Upload
lucas-simpson
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
From Watershed Hydrology to Landscape Evolution: A New Semi-Discrete Finite Volume
Model of Intermediate Complexity
Chris Duffy, Shuangcai Li, Mukesh Kumar, Yizhong Qu, and Rudy Slingerland
Departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering & Geosciences
The Pennsylvania State University
July 2008
2
What is our Objective?
To understand how Earth surface systems form spontaneously in response to their internal dynamics
To understand how Earth surface systems couple across large time and space scales
Albert Bierstadt; Rocky Mountains
3
Example: Dynamic Hydrology
How does hydrologic system change if weathering of bedrock and erosion of sediment are dramatically increased?
Time & space scales: 101 -104 yrs
4
Example:
How do surface processes self-organize into such different landscapes?
Time & space scales: 102 -106 yrs
Badlands NW of Interior, South Dakota; photo by Louis J. Maher, Jr.
Colorado River tidal flats; National Geographic
5
So what is the modeling problem?
RMB
We want a physically-based, spatially-distributed, hydrologic & sediment routing model that is morphodynamic, captures all relevant processes at the precipitation event time-scale….. and simulates thousands of years
Being mindful that….“….attempting to extract the dynamics at higher levels from
comprehensive modeling of everything going on at lower levels is……like analyzing the creation of La Boheme as a neurochemistry problem.”
--Chris Paola (2000)
We think a continuum approach is going to work, but we need to…. improve representations of morphodynamic processes, correctly and efficiently treat strongly coupled effects spanning wide ranges of spatial and
temporal scales, acknowledge that the defect rate for large communal codes is about seven faults per 1000
lines of FORTRAN (Hatten and Roberts, 1994).
6
Earlier Approaches
RMB
Catchment Scale ANSWERS –Bierly et al. CREAMS – Alonso, Knisel, et al. SHESED – Wicks & Bathurst KINEROS – Woolhiser et al. EUROSEM – Morgan et al. InHM – Heppner et al.
Landscape Scale SIBERIA –Willgoose et al. GOLEM/CHILD – Tucker CASCADE – Braun et al. CAESAR -- Coulthard et al.
7
A new strategy for integrated hydrologic and landscape modeling
1) Use GIS tools to decompose horizontal projection of the study area into Delauney triangles (i.e., a TIN)
2) Project each triangle vertically to span the ‘‘active flow volume’’ forming a prismatic volume
3) Subdivide prism into layers to account for various physical process equations and materials
4) Use adaptive gridding
8
A new strategy for integrated hydrologic and landscape modeling
4) Write down equations describing hillslope and channel surface processes
5) Use semi-discrete finite volume method to transform the PDEs into ODEs For small-scale numerical
grids, FVM yields contiuum constitutive relationships
For larger grids the method reflects assumptions of semi-distributed approach, but with full coupling of all elements
Example: Conservation of Mass
Becomes….
V Stc
c¶
+ Ñ × =¶
2 3
1 1k i
k i
dQ Q
dtc
= =
= -å å
9
A new strategy for integrated hydrologic and landscape modeling
6) Assemble all ODEs within a prism, each associated with its appropriate layer(s) 1) “local system”
Combine the local system over the domain of interest into a “global system”
Solve global system by SUNDIALS (SUite of Nonlinear
and DIfferential/ALgebraic equation Solvers) or
PETSc (Portable, Extensible Toolkit for Scientific computation)
' ( , , , )M f x y tc c=
II o
i
dSP E P
dt
æ ö÷ç ÷= - -ç ÷ç ÷çè ø
3
1
( ) /ijo s oc
j i
dhP Q Q A
dt =
æ ö÷ç ÷ç = + - ÷ç ÷ç ÷çè øå
etc.
10
Advantages
Mass conservation at all elements All major hydrologic and sediment transport
processes fully coupled into one ODE system
Interactions treated as internal terms on the right hand side of ODE system
Flexible model kernel
11
One Possible Realization: PIHMSed Canopy-interception Snowmelt runoff Evapotranspiration
Bucket Model II o
i
dSP E P
dt
æ ö÷ç ÷= - -ç ÷ç ÷çè ø
Temperature Index Model snowsnow
i
dSP E w
dt
æ ö÷ç ÷= - -ç ÷ç ÷çè ø&
Evapotranspiration: Pennman-Monteith Equation
12
One Possible Realization: PIHMSed Subsurface
unsaturated flow Subsurface saturated
flow
0
30
1
Richard Equation
( ) /
si
ijg l gc
j i
dI q ET
dt
dq Q Q Q A
dt
x
z
=
æ ö÷ç = - - ÷ç ÷ç ÷è øæ ö÷ç ÷ç = + - + ÷ç ÷ç ÷çè ø
å
13
One Possible Realization: PIHMSed Surface overland and
channel flows
( ) ( ) ( ) 2
1k
k
h uh vhq
t x y
r r rr
=
¶ ¶ ¶+ + =
¶ ¶ ¶å
( ) ( )( ) ( )( )
2 2 / 2ox fx
u h ghuh uvhgh S S
t x y
rr rr
¶ +¶ ¶+ + = - +
¶ ¶ ¶
( ) ( ) ( )( )( )
2 2 / 2oy fy
v h ghvh uvhgh S S
t x y
rr rr
¶ +¶ ¶+ + = - +
¶ ¶ ¶{
14
One Possible Realization: PIHMSed Sediment transport and
bed evolution equations for non-cohesive
sediment from Cao et al. [2002] for illustration:
( ) ( ) ( )ch cuh cvhE D
t x y
¶ ¶ ¶+ + = -
¶ ¶ ¶
1
z D E
t l
¶ -=
¶ -
( )0 1m
D c cw= -
( ) ( )0.8
1160 c
c
dUE
hR
l q q
q¥- -
={
15
One Possible Realization: PIHMSed Sediment transport
Detachment rate by rain-splash
Bed armoring Concept of active layer
( ) 2R rD c k h i=
Other processes? Downslope flux by tree-
throw Etc.
16
Example: Definition of erosion “hotspots” in the Shale Hills CZO
from Henry Lin
17
Example: Definition of erosion “hotspots” in the Shale Hills CZO Domain decomposition
566 elements
Precipitation forcing Daily precipitation from
2004 repeated for 100 years
18
Example: Definition of erosion “hotspots” in the Shale Hills CZO Initial conditions
Lower third of regolith is saturated overland flow and stream flow depth = 10-6 m sediment load = 0 Sediment sizes: 0.0004, 0.002, and 0.02 m
Boundary conditions No-flow around the watershed perimeter Weir condition at stream outlet
19
Example: Definition of erosion “hotspots” in the Shale Hills CZO
20
Conclusions A rich class of problems requires knowing how
Earth surface systems form spontaneously in response to their internal dynamics
To solve these problems we need a physically-based, spatially-distributed, morphodynamic water & sediment routing model of catchment to river basin scale
The mathematical know-how already exists; it is the process laws that require work