Upload
bryan-osborn-fitzgerald
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 1
Double spin azimuthal asymmetries ALT and ALL in semi-inclusive DIS
Aram Kotzinian Torino University & INFN
On leave in absence from YerPhI, Armenia and JINR, Russia
In collaboration withB. Parsamyan, & A. Prokudin, hep-ph/0603194, PRD 2006;M. Anselmino, A. Efremov & B. Parsamyan, in preparation
IntroductionPositivity bounds for TMD DFsStatus of Lorentz Invariance relations
Predictions for azimuthal dependence of ALT
Cahn effect and predictions for azimuthal dependence of ALL
Conclusions
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 2
TMD quark DFs of Nucleon
Twist-two:
6 T-even & 2 T-
odd
Use this DFs and
put soft and hard
factors equal to 1
At twist-three:
8 T-even & 8 T-
odd
Collins, Soper (81,82); Ji, Ma, Yuan (03, 04); Collins, Metz (04)
N
@ twist 2
2
1 ( , )q
T Th x k
2
1 ( , )q
L Th x k2
1 ( , )q
Th x k
2
1 ( , )q
T Th x k
2
1 ( , )q
T Tf x k
2
1 ( , )q
Tf x k
2
1 ( , )q
L Tg x k
2
1 ( , )q
T Tg x k
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 3
Positivity bounds
Sivers function
For d-quark this bound is reached at
for the best fit parameters. But error bars of extracted parameters
are large enough and allow to fulfill the general positivity bound.
Naïve bound was used during fitting:
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 4
Status of Lorentz invariance (LI) relations
2001: explicit model calculations of DFs by Kundu & Metz show that these relations are violated2003: Goeke, Metz, Pobylitsa & Polyakov demonstrated that the same Wilson link in the definition of DFs which makes possible the existence of nonzero Sivers effect leads to violation of LI relations among DFs.
Without Wilson link Sivers effect = 0. If observed by HERMES asymmetry is due to Sivers effect then LI relations can be strongly violated
is g1T smaller or larger than proposed by LI relation?
12 1 ...( )( ) ( ),q q
T
dg x g x
dx
Relations between kT-integrated twist-3 and twist-2 PDFs
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 5
SIDIS and TMD DF21 ( , )T Tg x k
2 21
2 2 21 1
( , ) ( , ),
( , ) ( , ) ( , )
q qN T T
Nq q q q T T
N T L L T N T T
x k f x k
k Sx k s g x k g x k
M
P
P
cos( ) cos( ) cos( ) term in the SIDIS x-sectionN hT T q s h s sk S
1 1 1
22
2 2
21 1
...)
l
( ) ( ) cos( )
(
L T
N lhXN
f l N g T g h sh
dy D y
dxdydzd P Q y
SSA Sivers Collins
SH H H
1
1
1
2 2 2 21
2 2 2 21
2 2 2 21
T
L
q hf q T T q hT T
q
q hT hTg q T T T q hT T
q hT
q hg q T L T q hT T
q
e d k f x D z z
e d k g x D z zM
e d k g x D z z
k P k
k Pk P k
P
k P k
( , ) ( ,( ) )
( , ) ( ,( ) )
( , ) ( ,( ) )
H
H
H
TS
N
qLs
Tk
qs
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 6
Double Spin Asymmetry
1
1
1( , , , , ) ( ) cos( ) ...Tgh h h
LT hT s sNfl T
d dA x y z P D y
d d
S
H
H
2 (1)21
221
( ) ( )cos( )( )| |cos( ) ( , , ) 2 2 ( )
( ) ( )( )
q hhhTq T qT s
qh hhTs LT q h
q qTq
e g x D zd P d dMA x y z zD y
M e f x D zd P d d
PP
2(1) 2 2
1 12( ) ( , )
2q qTT T T Tg x d k g x k
M
kWeighted asymmetry is related to the first kT-momentum of g1T:
There exists a relation between first momentum of g1T and g2
(follows from Lorentz invariance, Tangerman & Mulders) :1 1
(1) 11 2 2
0
( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
x qq q qT
x x
g yg x g y dy g y dy WW appr x dy
y
All ingredients (DFs & FFs) are known!
First estimations by A.K. & P.Mulders, PRD 54, 1229 (1996)
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 7
g1T(1)
GRV98+GRSV2000 LO, std DFs Kretzer FFs
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 8
CUTS
Low
x, y, z & pT
High
x, y, z & pT+
Low
x, y, z & pT
High
x, y, z & pT
+
ATMD=
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 9
PT-weighted asymmetries: COMPASS
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 10
PT-weighted asymmetries: JLab
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 11
Transverse momentum dependence (1)
N is fixed by
holds if 21 0.246 (GeV/c)2
From analysis
of unpolarized
PhT dependence
and Cahn effect
Predictions for
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 12
Transverse momentum dependence (2)
pT-unintegrated asymmetries
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 13
Transverse momentum dependence (Deuteron)
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 14
x,y, z dependence of asymmetries
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 15
Cahn effect in ALL
1/Q kinematical correction: azimuthal modulation of lepton-quark
non-coplanar hard scattering cross-section in presence of nonzero
transverse momentum of quark in nucleon
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 16
ST correction
0S
l’l
γ*
SST
x
z
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 17
Gaussian parameterization of DF
x- and z-dependencies are known
within this approach !
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 18
cosφh-weighted ALL
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 19
Results PT-dependence, Proton target
2 21
2 21
2 21
0.10 (GeV/c)
0.15 (GeV/c)
0.20 (GeV/c)
LT
Influence of
ΔσLT
is negligible
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 20
Results x,y,z-dependence at COMPASS
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 21
Results x,y,z-dependence at HERMES
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 22
Results x,y,z-dependence at JLab6
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 23
ConclusionsTo check the self-consistency of LO QCD picture of polarized SIDIS with TMD DFs & FFs it is important
to measure at different energies the azimuthal and PhT dependence of
unpolarized SIDIS ALL & ALT
These and also Sivers asymmetry measurements will allow
to check the Lorentz invariance relationsto perform a “global” analysis and extract the parameters describing the transverse momentum dependence of g1T and g1L (and xBj dependence of Sivers function) taking into account the positivity bounds for TMF DFs.
Data are already available at COMPESS, HERMES & JLab !
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 24
ConclusionsTo check the self-consistency of LO QCD picture of polarized SIDIS with TMD DFs & FFs it is important
to measure at different energies the azimuthal and PhT dependence of
unpolarized SIDIS ALL & ALT
These and also Sivers asymmetry measurements will allow
to check the Lorentz invariance relationsto perform a “global” analysis and extract the parameters describing the transverse momentum dependence of g1T and g1L (and xBj dependence of Sivers function) taking into account the positivity bounds for TMF DFs.
Data are already available at COMPASS, HERMES & JLab !
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 25
Additional slides
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 26
Spin physics “golden rule”
Minimize relative error:
Maximize:Constant acceptance, N
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 27
Contributions from long. & tran. components of target polarization
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 28
Transverse momentum dependence (Proton)
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 29
x,y, z dependence of asymmetries
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 30
x,y, z dependence of asymmetries
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 31
PT-weighted asymmetries: HERMES
Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian 32
Results PT-dependence, Deuteron target
2 21
2 21
2 21
0.10 (GeV/c)
0.15 (GeV/c)
0.20 (GeV/c)
Influence of
ΔσLT
is negligible