42
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley [email protected]

1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts I

Consideration

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

Page 2: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Six Questions

1. Definition: Benefit-Detriment and Bargain Theory

2. Family Promises3. The Effect of a Seal4. Adequacy of Consideration and

Nominal Consideration5. Past consideration rule6. Relevance of Motive

2

Page 3: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The need for a consideration

Requirement of a Bargain § 17(1), 71 Agreement and Bargain: § 3

3

Page 4: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The need for a consideration

What was the consideration in Hamer v. Sidway at p. 42?

4

Page 5: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The need for a consideration

What was the consideration in Hamer v. Sidway at p. 42?

5

The nephew was going to the dogs…

Page 6: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Hamer v. Sidway

6

What is the benefit-detriment standard? Do we have to ask whether it was an

unpleasant detriment? Or whether it was a benefit to the uncle?

Page 7: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Hamer v. Sidway

7

What is the benefit-detriment standard? Can you suggest why the uncle might

have intended that the promise be legally enforceable?

Page 8: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Kirksey p. 128

Why did Isaac invite Antillico to Talladega?

8

It wasn’t to see the speedway…

Page 9: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Kirksey

Why did Isaac invite Antillico to Talladega county? Was there a benefit to Isaac? A detriment to Antillico?

9

Page 10: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Kirksey

Why did Isaac invite Antillico to Talladega county? Was there a benefit to Isaac? A detriment to Antillico? Williston’s tramp at p. 130?

10

Page 11: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Family Promises

Do you think Isaac intended legal liability? The problem of family promises

11

Page 12: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

St. Peter v. Pioneer p. 43

Why didn’t the theatre restrict bank night to paying patrons?

12

Page 13: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

St. Peter v. Pioneer

Why didn’t the theatre restrict bank night to paying patrons?

So was there a contract with non-paying people waiting outside?

13

Page 14: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

St. Peter v. Pioneer

Why didn’t the theatre restrict bank night to paying patrons?

So was there a contract with non-paying people waiting outside?

How was the Π to accept? Unilateral vs bilateral

14

Page 15: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

St. Peter v. Pioneer

“The requested acts were bargained for” Restatement § 72 Can you articulate why the theatre might

have wanted the promise to be binding? Recall Lefkowitz

15

Page 16: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Bargain Theory

Was Kirksey a bargain situation? What about Hamer v. Sidway? Spiedel at 134 on the move to a

capitalist economy Is something else going on with family

promises?

16

Page 17: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Bargain Theory

How would you define it? You and I want to set a date for lunch but

quarrel over the date. Is this bargaining?

17

Page 18: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

What if there’s no bargain:Gratuitous Promises

Uncle Ebenezer might want to bind himself? So how does he do so? At common law, a gift is effective if:

Donative intent (animus donandi), Delivery by donor, and Acceptance by donee

18

Page 19: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

What if there’s no bargain:Gratuitous Promises

Uncle Ebenezer might want to bind himself? So how does he do so? What constitutes delivery by donor?

Actual delivery of gift Constructive delivery (e.g. key to car or

house) Deed of gift

19

Page 20: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

What if there’s no bargain:Gratuitous Promises

But what if he doesn’t have anything to give at that point and can only promise to give in the future?

20

Page 21: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The seal

21

Page 22: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The seal

22

Definition: Restatement § 96

Effect of seal: Restatement § 95(1)

Statutory abolition?

Page 23: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Adequacy of Consideration

Wolford v. Powers 141 Could a court measure the difference in

values?

23

Page 24: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Wolford v. Powers

What was the consideration from the Wolfords? “be it ever so small”: Restatement § 79

24

A peppercorn

Page 25: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Lon Fuller on Considerationp. 135

The evidentiary function Evidence that a promise exists

The deterrent function a check against rash promises

The channeling function “channels for the legally effective

expression of intention”

25

Page 26: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Lon Fuller on Consideration

Does all this simply come down to the intention to be legally bound?

26

Is that all there is?

Page 27: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Re Greene p.130What was the consideration?

What do you think was going on here?

27

Page 28: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Re GreeneWhat was the consideration?

“for one dollar and other good and valuable consideration” Nominal consideration vs. Adequate

consideration What if they had added “the receipt and

adequacy thereof is hereby acknowledged”

28

Page 29: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Re GreeneWhere was the consideration?

What about the seal?

29

Page 30: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Nominal Consideration

Suppose I promise to give you $1,000 in return for $1? Schnell v. Nell (p. 146)

30

Page 31: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Schnell v. Nell (p. 146)

A promise of $600 to honor wife’s promise in will consideration of: Promise in will one cent love and affection for deceased wife

31

Page 32: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Batsakis p.139

Is this a case of nominal consideration?

32

Page 33: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Batsakis p.139

What happened threeweeks later

33

Athens, April 27 1942

Page 34: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Batsakis p.139

Why did they structure the April 2 loan of $25 as a loan of $2,000 at 8 per cent? Is this a case of nominal consideration? Recall Aquinas’ Starving City

34

Page 35: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Past Consideration Rule

Restatement § 86 Note that there was past consideration in

Wolford

35

Page 36: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Past Consideration

A reward is offered for apprehension of a thief. Policeman catches thief in performance of his duties. Is there consideration?

36

Page 37: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Past Consideration

A reward is offered for apprehension of a thief. Policeman catches thief in performance of his duties. Restatement § 73, illustrations 1 and 2

37

Page 38: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Past Consideration

A reward is offered for apprehension of a thief. Policeman catches thief in performance of his duties. Why is this a sensible policy?

38

Page 39: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

What’s wrong with a public official charging for services?

39

I don’t get it…

Page 40: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Performance of Prior Legal Obligation

Compromise with creditors? Restatement § 73, illustrations 5 and 6

40

Page 41: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Does the offeree’s motive matter?

Williams v. Carwardine (p. 147) “believing that she has not long to live,

she makes this voluntary statement to ease her conscience, and in hopes of forgiveness hereafter”

Restatement § 81(1)

41

Page 42: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Consideration F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mutuality of Obligation

Either both are bound or neither is bound Restatement § 79: not a separate requirement Inapplicable in unilateral contracts

42