. The quality code is weighted toward the robustness of the slip rate data.

= Fault zone with high quality field (e.g., trench, dated displaced markers) or marine (e.g., swath, markers with well constrained ages) data.

= Fault zone with some constraints from field or marine data; slip rate largely estimated from regional slip rate budgets.


= Fault zone in offshore Bay of Plenty (northern domain 2) with well constrained geometries from swath and seismic data, but slip rate inferred based on distribution of GPS-derived extension rates.

= Fault zone with few data and slip rates mainly inferred from geomorphic expression (e.g. scarp height and morphology as an indicator of age).

= Fault zone within the central South Island (northwestern domain 11) that does not have demonstrable activity and hence a slip rate has not been inferred.

2.3 PARAMETER UNCERTAINTIES

For the numerical parameters dip, rake, and net slip rate, uncertainties are quantified by providing three values for each, a minimum value, a maximum value, and what is considered to be the best (most likely) value. They are inferred to approximate 95% confidence bounds, in a qualitative rather than statistically rigorous way. The best value may in some cases be the mean of several site-specific measurements, or be the median between maximum and minimum values. In other cases, it is calculated from the best-constrained site-specific offset and age data, and may return a value anywhere between the maximum and minimum (e.g. for a particular fault zone, a value towards the maximum may be considered most likely). As a result there is not necessarily a symmetrical distribution of uncertainty between maximum and minimum values.

This page is intentionally left blank.


3.0 PARAMETER DESCRIPTIONS

The derivation of each parameter for each fault zone is briefly described below. The number in brackets refers to the numbers in Table 1.1 and Figure 1.2 - Figure 1.8. In order to reduce the lengths of the headings, fault zone names which include single numbers, e.g., Alderman East 1, Alderman East 2, Alderman East 3, are listed as Alderman East 1, 2, 3. This distinguishes them from short faults which have been grouped together as a single fault zone (e.g., Waitotara 10 & 11, or Nukumuru - Waitotara 1-6).

WAIROA NORTH (1)

The Wairoa North fault zone includes the Wairoa North and Wairoa South Faults (sometimes collectively called the Wairoa North Fault), the northernmost faults in tectonic domain 1 (Figure 1.1). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural exposures, and gravity, vertical electronic sounding, and seismic reflection profiles (Edbrooke, 2001; Wise et al., 2003). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

KEREPEHI NORTH, KEREPEHI CENTRAL, KEREPEHI SOUTH (2-4)

These fault zones are the northern, central and southern parts of the Kerepehi Fault, in the Hauraki Rift in the northern part of tectonic domain 1. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are derived from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures, and marine seismic profiles (Chick et al., 2001; Villamor et al., 2001; M. Persaud, P. Villamor, K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal, although there are indications of some dextral motion preserved at one site. The slip rate is calculated from offset of a fluvial terrace (M. Persaud, P. Villamor, K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006).

ALDERMAN EAST 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ALDERMAN WEST 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ASTROLABE 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, MATATARA 1, 2, 3, 4, MAUNGATI EAST 1, MAUNGATI WEST 1, 2, 3, NGATORO SOUTH 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, OHENA 1, 2, 3, 4, OTARA EAST 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, OTARA WEST 1, 2, 3, TE ARAWA 1, 2, 3, TUHUA NORTH 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, TUHUA SOUTH 1, 2, 3, TAURANGA TROUGH WEST 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, TAURANGA TROUGH EAST 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, TUAKANA 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, TUATORU 1, 2, 3, TUMOKEMOKE 1, 2, 3, VOLKNER 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, WAIRAKA 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, WHITE ISLAND NORTH 1, 2, WHAKAARI 1, 2, 3, 4 (5-109)

These fault zones are situated in the submarine Havre Trough, in the northern part of tectonic domain 2. Most are simplifications of multiple fault strands and a few (Tuhua North 4, Ohena 3, Tauranga Trough West 2, Otara West 3, Otara West 2, Otara East 3, Otara East 4, Wairaka 2, Wairaka 1, Te Arawa 1, Volkner 4, Volkner 1) were further simplified in this study so that the minimum horizontal spacing between fault zones dipping towards each other is 5 km. Sense of movement and dip directions were derived from seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). Seismic reflection profiles show that the fault zones are generally listric, so single average dip values have been inferred. The rakes are assigned to reflect the interpretation that they are pure normal faults. The slip rates were assigned from a proportion of calculated total extension rates across the entire fault zone, according to their relative geomorphic expression (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). For the above-mentioned fault zones which were further simplified in this study by combining two faults


spaced less than 5 km apart, the combined slip rates were decreased by subtracting the lower of the two slip rate values.

CALYPSO 2, 3, DOMINO 2, OKUREI 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, MAKETU 1, 2, 3, MOTUHORA SOUTH 1, MOUTOKI 1, 2, NUKUHOU 1, OHIWA 1, OHIWA NORTH 1, PIRIPAI 1, POKARE 1, 2, PUKEHOKO NORTH 1, PUKEHOKO SOUTH 1, RANGITAIKI 1, 2, TARAWERA 1, 3, 4, 5 TAURANGA 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, THORNTON 1, 2, TOKATA 1, WHITE ISLAND 1, 2, 3 (110-150)

The above are situated in the submarine Havre Trough and northern Taupo Rift (offshore Whakatane Graben), in the northern part of tectonic domain 2. Most are simplifications of multiple fault strands and a few (Tauranga 2, Tauranga 6, Tarawera 4, Pukehoko South 1) were further simplified in this study so that the minimum inter-fault spacing between fault zones dipping towards each other is 5 km. Sense of movement and dip directions were derived from seismic reflection data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005; Bull et al., 2006; Lamarche et al., 2006). Seismic reflection data show that the fault zones are generally listric, so single average dip values have been inferred. The rakes are assigned to reflect the interpretation that they are pure normal faults. The slip rates were calculated from offset of a diachronous post-glacial transgressive ravinement surface (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005; Bull et al., 2006; Lamarche et al., 2006). For the above-mentioned fault zones which were further simplified in this study by combining two faults spaced less than 5 km apart, slip rates were decreased by subtracting the lower of the two slip rate values.

MATATA (151)

The Matata fault zone represents multiple onshore-offshore fault traces in the northern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and a trench exposure (Ota et al., 1988) and the dip is inferred by Villamor and Berryman (2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of tephras in a trench (Ota et al., 1988) and converted to a net (=dip) slip rate based on the dip values.

BRAEMAR (152)

The Braemar fault zone is a zone of multiple fault traces in the northern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Beanland, 1989). The dip is assigned from the nearby Edgecumbe 1987 Fault. The slip rate is estimated from offset tephras in a trench (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

OTAKIRI (153)

The Otakiri fault zone is a series of fault traces in the northern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The traces were first recognised after they ruptured in the 1987 Edgecumbe Earthquake (Beanland et al., 1989, 1990). The sense of movement and dip direction are from the post-earthquake surveying (Beanland et al., 1989, 1990) and the dip is assigned from the nearby Edgecumbe 1987 fault zone. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (K. Berryman, unpublished data 2005).


EDGECUMBE COASTAL (154)

The Edgecumbe Coastal fault zone is situated in the northern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The fault zone is an inferred extension of the Edgecumbe 1987 fault zone, which is extended to connect with the White Island 1 fault zone to the northeast. The sense of movement, dip, dip direction, and rake are inferred from these two fault zones, and the slip rate is assigned from consideration of the slip rates of surrounding fault zones (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

EDGECUMBE 1987 (155)

The Edgecumbe 1987 fault zone is the Edgecumbe Fault sensu stricto, which comprises a series of fault traces in the northern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. These fault traces were first recognised after they ruptured in the 1987 Edgecumbe Earthquake (Beanland et al., 1989, 1990; Nairn and Beanland, 1989). The Edgecumbe fault zone is considered to have been the primary fault which ruptured in that earthquake, so the sense of movement, dip, dip direction, and rake are from a combination of the post-earthquake field surveying, trenching (Beanland et al., 1989, 1990) and seismological studies of the earthquake (Anderson and Webb, 1989). The slip rate is calculated from offset tephras in the trenches (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

ROTOITIPAKAU (156)

The Rotoitipakau fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the northern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. Three of these fault traces ruptured in the 1987 Edgecumbe Earthquake (Beanland et al., 1989; Berryman et al., 1998). The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Berryman et al., 1998; Villamor et al., 2011). The dip and rake are assigned from the nearby Edgecumbe fault zone. The slip rate is calculated from offset tephra layers in trenches (Berryman et al., 1998).

HOROHORO (157)

The Horohoro fault zone comprises a series of short traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. It has been extended to the southwest, inferred to be buried beneath volcanic deposits (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005). The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Zachariasen and Van Dissen, 2001; Villamor et al., 2011). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of tephras in trench exposures (Zachariasen and Van Dissen, 2001) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

NGAKURU SOUTHWEST (158)

The Ngakuru Southwest fault zone is part of the west strand of the Ngakuru Fault, which comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor and Berryman, 2001; Villamor et al., 2011). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is inferred from the east strand (Ngakuru New) (Villamor and Berryman 2001).


NGAKURU NEW (159)

The Ngakuru New fault zone is the east strand of the Ngakuru Fault, which comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Villamor and Berryman, 2001; Villamor et al., 2011). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offsets of ignimbrites (Villamor and Berryman, 2001) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

MALEME (160)

The Maleme fault zone comprises a series of traces forming a graben in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, trench exposures, and GPR profiles (Villamor and Berryman, 2001; McClymont et al., 2008, 2009; Tronicke et al., 2006; Villamor et al., 2011). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from offset of a lacustrine terrace (Villamor and Berryman, 2001).

MANGATETE (161)

The Mangatete fault zone is the Mangatete/Lakeside Fault, which comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offsets of a lacustrine terrace (Villamor et al., 2001) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

WHIRINAKI WEST (162)

The Whirinaki West fault zone is the west strand of the Whirinaki Fault, which comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Villamor and Berryman, 2001; Canora-Catalan et al., 2008; Villamor et al., 2011). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offsets of tephras in a trench (Canora-Catalan et al., 2008) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

WHIRINAKI EAST (163)

The Whirinaki East fault zone is the east strand of the Whirinaki Fault, which comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Villamor and Berryman, 2001; Canora-Catalan et al., 2008; Villamor et al., 2011). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offsets of tephras in a trench (Villamor and Berryman, 2001; Canora-Catalan et al., 2008) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.


HOSSACK ROAD (164)

The Hossack Road fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offsets of basin fill sediments (Villamor and Berryman, 2001) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

TE WETA (165)

The Te Weta fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor and Berryman, 2001; Villamor et al., 2011). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offsets of basin fill sediments (Villamor and Berryman, 2001) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

PAEROA (166)

The Paeroa fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Villamor and Berryman, 2001; Berryman et al., 2008; Villamor et al., 2011). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of an ignimbrite surface (Berryman et al., 2008) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

NGAPOURI (167)

The Ngapouri fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Villamor and Berryman, 2001; Nairn et al., 2005; Villamor et al., 2011). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of tephras in exposures (Villamor et al., 2001) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

TUAHU (168)

The Tuahu fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Berryman et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. This slip rate is estimated from displacement of volcanic dome units (Berryman et al., 2001).


LAKE OHAKURI (169)

The Lake Ohakuri fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for this part of the Taupo Rift (Villamor et al., 2001).

WEST WHANGAMATA (170)

This fault zone is the Hauraki / West Whangamata Fault, which comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for this part of the Taupo Rift (Villamor et al., 2001).

PUKETERATA (171)

The Puketerata fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for this part of the Taupo Rift (Villamor et al., 2001).

WHANGAMATA (172)

The Whangamata fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of tephras (Villamor et al., 2001) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

ORAKEIKORAKO (173)

The Orakeikorako fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned from assigned from a slip rate balance for this part of the Taupo Rift (Villamor et al., 2001).


ORAKONUI (174)

The Orakonui fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from offset of tephras (Villamor et al., 2001).

NGANGIHO (175)

The Ngangiho fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from offset of tephras (Villamor et al., 2001).

WHAKAIPO (176)

The Whakaipo fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from offset of tephras (Villamor et al., 2001).

KAIAPO (177)

The Kaiapo fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that it motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from offset of tephras (Villamor et al., 2001).

ARATIATIA (178)

The Aratiatia fault zone comprises a series of traces in the central Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from offset of tephras (Villamor et al., 2001).


KAINGAROA (179)

The Kaingaroa fault zone is situated in the central Taupo Rift, in the southeastern part of domain 2. Although it is not marked by active fault traces (most likely because it is buried by young tephra), it is inferred to be the source of an earthquake in 1895 (Villamor et al., 2001). The sense of movement and dip direction is from geomorphic expressions and natural exposures (Grindley, 1960). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is inferred based on consideration of slip rate budgets in this part of domain 2 (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

WAIHI WEST (180)

The Waihi West fault zone is the northern part of the Waihi Fault, which comprises a series of traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (P. Villamor, unpublished data 2005). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (P. Villamor, unpublished data 2005).

WAIHI SOUTH (181)

The Waihi South fault zone is the southern part of the Waihi Fault, which comprises a series of traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (P. Villamor, unpublished data 2005). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (P. Villamor, unpublished data 2005).

WAIHI EAST (182)

The Waihi East fault zone comprises a series of unnamed fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (P. Villamor, unpublished data 2005). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (P. Villamor, unpublished data 2005).

POUTU (183)

The Poutu fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor et al., 2001). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from offset tephras (P. Villamor, unpublished data 2008).


TREETRUNK (184)

The Treetrunk fault zone is situated in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. Although it is not marked by active fault traces (most likely because it is buried by young tephra), there are streambank exposures of a wide zone of faults offsetting young tephras. The sense of movement and dip direction are from the exposures and the dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (P. Villamor, K. Berryman, unpublished data 2005).

WAHIANOA (185)

The Wahianoa fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. It has been extended northeast to include the northern part of the Rangipo (Desert Road) Fault. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor and Berryman, 2006a, b). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of a lava flow (Villamor and Berryman, 2006a, b) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

RANGIPO NORTH, RANGIPO CENTRAL, RANGIPO SOUTH (186-188)

These faults are the central and southern parts of the Rangipo (Desert Road) Fault, which comprise a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Villamor et al., 2007). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of a tephra in a trench (Villamor and Berryman, 2006b) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

NATIONAL PARK (189)

The National Park fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (P. Villamor, unpublished data 2005). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (P. Villamor, unpublished data 2005).

RAURIMU (190)

The Raurimu fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Villamor and Berryman, 2006a, b). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of laharic deposits (Villamor and Berryman, 2006b) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.


OHAKUNE (191)

The Raurimu fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Villamor and Berryman, 2006a, b). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of laharic surfaces (Villamor and Berryman, 2006b) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

RAETIHI (192)

The Raetihi fault zone includes the Raetihi North and Raetihi South faults in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression for the Raetihi North Fault (Villamor and Berryman, 2006a, b). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is a combination of the slip rate of both faults, calculated from vertical offset of laharic surfaces (Villamor and Berryman, 2006b) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

WAIPUNA (193)

The Waipuna fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor and Berryman, 2006a, b). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of a fluvial terrace (Villamor and Berryman, 2006b) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

ORUAKUKURU (194)

The Oruakukuru fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Villamor and Berryman, 2006a, b). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of a fluvial terrace (Villamor and Berryman, 2006b) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

KARIOI (195)

The Karioi fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Villamor and Berryman, 2006a, b). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of tephra in a trench exposure (Villamor and Berryman, 2006b) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.


SHAWCROFT ROAD (196)

The Shawcroft Road fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Villamor and Berryman, 2006a, b). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of tephra on a laharic terrace (Villamor and Berryman, 2006b) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

SNOWGRASS (197)

The Snowgrass fault zone comprises a series of fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Villamor and Berryman, 2006a, b). The dip is assigned from inferred average values for listric faults in the Taupo Rift (Villamor and Berryman, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned from nearby faults (Villamor and Berryman, 2006b).

KAWEKA (198)

The Kaweka fault zone is situated in central domain 4, and has been extended to the southwest to link with the Snowgrass Fault. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and a natural exposure (Beanland, 1995), although the extended, southwest portion is more likely to have a predominant normal component similar to Taupo Rift (Domain 2) fault zones. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006).

MATAROA, TAIHAPE, RANGITIKEI (199-201)

The Mataroa, Taihape, and Rangitikei fault zones are short fault traces in the southern Taupo Rift, the onshore part of domain 2. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. Slip rates are inferred to be low (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

TURI NORTH, TURI CENTRAL, TURI SOUTH (202-204)

These fault zones are the northern, central and southern parts of the submarine Turi Fault Zone, a series of fault traces in the Taranaki Rift, southwestern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (A. Nicol, unpublished data 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of seismic reflection profile horizons (A. Nicol, unpublished data 2006) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.


CAPE EGMONT NORTH, CAPE EGMONT CENTRAL, CAPE EGMONT SOUTH (205-207)

These fault zones are the northern, central, and southern parts of the submarine Cape Egmont Fault Zone in the Taranaki Rift, southwestern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Nodder, 1993, 1994; Nicol et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of seismic reflection profile horizons (Nodder, 1993, 1994; A. Nicol, unpublished data 2006) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

OAONUI (208)

The Oaonui fault zone is a short onshore trace in the Taranaki Rift, southwestern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures, and seismic reflection profiles (Hull, 1996; Townsend et al., 2010; Mouslopoulou et al., 2012). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of laharic deposits (Hull, 1996) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

INGLEWOOD (209)

The Inglewood fault zone is a series of short onshore traces in the Taranaki Rift, southwestern domain 1. The sense of movement and dip direction are from trench exposures (Hull, 1994, 1996). The dip is assigned from submarine faults to the south (e.g., Nodder, 1994). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that it is a pure normal fault. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of laharic deposits (Hull, 1996) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

NORFOLK (210)

The Norfolk fault zone is a short trace in the Taranaki Rift, southwestern domain 1. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Hull, 1996). The dip is assigned from submarine faults to the south (e.g., Nodder, 1994). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

ARARATA (211)

The Ararata Fault is a short fault trace in southern domain 1. The sense of movement and dip direction are from a streambank exposure (Pillans, 1990). The dip is assigned from submarine faults to the south (McVerry et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from vertical offset of a marine terrace (Pillans, 1990) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.


WAVERLEY - OKAIA 1 (212)

This fault zone includes the onshore Waverley Fault and the submarine Okaia 1 Fault in southern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Townsend, 1998) and seismic reflection profiles (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from a combination of the vertical offset of a marine terrace (Pillans, 1990) and offset of seismic reflection profile horizons (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005), and is converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

MOUMAHAKI - OKAIA 4 (213)

This fault zone includes the onshore Moumahaki Fault and the submarine Okaia 4 Fault in southern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from a combination of the vertical offset of a marine terrace (Pillans, 1990) and offset of seismic reflection profile horizons (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005), and is converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

RIDGE ROAD - OKAIA 2 (214)

This fault zone includes the onshore Ridge Road Fault and the submarine Okaia 2 Fault in southern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from a combination of the vertical offset of a marine terrace (Pillans, 1990) and offset of seismic reflection profile horizons (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005), and is converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

WAITOTARA 10 & 11 (215)

The Waitotara 10 & 11 fault zone includes the onshore Waitotara Fault and the submarine Waitotara 10 and 11 Faults in southern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from a roadcut exposure (Pillans, 1990) and seismic reflection profiles (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from a combination of the vertical offset of a marine terrace (Pillans, 1990) and offset of seismic reflection profile horizons (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005), and is converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

NUKUMURU - WAITOTARA 1-6 (216)

The Nukumuru - Waitotara 1-6 fault zone includes the onshore Nukumuru Fault and the submarine Waitotara 1-6 Faults in southern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from a combination of the vertical offset of a marine terrace (Pillans, 1990) and offset of seismic reflection profile horizons (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005), and is converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.


OKAIA 5 (217)

The Okaia 5 fault zone is a submarine fault in southern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from offset of seismic reflection profile horizons (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005), and is converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

OKAIA 3 (218)

The Okaia 3 fault zone is a submarine fault in southern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from offset of seismic reflection profile horizons (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005), and is converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

WAITOTARA 8 & 9 (219)

This fault is the submarine Waitotara 8 and 9 fault zones in southern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from offset of seismic reflection profile horizons (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2005; McVerry et al., 2005), and is converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

HARIKI (220)

The onshore-offshore Hariki fault zone is in the northern Hikurangi (Subduction Margin) Forearc, domain 5. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions were derived from seismic reflection data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rates were calculated from deformation beneath a diachronous post-glacial transgressive ravinement surface (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005).

OHAE 1, 2 (221-222)

The Ohae 1 and Ohae 2 fault zones include a series of submarine faults in the northern Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions were derived from seismic reflection data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rates were calculated from deformation beneath a diachronous post-glacial transgressive ravinement surface (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005).


OHAE 3 (223)

The Ohae 3 fault zone is a series of submarine faults in the northern Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. These faults have seafloor scarps as identified in seismic reflection, multibeam bathymetry, and side-scan sonar data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions were derived from seismic reflection data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate was calculated from offset of a diachronous post-glacial transgressive ravinement surface (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005).

OPAPE 1 (224)

The Opape 1 fault zone includes the submarine Opape 1 Fault and an unnamed onshore fault in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt (also called the North Island Fault System), domain 4. The submarine faults have seafloor scarps as identified in seismic reflection (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions were derived from seismic reflection data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly normal with a possible small dextral component. The slip rate was calculated from offset of a diachronous post-glacial transgressive ravinement surface (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005).

OPOTIKI 2, 3 (225-226)

The Opotiki 2 and Opotiki 3 fault zones include a series of submarine faults in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The faults have seafloor scarps as identified in seismic reflection data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions were derived from seismic reflection data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly normal with a minor dextral component. The slip rate was calculated from offset of a diachronous post-glacial transgressive ravinement surface (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005).

TIROHANGA 1 (227)

The Tirohanga 1 fault zone includes the onshore Tirohanga Fault and the submarine Opotiki 1 Fault in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The submarine faults have seafloor scarps as identified in seismic reflection, multibeam bathymetry, and side-scan sonar data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions were derived from seismic reflection data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly normal with a minor dextral component. The slip rate was calculated from offset of a diachronous post-glacial transgressive ravinement surface (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005).

UREWERA 3 (228)

The Urewera 3 fault zone includes the Motuhora and Kotara Faults in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000; K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is assigned based on geomorphic expression and consideration of slip rate budgets across the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).


UREWERA 2 (229)

The Urewera 2 fault zone includes the north-striking Motu Fault in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4, and an inferred extension to the southwest (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000; GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is assigned based on geomorphic expression and consideration of slip rate budgets across the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

UREWERA 1 (230)

The Urewera 1 fault zone is situated in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Although it is not marked by active fault traces (most likely because they have been eroded away), it is inferred to link the Urewera 1 fault zone with the Waimana South fault zone (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006). The dip and dip direction are assigned from the Urewera 1 and 2 fault zones (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is assigned from the combined slip rate of the Urewera 2 and 3 fault zones along-strike (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

RAUKUMARA 9 (231)

The Raukumara 9 fault zone is a short, unnamed trace in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is inferred to be low (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

WAIRATA (232)

The Wairata fault zone includes the short trace of the Koranga Fault in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

WAIKAREMOANA (233)

The Waikaremoana fault zone includes the onshore Waiotahi Fault and part of the submarine Waikaremoana Fault in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. It has also been extended to the south to link with the Waimana fault zone. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Mouslopoulou et al., 2007, 2009) and seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect its interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral strike-slip with a small normal component. The slip rate is calculated from offset fluvial terraces (Mouslopoulou et al., 2009).


WAIMANA – WAIKAREMOANA (234)

The Waimana - Waikaremoana fault zone is a series of submarine traces in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. These are interpreted to be the northward extension of the (merged) Waimana and Waikaremoana Faults. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect its interpretation that motion is oblique normal-dextral (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2008). The slip rate is assigned from the combined Waimana North and Waikaremoana fault zone slip rates (R. Van Dissen, N. Litchfield, unpublished data 2008).

WAIMANA NORTH (235)

The Waimana North fault zone includes the northern part of the onshore Waimana Fault and the submarine Waimana 1 fault zone in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Mouslopoulou et al., 2007, 2009) and seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect its interpretation as a predominantly dextral strike-slip fault with a small normal component. The slip rate is calculated from offset fluvial terraces (Mouslopoulou et al., 2009).

WAIMANA SOUTH (236)

The Waimana South fault zone includes the southern part of the Waimana Fault in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4, and has been extended south to link with the Patoka - Rangiora fault zone. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Mouslopoulou et al., 2007, 2009). The dip is inferred to be slightly steeper than the Waimana North fault zone. The rake is assigned from the Waimana North Fault. The slip rate is calculated from offset fluvial terraces (Mouslopoulou et al., 2009).

AWAKERI (237)

The Awakeri fault zone is in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and seismic reflection profiles (Beanland, 1989). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

WAIOHAU NORTH (238)

The Waiohau North fault zone is in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, part of the Waiohau Fault, in northern domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Beanland, 1989; Mouslopoulou et al., 2007, 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral strike-slip with a small normal component. The slip rate is calculated from offset geomorphic features (Mouslopoulou et al., 2009).


WAIOHAU SOUTH (239)

The Waiohau South fault zone is the southern part of the Waiohau Fault, in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Mouslopoulou et al., 2007, 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral strike-slip with a small normal component. The slip rate is assigned from the Waiohau North fault zone (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

WHAKATANE NORTH (240)

The Whakatane North fault zone is the northern part of the onshore Whakatane Fault and the submarine Kohi Fault in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Mouslopoulou et al., 2007, 2009) and seismic reflection data (Lamarche and Barnes, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from offset geomorphic features (Mouslopoulou et al., 2009).

WHAKATANE SOUTH (241)

The southern part of the Whakatane Fault is in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Mouslopoulou et al., 2007, 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral strike-slip with a minor normal component. The slip rate is calculated from offset geomorphic features (Mouslopoulou et al., 2009).

WHEAO NORTH, WHEAO SOUTH (242-243)

These fault zones are the northern and southern parts of the Wheao Fault in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4, but Wheao North fault zone has also been extended further north. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and consideration of slip rate budgets in that portion of domain 4 (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

TE WHAITI (244)

The Te Whaiti fault zone is in the northern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and consideration of slip rate budgets in that portion of the North Island Fault System (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

PATOKA – RANGIORA (245)

The Patoka - Rangiora fault zone includes the Patoka and Rangiora Faults, and the northern part of the Mohaka Fault, in the central North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Cutten et al., 1988; Halliday, 2003). The slip rate is inferred taking into account calculated values from offset fluvial terraces and considering slip rate budgets in that portion of the North Island Fault System (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).


MOHAKA NORTH, MOHAKA SOUTH (246-247)

These fault zones are the northern and southern parts of the Mohaka Fault in the central North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Raub et al., 1987; Marden and Neall, 1990; Beanland, 1995; Zachariasen et al., 2000). The slip rate is inferred taking into account calculated values from offset fluvial terraces and considering slip rate budgets in that portion of the North Island Dextral Fault Belt (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

RUAHINE NORTH (248)

The Ruahine North fault zone is the northern part of the Ruahine Fault, in the central North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Beanland, 1995; K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is inferred taking into account calculated values from offset fluvial terraces and considering slip rate budgets in that portion of domain 4 (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

RUAHINE CENTRAL, RUAHINE SOUTH (249-250)

These fault zones are the central and southern parts of the Ruahine Fault in the central North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is inferred taking into account calculated values from offset fluvial terraces and considering slip rate budgets in that portion of domain 4 (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

MASCARIN 1, 2 (251-252)

The Mascarin 1 and Mascarin 2 fault zones are the southern and northern part of the submarine Mascarin Fault in domain 3, although the Mascarin 1 fault zone has also been extended further south. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions were derived from seismic reflection data (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (Nodder et al., 2007) and slip rate budgets for this part of domain 4 (Robinson et al., 2011).

FISHERMAN 1 (253)

The Fisherman 1 fault zone comprises a series of unnamed submarine faults in domain 3 (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007). Sense of movement, dip, dip direction, rake, and slip rate are assigned from the Fisherman 2 Fault along-strike. The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007) and slip rate budgets for this part of the North Island Dextral Fault Belt (Robinson et al., 2011).


FISHERMAN 2 (254)

The Fisherman 2 fault zone includes a series of unnamed submarine faults, the southern Waitarere Fault, and part of the Okupe Fault, in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions were derived from seismic reflection data (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007; G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that they are predominantly reverse faults with a small component of strike-slip motion (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007; Robinson et al., 2011) and slip rate budgets for this part of domain 3 (Robinson et al., 2011).

FISHERMAN 3 (255)

The submarine Fisherman 3 fault zone includes part of the Okupe Fault and the northern Waitarere Fault in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection data (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007; G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation they are predominantly reverse faults with a small component of strike-slip motion (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007) and slip rate budgets for this part of domain 3 (Robinson et al., 2011).

OKUPE 1 (256)

The submarine Okupe 1 fault zone includes a series of unnamed faults and part of the Okupe Fault, in domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007; G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation they are predominantly reverse faults with a small component of strike-slip motion (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (Nodder et al., 2007) and slip rate budgets for this part of domain 3 (Robinson et al., 2011).

OKUPE 2 (257)

The Okupe 2 fault zone includes a part of the submarine Okupe Fault in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly reverse with a small dextral component (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (Nodder et al., 2007) and slip rate budgets for this part of domain 3 (Robinson et al., 2011).

ONEPOTO 1 (258)

The Onepoto 1 fault zone includes a part of the submarine Okupe Fault in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly reverse with a small dextral component (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (Nodder et al., 2007) and slip rate budgets for this part of domain 3 (Robinson et al., 2011).


ONEPOTO 2 (259)

The Onepoto 2 fault zone is a submarine fault in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation they are predominantly reverse faults with a small component of strike-slip motion (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (Nodder et al., 2007) and slip rate budgets for this part of domain 3 (Robinson et al., 2011).

RANGITIKEI OFFSHORE 1 (260)

This submarine fault zone combines the Rangitikei Fault and the northern part of the Otaheke Fault in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007). The rakes are assigned to reflect the interpretation it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (Nodder et al., 2007) and slip rate budgets for this part of domain 3 (Robinson et al., 2011).

RANGITIKEI OFFSHORE 2 (261)

This fault zone includes the submarine Rangitikei Fault and the southern part of the onshore Leedstown Fault in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Nicol and Beavan, 2003; Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned taking into account the submarine Rangitikei Fault slip rate and the geomorphic expression of the Leedstown Fault onshore, which suggests the slip rate decreases rapidly northward (Robinson et al., 2011).

MANA - OTAHEKE 1 (262)

The Mana Otaheke 1 fault zone includes the onshore Terawhiti Fault (Ota et al., 1981) and a series of unnamed submarine faults (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007) in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of the submarine post-glacial erosion surface (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007), the offset of fluvial terraces on the Terawhiti Fault, and slip rate budgets for this part of domain 3 (Robinson et al., 2011).


The Mana - Otaheke 2 fault zone comprises a series of unnamed submarine faults (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007) in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007) and slip rate budgets for this part of domain 3 (Robinson et al., 2011).



The submarine Mana - Otaheke 3 fault zone includes a series of unnamed faults (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007), and the southern part of the Otaheke Fault (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007), in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Lamarche et al., 2005; Nodder et al., 2007; G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of the vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (G. Lamarche, unpublished data 2007) and slip rate budgets for this part of the North Island Fault System (Robinson et al., 2011).

MARTON ANTICLINE (265)

The Marton Anticline fault zone is a proposed blind thrust fault beneath the Marton Anticline (Jackson et al., 1998; Clement and Brook, 2008), in the central part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Jackson et al., 1998) and from the nearby Mt Stewart Fault (Melhuish et al., 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from a combination of deformation of marine and fluvial terraces and comparison with the Mt Stewart Fault (Robinson et al., 2011).

GALPIN (266)

The Galpin fault zone is a short fault in the central part of domain 3. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from natural exposures and geomorphic expression (Fleming, 1953; Pillans, 1990). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from vertical offset of a fluvial terrace (Pillans, 1990) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

LEEDSTOWN (267)

The Leedstown fault zone is in the central part of domain 3. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from natural exposures and geomorphic expression (Pillans, 1990). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is from vertical offset of a fluvial terrace (Pillans, 1990) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

MT STEWART (268)

The Mt Stewart fault zone is a blind thrust beneath the Mt Stewart-Halcombe Anticline in the northern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profile data (Melhuish et al., 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is from offset and folding of seismic reflection profile horizons (Melhuish et al., 1996).


FEILDING ANTICLINE (269)

The Feilding Anticline fault zone is a proposed blind thrust beneath the Feilding Anticline (Jackson et al., 1998; Clement and Brook, 2008), in the northern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Jackson et al., 1998) and from the nearby Mt Stewart Fault (Melhuish et al., 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from a combination of deformation of marine and fluvial terraces and comparison with the Mt Stewart Fault (Robinson et al., 2011).

POHANGINA ANTICLINE (270)

The Pohangina Anticline fault zone is a proposed blind thrust beneath the Pohangina Anticline (Jackson et al., 1998; Clement and Brook, 2008), in the northern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Jackson et al., 1998) and from the nearby Mt Stewart Fault (Melhuish et al., 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from a combination of deformation of marine and fluvial terraces and comparison with the Mt Stewart Fault (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

RUAHINE REVERSE (271)

The Ruahine Reverse fault zone is an unnamed fault in the northern part of domain 3. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from the geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 3 (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

SHANNON ANTICLINE (272)

The Shannon Anticline fault zone is a proposed blind thrust beneath the Shannon Anticline (Hesp and Shepherd, 1978), in the central part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression and from the nearby Mt Stewart Fault (Melhuish et al., 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from a combination of deformation of marine and fluvial terraces and comparison with the Mt Stewart fault zone (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

LEVIN ANTICLINE (273)

The Levin Anticline fault zone is a proposed blind thrust beneath the Levin Anticline (Hesp and Shepherd, 1978), in the central part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression and from the nearby Mt Stewart Fault (Melhuish et al., 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from a combination of deformation of marine and fluvial terraces and comparison with the Mt Stewart Fault (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).


HIMATANGI ANTICLINE (274)

The Himatangi Anticline fault zone is a proposed blind thrust beneath the Himatangi Anticline (Hesp and Shepherd, 1978), in the central part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Clement and Brook, 2008) and from the nearby Mt Stewart Fault (Melhuish et al., 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from a combination of deformation of marine and fluvial terraces and comparison with the Mt Stewart fault zone (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

POROUTAWHAO (275)

The Poroutawhao fault zone is a proposed blind thrust beneath the Poroutawhao High (Hesp and Shepherd, 1978), in the central part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006) and from the nearby Mt Stewart Fault (Melhuish et al., 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from a combination of deformation of marine and fluvial terraces and comparison with the Mt Stewart Fault (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

PUKERUA - SHEPHERDS GULLY 1, 2, 3 (276-278)

The Pukerua - Shepherds Gully 1 and 2 fault zones are the southern and northern parts of the Shepherds Gully Fault. The Pukerua - Shepherds Gully 3 fault zone includes the Pukerua Bay Fault and its inferred offshore extension to the northeast, in the southern part of domain 3. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression of the onland parts (Ota et al., 1981; Van Dissen and Berryman, 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that they are pure dextral faults. The slip rates are estimated from a combination of fluvial terrace offset data from the Pukerua Fault (Van Dissen and Berryman, 1996) and consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 3 (Robinson et al., 2011).

OHARIU SOUTH 1, 2 (279-280)

These fault zones are the southern, offshore part of the Ohariu Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Sense of movement, dip, dip direction, and rake are from seismic reflection profiles and multibeam bathymetric data (Pondard and Barnes, 2010) and consideration of the fault strike with respect to regional shortening directions (Robinson et al., 2011). Slip rate is assigned from the Ohariu South 3 and Ohariu Central Faults.

OHARIU SOUTH 3, OHARIU CENTRAL (281-282)

The Ohariu South 3 and Ohariu Central fault zones are the central and northern, predominantly onshore parts of the Ohariu Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural exposures, and trench exposures (Heron et al., 1998; Litchfield et al., 2004, 2006, 2010). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral. The slip rate is calculated from offset fluvial and marine terraces (Heron et al., 1998).


NORTHERN OHARIU (283)

The Northern Ohariu fault zone is in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from a combination of geomorphic expression (Van Dissen et al., 1999) and the Ohariu Fault along-strike to the south. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure dextral. The slip rate is calculated from offset fluvial terraces (Van Dissen et al., 1999).

MOONSHINE (284)

The Moonshine fault zone is in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Van Dissen et al., 1998; Begg and Johnston, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure dextral. The slip rate is assigned from consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of the North Island Fault System (Robinson et al., 2011).

AKATARAWA (285)

The Akatarawa fault zone is in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and a trench exposure (Van Dissen et al., 2001). The rake is calculated from the H:V ratio of the most recent offset fluvial terrace data (Van Dissen et al., 2001). The slip rate is from a combination of calculations from offset fluvial terrace data (Van Dissen et al., 2001) and a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

OTAKI FORKS 1, 2 (286-287)

The Otaki Forks 1 and 2 fault zones are the southern and northern parts of the Otaki Forks Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Langridge et al., 2005b). The rake is assigned from the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral, and orientation with respect to regional shortening directions (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned from the combined slip rates of the Moonshine and Akatarawa Faults (Robinson et al., 2011).

WELLINGTON HUTT VALLEY 1, 2 (288-289)

These fault zones are the southern, submarine parts of the Wellington Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The fault is interpreted only from multibeam bathymetric data (Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The sense of movement, dip, dip direction, and rake are inferred with consideration of the fault strike with respect to regional shortening directions (Robinson et al., 2011). Slip rate is assigned from the Wellington Hutt Valley Faults 3 and 4.

WELLINGTON HUTT VALLEY 3, 4 (290-291)

These fault zones are the central parts of the Wellington-Hutt Valley Segment of the Wellington Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Berryman, 1990; Van Dissen et al., 1992; Van Dissen and Berryman, 1996; Langridge et al., 2011; Rhoades et al., 2011). The rake is assigned from consideration of the regional shortening direction (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is from a combination of calculated values from offset fluvial terraces (Van Dissen and Berryman, 1996; Little et al., 2010) and consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 4 (Robinson et al., 2011).


WELLINGTON HUTT VALLEY 5 (292)

The Wellington Hutt Valley 5 fault zone is the northern part of the Wellington-Hutt Valley Segment of the Wellington Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures, and GPR profiles (Berryman, 1990; Van Dissen et al., 1992; Van Dissen and Berryman, 1996; McClymont et al., 2008; Little et al., 2010; Langridge et al., 2011; Rhoades et al., 2011). The rake is assigned from consideration of the regional shortening direction (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is calculated from offset fluvial terraces (Ninis et al. 2013).

WELLINGTON TARARUA 1, 2, 3 (293-295)

These fault zones are the southern, central, and northern parts of the Tararua section of the Wellington Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are assigned from a combination of geomorphic expression (Langridge et al., 2005a; Little et al. 2011) and consideration of the strike with respect to the regional shortening direction (Robinson et al., 2011). The rake is assigned from consideration of the regional shortening direction (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is from preliminary analysis of offset fluvial terraces (Little et al. 2011).

WELLINGTON PAHIATUA (296)

This fault zone is the Pahiatua section of the Wellington Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural, and trench exposures (Marden and Neall, 1990; Langridge et al., 2005a; Langridge et al., 2007). The rake is assigned from consideration that it is primarily a dextral strike-slip fault. The slip rate is from a combination of calculated values from offset fluvial terraces (Langridge et al., 2005a) and consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 4 (Robinson et al., 2011).

WOODVILLE (297)

The Woodville fault zone is in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Lee and Begg, 2002). The dip is inferred from the Ruataniwha Fault to the north. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 4 (Robinson et al., 2011).

PAHIATUA (298)

The Pahiatua fault zone is in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. Sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Lee and Begg, 2002). The dip is inferred from the Ruataniwha fault zone to the north. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 4 (Robinson et al., 2011).


MAUNGA (299)

The Maunga fault zone is in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. It is unclear whether this fault is active and hence only its sense of movement and slip rate have been inferred (K. Berryman unpublished data 1994; Stirling et al., 1998).

RUATANIWHA (300)

The Ruataniwha fault zone is in the central part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. Sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Beanland et al., 1998). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that it is predominantly a reverse fault. The slip rate is assigned from consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 5 taking into account displacements of fluvial terraces of inferred ages (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006; Klos, 2008).

ORUAWHARO (301)

The Oruawharo fault zone is in the central part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. Sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and seismic reflection data (Beanland et al., 1998). The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 5 (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

WHITEMANS VALLEY (302)

The Whitemans Valley fault zone is in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement and dip is from geomorphic expression and a trench exposure (Begg and Van Dissen, 1998). The dip is inferred to be steeper than that in the trench exposure. The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly reverse with a small dextral component. The slip rate is inferred from offset fluvial terrace data (Begg and Van Dissen, 1998) and consideration of a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

WAIRARAPA 1 (303)

The Wairarapa 1 fault zone is the southern, onshore-offshore portion of the Wairarapa Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. It has recently been suggested that this portion of the Wairarapa Fault, rather than the Wharekauhau Thrust, ruptured in the 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake (Little et al., 2009). The sense of movement is from a combination of seismic reflection profiles and multibeam bathymetric data (P. Barnes, unpublished data 2007; Mountjoy et al., 2009) and the interpretation that it is pure dextral as thrust motion is partitioned onto the Wharekauhau Fault. The rake is assigned to reflect the dextral motion accordingly. The dip and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (P. Barnes, unpublished data 2007; Mountjoy et al., 2009). The slip rate is assigned from Wairarapa 2 fault zone and consideration of a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).


WAIRARAPA 2 (304)

The Wairarapa 2 fault zone is the southern/central portion of the Wairarapa Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The Wairarapa Fault ruptured in the 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake (e.g., Grapes and Downes, 1997). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Grapes, 1991, 1999; Van Dissen and Berryman, 1996; Rodgers and Little, 2006; Little et al., 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral with a minor reverse component. The slip rate is calculated from the strike-slip and dip-slip offsets of fluvial terraces (Wang and Grapes, 2008; Carne et al., 2011).

WAIRARAPA 3 (305)

The Wairarapa 3 fault zone is the northern portion of the Wairarapa Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The Wairarapa Fault ruptured in the 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake (e.g., Grapes and Downes, 1997). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Van Dissen and Berryman, 1996; Grapes, 1999; Rodgers and Little, 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation of a predominantly dextral fault with a minor component of reverse motion. The slip rate is inferred from consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 4 (Robinson et al., 2011).

ALFREDTON - MAKURI 1 (306)

The Alfredton - Makuri 1 fault zone is the Dreyers Rock / Kowhai Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Kelsey et al., 1995; Schermer et al., 2004). The rake is assigned to reflect its interpretation as a predominantly normal fault with a minor component of dextral motion. The slip rate is inferred from consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 4 (Robinson et al., 2011).


The Alfredton - Makuri 2 fault zone includes the Alfredton Fault and the southern part of the Makuri-Waewaepa Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The Alfredton Fault probably ruptured during the 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake (Schermer et al., 2004). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Kelsey et al., 1995; Schermer et al., 2004) and a seismic reflection profile (Lamarche et al., 1995). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral with a minor reverse component. The slip rate is inferred from consideration of a slip rate calculated from offset fluvial terraces (Schermer et al., 2004) and slip rate budgets in that part of domain 4 (Robinson et al., 2011).


The Alfredton - Makuri 3 fault zone is the northern part of the Makuri - Waewaepa Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Kelsey et al., 1995). The rake is assigned to reflect its interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral with a minor reverse component. The slip rate is assigned from the Alfredton - Makuri 2 fault zone.


WHAREKAUHAU 1, 2, 3 (309-311)

These fault zones are the southern, central and northern parts of the offshore-onshore Wharekauhau Thrust, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, a gravity profile, and natural exposures (Grapes and Wellman, 1993; McClymont, 2000; Schermer et al., 2009) and seismic reflection profiles (Barnes and Audru, 1999a; Mountjoy et al., 2009; Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned from consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 4 (Robinson et al., 2011).

BIDWILL (312)

The Bidwill fault zone is in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006). The dip is inferred as a typical reverse fault dip, and is consistent with seismic reflection profile data across similar reverse faults to the east (Nicol et al., 2002). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression and consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 5 (Robinson et al., 2011).

MARTINBOROUGH (313)

The Martinborough fault zone includes the short trace of the Martinborough Fault, in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5, but has been extended to the northeast. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and seismic reflection profile data (Nicol et al., 2002; Litchfield et al., 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of an alluvial fan (Litchfield et al., 2007) and converted to a net slip rate (= dip slip rate) using the dip values.

OTARAIA (314)

The Otaraia fault zone is in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Begg and Johnston, 2000). The dip is inferred as a typical reverse fault dip, and is consistent with seismic reflection profile data across similar reverse faults to the north (Nicol et al., 2002). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression and consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 5 (Robinson et al., 2011).

DRY RIVER - HUANGARUA 1 (315)

This fault zone includes the Dry River Fault and the southern part of the Huangarua Fault in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and a seismic reflection profile (Nicol et al., 2002; Formento-Trigilio et al., 2003). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces on the Huangarua Fault (Formento-Trigilio et al., 2003) and is converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) using the dip values.


DRY RIVER - HUANGARUA 2, 3 (316-317)

The Dry River - Huangarua 2 fault zone includes the northern end of the Huangarua Fault and the Dry River - Huangarua 3 Fault is an inferred extension to the northeast, and both are situated in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, a trench, and a seismic reflection profile (Nicol and Van Dissen, 1997; Nicol et al., 2002; Formento-Trigilio et al., 2003). The rake and slip rate are assigned from the Dry River - Huangarua 1 fault zone.

NGAPOTIKI (318)

The Ngapotiki fault zone is the Wairangi/Ngapotiki Fault in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposure (Grapes et al., 1997). The rake is assigned to reflect its interpretation as a predominantly reverse fault with a minor component of dextral motion. The slip rate is calculated from consideration of vertical offset of a fluvial terrace (Grapes et al., 1997) and a slip rate balance in central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

KAUMINGI (319)

The Kaumingi fault zone is in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Lee and Begg, 2002). The dip and rake are assigned to reflect the interpretation from its orientation that motion is predominantly dextral with a minor normal component (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned from consideration of geomorphic expression and a slip rate balance in central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

CARTERTON (320)

The Carterton fault zone is in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural, and trench exposures (Langridge et al., 2005b; Little and Begg, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral with a minor normal component. The slip rate is assigned from consideration of offset of fluvial terraces (Langridge et al., 2005b; Little and Begg, 2005) and a slip rate balance in central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

MASTERTON (321)

The Masterton fault zone is in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural, and trench exposures (Begg et al., 2001; Langridge et al., 2005b; Little and Begg, 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral with a minor normal component. The slip rate is assigned from consideration of offset of fluvial terraces (Langridge et al., 2005b; Little and Begg, 2005) and a slip rate balance in central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).


MOKONUI SOUTHWEST, MOKONUI NORTHEAST (322-323)

These fault zones are the southwestern and northeastern parts of the Mokonui Fault in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Townsend et al., 2002; Langridge et al., 2003a; Langridge et al., 2005b; Little and Begg, 2005). The dip and rake are assigned to reflect the interpretation from its orientation that it is a predominantly dextral fault and that the more easterly striking northeastern portion has a component of normal motion (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned from consideration of offset of fluvial terraces (Townsend et al., 2002; Langridge et al., 2003a; Little and Begg, 2005) and a slip rate balance in central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

WAITAWHITI (324)

The Waitawhiti fault zone includes the Waitawhiti Fault and unnamed faults to the northeast in the southern Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction is from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Schermer et al., 2004). The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 5 (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

PONGAROA – WEBER (325)

The Pongaroa - Weber fault zone is in the southern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Schermer et al., 2004). Dip is inferred to be steep. The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 5 (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

SAUNDERS ROAD – WAIPUKAKA (326)

The Saunders Road - Waipukaka fault zone is in the southern part of the North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The Waipukaka Fault ruptured during the 1934 Pahiatua Earthquake (Schermer et al., 2004). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Kelsey et al., 1995; Schermer et al., 2004). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral with a minor reverse component. The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of slip rate budgets in that part domain 4 (Robinson et al., 2011).

WAIPUKURAU – POUKAWA (327)

This fault zone includes the Waipukurau Fault Zone and the southern and central part of the Poukawa Fault Zone in the central part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Kelsey et al., 1998; Langridge et al., 2006; Langridge and Villamor, 2007). The rake is calculated from the H:V ratios (Kelsey et al., 1998) and the dip values. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Kelsey et al., 1998; GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006) and converted to a net slip rate using the H:V ratios and dip values.


NAPIER 1931 (328)

The Napier 1931 fault zone includes the northern part of the Poukawa Fault Zone and its northward continuation as a blind fault, in the central part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. This fault zone ruptured in the 1931 Napier Earthquake (e.g., Hull, 1990; McGinty et al., 2001). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, and trench exposures (Kelsey et al., 1998; GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006) and the geodetically determined earthquake rupture plane (McGinty et al., 2001). The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Kelsey et al., 1998; GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

TUKITUKI THRUST (329)

The Tukituki Thrust fault zone is in the central part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Cashman et al., 1992; GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006; Langridge et al., 2006; Langridge and Villamor, 2007). The dip is inferred from typical reverse fault values. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

RAUKUMARA 1, 2, 3 (330-332)

These fault zones are a series of short unnamed traces in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The dip is assigned as a typical normal fault dip, consistent with the dip of the nearby Repongaere Fault (Berryman et al., 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. Slip rates are assigned to be low (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

REPONGAERE (333)

The Repongaere fault zone is in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Berryman et al., 2009). The dip is assigned a typical normal fault dip, consistent with the dip in the trenches (Berryman et al., 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from offset of tephra deposits in trenches (Berryman et al., 2009).

OTOKO - TOTOTANGI, RAUKUMARA 6 (334-335)

The Otoko - Totatangi and Raukumara 6 (a short unnamed trace) fault zones are in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The dip is assigned as a typical normal fault dip, consistent with the dip of the nearby Repongaere Fault (Berryman et al., 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. Slip rates are assigned to be low (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).


PAKARAE (336)

The Pakarae fault zone is in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Ota et al., 1991; Wilson et al., 2006). The dip is assigned as a typical normal fault dip, consistent with the dip of the nearby Repongaere Fault (Berryman et al., 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from offset of marine terraces (Ota et al., 1991).

MARAU BEACH (337)

The Marau Beach fault zone is in the northern Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse.

RAUKUMARA 27, 30 (338-339)

These fault zones comprise a series of short unnamed traces in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The dip is assigned as a typical normal fault dip, consistent with the dip of the nearby Repongaere Fault (Berryman et al., 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. Slip rates are assigned to be low (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

RAUKUMARA 29 (340)

This fault zone includes the Pangopango fault in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned to be low (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

FERNSIDE (341)

The Fernside fault zone is in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb, 1984). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned to be low (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

RAUKUMARA 31, 32 (342-343)

These fault zones comprise two short unnamed traces in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The dip is assigned as a typical normal fault dip, consistent with the dip of the nearby Repongaere Fault (Berryman et al., 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned to be low (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).


RAUKUMARA 16, 17, 18 (344-346)

These fault zones are short, unnamed faults in the northern, Bay of Plenty side of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned from geomorphic expression and vertical offset of marine terraces (K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006).

MOTU RIVER (347)

The Motu River fault zone is in the northern, Bay of Plenty side of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is assigned from geomorphic expression and vertical offset of marine terraces (K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006).

RAUKUMARA 20 (348)

The Raukumara 20 fault zone is a short, unnamed fault in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The slip rate is assigned to be low (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

RAUKUMARA 21 (349)

The Raukumara 21 fault zone is the Harapara Fault in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned from geomorphic expression and vertical offset of marine terraces (K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006).

RAUKUMARA 25 (350)

The Raukumara 25 fault zone is a short, unnamed fault in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned from geomorphic expression and vertical offset of marine terraces (K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006).

KEREU (351)

The Kereu fault zone is in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned from geomorphic expression and vertical offset of marine terraces (K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006).


RAUKUMARA 24, 26 (352-353)

These fault zones are short, unnamed faults in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of motion and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mazengarb and Speden, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal.

EAST CAPE (354)

The East Cape fault zone is in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. It is unclear whether this is an active fault and the dip and dip direction are unknown. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is assigned to be low (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

HOUTUNUI (355)

The submarine Houtunui fault zone is in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Lewis et al., 2004). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is assigned based on a slip rate balance for northern offshore domain 5 (R. Langridge, N. Litchfield, P. Barnes, unpublished data 2008).

RUATORIA SOUTH 1, 2 (356-357)

These submarine fault zones are in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles and multibeam bathymetric data (Lewis et al., 1997; Collot et al., 2001; P. Barnes, unpublished data 2008). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned based on a slip rate balance for northern offshore domain 5 (R. Langridge, N. Litchfield, P. Barnes, unpublished data 2008).

ARIEL BANK, ARIEL EAST, ARIEL NORTH, GABLE END, POVERTY BAY (358-362)

These submarine fault zones are in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Mountjoy and Barnes, 2011). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation they are pure reverse faults. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of a post-glacial erosion surface (Mountjoy and Barnes, 2011). The Gable End fault zone slip rate is consistent with the coastal uplift rate determined from marine terraces (Wilson et al., 2006).

PARITU RIDGE, PARITU WEST, TUAHENI RIDGE (363-365)

These submarine fault zones are in the northern part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles and multibeam bathymetric data (Pedley et al., 2010). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned based on a slip rate balance for the northern, offshore domain 5 (R. Langridge, N. Litchfield, P. Barnes, unpublished data 2008).


LACHLAN 1 & 2, 3 (366-367)

These fault zones are the northern and southern parts of the submarine Lachlan Fault, in the central part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes et al., 2002a; Mountjoy and Barnes, 2011). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of seismic profile reflections and uplifted marine terraces (Berryman, 1993; Barnes et al., 2002a; Mountjoy and Barnes, 2011).

MAHIA 2 (368)

The submarine Mahia 2 fault zone is in the central part of the Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes et al., 2002a). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned based on a slip rate balance for the northern, offshore domain 5 (R. Langridge, N. Litchfield, P. Barnes, unpublished data 2008).

HAWKE BAY 1, 2, 4, 5 & 11, 6 & 12, 7, 8 (369-375)

These fault zones are a series of unnamed submarine faults in the central Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes et al., 2002a; Paquet et al., 2011). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from vertical offset of seismic profile reflections (P. Barnes, unpublished data 2008).

KAIRAKAU 2, KAIRAKAU NORTH, KAIRAKAU SOUTH, KIDNAPPERS RIDGE, MOTUOKURA NORTH, MOTUOKURA RIDGE, WAIMARAMA 1 & 2, WAIMARAMA 3 & 4 (376-382, 389)

These fault zones are series of submarine fault traces in the central Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes and Nicol, 2004; Barnes et al., 2010; Paquet et al., 2011). The rakes are assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rates are assigned based on a slip rate balance for the northern, offshore domain 5 (R. Langridge, N. Litchfield, P. Barnes, unpublished data 2008) and are consistent with that calculated from uplifted marine terraces (Ota et al., 1990a, b) and vertical offset of seismic profile reflections (Mountjoy and Barnes, 2011).

MADDEN, MOTUOKURA EAST, OMAKERE RIDGE, OMAKERE SOUTH, PAOANUI RIDGE NORTH, PAOANUI RIDGE SOUTH, PORANGAHAU RIDGE, PORANGAHAU WEST 1, PORANGAHAU WEST 2, RITCHIE RIDGE, RITCHIE WEST 1, RITCHIE WEST 2, URUTI EAST, URUTI RIDGE 2, URUTI BASIN, URUTI NORTH, WHAREAMA BANK (383-388, 390-400)

These fault zones are series of submarine traces in the central and southern Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes and Mercier de Lépinay, 1997; Barnes et al., 1998; Barnes et al., 2010). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned based on a slip rate balance for the central and southern, offshore domain 5 (R. Langridge, N. Litchfield, P. Barnes, unpublished data 2008).


MATAIKONA (401)

The Mataikona fault zone is an inferred submarine fault, interpreted to be responsible for uplift of marine terraces along the coast, in the southern Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5 (Berryman et al., 2011). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from the marine terraces and other nearby reverse faults. The slip rate is from the coastal uplift rate calculated from marine terraces (Ota et al., 1990a ; Berryman et al., 2011) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) using the dip values.

RIVERSDALE (402)

The Riversdale fault zone is an inferred submarine fault, interpreted to be responsible for uplift of marine terraces along the coast, in the southern Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5 (Berryman et al., 2011). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from the marine terraces and other nearby reverse faults. The slip rate is assigned from the Mataikona Fault.

PALLISER – KAIWHATA (403)

The submarine Palliser - Kaiwhata fault zone is in the southern Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles and multibeam bathymetry data (Barnes and Mercier de Lépinay, 1997; Barnes et al., 1998; Mountjoy et al., 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly oblique reverse-dextral. The slip rate is assigned based on a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011) taking into account uplift rates from marine terraces (Berryman et al., 2011).

HONEYCOMBE, OPOUAWE - URUTI, PAHAUA (404-406)

These submarine fault zones are in the southern Hikurangi Forearc, domain 5. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles and multibeam bathymetry data (Barnes and Mercier de Lépinay, 1997; Barnes et al., 1998; Mountjoy et al., 2009; Plaza-Faverola et al., 2012). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned based on a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

BOO BOO (407)

The submarine Boo Boo fault zone is in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain (8). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles and multibeam bathymetry data (Barnes and Audru, 1999a; Barnes et al., 1998; Mountjoy et al., 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure dextral. The slip rate is calculated from offset seafloor features (Barnes et al., 2008).

WAIRARAPA - NEEDLES 2 (408)

This fault zone includes multiple traces of the submarine Nicholson Bank Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles and multibeam bathymetry data (Barnes and Audru, 1999a, b; Barnes et al., 2008; Mountjoy et al., 2009; Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure dextral. The slip rate is assigned from the Wairarapa Fault (Robinson et al., 2011).


WAIRARAPA - NEEDLES 1 (409)

This fault zone is the northern part of the submarine Needles Fault, in the southern North Island Dextral Fault Belt, domain 4. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes and Audru, 1999b; Barnes et al., 2008; Mountjoy et al., 2009; Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure dextral. The slip rate is assigned from the Wairarapa Fault (Robinson et al., 2011).

VERNON 1, 2, 3, 4 (410-413)

These fault zones are parts of the onshore-offshore Vernon Fault in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction, which change along-strike, are from geomorphic expression (Ota et al., 1995; Benson et al., 2001a) and seismic reflection profiles (Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The rake is assigned based on consideration of the fault strike and the regional shortening direction (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned based on consideration of offset terrace data (Benson et al., 2001a) and a slip rate budget for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

CLOUDY 1, 2, 3 (414-416)

These fault zones are parts of the submarine Cloudy Fault in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction, which change along-strike, are from seismic reflection profiles (Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The rake, which varies along-strike, is assigned based on consideration of fault strike and the regional shortening direction (Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The slip rate is calculated from offset of seismic profile reflections (Pondard and Barnes, 2010).

WAIRAU 2, 3 (417-418)

These submarine fault zones are parts of the onshore-offshore Alpine/Wairau Fault, in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles and multibeam bathymetric data (offshore, Barnes and Pondard, 2010; Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The rake is assigned based on consideration of fault strike and the regional shortening direction (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned from the Wairau 1 fault zone.

WAIRAU 1 (419)

The Wairau 1 fault zone is the central, onshore portion of the Alpine/Wairau Fault, in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (onshore, Lensen, 1976; Grapes and Wellman, 1986; Berryman et al., 1992; Knuepfer, 1992; Zachariasen et al., 2006). The rake is assigned based on consideration of fault strike and the regional shortening direction (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is calculated from displaced fluvial terraces (Berryman et al., 1992; Knuepfer, 1992).


NEEDLES (420)

The Needles fault zone comprises the central and southern parts of the submarine Needles Fault, in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System domain (8). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes and Audru, 1999b; Mountjoy et al., 2009) and unpublished multibeam bathymetric data. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is oblique dextral-reverse. The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Barnes et al., 2008; Robinson et al., 2011).

CAMPBELL BANK 1, 2 (421-422)

These fault zones are the northern and southern parts of the submarine Campbell Bank Fault, in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain (8). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes and Audru, 1999b; Barnes et al., 2008; Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The rake, which varies along-strike, is assigned based on consideration of fault strike and the regional shortening direction (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

CHANCET (423)

The submarine Chancet fault zone is in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain (8). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes and Audru, 1999b; Barnes et al., 2008; Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation it is primarily a dextral fault with a small component of normal motion (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

KEKERENGU 1, 2 (424-425)

These fault zones include the southern and northern portions of the onshore-offshore Kekerengu Fault and the onshore Heavers Creek Fault, in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The rake, which varies along-strike, is assigned based on consideration of fault strike and the regional shortening direction (Robinson et al., 2011). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Van Dissen et al., 2005; R. Van Dissen, T. Little, unpublished data 2007). The slip rate is from offset terrace data (Knuepfer, 1992; Van Dissen et al., 2005).

TE RAPA 1, 2 (426-427)

These fault zones are the southern and northern parts of the submarine Te Rapa Fault, in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes and Audru, 1999a, b; Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation it is predominantly a reverse fault, with a possible component of dextral motion (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).


HOPE OFFSHORE 1, 2 (428-429)

These fault zones are the northern and southern parts of a series of traces and folds above blind faults interpreted to be the offshore continuation of the Hope Fault, in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes and Audru, 1999b). The rake, which varies along-strike, is assigned based on consideration of fault strike and the regional shortening direction (Robinson et al., 2011). The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

KAIKOURA (430)

The submarine Kaikoura Fault of Barnes and Audru (1999a) (referred to as MS05 by Stirling et al., 2008, 2012), lies in the northeastern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes and Audru, 1999a). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure dextral. The slip rate is estimated based on geomorphic expression (P. Barnes, unpublished data 2007).

UPPER SLOPE (431)

The submarine Upper Slope fault zone is in the northeastern part of domain 9. The sense of movement and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes et al., 1998). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

KEKERENGU BANK (432)

The submarine Kekerengu Bank fault zone is in the northeastern part of domain 9. The sense of movement and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes et al., 1998; Walters et al., 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

MARLBOROUGH SLOPE 1, 2, 4, 9 (433-436)

These fault zones are unnamed submarine faults in the northeastern part of domain 9. The sense of movement and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes et al., 1998). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated based on geomorphic expression (P. Barnes, unpublished data 2007).

NORTH MERNOO B0, B1, B2, E1, E2, F1, F2, K1, K2, M, 18 & 19, 46 & 47 (437-448)

These fault zones are unnamed submarine faults in the North Mernoo Fault Zone, domain 10. The sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes, 1994). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rates are estimated from offset unconformities imaged in seismic reflection data (P. Barnes, unpublished data 2007).


HUNDALEE (449)

The Hundalee fault zone is an onshore-offshore fault in northeastern domain 9. The sense of movement and dip direction are from surface expression and natural exposures (Beanland and Berryman, 1990; Ota et al., 1996). The dip was inferred by Pettinga et al. (2001). The rake is calculated from inferred H:V ratios, assuming it is a predominantly reverse fault but it could have a dextral component offshore. The slip rate is estimated from vertical offset fluvial terraces (Ota et al., 1996; Pettinga et al., 2001) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) using the dip values.

NORTH CANTERBURY SHELF 1, 2, 4, 8 TO 10, 10, 11, 13 (450-456)

These fault zones are unnamed submarine faults coring folds in northeastern domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip directions are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes, 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rates for all except North Canterbury Shelf 10 (451) are estimated based on folded unconformities in seismic profiles (P. Barnes, unpublished data 2007). North Canterbury Shelf 10 (451) has significant bathymetric expression associated with Conway Ridge and Trough, and is inferred to be very active, but the rate is unconstrained by stratigraphic offsets.

PEGASUS (457)

The Pegasus fault zone is the submarine Pegasus Bay Fault in the northeastern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes, 1996). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated based on offset of seismic profile reflectors (P. Barnes, unpublished data 2007).

PAPAROA RANGEFRONT (458)

The Paparoa Rangefront fault zone includes the Lower Buller Fault (sometimes called the Kongahu Fault) and the Canoe Fault, in domain 7. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Suggate, 1989; Nathan et al., 2002). The dip is assigned from typical reverse fault values. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from offset marine and fluvial terraces (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

BRUNNER ANTICLINE (459)

The Brunner Anticline fault zone includes the short trace of the Montgomerie/Blackball Fault, but extends north and south as a blind fault beneath the Brunner Anticline (Bishop and Buchanan, 1995; Suggate, 2006), in domain 7. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and a seismic reflection profile (Bishop and Buchanan, 1995; Nathan et al., 2002; Suggate, 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from offset and folding of fluvial terraces (Suggate, 1987; GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006) and converted to a net slip (=dip slip) rate using the dip values.


MAIMAI (460)

This fault zone comprises the Maimai Fault and the Big River Fault in domain 7. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Nathan et al., 2002; Ghisetti and Sibson, 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

INANGAHUA (461)

The Inangahua fault zone (sometimes called the Glasglow Fault) is in domain 7. Although one of the few scarps produced by the 1968 Inangahua Earthquake is close to the Inangahua Fault, the scarp is considered a secondary, flexural-slip feature, and thus the Inangahua Fault is not considered to have ruptured during that earthquake (Anderson et al., 1994). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Nathan et al., 2002; Ghisetti and Sibson, 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression, taking into account offset and folding of fluvial terraces (Suggate, 1988a, c; K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006).

LYELL (462)

The Lyell fault zone is in domain 7. Although a scarp and some post-earthquake warping associated with the 1968 Inangahua Earthquake are close to the Lyell Fault, they are considered to be related to the proposed blind fault beneath the Grey-Inangahua Depression (Anderson et al., 1994). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Nathan et al., 2002; Ghisetti and Sibson, 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that the motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression, taking into account offset and folding of fluvial terraces (Suggate, 1988a, c; K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006).

WHITE CREEK (463)

The White Creek fault zone, in domain 7, ruptured during the 1929 Buller (Murchison) Earthquake (Berryman, 1980). The fault has been extended significantly further north of the mapped traces (which are in a heavily forested area), on the basis of earthquake damage (e.g., landslides, Hancox et al., 2002). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Nathan, 1978; Berryman, 1980; Suggate, 1990; Ghisetti and Sibson, 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression, taking into account offset and folding of fluvial terraces (Berryman, 1980; Suggate, 1988b, 1990; K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006).

WAIMEA NORTH, WAIMEA SOUTH (464-465)

These fault zones are the northern and southern parts of a series of faults in domain 7. From north to south, they include the Whangamoa, Bishopdale, Eighty Eight, Heslington, and Waimea Faults. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, and natural and trench exposures (Rattenbury et al., 1998; Fraser et al., 2006; Rattenbury et al., 2006). The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression, taking into account a vertical rate from offset fluvial terraces on one strand (Fraser et al., 2006).


WAIRAU A (466)

The Wairau A fault zone is the southwestern part of the onshore Alpine/Wairau Fault, in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Berryman et al., 1992; Yetton, 2002). The dip, rake, and slip rate are assigned from the Wairau1 Fault.

AWATERE NORTHEAST 2 (467)

This fault zone is the northeastern onshore-offshore portion of the Awatere Fault, in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. At least the onland part of this fault ruptured during the 1848 Marlborough Earthquake (Grapes et al., 1998; Mason and Little, 2006). The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Little et al., 1998) and seismic reflection profiles (Pondard and Barnes, 2010). The dip is determined from detailed surveying in a stream valley (Little et al., 1998). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure dextral. The slip rate is calculated from offset of a stream valley wall (Little et al., 1998).

AWATERE NORTHEAST 1 (468)

This fault zone includes the majority of the Eastern Section of the Awatere Fault in the Marlborough Fault System (domain 8). The Eastern Section ruptured during the 1848 Marlborough Earthquake (Grapes et al., 1998; Mason and Little, 2006). The sense of movement, dip (which steepens eastwards), and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, detailed surveying, natural and trench exposures (Little et al., 1998; Benson et al., 2001b; Mason et al., 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral with a minor reverse component. The slip rate is calculated from offset of an alluvial fan (Benson et al., 2001b).

AWATERE SOUTHWEST (469)

This fault zone includes the Molesworth and Southwest Sections of the Awatere Fault, in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (McCalpin, 1996; Mason et al., 2006; R. Langridge, unpublished data 2001). The rake is assigned from the Awatere Northeast fault zone. The slip rate is from offset fluvial terraces (Mason et al., 2006).

FOWLERS (470)

The Fowlers fault zone is the eastern part of the Fowlers Fault in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement is from geomorphic expression (Rattenbury et al., 2006), and the slip rate is also inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).


BAREFELL (471)

The Barefell fault zone includes the southwestern end of the Eastern Section of the Awatere Fault and the Barefell Pass Fault, in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The Eastern Section of the Awatere Fault and at least the northern half of the Barefell Pass Fault ruptured during the 1848 Marlborough Earthquake (Grapes et al., 1998; Mason and Little, 2006). The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and the 1848 earthquake scarps (Grapes et al., 1998; Mason and Little, 2006; Rattenbury et al., 2006). The dip and slip rate are inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

CLARENCE NORTHEAST (472)

The Clarence Northeast fault zone includes the Eastern Section of the Clarence Fault and the eastern half of the Elliot Fault, in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Nicol and Van Dissen, 2002; Van Dissen and Nicol, 2009). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly dextral with a minor reverse component. The slip rate is calculated from the recurrence interval determined from four rupture events recorded in natural exposures and the single event displacement calculated from offset topographic features (Nicol and Van Dissen, 2002).

CLARENCE CENTRAL (473)

The Clarence Central fault zone is the eastern half of the Western Section of the Clarence Fault, in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Kieckhefer, 1979; Rattenbury et al., 2006). The dip and rake have been assigned from the Clarence Southwest fault zone. The slip rate is assigned as a portion of the Clarence Northeast fault zone slip rate, and considering geomorphic expression (R. Van Dissen, unpublished data 2008).

CLARENCE SOUTHWEST (474)

The Clarence Southwest fault zone is the western parts of the Elliot and Clarence Faults, in the southwestern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Kieckhefer, 1979; Rattenbury et al., 2006). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation it is predominantly a dextral fault with a minor component of reverse motion. The slip rate is assigned as a portion of the Clarence Northeast fault zone slip rate, and considering offset of fluvial terraces (Knuepfer, 1992; R. Van Dissen, A. Nicol, unpublished data 2008).

FIDGET (475)

The Fidget fault zone is in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement is from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Van Dissen, 1989; Reay, 1993). The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).


JORDAN (476)

The Jordan fault zone includes the Jordan Thrust and an inferred blind fault uplifting the Seaward Kaikoura Range (Van Dissen and Yeats, 1991), and is in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Van Dissen, 1989; Van Dissen and Yeats, 1991; Van Dissen et al., 2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is predominantly reverse with a minor dextral component. The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011).

HOPE CONWAY (477)

The Hope Conway fault zone is the western part of the Seaward Segment and the Conway Segment of the Hope Fault, in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural, and trench exposures (Freund, 1971; Knuepfer, 1984, 1992; Van Dissen, 1989; McMorran, 1991; Langridge et al., 2003b). The rake is calculated from H:V ratios (which are calculated from the strike slip and dip slip rates and the fault dip values. The slip rate is assigned from a slip rate balance for central New Zealand (Robinson et al., 2011), taking into account calculated values from offset terraces (Van Dissen, 1989; McMorran, 1991; Langridge et al., 2003b).

HANMER (478)

The Hanmer fault zone is in the Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, trenches, and seismic reflection profiles (Freund, 1971; Wood et al., 1994; Pettinga et al., 2001; R. Langridge, unpublished data 2008). The rake is calculated from the H:V ratio (which is assigned from the Fyffe Fault) and the dip values. The slip rate is estimated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Pettinga et al., 2001) and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values.

HOPE 1888 (479)

The Hope 1888 fault zone is the Hope River Segment and the eastern part of the Hurunui Segment of the Hope Fault, in the southwestern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. This part of the Hope Fault ruptured in the 1888 Amuri Earthquake (McKay, 1890; Cowan, 1991). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, 1888 earthquake offset data, natural and trench exposures (Freund, 1971; Cowan, 1990, 1991; Cowan and McGlone, 1991). The rake is calculated from H:V ratios (from the strike slip and dip slip rates) and the dip values. The slip rate is calculated from offset fluvial terraces (Cowan, 1990), and converted to a net slip rate from the H:V ratio and the dip values.

HOPE CENTRAL WEST (480)

This fault zone is the western part of the Hurunui Section of the Hope Fault, in the southwestern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Freund, 1971; Langridge, 2004; Langridge and Berryman, 2005). The rake is calculated from H:V ratios (calculated from offset terraces; Langridge and Berryman, 2005) and the fault dip values. The slip rate is assigned taking into account calculated values from offset fluvial terraces (Langridge and Berryman, 2005) and considering the slip rates along-strike and on the Kakapo Fault (R. Langridge, unpublished data 2006).


HOPE TARAMAKAU (481)

This fault zone is the westernmost, Taramakau Section of the Hope Fault, in the southwestern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Freund, 1971). The dip is assigned from the Hope Central West Fault. The slip rate is assigned based on geomorphic expression and consideration of the partitioning of slip between this section and the Kelly Fault (Langridge et al., 2010).

KAKAPO (482)

The Kakapo fault zone is in the southwestern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The 1929 Arthurs Pass earthquake was once attributed to rupture of the Kakapo Fault (Yang, 1992), but subsequent work showed it instead ruptured a previously unmapped fault, the Poulter Fault (Berryman and Villamor, 2004). The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Freund, 1971; Yang, 1991; Berryman and Villamor, 2004). The dip was inferred by Pettinga et al. (2001). The rake is calculated from H:V ratios (from the strike slip and dip slip rates) and the dip values. The slip rate is calculated from offset fluvial terraces (Knuepfer, 1992; Pettinga et al., 2001) and converted to a net slip rate using the H:V ratio and dip values.

KELLY (483)

The Kelly fault zone includes the Kelly Fault (east) and the Hura and Newton Faults (west), in the southwestern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Nathan et al., 2002; R. Langridge, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is inferred from consideration of transfer of slip rate from the central section of the Alpine Fault to the northern sections and the Hope Fault (Langridge et al., 2010).

POULTER (484)

The Poulter fault zone is in the southwestern Marlborough Fault System, domain 8. This fault ruptured during the 1929 Arthurs Pass Earthquake (Berryman and Villamor, 2004). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural exposures, and focal mechanism determinations for the Arthurs Pass Earthquake (Doser et al., 1999; Berryman and Villamor, 2004). The rake is that calculated for the Arthurs Pass Earthquake focal mechanism (Doser et al. 1999). The slip rate is from offset of ridge and gully topography (Berryman and Villamor, 2004) and converted to a net slip rate using the H:V ratios and the dip values.

ESK (485)

The Esk fault zone includes the Esk Fault and an extension to the southwest, and is in the central part of domain 9. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Pettinga et al., 2001; Rattenbury et al., 2006). The slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).


WAITOHI DOWNS (486)

The Waitohi Downs fault zone is in the central part of domain 9. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Mould, 1992; Pettinga et al., 2001). The dip was inferred by Pettinga et al. (2001). The slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

LOWRY (487)

The Lowry fault zone includes the Hurunui Bluff Fault, Lowry Peaks Fault, and Leonard Mound Fault in the central part of domain 9. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Armstrong, 2000; Pettinga et al., 2001; Litchfield et al., 2003). The dip was inferred by Pettinga et al. (2001). The rake is calculated from an inferred H:V ratio considering the possibility of a small dextral component (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression (Pettinga et al., 2001).

KAIWARA SOUTH (488)

The Kaiwara South fault zone includes the Moores Hill Fault and the southern part of the Kaiwara Fault, in central domain 9. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Kellahan, 1998; Litchfield et al., 2003). The dip was inferred by Pettinga et al. (2001). A vertical slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression (Pettinga et al., 2001) and a net slip rate is calculated using the H:V ratio and the dip values.

KAIWARA NORTH (489)

The Kaiwara North fault zone includes the northern part of the Kaiwara Fault, in the central part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from geomorphic expression (Pettinga et al., 2001). A vertical slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression (Pettinga et al., 2001) and a net slip rate is calculated using the H:V ratio and the dip values.

OMIHI (490)

The Omihi fault zone is in the central part of domain 9. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Yousif, 1987; Nicol et al., 1994; Al-Daghastani and Campbell, 1995). The dip was inferred by Pettinga et al. (2001). The slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression (Pettinga et al., 2001).

PORTERS PASS – GREY (491)

The Porters Pass - Grey fault zone comprises a series of faults making up the Porters Pass-to-Amberley Fault Zone, in the southern part of domain 9. These faults include the Porters Pass Fault, Coopers Creek Fault, Glentui Fault, Mt Thomas Fault, and Mt Grey Fault. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (Cowan, 1992; Cowan et al., 1996; Nicol and Campbell, 2001; Campbell et al., 2003; Howard et al., 2005). The rake is calculated from H:V ratios (measured from offset geomorphic landforms; Knuepfer, 1992) for the Porters Pass Fault and the fault dip values. The slip rate is from offset geomorphic landforms on the eastern Porters Pass Fault (Howard et al. 2005) and converted to a net slip rate using the H:V ratio and the fault dip values.


SPRINGFIELD (492)

The Springfield fault zone is in the southern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and seismic reflection profiles (Dorn et al., 2010a, b). The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression (Stirling et al., 2008).

ASHLEY (493)

The Ashley fault zone is a partially blind fault complex in the southern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, trench exposures, and seismic reflection profiles (Cowan et al., 1996; Pettinga et al., 2001; Sisson et al., 2001; May, 2004). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from offset fluvial terraces (Stirling et al., 2008).

CUST (494)

The Cust fault zone is a partially blind fault complex in the southern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural exposures, and seismic reflection profiles (Pettinga et al., 2001; May, 2004; Dorn et al., 2010a, b). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from offset terraces (Stirling et al., 2008).

SPRINGBANK (495)

The Springbank fault zone is a blind fault in the southern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and seismic reflection profiles (Estrada, 2003; Dorn et al., 2010a, b). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression (Stirling et al., 2008).

HORORATA (496)

The Hororata fault zone is a blind fault in the southern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Dorn et al., 2010a, b). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is inferred from seismic reflection profiles (Stirling et al., 2008).

TORLESSE (497)

The Torlesse fault zone includes the Torlesse Fault and the Esk Head Fault in the southern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Pettinga et al., 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

CHEESEMAN (498)

The Cheeseman fault zone is in the southern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Cox and Barrell, 2007). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is estimated from offset fluvial terraces (Pettinga et al., 2001; GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).


AVOCA (499)

The Avoca fault zone is not marked by active traces, but is inferred to be the fault plane which ruptured during the 1994 Arthur’s Pass Earthquake (sometimes called the Avoca Earthquake), in the southwestern part of domain 9. The earthquake was a complex one in that the focal plane solution suggests it involved primary rupture on a northeast-striking reverse fault, while the aftershock sequence, GPS data, and distribution of landslides, suggested rupture of a northwest-striking sinistral fault (Arnadottir et al., 1995; Van Dissen and Berryman, 1995; Abercrombie et al., 2000; Robinson and McGinty, 2000). The sense of movement and dip are from the sinistral fault interpretation. The slip rate is inferred from consideration of slip rate budgets in that part of domain 9 (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

BROWNING PASS (500)

The Browning Pass fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault and is part of the Main Divide Fault Zone in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Becker and Craw, 2000; Nathan et al., 2002). The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (Stirling et al., 2008; GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2006).

MUNGO (501)

The Mungo Fault includes part of the Mungo Fault and the Remarkable Peaks Fault and is in the central Southern Alps, in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from offset rocks of different metamorphic grade, geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from surface offsets (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

BRUCE (502)

The Bruce fault zone is in the central Southern Alps, in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from surface offsets (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

MISTAKE – ROLLESTON (503)

This fault zone includes part of the Mistake Hill Fault and part of the Rolleston Range 1 Fault, and is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

SHINGLY (504)

The Shingly fault zone is in the central Southern Alps, in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures, including preserved Tertiary sediments (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from surface offsets (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).


NORTH BRANCH (505)

The North Branch Fault is in the central Southern Alps, in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; S. Cox, unpublished data 2008). The rake is inferred from surface offsets (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

JAGGED (506)

The Jagged fault zone is in the central Southern Alps, in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from surface offsets (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

OBSERVATION (507)

The Observation fault zone includes parts of the Observation West and Observation East faults, and is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from juxtaposition of rocks of different metamorphic grade, geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

MATHIAS (508)

The Mathias fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

LORD RANGE (509)

The Lord Range fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from juxtaposition of rocks of different metamorphic grade, geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

WAITAHA (510)

The Waitaha fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

JOLLIE RANGE (511)

The Jollie Range fault zone is in the central Southern Alps, in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from surface offsets (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).


POTTS RIVER (512)

The Potts River Fault is in the central Southern Alps, in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from surface offsets (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

POTTS RANGE (513)

The Potts Range fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

TWO THUMB STREAM (514)

The Two Thumb Stream fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).

VEIL STREAM (515)

This fault zone includes part of the Veil Stream Fault and the Argument Creek Fault, and is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations on the Veil Stream fault zone (Cox et al., 2012).

MOUNT ADAMS (516)

The Mount Adams fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).

GUNN GLACIER (517)

The Gunn Glacier fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the southwestern part of domain 9. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).

MOUNT ROON (518)

The Mount Roon fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. Although shown as a single fault zone it represents a series of brittle-ductile shears (Wightman and Little, 2007). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).


STRAIGHT CREEK (519)

The Straight Creek fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, shear indicators in the hanging wall, and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).

MURCHISON (520)

The Murchison fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).

LIEBIG NORTH (521)

This fault zone includes parts of the Liebig North and Jollie faults, and is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations on the Liebig North fault zone (Cox et al., 2012).

MACAULAY 2 (522)

The Macaulay 2 fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).

LILYBANK (523)

The Lilybank fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

BLACK BLOB – HAAST RIDGE (524)

The Black Blob - Haast Ridge fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from juxtaposition of rocks of different metamorphic grade with steps in thermochronologic ages, geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Findlay, 1995; Cox and Barrell, 2007; Herman et al. 2009; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).

GREAT GROOVE (525)

The Great Groove fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from juxtaposition of rocks of different metamorphic grade, geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Lillie and Gunn, 1964; Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).


DOUGLAS DUPLEX (526)

The Douglas Duplex fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from juxtaposition of rocks of different metamorphic grade, geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox et al. 1997; Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).

KARANGARUA (527)

The Karangarua fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from juxtaposition of rocks of different metamorphic grade, geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

LANDSBOROUGH 2 (528)

The Landsborough 2 fault zone includes the Landsborough 2 Fault and the southern part of the McKerrow Fault, and is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Rattenbury et al., 2010; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from fault striations on the McKerrow Fault (Cox et al., 2012).

HUXLEY (529)

The Huxley fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Rattenbury et al., 2010; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

AHURIRI (530)

The Ahuriri fault zone includes part of the Ahuriri and Neumann Range faults, and is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from offset rocks of different metamorphic grade, geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Rattenbury et al., 2010; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

DOBSON (531)

This fault zone includes part of the Dobson Fault and the Maitland Stream Fault, and is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is from measured fault plane striations (Cox et al., 2012).


DINGLE (532)

The Dingle fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from juxtaposition of rocks of different metamorphic grade, geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Rattenbury et al., 2010; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

HUNTER (533)

The Hunter fault zone is a representative, concealed central Southern Alps active fault in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from changes in metamorphic grade of rocks on either side of the valley (Rattenbury et al., 2010; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

MAKARORA (534)

The Makarora fault zone is a representative central Southern Alps active fault in the central part of domain 11. It is concealed and inferred at its southern end, but is exposed as the Castle Hill Fault in the north (Rattenbury et al., 2010). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Rattenbury et al., 2010; Cox et al., 2012). The rake is inferred from fault geometry (S. Cox, unpublished data 2008).

LAKE HERON (535)

The Lake Heron fault zone is in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Oliver and Keene 1990; Pettinga et al., 2001). The dip is inferred from typical reverse fault dip values (Berryman et al., 2002). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation it is primarily a reverse fault with a possible component of sinistral motion (Berryman et al., 2002). The slip rate is calculated from inferred vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Pettinga et al., 2001; Berryman et al., 2002) and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values.

HUTT PEEL (536)

The Hutt Peel fault zone (also called the Canterbury Range Front Faults and Geraldine-Mt Hutt Fault System) includes the Montalto Fault, the Peel Forest Fault, and unnamed fault traces in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural fault exposures (Pettinga et al., 2001; D. Barrell, unpublished data 2008). The rake is inferred to reflect its interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from folded fluvial terraces and alluvial fans (D. Barrell, unpublished data 2008).

HEWSON (537)

The Hewson fault zone is in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural fault exposures (Oliver and Keene 1989; Barrell et al., 1996; Cox and Barrell, 2007). The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Group, unpublished data 2006).


FOREST CREEK (538)

The Forest Creek fault zone is in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural fault exposures (Barrell et al., 1996; Upton et al., 2004; Cox and Barrell, 2007). The rake is inferred from the interpretation that motion is primarily reverse with a minor dextral component (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Group, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is assigned from the Lake Heron Fault.

IRISHMAN CREEK (539)

The Irishman Creek fault zone is in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, gravity data, and seismic reflection profiles (Pettinga et al., 2001; Long et al., 2003; Amos et al., 2007). The rake is inferred from the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Berryman et al., 2002; Amos et al., 2007) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) using the dip values.

FOX PEAK (540)

The Fox Peak fault zone is in the northern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Pettinga et al., 2001; Upton et al., 2004). The rake is assigned to reflect its interpretation as a predominantly reverse fault with a component of dextral motion (Berryman et al., 2002). The slip rate is inferred based on vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Berryman et al., 2002; Upton et al., 2004) and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values and the inferred H:V ratio.

BROTHERS (541)

Although there are no surface traces mapped along the Brothers fault zone, it is inferred to be an active fault in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from natural exposures, gravity, and seismic reflection data (Langdale and Stern, 1998). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (Berryman et al., 2002) and converted to a net slip rate (= dip slip rate) using the dip values.

ALBURY (542)

The Albury fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007). The dip is inferred from the Brothers Fault. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (Berryman et al., 2002).

HUNTERS HILLS (543)

The Hunters Hills fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007; Pettinga et al., 2001). The dip is inferred from the Brothers Fault. The rake is inferred from the interpretation it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is estimated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Berryman et al., 2002) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) using the dip values.


OPAWA (544)

The Opawa fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Cox and Barrell, 2007). The dip is inferred from the Brothers Fault. The rake is inferred from the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Berryman et al., 2002).

DALGETY (545)

The Dalgety fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Cox and Barrell, 2007). The dip is inferred from the Brothers Fault. The rake is inferred from the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Group, unpublished data 2006).

OSTLER (546)

The Ostler fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, trench exposures, seismic reflection profiles, and GPR profiles (Read and Blick, 1991; Van Dissen et al., 1993; Davis et al., 2005; Amos et al., 2007, 2011; Ghisetti et al., 2007; McClymont et al., 2008; Wallace et al., 2010; Campbell et al., 2010a, b). The rake is inferred from the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Berryman et al., 2002; Davis et al., 2005; Amos et al., 2007, 2010) and converted to a net slip rate using the dip and inferred H:V values.

KIRKLISTON (547)

The Kirkliston fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Forsyth, 2001; Barrell et al., 2009). The dip is inferred from typical reverse fault dip values (Berryman et al., 2002). The rake is inferred from the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from vertical offset of alluvial fans (Barrell et al., 2008) and converted to a net slip rate (= dip slip rate) using the dip values.

DRYBURGH NORTHWEST (548)

This fault zone is the Dryburgh Fault and an inferred extension to the northwest, and is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (D. Barrell and K. Berryman, unpublished data 2002; Barrell et al., 2009). The dip is inferred from typical reverse fault dip values (Berryman et al., 2002). The slip rate is estimated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (D. Barrell and K. Berryman, unpublished data 2002) and converted to a net slip rate (= dip slip rate) using the dip values.

AWAHOKOMO (549)

This fault zone is the Awahokomo Fault and an inferred extension to the southeast, and is in central domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Forsyth, 2001; Berryman et al., 2002). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation that motion is primarily reverse with a minor dextral component. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Berryman et al., 2002) and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values and inferred H:V ratios.


WAITANGI (550)

This fault zone is the Waitangi Fault and an inferred extension to the northwest, and is in central domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Barrell et al., 2005, 2009). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation that motion is primarily reverse with a minor dextral component. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of fluvial terraces (Barrell et al., 2005, 2009) and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values and inferred H:V ratios.

FERN GULLY (551)

The Fern Gully Fault includes the Otematapaio Fault (also called the Middle Range Fault) and the Fern Gully / Wharekuri Fault, in central domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Berryman et al., 2002; Barrell et al., 2009). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation that motion is primarily reverse with a significant sinistral component. The slip rate is calculated from offset of fluvial terraces (Berryman et al., 2002) and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values and inferred H:V ratios.

OTEMATATA (552)

This fault zone is the Otematata Fault and an inferred northwest extension, and is in central domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Forsyth, 2001; Berryman et al., 2002). The dip is inferred from similar faults (e.g., the Waitangi Fault). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation that motion is primarily reverse, but with relatively large uncertainties to allow for a possible significant strike-slip component of motion. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (Berryman et al., 2002).

AHURIRI RIVER (553)

This fault zone is the Ahuriri River Fault, and inferred extensions to the northwest and southeast, and is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Turnbull, 2000). The dip is inferred from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Group, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is estimated from vertical offsets of till surfaces (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Group, unpublished data 2006).

LINDIS PASS (554)

The Lindis Pass fault zone includes the Dalrachney / Lindis Pass Fault and the Longslip Fault, in central domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Turnbull, 2000). The dip is inferred from geomorphic expression (Berryman et al., 2002). The slip rate is estimated from vertical offsets of alluvial fans (Berryman et al., 2002) and converted to a net slip rate (= dip slip rate) using the dip values.

BLUE LAKE (555)

The Blue Lake fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Madin, 1988). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation it is primarily a reverse fault with a component of dextral motion (Berryman et al., 2002). The slip rate is estimated from vertical scarp heights (Berryman et al., 2002) and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values and inferred H:V values.


CARDRONA NORTH, CARDRONA SOUTH (556-557)

These fault zones are the northern and southern parts of the Northwest Cardrona Fault, in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Beanland and Barrow-Hulbert, 1988). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation it is primarily a reverse fault with a component of dextral motion (Berryman et al., 2002). The slip rate is calculated from vertical offsets of alluvial fans (Berryman et al., 2002) and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values and inferred H:V values.

GRANDVIEW (558)

The Grandview fault zone has no mapped traces, but late Quaternary deformation of subsurface units have been documented (Beanland and Berryman, 1989), and is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are inferred from subsurface unit and bedrock offsets, and the Pisa Fault to the south (Beanland and Berryman, 1989). The dip is inferred (Berryman et al., 2002). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is assigned from the Pisa Fault to the south.

PISA (559)

The Pisa fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures, and gravity data (Beanland and Berryman, 1989). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation that it is a pure reverse fault. The vertical slip rate is from vertical offset of alluvial fans (Beanland and Berryman, 1989; Berryman et al., 2002), and the net slip rate (=dip slip rate) is calculated using the dip values.

DUNSTAN (560)

The Dunstan fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Beanland et al., 1986; Madin, 1988; Van Dissen et al., 2007). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from consideration of recurrence interval and single event displacement calculated from trenches (Van Dissen et al., 2007).

RAGGEDY (561)

The Raggedy fault zone is the Blackstone / Raggedy Range Fault, a partially blind fault in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and gravity data (Jackson et al., 1996; Markley and Norris, 1999; Markley and Tikoff, 2003). The dip is assigned from dislocation modelling of uplift of the central Otago ranges (R. Norris unpublished data 2005), consistent with the Dunstan Fault dip. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is inferred from the long-term vertical offset of an erosional, peneplain surface (Litchfield et al., 2005; Bennett et al., 2006), and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values.


GIMMERBURN (562)

The Gimmerburn fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Jackson et al., 1996). The dip is assigned from dislocation modelling of uplift of the central Otago ranges (R. Norris unpublished data 2005), consistent with the Dunstan Fault dip. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is inferred from the long-term vertical offset of an erosional, peneplain surface and a slip rate balance with the late Quaternary rate on the Garabaldi Fault (Bennett et al., 2005; Litchfield et al., 2005), and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values.

LONG VALLEY (563)

The Long Valley fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Stirling and Berryman, 2000; Forsyth, 2001). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is estimated from vertical offset of alluvial fans (Berryman et al., 2002) and converted to a net slip rate using the dip values.

RANFURLY (564)

The Ranfurly fault zone is a series of traces in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Forsyth, 2001). The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (D. Barrell, unpublished data 2006).

WAIPIATA (565)

The Waipiata fault zone is a partly blind fault in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Jackson et al., 1996; Forsyth, 2001). The dip is assigned from dislocation modelling of uplift of the central Otago ranges (R. Norris unpublished data 2005), consistent with the Dunstan Fault dip. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

HYDE (566)

The Hyde fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Norris et al., 1994; Jackson et al., 1996). The dip is assigned from dislocation modelling of uplift of the central Otago ranges (R. Norris unpublished data 2005), consistent with the Dunstan Fault dip. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is a combination of the long-term offset of an erosional peneplain surface, vertical offset of an alluvial fan, and a river incision rate (Norris and Nicolls, 2004; Litchfield et al., 2005) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) using the dip values.


TAIERI RIDGE (567)

The Taieri Ridge fault zone (also known as the Horse Flat Road Fault) is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Norris and Nicolls, 2004). The dip is assigned from dislocation modelling of uplift of the central Otago ranges (R. Norris unpublished data 2005), consistent with the Dunstan Fault dip. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is a combination of the long-term offset of an erosional peneplain surface, and vertical offset of a paleolake sequence (Norris and Nicolls, 2004; Litchfield et al., 2005) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) using the dip values.

BILLYS RIDGE (568)

The Billys Ridge fault zone is in the central part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Norris and Nicolls, 2004). The dip is assigned from dislocation modelling of uplift of the central Otago ranges (R. Norris unpublished data 2005), consistent with the Dunstan Fault dip. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Team, unpublished data 2005).

AKATORE (569)

The Akatore fault zone is in the southeastern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Norris et al., 1994; Litchfield and Norris, 2000). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from single event displacement and recurrence interval estimates from cored sag ponds and estuaries (Litchfield and Norris, 2000; Hayward et al., 2007).

SETTLEMENT (570)

The Settlement fault zone is in the southeastern part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Bishop and Turnbull, 1996; Turnbull and Allibone, 2003; Hayward et al., 2007). The dip is assigned from the Akatore Fault to the north. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is inferred based on geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Group, unpublished data 2006).

BLUE MOUNTAINS (571)

The Blue Mountains fault zone is in the southern part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Pace et al., 2005). The dip was inferred by Pace et al. (2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of alluvial fans (Pace et al., 2005) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) using the dip values.

SPYLAW (572)

The Spylaw fault zone is in the southern part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Pace et al., 2005). The dip was inferred by Pace et al. (2005). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from vertical offset of alluvial fans (Pace et al., 2005) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) using the dip values.


OLD MAN (573)

The Old Man fault zone is in the southern part of domain 11. Although the fault is not marked by active traces, exposures of faults offsetting middle Quaternary gravels suggest it could be an active fault (Stirling and Berryman, 2002). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Stirling, 1990; Stirling and Berryman, 2002). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is calculated from offset of river gravels (Stirling and Berryman, 2002).

NEVIS (574)

The Nevis fault zone includes the Nevis Fault, the Wrights Fault, and the West Nokomai Fault, in the southern part of domain 11. The sense of movement is from geomorphic expression and trench exposures (Beanland and Barrow-Hulbert, 1988). The dip is assigned from dislocation modelling of uplift of the central Otago ranges (R. Norris unpublished data 2005), consistent with the Dunstan Fault dip. The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from vertical offset of alluvial fans (K. Berryman, unpublished data 2006) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) using the dip values.

HOKONUI (575)

This fault zone includes the Hillfoot Fault and some unnamed traces bounding the Hokonui Hills, in the southern part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Turnbull and Allibone, 2003). The dip is inferred to be the same as reverse faults to the north (e.g., the Dunstan Fault). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Group, unpublished data 2006).

TAKITIMU 1, 2 (576-577)

The Takitimu 1 fault zone is the Tin Hut Fault and the Takitimu 2 fault zone comprises a series of unnamed traces, in the southern part of domain 11. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression (Landis et al., 1999; Turnbull and Allibone, 2003). The dip is assigned from typical reverse fault values (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Group, unpublished data 2006). The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Group, unpublished data 2006).

MOONLIGHT NORTH, MOONLIGHT SOUTH (578-579)

These fault zones are the northern and southern parts of the Moonlight Fault, in the southwestern part of domain 11. The southern end of the Moonlight Fault, where it is locally known as the Blackmount Fault (Norris et al., 1978; Turnbull and Uruski, 1995), is taken to be the intersection with the Hauroko and Monowai faults. The sense of movement and dip direction are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Turnbull, 2000; Turnbull and Allibone, 2003). The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression (GNS Science Earthquake Geology Group, unpublished data 2006).


MONOWAI (580)

The Monowai fault zone is on the eastern side of Fiordland (Turnbull and Allibone, 2003; Carter and Norris, 2005; Turnbull et al., 2010) in the southwestern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, dip direction, and rake are inferred from geomorphic expression, orientation and regional setting (Turnbull and Allibone, 2003; Carter and Norris, 2005; Turnbull et al., 2010; R. Sutherland unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is calculated from deformation of a 250,000 year old fluvial terrace, and converted to a net slip rate using the dip and rake values (Carter and Norris, 2005).

HAUROKO NORTH (581)

The Hauroko North fault zone is the northern half of the Hauroko Fault, which is on the eastern side of Fiordland (Turnbull and Uruski, 1995; Turnbull and Allibone, 2003; Turnbull et al., 2010) in the southwestern part of domain 11. Fault scarps are present crossing fluvial terraces near the northern intersection with the Moonlight Fault (Carter and Norris, 2005). Sense of movement, dip, dip direction and rake are from natural exposures, geomorphic expression and long-term (post-Oligocene) movement (Norris and Turnbull, 1993; Turnbull and Uruski, 1995; Carter and Norris, 2005). The slip rate is inferred based on thermochronologic ages and geological constraints (Turnbull and Uruski, 1995; Carter and Norris, 2005; Sutherland et al., 2009).

HAUROKO SOUTH (582)

The onshore-offshore Hauroko South fault zone is the southern half of the Hauroko Fault, on the eastern side of Fiordland (Sutherland et al., 2006a; Turnbull et al., 2010) in the southwestern part of domain 11. Detailed mapping of geomorphology has not revealed offset Quaternary terraces in the onshore part (R. Sutherland and J. Zachariasen, unpublished data), but Quaternary activity is inferred from the Hauroko North Fault to the north, a Holocene seabed scarp (Sutherland et al., 2006a) and possible rupture of the southern part in the 1968 Solander Earthquake (Anderson and Webb, 1994; Melhuish et al., 1999). The sense of movement, dip, dip direction and rake are from natural exposures, geomorphic expression and seismic reflection profiles (Turnbull and Uruski, 1995; Melhuish et al., 1999; Sutherland et al., 2006a). The slip rate is estimated from geomorphic expression and long-term (post-Miocene) slip rates (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).

SOLANDER (583)

The Solander fault zone comprises a series of submarine faults which cut the Solander Island volcano (Sutherland et al., 2006a; Turnbull et al., 2010) in the southwestern part of domain 11. No seafloor scarps have been observed, but seismic reflection profiles show deformation (mainly folding) of post-3 Ma strata (Sutherland et al., 2006a). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are inferred from seismic reflection profiles (Sutherland et al., 2006a). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation it is a pure reverse fault. The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and consideration of the long-term slip (post-3 Ma) rate (Sutherland et al., 2006a).


HUMP RIDGE (584)

The Hump Ridge fault zone is an onshore-offshore fault (Sutherland et al., 2006a; Turnbull et al., 2010) in the southwestern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Sutherland et al., 2006a). The rake is inferred from orientation and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012). Slip rate is inferred from the long-term (Pliocene-Quaternary) slip rate (Sutherland et al., 2006a).

TAURU (585)

The submarine Tauru fault zone is the most southern fault within Pacific Plate continental crust (Sutherland and Melhuish, 2000) in southwestern domain 11. It controls seabed topography and deforms Pliocene-Quaternary sediments in seismic reflection profiles (Sutherland and Melhuish, 2000). The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Sutherland and Melhuish, 2000). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation that it is a pure reverse fault (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is inferred from long-term (post-Miocene) slip rates (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).

LIVINGSTONE KEY SUMMIT (586)

The Livingstone Key Summit fault zone is the Livingstone Fault, which is a major basement terrane boundary fault (Turnbull, 2000) in southwestern domain 11. It has a scarp across Holocene deposits in the Key Summit region (Sutherland, 1995). The sense of movement and rake are inferred based on its orientation and regional tectonic considerations. The dip and dip direction are from natural exposures and topographic orientation. The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).

HOLLYFORD (587)

The Hollyford fault zone is in southwestern domain 11. The Hollyford Fault in this compilation represents a zone of several faults with topographic expression, Holocene scarps, and soft fault gouges that are located within the Hollyford and Pyke valleys, and lie within or near a major basement terrane boundary (Sutherland, 1995; Turnbull, 2000). The sense of movement, dip, dip direction and rake are from natural exposures and intersection with topography (Sutherland, 1995). The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).

SKIPPERS (588)

This fault zone is the Skippers Range Fault in the southwestern part of domain 11. It consists of several fault scarps offsetting Holocene surfaces near the Alpine Fault (Ballard, 1989; Turnbull, 2000). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from natural exposures, and the sense changes northward from down-to-the-east to down-to-the-west (Ballard, 1989). The rake is inferred from orientation and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).


DARRAN (589)

The Darran fault zone is in the southwestern part of domain 11. No active traces have been mapped along the Darran fault zone but it is characterised by cataclasite and soft clay gouge, and subsidiary parallel faults to the southwest have scarps across glaciated surfaces (Sutherland, 1995; Turnbull, 2000). The northern part lies beneath Lake McKerrow. The sense of movement, dip, dip direction and rake are from natural exposures and geomorphic expression (Sutherland, 1995). The slip rate is inferred from geomorphic expression and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).

TE ANAU (590)

The Te Anau fault zone, in southwestern domain 11, is inferred to exist beneath Lake Te Anau and along traces mapped as the Glade or southern Glade-Darran Fault at its northern end (Turnbull and Allibone, 2003; Turnbull et al., 2010). The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from natural exposures and consideration of long-term (Pliocene-Quaternary) displacements (Turnbull et al., 1993; Sutherland et al., 2009). The rake is inferred from orientation and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is inferred from consideration of Pliocene-Quaternary exhumation (Sutherland et al., 2009) being similar or less than topographic differences (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).

SPEY-MICA BURN FAULT (591)

The Spey-Mica Burn fault zone is in central Fiordland in southwestern domain 11. The southern end comprises two scarps, the Kilcoy and Vincent Faults (Turnbull et al., 2010), but it is inferred to extend further north along bedrock faults. The dip and dip direction are from exposures in Manapouri Tunnel. The sense of movement and rake are inferred considering the fault orientation and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is unknown, so has been assigned a low value with large uncertainties (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).

FIVE FINGERS (592)

The Five Fingers fault zone is an onshore-offshore fault (Barnes et al., 2005) in the southwestern part of domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes et al., 2005). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation that motion is pure normal. The slip rate is inferred from scarp heights and regional tectonic considerations (P. Barnes unpublished data 2005).

BARN (593)

The submarine Barn fault zone is the northernmost fault in domain 13 and is inferred to have produced very slight deformation of linear moraines and small amounts of coastal uplift between the Alpine Fault and the coast (Sutherland et al., 1995; Sutherland et al., 2007). The sense of movement, dip, dip direction, and rake are inferred from the orientation and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is inferred from marine terrace-derived coastal uplift rates (Sutherland et al., 1995; Sutherland et al., 2007) and likely decreases to the north.


MADAGASCAR (594)

The submarine Madagascar fault zone bounds the western edge of active deformation west of the Alpine Fault in the northern part of domain 13. It is the continuation of the deformed wedge of Fiordland Basin sediments west of the Alpine Fault (Barnes et al., 2002b, 2005) in northern domain 11. The sense of movement, dip, dip direction, and rake are inferred from the orientation and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is inferred from regional consideration of the Fiordland Basin and South Westland uplift rates (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).

MILFORD BASIN 5 TO GEORGE R2, GEORGE R1, CENTRAL WEDGE 1 & 2 & 3, CENTRAL WEDGE 4 – SOUTH WEDGE 411, SOUTH WEDGE 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 TO 10, ETRON (595-604)

These submarine fault zones form a thrust wedge (Delteil et al., 1996; Wood et al., 2000; Barnes et al., 2002b) in central and southern domain 13. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are estimated from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes et al., 2002b). The rake is inferred from the interpretation that they are all pure reverse faults. The slip rates are assigned from offset Pliocene-Quaternary sediments in seismic reflection profiles (Barnes et al., 2002b).

CASWELL HIGH 1, 211, 3, 4, 5, 67, 8, 9, 10 (605-613)

These submarine fault zones bound the southeastern edge of the Caswell High (Delteil et al., 1996; Barnes et al., 2002b) in western domain 13. The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are estimated from seismic reflection profiles (Barnes et al., 2002b). The rake is inferred from the interpretation that they are all pure normal faults, although the northern part has been recently reactivated as a reverse fault (Barnes et al., 2002b). The slip rates are based on offset of Plio-Quaternary seismic reflectors (Barnes et al., 2002b).

WEST BALLENY (614)

The submarine West Balleny fault zone is in the northern part of domain 14. It is characterised by a prominent lineament on the western side of Puysegur Bank and seismic data indicate it aligns with the Puysegur Ridge Fault Zone (Melhuish et al., 1999; Lamarche and Lebrun, 2000). The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (Melhuish et al., 1999; Lamarche and Lebrun, 2000). The rake is inferred from interpretation that it carries some strike-slip motion (R. Sutherland unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is inferred from offset of seismic reflectors and consideration of regional tectonics (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012) and the lack of clear geomorphic expression at the northern end suggests that activity may decrease northwards.

CENTRAL BALLENY (615)

The submarine Central Balleny fault zone is in the northern part of domain 14. It is characterised by a prominent fault scarp offsetting the Quaternary wave-cut surface of southern Puysegur Bank (Melhuish et al., 1999). The sense of movement, dip, dip direction and rake are from seismic reflection profiles and the presence of a prominent pull-apart basin in a fault step-over (Melhuish et al., 1999). The slip rate is inferred from the displaced wave-cut surface and an assumed age (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012) and likely decreases northwards.


SNARES (616)

The submarine Snares fault zone comprises a zone of faults within the Snares Trough (Melhuish et al., 1999; Lamarche and Lebrun, 2000) in central domain 14. The sense of movement, dip, dip direction and rake are from seismic reflection profiles (Melhuish et al., 1999; Lamarche and Lebrun, 2000). The rake is inferred from the straight trace and regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is also inferred from regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).

PUYSEGUR RIDGE (617)

The submarine Puysegur Ridge fault zone is inferred on the basis of a linear valley that runs along the crest of Puysegur Ridge (Collot et al., 1995; Delteil et al., 1996), in southern domain 14. The sense of movement, dip, dip direction and rake are inferred from the straight linear trace and the interpretation that it is a strike-slip fault accommodating the plate boundary parallel component of relative plate motion (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is inferred from regional tectonic considerations (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012).

ALPINE SPRINGS JUNCTION TO TOPHOUSE (618)

This fault zone is the northern part of the Alpine Fault (domain 12), north of the junction with the Awatere Southwest fault zone. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, a trench exposure, and GPR profiling (e.g., Berryman et al., 1992; Yetton and Nobes, 1998; Kaiser et al., 2009). The rake is assigned from the interpretation that it is primarily a dextral fault with a minor reverse component. The slip rate is assigned from consideration of a slip rate balance with the northern faults of the Marlborough Fault System (R. Langridge, unpublished data 2012).

ALPINE KANIERE TO SPRINGS JUNCTION (619)

This fault zone is part of the northern Alpine Fault (domain 12) between the junctions with the Kelly fault zone (south) and the Awatere Southwest fault zone (north). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from geomorphic expression, natural and trench exposures (e.g., Berryman et al., 1992; Yetton, 1998, 2002; Wells et al., 1999; Langridge et al., 2010). The rake is calculated using H:V ratios, which in turn is calculated from the dip slip and horizontal slip rates (Norris and Cooper, 2001). The slip rate is from displacement of a dated fluvial terrace (Langridge et al., 2010).

ALPINE JACKSONS TO KANIERE (620)

This fault zone is the central part of the onshore Alpine Fault (domain 12). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from natural and trench exposures (Norris and Cooper, 2001; Berryman et al., 2002, 2012), and crustal geophysics (Davey et al., 1998). The rake is calculated using H:V ratios from offset fluvial terraces and moraine deposits (Norris and Cooper, 2001). The slip rate is calculated from offset fluvial terraces (Berryman et al., 1992; Norris and Cooper, 2001).


ALPINE MILFORD TO JACKSONS (621)

This fault zone is the southernmost fully onshore part of the Alpine Fault (domain 12). It is considered a separate fault in this compilation because it has a different dip and sense of movement to the fault to the north and south (e.g., Berryman et al., 1992). The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from natural exposures and the straight trace across topography (Hull and Berryman, 1986; Berryman et al., 1992; Sutherland and Norris, 1995). The rake is inferred based on the interpretation that motion is almost pure strike-slip with a slight normal component (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is calculated from offset glaciated surfaces and moraines (Sutherland et al., 2006b)

ALPINE CASWELL TO MILFORD, ALPINE RESOLUTION (622-623)

These fault zones are the southernmost part of the Alpine Fault (domain 12) and are entirely submarine. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles and displaced moraines and outwash fans imaged with multibeam bathymetry data (Delteil et al., 1996; Barnes et al., 2005; Barnes, 2009). The rake is inferred based on the interpretation that motion is almost pure strike-slip with a slight normal component (R. Sutherland, unpublished data 2012). The slip rate is calculated from offset glacial moraines and outwash fans (Barnes, 2009).

PUYSEGUR (624)

This fault zone comprises a series of thrust faults making up the Puysegur Subduction Zone in the southern part of domain 15 (Collot et al., 1995; Delteil et al., 1996). The sense of movement, dip and dip direction are derived from historical earthquake and seismic data (Anderson and Webb, 1994; Melhuish et al., 1999; Lamarche and Lebrun, 2000). The rake is assigned based on the interpretation that it is primarily a thrust fault with a small component of dextral motion, with the strike-slip component partitioned onto the Puysegur Ridge Fault. At the northern end an Mw 7.3 earthquake in 1979 was inferred to be on the subduction interface, and had significant dextral component (Anderson and Webb, 1994; Melhuish et al., 1999). More recently, the 2009 Dusky Sound earthquake ruptured the most northern patch of the Puysegur subduction interface and had a motion that was precisely as predicted from the current plate motion estimate (Beavan et al., 2010). The slip rate is assigned by calculation from the current plate motion vector and assigned slip vector, which is partitioned with the Puysegur Ridge Fault in the south, and accommodating nearly all plate motion in the north (DeMets et al., 2010).

WAIHEMO (625)

The Waihemo fault zone is in the eastern part of domain 11. The fault is only the central part of the bedrock Waihemo Fault, where there is an active scarp (Curran et al., 2011). The sense of movement, dip, dip direction, and rake are from geomorphic expression and natural exposures (Curran et al., 2011). The slip rate is calculated from an exposure of gravels (dated by OSL) thrust over a fluvial strath (Curran et al., 2011).


GREENDALE (626)

The Greendale fault zone ruptured in the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) Earthquake in the northeastern part of domain 11. The fault was previously unknown, so was subsequently added to the model. The sense of movement and downthrown side are from offset cultural features (roads, fencelines, etc) (Quigley et al., 2010, 2012). The dip and dip direction are inferred from the predominance of dextral motion and general transpressional nature of the rupture, and are consistent with geodetic and seismological fault rupture models (Holden et al., 2011). The rake is from the mean H:V ratio of 5:1 determined from offset cultural features (Van Dissen et al., 2011; Quigley et al., 2012), and the uncertainties assigned as an arbitrary ±10°. The mean slip rate is calculated from the mean displacement (2.5 m) and an assumed age of the predominant alluvial fan surface across which it ruptured, and the uncertainties calculated from an arbitrary halving and doubling of the surface age.

HIKURANGI RAUKUMARA, HIKURANGI HAWKE BAY, HIKURANGI WELLINGTON (627-629)

These entirely submarine fault zones together comprise the Hikurangi subduction interface (domain 6). The exact positions of the boundaries between these fault zones are poorly defined; instead they mark the approximate position of along-strike changes in general margin characteristics, historical seismicity and the distribution of interseismic coupling and slow slip events, and do not preclude the possibility of a single through-going rupture (Wallace et al., 2009; Stirling et al., 2012). The fault zones in this model extend upwards to the Hikurangi Trough, whereas Stirling et al. (2012) consider the up-dip limit for rupture may be 5-15 km. The sense of movement and dip direction are from seismicity, geodesy, and seismic reflection profiles (e.g., Webb and Anderson, 1998; Reyners, 1998; Wallace et al., 2004, 2009; Henrys et al., 2006; Barker et al., 2009; Barnes et al., 2010). No single dip values are assigned because of the concave and/or kinked shape of the interface (Ansell & Bannister, 1996; Henrys et al., 2006; Barker et al., 2009). The rake is inferred to reflect the interpretation the movement is pure reverse (thrusting). The slip rate is the full plate rate (Wallace et al., 2004, 2009; Stirling et al., 2012).

RAHOTU, KINA, IHAIA, KIRI, PIHAMA (630-634)

These are onshore-offshore fault zones in the Taranaki Rift, in southwestern domain 1. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles and trenches (Townsend et al., 2010; Mouslopoulou et al., 2012). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that the motion is pure normal. The slip rate is calculated from vertical displacement of lahar deposits (Mouslopoulou et al., 2012) and converted to a net slip rate (=dip slip rate) based on the dip values.

MANAIA (635)

The submarine Manaia fault zone is the northwest continuation of the Waimea North and South fault zones in northern domain 7. The sense of movement, dip, and dip direction are from seismic reflection profiles (e.g., King and Thrasher, 1996; Nicol, 2011). The rake is assigned to reflect the interpretation that the motion is pure reverse. The slip rate is inferred to be a low value (A. Nicol unpublished data, 2012).


4.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was funded by the New Zealand Science and Technology Contracts C05X0702 and C05X0402. NIWA authors were funded by contract C01X0702 and Coasts and Oceans Research Programme 1 (2013/14 SCI). Patrick Sweetensen is thanked for his work on the references.

5.0 REFERENCES

Abercrombie, R.E., Webb, T.H., Robinson, R. and McGinty, R.J., 2000. The enigma of the Arthur's Pass, New Zealand, earthquake 1. Reconciling a variety of data for an unusual earthquake sequence. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(B7): 16119-16137.

Al-Daghastani, H.S.Y. and Campbell, J.K., 1995. The evolution of the lower Waipara River gorge in response to active folding in North Canterbury, New Zealand. ITC Journal, 3: 245-255.

Amos, C.B., Burbank, D.W., Nobes, D.C. and Read, S.A.L., 2007. Geomorphic constraints on listric thrust faulting: implications for active deformation in the Mackenzie Basin, South Island, New Zealand. Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 112(B3): B03S11, doi:10.1029/2006JB004291.

Amos, C.B., Burbank, D.W. and Read, S.A.L., 2010. Along-strike growth of the Ostler fault, New Zealand: Consequences for drainage deflection above active thrusts. Tectonics, 29, TC4021, doi:10.1029/2009TC002613.

Amos, C.B., Lapwood, J.J., Nobes, D.C., Burbank, D.W., Rieser, U. and Wade, A., 2011. Palaeoseismic constraints on Holocene surface ruptures along the Ostler Fault, southern New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 64: 367-378.

Anderson, H. and Webb, T., 1989. The rupture process of the 1987 Edgecumbe Earthquake, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 32: 43-52.

Anderson, H. and Webb, T., 1994. New Zealand seismicity: patterns revealed by the upgraded National Seismograph Network. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 37: 477-493.

Anderson, H., Beanland, S., Blick, G., Darby, D., Downes, G., Haines, J., Jackson, J., Robinson, R. and Webb, T., 1994. The 1968 May 23 Inangahua, New Zealand, earthquake: an integrated geological, geodetic, and seismological source model. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 37: 59-86.

Ansell, J.H. and Bannister, S.C., 1996. Shallow morphology of the subducted Pacific plate along the Hikurangi margin, New Zealand. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 93: 3-20.

Armstrong, M.J., 2000. Geomorphological and geophysical investigation of the effects of active tectonic deformation on the hydrogeology of the north Culverden Basin, North Canterbury, PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 211 pp.

Arnadottir, T., Beavan, J. and Pearson, C., 1995. Deformation associated with the 18 June 1994 Arthurs Pass earthquake, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 38: 553-558.


Ballard, H.R., 1989. Permian arc volcanism and aspects of the general geology of the Skippers Range, NW Otago, PhD Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin.

Barker, D.H.N., Sutherland, R., Henrys, S.A. and Bannister, S.C., 2009. Geometry of the Hikurangi subduction thrust and upper plate, North Island, New Zealand. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 10: Q02007, doi:02010.01029/02008GC002153.

Barnes, P.M., 1994. Continental extension of the Pacific Plate at the southern termination of the Hikurangi subduction zone: the North Mernoo Fault Zone, offshore New Zealand. Tectonics, 13: 735-754.

Barnes, P.M., 1996. Active folding of Pleistocene unconformities on the edge of the Australian-Pacific plate Boundary zone, offshore North Canterbury, New Zealand. Tectonics, 15: 623-640.

Barnes, P.M., 2009. Postglacial (after 20 ka) dextral slip rate of the offshore Alpine fault, New Zealand. Geology, 37: 3-6.

Barnes, P.M. and Audru, J.-C., 1999a. Quaternary faulting in the offshore Flaxbourne and Wairarapa Basins, southern Cook Strait, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 42: 349-367.

Barnes, P.M. and Audru, J.-C., 1999b. Recognition of active strike-slip faulting from high-resolution marine seismic reflection profiles: Eastern Marlborough fault system, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 111: 538-559.

Barnes, P.M. and Nicol, A., 2004. Formation of an active thrust triangle zone associated with structural inversion in a subduction setting, eastern New Zealand. Tectonics, 23: TC1015, doi:1010.1029/2002TC001449.

Barnes, P.M. and Pondard, N., 2010. Derivation of direct on-fault submarine paleoearthquake records from high-resolution seismic reflection profiles: Wairau Fault, New Zealand. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 11: Q11013, doi:11010.11029/12010GC003254.

Barnes, P.M. and Mercia de Lépinay, B., 1997. Rates and mechanics of rapid frontal accretion along the very obliquely convergent southern Hikurangi margin, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(B11): 24931-24952.

Barnes, P.M., Mercier de Lépinay, B., Collot, J.-Y., Delteil, J. and Audru, J.-C., 1998. Strain partitioning in the transition area between oblique subduction and continental collision, Hikurangi margin, New Zealand. Tectonics, 17(4): 534-557.

Barnes, P.M., Nicol, A. and Harrison, T., 2002a. Late Cenozoic evolution and earthquake potential of an active listric thrust complex above the Hikurangi subduction zone, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 114: 1379-1405.

Barnes, P.M., Davy, B., Sutherland, R. and Delteil, J., 2002b. Frontal accretion and thrust wedge evolution under very oblique plate convergence: Fiordland Bain, New Zealand. Basin Research, 14: 439-466.

Barnes, P.M., Sutherland, R. and Delteil, J., 2005. Strike-slip structure and sedimentary basins of the southern Alpine Fault, Fiordland, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 117: 411-435.

Barnes, P.M., Pondard, N., Lamarche, G., Mountjoy, J., Van Dissen, and Litchfield, N., 2008. It's Our Fault: Active Faults and Earthquake Sources in Cook Strait. NIWA Client Report: WLG2008-56, 36p.


Barnes, P.M., Lamarche, G., Bialans, J., Henrys, S., Pecher, I., Netzeband, G.L., Grenert, J., Mountjoy, J.J., Pedley, K. and Crutchley, G., 2010. Tectonic and geological framework for gas hydrates and cold seeps on the Hikurangi subduction margin, New Zealand. Marine Geology, 272: 26-48.

Barrell, D.J.A., Forsyth, P.J. and McSaveney, M.J., 1996. Quaternary geology of the Rangitata Fan, Canterbury Plains, New Zealand. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Science Report 96/23.

Barrell, D.J.A., Van Dissen, R.J. and Read, S.A.L., 2005. Characterisation of late Quaternary displacements on the Waitangi Fault at Aviemore Dam, New Zealand, 2005 Annual New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Technical Conference, Wairakei, Taupo, pp. 1-8.

Barrell, D.J.A., Van Dissen, R.J., Langridge, R.M., Cox, S.C., Wilson, K.J., Rieser, U. and Lukovic, B., 2008 Seismic loads on dams: Waitaki system - Kirkliston Fault displacement characterisation. GNS Science consultancy report 2007/146.

Barrell, D.J.A., Read, S.A.L., Van Dissen, R.J., Macfarlane, D.F., Walker, J. and Rieser, U., 2009. Aviemore: a dam of two halves. In: I.M. Turnbull (Editor), Geological Society of New Zealand & New Zealand Geophysical Society Joint Annual Conference, Oamaru, 23-27 November 2009: field trip guides. Geological Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication. 128B. Geological Society of New Zealand, Wellington, pp. 30 p.

Beanland, S., 1989. Detailed fault mapping in the Matahina Dam Region. New Zealand Geological Survey Client Report 89/8.

Beanland, S., 1995. The North Island Dextral Fault Belt, Hikurangi Subduction Margin, PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.

Beanland, S. and Barrow-Hurlbert, S.A., 1988. The Nevis-Cardrona Fault System, Central Otago, New Zealand: Late Quaternary tectonics and structural development. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 31: 337-352.

Beanland, S. and Berryman, K.R., 1989. Style and episodicity of late Quaternary activity on the Pisa-Grandview Fault Zone, Central Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 32: 451-461.

Beanland, S. and Berryman, K., 1990. Hundalee Fault, North Canterbury. New Zealand Geological Survey client report 90/7.

Beanland, S., Berryman, K.R., Hull, A.G. and Wood, P.R., 1986. Late Quaternary deformation at the Dunstan fault, Central Otago, New Zealand, Recent crustal movements of the Pacific region. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 24, pp. 293-306.

Beanland, S., Berryman, K.R. and Blick, G.H., 1989. Geological investigations of the 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 32: 73-91.

Beanland, S., Blick, G.H. and Darby, D.J., 1990. Normal faulting in a back arc basin: geological and geodetic characteristics of the 1987 Edgecumbe Earthquake, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95(B4): 4693-4707.

Beanland, S., Melhuish, A., Nicol, A. and Ravens, J., 1998. Structure and deformational history of the inner forearc region, Hikurangi subduction margin, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 325-342.


Beavan, R.J., Haines, M., Litchfield, N.J., Van Dissen, R.J., Barnes, P. and Haines, J., 2007. Continuous deformation map of New Zealand from active faulting. In: Mortimer, N., Wallace, L.M. (Editors), Geological Society of New Zealand & New Zealand Geophysical Society Joint Annual Conference: launching International Year of Planet Earth, 26-29 November 2007, Tauranga: programme and abstracts. Geological Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication, 123A: 8.

Beavan, R.J., Samsonov, S., Denys, P., Sutherland, R., Palmer, N.G. and Denham, M., 2010. Oblique slip on the Puysegur subduction interface in the 2009 July Mw 7.8 Dusky Sound earthquake from GPS and InSAR observations: implications for the tectonics of southwestern New Zealand. Geophysical Journal International, 183: 1265-1286; doi: 1210.1111/j.1365-1246X.2010.04798.x.

Becker, J.G. and Craw, D., 2000. Structure and neotectonics on the Main Divide, upper Wilberforce valley, mid Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 43: 217-228.

Begg, J.G. and Johnston, M.R., 2000. Geology of the Wellington area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 10. 1 sheet + 64 p. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt.

Begg, J.G. and Van Dissen, R.J., 1998. Whitemans Valley Fault: a newly discovered active second order fault near Wellington, New Zealand - implications for regional seismic hazard. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 441-448.

Begg, J.G., Villamor, P., Zachariasen, J. and Litchfield, N., 2001. Paleoseismic assessment of active Masterton and Carterton faults, Wairarapa. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Client Report 2001/70.

Bennett, E.R., Youngson, J.H., Jackson, J.A., Norris, R.J., Raisbeck, G.M., Yiou, F. and Fielding, E., 2005. Growth of South Rough Ridge, Central Otago, New Zealand: Using in situ cosmogenic isotopes and geomorphology to study an active, blind reverse fault. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110: B02404, doi:02410.01029/02004JB003184.

Bennett, E., Youngson, J., Jackson, J., Norris, R., Raisbeck, G. and Yiou, F., 2006. Combining geomorphic observations with in situ cosmogenic isotope measurements to study anticline growth and fault propagation in Central Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 49: 217-231.

Benson, A., Hill, N., Little, T.A. and Van Dissen, R.J., 2001a. Paleoseismicity, rates of active deformation, and structure of the Lake Jasper pull-apart basin, Awatere Fault, New Zealand. Consulting Report 2001/1. Victoria University of Wellington, School of Earth Sciences, Wellington.

Benson, A.M., Little, T.A., Van Dissen, R.J., Hill, N. and Townsend, D.B., 2001b. Late Quaternary paleoseismic history and surface rupture characteristics of the eastern Awatere strike-slip fault, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 113: 1079-1091.

Berryman, K.R., 1980. Late Quaternary movement on White Creek Fault, South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 23: 93-101.

Berryman, K.R., 1990. Late Quaternary movement on the Wellington Fault in the Upper Hutt area, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 33: 257-270.


Berryman, K.R., 1993. Age, height and deformation of Holocene marine terraces at Mahia Peninsula, Hikurangi subduction margin, New Zealand. Tectonics, 12: 1347-1364.

Berryman, K. and Villamor, P., 2004. Surface rupture of the Poulter Fault in the 1929 March 9 Arthur's Pass earthquake, and redefinition of the Kakapo Fault, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 47: 341-351.

Berryman, K.R., Beanland, S., Cooper, A.F., Cutten, H.N., Norris, R.J. and Wood, P.R., 1992. The Alpine Fault, New Zealand: variation in Quaternary style and geomorphic expression. Annales Tectonicae, special issue (Supplement to volume VI): 126-163.

Berryman, K., Beanland, S. and Wesnousky, S., 1998. Paleoseismicity of the Rotoitipakau Fault Zone, a complex normal fault in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 449-465.

Berryman, K., Villamor, P. and Litchfield, N., 2001. Waikato Seismic Loads Task 4: Review of faulting hazard. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Client Report 2001/69.

Berryman, K., Webb, T., Hill, N., Stirling, M., Rhoades, D., Beavan, J. and Darby, D., 2002. Seismic loads on dams, Waitaki System, earthquake source characterisation. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Client Report 2001/129.

Berryman, K., Villamor, P., Nairn, I., Van Dissen, R., Begg, J. and Lee, J., 2008. Late Pleistocene surface rupture history of the Paeroa Fault, Taupo Rift, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 51: 135-158.

Berryman, K.R., Marden, M., Palmer, A. and Litchfield, N.J., 2009. Holocene rupture of the Repongaere Fault, Gisborne: implications for Raukumara Peninsula deformation and impact on the Waipaoa Sedimentary System. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 52: 335-347.

Berryman, K.R., Ota, Y., Miyauchi, T., Hull, A., Clark, K.J., Ishibashi, K., Iso, N. and Litchfield, N.J., 2011. Holocene paleoseismic history of upper-plate faults in the southern Hikurangi subduction margin, New Zealand, deduced from marine terrace records. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101: 2064-2087.

Berryman, K., Cooper, A., Norris, R., Villamor, P., Sutherland, R., Wright, T., Schermer, E., Langridge, R. and Biasi, G., 2012. Late Holocene rupture history of the Alpine Fault in South Westland, New Zealand. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102: 620-638.

Bishop, D.G. and Turnbull, I.M., 1996. Geology of the Dunedin area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 21. 1 sheet + 52 p. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt.

Bishop, D.J. and Buchanan, P.G., 1995. Development of structurally inverted basins: a case study from the West Coast, South Island, New Zealand. In: J.G. Buchanan and P.G. Buchanan (Editors), Basin inversion. Geological Society Special Publication 88. Geological Society of London, London, pp. 549-585.

Bull, J.M., Barnes, P.M., Lamarche, G., Sanderson, D.J., Cowie, P.A., Taylor, S.K. and Dix, J.K., 2006. High-resolution record of displacement accumulation on an active normal fault: implications for models of slip accumulation during repeated earthquakes. Journal of Structural Geology, 28: 1146-1166.


Campbell, J.K., Nicol, A. and Howard, M.E., 2003. Long-term changes to river regimes prior to late Holocene coseismic faulting, Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of Geodynamics, 36: 147-168.

Campbell, F.M., Kaiser, A., Horstmeyer, J., Green, A.G., Ghisetti, F., Gorman, A.R., Finnemore, M. and Nobes, D.C., 2010a. Processing and preliminary interpretation of noisy high-resolution seismic reflection/refraction data across the active Ostler Fault zone, South Island, New Zealand. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 70: 332-342.

Campbell, F.M., Ghisetti, F., Kaiser, A.E., Green, A.G., Horstmeyer, H. and Gorman, A.R., 2010b. Structure and evolution of the seismically active Ostler Fault Zone (New Zealand) based on interpretations of multiple high resolution seismic reflection profiles. Tectonophysics, 495: 195-212.

Canora-Catalan, C., Villamor, P., Berryman, K., Martinez-Diaz, J.J. and Raen, T., 2008. Rupture history of the Whirinaki Fault, an active normal fault in the Taupo Rift, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 51: 277-293.

Carne, R.C., Little, T.A. and Reiser, U., 2011. Using displaced river terraces to determine Late Quaternary slip rate for the central Wairarapa Fault at Waiohine River, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 54: 217-236.

Carter, R.M. and Norris, R.J., 2005. The geology of the Blackmount district, Te Anau and Waiau Basins, western Southland, Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Science Report 2004/23.

Cashman, S.M., Kelsey, H.M., Erdman, C.F., Cutten, H.N.C. and Berryman, K.R., 1992. Strain partitioning between structural domains in the Forearc of the Hikurangi Subduction Zone, New Zealand. Tectonics, 11: 242-257.

Chick, L.M., De Lange, W.P. and Healy, T.R., 2001. Potential tsunami hazard associated with the Kerepehi Fault, Firth of Thames, New Zealand. Natural Hazards, 24: 309-318.

Clement, A.J.H. and Brook, M.S., 2008. Tilting of active folds and drainage symmetry on the Manawatu Anticlines, New Zealand: a preliminary investigation. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, doi:10.1002/esp1632.

Collot, J.-Y., Lamarche, G., Wood, R.A., Delteil, J., Sosson, M., Lebrun, J.-F. and Coffin, M.C., 1995. Morphostructure of an incipient subduction zone along a transform plate boundary: Puysegur Ridge and Trench. Geology, 23: 519-522.

Collot, J.-Y., Lewis, K., Lamarche, G. and Lallemand, S., 2001. The giant Ruatoria debris avalanche on the northern Hikurangi margin, New Zealand: Result of oblique seamount subduction. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106(B9): 19271-19297.

Cowan, H.A., 1990. Late Quaternary displacements on the Hope Fault at Glynn Wye, North Canterbury. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 33: 285-293.

Cowan, H.A., 1991. The North Canterbury earthquake of September 1, 1888. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 21: 1-12.

Cowan, H.A., 1992. Structure, seismicity and tectonics of the Porters Pass-Amberley Fault Zone, north Canterbury, New Zealand, PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.


Cowan, H.A. and McGlone, M.S., 1991. Late Holocene displacements and characteristic earthquakes on the Hope River Segment of Hope Fault, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 21: 373-384.

Cowan, H.A., Nicol, A. and Tonkin, P., 1996. A comparison of historical and paleoseismicity in a newly formed fault zone and a mature fault zone, North Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research 101(B3): 6021-6036.

Cox, S.C. and Findlay, R.H., 1995. The Main Divide Fault Zone and its role in the formation of the Southern Alps, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 38: 489-499.

Cox, S.C. and Barrell, D.J.A., 2007. Geology of the Aoraki area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 15. 1 sheet + 71 p. GNS Science, Lower Hutt.

Cox, S.C., Craw, D. and Chamberlain, C.P., 1997. Structure and fluid migration in a late Cenozoic duplex system forming the Main Divide in the central Southern Alps, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 40: 359-373.

Cox, S.C., Stirling, M.W., Herman, F., Gerstenberger, M. and Ristau, J., 2012. Potentially active faults in the rapidly eroding landscape adjacent to the Alpine Fault, central Southern Alps, New Zealand. Tectonics, 31, TC2011, doi:10.1029/2011TC003038.

Curran, C., Norris, R. and Rieser, U., 2011. The Waihemo Fault of north Otago: constraints on late Quaternary activity. In: N.J. Litchfield and K. Clark (Editors), Abstract volume, Geosciences 2011 Conference, Nelson, New Zealand. Geoscience Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication 130A, pp. 29.

Cutten, H.N.C., Beanland, S. and Berryman, K., 1988. The Rangiora Fault, an active structure in Hawkes Bay. New Zealand Geological Survey Record, 35: 65-72.

Davey, F.J., Henyey, T., Holbrook, W.S., Okaya, D., Stern, T.A., Mellhuish, A., Henrys, S., Anderson, H., Eberhart-Philips, D., McEvill, T., Uhrammer, R., Wu, R., Jiracek, G.R., Wannamaker, P.E., Caldwell, G. and Christensen, N., 1998. Preliminary results from a geophysical study across a modern continent-continent collisional plate boundary - the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Tectonophysics, 288: 221-235.

Davis, K., Burbank, D.W., Fisher, D., Wallace, S. and Nobes, D., 2005. Thrust-fault growth and segment linkage in the active Ostler fault zone, New Zealand. Journal of Structural Geology, 27: 1528-1546.

Delteil, J., Herzer, R.H., Sosson, M., Lebrun, J.F., Collot, J.Y. and Wood, R.A., 1996. Influence of pre-existing backstop structure on oblique tectonic accretion: the Fiordland margin (southwestern New Zealand). Geology, 24: 1045-1048.

De Mets, C., Gordon, R.G. and Argus, D.F., 2010. Geologically current plate motions. Geophysical Journal International, 181: 1-80.

Dorn, C., Carpentier, S., Kaiser, A.E., Green, A.G., Horstmeyer, H., Campbell, F., Campbell, J., Jongens, R., Finnemore, M. and Nobes, D.C., 2010a. First seismic imaging results of tectonically complex structures at shallow depths beneath the northwest Canterbury Plains, New Zealand. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 70: 317-331.


Dorn, C., Green, A.G., Jongens, R., Carpentier, S., Kaiser, A.E., Campbell, F., Horstmeyer, H., Campbell, J., Finnemore, M. and Pettinga, J., 2010b. High-resolution seismic images of potentially seismogenic structures beneath the northwest Canterbury Plains, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115: B11303, doi:11310.11029/12010JB007459.

Doser, D.I., Webb, T.H. and Maunder, D.E., 1999. Source parameters of large historical (1918-1962) earthquakes, South Island, New Zealand. Geophysical Journal International, 139: 769-794.

Edbrooke, S.W., 2001. Geology of the Auckland area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 3. 1 sheet + 74 p. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt.

Estrada, B.E., 2003. Seismic hazard associated with the Springbank Fault, North Canterbury Plains, MSc Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 193 pp.

Fleming, C.A., 1953. The Geology of the Wanganui Subdivision, New Zealand Geological Survey Bulletin 52, 361 pp.

Formento-Trigilio, M.L., Burbank, D.W., Nicol, A., Shulmeister, J. and Rieser, U., 2003. River response to an active fold-and-thrust belt in a convergent margin setting, North Island, New Zealand. Geomorphology, 49(1-2): 125-152.

Forsyth, P.J., 2001. Geology of the Waitaki area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 19. 1 sheet + 64p. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt.

Fraser, J.G., Nicol, A., Pettinga, J.R. and Johnston, M.R., 2006. Paleoearthquake investigation of the Waimea-Flaxmore Fault System, Nelson, New Zealand, New Zealand Geotechnical Society 2006 Symposium. Institute of Professional Engineers, Nelson, pp. 59-67.

Freund, R., 1971. The Hope fault: a strike slip fault in New Zealand, New Zealand Geological Survey Bulletin 86. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, 49 pp..

Ghisetti, F.C., Gorman, A.R. and Sibson, R.H., 2007. Surface breakthrough of a basement fault by repeated seismic slip episodes: the Ostler Fault, South Island, New Zealand. Tectonics, 26: TC6004, doi:6010.1029/2007TC002146.

Ghisetti, F.C. and Sibson, R.H., 2006. Accommodation of compressional inversion in north-western South Island (New Zealand): Old faults versus new? Journal of Structural Geology, 28: 1994-2010.

Grapes, R.H., 1991. Aggradation surfaces and implications for displacement rates along the Wairarapa Fault, southern North Island, New Zealand. Catena, 19: 453-469.

Grapes, R., 1999. Geomorphology of faulting: the Wairarapa Fault, New Zealand. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie, 115: 191-217.

Grapes, R.H. and Wellman, H.W., 1986. The north-east end of the Wairau Fault, Marlborough, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 16: 245-250.

Grapes, R.H. and Wellman, H.W., 1993. Field guide to the Wharekauhau Thrust (Palliser Bay) and Wairarapa Fault (Pidgeon Bush). Geological Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication, 79B: 27-44.


Grapes, R.H. and Downes, G., 1997. The 1855 Wairarapa, New Zealand, earthquake: analysis of historical data. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 30: 271-368.

Grapes, R., Little, T. and Downes, G.L., 1998. Rupturing of the Awatere Fault during the 1848 October 16 Marlborough earthquake, New Zealand: historical and present day evidence. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 387-399.

Grapes, R.H., Little, T.A., Browne, G.H. and Rait, G.J., 1997. Ngapotiki Thrust, White Rock and Te Kaukau Point, southeast Wairarapa: active and inactive structures of the Hikurangi Forearc. In: H.J. Campbell and R.H. Grapes (Editors), Geological Society of New Zealand 1997 Annual Conference: 25-27 November 1997 Wellington: field trip guides. Geological Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication, 95B, 22 pp.

Grindley, G.W., 1960. Sheet 8, Taupo. Geological Map of New Zealand 1:250 000. New Zealand Department of Science and Industrial Research, Wellington.

Halliday, S., 2003. The tectonic geomorphology and paleoseismology of the Patoka Fault, North Island Dextral Fault Belt, New Zealand. Unpublished BSc(hons) Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. 78 p.

Hancox, G.T., Perrin, N.D. and Dellow, G.D., 2002. Recent studies of historical earthquake-induced landsliding, ground damage, and MM intensity in New Zealand. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 35: 59-95.

Hayward, B.W., Grenfell, H.R., Sabaa, A.T., Southall, K.E. and Gehrels, W.R., 2007. Foramaniferal evidence of Holocene subsidence and fault displacements, coastal south Otago, New Zealand. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 37: 344-359.

Henrys, S., Reyners, M., Pecher, I., Bannister, S., Nishimura, Y. and Maslen, G., 2006. Kinking of the subducting slab by escalator normal faulting beneath the North Island of New Zealand. Geology, 34: 777-780.

Herman, F., Cox, S.C. and Kamp, P.J.J., 2009. Low-temperature thermochronology and thermokinematic modeling of deformation, exhumation, and development of topography in the central Southern Alps, New Zealand. Tectonics 28: TC5011, doi: 10.1029/2008TC002367.

Heron, D., Van Dissen, R. and Sawa, M., 1998. Late Quaternary movement on the Ohariu Fault, Tongue Point to MacKays Crossing, North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 419-439.

Hesp, P.A. and Shepherd, M.J., 1978. Some aspects of the late Quaternary geomorphology of the lower Manawatu Valley, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 21: 403-412.

Holden, C., Beavan, J., Fry, B., Reyners, M., Ristau, J., Van Dissen, R., Villamor, P. and Quigley, M., 2011. Preliminary source model of the Mw 7.1 Darfield earthquake from geological, geodetic and seismic data, Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Building an Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, paper number 64.

Howard, M., Nicol, A., Campbell, J.K. and Pettinga, J.R., 2005. Holocene paleoearthquakes on the strike-slip Porters Pass Fault, Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 48: 59-74.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2008TC002367/abstract




Hull, A.G., 1990. Tectonics of the 1931 Hawkes Bay earthquake. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 33: 309-320.

Hull, A.G., 1994. Past earthquake timing and magnitude along the Inglewood Fault, Taranaki, New Zealand. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 27: 155-162.

Hull, A.G., 1996. Earthquake and volcanic hazards in Taranaki - potential threats to oil and gas production and distribution infrastructure. 1996 New Zealand Petroleum Conference Proceedings. Confronting the issues 1996: an international perspective: 261-271.

Hull, A.G. and Berryman, K.R., 1986. Holocene tectonism in the region of the Alpine Fault at Lake McKerrow, Fiordland, New Zealand, Recent crustal movements of the Pacific Region. Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin, pp. 317-331.

Jackson, J., Norris, R. and Youngson, J., 1996. The structural evolution of active fault and fold systems in central Otago, New Zealand: evidence revealed by drainage patterns. Journal of Structural Geology, 18: 217-234.

Jackson, J., Van Dissen, R. and Berryman, K., 1998. Tilting of active folds and faults in the Manawatu region, New Zealand: evidence from surface drainage patterns. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 377-385.

Kaiser, A.E., Green, A.G., Campbell, F.M., Horstmeyer, H., Manukyan, E., Langridge, R.M., McClymont, A.F., Mancktelow, N., Finnemore, M. and Nobes, D.C., 2009. Ultrahigh-resolution seismic reflection imaging of the Alpine Fault, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114: B11306, doi:11310.11029/12009JB006338.

Kellahan, H.J.R., 1998. Structure and stratigraphy on the Cheviot Basin margin, northeast Canterbury, MSc Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.

Kelsey, H.M., Cashman, S.M., Beanland, S. and Berryman, K.R., 1995. Structural evolution along the inner forearc of the obliquely convergent Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand. Tectonics, 14: 1-18.

Kelsey, H.M., Hull, A.G., Cashman, S.M., Berryman, K.R., Cashman, P.H., Trexler Jr., J.H. and Begg, J.G., 1998. Paleoseismology of an active reverse fault in a forearc setting: The Poukawa fault zone, Hikurangi forearc, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 110: 1123-1148.

Kieckhefer, R.M., 1979. Late Quaternary tectonic map of New Zealand, Sheets M31D, N31A, N31C and parts M32A and M32B, Leader Dale, Sheets N31B and N31D, Dillon, Sheets O30C and O31A, Lake McRae. Scale 1:50,000. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, 3 maps + 1 booklet pp.

King, P.R. and Thrasher, G.P., 1996. Cretaceous and Cenozoic geology and petroleum systems of the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Monograph 13. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Ltd, Lower Hutt.

Klos, P.Z., 2008. The Ruataniwha Fault: neotectonic evaluation and seismic hazard, Dannevirke Region, New Zealand. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, USA. 86 p.

Knuepfer, P.L.K., 1984. Tectonic geomorphology and present day tectonics of the Alpine shear system, South Island, New Zealand, PhD Thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, 489 pp.


Knuepfer, P.L.K., 1992. Temporal variations in latest Quaternary slip across the Australian - Pacific plate boundary, northeastern South Island, New Zealand. Tectonics, 11: 449-464.

Lamarche, G. and Barnes, P., 2005. Fault characterisation and earthquake source identification in the offshore Bay of Plenty. NIWA Client Report WLG2005-51.

Lamarche, G. and Lebrun, J.-F., 2000. Transition from strike-slip faulting to oblique subduction: active tectonics at the Puysegur Margin, South New Zealand. Tectonophysics, 316: 67-89.

Lamarche, G., Beanland, S. and Ravens, J., 1995. Deformation style and history of the Eketahuna region, Hikurangi forearc, New Zealand, from shallow seismic reflection data. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 38: 105-115.

Lamarche, G., Proust, J.-N. and Nodder, S.D., 2005. Long-term slip rates and fault interactions under low contractional strain, Wanganui Basin, New Zealand. Tectonics, 24, TC4004: doi:10.1029/2004TC001699.

Lamarche, G., Barnes, P.M. and Bull, J.M., 2006. Faulting and extension rates over the last 20,000 years in the offshore Whakatane Graben, New Zealand continental shelf. Tectonics, 25: TC4005, doi:4010.1029/2005TC001886.

Landis, C.A., Campbell, H.J., Aslund, T., Cawood, P.A., Douglas, A., Kimbrough, D.L., Pillai, D.D.L., Raine, J.I. and Willsman, A., 1999. Permian-Jurassic strata at Productus Creek, Southland, New Zealand: implications for terrane dynamics of the eastern Gondwanaland margin. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 42: 255-278.

Langdale, S. and Stern, T.A., 1998. Late Tertiary deformation in Cannington Basin, South Canterbury, New Zealand: evidence from seismic and gravity data. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 247-257.

Langridge, R.M., 2004. How is tectonic slip partitioned from the Alpine Fault to the Marlborough Fault System?: results from the Hope Fault. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences science report, 2004/32: 29.

Langridge, R.M. and Berryman, K.R., 2005. Morphology and slip rate of the Hurunui section of the Hope Fault, South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 48: 43-57.

Langridge, R. and Villamor, P., 2007. Hastings District LiDAR fault trace survey. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2007/145.

Langridge, R.M., Townsend, D. and Persaud, M., 2003a. Paleoseismic assessment of the active Mokonui Fault, Wairarapa. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Client Report 2003/68.

Langridge, R.M., Campbell, J., Hill, N.L., Pere, V., Pope, J., Pettinga, J., Estrada, B. and Berryman, K.R., 2003b. Paleoseismology and slip rate of the Conway Segment of the Hope Fault at Greenburn Stream, South Island, New Zealand. Annals of Geophysics, 46: 1119-1139.

Langridge, R.M., Berryman, K.R. and Van Dissen, R.J., 2005a. Defining the geometric segmentation and Holocene slip rate of the Wellington Fault, New Zealand: the Pahiatua section. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 48: 591-607.


Langridge, R.M., Van Dissen, R.J., Cochran, U.A., Litchfield, N.J., Berryman, K.R., Begg, J.G., Villamor, P., Heron, D., Nicol, A. and Townsend, D., 2005b. Active faulting and paleoearthquakes in the Wairarapa and Wellington Regions. In: J. Townend, R. Langridge and A. Jones (Editors), The 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium. Proceedings Volume, pp. 49-65.

Langridge, R., Villamor, P. and Basili, R., 2006. Earthquake fault trace survey: Central Hawke’s Bay District. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2006/98.

Langridge, R., Berryman, K. and Van Dissen, R.J., 2007. Late Holocene paleoseismicity of the Pahiatua section of the Wellington Fault, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 250: 205-226.

Langridge, R.M., Villamor, P., Basili, R., Almond, P., Martinez-Diaz, J.J. and Canora, C., 2010. Revised slip rates for the Alpine Fault at Inchbonnie: Implications for plate boundary kinematics of South Island, New Zealand. Lithosphere, 2: 139-152.

Langridge, R., Van Dissen, R., Rhoades, D., Villamor, P., Little, T., Litchfield, N., Clark, K. and Clark, D., 2011. Five thousand years of surface ruptures on the Wellington Fault, New Zealand: implications for recurrence and fault segmentation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101: 2088-2107.

Lee, J.M. and Begg, J.G., 2002. Geology of the Wairarapa area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 11. 1 sheet + 66 p. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt.

Lensen, G.J., 1976. Late Quaternary tectonic map of New Zealand, Sheets N28D, O28C & N29B, Hillersden and Sheets O28D, P28A & P28C, Renwick. Scale 1:50,000. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, 2 maps + 1 booklet pp.

Lewis, K.B., Collot, J.-Y., Davy, B.W., Delteil, J., Lallemand, S.E. and Uruski, C.I., 1997. North Hikurangi GeodyNZ swath maps: depths, texture and geological interpretation. Scale 1:500,000. NIWA, Wellington.

Lewis, K.B., Lallemand, S.E. and Carter, L., 2004. Collapse in a Quaternary shelf basin off East Cape, New Zealand: evidence for passage of a subducted seamount inboard of the Ruatoria giant avalanche. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 47: 415-429.

Lillie, A.R. and Gunn, B.M. 1964. Steeply plunging folds in the Sealy Range, Southern Alps. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 7: 403-423.

Litchfield, N.J. and Norris, R.J., 2000. Holocene motion on the Akatore Fault, south Otago coast, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 43: 405-418.

Litchfield, N.J., Campbell, J.K. and Nicol, A., 2003. Recognition of active reverse faults and folds in North Canterbury, New Zealand, using structural mapping and geomorphic analysis. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 46: 563-579.

Litchfield, N., Van Dissen, R., Langridge, R., Heron, D. and Prentice, C., 2004. Timing of the most recent surface rupture event on the Ohariu Fault near Paraparaumu, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 47: 123-127.

Litchfield, N., McVerry, G., Smith, W., Berryman, K. and Stirling, M., 2005. Seismic hazard study for Tailings Embankment at Macraes Gold Project. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Client Report 2005/135.


Litchfield, N., Van Dissen, R., Heron, D. and Rhoades, D., 2006. Constraints on the timing of the three most recent surface rupture and events and recurrence interval for the Ohariu Fault: trenching results from MacKays Crossing, Wellington, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 49: 57-61.

Litchfield, N., Van Dissen, R. and Nicol, A., 2007. Reassessment of slip rate and implications for surface rupture hazard of the Martinborough Fault, South Wairarapa, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 50: 239-243.

Litchfield, N., Van Dissen, R., Hemphill-Haley, M., Townsend, D. and Heron, D., 2010. Post c. 300 year rupture of the Ohariu Fault in Ohariu Valley, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 53: 43-56.

Litchfield, N.J., Van Dissen, R., Sutherland, R., Barnes, P.M., Cox, S.C., Norris, R., Beavan, R.J., Langridge, R., Villamor, P., Berryman, K., Stirling, M., Nicol, A., Nodder, S., Lamarche, G., Barrell, D.J.A., Pettinga, J.R., Little, T., Pondard, N., Mountjoy, J.J. and Clark, K., In press. A model of active faulting in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics.

Little, T. and Begg, J.G., 2005. 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium: all-day field-trip to the Wairarapa Fault and 1855 rupture sites, 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium (2005: Wellington, NZ). Greater Wellington Regional Council, [Wellington, NZ], pp. 28 p.

Little, T.A., Grapes, R. and Berger, G.W., 1998. Late Quaternary strike-slip on the eastern part of the Awatere fault, South Island, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 110: 127-148.

Little, T.A., Van Dissen, R., Schermer, E. and Carne, R., 2009. Late Holocene surface ruptures on the southern Wairarapa fault, New Zealand: Link between earthquakes and the uplifting of beach ridges on a rocky coast. Lithosphere, 1: 4-28.

Little, T.A., Van Dissen, R., Rieser, U., Smith, E.G.C. and Langridge, R.M., 2010. Coseismic strike slip at a point during the last four earthquakes on the Wellington fault near Wellington, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115: B05403, doi:05410.01029/02009JB006589.

Little, T.A., Langridge, R.M., Van Dissen, R. and Gillam, B., 2011. LiDAR data illuminates Holocene activity of the Wellington Fault in the Tararua Ranges. In: Litchfield, N.J., Clark, K. eds. Abstract Volume, Geosciences 2011 Conference, Nelson, New Zealand. Geoscience Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication 130A: 68.

Long, D.T., Cox, S.C., Bannister, S., Gerstenberger, M.C. and Okaya, D., 2003. Upper crustal structure beneath the eastern Southern Alps and the Mackenzie Basin, New Zealand, derived from seismic reflection data. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 46: 21-39.

Madin, I., 1988. Geology and neotectonics of the Manuherikia Basin, Central Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Record, 27.

Marden, M. and Neall, V.E., 1990. Date Ohakean terraces offset by the Wellington Fault, near Woodville, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 33: 449-453.

Markley, M. and Norris, R.J., 1999. Structure and neotectonics of the Blackstone Hill Antiform, Central Otago. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 42: 205-218.


Markley, M. and Tikoff, B., 2003. Geometry of the folded Otago peneplain surface beneath Ida valley, Central Otago, New Zealand, from gravity observations. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 46: 449-456.

Mason, D.P.M. and Little, T.A., 2006. Refined slip distribution and moment magnitude of the 1848 Marlborough earthquake, Awatere Fault, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 49: 375-382.

Mason, D.P.M., Little, T.A. and Van Dissen, R.J., 2006. Rates of active faulting during late Quaternary fluvial terrace formation at Saxton River, Awatere Fault, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 118: 1431-1446.

May, B.D., 2004. Comparative geomorphology of two active tectonic structures, near Oxford, North Canterbury, MSc Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 187 pp.

Mazengarb, C., 1984. The Fernside Fault: an active normal fault, Raukumara Peninsula, New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Record, 3: 98-103.

Mazengarb, C. and Speden, I.G., 2000. Geology of the Raukumara area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 6. 1 sheet + 60 p. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt.

McCalpin, J.P., 1996. Tectonic geomorphology and Holocene paleoseismicity of the Molesworth section of the Awatere Fault, South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 39: 33-50.

McClymont, A.F., 2000. A gravity survey of the Wharekauhau Thrust, Palliser Bay, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 43: 303-306.

McClymont, A.F., Green, A.G., Villamor, P., Horstmeyer, H., Grass, C. and Nobes, D.C., 2008. Characterization of the shallow structures of active fault zones using 3-D ground-penetrating radar data. Journal of Geophysical Research 113(10): B10315, doi:10310.11029/12007JB005402.

McClymont, A.F., Villamor, P. and Green, A.G., 2009. Fault displacement accumulation and slip rate variability within the Taupo Rift (New Zealand) based on trench and 3-D ground-penetrating radar data. Tectonics, 28: TC4005, doi:4010.1029/2008TC002334.

McGinty, P., Darby, D. and Haines, J., 2001. Earthquake triggering in the Hawke's Bay, New Zealand, region from 1931 to 1934 as inferred from elastic dislocation and static stress modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106(B11): 26593-26604.

McKay, A., 1890. On the Earthquakes of September 1888, in the Amuri and Marlborough Districts of the South Island. New Zealand Geological Survey Report of Geological Explorations 1890-1891, 20: 1-16.

McMorran, T.J., 1991. The Hope Fault at Hossack Station, east of Hanmer Basin, north Canterbury, MSc Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.

McVerry, G.H., Stirling, M.W. and Nicol, A., 2005. Kupe Development Project - Seismic Hazard Study. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences client report 2005/14.

Melhuish, A., Van Dissen, R. and Berryman, K., 1996. Mount Stewart - Halcome Anticline: a look inside a growing fold in the Manawatu region, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 39: 123-133.


Melhuish, A., Sutherland, R., Davey, F.J. and Lamarche, G., 1999. Crustal structure and neotectonics of the Puysegur oblique subduction zone, New Zealand. Tectonophysics, 313: 335-362.

Mould, R., 1992. Structure and kinematics of Late Cenozoic deformation along the western margin of the Culverden Basin, North Canterbury, New Zealand, MSc Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.

Mountjoy, J.J., Barnes, P.M. and Pettinga, J.R., 2009. Morphostructure and evolution of submarine canyons across an active margin: Cook Strait sector of the Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand. Marine Geology, 260: 45-68.

Mountjoy, J.J. and Barnes, P.M., 2011. Active upper plate thrust faulting in regions of low plate interface coupling, repeated slow slip events, and coastal uplift: Example from the Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 12: Q01005, doi:01010.01029/02010GC003326.

Mouslopoulou, V., Nicol, A., Little, T.A. and Walsh, J.J., 2007. Terminations of large strike-slip faults: an alternative model from New Zealand. In: W.D. Cunningham and P. Mann (Editors), Tectonics of strike-slip restraining and releasing bends. The Geological Society of London Special Publications, 290: 387-415.

Mouslopoulou, V., Nicol, A., Little, T.A. and Begg, J.G., 2009. Palaeoearthquake surface rupture in a transition zone from strike-slip to oblique-normal slip and its implications to seismic hazard, North Island Fault System, New Zealand. In: K. Reicherter, A.M. Michetti and P.G. Silva (Editors), Palaeoseismology: Historical and prehistorical records of earthquake ground effects for seismic hazard assessment. The Geological Society of London Special Publications, 316: 269-292.

Mouslopoulou, V., Nicol, A., Walsh, J.J., Begg, J.G., Townsend, D.B. and Hristopulos, D.T., 2012. Fault-slip accumulation in an active rift over thousands to millions of years and the importance of paleoearthquake sampling. Journal of Structural Geology, 36: 71-80.

Nairn, I.A. and Beanland, S., 1989. Geological setting of the 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 32: 1-13.

Nairn, I.A., Hedenquist, J.W., Villamor, P., Berryman, K.R. and Shane, P.A., 2005. The ~AD1315 Tarawera and Waiotapu eruptions, New Zealand: contemporaneous rhyolite and hydrothermal eruptions driven by an arrested basalt dike system? Bulletin of Volcanology, 67: 186-193.

Nathan, S., 1978. Tertiary rocks near the White Creek Fault, upper Buller Gorge, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 8: 5-15.

Nathan, S., Rattenbury, M.S. and Suggate, R.P., 2002. Geology of the Greymouth area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 12. 1 sheet + 58 p. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited.

Nicol, A., 2011. Landscape history of the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 54: 195-208.

Nicol, A. and Campbell, J.K., 2001. The impact of episodic fault-related folding on late Holocene degradation terraces along Waipara River, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 44: 145-156.

Nicol, A. and Van Dissen, R.J., 2002. Up-dip partitioning of displacement components on the oblique-slip Clarence Fault, New Zealand. Journal of Structural Geology, 24: 1521-1535.


Nicol, A. and Van Dissen, R.J., 1997. Note: a reassessment of abruptly fanning bed dips on the northwestern limb of the Huangarua Syncline, Wairarapa, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 40: 257-260.

Nicol, A. and Beavan, J., 2003. Shortening of an overriding plate and its implications for slip on a subduction thrust, central Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand. Tectonics, 22: 1070, doi:1010.1029/2003TC001521.

Nicol, A., Alloway, B. and Tonkin, P., 1994. Rates of deformation, uplift and landscape development associated with active folding in the Waipara area of North Canterbury, New Zealand. Tectonics, 13: 1327-1344.

Nicol, A., Van Dissen, R., Vella, P., Alloway, B. and Melhuish, A., 2002. Growth of contractional structures during the last 10 m. y. at the southern end of the emergent Hikurangi forearc basin, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 45: 365-385.

Nicol, A., Walsh, J., Berryman, K. and Nodder, S., 2005. Growth of a normal fault by the accumulation of slip over millions of years. Journal of Structural Geology, 27: 327-342.

Ninis, D., Little, T.A., Van Dissen, R.J., Litchfield, N.J., Smith, E.G.C., Wang, N., Rieser, U. and Henderson, C.M., 2013. Slip rate on the Wellington Fault, New Zealand, during the late Quaternary: Evidence for variable slip during the Holocene. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103: 559-579.

Nodder, S., 1993. Neotectonics of the offshore Cape Egmont Fault Zone, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 36: 167-184.

Nodder, S.D., 1994. Characterising the potential offshore seismic sources using high-resolution geophysical and seafloor sampling programs: An example from Cape Egmont fault zone, Taranaki shelf, New Zealand. Tectonics, 13: 641-658.

Nodder, S.D., Lamarche, G., Proust, J.-N. and Stirling, M.W., 2007. Characterizing earthquake recurrence parameters for offshore faults in the low-strain, compressional Kapiti-Manawatu Fault System, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(B12): B12102, doi:12110.11029/12007JB005019.

Norris, R.J. and Turnbull, I.M., 1993. Cenozoic basins adjacent to an evolving transform plate boundary, southwest New Zealand. In: P.F. Ballance (Editor), Sedimentary Pacific Basins of the World. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 251-170.

Norris, R.J. and Cooper, A.F., 2001. Late Quaternary slip rates and their significance for slip partitioning on the Alpine Fault, New Zealand. Journal of Structural Geology, 23: 507-520.

Norris, R.J. and Nicolls, R., 2004. Strain accumulation and episodicity of fault movements in Otago. University of Otago, Dunedin, 146 pp.

Norris, R.J., Carter, R.M. and Turnbull, I.M., 1978. Cainozoic sedimentation in basins adjacent to a major continental transform boundary in southern New Zealand. Journal of the Geological Society of London 135: 191-205.

Norris, R.J., Landis, C.A. and Koons, P.O., 1994. Seismotectonic evaluation of fault structres in East Otago: Neotectonics of the Akatore Fault. EQC Report.

Oliver, P.J. and Keene, H.W., 1989 Geological map of New Zealand 1:50,000 Sheet K36 AC and part Sheet K35 Mount Somers. 1 map + 1 booklet Geological map of New Zealand 1:50,000 K36 & part K35. New Zealand Geological Survey, Lower Hutt.


Oliver, P.J. and Keene, H.W., 1990 Geological map of New Zealand 1:50,000 Sheet J36 BD and part Sheet J35 Clearwater. 1 map + 1 booklet. Geological map of New Zealand 1:50,000 J36 & part J35. New Zealand Geological Survey, Lower Hutt.

Ota, Y., Williams, D.N. and Berryman, K.R., 1981. Part sheets Q27, R27 and R28 - Wellington 1st Ed. Late Quaternary tectonic map of New Zealand 1:50 000. With notes. Department of Science and Industrial Research Limited, Wellington.

Ota, Y., Beanland, S., Berryman, K.R. and Nairn, I.A., 1988. The Matata Fault: active faulting at the north-western margin of the Whakatane Graben, eastern Bay of Plenty. New Zealand Geological Survey Record, 35: 6-13.

Ota, Y., Berryman, K.R., Fellows, D., Hull, A., Ishibashi, K., Iso, N., Miyauchi, T., Miyoshi, M. and Yamashina, K., 1990a. Sections and profiles for the study of Holocene coastal tectonics, Gisborne-Cape Palliser, North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Record 42. DSIR Geology & Geophysics, Lower Hutt, 114 pp.

Ota, Y., Miyauchi, T. and Hull, A.G., 1990b. Holocene marine terraces at Aramoana and Pourerere, eastern North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 33: 541-546.

Ota, Y., Hull, A.G. and Berryman, K.R., 1991. Coseismic uplift of Holocene marine terraces in the Pakarae River area, eastern North Island, New Zealand. Quaternary Research, 35: 331-346.

Ota, Y., Brown, L.J., Berryman, K.R., Fujimori, T. and Miyauchi, T., 1995. Vertical tectonic movement in northeastern Marlborough: stratigraphic, radiocarbon, and paleoecological data from Holocene estuaries. New Zealand Journal Geology Geophysics, 38: 269-282.

Ota, Y., Pillans, B., Berryman, K.R., Beu, A., Fujimori, T., Miyauchi, T. and Berger, G., 1996. Pleistocene coastal terraces of Kaikoura Peninsula and the Marlborough coast, South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 39: 51-73.

Pace, B., Stirling, M.W., Litchfield, N.J. and Rieser, U., 2005. New active fault data and seismic hazard estimates for west Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 48: 75-83.

Paquet, F., Proust, J.N., Barnes, P. and Pettinga, J.R., 2011. Controls on active forearc basin stratigraphy and sediment fluxes: The Pleistocene of Hawke Bay. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 123: 1074 -1096

Pedley, K.L., Barnes, P.M., Pettinga, J.R. and Lewis, K.B., 2010. Seafloor structural geomorphic evolution of the accretionary frontal wedge in response to seamount subduction, Poverty Indentation, New Zealand. Marine Geology, 270: 119-138.

Pettinga, J.R., Yetton, M.D., Van Dissen, R.J. and Downes, G., 2001. Earthquake source identification and characterisation for the Canterbury Region, South Island, New Zealand. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 34: 282-317.

Pillans, B., 1990. Vertical displacement rates on Quaternary faults, Wanganui Basin. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 33: 271-275.

Plaza-Faverola, A., Klaeschen, D., Barnes, P., Pecher, I., Henrys, S., and Mountjoy, J., 2012. Evolution of fluid expulsion and concentrated hydrate zones across the southern Hikurangi subduction margin, New Zealand: an analysis from depth migrated seismic data. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 13, Q08019, doi:10.1029/2102GC004228.


Pondard, N. and Barnes, P.M., 2010. Structure and paleoearthquake records of active submarine faults, Cook Strait, New Zealand: implications for fault interactions, stress loading, and seismic hazard. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115: B12320, doi:12310.11029/12010JB007781.

Quigley, M., Van Dissen, R.J., Villamor, P., Litchfield, N.J., Barrell, D.J.A., Furlong, K., Stahl, T., Duffy, B., Bilderback, E., Noble, D., Townsend, D.B., Begg, J.G., Jongens, R., Ries, W., Claridge, J., Klahn, A., Mackenzie, H., Smith, A., Hornblow, S., Nicol, R., Cox, S.C., Langridge, R.M. and Pedley, K., 2010. Surface rupture of the Greendale Fault during the Darfield (Canterbury) Earthquake, New Zealand: initial findings. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 43: 236-242.

Quigley, M., Van Dissen, R.J., Litchfield, N.J., Villamor, P., Duffy, B., Barrell, D.J.A., Furlong, K., Stahl, T., Bilderback, E. and Noble, D., 2012. Surface rupture during the 2010 Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake: implications for fault rupture dynamics and seismic-hazard analysis. Geology, 40: 55-58; doi:10.1130/G32528.32521.

Rattenbury, M.S., Cooper, R.A. and Johnston, M.R., 1998. Geology of the Nelson area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Geological Map 9. 1 sheet + 67 p. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt.

Rattenbury, M.S., Townsend, D.B. and Johnston, M.R., 2006. Geology of the Kaikoura area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 13. 1 sheet + 70 p. GNS Science, Lower Hutt.

Rattenbury, M.S., Jongens, R. and Cox, S.C., 2010. Geology of the Haast Area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 14. 1 sheet + 58 p. GNS Science, Lower Hutt.

Raub, M.L., Cutten, H.N. and Hull, A.G., 1987. Seismotectonic hazard analysis of the Mohaka Fault North Island, New Zealand, Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 219-230.

Read, S.A.L. and Blick, G.H., 1991. Late Quaternary deformation and geodetic monitoring in the area of "The Knot" on the Ostler Fault Zone, South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Record, 43: 85-91.

Reay, M.B., 1993. Geology of the middle part of the Clarence Valley. Scale 1:50 000. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences geological map 10. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, 1 map + 144 pp.

Reyners, M., 1998. Plate coupling and the hazard of large subduction thrust earthquakes at the Hikurangi subduction zone, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 343-354.

Rhoades, D.A., Van Dissen, R.J., Langridge, R.M., Little, T.A., Ninis, D., Smith, E.G.C. and Robinson, R., 2011. Re-evaluation of conditional probability of rupture of the Wellington-Hutt Valley segment of the Wellington Fault. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44: 77-86.

Robinson, R. and McGinty, P., 2000. The enigma of the Arthur's Pass, New Zealand, earthquake 2. The aftershock distribution and its relation to regional and induced stress fields. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(B7): 16139-16150.

Robinson, R., Van Dissen, R. and Litchfield, N., 2011. Using synthetic seismicity to evaluate seismic hazard in the Wellington region, New Zealand. Geophysical Journal International, 187: 510-528.


Rodgers, D.W. and Little, T.A., 2006. World's largest coseismic strike-slip offset: the 1855 rupture of the Wairarapa Fault, New Zealand, and implications for displacement/length scaling of continental earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(B12): doi:10.1029/2005JB004065.

Schermer, E.R., Van Dissen, R., Berryman, K.R., Kelsey, H.M. and Cashman, S.M., 2004. Active faults, paleoseismology, and historic fault rupture in northern Wairarapa, North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 47: 101-122.

Schermer, E.R., Little, T.A. and Rieser, U., 2009. Quaternary deformation along the Wharekauhau fault system, North Island, New Zealand: Implications for an unstable linkage between active strike-slip and thrust faults. Tectonics, 28: TC6008, doi:6010.1029/2008TC002426.

Sisson, R.J., Campbell, J., Pettinga, J. and Milner, D., 2001. Paleoseismicity of the Ashley and Loburn faults, North Canterbury, New Zealand. Earthquake Commission Research Foundation, Wellington, 31 pp.

Stirling, M.W., 1990. The Old Man Range and Garvie Mountains: tectonic geomorphology of the Central Otago Peneplain, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 33: 233-243.

Stirling M. and Berryman, K.R., 2000. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of the Roxburgh Dam Site. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Client Report 2000/150.

Stirling, M.W., Wesnousky, S.G. and Berryman, K.R., 1998. Probability seismic hazard analysis of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 355-375.

Stirling, M.W., McVerry, G.H., Berryman, K.R. 2002. A new seismic hazard model for New Zealand. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92: 1878-1903.

Stirling, M.W., Gerstenberger, M.C., Litchfield, N.J., McVerry, G.H., Smith, W.D., Pettinga, J. and Barnes, P., 2008. Seismic hazard of the Canterbury region, New Zealand: new earthquake source model and methodology. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 41: 51-67.

Stirling, M.W., McVerry, G.H., Gerstenberger, M.C., Litchfield, N.J., Van Dissen, R.J., Berryman, K.R., Barnes, P., Beavan, R.J., Bradley, B., Clark, K.J., Jacobs, K., Lamarche, G., Langridge, R.M., Nicol, A., Nodder, S., Pettinga, J., Reyners, M.E., Rhoades, D.A., Smith, W.D., Villamor, P. and Wallace, L.M., 2012. National seismic hazard model for New Zealand: 2010 update. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102: 1514-1542.

Suggate, R.P., 1987. Active folding in North Westland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 30: 169-174.

Suggate, R.P., 1988a. The high terraces of the upper Buller Gorge: sequence, nomenclature and deformation. In: R.P. Suggate (Editor), Quaternary deposition and deformation in the Buller and tributary valleys. New Zealand Geological Survey Record 25: 5-11.

Suggate, R.P., 1988b. Quaternary deposition and deformation in the Buller and tributary valleys. New Zealand Geological Survey Record, 25.

Suggate, R.P., 1988c. The Speargrass surface (c. 18000 yr BP) and its deformation in the Buller and tributary valleys. In: R.P. Suggate (Editor), Quaternary deposition and deformation in the Buller and tributary valleys. Record / New Zealand Geological Survey. 25. Record / New Zealand Geological Survey. 25. New Zealand Geological Survey, Lower Hutt, pp. 27-43.


Suggate, R.P., 1989. The postglacial shorelines and tectonic development of the Barrytown coastal lowland, North Westland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 32: 443-450.

Suggate, R.P., 1990. Vertical displacement associated with the White Creek Fault accompanying the 1929 Murchison (New Zealand) Earthquake. New Zealand Geological Survey Report EDS, 131.

Suggate, R.P., 2006. The northern Grey Valley Trough and the Montgomerie Fault, north Westland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 49: 491-502.

Sutherland, R., 1995. Late Cenozoic tectonics in the SW Pacific and development of the Alpine Fault through southern South Island, New Zealand, PhD Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, 294 pp.

Sutherland, R. and Norris, R.J., 1995. Late Quaternary displacement rate, paleoseismicity, and geomorphic evolution of the Alpine Fault: evidence from Hokuri Creek, South Westland. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 38: 419-430.

Sutherland, R. and Melhuish, A., 2000. Formation and evolution of the Solander Basin, southwestern South Island, New Zealand, controlled by a major fault in continental crust and upper mantle. Tectonics, 19: 44-61.

Sutherland, R., Nathan, S. and Turnbull, I.M., 1995. Pliocene-Quaternary sedimentation and Alpine Fault related tectonics in the lower Cascade valley, South Westland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 381: 431-450.

Sutherland, R., Barnes, P. and Uruski, C., 2006a. Miocene-Recent deformation, surface elevation, and volcanic intrusion of the overriding plate during subduction initiation, offshore southern Fiordland, Puysegur margin, southwest New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 49: 131-149.

Sutherland, R., Berryman, K. and Norris, R., 2006b. Quaternary slip rate and geomorphology of the Alpine fault: Implications for kinematics and seismic hazard in southwest New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 118: 464-474.

Sutherland, R., Kim, K.J., Zondervan, A. and McSaveney, M.J., 2007. Orbital forcing of mid-latitude Southern Hemisphere glaciation since 100 ka inferred from cosmogenic nuclide ages of moraine boulders from the Cascade Plateau, southwest New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 119: 443-451; doi: 410.1130/B25852.25851.

Sutherland, R., Gurnis, M., Kamp, P.J.J. and House, M.A., 2009. Regional exhumation history of brittle crust during subduction initiation, Fiordland, southwest New Zealand, and implications for thermochronologic sampling and analysis strategies. Geosphere, 5: 409-425.

Townsend, D., Begg, J., Villamor, P. and Lukovic, B., 2002. Late Quaternary displacement of the Mokonui Fault, Wairarapa, New Zealand: A preliminary assessment of earthquake generating potential. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Client Report 2002/58.

Townsend, D., Nicol, A., Mouslopoulou, V., Begg, J.G., Beetham, R.D., Clark, D., Giba, M., Heron, D., Lukovic, B., McPherson, A., Seebeck, H. and Walsh, J.J., 2010. Paleoearthquake histories across a normal fault system in the southwest Taranaki Peninsula, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 53: 375-394.


Townsend, T., 1998. Paleoseismology of the Waverley Fault Zone and implications for earthquake hazard in South Taranaki, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 467-474.

Tronicke, J., Villamor, P. and Green, A.G., 2006. Detailed shallow geometry and vertical displacement estimates of the Maleme Fault Zone, New Zealand, using 2-D and 3-D georadar. Near Surface Geophysics, 4: 155-161.

Turnbull, I.M., 2000. Geology of the Wakatipu area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 18. 1 sheet + 72 p. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt.

Turnbull, I.M. and Allibone, A.H., 2003. Geology of the Murihiku area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 20. 1 sheet + 74 p. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt.

Turnbull, I.M., Allibone, A.H. and Jongens, R., 2010. Geology of the Fiordland area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 17. 1 sheet + 97 p. GNS Science, Lower Hutt.

Turnbull, I.M. and Uruski, C.I., 1995. Geology of the Monowai-Waitutu area, scale 1:50 000. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences geological map 19. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, Lower Hutt, 2 shets + 68 pp.

Turnbull, I.M., Uruski, C.I., Anderson, H.J., Lindqvist, J.K., Scott, G.H., Morgans, H.E.G., Hoskins, R.H., Raine, J.I., Mildenhall, D.C., Pocknall, D.T., Beu, A.G., Maxwell, P.A., Smale, D., Watters, W.A. and Field, B.D., 1993. Cretaceous and Cenozoic sedimentary basins of western Southland, South Island, New Zealand. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences monograph 1. New Zealand Geological Survey basin studies 4. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, 86 pp.

Upton, P., Craw, D., James, Z. and Koons, P.O., 2004. Structure and late Cenozoic tectonics of the southern Two Thumb Range, mid Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 47: 141-153.

Van Dissen, R.J., 1989. Late Quaternary faulting in the Kaikoura region, southeastern Marlborough, New Zealand, MSc Thesis, Oregon State University.

Van Dissen, R. and Yeats, Y.S., 1991. Hope Fault, Jordan Thrust and uplift of the Seaward Kaikoura Range, New Zealand. Geology, 9: 393-396.

Van Dissen, R. and Berryman, K., 1995. The Arthur's Pass (Avoca River) earthquake of 18 June, 1994: an overdue note regarding landslide damage and the search for surface rupture. Geological Society of New Zealand Newsletter, 107(July): 28-33.

Van Dissen, R. and Berryman, K.R., 1996. Surface rupture earthquakes over the last ~1000 years in the Wellington region, New Zealand, and implications for ground shaking hazard. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(B3): 5999-6019.

Van Dissen, R. and Nicol, A., 2009. Mid-late Holocene paleoseismicity of the eastern Clarence Fault, Marlborough, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 52: 195-208.

Van Dissen, R., Berryman, K.R., Pettinga, J.R. and Hill, N.L., 1992. Paleoseismicity of the Wellington - Hutt Valley segment of the Wellington Fault, North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 35: 165-175.


Van Dissen, R.J., Hull, A.G. and Read, S.A.L., 1993. Timing of some large Holocene earthquakes on the Ostler Fault, New Zealand, CRCM, Kobe, pp. 381-386.

Van Dissen, R., Begg, J., Palmer, A., Nicol, A., Darby, D. and Reyners, M., 1998. Newly discovered active faults in the Wellington region, New Zealand, New Zealand National Society of Earthquake Engineering Conference, Wairakei, pp. 1-7.

Van Dissen, R., Heron, D. and Palmer, A., 1999. Ohariu and Northern Ohariu Faults: field guide to Late Quaternary active faulting. Geological Society of New Zealand Inc 1999 Annual Conference, 29 November - 1 December, Massey University, Palmerston North: field trip guides. Geological Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication, 107A: 29-69.

Van Dissen, R.J., Begg, J.G. and Robinson, R., 2001. The Akatarawa Fault: a newly discovered active fault in the Wellington region, and implications for increased hazard on the Wellington fault. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Inc Technical Conference and AGM, Wairakei Resort Hotel, Friday/Sunday 23-25 March 2001: Conference Technical Papers: Paper no. 4.06.01 (08p).

Van Dissen, R.J., Little, T. and Nicol, A., 2005. Field trip 4: faults of eastern Marlborough: Picton, Awatere and Kekerengu. In: J.R. Pettinga and A.M. Wandres (Editors), Geological Society of New Zealand 50th annual conference, 28 November to 1 December 2005, Kaikoura: field trip guides. Geological Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 119B: 85-110.

Van Dissen, R., Barrell, D., Langridge, R., Litchfield, N., Villamor, P., and Tonkin, P. 2007. Reassessment of seismic hazard at Clyde Dam, Central Otago: Earthquake geology field investigations and determination of Dunstan Fault rupture characteristics. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2006/47.

Van Dissen, R., Barrell, D., Litchfield, N., Villamor, P., Quigley, M., King, A., Furlong, K., Begg, J., Townsend, D., Mackenzie, H., Stahl, T., Noble, D., Duffy, B., Bilderback, E., Claridge, J., Klahn, A., Jongens, R., Cox, S., Langridge, R., Ries, W., Dhakal, R., Smith, A., Hornblow, S., Nicol, R., Pedley, K., Henham, H., Hunter, R., Zajac, A. and Mote, T., 2011. Surface rupture displacement on the Greendale Fault during the Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake, New Zealand, and its impact on man-made structures, Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Building an Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, paper number 186.

Villamor, P. and Berryman, K.R., 2001. A Late Quaternary extension rate in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand, derived from fault slip data. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 44: 243-269.

Villamor, P. and Berryman, K.R., 2006a. Evolution of the southern termination of the Taupo Rift, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 49: 23-37.

Villamor, P. and Berryman, K.R., 2006b. Late Quaternary geometry and kinematics of faults at the southern termination of the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 49: 1-21.

Villamor, P., Berryman, K. R., Webb, T. H., McVerry, G. H., Stirling, M., McGinty, P., Downes, G., Harris, J. and Litchfield, N., 2001. Waikato seismic loads task 2.1: Revision of seismic source characterisation. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Client Report 2001/58. Lower Hutt, New Zealand.


Villamor, P., Van Dissen, R., Alloway, B.V., Palmer, A.S. and Litchfield, N., 2007. The Rangipo fault, Taupo rift, New Zealand: an example of temporal slip-rate and single-event displacement variability in a volcanic environment. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 119: 529-647.

Villamor, P., Berryman, K.R., Nairn, I.A., Wilson, K., Litchfield, N. and Ries, W., 2011. Associations between volcanic eruptions from Okataina Volcanic Centre and surface rupture of nearby active faults, Taupo Rift, New Zealand: insights into the nature of volcano-tectonic interactions. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 123: 1383-1405.

Wallace, L.M., Beavan, R.J., McCaffrey, R. and Darby, D.J., 2004. Subduction zone coupling and tectonic block rotations in the North Island, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109(B12): B12406, doi:12410.11029/12004JB003241.

Wallace, L.M., Reyners, M.E., Cochran, U.A., Bannister, S.C., Barnes, P.M., Berryman, K.R., Downes, G.L., Eberhart-Phillips, D., Fagereng, A., Ellis, S.M., Nicol, A., McCaffrey, R., Beavan, R.J., Henrys, S.A., Sutherland, R., Barker, D.H.N., Litchfield, N.J., Townend, J., Robinson, R., Bell, R.E., Wilson, K.J. and Power, W.L., 2009. Characterizing the seismogenic zone of a major plate boundary subduction thrust: Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 10: Q10006, doi:10010.11029/12009GC002610.

Wallace, S.C., Nobes, D.C., Davis, K.J., Burbank, D.W. and White, A., 2010. Three-dimensional GPR imaging of the Benmore anticline and step-over of the Ostler Fault, South Island, New Zealand. Geophysical Journal International, 180: 465-474.

Walters, R., Barnes, P. and Goff, J.R., 2006. Locally generated tsunami along the Kaikoura coastal margin: Part 1. Fault ruptures. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 40: 1-16.

Wang, N. and Grapes, R., 2008. Infrared-stimulated luminescence dating of late Quaternary aggradation surfaces and their deformation along an active fault, southern North Island of New Zealand. Geomorphology, 96: 86-104.

Webb, T. and Anderson, H., 1998. Focal mechanisms of large earthquakes in the North Island of New Zealand: Slip partitioning at an oblique active margin. Geophysical Journal International, 134: 40-86.

Wells, A., Yetton, M.D., Duncan, R.P. and Stewart, G.H., 1999. Prehistoric dates of the most recent Alpine fault earthquakes, New Zealand. Geology, 27: 995-998.

Wightman, R.H. and Little, T.A., 2007. Deformation of the Pacific Plate above the Alpine Fault ramp and its relationship to expulsion of metamorphic fluids: an array of backshears. In: Okaya, D.A., Stern, T.A., Davey, F.J. (Editors). A continental plate boundary: tectonics at South Island, New Zealand. Washington DC, American Geophysical Union. Geophysical Monograph 175: 177-205.

Wilson, K., Berryman, K., Litchfield, N. and Little, T., 2006. A revision of mid-late Holocene marine terrace distribution and chronology at the Pakarae River mouth, North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 49: 477-489.

Wise, D.J., Cassidy, J. and Locke, C.A., 2003. Geophysical imaging of the Quaternary Wairoa North Fault, New Zealand: a case study. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 53: 1-16.

Wood, R.A., Pettinga, J.R., Bannister, S., Lamarche, G. and McMorran, T.J., 1994. Structure of the Hanmer strike-slip Basin, Hope Fault, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 106: 1459-1473.


Wood, R.A., Herzer, R.H., Sutherland, R. and Melhuish, A., 2000. Cretaceous-Tertiary tectonic history of the Fiordland margin, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 43: 289-302.

Yang, J., 1991. The Kakapo Fault - a major active dextral fault in the central North Canterbury - Buller regions of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 34: 137-143.

Yang, J., 1992. Landslide mapping and major earthquakes on the Kakapo Fault, South Island, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 22: 205-212.

Yetton, M., 1998. Progress in understanding the paleoseismicity of the central and northern Alpine Fault, Westland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 475-483.

Yetton, M.D., 2002. Paleoseismic investigation of the north and west Wairau sections of the Alpine Fault, South Island, New Zealand. EQC research report. Earthquake Commission, Wellington, 96 pp.

Yetton, M.D. and Nobes, D.C., 1998. Recent vertical offset and near-surface structure of the Alpine Fault in Westland, New Zealand, from ground penetrating radar profiling. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 41: 485-492.

Yousif, H.S., 1987. The applications of remote sensing to geomorphological neotectonic mapping in North Canterbury, New Zealand, University of Canterbury, PhD Thesis, Christchurch, Christchurch, 410 pp.

Zachariasen, J., Villamor, P., Lee, J., Lukovic, B., and Begg, J., 2000. Late Quaternary faulting of the Masterton and Carterton Faults, Wairarapa, New Zealand. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Client Report 2000/71.

Zachariasen, J. and Van Dissen, R., 2001. Paleoseismicity of the northern Horohoro Fault, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 49: 159-174.

Zachariasen, J., Berryman, K., Langridge, R., Prentice, C., Rymer, M., Stirling, M. and Villamor, P., 2006. Timing of late Holocene surface rupture of the Wairau Fault, Marlborough, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 49: 159-174.

1 Fairway Drive

Avalon

PO Box 30368

Lower Hutt

New Zealand

T +64-4-570 1444

F +64-4-570 4600

Dunedin Research Centre

764 Cumberland Street

Private Bag 1930

Dunedin

New Zealand

T +64-3-477 4050

F +64-3-477 5232

Wairakei Research Centre

114 Karetoto Road

Wairakei

Private Bag 2000, Taupo

New Zealand

T +64-7-374 8211

F +64-7-374 8199

National Isotope Centre

30 Gracefield Road

PO Box 31312

Lower Hutt

New Zealand

T +64-4-570 1444

F +64-4-570 4657

Principal Location

www.gns.cri.nz

Other Locations

Documents

1 GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand 2012-019.pdf · 1 GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand 2 NIWA, ... APE : E: GMONT : C: ENTRAL, C: APE